Political Correctness and Vacuous Wokeness: Douglas Murray debates Sylvana Simons
2019 ж. 13 Жел.
2 740 065 Рет қаралды
British conservative commentator and author, Douglas Murray, and Dutch left-wing politician and author Sylvana Simons debate political correctness and identity politics - including Murray’s latest publication, The Madness of Crowds: gender, race and identity.
Have political correctness, "wokeness" and identity politics gone too far?
Cultural critic Douglas Murray and author Sylvana Simons go head to head to debate what Murray calls "the dementing whirlwinds of our time."
Ignore this woman, just like we do in the Netherlands.
Truth
check
That is the best say to deal with such people. +1
ignoring hr is dangerous sinnce that leaves her free to spew such bs and some will fall for it unless her lies are exposed
She says she is a "Party Leader" but she 1 seat in the Amsterdam local township. And her "Party" has 0 seats in the parliament in The Hague. Besides, the best way to deal with extremists is to let them speak and ignore them at the same time. They will speak more and extreme BS which leads to self elimination. The fate of all extreme leftists, suicide by going more and more extreme. Let them be heard.. let everyone hear their nonsense.
I get the feeling this black woman is a professional victim.
Yes she is.
@@NatasjavanDijknah It seems that it is only these "professional victims" who are given any air-time - nothing ever broadcast about Thomas Sowell's or Morgan Freeman's opinions, though, are there? Awful lot of "ums" and "ers" in her speech, too.
She struck me as such from the first 30 seconds or so and I was waiting for Douglas to give her the killer reply, which didn't really happen. Dang, would have been fun :) Specially toward the end when she talked about respect, I thought she had deserved to be given a lecture. No, maam' respect is rare and has to be earned and not every child gets a trophy in life.
@@jvgauthier Douglas was weak. He has been tamed by the likes of this harridan. Poor show.
Plenty of them are born victims , the whole world is against them.
*Sylvana Simons wants to lead us down the road to insanity and Douglas Murray is saying, "I'm not going."*
Douglas Murray is one of the best voices currently around
That woman is what is wrong with the world.
Like every word out of her mouth was bs lies
Well, she's an actor/politician. What would you expect?
Her smirky face 😡
Thanks, you saved me from saying it.
She is THE worse.. the anti black pete organisation is famous for disrupting childerensparties (thats what Sinterklaas is). She refuses to do her homework on the history of blackpete (who was a LIBERATED SLAVE who chose to serve Sinterklaas for freeing him.. ) Also: Sylvana is "partyleader" from a ONEMAN political party WITHOUT ANY support other than white people hating racist... Sylvana Simons has NO voice, NO support and DOESN'T deserve ANY respect.
I’m offended by her statements. She should get fired immediately because she does not respect my feelings.
I like Zwarte Piet beer. :(
Yes, when she says "respect," she means "kowtow to."
Only a leftist is allowed to be offended.
Absolutely.
If someone doesn't allow you to speak your own mind or even try to arrive at your own thoughts and beliefs because of their own interests then very likely they don't respect you as an individual (since they don't want to encounter you as one). Everyone innately wants to be free, to have the right to speak and think for themselves and to not be dictated to, everyone hates being coerced, manipulated, bullied, pressured or cajoled to speak and act in ways that don't agree with their sense of self (we struggle to grow into our freedoms from childhood). That is why I think Sylvana Simmons approach is completely incorrect and self-defeating, she says that we must show respect for a trans person by agreeing that they are the gender of their preference, but that is ridiculous in my mind, for a number of reasons: * First, those two things simply aren't the same or coequal; someone who is narcissistic, egotistical, self-superior or highly ambitious might be annoyed or offended if you didn't treat them as a big shot, but I am not obligated to do this, and there are many other ways to show respect towards that person other than indulging their self-conception, such as treating them well, listening to them, putting up with their excesses, being generous to them socially when it is appropriate etc. etc. You can show someone respect by not avoiding them, by looking after them, by not excluding them, by being fair and equitable towards them and others (applying the same standards as you would with anyone else, even when you would rather not), but you can do all of these things without agreeing that a man is a woman. My neighbour might be angry with me if he has a Messiah complex and I don't agree that he is the Messiah, but that doesn't mean I have to dislike him, make fun of him, hate him or try to deny him his rights - my uncle is trans, but I am not obligated to think of him in the same way he thinks of himself (I am willing to guess my estimation of many people I respect and treat respectfully is different from their self-estimation, but that is just one facet of our lives and interactions, we still manage to get on with the work of life). I DO respect trans people, but I disagree that there is just one type of trans person, that they are all the same, conceive of themselves in the same way and want the same things, the phenomenon is also so new and ever evolving (which is why we're only just starting to run into problems like trans children and inequalities in sports) that I don't think it is even necessary for me to have strong opinions or beliefs on it at all times; if the terrain is clearly complicated, nuanced and sometimes messy why would I allow someone else to force their simplistic beliefs on me about the subject when I haven't settled on what I even think about it all yet? * Second, to return to my earlier point, we all hate being forced to say things or act in ways that don't come naturally to us. Sylvana Simmons seems to think that we owe it to a person of colour, a trans, non straight or religious person to not offend them, I disagree. Of course we shouldn't be excessively rude and offensive towards others, but we have a right to live our own best lives and be ourselves regardless of whether others might occasionally be offended by this (religious people are going to be offended by people who are sexually liberal or promiscuous, but neither should be able to dictate to their opposite). It is fundamental to who we are, as people, that we all want to be free, able to think for ourselves and express ourselves. This is more meaningful and fundamental to who we are than any sense of how black, gay or trans we might be, because all of those things are only one facet of who we are, but the degree to which we are free and empowered as individuals effects every facet of our lives and being. We live in a liberal democracy which does an amazing job of fostering and enhancing these goods (freedom, happiness, self-exploration), so we should do what we can to try and achieve the goals of giving people more freedom, but also at the same time encourage love, tolerance and mutual respect. We don't need to excise freedom of thought and freedom of expression from our societies or universities to cultivate the freedom of minorities, we just need to keep better educating society as a whole and working on the values that make democratic society possible, because fundamentally we all want a liberal society with freedom of thought, freedom of belief, freedom of expression and a culture of mutual respect. We can continue to grow and mature our democracy without rampant cancel culture, without forcing race, sex and sexuality into every conversation, without radicalised lunatics who have no integrity taking over every facet of society (journalists who don't do real, principled journalism, academics who don't actually embody the values of academia, populist politicians who blame everything on systemic racism or patriarchy, and 'experts' on woke talking points who have no respectability outside of commercialised, faux-radical circles and their coat-tail chasers). * Third, it might be seen as a flippant or sarcastic remark but I agree 100% with Kiryk Drewinski; because I value freedom of thought (as someone who has enjoyed university life, debate and academia), freedom of expression (as a lover of art / a would be artist), and as a liberal (who grew up in and believes in democratic society), I find what woke culture is doing to our democracy deeply offensive. I personally would find it deeply offensive if someone wanted to deny me the right to think and speak freely, because these things are so fundamental to who I am, what I want and what makes my life worth living. Equally, all of the comedians, politicians, artists and academics who have been cancelled or de-platformed on the slightest of offenses and the most exaggerated charges are sure to feel the same way. I would invite Sylvana Simons to think about the perspective of people like Chris Rock, Dave Chappelle etc. etc. Usually I would try to round off the subject with a quick final paragraph but this is such a broad and bloated subject it is hard to meaningfully put a cap on the conversation. Maybe the best I could achieve would be to say that we should go back to principled, intelligent and dignified thinkers like Martin Luther King, rather than look towards the terminally offended as our guides on how best to conduct ourselves and organise our societies.
Douglas is an extraordinary communicator. Totally nails it!
Love how she keeps demanding respect. Nobody deserves respect. Everyone has to EARN it. Douglas was very wise to say "courtesy".
The horrid thing is, it's not respect she demands, it's authoritarianism disguised as respect, she want's the power to control other people's speech and there for behavior
@@jackbotmanexactly. Her last point of "thinking before you offend somebody" was a non starter. Jordan Peterson said it best, but I will paraphrase. You can probably tiptoe around one person, what what about 10? What about 100? How about 10,000? There is a limitless list of things people are offended by, and you can't possibly avoid them all. If you have a sufficient audience, and you are talking about any kind of deep, real issue, it is impossible.
@@jackbotmanthat’s what anyone who supports this BS “cause” is seeking, total control over other thoughts and speech. It’s mind blowing people can’t see though this shit.
Rubbish, fundamental human rights assumes respect. You do not to do anything to have the right of a trial by jury for example.
@@adamgrimsley2900Rubbish, the idea of rights is an absolute fallacy.
Imagine having a life so easy you have to invent problems. That's privilege.
or a career. It's a great career if you can get your spoon in the victim gravy. Because all your adherents only listen to hear you say what they believe, not what you actually think. As Peterson once said, once you know their ideology, you know exactly what they are going to say.
@@MarkJones-gt2qd If you can get your spoon in the victim gravy. My quote of the month.
This comment and the reply, absolute Gold.
🏆winning comment courtesy SO different from respect! Wow! We are really splitting hairs and dancing on heads of pins and walking on egg shells-because we have nothing more pressing to do like surviving childbirth and the winter and famine🙄🤦♀️
Obviously, these people have special privileges and men lack rights as always. It is an inconvenient to which their radical social constructivism and postmodernism keep giving. They end up making worse the actual problem. And of course they won't refute any arguments, and be full of fallacies. There was a time priests silenced philosophers, now see what happens to scientists: "Shut up and listen," they say, everything a priori and without a point to make. The woke woman in the video got jealous she couldn't silence a free thinker, at the end. It just makes me laugh.
Douglas calmly explains everything wrong with wokeness.... then she demonstrates everything wrong with wokeness.
That's how lessons are usually conducted, right? You learn the theory first, then there's a practical demonstration.
100%. She is the shining example of the minority of idiots trying to spoil everything for the majority of sane minded people.
The woman is not very intelligent. She gets sweeped under the intellectual rug quite quickly in this discussion.
He's smart, almost like he knew what she would say before she said it.
@@yukiminami9202 You mean "dismantle western society by applying racism against white people"
Thank you for fighting the good fight, Douglas. And for showing such patience and class in the face of such unrelenting imbicility.
Im from the Netherlands. Just to point out that Sylvana’s career path basically goes something like this. She was first a hair stylist, then a presenter on the equivalent of MTV here in the Netherlands. Because she is a black woman though, that’s all the credentials you need to become a political activist trying to get a seat in parliament. She’s pretty awful and indeed the pinnacle of wokeness in the Netherlands. She is by no means an intellectual, nor has any real credentials to speak about political issues. It is very hard to take her seriously
And that makes sense from her incoherent babblings when it was her time to speak.
All that crap about Zwarte Piet being "in blackface" was a prime example. It's not blackface. It is dirt and soot from going up and down the chimney - so being dirty is racist now?
stem die kut dan uit de regering? ;)
Well, I am Belgian (Flemish) and have seen her in the Dutch parliament and I completely agree with you. The fact that she lost her seat in the most recent election a year after your post says a lot, doesn't it?
I'm Dutch to, and want to say sorry for this terrible human being
An intellectual genius debating a woman with the mindset of a silly teenager
Teenager? I've always thought they were more like 7th graders. And, I was being kind.
@@GuapoJhimi That's a teenager. So you know
Yes
💯 million percent correct 👏
The thing that I'm most frightened (phobic) about with the movement of constantly being called out on mis-gendering or incorrect pronoun usage is *:* It seems like a movement that has been designed by our adversaries to cause social instability and vulnerability and to distract people's attention from vital, higher priority issues. Conservative *:* Infrastructure = Roads, Public Utilities Liberal *:* Infrastructure = Tech designed to invade individual citizen's privacy
They always have that smug, narcissistic smile and air of nonchalant arrogance. It’s sickening
It really is, couldn't agree more. It's because they have been elevated by others to this position where they mostly go unchallenged.
Welcome to Cambridge / Boston Massachusetts / San Francisco.
Megan Markle has that smug smile.
It's a mix of invincible parochialism, under moral superiority, dupers delight or some other malicious satisfaction and doing harm she knows she's going to get away with telling lies she knows we'll get away with and so l fifth.
Her sneering turned into full disgust noises by the end. You wouldn't want her to be a dictator... the killing fields would stretch for miles.
i love how Douglas exposes the rotten media. His articles are usually so rightfully sarcastic. It's always a delight to hear and read him.
So she freely admits that neither her race nor gender held her back, but it was her strong character that propelled her into success. So what, she wants to wage a crusade in advocacy of black females who have a more timid character? She just destroyed her own argument.
She is successful because she is awesome, not because she has opportunities that people who look like her have not historically had available to them. It's her personal awesomeness you understand. Awesome. Did I mention how awesome she is?
Just a bunch of words. No substance. She can get where she's at but for some reason other young black women can't?
Shows that she is not intelligent
@@grantmillard8387 Yeah, looks so pathetic every time she praises herself 😂
I am a black woman, and I agree wholeheartedly and unequivocally with Douglas Murray.
Whaaaaat?! How can this be?!
We also need to hear how Sylvia makes you cringe.
♥️ (from a "white person" who doesn't give a sh#t about skin colour)
I’m a gay man and agree with Douglas Murray. It’s good he has voice and dismisses that gay men are all lefties. I find it strange that some people seem to think who you sleep with determines your political opinions and which party you vote for. All the gay men I know are right leaning when it comes to politics - so there is a mix, just like any other demographic.
You are a great Human being ♥️✌
The woman is such a professional victim. The fact she’s on the stage with her designer glasses proves her vacuous arguments as empty.
apec. Hate judging a book by its cover but what was inside her book cover was exactly what I thought as soon as she opened her mouth.
@@ronskancke8166 activism, not discussion.
Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic. She’s a god damn stereotype.
That's why most Dutch hate her
@@ruuddriessen8547 I can understand that they do not like her, she is not likeable,but hate is something sinister, isnt't it.
She speaks of respect then keeps talking over him. He is brilliant 😊
"Man comes out in not very homophobic society and nobody cares." 😂😂😂😂
Calling Sylvana Simons a politician is like calling a 6 year old with a lemonade stand an entrepreneur.
by the very definition.
That doesn't seem fair to the child... this woman is insane.
I don't know about you, but I have seen some downright impressive ideas on display at lemonade stands!
@@codychickadee5095 Right? I would say the 6 year old is better suited for business than Sylvana is for politics. In fact women like this should be kept as far away from actual policy or legislation as possible!
YanAbaus politicians are all cunts
I'm black. This woman does not represent me one bit. I believe she believes she represents us.
Arnold Garry blacks and browns have never fought for freedom or stopped slavery in their own countries, unlike Whites who stopped slavery, which is why the elite are forcing masses of brown and blacks into white countries to make white countries slave countries.
This woman is trying to accrue power. Her statements reveal her feelings of superiority. She does want equality. She wants power. She speaks for herself, and no one else. "We've spoken and I haven't killed you." No conciliation in her at all.
Arnold Garry That’s a universal characteristic of all sjw’s.
@@christina7215 that is funny! I m in tears!
Only collectivist pinheads would think someone speaks for a group simply by inheriting some genes.
Wow Douglas Murray really went easy on her.
Courtesy is given freely... Respect is earned.
She wasn't listening the entire time. These people never listen, they just wait for their turn to speak.
So true...
Bc if she listened, she might actually have to critically think and challenge her ideology. Easier to not listen than to challenge ones beliefs
True. They can't listen. They believe there intellectualy superior. And if they actually listen then their argument can't stand up to logic or objective reality. Which by extension ridicules their chosen logic and reality which can't hold water in an adult conversation, So you just get these childish inflammatory and ridiculous slurs posing as counter arguments that your a racist,/sexist/xenophobe/ Nazi,/homophobe.etc.etc.. It's sad to see that this is the road that were on, and that effectively you can't have an adult conversation about these topics.
Sadly, our youth love her diatribe, because, they can shut down anyone intellectually superior to them by using race, homophobia, etc....Its an easier route than learning and researching like we have forever!
Be weary of a debater that spends most of their time postering and grinning for their fans in the crowd rather than actually *listening* to and dissecting their opponent’s statements, which is suppose to be the point, to elevate and strengthen the discussion and ideas.
She just confirms everything wrong about WOKENESS. She is the personification of the word WOKENESS.
Gosh Douglas, you absolutely destroy your opponents every time, and I bloody love it!!
He actually went easy on her because he recognised her intellectual deficiency.
She has that smug woke look. They have no idea how their pretentiousness annoys everyone, especially when they have nothing of true intelligence to say.
I don't understand how "woke" even applies. Maybe if this was the 60's...but, its not.They just make stupid shit up to be all enraged about. They're nothing more than narcissistic, spoiled brats
@@disf5178 meaning of . Woke . Smarmy prat
She refrains from looking at him while he speaks, or when she speaks. No respect at all.
TheSeer101 everyone is dumber for having to listen to her She doesn’t even believe other black ladies are equal to her yet whines like a bitch about equality
These bastards are Taking OVER the perverted, Liberal medias! We just laugh at them and continue to move on! They really don't want any of us! Locked and Loaded!
Woke = Your mind being so open that your brain falls out
Seriously. "If you tell me that what I do is offensive, tell me what I can do so I don't offend you. Thats what I'll do." What if what their offended by is unreasonable? What if its really dumb? How about I'll think about it, before I do anything. What if I'm playing plastic wardollies 40k and I'm enslaving someone's models. What? You gonna tell me thats wrong cause you don't like it? Well boohoo I stole his dollies.
@@JacksonHighlander - This comment offends me. You've been reported. Enjoy the Gulag.
@@JacksonHighlander - No, but seriously. These people are begging to get destroyed.
@Alex M - Being offended over little things when I was a child would brand you as a knob gobbler. Times have changed... I'm only 29.
Common decency is given freely, respect is earnt. Probably the main root of disagreement with her.
Respect is earned by showing character
Clever. Articulate. Accurate. Brilliantly observed. CANCEL HIM!!!!!
He should have turned to her and said, "I am a black woman". I identify as the blackest woman ever don't tell me anything about being a black woman".
Best comment ever!
@@robbas_krk1510 for sure!
So woke lol
That would be fun. Murray is not there to make sarcastic remarks, he always tries to keep the discussion serious.
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
This woman is the type of person I tune out completely. Pompous demeanor, absolute confidence that she is the smartest person in the room and ideas that a very small but loud groups of generally very unhappy and hateful people agree with. Toss her overboard with the latrines!
I think the majority of people would be erroneous in believing they're the smartest in the room when that room also contains Douglas Murray
That's why we hate her here in the Netherlands because all the traits you mentioned.
Massive narcissist. CAn't be arsed listening to people like her, especially when they are next to a person as eloquent and intelligent as Murray.
no,no,no,no,,,,not the latrines,,please,,,there usefull,.
She comes across as far too arrogant and defensive, difficult to debate with someone so unstable, she is trying to stir up a problem that just isnt there. How did she cope in the 80s when growing up ffs, I bet she was afraid of her own shadow. Now she is picking on santa because she has no real world experience to justify her paranoia.
What a delightfully civil discourse on such a fraught set of issues. Cheers to both of you!
This woman has lost her mind. The woke PC club are insufferable
Woke is the past tense of wake.
She gets paid, she gets to push people around, life is wonderful.
Her smiling when he makes his argument is so scary and evil
Great how she complains about racial profiling, then immediately engages in racial profiling.
Standard marxism....
EXACTLY!
She has no problem with racial profiling just in who is being profiled.
She is Dutch, why does she prefer this English accent.
@@brandwijkgg cuz it sounds cleva!
Respect is earned, not demanded. I respect Douglas but not Sylvana.
Exactly!
It is here where we have to be careful with these people, they are changing, without the majority of society realizing it, the meaning and the usage of words and traditions. If we are use using their words and definitions, believing that we know the meaning of them, we are on their battleground, and we will lose that fight, because after the new meaning of a word, our arguments seem weak, always be aware of that, whatever you do, don't attack their ideas first, but the changes they make to the language, only then can we have a say in what the battleground looks like. A good example of this is Decency and Respect are interchangeable among these people, but Merriam-Webster says otherwise www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/decent#synonyms www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/respect#other-words
@piranhaP Well you lost my respect with the word correction. Never heard the term. Both have to be earned in my opinion.
Respect goes both ways lady.
"I don't understand why they're afraid." We are afraid to lose our jobs, our reputation, our friends for being labeled "transphobe, homophobe, racist, sexist" when in reality we simply DISAGREE with your position. On top of that, we are afraid to trade truth for a lie.
She's a professional victim, during the debate she asked " Why do we need your permission to be who we want to be " . My reply would have been " Why do I need your permission to think what I want to think".
Good point. The general problem with people like her is they feel things that offensive should be changed but only the things she or certain people find offensive. This has been the main problem the last 25 years or so. The point on small lies makes sense too. We keep lying for years politely and now have a big problem we can't deal with.
Exactly
My thoughts exactly. Total hypocrisy!
That is what this is all about @big cheese. You can be as polite and respectful as a saint, they want to control what you think. This is all about control. For example, have you ever used he or she when directly addressing that person? I haven't - I only use he or she when I am speaking about another person, usually when they are not even there. But to them, they are offended.....fuck right off.
Bingo
It's incredible how within a few sentences of even getting started she proceeded to speak for her entire country. This is the exact rhetoric that is being used to bulldoze logic all over the world. Lady you speak for yourself and only yourself 100% of the time.
No one likes her over here 😂
She said that her country’s version of Santa clause & his helpers were impersonating blackface, were being racist because they were covered in soot from going down the chimney. It has nothing to do with race!🤦🏿♀️
@@craigdawson1749 She muffled in the word `supposedly` but it wasn't very well articulated. Can you believe this woman used to be an MTV VJ speaking English like that? In present day she acts as the Dutch department of BLM which in The Netherlands is even more silly than it is in its country of origin and mostly comes down to them wanting money for free because of their skin tone. A bit of history - Saint Nicholas is the catholic version of an ancient pagan midwinter rite of which many versions exist(ed) but they commonly are about the god Odin descending to Earth and leading an army of black creatures - ravens, death people, demons (you probably heard of Krampus) - to hunt children. The main change is that in the catholic version Saint Nicholas is not a boogie man but the protector of children who is keeping the demons on a leash. What makes the Dutch version stand out is that after the uprise in the 16th century catholic worship was banned by the new protestant government. The Saint Nicholas festivity prevailed behind closed doors and so transformed into a family feast that also found it's way to America where it got picked up by people that were eager to transform Christmas from a time of drinking and looting into something nicer. Saint Nicholas in Dutch is Sint Nicolaas, also pronounced as Sint Ni'Klaas or Sinterklaas and the latter phonetically transforms into English as Santa Claus. As freedom of speech became the norm two modernised versions of public Sinterklaas festivities rose: Dickens Christmas in Anglo-American territory and present day Sinterklaas in The Netherlands and Belgium and of course both feasts became the victim of their own success, first targetted by commerce and then by the media. Television required Black Pete to become brown which of course no viewer noticed until the introduction of colour TV and then it went haywire - stupid jokes, actors trying too hard by mimicking accents from immigrants and the seed was sown for people like Simons to start an endless stream of pointless accusations while posing as a victim. Of course with charlatans like this there is always only one winner, this woman managed to get herself elected into parliament and as such now receives three times the income of an average white guy.
The dangers of herd mentality, exemplified. She likely talked with her girlfriends inside her limited social bubble, and they all agreed with her, (most of them out of fear of being excluded from the "club"), and that then becomes the agreement of the entire world in her mind. The quintessential definition of solipsism, basically. But the facts are that this woman only speaks for a miniscule percentage of the whole population, and only an ever-increasingly radicalized femimarxism has provided her with a voice, with the clearly stated goal of creating further societal division. In short: She's a tool on a platform built out of decades of deliberate social engineering, entirely focused on population reduction.
The Woke don’t appear to be able to hear any viewpoint but their own.
We are all born equal and we all die equal . Society has changed so dramatically now freedom of speech is quickly going out the door. Treat others as you would have them treat you . Political correctness is taking over
He’s so thought provoking.😊
Douglas Murray is such an important and rational voice.
Amen
He is a genius and genuinely an important voice for freedom of speech.
both pointless, good god the discussion could have just been a 2min voicing of views
@@prospero4183 how? I bet you can’t explain why
@@prospero4183 Correct, not the best debate
She is a caricature of all woke people.
She's a real life titania mcgrath
To be honest I think it's very unfair to have a thoughtful intellectual like Murray matched by someone not speaking her native language and a mediocre brain like Simons. Simons is someone who has, with a Dutch expression, 'fallen upward'. That often happens to the very privileged. In the wake of the economic crisis that hit the Netherlands pretty bad in the eighties most well off kids of her age studied hard to get some serious eduction with good job perspective but often not the most fun and interesting. Simons otoh was primarely concerned with dancing and jazz in the appearently not too deprived school. She quit high school after 3 of the 5 years, worked as a hairdresser shortly but was still allowed on a prestigious ballet school. Great of course, but she had the privilege to make such an uncertain career choice. But it's typical for the chances immigrants get in the Netherlands. Soon after she got famous as a presenter for TMF, an MTV like music network. She was very pretty and fun and she had a good career as a television presenter, usually the commercial low brow stuff. She did a book show once for which she wore glasses, looking even hotter, but she was out of her depth there despite it was a show for the 'popular' books. She wrote columns for the playboy but I never read the articles, but I suspect this had also something to with her looks. Over all those years she has consistently claimed that her skin colour worked to her advantage, and advantages she got, which can't have been surprising to any Dutch at that time. She also made some rather mean comments about black men and relationships in those days which could have been interpreted as racist. Anyway, it was the typical no nonsense assertive hot girl getting ahead in life in the post racial Netherlands of the 90's and 00's. And suddenly she was back as a radio DJ with 'the black list', a radioshow with only music from black people. I'm Dutch and I had never known the idea of 'black music'. I knew about seperate(d) audiences in the US but we never had that, jazz was embraced since the 20's: Almost all modern music is black in origin and played by people of all colours. We grew up with tapes and sleeves often not revealing the skin colour of the musicians. By far the biggest Dutch (language) band in the 80's that even caused a real mania was a ska/reggae band. Motown was also very well know since the 60's and rap hit the ground running. Even my guitar rock was quite black. It's not like 'black' music was ever overlooked and needed some extra attention. Soon after that she did nothing but playing the race card, she became a race card herself. Suddenly the Netherlands was a racist hell hole where non-whites got no chances and she even teamed up with the Turkish Erdogan fan party in the Netherlands because they are (supposed to be) not white. Now she is the princess of wokeness, making a job out of her skin colour and creating an industry of subsidized blackness in a process that oozes tribalism and clientelism of African size, not to say segregation. She's gone mental, entirely fact free and I mean seriously mental. The only explanation for her sudden change into a victim is serious mental issues that require professional help. Is that common among the woke? Do people become woke without mental issues?
@@DenUitvreter Well put and easy to follow your points on facts. Nature is the true force of life on our planet. She has no investment in any of her species, proof is, all go into extinction. Addressing the species of mankind, nature gave it critical thinking and the means to jump out of the box in which nature didn't think it through to see all the future problems it would cause. Nature didn't gift us with intelligence that would have prevented all the social problems we find our selves in now. However we have the ability to gain knowledge of the things that should bring us to a better understanding on how things should and could work in our favor to live better lives, such as gaining world peace, love for one another, wanting for others as we want for our selves and so on. This so called problem with race hating is a human mistake. Nature made the humans in four colors, (blood lines) red, black, yellow, and white, and these colors are long gone due to the mixing of these blood lines. So long gone is the red man, black man, yellow man, and white man. If anyone has a problem with that they should take that up with nature who doesn't care one bit, nor does she answer to any of her species. We've been given the tools to work things out for our selves so lets get busy by seeing the real truths in this reality, then do what we must to correct the things we have done that has put our lives, and the lives of our children in jeopardy and get it working as nature intended it to work in the first place, called survival, in which truth is a very necessary ingredient to solving the problems for all of us, keeping in mind that lies are the seeds of evil which keeps us all in darkness. Lets step into the light so all may see the true path to love and peace.
Pure knobhead mentality. No clue.
@@DenUitvreter "to fall upwards" nice one. We have "to be educated beyond one's intelligence" and "quarterinteligentsia" here in Poland.
What a hateful woman. I can't believe anyone feels she speaks for them.
Douglas Murray correct on this subject.
And yet there's not a single country in Africa she wants to live in.
She doesn't seem to appreciate the culture in which she finds herself. She talks of respect but interrupts him right after shaking her head and squirming!!
LMFAOOO!!!! EXACTLY MY POINT
Ok but that should not limit her right to voice her worries
Isn't she Dutch?!
@Brad Sanchez Even the Japanese would have an airplane ready to take her back before she ended her sentence - yet white countries kowtow to this garbage.
She has her own version of the truth, which is far worse than lying. Greetings from the Netherlands.
That's the way of the whole Left and the whole SJW movement and other factions of the Democrat Socialist movement (here in America). They want THEIR TRUTH...over & above FACTS. Joe Bye-Done, and one of those now famous moments of clarity, said it himself. He said they believe in TRUTH over FACTS. What he didn't say out loud was he meant HIS PARTY'S TRUTH over ACTUAL FACTS. INCLUDING scientific facts. For eg allowing, and even encouraging CHILDREN to decide, at their tender age, whether they want to be a boy or a girl is really tantamount to child abuse.
Absolutely. The lie that Britain has always been diverse. Such a lie.. Monoculture for millenia until last 30 to 50 years
So, an opinion then? .
@@riancreamer6904 No, she twists facts around to make it fit for her, that is not an opinion.
Voorman! A brilliant summary. Agreed.
She basically said you don't eat food you consume it. She is just vocally dancing around what she is saying (people should roll over) Douglas, never change
Douglas Murray 👌
She's wrong. It's courtesy we need in society. Respect is earned
I practically screamed this at my screen! Courtesy is my duty to give. Respect is your duty to earn. No rights without responsibility
Best remark of 2019
I'm anti-pc, but I don't think respect has to be earned. I was taught to respect my elders, and fellow human beings. I try to be respectful to anyone I encounter, but that respect can certainly be lost. "Respect is earned" sounds like a Nike commercial to me. It sounds good, but lacks wisdom.
The irony is: respect for others comes from respect for the self, and everything about wokeness and victim culture destroys a person's ability to respect themselves or even to identify themselves as separate from their group identities.
That is default respect for the position they hold. That respect should be given at first, but it can be lost, thus that respect may already been earned, but must be retained. That sounds better?
Respect is earned, not demanded, she has it wrong
Those that demand it won't get it..
Someone else’s need to have their nonsense respected isn’t my problem
depends on what level of respect is referred to. For any civil society, everyone should show everyone a basic level of courtesy also known as respect. At a bare minimum avoid blatant disrespect! To attain elevated status or admiration, also known as respect, one must do something worthy... the concept of "earned" respect fits there.
@@watcherwlc53 Sir, that's the most complete concise and accurate breakdown of the little "respect" kerfuffle and confusion that I've seen yet.
I totally agree. I can show you a courtesy that's easy. If you work in customer service you do it every day. Jerk customer, you still smile and get the exchange done. But you don't need to respect that person. If many parts of a comunity are disproportionately commiting violence than we need to address that. And more over respect is something between known individuals.
Love Douglas Murray😊
She’s extremely arrogant. I don’t see the “dominant character” of her self-compliment. And she just regurgitates every grad school social science curriculum talking point.
she is arrogant because she has been pushed to the front by ignorant liberals that think they are infinitely better for pushing those of certain hues along in life....regardless of their thoughts, abilities to reason or being able to articulate anything....that is the ignorance of the liberal....they are ignorant people that have convinced only themselves that they are brilliant.....
‘Dominant character’ is pretty easy when you’re ‘diverse’ in a society that worships a false god such as ‘diversity’. Notice how she not living in whatever shithole her parent or grandparent came from with that supposed ‘dominant character’. Human garbage.
Why do these fascists like her always substitute the word “truth” for the word “opinion”.
@rross27 awesome, well written 👏 it’s like in 1984 when Orwell’s character is tortured until he not only says 2+2=5 but also believes it when he says it. I can see the west spiralling into a conflict just as in Western and Central Europe in the 1930’s because of foul communists/fascists like her. I heard a quote, ostensibly from Adolf himself; “control the fear and you control the masses”. And “respect” is not automatically owed to anyone as this ignorant woman so arrogantly puts forward. Courtesy is all you can expect, respect is earned. She does not have my respect.
@rross27 you just described CNN ... not interested in truth or resolving issues just agitation and or humiliation
A lot of black people find this woman and her carping self important nonsense embarassing.
I detected she is projecting her needs into a play on base_1 first degree victimhood
They do.
That's not entirely true. We find that she has lost focus by fighting for a group that is not being structurally marginalized. People from the Alphabet community have confiscated the struggle of black people. No it's not like in 1855 but we still face injustice on numerous levels. I think the part where she was talkinf about Zwarte Piet was a good example of how whites position themselves in a racist spectrum...
@@nelsondewaard9267 The 'zwarte piet' discussion has three major problems of conflation. 1 'zwarte piet' has nothing to do with the racist US blackface tradition, it's way older. Yet somehow many opponents of zwarte piet seem to claim there is a connection. 2 There are racist and stupid people among the dutch who call black people 'zwarte piet'. Removal of zwarte piet won't reduce the amount of racism in the Netherlands. Racist people will find other words to abuse. 3 Only the ones with the black skin color in the tradition get accused of being racist. For those who appreciate a more sensible take on the problem I recommend this video : kzhead.info/sun/ZZ16l6mHrqOYnYE/bejne.html
I can buy that.
Respect is earned
Courtesy is GIVEN. Respect is EARNED. Nobody owes it to anybody
Can't help but notice the difference between someone knowing what they're talking about, and someone just reading buzzwords from their tablet.
She never even addressed any of his claims or talking points. She just read straight from her iPad. She just walked up and started naming off offenses by the cops and people who disagree with her. I understand points on both sides, but he was never smug and condescending. You could tell he was there to learn together. She was there to win an argument.
US is 45th on the World Press Freedom Index #FreeAssange She mentioned divorced Prince Andrew's family that heads the church he loots 250,000 lifelong FREE money
Fucking all the LOLZ 🤣🤣🤣
Yeah I noticed that as well, She probably didn't get the memo when debating Douglas Murray come well prepared or best stay home!!!
She'd fail a primary school presentation with that shit, most impressive part was how her glasses stayed in place considering she was looking at the ground so much
Murray is having to take a big step down intellectually to debate this woman
Her logic is “We want a seat at the table, and we want to think and do as we please at the table, but in order to feel equal, we also want to take away _your_ ability to think or do as _you_ please, because that somehow negates my feelings and I won’t feel allowed to be ‘myself’ even though I actually have all rights supporting me to live as I wish.”
We all are lol
No real intelligence from her. Just playing her pc flute
Murray is a devious, brazen liar. Intellectual for the simpeletons!
Murray tries to educate the deluded, and simpletons. Inc the brazen liars
This needs to continue... with additional panel members from additional countries. Knowledge breeds understanding. You are not required to agree to understand. Both guests had thought provoking statements & rebuttals. My knowledge was boosted in >30min. Good job!
Words are words and have no power to harm or hurt anyone… if a word hurts you … you are what is wrong with society today!
Japanese worker: I'm Gay Other Japanese workers: And this has what to do with work?
I lived in Japan for 8 years and not once did I see any obvious same sex couples walking together. I spent a lot of time working and playing in the city of Osaka, a huge city of 20 milllion. That tells me it is far more hidden than in Australia. Yes you have lots of gay people on tv but that is a very different world to every day society.
@@Explorshon123 I live in Copenhagen which is a rather "open minded" city as far as I know, and I do not recall observing same sex couples walking together... ever, but that could be for a variety of very obvious and simple reasons: lots of people walk together as friends do, and do not give hands or an arm around, so how would you distinguish friends from couples? Also, same sex couples are in a rather small number comparing to everyone else, so chances get slimmer. And finally, it doesn't matter, people don't care... it's not like "in the ideal world, a street of people walking should look like such and such, and have a distribution of yadayadayada". If I see someone on the street... I don't care who they are, or where they come from, what they had for breakfast, or what they chose to do the night before.... I simply walk by and move along. On sunny days I may give them a smile just because it may make their day better, but whomever they are... I still don't care. So the only thing I believe you can observe or not, and is the only thing that matters, is the stories you hear, or if encounter a situation where someone clearly acted homophobic. Sorry for the long reply, just sharing my thoughts :) cheers!
it means he'll be the most tastefully dressed man in the whole office
@Mrs. Edna Welthorpe sorry to hear that :/ it can certainly be that I'm wrong, but from the people I know (mainly PT and DK)... I feel most people are nice at least to the extent of consciously respecting one another. In other words I don't know personally anyone I could really think of as "what a horrible person". Some will be more rude or emotionally clumsy or brute than others, others will have very different political mindsets and various cultural influences... but raw mal-intent... or a sense of actual superiority... I feel it's only something found in a minority of people who most likely have underlying psychological issues.
Nathan Ryan know what my employer, a municipal gov one, that will remain nameless, will be doing in the near future? Having us employees "participate " in open group public support of one of these woke and favoured and pandered and hyper protected groups. Whether it be a union funded picnic in public or wearing colored arm bands for a week or a combination of forced activities. It will be recorded and have consequences if I DON'T participate willingly. Interesting use of words there, "willingly". Im not allowed to even argue my case why I dont want to be forced into a costume that favours ONLY ONE SPECIFIC trend group that I dont belong to. I could lose my job if I dont. We already went thru "sensitivity training" that had several examples of what discrimination is and how it isnt in our interests to cause it, firing or legal ramifications could follow . One example was "not offering an individual to join your group to go to a restaurant " for lunch, or not including someone in a group conversation. Then the other manners based examples like insulting or shunning someone else, cruelty of that sort. I have some decisions to make about holding to my personal beliefs, personal integrity, and personal actions coming up this yesr. And no, if ALL PEOPLE are not going to be respected, publicly and EQUALLY "celebrated and supported" in one full encompassing act, instead "certain specific trending groups only" having my union dollars and tax dollars being spent on materials and activities I am forced to participate in, then I want none of it, and want to go to an employer that doesnt behave in such pandering ridiculous ways. I will try not to let the years of service I put in and now accounting for nothing now, get me down
Vote Conservative. It's the right thing to do. 🇦🇺🇺🇲🇬🇧
🇨🇦 too!
lol
Ash Davidson we did...and won. 👍🏽🏴🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
Yup if anyone wants to know why our electorates have shifted right, they just need to be reminded that women like this, calling us racist and demanding everything change to suit them; are currently favoured by our establishments and (if we carry on as we are) will represent the new European majority in the next five decades. And no that isn’t a far right conspiracy theory. Everyone from the Guardian to the BBC have reported gleefully that indigenous Europeans are set to become the minority in Western Europe.
Honest John yes, I’ve read that too. How incredibly sad to lose our country, and our people.
Respect is earned. You get a seat at the table if you exhibit competence. I would not give her a seat at the table, she’s not competent.
One of the few people I would love to meet. He is simply brilliant.
Douglas surgically takes Sylvana apart and she can't even see it.
I'm black and I despise that woman. She is really dumb and angry all the time
Yes!!!! He is right! He is completely RIGHT!!! I’m sick of these “Victims” crying!!!
The look on Sylvana's face while Douglas is speaking tells you everything you need to know.
It screams "I'm better than you." She's extremely smug.
Yep, pure bile and loathing.
I noticed from the second Douglas started speaking she was looking out at the audience and not listening to douglas. So I knew she was just going to preach and screech her prepared narrative.
I watch that face and I'm confident she'll have nothing to teach me. I'd love some spirited opposition to Douglas' perspective, but she's not it and life's too short to spend on sour pretentious women stuck in ossified puberty revolt.
She's a politician. And a "victim" blah blah blah blah blah 😑
courtesy is given, Respect is earned
The woman was not even listening to him, just waiting for her chance to blast nonsense.
Douglas Murray is a class act.
such a thoughtful and respectful individual, makes me want to be a better person each time i hear him. 😊
douglas is a homosexual aswell
Sylvano repeatedly implies that if someone doesn’t agree with her, then they are guilty of oppression. It’s bullying.
That is the left's strategy. Total hypocrisy and no respect for fairness or truth. Society would be so much better off if we could just completely ignore them.
The people who call anyone who has a different point of view, Nazi and Racist, want to know why everyone doesn't want to be curteous and respectful about their latest whim being enforced by law. Woke = I want to control everyone but myself.
"I've come up with a new grammar that you need to follow. You now have to use extra pronouns. That's none of your business, though."
And a racist
I would destroy her. Diversity? Go back to your own country! Here's diversity for you. Build your own society, if you can. Do whatever you want - IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY!
She sits there and freely interrupts like everyone is on the edge of their seats waiting to hear her speak.
Ms. Simons literally describes the problem. She's okay making a change to her life, to stop saying a thing if someone prefers she doesn't. When does it stop though? When does it get to a point when you can't say anything at all because everyone's offended at all the things?
I detest identity politics and Respect is EARNED dear
What does she need character for, she has a correct identity.
Scrolled down to comment just this.
True respect is earned. Many mistake respect with common courtesy and "good manners in a civilized society". We have developed those 2 because we have learned over time that this approach is what usually leads to the best outcome when communicating with other people. But with people who are not civilized, good manners only leads to them trampling you. So there are situations where common courtesy no longer leads to the best outcome and so people are adapting. Big surprise she is complaining. ;)
Murray wins. He never went woke. That’s why he will never go broke.
Get woke, go broke.
Ofcourse he wins. Who wouldn't win from a one celled organism like that twat. She is the biggest joke in Holland. It baffles me someone thought she was even remotely qualified to debate Douglas..
Her arrogance and do as I say attitude is astounding 😂😂😂😂
Thank you for standing up for us. We need to stop labelling and judging. Finding the solution continues 🎉
She is exactly what I imagined her to be.
SufamiDan ... Nut job??🤔🤔
No, she is far, far worse...
You only have to hear one point to know her whole opinion on everything because she's possessed by radical leftist ideology. Really boring talking to those people because you immediately know what they think.
He's poignant, thoughtful, and respectful in his delivery. She comes across as arrogant, pretentious, dismissive, and petty. She also continually interrupts him. Douglas won this exchange hands down.
lets be honest most of us knew this before we hit play
@@jamyphill Sylvana Simons apparently didn't. Can you imagine the conversation she had with her manager? "what's this? a debate against a british racist white guy? i'm going to murder him." --day of the debate-- "Sylvana, we've got some bad news. Turns out, Douglas... is gay." "..gay?.. no... No.... NOOOO!!!!!!" "We're going to have to scrub your speech of all mentions of him being an incel." "NOOOOOO!" "you're basically... you're going to have to treat him... like an equal."
that attitude seems to go hand in hand with this ideology
That and he gave his talk fluidly while periodically glancing at a book. She had her eyes fixed to a screen reading like it was a teleprompter. Not a fair match IMO.
Funny how her type always call the open societies of the West racist, but have no problem with the extreme anti-white racism in South Africa (and in the Western media in general). That's because they smolder with anti-white hatred.
He was right saying courtesy...respect is earned, no one is entitled to it
Respect goes two ways.
how does Douglas stay so polite, the man is a legend.
Because he has class
He seemed disconcerted here, to be coupled with such an ideological dwarf. It's hard to formulate a structured debate with a toddler.
I felt his annoyance at the intellectually reductive company he found himself in, then he notes the pompous fireplace decor thing, and then internally sighs as he realises what he's in for. His intro was gold.
@@jamessadia You are so right. lol
Sometimes too polite
She really deserves an Oscar for Smuggest Smug person in Smugland.
*smudge
Shes got a one way ticket to smug city
Lol sounds like a description from Blackadder. Along with more cunning than a fox who is professor of cunning
We are always happy when other countries invite her. So we do black pete real quick before she comes back.
She is smugarant.
Douglas is a brilliant human.
We in the western world are so lucky to have Douglas Murray .
What Western world are you living in?
We are. He is up there with the likes of the now dead Christopher Hitchen, Professor Jordon Peterson. They speak up for the truth and have cut through the woked BS of modern biased views. I mean when the BBC education channel had a head teacher telling two confused children saying there are 100 genders. Not 200 or 300 but 100 genders and she smugly smiled when she was teaching this nonsense that feelings and thoughts on gender trumps and overturns science where DNA, Genes rule. It seems some in the West are intentionally regressing. I wonder what the great people who advanced our world, Di Vinci, Galileo, Aristotle and Archimedes, Albert Einstein and Crick and Watson. I know who I would rather believe.
@@andrewpascoe1132 What other western part of Earth is there?
@@RealIllumin Western society... where the people are so ignorant that even if you took a frozen trout and slapped them in the fact with it in the name of 'truth', they would probably call the Police in fear to say a radicalised jihadi trout fell from the sky and that climate change caused it. Maybe that's just Australia though?
@@andrewpascoe1132 Yeah OK whatever, everyone in the west is ignorant. You should be proud that you don't live there then...
Listen to the tone in her voice. Then imagine her with absolute power.
tumarfa Ugghh NO!
She would kill more people than Mao.
@Joe Blow yeah her facial expressions when he said he didn't know what non-binary meant because it hadn't been sufficiently explained. Of course she made no attempt at it and instead said some dumb platitude about having to respect everyone.
Look at her body posture it's typical of ,I'mnot listening
So sincere, so confidant... in her ignorance.
"I'm not talking about courtesy, I'm talking about respect" - no, lady, you're talking about courtesy. Respect isn't demanded, it's earned.
I hate how that lady just interrupts constantly.
This leftist woman is terrible.all she is saying is nonsense.
She is like the most hated person in the netherlands, she is a crazy racist herself
Not all lefty woman
@小熊维尼 Taiwan #1
@zzllup woah there friend, the hell?
Leftist-Rightist.. what a silly language. Even in 20'th century it was outdated and misfunctional already. Nowdays it's just stupid. The real front line is of -Collectivism vs Individualism or -Statists vs Anarchists
Thank God for Mr Murray
She's a living example of why non-European migration into Europe is a terrible idea. Everything she says proves the point.
Just her. My Nan was an Indian in the British army during WW2. She loved the UK till the day she died. I served alongside the Gurkhas in a different regiment, they all loved the UK and are very good people. It’s culture. And it’s a lack of loving British culture. Islam is the biggest threat. This person is few and far between. They’re the weak who have been given a loud speaker by the elite. I’m mixed race, I served the UK. I love England and it’s culture.please don’t lump me in or my Nan in with these idiots.
You can not argue with a person that lacks understanding of general semantics and using identity politics as arguments. look at the US, The indians, are the, most successful immigrants haha.
dude, she says "burning cars" is covered by freedom of speech. she is talking shit. its not even debatable.
@@rooroo8767 The Left pushed/pushes so hard it's become "throw the baby out with the bathwater".. The one problem of course there are documents stating that those in charge wish Western countries in their 1950's make-up as such need to disappear for good.
Chris Poole I suppose that may be true about the higher ups. But that shouldn’t detract my original point. Though saying that I understand the progress trap the west is in. It is entirely cultural. Too much too soon is detrimental. Especially in a democracy. I would force a dedication of immigrants to serve in public sector and serve with the armed forces and if they commit even a parking offence - kick them out. I, like my grandparents, are dedicated to preserving and enforcing British rule, culture and advancement on a world platform. I’m a nationalist. I don’t think we should let anyone in that would hold ill intent towards the empire. Saying that, I believe we should hold those of a different race close as we the willing helped facilitate the empires reign on the world platform. Yes, the Anglo Saxon whites succeeded in the conquest, no doubt, but what was great about it was they gave back so much and attempted to incorporate the conquered into their laws, culture and dynasty. All I’m saying is as free thinking democratic people - we should not oppose that. I say this as a mixed race white/Asian lover, nationalist and upholder of British values. Not that my race, or lack of, should have anything to do with my values, imo.
'Dominant character' speaks volumes.
Demanding a respect is astonishing.
"The slow death of free speech" Mate this ain't slow, this is bloody rapid.
yes it is
The left is hellbound to hyper-protect their fragile / weak emotional state. What they want is complete hyper-control of their environment so as to NO SPEECH exists that triggers their fragile emotions
That woman is pure inflated ego. She would actually be tolerable to listen to if she acted like an adult instead of an adolescent.
A narcissist with an iPad. The smirking, lip-pursing and check sucking!
The gay guy could do the same thing, but a typical effeminate gay guy!
Most adolescents in my family have more common sense.
She’s claiming that people of colour are out behind in Dutch society. Yet she made a killing as a veejay on TV. The irony.
@@AlexJae30 No more effeminate than your dad. 😁
She's right about one thing, courtesy and respect are two different things. Respect is earned, courtesy is being polite. I think we should all be polite to one another, but I don't have to respect you or your ideas. That should be okay, but many want to force you to think like them, or else!
What has climbing up chimneys and getting covered in dirt got to do with this?