BFV Graphics Comparison. Resolution: 1920x1080.
● CPU: Intel Core i5-8600K 4.8GHz, Hexa Core / Coffee Lake.
● GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING 8G.
● RAM: G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 16GB (2x8GB) 3000MHz CL16 1.35V XMP 2.0.
BFV Graphics Comparison. Resolution: 1920x1080.
● CPU: Intel Core i5-8600K 4.8GHz, Hexa Core / Coffee Lake.
● GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING 8G.
● RAM: G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 16GB (2x8GB) 3000MHz CL16 1.35V XMP 2.0.
0:19 LOL, people with Low have better visibility
sadly, but yes
You always play online games on low.
always wondered how they snipe me when I am in the grass and "invisible", now I know
Eugene Fifchikus disable foliage maybe if possible
And much faster visibility after explosions.
grass = ultra no grass= low
You = idiot
Amir SA lol😂😂
Grass is a high detail bro if you are new at game logic
Amir SA r/woooosh
@@murtacke228 i said it because the grass is the only big difference, low or ultra the game looks almost the same
And i was wondering how the hell they see me in the grass while i m lying on the ground.Now i feel like the elephant that he is trying to hide behind a flower.
damn so treux your comment damnn
they could spot you so you have big red mark above your head for everybody on enemy team, but its easier to spot ppl in grass with low thats true
I play BF1 alot, and words cannot describe how much I can relate to this
Especually in Twisted Steel
Good
2:56 on ultra, people can pop out and shoot you while you can't see a thing. :D
yeah this is one of those games where i choose ultra anyway. I know its giving me a slight disadvantage but i feel like the extra detail is worth a few more deaths
@@jadowarcadia6227 well. Then you just a bad player.
@@SHUTENSEPC WDYM? Some people just prefer visuals over tryharding
Battlefield isn't exactly the most competitive game tbh
@@moosh7078 true
The thumbnail is literally the same picture
Oh my god someone actually has eyes
ninja of puerto rico I noticed it too
I tought it too, but sky is more lighty and White at low.
Oh actually not. They are same
being poor is cheating
Unless you are not poor and decide to play on low, because you get more fps :)
@@kikas7905 That's double cheating then!
@@lowwcas The rich will always oppress the poor :)
@@kikas7905 But doesn't the rich always get oppressed by society as a whole anyways? So everything seems balanced to me.
Corey B poor is a strong word cant be used like this
Single on ultra, multi on low :D
ya this is true
Single on low multi on low cuz my pc sucks
@@saphyrel9274 same
Both on ultra tbh. I don't care. This will only affect me really on Arras.
Idiot
It sucks when low settings give people advantage
On the otherway, people with shitty PCs can rightfully have the advantage becuse theyr FPS will (probably) be lower.
@@oneoneoneangel Incorrect. No one with super shitty pc's are gonna be able to afford a 90 dollar game.
Sappy my pc isn't good I can afford it
@@Haggo8818 Afford is relative. Just because you have the funds to buy it doesn't mean that you can afford it. A 90 dollar game that you can't even run properly... with 90 bucks you could be spending on something much more productive or at least save up for more, because having less than 90 in your bank literally means you're bankrupt. Not to mention, a 600 dollar build with a 1050ti could run this game with a high framerate.
Sappy yeh suppose but I'm getting a new 1 with 16gb ram ddr4 Intel i7 8700 and a rtx 2080
People will play multiplayer in low after this video. Nowhere to hide.
im the one for shure m8 hhhh low setting straight
Kinda sucks as it looks so much better on ultra. I may stick to ultra even if it makes me worse off in multiplayer
@@Codfantaisia Yeah I'm sticking with Ultra also; I'm just going to be mindful that smoke clears quicker and grass and some trees are invisible and useless as cover. Will make playing a bit more interesting.
Typically that's always been the case for competitive shooters. People who are more serious want the highest frames, so low it is. Didn't people play Counter strike and such on low too? It's just that graphics have advanced so much that the gap between low and ultra can be much larger. I play bf5 and pubg on a 1070 at low
The difference is mostly in grass.
Not only. Look at 1:28. Smoke effects too. This is really bad! Really disadvantage for players with higher settings. They see nothing for a longer time and cant react. Super video Wolfgang! Thx!
i don't think the guy who uploaded this restarted the game between runs because it doesn't seem like things like textures change.
@BG Cool Crayon look the 2:54
The smoke dissipation time of smoke on explosions was also unreal...
2:55
The soundtracks in this game.................are amazing.
that v1 missile when it hits the ground... first time i heard it i got scared : I had my headphones on. Super sound and soundtrack indeed
It's sound effects 😅
In gaming industry, *THE POOR WILL ALWAYS OPPRESS THE RICH MASSES*
yes ofc, 20 fps will indeed oppress people running a game at 100fps, not the mention the ability to change graphics, it's not like rich want ultra high settings for multiplayer
@Tree Gaming 45 is torture for me tho
Awesome comparison, you did a great job showcasing the modes! YoutTube compression does wash out the image overall, so it's harder to tell when not seeing it first hand, but the differences between quality settings are subtle. What I can confirm is that the game really looks a lot better than expected even on low settings.
Thank you.
Buys a RTX 2080Ti.. play at low settings
i bought a 3090 and play solitaire
@@deathrager2404 i bought 1070 and play LOL
@@deathrager2404 😂
@@deathrager2404 lol 😂
Like a bossdd
Great testing, got to give it to the developer of BFV, what a beautiful game you guys have made. The attention to DETAILS on everything... Good job 👍
Its easy Campaign = Ultra settings Multiplayer = Low settings :v
True that for sure. I'd do the same
That’s what I do :D
Yo también soy un papulince xd
@@getarmless2402 calla fan del shitpost V:
Everything ultra Undergrowth low Job done
Not even. Every added effect and detail is a distraction to your eye. Shadow detail and distance also makes the scene more complex, thus distracting your eye. Smoke effects are easier to see through and faster vs ultra and same w/ explosions which clear up faster on low making it easier to see first and shoot.
Low graphics battlefield V = Ultra High graphics COD WWII
that's because their biggest buyers platform is console gamers; lol
@@one10RC Well yeah of course. CoD is built for console, It's a console shooter.
Peter Dell'Ario that’s not a good excuse for outdated graphics, BFV on consoles is still miles ahead of WWII
Cod waw*
@@ruhidmohamad have u ever TRIED bfv on console?If u have,u will know it kinda sucks.Try before saying
Settings that change the terrain are absurd.
@Alex You are an ass. Nice going chief.
If you want to play on ultra but still want to retain visibility or be aware if you are visible. Just play with undergrowth on LOW. That's all.
First hi wolf :) game looks nice even on LOW but Ultra is fantastic .
hey man :)
Actually, i dont see much difference at all. Ultra only has shadows, while Low does not.
@@Morpheus-pt3wq I saw another comment say textures might not have changed as he didn't restart the game.
@@staryoshi06 well, it actually does not matter, since most ppl playing mp are using low details.
The difference is a lot smaller than I expected, and for the huge difference in performance I would definitely run low but just turn textures and AA up.
Congratulations, well done comparison, very good video.
Low looks great!!!
I realised that I was watching this video on 144p
I was watching it at 480 lol
@@yuriqueen6294 xd
It's all about keeping it as close to 144fps as I can i adjust every game accordingly
I'm struggling to get 40 fps at 720p.. i need more money :(
@@axeonhand damn save as much as you can dude it ain't easy
Love the song at the end.
Great vid. You should do medium and high in my opinion
Both looking better than black ops 4 hahaha
When you laugh at your own shitty joke
axoplax cod fanboy
Hahahha true
Even bf 1 low better than CoD bo4
competitive players play game bcs of a game itself...idgaf about graphics
Such a beautiful game
The difference between the two is clearly the shadows. I would rather play it on ultra that way the shadows are where they realistically are suppose to be and it helps keeps clarity with a few other tweaks I would make along with it and that is brightness and contrast. All those things together with rich color tone will bring the picture out to the fullest. You just have to know how to calibrate everything together.
Forget the graphics, that sound design is stunning.
i thought oh the graphic was so nice but when i realized it was low settings...
5:26 lmao the reflection on ultra gets so messed up
im impressed on how good fps you get on low and it still looks amazing
They did such a good work with the graphics and the running.
1:05 wtf is happening with the hand xD
Shadows
yea like its liquid😂😂
@@damankhaira7952 haha yea
Looks like hand cramps.
Alien
Tbh the game looks good on low aswell
FPS? and wich program u used the record? very nice slow motion...
Bel video bravo soccia la differenza e abissale
Is it me or low has a better advantage than ultra? I thought it was the other way around, but in this case its not.
Crazycauses 51 it's clearly that low has better advantage than ultra
yeah big advantage, I usually play on Ultra but gonna try Low after watching this vid
low always gives u better visibility because turning off particles, lighting and grass allows you to see players easily. Smoke effect will be less, no grass and no glaring effect from the reflections
its never been a bigger advantage to play any game on ultra unless the render/view distance is an option in which you just put that on max.
Set texture on ultra and everything else on low.
3:14 It's me, or the snow is better on low?
It's you
better on low
@@deciboo189 And the ultrasnow seems to randomly jump somewhere.
the snow looks more realistic on low
It looks less realistic on snow without subsurface scattering
Imo Put texture, AA and shadow at max but leave the rest at low/off Works perfectly fine
Cool video. To sum it up: In "Low" settings the grass is cut and in "Ultra" it is not :)
Low=dessert ultra=jungle XD
I bet you cant see a difference between High and ultra .. but high gives you 10 fps or more ...
Nick AlexuseesuxelA i saw a video of this channel on bfv low vs medium vs high vs ultra, and high and ultra were the same graphics and fps
I disagree. I get like 1fps more when using high instead of ultra
What is going on here bc on ultra I get 5-7 FPS more than low med and high wtf...
they are same but i heard ultra is only becouse for those RTX 2080 player that use that ray stuff, in high they see it less
@@brienmaybe.4415 youre high dude, or maybe there were an explosions when on med and high.
Always set to low for the best performance and it also gives you advantage
Wow, the huge difference really was the grass which looked flat but after that, its still looks really good
omg, i bought new card for ultra and now I must play on low
It is still disgusting as fk on low.. its a huge advantage and this should be banned, not because some ppl have toasters but for this...come on thats like fking cheating lol.
Imagine being in a little patch of grass which people with low settings can find you
Especially on Twisted Steel Map, but also on the other, the Low Quality is very helpful because no bush/ thicket blocks your sight 🤷🏼♂️ And smoke disappears faster
5:25 lol low has better details on pistol
I love low settings of every games😉 because my pc can't handle high graphic settings 😂
@BG Cool Crayon intel core 2 duo and 1gb ram and 8800gts
If you have lag issuse on high graph lower your resoluton
yea same, i love how they make low and high graphic settings almost same but without those pesky shadows :D
i have a question, did you restart the game to change the settings or not because it looks like you have not as none of the textures seem to change.
Ultra definitely looks better when you do a side by side comparison with low but even low is not bad in most cases either. You won't be disappointed with low if you don't know what ultra is.
Ultra is placebo, high or very high are enough
I think you mean ultra is for screenshots and cinematic stuff because it takes a lot of gpu and cpu power
@@cozmics1191 running Ultra with 800€ PC ...
Transtar did I say you couldn’t run it? No, all I was saying is ultra in most games takes more power because it’s made for screen shots if you want higher fps then high is fine
@@cozmics1191 yep my Bad, sorry
low for hackers 😂
nice comparison . Dont forget guys you can play on low/medium with a 400 to 500 bucks pc . for ultra you need 700-1200 bucks maybe even more
thanks for this, im gonna put everything to low now.
I prefer on low. Less foliage that clutters my sight.
I prefer to play on ultra settings for better looks :)
well... That's the whole point buddy .
@@BWNutrition075 low settings=more fps and its kinda cheat lol
@@LevlQil ???????????????????????????????
rich guy detected
that low visibility edge that every true gamer utilizes xD
It's good to see someone always mowes the grass for low guy ;)
We get a knife in the back for have a good pc and support new good games....
EA is the best graphic design
Dice*
lol nope this game look good but i see much better graphic games
@@miloszgramolxd3764 learn english kid
@@act5886 haha no better to learn spanish
@@act5886 You forgot to capitalize the first letter of learn and English. You also forgot to place a period at the end of your comment. Learn English kid.
Flabbergasted here about the amount of people not knowing to play online on LOW. It has always been like that as far as i can remember, and im old!
Wait hold up a second this explains why when I am camping in a bush with a sniper someone still manages to see me this is bull
да уж разницы можно сказать что и нету
2080 RTX точно покупать не хочется
@@alexchameleon8497 этот RTX отработает и сдохнет, пока полноценные игры для нее выйдут
bLOWfield V
5:30 this music reminds me of this girl with dark latex suit. Nostalgia
Das ist ja mal echt interessant für Leute wie mich ,die am überlegen sind sich extra eine neue gfk zu holen nur um es in ultra spielen zu können
Like Ps4 vs PC xdd
I have ps4 pro with 4k hdr 10bit 65" tv samsung 9000 series and a gaming PC with 1080TI and 49" SUW samsung 144hz Display and I bought BF5 on PS4 because of an even playfield and the game still looks fantastic on PS4.
I have ps4 pro with 4k hdr 10bit 65" tv samsung 9000 series and a gaming PC with 1080TI and 49" SUW samsung 144hz Display and I bought BF5 on PS4 because of an even playfield and the game still looks fantastic on PS4.
@@253Jaren hahaha shooter on console...
MiGPU I have no complaints. Battlefield is kind of a casual shooter so it works out fine.
@@dontrauma1042 ikr i hate it
lOw Is BeTtEr. Said the nigah with the 1050 cuz that’s all he can run.
Lmao 😂😂😂
I can relate
lol omg
Can’t relate 1070ti 8gb but still low is better
Ultra quality adds more camouflage for ultra settings players and people with low quality is so good at this game
In competitive games i always play on lol, it offers you better visibility sometimes, not in cs go though, or does it?
Proof AMD users really do have the advantage.
Lmao
NVIDIA shill
Low looks like a game from 2013 on max settings
Josh It’s looks really good
U got the wrong game bruh, u meant rdr2
BF 4
Attentive people, can you mention please what does change besides terrain detail, grass, depth of light calculations, advanced reflections, and clouds of snow and smoke? I can't see any other things. I don't see reflections or mud tracks disappear. Also, according to Notebookcheck, the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra on old graphic chips is around 100% (2 times), while on new graphic chips is only around 50%.
Well this explains why I get found so easy when hiding in the grass.
All game BF5 is LOW
This physics looks very bad 3:32
@@33noah3 yes
@@33noah3 Awwwww triggered? So cute. :)
Edwards Baron triggered about what?
@@33noah3 noah stop crying. Physics sucks. It's a fact. Your technical knowledge is zero.
@@sancarlos1044 hahahahaha
If you check pro-players setups are usually set on low due to better imput lag and less detail to lash on. I believe that in games like this you should enjoy the ultra settings on the campaign and reduce the settings in order to have a better result in multiplayer
"Low" settings have to be lower, there still are shadows, quality reflections, fog, particles, etc. If EA allowed the graphics to be turned down even more they could get more people to play the game, and more money to them which I imagine is what they want
This game is so fast paced that I don't even notice the graphics when I play
0:50 - "Powered by RTX" Shadows which we deserved...
So pretty much if you want a good experience while having competitive advantage you'd need to set textures, water, reflections to high and everything else to low with shadows depending on how bothered you are by it.
They both look great :D
For competitive gaming low details are usually preffered. You want low - medium shadows, low everything else, no motion blur or screen effects, as much AA as your system can push and the highest possible resolution and refresh rate. High textures, draw distances ect, like 0:25 in this video, a player hiding in the grass, isnt actually hiding in the grass, if you, have no grass... And his grass will be blocking his veiw of you most likely. And thats just cause games always seem to over do the length of grass in games... Why can they just have normal grass lol instead of long ass old seeded looking grass
I always thought the snow on the roof was a debris trigger that could hurt someone but it's just graphics making you see nothing vs those playing on low. Sad.
4:22 It looks like there is a dark aura surrounding her hand on the ultra setting.
I would not be sad if could only play it on low instead of ultra still looks awesome even on low settings
So if your enemy is at low settings, apparently you can’t hide at grass anymore. Lol
First 5 seconds into the video I stop and went to change settings since I was about to start playing that map. Got top place for the 1st time with a bunch of kills. Now I call that skills haha.
this is why i play with effects/mesh/terrain all on low with everything else on ultra lol. i want it to look good but i also dont want to be disadvantaged
Wow. besides slightly better shadows, and lighting, the only real differences is better more accurate screen space reflections, and of course much more vegetation, and objects rending at a farther distance in the environment. and most people are only gonna notice the higher amount of vegetation and props in the environment.also there does seem to be a bit more tessellation on certain textures throughout the environment.
Player with ultra graphics hiding in the grass: guess you can't see me boi Enemy with low graphics: *try me*
Thumbnail is literally the same picture xD Edit: I've noticed this on every one of his comparison videos' thumbnails. Why does he do this?
Basically, ultra on single player, Low on multi-player lol
The game on low looks like a game from 2013-2014