X 36 Maiden Flights! lots of learning

2024 ж. 10 Мам.
1 450 Рет қаралды

Files will be available soon. I'm printing one more version and once I feel comfortable ill put them on my Cults page

Пікірлер
  • You could try to use a clear plastic rudder so it doesn't show up so well when the jet is in flight.

    @rgilley7@rgilley716 күн бұрын
  • great job and cool to see the process.......thumbs up👍👍

    15 күн бұрын
  • Nice job

    @franks.jr.7236@franks.jr.723616 күн бұрын
  • Gyro on elevons won't help yaw stability. You still need to control yaw with something.

    @toolbaggers@toolbaggers16 күн бұрын
  • Love the colour co-ordinated crash bag :)

    @alanartt3138@alanartt313815 күн бұрын
    • 💯

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
  • Twist the wings so that the wingtips have a negative lift. This way you don’t need a horizontal stabilator. This is a fairly new discovery at NASA. This causes the higher wingtip to accelerate when turning so that the turn is coordinated although there is no rudder. I can’t find the literature on it now. But there are also couple of videos where they explained that it was a student who followed the math and built a rc plane accordingly. The development team thought they had done an error in their simulations, but it wasn’t an error. If I remember correctly about 20% in from the wing tip you should have neutral lift. Outward from that it should be negative. With a twisted wing like that, you will need a slightly longer wingspan to generate same amount of lift as a traditional wing. The benefit is in less drag and no need for a horizontal stabiliser.

    @dbtest117@dbtest11715 күн бұрын
    • Also there will be no wing tip vortex, the vortex is moved inwards. When you se birds fly in a V formation you notice that the wingtips are overlapping in the formation. This is with the same amount as to where the vortex if formed.

      @dbtest117@dbtest11715 күн бұрын
  • looks cool . try a ww2 shinden canard edf that seems to be a problem plane

    @vrosi1963@vrosi196316 күн бұрын
  • You make better planes than horizon 😄

    @aidenkahn4338@aidenkahn433816 күн бұрын
  • That was pretty cool!! I'm surprised you got it airborne without a flight controller. And it flew progressively better as you adjusted the CG! As you probably know, that plane was designed with fly-by-wire (computer control) in mind. It was inherently unstable and required constant input from the computer to control it. It also was a unmanned drone and never made it to production. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_X-36

    @Blackys-Boy@Blackys-Boy16 күн бұрын
  • How do you make it so detailed?! Your work is amazing I've been trying so hard on my project and can't get even close to u. I guess it takes time. Fantastic plane!!!✈️

    @Aerospace_Engineering_Noob@Aerospace_Engineering_Noob16 күн бұрын
    • Takes lots of trial and error! Keep at it

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
  • Would you look at doing a 'FanJet 600' model for 50mm EDF? Id bet you could do a great one.

    @bobjoatmon1993@bobjoatmon199316 күн бұрын
    • Wow I’ve never seen this! Definitely going to look into it

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
  • Low rates first ,trim, balance, then try stunts, crash was a forgone truth!😮

    @thomasdobbs9001@thomasdobbs900115 күн бұрын
  • Split flaps will help with tailess design or use a tail of a kite for drag.

    @Johnellenberger1@Johnellenberger116 күн бұрын
  • Nice video! I can't believe that first nose dive crash didn't destroy the plane!!!

    @wwjoesr@wwjoesr16 күн бұрын
    • Shows the toughness of LW printed pla

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
  • Who makes the funky orange PLA?

    @johnmainville6512@johnmainville651215 күн бұрын
  • Yes, it was tail heavy and needed the CG adjusted. That being said, I noticed when you looked at it from the side view, the canards appear to be giving the plane a nose up attitude, even with the 2200. If that's the case, you may not need such a large battery if you adjust them to level. Just throwing stuff out there.... AirHammer out!!

    @airhammer6203@airhammer620316 күн бұрын
    • After designing 4-5 canard airframes I found that a static front canard needs 4-8 degrees I’d positive attitude to have level flying characteristics. If you go back to my early Viggen design you’ll see I’ve spent a while figuring out the canards 👍🏻

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
    • @@hotlapkyle are you saying 4-5 different airframes of the same aircraft? Every aircraft, depending on design, can display different flight characteristics. The viggens canards are in a different location, along with size and shape, than this model. I'll check the viddy's out a little later when I have time.

      @airhammer6203@airhammer620315 күн бұрын
  • I'd like to see you try to add a split elevon setup somehow then put the split on a gyro for yaw control like the B2

    @ryancheesman400@ryancheesman40016 күн бұрын
    • I’d love to eventually

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
  • Why don't you try the F16XL design and then you can see what I've been saying about the fast and slow speed handling that I have been talking about

    @Soshstar999@Soshstar99916 күн бұрын
    • I’m definitely going to make that F16xxl 😁

      @hotlapkyle@hotlapkyle15 күн бұрын
    • @hotlapkyle I don't think that you will be disappointed at all with the flight characteristics of that wing design, another design that you might find interesting is the " monogram snaptite 1:72 stealth F19 mystery plane model kit, that's the most beautiful plane that I have ever seen in the air, I actually got to see it with my own eyes in flight, absolutely beautiful to say the least

      @Soshstar999@Soshstar99915 күн бұрын
  • Great video, but you have to stop cutting the videos short!!! You have to give us time to press the like button... I really hope you don't miss likes because of it... 👍🙂

    @zcdat@zcdat4 күн бұрын
KZhead