Putin will lose territory after US pledges to send ATACMS to Ukraine | Colonel Brendan Kearney
2024 ж. 24 Сәу.
161 454 Рет қаралды
“It's a real combat multiplier for the Ukrainians. It will give them the ability to fire at a much longer range into Russia.”
“High tech weapons” being sent to Ukraine will help them “retake the ground the Russians have managed to gain”, says Colonel Brendan Kearney.
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
At least the Ukrainians are making good use of USA and NATO weapons given to them unlike the South Vietnamese and Afghans who just gave it all to their enemies and ran away, Ukrainians stood up and fight and 2 years later still fighting hard standing strong vs. continued Russian attacks with a ferocity not seen since WW2 Eastern Front.
Agree completely.
🎯👏🙌🏻🇺🇦
Still losing territory every single day and with zero chance to victory.
@@hamidhamidi3134😂😂😂😂😂 ok Putin jr 😂😂
@@chasemccall391 can ukraine join nato while russia occupies it's territory?
Wow 90% of this comment section has no clue🤦♂️
Source: I know it all
Yeah, poor russion bots 😢
@@Amradar123 Im definitely not a bot 🤖 but at this point the west is clearly using Ukraine as a proxy and has invested interest in continuing this war rather that working towards peace. 60 billion and a few weapons ain’t going to change anything apart from escalate the matter, all while innocent people die and the world gets drawn ever more closer to all out war. But yeah keep cheering it on until it start affecting you 👍
How would you know vatnik?
Like being in a kindergarten. Be amazing if any one of them join the forces or ever actually pay income tax. Have a clue what war is about other than on games.
ANOTHER game changer
Yep. The first ones kicked them back to the east, the second out of the black sea and crimean harbours and these will kick them back to Russia.
It will be, for many future Russian widows - the question 'What did my husband die for' is growing in popularity.
A huge amount of ordnance for Ukraine is already in Europe...
It is right now going over the border into Ukraine here in Poland
@@Amradar123Careless talk costs lives. 🤫
Trump didn't just say he wouldn't come to a nations' aid, he said that he would actively encourage Russia to invade a fellow NATO member's land if they didn't pay more for defence.
The funny thing is though is that all bar 1 country that shares a border with Russia, pays the 2%. So he would have to help. The only one he won’t help would be Norway. But considering how narrow that border and how remote it is, it would be suicidal to attempt it.
That’s actually true but he’s still a horrible leader ….
@@DTChapman1 Norway is one of the countries that support most Ukraine per GDP. If the US wants NSMs, JSMs, PROTECTORs, NASAMS, 3SM and Norway buying F-35s, the US better come. Don't forget Norway supplies 40% of EUs gas consumption and owns 1,4% of all the world stocks and even more in the US.
anything is better than Biden
@@victorosborn3348 He was not being serious. There is a zero % chance that Western Europe a) gets invaded by Russia b) that it gets invaded by Russia and the US doesn't immediately enter no matter who is president. The media just wants to fear-monger. He says things like that as a part of the "big ask" as he see's everything through the lens of a business negotiation. What I find funny is people say he's "a liar and you can't believe a word he says" when he's saying something positive, but whenever he says something negative it's "did you hear that! Oh my god we're all gonna die!!!!" lol. Pick one. Can't have both...
The “experts” on here are funny 😄
The Times Radio, The Times Radio stop the lengthy damned intro only to hear it again after. Shall I say it again?
at least give us the ability to skip the “intro” !
Haha. 😂. True
Agree
Yeah it's absolutely unnecessary at best. Very annoying.
I like the intro, 'cause it sums up the whole interview and it helps to focus on the meaningful core
Someone should make timeline of the best Times Radio titles, more then half things which they announced as a "game changers" in the past actually did not changed anything on the battlefield.
Yep.
It's called click bait.
your comment is game changer.
@@smithb0134 it’s called 🗣💩-
The HIMARS have decimated Russia's military. They are lucky Ukraine only has a few of them. They can'y do anything to stop them
I am glad that the United States has made the right decision by once again proving its right to be the leading free nation in the world. Thank you to the USA and UK for their support in such a difficult time. God bless America! God save the King! Glory to Ukrainian heroes!
Same.
What happened to the 2023 counter offensive which the US and its almighty vassal promoted ? Why would this be different ?
🤡
@@johnadam2885 So what? Russia hasn't taken Kyiv have they? They planned it would take 3 weeks to take Kyiv and they are not even close.
God bless the King? What did he do?
Bye bye bridge
Yes, the infrastructure in Ukraine is toast.
Bridge over troubled waters has a melody that the Russians will appreciate.
And Russia will have to pay to have it rebuilt@@Memovox
The Kerch bridge is no longer used much for military purposes as they have a railway now through the occupied territory.
@@tomconnor7786….. even easier to knock-out 👊
In 1935, UK military spending was similar to today, By 1938, it had ramped up because Germany was looking dangerous. By 1942, 40% of British GDP was going on funding the war. Paying for a powerful military is MUCH cheaper than going to war.
The last mening are 100% correct! From Sweden.
How did increased defence spending prevent both World wars?
@@brettonsmith8534?? That’s not a claim being made…..
Both the UK and US are broke. Your theory about preparing for war rather than engaging in war doesn’t mean squat when a government is funding a corrupt military industrial complex.
@@jimtalbott9535 That's exactly the claim that is being made. Spend 'more' and it magically prevents wars. No evidence at all how that happens or what the magic spend point is.
Hahaha the amount of comedy these people bring in is just fascinating. 😂😂
That’s Russia for you!
Yep. The actor/lawyer Zelensky made the taxi driver Putin the biggest laughing stock in history. The future will not be kind to him.
@@rmdomainer9042 Taxi driver Putin? Where are you getting this info? From the barnyard university?😂😂😂😂😂
@@VH-eq2ci He was literally a taxi driver. Look it up. You think KGB in Germany paid salaries after the wall fell?
@@VH-eq2ci direct quote ""Sometimes I had to earn extra money," he said. "I mean, earn extra money by car, as a private driver"
Foolish thoughts
Shame on the 18 republicans. The future will look at them in disgust. Most likely even their own descendants.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😄😄😄😄💙💙💛💛
Every Senator, including the 18 you are shaming, and all but 10 (out of 435) House members supported the Ukraine Democracy Defence Lend-Lease Act of 2022. It created an 18-month window for Ukraine to apply and expired unused at the end of September 2023. Ukraine never applied. The failure to utilize that aid is the giant mistake that was made in the support of Ukraine. The blame for that has only two possible parties - the Biden administration and/or the Ukrainian government itself.
Are you speaking English?
It was moscow Mike only
All of the 18 you shame voted in support of the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022.
The thing is that most off that money will stay in the U.S. Growing it's own military industrial capacity but a lot of the weapons that will be sent to Ukraine are end of life munitions that would cost the U.S. hundreds of millions to decommission so they're sending Ukraine old weapons at end of life status plus America will be getting brand new weapons systems to replace the old stock it's a win win for the U.S. Plus the is will be getting invaluable research information on how there weapons are performing in real life war situation and that will cut down on how much the us has to spend on R and D it's nothing but a win win like I said also no U.S. Lives are being lost
"old" by US standards is "ultra-modern" by everyone else's standards. thats why the Russian propaganda campaign is so active...they know this.
Why do people still think trump doesnt mean exactly what he says. And the irony of trump, who never pays any bills, fuming for nato countries not paying their "bills" is too much
F drumpf. Guys a conman and a loser. He's going to jail. Move on.
that IS kinda ironic
@@mikelittle5250 Lots of ironies on that side of the aisle. Forbidding doctors to save a woman's life when her dead fetus is causing sepsis is A-OK with them, but asking them to wear a mask is "tyrannical government overreach". Seems fitting that now the Repub's are going to be forced to carry a nonviable candidate to term. The irony is as far above them as the m-o-o-n.
Exactly, plus he does not understand how the system works. He's talking as if otherr NATO members owed the US money, that's not the case. Plus the two percent spending goal always seemed a bit weird to me. I don't think that money is the real issue. There is enough money but it's not being spend effectively. To solve that problem would be much more beneficial than insist on the two percent.
@@TechSucht Most likely 45 was acting on Putin's longstanding wish to inject fear, uncertainty, and doubt into western relations.
Dream on boys, soon it will be wake wake.
the common point about false hopes is they never change
Yeah, shame that Putin has all those falls hopes still 😢
Russia didn't win in Afghanistan which was a smaller and less sophisticated and well armed adversary. It takes overwhelming strength to occupy and subdue a country and Russia simply does not have an overwhelming advantage.
and that's why Putin has no intention of occupying or conquering all of Ukraine
Russia had every advantage and has performed poorly on every level.
How are they supposed to take territory? They couldn't do it before when well supplied. How are they supposed to do it now?
With that equipment they did kick russia all the way back from kyiv to the east, swept them from the black sea, and made russia retreat their "fleet" from the crimean harbours
@@Amradar123 The "counteroffensive" was a huge failure though. All of the big wins for Ukraine happened in late 2022. Ukraine hasn't taken any land back since then. There wont be any big push from the Ukrainians this year. Maybe in 2025 we will see the counteroffensive 2?
@@diasflac0gnot really. They destroyed a lot of ammo depots and slowed down Russian counter attacks. They increased the loses in equipment and men since then. It hover around 1000 per day for a while. Before it was 300 and 500 at worst right before Bakmut.
@@escutus But there's no evidence of these losses: these come from the same people who told us that there was a Ghost of Kyiv.
They were never well supplied or supplied in time. They got a few hundred tanks against russias several thousand.
The political system in UK is rotten 😂😂
Bot
It's time for the general public to start getting serious about the situations we face. Man, woman and child.
...camera, TV
That's not the only thing Putin will lose, he will lose his position without realizing the world is against him. The citizens will eventually come to the same realization and when the majority makes up its mind that they do not want to suffer anymore because of this one man's tyrannical ambition.
He doesn't care because his country has huge gold reserves and borders China. The US has treasuries backed by 35 thousand billion dollars of debt and no domestic manufacturing.
That isn't going to happen
It's true, Putin is not Russia! People are tired of him.
"the world is against him" - the West is not the whole world.
You fools have been saying that since this war started, not going to happen. Also, Russia is not going to lose territory, they have been making steady advances across the front and this aid package is not going to stop that
Why pull out of NATO? Trump first started saying that in 1987 a few months after his first meeting with the KGB in Moscow on July 4, 1987. He took out a full page ad in the new York times saying that after his meeting with the Russians
Wsn't NATO designed to keep countries from going to war with each other ? And for one NOT to get to large to rule the others ? How's that working out ?
2,5% of GDP in 2030 is not enough it needs to be that tomorrow. Armies take decades to build the neglect is not cleaned over night. At worst case we could already be in war as NATO in 2030.
Feel free to spend your own money. Don't spend mine.
@@brettonsmith8534 Sorry but it does not work that way. UK has committed it self to 2% of defense spending in Vilnius summit and they were supposed to start ramping up to it back in 2014. Because why should anyone defend you if you are not willing to at least try to protect your self and it's actually cheaper being part of integrated defense than going about it by your self. You've been using the money you've saved over the years by not spending on your economy so you should be more able to spend than my home country of Finland that never had the luxury of not at least spending the 2% that we have pretty much done since coldwar. If you are unhappy how the "saved" money was spent you need to take it up with your politicians not NATO allies.
Go to Rwanda then - you will get all the warmongering you want.
Can you imagine what Ukrainians could do with the missile replacing the ATACMS. I guess they'll never get the best. How are those old patriots holding up
@ 12:40..."U.S funding going overseas". AGAIN, this is an ignorant statement which happens to be with my republican party, and many people in general, that they just don't get the fundamentals of our weapons' caches- Let me say it ONE more time to my fellow Americans: A) Ammunition does NOT have a infinite shelf life. B) Ammunition and weapons sources become out-dated C) We need to actually spend money and resources to dispose of older systems, etc. D) the money actually stays here in the U.S to develop new weapons, new systems, and research for said newer systems/weapons, which we needed to do anyway. If there is an "E" to this, it' is all a win-win scenario 80 % of the funding will be staying right here in the states and creating jobs while we hand off what has been ready to defend the U.S this whole time, but that we didn't need. "Use it or lose it" is the name of the game right now. It's not entirely just handing money over to another country...and if there's an "F)" It's that we ARE NOT EVEN PHYSICALLY doing the fighting...Slava UKRAINE
Also it costs WAY more to dispose of old stock than giving it away.
THOUGHT RUSSIAN RAN OUT MISSILE LONG AGO?
Wait till they turn up the Volume. NEVER KNIW WHO WILL STEP TO TGEIR SIDE YET....
They did. You thought correctly. They attached jet engines to washing machines full of explosives.
@@lg2058 same like UA.if it works what speaks against it. Why you are not serving your country?! I see here in UA at the borders how people like you run and B.S. from a safe place.
@@lg2058 Worse, we stole the toilets and dropped them from the air.
They did. They are running on what they can make, apart from the odd X22 thrown in...
Putin won't lose any territory. Russia was never invaded. He may be forced to give up some of another country's territory he grabbed though.....
Belograd
@@stevenbenson9976 Those were Russians, not an invasion. Ukraine of course gave them material support. Iran gave Russians an enormous amount of drones that had devastating impact, but it wasn't Iran that invaded Ukraine.
@@atklm1 I don't think that Ukraine will directly take any territory but they will definitely assist others in doing so
@@stevenbenson9976 They gave weapons for a handful of Russian pro-Ukraine partisans who "captured" tiny spot, half a village for a moment as a ruse, to lure Russia thinning their lines by allocating groups and material far away for nothing.
Funny, Russians said the same thing in 1991.
Let us hope you are right.
the "counteroffensive" had far more funding, planning and better starting conditions. You can't just pretend it didn't happen and that some weak second attempt is surely going to do it
I don't understand the argument about not sending US military aid overseas. America is not likely to be invaded and be forced to fight a war within its own borders, so if they don't use their weapons overseas, what exactly is the point of the US military?
What fantastic mental gymnastics. I am guessing that what you wrote is a deliberate joke.
You nailed it.
100%
kzhead.info/sun/f8usabWNq4mZZoU/bejne.htmlfeature=shared
@@russellspeed1693 Why...German is still a Hosted Country of US. And please reconcile why this should be a delib..joke. West is getting a lesson. USA got theirs in Vietnam..PH, 9/11 and Afghanistan. AND ON TOP US IS INVADED WITHOUT A WAR🤷♂️ ALL SUFFERING THAT SUPPORT IS 100% DESERVED. IMAGINE THE ARABS, Chinese, African.... step up to Russia to assist....😉 well all is the Fynds disapear, weapons etc did till now save zero UA lives and neither on Russian. What will be now is the Volume will go up and Kiev, Odessa will be highly ...You think different I invite you to UA and show you arround....Possible to Travel and have Competitions do not have a war. And raising people's income with foreign funds( pay, social, retirement...) 🤷♂️ But oh well Whom I Am Wrting this To...More Russll in Speed😉
The NATO Treaty does not specify how much each Country should pay for Defense. The 2% of GDP is just a suggested amount.
no, it was an agreed amount, 10 years ago
Carol, if I may, allow me to emphasize that, as so many commentators have noted, including your guest, the investment is going into the US economy.
The one truth he spoke was 7:53 when he said:"we have to wait and see what's gonna happen" And about British military...
Brendan never saw a Ukrainian who he thought shouldn't be six feet under. I admire his moral courage. He is ready to keep going to the last one.
good job Joe a man of his word, Pres Z would be a happy man today
😂🤣
Joe is a habitual liar, actually. He is famous for it in the US. But it is good aid got through after many mistakes by many parties.
The Minor Attracted President has been slow-walking pretty much all the promised aid to Ukraine, while strengthening Russia.
Ukraine just needs to hold the line while they pick away at Russia's refineries and power stations. Russians will depose Putin once the economy falls then the invaders will retreat back to Russia.
I think that's pretty much the collective strategy of the West. They don't want Russia to win because Russia winning means taking Warsaw, and they don't want Ukraine to win, which would mean taking cities in Russia proper like Belgorod, Rostov on Don, Kursk.
Supposing Russia takes Ukraine what happens than?
Not retaking anything, this is a waste of money
After the war Kaliningrad to Poland Kola Peninsula to UK Novaya Zemlya to the Netherlands Krasnodar Krai to France Severnaya Zemlya to Spain Chukotka to US
We need to stop reading those comic books, botski. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
Russia wants to rule the world! Incompetent Russia? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
Ukraine should not counter attack and thereby lose men. Keep defending and withdrawing. This will highlight that the US was too late in reaching agreement, and MAGA are to blame.
Thanks, Times Radio.
Nato members really need to increase their military spending. It is Poland Romania and Germany that will follow. Trump is not wrong about that..
Actually Putin and his mess made us in Poland to spend 4%
Poland spends almost 4% We will eat grass if needed but will not be subdued by the Russians again...
Or Russia and China could stop invading and there's no need for NATO!
Poland and Romania already spend more than the US as a proportion of GDP.
@@Hattonbank shhheet! Please tell Trump!
-hearing that the russian orthodox church is getting kicked out of Europe, why can’t we do that in the USA???
why is the US still hosting Ruskis in UFC etc?
Founded on religious freedom, we have to protect religious beliefs, until they become criminal. It's a high bar.
Doesn't really matter what religion you are, there are other issues the world must work on.
Because religous freedom is the most fundemental of laws in the United States. Among the noteable cases heard by the supreme court. The amish are given an religos exeption for being required to pay into socail secuity. Their is a church who is permitted to use ayawaska as they claim it as thier sacrament. The Britsh which Americans came from experenced a torrid history of religos warfare. over hundreds of years.
@@thewallstreetjournal5675 -yah, but it would be so funny just to ban russians in general, look at the EU banning cars registered in russia -how beautiful is that!!! i applaud them
Wishful thinking is a wright of everyone!
They sent weapons way before this latest package was approved...
You said the same about the counterattack that failed to take anything other than a couple of villages. Best hope for Ukraine and in fact for everyone, other than the arms industry, is peace.
Problem with that is that the western elites chained themselves to the idea of total victory over Russia.Over the past 2 years they have declared victory over Russia multiple times.If they admit a loss now then they will look like clowns.
Yes, peace, which will come when the Russians leave Ukraine.
Putin doesn't want peace. He will look weak if he doesn't win the war.
Sure! Just as soon as Russia evacuates all the territory it seized from Ukraine and turn themselves in to The Hague to stand trial for the war crimes they've committed. Then we can have peace.
Peace is easy, Putin could simply order his troops to leave Ukraine. There is no peace because Putin wants this war.
They're not fighting for territory in the short term. They're fighting a war of attrition, which at this this time involves strategical positions which can maximize the attrition against the opponent. For the purpose of obtaining a stronger negotiating position, to negotiate where borders will be, what restrictions will be placed on the side with the weak negotiating position... if a settlement happens, which is the only way this war can end, officially.
Always will, newer was.
As an American I am glad this aid is finally on the way but I’m getting sick and tired listening to shows like this complaining about the delay in U S aid. The US has funded the vast majority thus far and given Europe is in the crosshairs of Russian expansion it seems to me the whining should stop and giving until it hurts should prevail.
"the US has funded the vast majority thus far a" Only if you have a problem understanding numbers.
How absurd. - Putin complaining about others he has been attacking when they get the upper hand.
People forget that Putin attacked Georgia in 2008
The situation on the ground is getting very bad but will soon improve.
Waiting this good news to reach reality in 2304 AD
Thank you President B and the real patriots in the house and senate ! To those that voted against it take your families and move to Russia …
Big OOF for Putin!
Been saying that for 2 years 🤣
Ukraine is losing. Stop the war.
Putin may have bitten off more than he can chew. The US has unlimited resources.
I love the statement that "Putin will lose territory " ... I always pray for Ukraine and pray that America always stays behind Ukraine
No truer words has ever been spoken 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
The delays caused by Trump, MTG, and MAGA have added at least a year to the war, greatly increased the odds of wider conflict, and have raised and will raise the casualty count by hundreds of thousands, perhaps even millions.
We need to support Ukraine way more than we already are.
Let's see how Brendan's predictions pan out lol
Russia is NOT loosing territory till Ukraine takes part of Russia!
POO THIN is running
Okay We will believe as we believed they would make a difference. They have already sent many game changers but ultimately the game changed their weapons
Yeah, for russia their ships turned into submarines and their T90s into T62s during the game :)
@@Amradar123 American Abrams tanks that cost $10,000,000 each turned out to be a "Empty Tin Can" 🤣
@@9w9id Just how many thousands of tanks have the Russians lost? ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
@@WuFu-ku8si They only lost tanks because over 30 countries helping ukraine fight one countrie and they can't do anything about it 😅
@@9w9id And why are there no countries helping Russia? Does Russia have no friends? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
I love this woman Carol Walker. What a dignified and edifying woman.
Father help your solders make them strong brave in you. Amen
Disgusting.
The only one who has lost territory, and is in the process of losing rapidly more territory is Ukraine.
20 km in 3 years. And while doing so russia lost control of the red sea and had to evacuate the remains of their fleet back to russia. They are losing the strategic key battle to win the war at Crimea
@@Amradar123excuse me have you seen any Ukie ships anywhere near Crimea? Oh yeah their navy left the chat at the start of the war. What's the point damaging Russian ships in Crimea when you can't and will never be able to assemble a landing force to capture Crimea
who said a landing force will be used? Also Ukraine can export grain to feed the world again.
@@adzilabidin6136Crimea is not an island and can be accessed by road. The russian black sea fleet are capable of launching missiles to attack Ukraine and that is the reason for destroying the russian black sea fleet.
If Ukraine with scarcity of weapons has given rusia such a hardtime, rusia is very weak .
u are being kind, That's sweet.
Russia is not a malevolent state like warmongers terrorist states U.S./U.K.
I’m sorry did the criminal just say that he expects the Ukraine to go on the offensive I mean geez that’s the most optimistic analysis I’ve heard in quite some time most people right now are saying even with the eight package they’d be lucky to slow down the Russians On another note, I think it’s correct for Trump to scare any of our allies that don’t want to come to their own defense. Why should we defend some people that refuse to defend themselves? Everyone has been living high on the hog for far too long and look at where it has gotten us if they would’ve listened to Trump when he was in Office increased their defense spending then we may have either avoided the Ukraine war altogether would have in reserve to properly supply them by now. They are playing catch-up as usual. He was proven right in hindsight.
Great show!
This package is so going to help
Yep, to fill the pockets of the globalists deep state😂😅
Time radio need to start doing a homework when they report on overseas news
Oh yeah? Should they ask your Kremlin tutors for help?
@@nikolaikrustev1159 GTFOOH THAT'S B@#$_ AIN'T 💩 AND NEITHER ARE YOU 😏JOE BIDEN 👣2024
Yeah, all they do is parrot what Ukraine says.
@@CountDuckEggyou’ve already lost buddy. Doubled your border with NATO and can’t defeat a country without a navy or Air Force ( read that back to yourself it’s pathetic). Ukraine has had inconsistent low to middling weapons out and Russia can’t finish the job. Weak
@@michaeljohnston980 If Ukraine doesn't have a navy, why is Vice Admiral Oleksiy Neizhpapa the commander of the navy? And whenever Ukraine received new weapons, especially for their Great Counteroffensive, we were told that they were 'gamechangers' and that the Russians would 'run away' from Leopards and 'invincible' Challengers, haha. Of course, Ukraine's multi-billion dollar counteroffensive was comprehensively defeated. Ukraine has the backing of 50+ countries, and it is still losing territory. Weak.
😂😂Nato losing .
where did the times find this guy 😂😂 the Ukranians did NOT "do well" last summer. it was a devastating and humiliating failure which achieved nothing except to expend huge numbers of Ukranian lives for 0 gain. the idea that they're going to go on the offensive now when the russians are gradually crushing them is utterly deluded.
Times radio is not balanced/nuanced at all. It does not help Ukraine to be overly optimistic. How can Ukraine gain territories after the west starved them from ammunition for about 4 months. Because of the delayed aid, Ukraine lost strongly fortified defensive positions. Now they are on the back foot. In my opinions the best they can do, is to inflict high casualties to the Russians and stop listening to western advisors who know little and pushed them to the offensive last summer.
You had no weapons or equipment to begin with means you already lost and peace negotiations should have been met. NO NATO, bring back accords and who ever is in charge of Ukraines military was ill prepared.
western advisers advised Ukrainian forces to attack in certain directions and locations or in general to concentrate their forces in certain areas, all of the actual decisions on the ground were made by Ukrainian forces though,
@@JoshuaOakley true...BUT under pressure from the west, their media, and therefore public opinion / MPs. Media and west should shut-up / be more humble. Especially in public. Will be better for the Ukrainians when they make decisions
@@JoshuaOakley Why didnt Ukraine just stay the fc.k outta Natos pocket and influence. Russia had the oppurtunity and could have been attacked them but they got pushed. Think bout tje lives saved. Also different subject if Israel wanted a genocide they could have wiped Hamas and Palestinians out long before. They got attacked and fighring terrorist embeded with citizens is a hard task Hamas and palestine with the sympathizes . are like the same. Palestine should have never left hamas come into power. I am a 11th grader in highschool Gen z and we can see it and the bs and the media lies and the common sense truth.
It would be great to see the same support from many EU countries. While some are giving their support, others just look away .
The US has the largest army. Largest defense industry. Most European countries buy their weapons from the US. How would you see this?
Don't think the US helps "A LOT", it doesn't, and the EU is even in supporting Ukraine if not given more!
@@pjhgerlach exactly which part of your statement explains, why EU countries should help less than US? While some are assisting financially and with equipment (especially Baltics, who almost have nothing), others - like Spain and Greece, are very ignorant and just looking from sidelines.
@@pjhgerlach and of course with "same" I mean at least in % from GDP. I thought that was understandable without additional explanation
@@didzisskards7987 Exactly where did I state the the EU should do less? Please refrain from framing.
Yes, its true. ATACMS are actually pronounced as, "attack ems".
The ATACMS was first used in combat in 1991: 32 were fired from the M270 MLRS during Operation Desert Storm. In 2003, more the 450 were fired in Operation Iraqi Freedom. As of early 2015, more than 560 ATACMS missiles had been used in combat. In 2007, the U.S. Army terminated the ATACMS program due to cost, ending the ability to replenish stocks. To sustain the remaining inventory, the ATACMS Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) was launched, which refurbishes or replaces propulsion and navigation systems, replaces cluster munition warheads with the unitary blast fragmentation warhead, and adds a proximity fuze option to obtain area effects. Deliveries were projected to start in 2018. The ATACMS SLEP is a bridging initiative to provide time to complete analysis and development of a successor capability to the aging ATACMS stockpile, which could be ready around 2022. Ukraine has requested ATACMS since early stages of the Russo-Ukrainian War. In October 2023, a year and eight months after the Russian invasion, the United States delivered ATACMS to Ukraine. The use of these missiles threatened the entirety of the Russian land corridor in southern Ukraine It further placed within reach the vast majority of the air bases operated by Russia inside Ukraine (north of Crimea), and complicated Russia's use of attack helicopters against Ukrainian targets. On February 19, 2024, NBC News reported that U.S. President Joe Biden is considering providing Ukraine with longer-range ATACMS. On 17 April 2024, six explosions were reported at the Dzhankoi (air base) in Russian-occupied Crimea. Pro-Russian military bloggers and Ukrainian sources believe that ATACMS missiles or ballistic missiles were used. Some of these missiles deployed cluster munitions. At least six explosions and multiple secondary explosions were reported by locals. The Kyiv Post posted a picture of contrails which it suggests were consistent with a missile being controlled up until impact (as opposed to a ballistic missile). On April 20, 2024, after months of delays, the U.S. House of Representatives approved an additional $61 billion in foreign aid to Ukraine which has been reported to include the delivery of the longer-range version of ATACMS. On April 24, 2024, it was reported that the U.S. secretly sent the 300km range version of ATACMS to Ukraine in March 2024
It was 1 man blocking the aid. Under the direction of 1 other
The holdup was not due to “some Democrats…” as the guest implied. If there were 1 or 2, that’s not “some”. The delay was ENTIRELY due to the right wing Republicans who are craven enough for continued power. Ukrainian blood and misery during that time is on THEIR hands and their fault.
Kearney! When someone tells you who they are BELIEVE THEM! Trump said he would let them do whatever, BELIEVE HIM!
More Times bs, Dream on Times ,
American leadership came through🇺🇸
What leadership? All America has done is prove they don't care about their allies.
Thank you 💛 for your excellent report today. Thank goodness for Ukraine 🇺🇦. Stay safe everyone.
What are you a bot?
Y'all are missing the fact that almost all the NATO grifters (not spending appropriately) are well removed from Russia, so Trump's "threat" is really pretty meaningless, other than as simply an expression to highlight the slackers. Turkey might be considered an exception, but, Turkey has huge manpower to draw on: Pooty would have to truly be out of his mind to attack Turkey.
Hegemony isn't free. If the US want's hegemony, don't expect others to pay for it.
@@Memovox fo4rget hegemony. what about self-defense? or is that not in Vladimirs interest ?
@@icu17siberia US hegemony is not in the interest of the global majority.
😂😂😂 ARE YOU NOT TIRED OF LYING TO THE WORLD 😂😂😂😂😂
Viva Ukraine ❤
You are a good interviewer Carole.
Americans thank you for your unwavering support to Ukraine.🙏🙏🙏
Listening to this interview you would think that the journalist has inside knowledge that trump will be president. To much on this maybe point.
He's rite 'bout that 😎
I didn't even watch the clip, just read the headline. Delusional 😂
Just like you cruised through your education eh?
This proxy war will continue until both sides agree that it's better to have peace than war. Also always ups and downs.
There's only one invading country, only one country needs to rethink.
If Mexico invaded the USA and occupied all of California should the US just negotiate and let them have it for the sake of peace?
It is better to stop terrorists. Peace is not possible when autocrats are trying to expand their empires.
@@alanross1117Absolutely. Peace comes when the aggressors withdraw and putler is given up to the Hague.
Peace is something the West doesn’t understand…
2:20 _"I don't know what the Representatives' rationale was for opposing further aid to Ukraine."_ The Colonel must have flunked Situational Awareness 101". The rationale was stated clearly; publicized widely; and strongly supported by the facts: (1) our own (US) border is being left wide open to criminals and terrorists, (2) the US goal is for Ukraine to join NATO, which Russia might well go nuclear to prevent, and (3) the US doesn't have USD 60 billion to spare.
Times, your analysis is not objective. It always fails to look at the tactical reality, recognize what the Russian's are doing well and avoid completely or downplay the challenges Ukraine is facing. It's not ammo or weapons, it's the human dimension, man power shortages and will to endure that will decide the outcome.
Dream on
Speaking of territory - Rostov used to belong to Ukraine, before Russia stole it by force. It should be part of the reparations. Returning it to Ukraine will make it harder for the Muskovites to invade again when their next government reputiates / forgets the treaties it signed. And history shows this happens more often than not.
Well maybe only time will tell but its not likely. It will fix man power shortage
No Air Force !!!
And Putin is still there!
And Zelensky too
Putin would be gone if Nato got involved
Meaning what ? If sleepy grumpy was in office Putin would have won. Shut up.
@@_alienblood nato can't get involved because putin has more nukes than all of nato put together, and everyone in nato is vying for power so they cannot agree...putin already has total control of russia lol