Leather Shield - Stabbing, Slashing, Smashing tests - Part 4
A viewer brought an original instruction for creating a shield covering 'Impenetrable to any edged tool'. I had to try it and after making the shield I finally got to test it with arrows and now 'edged tools' - or more normally swords, daggers, axes etc.
Lets hit the shield with loads of stuff and find out if it really is impenetrable.
Film 1 Making leather shield armour • Making leather shield ...
Film 2 Adjusting the leather shield armour. • Leather shield armour ...
Film 3 Testing the 'Impenetrable' shield with arrows. • "Impenetrable" leather...
Anti armour dagger - Tested with Matt Easton • Testing a medieval ant...
For budget medieval replicas of fantastic accuracy and value todcutler.com
For commissions and custom work todsworkshop.com
For merch todsworkshop.creator-spring.com
For those who enjoyed Arrows vs Armour todtodeschini.com
Tod's workshop: come for the crafts, stay for the destruction
Tod's Workshop: He's almost as good at unmaking things as he is at making them
I have my moments
@@knightshousegames Better at making them, the shield was still very much extant by the end! I'm actually shocked that it could have so many punctures and slashes through it, but still remain a single object at the end.
Creation and destruction beling together anyway .
I love that Tod casually tells us both imperial and metric measurements smoothly in quick succession like an absolute chad
Yeah, it's cool he makes his videos accessible to disabled people, as well as people who use Imperial. :)
Funny, but surely the other way round?
As a Fitter and Turner it makes my teeth ache to hear centimetres, urrgh!!cheers Tom
@@thomasfowles7366 As a scientist it makes me die a little inside every time I hear Imperial units.
@@thomasfowles7366it fits better in metrics, how do you measure a millimeter in imperials?
its honestly fascinating to see these sort of experiments
Thanks and it is fascinating doing them
@@tods_workshop im a firm believer that things like this need to be more wide spread, maybe then some historical mysteries wont be mysteries anymore
@@tods_workshopquestion. What would happen if you made the wood of the shield thinner to help compensate for the weight? Would it still be as effective?
@@dakken74 great question
I love that you built a Hussite war flail. Small detail: Jan Hus and the Hussites. Hus is pronounced Hoos, like goose! Hussites are hoo-sights. Hus is in fact Czech for goose !
It seems that the iron and glass treatment doubles the weight (about 5 pounds to about 11 pounds). If weight is the factor we are trying to optimize, you should compare it with a poplar shield with double-thick planks, to see if the iron and glass treatment gives more protection than simply another layer of wood, and separately apply the iron and glass treatment to a much thinner layer of wood to see if you get comparable performance for less weight.
My thoughts too. Double layers of wood with grains in horizontal position. Seems it would be less work compared to the leather/glass/iron.
That doubling of the weight isn't even with the full shield covered.
@@corwinhyatt519 It is - it's not the actual weight of the shield as it is, it's the weight *it would be* if it was fully covered.
Indeed. Is there a sweet spot where the extra “armor” over thinner wood offers more protection but at the same weight as a regular shield? If so, is hitting that sweet spot worth the extra labor and materials used? I suspect it isn’t for mass production, otherwise more shields would have been built that way. Still, a knight or someone else with the money to spend might have had it done to gain a small but critical advantage.
@@sanityormadness No, it is the weight of the shield as it sits for this test with the three testing sections being of different composition. 1:45 is where he states this. The full shield being set up with the same composition as the red section would be even heavier than the 11.5 lbs stated there.
The Old Norse referred to shields as 'the net of spears.' I guess Tod showed us why.
watching this, lob enough spears and make them too heavy to wield. Net of Spears makes sense.
They did? Source?
From some reason I thought that mail was called that, since it's kind of a net, after all. But it indeed seems to be about a shield. The source seems to be Snorra Eda and the word is "oddnets" so more literally "point net". One kenning for mail is "gǫtvar geirrotu" seems it means "clothing/garment of spearrain".
These real life practical tests really are very interesting. Thank you for showing us how ancient and medieval weapons and armor really worked.
I assume that was a silver sword, because the shield is a monster.
Nice! But actually it was a season two 'brooch' sword
@@tods_workshop which was a beautiful touch and seemed to "fit" with the blade while never being shoved in the viewers face as a "look we did this!!!". Shoved in plenty of monsters faces though.
Tod going full "torturerer laying out their tools" on the shield...
Shield: I won't say anything, not even ouch!
It's amazing how much punishment that shield can take. I was sure you would shatter it with the axe after a few blows.
It continually amazes me just how tough they are
Yeah, the handaxe out of everything surprised me. I think it's because that's the one I'm most familiar with, but the situations I encounter it in are made to work in its favor. If you're chopping firewood or branches you're going with the grain, there's no reinforcement to try and hold the wood together, it's what the tool was made for.
it did seem like the axe was going to be the tool that made the shortest work of the shield though!
I think one of the most interesting things about this test, is just how durable this shield is against all of these attacks. That is even more impressive when you think during combat, you wouldn't really be seeing these nice clean attacks and cuts, its far more likely they'd be coming in at a weaker force or less than ideal angle. Plus the defender would be likely trying to deflect the attack sideways. Crazy
Amazingly so
Adding on to that, even *if* the attacker managed a blow like one of those in combat, in each case it's completely ineffective at causing a wound in the shield carrier, and in almost every case would result in a disarmed attacker. It's not easy getting any of that out of the shield again. As you said, you would be unlikely to get those angles in combat, so I don't thinkt he disarming would be that likely, but still more likely than somehow wounding the shield carrier *through* the shield.
axes look pretty damaging against them!
I think that late Medieval and Renaissance shields were some kind of wood/glue/sinew/other stuff composites for most part. Leather was also sometimes used. In Polish lands at least, pavises and shields were pretty ordinarily made by painters guild (pictores?) not any other one. So applying layers of some sticky stuff that could by applied with a brush was probably integral part of construction. Providing a pavise or a shield was customary payment for joining a painters guild in Kraków, for example. Those guilds were also involving wood carvers, probably to work both on shields as well as preparing planks for actual painting. All the way in 1580 Stanisław Sarnicki mentions hussar's shields: "against lances, they have shields from meaty wood, strenghtened with veins (probably meant sinews, common in 16th century Polish) and glues" Later, Claudio Ragnoli mentions " some hussars only use lance alone, the hatchet and shield from sturdy wood and dried sinew of great beasts, joined with glue. The shield is so strong, it resists every strong blow of the lance. They use those shields so dexterously, that they disregard every enemy, as if they were entirely clad in armor". Medieval Crossbow channel has a recipe for very elaborate composite pavise. kzhead.info/sun/epaLnJ18g4eclKc/bejne.html
Great information! And Kraków is one of my favorite cities! ❤ I would recommend a visit to anyone.
very interesting! btw, "In Polish lands at least, pavises and shields were pretty ordinarily made by painters guild (pictores?) not any other one." - "Shield" in Dutch is "Schild", and painting is called "Schilderen" and painters are called "schilderaars" - So yeah, I think what you said might have been pretty much standard across the medieval world perhaps
Please I want Tod to build and test one
@@lotoreo I think that in German sources shield makers are sometimes listed with their own name "schilders" but it seems that in most cases they were grouped with other artists and woodworking trades. Probably they could form their own guilds in heavily specialized, industrialized South German towns, where there were few towns specializing entirely in making mail, for example. But probably not in Poland, or say, Sweden.
This makes a lot of sense as many paintings were done on wood panels, which would need to be prepared specially for painting on, differently from say pieces of cabinetry. Then there’s the carpentry/joinery and carving skills needed to make picture frames, again specialized for that purpose even though the techniques would be similar to those used to make cabinetry or other purely decorative (as opposed to structural) woodwork.
Even if the shield is very tough without the leather, I would definitely want the leather covering the part where my arm is on the back, to prevent penetration into the arm. And then maybe save the weight on the rest of the shield.
Exactly what I was about to suggest. Have it "impenetrable" on that middle section with the grip/armrest, and lighter, but "protective enough" on the rest of the shield. That could maybe cut down the weight down a kilo.
This was a bundle of fun to watch! 😆I hope Tod enjoyed himself too.
I think that's a fairly safe bet.
Coming up to 9 minutes, and the shield is still fully functional. Not bad, that! Edit: Of course, Tod makes the same point a few minutes later.
Shields: do they work? Yes. Yes, they do.
Absolutely love your experiments with stuff like this. Please do more weird weapons too! Your flail testing videos are some of my favorites.
Got another very weird weapon coming, probably next week
@@tods_workshop can't wait!
Heavy axes are definitely the weapon of choice to produce the most damage. But as you demonstrated, extracting the weapons from the shield is bloody tough 😂 Exposes the attacker to a counter-attack.
To be frank, 5 kilos strapped shield doesn't sound all that bad, 4kilos centergripped is manageable in combat, so I'd imagine with the straps, five would be ok ? And to avoid arrows going through your forearm with bits of wood leather and god knows what else at a time where medicine can't really treat infections effectively, I'd probably get the extraweight if I went against longbowmen
If you had the time and resources to train for it, 100% would go for the extra weight
You'd have protection on your arms though as well, and if it's only poking through an inch there is no way it would be able to go through your arm armor
I figure there were probably a lot of people who didn’t have solid plate armor for their forearms. Even if I had mail I think I’d want the extra protection, even if it’s just over the arm strap area.
I generally agree, but this was based on the construction of original 14thC shields and I guess they knew what they were looking for
@@tods_workshop Thank you for your answer ! I'll check your other videos to learn more about this type of shield, I haven't looked at finds yet for shield of this era. With center gripped, you get the umbo to protect your hand so I had assumed they wouldn't have switched if it made their arms more vulnerable, but perhaps when the heater shield arrived, bows and arrows weren't as prominent as they used to be and that's why they didn't bother ? I didn't know archaeology had established a common trend in this period's shield weights, I had thought maybe some might have been optimised for dueling and made lighter while others would have been heavier for battle, but if the surviving example share the same weight that's most likely not the case. I guess they just prayed it wouldn't hit the arm rest. Thanks for your passionating videos and very interesting tests I always learn a lot.
It's been 22 years of whiners telling me "Your reenactment fighting is bogus because you rely on a magic shield that'd disintegrate within a minute of REAL dueling!" Now, thanks to your wonderful video, I can tell the haters to find something else to whine about. Thank you!
What I find really interesting is how many of the anti-armour weapons get stuck in the shield on the first heavy blow in a way that in combat would probably force one to draw another weapon. Obviously one would probably try to avoid it and not just hammer in a blow like that into the middle of a shield, but it still can happen. The Falchion did seem to have that trouble, which despite it not damaging the shield that much, could have been a desirable trait. I love those videos!
I guess the shield would fare even better if supported by an arm rather than an easel; as the arm could absorb some of the impact by moving. Thanks for another fun and informative video.
I've been waiting for the conclusion of this.
banger video and Im super happy there is someone with such a methodical yet functional and entertaining approach doing experimental archeology. Keep it up!
Some times you just have to hit things to see how durable they are. Experimental archeology like this is essential to understanding the past. It is also a load of fun.
What are you doing as a job? Archeologist. That's boring! You have no idea HOW boring it is. Sometimes it's literally boring holes in composite materials!
I suppose it's worth remembering that nobody was trying to hit a shield. They were trying to avoid it and hit the man. So however effective a weapon was against a shield, it was really only useful (as you've shown) if it removed the shield from use. JAT. 👍
And of course, you don't need to do it for long. If you just hook the end of your axe behind a shield, you can open it up pretty fast to let someone else use a spear.
@@rianfelis3156 I suspect this type of strategy was what made some battle lines far more successful than others. Working in teams to create that hole in the enemy line. Fighting man to man........your odds are even. I remember hearing somewhere that Roman troops were trained to kill the man in front of the man beside them, not the man in front of them. So as to exploit the gaps in enemy shields(and attention) during the pushing battles when two lines collide. I don't know if that's true but it certainly makes some sort of sense.
For the algorithm!
The algorithm!
The algorithm
All hail 😆
finally a video where Tod gets to hit the target every single time!!!! :D
Fantastic work! I'm thinking, if I'm planning to be fairly immobile and expecting to take lots of arrow hits, I'll take the leather fronted shield. If I want to be mobile, and not expecting lots of arrow hits, I'll take the regular shield. Also, fantastic work on making the beautiful shields, and showcasing some of the beautiful weapons you make in testing them!
Thanks and a pleasure
I think if you plan to be fairly immobile a tower shield would be a better bet, but a shield like this might have some niche uses
I think if you wanted to revisit this, the next thing to look into would be shield bosses. As noted by Matt Easton in a relatively recent video, they seemed to make a comeback in that 14-15th century. He theorizes that some Heater Shields became boss held due to armor, but my theory after seeing this series is they are a deflecting surface placed on top of where the arm goes, to protect the arm from missiles piercing it like we saw in Part 3 of this series That might be worth investigating. seeing if arrows deflect off of a shield boss, and if so, how much energy they have when they hit the shield. Additionally, I think you should look into just putting a strip of that leather facing just across the middle where the arm goes, and face the rest with canvas, with a boss, and see what the weight is compared to the canvas only shield, to see if it is still usable.
This is a really interesting idea. I don’t think the iron-glass mixture is worth adding but even just getting a calculation for how heavy the smaller treated leather strip would add could be very interesting.
@@andrewreynolds4949 If it's the difference between an arrow maybe putting a hole in your doublet vs an arrow an inch deep into your forearm, that feels worth it to me. My theory is if you just protect the section where your arm is, and leave the rest untreated, anything bouncing off the boss might not even have the energy to penetrate the rawhide and might even just glance off completely, while balancing the weight nicely, since the heaviest part will be attached to you, so the felt weight isn't as bad
@@knightshousegames I'm agreeing with you. It's possibly worth it to protect the arm area with the leather layers, but I doubt the iron-glass mixture does much to be worth the extra effort, just going by the arrow test from earlier. It seems to me the leather is what is making the difference
i was going to say basically the same thing as knightshouse; it would be interesting to see how the weight-to-protection-ratio worked out if you just used the iron+glass treatment in the area where your hand/arm/body would be [behind the shield]. _So putting the iron+glass mix on the leather in something like a square bit in the middle of that heater, which covered approx half the center area of the shield maybe... with the rest of the shield just being wood covered with the standard 1-2 leather-layers or whatever made the best compromise for protection & mobility (and kept arrows from going so deep they were able to also go through your body armor after the shield perhaps). RE: andrewR from this video and the brief testing we see here it might seem like that added effort of adding the metal+glass-mix was not worth the time nor extra weight added, but i'd personally want to test the whole idea a lot more. Using different shield types, perhaps combining a small metal boss with partial metal+glass-mix application in key areas etc. A shield rarely sits still to be struck flat-on at a right-angle (90 degrees ish etc), and it mainly just needs to keep you from getting hit by a few arrows until you can close distance enough that your proximity to the enemy should discourage enemy ranged-weapon-fire for fear of hitting friendlies. In such a case you might carry a 2nd shield or be mostly concerned with how the shield performs in melee, which seemed like the place that the added durability would be most important. _ _The main problem i'm seeing is not the weight... it's actually what happens if the enemy can use the fact their weapon is stuck in your shield against you to pull your shield out of alignment or physically move you around in such a manner that you are easily dispatched as a result... so maybe trying a different wood and/or glue might make weapons stick in the shield a bit less? -just my first thoughts & 2c
@@Dack.howaboutyou I think there will be an issue with weapons/arrows stuck in the spear regardless of the extra layers of protection. I'm still not convinced the iron/glass mixture is worth the extra work, or that it provides much additional protection, particularly based on the arrow penetration tests in the part 3 video, but the treated leather definitely seems to have a significant effect.
I love this kind of content. Doesn't matter if it's guns or melee weapons. Just show me what it does to a target!
Do you watch Kentucky Ballistics? That channel is all about the impact. 😄😄😄👍
@euansmith3699 I love that channel! Around the time of the 4-Bore I started asking for a Punt Gun video on every episode. The exact video after I purchased one of the energy drinks that sponsored him, he does a video on the Punt Gun. I was so happy, it felt like Christmas came early.
@euansmith3699 high-speed ballistics is another great channel. The video they did on bullets vs glass was so interesting. Tempered glass breaks so fast!
@@dogishappy0 Thanks for that recommendation👍👍👍Slo-mo Guys do some great blowing things to bits videos too.
Okay, you got me with the Witcher sword. Spectacular ending, and a lot of fun from beginning to end!
On the weight issue: I suspect people had different shields for different situations, you'd bring your lighter shield on the march where the chances of arrows and combat are slim but never zero, choose the "regular" one for a battle but you'd get out the big heavy boy if you know you'll storm a castle during a siege because there will be projectiles by the ton and lots of very unfriedly defenders up on the ramparts. We know of siege armour, only makes sense that the idea extended to the shield as well.
That is a glorious array of weaponry Tod.
If Matt should happen by one night, you could ask him to have a go at this. 😀 I'm sure he'd leap at the opportunity.
My understanding is that Viking shields kept the wood panels quite thin, then overplayed the leather. That might keep the weight down and allow the hide (and/or glass and iron filings) to become more beneficial. But with this thick chunk of poplar, the laminants don't matter much in comparison.
The archeological ones found have sometimes got thin calfskin/leather or sheepskin coverings, and sometimes nothing but paint, so depending on what you mean by "overplayed" I don't think you're quite right. Leather is very heavy; even adding 2-3 Oz-thickness leather (meaning 1 mm of leather fronting) to a 90cm shield is gonna up the weight by a pound or so.
Thanks Soren, I thoughts they were always covered - is that not so?
So - not a scholar in any way, but - from what I understand the biggest find so far is 30-something shields from a single norwegian ship-grave at Gokstad, and all of those had paint-residue straight on the wood, which presumably means no covering. But maybe they were just slapped together and painted for the funeral, and not meant for combat? Hard to say. The one found at Trelleborg has apparently been a covered shield, back in the day, according to the Danish National Museum website. I think there's been some living archaeology-historians in Denmark in recent years, who have definitely popularized the idea that they must've been all covered, because it does tremendously help with their (somewhat flimsy) construction. But then again - the sagas are full of stories of shield being split and sundered, so maybe flimsy shields were just how things were done.
Still a functioning shield after getting hit by 13 different weapons, that's amazing
Sure, the leather layers double the weight, but after seeing how well it stops arrows compared to the 'plain' poplar shield, I would say for me personally that it's worth it.
I would like to see if it significantly improved the lifespan of the shield on repeated edge strikes. Also, i do like the concept of putting the leather jusg over the section your arm is behind because it needs less penetration to harm you in that spot only.
Really intriguing. But I wonder how resilient an 11.5 pound wood shield would be? It would be twice as thick as the original 5+ pound shield.
Not quite. The 5lb shield is just leather covered poplar. The 11.5lb shield has an added layer of ground glass & iron filings in glue, so that accounts for the extra weight, not thicker wood. That is why you have the 3 different coloured zones on Tod's test shield, with each differently covered over the same thickness wood. Would it really be too heavy as Tod said? Well if you constantly trained with it you'd get quite used to it, considering that Roman Scutum & Greek Hoplite shields were even heavier.
I agree, shields are good!
Todd may not be a professional athlete but he has the coolest way of getting in a workout!
Fascinating that this composite armor uses glass beads, exactly like the early ceramic armor of the T-64 (?). I wonder how much it helps over just leather. Surely it would tend to dull the edge coming through and that'd slow it down a lot...but you've demonstrated really well that it's hard to say. Maybe just gluing it to the outside would be lighter? Anyway, thank you so much for letting us see this kind of thing, it's amazing!
A pleasure and it is interesting how thought streams seem to go over huge lengths of time n- one of the reasons I love history
It's always a pleasure to watch people hitting stuff with great reproduction weapons =)
Tod rules.
Brilliant!
Great work as always
Amazing work!
Oh wow. Light Shield, Heavy Shield. +1 armour class, +2 armour class. D&D had it right all along.
Thanks Tod. Another fascinating video.
Axe goes chopchop! Shields really are amazing
Awesome video Todd, thanks!!!!
I love this series
The ending made me laugh. It is funny thinking how they must have dealt with having things stuck in their shields while trying to still be reasonably mobile during battle. I wonder if there was a protocol around that situation. Chuck it away, get fellow soldier to pull it out or just keep going as best as you can with the added things sticking out of it until you can pick up an unencumbered shield to replace it with.
Awesome work Tod. Always a fun watch and a good time. Thanks.
Great stuff. Keep it coming.
Good test.
Awesome video series and tests!
Awsomely informative video with an entertaining ending. Great work as usual Tod!
Thanks, Tod, for all the fine entertainment you're showing. Keep em` coming.
This was fun to watch
The Witcher's sword conclusion was perfect 👏🤣👏
Great Video as always ❤
Love the ending!😆
Great video Tod!
Very interesting thanks for sharing
This was too much fun too watch, honestly need more of these crazy destruction Tod videos.
Lovely video! i waited for this since you announced
Keep pounding Todd. Love your creativity in offense/defense
"I'm not the best thrower... We've established that..." 😂🤣
Thank you.
Great film Tod.! that for this demonstration mate!
I'd have thought that if the blade goes in as much as 5 inches, it wouldn't really matter as long as it's away from your arm: if you had a small strip where your am is (like you seem to have on the back) you'd be ok. It's also interesting that some weapons get stuck, that would be a big disadvantage to your attacker. It would also be interesting to do the same tests with someone (trying to) hold the shield.
Having weapons get stuck could also be an advantage if the attacker was then able to have control of your shield and/or YOU by effectively putting a nice big handle on you that they can grab it in order to move you in such a way that their allies were more easily able to kill you. _This idea makes me wonder if different types of wood and/or glue might be better able to avoid the "sticking problem". Maybe putting the leather protection later on the inside rather than outside of the shield... and then just canvas/cloth covering the entire thing (for a bit of extra prot. + decoration that would be easily replaced instead of having to re-paint... or maybe repainting would be easier, not sure ;))
A major historical factor I've learned recently is that wood today may not be the same as it was then. In WW2 America cut down a ton of very old trees for making the stocks of their M1 garands. This wood had an extremely tight grain structure and as a result was significantly tougher than modern versions of the M1 design made with wood that was much younger. People who own original and modern M1s notice that the modern one very easily gets divets, deep scratches, etc. whereas the originals effectively dont get damaged very much from falls and scrapes even though they are made from the same wood type.
Interesting test. I think it mostly demonstrates why they would not attack the shield. If you have a weapon with a pointy side and a blunt side, you use the blunt side against the shield so it can't get stuck. And then use the pointy end when you can get past the shield. Because getting your primary weapon stuck in someone else's shield is probably worse than holding a shield with a weapon stuck in it.
Or, a pollaxe could be an excellent weapon against such a shield. The bottom end is useful for knocking the shield about, the hammer or axe good for smashing it
Great video, Mr. Todd.
well done mate.
I've enjoyed watching this shield series.
By far the greatest channel on KZhead. Your genuine love for your craft and historical armory is so wholesome and happy. Thank you Tod for letting us join you in your fun!
Richard Taylor, in his book on the Greek Phalanx, cites the hoplite shield as 5.5-8kg. Clearly heavier shields were a goer. They lined theirs with inner facing of leather and outer skin of bronze. Seems close to what you're experimenting with.
Good points Thane Max. This is exactly what i was thinking- maybe putting softer-stuff on the inside would help prevent things from getting stuck in the shield quite as much too (which might avoid the issue of giving your enemy a nice handle they can then grab and use to move you in such a way as to get you killed!).
Quality content as always !!
It really goes to show how far you can get with very little in terms of a defensive object like a shield being useful. It doesn't have to be an indestructible object. It just needs to be good enough, and you're already there.
Amazingly resilient, didn’t expect it to do so well vs axes
Keep in mind that, in actual battle, the various weapons won't likely penetrate as far as you had them go. (I know, you're not as massive as a typical Roman warrior.) You have the shield mounted on a fairly substantial backing. The same shield on someone's arm, even an impressive arm, would have a lot more give than when supported on all sides. Makes the simple poplar shield all the more impressive.
Real Science , and have fun too !😊
bottom line, shields are really, REALLY good!
I think this would warrant a Part 5: Iron filings and Glass shards can come in a large variety of forms and slightly bigger pieces could act like sharp force-concentration and spreading points (concentrating the force on the blade-edge while spreading it on the shield). And due to the materials they might very well blunt the edge of a weapon faster than if it was just leather. So slightly larger junks, maybe a bit thinner leather, and using the same edged weapon several times. ... And i think nobody would object to more videos of you making and testing shields.
Love the ending. Put a massive grin on my face, which I needed. Really enjoyed the experimental section too.
Top marks Tod yet again, really enjoyed watching that,very informative too.
Thanks
Cathartic.
I specially loved the ending.🤣 👍👍👍
Awesome Video 👍
Nice to see shields used for what they are made for
I'd love to see a sparth or a gallowglass axe take a chop at it. That extra leverage and narrow head should get in deeper than your felling axe. Great work as always Tod!
Shields are good, shields stop wham bams very well! Fantastic video, going to check out the previous film now! Thanks Tod.
Thats Aweesome Tod! Would love to test one against Throwing Weapons :D
Thanks Adam and good to see you here. Unless the thrown weapons had significant mass I doubt they would do much
@@tods_workshop Well i think full spin with a war hammer would do something :P and maybe some spear throw ? Cheers Tod awesome test
I know it’s not a direct analogy, as we were overbuilding things to reduce injury, but in the 70s and 80s SCA shields hung on the arm like that were up to 16lbs, and not particularly encumbering. Again, realizing that the sca is not necessarily historical, (or battleground focused) but in general, we found that among those who intentionally trained to use the shield offensively - the person with heavier shield could leverage more control in a fight.
But this is based on the build of original 14thC shields
Oh absolutely, I am in no way implying that the people in the middle ages did it the same way or even had the same theories about shield usage. Just saying that (admittedly, from a small sample size) the weight might not have been a particularly limiting concern, vs the cost for example.
Love this stuff Tod, you're doing proper "experimental archaeology" on a personal level from the point of view of the average grunt in the field. A bog standard soldier in whatever era you're talking about, this is the kind of weapons, armor, and equipment they'd be using every day in the field. As a grunt in the US Army back in the 90's, when bored we'd do experiments to see if we could improve what we had been issued, whether it was making MRE's taste like anything OTHER than wet cardboard, or adding a bit of padding to our LBE/plate carriers, to tightening/polishing up the actions on our weapons to make em a tiny bit more accurate and reliable. Soldiers as far back as there have been even semi-organized armies did stuff like this to make their lives a little easier and most importantly SAFER in battle.
This behaviour seems to go back as far as time - thanks
Going hell for leather there
awesome
I love this channel. One of the few that I get genuinely excited to learn on through these experiments. I LOVED castled as a kid and always imagined knights to be undefeatable. It's so cool to think about how they would have to decide between heavy duty and more weight or lighter, more agile... What do you think about using the leather backing on the shield just around the area your arm sits? That would seem to make the most sense for weight vs protection, as the only part that would be affected by most of those weapons that you just tested would be your arm on the back (since most of them went less than 25mm deep) I would love to see a shield build with that section extra protected and the rest just poplar! Or even a modular shield with the middle section permanent/ heavy duty and the top and bottom just replaceable pieces of poplar! Might be going too deep there, but I think the idea of just the arm being protected with the halftanned leather would be excellent blend of strength and weight!
I was thrilled about this series of videos about this project. The results are very interesting from a historical point of view and also for creating armour in general. The shield became tougher and would take a lot of more brute force until it breaks. The glued on leather helped the wood fibres to stay together. The project gave me inspiration and ideas for a body armour project. The lessons learned in that videos were quite usefull.