Why You Can't Mess with the Bradley Fighting Vehicle
2024 ж. 4 Мам.
2 732 471 Рет қаралды
This is not simply a "battle taxi". The Bradley Fighting Vehicle is a sophisticated weapons platform capable of providing tremendous firepower in direct support of the Infantry it carries. The role of the Bradley is to Safely transport Infantry to critical locations on the battlefield, Provide fire support to cover their dismounted operations, and Destroy enemy tanks and other vehicles that may threaten the Infantry it carries.
Other videos you might like:
1 Battle Made the F-15E Feared around the World ► • 1 Battle Made the F-15...
The World's Fastest Jet the USA Ever Built ► • SR-71 Blackbird: World...
Nothing Seems to Fight America’s Aircraft Carriers ► • Nothing Seems to Fight...
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► kzhead.info...
Thank You
Wasn't planning on doing that in the first place, but ok.
I was planning to book a ticket to usa so i can have beef with a tank till he told me not to
This one made me laugh more than it should have😂😂
Go forward, America! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!
:V
Well don't!
thank you U.S.A ❤ God bless 😔
As Ukrainian I'd like to thank American people for your help in this war against evil Putin's Russia. The White House has just allowed to send to us these beauty Bradleys and many more other good weapons for our heroes to fight Putin. Thank you from the bottom of my heart! God bless America! Glory to Ukraine!
Sorry , but you should know that the USA ignited this war . The USA is not interrested in Ukrain , the profits of american multinationals is the only thing that counts.
🇺🇸 🇺🇦
You have to tanks your president and usa for destruction of ukrain 😉 Usa dont care for ukrain, you are just meet for war, they need Russia. You will see, ukrain will wanish in cloud of history.
🇷🇺 all the way...
@@jantadema9711 The Raytheon-Putin cabal really runs deep. Hopefully Russians overthrow Putin and regain independence from American MIC
My Brother-in-law, Sgt Haraway, was the gunner on that M2 that killed the T-72 in ODS with the 25mm. Said the APFSDS they had back then could punch through their armor no problem. With the lethality upgrades the Bushmaster and it's ammo has gotten since then, Russia's tankies should be very afraid of this beast showing up on the battlefield this Summer
This thing is a coffin, but with guns
really..its dumb to assume the russian will be the same with iraqi, and this thing is the same with that APC right?!..well there a lot of wreckage of similar vehicle in there.
@@devatsdb7 Yes, Russians bringing in t-62M after 7000+ military vehicles was lost in 8 months. Now they use infantry only since tanks crews are scared of Javelins.
Russia has new t90m "breakthrough" tanks, they are able to withstand even ATGMs, and they are already fighting in Ukraine, + Russia has its own BMP "terminator" which has proven its effectiveness
Or the russians will just drop a lot of artillery on it.
I was a instructor on the Bradley at Ft Benning. (WGMD)
Does it get hot inside those vehicle’s?
Go forward, America! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!
Me and my friend watch these vids so Much. He is a maintainer and when we watched this all I could see was a angry face and a undertone voice saying “ never had a lunch break with these “ I’m sure all the armoured equipment is hard to maintain but they do, and they do it so the crews can survive, maintainers are the spine of the body in USmilitary.
mechanics dont do shit 95% of the time, its one of the many reasons your friend "cant catch a break", because they dont do their job and shit gets worse and worse over time
Exactly why they wont last in Ukraine
@@chilistakeout229 This is is bullshit, pmcs your crap.
@@rolthox lmao how are you gonna tell me its bullshit, are you here with me rn?
@@rolthox actually tell me how it took me almost a month to get a dvdb to get replaced when they left it in a connex and never shipped it out to get replaced in the first place
2021: Why You Can't Mess with the Bradley Fighting Vehicle 2023: Anyone else remember what an unexploded Bradley look like?
2024. Bradley hunting T-90 / BMP
😂😂😂 wdym they havent even bine destroyed that mutch
@@marijnnn4992 Bradley broke the glass of the T90, Bradley is a game changer, SLIVA URINE! 🤣🤣
@@VVV85650 ist slava and it didnt only break the glass it destroyed the optics and killed the elektronics
This aged well.
Not really, the Bradley is taking out quite a bit of Russian armor currently, losses occur and the Bradley isn't invincible, but its effective.
@@crusader_wolf1104 nope bradley gets snipe by alligator lmao.
@@kylelee8685 At least it isn't like the thousands of Russia vehicles that have been destroyed by Javelins and NLAWs lol
@@crusader_wolf1104bradley lost all his reputation in just 2 months wtf.Only good at fighting Arabs xD
@@UsudUsud-ly9qr It didn't? I suppose the hundreds of T-80's that have been destroyed in Chechnya, Georgia and Ukraine means its obsolete too huh? Idiot
"why you can't mess around with Bradley" WT Players: "goddamn Sabot and Missile Spammers like a Lizard"
Yup and I'm one of those people 🤣🤣
it looks kind of old and outdated
@@lenny108 it is right now the army is making a new vehicle to help phase out the older models
Yea lol, but Sabot cant do sh*t against a Tiger.
@@lenny108 and can still smash Russian and Chinese armored vehicles
Direct Enemy Fire lost : 3 Indirect.. self inflicted : 150
The russians really mess with the Bradley......yeah.......😂😂😂😂
Yeas they mess with it and they lose T-90 / BMP in the process 😂. I hope you don't have to delete your comment
I was a mechanic for one of these, they break just by standing still.
How so? And which part of the vehicle was most prone to breaking?
Answer me what parts did it break? I could maybe wait like 1 day till the Bradley breaks down
This makes more sense after I watched a vid on the calamity of how the thing came about. Feel for whoever has to fix it. Or fight in it.
The fuel distribution pump is one of the things that breaks the most and is a bitch and a half to replace. The electronic are extremely picky on the battery power level, the seal on the generator breaks constantly causing a mess in the engine bay. The CIV is super delicate even tho it's one of the things that will get hit first since is popping out on top. I would go on but I have a life to love.
Oh it'll shoot, unless a grunt timed the gun wrong. Or the master gunner takes a tanker bar to the receiver and fucks the mounting rails.
Og’s from socom 3 us navy seals should remember that time when the bradley pulled up to destroy that t-72
Hello
Gratifying to hear the news that the US has just supplied Ukraine with 50 of these. US military support of Ukraine has been inspiring to behold.
And we are very thankful. Slava Ukraini, God Bless America!
the brads are gonna be no use to ukraine, if we can barely maintain them because theyre old and out dated and literally break from sitting still, not to mention snow and ice will defeat them, and the 25 isn't reliable at all, russia will fucking destroy them
Please send your children too
@@thetruth7633 please, go help putler and bring a plastic bag with ya
Yeah it was also gratifying when the Romans diced...sliced..and crucified Jesus...then gave us the Roman Catholic Church...and the bible...
"You can't mess with the Bradley..." Ivan: Hold my vodka
Ivan is now a dead orc
@@typicallymoodyIvan is now happy bradleys got destroyed in minefields
?? there a lot of orcs russian tank destroyed xd @@UsudUsud-ly9qr
@@UsudUsud-ly9qranything will get destroyed in a minefield,
@@UsudUsud-ly9qr Alot of russian armor died on tank mines too. The thing is the Bradley has a far better running score versus Russian armor and Russian training in deep desert. Now the Bradley is fighting on the very ground it was designed to fight on. Its not even a MBT like the Abrams too.
I remember the breathless "news" reports worried about our solders in the Bradley in the First Gulf War. 60 minutes even did an "expose' " about how dangerous it was and all the body bags that are going to be needed.
Yes .. agreed.. but do you think these will be used on chinese mainland ... I can’t see them getting there because massive logistics and supply lines... I also don’t see China on us soil. I do though see them perhaps on Taiwan soil but there is also massive logistics there too, so,don’t think so But I see the Chinese eventually getting their tanks on Aussie soil .. we have vast open spaces. We need to prepare now because you know what, the bastar.d Chinese are creating a diversion .l they won’t try Taiwan yet, it’s a smokescreen, they will cop some military hurt there. So they will go for the big prize , we in Australia first. So we need to get the us to send to our north 100s of Bradleys , ditto,for Abrams tanks and hundreds of F15 jet EX jet fighters which I understand are excellent .. aside from nuclear equipped carriers . So you can’t do that until the physical infrastructure Is there to house them etc etc .. it’s a massive job, but the us must do this work in Aus .. it will cost 100 billion but it would be a big deterrent etc etc I READ THAT DEFENCE EXPERTS SAY THAT CHINA WILL LOOK FOR A WEAK LINK, AND PLACE WHERE THERE IS ROOM AND FOOD ETC. TAIWAN DOESNT PROVIDE THAT .. AND THE TAIWANESE WILL HURT CHINA IN A CONFLICT EXPOSING THEM TO A FRIGHTENING ATTACK FROM THE US WHICH WILL SINK THEM FOREVER ..
@@pragmatist165 The USA will never directly invade China. There is no point just like there is no point to invade Russia although they act like everyone is after them. It's only their governments behavior and military that's the problem. Conscripts aren't exactly professionals.
@@wolfgangjr74 I agree .. it was an emotional comment I made to send 100s of tanks to Taiwan. You'd have to say now though that because of the very large military ' activity' in the South China Sea, the chance of a mistake or a reaction might lead to war. It's becoming an increasingly likely eventuality. The tasks now for the world, in response to China's flagrant belligerence and its predisposition to make enemy after enemy, it's emerging military hubris, is reason for the G7 and other nations to build more deterrents, some of these visible and powerful, eg in Australia's north, and for the world to begin to plan and develop a list of all exports from China, start making products themselves and eventually do what China is doing, holding some nations to mercy and random , eg Australia and weakening very much their economies. Viz strangle China economically.. that will hurt .. but it will hurt China even more .. yes it will take 10 years and it will require extraordinary purpose, resolve and cooperation , but it must be done to send out a powerful message, hurt our friends and together we'll hurt you .. Food security is emerging as a world threat, particularly in China, so massive boycotts of world food exports to China is one of the tasks .But it can't be one or two countries against China, it must be many. We are not far from that point now. China seems extraordinarily confident about its military might now, and that is already a serious threat right now.
@@pragmatist165 Don't take China seriously with their threats on Taiwan. Even they aren't dumb enough to try something dumb like that not to mention they are smart enough to know they will not have the logistics to even start thinking of war with Taiwan. What China wants is stability as that is what keeps the current status-quo and war will most definitely cause enough instability to collapse from internal pressures.
@@pragmatist165 America would come to Australia aid and wipe out anyone trying to harm you guys
Went from towed Vulcan to tracked Vulcan on the M113 chassis then on to the Bradley with tow launcher. Then we replaced the Tow Launcher with SVLM - Stinger Launcher and carried AT-4's in the back. Some units carried Javelins. The Bradley is a Cadillac compared to the M113 Chassis and better able to defend itself.
I liked tht comparison you made I drive a cadi
So, Russian towed tanks will be no match for it?
Yeah the M113 is pretty much obsolete, don't know why you keep those.
@@michalandrejmolnar3715 - we don’t
@@Negotea - it is not a Tank Destroyer to start with -it is an Infantry Fighting Vehicle- for providing infantry to M1s the combined arms combat arena- tanks without infantry are vulnerable to infantry hand launched anti tank rockets and artillery and infantry without tanks are vulnerable to the shock, firepower and mobility of tanks- The M2 is primarily the means for the infantry to keep up with the M1 in their combined arms role- the armament of the Bradley is for direct fire support of the deployed infantry- the anti tank rockets and the main guns do give it the capability to defend itself from tanks and to destroy enemy infantry haulers- it avoids contact with tanks seeking to break contact and call for its own tank support or set it up for destruction for the javelins in the hands of the infantry
Конечно нельзя, она на поле боя живёт 2 минуты
С вонючего дивана тебе виднее
What the bmp’s?
My dad was a sergeant in the Army during operation Iraqi freedom, he used to drive these. He said they were fun as hell to be in.
@Mister Google and the third world panties always want to fight the pentagon 😔
And the third world always gets waxed . Why is that ?
Iraqi freedom? what a bastard, you guys ruin the country for oil on the name of freedom.
11M20. I served in all crew positions on the M2A1 and A2 during 2 tours in Germany. First got in one in 1988. It had some speed, but the early versions struggled to keep up with the Abrams tanks. Definitely had some adventures in those beasts.
Them early M2s had a horrible transmissions but were extremely lethal nonetheless. I was an 11B sent to the 3rd A.D. to bring them to full strength. First time I saw it in action was in ODS.
@@jimmy0999 Didn't have transmission issues. Just a bit low on power
@@sergeanttrucker The M2s we had you'd be going along and as they changed gears would jerk, experienced the same thing with the ones we drew at NTC in the '90s.
I was with the first unit in Europe to get Bradleys. Started out in M113s and Willy jeeps. Got Humvees around the same time as Bradleys.
@@sergeanttrucker bet you loved going to the gay bars in Europe, like all the American military, you got your asses handed to you in Afghanistan
Bradley crewdog (C 3-15 Inf, 24th ID), checking in...Hearing that 25mm thumping still gets this old grunts heart to beating fast. Some awesome footage of the Bradley doing Bradley stuff, brings back alot of memories, good and bad.
is it possible to kick out t72 with 25mm gun?
@@user-tw2jq7xs2j yes. Reactive armor attached to t72 gets peeled off by precision fire and sometimes ignites
I heard they break easy, is this true?
C and A Co 2/7
11M, C co. 1-18 INF. 3/24. Ft. Benning, First To Fight!
As former infantry. I can honestly say you feel much safer with a few Bradleys watching you six.
especially when you fight slipper wearing shepherds with rusty AKs
What happen in agfhan
@@TheGhostOfMichaelJackson 🤣😂
Thank you for your service ❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍👍👍👍👍👍👌😎
@@joek600 you took the words out of my mouth mate....well said...👏👏👏
I had a lot of friends serve in the military during Desert Storm Desert Shield. They do not go on and on about the M1 Abrams, fighter jets or anything else. I can't think of any piece of equipment that was bragged on except for one. The Bradley Fighting Vehicle. I heard multiple guys tell me about what a versatile dangerous piece of equipment it is. It can destroy a tank, it can provide close-quarters infantry support, all while safely transporting soldiers. It was the only piece of equipment I can remember being complimented in such a way
I was in a Transportation unit that stayed in Khobar Towers the first few weeks there until our trucks arrived at Dammam, and one of the first things we saw was a Bradley on the perimeter around the buildings...it was nice to see it there (the Patriot launcher some distance away came in very handy, too. Good to know those are also going to Ukraine.)
As a former FMC employee , it sure feels good to hear these stories . We worked hard at the San Jose plant to put out a tough vehicle .
lol they compliment really well against an army that does not use sandals for weapons and bradley left the chat.
@@Stockfish1511 well, am I going to listen to guys who served over there and actually relied on the Bradley to save their lives, or some internet d-bag who probably jerks off in his parents basement.
How impressive I find the Bradley is exponentially increased by knowing the absolute shit show that went into producing it and how it was almost a worthless death trap.
I love troop carriers ~ any thing that can give our troops fire power, amour cover, and transportation ! They need all the help they can get.
Lol, funny to watch it after the ukrainian counteroffensive were stuck in the famous "Bradley Square" in Orekhovo.
As a former 12B I can honestly say I miss my Bradley.
It was a love/hate for me lol
I was a scout in the 2 A.D., when there was a 2nd Armored Division, and was on the M3. For a 19 y/o, it was fun to drive around in…..in Texas. But it broke down a lot, mostly transmission problems, and it was made of aluminum, not steel. Im sure (I hope anyway), they’ve upgraded it to make it more reliable and survivable. This was in the mid to late 80’s.
aluminium armour is way too easy to ignite
it's still aluminum......
They put ERA on it, like with the T-72, T-64 and T-80.
@@michalandrejmolnar3715 Funny how ERA hasn't helped much with top attack fires like Javelin
The sound and smell of the 25mm from the inside of the turret when you’re shooting it is one of my favorites. Also badass when they’re shooting over you for a base of fire.
Your lung disease is not service related
Yeah. You fired it on women and children, you cowards.
@@mansoor24 and we liked it
What's even more badass is when they get put in a firing bag by remote-laid Russian minefields. You guys never fought a combatant that could fight back, otherwise, you would not be reminiscing about this mobile crematoriom so fondly.
7:26 is from Fort Stewart Division Headquarters building 001. I worked at that building for years.
bradley messed with the high precision artillery, AT mines and drones guess you can mess with bradley IFV all you want LMAO
And the kornet 👍🏼
Bradley successfully knocked out T-90 and BMP. Do you have the same options as before😂
sooo with the Bradley, Marder and AMX, the UAF is building a dream team for the most epic thunder-run the world has yet to see. I've never though i'll live long enough to see this.
As long as they don't break down.
" Make the best of today because nobody is promised tomorrow " - My Dad , Navy SEAL in Vietnam . I pray this message may bless you in Lord Jesus' name , Amen 🙏
They are already stuck in the ukranian frozen mud. Theres a hilarious tktok
@@roywall5231 you do know that they are not even in Ukraine yet right? At most they are in Poland
@Fred Gordon Stop reading fairytales written by Peskov.
I do know from personal experience it will do 60 mph. We found that out railheading back from Hoenfels. We had a 10 mile road trip to get to the rail cars. Someone messed up our load time so we had to haul ass down the highway so we wouldn't be late.
Горят как коробки, к счастью
T90 burns like boxes while these things will take back Crimea
@@typicallymoody Cry
@@typicallymoody Take back Crimea? take back Soledar first
@@knightlypoleaxe2501 might take a while but it’ll happen. Your orc military is slowly faltering. Every day hundreds of your demon soldiers are being sent back to hell where they belong
@@knightlypoleaxe2501 Крым- наш, Соледар - тоже наш
Apparently, those water jugs were designed in case Shaq stops by and gets thirsty
Hi
@@Sopheap954 bruh
i love the fact that they can track and target upto 70 targets. i served in one when i was in the national guard i loved it
They can’t track more than the gunner can shot at!!! It’s just another M113!!!! You think UKraine can get several master gunners in 3 months!!!! NAH!!!! More targets for the drones. That tow jams too!!!
@@johnburk5805 Master gunner Kremlin troll here. Actually the fire control system is modern and intuitive, the gun is so accurate that even a kid with PlayStation joystick experience can hit long range targets after a couple of days training. Did you know that during Iraq war Bradleys have destroyed more tanks than Abramses? TOWs are great and Ukrainians will beat the sht out of Russian armor
@@lucyelkins7639 Yeah went so well for them. They use joestick and all got wasted in bradley square. Send abrams now.
This is a deadly machine. That 25mm gun is so deadly accurate at 3:07 while firing multiple Shots at the same time. No recoil keeps it on target the entire time.
deady for the crew... its a junk even compare do bmp-1.
@@makoado6010 are you Russian? 😂
@@makoado6010 is there any sort of studies out there for this sort of claim? not attacking you, just asking.
@@makoado6010 anything Russian is Garbo, and proof is in Ukraine LOL
Yeah, so deadly, it will pulled out of rotation in Iraq
Writing from Kyiv. very-very-very thankful to the people of the USA for all the help and support. This will be our common victory!
Wish we can give you guys A10 warthogs and F-18 super hornets for air power...
Russian orcs will soon feel the power of Bradley at their own skin
ААХАХААХ, А ГДЕ ЖЕ ВАШИ ХВАЛЕНЫЕ БМП? АХ ДА У ВАС ЖЕ НЕТ СВОЕГО НЕЧЕГО, КАК ЦЫГАНИ
@@magnusthered3055 Київ, взяв за 3 дні?! ПОЗОРИЩЕ!!!
@@magnusthered3055bmps get eaten alive by bradleys
@@mercedesbenz1174сало бандера 🐷🐷🐷
Try hard bidump Jihadists BOT
Terrific presentation. Love the evolution of M-2. First met it in September of 86 fresh out of OSUT. Over the next 7 years and 4 continents I experienced first hand its capabilities. Served in every position in a mechanized platoon save that of LT and PSG. Kinda miss those recycled beer cans (ALCOA stamp inside the drivers hatch lol). One thing, at least on the earlier ones, there's no burst select, it's just your trigger finger. Tap one round, or squeeze to pop them off. Fire discipline, 1 1 3 3. First 2 for ranging then double triple for the win. Thanks for your work
Thanks for sending these to Ukraine!! 🇺🇦❤️🇺🇸
Thank the Gods that Combat Engineers finally got these to replace the M113-A2! We were nothing but sitting ducks when doing breaching operations! Essayons!
This didn't age well.
Are you sure about that
I'll admit, I long to see an end to conflict like many but until then I'd rather be at the top instead of the bottom when it comes to military power.
😂😂😂 NICE SCRAP METAL
You can mess with it, just don't except to survive
Bradley is basically a multi tool but with guns
It’s a coffin, but with guns
Imagine the Swiss' IFV
Swiss army full metal jacket
It can’t swim.
@@TS-vn2fc Maybe if the Russians used it? Fortunately, it's going to be used by competent people. Don't worry your pretty lil head. :)
Destined for Ukraine.. I wish they could also get Abrams Tanks too
Abrams is too heavy for anything in Europe, small bridges and roads, ukrainian soft ground. Bradley will be outgunned and without sufficient range.
@@lupus_croatiae the brad isnt meant for europe either, i know because im here right now and they suck more than they normally do
@@lupus_croatiae Not to mention the logistic nightmare to keep that thing fueled and it uses some fuel mixture similar to jet fuel. Also that 1000 degree exhaust can cause problems in an urban setting. Thing is only good for deserts with massive logistic support.
@@chilistakeout229 i agree with you and Dope Cat. US military hasn't encounter anything at this level, they only have experience fighting Iraqis who weren't exactly a superpower and made some awful mistakes. Area was desert and US had air superiority. I doubt value of Bradley, Abrams is good but it requires American logistics. Field issues are even bigger problem. The whole thing exposed how messed NATO is, it solely relies on US because Europeans don't have enough equipment. This was already seen when Brits and French couldn't continue bombing Gaddafi so America stepped in.
Was 11M10 1985 when we still had the firing port weapons. Bradley is a great platform
Those were cool , they never should have eliminated them .
It's a time-tested design that's worked well for our military and I'm glad that it was a good safe vehicle for our soldiers to drive around in and destroy the enemy
You should go to war in a Ford Model-T which is even more time-tested.
the brad is shit and we are not safe at all in these
Modern warfare be like “PUSH UP WITH THE BRADLEY” and then makes it 10 metres and gets direct impacted by an RPG
That has aged like milk.
😊 OK.
Ukraine is going to put these to good use!!!! 💙💛
that's right, the Ukrainian military will give American weapons to the Russians)))
@@user-mu8kf5tx3s yep, just like the HIMARS Ukraine is really gonna let em have it with them lol. There gonna give it to em good lol. They got a bullet and a missile with their name on it lol.
I'm literally sitting in the back of one a fort irwin right now and a butterfly could land on this and it would be disabled in some form or fashion lmao
Lol yeah they suck as well as ntc of course
They would literally break just from the train ride to California lmao
I call bullshit.
Like most American military tech, looks cool but overcomplicated and always breaking, even down to the rifles.
@@dopecat4012yeah… no lmao Russian bots here we go
You forgot the M7 Bradley Fire Support Vehicle. The B-FiST has replaced the existing armored FiST vehicle (FiST-V) platform, the M981 FISTV, in the U.S. Army inventory. The TOW/UA suite is replaced by target location equipment, integrated with the Bradley ISU sight unit. It also carries equipment for use by dismounted observers. A hybrid GPS/inertial/dead reckoning navigation system robustly provides the vehicle location as a reference point.
He does mention it at 7:45
the b-fist is the m2a2 not the "m7"
@@chilistakeout229 It is The M7 B-FiST it's just a M2A2 Variant
The AMF company who builds the Bradley, chose our Dodge Bearings for the turrent where they could fire on the "run" with dead on accuracy as well as having the TOW, "target on wire" missile, met the supervision of this company and they showed us a video of the Bradley in action. Good video.
That was FMC Corporation that built the Bradley , in San Jose Ca .
@@gordonlandreth9550 you're right, got my letters and company's mixed up, that's been several years ago, during the first gulf war, and I've long since retired,but I do remember that period.
Right Roger , good man . I worked there for 10 years , and it was good to be part of building the Bradley .
Waited to see a video praising the Bradley. Really is a deadly machine. A good gunner can take out t72s possibly t80s with the 25mm.
Nope
Maybe in Call of Duty
They are burning in Ukraine 😂
I love America MILITARY ~👍👍👍
The Bradley's are getting a new main gun change also and they will be even deadlier in combat and be able to fire rounds even farther too.
The M109A7 Paladin use the same chassis as the newest version of the Bradley. Love the big guns.
I love the Bradley loved it ever since I played conflict desert storm awesome armour along with the warrior.
I feel like it is like a modern sherman or a tank inspired by a sherman firefly.(concept) Troop support, troop CARRIER, and tank killer. But much more modern. The shape and spirit live on.
I.E.D.'s mess with them real good. I saw one in Ramadi get all messed up.
Indeed you can't mess with it - it burns too fast for you to do so. Kinda hard to find an intact one to mess with...
come on hahaha
The Abhram and and Bradley are like sniper buddies too. The Bradley gives the target's location and the Abhram puts a round on it.
Did you know that Bradleys and Abrams tanks got their asses blown up by dudes in sandals, in Yemen. Also the Abrams is so ridiculously heavy and needs a ridicules amount of actual jet fuel to function, most countries don't even want it. Not to mention Abrams' engine exhaust is hot, around 1000 degrees Celsius, that means any crappy heat seeking rocket will always find it's target.
@@dopecat4012... did you know that the bradley and HMMWV also run on jet fuel. lol
@@brianthompson9485 Really? Is it because jet fuel is less flammable?
@@dopecat4012 Most equipment and vehicles the military has runs on JP-8. It's mostly for logistical reasons. Trucking and flying a bunch a different fuels into a conflict area would be a logistical nightmare.
@@brianthompson9485 So it must be a nightmare for the Ukrainians because they are running vehicles that are NATO standard and Soviet made.
Great list! I’ve always been partial to the C-5 Galaxy. My Pops wrenched on them & you can recreate the Wright brothers first flight in the cargo bay.
How many troop carrying fighting vehicles can claim more kills than tanks in the same battleground:)
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 I feel like tanks are only relevant against nations that dont have them or have laughably outdated ones.
That was then, this is now. While the army has upgraded the chassis extensively, its weapons system are in dire need of a upgrade The 50mm XM913 and new long range missile capable of engage targets over 10 miles away is must Russia T-15 can be equipped with 57mm cannon while China ZBD-10 carries the HJ-10 missile. The 50mm cannon and longer range missile would give Bradley perfect balace
Remember when you need a tank. You need a tank. It's the most heavily armored and has the most firepower of anything else on the battlefield.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 There is thing called variants Just as the Stryker MGS is variant of the Stryker IFV/AFV The M3 Bradley CFV is variant that carries TOWs in the storage instead of troops They can make heavy gun carrier variant of the Bradley Just like the M3
Ill tell ya who, Taliban with no airforce, army or seals😘😂 shoved the bradley right up America's 💥
It was always targeted with explosive devices in the Dora area in Baghdad, and we used to see it turn into scrap, and most of the soldiers inside it were killed or their limbs were cut off, and I remember their screams because of the severe injuries, because my house was on the main street, and the forces left them and did not return to them until after the presence of Apache helicopters
Nice try Ali ( are you related to Comical ?).
Thank you for your service
4:33 watching the tow being launched & tracking it in flight all the way to impact is so cool. My favorite weapon.
@@TheGhostOfMichaelJackson huh? What do you mean? It's not meant to do that?
TOWs are bad ass, the wires left across the area, not so much
No... it's not a fire and forget missile.. You have to keep the crosshairs on the target until impact... I was a TOW Dragon missile repairman... I was often on range as to support range qualifications... Often, soldiers would move their heads to see the explosion (by ground mount versions) to totally miss the targets... Expensive mistakes...
@@WOWayne325 whoa! That would be an expensive miss.
A Bradley and Leopards wow that is a deadly combination!
The Mechanized Infantry Fighting Vehicle that can ALMOST fit a whole Infantry Squad inside it.
Isn’t six troops a squad?
Got to love US weaponry. They make the best stuff bar none.
What a joker,most of the Bradleys were destroyed using cheap $35000 Russian and Iranian drone.Same fate will fall on Abram,very positive.
Bradley has so far been more successful than any Russian BMP
Name one BMP that is performing better Vladimir?
Mine fields of zaphohria have entered the chat
must be so much fun to shoot the gun from inside. no recoil at all. highly accurate. huge 25mm pellets
"Pellets"
It's cramped and loud and awesome to shoot. Reach out and touch someone, day or night. Pellets though... no no. 25.4mm is an inch. This is no pellet gun, it's a cannon!
Thanks for the heads up. I was just about to mess with a Bradley Fighting Vehicle
I was toying with the idea, myself. Thank goodness for this video... lol
"A troop-carrier that can't carry troops, a reconnaissance vehicle too conspicuous to do reconnaissance, and a quasi-tank structure with less armor than a snow plow, but enough ammo to take out half of DC."
Yup a direct quote from the classic movie!
@@oculosprudentium8486 and a complete lie to boot!
It will not be easily replaced. Anyone wanting to see the early true story of the Bradley's development and testing needs to watch HBO's movie, The Pentagon Wars. It's a hilarious movie and shows shocking just how bad the Bradley initially was.
be carefull with the film it really tells a hole other story then what really happend
I served in vietnam on a M113a2 APC, 50 cal. browning, 2-3 M,60 light machine guns , at 16 tons loaded 45 MPH a great battle wagon. LZ. X-Ray, and albany , seearch out and destroy base camps. 4th div.
My best regards from Zaporozhye (Ukraine).Many thanks for video. 🇺🇲🤝🇺🇦,🇺🇲🗽🦅👍👏🎆.
Y'all stay strong over there.
@@calvinwalkerwalker5698 fax, don’t give Russia a damn inch of ground!
@@calvinwalkerwalker5698 Thank you.Good like in your life.
@@officalkingkrab1912 Thank you.Good like in your life.
@@Antares777d7 of course man! 🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦
Love my country USA BEST AS THEY COME!!!
great to know that Ukraine will get these soon 💪
great to know how easily theyll be taken out and that the death numbers for ukraine are about to sky rocket 🫶🏻
Ukraine needs to get all the support it needs otherwise Poland or other countries will be on Russias hit list. Too many times the EU, Uk and US ignored Russian aggression leading to this situation. Stay strong Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇬🇧
"Don't mess with it, it'll break"
My dad was in the 1-5 CAV and he was a Bradley gunner in Iraq at around 2010 or '11, and one time some insurgents hit one of their MRAPs, so their commander sent out every single vehicle, including Bradley's, and they just started firing out into the darkness. They weren't sure if they got them.
Bradley is one badass piece of kit!, the MLRS is truly wicked!!.
The Bradley is outdated and obsolete.
Check out the movie, "The Pentagon Wars" starring Cary Elwes and Kelsey Grammer. Sort of a satirical view of the development process involving the Bradley fighting vehicle. Originally starting as a troop carrier and then all the Congressmen and Senators and generals kept making change requests that increased its weight, making it slower, and its weaponry, making it a target of antitank weapons, and less able to carry troops, which was what it was supposed to do in the first place.
I think that I've become a big skeptic nowadays as I feel that Every new military spending has as it's primary goal, to be funding some general or admirals retirement funds. Providing a real military purpose is item #5
Vue.
Pentagon wars is a fictional bunch of shit based on a nonsense book by a quack who thinks the M113 is the perfect vehicle even fit to be a plane, and that planes don't need radar or missiles. If the Bradley is so shit, why does the world keep building vehicles that look so much like it? Rheinmetall Lynx and Puma, Hanwha K21, the British Griffon, the BMP 21, the list goes on. Pentagon wars assumes it was a replacement APC like the M113, it isn't. It's designed to keep track with tanks and support them by flushing out entrenched infantry, which are a threat to MBTs
@@tinyplaidninjas8868 almost. The m113 guy is Mike Sparks, and he’s a complete lunatic. The guy behind The Pentagon Wars is James Burton, who decided that the best way to test the Bradley’s durability was to load it with all its fuel and live ammo before hitting it with missiles designed to kill T-80s.
God bless the United States of America
that anti tank is OP
Turns out they are useless when the opponent is not a heavily sanctioned third world military 😂
They've....got a great K/D in Russia, what are you on about? They've got 17 losses to about 52 kills, that's worth a LOT.
There is footage of the TOW atgms taking out Russian tanks, but cope harder Z bot lol
@@crusader_wolf1104 it should be easy to give me a reference seeing as YT is pro Ukrainian but it is what it is with you guys and your trust me bro sources. No doubt it was a Bradley that shot down those 5 imaginary ka52 choppers last week😂
@@joeo2533 Your argument is redundant since everything you say can also just be turned into a "trust me bro" statement lol
@@crusader_wolf1104I don't see heroic Bradleys doing jackshit outside shooting at bushes and the 2 or so tow videos that could have just been humvee mounted tows firing at targets even on combat footage reddit that only exists to show the best UA can do. Videos and pics of Bradleys wrecked or getting utterly wrecked by helicopters, t72s, atgms, artillery and mines however exist in abundance and are easy to find even in pro Ukraine YT. Just saw a new one on pro Russian telegram while having my morning coffee lol.
anyone in uniform reading this thank you for your service
@Tim Burm1 fax
@Tim Burm1 by far most wehrmacht soldiers didnt do anything wrong. Just on the wrong side of the war. It was mostly the elite and the SS fanatics
Driver and gunner for one of these . A love hate relationship for the M2A3 Bradley 🇺🇸
How rough is it when tanks jump and shoot? Seems like the gunners would bust their faces on the optics
Going to check one at my backyard. Thanks US from Ukraine.
Very Nice - Thank You ! ! ! 🙂😎👍
Such an AWESOME vehicle
A 10: go Brrrrrrrrrrr Bradley: fu-
USA: Choo Choo. Ukraine: Pew Pew. Russia: QQ
Great presentation.
Too nice video about famous &superior ability armoury vehicle Bradley's vehicle which has superior ability to attack tanks and supports infantry troops advanced also video clearly explaining all specific characteristic of two versions of Bradley vehicles👍 🇺🇸👍
the brad wont take any tank out they're fucking shit, i know guys that will dismount their track if they see and tank because the brads stand no chance and they arent gonna die do to a shitty vehicle
Can’t wait to get them in Ukrainian Armed Forces Deoccupation will be so much more swift and with less casualties