Samsung 2024 TV Lineup Explained: QD-OLED vs WOLED vs Neo QLED
Samsung has launched its flagship S95D, midrange S90D & entry-level S85D OLED TV lineup for 2024, but won't seek to communicate which is QD-OLED & which is WOLED in its marketing, so here's a detailed video to help you decide.
The company also showcased its 8K Neo QLED (flagship QN900D & step-down QN800D) & 4K Neo QLED (QN90D, QN85D, Q70D & Q60D) ranges at an exhibition event in Frankfurt, as well as Micro LED TV & lifestyle displays such as The Frame & The Serif.
The "Includes Paid Promotion" message in this video refers to the sponsorship by British AV retailer Richer Sounds. If you're interested in getting a new TV, even if it's not a Samsung OLED, please support this channel by considering buying from them. Visit your local Richer Sounds store to get the best deals through cheaper 'VIP exclusive' in-store only prices, or call telesales for your next TV purchase on 0333 900 0093. Thanks again for your support.
========================
**Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More Reviews, Sneak Peeks & Tips:
/ @hdtvtest
========================
VISIT HDTV Test
www.hdtvtest.co.uk/
FOLLOW US!
www.threads.net/@hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ vincent_teoh
/ hdtvtest
Their absurd anti glare coating ruins the entire contrast instead of the glossy coating which has a far better tradeoff
I find it crazy - people claiming how bright their TVs go , and they watch in a reasonably lit room . That should just be for convenience and stuff like Sports , News , kids cartoons etc ( bright images ) where dark scenes , and infinite contrast don't matter . HDR is mastered for dark room viewing . If you have a TV that can do 0-10 000 Nits - if WILL always have less contrast if watched in a bright room compared to a 0-1000NIts TV watched in a dark room . The lifted blacks will be bad and it's impossible to overcome in a bright room . Would you watch a movie with a vacuum cleaner going? , so why watch on a movie on an expensive TV in UHD HDR in a bright room . If you want a TV for bright room viewing get a kick ass big Mini-LED at 98"
@@nimblegoatYou’re totally right. I have a LG CX and have never played on it in a bright room, a dark room is always superior for brightness and contrast.
Innovation SUCKS !
@@nimblegoatpeople don't like that HDR is designed for a dark room. I don't have a movie theater in my house even if I tried. Are your walls and furniture black?
@@eslamarida -I keep needing to upgrade my TV and keep holding it off . The G4 83" will be silly price in my country , though who knows. So I think for me a 77" Z93A Panasonic , or a 83 C4, or a Sony A80N 83" would all be great . All have there advantages . all 3 great upscaling . Yes I don't get best BT2020 or MLA+ /QDOLED nit boost , But given I prefer older SDR movies as well and I watch in dark room . All 3 will hit or better the 1000NITS . Larger size will better higher NITS as most common owner's response . Plus still allows a great deal on a 55" in say 3 years as another option that can hit higher volume/NIts. Plus if the TV I buy looks great, that will not change it better TVs come out ( most important point ) , Plus I will build a new PC in 2 or 3 years - that monitor will be fantastic
Holy shit...Samsung finally did it. They made an OLED panel that suffers from blooming. This is incredible.
That S95D is gonna bomb. Hopefully they have a way to remove that filter. S95C looks so clear and then S95D looks like an lcd from 15 years ago with all the washout.
The S95C does not look clear; it has a huge big reflection of the ring light right in the middle. Very distracting. Hard to focus on what you're actually trying to watch. Spreading the same amount of light over a larger area will always be better. Of course, what's shown in the video is an extreme case, and there's a much better way to solve it: turn off the damn light. But if that's not possible, spreading out the reflection as much as possible will make it minimally distracting.
@@karlhendriksethis this coating effects its dark room performance as well.
@@karlhendrikseif you turn off the light the glossy is even more superior lmao
Doesnt matter even if u remove it it has the one connect box which mena u cant do gaming on it, so it has 144hz for no reason. 😂 samsung really shit themself
What do you mean @sidewayssingh
That matte screen has already killed the perceived contrast - 2:49 showing the B&W hooded crow by the water. Sigh. When will manufacturers stop putting matte on HDR displays?
I noticed. The matte screen only managed to spread out the light shining on it, whereas the glossy one did not...
I agree, but the main cause is of course the strong ring light aimed straight at the display. I don't think the glossy looks any better in this extreme scenario, the ring is also very annoying.
Perceived contrast is not as big of an issue as the reflected light where your eyes shift focus. Many of us in darker countries like to watch tv with the daylight filling the room
@@18yearsoldnot For that purpose you might as well buy a LED TV. A matte coating ruins the image quality benefits and selling points of an OLED.
@@MA-jz4yc only a bit. I have had both IPS and va tvs before
Seeing the light diffused over the whole screen making it look like i spread vegetable oil on it is way more distracting tbh
The light is always diffused. It's just more obvious on a glossy surface, where the light source is mirrored.
Oh my goodness this video was needed. I've been searching the entire internet for information on 2024 Samsung TVs and found NOTHING (except everyone complaining the S95D has a matte screen coating). Vince to the rescue!
Koreans are nuts for requesting matte screens.
Go enjoy your philips then. Lol
@@ashokathegreat4534America so we only have Samsung and Sony
@@langstonbelin Panasonic and Pioneer for me
On my S95C the S95C in the video looks way better lol. I would never go matte screen on an oled.
I had a good friend once who told me that "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Why Samsung introduced this anti-glare filter is beyond me. :(
Because glossy coating sucks? “If aint broke, break it” - Consumers wanting inferior OLED junk that doesn’t last long
@christophervanzetta no sorry mate glossy coating actually boosts colour and screen vibrancy this anti-glare coating actually dulls the overall screen vibrancy as on the S24 ultra
@@christophervanzettayou are not in the majority. Your opinions on TVs are hilarious really. You enjoy your matted lcds we’ll stick with glossy OLEDs thank you.
@@enzog1078 considering that about 95%+ gaming laptop screens have matte screens, he's in vast majority, unfortunately. Which is why we pretty much don't have a choice these days. Among 16:10 monitors there also pretty much no glossy models.
@@TabalugaDragon hardly think laptop monitors are the same thing as flagship consumer TVs, but even modern monitors are moving to glossy panels thankfully. OLED laptops are also starting to crop up which is great.
I am more than satisfied with my Best Buy exclusive Samsung 77 s89c QD-OLED TV, I purchased for only $1799! Deal of the century for this PHENOMENAL TV!
How do you liked it? Been looking at it for a week cus im getting one soon prob in 2-3 weeks that s89c 77inch
I was going to get a Sony A80L , I'm now thinking of the S89C because the price is just insane. How do you like it?
the matt coating is a deal breaker for me
to me too, but in my case to not buy it...I really didnt liked the image result in the matte finish, in a dark room I'll only loose quality with no gain...
I haven't seen an anti-glare coating yet that I think looks good. It's like drinking non-alcoholic beer. 🤣
If course it doesn't look good if you are thinking about how good the the coating and the reflections look. But the entire point is that you don't want to think about those things; you want to watch the movie or play the game or whatever. "The contrast isn't so great" is a hell of a lot better than "look I can see myself in the screen, hi me".
@@karlhendrikseno shot. It’s bad every time. Gross really.
non-alcoholic beer is fine with a vodka top-up 🥴🍺 Glossy is definitely better for deep blacks and I watch most HDR content at night
@@karlhendrikseif there is lighting that you cannot control, you might as well get an mini LED already with higher peak brightness. Put a new 2024 OLED and then destroying the blacks, what is the point of the OLED anymore?
I will take the one without the anti glare coating, all day. The picture looks much better. Also, ive already completely light-controlled my room..what about the one connect box? Is it actually 48gbps? I was really hoping to get a 77 qd oled this year but it doesnt look like this is it. The only thing that would have me considering this year's lineup would be if the 90 is a 3rd gen, and if you can tweak the brightness to match the 95
samsung loves to evolve Just backwards
Anti-glare coating 🤮
Gag so much
That matted screen doesn't look too good, it's going to be interesting seeing the reviews on the coated S95D screen.
Great now they've started doing the same VA Vs IPS scenario but for OLED this time.
Once again, Vincent comes to the rescue to sort out the mess of Samsung TV range as to which models have which panels. Samsung want to confuse the consumers so they can get away with it, but Vincent is the only one who can give a clear information for free of charge, and there is no one else like him on KZhead!
Yeah... Exactly how I imagined. A hard NOPE to S95D. 7:29 Q70 was always a Q60 with 120Hz Panel. Never a miniLED or Full Array.
@MirelRC: That's what the Samsung representative at the Frankfurt event told us, although it may be lost in translation.
Yes, Q70T/A/B/C is trash for money
@@the_guganez yeah. Usually, Q80 is closer to Q70 and it's better.
@@hdtvtest Hello Sony x80L or Samsung Q80C plz ??
@@MirelRC Hello Sony x80L or Samsung Q80C plz ?
Right the s95D does look washed out and the blacks are lifted., the ss5c has by far better contrast , the purpose of having an oled is having that superior infinite contrast . Now is see what Brian from whisper status was saying at ces he had Samsung turn all the lights and to him the w oled looked better because of the contrast , when they had them side by side .
Glad I didn’t wait
Thanks for Hdtvtest, but is there information about the *_SAMSUNG QN95D_* yet? I really hope for that
So will this year's Shoot out, be with the S90D? Who the fuck wants a Matte Screen. There is NO way it can compete with a Matte screen
I will not go anywhere near it.
Only the s95d does (they are trying to see if people want it if so they will keep it next year) but the s90d is glossy
@@nttinvis what even is this comment?
I want a matte screen. Well, I'm not keen on the internal reflection stuff. If it compromises picture quality in a pitch black room then I'm not keen. But I'd definitely rather diffuse reflections than sharp reflections of bright things in the room.
Hopefully they’ll have both the S95D and S90D to show the differences and why the matte screen is not worth the trade off.
That coating makes the screen less sharp and washed out, no thanks .
The matt finish looks grey black, which is Not what OLED is known for! They made a mess of it😅 The question is does the S90D comes with 3rd gen QD-OLED panel, if it does then that’s the one to get.
And that's on top of QD-OLED already having worse blacks than LCD (with ambient light in the room)
Vincent, can you test reflections from objects indirectly lit by the TV itself, which I think is a way more realistic scenario than an ring light shone directly at the TV? I also think it’d be way more useful, since _that_ is an actual problem many of us have with glossy OLEDs.
S95D is the model to avoid it seems One connect box always has black outs Even my ks8000 had it
Yep my s95c had it
Hi there, I've just picked up the AW3423DWF can you recommend any good screen settings please thank you
I think the hunt for the perfect anti-glare coating has run rampant. Between the S95C and S95D, I would choose deeper blacks over hazy blacks. The light sources in your room can most of the time be fixed, whereas the aggressive anti-glare coating will forever give you the less attractive blacks.
I'm actually surprised reading comments in this video of how many people dislike matte. Why then we have pretty much exclusively matte screens on gaming laptops(as opposed to office laptops which have a glossy coating way more often) and 16:10 screens? I just don't get it. There seems to be the public outcry for glossy displays in the last few years, yet next to zero glossy options in many big screen segments 🤷♂
Lol the anti glare makes the screen look foggy! Samsung sux
Nice informative video as usual. Please give me your advice which TV is the best for PC monitor and HDR gaming and movies? I'm living now in Saudi Arabia, Thanks in advance.
I'm kind of baffled what happened to OLED improvements over the year. Development seemed to have gone mostly in to increasing peak brightness instead of tackling more fundamental issues like near black performance and color uniformity. I'm not that interested in simulating flash grenades, OLEDs have been bright enough for me since like 2019 and apart from higher refresh rates and adaptive frame rate support I haven’t seen anything I care for actually improve noticeably
Excellent video Vincent... You can test the new feature in nvidia cards called RTX Super Resolution os worth it? Is accurate? Thanks!
Stock up on the S95C while it's still being sold for a decent price boys.
Had it and had black screen every 5 seconds gaming
Won’t the s90d be a good value? S90d has similar brightness and better processor than s95c.
@@manyakgaming1346sounds like a faulty unit.
@@iubball410good point. If it has the same coating as the S95D it will still be a red flag though. In any case, the S95C can now be had for a cheap price, so it can still be worth it. I use the video processing on my PC and don't rely too much on the TV to do it. The TV's kinda sucks.
Good evening great video. Just looking at buying a Sony XR-65-A95L just wondering if you could recommended anybody Leeds to calibrate it please
What's my next upgrade from a Sammy QN90A ... for gaming only ? Thnx for opinions. (No Oleds ... I have one. Not using for gaming)
S95D looks washed out compared to last year. That coating sucks. Hard pass.
Oddly, the S24 (at least the Ultra version does) screen looks washed out, compared to last year, even when one chooses vivid mode. Seems Samsung wants to tone down the colors
@@guadalupe8589 i think its just the new anti reflection coating they're using
Yeah I've just found it handy when I'm watching a movie to just stop walking around with a bright circle light, now I just sit on the sofa with no light and it's fine.
Best thing is that they consider this muddy look better than one clean reflection? ahahaha samsung becoming dumber and dumber
They also have s90d??
Matte is awful, hope they don't sell well, I can wait for the next ones with my S90C.
What is that red diamond gelatin tv demo from??? Can I get a link for it?
Anti glare on oled is a crime
Hey Vincent, kind of off-topic for this video, but I would be so happy if you can answer me. It's about the contrast setting for Xbox Gaming SDR on LG OLED. Ninjician posted somewhere in a forum, that LG Contrast 85 ist extended range, meaning values for 16-255 and LG Contrast 100 is legal range, meaning values from 16-235. My question: why is contrast setting 85 correct for SDR? In the calibration menu within Xbox blacks should not be distinguishable, so the black eye disappears or is not visible with brightness setting 50. But the white sun is clearly visible with contrast 85. It only disappears with contrast 100. So black fades into black and white fades into white. Isn't then contrast 100 correct for SDR, where the source clearly only outputs HDMI Black Level limited range (16-235)? It even looks dimmer and kind of "not enough" when on contrast 85. What is your professional comment to this? :) Thanks a lot in advance and keep up your fantastic humour. *bling* 😅
What about QN95D... is it being discontinued?
will they have bfi?
I don’t think I’m being hyperbolic when I say that whoever decided it should have this anti-glare filter should be fired.
Well they still have a glossy model
@@nttinvis The S95D has a glossy version? If not, my point still stands since that’s their top of the line model. It’s like having your only options being: a Ferrari with shit permanently smeared into the paint or a corvette but has no shit smeared all over it. It’s just bad.
@@lllULTIMATEMASTERlll s95d is crasy expensive anyway dont see that many people buying it plus the 3rd gen panel is barely brighter but needed to compensate for matte screen (they are trying it this year i assume it will fail or hopefully optional next year)
Dose the new Samsung s95d have Gen 3 Samsung QD-OLED panel ?? I searched everywhere. There is no clear answer. Thanks for the vid
When does qn90d come out?
Now I'd like to have a comparison with the LG TVs anti glare coating
Hard pass for me for s95D....just thinking now if the A95L does worth the difference in price over the s95C
What about the Q80D? Is it absent from their lineup or is it just not changing much?
staying with the 77" S90C SM to S95C for another year.
I think in a dim room the matte finish would look better, and when tbe screen faded to black you wouldnt be looking at yourself. The matte finish to me mimics that premium projector look where the pixels slightly blend together vs the panel sharpnes on glossy displays. But in a bright environment I do see why people are against it. Personaly if i was going to buy a tv for home cinema, it would be an s95d. But in a bright living room it would be the qn900D.
Is there a way to determine whether the S90D’s panel is QD-OLED or W-OLED through the TV’s menu or settings?
Will you review the tcl c755…??
Matte looks less sharp and duller.
the anti glare casues the blacks to look grey though
Hello, I have a technical question that unfortunately no one can answer for me. That's why I hope you can do it since you're familiar with it. I have a Sony XH95 TV. If I connect my HW Q900A soundbar to the ps5 and then the soundbar to the TV via EarC, I can play in 1080p with 120fps. However, if I connect my hwq990c the same way, I can only play at a maximum of 60 fps at 1080p resolution. why doesn't it work with hw 990c but with the older hw q900a is does?, hdmi 2.0 shoud be enough for 120fps at full hd. I want to connect the PS5 via the soundbar because when I connect the PS5 directly to the TV and activate earc, I have problems with internal apps and the sound.
Hello .. i am looking for tv which is good in upscaling videos quality.. because i am always watching videos from external hard drive and tv channels ( which are usually 720 and lower in quality) .. i am thinking of A80L sony model .. do you recommend it or suggest another ( i tried lg qned81 and it was very bad experience and i have to change it) thanks everybody
Thanks Vicnent. This matte screen does not interest me coulpled with that one-connect box. I look forward to similar takes on the LG and Sony line-up for 2024.
LG G4 OLED WILL DESTROY THIS SAMSUNG TV
The glare free looks worse. It makes the image looks fuzzy and low contrast.
So are these one connect boxes going to have the same 40gbps limit that ruins any high end gaming at 4k 144 with constant black screen signal dropouts that cause the video card drivers to crash when the pc surpasses that limit? I'm having that issue now with my s95c and am getting it serviced but in the end it'll go back to the store and I'll buy another brand (probably Sony). HDMI 2.1 heh yeah right not without having 48 Gpbs capable bandwidth, almost all my newer games are unplayable because of this issue.
I could definitely see the S95D has a bit of haze in the eye retina. Mmm 🤔
The anti glare is terrible. Let me get rid of reflections in my room, dont ruin the image for the TV I just spent a ton of money on.
s95d has blooming from anti reflection filter
So between s90d and s95c which one could be better?
What's the difference between having a one connect box and not, when both tvs support four 144hz?
The AG coating just spreads the glare all over the screen and doesn't look good, even through the video I can see the graininess in the highlights, yikes. Rather just have a glossy screen and watch it in a dark room like you are supposed to...
If you can find a S89C and you live in the States get it! $1799 at Best Buy for a 2nd gen QD OLED that is amazing. Much better and far superior to the C3. I have had the TV for a month now and it is the best gaming TV I have had to date. Glad I didn’t needlessly spend an extra $3k for an A95L
Yesssiir getting that in 2-3 weeks my very first oled in 77inch 🥹
@@Watever310 amazing TV. Loving it
Ill take the glassy glare over that flat washed-out blacks all day and twice on mondays
So the LG G4 83 Is the one to buy.
I have the limited Steam Deck, with anti glare. It tends to look fantastic. I also have a C1, glossy of course. They both look amazing, but I don’t spend time looking at both of them next to one another.
They are still doing the separate box? Hard pass.
Glad I've seen someone else say this. That box is the absolute worse. The amount of times that has caused me to lose connection to the screen whilst using an external device via HDMIS
My original One Connect Box with S95C 65" dropped every incoming signal. Samsung couldn't send out a replacement One Connect Box so they swapped the entire unit. The new S95C 65" and One Connect Box is perfect. 4K120Hz/4K144Hz, HDR, ALLM, and VRR feels fantastic with my PS5, XSX, and 3090 Gaming PC.
S95C looks way better than S95D, matte coatings are crap. If you don't like glare, turn off the lights or get bias lighting instead, you'll solve the problem without ruining your blacks and washing out the image. The S90D sounds again like the best option.
Should I wait for the s90d or get an s95c? S90d will have similar brightness and better processor.
Given the recent news if the HDMI Forum screwing Linux users, please keep an eye on TVs that will start including DisplayPorts connectors.
No
Is dolby Vision still superior than hdr10 in 2024 .. heard that since Samsungs qd oled are capable of higher peak brightness and color luminance , Dolby vision support on lg,Sony… etc..doesn’t matter anymore
Should I hang on to my Q9FN or upgrade to the new Oled. Tv is used around 14 hours each day, mainly news, gaming and films.
LG G4 OLED WILL DESTROY THIS SAMSUNG TV
Lol I appreciate the comparison of the screen reflectivity/glare. The glossy display looks so much better, it seems like a joke. You can obviously tell there’s a light shining at the display in both instances, so why settle for all the ugly trade-offs _just_ to obscure exactly _what_ is causing the glare? Matte displays suck.
they should make a coating like that, low reflection but doesn't smudge and make the light source bigger. 2:25 in here it's a complete circle
Let us know when Samsung releases 83” QD-OLED?
Matte just looks so bad.lcd can get away with because it's bright but on OLED is severely destroyed its contrast
This just in: Tim Cruise slated to issue PSA advocating for anti-glare filters as well as a public shaming sentence for anyone found guilty of using motion interpolation.
dude the 23y samsung oled looks way sharper with deeper color and better contrast even on the youtube video.
Anyone know if there is a meaningful difference between the S90C and S90D? Presumably both have less maximum brightness as compared to the respective S95C/D but did the 90D increase max brightness over the 90C? Thanks!
90D doesnt even guarantee u to get QD OLED 😅, 90C is always QD. I highly doubt D is better than C 🤷♂️
@@grantorino9049That can’t be true. I know you’re not exactly enamored of Samsung-fair enough-but making an unnecessarily confusing marketplace even less clear doesn’t help the cause of shedding more light. As I understand it (which is to say: enormous grain of salt) the *initial* 90Ds -may- be the same QD-OLED screens as used in the 90Cs (until stock runs out) at which time the nee 90D screens will be invisibly slipped into manufacturing. Now don’t get me wrong. If true that enormously sucks and is (IMO) colossally stupid of Samsung. The obvious way to handle the situation would have been to use only the new screens on the new product-protecting brand and consumer confidence-and using the older screens on a lesser product which may, therefore, have some “unexpectedly” better parts used-and just delay manufacturer discounts to move stock a few months to recoup costs. Assuming you have the warehouse space everybody wins. But this scenario takes something the Koreans (and Japanese) used to have before becoming slaves to stockholders-just like US companies-vision and room to act in support of the company long-term. But I think I digress… My question remains: absent (!) the latest generation screen, is their a meaningful difference between the 90C and 90D? Let me perl a layer back on my thinking. I had all bu decided to get a 77 95C-but the order got screwed up! So now the D line is out. Get the 95? Wait for the D? All everyone talks about is the 95D screen-not the considerably cheaper 90D. And not a word about the digital processing). Truth to tell I’ve started to reconsider getting the Sony x77a95l but it is out of stock everywhere, by console is only 60” wide (no problem for the pedestal Samsung). And audio is a significant consideration. I had the top Samsung Atmos sound-bar included with the 95c. There isn’t an equivalent with the Sony. So…
I'm still.good with my S95B from 2022 😊
Thank goodness I did not go for the ViewFinity S9 for the matte display!
Mat screens are dreadful, all they do is lower the contrast and look washed and, what the hell are Samsung playing at....... The have ruined this year's QDOLED, it should have been the best....
Indeed. Even glossy OLEDs have bad real-life contrast (not to be confused with PR “infinite contrast” BS) because they often lack polarisers, so they reflect back crazy amounts of incoming light, if used not in complete darkness. This is because the actual display matrix is a huge number of metal wires, so it is a mirror. Matte OLEDs are even way worse than that.
A little off-topic, but when Sony’s event that will show their 2024 tv lineup will actually happen? Are there any estimates?
Mid April
The pictures on the left look much nicer.
So no QN95D this year?
2:37 Here is a an idea: how about not having bright lights in the same room as your screen? I know, insane idea.
Here’s a wild thought, not everyone has a living room isolated from all sources of light (windows, etc) and sometimes people want to watch something without turning the lights out.
Not all of us have a dedicated theatre room. I have either large windows on either end of the room, or lights in the room on. I tried a S95C and it was like looking into a mirror in my space. I'm looking forward to an option to get a matte screen again, as my old LED Samsung is also matte.
@@mstreich You don't need a theatre room, dim lit room is more than enough or even normal lights with no direct lights behind the tv works too. The antireflection dark layer dims reflections, its nothing like a mirror. Matte only takes the light and diffuse it all over the screen. Matte coating absolutely destroys picture quality, its not an option if you care about PQ.
I dont have a theater room, but it was easy to paint my living room black. Get curtians for the very large back windows and put a nice led strip behind the tv. I also put a black cloth on top of the entertainment cabinet. It's an easy compromise for better picture.
Say that to the sun! 😂
Yeah it's in the name. W-OLED is the one. W
Samsung playing games by not being upfront with which models are QD vs W OLED, it’s lifted blacks from its “anti-glare” implementation, and continued lack of Dolby Vision support….no thanks.
65'' S90D QDCC for €3000 is too much
What about Q80D?
*If S90D uses qd-oled, will it be the third gen panel?*
Probably it will be similar to S90C, by first using up remaining second gen panels and then switching to third gen. Unless Samsung decides to continue making second gen panels for whatever reason.
According to the video: yes, most likely. 00:57
@@exscape*I'm talking about the S90D not the S95D.*
This is sh*t. I am waiting to buy a 3rd gen QD-OLED panel. How they heck do they get away with *NOT telling you what the heck they are using?!😡😡*
Its a 2nd gen panel s90d* 3rd gen is small improvement mostly for the ew matte model that you need higher brightness to compensate for less light pass through on matte
So the decision to watching something in a bright room is a washed out hazy picture that is still seeable or a blotting of the picture but keeps the contrast/quality around it. It's like choosing between myopia or central serous retinopathy. Best to just watch it in a dark or dimly lit room to avoid most of these issues. Blinds exist for a reason or just leaving the door ajar that lets in some light which isn't in contact with the screen itself.
Man, - that sandwich is looking good! lol
I did just bought the samsung s90c it's totally worth it. Thanks for the review i did get an idea on a good quality thanks mate even its, cheap oled and the price is low its totally worth it.. I almost bought lg qned 86 mini led but theres a big difference on gaming.
7:12 Ideally we should still get a fill rundown of the zone count, brightness and contrast of every QLED from Samsung this year. QD-OLED is great but FALD still has potential to give the best HDR performance in the industry.
Which tv in next 1 month 77-87 size budget 3000-4000 pounds
Bottom line: S95D = 2002 TFT/lcd panel S90D = 2024 Proper Oled flagship 🎉