Daniel Yanofsky vs Bobby Fischer • Stockholm - Sweden, 1962
Пікірлер
Que gran duelo...😮 Maestros !!!!
@grama78659 ай бұрын
It was a game with sophisticated steps. It was very funny and exciting to follow it with the mind.
@anestismoutafidis45759 ай бұрын
Precious gift,thanks for sharing..👍 CHESS MATE💙😑👍👏👏👏...
@kegelchen328 ай бұрын
Maravillosa partida!
@dimitrimitris3899 ай бұрын
Thank you so much
@luigicolombo21919 ай бұрын
A very well played game, a true masterpiece!
@marcelobrunorodrigues763010 ай бұрын
Schach ist große Geduld!
@thomaswiese232410 ай бұрын
This is very good no irritated oc commentary just watching 2 masters play
@BishopBattles-qz4ko8 ай бұрын
Thank you very much 🙏
@Chess-Mates8 ай бұрын
Me gusta tú agresivo juego la jugada delAlfil atacando el enrroque yo ya la conocía y es muy buena, saludos cordiales..
@user-nm8yg8yu4v10 ай бұрын
Menor mini escavadeira do. Mundo
@washingtonjapa10 ай бұрын
Menor escavadeira
@washingtonjapa10 ай бұрын
His blunder was playin Bobby
@billmkyzl9339 ай бұрын
Fischer nos finais era insuperável estava com 19 anos
@jorge678319 ай бұрын
deutsche Übersetzung!?...😐...
@kegelchen328 ай бұрын
Bobby faz uma manobra torre e cavalo q ninguém prevê insuperável o maior enxadrista de todos os tempos 😂
@jorge678319 ай бұрын
Bobby was such a master of the end game. He was so patient and careful with his rook and knight at the end and protecting those last two pawns.
@AmbassadorAusar8 ай бұрын
Yes 👍
@Chess-Mates8 ай бұрын
Mess up the opponents pawn structure while maintaining your own, trade queens and move into the end game. Works every time. Thats why, early on, you might trade a piece, or two, leaving the opponent wondering, why you did that. 10 moves later, they realize, oh crap! 😅😂😅
@williamtsmith96689 ай бұрын
Rajan koranpeedika india
@user-ih8es5oy8r10 ай бұрын
Did Yanofsky blunder by letting Fischer take his bishop at the end?
@multilingual110 ай бұрын
No, Yanofsky did not blunder. Fischer had a stronger end game, taking advantage of his small but significant material advantage. Yanofsky put up a good fight. He should have fought for a draw earlier in the game. But hind-sight is always 20/20.
@TheBinaryWolf9 ай бұрын
Nice! Finally i found the source of pro game reconstructions with no "what if this or that happened and this is what the engine suggests" or some bimbo trying to act like she has never played against someone. This is what chess sounds like, without any extra bs on the backround :)
@markkuhexen-sonderauftrag77608 ай бұрын
Thank you very much! Please push the bell 🔔 to stay connected with this channel. If you need any help, feel free to write us
@Chess-Mates8 ай бұрын
I don't believe the rating under Bobby's name. Add a 100 and I would.
@gheffz8 ай бұрын
...at least👍😀...
@kegelchen328 ай бұрын
Where your comments? Where did Yanofsky blunder?
@AriAllenby10 ай бұрын
ĺĺlĺ
@benghok778810 ай бұрын
I suppose 104. Rb2-b4 was the only error since he allowed Fischer to give check to his opponent's King and win few moves White's remaining Pawn.
@marcelobrunorodrigues763010 ай бұрын
Playing White with no real aggression already defending far too early.
Que gran duelo...😮 Maestros !!!!
It was a game with sophisticated steps. It was very funny and exciting to follow it with the mind.
Precious gift,thanks for sharing..👍 CHESS MATE💙😑👍👏👏👏...
Maravillosa partida!
Thank you so much
A very well played game, a true masterpiece!
Schach ist große Geduld!
This is very good no irritated oc commentary just watching 2 masters play
Thank you very much 🙏
Me gusta tú agresivo juego la jugada delAlfil atacando el enrroque yo ya la conocía y es muy buena, saludos cordiales..
Menor mini escavadeira do. Mundo
Menor escavadeira
His blunder was playin Bobby
Fischer nos finais era insuperável estava com 19 anos
deutsche Übersetzung!?...😐...
Bobby faz uma manobra torre e cavalo q ninguém prevê insuperável o maior enxadrista de todos os tempos 😂
Bobby was such a master of the end game. He was so patient and careful with his rook and knight at the end and protecting those last two pawns.
Yes 👍
Mess up the opponents pawn structure while maintaining your own, trade queens and move into the end game. Works every time. Thats why, early on, you might trade a piece, or two, leaving the opponent wondering, why you did that. 10 moves later, they realize, oh crap! 😅😂😅
Rajan koranpeedika india
Did Yanofsky blunder by letting Fischer take his bishop at the end?
No, Yanofsky did not blunder. Fischer had a stronger end game, taking advantage of his small but significant material advantage. Yanofsky put up a good fight. He should have fought for a draw earlier in the game. But hind-sight is always 20/20.
Nice! Finally i found the source of pro game reconstructions with no "what if this or that happened and this is what the engine suggests" or some bimbo trying to act like she has never played against someone. This is what chess sounds like, without any extra bs on the backround :)
Thank you very much! Please push the bell 🔔 to stay connected with this channel. If you need any help, feel free to write us
I don't believe the rating under Bobby's name. Add a 100 and I would.
...at least👍😀...
Where your comments? Where did Yanofsky blunder?
ĺĺlĺ
I suppose 104. Rb2-b4 was the only error since he allowed Fischer to give check to his opponent's King and win few moves White's remaining Pawn.
Playing White with no real aggression already defending far too early.
Бессмысленных ходов много.
Fiser
Yanofsky resign!
Qg6 blunder