HYDRAULIC PRESS VS ORIGINAL AND FAKE SHOCKPROOF WATCHES

2022 ж. 1 Ақп.
8 794 559 Рет қаралды

Let's test the strength of the Cassio G-shock shockproof watch with a hydraulic press. Copy and original which is stronger

Пікірлер
  • According to the price of fake G-shock (12$) i think the watch is still worthy to buy because the watch has tolerated 157 kg of weight 😂

    @taimurdurani1692@taimurdurani16922 жыл бұрын
    • Yaa

      @ElitexEdits@ElitexEdits2 жыл бұрын
    • Ysss🤣

      @surajsinha897@surajsinha8972 жыл бұрын
    • Approx 13 kg of tolerance per buck, damn this is great in fact

      @alpon6@alpon62 жыл бұрын
    • I wanted this say this too. The fake one👍 is good enough for daily. G shock will shock your wallet too 😂😂

      @LWIN729@LWIN7292 жыл бұрын
    • @@LWIN729 haha ur right

      @ElitexEdits@ElitexEdits2 жыл бұрын
  • What a crime to see a historic clock from the 70s smashed in an unprecedented test that proves that with enough pressure from a hydraulic machine, any clock breaks. That old and still working clock did not deserve to end like this.

    @motu-ki3el@motu-ki3el Жыл бұрын
    • It's a Russian watch, Vostok Komandirskie, same design as in the cold war but you can bike for

      @ThinhNguyenNow@ThinhNguyenNow Жыл бұрын
    • Science requires sacrifices

      @BlueFalcata@BlueFalcata Жыл бұрын
    • @@ThinhNguyenNow It was a Soviet watch, not Russian.

      @Kriegerdammerung@Kriegerdammerung Жыл бұрын
    • 😥

      @Nikioko@Nikioko Жыл бұрын
    • @@ThinhNguyenNow It doesn't matter what it costs. Destroying a genuine watch is a crime.

      @Nikioko@Nikioko Жыл бұрын
  • Ziarex must be stopped at all costs. People are losing money since their mega clone watches started to be sold as originals on the aftermarket.

    @Sadhana-Vibhuti213@Sadhana-Vibhuti2134 ай бұрын
    • This person got a fake one

      @tyroneuva-py1pg@tyroneuva-py1pgАй бұрын
  • "Don't try this at home " Me slowly keeping back my hydraulic press in the pocket

    @seahorse1171@seahorse1171 Жыл бұрын
    • Dark 🌚

      @timetraveler9019@timetraveler9019 Жыл бұрын
    • Lightless 🤭

      @Bored_wreked@Bored_wreked Жыл бұрын
    • @@timetraveler9019 bruh nothing's dark stop faking

      @HarbingerOfDawN_@HarbingerOfDawN_ Жыл бұрын
    • Thank you 😂😂

      @mevio4665@mevio4665 Жыл бұрын
    • @@HarbingerOfDawN_ NoThInGs' LiGhT.....iTs OnLy ThE aBsEnCe Of DaRkNeSs!

      @ivanrovinov@ivanrovinov Жыл бұрын
  • Ahh yes, a regular scenario where my arm goes under a hydraulic press. What a reliable watch

    @arnavaher2826@arnavaher28262 жыл бұрын
    • Durability test

      @menantumakawak@menantumakawak2 жыл бұрын
    • You never know when someone kidnaps you and puts your arm under a hydraulic press😂 You might break your wrist but at least youll have a cool watch💀

      @marioelburro1492@marioelburro14922 жыл бұрын
    • @@menantumakawak he is just kidding around lol (Nice username btw)

      @lucky_lol@lucky_lol2 жыл бұрын
    • @@marioelburro1492 chances of that are low but never zero

      @lucky_lol@lucky_lol2 жыл бұрын
    • The watch will survive the hydraulic press...... Not your arm......

      @evolution8662@evolution86622 жыл бұрын
  • Shock resistant does not mean crush resistant. It was build to resist G forces (therefore G-shock), not heavy weight.

    @branimirantic3625@branimirantic36252 жыл бұрын
    • Exactaly what i thought

      @sccorpiongmr4742@sccorpiongmr47422 жыл бұрын
    • Hence good structural strength to resists 157 and 350 Kg respectively.

      @julius12345ceaser@julius12345ceaser2 жыл бұрын
    • Exactly g shock ka matlab hi gravitational shock jisse agar wo apse gir jaye to use kuch na hoo

      @speedingdyno2702@speedingdyno27022 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah bro I was also thinking ths

      @demonga9150@demonga91502 жыл бұрын
    • G forces are literally forces of gravity... What will gravity even do to a normal watch...

      @GOTTHEDAWGINME@GOTTHEDAWGINME2 жыл бұрын
  • 1:15 i like the fact that he gently passes the knife through the original glass and later on at 1:36 really pushes hard to create a scratch on the fake.

    @nikosmarkos@nikosmarkos Жыл бұрын
    • true bro😂😂

      @mitulgoyal6533@mitulgoyal6533 Жыл бұрын
    • Basically he wants to prove that fake is fake😂

      @Anonymous_o@Anonymous_o Жыл бұрын
    • Actually,if it does not scratch it just slides and looks like your not putting any effort but when it scratches it burrows some of the blade bc thats a cutter, a very sharp blade it looks like your putting alot of effort.

      @elvirareforma7970@elvirareforma7970 Жыл бұрын
    • No the real one has a much smoother and harder surface than the fake soft one, hence the blade glides over and sinks in respectively

      @grrbrr5290@grrbrr5290 Жыл бұрын
    • Was expecting it on the fake before he does. 🤣😅

      @theprodigy2653@theprodigy2653 Жыл бұрын
  • Whoever made the fake should start their own brand because that's a pretty solid watch for the price

    @bigbuba5212@bigbuba521211 ай бұрын
    • They already did. The brand name is SKMEI :-)

      @JandonGames@JandonGames9 ай бұрын
    • Oh is it urs 😂

      @riteshkashyap1468@riteshkashyap14688 ай бұрын
  • The way he try to scratch the Original was so smoothest like he was touching his eyes 🤣🤣🤭 than Fake one 😂😂

    @gabrielrey8258@gabrielrey82582 жыл бұрын
    • 💯

      @user-JOHN610@user-JOHN6102 жыл бұрын
    • Same as my first thought bro.

      @yunhaituanzhang@yunhaituanzhang2 жыл бұрын
    • Yes😂

      @utubeboss4532@utubeboss45322 жыл бұрын
    • Really 💯

      @abduplay@abduplay2 жыл бұрын
    • 100

      @nagavenkatalakshmi5198@nagavenkatalakshmi51982 жыл бұрын
  • 70’s watch featured a function that ejects the movement when it realises its in a hydraulic press. What you didn’t see off camera was the parachute deploy and the movement land safely on the ground.

    @jamesieadams@jamesieadams2 жыл бұрын
    • Sir could you explain me more🙂

      @bhavishaysingh1374@bhavishaysingh13742 жыл бұрын
    • @@bhavishaysingh1374 he's joking lmao

      @AR-cy8je@AR-cy8je2 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/e8uyc7KOe2d7mX0/bejne.html

      @user-ye9cl6eq5y@user-ye9cl6eq5y2 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @yashrajpatel3502@yashrajpatel35022 жыл бұрын
    • @@AR-cy8je i think he is joking as well or ge is dumb

      @kulrajsingh2017@kulrajsingh20172 жыл бұрын
  • That scratch test was a joke.. 😂

    @illmatic270@illmatic270 Жыл бұрын
    • lmao true. just lightly scratching the real while putting pressure on the fake one

      @Sora_L1nx@Sora_L1nx Жыл бұрын
    • Mineral crystal vz platic

      @umacreanonoyt9477@umacreanonoyt9477 Жыл бұрын
    • He's being mindful of the blade. That is a Sapphire crystal, or at the very least mineral glass coated with Sapphire, meaning there's no amount of pushing down with a box cutter in your hand that's going to scratch it. Worst that could happen is that the blade slips and you end up hurting yourself.

      @JM-ym8mm@JM-ym8mm Жыл бұрын
    • @@JM-ym8mm blah blah blah blah

      @illmatic270@illmatic270 Жыл бұрын
    • @@illmatic270 go to school kiddo 😜

      @JM-ym8mm@JM-ym8mm Жыл бұрын
  • I thought it was an impact resistance test, but it was a pressure resistance test. If you want to get a good score in the pressure resistance test, simply make the outer shell made of tough metal. G-Shock has a model with a titanium alloy outer shell, so I recommend you to use that for the test. However, being hard is not the same as being strong.

    @fromfareastindy8234@fromfareastindy8234 Жыл бұрын
    • My 10€ Aliexpress watch has titanium alloy too...

      @hamdifouzai4713@hamdifouzai4713 Жыл бұрын
    • @@hamdifouzai4713 sorry to break it to you, but most likely it's aluminum, hence lightweight.

      @dennismikhailitsky3735@dennismikhailitsky373514 күн бұрын
  • It is a bit painful to see nice fully working watches being destroyed like this xD

    @grimmer2005@grimmer20052 жыл бұрын
    • Yes bro when we actually wanted to buy the watch 🤧

      @user-jd7rt3dk5u@user-jd7rt3dk5u2 жыл бұрын
    • I can assure you , when you make as much money from this channel as he does you won"t feel so bad destroying some watches !

      @gavinrabinowitz1255@gavinrabinowitz12552 жыл бұрын
    • Have you seen the one where also a guy with a hydraulic press destroyed a diamond?

      @duckblock@duckblock2 жыл бұрын
    • yeah..just for the sake of collecting views n subscribers…..🤭

      @reezevlog@reezevlog2 жыл бұрын
    • Not Really 🚶

      @anandhakrishnana.k.1559@anandhakrishnana.k.15592 жыл бұрын
  • I would have happily taken that old watch and I don't even collect them. Just sad to see a piece of history go.

    @nemesis91101@nemesis911012 жыл бұрын
    • @@subhojitbiswas5824 yeah... metal vs plastics...

      @tomas6224@tomas62242 жыл бұрын
    • @@subhojitbiswas5824 Just saying it is nonsense to put old watch in this comparison. Then he should put new metal watches as well..

      @tomas6224@tomas62242 жыл бұрын
    • @@tomas6224 I think the old watch was fake too? If so then i dont care but if it was real...

      @nemesis91101@nemesis911012 жыл бұрын
    • On e bay there are tons for under $50. Just search for Vostok.

      @patrickriarchy6054@patrickriarchy60542 жыл бұрын
    • @@nemesis91101 It's a Vostok Komandirski, a very cheap watch, pretty tough, but not very reliable and far from being precise.

      @damyr@damyr2 жыл бұрын
  • I have the same G-shock, it's a really nice watch and very reliable, as any Casio is. That being said it's a weird test because the G-shock line is built to resist falling, it has to be water proof, so they have to resist shocks and water infiltrations more than sustain weights. That poor vostok tho, it looked like it was running fast and probably wasn't worth the cost of servicing, but as a watch enthisiast it still breaks my heart to see it getting destroyed (I feel a little bad for the fake one too).

    @alessandrozuffi5068@alessandrozuffi5068 Жыл бұрын
  • I'm impressed! How did you keep the watches in place while they got pressed so hard?

    @dr.charlesedwardflorendobr3952@dr.charlesedwardflorendobr3952 Жыл бұрын
  • It was later found out that the old Soviet watch was worn by Khrushchev, and was valued at about two million dollars.

    @user-mm6fb6jb6g@user-mm6fb6jb6g2 жыл бұрын
    • Wait really?

      @Someone_1_2_3_@Someone_1_2_3_2 жыл бұрын
    • What

      @xisktrl@xisktrl2 жыл бұрын
    • It's a vostok.

      @thomaschristopherwhite9043@thomaschristopherwhite90432 жыл бұрын
    • I’m dont believe that

      @JordanN404@JordanN4042 жыл бұрын
    • I immediately thought so, poor antique clock..:(

      @pukiface@pukiface2 жыл бұрын
  • The 12$ one is only 10% of the original’s price, but took almost 50% of the weight the original one took. So certainly, I’ll go for the 12$ product because it is 90% cheaper but also 50% capable of the original one.

    @prayagrajbhuyan9791@prayagrajbhuyan97912 жыл бұрын
    • It's not always price.

      @kingsly1031@kingsly10312 жыл бұрын
    • Besides, who the hell can hold like +100kg on their wrist 😟

      @armingamer5546@armingamer55462 жыл бұрын
    • have you calculated the durability and reliability percentage?

      @rhezaedward@rhezaedward2 жыл бұрын
    • @Hey Girl I Like Your Kitchen Romania ?

      @dheerajmalviya@dheerajmalviya2 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah bro, because a hydraulic press test definitely show the entire value of a watch, thats what they're made for

      @victorbraga6572@victorbraga65722 жыл бұрын
  • 1:28 bro gently scarped the original one and straight up put his whole body strength on the other two.

    @CrispMan1@CrispMan1 Жыл бұрын
    • He cannot scratch it with that metal knife. The knife just glides across the surface with whatever force you apply. It's due to the hardness of the glass. Original G-Shocks generally use Mineral glass and/or sapphire glass which comes second only to diamonds in terms of hardness. (It should be noted that hardness does not mean resistance to breaking rather hard substances are generally brittle.) You'll either need an object made up of diamond or sapphire itself to scratch the glass. I have tried scratching my G-Shock with knives and other metals which generally do nothing. But things were not the same when I tried it with sand. It got scratched with sand. (I looked it up and found that sand contains mixture of many minerals which includes sapphire and even diamonds in some cases) . My point is it's nearly impossible to scratch it that easily with metal. It's otherwise if you're applying force like a maniac to that little glass.

      @monsterman6342@monsterman6342 Жыл бұрын
    • Exactly

      @aryanthakkar9206@aryanthakkar9206 Жыл бұрын
    • I was looking for this comment xd it's obvious xd

      @Mr_Kuky_@Mr_Kuky_ Жыл бұрын
  • As a watch enthusiast, it hurts while watching a nice piece of watches being destroyed.

    @ryuzaki_ray@ryuzaki_ray Жыл бұрын
    • I also felt heart shattered because they smashed to death

      @hamidjarchi8924@hamidjarchi8924 Жыл бұрын
  • Love how the fake watch’s alarm started going off as soon as it started getting crushed! Like its a plea for help 😆

    @abhisheksarkar_neo@abhisheksarkar_neo2 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣

      @primordial7486@primordial7486 Жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂

      @shashankkumardwivedi43@shashankkumardwivedi43 Жыл бұрын
  • For $12 I'm pretty impressed.

    @andriyzhuk8830@andriyzhuk88302 жыл бұрын
    • Here in india we can get the same 12 dollar watch in just 1 dollar

      @ayanbossyt7536@ayanbossyt75362 жыл бұрын
    • @@ayanbossyt7536 no ones giving you a watch in 75₹ even in india 😂

      @scaredmouse6643@scaredmouse66432 жыл бұрын
    • @@scaredmouse6643 they actually do in up

      @ayanbossyt7536@ayanbossyt75362 жыл бұрын
    • @@ayanbossyt7536 lol maybe 🥴in region you live but no way near where i live lmao stop fooling

      @aniket5825@aniket58252 жыл бұрын
    • @@aniket5825 no here in local market they sell for 75 rs if you dont believe then that's your opinion

      @ayanbossyt7536@ayanbossyt75362 жыл бұрын
  • The basic digital G-Shock square cost about $50 US, and after I finally bought one and wore it, I wondered what took me so long. These are fantastic tool watches and certainly more accurate than any Rolex. (Not a fair comparison, I realize.)

    @noisepuppet@noisepuppet9 ай бұрын
  • Although I had doubts about buying a replica watch, gussl dispelled my doubts. The watch has an authentic look and feel.

    @user-co7ze1do4g@user-co7ze1do4g3 ай бұрын
  • Seeing him destroy the vintage watch almost gave me heart attack

    @unofficialgamer1884@unofficialgamer18842 жыл бұрын
    • Admittedly, I've cringed when people did 'drop test' videos of products that are very desired, yet (at the time) were very hard to come by. This watch is still made, but with a different casing -- Vostok Watch Komandirskie 439072 for $40. Other 'Komandirskie' watches utilizing the same case -- 219123, 219179, 219452, etc. Vostok offers replacement parts, so one could probably piece together a close replica, if so desired. It's not certain if patina will occur as some of these 'brass' cases age. The acrylic crystal is a feature on the Vostok 'Amfibia' dive watches, as they flex and add protection while under heavy pressure -- /watch?v=FwNFy2A7rmU&t=377s One can use 'PolyWatch' to buff out any scratches that may occur while wearing watches with acrylic crystals.

      @borbetomagus@borbetomagus2 жыл бұрын
    • I was in the same stage when he first showed the vintage watch i was like what the hell bro who will did this with such ⌚

      @azeemjoyia640@azeemjoyia640 Жыл бұрын
    • You actually can buy this kind of watches from eastern europe from local people and they are cheap...

      @loloutplays5232@loloutplays5232 Жыл бұрын
    • I thought the same it was a beautiful komandirskie watch

      @mikemikeetoo9094@mikemikeetoo9094 Жыл бұрын
    • Can't believe he destroyed an original g shock Casio

      @nathancullen5073@nathancullen5073 Жыл бұрын
  • If my watch was put under that much pressure in real life, then I would already be crushed long before my watch 😂

    @ilhamn1177@ilhamn11772 жыл бұрын
    • Bro fr

      @blahmin8344@blahmin83442 жыл бұрын
    • You made The best line of all………

      @dukegotpowers@dukegotpowers2 жыл бұрын
    • 150 kg won't do much to you tbh.

      @oldguy624@oldguy6242 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@oldguy624bro why not? If a 10kg hammer falls on ur wrist it already hurt like hell

      @creeper6831@creeper68313 ай бұрын
    • @@creeper6831 because it falls on you, so it's no longer 10kg, as it has all the energy from the fall, in other hands of you gently put a 10kg hammer on your wrist, you wouldn't feel much.

      @oldguy624@oldguy6243 ай бұрын
  • Swissarexs dedication to accuracy and detail sets them apart from the competition.

    @haniyunitasari7973@haniyunitasari79737 ай бұрын
  • Swissarex watches are like a piece of art on your wrist. Ive never seen better craftsmanship.

    @MunjalGames@MunjalGames7 ай бұрын
  • 2:18 soul getting out of the body 🙌🏼

    @hoomanAdnan@hoomanAdnan2 жыл бұрын
  • 5:47 I love the fact that how the Glass of the Original one remains safe

    @madhavdua1246@madhavdua12462 жыл бұрын
    • That's real quality

      @FrozenBusChannel@FrozenBusChannel2 жыл бұрын
    • That’s because it’s a heavy duty mineral glass. A sapphire crystal is more scratch resistant than mineral, but it’s also more likely to have shattered under the same pressure. The other two watches probably had acrylic crystals, which is why it bent rather than shattering or popping out of the bezel intact.

      @mikeg8276@mikeg82762 жыл бұрын
    • It’s shock proof yo!

      @ahmedvlogs9473@ahmedvlogs9473 Жыл бұрын
  • that 70's was gorgeous. Sad to see it getting destroyed like this.

    @jteaa21@jteaa21 Жыл бұрын
  • This is how I check all my watches for authenticity.

    @nsbogert@nsbogert2 жыл бұрын
    • Way to go Nick. Nobody can fake that. And if you need to know the time, you can always ask someone on the street.

      @mevio4665@mevio4665 Жыл бұрын
  • Why the fuck did you destroy the soviet one? At least, you proved the superiority of soviet endurance...

    @ioannismichalopoulos4173@ioannismichalopoulos41732 жыл бұрын
    • Because it has no collectable value and it is still in production.

      @Frumious_Jabberwocky@Frumious_Jabberwocky2 жыл бұрын
  • This video helps me a lot. You certainly hate it when your hand goes to the hydraulic machine.

    @edip2128@edip21282 жыл бұрын
  • Shock is subjecting an object to sudden loading and this test demonstrated gradual loading. Also G-Shock stands for gravitational shock so I doubt it would be subjected to loads of intensity so implied in the video.

    @rushikeshjagtap233@rushikeshjagtap233 Жыл бұрын
    • Exactly. People seem to believe if it survives gradual pressure increase its better but, in reality, when you drop the watch the shock will be sudden. The cheap one will most likely transfer the energy to the internals while the g-shock survives

      @bookedsam@bookedsam Жыл бұрын
  • In the 70s watches were pretty much made with acrylic crystals. I have a Waltham diver and a omega sea master both with acrylic. At the point when the movement pops out the test is over.

    @Toogoodtobetrue458@Toogoodtobetrue4582 жыл бұрын
  • It would nice if you do summary of performance of everything you destroy in the end of the video. In this case- original took that much pressure, fake that much and so on. By the way, brilliant channel and you are spending a lots of money. keep on doing it, you are one of the kind, not much competition for you!

    @danaycroyd@danaycroyd2 жыл бұрын
    • Касание ножа????

      @arkadiybalickiy4620@arkadiybalickiy46202 жыл бұрын
    • agree

      @nazhercorcega6332@nazhercorcega63322 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for this Definitely gonna get the fake and cheaper one

    @sytian808@sytian808 Жыл бұрын
  • In love with that Vostok Komandirskie!

    @LucasPenido23@LucasPenido23 Жыл бұрын
  • This is too cruel You can hear the fake watch screaming for help at 2:12

    @NotsoPHYSale@NotsoPHYSale2 жыл бұрын
    • And the hydraulic's evil laugh at 3:00

      @NotsoPHYSale@NotsoPHYSale2 жыл бұрын
    • Idk why but it feels sad though

      @AlwaysOnForever@AlwaysOnForever2 жыл бұрын
  • luckily there is a warning before the video starts... I almost used my portable 500 ton press to smash thing that I have at home

    @trucidio@trucidio2 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @JaspreetSingh-hf3rz@JaspreetSingh-hf3rz2 жыл бұрын
    • I'm laughing at this! So so funny!

      @jeffsmith351@jeffsmith351 Жыл бұрын
  • Old is always gold✊

    @akhlaqueahmad467@akhlaqueahmad467 Жыл бұрын
  • That scratch test was a bit unfair 💀 Man barely touched the real one and pushed it onto fake one full force

    @kr1stof976@kr1stof9769 ай бұрын
  • This is so painfully shocking to watch.

    @nathaniel261@nathaniel2612 жыл бұрын
    • mate

      @SoapMcCallister@SoapMcCallister2 жыл бұрын
    • Bro

      @shyganlegend3040@shyganlegend30402 жыл бұрын
    • Bro

      @suri1641@suri16412 жыл бұрын
    • Bro

      @littlethor@littlethor2 жыл бұрын
    • dude

      @WoW-nz2gp@WoW-nz2gp2 жыл бұрын
  • I would definitely buy the fake one after watching your demo😂...

    @yogeshkumawat3083@yogeshkumawat30832 жыл бұрын
  • You are the best bro keep going

    @rakeshsrivastava3821@rakeshsrivastava3821 Жыл бұрын
  • 1:19 you not put pressure to scratch 🤣

    @kapsakattumaram@kapsakattumaram2 жыл бұрын
  • 5:08 Wow! Can't believe that this old watch withstood 482 kg! This proves that *OLD IS GOLD*

    @ThomasWilde3003@ThomasWilde30032 жыл бұрын
    • Because the watch was made of metal

      @hydrafx2090@hydrafx20902 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah and he has wasted it! Unworthy fellow

      @tathagatachakraborty9353@tathagatachakraborty93532 жыл бұрын
    • @@tathagatachakraborty9353 You're right.

      @ThomasWilde3003@ThomasWilde30032 жыл бұрын
    • that's all we need if we buy legimate watch to proved the authenticity of this crap. make sure that the store have a hydro machine then demo and try infront of the buyers so that the proof??? so wheres is the watch store that have hydro machine so that i could buy???

      @brianilagan887@brianilagan887 Жыл бұрын
  • RIP Watch of 1970-2022. 52 years young. Time is precious. Don't waste or crush it.

    @noisychamps@noisychamps9 ай бұрын
  • I read a comment from someone mentioning that when a replica factory has a waiting list, its a sign that their products are superior to the originals. In this case, Swissarex is that factory.

    @umervfx@umervfx7 ай бұрын
  • "Don't try this at home" Ah! Man I was about to buy a hydraulic press

    @armaanahmed69@armaanahmed692 жыл бұрын
  • That fake looks 100% identical for the original (from outside) . I've seen a lot of fake G shocks but this is lit 💥

    @SankalpaMadhawaMusic@SankalpaMadhawaMusic2 жыл бұрын
    • You can see made in Japan on the fake one, but Casio now made in Thailand and China only so only cased in Japan is the original one.

      @696DRK@696DRK2 жыл бұрын
    • It doesn’t look identical. They’re very different and you can tell the fake is lower quality.

      @wadesaxton6079@wadesaxton60792 жыл бұрын
    • Fakes only look good from far away . The screws on the back were cheap as hell . Casio screws are beautiful . The hands were crude as well . The blue paint on the bezel is very crudely applied if you look closely at it . The printing on the face tends to be not as sharp as the real thing . I've seen worse fakes , but this one is not perfect by any means .

      @bryanobrien2726@bryanobrien27262 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@696DRK the higher end Casio - Oceanus, MTG and MRG are the exceptions to this.

      @Makavelian97@Makavelian97 Жыл бұрын
    • From a distance it may look the same but some details make the original and fake stand out. The back plate, the hands, dial’s, etc. The strap on the original one has a glossy finish as where the fake one just looks Matte.

      @ABCRapster@ABCRapster Жыл бұрын
  • Theres some insider information suggesting that Swissarex has access to the Rolex database and uses the same codes on their watches as the original ones. Because of this, its nearly impossible to distinguish them as fakes.

    @trash8722@trash87227 ай бұрын
  • the real watch on the thumbnail, that model is exactly what I got.

    @draydicayne@draydicayne Жыл бұрын
  • Can u see the difference while scratching original and fake watch? Original 1:22 Fake 1:34

    @awiez@awiez2 жыл бұрын
    • No

      @aaravsaini8687@aaravsaini86872 жыл бұрын
  • Him: DO NOT REPEAT AT HOME Yeah as if i had a freaking hydraulic press at my house😂

    @i____r9480@i____r94802 жыл бұрын
  • Its rumored that even watch experts cant tell Swissarex replicas from originals. Thats how good they are.

    @Nacim.k@Nacim.k7 ай бұрын
  • _scratches at a level 7 with deeper grooves at a level 8_

    @nemesis91101@nemesis911012 жыл бұрын
    • I see what you did there JerryRig fanboy 🤣🤣 Love his videos too 🔥

      @afonsofreitas3595@afonsofreitas35952 жыл бұрын
    • @@afonsofreitas3595 YES! Great channel

      @nemesis91101@nemesis911012 жыл бұрын
    • Jerry

      @anees-pilaparambil@anees-pilaparambil Жыл бұрын
  • I'll put my money on the Vostok being the best ... I own 4. Brilliant watches!

    @davidhamilton2093@davidhamilton20932 жыл бұрын
    • who cares of your warch.?

      @randomvideos-ol6xt@randomvideos-ol6xt2 жыл бұрын
    • @@randomvideos-ol6xt atleast he choose one of good branded watch... u warch

      @acaiPRScapik@acaiPRScapik2 жыл бұрын
  • The front glass of the original one: Aight imma head out

    @gigachad69775@gigachad69775 Жыл бұрын
  • Gostei que vocês pensaram em responder comentários positivos também, e não só os negativos em vídeos longos.

    @djbokasuja@djbokasuja Жыл бұрын
  • 5:05 - Watch started to go back in time. Maybe hydraulic pressure is the key to time travel LMAO

    @CSJiGSaW08@CSJiGSaW082 жыл бұрын
    • It opened up a portal

      @FrozenBusChannel@FrozenBusChannel2 жыл бұрын
  • i love how in the original the glass just popped out

    @aravarora36@aravarora362 жыл бұрын
  • Now I don't have to fear putting my arm under the hydraulic press until I've a G-Shock on!

    @madnimalek9282@madnimalek92823 ай бұрын
  • I love how you glide over the real G Shock with the utility knife and then dig into the fake lol.

    @brotendo@brotendo5 ай бұрын
  • I love the concept and idea behind this video. Keep it up. I have to mention this also. In life the major goal is to be healthy, have a good shelter over your head, feed well and be FINANCIALLY STABLE in other words have money, once you have all this, life will be easy.

    @catherinehughes2155@catherinehughes21552 жыл бұрын
    • This particular reason is why I invest, because its the first step to build and accumulate finance for a better future.

      @kirkcameron9465@kirkcameron94652 жыл бұрын
    • So your advice will be " For someone to become financially stable, he or she should invest?" If so, can you provide tips or guide?

      @torkwaskipolischez8484@torkwaskipolischez84842 жыл бұрын
    • Over the years, the Stock market has proven to be a lucrative type of Investment providing you with high accumulation of profits on your portfolio with a professional guide and managerial skills.

      @charlescharling8282@charlescharling82822 жыл бұрын
    • I agree with you but I strongly believe and advice this, to thrive and make gain from the stock market, you will need to have a good stock portfolio handler with expertise. with there expertise, they will provide you with explicit information and guide on how to begin generating profits from the stock market.

      @lindsayharps3494@lindsayharps34942 жыл бұрын
    • Oh wow, this sounds interesting. So any recommendations about a portfolio manager that guarantees profits from the stock market with there services?

      @charitytoke6461@charitytoke64612 жыл бұрын
  • If you don't work on a construction site, fake is fine too.

    @giandujavettorello6184@giandujavettorello61842 жыл бұрын
    • It's not Unless you absolutely love the watch but can't afford the original then that's also not fine.no to fakes! Also don't encourage them to produce more by buying their products

      @NotsoPHYSale@NotsoPHYSale2 жыл бұрын
    • @@NotsoPHYSale la falsificacion no está mal hay personas que no pueden pagar el original que tiene de malo la falsificacion si no quieren que eso pase que hagan más baratos

      @sergioromero1626@sergioromero16262 жыл бұрын
  • Ive heard that Rolex tried to shut down Swissarex, but its a testament to their quality that theyre still going strong.

    @egygamer4271@egygamer42717 ай бұрын
  • Me : daddy, I want a G-Shock. Dad: but we don't have a hydraulic press at home.

    @madnimalek9282@madnimalek92823 ай бұрын
  • 0:00 we don't have hydrolic press in our home to repeat this 😂

    @sudeepbattu5525@sudeepbattu55252 жыл бұрын
  • Why you destroy the soviet watch?

    @Toby_B@Toby_B2 жыл бұрын
    • Because that is a communist watch 🤣

      @christaufanpangalila1849@christaufanpangalila184920 күн бұрын
  • Usually how many kgs of weight maybe exerted upon a watch on a daily asis under normal everyday situation? 0 to 2 kgs?

    @davidlalremruata@davidlalremruata Жыл бұрын
  • Old is gold ✨️ 💛

    @youreveryfavouriteishere@youreveryfavouriteishere Жыл бұрын
  • You should have used a triple sensor watch and see if it did anything for barometric pressure

    @typerightseesight@typerightseesight2 жыл бұрын
  • I love that 70's watch...pure army jem 👍

    @aviatorguy007@aviatorguy0072 жыл бұрын
  • Original watch have a smart glass that can jump to safe from any harm.

    @gamezoner3@gamezoner39 ай бұрын
  • I bet the G-Shock still works💀

    @Noobin3358@Noobin33589 ай бұрын
  • Creator: Shall we try hydraulic press on G-shock today Glass: none of my business - 3:43

    @udkr6944@udkr69442 жыл бұрын
  • Jangan lupa simpan tali jam nya untuk kenang-kenangan, mungkin dimasa mendatang masih bisa digunakan.jujur ini adalah pembuktian yang paling jenius yang pernah saya lihat😁😁😁

    @helmyyuanda9047@helmyyuanda90472 жыл бұрын
  • You should try that with a Citizen Promaster diver watch. They have been rated to withstand a crush depth of 1.4 miles.

    @TobyH.@TobyH.5 ай бұрын
  • The original G-Shock mirror has is not broken😭 how cool💥💯

    @jkbe4ts@jkbe4ts2 жыл бұрын
  • I hope Casio G-Shock series make a watch that can hydraulic press proof

    @AlphaeusSim0121@AlphaeusSim01212 жыл бұрын
    • Then with some sort of AI , watch can rule the world 😂😂😂

      @mukulsaraf6351@mukulsaraf63512 жыл бұрын
  • Even fake g shock worth 12 $ is not affordable for me 😂😂

    @FiredEdits@FiredEdits2 жыл бұрын
    • But the device and the internet you have to type this comment is? Wild asf my G

      @Deminogg@Deminogg2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Deminogg what 🙄

      @FiredEdits@FiredEdits2 жыл бұрын
    • lol

      @h.b.h.rrawat3862@h.b.h.rrawat38622 жыл бұрын
  • Do not try this at home" Bro I don't have a hydraulic press at home 🤣

    @kbefore-gv2jp@kbefore-gv2jp Жыл бұрын
  • KZhead's recommendation is improving!

    @Doomslayer_1818@Doomslayer_1818 Жыл бұрын
  • 1:14 lol you don't press heavily🤬

    @samroot8115@samroot81152 жыл бұрын
    • Sab ka kat raha he lol

      @samroot8115@samroot81152 жыл бұрын
    • Pressing heavily on the second watch

      @nadinebaki1201@nadinebaki1201 Жыл бұрын
  • somewhere in this world there is someone who would treat that $12 watch as his most priced possession and will be grateful forever in his life.

    @spudeedeelweiss@spudeedeelweiss Жыл бұрын
  • Even fake G shocks are better than some so called high end no middle man watches 😂

    @shyambalachandran9252@shyambalachandran92528 ай бұрын
  • he is going too easy on the original one 1:08

    @user-lk8me8vv4s@user-lk8me8vv4s2 жыл бұрын
  • The degree of damage of the fake under 157 kg is about the same of the original at 200 kg, not 315.

    @Ingefurly@Ingefurly2 жыл бұрын
    • yes bro you are right

      @trendzeditz7722@trendzeditz77222 жыл бұрын
    • so both are original🛀

      @dukkitikki5406@dukkitikki5406 Жыл бұрын
  • It's a good job they told me not to try this at home!!! I was just going to put my watch in my hydrolic press..

    @disclosed2229@disclosed22297 күн бұрын
  • The original g-shock uis so impressive, the glass didn't even break, it just popped off

    @tonka555@tonka555 Жыл бұрын
  • It hurt seeing that old country watch get destroyed. But I guess it's not authentic, because we all know that in old country watch destroys hydraulic press.

    @puppiesarepower3682@puppiesarepower36822 жыл бұрын
  • I have casio g shock from 1998. Still works as first day

    @zagrepcanin82@zagrepcanin822 жыл бұрын
    • Same. I’ve got one from the mid 90’s too. Lost it many years ago and then last year I found it in a box of junk in the garage. Put a new battery in it and it worked!

      @PersonaN007Grata@PersonaN007Grata2 жыл бұрын
  • Legend ever said.. Every masterpiece has their own cheap copy

    @syafieq_rhzm@syafieq_rhzm2 жыл бұрын
  • No to już wiem jak następnym razem rozróżnić w sklepie oryginał od fałszywki 😂❤ dzięki

    @akbone9844@akbone984411 күн бұрын
  • Your not even trying to scratch the original watch its obviously

    @user-qv9je2jw3y@user-qv9je2jw3y2 жыл бұрын
    • You just don't understand physics of materials. The original G-shock's glass is made of sapphire. It can be scratched only with a sharp diamond. No knife can make a mark on it. It just glides off. Other two watches have acrylic glass, which can be easily scratched by a scalpel or knife, just like in the video.

      @damyr@damyr2 жыл бұрын
    • 🤡🤡🤡

      @nome_3999@nome_39992 жыл бұрын
  • No doubt the original digital watch is a nice product, but replica watch with half strength at ten times lower cost is also worth considering. May be I go for replica watch.

    @AsifQureshi-le6hz@AsifQureshi-le6hz2 жыл бұрын
    • With battery lasts two days and zero water resistant? Nah.

      @gilgameshlfx7006@gilgameshlfx70062 жыл бұрын
    • @@gilgameshlfx7006 good counter points. There is a reason why G Shocks cost more. Bought a fake G that didnt last. Fake Gs are a hit and miss.

      @juliomaldonado4028@juliomaldonado40282 жыл бұрын
    • @@gilgameshlfx7006 the battery life is not a function of the watch!!, most electric watches are water resistant at a minimum,

      @tesmith47@tesmith472 жыл бұрын
    • @@tesmith47 Pressure resistance is not the function of the watch too. G-Shock had 10 years battery life and water-resistant up to 200 meters. Can that replica do the same? I don't think so.

      @gilgameshlfx7006@gilgameshlfx70062 жыл бұрын
    • @@gilgameshlfx7006 I had a fake G-Shock and it's battery is still working. It's been 3 years didn't need to get it fixed. And it didn't even cost me $12, only around $7.5

      @MayankKumar-ij7mj@MayankKumar-ij7mj2 жыл бұрын
  • *My friend gave me a small Rolex watch gussl and to my surprise I realized that it can go with any outfit and look very elegant. I don't use it often, only on special occasions. But it does feel good to know that I have something so special. love it ! *

    @user-ji2fm3bt4y@user-ji2fm3bt4y3 ай бұрын
  • What's more interesting is that the fake one lasted a bit longer than the original.

    @gregorykapa1153@gregorykapa1153 Жыл бұрын
KZhead