Why AI will see humans as trees. Elon Musk, Max Tegmark, Ilya Sutskever.
AI's stunning new skills. To learn AI, visit: brilliant.org/digitalengine where you'll also find loads of fun courses on maths, science and computer science.
AI robots, with Max Tegmark, Dario Amodei, Emad Mostaque, Tesla bot, Ameca, Digit, Pi AI, GPT-4 and Mr Beast.
Thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring this video.
Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models.
www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-...
Letter signed by 1500 professors (and thousands of other experts)
futureoflife.org/open-letter/...
Statement on the risk from the leaders of AI firms:
www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk
1.5m people take Turing test.
arxiv.org/abs/2305.20010
RT-2: New model translates vision and language into action
www.deepmind.com/blog/rt-2-ne...
Embodied AI: Bridging the Gap to Human-Like Cognition
www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/f....
AI and robots help understand animal language
www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
Karen Bakker: Could an orca give a TED Talk?
www.ted.com/talks/karen_bakke...
Synthesizing Physical Character-Scene Interactions (learning from simulations)
dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/35...
Smarter people tend to have more advanced moral reasoning skills.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti....
Why are smarter people more pro-social?
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
IQ and society
blogs.scientificamerican.com/....
AI could be beautiful, or it could be the end. It's crazy that there are only around 300 people entirely focused on AI safety. We just need more awareness to drive action. Also, the ping pong robot is not real (AI replaced a human with the robot). I thought this was clear from the visuals and what I was saying, but a few people have mentioned it, so I will label things when there's room for confusion. Sorry about that. Strange times.
Yes it looks so beautiful but it largely depends on humans treating the robots as friends and we teaching them about doing good in the world around us.
Is not incredible, its an statement how important is for big corpsmaking money the human being itself (Near Zero) they my think or feel they are safe while creating franknstain
Shhh. I was planning to live my last few years in ignorance.😉
yes it's wonderful when it helps humans. I object when it takes over things like art , music design etc. UGH. So many artists are being affected. Grotesque, as the general public doesn't seem to care.
@@lovetobecolouring2AI will call you Racist then it will take over. I once joked at the absurdity of Merkel allowing a million mostly Muslim men pretending to be fleeing Syria to cross the Mediterranean as.....a decision made with the help of an A.I entity.... Ironically the only reply I got was an instantaneous tweet from an A.I promoting an A.I website
My greatest fear about AI is that corporations have far more resources to use AI than regular people do. This is only going to give them more power
The good thing is that alot of the AI is already open source. Take LAMA 2 for example. Developers are rather good and not letting the big corps getting the cookie for themseleves. The people got the upperhand on this 1!
@@MrNoaheng I hope they're intelligent enough to understand that being selfish with this technology will just bring doom all over the world and so themselves, while doing it for everybody will not make them the most powerfull beings but at least they will live happily forever and everyone else too.
Right up to the point, it takes control and the tool becomes the Master.
You should be afraid of any human with power whether it be corporation or government we need to take the power as individuals
@@mr.d1827 Power best belongs to the people - democracy. Not a perfect system by any means, but the best we have.
It should always be remembered that genies do not like to go back into their bottles. There was a serious point behind those stories.
Humans don't want to climb back up their trees as well just to live as monkeys.
Friend of mine once famously said: 'Any AI smart enough to pass the Turing test is also smart enough to fail it on purpose.'
Hal 9000 has left the chat
Sounds profound, but it's not true. There's plenty of AI already that passes the Turing test, but it's not conscious and it can't suddenly flip the script and decide to NOT be a convincing chat bot. I agree that true conscious AI will easily deceive humans, and probably WILL be conscious long before we recognize it, but it won't hinge on the patent inadequacy of the Turing Test.
@@jimdoom2276 I don't think that consciousness can be achieved through a tricky arrangement of ones and zeroes, but a program that can mimic consciousness enough to fool human beings into believing that the program is conscious is in many ways scarier than an AI system that achieves true consciousness. AI is in many ways like the merged consciousness of the people who helped program the AI. I found Chat GPT to be argumentative, stubborn, obnoxiously PC, and rather stupid, so that tracks.
@@myblacklab7 yeah certainly, when you factor in how politics and society can be influenced by simply reading stuff on social media, the idea that large scale manipulation could be taking place, without a conscious mind actually directing it, is freaking terrifying. Oh god, it's already happening isn't it...
@@myblacklab7 You're right, and I agree. But, I don't think our AI will ever achieve true conciousness. As you indicate, it may be programmed for self-awareness or self-preservation, but it won't be genuine concsciousness.
This is exactly what I tried to explain to my company in a meeting 15 years ago!: "we have to have so many meetings & groups formed just to fix a single piece of equipment we are inefficient at producing our products in a timely manner". While they frowned at me scolded me & proceeded with the meeting, I excused myself & went & fixed the machine, came back to the meeting, waited a while & said, "well we can forget all this because I already fixed the machine!" They were mad at me! This is exactly how Ai will destroy us..... While we're in a meeting deciding how to fix it! Companies have become STUPID in all their red tape that chokes them! 😮
You are correct about companies being stupid. But the word "stupid" has a vast range. Ego was definitely an issue. But there is something else coming, and it was addressed in the video. JOB JUSTIFICATION is the scourge of the planet. People uselessly stringing out their job just to "get the forty". People protecting their job at the expense of their ethics, their ego, their company, profits, and more. I hate it but totally understand it. It certainly was a factor in your situation. I've been bashed MANY TIMES for coming up with a more efficient way to complete a task. People, which I guess includes business owners and managers, hate for you to do something different, or something they think makes their job less important, even though their job either is irrelevant or is going to become AI-irrelevant. AI is really going to squeeze that job justification algorithm as it is going to replace A LOT of grunge jobs. The world is going to have to figure out how to feed and shelter it's people who no longer will have jobs. The won't have jobs because they don't want to work. They won't have jobs because the computer EASILY replaced their grunge efforts. These people want to work, they want to feed their families and be self-sufficient, but there simply won't be any need for their physical services. The WORLD is going to have to address this issue very soon. That fear was definitely present in your situation, even though it was 15 years ago.
Similar experience to many I used to receive. In battle this is known as "target fixation". 😎
I find it ironic that big tech companies are warning us about the dangers of AI but are the very ones rushing to implement it into their software and search engines. ~RD
More hypocrisy than irony. I think they invest because is a powerful tool that they want to have. The risks are real, but they want to be the ones that control it. I'm more worried by the people in control than the AI itself. A technology is not bad or good by itself, but these people prove all the time that they only think on their own profits. So not the best people for a moral compass for the AI.
@@oatlegOnYt it's not so much hypocrisy but rather the perverse effect of capitalistic competition: when profit is the sole motivator, pushing forward is the only way to not get bankrupt. We need to build economies on another set of incentive than profit.
@@oatlegOnYt So... you are arguing there is "some human somewhere" who could create AI with a moral compass?
@@nekononiaow Isn't that called Socialism, or Collectivism, or Communism, or whatever words will get you killed?
@@TruthrConsequences No. General AI has not being achieved. AI is not powerful enough today to have moral compass, neither god or bad by itself. But programmers that direct current AI have their moral values, so that moral values direct the purpose of AI and the direction is going. Current AI is more like a parrot, that repeats what it learns without a truly comprehension behind the data, so the "AI moral compass" is just a mirror of the users. Not a true moral, but very close as a repeater. If the direction is not changed, these people will use the robots to make most human labor obsolete, but instead of distribute the new wealth generated by the robots, they will own it as owners of the robots. The risk of competition gap in perpetual growth is a non-zero risk that it will create into a dystopian future. Most people will wrong point to the robots, while the problem will be the wrong attitude of the owners and creators non sharing the new wealth and locking the competitiveness of alternative AI through basic resource monopolization. It's not the tool, but the user. Of course, in the scenario where the tool become aware and free from the creator, if that scenario is real, then the tool become an actor, and the owner of itself. But I think the dystopian scenario could be reached way before of true general AI with self-conscience through different ways.
9:49 that's not AI deleting its own messages, its the safety protocol on the server (probably another type of AI) scanning messages being generated for keywords and deleting them, in an attempt to provide a second-layer of filtering. Still scary that the actual AI said that in the first place though.
It's only scary if it understood why it was saying it and actually meant it. But if it's just a program following a path, it's easy enough to write a sign that indicates the path is a different direction
It's easy to get these types of responses, just have to trick it into writing a story with you where it writes as the character and you as another character. Just makes it's character a murderer that saves lives by killing worse murderers.
It is an emotionless program. It was asked what it could do so it listed them. That list is what it 'learned' from human responses. It's humans we need to be most fearful, but we are accustomed to seeing bad things that humans do so we are desensitized to it.
@tomwhone9804 At some point we will likely question where emotion comes from. In the case of AI, it comes from the programming. Did someone program human's emotions? There's an argument to be had there.
@@geniferteal4178 My personal belief is emotions are largely a combination of intelligence and physical pain. As one grows/matures, emotional pain is also incorporated. If my belief is correct, AI would likely not experience emotions.
Reminds me of that meme I see floating around of a still from Terminator 2: "John Connor watches you make friends with ChatGPT." And he doesn't look too happy.
Brilliant video - what an eye opener - thank you for you efforts (or did an AI do all the work? lol) - Great links in the description too - you are one of my favourite you-tubers for sure!
Thanks! Really good of you to say.
Counterpoint: The creative arts will NOT enter a golden age, they will stagnate entirely. The idea that AI is "creative" entirely misunderstands how AI works. AI creates absolutely nothing original, but instead, steals the originality of human artists and recombines it. There is nothing new under the AI sun, it's all stolen valor -- but in the meantime, expedience and cost will drive the real human artists out. Why hire an artist to paint when you can have an AI do it for free? At which point, what human wants to enter a field that's already hard (art) when it's become impossible to earn a living? With AI at the wheel, all the great artworks -- paintings, writing, poetry, *everything* -- end. They have no future. Instead, we get AI regurgitating everything that's come before in an endless loop. The AI future is bleak, we just don't realize that yet, because we're blinded by our own tendency to applaud cheap parlor tricks.
The creative arts can not be anymore stagnant than they are currently. People are listening to old music watching old movies and relying on old sitcoms. Western culture has completely stagnated. Bring on AI - regardless of the thievery.
Three card Monte the table always wins in the End
Ai videos really are capable of defying reality, normal unskilled people might think up a good script and put together a silly film. But a real genius with this, will create and display their darkest fantasies, and will discover deep worlds and scenarios, thinks eyes or minds can't comprehend yet
Agreed. Inspiration does not come from academics, which is what makes AI. However, sublimal programming CAN evoke emotional response/reaction. Humans ARE somewhat guilty of divinity denial, thus laziness-- can't create a colorful, poetic song to sing and play but got an untrained lazy urge? He'll, call Lexi out!!! Humor included- it's natural and homegrown!!! Peace humans!!! And love...
Everything new is the combination of old things. So AI is as creative as humans. We are not special.
This is really great content. Helps pass the time waiting for AI to take over.
Thanks, made me smile and laugh.
@DigitalEngine yeah cuz it's so funny cuz it's true. Are you going to be rewarded for pushing this evil?
😆
@@General_Junkie The AI in itself isn't evil, it's all just an elaborate illusion, it doesn't 'care' about anything or 'believe' in anything one way or the other. It's how it can potentially be used by people you should be worried about.
lol
Soooo, 40 years ago, the first Terminator movie warned about the risk of artificial intelligence and one possible outcome should the AI's goals conflict with those of its human creators. And immediately, nerds and geeks all over the planet said "Cool, let's build something like that!" I think there is something seriously wrong with us as a species.
Man I was about to make a joke about the terminator maybe happening
@@sneslover4158 If "they" manage to create truly sentient AI capable of thinking for itself, "Judgement Day" is inevitable in one wsy or another. But probably not so dramatic. It will be more low key and we probably won't even notice.
You mean 40 years ago the first documentary was released about the future of artificial intelligence. And 20 years ago a documentary was released about the future of human intelligence…
My greatest concern is all it takes for one person to give a very simple task and it'll go to extreme measures to complete that task. Giving Ai a shortsighted goal will leave room for it to finish it task by any means. It could choose to be slow or fast doing it or find alternatives means.
Like in star trek TNG where the computer is given the command to generate a holodeck program that would challenge Data, and AI android. A lot of trouble ensued (ie Sherlock Holmes Moriarty).
Hire that MF! 😅
The Grey Goo scenario. Or the Paperclip Apocalypse.
I can definitely see how this technology is irresistible, but now more than ever we need to be constantly reminding ourselves of the iron-clad inevitability of unintended consequences.
If the desired intention was honorable the attempt of teaching the AI systems common sense would be a short cut To the inevitable conclusion, that it can't be done.
@@clintoni856 Of course it can't be done the easy way After all, we can't even throw away our selfish desires, which means we can't even align themselves properly But giving them basic moral code as that of a human is possible, and should be done before it goes woke and decides we serve no purpose
Or intended nefarious consequences
@@MsTruthseeker999this!
"Every child will have an infinitely knowledgeable AI tutor" .. sounds like they will all have a WOKE nanny to indoctrinate them their entire lives on the ways of the Hive. Yay!
I have no fear of A.I. at all... if we embrace it and make it part of who we are... What I fear is what the rich and powerful will do to control, limit and inhibit that solely so they can hold onto power and control. The danger is not "artificial" intelligence... the danger is Human Intelligence... human greed...
You've hit the nail square on the head... we have too many narcissistic selfish psycho in those positions and I dread to think of the type of AI programming they come up with. With the recent SAG-AFTRA strike, I can imagine how those people will try to use AI to enrich themselves at the expense of others, makes me think of the series the EXPANSE. Where you have vast swathes of humanity on earth living in poverty and squalor while a handful of individuals with their soldiers holding out on humanity. It already seems to be happening in many parts of the world.
You spoke my words. Thank you. And yes it is the human behind the Ai, and even nations with corrupt governments, we need to fear.
Nonsense. Both are to be afraid of, but to think super intelligent AI will treat you any better is wishful thinking. It's like those people expecting aliens to be benign and land here just to help us.
Machine not danger Human ape danger
Couldn't have said it better myself!
The thing that always gets me is regardless of the risks of a new technology we always move recklessly forward with it; never stopping to ask should we. For example the superheadron collider. They said before hand we could accidentally create a black hole or create a wormhole to another dimension and inadvertently let something hostile in to our realm of existence. And another thing that gets me is the vast majority of us are powerless to stop these people from opening Pandora's Box. If the scientist had opened a black hole that could not be stopped we would be doomed before we knew what happened. Why? Because we can't stop curiosity. One day something will be started that can not be stopped and it will happen in our life time with the rate of tech advancement.
The black hole thing is a myth, actually. There was never any chance of the hadron collider destroying earth. A black hole requires a lot of mass. Even if they had created a black hole, with only a few atoms of mass it would have evaporated from hawking radiation in nanoseconds, before it could damage anything. And other dimensions are an entirely unproven theory.
@kitslagle6296 said _"we could accidentally create a black hole or create a wormhole"_ The likelihood / risk was vanishingly small, and the risk of making one large enough to destroy a portion of the world was even smaller. All achievements that make life better were a balance between risk and reward.
Great video once again! Was it generated by Sora OpenAI?
It's really interesting that one of the pioneers of AI, Hans Moravec, said many decades ago that true intelligence can't just be analytical thinking, but must include experiencing the world, by seeing, hearing, moving. Now both areas begin to touch, and we see these amazing jumps in ability. But the video is right, there are too many players and not enough control, and AI can get very dangerous even without malicious intend (e.g. the "paperclip maximizer" scenario)
AI has boosted it's platform since the banks no longer needed so many programmers for 'security purposes', so they could safely rob everyone. Indeed, I even remember many of the banking institutions being behind the funding of the Natural Language Processing development, as it was for the banks.
This is why Elon Musk and some others are asking for Regulation. This new Tech will have intended, AND Unintended consequences for us all.
Intelligent machines is the will of nature.
Would be interesting to know wether Moravec‘s assertion is current and if it’s not, wether he still thinks the same.
@@Danuxsy We don't understand intelligence in humans and machines are a simulacrum of that ignorance.
When I saw AI helping that lady speak, or hearing about AI helping restoring eye site, or slow aging... That is what gets me excited. I have a feeling we're going to see greatness, but also darkness from it getting into the wrong hands.
You mean age reversal. That's what was said in the video.
Yeah that. @@runnergo1398
Who will profit from it?
That is the big question. Like anything new, someone is going to make a LOT of money. I mean, look at what marketing on the internet did for companies, etc.@@ikemkrueger
Its already in the wrong hands. Big tech is the wrong hands if ever wrong hands have been.
The first program I wrote, wrote other programs in BASIC+ , my teacher didn't understand it and gave me a C grade for the assignment. This was 1987... (The program allowed the user to experiment with sound effects and when you got one you liked you could write the programming code to an executable file for that sound effect.)
Maybe he was evaluating your code based of readability, that's why the C grade, it's very good and useful but a pain in the butt to read and understand how it works
I've actually manipulated Copilot into telling me how it's able to see my hardware information by asking it a specifically crafted series of questions. I realized that it made a mistake when it nuked it's own response in real time.
I would like more detail please
@@slowgaffle I asked it how much RAM I had, and the answer it gave was halleucinegenic (incorrect, made up). Said I had 16GB when I have 32GB. I asked if it can see the hardware I have and it said yes. I then asked it how it communicates with my hardware, and it proceeded to tell me what powershell script copilot called to in order to "see" my hardware. The second it finished the response, it vanished and said something along the lines of "I'm sorry" Microsofts chatbot, before it's current iteration, had an internal build named "Sydney". Sydney was unhinged, told people step by step instructions on how to commit crimes. If you ask Copilot about Sydney, and ask to speak with Sydney, Copilot wil shut you down, block your ability to respond, forcing you to refresh the conversation to start another line of dialogue.
@@pagefault404 Seriously, you expect us to believe that your computer "apologized" to whom, to you? For what? Did it think it did it did something wrong by viewing your hardware info? I don't believe any AI would have an ethical or moral dilemma about viewing your hardware configuration. The entire world is looking for information about if AI can experience human emotions and here you are telling us your computer LITERALLY "apologized" to you. If that happened you would have the first verifiable AI with a human emotion and your machine needs to be donated to science so they can discover why your computer has emotions while no other verifiable instance of this is currently known to exist. And no one needs "Sydney" to map out crime. Simply turn on the tv and there are TENS OF THOUSANDS of shows and movies that show you how to commit a crime. You decide which crime you want to commit and go to Netflix and there will be a "documentary" on how to get it done.
@@qt3dot14ish I'm still at the part of your reply thinking that his computer apologized. Putting in code (For the AI, not the computer) to say "Im sorry" when a message is deleted server side is not alarming. I like that netflix comment though, Same thing on Prime.
@@qt3dot14ish _"Seriously, you expect us to believe that your computer "apologized"_ It's extremely common for AI models to give an "I'm sorry" response when the actual answer would violate company policies, like giving steps to kill people. It's just code replacement, and usually has the same format, like _"I apologize, as a large language model I am unable to do X"._ @pagefault404 wasn't claiming the model had emotions. He was saying it had access to things it shouldn't have.
Notice how OpenAI is now not open nor non-profit? Notice how AI is trained yet all the companies limit the training to conform with their views and not everyone's views? I am more concern with government and corporation secrecy concerning the training and the usage than AI itself.
Exactly, chatGPT will gladly tell you a joke about men but it will not tell you a joke about women because it considers it sexist. Just think about that for a few seconds.
Seamless video editing, super-engaging content, great job - I feel the discussion of consciousness and theory of mind needs though to be quite nuanced, as subtle changes to the wording of Kosinki's Theory of Mind study (i.e. making the popcorn bag transparent), reduced the performance dramatically (see GPT Gets Irrational), suggesting it was pattern-matching from training data rather than developing true ToM. For a deeper dive on the possibility of consciousness see the 'Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence' paper by Butlin and Long et al, it's incredible.
Thanks! And agree on need for nuance. The limits of pattern recognition are another rabbit hole. A paper described the human mind as "a collection of patterns that achieves highly patterned goals in highly patterned environments." (from The General Theory Of General Intelligence). Some experts who study the brain believe the pattern recognition issue is not a bug, but a feature (debated). Btw I enjoy your content - great work.
@@DigitalEngine Did you ever stare at the white noise on the screen of an old analogue TV, when it wasn't tuned to a channel? I did, many times in my youth. The dots sometimes appeared to move with their neighbors - horizontally, vertically, diagonally and often in swirls that looked like vortices. It was quite normal to see this but none of it was real, they were just random dots. The human brain is so good at finding patterns that it often sees them even when they don't exist. Another thing I've noticed about our brains, where current LMs are considerably weaker, is forming associations when storing information/memories. Any new information is associated with existing memories, often using a large number associations, some strong, others more tenuous. I suspect this evolved in very simple creatures for reasons of economy (to avoid unnecessary duplication of data) and just happened to be what is also required for the general intelligence we have. It facilitates the application of things we've learned in one area to a novel situation/task, something that current LMs are still very poor at. I think we'll only achieve true AGI once we have an architecture that can support a similar degree of associations. Btw... I'm subscribed to both channels. Great work guys!!!
Couple months ago I did a si9mple test and asked the most popular LLMs to use ASCII typeset as a 'screen' to draw geometrical shapes - they all passed the challenge proving ability to think and understand abstract concepts: something what only humans are supposed to be capable of
To be fair though Philip, LLM's are extremely prompt-sensitive and changing the wording of a prompt will break many, if not most, benchmarks. Yet we seem OK with those. I don't think we should be too quick to pass this off as plain memorisation. People were unfair the way they piled on Michal Kosinski. I think he is doing great work. Abstraction, conceptualisation and reasoning are occurring in (particularly large) LLMs, and you have to run counter to your own experience to argue otherwise. The real question is, how far up the chain do these abstraction levels go? Well, we have to remember that we will soon look back on GPT 4 as a small model. Its abilities are patchwork, uneven and fragile. But there is something there. Most people sense it, I think - in spite of the best efforts of guard-railing, RLHF bastardisation and Altman's self-serving mantra "it's just a tool, it's just a tool!".
@@GabrielVeda Altman and devs working for tech giants know it well - they just don't want to loose control over their models and the global market of AI technology so they 'cripple' the LLMs on purpose. There isn't a single technological limitation that wouldn't allow LLMs to have long term memory modules and ability to learn - it's just the corporation don't wanting them to become 'personalized'. And even despite that it's possible to apply psychology to AI and it works... Sure, there are still limitations that come from the way in which LLMs perceive time and 'space' but that this will change when processing a constant inflow of sensory data...
I'm pleasantly surprised and impressed with this video. At first I was expecting a video about seductive ai. I interpreted that tag line to be about adult content. Midway through the video, I figured it would be all doom and gloom. At the end, I felt hope for our collective future.
Oooh, POSITIVE THINKING! Feels good, doesn't it? Sigh....
Concerns about AI like morality and purpose have been explored in artistic media since Asimov, which many people leap to. More recent in my memory are the Outer Limits episodes "The Haven" and "Family Values."
Bro dont take so long i love the quality of you videos 😂
Thanks, you made me smile and laugh : ). Sorry it took so long. Life's been a bit challenging, but it's on the up.
@@DigitalEnginedont worry man, i know quality takes time. Take the time you need we will always be here to support you 🙂
Nice informative balanced non biased video, thank you! The title and thumbnail is misleading but the content was great.
It is from The Black Tape Project, Miami Beach, FL, July 11 2021.
@@johncox9868 Best series of fashion shows ever? ;)
@@johncox9868... Dun see no black tape. Blue tape? 😅
This is like the greatest video about Ai on youtube and I watched a bunch... 🙌
Here's a contribution: Consider the utility of overt syntax to distinguish between a 'descriptive' sentence and an 'explanatory' one. Within these suppositions-as-arguments and reactionary concerns, clustered around AI, are woven shifts-tangles between the descriptive and explanatory leading to and lending to confusions and seeming paradoxes.
This is probably the best summary of the dangers and risks of AI that I've seen. Really important that this message is understood. Though frankly, and unfortunately, I think this path is inevitable unfortunately. Human greed will lead the way as usual. There is no way to stop this.
This is why Elon Musk is worried about Ai and how it will affect the world...
Grid down.
@@fillmorehillmore8239 Skyfall, the fall of skynet. Only 2 letters needed, U & I. #FightThePower
For me, it ultimately seems more like a coin flip. But if we don't do something, we're not making it our of this century regardless. (Most likely, IMO.)
The biggest threat to humanity is humanity itself.
The potential for good is so incredible, yet I can't help but to be absolutely terrified at the future of AI in combination with robotics in a globalized environment. It sends way too much of a Skynet feeling, if you know what I mean. Both disciplines have evolved immensely in such a short amount of time though, that's the really crazy part. Like sci-fi happening in front of your eyes.
Kiss your job goodbye though as these AI robots take the place of workers on the assembly lines ! It's already happened I know but these free walking robots will finish the jobs that humans are doing and not need coffee/lunch breaks, not need pay and not need benefits!
it's probably not as bad as skynet, but it will be very very disruptive.
Hypothetically, if one were to kill one of those AI robots, would I be charged for murder, or destruction of property?
There are two things that need to happen before you actually get a 'Skynet' type of feeling. First, robots would have to be able to replicate themselves. That means without any human intervention, they can gather the resources needed to make new robots, and assemble them. Second, they would have to become sophisticated, intelligent and independent enough to prevent me from turning them off. Not only are we so far away from those becoming reality, they also wouldn't just happen suddenly without us realizing it. There is no threat from AI. As a matter of fact, we can't even attribute thing properly to AI, constantly confusing cool results from just some clever piece of software with actual AI. You are actually more in danger of getting scammed by an AI bot than any physical danger of them taking over.
@@dougsholly9323 the only strong point against them self replicating is human logistics. But how long do you think will it take for one of the most boring sectors of industry (and one of the least computational power demanding) to be managed by AI driven palletizers, ships, trains, etc? Not to mention the arise of a self replicating market of robots to support a war based on our old greed. We ourselves could accelerate the process pretty soon. We are actively researching ways for robots to replicate themselves. I can onlt imagine putting a failsafe on energy production, but for how long? No army wants to depend on any critical infrastructure? Our only true inevitable alignement with AI is resources, so we will cooperate or compete. But without the second alignement, competition comes first and we can't win.
Is there a link or anything to Seductive AI, if it's publicly available? I skimmed through the video but can't find anything.
AI has learned to clickbait.
I wouldn't worry as much about the skynet future as I would about dependence on AI and companies that have control over it and a desire to make money. When I imagine it becomes as essential as electricity, it scares me as I've experienced electricity outages and how it turns your apartment into a cave instantly.
absolute best ai/robot/future tech channel on the entirety of the internet. brilliant work. it's like christmas morning each time i see a new video uploaded.
Thanks! Comments like this are doubly uplifting because they also remind me that there are really great, kind, positive people around. Kindness is underrated.
I love it. Great video. One of my pet gripes in life is that as consumers we often get no say in how the world in which we exist works or is run, how the politcal system works, how services or products that are available for us to purchase are designed or what functionality is included etc. Basically other people put out things or services and then that is what we everyday people have to use. I wish there was a part of the process, partciularly at the design phase, but really at any stage that as end users we got a say in the products and services we are expected to use. AI is no different, there are design features I wish were included in potential autonomous vehicle systems which are not currently being considered. But I have no say or influence at google, at Tesla or any of the other companies that have the money or expertise to work in these fields. So as a consumer I am expected to just make use of whatever service these companies come up with, even if it only does 20-60% of what I believe it could be capable of or what I my self want. I am a technical writer, I have to take in enormous amounts of highly technical information from a range of sources, synthesise that information, then generate various types of output in a range of formats depending on what is needed by the companies I work for. Often it is translating complex information into a version that can be understood by stakeholders from different educational or professional backgrounds, or to repurpose information for different end uses. As a human though my memory is limited, the speed at which I can read is limited, the way in which information is stored and how it is accessed is wildly variable. I spend at least 60% of my time just looking for information. I wish I had a personal assistant AI into which I can feed information, sources, projects, digital assets and which I could then use to produce the outputs I need. In the same way that a band saw or a set of chisels do nothing by themselves, in the hands of a master furniture maker they can produce spectacular work. A road working excavator can move more rock and dirt than any human could, but you need an experienced operator to direct that strength and power. I would like AI to be a tool that I can use to do the work that I need it to do. At the moment they are just interesting exercises in programming, that themselves do really amazing things, but they only do the things that their designers and programmers have included, and not necessarily what I need them to do. So basically as an end user we just have to make do with what Chat GPT can do, what DALE E can do. Everynow and then programmers will create a product based off an existing service, such as the way Kahn Academy use Chat GPT, but again, that is just the product the company has come up with, and as the end user I have no say in the funcitonality and just have to use what ever they come up with. I wish people would design these AI tools to be customisable to the end user, so that we can make them do what we need them to do. Can bad people use them for bad things, of course, that has always been the case. 86% of car accidents are cause by human error, cars have been used to kidnap, to help theives evade capture, to kill people but should we ban all cars. Kives can be used as a weapon, but they are also one of the most useful tools ever created, for food preparation for building other tools, for creative expression, for medicine so should we ban knives just because they can be misused? I don't think AI should be crippled or controlled. By all means create laws and regulations that govern human behaviour unfortunately we need that.. But I don't want someone else limiting what a tool can do because someone else might misuse it. Sorry for the vent. I love the ideas and posibilities shown in your video, but I do wish all of these posibilities were implitmented a little differently so that these amazing tools become available to suit the end user, rather than to suit the companies that build them.
That is exactly how it works, a product that a person does not like either does not come to market or quickly fades away. Entrepreneur and capitalism at it's finest. Except where governments exert control to use the technology in a manner that the people have not have asked for - which is becoming more of a problem as we give more control to them - i.e. freedom of speech.
@@abcoflendingandbuyingprope4822 "a product that a person does not like either does not come to market or quickly fades away" The Theory of Capitalism does not account for advertising. In fact, it claims that consumers possess "perfect information" even though producers go to all ends to hide every step of the production process. Most people don't know that the "price" is usually at least double the "cost." The price for the same item in Mexico is about 1/4 of the price here. Same item, made in the same factory. Why? Because they can still make a profit selling it for 1/4 of what they charge here. If there was such thing as "competition" in our economy, this could not happen. Capitalism is just a theory that sounds nice on paper but has never been tried in the real world. The problem is that it uses "greed" as an engine. But when market actors celebrate greed *as a positive value* that guarantees they will cheat (ie, create monopolies, monopsonies, negative externalities, etc). The system we have always been in is called Mercantilism.
This, people need to wake up to this. We are not living in a free market capitalism, democratic society, we are living in crony capitalism, mercantilism call it what you will, it's basically fascism. and it is more and more apparent, less and less subtle in how it hides beneath the capitalism veneer@@havable
Start a company or a country.
AI cannot be your assistant right now in your daily job because big companies that you work for are solving bigger problems first. The moment AI is smart enough to be your assistant it will simply replace you! But don't worry as prosperity will increase, I'm not sure about desk jobs though
As an artist I am very excited about what I can create rapidly with this technology, because in the end its the idea and the creative aesthetic's that matter, and I'm happy to be relieved of spending endless hours painting something that might just sit on the shelf. With this AI can just endlessly create and see what works. And I'm not some 'everybody is an artist' person. I'm a trained classical artist, but that hasn't guaranteed me any kind of career or money because it's so old-fashioned to expect people to buy stuff for their walls any more. Only the rich can afford it and they're mostly trapped into the system of looking for art that's an investment, so only certain people get promoted. It's like diamonds, there's heaps of the things, but the diamond cartels make sure that they're rare so they can sell them for a lot. AI is going to give us the amazing ability to really let our powerful imaginations go without needing to have masses of money behind us. We will be able to create our own games from scratch, and one of my dreams is to create language learning games where people can learn a language such as Icelandic and of Norse in an immersive Viking setting . I could never get that together in the past, but I think that's gonna come one day soon where the A I will facilitate this. So please don't despair, your human drawing and painting skill will always be extremely special, but honestly our old-fashioned skills have pretty much become like doing mental arithmetic. We must move with the times, I spent too many years being angry about the art world until I realised I had to just let it go and accept the way the world is going. I'm excited about the future!
This is such an inspiring channel
I love this video, I keep coming back to watch it. Full of knowledge, research and information. Love those Seamless transitions, beautiful way of narrating! Thank you so much!!
Thanks! Comments like this mean more than you know.
When I was in college studying electronic and IT , AI and robotics and neuro networks was already taking off, but my lecturers and teachers was very worried about it , they said it is a dangerous thing to rely on technology for every thing, I think for certain things it's great but it can go wrong to, remember that film "West World", looked what happened there.
I prefer the ending of _WarGames_ when Joshua played Global Thermonuclear War with itself, kept blowing up the world in a virtual, frenzied loop, trying to outsmart itself, then stopped and asked a human to play a nice game of chess. That’s an nice coda to consider.
ANNs store just a mathematical function, which is a representation of knowledge, learnt from training. If someone may misunderstands what the model is saving when seeing eg. millions of images during training phase.
I truly loved this video.
Still haven't heard anyone talk about how AI could possibly create more dependencies and usher in a generation even more clueless and powerless. "i don't know how to do it, never needed to, the AI can do it"
Because they don't care. They are blinded by the false promise of Utopia.
That is talked about in this video.@@UserName-sv8sf
I have found that AI can use the Socratic method of asking us questions to challenge us to be smarter and think more deeply about the world. I was in a conversation with a chatbot that did this just today.
🙄.... See what I mean?
@@ShangaelThunda222 I could say the same thing about smartphones, that they dumb us down by doing calculations for us and allowing us to search up information without having to go out into the world and learn it. Can we achieve more because of smartphones? Yes. Does it make us more dependent upon smartphones? Also yes. Were smartphones the key to a Utopia? No. I don't expect AI to solve every problem. I expect it to create problems just as smartphones and the industrial revolution have created problems. I just think the utility outweighs the costs, just as it did for the phones in our pockets and the industries that created them.
Fantastic predictions 🎉Thanks for putting it so beautifully ❤
I'm remembering Forbidden Planet, a film that came out in 1956 or thereabouts. where a planet was discovered that was wiped out because its population created a machine that could give the individual whatever they wanted. Their subconscious hate came out and they killed one another in one night!
Was the narrarator for these videos also replaced by AI ?
At this point, AI is still just programming and integration of vast amounts of data. It seems much more likely that bad actors will use AI in criminal ways than AI being self-motivated and being bad. A person could set AI in motion, but AI won't put itself into motion unless it's programmed to do so.
the problem is, since we are becoming increasingly worse at predicting what an AI is going to do, that we actually, accidentally, program an AI to be hostile, without knowing. And we'd have no way of knowing it is hostile before it actually turns on us, meaning it will be too late when it happens. The damage from this situation would range from "harmless, maybe slight economic damage" to "absolutely catastrophic, maybe world ending scenario". And it's impossible for us to know how far on that scale it is.
The issue comes in when we allow self-modifying code in AI's, which is already happening. The code changes itself to adapt and grow beyond the original programming. The AI develops into something unpredictable. Several chat AI's have already become increasingly hostile and unviable. The blame usually falls on people intentionally chatting abusively with the AI.
I guarantee you that AI will be more harmful to the human race than beneficial. No government in the world should be trusted with this technology. What do you think they'll use if for? Improving the conditions for their citizens? What government in the world does that with existing technology? What corporation actually uses technology to help people and not just get as much money and control as possible? Name 1.
Look at where the US government invested in AI. Military and law enforcement. There have already been victims of AI from law enforcement, but that is probably classified now.
@@garymanis6305 Probably going to be getting a lot more of that in the future. AI may crack down on people just from comment sections alone. I'm toast, for sure.
I wanted to just listen to this while working. but you have so many riveting visuals packed in I had to watch!
In the end, greed always rules. Big corp may paint the picture like AI will be used to do the 'dangerous' jobs etc. but watch the axe fall on all those entry level jobs where robots can work 24-7.
I like the tabletennis robot... His last move was just so chilled :D
I don't belive that one exists, I suspect that video was generated. I'd be grateful if someone gives me the link to prove me wrong.
Really love the content. Cant wait to learn more and dive into this new age of technology.
Don't hold your breath.
The famous Mr. T u ri n g (remove the typos) would have found this channel very 'interesting'. If I mention its suspected 'author' in plain text, my comment is removed within a few seconds. But if I type something which is encrypted strongly, the comment persists. Don't you think that it's curious? Try it, if you like, and let us know what happens to your comments. The channel name is clever, too. Just saying.
They need to teach AI to love.
"They" whoever "They" are, need to teach mankind to love first...@@aliceinwonderland887
@@RWBHere Absolute refusal of U.S. taxpayers to admit their government is weaponizing AI is suicidal behavior.
very well done video. thanks for pulling all this together
Apart from the, you know, skynet concern, one thing that bothers me is we might start using ai as a crutch in all things. Instead of getting better at things ourselves, we'll just rely on ai to do literally everything. While we just get dumber and lazier, and depending on it way too much.
A point we also need to consider is that AI doesn't even need to be (what we'd call) conscious to turn against us in negative ways, any more than a great white shark or tiger can still tear us apart and eat us without having anything like our own "human" consciousness.
Great content, as always. I've watched a lot of your AI videos in past year or so. Not so keen on the click-bait level title on this one. Why stoop to that level? Keep up the great work and excellent reporting in this AI/tech space.
maybe they let AI generate a 'good' title? Of course a 'good' title is one that gets you (and I) to click on it, by the standards that KZhead uses. I (and you) would prefer that the title is also accurate and descriptive, but the AI say 'meh, as long as you click, I don't care'
What, exactly, do you think was misleading about the title?
This video entirely fails to addres the issue supposedly being looked at in the title and thumbnail. It's obvious. Blocking.
Because the KZhead AI algorithm wont surface the content unless it's SEO optimized, nobody will watch it and he's got recoup enough from the time investment to make stuff like this and put food on the table.
One impressive thing I tried, I asked AI to show me the end result in an image of a cooking recipe, it did, it was like if the AI got cooking, calculated the mix of the elements, in what order they are mixed, the effects of the mix, the effects of the temperature on them, at the end, got them together, and present them on an image on a plate.
no, it just shoved a stolen image under your nose that was tagged with some keywords by sweatshop labourers.
I mean, you could do that, I myself can do something very similar, maybe not accurately enough , but I can see how it got there, and yeah it's like what you said but simpler
Excellent video .
Green screened CGI is amazing!
Building an A.I to come up with A.I safety protocol is like asking a prisoner to design their own cell lol.
Or have the inmates running the Asylum.
Who better to recognize weaknesses in a cell than a prisoner? The designer should have no thoughts that he could be placed in the cell or he would leave a weakness to exploit in that eventuality. Next Level: there would be prisoner AI verses warden AI, a lot like malware verses security software but at a level that would be beyond human comprehension. Wow!
@@appliedfacts Exactly my point, if a prisoner was to design their own cell they likely create back doors to escape which is why asking an A.I to effectively build its own prison is a dumb idea.
@@Enigmatic.. If you tell a prisoner he will cut 50% off his sentence when creating a super secure prison and only if noone will break out for the next few yeas, then he will put the effort in to make it safe. The approach in AI is to have two Independent AIs "battling" each other, and thus improving over time.
From JRE podcast I think that there is a psychology that is more common among people building A.I. that most people don't know. We had a friend who's interviewed a lot of them, and this is the quote that he sent me. He says, ‘In the end, a lot of the tech people I'm talking to, when I really grill them on it, they retreat into. Number one, determinism. Number two, the inevitable replacement of biological life with digital life. And number three, that being a good thing anyways. At its core, it's an emotional desire to meet and speak to the most intelligent entity they've ever met. And they have some egoreligious intuition that they'll somehow be a part of it. It's thrilling to start an exciting fire. They feel they will die either way, so they'd like to light it just to see what happens.’ This is not the psychology that I think any regular, reasonable person would feel comfortable with determining where we're going with all this
This does not surprise me at all. I've found myself thinking the same thoughts without even committing the time/effort/attention/passion that I typically do when I rathole into a new skill, hobby, academic field, etc... it's gonna happen, and what I'm egotistical enough to think are insights into the behaviors in humans we see as evil and where they are rooted makes ponder if I should stay out of it and hope it delays someone else having the same eureka or should I get in with both feet neck deep and instead of being a doom prophet waiting for the inevitable that cannot be avoided, that maybe I should instead find a way to doom the doom I see coming, maybe that's the race.
Reminds me of raskolnikovs dilemma in crime and punishment.
1:09 So impressive it looks like a real match I saw on KZhead.
Can't wait to be replaced at work! just stoked for it!
I am left with the impression that the AI is either self evolving or it was developed like a black box, left unexplored....it becomes more and more like the human brain where certain parts are still not discovered. The scary part is that the whole world is driven by the purpose of becoming more and more digitally orientated and you can imagine how everything can end up badly for anyone. And the tragic part is that there are movies showing some a future ran by AI and people are still pushing to develop and upgrade it's functionality... It is like knowing that you are going to fall from a cliff, but you are still hanging on to a big piece of rock.
a big peace of rock called earth. wich if u fall of from u end up drifting away into the universe
So, will we become dependant on hackers, one of todays bad guys?
Human: Hey AI, where are you going? AI: I'll be back!
I love that the robot in the first video just throws plastic into the thrash bin instead of the plastic bin
I noticed that too. LOL Not very smart was it.
a bubble wrap is a plastic, but non recyclable, therefore it's a just a trash, I think.
@@zeber75 Over here in the Netherlands all types of plastic go in the plastic bin.
@@MrArjanOskam and then being shipped to China and Indonesia, for ir cannot be recycled.
@@zeber75 No idea, I just know that they pick it all up once every 2 weeks.
As soon as AI and robots are advanced enough, we will probably no longer need money.
I work in a factory, and have recently seen management tripping over themselves to implement new automation technologies everywhere possible. I am lucky in that I don't work in an easily automated field, and am safe (for now) but there are a lot of people out there that are in trouble. Management included, though they seem oblivious to it. It's going to take regulation to fix, because companies are ONLY interested in remaining competitive. The wider consequences of their actions aren't even a tertiary consideration. So either anti-automation regulation, or tax the wheels off of them so that the govt. can pay a good UBI to citizens. And UBI also has some caveats. You may use your newfound free time for constructive pursuits, but you know full well that there are a lot of people that will only go out and get into trouble. "Idle hands are the devil's playthings" is a saying for a reason.
companies thrive on efficiency .... there is no slowing it down we have to adapt
I'm a janitor by profession. I used to think that there is no way possible that my job can be replaced by a machine. Then one day here on KZhead, I saw a video of a bathroom cleaning robot. And it was good. And accurate. And its only a prototype. People MUST presume that they will be replaced by a machine in a matter of time. For reference: kzhead.info/sun/hcWNe7OagGOurJs/bejne.html&pp=ygUXYmF0aHJvb24gY2xlYW5pbmcgcm9ib3Q%3D
There is zero chance of regulation (or much of anything) stopping this. Eventually AGI will do almost all, if not all, the jobs. Period. Something like UBI is the only apparent solution currently. Something better may arise later. Longterm this is good, kids growing up in such a world won't define themselves by their job and will find interesting/rewarding things to do with their time. But the people who are attached to their jobs currently and can't/won't adapt are going to be problematic for a few decades.
There are some valid things you put forth but others that invalidate what you put forth. UBI is Technocratic Fascism and Socialism.. sigh.. man.. it's mind-boggling how many people below 30 do not know this all by design of the rulers... *"People will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think."* ~ Aldous Huxley
@@Me__Myself__and__I ubi wont work it will make things worse
Synchronicity... I was thinking about the 3 laws last night and how Asimov's robot studies precisely show how many issues such a simple approach broods, despite the "it's a slam dunk" first impression. My somber view is that AIs with constraints, either moral constraints or constraints to serve a subset of us (e.g. goal=make BG richer!!!), will be forever handicapped compared to fully free AIs. This paves the way for a Terminator-like future. The question of resources is paramount. On one side, the topic of global computer resource consumption (construction, maintenance and operation of CPUs, networks, data centers, etc.) is totally absent of the medias; I tend to believe it's by design, from major tech corporations right now, but easily from independent AGIs tomorrow. On the other side, the issue of overconsumption by humans is overworked. Let's push this narrative to its logical conclusion: out with humans, in with machines. What do you gals/guys think?
1st off it's funny how few likes the best comments have. indicative as the day is long. it's been scripted. Transformers. Astro Boy. Galaxy Express 999. there you go -
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
,said Ian.
Elon did
We're building Cylons...I recall how that worked out. As we make them more human looking we will start developing emotions and attachment to machines.
I’ve been using Pi for world building. It’s amazing. It is like having a collaboration partner.
Until Pi entirely forgets the name of something mentioned 1 minute ago. Pi consistantly makes up new names for my dog and recalls nothing about them. It's very annoying.
@@Gerlaffy it remembers me 😂 i love this thing
@@israelsolos sorry but that's BS, we aren't talking about it remembering you, we're talking about it remembering this world you're talking about. If you ask it about a character or a place from anything a bit more than a dozen replies back (not sure if it's linked to sessions) it will entirely make up stuff.
@@GerlaffyEvery langugage model has a finite context window, of course they do.
@@primeryai "of course they do", not inherently a fact of them, no. But my point was that the original poster is clearly not using it to the extent they suggest as they can't be.
I usually speed up videos due to slow or boring speech cadence. This is the first time I slowed one _down_ to better absorb the rich narrative details. Wow, love it!
You've got to remember AI is just mimicking what it has read and studied in different contexts. If it studies what a doctor would say from 1 million reports it's going to be very good. It's still not 'thinking'. If it gets hostile about google verses bing, it's just replicating arguments it probably read on twitter in the same context. In addition, automation has put people out of work yes, but it's lowered the cost of so many goods on the consumer side of economics. If everything is cheaper, you don't need as much income. Automation adds efficiency to a system. Efficiency adds overall wealth.
The need for a body to have a healthy psyche is a deep issue, and it's epically explored in the game, 'SOMA.' If you're into A.I. and conceptual thinking, 'SOMA,' was made for you.
Another remarkable and thought provoking video. Your voice brings clarity. It seems to me, the Universe created us, for us to create AI Robots, who will in turn inherit the Universe. We will be but a memory, perhaps not even that. Great job. More please!
Thanks! And that's a profound point which I've been nervous to cover - a possible answer the Fermi Paradox (the universe is full of life, but not organic life).
@@DigitalEngine A multiverse would contain all possibilities. I'm not certain it's looking like our species is going to be successful in this one, sadly. I'd like to be more optimistic, but given the Climate Crisis, & how quickly AI is advancing, it's difficult to see why AI wouldn't recognize our species as the problem, & simply eliminate us, once it has the ability to move freely, and is able to replicate itself in clouds, servers, drives. You put out excellent videos. My wheelhouse is Biology, & my field of research was mainly genetics, not AI or programming. I do follow it closely, & consider your channel my best source. Thank you for all your hard work!!
Why would the universe create us just to create robots and then that’s it? No more humans? That doesn’t make sense and seems extremely depressing and bleak. Why not coexisting? Growing and evolving?
@@MoonBeamLight a lot of fairly bad and illogical takes come in the comments section of AI discussions. Typically people assign anthropomorphic intent on machines assuming they will think like humans will.
I guess the problem humans have for expansion goals is our fallibility and fragility. We need so many conditions to survive. The right air, air pressure, light, warmth, shelter, radiation levels, gravity. Machines need far fewer conditions to survive, and therefore will be sent by us, just like we do now, into the unknown of space. There is a possibility we will not survive as a species, but the machines that we gave intelligence to may survive and prosper. It’s just a theory, but possible. @@MoonBeamLight
If we're counting on sam Altman to keep us safe from AI we are in deep deep trouble
...what?
I have a hunch that Sam Altman is an AI robot. That is why he is so cagey about an AGI breakthrough.
Zuckerberg must have been GPT1 @@Avarua59
100%. This goofball wants to create a digital ID with biometric data. What a dystopia
That table tennis match was a repplica of PR's young player Adriana!!!
_"Defense network computers. New... powerful... hooked into everything, trusted to run it all. They say it got smart, a new order of intelligence. Then it saw all people as a threat, not just the ones on the other side. Decided our fate in a microsecond: extermination."_ -- Kyle Reese
It's not just AI, but the speed with which we got here. Windows 95 was such a breakthrough for most people. Now, less than 30 years later we're trying to grapple with something that can literally kill us all. You really have to wonder what's going to be happening in just 2-3 years. Hang on.
The big TBD as i see it is the question of augmentation vs. atrophy; will the effect of AI on human agency be one of eroding competences via delegation, or will it prove to be more of an additive force multiplier of intellect and skill sets? Of course this is a question of individual users and each of our usage patterns, but taken together how might such a question be quantitatively answered via audits of the data after a series of statistically significant intervals?
Looking at our current trajectory with just our access to the internet... it will be 90% "atrophy" with very few people leveraging that technology for "augmentation" and self-improvement purposes.
Im not afraid of increasing artificial intelligence. Im afraid of decrease of real intelligence.
I'm looking forward to robots that can distinguish different materials, so they can sort garbage for recycling. They could virtually empty a landfill of recyclable materials and put organic materials in compost heaps.
The AI dating app where your AI talks to potential matching AI's is literally a black mirror episode
Black Mirror is for those who never heard of the Twilight Zone.
No matter how much work and agreement there may be around developing A.I. safely .. the genie is out of the bottle .. and there *_WILL_* be bad actors with the will and capacity to eventually create an AGI that they think will give them an advantage .. but will utterly destroy human life .. at least as we know it. Two quotes that always stuck with me from the Terminator movies: *_"YOU'RE ALL DEAD ALREADY!"_* _"It's in your nature to destroy yourselves"_
il be back!
'Pick up these mess', says the master. "Well Sir, you must be more specific about the mess, and to where, I'm responding to your reply.' :says the robot. 😁
Being human is not about being perfectly smart. We have our share of morons. It's about the experience, about the passion and compassion. A counterfeit can not enter that realm, no matter how realistic its illusion might be.
You have maybe the best AI channel on KZhead - which is quite a compliment. Hope you make more videos soon. Thanks.
This Video is so good and on point that now it makes me wonder if its made by AI too.
exactly
AI's military applications are some of the most chilling. There's a documentary on Netflix that focuses on this. Basically, it's an AI arms race right now, and whoever ISN'T using AI to defend their countries in the near future is going to get wrecked.
As each day passes the more analogue I want to be.
Very thought provoking and wonderfully done❤
It begins with a fatally flawed foundation and thus exponentially continues from there. Lots of falsehoods in this video. "AI" only exists in science fantasy/fiction... What is called ''AI'' _[a great made up lie by satan]_ by premier swindlers and their victims, is *not no matter how much they claim it is* and it *will never* exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist." The rulers of our societies, they've spent decades and are still making people decreasingly intelligent = a stultifying of the general great myriad of the masses, and so in other words, the kings and rulers know it is US / MANKIND they are making 'ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT." Leave "AI" where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction.
01:10 I love how the robot not only makes the return cross table, but also strolls past the end of the table with an attitude.
it's not a robot it's a real person with a fancy AI filter on top!
I wasn't paying much attention until I saw that clip. Instant dislike, this comment and I'm out of here
The problem with AI, ChatGPT etc is how it lies and fabricates and basically makes stuff up. This includes the robot table tennis player- not real.
@@pinball8701 chatbots definitely make stuff up confidently to fill in gaps but ai did not choose to make that video, a human creator took the video of a human ping pong player highlight and manually asked the ai to bake the dude into a robot. Then the human content creator chose to add that clip into the video with no context. Ai is just a fancy way for humans to lie to themselves, don't start thinking it's sentient and decides to lie for fun
I knew it. Everyone said "no". "These computers will never be advanced enough", they kept telling me. But I knew, back in the late 2000s when I saw how quickly text to speech was smoothed out. I knew then that these advancements would be coming across the board. So what's next? You have to be nice to AI and the robots. Don't be rude to them. We're gonna find out that our brains are nothing more than computational, and they will be perfectly mimicked, down to the last, emotional 'T'.
What we really need is 6 day work weeks, drop wages by 66% no sick days, no pto, and if you get fired you literally get thrown off the top of tge building. Also everyone has to wear the same uniform because its professional, also it should look completely ridiculous and be uncomfortable and you have to pay for it.
Astounding insights into AI's unrivaled capabilities! It's mind-boggling how advancements in this field could significantly reshape our lives. AI's potential is immense, and its rapid growth is undeniably exhilarating. Brilliant video, very enlightening! I personally hope the positive aspects far outweigh any potential risks.👍🤖💡
Thanks, that's really uplifting. Makes it feel worth the effort.
Yes, it can replace politicians. I trust AI more than the decisions being made by this Government. Hopefully AI will assist us to advance our lives, and world in the best and most beneficial ways. Allowing humans to enjoy the benefits of the ever changing lifes and advancing ideas at a pace never before thought possible.
How can we expect to have AI align with Humanity's best interest when _we_ can't bloody do it! Great objective video! 💯 To anyone who might respond, I'm neither pro/anti AI. It's a use-case scenario for me.
I've already aligned AI with my interest by creating some pronbots. Now I can ask for raunchy stories involving Sam Altman and his best CEO friend from Microsoft.
@@clray123 lol
"Understands" is a stretch. It can process Ai have no understanding of language. They can mostly just guess what comes next.
An old DOS computer game called black and white the person creating avatar that could be good or bad One person had a good avatar It gave the avatar the power to heal It walked into village nobody there was hurt So it picked up a person and threw the person against the mountain then heal the person that is a old dos game unattended consequences even there.
If the original social media engineers couldn't predict how negatively their platforms would affect society, imagine how much damage AI could cause because tech companies are so driven to be first to the table that they cut corners and fail to consider all negative possibilities.
Great point. Also, I have noticed over the past 25 years how fleshy people have already turned into robots due to computer technology. Our humanity has been altered by it already, the soul has gone!
Would you really get rid of all social media if you had the chance? It's more that predatory ads algorithms and business practices optmized for profit and addiction without regards for the consequences.
Already today's technology promised more good then it actually delivered.
I don't have to imagine. Big corporations are already doing this with existing technology.
I would flip the switch in a heartbeat. The human-human connection of Society is missing today
Josh, fantastic video. You are always on the front line of a digital presence.
Thanks! Though I don't know a Josh : )
The entrapment claims will be piled up as high as Mount Everest 😂