The Most Terrifying Theory Scientists Don’t Even Want To Talk About

2024 ж. 20 Қаң.
626 188 Рет қаралды

To play the Chaos Game
www.geogebra.org/m/yr2XXPms
I set the number of points to be 3, clicked start, and set the speed to ‘fast’.
The key takeaway of chaos is this: even when your equations are perfectly deterministic, you cannot know the initial conditions of arbitrary sensitivities.
When the present determines the future, but, the approximate present does not approximately determine the future, is “Chaos”.

Пікірлер
  • if a flap of a butterflies wing could cause a tornado somewhere else in the world, i now suddenly feel bad for every time i have ever farted.

    @scottrettig5608@scottrettig56083 ай бұрын
    • 🤣

      @rebwarwar5184@rebwarwar51842 ай бұрын
    • Top comment. lol

      @Troof_Da_God@Troof_Da_God2 ай бұрын
    • Put a cork in it...

      @user-wf7pe3zb8q@user-wf7pe3zb8qАй бұрын
    • 😂

      @cholleydanyel9558@cholleydanyel9558Ай бұрын
    • Look out world, here comes hurricane Jimmy!! **squeaky fart**

      @jamesgrey13@jamesgrey13Ай бұрын
  • Flexl: " Looks familiar, right? " Me: " The Triforce, from Legend of Zelda! " Flexl: " It is indeed the sierpinski triangle. " Me: " Aw... dammit... "

    @fumomofumosarum5893@fumomofumosarum58932 ай бұрын
    • Aka the super triforce

      @CryptoScammers.DoNotSendMoney@CryptoScammers.DoNotSendMoneyАй бұрын
    • I thought so too😂

      @onyxrose3407@onyxrose340716 күн бұрын
    • The creator of Zelda knew about the Sierpinski triangle.

      @citomp1240@citomp124010 күн бұрын
  • Chaos is just an euphemistic term for man's extremely restricted ability to grasp infinity ...

    @klaushubbertz7009@klaushubbertz70092 ай бұрын
    • You are infinitely correct 🤔

      @louiscolborn6715@louiscolborn6715Ай бұрын
    • @@louiscolborn6715 NO. but nice word play fun have.

      @youbetyourwrasse@youbetyourwrasseАй бұрын
    • Totally agree! The seasons, days, months, they're all cyclic. We think the universe is also cyclic

      @sleepyinterface8819@sleepyinterface8819Ай бұрын
    • @@sleepyinterface8819 BINGO!! Yesterday the Big Bang, tomorrow afternoon the Big Crunch, rinse, repeat ... and humans are still fighting about "ideas" ...🤣🤣🤣🤣

      @klaushubbertz7009@klaushubbertz7009Ай бұрын
    • Expect next you'll claim we exist only in some computer program.

      @johnphelps7519@johnphelps7519Ай бұрын
  • Scientists may not want to talk about it. But Mathematicians are more than glad to talk about it. 😃

    @WitchidWitchid@WitchidWitchid3 ай бұрын
    • No, they're not.. at what exact altitude does the horizon stop being horizontal...🌅🦧🎈🌛🤙

      @Rafiki9112@Rafiki91123 ай бұрын
    • The study of large numbers

      @Hankinit9@Hankinit92 ай бұрын
    • Engineers, too. Love the stuff.

      @crysstoll1191@crysstoll1191Ай бұрын
    • That adds up 😂

      @louiscolborn6715@louiscolborn6715Ай бұрын
    • ​@@Rafiki9112it's never horizontal, it's horizon-taly, as in almost-ish horizontal, ✨🤨😆

      @louiscolborn6715@louiscolborn6715Ай бұрын
  • Unpredictability does not imply randomness. Notice that chaos theory only works where there is a pre-established set of rules, and those rules are determined by a conscious observer.

    @OneBriteStar@OneBriteStar4 ай бұрын
    • We do not know the rules. We are currently trying to figure them out by observation but it seems not everything can be observed and not everything can be observed objectively.

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
    • There does not have to be a conscious observer.

      @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler3 ай бұрын
    • Laws of nature aren't determined or dependent on conscious observer.

      @ConnoisseurOfExistence@ConnoisseurOfExistence3 ай бұрын
    • The “Laws of Nature” are EXCLUSIVELY the observations of humans. I believe that the entire Universe is Schrodinger’s Box; All possibilities existing simultaneously, in a state of infinite potentialities, until the very moment it’s observed. It is IMPOSSIBLE to remove the observer from an experiment.

      @boblydecker5951@boblydecker59513 ай бұрын
    • The double split experiment and that other new one that came out recently using helium atoms proves light travels as a wave or particle until a conscious observer watches. It makes no sense I don't understand physics that well but I do know when they don't use a camera to observe the single light particle they shoot it goes through both slits creating a dissonance pattern and when it is observed it creates a single line meaning that conscious observers have an effect on the way light chooses to act. Interestingly enough it kind of confirms some of what the buddhist believe, that reality is generated from within and are thoughts, desires, and expectations have and effect on the world. That doesn't mean things we have no control over don't happen. It just means we always have the choice to choose how we personally react to everything and what we choose to attach ourselves to and what to ignore. A lot of people's reactions are formed by their parents friends family. Monkey see monkey do. Most people don't usually take the time to sit back and wonder why they react to the world the way they do. Got carried away I'm stoned. Reality may or may not be what any of us expect. It could all just be an illusion formed by our perceptions and state of mind. I mean every animal bug plant expirence a different version of reality whose to say ours is the ultimate true one. It's all subjective which is where Einstein comes in with his theory of relativity. Food for thought

      @jacobbeaudoin4237@jacobbeaudoin42373 ай бұрын
  • The most unpredictable thing is our mind and Supreme Consciousness lying within whole matter of Universe 😌

    @DeepObserver7689@DeepObserver76893 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for taking the time to make this video. This topic absolutely fascinating!

    @Edenismdotca@Edenismdotca2 ай бұрын
  • What's the "terrifying" part?

    @falconquest2068@falconquest20684 ай бұрын
    • This is the terrifying part: "If there is a real, true, monotheistic God in existence, this would explain the origin and reason to be, of such a God. But then again, this will proof that God is not the original Creator, but merely a Co-Creator, just like humans or perhaps more like Jesus, and for that matter, anything that can change the existing status quo in whatever miniscule manner, even the flutter of a butterfly's wing... In plain words: that makes the Principle of Evolution the Main Creator, and secondly, that makes for a multitude of GODS! By creating AI, we became a Creator God... and soon AI will be better GODS than what we can hope to be.... But will that fact not make us then again Better Gods?"

      @chrisbresler5444@chrisbresler54443 ай бұрын
    • @@chrisbresler5444 If there is a scary part it's going to be the reaction of those who believe in god when they find out that is a complete myth. The elements may be correct but I have a hunch our "creator" is much different than we understand.

      @falconquest2068@falconquest20683 ай бұрын
    • Nothing. It's clickbait.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • @@chrisbresler5444 I think terrific part is that everybody IS a God! Monotheistic is relativistic, because Everything is One and One is Everything. All life (maybe everything IS life?) is one. Separation is only illusion.

      @lendalennuk2484@lendalennuk24843 ай бұрын
    • ​@@lendalennuk2484Amen brother! Ironically I think that's what scares most people, to believe they have such a capacity for love and understanding, but It's a tough journey into one's soul. I had what psychiatrist Maslow called a Peak Experience years ago and I can tell you, you're bang on, we're all capable of such powers.

      @madmaxine4185@madmaxine41853 ай бұрын
  • The butterfly effect is when some egomaniacal primate singles out one butterfly among 28 billion buterflies, all flapping their wings at the same time in Brazil, and saying that this particular butterfly is to blame for a dust-devil in Australia 127 years, 6 months, 3 days, 12 hours 38 minutes and 12.9567831427 seconds later...as opposed to any other butterfly which flapped it's wings in that moment in time. The Butterfly Effect is confirmation bias on the grand scale, randomly confusing cause and effect because no-one stops to ask if the flap of the butterfly's wing causes the change in the air current or if it is the change in the air current which is the reason that the butterfly chooses that precise moment to flap it's wing in a particular direction.

    @Mercurio-Morat-Goes-Bughunting@Mercurio-Morat-Goes-Bughunting3 ай бұрын
    • U must have went to middle school I didn't mak it past 5yh grade u no some big words

      @eddiehubbs9492@eddiehubbs94923 ай бұрын
    • So, this is someone that like to talk about them selves, and just thinks their smart?

      @vc7393@vc73933 ай бұрын
    • Precisely. Made a decent movie though.

      @timroderick2314@timroderick23143 ай бұрын
    • @@eddiehubbs9492 And you have obviously have no sense of humor.

      @vc7393@vc73933 ай бұрын
    • I magine u philosophize about all the bad in the world but what do you do to help it

      @eddiehubbs9492@eddiehubbs94923 ай бұрын
  • "irregularity is a charecteristic property" isn't irregularity a measure of the complexity of an "algebraic surface" while charecteristic property refer to identification and classification system, particularly substances. my mind is blown btw, thanks OP! great work!

    @mactabilis6039@mactabilis60393 ай бұрын
    • When people use quotation marks, it is imperative that what is between the marks is exact. Otherwise you could be accused of twisting a person's words or trying to manipulate the audience with lies.

      @david_cop_a_feel7538@david_cop_a_feel75383 ай бұрын
  • There’s more than one butterfly in the world flapping its wings. The scariest thing about the universe is that our tiny little brains are capable of taking it all in. Imagine a brain the size of the Sun. Or a galaxy. Indeed, the entire universe could be one giant brain. Either way, we are all individually burdened with the weight of our own existence. Sometimes it takes getting really stoned to understand the heaviness of it all.

    @BennyMcGhee@BennyMcGhee3 ай бұрын
    • It is what it is. Say no to drugs, kids.

      @adamjosey1543@adamjosey15433 ай бұрын
    • There's nothing heavy about it. What it comes down to is that we are different in life for love. Please read some of the realizations by such saints as Anandamayi Ma, Rabindranath Tagore or Jesus.

      @sven888@sven8883 ай бұрын
    • @@sven888 ... and Krishnamurti.

      @lendalennuk2484@lendalennuk24843 ай бұрын
    • @@adamjosey1543 - Thank God for that! Can you just imagine if it wasn't? (what it was)

      @david_cop_a_feel7538@david_cop_a_feel75383 ай бұрын
    • The drawback to that is that, even though you 'figure it all out' while hashed out to the shits, once it wears off you can't quite put your finger on it.

      @david_cop_a_feel7538@david_cop_a_feel75383 ай бұрын
  • I think, it is stretched a bit too far. In the triangle example, all the dots positions were pre-determined. The probability had nothing to do with them. It was only the choice of "which one first and next". Of course, after a number of repetitions you see all the pre-determined dots revealed with the pattern. You didn't need the randomness to produce that result. You might as well simply enumerate all the choices in simple order. It would be less amusing to watch, of course, but may be that is the whole point? It is not about a discovery of something new and yet unknown, but really about entertainment and amusement. What is more amusing to watch happening, that is "the discovery", I suppose.

    @AlexthunderGnum@AlexthunderGnum3 ай бұрын
    • My first thought. The triangle patterns 'appears', due to starting with 3 dots AND the 'rule' to roll the dice and move from the half way point to the next point by the rule of where to go based on what was rolled. I bet starting with more points would end up creating a very predictable pattern. That example doesn't sell it for me.

      @joeshmoe7967@joeshmoe79673 ай бұрын
    • He used math to create a pattern! It's chaos!

      @oo7moses@oo7moses3 ай бұрын
    • @@oo7moses What do you mean? I don't see any chaos. It looks like perfect order instead. Very predictable order. What was the surprise to you?

      @AlexthunderGnum@AlexthunderGnum3 ай бұрын
    • @@AlexthunderGnum It was sarcasm!

      @oo7moses@oo7moses3 ай бұрын
    • It's kinda like: how many peas are in a pod true or false? 😊 How many basket balls does it take to get to the moon.

      @louiscolborn6715@louiscolborn6715Ай бұрын
  • What a nice summation of chaos theory! Love it. I believe it’s easier to envision all this when we remember that our reality is defined not in linear/causal 4D spacetime, but in the five dimensions of the quantum wavefunction.

    @10thdim@10thdim4 ай бұрын
    • 5D quantum wavefunction? A quantum process can be described in any number of dimensions depending on the object or process under observation.

      @charlesmiller8107@charlesmiller81074 ай бұрын
    • Smart but agree there is no 'the' 5 Dimensions friend, fractal dimensions would surely go on toward infinity or to a return point possibly, until it all collapses back to fold into one

      @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r4 ай бұрын
    • The quantum wavefunction is calculated in what Hawking called “imaginary time, at right angles to spacetime”. Everett said his Many Worlds exist within “a subspace orthogonal to spacetime”. Kip Thorne describes the “multiple branching 4D world tubes bending in the warped geometries of the tesseract” that a hypothetical 5D observer would see. The additional degree of freedom afforded by the fifth dimension allows for the probabilistic forms of chaos and causality that Schrödinger was envisioning when he said “I insist upon the view that all is waves”.

      @10thdim@10thdim4 ай бұрын
    • They are powerful theories. I don't feel the 5th dimension would 'see' the other dimensions unless it had a method of analysis, like we try to understand the quantum level, but it may be a realm experiencing more freedom. I agree with the warping within a tesseract but my knowledge of geometry and division denotes no end to the dimensions... Like 11th is highest... How exactly? Anyway we belong to a race that utilises nuclear energy for warfare so we don't deserve to know the 'secrets' of the Universe. We can't even be civil to each other.

      @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r4 ай бұрын
  • Wow - what a great explanation. A complex topic that has been distilled down to 20m, a sign of brilliance. Excellent!

    @MA4TU2@MA4TU24 ай бұрын
    • This is not a good explanation and this video appears to have about 30 minutes of work put into it.

      @SolidSiren@SolidSiren3 ай бұрын
    • @@SolidSiren Really? That much??

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • And I’ve never learned so much about fish in one video, so there’s that

      @JMazzaTaz@JMazzaTaz3 ай бұрын
    • @@JMazzaTaz 🤣

      @Stryker-K@Stryker-K2 ай бұрын
  • Fascinating description. Well done! This is very useful information

    @user-ew5pq3ek9q@user-ew5pq3ek9q3 ай бұрын
  • I love your channel mate! This blew my mind

    @Sent2Strike@Sent2Strike3 ай бұрын
  • Thermodynamics and its laws are a good place to start to study chaos theory. Even though individual particles of a gas move randomly we can predict temperature, pressure, and volume. Keep in mind that the ontology of thermodynamics includes a caveat. Included in the analysis is the requirement of a quasistatic, adiabatic process. If you want a more humanistic idea of this you should read Issac Asimov and his Foundation series of books. The premise of the Foundation series relies on the “gas laws” of classical physics to sketch out the story.

    @wadeedden4552@wadeedden45524 ай бұрын
    • Nuclear Bonds Good To Know ??? & So Fluoride In The Water By LAW ? Oh Why ??? & Schools ??? Lawyer Greed Law

      @FixItStupid@FixItStupid4 ай бұрын
    • I'm afraid you've got that completely wrong. I mean, what you say is correct but it's missing the point. The whole point about thermodynamics is that the tiny (or even quite large) differences don't matter, they all average out to well behaved phenomena. The point of chaos is that the tiniest differences matter massively and can lead to hugely different outcomes.

      @transientaardvark6231@transientaardvark62314 ай бұрын
    • @@transientaardvark6231 Thanks for the info.

      @arturofuente4832@arturofuente48323 ай бұрын
    • I understanding there is sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The epiphenomenon of order in the midst the thermodynamics is transitory whilst the final result is predictable. I must say that your posted video is very spot on and mostly complete, thank you for that.@@transientaardvark6231

      @wadeedden4552@wadeedden45523 ай бұрын
    • thanks wade! you comment, too, is informative.

      @mactabilis6039@mactabilis60393 ай бұрын
  • I wonder, would you get the same result, with the triangles, if done by hand? Or, what if you had a computer with the ability to process things outside the standard defined variables? Love the video.

    @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler3 ай бұрын
    • Could you guarantee the exact same hand motions every time at every level? Chaos(or unpredictability) does not exist as absolute, but as relative. What seems like chaos are things that we dont understand enough to fully see the path from cause to effect. Our minds are limited, not infinite. So our understanding of anything will always be limited and their always be some chaos to it(relative to our limited understanding). However, to a being that infinite understanding(which could only be God, who is infinite) then there wouldnt be any chaos from His perspective because he would have infinity perspective and infinite understanding. The point is, some things seem uncertain to us, but thats because of our comprehension and awareness limitations, not because of the nature of the phenomena itself.

      @jonathanspivey437@jonathanspivey4373 ай бұрын
    • For free will to exist, an I believe it does, on some level anyway, the system has to exist as a set of probable outcomes, that only become defined as now moves forward. It would still chaos, just contained within specific bounds. I think we see things in much the same way, just providing my interpretation. @@jonathanspivey437

      @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler3 ай бұрын
    • @@jonathanspivey437 I think free will is chaos, but god has computing power to allow for choice (sometimes) that exists within a set of outcomes that are acceptable.

      @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler9 күн бұрын
  • It makes me sad I can't have deep conversations like this with my family because they don't understand/care about this . Can't believe I understand this stuff.🎉

    @miguelmartinez2488@miguelmartinez24882 ай бұрын
    • Older souls have closed minds. They were raised in a different lighter light.

      @user-dq2zx2ei4m@user-dq2zx2ei4m14 күн бұрын
  • There are no mistakes in this Universe. Not even one molecule can be out of place... anywhere.

    @TerryConspiracy420@TerryConspiracy42014 күн бұрын
  • The 3 dots in there positions all ready represent a triangle, so it will form many triangles .

    @davidwood2387@davidwood23874 ай бұрын
    • If you understand geometry many things become obvious.

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
    • As long as the three points are not co-linear. It can be a very obtuse form of a triangle.

      @chrisrichardson8881@chrisrichardson88813 ай бұрын
    • does that theory work lol... with that geogebra site ... do the same trick with 4 dots and you still get triangles :p~

      @jarnoronkainen75@jarnoronkainen753 ай бұрын
    • Plus, the scheme in which you play the chaos game is what makes the pattern: it's a wave function. Change the function and you get a different pattern.

      @Sutanreyu@Sutanreyu3 ай бұрын
    • It's actually 'their', but thanks for dropping by.

      @david_cop_a_feel7538@david_cop_a_feel75383 ай бұрын
  • This video is perhaps adequate at describing a layman's superficial understanding of the subject matter, but never really explains what the "terrifying theory scientists don't want to talk about" is, or why it is "terrifying". This is pretty much click bait drivel as far as I can tell, but with a quite a bit of effort put into it, so slightly better than most click bait drivel. I clicked it, so it worked.

    @noprivacyleft@noprivacyleft3 ай бұрын
    • Yes, you clicked it and it worked, but only because of the clickbait title, right? And you stayed because of the clickbaity language ("but trust me, it's way more serious than you think"... conspiracy, anyone?). And if there's so much effort in it, why does it start right away with the mistake of presenting the butterfly effect as a "probabilistic mode" when in fact it's an example for deterministic (i.e., *not* probabilistic!) chaos?

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for this brilliantly set out video essay! I've duly subscribed and liked!

    @isaganipalanca8803@isaganipalanca88033 ай бұрын
  • 3:00 your example is control disguised as chaos. You are marking in the middle of every roll. That is not chaos, that is a pattern. There is no other conceivable outcome.

    @chasepalagi7675@chasepalagi76752 ай бұрын
  • Thanks Fexl I love these video's. This one gave me an epiphany or two including something I've not quantified yet about how randomness doesn't matter with regard to the outcome of a system. The moment you began the 1st roll of the die picked the pre-made design / outcome. Always has a good way of conveying an idea with clear logic. Thanks again.

    @coryrichardson7272@coryrichardson72724 ай бұрын
    • The moment you decided the rules for where to place the dots determined the outcome.

      @user-kb8qw7dy4t@user-kb8qw7dy4t3 ай бұрын
  • Good job, well done, guys! I am a physicist and have studied these phenomena, yet they do not cease to give me shivers and awe!

    @giannicallegari@giannicallegari4 ай бұрын
    • "Good job", "well done", "physicist", "have studied". Heard all that before. Déjà vu. Same questions to you too, therefore: Please do explain how the formulas and figures shown at 14:29 in the video clarify the narrative ("deterministic equations such as Newtons laws of motion do not always result in a deterministic universe"). In special, I would like to hear from you how the term in brackets, i.e. (t/T - x/λ), is derived in the formula at the top of the screen, center between left and right. As you can see, this term is being multiplied with E_k. How does it influence the result (i.e. the right side of the equation, 1/2 mv^2)? Also, please explain the role of the Δ symbol that occurs twice in the formula at the upper left of screen, and tell us how the large U-shaped object that's depicted middle right fits into the big picture. You've studied physics, so it should be an easy task for you.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. - John 13:35 NIV

      @sven888@sven8883 ай бұрын
    • @@Nonononono_Ohno He must have mixed up the Bible and his physics textbook

      @greywolf271@greywolf2713 ай бұрын
  • best thing i've seen since melody sheep's museum of alien life 2. thank you so much . big respect

    @williamcorycory7836@williamcorycory78363 ай бұрын
  • Where do we get any randomness? The only thing I can think of is the decay of a neutron into a proton. What happens is well described, but why it happens is not. It seems spontaneous and random. Ultimately, it is an up quark turning into a down quark.

    @londomolari5715@londomolari57153 ай бұрын
  • In the Chaos Game 3 dot - the rule to get the (red, normal orientation) Sierpinski triangles is as stated - but what if you wanted to plot the white (inverted) triangles instead? What ruleset would plot those? Hmmmmm.....

    @PTEC3D@PTEC3D3 ай бұрын
    • The Sierpinski triangle represents a pattern of eternal triangles within triangles.

      @dennishaladyn8205@dennishaladyn8205Ай бұрын
    • Same rules. You just start from some point, that is white. For example in the middle area of the triangle. The rule just maps the "current point" of the whole triangle to a corresponding point in one of the ½ size triangles in each corners of the big triangle. With same color. And then you map that point and the next one etc. Randomness just decides the drawing order of the points.

      @pesasafi@pesasafiАй бұрын
  • You made a mistake in the segment "Can you predict the future of our number?" It's totally predictable and there's no chaos about it. According to what was shown, multiplying by 10 and removing the integer portion, it creates a simple series: 0.123267203462345822542, 0.23267203462345822542, 0.3267203462345822542, ..., 0.542, 0.42, 0.2, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0. etc. I can predict that millionth iteration is still 0.0.

    @CoolHandLouis@CoolHandLouis3 ай бұрын
    • That's exactly what i thought, keep multiply by 10, and remove the 1st number (ahead of the decimal point), and you hit zero pretty quickly. And after that it will always remain zero. How could this producer get this so wrong? Is this really 100% AI generated? If so, more fools will be created!

      @TheNewsicalProfessor@TheNewsicalProfessor2 ай бұрын
    • Right? This made no sense. It made me think this whole video might have been made by AI.

      @chickenmuffin@chickenmuffin2 ай бұрын
    • your calculation appears to have precision rounding. the answer may differ with different levels of rounding.

      @billjohnson9472@billjohnson94722 ай бұрын
    • American AI. Can't understand decimal system.

      @XtreeM_FaiL@XtreeM_FaiL2 ай бұрын
  • Great food for the thinking mind. Adding new drawers to our cabinets of knowledge inside our minds. There's a lot of effort in the visuals as well; contributes to the video being of a higher standard. One room for improvement though, is to incorporate little silent voids, to process the presented information, and to prepare for what comes next. Plus, a rudimentary summary every now and then, to help each core piece of the theory to be stored, and to be stored in the right drawer.

    @1917WorkingClass@1917WorkingClass8 күн бұрын
  • Click bait title - not watching this one.

    @Trottelheimer@Trottelheimer3 ай бұрын
    • You should. I've always believed this. I never knew it had a name. It just made sense to me.

      @Allyourheroswenttohell@Allyourheroswenttohell2 ай бұрын
    • Free will is imaginary.

      @Allyourheroswenttohell@Allyourheroswenttohell2 ай бұрын
    • Why? It’s really interesting! ❤

      @Private-wj4nd@Private-wj4nd2 ай бұрын
    • Despite the clickbait title it is very good

      @dee_w784@dee_w7842 ай бұрын
    • Exciting visual stimuli coupled with vocal delivery suggesting a tense suspense yarn almost make me fail to notice extremely poor logical continuity and flow. After seven minutes plus I've little idea what it's about. I think it's cotton candy crap, electronic monosodium glutamate, possibly composed by nonhuman. Kindly refund my wasted time

      @ianyeager2893@ianyeager28932 ай бұрын
  • Honestly this is a very informative video not only on the scientific side of things but in life like actual life ….I am a stock trader and the fractals part is spot on 😊

    @gaddafykibao3545@gaddafykibao35454 ай бұрын
    • I was a little put off by his example of the stock market. He said, and I am paraphrasing, when a stock price changes, it causes people to buy or sell. Uh, the stock price changes BECAUSE people buy or sell. It's a market, stock prices don't change on their own. (although it may seem that way based on all of the shenanigans that go on in the background).

      @falconquest2068@falconquest20684 ай бұрын
    • AI has access to the same info as you do.

      @jonh8488@jonh84883 ай бұрын
    • @@jonh8488 You are correct sir.

      @falconquest2068@falconquest20683 ай бұрын
    • There is next to no science in this video.

      @SolidSiren@SolidSiren3 ай бұрын
  • There is NO random, just the illusion of random due to lack of knowledge about the dependencies.

    @engjds@engjds2 ай бұрын
  • I read James Gleick's book over a decade ago. Brilliant. I've always excelled in mathematics, and there are dimensions within geometry we have yet to understand. My interests shifted toward quantum mechanics afterword. There's a multidimensional universe all around us. Up until recently, all we've been able to see and measure - from our limited 3D perspective - is the little shining spheres all around us. We haven't even figured out gravity yet. You can't create gravity without understanding levity. Excellent commentary!

    @DADela-ht6ux@DADela-ht6ux14 күн бұрын
  • there are localized effects that have no bearing on macro systems. I'm not worried about a tornado storm when a cloud of butterflies take wing

    @kanubeenderman@kanubeenderman3 ай бұрын
  • Like in Jazz🎺🎶, overcoming chaos comes from choosing🦉wisely,🤯improvisation in♾️the moment😂!

    @tomato1040@tomato10403 ай бұрын
  • Chaos and order. "Imposition of order = escalation of chaos." - Robert Anton Wilson

    @FredCarpenter-vv9ld@FredCarpenter-vv9ld16 күн бұрын
  • An interesting observation about the chaos game: Due to the nature of the ruleset you immediately limit the area in which dots can be placed, removing a ton of potential randomness from the get-go. Id say in this case specifically its not too surprising if you end up with something orderly.

    @WH40KHero@WH40KHero3 ай бұрын
  • Theory’s are always interesting to learn about.

    @raymondterrazas5702@raymondterrazas57024 ай бұрын
    • “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

      @davidrandell2224@davidrandell22243 ай бұрын
  • This stuff is older than I am and I'm old. Scientists have been talking about it the whole time.

    @johnstones66@johnstones663 ай бұрын
  • So with the fish... it's true that they will never all be in the exact same position with the exact same trajectory, inertia, momentum etc... BUT ONLY because of the limiter of time. Should the fish live forever and not age, they will 100% replicate the exact same situation infinite times. I'm not sure what the significance of this is but it's fun to consider.

    @joshisdriven@joshisdriven3 ай бұрын
    • so are these chaotic systems made possible by entropy?

      @joshisdriven@joshisdriven3 ай бұрын
  • This theory is terrifying because 47.47354% of all humans attempting to understand it die - their heads explode.

    @keithcourson7317@keithcourson731722 күн бұрын
  • Don't forget chaotic attractors.

    @petevenuti7355@petevenuti73554 ай бұрын
  • Because of chaos, determinism can have anomalies arise because of the indeterminate consequences that may unfold. Determinism is still at the whim of probability.

    @jimkirby1799@jimkirby17994 ай бұрын
    • And everyone ignores the will. Life is in many ways what you make it. There are no limits if you understand the people around you and what moves them. But this is not the average human. Some were born to change the world.

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
  • Very nice summary of the complex topics of Chaos Theory.

    @jackfroste@jackfroste3 ай бұрын
  • Me:*moves chair* The theory: the world will end

    @Just_A_Kid5693@Just_A_Kid5693Ай бұрын
  • There was nothing “chaotic” about the chaos game at the beginning. You were following a set of rules that would obviously lead to the Sierpinski Triangle if you put some thought into it. The second game wasn’t deterministic as you were randomly removing a number, even though it was the first number, you’re still removing a random element. After watching the first two fails you lost me on this one.

    @AT-ol2yj@AT-ol2yj4 ай бұрын
    • Another Ai created channel?

      @user-ur9yq6ik1h@user-ur9yq6ik1h4 ай бұрын
    • Yes chaos usually flows on cycles where they form into fractals. It may have had a little quasi chaos but you can measure. The amount of chaos based on Lyapunov exponents.

      @eiwo323s@eiwo323s3 ай бұрын
    • ❤❤❤❤ 💯

      @jaydils9680@jaydils96803 ай бұрын
    • Do you mean that the number is random because the starting number was random?

      @lucasbrelivet5238@lucasbrelivet52383 ай бұрын
    • It's not chaotic" because everything is in a wave, and the random comes into play, it all depends how you ride the wave .

      @luckyMePopUp@luckyMePopUp3 ай бұрын
  • I go outside with butterfly wings on every morning and flap my wings for hours. Neighbors are convinced I am to blame for everything.

    @Shattered_Instance@Shattered_Instance3 ай бұрын
    • Someone liked my comment... Clearly the wings are working.

      @Shattered_Instance@Shattered_Instance3 ай бұрын
    • Then stop it.

      @glenfoxh@glenfoxhАй бұрын
  • Interesting topic - perhaps a little bit too dramatically told - but absolutely gorgeous graphics - WOW ! Thumbs up !

    @jeytee289@jeytee2894 ай бұрын
  • COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES The greatest detective story of all time! Who were the Anunnaki? Where was sun was born? Where did the light come from to create all coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick. It could no come from the sun at Earth had a thick CO2 atmosphere. Earth is very unique indeed. Our solar system was born in Orion. After we left Orion Earth froze up for a billion or so years because space is cold and the sun didn’t burn as hot back then. At that time early Earth had one ocean and one continent with a 1000 PSI carbon dioxide atmosphere much like Venus has today. With such a thick 3000-mile deep atmosphere you wouldn’t see the sun. Our solar system was captured by Sirius A and B about 850-million years ago. Sirius B is the size of Earth but has 1.5 solar masses. It was the light from those objects that created all the coal, oil and limestone on Earth, not the Sun. The sun could not get through a 3000-mile-deep atmosphere. Alll that carbon dioxideis underground now in the form of coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick. Sirius B is the size of Earth puts out more than 100 times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum. Sirius B is in a fifty-year elliptical orbit around the two-solar-mass Sirius A of 8 to 12 astronomical units. At 8 AU it could feed off Sirius A and put out more than 1000 times the light of our sun. One teaspoonful of Sirius B would weigh more than a city bus on Earth. The Anunnaki’s home planet is in the Sirius system. You need ORME gold, the white powder gold mentioned in Exodus to spray in your atmosphere to shield it from the harsh UV light of Sirius B. The Nephilim came to Earth 400,000 years ago to mine gold. They tried to get it out of seawater but that wasn’t enough for their needs so they moved to South Africa. They imported a race of smaller workers called Igigi to dig underground because the Nephilim are tall. Some are twenty-feet tall making it impractical for them to go underground due to cave-ins. Enlil was a hard taskmaster who worked many of the Igigi to death. His brother Enki was more kind causing friction between himself and his brother. Enlil starved 15,000 Igigi to death. Eventually they rebelled and sought refuge away from the mines. The Anunnaki/Nephilim needed workers to continue mining gold so they did genetic experiments using some of their own DNA. After many tries they created a subservient creature they called Adam. They needed a genetically compatible mate so they took part of Adam’s rib to clone Eve. Problems developed when humans became aware that the large beings were not gods but slave masters. Nakosh, on of the reptilian aliens raped Eve and she became aware of the knowledge of good and evil. She convinced Adam to get the Hell out of Eden. It was for their own safety that they departed Eden. The newly created humans were capable of mating with the other indigenous races living on the planet. The Nephilim or Elohim kept the knowledge of the white-powder-gold from the humans to limit their age to 120 years so they wouldn’t overpopulate the planet. Other problems arose when the Nephilim looked upon the fair human females and decided to mate with them creating the races of giants the heroes of old, the men of renown. Something had to be done. Once the Nephilim had enough gold they burned it into the white powder to take if off planet. It weighs nothing in that state and when heated it weighs less than nothing. Our Sun was leaving the vicinity of the Sirius at that time. The Anunnaki had to leave Earth and ship thei ORME gold to Niberu. The remaining eight Elohim on Earth started squabbling among them. They decided to separate each taking their human slaves to different parts of the Earth. One went to China, another to Tibet. Quetzalcóatl - god of winds and rain and the creator of humanity took his slaves and built pyramids in Central America. Huitzilopochtli - the supreme god of the Sun and war built pyramids and cities in the Amazon and roads connecting South America with Central America. A gigantic 239-meter high Chinese Pyramid in a Gigantic Forgotten Walled City of Shimao is located in the northern part of the Loess Plateau, bordering the Ordos Desert. Shimao is often referred to as “The Chinese Pyramid of Civilization,” because it is the largest late-Neolithic archaeological site in China. Dated to around 2000 BC. This Chinese pyramid structure was the base for a grand palace that sat on the flat top of the pyramid. This gigantic palace at the top of the pyramid was the size of 10 football fields or 861,112 square feet (80,000 square meters). It overlooked a walled city, which was 50 times bigger than the palace area. Recently, a garden pool where crocodiles were kept. Thoth built the Great Pyramid in Egypt. He wrote the 48 books of Thoth and the Tablet and taught the Greeks mathematics and healing. YHWH the un-pronounceable name of Moses God was responsible for monotheism of Christians and Jewish religion. He instructed Moses to take three million Hebrews slaves out of Egypt. They camped out in the wilderness for 40-years to kill off all the old religions. Moses fed the children the priest bread to purify their DNA. YHWH was an outcast and could not go to the Promised Land until the other Anunnaki/Elohim departed. He was a giant bird-like creature with a beak. Enlil decided to bring the Moon into orbit around Earth. To move it one simply started up the huge pumps moving the ocean inside off center of mass in the direction they wanted to go. Enlil realized that the resulting impact would cause world-wide floods and he only wanted to save most of the flora and fauna. Enki was forbidden to tell his son, Noah about the impending flood. Instead he drew plans for an Ark and a letter to Noah explaining the situation. Noah was a giant half man half Anunnaki/Elohim/Nephilim. The rest is history. It was little Sirius B that created most all the coal, oil and limestone on Earth, not the sun. When you are driving your car down the road or heating your house with electricity generated by a coal generating plant you are recycling stellar energy that did not come from the Sun! Humanity has been worshiping the wrong sun god for the last 4000 years. The ancient Egyptians knew we were in orbit around Sirius and based their New Year when Sirius becomes visible on the horizon. Book: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES can be found on: www.GuardDogBooks.com or: www.Amazon.com and book stores around the world in China, Japan, Indonesia and Europe. 1000-foot tall pyramid in China.

    @HankKroll@HankKroll3 ай бұрын
  • Nicely explained yet will always remain mind boggling. Great visuals!

    @Aangel452@Aangel4523 ай бұрын
  • Where's the "Don't recommend this Channel" when ya need it ?

    @DeweyKiller@DeweyKiller3 ай бұрын
    • As soon as I heard the AI voice and saw this comment. 🏃🏾💨

      @aman7525@aman75254 күн бұрын
  • Input> >water+food+home for everyone

    @gf.calabretta@gf.calabretta2 ай бұрын
  • Just because a butterfly flapping its wings has consequences around the world in a way that’s so complex we could never trace the cause->effect throughline, doesn’t mean it’s random or probablistic at all. Everything (in this regime) is still deterministic, but absurdly complex. True probabilistic behavior is something like radioactive decay, though since we don’t fully understand quantum physics at a conceptual level, it’s possible even this type occurrence has an as-yet unseen cause. You could sum up the current state of physics by saying we have two understandings of reality: one deterministic (relativity) and one probabilistic (QM). They cannot both be true, yet it appears to us that they are.

    @dukeon@dukeon3 ай бұрын
  • The flap of the butterfly "can" cause a tornado half a globe away IF that flap, the "wind" of that flap was in some very improbable manner reinforced with other winds caused by other things, and if that flap was the initial snowflake in the big snowball which would be the eventual tornado at the end. BUT, that is very unlikely to happen.

    @ozymandiasultor9480@ozymandiasultor94803 ай бұрын
  • Probability breaks down at a certain point and determinism takes over as an event unfolds. Even if that transfer is only at a Planck distance in a Planck time away from the culmination of the event. Until then, some level of uncertainty still exists.

    @the_proteus_void@the_proteus_void4 ай бұрын
    • No, uncertainty is a fundamental ingredient in quantum mechanics.

      @karlschmied6218@karlschmied62183 ай бұрын
    • @@karlschmied6218 I appreciate the sentiment, but I'm referring to a real life event, such as picking up my phone. I'm not referring to a theoretical event or any math involved in the quantum mechanical realm. Real life doesn't rely on quantum mechanics, which is only our perception that we desire to measure and comprehend. In real life, uncertainties exist in the probability field only up to the moment that I have actually picked up my phone. At that point, the probability field collapses and the uncertainty pertaining to the completion of that specific event ceases to exist. Other uncertainties still exist relating to a wide array of other possibilities, but it's not going to be the same uncertainty.

      @the_proteus_void@the_proteus_void3 ай бұрын
    • @@the_proteus_void Ok now I know what you mean. But I could not see that in your first statement.

      @karlschmied6218@karlschmied62183 ай бұрын
    • @@karlschmied6218 Understood. Sometimes thoughts come out as incomplete statements. I'm glad I was able to clarify.

      @the_proteus_void@the_proteus_void3 ай бұрын
    • @@the_proteus_void Thanks!

      @karlschmied6218@karlschmied62183 ай бұрын
  • ⚠️ The AI voice is from Eleven labs. Terrible. Many channels are using this same voice. The content here is also wrong in several points. 😮😮

    @DihelsonMendonca@DihelsonMendonca3 ай бұрын
  • chatGPT did not cook on this one

    @zezlink8180@zezlink81806 күн бұрын
  • I had the Butterfly wings principle been thought in a different way..... The loose nail of a horse shoe can cause the loss of a war and the loss of a kingdom...

    @erikblaas5826@erikblaas58263 ай бұрын
    • That's a Todd Rundgren song..."For the Want of a Nail', but it gets to the point of 'what else could the answer be?'

      @oopsadaze@oopsadaze3 ай бұрын
    • & a loose tongue looses a girlfriend. 😢😅

      @dareese6778@dareese6778Ай бұрын
  • What about if consicious mind observing makes paterns and shapes out of the Chaos.

    @daxons2889@daxons28894 ай бұрын
    • Uhhhhhhhhhhh yeah it's called the observer effect. Schrödinger's cat and all that. None of this is new. Einstein ushered in the quantum physical age. He famously said "God does not play dice" believing in a static universe and an unsplittable atom. Then they split the atom and Hubble laid bare the redshift in galaxies moving apart at various rates "The Hubble Constant". Einstein relented, god does indeed play dice. Probablism and determinism coexist in a Newtonian and Einsteinian universe. Shocking new science c. 1915.

      @jules6601@jules66012 ай бұрын
  • Does quantum entanglement follow determinism or probabilism? I'm new to all of these awesome concepts, and am genuinely curious and not trying confound anything current...

    @dante101888@dante10188820 күн бұрын
  • I now understand why a single dice is called a die. The thinking dead realm does "play dice." It's hissing gulping puffball is chaotic because you have no idea when it will kill you or when it will stop you from revealing it killed you. It is then you realize the uncertainty principle means, ultimately, what is symmetry. Well, the flashing complementary realm is not symmetrical because there is no conservation. The synthetics from the dead realm who quantum tunnel through lie they're real. So, the difference between a real fractal and an electric one is the real one doesn't want to kill you or use you as a battery. In this video they clearly squash the real fractals and electric fractals into one realm. They "renormalize." So, what the scientists are scared of, or should be, is that they've called zero pt mass and mass zero pt. The thinking part of the mass is what threw them because it is able to make light speed seem instantaneous through an energy exchange. That is the true illusion the real "illuminati" wants to bring to our understanding. Their conclusions are twisted. IOW, this should be that and that should be this.

    @tarawasjesus@tarawasjesus3 ай бұрын
  • Even E.T. said on several occasions that we do not understand what we are capable of doing, which is partly why they too live here on our planet with us. As some want to see our ascension up to the next level. Admittedly we have lots of faults as with many of the species that are tens of thousands of years ahead of us. Which I now hope will put things into perspective. Thank you for reading, and have a good night.

    @abeautifulmindispoetrydefi5323@abeautifulmindispoetrydefi53233 ай бұрын
    • The Others have their faults, too, It is not quite THEY: golden and enlightened vs US: stupid and naval gazing (though yes). Weird things have happened. Some people are exploiting THEM. What we think as a "UFO" is sometimes an entire BODY that changes; sometimes it is a copy of a body or a vessel and such. There's so much to learn, it is like drinking from a hose

      @jeremygreen2439@jeremygreen24393 ай бұрын
    • they'll go extinct early haha

      @JohnGrandline@JohnGrandline2 ай бұрын
  • Does this work for all shapes

    @jackcarvis3668@jackcarvis36684 ай бұрын
    • Yes, even for jelly pudding.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • Yes but because math.

      @nicolepadilla866@nicolepadilla8663 ай бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/h9VwmLmugKWIkqs/bejne.html

      @Beyond-Story-rn7jb@Beyond-Story-rn7jb2 ай бұрын
  • 19:10 "Perfect predictability is probably an illusion." 🤔 I think this says more about the inadequacy of our mathematical system than the assumed lack of order in the Universe. "As above, so below. As within, so without. As the Universe, so the soul." [Hermetic philosophy]

    @farrier2708@farrier2708Ай бұрын
  • All systems tend towards chaos, yet new systems emerge from the chaos.

    @wakeUPdummies@wakeUPdummies3 ай бұрын
  • Interesting topic, nice video, like always, thanks Fexl! 🙂 We living beings and our planet is in danger... We have to take care about us, animals and plants, about the entire planet! What we have done to our planet and all living creatures over the last 200 years can only result in bad karma. We have to change our attitude and learn to really love and respect, everyone and everything... 💞

    @thekingofmojacar5333@thekingofmojacar53334 ай бұрын
    • You got all that from ... wait ! ......Wow !

      @greywolf271@greywolf2713 ай бұрын
  • So you’re saying trying to create a hurricane from my farts isn’t out of reach. 🤔 Challenge accepted.

    @BuffaloMotivated@BuffaloMotivated3 ай бұрын
    • a fartnado

      @rich2rock@rich2rock3 ай бұрын
    • Go down the Sharnado route and you could end up with a 5-arsed Fartnado . . . . or even an Infinite Fartnado.@@rich2rock

      @theverseshed@theverseshed3 ай бұрын
  • Butterfly effect is deterministic. I have a better analogy, a bee landing on your nose can save your life. You are about to cross the road, green light indicates you can go but there is a car rushing about to hit you, out of nowhere a bee lands on your nose you step back and try to gently get rid of it. Someone could maybe start running faster and be hit by the car, but in this instance you "chose" to stop and gently chase it away, why did you chose to stop is deterministic as well. You could be bit by a bee in past as a child while trying to run away, and this is in your subconscious waiting for years to act on your "free decisions" when time comes...

    @Zariston@Zariston3 ай бұрын
  • Instead of a TRIANGLE... reality is a CIRCLE.

    @lshtar777@lshtar7772 ай бұрын
  • Kind of throws a wrench in Azimov's "Foundation" premise.

    @randywise5241@randywise52414 ай бұрын
    • It seems you don't understand the premise of the Foundation series... Because my enjoyment of the series was because Asimov builds the entire series specifically around the concepts of Chaos Theory -- and he even shows how different understanding of the underlying concepts can lead to different schools of thought -- and consequent actions.

      @StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt4 ай бұрын
    • @@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt You cannot predict the future like that. Didn't you listen to the video?

      @randywise5241@randywise52414 ай бұрын
  • If you ever see a turtle on top of a fence post, it’s a safe bet that it didn’t get there by itself. The more you know….

    @JMazzaTaz@JMazzaTaz3 ай бұрын
    • I don’t get it

      @Just_A_Kid5693@Just_A_Kid5693Ай бұрын
  • IQ is about pattern recogntion, but Chaos Theory is not talked about much by Scientists. That's not good for us.

    @LEMONMANIZATION@LEMONMANIZATION2 ай бұрын
  • The emerging image of the Sierpinski Triangle reminds me of the double-slit experiment where a single photon is fired through the slits one at a time to create a pattern of light and dark bands.

    @FatFilipinoUK@FatFilipinoUK3 ай бұрын
  • The deeper you dive into modern science the better you can understand the universe. Like quantum mechanics and the quantum computer. Seth Lloyd wrote the book Programming the Universe. He was the first one to design a buildable quantum computer and the way he figured out how to do this was by studying How the Universe Works like a giant quantum computer that was preprogrammed to do exactly what you see. The most complexed system in the known universe is your brain which gives you ☆ CONSCIOUSNESS ☆

    @michaelward878@michaelward8784 ай бұрын
    • You sound you like you get it, or are right there. Best of luck. AI and distributed neural networks.

      @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler3 ай бұрын
  • That wasn't chaos. Try that point program again but this time your starting and ending points are random each time. That would be chaos. But as soon as you apply rules, you're no longer in chaos. The universe is chaos until observed because observation creates boundaries and rules for how things are/should be based on inmate bias, understanding, and capabilities of that observer. It's why the light slit experiment works and why quanta appear in multiple states until observed. Because of OUR limitations we can't observe the universe in it's true state so we grab at patterns to form boundaries for our experience which eventually appear as universal laws and facts. It stems from the fact that everything is the same one thing, and all of time is instantaneous (non-existent)

    @GtommyT@GtommyT3 ай бұрын
    • That the "triangle magic" isn't chaos, yes, agreed. But the rest is a *very* esoteric view, to say the least.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • @@Nonononono_Ohno It may be a little esoteric (what theory of the nature of reality isn't?) but it's coherent and quite intellectually pleasing. I say thanks to @GtommyT for taking the time to put that one out there. We are seeking greater understanding and enlightenment, after all, or we're doing nothing at all.

      @awaben@awaben3 ай бұрын
    • @@awaben You have a strange view of coherence. If you really seek understanding, you might better want to consult a good physics textbook, instead of reading completely misunderstood and plain wrong comments under useless videos. As a starting point, I'd like to recommend the Feynman lectures.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • @@Nonononono_Ohno I hadn't come on here for an argument. But I'm happy to give you a retort: You watched the same "useless" video I did, you responded to the same comment I did, you then proceeded to attempt to denigrate my having done so. Presumably you doing the same should be applauded. Tell me, how's that superiority complex working out for you? Seems like a timely moment to bust out a bit of Robert Burns: "O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us! It wad frae mony a blunder free us, An’ foolish notion" Bye, bye now.

      @awaben@awaben3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@awaben I'm sorry that I've hurt your feelings. However, videos like this one, and the above comment aren't doing science any favor. There are very good reasons for having a concept of passing time in physics. At first glance drivel like 'time does not exist', or 'the universe is chaos until observed' may seem very deep and enigmatic and therefore appealing to some people, but in fact it's just plain wrong. Subsequently it leads to even more completely wrong notions, like chaos being the reason for what we observe in the double slit experiment, or being the reason for the existence of quantum states. Science students who, when learning, come across this kind of nonsense often lose valuable time, which is why I occasionally point it out as what it really is. I hope that makes sense to you, and maybe it lets you understand my reaction to your comment a bit better.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
  • Please give credit where credit is due: *Lorenz Butterfly Effect* Source: When the Butterfly Effect Took Flight | MIT Technology Review "The unexpected result led Lorenz to a powerful insight about the way nature works: small changes can have large consequences. The idea came to be known as the “butterfly effect” after Lorenz suggested that the flap of a butterfly's wings might ultimately cause a tornado."

    @lloydgarth1@lloydgarth13 ай бұрын
  • And in more recent news: Scientists claim they have been able to circumvent the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

    @johnphelps7519@johnphelps7519Ай бұрын
  • Because of hemes Tricemeguistus I understand the principle of three and every single geodesic, singularity, super conductive super determination..... It all means even less when the only controlling force is yours end there is no other witness to confirm the happening

    @WittyBlindEyez-Radio@WittyBlindEyez-Radio4 ай бұрын
    • Your own experience is in the end all that matters as this is reality for you. There is an objective reality but we will never agree on what it is. The sad fact is that most people are deluded as they generally only have one source of information (media), and that information is carefully crafted to keep us ignorant and in line. Unless you have already woken from your sleep, you won't know what I am talking about.

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
    • You got a pretty good grasp of the overall state of things. Any idea on how many of us are awake or whatever? Are there like meetups? I hope you don't read this as sarcasm or insulting or something, seems like that could be a possible defense mechanism of the great distributed neural network that humanity is. Anyway, good luck with your reality (game as I call it), I'm working hard at mine. Trying to become a genetic engineer, hopefully that will allow me more freedom. Eh, at least I get good music. @@Willy_Tepes

      @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler3 ай бұрын
    • What thee actual fuck are you talking bout, Willis‽‽‽ 20:41

      @Holographic-Stallions.X0@Holographic-Stallions.X03 ай бұрын
    • It went completely over your head, didn't it? Kind of proves my point, doesn't it?@@Holographic-Stallions.X0

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes3 ай бұрын
  • @0:08 "This may sound like a joke or something, but trust me..." Ah! You lost me there, mate. I don't even know you and you're asking me to trust you already?

    @sandytrunks@sandytrunks3 ай бұрын
    • And only 20 seconds later comes the first mistake, the butterfly effect isn't "probabilistic".

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_Ohno3 ай бұрын
    • faccs

      @nftherula.@nftherula.2 ай бұрын
    • @@Nonononono_Ohno Correct. The Butterfly Effect is simply a statement about the uncomputability of any complex, deterministic system beyond some relatively near horizon. However, the video makes that clear. You are constructing a strawman based on your own misunderstanding of what was being said.

      @donnievance1942@donnievance1942Ай бұрын
    • @@donnievance1942 Your comment only shows that you have not been listening to, or understood, what is being said in the video. But I cannot blame you, with all that drivel. In the video we hear that "In the probabilistic mode, our universe unfolds with an element of chance. Small, seemingly insignificant events like the butterfly's wings cancascade into significant unpredictable consequences." This shows that whichever language model constructed this video erroneously "thinks" that the butterfly effect is "probabilistic mode". This is false.

      @Nonononono_Ohno@Nonononono_OhnoАй бұрын
  • But if you caught that butterfly, another hurricane comes from another butterfly. The atmospheric energy must be discharged.

    @markwrede8878@markwrede88782 ай бұрын
  • This overlooks the human capability to manifest change. Greater worlds have been known.

    @charlesprice925@charlesprice9254 ай бұрын
    • What proof other than delusions/hallucinations?

      @ichimaruvegeta@ichimaruvegeta4 ай бұрын
    • Plenty. Go outside, live, take notice and avoid distraction long enough and youl see@@ichimaruvegeta

      @benayers8622@benayers86224 ай бұрын
    • @@ichimaruvegeta You've obviously never don it.

      @charlesprice925@charlesprice9254 ай бұрын
    • @@charlesprice925 that’s a nice way to say you have no proof.

      @ichimaruvegeta@ichimaruvegeta4 ай бұрын
    • The German election in 1933. He manifested what was in his mind.@@ichimaruvegeta

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
  • Uhhhh... Butterfly effect applies for either theory, as does cause and effect - it's just that a certain cause will always happen to cause its respective effect if it's deterministic.‚

    @beeftimer@beeftimer4 ай бұрын
    • How many acid tabs have you taken?

      @MasterBlaster3545@MasterBlaster35454 ай бұрын
    • Correlation doesn’t always imply causation though.

      @ichimaruvegeta@ichimaruvegeta4 ай бұрын
    • I have observed the butterfly effect in practice through my many years of commenting on the web. One sentence from me has spread into minds I never thought possible just by chance. You do have the power to change the world even without meaning it. Imagine what you can do when you realize your power. People can be influenced, and people do stuff ;)

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
    • @@Willy_Tepes ummm, okay. Cool! Good for you, man

      @beeftimer@beeftimer3 ай бұрын
    • @@ichimaruvegeta Ok? What do you people think I'm saying?

      @beeftimer@beeftimer3 ай бұрын
  • 6:34 The biggest thing for me was noticing how the astronomers were saying that in order for galaxies to hold together they must need extra mass because the velocity was too much for the matter we could see. But to me, I noticed that storms on earth with far less density and lower temperature matter like air (argon, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen) can muster up tremendous power enough so they can fight gravity and even atmospheric pressure. So the galaxy works the same way. Heat chases cold absolutely and black holes (center of a galaxy) are absolute zero temperature mocking a low pressure center with air. So highly charged energy will attest to the common center just like a galaxy has highly charged stars and gaseous masses swirl around Sagittarius A star here in our Milky Way. The small gives us a glimpse into the MACRO. Go put up a firepit and get it lit real good (safely) of course, and you’ll notice it will charge up and chase a cold dense stick. Just put a stick near the pit and see the fire light up and chase the dense mass. So in a vacuum without atmospheric pressure caving in on the fire it will chase even more. So that means our missing DARK MATTER is really storm force. Heat and cold attracting. ☺️💯☑️ the hot charged part of the galaxy chases the cold center in a circle or elliptical pattern. Cycles. 💡💥💯

    @JKDVIPER@JKDVIPER4 ай бұрын
    • Manifold

      @Eaglepass@Eaglepass4 ай бұрын
    • @@Eaglepass yup. Pretty much. A more inspired way of looking at it.

      @JKDVIPER@JKDVIPER4 ай бұрын
    • wait, why is this making me think of this girl I met? hmmmmmm, interesting. Anyway, well written, seems to be speaking to a number of people.

      @LukeRiedler@LukeRiedler3 ай бұрын
  • 2:50 - Fexl: cool experience! Nintendo: Cease and Desist.

    @Fenrisson@Fenrisson23 күн бұрын
  • The triangle theory is missing the point that it's a metapattern. Because you're starting within the shape of a triangle and the movement is restricted within, of course it's going to self-replicate more triangles. I'm no physicist but having worked with data long enough I can easily see that for what it is, even if I can't put it into proper terms. In the end, anything seemingly chaotic or probable eventually results in the same thing - a (observable and therefore potentially subjective) metapattern. Micro to macro - it's a constant "loop" if that's an appropriate term.

    @phyrr2@phyrr228 күн бұрын
  • The dots don't have anywhere to go except for three choices though. The Triforce was not mysterious shape as his reaction would led to believe, rather it was inevitable.

    @EsotericBibleSecrets@EsotericBibleSecrets4 ай бұрын
    • It's not a triforce -- it's The Sierpinski Triangle. It's a fractal shape, that arises in many places in the fractal geometry and in chaos theory. And there was nothing inevitable about this: if you were asked ahead of time what shape the process would give rise to, you wouldn't have been able to answer.

      @lechatquilit@lechatquilit4 ай бұрын
    • Anyone with a logical mind could predict this as there are areas that never will receive a dot.@@lechatquilit

      @Willy_Tepes@Willy_Tepes4 ай бұрын
  • It may not seem like it, but this is all inherently linear thinking.

    @NothingMaster@NothingMaster4 ай бұрын
    • 9-likes were tipping the scales I gave you another likable scientology Mystery. One moment of a time-piece Superlatives 10th. 🕒 .00-unrelated anything dramatically accounts for 1+1=1plused2.00-unrelated Originally anything is strategy adaptation. Butterfly 🦋 ....... .. no disrespect said opinion is a value

      @Eaglepass@Eaglepass4 ай бұрын
    • @@Eaglepass FYI: I only have one KZhead account, and I don’t give myself likes. Also, I didn’t mean to be disrespectful, I merely stated my opinion.

      @NothingMaster@NothingMaster4 ай бұрын
    • I think you meant, respectfully, this video/concept may sound far out but actually makes complete sense and isn't even making any stretches. The pace of the info was fast for most. It's not a terrifying theory, just science isn't funding any real application of it.

      @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r4 ай бұрын
    • @@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r That’s not what I meant at all. What I meant is what I said: linear thinking/logic vs. nonlinear thinking/logic. In other words, the ideas flow linearly in a very straightforward way and are somewhat trivial to grasp. They lack trans-dimensional, or even multidimensional, complexity, and with no imbedded or unexpected anomalies.

      @NothingMaster@NothingMaster4 ай бұрын
    • @@NothingMaster Yes

      @whyyoumakethissohard@whyyoumakethissohard4 ай бұрын
  • I do not believe in "random." I do believe that there are many patterns that we cannot perceive.

    @pattoneill2402@pattoneill240215 күн бұрын
  • We were never supposed to know everything. We are human and our time on this planet was meant to begin and end. It’s out of our hands.

    @stevenray3029@stevenray302913 күн бұрын
  • this channel is legit underrated with only 76k subs because it puts out content of substance and not just the same 'float through the planets' with narrator voice on top typical space related channels.

    @BossInVegas@BossInVegas4 ай бұрын
    • We are just watching some random stitched videos of stock footages though.

      @origenjerome8031@origenjerome80314 ай бұрын
    • This channel is legit shit you mean

      @johnr2391@johnr23914 ай бұрын
  • Click bait.

    @Steven-ff4wl@Steven-ff4wl3 ай бұрын
    • it's basically all we've got now

      @stevenmoore3480@stevenmoore348012 күн бұрын
    • How so Stev?

      @mrx1278@mrx12784 күн бұрын
    • @@mrx1278 you cannot sell anything now without lying about what it is you are actually going to get for your time or money...

      @stevenmoore3480@stevenmoore34804 күн бұрын
    • @@stevenmoore3480 oh....

      @mrx1278@mrx12784 күн бұрын
    • @@mrx1278 It's nonsense.

      @Steven-ff4wl@Steven-ff4wl4 күн бұрын
  • WOW!!! Fantastic lecture 🙂 I love it.

    @DStrayCat69@DStrayCat693 ай бұрын
  • Negative feedback loops usually provide stability. Positive feedback loops lead to destruction and chaos. However, the positive feedback loops are useful too when they are controlled. I wonder if the nature ever does it. In technology we use positive feedback loops in all kind of radios and signal generators (a resonance is a case of positive feedback) and in nuclear reactors, when a chain reaction is moderated. BTW, predator-pray loops used to be very stable until external environmental factors broke the stable conditions. Yes, it's another way of saying we broke it. However, even broken, destabilized systems can get back to equilibrium over time.

    @01001000010101000100@01001000010101000100Ай бұрын
  • Clickbait bullshit.

    @Slabbin_Cabin@Slabbin_Cabin3 ай бұрын
    • I take it you're not a physicist.

      @teresaboone893@teresaboone8933 ай бұрын
    • @@teresaboone893 I take it you enjoy clickbait titles.

      @Slabbin_Cabin@Slabbin_Cabin3 ай бұрын
    • Fr bro it’s making me think that if I move a stick then the world will end💀

      @Just_A_Kid5693@Just_A_Kid5693Ай бұрын
  • Where's the *terrifying* part? 🙄🤡

    @jimbotron70@jimbotron703 ай бұрын
    • The butterfly

      @KaterinaZharaya@KaterinaZharayaАй бұрын
    • Er, the clickbait title? F'ing chatbots.

      @earthtraderssaga@earthtraderssagaАй бұрын
    • The terrifying part is what stopped us scrolling, froze us in space and nicked our time

      @CeoAhmedOsman@CeoAhmedOsmanАй бұрын
  • 4:16 the explanation is wrong, b/c computers usually cannot store decimal floating-point numbers *at all* . Instead, they use *binary* floating-point numbers, with digits after the point representing 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and so forth. A "double" is usually implemented as 64-bit IEEE binary floating-point number. This binary representation is completely deterministic, however b/c the format cannot precisely "store" the decimal digits specified after the decimal point, it's only an approximation (compare 1/2 vs 1/3, for instance -- try to write them down as binary floating-point as an exercise).

    @durrcodurr@durrcodurr2 ай бұрын
  • Probability and determinantal phenomenon make us to use our thinking power to exhaust completely. Likewise chaotic theory also. There is nothing like determinantal (that is sure to happen) phenomenon. As said in this video we like determinantal things , that is we want trains to run at fixed time, we need rains should stick to rainy season only. Like that we want our space activities should also be as expected. No problem any where correct take off correct journey and correct landing on moon or other planets and so on. We want everything determinantal ( that is accurate) but we have seen more failure then success in almost all cases. But probability can be relied. Trains may run in time or may not be in time. Our space activities can be accurate as planned or may end in failure. Predictability , we must hope but we should be ready to face failure as well. We can not predict weather, stock market, and many more cases as said in this video. There is quontom theory , which says the same thing that is nothing is predictable. So my view is we should be ready to sacrifice determinantal and accept probability in every aspect in physical world as well as behavioural aspects as well. We can not predict behaviour of any one continuously. Thanks for the video showing the various systems showing contradictory elements associated with each system like determinantal and probability.

    @malakannagowli2350@malakannagowli23504 ай бұрын
  • HORRIBLE fearmongering clickbait by shit AI... Welcome to 2024. KZhead needs to clean this crap up!

    @johnr2391@johnr23914 ай бұрын
KZhead