KZhead

Are Russians using T-10 Tanks on the Frontline??

RedEffect
2023 ж. 22 Қыр.
602 601 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

A video of a Russian offensive came out with an unusual looking tank, which made many believe that Russians are now actually using T-10 heavy tanks on the frontline...
Patreon: / redeffect
Outro: "face away" - svard

Пікірлер

  • If it really was a T-10, it would be mad impressive to see a 1950s tank survive not one, but TWO modern anti-tank mines

    @sooryan_1018@sooryan_10187 ай бұрын

    • Some heavy tanks have thicker bottom armor than modern MBTs, its not that surprising.

      @neurofiedyamato8763@neurofiedyamato87637 ай бұрын

    • @@neurofiedyamato8763 modern western tanks have thin bottom and side armor

      @187Rajah@187Rajah7 ай бұрын

    • Maybe they make unmanned tank

      @1Night1Hawk1@1Night1Hawk17 ай бұрын

    • @@somebody700 except that's where you're wrong, modern MBTs have fairly thin bottom armor to save on weight, where old heavy tanks had thicker bottom armor plates (also, they probably outclass them in cost, modern system are expensive [they're worth their price ofc], and composite armor is much harder to do compared to rolled armor [ofc one beats the other, duh])

      @righty5890@righty58907 ай бұрын

    • ​@@somebody700except trice the thickness of side's armour

      @worldoftancraft@worldoftancraft7 ай бұрын

  • When you got no other backup on WT top tier

    @LostCauseRT@LostCauseRT7 ай бұрын

    • bt5

      @Dr.Sandwich2@Dr.Sandwich27 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Dr.Sandwich2 BT-5 tanking a 38cm Sturmtiger rocket and surviving be like:

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • @@Dr.Sandwich2 truly a 11.7 M22 moment

      @LostCauseRT@LostCauseRT7 ай бұрын

    • he should use BT 5

      @mrmakhno3030@mrmakhno30307 ай бұрын

    • @@saucyinnit8799No but seriously a month ago I was in the Wiesel 1A2 and a bt-5 tanked my TOW-2A lmao

      @maplearrow1842@maplearrow18427 ай бұрын

  • "I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with T-10s" - Albert Einstein

    @69dm@69dm7 ай бұрын

    • Based T-10

      @donflamingo795@donflamingo7957 ай бұрын

    • "Space and time are relative, but the T-10 is always constant" - Einstein

      @sooryan_1018@sooryan_10187 ай бұрын

    • Turns out its T10-Anti Galactic Neutron Bomb

      @krishthakar6661@krishthakar66617 ай бұрын

    • I rate it T-10/T-10

      @adnanekhatouti8154@adnanekhatouti81547 ай бұрын

    • Bullshit, everybody knows that only T-55s are able to survive that long without maintenance!

      @LoboalphaMASTER@LoboalphaMASTER7 ай бұрын

  • Sees tank zooming down a road at speeds only a gas turbine could achieve: "Must be 70 year old heavy tank because Russia."

    @michaelthayer5351@michaelthayer53517 ай бұрын

    • "I can tell by the pixels"

      @lolatmyage@lolatmyage7 ай бұрын

    • Lmao

      @racing_mntage1584@racing_mntage15847 ай бұрын

    • Our M18 could make 55 mph. Yes, it’s a shoot and scoot tank killer, but it does scoot without a turbine!

      @kennethjackson7574@kennethjackson75747 ай бұрын

    • ​@@kennethjackson7574M18 wasn't even a Tank.

      @Lodymir_Elensky@Lodymir_Elensky7 ай бұрын

    • @@kennethjackson7574 There are slight differences between making 17t and 52t vehicle zoom around at speed.

      @megalamanooblol@megalamanooblol7 ай бұрын

  • when your friends takes a T-80BVM instead of playing 7.7 with the T-10

    @eijmert@eijmert7 ай бұрын

    • these uptiers getting crazy

      @armadillo3454@armadillo34547 ай бұрын

    • Hey man, the T-10M can uptier great.

      @randomexcessmemories4452@randomexcessmemories44527 ай бұрын

    • @@randomexcessmemories4452 that it can. Until about 9.7-10 when you start seeing modern MBTs lol

      @armadillo3454@armadillo34547 ай бұрын

    • @@armadillo3454 Fair. It can still atomize light tanks and IFVs though.

      @randomexcessmemories4452@randomexcessmemories44527 ай бұрын

    • балансировщик все еще не позволяет отправить объект279, т.к. нужно дожидаться ввода абрамса х

      @nyashsh@nyashsh7 ай бұрын

  • Highly experienced world of tanks crews with 7 skills, unstoppable.

    @alenmujic3985@alenmujic39857 ай бұрын

    • As a former World of Tanks player, this is true.

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • people stil play this trash game?

      @AgentK-im8ke@AgentK-im8ke7 ай бұрын

    • @@saucyinnit8799 wargaming haven't stopped rigging the RNG i guess ?

      @AgentK-im8ke@AgentK-im8ke7 ай бұрын

    • yes lots of people do its a great game devs just like money very much lol@@AgentK-im8ke

      @drsushi7570@drsushi75707 ай бұрын

    • @@AgentK-im8ke more than trash. War Thunder is just so f special to play.

      @NandiCollector@NandiCollector7 ай бұрын

  • I mean, the biggest tell would be that there are unlikely to be that many T-10's even left at this point; they produced less then 1500 of them, they went out of production 57 years ago, and a portion of those would likely have been sold/provided to other countries, turned into monuments or scrapped.

    @guitarhausdoesntknowwhatac3285@guitarhausdoesntknowwhatac32857 ай бұрын

    • T10 stop use after collapse ussr in 1991

      @carkawalakhatulistiwa@carkawalakhatulistiwa7 ай бұрын

    • Russia stop use t64 in 2004

      @carkawalakhatulistiwa@carkawalakhatulistiwa7 ай бұрын

    • @@carkawalakhatulistiwa he or she ain’t talking about a T64 is he?

      @MrH1990s@MrH1990s7 ай бұрын

    • @@carkawalakhatulistiwa It was also produced until 1987.

      @guitarhausdoesntknowwhatac3285@guitarhausdoesntknowwhatac32857 ай бұрын

    • They did not fully stop using them, but indeed not frequently.

      @van0tot100@van0tot1007 ай бұрын

  • As a Tanker myself, I hate videos of tank’s getting blown up. I feel for the crew. Tankers are Tankers, no matter what country you are from. Unless it’s in my sights, than it’s on!

    @jesserivas1387@jesserivas13877 ай бұрын

  • We all know from our experience in War Thunder, that the real deal would be BT-7s rolling in

    @just_a_turtle_chad@just_a_turtle_chad7 ай бұрын

    • Or ASU-57, hiding under dead Leopard

      @saint_alucardwarthunder759@saint_alucardwarthunder7597 ай бұрын

    • Watch when NATO counters by sending a bunch of M22's and Tetrachs

      @Lo-tf6qt@Lo-tf6qt7 ай бұрын

    • Strangely i did well in a few lucky high tier games in the DShK milk truck. But technicals are already a thing. Maybe a SU-76 with the main gun replaced by a Vasilek automortar?

      @KorianHUN@KorianHUN7 ай бұрын

    • Meh, they should do an IS-7 with modern armor and equipment. Obviously!

      @DIREWOLFx75@DIREWOLFx757 ай бұрын

    • No, it's when RBT-5 rolling on🥵

      @urip_zukoharjo@urip_zukoharjo7 ай бұрын

  • They were trying to get a "Godmode" 💀

    @frenchhonhon@frenchhonhon7 ай бұрын

    • Just shoot a Bradley with a BT-7 lol

      @KorianHUN@KorianHUN7 ай бұрын

    • an engineer is on top of the tank

      @mrhonkhonk6116@mrhonkhonk61167 ай бұрын

    • @@KorianHUN I’ve done that before

      @SomuaSomua@SomuaSomua7 ай бұрын

  • Why is no one talking how that tank ran over 2 anti tank mines and kept going, pure stalinium there, also a huge thanks to red effect for being the only one spreading the truth

    @irinaluchianova3015@irinaluchianova30157 ай бұрын

    • Russian bias

      @ArnhemAntiques@ArnhemAntiques7 ай бұрын

    • I surprised he don't even lose mobility

      @trololoev@trololoev7 ай бұрын

    • stalinium armor

      @Brian-qj4kk@Brian-qj4kk7 ай бұрын

    • Because this is the reality of manportable antitank measures they aren't 100% , if they were 100% no militaries in the world use tanks Also a lot of the clips on the internet especially by Ukraine are cut, so you see the explosion but they cut the video before the smoke clears showing the tank is fine

      @xblade11230@xblade112307 ай бұрын

    • Who said they were anti-tank mines? They could just be normal mines for infantry.

      @elaqgarahulelpon1479@elaqgarahulelpon14797 ай бұрын

  • Cant wait for the 47 minute Lazerpig video about how this is actually a T-10 just for him to end up using the wrong video entirely

    @tylerlewis2766@tylerlewis27667 ай бұрын

    • Who is Lazerpig?

      @eos716@eos7167 ай бұрын

    • @eos716 youtube has a search bar at the top of the page if you didn't know

      @tylerlewis2766@tylerlewis27667 ай бұрын

    • @@tylerlewis2766f u

      @eos716@eos7167 ай бұрын

  • Is no one going to comment how this tank ate 2 AT Mine detonations and kept going.

    @ilumana6084@ilumana60847 ай бұрын

    • They had an Engineer constantly repairing it ontop of the tank. Typical Battlefield 4,5 and 1 Strategy.

      @jaydensavage689@jaydensavage6897 ай бұрын

    • inertia of such heavy vehicle and it moved forward for some time still. mines seems to be pretty close

      @jebise1126@jebise11267 ай бұрын

    • Maybe they arent AT mines but anti personell ones and they are just using the tank to blow them up.

      @quan-uo5ws@quan-uo5ws7 ай бұрын

    • 30 sec of repair time

      @bluebud169@bluebud1697 ай бұрын

    • Either this is an Stalinium tank or they never ate the mine to get snared, maybe its one of the light mines like ghe rear echellon one

      @gerfand@gerfand7 ай бұрын

  • When a 8.0 player buy a TURMS-T and 2S38 at level 30:

    @mrmakhno3030@mrmakhno30307 ай бұрын

    • Based pfp

      @lehonwhale8070@lehonwhale80707 ай бұрын

    • Lmao

      @Prowamfordihno@Prowamfordihno7 ай бұрын

    • You play too much war thunder

      @lalhriatpuiahauchhum3286@lalhriatpuiahauchhum32867 ай бұрын

    • Gaijin's winning formula: Pay to still lose

      @tomfahey2823@tomfahey28237 ай бұрын

    • @@lehonwhale8070 Nah antifa does incredibly dumb stuff

      @maplearrow1842@maplearrow18427 ай бұрын

  • Ukraine: Use Leopard 1 Russia: Allow me to use T - 10 to make the game more fair

    @mohdamiruddinsulaiman1383@mohdamiruddinsulaiman13837 ай бұрын

    • Funny you say this considering how trash ruskie tanks are now🤣

      @nestor7408@nestor74087 ай бұрын

    • @@nestor7408 you are a bot

      @muhammadluqman3452@muhammadluqman34527 ай бұрын

    • @@muhammadluqman3452 you wish, pro rus clown😂😂

      @nestor7408@nestor74087 ай бұрын

    • @user-fx6cr3ze4k leopard 1 get kil by Bmp 2 With 30mm

      @ligmasurvivor5600@ligmasurvivor56007 ай бұрын

  • the fact that it survived 2 mines is just incredible

    @agentusm7871@agentusm78717 ай бұрын

    • If it has a mine-triggering wheel-type plough, then those mines don't damage the tank itself.

      @Max_Da_G@Max_Da_G7 ай бұрын

    • T-10 is Heavy tank

      @s1p0@s1p07 ай бұрын

    • not a t10 @@s1p0

      @lixm_UD@lixm_UD7 ай бұрын

    • That tank really made out of stalinium

      @adillakandi.r@adillakandi.r7 ай бұрын

    • @@adillakandi.r russian bias is real

      @agentusm7871@agentusm78717 ай бұрын

  • It's so interesting how most people think "I see this very obvious feature exclusive to the t10" and they're convinced, but Red decides to keep watching to look for more evidence. I would have been convinced if not for him

    @andrasbeke3012@andrasbeke30127 ай бұрын

    • People would rather be sheep.

      @just_a_turtle_chad@just_a_turtle_chad7 ай бұрын

    • ​@just_a_turtle_chad Also people want something they think to be really cool to be real.

      @christianpethukov@christianpethukov7 ай бұрын

    • @@just_a_turtle_chadSafety in masses. Else risk becoming a witch.

      @DzinkyDzink@DzinkyDzink7 ай бұрын

    • @@just_a_turtle_chadcomedy

      @thechroniclegamer4285@thechroniclegamer42857 ай бұрын

    • Brainwashing. They didn't see it and say hey that looks like a T10! They looked and said hmmm, I know Russia is stupid, drunk, incompetent, out of ammo, retreating and desperate... so whats the most pathetic possible tank this could be 🤔

      @springbloom5940@springbloom59407 ай бұрын

  • it'S the downtier strategy , thinking they get more exp with lower tier vehicles.

    @0BLACKESTFUN0@0BLACKESTFUN07 ай бұрын

    • GodMode!

      @malikbian1057@malikbian10577 ай бұрын

    • @@malikbian1057more like “skill matters”

      @andrewezjevikov@andrewezjevikov7 ай бұрын

    • They may have some God Mode after knocking out a Bradley or what not(they can, theoretically)

      @mrmakhno3030@mrmakhno30307 ай бұрын

    • @@mrmakhno3030 the only issue T10-M has is a long reload and lack of modern armor. Long reload in particular is deadly for this tank. Otherwise 122mm HE will obliterate any light vehicle. 122mm APHE in the vulnerable spot will be deadly to most MBTs.

      @andrewezjevikov@andrewezjevikov7 ай бұрын

  • Are we gonna ignore the fact that a t80 just ate 2 mines?

    @ddarkon1223@ddarkon12237 ай бұрын

    • It's russian so NAFO cope posters won't say anything

      @Svannuta@Svannuta7 ай бұрын

    • THERE IS NO RUSSIAN BIAS, of course

      @user-cb3oq5sy2s@user-cb3oq5sy2s7 ай бұрын

    • must have made the tracks out of the same stuff the T-34's driver hatch is made of: Stalinium armor.

      @NK-qn6pq@NK-qn6pq7 ай бұрын

    • If two mine hits results in your tank rollling off the road and being disabled, its not something to write home about. its the average.

      @M3RUL3Z@M3RUL3Z7 ай бұрын

    • ​@Svannuta Are we just gonna ignore the fact that the tank ate 💩 and died? Alongside 500 other T-80s 🤡 lmfao another russonazi tank gets destroyed but I'm the one that's supposed to be coping?

      @theangrycheeto@theangrycheeto7 ай бұрын

  • I cant wait for the Lazer Pig response video where he conclusively proves its a T-10 and it uses a 1940s german *insert component here*

    @TraitorsGambit@TraitorsGambit7 ай бұрын

    • it's literally using a tiger engine! guys believe me, it says it in the sources i won't share because they are 100% true and real

      @spygineer1076@spygineer10767 ай бұрын

    • @@spygineer1076 Jokes on you, it's have a glorious .88 gun and with 14 tungsten sabot projectiles! They stole it and stopped counteroffensive!

      @ImPedofinderGeneral@ImPedofinderGeneral7 ай бұрын

  • Bro still had spawn protection at the beggining 💀

    @matump9879@matump98797 ай бұрын

  • Tbh if one saw a T10 moving towards them with such speed, yes it's an old obsolete tank but seeing a heavy tank moving at such speed would probably make someone soil their paint

    @Bernoris@Bernoris7 ай бұрын

    • T 10 is a pretty fast heavy tank for its time. Both in game and in real life.

      @mrmakhno3030@mrmakhno30307 ай бұрын

    • Even if i had a modern AT launcher on me id still briefly shit a brick

      @MrRed_2205@MrRed_22057 ай бұрын

    • Yeah these old heavys look scary as shit

      @militaristaustrian@militaristaustrian7 ай бұрын

    • T-10 vs IS-3

      @deskmat9874@deskmat98747 ай бұрын

    • ​@@deskmat9874T10 is better but Is3 is more terrifying

      @kanestalin7246@kanestalin72467 ай бұрын

  • Camera seeing space 10000000 miles away:🗿🍷 Camera catching a tank 1000 ft away: 💀💀💀

    @Epikmoumoupat@Epikmoumoupat7 ай бұрын

  • Not to mention, during the 2nd half of the clip, you can see very good stabilization of the gun, which if you look to post-WW2 era tanks, they tend to not have stabilization or very rudimentary ones, not to mention how fast the turret moves, and it does so even doing movement, which indicates good stabilization. Not something you would see on post-WW2 tanks.

    @etzwei7994@etzwei79947 ай бұрын

    • T-10M have pretty close characteristic to a NATO MBT. Weight 50t, max speed at 50 kph with roughly 15 hp/t, have stablizer and APDS

      @Tongqualin2@Tongqualin27 ай бұрын

    • The T10 had good stabilization, which is strange for those years and the caliber of the gun

      @lamawdoniczce1797@lamawdoniczce17977 ай бұрын

  • I benched 225 today

    @TeenyHatHarold@TeenyHatHarold7 ай бұрын

    • Magnificent!

      @NKVD_Enjoyer@NKVD_Enjoyer7 ай бұрын

    • Keep it up king👑

      @davidoblast8291@davidoblast82917 ай бұрын

    • Did you do it properly? Lol jk, I’ve yet to go to a gym, keep it up!

      @visayanmissnanny2.076@visayanmissnanny2.0767 ай бұрын

    • Gg mate. Keep it up

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • @@visayanmissnanny2.076 I abuse the shit out of some pharmaceuticals though. If you do something healthy it counters out abusing drugs right?

      @TeenyHatHarold@TeenyHatHarold7 ай бұрын

  • *DAMN IT ! WE WE'RE SO CLOSE ON SEEING HEAVY TANKS BEING USED AGAIN IN THE MODERN BATTLEFIELD AND SEEING ITS EFFECTIVENESS ONE LAST TIME !*

    @mukadewolf530@mukadewolf5307 ай бұрын

    • T 10 just below 60 tons

      @quanghuynguyenang8455@quanghuynguyenang84557 ай бұрын

    • @@quanghuynguyenang8455 the Abrams weights about 70 tons fully loaded . Thats a Tiger 2 weight

      @mukadewolf530@mukadewolf5307 ай бұрын

    • There are some photos of a bunch of t10s being transported towards a tank factory being circulated. Don't get your hopes up though, Russian army has more 125 mm barreled tanks then they can produce ammo, and a huge stockpile of every other caliber tank shell, so most likely it's intended to be used as mobile artillery, much like the intent was with older 115mm and 100 mm tanks.

      @user-dn2ux6jf5u@user-dn2ux6jf5u7 ай бұрын

    • Bro activated double caps

      @LostCauseRT@LostCauseRT7 ай бұрын

    • The Challenger 2 is not exactly a light weight!

      @Nikocum@Nikocum7 ай бұрын

  • ah shucks, i accidentally placed the T-72B3 in my 8.3 lineup

    @wzr3293@wzr32937 ай бұрын

  • I'm disappointed by russians... I really hope to see at least a M48A3 vs IS-4 tank duel by the end of this conflict.

    @adrianzanoli@adrianzanoli7 ай бұрын

    • M3 Lee vs BT-5 : FIGHT !

      @mathieuschafer1360@mathieuschafer13607 ай бұрын

    • I hope you know that dpr and lpr and known for using old tanks like the t55 or ww2 tanks

      @beavis6157@beavis61577 ай бұрын

    • @@mathieuschafer1360 M3 LEE TO TALL 4 YOU

      @danielpetrucci8952@danielpetrucci89527 ай бұрын

    • @@beavis6157 LPR and DPR separatist forces, like the rest of the AFU then, were mostly trained on T-64s, since it was mostly produced in Ukraine and it was their main MBT after independence. Russia gave them their old T-64s (officially retired from service in 2013). This is why we see separatist forces mostly with T-64BVs... They've also used at least one IS-3 for which they adapted D-30 rounds, and a T-34 as roadblock since it lacked ammunitions... both were former monuments, placed there in the 90's.

      @adrianzanoli@adrianzanoli7 ай бұрын

  • I really don't see how people can say. It's a T10, like how

    @Anarcho-harambeism@Anarcho-harambeism7 ай бұрын

    • Tank outlines, a T-62 can be misindentified as a T-54 from a distance

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • @@saucyinnit8799 those are vastly more similar than a T10

      @Anarcho-harambeism@Anarcho-harambeism7 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Anarcho-harambeism you saw in the video. Nearly everyone thought it was a T-10. Just after the tank turned could you see it's not. Most people would just look at the 1st 3 seconds of the clip and say "It's a T-10" in that video the T-80 and T-10 had similar frontall outlines.

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Anarcho-harambeism also The T-62 has a very squashed turret compared to the T-54 and especially the T-55.

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • @@saucyinnit8799 Sure if you pause it at the right moment and refuse to watch the rest.

      @viktoriyaserebryakov2755@viktoriyaserebryakov27557 ай бұрын

  • He uptiered💀

    @verden2323@verden23237 ай бұрын

    • bruh br compression fr fr

      @goddepersonno3782@goddepersonno37827 ай бұрын

  • I think it would be a horror, from a historic point. Wasting such artifacts... We have to preserve them

    @GrafXohoo@GrafXohoo7 ай бұрын

    • Indiana jones and the lost tank going through Ukraine and steeling equipment for the Bovington tank museum

      @lucagerulat307@lucagerulat3077 ай бұрын

    • If anything, it is the greatest honor for a historical artefact to be put into use, as was its intended purpose. Nothing I hate more than people who buy classic cars, for example, and just park them in a glass box.

      @takiherosquires1372@takiherosquires13727 ай бұрын

    • @@takiherosquires1372 Thats something different, of course its nice to see something getting its use, buts in this case it would end up as a pile of ash... I get your point but militaria like have simply to much worth. And driving a car is something different than drving a old tank in a war with modern tech

      @GrafXohoo@GrafXohoo7 ай бұрын

  • No one gonna talk about how it took a major beating and kept moving.

    @bigmungus4864@bigmungus48647 ай бұрын

  • Damn, my grandad used to drive one of such.

    @sloptek1807@sloptek18077 ай бұрын

    • Does he have any memorable experiences you could tell us?

      @Fv4005_enjoyer@Fv4005_enjoyer7 ай бұрын

    • @@Fv4005_enjoyer Well, grandad served in heavy tank regiment stationed at the border with Western Germany. Regiment wad equiped with T-10M tanks. Their mobility and protection characteristics were considered bad ( 1967-1969). However, firepower was considered discent and as such they received logical task. They had to cover Eastern German border, dig in prepared defence position and hold the enemy back as long, as possible, win the time for other DDR / USSR troops to prepare themselfs. Except that, he said that crew consisted only of 3 people. He was a driver and later, after tank would arrive at position, he would've became loader. Also, transmition of T-10M was smooth and reliabile. He absolutely loved this tank. Always joked, that his senior commanders prapered them ( drivers) greatly - even 40 years later he still remembered every single detail of his usuall road trips to the main and secondary positions.

      @sloptek1807@sloptek18077 ай бұрын

    • @@sloptek1807 thx a lot. Have a great day

      @Fv4005_enjoyer@Fv4005_enjoyer7 ай бұрын

    • @@sloptek1807 Nice.

      @falatchuja1745@falatchuja17457 ай бұрын

  • you don't need Nvidia DLSS technology. Give this man a pixel, he will generate 10 mins of video and the entire history of the universe for 14,000,000,000 year

    @ylstorage7085@ylstorage70857 ай бұрын

    • Fake frames vs real info

      @heyno3306@heyno33067 ай бұрын

  • Imagine this is actually the IS-7

    @nuclearkitten6421@nuclearkitten64217 ай бұрын

    • Only the is7 could move that fast it had a 1500 hp engine i think

      @kanestalin7246@kanestalin72467 ай бұрын

    • ​@@kanestalin7246its 1050hp and i dont get why russia is just modernizing the v-2 instead of building a totally new engine

      @ligmasurvivor5600@ligmasurvivor56007 ай бұрын

    • ​@@ligmasurvivor5600i like v2 so much a beast in war of tanks

      @anirbandasxisciencesection9226@anirbandasxisciencesection92267 ай бұрын

    • @@kanestalin7246 as the person above said, it’s 1050HP but it could go around 60 km/h on roads. But seriously, imagine how scary it would be if the is-7 suddenly disappeared from the Kubinka museum? If I was a tanker I’d be scared, that thing with ERA could definitely still pose a threat.

      @nuclearkitten6421@nuclearkitten64217 ай бұрын

    • @@ligmasurvivor5600 Reason is it's got enough power to give a 40-something ton tank great mobility, and that's exactly the kind of tanks they're used in. But for future development, turbines seem to be preferred as they give more power in a package small enough to keep the tank's low profile etc.

      @ivannegrozny5388@ivannegrozny53887 ай бұрын

  • The obvious give away is the speed. A T-10M (last model) topped out at 50 kph and was 7.4 meters long. Some quick calculation shows that it could only cover less than twice its own length in 1 second at top speed. Repeated close examination of the video at various speeds shows that this tank is moving faster than a T-10 could go.

    @mikearmstrong8483@mikearmstrong84837 ай бұрын

    • Bro has maxed his stats. How dare you question the speed?!

      @disgracedwolfyt@disgracedwolfyt6 ай бұрын

    • @@disgracedwolfyt Because he rolled a freaking 2 on a D10 for his speed!

      @mikearmstrong8483@mikearmstrong84836 ай бұрын

    • @@mikearmstrong8483 bro got the special attackments

      @disgracedwolfyt@disgracedwolfyt6 ай бұрын

  • Be so crazy to see old Heavy Tanks driving around in combat again. I always think about what would happen if someone remade a few of the most famous heavy tanks with composite armor, putting ERA, and making APFSDS shells to fit the guns. It would be a sight to see for sure

    @darryldworak6356@darryldworak63567 ай бұрын

    • well, some western mbts are now heavier than heavy tanks, we could very well call those heavy tanks too. IS7 and latest M1A2 have the same weight, now.

      @jonathanmichel6399@jonathanmichel63997 ай бұрын

  • The last knight (heavy tank)

    @mr.waffentrager4400@mr.waffentrager44007 ай бұрын

    • i saw footage of an obj 279 rolling without paint on it so it's not the last one

      @philippey4918@philippey49187 ай бұрын

    • @@philippey4918 yes obj 279 was the last made heavy tank, but it wasn't in service.

      @mr.waffentrager4400@mr.waffentrager44007 ай бұрын

  • it'd be dumb to go around claiming it's a T-10M since we haven't even seen T-55's actually being used as tanks yet (litteraly only 1 example documented as a loss so far) it's safe to assume Russia would first use up T-55 and T-62 tanks of all variants before digging into their ww2/early post-ww2 stockpile of tanks

    @JustaGuy1250@JustaGuy12507 ай бұрын

    • T-10s were kept as tank reserves (aka oh fuck our favourites just got incinerated in nuclear fire but I have a dinner date in West Berlin at 8PM level of tank for when there is literally nothing better left to reinforce with) and T-10Ms would still be in okay ish condition due to how long they were kept in active reserve up until like the 90s, so both them and T-55s/62s would be in vaguely similar shape, disregarding the fact that T-55s and 62s were kept as reserve longer or even rebuilt for export recently

      @domaxltv@domaxltv7 ай бұрын

    • @@domaxltv thing is T-55 and T-62's are way capable as tanks nowadays than T-10's are in any way. Furthermore, they're also very much upgradeable with modern tech (thermal imagery, APFSDS, ERA armor packs such as the M-1 variants) Such an upgrade does not exist for the T-10

      @JustaGuy1250@JustaGuy12507 ай бұрын

    • T55s are not used as MBTs at the Front anymore by Russia, they have a huge Stock of 100mm so they use them as cheap Artillery Support Vehicels since they are better protected than modern SPGs who have max. 40 mm Armor (at the Front) while T55 have 30mm Top Armor and 220-120mm around the Turret and 100mm-60mm-40mm at the Hull Front/Side/Back. They fire 15kg HEs from 4-14km away, they know that the T55 with only Steel Armor cant do anything.. Ukraine is actually the one using T55s as Makeshift MBTs.. but even with some modernisations and ERA they are pretty much outdated by now on the Frontline.

      @Sheppart92@Sheppart927 ай бұрын

    • @@Sheppart92The russians also used them as suicide car bombs, hopefully unmanned but knowing how little bunker grandpa cares about his people I wouldn't be shocked if some poor ethnic mobik or convict slave was forced to drive the thing. The video of one being sent towards Ukrainian lines only to get stopped by a mine and detonate with FAR more boom than it would if it wasn't crammed with explosives when it was hit by an ATGM. Never understood why people so often try to deflect to Ukraine using something old as a way to excuse russia, because Ukraine never sold itself as anything more than a backwater former soviet slave-state trying desperately to claw out of moscow's chains while russia acts like it is a world power capable of trading with all of NATO in a modern high-tech war. If the US had to deploy Patton tanks because they lost so many Abrams in war with Mexico everyone would be laughing at them. The fact people try to sweep the fact we have more visually confirmed russian tank losses than all but 10 other nations have tanks in total is hilarious to me, and the fact visually confirmed losses are maybe 1/3rd of actual losses (Especially if you include losses due to mechanical failure) meaning the actual number of losses is almost certainly above what even the US fields makes that even more hilarious.

      @demomanchaos@demomanchaos7 ай бұрын

    • I'm aware, hence why i wouldn't believe anyone saying they're using the T-10 even without the video being debunked in depth@@Sheppart92

      @JustaGuy1250@JustaGuy12507 ай бұрын

  • If that shit is as OP as it is in War Thunder, the Russians are in London in the next two weeks.

    @xXArnOdu974Xx@xXArnOdu974Xx7 ай бұрын

    • its straight ass in warthunder tf? Used to be good but now just gets steamrolled by sabot and heat fs

      @_wayward_494@_wayward_4947 ай бұрын

    • The T-10M kinda sucks in War Thunder though.

      @hedgehog3180@hedgehog31807 ай бұрын

    • It does..Now. Not when it was top tier.

      @Livewyr7@Livewyr77 ай бұрын

    • Wtf, it's a good tank but op?

      @UnknownMemoryOfTheDistantStar@UnknownMemoryOfTheDistantStar7 ай бұрын

  • Спасибо за видео. На самом деле можно было сказать намного проще. В России всего 1 Т-10, который находится на ходу и он недавно переехал в музей.

    @Kawaii_Boy3@Kawaii_Boy37 ай бұрын

    • Больше, они кое где на хранении мелькали.

      @_b_x_b_1063@_b_x_b_10637 ай бұрын

    • What happened to the rest?

      @kanestalin7246@kanestalin72467 ай бұрын

    • ​@@_b_x_b_1063да кстати интересно куда все делись их пару тысяч сделали

      @user-zs5ve1cc4m@user-zs5ve1cc4m7 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-zs5ve1cc4mутилизировали, логично же.

      @user-yk8vb1sm2i@user-yk8vb1sm2i7 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-zs5ve1cc4mбольшую часть переплавили

      @user-ku5is6xs6k@user-ku5is6xs6k7 ай бұрын

  • Can someone please acknowledge how beautifully the anti-tank mine was placed under a layer of water/in a puddle?

    @MavMcLeod@MavMcLeod7 ай бұрын

    • You just did, well done!

      @Clyde__Frog@Clyde__Frog7 ай бұрын

    • and it had zero effect lol

      @mpkid5@mpkid57 ай бұрын

    • @@mpkid5 that its why the mine did not effect... it was covered BY MUD AND WATER... the tank actually is a M55S and is not russian lol

      @SargentoDuke@SargentoDuke7 ай бұрын

    • @SargentoDuke a puddle of water wont affect a mine numbnuts. Even an anti personel mine wouldnt be affected by being in a puddle. It would have to be a minimum of 3 ft deep to slow anything down and even then the explosion would push the water out of the way as fast as the fragments so it really wouldnt matter unless it was literally multiple feet deep, which it clearly isnt. Russian vehicle or not is irrelevent in this video.

      @mpkid5@mpkid57 ай бұрын

    • ​@@SargentoDukeThen it make sense why explosions are so big and why mines do nothing.

      @deauthorsadeptus6920@deauthorsadeptus69207 ай бұрын

  • If I remember right, Lugansk milita used IS-3 from museum as artillery during 2014 events.

    @yamatohime2035@yamatohime20357 ай бұрын

  • Given that T-80s of various makes are now the most common used Russian tanks in theatre this makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the explanation!

    @seroriman2865@seroriman28657 ай бұрын

  • Spoiler: It was a lada vesta with a t10 hull/t55 turret bamboo mockup strapped to it.

    @snakeplissken1754@snakeplissken17547 ай бұрын

  • T-10 is a freaking Monster.

    @pred9665@pred96657 ай бұрын

  • Even if it was a T-10M, let's not forget the heavy tanks as IS and T-10M (IS-8 initially) were used until the 1990s as fire support. They couldn't match against modern tanks, but they could be still useful with their powerful gun and explosive shells anyway

    @cedricceddy4697@cedricceddy46977 ай бұрын

    • yep, its like a turreted ISU-122, or a more heavily armoured 2S1 Gvozdika with worse elevation (70deg on 2S1 vs 18deg on T-10) regardless, a 122mm HE shell could wreck a lot of things

      @quoccuongtran724@quoccuongtran7247 ай бұрын

    • T-10M have pretty close characteristic to a NATO MBT. Weight 50t, max speed at 50 kph with roughly 15 hp/t, have stablizer and APDS

      @Tongqualin2@Tongqualin27 ай бұрын

    • @@Tongqualin2 it could not match anyway, let's be realistic, they could still make damages but they don't have modern equipment to target at distance, precision, speed, etc. And the modern guns could easily pen their armour... "Heavy tanks" were stopped to be produced because modern MBT were cheaper with almost same firepower

      @cedricceddy4697@cedricceddy46977 ай бұрын

    • @@cedricceddy4697 oh, I'm talking about NATO MBTSs at that era

      @Tongqualin2@Tongqualin27 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Tongqualin2Then it is same as trying to wrestle white bear with bare hands. T-10 crew would be better killing themselves to avoid suffering.

      @deauthorsadeptus6920@deauthorsadeptus69207 ай бұрын

  • plot twist: turns out it is really T-10 with a new engine and transmission, sent to troll the enemy.

    @iamt_tl@iamt_tl7 ай бұрын

  • I think the oldest tanks we'll see destroyed in this war is probably T-54s but I wouldn't be surprised if I'm wrong.

    @Juel92@Juel927 ай бұрын

    • *T-55 and even those are the modernized versions not the stock version

      @kowalski3950@kowalski39507 ай бұрын

    • That's true that Russia uses T-54 & T-55 in Ukraine but they are used mainly for mobile artillery, yeah that's right ;D kinda smart.

      @MeowMeow6118a@MeowMeow6118a7 ай бұрын

    • @@MeowMeow6118aда, the turret commander is removed as there is no need for him

      @ZOV24-2-22@ZOV24-2-227 ай бұрын

    • ⁠@@MeowMeow6118aI know they pulled them out of storage and Red speculated about them being used for improvised artillery, but as far as I’m aware there isn’t any footage of them actually being in ukraine

      @yarnickgoovaerts@yarnickgoovaerts7 ай бұрын

    • @@yarnickgoovaertsthere was that remote controlled T-54 packed with explosives back in June. And Oryx has a picture of a damaged T-55 complete with cope cage from August.

      @ronkolek613@ronkolek6137 ай бұрын

  • Oh hell no Bro got Uptiered 💀

    @arustwat7766@arustwat77667 ай бұрын

    • Why Christmas hat on your AVI

      @gerfand@gerfand7 ай бұрын

  • that's one speedy boi, so maybe T-80 after all

    @juusolatva@juusolatva7 ай бұрын

  • Okay RedEffect. I disagree. A T-10 with turbo and a mobility build for the crew, will greatly increase the mobility of the T-10, which is arguably the best tier 9 in WoT, and it isn't stock, so the speed makes sense. But a T-80 makes sense too!

    @DDayJayke@DDayJayke7 ай бұрын

    • imagine babe, the new T-10M2 (very heavily modernized) just dropped, only in auction for 2 hrs

      @02suraditpengsaeng41@02suraditpengsaeng417 ай бұрын

    • @@02suraditpengsaeng41 What a steal!!!

      @DDayJayke@DDayJayke7 ай бұрын

  • With all honesty for the placement of the explosive armor that tries to cover the entire area of the turret... I think it is a captured T-64... maybe a BM(Bulat) but unlikely. And moreover if you look at the entire chassis you can see that the turret is placed behind the center of gravity of the middle of the tank... in my opinion it is possible it is a T-64.

    @leonardostojkovic3897@leonardostojkovic38977 ай бұрын

    • Не прав

      @Vadim-gi4sg@Vadim-gi4sg7 ай бұрын

    • T-64 would never going that fast due to its underpowered engine, that more likely from a gas turbine engine

      @adillakandi.r@adillakandi.r7 ай бұрын

    • @@adillakandi.r well in fact what I said is just my thoughts on the matter... the T-64 may have a 700HP engine but still manages to reach a speed of 60km/h... honestly IN MY OPINION... it's rare that a T-80 is used in this way... given that it is one of those few weapons that Russia can really support and make a difference on the ground... It could also be, I can't say no... about it I can't say anything concrete... since we don't know the location of the tank or the reason... perhaps it's possible that it was running towards the front line... or that it was trying to break through the front line ...but according to the manuals such a thing would not be possible given that the ground support placed at the sides is completely missing... but these are just my guesses.

      @leonardostojkovic3897@leonardostojkovic38977 ай бұрын

  • Fun fact: There are no T-10 tanks on the frontlines. There IS, however, a morale booster piece IS-3M that is actively rolling around in DPR. There IS also another morale booster piece - T-34-85. This one is actually on Armed Forces balance sheet so it could get spare parts from the other brothers used mostly in celebrations and parades. Neither of these tanks are used on the frontlines.

    @burningsinner1132@burningsinner11327 ай бұрын

    • IS-10

      @Dat-nu2qu@Dat-nu2qu6 ай бұрын

    • IS3 is best ww2 tank, hit never fought against nazis, but used in ua against uia(upa) bandera forces. this is real morale booster for DPR.

      @madmatrac@madmatrac6 ай бұрын

  • If this had been a T-10, it would be me being up tiered again...

    @Blind_Hawk@Blind_Hawk7 ай бұрын

  • You’re always on top of it man. Thanks.

    @ArmorDoge@ArmorDoge7 ай бұрын

  • The attention to detail in your knowledge of russian tanks is always REALLY impressive, thank you for sharing this with us all

    @vincediscombe7360@vincediscombe73607 ай бұрын

    • A T-10 cannot drive that fast. Its not a T-10

      @privatecanook@privatecanook7 ай бұрын

    • @@privatecanook which, had you watched his video, is exactly what he said (among other reasons it's not a T-10)

      @vincediscombe7360@vincediscombe73607 ай бұрын

  • because of the poor quality of the video, it is difficult to say what kind of tank. Similar to the T-10m, but maybe it's the Slovenian T-55

    @MaxRomashov@MaxRomashov7 ай бұрын

  • Everyone gansta till a Bob Semple rolls down the road

    @slavking992@slavking9927 ай бұрын

  • I saw tons of Ukraine/Russian war/tank footage and never saw a T-10 tank clearly, if there are some on the field then it's probably a super small amount of them. And ofc the media would eat that hardcore if there is footage of a clear T-10 tank and spread that for HQ Propaganda ;D

    @MeowMeow6118a@MeowMeow6118a7 ай бұрын

    • Hellfire555 made a video about what seemed like T-10 being prepared for deployment, but there's very little information. I expect them to be fielded as artillery in difficult sectors, if they even get sent to the frontlines

      @ivannegrozny5388@ivannegrozny53887 ай бұрын

  • in War Thunder t-10 has 8.3 br like t55a(8.3 too) so it is historical

    @Neurax-lx7ck@Neurax-lx7ck7 ай бұрын

  • They trying to get their third mark Mark of Excellence

    @randomshitpost8477@randomshitpost84777 ай бұрын

    • MM has been pretty awful as of late tho

      @AllMightyKingBowser@AllMightyKingBowser7 ай бұрын

    • 😂😂 they probably went full bond equipment + rations

      @mathieuschafer1360@mathieuschafer13607 ай бұрын

    • Man really had that bond hardening hahaha@@mathieuschafer1360

      @zweboi1094@zweboi10947 ай бұрын

  • Сейчас бы перепутать Т-72 с Т-10

    @user-lp8lu9wb3g@user-lp8lu9wb3g7 ай бұрын

  • Tanks for making the content. 👍

    @effdiffeyeno171@effdiffeyeno1717 ай бұрын

  • This is pretty clearly a T-80BV, if you take EVERY angle shown into account.

    @TheArcticFoxxo@TheArcticFoxxo7 ай бұрын

  • Good job for everyone who is in the tank game it is quite obvious that isn’t a T10 it’s very likely a T80U or T80U-1 or even more likely a T64BM

    @SurreyBoy500@SurreyBoy5007 ай бұрын

  • Could be a T-64BM2 Bulat. If you searched, the turrent has the same shape and doesn't have a muzzle brake on the barrel.

    @MrNicholas89@MrNicholas897 ай бұрын

  • The tank is older than 90% of the ammunition and can easily withstand it

    @43.99npouentoB@43.99npouentoB7 ай бұрын

  • I just want to know, what is the fate of this tank? Casually strolling atop 2 mines and still going, I want the full story! Damn these cliffhangers!

    @helvosthecreator1920@helvosthecreator19207 ай бұрын

    • depends on it's location.

      @kowalski3950@kowalski39507 ай бұрын

    • Probably abandand by a very disoriented crew, my guess anyway

      @Clyde__Frog@Clyde__Frog7 ай бұрын

    • @@Clyde__Frog Assuming the crew hadn't been turned to mush.

      @hedgehog3180@hedgehog31807 ай бұрын

    • @@hedgehog3180 Leopard 2/Challenger 2 is completely burned : " The crew made it out alive don't worry " T-80BVM drives over mines and keeps going : " The crew is mush "

      @Svannuta@Svannuta7 ай бұрын

  • Comrade Red keeping it real as always.

    @theredbar-cross8515@theredbar-cross85157 ай бұрын

  • Guy drove directly into a mine, took a sharp turn directly into another random mine in the field.

    @EzioAuditore@EzioAuditore7 ай бұрын

  • Redeffect is a type of guy who will see 4 pixel and tell you every detail about the tank

    @erwinrommel6529@erwinrommel65297 ай бұрын

    • Cry about it

      @dentercognitarna7602@dentercognitarna76027 ай бұрын

    • @@dentercognitarna7602 nobody is crying.

      @erwinrommel6529@erwinrommel65297 ай бұрын

    • @@dentercognitarna7602 he is complimenting the youtuber numbnuts

      @mpkid5@mpkid57 ай бұрын

  • this guy says the huge wedge is just an artifact in the video and in the next moment he claims he can makeout little lights on the tank...

    @speedkiller3026@speedkiller30267 ай бұрын

  • Just a quick question regarding the video , did that tank just drive over 2 anti-tank mines and simply continue to drive ??? because if thats the case then i am impressed ! ( Noted that at least one of the mines was a bit to the side of the tank and not under it ) still if anyone knows please let me know as well !

    @nektarkir4220@nektarkir42207 ай бұрын

    • The tank was moving quick.

      @alexflores9735@alexflores97357 ай бұрын

    • @@alexflores9735 Does that make it invincible to landmines ?

      @nektarkir4220@nektarkir42207 ай бұрын

    • ​@@nektarkir4220it doesnt but it could trigger them otherwise wich could make theit explosion less likely to pen the hull or detrack it

      @LarryPigeon1@LarryPigeon17 ай бұрын

  • Noone like redeffect to figure out which tank is a smudge of pixels ahahhaha you always impress!

    @TheOnlyKingBee@TheOnlyKingBee7 ай бұрын

  • The T-10 was an exceedingly fat and slow slab of steel. There is NO WAY it could've moved as fast as it did in the video.

    @LuigianoMariano@LuigianoMariano7 ай бұрын

  • Could be a T-64 as well, Donetsk/Luhansk guys were using them a while back, so it's not impossible.

    @balazsfonnyadt1903@balazsfonnyadt19037 ай бұрын

  • The gun of the T-10 is more distinctive than the hull, IMO... usually also easier to see... the muzzle-brake of the D-25T series of guns really stands out, and as far as I know, the IS-series of heavy tanks were the only ones to use it.

    @mspicer3262@mspicer32627 ай бұрын

  • Badass videos! Keep it up bro.

    @MrGunnerru@MrGunnerru7 ай бұрын

  • as a T-10M commander in war thunder i could say that it's very good against modern tanks 😂🇷🇺

    @sovietchannel8300@sovietchannel83007 ай бұрын

    • That's because of the obvious Russian bias which ignores real life capabilities

      @Big_Caesar1@Big_Caesar17 ай бұрын

    • @@Big_Caesar1 poor guy. Wanna speak about it? You need to talk out

      @ImPedofinderGeneral@ImPedofinderGeneral7 ай бұрын

    • Is that what this retarded Special Military Operation is, in fact? Just poor old Putin trying to play a more realistic version of War Chunder?

      @gdutfulkbhh7537@gdutfulkbhh75377 ай бұрын

    • 122 mm HE will damage even modern MBTs if it is a direct hit, may not be a kill but will definitely do damage. RPG-7 with 73/84mmm can knock out tanks than 122mm surely can

      @Archer89201@Archer892017 ай бұрын

    • @@Big_Caesar1 Nyet, everyone knows t-10 is made of stalinium-titanium-carbon-fiber and can bounce any projectile thrown at it.

      @selectionn@selectionn7 ай бұрын

  • I think your right on calling it a t80 variant, that’s too quick for a t64 to be booting down the road. I’m an expert since I am a Russian/British Main on WarThunder 🧐

    @cjaydustie1867@cjaydustie18677 ай бұрын

  • Biggest giveway that's not a T-10 is: *It's fast as fuck buoyyy!* Crew was protected by those massive balls of steel running around in the minefield like that!

    @c0nstantin86@c0nstantin867 ай бұрын

  • Bro you rocking svardvas your outro?nice. I thought my phone was ringing for a second

    @pencilcase8068@pencilcase80687 ай бұрын

  • It would actually be cool if it was a T-10

    @nemanja162@nemanja1627 ай бұрын

  • To me it looks like a Captured T-64BV usaly the DPR/LPR Troops uses these tanks in great numbers since they captured many of them from the Ukrainian Army when this thing kicked off in 2014 I've seen some Russians Forces use the T-64BV but in small numbers the T-64BV uses the same gun as the T-72 T-80 and T-90 so it would make sense for Russia to give captured T-64's to the DPR/LPR troops

    @danielpetrucci8952@danielpetrucci89527 ай бұрын

    • Plot twist : Many soldiers from the ukranian military joined the separatists in 2014. Most of these tanks stayed with their owners, not " captured " in any way. That's the whole reason the then administration hired ultranationalist groups to fight in place of the defecting army.

      @Svannuta@Svannuta7 ай бұрын

    • @@Svannuta Not a bad take because In Lugansk and Donetsk Cities and in the Oblast's thier was alot of Millitary bases with T-64BV's in them so your take is not wrong

      @danielpetrucci8952@danielpetrucci89527 ай бұрын

  • The biggest question should be why he drove over a visible mine field

    @somedude1841@somedude18417 ай бұрын

  • Thanks, RedEffect.

    @darrencorrigan8505@darrencorrigan85057 ай бұрын

  • I like how if it was a T 10, nobody would be surprised 💀

    @isaacdepaula2103@isaacdepaula21037 ай бұрын

    • actually I would be surprised it wasn't sold to a museum for more then it's worth in RL war.

      @nikoladd@nikoladd7 ай бұрын

    • yeah, people eat up propaganda slop on both sides, i don't know how any sane person could actually believe T-10s are being used on the frontlines.

      @TK-317@TK-3177 ай бұрын

    • You must be one of those guy who a while back were sure of t34/85 being sent to the front

      @triarii217@triarii2177 ай бұрын

    • @@triarii217 no?

      @isaacdepaula2103@isaacdepaula21037 ай бұрын

    • ​@@triarii217no, not yet

      @mathieuschafer1360@mathieuschafer13607 ай бұрын

  • So was the tank destroyed tho?

    @NKVD_Enjoyer@NKVD_Enjoyer7 ай бұрын

    • Doesn't seem like it. However it did survive like 3 AT mines

      @saucyinnit8799@saucyinnit87997 ай бұрын

    • ​@@saucyinnit8799cold 🥶🥶🥶

      @Fv4005_enjoyer@Fv4005_enjoyer7 ай бұрын

    • @@saucyinnit8799 these are some great news, the tanks and the crews are beasts! :)

      @NKVD_Enjoyer@NKVD_Enjoyer7 ай бұрын

  • Whatever it is it seems to tank those mines like an absolute boss. Did it get knocked out by the second one or just keep on going?

    @vyperlube@vyperlube7 ай бұрын

  • pretty sure it lost the right track on the first boom and thats why it pivoted left. if you look close when it comes out of the cloud from the mine detonation it looks like unspooled track links coming off the right side.

    @ripvanwinkle2002@ripvanwinkle20027 ай бұрын

  • The Nafo bots will try to claim anything lol

    @Nero-Caesar@Nero-Caesar7 ай бұрын

  • Bro got uptiered💀

    @chunkysushicatman6131@chunkysushicatman61317 ай бұрын

  • A lot of T10s had the turrets removed and used as static pillboxes during the 60s.

    @SCARFACE-gp4fy@SCARFACE-gp4fy7 ай бұрын

  • Wonderful as always

    @VAcooking@VAcooking7 ай бұрын

  • THUMBNAIL IS NEAR MY HOME

    @user-jt2jp9gz3j@user-jt2jp9gz3j7 ай бұрын

  • Same thing if the US Army was using the M103 today. 😂

    @poplar6658@poplar66587 ай бұрын

    • I saw American Military use M-60's in Desert Storm

      @danielpetrucci8952@danielpetrucci89527 ай бұрын

  • In a few frames it looks like it has the rubber screens and search light of the T-80U so it might be it or one of it's derivatives.

    @erisdelta5950@erisdelta59507 ай бұрын

  • Good analysis!

    @markanderson3870@markanderson38707 ай бұрын

  • Next: Russians are using horses and carriages. This channel 😂😂😂

    @Proton_N@Proton_N7 ай бұрын
KZhead