New Telescope Findings Challenge Big Bang Theory
On Christmas Day, 2021, the world’s most powerful space telescope was launched. A joint effort between the North American and European Space Agencies (NASA and ESA), the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)’s “primary aim is to shed light on our cosmic origins”.
So, how's the mission going? What discoveries has this multi-billion-dollar marvel of technology and engineering produced? Are the latest cosmic revelations consistent with the big bang model of the universe (as was widely predicted before JWST was launched)? Or has the data, in fact, contradicted that model? How has the biblical model of the origin of the universe fared (and were creationist predictions about JWST findings any more accurate)?
Join Dr Mark Harwood (who played a key role in the development of Australia’s national satellite system) for a fascinating and enlightening discussion on JWST, the big bang, and the Bible!
⏳ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Teaser
00:42 Introduction: JWST findings contradict the big bang theory
01:29 A brief overview of the big bang theory
02:51 The secular dilemma: Did the universe have a beginning?
04:40 Could God have used the big bang? (No: The Bible and the big bang are incompatible)
07:06 Is there any observational support for the Big Bang?
09:31 Does the big bang adequately explain the observations?
10:08 JWST findings are a complete shock to the Big bang community:
11:43 → Large, highly structured galaxies contradict big bang predictions
12:24 → Supermassive black holes contradict big bang expectations
14:11 Are astronomers abandoning the big bang in favor of other theories?
15:50 Other examples of big bang failures:
16:05 → The Baryon Asymmetry Problem: Where’s all the antimatter?
17:55 → Initial stars: Where are all (or any of) the Population III stars?
19:21 → The Horizon Problem: How did CMB radiation get so even?
23:00 Philosophical commitments are all that keep the big bang theory alive
24:16 JWST findings are consistent with a biblical view of the universe
27:20 Creationist predictions about JWST observations have proven correct!
29:20 Conclusion: The heavens declare the glory of God!
✍️ LINKS AND SHOW NOTES
• New images from the James Webb Telescope: Do they challenge the Big Bang? creation.com/james-webb-image...
• What you need to know about the James Webb Space Telescope - creation.com/the-james-webb-s...
• NASA releases James Webb Space Telescope’s first deep field image - creation.com/james-webb-teles...
• A ‘space-view’ shift: Admissions about discoveries ‘reshaping’ astronomy and cosmology - creation.com/space-view-shift
• Will the new space telescope find ET life? creation.com/space-telescope-et
• Will JWST find habitable planets? creation.com/jwst-exoplanets
• Astronomy and Astrophysics Questions and Answers - creation.com/astronomy
• Big Bang and the Bible - • Big Bang and the Bible
• Is the big bang really scientific? - creation.com/big-bang-scienti...
• Can Christians add the big bang to the Bible? creation.com/can-christians-a...
• The mind of God and the ‘big bang’ - creation.com/the-mind-of-god-...
• Did God use a big bang? - creation.com/did-god-use-big-...
📚 HELPFUL RESOURCES
• Our Created Universe (streaming) - creation.com/s/35-8-113
• Our Created Stars and Galaxies (streaming) - creation.com/s/35-8-112
• Our Created Solar System (streaming) - creation.com/s/35-8-111
• Dismantling the Big Bang (book) - creation.com/s/10-2-188
• Taking Back Astronomy (book) - creation.com/s/10-2-252
• Our Amazing Created Solar System (book) - creation.com/s/10-2-626
• Creation Astronomy for Kids (book) - creation.com/s/10-1-632
💙 SOCIAL MEDIA
► Facebook: / creationministries
► TikTok: / creationministries
► Instagram: / creationministries
► X / Twitter: / creationnews
► eNewsletter: creation.com/infobytes
📅 EVENTS
We present at hundreds of events around the world each year.
To see what events are happening near you, or to request a creation presentation in your Church (or other gathering) visit:
creation.com/events
Thanks for watching!
Love it. I had the opportunity of chatting with many people - secularists - about JWST. From just after its launch to just after the first images. When I told them what I expected JWST to show us (fully-formed galaxies, no pop III stars, etc) I was mocked. When my expectations were confirmed I humbly reminded them that they were invited to embrace the Creator. I was blocked from the chat, removed for "spreading conspiracy theories", and again mocked. To this day I am still blocked from the chat. Please join me in praying for those who are lost and for those who deny.
You’re blessed. Heavenly Father I pray that you would open the eyes of the men and women in this world who are lost and blind, and I pray you would reveal yourself to them, as you have for me and others here reading and watching. In Jesus’ name I pray, Amen. That is interesting though I’m not surprised. Nothing would have made me believe before God revealed Himself to me. I would’ve written all of this off probably, simply because I didn’t really want to believe in God. I didn’t really realize I didn’t want to believe, but I certainly didn’t.
it's d'big strong & righteous hand of r father god. Created thats matter. And mades us all thnk u lord
@@cgeorgeleonde5175 I would add: believe on the name of his son Jesus Christ and love one another as he gave commandment, 1st John 3:23 Very Definitely 💯 matters beyond only that God created us, with the cooperation of his son Jesus Christ In The Beginning, John 1:1-3.
When they turn their back on God, God turns his back on them. The further they walk away, the further God gets, and he will not restrain it. They're not lost, they've been rejected and abandoned by their own choices. First mistake was believing: "In the begining a singularity created......"
@@waynerenee3809 only with the New Testament revelation is there understanding that there were two 2️⃣ Creators IN THE BEGINNING, but only God, the God of Israel, would allow no other Creator, or God, to be known by Israel, for he ALONE AUTHORIZED bringing Israel out of Egypt; he did have helpers with him, such as Moses but not ending with Moses. The two 2️⃣ Creators were the Word and the God, John 1:1-3 ‘without him ( the Word) was nothing made that was made’ by the God of Israel, who wasn’t made flesh, John 1:14. The God of Israel made things IN THE BEGINNING with his hands 🙌 Isaiah 45:11-12, Hebrews 1:10!
As far as I know (correct me if I’m wrong), Dr. Jason Lisle was the only creationist to make successful public predictions of what JWST would discover. For example, fully formed and mature distant galaxies.
I think you're right.
Yes he did!
You are correct. A Biblical Creationist called it for the glory of GOD Almighty.
Love Dr. lisle , secularists demand science or God. Bit in reality there is no science with out God. God is the best mathematician, best scientists, best artist. His is I Am , and with out I am there is nothing.
I doubt that very much. I am not a trained scientist of any kind; I am what you might call a "buff" regarding astronomy. That is to say that I, an average guy, made the same predictions - independent from and prior to hearing what Dr. Lisle predicted. I am no genius. I am average. God does not try to confuse us. As Romans 1:22 says "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools..."
Before a telescope was invented Job 26:7 God stretches the northern sky over empty space and hangs the earth on nothing. 7 He spreads the skies over unformed space, hangs the earth out in empty space. GOD is.
Yes people continue to believe that big bang but the James Webb telescope already proved it couldn’t be like that but for some reason people don’t listen. God does not give his glory to anyone else!
Which god though? There are sooooo many……..
As far as I know Job has only one God.😂.
@@jofjofjof well I was curious since there’s so many different versions of the Bible. lol. Besides, this quote was taken a bit out of context 😂
@@DarthGandalftheBlackThere is one version of the Bible. Silly head. It's in Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. It is translated directly from those, so everyone on Earth can read and understand God's word. Nice try though.
The Galaxies never end. I think when God said let there be light it was one incredible Bang!
GoneCarnivore God said Let there be light, Genesis 1:3, and God formed the light Isaiah 45:7 with his hands 🙌 ( which is what FORMED means, Isaiah 45:11-12).
Comments suggest if an atheist/scientist is correct it means they're a good scientist. If a theist/scientist is correct he's just luckey. Sorry folks that qualifies as willingly ignorant.
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth 🌎 🙏
I think when he spoke there could have been a big bang
Revelation 22:13 [13] I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” Revelation 21:5 [5] And he who was seated on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” Also he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.”
Good created and dictators too
@@arbenlakuriqi578 created but they did not serve Gods will. God ordains things and God allows things. We are free willed to love and follow or choose our own path. That why there is so much chaos
Doctors invented sex changes because they weren't making enough money on boob implants.
The observable universe has a radius of 46.5 billion light years, but is only 14 billion years old according to popular science. Why has no one picked up on the fact that the universe supposedly expanded at 3x speed of light despite the speed of light being Unbreakable?
Because the fabric of space-time is expanding at that speed. Only things travelling through it can not travel faster. I'm an electrician so don't really know shit but i heard Brian Cox say it once
@kristaylor6694 I'm guessing they came to that conclusion by simply doing the math and saying "The math don't add up. Guess the universe just expands faster than the speed of light *shrug "
In the theory of the expansion of the Universe if you travel at the speed of light time stops, you can see both the past and the future, but the Universe expands much faster because you will never be able to see the Horizon Of Events that don`t yet exist. Now , the reason why the Universe is expanding faster and faster some scientists attribute it to antimatter. But a theory is just a theory , and is taken as a reference until another theory has more validity or is proven without a doubt that is a fact.
@AbberjamUK yeah then they just said something is pushing the universe apart let's call that dark energy
Astrophysics…. The science most closely related to psychology. Aka, no one really knows what the hell is going on. lol
This is an excellent video 😀!
When you have the ability to speak a galaxy into existence it disproves the big bang theory.
Great video the heavens do declare the Glory OF GOD!
*He made the ⭐️ ✨ 🌟 stars also.*
Yep, God said, "and the stars " and bam there they all were. And he knows them all by name!
On the day that JWST was launched, there was plenty of chitter-chatter in the comments of various KZhead channels which had made predictions of what we would likely see in the "early" universe. I commented that we would see just more of what we see around us, and that there would be more unanswered questions and problems for the evolutionists to ponder over. I was laughed at by my comments, but I bet they're not laughing now!
They're not laughing because they mentally blocked anything that doesn't fit the world's view.
they're probably still making some weak excuse to laugh at you
I heard some of this on another channel too. They said the further they look, the more they find, and didnt expect it. Almost as if its coming about as they come up with ways to search further. Almost as if, "Oh, youre going to look way out there? How do you like this?"
JW can't see the edges of the universe
@@mrazyoneBecause the universe is expanding at a rate that will never allow anyone to see the edge.
@@michaelharrington75 they suspect its expanding.
@@mrazyone It's been confirmed. It's called Hubble's Law.
@@mrazyone It's been proven for nearly a hundred years. It's called hubbles law.
wow just wow...Glory to GOD
I love it that they keep using descriptors like “The edges of the universe”, when really they should say that the limits of our technology restrict us from viewing deeper into the universe. Conversely, our technology prevents us from seeing the “beginnings” of molecular matter; everything we find microscopically is made of smaller particles. God has made our environment with no beginning or ending.
Yeah, I've always wondered that, how can they possibly know? I mean, is it like the fluted edge of a pie crust or what? Seems more likely to me that there is no edge at all - isn't "infinite" kinda like "eternal" ? Makes more sense that as far as we can see is the edge & we keep expanding that line within everything that is there.
Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork.
Starlight and Time: Solving the Puzzle of Distant Starlight in a Young Universe, written by Dr. Russell Humphreys a physicist is an excellent book for both the layman and those who have advanced mathematics.
CMI has a video on their website that explains this concept quite well
also check out 'Distant Starlight and the Age, Formation and Structure of the Universe based on Pearlman YeC SPIRAL cosmological model.'
How old was Adam when he was created? He was zero years old. How old did Adam look when he was zero years old? Probably 30 or 40 years old. How old was the universe when God created it? Zero years old. How old did the universe look when God created it. As old as God needed it to look
In order to be a young earth creationist, one must not know the Bible very well. If I’m in to believe the Bible, then the Earth must be very old.
@@CerealDust-nStuff Give me an example please.
An excellent, enlightening discussion.
Moving to astronomy now! This is going to be really good
I'm a Christian, and every time my mind doubts "is God even real?", I watch one of CMI's videos and it puts me definitively back into my initial convictions
The interviews seem to be mostly 'confirmatory' rather than challenging. Would you find it more convincing if the interviewees were challenged more?
You need to study some apologetics
@@Choraldiscourse Apologetics is fine as a way of promoting an idea, but as a general rule I feel that allowing a proposal to be challenged is a stronger way to promote an idea. The same applies to political and ethical debate in my opinion, and very much so on matters of science. This broadcast is most certainly about religion and science, so I feel it would have benefitted from a higher degree of challenge. Do you?
@@simonthorneycroft1339 I was replying to the other guy and I don't agree. Sometimes an idea needs an accepting space to be expressed. There's certainly places where these ideas can be challenged though. I see you've posted many many times here. What are you hoping to achieve?
@@Choraldiscourse I am not sure I am trying to achieve anything. I just like engaging with people who hold views / ideas that differ from my own, to see how they think, maybe even why? Young Earth creationists, 9/11 Truthers, people who believe the world is flat, people who believe that there was a lost civilisation 12000 years ago that built the pyramids. I also feel that some of the ideas and the explanations do need politely challenging,
Brilliant explanations, Dr Mark Harwood, and given just off the cuff, quite amazing to me !😮😊🎉
A note about the "let there be light"dilemma. The idea of an earth that is old and in existence,and the let there be light in verse three is not in conflict. The genesis account is describing what an earthling would see, if he was standing on the surface of the earth,and observing the creative events taking place. So in verse 2 it says that the earth which didnt have any land masses,and was essentially a water world,was dark. The hebrew word used in these initial verses translated into "light",comes from a root that conveys the meaning diffuse(verses 4,5).This suggests that initially,the atmospheric gas composition was dense enough,and composed such,that it scattered light to a large degree,it was dark at sea level.However,in later verses a clearer atmosphere forms,its not as dark at the surface as it was in verse 1.Later,land and vegetation forms,there is less scattering of light.Finally,the two luminaries are now clearly distinguished from the surface by the end of verse 19,and the two luminaries were clearly visible from earths surface.The hebrew word translated "light",now has a change in the root meaning,which denoted direct visibility. This means sun,moon,and photons were already in existence BEFORE verse 2,the universe was fully formed,and the creator is from that verse onwards, describing the sequences taking place on the earth,from an earthlings viewpoint,as if he were watching from the surface. This seems to square with general scientific thinking that the earth had an initial thick atmosphere that thins out gradually over time. The Big Bang is not inconsistent with the genesis account, it is inconsistent with our misunderstanding of what Genesis is telling us. Much thanks.
Very well done . . . you know, God Himself responded to this line of thinking . . . in a book titled JOB.
Haleluya. Great and mighty our God. Thank you Dr.Sarfity and CMI team for this material. This is the core and substantial material for us as the churches. God bless you.
It's odd how Brian Cox came out stating the universe is 28 billion years old shortly after this discovery. Keep the lie alive..
Right they will keep trying to find an escape hatch like inflation or multiverse, etc etc
Just keep adding more and more time to the equation. It'll all work out! 😅
@@rayspeakmon2954 ikr 😂
Christans stick to the bible and jesus. Most never studdied planetary science to put it to the 7 days of putting life on earth. So the athiest will chew them up. I try to keep them informed . Did you know the planets were formed closer to our sun ? Never life prior. .
@@rayspeakmon2954 lol, the universe gets billions of years older every few years, and this "singularity that blew up" spawned from nowhere/nothing. What faith they have in nothing.
Im always amazed that most people couldnt even explain a 4 cycle engine, but they can exclaim the beginning of our universe with the big bang theory. Surely they jest. God is infinetely smarter than us.
True. It seems like the less they know the smarter they think they are. When you try and make them see they change the subject and if you keep pressing them they will tell you that God is mean and they wouldn’t allow xyz if they were God. Yet they do evil but don’t want to be held accountable. It’s interesting and sad mental gymnastics.
That sounds familiar to me . . . I'm sure I read that somewhere . . . gimme a minute, let me think . . . got it narrowed down . . . Psalms? No I think Proverbs - several variations of that actually.
wow, that was an amazing video., thanks for the update on the jwst. i havent heard anything published by the media on it for ages. :) God bless you.
Great topic and thank you. Slight correction to avoid confusion: the first law of thermodynamics says that ENERGY (not matter) can neither be created nor destroyed.
@markvanoostrom Another important distinction is that the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics do not GOVERN reality, they DESCRIBE it. Saying that something is impossible because it violates either law is a logical error. If we observe something that violates some expression of those laws, we shouldn't deny the evidence, but rather come up with a more accurate expression of the law that is in line with what we observe. The virtual particles of subatomic physics is a case in point.
I was going to make the same comments. Accuracy is important. Having said that, the point he was making, that an infinitely old universe desires the first law of thermodynamics is still true, just for a different reason. It's true because the universe would have LONG AGO run out of energy. Another problem a steady state model has is, you cannot get to now (this moment in time), from eternity. Time is a created property, just as space, and all it contains is. Good physicists usually speak of time and space together, "space time", they will say, because they are inextricably linked.
@@fargomonkey5133 there's no time and there's no space, just matter. things only grow and decay.
@@BrainDamagedBob It is considered a law because all observations are consistent with this. If something was actually observed that violated the law, then that would disprove it, but the issue is that for those who believe such things about the past are essentially claiming that in the unobservable past, something happened that goes against every scientific observation ever made, and that this hypothetical event conveniently enables their worldview. To believe in an eternal or uncaused universe is to deny the evidence in order to make up a story.
@@creationministriesintl, thank you for this very necessary clarification !😅🎉
The Universe because of its staggering immensity and uniformity could not have come from a physical singularity. That’s preposterous. It has to have its origin which is ongoing from a metaphysical dimension outside of the material restrictions of the space/time continuum. This is logical even without reference to the Bible.
Exactly. A sufficient cause for the universe must be: • Eternal (if it had a beginning, then it, in turn, would need a sufficient cause) • All-powerful (to be the sufficient cause of a universe of this size and energy/matter content) • Non-material (i.e. SUPER-natural; something cannot be it's own cause) Logic and the laws of science do actually point to God as the Creator. See creation.com/who-created-god for more.
@@creationministriesintl I used to believe this as well until I learned how relativity and quantum mechanics actually works.
The only certainty is nobody knows for certain..not yet anyway
Galaxies that shouldn't be there, animals that shouldn't exist, prophecies that couldn't be real... Any explanation but they don't admit the truth: We were wrong, God Is The Creator and sustains the entire universe
Patience, satan is still a very busy little bad guy . . . but not for much longer !!!
@@sydney.g.sloangammagee8181 Seriously ?
Correct. the only explanation that makes sense
@@sydney.g.sloangammagee8181 Satan is like that one trolling griefer in an online game, but he'll be banned to a bottomless hole soon.
@@TheClimbingBronyOldColt THANK YOU!!! I chose not to reply . . . that just proved my point!!!
Why does science insist on explaining everything within the confines of physics? It doesn’t make sense to me that you can create physics within the confines of the laws of physics. Kinda like a computer being confined to binary obviously can’t create a computer - something ELSE must have made the computer first. Scientifically - there MUST be another contributor to “kick things off”. It’s not scientific to limit the explanation of everything to science. In my opinion - believing everything we obverse and study was the result of chance requires a lot more faith than believing everything was designed and created by a supernatural being (God). Our accidental or happenstance existence both defies physics (matter) and is mathematically improbable (even after 13.8Billion years - it’s not enough time for all of this to happen). So here’s my question: Why are we so afraid of the possibility of a supernatural God that we spend trillions of dollars and millions of man-hours trying to discover an alternative explanation to our very existence? “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” - Werner Heisenberg
Well, perhaps God is tired of all His eye witness testimonials being shredded by scientists, so He is going to give them scientific, provable evidence - real soon!!!
Faith my friends
This is one of the most beautiful podcast/chat studios I've ever seen!
Great video, just wanted to say thank you
@@klouis1886Why don’t you have something to say that educates? Check out: Starlight and Time by Dr Russell Humphreys, before you are found going against God.
Awesome
Liked, commented, and shared
"Let there be light", these words are enough for creation of Universe..😊
Genesis 2:2-3 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. [3] And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
Superb guest, thanks from the States!
He is lying or just ignorant of the Laws of Thermodynamics
@@klouis1886 Check out: Starlight and Time by Dr Russell Humphreys Before you speak presumptively.
You've accused us of lying, but you haven't been specific. We deeply value truth.
@@klouis1886 what did he lie about? Can you be specific?
@@klouis1886 Where do the laws come from? How did they get there?
People who steal or comit murderdon't want to be held accountable..but they don't want the sane thing they do ..being done to them. They know its wrong.. Morals exist..there is right and wrong..where it comes from? We re made In Gods image...thats where it comes from.
Splendid and compelling points sir (or madam)..
Best program I've watched for ages
The telescope can see light that has been travelling for billions of years and somehow the young-earth creationists think they've got it right.
Another issue with the Big Bang is the idea that heat itself created an explosion. So what actually exploded? You need a flammable material under pressure to cause an explosion. And what was causing the singularity to compress? Something is needed to cause the compression. Nothing g can compress itself
Expand is a better term than explosion
@@klouis1886 you can’t get an expand without explosion and atheists don’t mean expand. The Big Bang model, not theory, says it was rapid and hot. Plus it would only expand until the pressure was gone. A singularity is said to be as small as the head of a pin. That isn’t going to expand to the size of our universe. Not even an explosion that small would. Especially without an oxygen atmosphere.
I love that you're asking good questions! I think asking good questions is the start of good science. The answer to this particular one is that it's an unfortunate effect resulting from the popular term 'Big Bang" and that some understanding is required of what exactly spacetime is. It's not just some explosion in space like what we understand in our conventional 'macro' physics. Einstein proved that space and time are basicaly the same thing (like electricity and magnetism are the same thing we know as electromagnetism) and therefore was there was no single point in space that stuff exploded from. Instead, there was a single point in TIME that spacetime itself EXPANDED from. Spacetime can be a bit weird to get a hold of at first (anyone that works in GPS satellites has to account for time moving slower for satellites relative to us on earth) so I'd recommend a good science communication channel like Arvin Ash, Sabine Hossenfelder, ScienceClic or Science Asylum to help explain it. Quantum mechanics is even weirder, just look up the "double-slit experiment" which you can do for yourself at home! (or for the lazy, watch youtube where Veritasium and Looking Glass Universe both did it). But keep asking those questions!
Those who have a belief other than creation don't want to believe God exists. Let alone have a personal relationship with our Heavenly Father.
Not in my experience. I desperately wanted to believe God exists, but the evidence from biology, geology, geography, virology, chemistry, paelontology, linguistics, zoology, archaeology, astronomy, particle physics, astrobiology, and indeed every field of science is so extremely strong that the universe is old, that the God of the books of Genesis and Exodus has set out to deceive us.
@wefinishthisnow3883 Excuse me but if you just look at how the body works: every single system and look at every single muscle how it works and what it does should be enough to convince you of intelligent design. You know less than you think.
Gotta love science. If they find what they expect, it proves science. If it's not what they expect like with the Webb telescope, it still somehow proves science!
Here is another miracle for the atheists to explain: Evolution to the Shroud of Turin that has an image that can't be duplicated even with todays technology. Add that to the list of miracles the atheist needs to answer.
And anti-Catholics.
@@johncollins8304 What do you mean?
@@jimmoore9490 Simply that anti-Catholic Christians have to confront the Shroud, from its inexplicable image to its history to our day.
Has any demolition company ever blown up a building and a brand new house appeared?
The question is loaded aimed to arrive at your view point. A forest burnt and destroyed in fire will regrow and get restored in few years.
@@happyguy650 it's Impossible for a giraffe to evolve.
@@happyguy650you mean the fine tuned for life laws of physics? The laws of physics that demonstrate the universe isn't eternal because it isn't the same temperature? Those laws of physics? The laws of physics which rule out the big bang without the inflation fudge factor?
Big bang didn't happen but I have to tell you it's more complicated then that, it's a super complicated fake story. Dr. Danny Faulkner has a good explanation of what the big bang story is just Google dr. Faulkner big bang.
@@happyguy650 Explain where seeds come from?
1st episode ive watched. Excellent. Easy to follow. Easy listening. Debunks much 'science' which is really not science.
What did it debunk and which part do you believe is not really 'science' and why?
How much more we are in awe of the things we cannot see.
& it's taught in school just like Theory of evolution that the education system wants you to believe. Environment adaptation & theory of evolution are different concepts.
God is the creator. Period. Thank you very much, sir .
Imagine Jezus a Human created all this This is proof JEZUS IS NOT GOD GOD IS DESCRIBED IN HOLY QIRAN BY GOD HIMSELF IN 4 LINES DEFINITION SURAH. IKHLAAS
Sorry bro, but he really is the Son of God. I worship him even if you don't. But tell me, what will you say to him when you finally meet? That day is coming, and no mistake.
@@ghengiskhan6145 i am a born-again Christian who also believes that Jesus christ is God.
Just like in quantum physics, the observer changes the observed, what if when we are observing the space, it is also changing and giving us a different perception?
Great video on so many levels! However, the statement - "Christians believe in miracles b/c we have a Miracle Worker, whereas atheists believe in miracles with no Miracle Worker, i.e. magic" is worth the whole thing! :-)
Without him was nothing made the word made everything and Jesus is the word amen
I would agree brother. But we should let the scientists do their science without forcing the Bible on them. They will find out what truth is if they have an open mind. God's creation shows his fingerprints and we have nothing to fear from scientific discovery. The more that gets discovered, the more it undeniably points to God.
God's word has all the answers we need in life! Even answers about the stars and the universe.
I THINK IT MAKE'S MORE SENSE THAT THE CREATION SPOKEN IN THE BIBLE IS SPECIFICALLY ABOUT OUR GALAXY AND NOT THE WHOLE UNIVERSE
I can agree with that. The bible does not give us an account of the entire creation of the universe. We are the babies in His vast kingdom. There is much for us to learn when Jesus comes, but I do not agree with the big bang theory as it has proven to be full of flaws
Just more blessed opportunities for the Great Physician to show his strength.
Yes, they wanted to see random gasses instead of fully formed galaxies so now they are backtracking.
There will be a sensible explanation soon enough. If anything, the JWST unexpected discoveries make science more credible, not less IMO.
@@ghengiskhan6145 Yeah, they'll make up a story. You can count on that.
Singer song writer Terry Clark wrote a song telling of the mountains pointing to our creators glory. Speaking though they have no lips. All creations anthem raised. Our creator liveth. See all the worlds his hands have made.
Oh must get it on my playlist.along with stairway to heaven and Freebird.🤣
Definitely, God is declaring his glory! The heavens is amazing
Great channel❤
"They're not supposed to be there..." How completely arrogant that statement is, as if the universe was ever supposed to conform to our beliefs. Those galaxies are exactly where they should be. It's our current beliefs that shouldn't be there, once we know more.
Nonsense, show me God if you can't then stop playing with your imagination!
The Heavens are telling the Glory of God!!!
“It’s a bit like God is showing off” I like that. We just returned from Devils Tower in Wyoming and there’s no consensus among geologist regarding that tower. for me I just think God wanted to have a little fun with us just like he did with the platypus, “ hey Angels, let’s see how they handle this”
Easiest way to tell a lie? The story keeps changing.
Science finds new data and updates our understanding of the world. That is how it works. This is science leaving creationist even farther behind.
An infinitely malleable model that has numerous failed predictions is not science. In order for it to be a scientific theory, it would need to be treated as falsifiable when tested against real world observations. "Cosmology is not even astrophysics: all the principle assumptions in this field are unverified (or unverifiable) in the laboratory, and researchers are quite comfortable with inventing unknowns to explain the unknown." -Richard Lieu (Distinguished professor of astrophysics, University of Alabama). Lieu, R., LCDM cosmology: how much suppression of credible evidence, and does the model really lead its competitors, using all evidence? 17 May 2007 "Cosmology may look like science, but it isn't," "A basic tenet of science is that you can do repeatable experiments, and you can't do that in cosmology"- James Gunn, A singular conundrum: How Odd is our universe?, science 317: 1848-1850, 2007. Its not science.
@@creationministriesintl I think you have the wrong impression of what repeatable means in this sense. The measurements taken are repeatable. Collecting the data is repeatable. The procedure to use the data to test hypothesis put forward are repeatable. It does not mean that since we can't reproduce the big bang in a test tube we can't study the universe. In fact, a part of physics is often envied by other sciences because of how reproducible the results are. They could talk about results far more precisely than a biologist could ever dream. It is so repeatable, they can take the text I'm writing now. Send it to space, account for space-time curvature, and send it down to where you live just so we can have this conversation. "God cannot create a triangle whose angles don't sum to 180 degrees" - Thomas Aquinas.
@@all_bets_on_Ganesh Spherical, concave or convex, triangles don't equal 180°
True. He was was wrong about a lot.
Finally some sense is coming back. OK here's a question thats gona throw you.... What happened between Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2. Hint the mistranslation of the word "was" in Gen 1:2 from Hebrew to English = "Became." The same word used when Lots wife, Gen 26:2 "... became a pillar of salt." See Psalm 104:30 (Therefore Gen 1:2 is the recreation) and my fav verse Job 38:1-7. Not only does GOD know the number of the stars in his Universe but also all their names (Psalm 147:4) ... far out so cool!!!
Great
Was no big bang
No. God created the universe and stretched it out.
Instead of being disappointed, secularists-atheists ought to be persuaded that God is real, and that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. They out be mesmerized in the glory and power of our Creator !
We’re dos it say that Jesus was God in the flesh ?
John 1:1-3 is a good starting place. But see others like John 5:18, John 20:27-29. Philippians 2:5-7, Colossians 1:15, Colossians 2:9, Hebrews 1:3, etc. For more, seee creation.com/trinity
@michaelhaigh9182 In addition to Jesus’ specific claims about Himself, His disciples also acknowledged the deity of Christ. They claimed that Jesus had the right to forgive sins-something only God can do-as it is God who is offended by sin (Acts 5:31; Colossians 3:13; Psalm 130:4; Jeremiah 31:34). In close connection with this last claim, Jesus is also said to be the one who will “judge the living and the dead” (2 Timothy 4:1). Thomas cried out to Jesus, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28). Paul calls Jesus “great God and Savior” (Titus 2:13) and points out that prior to His incarnation Jesus existed in the “form of God” (Philippians 2:5-8). God the Father says regarding Jesus: “Your throne, O God, will last forever and ever” (Hebrews 1:8). John states that “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word [Jesus] was God” (John 1:1). Examples of Scriptures that teach the deity of Christ are many (see Revelation 1:17, 2:8, 22:13; 1 Corinthians 10:4; 1 Peter 2:6-8; Psalm 18:2, 95:1; 1 Peter 5:4; Hebrews 13:20), but even one of these is enough to show that Christ was considered to be God by His followers. Jesus is also given titles that are unique to YHWH (the formal name of God) in the Old Testament. The Old Testament title “redeemer” (Psalm 130:7; Hosea 13:14) is used of Jesus in the New Testament (Titus 2:13; Revelation 5:9). Jesus is called Immanuel-“God with us”-in Matthew 1. In Zechariah 12:10, it is YHWH who says, “They will look on me, the one they have pierced.” But the New Testament applies this to Jesus’ crucifixion (John 19:37; Revelation 1:7). If it is YHWH who is pierced and looked upon, and Jesus was the one pierced and looked upon, then Jesus is YHWH. Paul interprets Isaiah 45:22-23 as applying to Jesus in Philippians 2:10-11. Further, Jesus’ name is used alongside God’s in prayer “Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:3; Ephesians 1:2). This would be blasphemy if Christ were not deity. The name of Jesus appears with God’s in Jesus’ commanded to baptize “in the name [singular] of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19; see also 2 Corinthians 13:14). Actions that can be accomplished only by God are credited to Jesus. Jesus not only raised the dead (John 5:21, 11:38-44) and forgave sins (Acts 5:31, 13:38), He created and sustains the universe (John 1:2; Colossians 1:16-17). This becomes even clearer when one considers YHWH said He was alone during creation (Isaiah 44:24). Further, Christ possesses attributes that only deity can have: eternality (John 8:58), omnipresence (Matthew 18:20, 28:20), omniscience (Matthew 16:21), and omnipotence (John 11:38-44). Now, it is one thing to claim to be God or to fool someone into believing it is true, and something else entirely to prove it to be so. Christ offered many miracles as proof of His claim to deity. Just a few of Jesus’ miracles include turning water to wine (John 2:7), walking on water (Matthew 14:25), multiplying physical objects (John 6:11), healing the blind (John 9:7), the lame (Mark 2:3), and the sick (Matthew 9:35; Mark 1:40-42), and even raising people from the dead (John 11:43-44; Luke 7:11-15; Mark 5:35). Moreover, Christ Himself rose from the dead. Far from the so-called dying and rising gods of pagan mythology, nothing like the resurrection is seriously claimed by other religions, and no other claim has as much extra-scriptural confirmation. There are at least twelve historical facts about Jesus that even non-Christian critical scholars will admit: 1. Jesus died by crucifixion. 2. He was buried. 3. His death caused the disciples to despair and lose hope. 4. Jesus’ tomb was discovered (or was claimed to be discovered) to be empty a few days later. 5. The disciples believed they experienced appearances of the risen Jesus. 6. After this, the disciples were transformed from doubters into bold believers. 7. This message was the center of preaching in the early Church. 8. This message was preached in Jerusalem. 9. As a result of this preaching, the Church was born and it grew. 10. Resurrection day, Sunday, replaced the Sabbath (Saturday) as the primary day of worship. 11. James, a skeptic, was converted when he also saw the resurrected Jesus. 12. Paul, an enemy of Christianity, was converted by an experience which he believed to be an appearance of the risen Jesus. Even if someone were to object to this specific list, only a few are needed to prove the resurrection and establish the gospel: Jesus’ death, burial, resurrection, and appearances (1 Corinthians 15:1-5). While there may be some theories to explain one or two of the above facts, only the resurrection explains and accounts for them all. Critics admit that the disciples claimed they saw the risen Jesus. Neither lies nor hallucinations can transform people the way the resurrection did. First, what would they have had to gain? Christianity was not popular and it certainly did not make them any money. Second, liars do not make good martyrs. There is no better explanation than the resurrection for the disciples’ willingness to die horrible deaths for their faith. Yes, many people die for lies that they think are true, but people do not die for what they know is untrue. In conclusion, Christ claimed He was YHWH, that He was deity (not just “a god” but the one true God); His followers (Jews who would have been terrified of idolatry) believed Him and referred to Him as God. Christ proved His claims to deity through miracles, including the world-altering resurrection. No other hypothesis can explain these facts. Yes, the deity of Christ is biblical.
One of my problems with the "Big Bang Theory" is that we are seeing these galaxies, not only highly structured galaxies, but we see them where they would be NOW and not 13.8 billion years ago.
You should invite Dr Hugh Ross to explain concordance of the Bible with the Big Bang
What a lame answer. 13 billion years of universe exposed all you can explain is ya a creator did it. Give credit to humans and the marvel of science discovering distance galaxies.
NASA lies. In case you haven't noticed.
According to big bang theory, as I understand it, when expansion began the outer edge was expanding outward at infinite velocity. Think about that. How far can it expand, very quickly, at that rate? I've asked a few physicists about that, but they don't talk about that. It makes a serious difficulty in dating the universe; makes the time much much less than 13.8 billion years...
Cosmic expansion at the rate scientist claim is impossible. I don't believe for one minute that the universe expanded from nothing to about half the size it is now within a second.
Then the physicists you spoke to are incompetent or you are choosing to ignore what they're saying. Physicists LOVE to talk about it. Those mysteries are partly what made them want to BE physicists. The answer to your question is that there was no 'outer edge'. The evidence so far suggests that the universe continues infinitely based on the fact that the geometry of the universe is flat. What this means is that if you follow two straight lines, they will not eventually converge like they would on a globe or move apart like they would on a saddle, but instead continue forever. So while it's possible that the universe may be closed in some way, the evidence is strong that it is infinite in all directions. So with an infinite universe in mind, the Big Bang was not an explosion in space, it was an EXPANSION of SPACETIME. Space and time are the same thing, so when we look out and see vast distances in space, we also see vast distances in time (e.g. light-years measurement). So there was no central point in space like an explosion, but there was a central point in time. The age of the universe is calculated by studying the oldest stars, the cosmic microwave background radiation, the hubble constant, the expansion rate, computer modelling amongst other pieces of evidence and now this most recent JWST data. They ALL agree that the universe must be somewhere between 13.7 and 13.9 billion years old relative to the earth. The only part that's really up for debate is the exact age, but we know the ballpark.
Is there really such a thing as 'infinite velocity'?
@@ghengiskhan6145 That's where the math leads.
By the way, do you know what the difference between the epicycles of Ptolemy and the adjustments to Big bang cosmology is? The epicycles didn't actually explain planetary motion
I would love to see your explanation of creation contrasted with Hugh Ross’ explanation that perfectly lines up with the Bible. Hugh posit’s that the frame of reference from which the creation event is told in the Bible makes a big difference.
There's actually a whole book on this! creation.com/refuting-compromise-refutation-of-hugh-ross-introductory-chapter-and-reviews
Love Easter
I love this video! Gen 1:1 may be a textual island, denoting a time before the first day when the universe including the sun moon and earth were created. Verses 2 to 5 may begin the first of 6 "days" when Jehovah is preparing the earth for life. His spirit cleared away whatever was preventing the light from the already created sun from reaching the surface. On the 4th day he cleared the atmosphere and the waters above it so the sun moon and stars that were already created were clearly visible.
I think new info does not contracdict the big bang. All galaxies, incl. black holes and most stars, were probably formed very soon after the big bang.
Physicists disagree that these things formed "very soon after the big bang". Because there isn't enough TIME for all these things to form-following the laws of physics and chemistry-within the big bang framework.
@@creationministriesintl Could you please name a single reputable physicist who believes that this new JWST evidence disproves the Big Bang Theory?
Right now humans are saying they "should" not be there. Thank God they are not saying they "must" not be there.
When we had the steady state model of the Universe, Creation always stood at the doorway reminding folks that it was indeed a viable option. Comes then the big bang model, that was a bit more indigestion inducing, creation was even more obvious. Current discoveries indeed hint at the idea that the current models may not be correct. However, creation is still there as a viable option. God has always said that He is evident in creation, everywhere.
Well elucidated... No man will ever challenge the creator. I do imagine how He perfectly made things in orderly manner with a well balanced nature....... But again i wonder why non believers go opposite direction by trying to make assumptions on creation. "Tools down and follow Jesus you lose nothing".
Galaxy's and space squeeze out at different and any point, big and little bangs😊
My astronomy professor at NMSU said that a thimble full of antimatter would collapse the universe. My question is, "how big is the thimble?"
Thank you very interesting. Perhaps the most obvious bing bang assertion is everything is in motion away from a center and thus an ability to estimate time. I do not actually think that true science is in opposition to creation but complements it.
For the big bang crowd I have a question. How did the "natural processes" become active? The natural processes are further evidence of a designer God.
How is that evidence for a god ?
@@caryfrancis8030 They had to come from some source. The characteristics of these interlocking processes could not have randomly occurred without a force behind them and coordinating them.
@@aladd646 How do you know that ? If you have no way of knowing, then admit it, and thats OK, we cannot know everything.
@@caryfrancis8030exactly the point He says it “for I alone knows”
It seems that the blue shift would be of interest, but people seldom mention that at all.
The second law of thermodynamics works only if the smallest particles are able to spin. With ether, the particles are likely to be single entities and you must have 2 or more parts to spin or at least to store energy into a spin. So, using the terms "likely" and "possible" I am going to say that the Universe began, but I'm not going to say when.
The guy in the video applied the laws of thermodynamics totally WRONG!
I’ve watched a lot of Hugh Ross and he is a Christian astronomer/physicist who has also studied ancient Hebrew and he contends that the Bible got it right and it is NOT in conflict with the Big Bang model - many Christians actually think the Big Bang supports the Bible
The universe is an ever evolving entity. I didn't like the big bang theory in the first place.
I believe in the Big Bang. God said let there be light and BANG
This could well be true IMO.
It seems to me that if you are going to use the findings of JWST to make your point, it would be nice to see these pictures you are talking about.
Wow, just wow
The background is constant light. LEt=R use photomath. It will verify
Amen...thank you...and God it totally AWESOME!
Maybe there are anomalies with the BB, but the universe can’t be just 10,000 years old & earth 6,000. I’m Christian aswell, but believe in all modern theories.
The modern theories is good for man to just have some clues about his universe but can never predict God. A child cannot describe the day his father was born, but the father can describe the day the child was born. Most Definitely, our radioactive and Biological dating are as scientific as we are scientific while the reason for all our science and discovery is God. The reason why scientists have job to do is because God made them and things. What will the clay say to the portal,what has thou made.
@@mayowaoluwaseun7284 Hi. Thanks for your reply. I agree with most of your comment. It was quite well put, as u did it without letting on, wether u believe certain theories are true or not. However, in my experience, people who stick rigidly to the young earth creation hypothesis, ( or belief cos it’s not really a hypothesis, as it’s just reading from scripture), are also the kind of people to deny Einstein’s relativity, a theory that was rejected by the Catholic Church in 1905, & has been proved correct time again.
@@martinhoy1 Thanks also for your kind reply. If I take a little time on Einstein's Relativity which is basically consistent on Relativity of all things(even though it combines some variables e.g time, space & others) in my view. If we take wisdom a little from relativistic theory which says things react, functions and relate with other objects base on their location, I guess my Relativity calculations will give me a different view if I make moon my initial location relative to earth. So I can conclude that all our knowledge, theories and discoveries here on earth is relative to earth because earth is our initial location which form the basis of all our views and beliefs, from another location which spiritual location can be one will make our calculations become entirely different in units. In my early class in physics we have many units from different countries e.g UK, Germany e.t.c before forming the S.I units, these units are relative to each country. The knowledge we have here is relative to earth, when we get to other location we shall see more relativistic knowledge. 1 John 3:1-3, "...when we see him(Jesus), we shall be like him ..."
I would like to know the scientific answer to Isaiah 38:8, and how that can be explained. Also if we have any writings during that time which is likely around 671 bce on how long one day during that time was.
I found these two articles on this channel's website, creation.com, that talk about Azah's sundial. Materialist's 'defence' of Bible fails - creation.com/materialist-defence-of-bible-fails Joshua's long day - creation.com/joshuas-long-day
There is no other logical explanation for this verse and many others that that the Bible is true. It is absolutely true. No doubt. But let the scientists do their thing. God's creation will point to him all on it's own. He does not need human validation. He is, and that's it. We submit, or we burn. I believe in Jesus.
ITS TIME TO WAKE UP PEOPLE 🙏
JEHOVAH is the Grand Awesome Ruler of the universe. Praise Jah!
There is so many things that I would love to ask this gentleman. So many questions about so many things I can’t even begin to think how I would type them in this space
Why not you just start with one?
“Let there be light” could have been the creation of the universe, or the catalyst behind the Big Bang where all time and matter were created from electromagnetic radiation, I.e. light