5 Incredible Things We've Already Discovered thanks to the James Webb Telescope

2024 ж. 14 Мам.
926 103 Рет қаралды

Unravel the mysteries of the universe with the James Webb Space Telescope! From impossible galaxies to ancient black holes and potential signs of extraterrestrial life, explore five mind-blowing discoveries in this captivating video!
Warographics: / @warographics643
MegaProjects: / @megaprojects9649
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
Places: / @places302
Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq

Пікірлер
  • I'm one of the thousands that spent years designing and building this amazing telescope. Even *we* are amazed at what our work has produced!

    @TimberworksTables@TimberworksTablesАй бұрын
    • That's awesome, it really is awesome what has already come from it.

      @danbuckley6584@danbuckley6584Ай бұрын
    • Wow that's amazing 👏

      @dwightbelinfanti836@dwightbelinfanti836Ай бұрын
    • Good thing you didn't hire spaceX, fanboys would have cheered while your hard work exploded into little bits of space debis.

      @flipflop82ful@flipflop82fulАй бұрын
    • Awww look at the little naysayer who doesn't understand what he's talking about 😅 ​@flipflop82ful

      @jedaaa@jedaaaАй бұрын
    • That's pretty awesome.

      @trumpone4443@trumpone4443Ай бұрын
  • As someone who spent more than 10 years of my life putting JWST together and making sure it worked right, it’s nice to see it highlighted in your work. Thanks.

    @scottantonille784@scottantonille784Ай бұрын
    • Me too, I designed it 😊

      @seanstewart8942@seanstewart8942Ай бұрын
    • Well done! I changed the oil on my lawnmower, my wife is kinda proud.

      @glennllewellyn7369@glennllewellyn7369Ай бұрын
    • @scottantonille754 Any new discovery JWST brings to the public is similar to a Christmas morning~ Exciting, new surprises, infinite possibilities~ I'm a kid again where learning about our Universe is priceless~ TY.

      @djstarrjunkie@djstarrjunkieАй бұрын
    • Obviously I am only one of the hundreds across the globe who dedicated themselves to JWST, but I think we all consider it our baby.

      @scottantonille784@scottantonille784Ай бұрын
    • I thank you for you work. Technicians and engineers like you are invaluable as exploratory tech becomes more and more advanced.

      @Rancid-Jane@Rancid-JaneАй бұрын
  • I don't think even James webb telescope can figure out how many channels this man has 😂

    @himnishishaan2364@himnishishaan2364Ай бұрын
    • You can spend a lifetime exploring the Whistlerverse and still leave more to discover

      @J30YLK@J30YLKАй бұрын
    • Infinity

      @Tsar-Czar@Tsar-CzarАй бұрын
    • It does spot the smaller ones by accident occasionally

      @StoccTube@StoccTubeАй бұрын
    • He's johnny sins of youtube

      @yecto1332@yecto1332Ай бұрын
    • He’s, he’s AI 🤖 😂, kidding, he is a master of concise delivery of information.

      @jackmcandle6955@jackmcandle6955Ай бұрын
  • A tip for the sound engineer. Relax with the compressor, i can hear all the inhales the dude is taking and it is really distracting. Otherwise, if you really need to push the compressor that hard. Just edit the inhales down so they are not that loud.

    @Busmagnus@BusmagnusАй бұрын
    • I agree. Plus, has something changed in the audio quality in the last few videos? It's like he's slurring the words and speaking very fast. I'm asking because I'm trying out new speakers for the tv and it coincides with this new weirdness for me.

      @dddaddy@dddaddyАй бұрын
    • @@dddaddy he is talking faster. it's almost like he went down into the basement and danny gave him some powder to inhale but i do not hear slurring

      @M3PH11@M3PH11Ай бұрын
    • And here I thought that I hear the inhales because I'm high as balls. But I compared woth other vids and it wasn't used to be like that before.

      @tamarothA@tamarothAАй бұрын
    • I just commented the same thing then looked to see if it was noticed by anyone else and here we are.

      @ernsailor9041@ernsailor9041Ай бұрын
    • He's not talking too fast. Are we special needs?

      @Stable_Genius@Stable_GeniusАй бұрын
  • Tools like the JWST help science prove that there are always more questions to ask about the universe than answers to give. So cool. Cheers....

    @bazzer124@bazzer124Ай бұрын
    • Cosmology's one of those fields where even figuring out _what_ questions to ask is difficult, but exciting.

      @NeutralDrow@NeutralDrowАй бұрын
    • And one of those fields where we get almost obnoxiously-excited at the prospect of being proven wrong with new data.

      @tgdm@tgdmАй бұрын
    • Questions are more important than answers !

      @theshadowoftruth7561@theshadowoftruth7561Ай бұрын
  • The language of science is precise. Thank you for being one of the few podcasts that use exact and correct language to describe science to us half-learned

    @mischeviouslingo8065@mischeviouslingo8065Ай бұрын
    • Speak for yourself.

      @X22GJP@X22GJPАй бұрын
    • He still can't say "kilometres" correctly

      @sirfer6969@sirfer6969Ай бұрын
    • @@sirfer6969different dialects

      @realdreamerschangetheworld7470@realdreamerschangetheworld7470Ай бұрын
    • Thank his writers. All this man does is read scripts.

      @crunks420@crunks420Ай бұрын
    • He’s not actually British first of all. He grew up in Michigan. 😂

      @DonnaChamberson@DonnaChambersonАй бұрын
  • im 51 years old i wanna see some aliens man

    @ME-ke7qc@ME-ke7qcАй бұрын
    • I’m two decades older, and I agree. I’ve wanted to meet space aliens since I first watched the cartoon Col. Bleep at the age of 6.

      @patriciaaturner289@patriciaaturner289Ай бұрын
    • Go have a conversation with an octopus. Might be the closest thing we get lol.

      @beatooze8025@beatooze8025Ай бұрын
    • ​@@beatooze8025fr

      @sentientmeat96@sentientmeat96Ай бұрын
    • Why?

      @CliffSedge-nu5fv@CliffSedge-nu5fvАй бұрын
    • ​@@CliffSedge-nu5fvmost species have likeness in multiple branches of evolution. We can, for example, trace dogs back to prehistoric times. Rodents, mammals and reptiles and what became of even the most remote ancestors. But cephalopods, that is crazy obscure. They share so little with others in their environment and resemble even less. They very well could be a foreign body that is "alien" to our evolution pool.

      @beatooze8025@beatooze8025Ай бұрын
  • Once you notice Simon's sharp intake of breath you keep hearing it. Trust me.

    @NomaddUK@NomaddUKАй бұрын
    • Dude I noticed it before I saw this comment and I can't unnotice it.

      @arunmoses2197@arunmoses2197Ай бұрын
    • I hate you guys😂😂😂

      @Adam-zr9qy@Adam-zr9qyАй бұрын
    • @@Adam-zr9qy Nah ya don't. 😁

      @NomaddUK@NomaddUKАй бұрын
    • Dammmmm yoooouuuu hahahaha

      @zepherreload@zepherreloadАй бұрын
    • You... What have you done?

      @draconbacon6395@draconbacon6395Ай бұрын
  • I know there was some controversy about webb due to its ten billion price tag as some scientists thought the money could have been better spent on a variety of smaller but useful projects. Also there were issues with the lengthy time it took to design and build it and fears of a launch disaster that could end it all but looks it was one big gamble with results better than anyone dreamed of.⚛😀😀

    @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd@FrankOdonnell-ej3hdАй бұрын
    • That seems to be the thing with space exploration. Everything we do (Hubble, the Mars landers, Voyager 1and 2, etc) either crash and burn or blow our minds! Massive gambles, but the results are well worth the cost.

      @pobsdad@pobsdadАй бұрын
    • It is both an engineering and a scientific advancement when it works out, which I also believe is worth the cost and effort, as is the case with the JWST.

      @jokerace8227@jokerace8227Ай бұрын
    • They are building a bigger version as we speak. And a couple of others, of similar size but specialised for specific light frequencies.

      @Thurgosh_OG@Thurgosh_OGАй бұрын
    • In a way human history with exploration is just constant gambles: be it remote areas, underwater or outer space is a bunch of money, planning and some folks crazy enough to try despite the huge probability of going wrong.

      @biazacha@biazachaАй бұрын
    • Wait--this nonsense cost _10 BILLION DOLLARS???_

      @I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music@I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_MusicАй бұрын
  • This just hurts the brain, to think about just how little we know about the existence of, well, existence.

    @rockythao5394@rockythao5394Ай бұрын
    • Well, we know both very little and also a tremendous amount. Think of it like our understanding of a hurricane. We can know a lot about how and why they form and do what they do but we’ll never know the exact position and velocity of every raindrop.

      @adamredwine774@adamredwine774Ай бұрын
    • @@adamredwine774 And we have done wonders in biology, come far with DNA and brains and immune systems and whatnot... yet we have not even _seen_ the _tip_ of the iceberg of _how_ and _why._ Cosmology and Neurology are equally mind boggling to me. As well as some philosophical subjects like phenomenalism How can for instance some "simple" neurons or energy impulses "know" what to do and form any semblance of coherency, let alone conscience or perception. How can microbiological forms on such small scales act almost as if they "knew" what they were doing. How come we are both the greatest caretakers but also greatest destructors of our known universe.

      @SebHaarfagre@SebHaarfagreАй бұрын
    • @@SebHaarfagre I never understood why people think conscience is so terribly hard to understand. It seems pretty straightforward to me. And yes, i understand that the nervous system is very complex and that we don’t fully understand every aspect of perception, but the basic concept that simple chemical mechanisms underlay conscience seems perfectly understandable to me.

      @adamredwine774@adamredwine774Ай бұрын
    • Perfectly stated

      @richpalm616@richpalm616Ай бұрын
    • Information doesn't come from mass or energy, it only comes from a mind 👍 The instruction book of life is the most complicated, intricate, intelligent, information packed into EVERY SINGLE LIVING CELL. Even Darwin, from his own statements, would not believe in Darwinian evolution today with the knowledge we have of the complexity of a single cell now- irreducible complexity. The same God that wrote that book inspired a book for you to read, to help you in the life He gave you, intentionally, of His own free will. That's the best selling book of all time- the Bible. Read the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John- the eyewitnesses to Jesus' life and sacrifice for YOU.

      @mrfattypancakes@mrfattypancakesАй бұрын
  • All i can hear is him taking breaths between words and i cant unhear it now.

    @MakesCache@MakesCacheАй бұрын
    • I had to stop watching because of this

      @zorven@zorvenАй бұрын
    • Ever listened to Kate Garraway on Smooth Radio? She's even worse . . .

      @EllieMaes-Grandad@EllieMaes-GrandadАй бұрын
    • Whaaat😂 why did you do this to me😂😂😂😂😂

      @Adam-zr9qy@Adam-zr9qyАй бұрын
    • @Adam-zr9qy didnt mean to spread that black magic to you.

      @MakesCache@MakesCacheАй бұрын
    • @@MakesCache you have been shunned upon!😂

      @Adam-zr9qy@Adam-zr9qyАй бұрын
  • Whatever this telescope cost, it was a bargain.

    @joshm3484@joshm3484Ай бұрын
    • UNLIKE MAAANY other "EXPENDITURES" 🤔

      @larrywhittaker9901@larrywhittaker9901Ай бұрын
    • Not even 1% of what the US spends on their military in just 1 year.

      @dezpotizmOFheaven@dezpotizmOFheavenАй бұрын
    • Pennies compared to we spend on other things that arnt necessarily at all

      @anthonyrobinson3514@anthonyrobinson3514Ай бұрын
    • Yep, there is no pricetag on such groundbreaking knowledge.

      @SuperCatacata@SuperCatacataАй бұрын
    • It was purchased on a deep discount sale for 346 trillion dollars.

      @TheDraeg@TheDraeg25 күн бұрын
  • I was on pins and needles watching this telescope launch, set up and start sending its first images. I wanted this to be a success so much even though i had nothing to do with building or designing it. I love science and i wanted so much to have everyone's hard work pay off and they all deserved the success they all earned. From my heart to yours, thank you, you are a rockstar and we cant wait to hear what you discover. ❤

    @s.crawford12@s.crawford12Ай бұрын
  • Who needs sci-fi when reality serves up discoveries like these? James Webb Telescope, you're a star!

    @TheEducat0r@TheEducat0rАй бұрын
  • My father helped build the JWT in the early 2000’s working at Northrop Grumman, in El Segundo, CA. He retired in 2011 after working there for 37 years. His highlighted resume: B-2 Stealth Bomber International Space Station James Webb Telescope Background: Grew up in a small ranch in Mexico. Grew up eating beans and corn tortillas EVERYDAY, no other choice. He started working at the age of 4 taking care of cows, then 7 he started growing corn crops, teenager started building stone/boulder fences. Migrated to America at the age of 16 with only $30. Started working at Northrop in the early 1970’s as a sweeper. Then moved up to eventually create tools for Northrop to build aerospace technology and worked on hundreds of aerospace and military. Mexican migrants are a jewel to America’s advancements DON’T HATE CONGRADULATE!

    @bench-clearingbrawl7737@bench-clearingbrawl7737Ай бұрын
    • And I'm so grateful. I live in London, we love our Mexicans.

      @saydvoncripps@saydvoncripps12 күн бұрын
    • Sounds like you can make a more powerful statement in reverse.

      @SeanP7195@SeanP71954 күн бұрын
  • It seems that we are learning enough to know that we don’t know anything yet. We are still young and relatively new at this whole space study venture

    @user-ml7dj2ni1j@user-ml7dj2ni1jАй бұрын
    • Always been the way

      @benfox6383@benfox6383Күн бұрын
  • This video makes me think that the big bang theory may need revision in the future.

    @bariman223@bariman223Ай бұрын
    • Every theory is subject to change. That is what is great about science. It is understood by every scientist that with new evidence, applicable theory reevaluated.

      @phapnui@phapnuiАй бұрын
    • All theories undergo revision all the time.

      @CliffSedge-nu5fv@CliffSedge-nu5fvАй бұрын
    • There's probably already a betting pool on new, alternative, and updated hypotheses based on how far out each researcher team's time with the telescope is dated. If there's not yet, I need to talk with some bookies.

      @bjhudson7673@bjhudson7673Ай бұрын
    • Similar to observing ripples from a rock landing in a pond, there's enough evidence that the big bang occurring can't really be disputed. What is definitely up for grabs is the why and how. And what was before that...

      @Alaster-@Alaster-Ай бұрын
    • ​@@Alaster-The Big bang can't be refuted.....🤔. So you're telling me that all those billions of years ago, there was some unbelievably dense point of matter that popped into existence from somewhere. We don't know where it came from, but trust us....that point of matter was there. Something caused that miraculously dense point of matter to explode....oh sorry, rather expand into something. Oh yeah. What did that point of matter exist in? Was it space? No, but it existed in something. We just don't know what it was. Then that point of matter for some reason or under some mechanism that we don't understand or know why.... decided to explode or rather expand into the universe that we know today. That's one hell of a yarn as far as I'm concerned. I don't believe in fantastical bullshit. If you want to, go right ahead.

      @kwaki-serpi-niku@kwaki-serpi-nikuАй бұрын
  • A disturbingly large amount of people in the comments don’t seem to understand that all statements made about the theories of the universe include the caveat - “Given the information we had at the time.” as if theories aren’t meant to be tested and broken when new information comes in to play, and that such things are celebrated rather than scorned.

    @siyrean@siyreanАй бұрын
    • Exactly, that's how basic logic works

      @iconofsin1043@iconofsin1043Ай бұрын
    • Some still bring up the bible, don't waste your time trying to fix stupid.

      @xgentis@xgentisАй бұрын
    • The problem is that theories are treated as proven facts by the majority of people who know about it, mainly the general public.

      @MineCraft-nz9pg@MineCraft-nz9pg13 күн бұрын
    • No these rock stars have been acting like they KNOW everything. I'm sick of the hubris that is in charge of "science" they lie to us to get all that funding it's a grift.

      @romanyrose4074@romanyrose4074Күн бұрын
  • Clarke’s First Law: “When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.”

    @bubbathedm@bubbathedmАй бұрын
    • Same for a software developer honestly 😂 every time I've told someone something isn't possible, it's because I wasn't experienced enough, now I just describe the time it'll take

      @Iscream4j0y@Iscream4j0yАй бұрын
  • Simon Whistler you are single handedly educating the Internet! I love you so much my guy, all your channels are so interesting! ❤

    @demoneIephant@demoneIephantАй бұрын
    • He has a team he just reads but... yes lol

      @stevennicholas4708@stevennicholas4708Ай бұрын
    • Dude has a dozen writers... 💀

      @xjunkxyrdxdog89@xjunkxyrdxdog89Ай бұрын
    • ​@@xjunkxyrdxdog89 He does, but would you or many of us know anything about this if Simon wasn't the one reading it to us.

      @ellen9575@ellen9575Ай бұрын
    • @ellen9575 how known these topics are isn't relevant to the point that he's not doing this "single handedly".

      @xjunkxyrdxdog89@xjunkxyrdxdog89Ай бұрын
    • @xjunkxyrdxdog89 and he's very very upfront about that, just look in his cellar.

      @ellen9575@ellen9575Ай бұрын
  • I consider myself a smart woman, I have a masters in education and have almost a whole 4 year health degree under my belt.... I don't know why I watch these videos - I understand about half the words, and even fewer concepts. I never feel more stupid than when trying to get a grasp on physics. The people who do get it, and the ones who are advancing it? Mind blowing!! Keep it up!! ❤

    @cheekyb71@cheekyb71Ай бұрын
  • 0:50 - Chapter 1 - Impossible galaxies 5:00 - Chapter 2 - Oldest black holes in the galaxy 8:05 - Chapter 3 - Dozens of jumbos 10:40 - Chapter 4 - A small rock 12:55 - Chapter 5 - Possible signs of life on another planet

    @ignitionfrn2223@ignitionfrn2223Ай бұрын
    • Chapter 1 & 2 - debunked false info proven false even before the video was made.

      @vetinaris1297@vetinaris1297Ай бұрын
    • oh the irony, starting off with "Impossible galaxies".. (according to their Standard Model, that falls flat on its face every time its predictions fail. Which is mostly all the time... ) .. to then tell you about "oldest black holes in the galaxy". Which seems fine, but only when you believe in such nonsense as Black Holes...

      @philosophicaltool5469@philosophicaltool5469Ай бұрын
    • Links please ​@@vetinaris1297

      @Dsnipez18@Dsnipez18Ай бұрын
  • Hubble walked so JWST could sprint.

    @bladedicedragon@bladedicedragonАй бұрын
  • Loved this. Excellent empiricism, pace and explanatory elegance. Thank you!

    @matthewpiper6526@matthewpiper6526Ай бұрын
  • An episode about the JWST but the thumbnail is from Hubble.

    @joncederqvist4337@joncederqvist4337Ай бұрын
    • I should've known there was already someone here who noticed. 😄

      @Coastfog@CoastfogАй бұрын
    • ​@@CoastfogIs Simons head on upside down?

      @animalbird9436@animalbird9436Ай бұрын
    • @animalbird9436 his whole room is actually upside down and he is hanging down like a bat

      @rgerber@rgerberАй бұрын
  • Simon sounds like he's in a box. The difference in sound between the podcast channels and the others is crazy. Why can't he use the same microphone??

    @curtislindsey1736@curtislindsey1736Ай бұрын
    • Yeah its not good falling asleep to these😂😅

      @Adam-zr9qy@Adam-zr9qyАй бұрын
  • I brought my son 2 images taken by this telescope. I was so awe struck by the pictures,the beauty of stars and nebulae, the amazing universe we live in. I couldn't help but think of all the scientists that have contributed to our knowledge and what they would have given to see these images. Douglas Adams said something like, the garden is beautiful, it doesn't need fairies at the bottom of it. Sums it up for me.

    @saydvoncripps@saydvoncripps12 күн бұрын
  • With so many scientist with their projects waiting for JWST observation time and the shere amount of incredible things that the telescope has already found we should put at least 5 JWST-y telescopes in space one after another every six months. I know the cost was huge and the process was time consuming but there arent enough hours in a day for all the people who want to peek trough the instruments of this AMAZING telescope. However....i heard that the plans for even better and biger ground and space telescopes are already in motion. Good video.

    @tomkop213@tomkop213Ай бұрын
    • *** - "sheer"...

      @jamesspears7242@jamesspears7242Ай бұрын
  • Has it found the edge of the ever expanding 'List of Simon Whistler's Channels'?

    @jasonsanders8797@jasonsanders8797Ай бұрын
    • Don't be ridiculous. We'll find the limits to the universe before we find the end of Simon's channels

      @ElenarMT@ElenarMTАй бұрын
    • He literally has a channel with almost 100k subs....and ZERO f**king videos! And the worst part is...I'm one of the subs!

      @jasonsanders8797@jasonsanders8797Ай бұрын
    • I strongly suspect he is part of a set of identical quintuplets. And each of them fathered a set of identical quintuplets. And so on and so forth

      @phapnui@phapnuiАй бұрын
    • He has 1 channel in each universe and KZhead is viewing them across the multiverse.

      @tr1p1ea@tr1p1eaАй бұрын
    • @ChrisKatsu 'The Whistlerverse'. I like that. I think you just coined a new phrase. We should all try to get Simon to do a video on 'The Whistlerverse' as if he has no idea what it is. I know the whole meta thing has been done to death, but i think that would actually be pretty cool.

      @jasonsanders8797@jasonsanders8797Ай бұрын
  • You know when someone points something out and you can never unsee, or unhear it again... From this point onwards, you will always hear the absolute gargantuan breaths Simon takes between sentences. You don't become a big brain without big breaths!

    @LivingWithTheCoopers@LivingWithTheCoopersАй бұрын
    • I noticed them as well!! I love his channels and videos but they could do with editing these out for the sake of my sanity

      @mizzshortie907@mizzshortie907Ай бұрын
    • @mizzshortie907 there isn't editing software strong enough to remove them! Ha ha

      @LivingWithTheCoopers@LivingWithTheCoopersАй бұрын
    • If you've ever watched a news or weather report, you can hear the big gasps of breath inward as they talk... once having focused on them, it is difficult to try to not hear them.

      @littleblackcat2273@littleblackcat2273Ай бұрын
    • I'm okay with hearing people breath; I do it myself, like, ALL the time! Seriously, I understand how it could be annoying, but I guess my brain just edits it out for me. : )

      @mcv2178@mcv2178Ай бұрын
    • You are history's greatest monster

      @ssj2_snake@ssj2_snakeАй бұрын
  • Gosh I love when Simon geeks out about space stuff

    @Beryllahawk@BeryllahawkАй бұрын
  • I've always been a bit of a space nerd kinda geeking out on the photos before JWST. Seeing the first deep field view from JWST and the picture of the Pillars of Eternity made me fall in love with space and our universe all over again. Can't wait to see what else we can find out there and what the next space telescope will be able to do.

    @andygish3461@andygish3461Ай бұрын
  • Space truly is amazing

    @jajo1166@jajo1166Ай бұрын
  • Love your work Simon

    @user-bb6ur9kb4i@user-bb6ur9kb4iАй бұрын
  • A thing so amazing. Involving so many bright people from everywhere. No war. We are all here.

    @Squidz66@Squidz66Ай бұрын
  • There are so many things out there we still need to discovery and/or figure out.... it really is humbling that every time we make new breakthroughs in technology, the usual first thing that comes up is more questions than answers. I am looking forward to seeing what comes next from the JWST.

    @anonymousrex5207@anonymousrex5207Ай бұрын
  • he's not even gonna expand on the giant bear in space? that's terrifying

    @nachoman@nachomanАй бұрын
  • Hi, I'm sorry to bring this up, but your audio seems to have an issue. It sounds like you have exposed hard walls around you, accross each other. There appears to be a short hard echo that dies out slowly (like ~0.5 seconds). They are more prominant on certain frequencies, around the frequency of your speach. It seems the sound can bounse multiple times and still be picked up by the microphone. It reduces the clarity of your voice and gets iritanting in the long run. You may know all of this already, but you may add acoustic panels or heavy cloth on the walls at the points of primary reflection. I don't see your microphone, but you may consider bringing it closer to you, increasing signal to echo ratio. If you have already treated your walls, it's possible the echo comes from your floor and roof. Your production quality for video is so high, it would be a shame, if your sound were to lagg behind. Anyways. Thank you for your videos. They are generally very well made.

    @tietosanakirja@tietosanakirjaАй бұрын
  • These amazing discoveries by the JWT has renewed my interest in astronomy!

    @Wolfie66@Wolfie66Ай бұрын
  • The more we learn the more questions occur. I love it ❤❤❤😮😮😮

    @HaYlEeXx19@HaYlEeXx19Ай бұрын
  • You can't just say "primordial black holes formed right after or BEFORE the Big Bang" as a throwaway line. AFAIK time emerged from the Big Bang. So, what gives?

    @vladalterax9840@vladalterax9840Ай бұрын
  • Years ago, I wrote a paper arguing that the universe is much older than 13.5 billion years. Many scientists now believe it's at least 20. The fact that there are stars older than the universe itself should have been a clue. This makes those huge bright distant galaxies far more understandable

    @TexasTimeLord@TexasTimeLordАй бұрын
    • But the largest problem is that "time" is a man-made concept and it's arbitrary and subject to things like energy, mass and other things. I've never understood (after realizing the full picture) how "everybody" is so caught up in trying to use "time" as a _constant._ It is fallacious at best, most probably wild guesses, and misleading bollocks at worst. Why isn't _energy_ the common denominator, even in "hobby" usage?

      @SebHaarfagre@SebHaarfagreАй бұрын
    • @@SebHaarfagreyou sound really smart 😍😯😯😯

      @HaYlEeXx19@HaYlEeXx19Ай бұрын
    • There are no confirmed stars older than the universe, and your claim of 'many scientists' is wrong. Maybe a few.

      @tonywells6990@tonywells6990Ай бұрын
  • I love your comment it is just so much information so fast and I consider myself someone that catches up on things fast, I can imagine someone that doesn't.

    @jerrya9665@jerrya9665Ай бұрын
  • I love the fact that the more we see, the more we find out we don't know.

    @codybailey855@codybailey855Ай бұрын
  • Thank you, Simon, et al, for this great episode. As always- a stunning and provocative presentation. Simply Amazing!

    @artdonovandesign@artdonovandesignАй бұрын
  • The pics of the JWST are amazing. My fav is the ones of Saturn.

    @Timmycoo@TimmycooАй бұрын
  • Re: the excessive compression on Simon’s dialogue: it’s really difficult to lower the volume of his breathing because the original audio was compressed too hard. It has nothing to do with phase, professional engineers record dialogue in mono (his voice was recorded in mono, correct?) Best option: create a frequency profile of the breaths, attenuate those freqs with an eq and side chain it to a downward expander with very fast attack & decay. Flux makes a dedicated downward expander but you can get the same results with Fabfilter Pro-MB.

    @zoltanszabados8445@zoltanszabados8445Ай бұрын
  • I love the images from the JW and i know 90% of what we see is known and explainable with science, but because that last little bit is guess work (for now), i kinda ignore all of it and just enjoy the photoa

    @rossharper1983@rossharper1983Ай бұрын
  • Perhaps time for us to recognise we don’t know sh*t. Our civilisation is young and we’re still learning

    @MetalSlug-ev5wu@MetalSlug-ev5wuАй бұрын
    • Learning like what this is, and as far as knowing shit, we know a lot more than we used too. I don't really get your point.

      @stevenson720@stevenson72028 күн бұрын
    • I know. What a future can we have. Just have to sort out who gets to be our leaders, or have none at all, and we might just make it

      @saydvoncripps@saydvoncripps12 күн бұрын
  • The information density of these presentations is TWO magnitudes better than most sites and broadcast sources.

    @StevenBanks123@StevenBanks123Күн бұрын
  • I remember thinking that something was going to happen to the telescope during launch or during its unpacking at L2 and how bad that would suck for everyone involved. Glad it worked out

    @TaylorFalk21@TaylorFalk21Ай бұрын
  • Big fan I think your mic to close this vid getting a lot of breathing louder than normal

    @danielmahoney8576@danielmahoney8576Ай бұрын
    • It’s all I can hear

      @Moto_Medics@Moto_MedicsАй бұрын
  • Cosmologists are the greatest… “Bursty star formation” 👀😳

    @JungleJargon@JungleJargonАй бұрын
    • *charlatans

      @philosophicaltool5469@philosophicaltool5469Ай бұрын
    • @@philosophicaltool5469 The explanation for star formation is somehow missing from the script.

      @JungleJargon@JungleJargonАй бұрын
    • @@JungleJargon the whole video is missing mainly a lot of common sense, much like the field of theoretical physics.

      @philosophicaltool5469@philosophicaltool5469Ай бұрын
    • I enjoyed your making fun of the phrase "Bursty star formation". But that is the way language works. You have to give something a "name" or "it" can't be talked about. Think about the name "Big Bang". This is actually a derogatory term given to "it" by its detractors. By giving "it" the name "Big Bang", you have given "it" a "handle" as the CBers (Citizen's Band radio) would have called it 50 years ago. Now, we can talk about "it" because "it" now has an agreed upon name, even if "it" is a silly name. Shakespeare said, "A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet." What he meant is that if we call a rose a "turd biscuit" it would still smell the same. Calling the process something silly like "Bursty star formation" does not undermine the serious attempt to differentiate the process from other, standard types of star formation. Think of it another way, would you rather it be called, "The Stevenson-Hewitt post-modern analogous rapid aggregation stellar nursery model" or "Bursty star formation." Sometimes, silly is superior to superfluous. Thanks for the smile.

      @itemlocation@itemlocationАй бұрын
    • @@itemlocation You can’t really talk about something that doesn’t exist. Star formation is an assumption without an actual process considering that energy and matter can’t make or direct themselves.

      @JungleJargon@JungleJargonАй бұрын
  • awesome video!!! Thank you it made my day

    @foreveranimallover1504@foreveranimallover150429 күн бұрын
  • I've been waiting for this update

    @mainman92@mainman92Ай бұрын
  • As usual when someone says "This shouldn't be possible" what they are really saying is "We do not understand the science behind this yet"

    @mikereid1195@mikereid1195Ай бұрын
    • No shit

      @vgstellar@vgstellarАй бұрын
  • People should not be surprised when we see the universe surprises us isn't that the point of science to learn new things even if one of those things is we were wrong 😊

    @clivemahony9827@clivemahony9827Ай бұрын
    • People expected to be surprised, it's just that the surprises far exceeded expectations.

      @awandererfromys1680@awandererfromys1680Ай бұрын
    • Scientists LOVE to be surprised, it's quite literally what keeps the field growing.

      @captainspaulding5963@captainspaulding5963Ай бұрын
  • I love hearing about this kind of stuff. Even if these discoveries seem inconsequential at this time, they contribute to a massive body of work that may lead to our salvation as a species.

    @Scott-vr3kf@Scott-vr3kfАй бұрын
  • I was at an Open-house event in the Goddard center when they had pieces of it in one of the Clean Rooms. I have pictures of some of the mirrors

    @VergilArcanis@VergilArcanisАй бұрын
  • is it me or host breathing is strongly laud between sentences?

    @BOOGY110011@BOOGY110011Ай бұрын
    • Now I can’t unhear that. Thanks. 😭

      @takster050974@takster050974Ай бұрын
  • Great vid. You have a minor prob with your audio. Every intake of breath sounds like you are taking a haul on a respirator. Do you smoke? Gasping for breath is not a good sign. Take it from someone with COPD.

    @ArchFundy@ArchFundyАй бұрын
  • A mystery that will be enjoyable to follow.

    @richardshalla@richardshallaАй бұрын
  • LOVE the new thumbnail style

    @niftybass@niftybassАй бұрын
  • Cool vid but the sound of you inhaling is distracting. Might wanna work that out with your Mic.

    @jimthar17@jimthar17Ай бұрын
    • Yeah he should do the entire thing in 1 breath.

      @tr1p1ea@tr1p1eaАй бұрын
    • @@tr1p1ea Okay bro, you got your smart-ass sarcastic comment in for the day. Congratulations 😃👍 But seriously, the audio is definitely off in this video.

      @Beeza2996@Beeza2996Ай бұрын
    • @@tr1p1ea Breath control goals.

      @excrono@excronoАй бұрын
  • Anyone else hearing the deep breaths in when he is talking? Gotta be a way to wait that out

    @andreamcleod9347@andreamcleod9347Ай бұрын
  • Love your work

    @philipmaxwell669@philipmaxwell669Ай бұрын
  • I love learning about space.

    @multiyapples@multiyapplesАй бұрын
  • It would be good if images that are artist's conceptions or CG were labeled as such, so they aren't mistaken for actual photographs.

    @KarlBunker@KarlBunkerАй бұрын
    • I agree but im not worried, have you seen the images comming out of Mars? Way better then any CG depiction, the truth is actually stranger/more beautiful than fiction, theres black sand dunes and blue rocks... no one would have thought to model that on Mars.

      @mikejones-vd3fg@mikejones-vd3fgАй бұрын
    • You actually believe those "photos" are from mars?? 🤦🏻‍♂️

      @DeeGee-mv6eq@DeeGee-mv6eqАй бұрын
    • @@DeeGee-mv6eq Yeah I really do, I'm sorry but our art is cool but not as cool as what nature's produced, that includes us.

      @mikejones-vd3fg@mikejones-vd3fgАй бұрын
    • ​@@DeeGee-mv6eq The area being checked out and photographed on Mars is huge so it should be a simple job for you to utilise Google maps to identify the exact Earthly area you claim is being used instead. Just think of the instant stardom and fame along with billions of "likes" that awaits your groundbreaking discovery when showing that to the world. We're waiting...........................................

      @fabianmckenna8197@fabianmckenna819726 күн бұрын
  • Sound is funky, tinny

    @redogg2749@redogg2749Ай бұрын
  • Simon always looks so suave, I'm taking style tips!

    @7r3v0rc@7r3v0rcАй бұрын
  • Some scientific disciplines create really highfalutin names for their concepts, and use terminology that’s little more than inscrutable technical jargon to anyone who is not in that field. But in cosmology it’s like, “what should we call the enormous space circle that’s so dense not even light can escape? Eh, I dunno let’s just call it - black hole.” And when you’ve got a burst of bursty stars bursting - well, bud, that there’s a bursty star formation. Absolutely mind blowing concepts, all revealed by highly technical science, but the names - straightforward af.

    @jmik6229@jmik6229Ай бұрын
  • i never realized ursa major had such a huge tail. i've never seen a bear with a tail that was more than a stub.

    @Stormy_Fairweather@Stormy_FairweatherАй бұрын
    • Bears do indeed have short tails. No evolutionary advantage for them if they had long tails. Maybe it represents a binturong. they resemble a bear with a long tail.

      @phapnui@phapnuiАй бұрын
    • Are we sure it was a tail? The ancients did have odd imaginations at time.

      @jota6262@jota6262Ай бұрын
    • Even Mizar is taking it to far.

      @chrisruthford4492@chrisruthford4492Ай бұрын
  • hey this isn't VSAUCE

    @z-qh8fj@z-qh8fjАй бұрын
  • Thank you for including the American measurement of the tiny asteroid

    @brandankankel5209@brandankankel5209Ай бұрын
  • The imaging of the “jumbos” is astounding

    @waxedearth5425@waxedearth5425Ай бұрын
  • I'm not a Great Dane Mass Object. I'm more of a Morbidly Obese English Mastiff Mass Object.

    @CrazyUncleChris@CrazyUncleChrisАй бұрын
    • I'm a 13.7 Snowshoe Feline Mass Object

      @txoilfield@txoilfieldАй бұрын
  • OFF TOPIC -- Where is the microphone? Every breath you in take sounds like you've got the mic right up in your throat. It's very loud in the headphones and I can't listen any other way.

    @doclewis8927@doclewis8927Ай бұрын
    • It‘s in the beard.

      @joachimb5721@joachimb5721Ай бұрын
    • ​@@joachimb5721I thought his head was on upside down😂😂

      @animalbird9436@animalbird9436Ай бұрын
    • I thought I was just stoned enough to hear that

      @blakekizer6401@blakekizer6401Ай бұрын
  • JWST is going to teach us so much about the Universe. The problem is there's just one of them! It's like a keyhole with a hundred people standing in line crowding each other to peer through.

    @robbabcock_@robbabcock_Ай бұрын
  • Well done!

    @nicolasperrault3363@nicolasperrault3363Күн бұрын
  • The JWST is an infrared telescope so all photos are doctored to make them look more colorful and in human eyesight light, so the red ones might merely be artifacts of the colorization.

    @weirdkitty07@weirdkitty07Ай бұрын
    • I agree with you and as good as tech is today,it’s still transmitted by binary code so is it really that accurate or just a human/computer interpretation? And before this comment gets hated on by the uneducated,just understand that it is my opinion and I’m always right.

      @stephenbrewins3689@stephenbrewins3689Ай бұрын
    • ​@@stephenbrewins3689😂

      @samuelgarrod8327@samuelgarrod8327Ай бұрын
  • That constantly heard sharp intake of breath is really really really really really irritating. Stopped me watching. Sort the miking out please

    @MikeLacey52@MikeLacey52Ай бұрын
  • You should talk about the Grand tack hypothesis one day.

    @alexandre4970@alexandre4970Ай бұрын
  • Great video Nomis👍 from Nehpets 😉

    @stephenhammond6962@stephenhammond6962Ай бұрын
  • Dear Editor, can you focus on quieting his inhales. they are much more pronounced than they used to be, and have become quite distracting the content.

    @whiterice87@whiterice87Ай бұрын
    • I totally agree. Maybe he should just slow down.

      @Britgirl58@Britgirl5814 күн бұрын
    • Editor: *Shadow bans* 'This fool knows too much'

      @SquidlyFishBeans@SquidlyFishBeans9 күн бұрын
    • Well I hadn’t noticed it until you pointed it out ffs

      @thomasboorer-williams4253@thomasboorer-williams42533 күн бұрын
    • Keep it to yourself the next time. Now it’s all I hear 🙉

      @wichiewichie@wichiewichie2 күн бұрын
  • Fun Fact: James Webb Space Telescope and JWST have the same amount of syllables, so the acronym only saves time when typing, and you could make the argument that "James Webb Space Telescope" rolls off the tongue better than "J W S T".... Just sayin...

    @thumpyloudfoot864@thumpyloudfoot864Ай бұрын
    • JWST: 4 syllables James Webb Space Telescope: 6 syllables

      @captainspaulding5963@captainspaulding5963Ай бұрын
    • @@captainspaulding5963 how many syllabus in "double you" "dub bull you" thats 3... plus "jay" which is one, "ess" which is one and "tea" which is also one, now I'm mathematicianist or anything but I believe 3 + 3 = 6.... jay dub bull you ess tea is 6 syllabus....

      @thumpyloudfoot864@thumpyloudfoot864Ай бұрын
  • I spent hrs watching the live broadcast and like millions of us, as we crossing our fingers hoping nothing would happen and we were all amazing that everything went smoothly. For how much it costs, they DEFINATELY should of put a launch escape system on it as it's far more valuable than anyone who's ever lived. There are people who'd quite happily give up their life if it meant it'd help humanity and especially this telescope.

    @TheManLab7@TheManLab7Ай бұрын
  • I liked the "pre big bang part", very fancy 👍

    @subrobsugrobych2809@subrobsugrobych2809Ай бұрын
    • he just "slipped it in there", to see if anybody was paying attention 😂

      @Julian-tf8nj@Julian-tf8njАй бұрын
  • love this but please fix your audio

    @SavoryCaroline@SavoryCarolineАй бұрын
    • I haven't noticed any issues whatsoever

      @cleverusername9369@cleverusername9369Ай бұрын
    • If you're talking about his breathing, I highkey agree

      @TheMunchkinita2509@TheMunchkinita2509Ай бұрын
  • Sophons. Innit.

    @markymark3075@markymark3075Ай бұрын
    • Wha??

      @ElenarMT@ElenarMTАй бұрын
  • Great video!

    @lisac.9393@lisac.9393Ай бұрын
  • We continue to discover just how useful the JWST is and how it is a breakthrough for all involved to overcome the daunting task of stepping up to successfully address the complexities of conceiving, planning, building and delivering the planet to its correct place in space. And now we have an instrument that will help us supersede our considerable knowledge about the Cosmos to date by proving how much we don't yet know. It's just the greatest of success stories in so many ways. Congrats to all, and may they have the good fortune to see JWST last for years of service.

    @garypippenger202@garypippenger20210 күн бұрын
  • All right! Posted 10 seconds ago. Bring it on Laser Eyes. Cheers from Tennessee

    @paulceglinski7172@paulceglinski7172Ай бұрын
  • I still refuse to call it that…. For me it’s Jumbo Wumbo Space Telescope

    @Its.Me.Wynter@Its.Me.WynterАй бұрын
  • The information about the binary pair JUMBO, so thought-provoking. Could it be the material that they're formed from was specifically and separately charged in such a way that they formed two separate bodies rather than one larger object? Then that charge-interaction is what links them as the pair forever while they fizzle away? It is fun to think about. I really appreciate your content. Thank you for it!

    @AnotherOneFromTwo@AnotherOneFromTwoАй бұрын
  • The word already is not necessary. Thanks for your content

    @WeeGrahamsaccount@WeeGrahamsaccountАй бұрын
  • Scientists: This shouldn't be possible! Our theories and models don't support this & we're big brains! Universe: 😂 yeah..?! Well have a look at this..🔭🌌

    @nasanerd8931@nasanerd8931Ай бұрын
  • Realy I like this video so so much its so interestyng

    @ioanbota9397@ioanbota93975 күн бұрын
  • I love how they are impossible, and not that we are just wrong

    @petergalione1414@petergalione14146 күн бұрын
  • It’s almost like we have no clue what really happened billions of years ago and every time we make an educated guess that turns into fact only stays as such until we learn how wrong we are.

    @01gtbdaily30@01gtbdaily30Ай бұрын
    • We hardly have a clue to what happened yesterday

      @TekkLuthor@TekkLuthorАй бұрын
  • Pre-date the Big Bang. I'm sorry, what?

    @user-lt9rq3yq4w@user-lt9rq3yq4wАй бұрын
    • It means before duh. What don't you understand?

      @CBe-ot8vu@CBe-ot8vuАй бұрын
    • @@CBe-ot8vu It what a rhetorical question. What don't you understand?

      @user-lt9rq3yq4w@user-lt9rq3yq4wАй бұрын
    • ​@@user-lt9rq3yq4w perhaps you should stop expecting people to read your mind on the internet? Your post was formed in a question, which was answered.

      @captainspaulding5963@captainspaulding5963Ай бұрын
    • @@captainspaulding5963 Yes, it was a rhetorical question, as I already stated. Google that and stop expecting to understand things that you do not.

      @user-lt9rq3yq4w@user-lt9rq3yq4wАй бұрын
KZhead