I wish this Sony lens existed years ago.

2024 ж. 1 Мам.
40 117 Рет қаралды

Pre-Order: bhpho.to/4ayKt29
This video is brought to you by SQUARESPACE! Visit squarespace.com/jasonvong to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
Follow Me on Tik Tok, Twitter, IG @jasonvmedia
KZhead Studio Gear
► Main Cam: BH bhpho.to/4ad14Zb | Amazon geni.us/D05j
► Main Lens: BH bhpho.to/4ccEjpH | Amazon geni.us/J7Ts
► Mic: BH bhpho.to/3xz8KXq | Amazon geni.us/ScF5
► Mixer: BH bhpho.to/4cQgDI1 | Amazon geni.us/QBzE0hs
► FULL LIST: geni.us/jv-yt-studio-2024
Music from Artlist.io | Get 2 EXTRA Month Free 👇
geni.us/04BA5R
Chapters
00:00 What makes it so "G"
01:20 VS Tamron & Sigma Options
04:06 VS 16-35 G Master or Power Zoom
05:25 Conclusion
06:12 SquareSpace but watch til the end!
06:42 OutCakes

Пікірлер
  • That G spot joke had me in tears 😂

    @craigradix7234@craigradix723416 күн бұрын
    • The doorbell sound made me almost spill my coffee lol

      @GrofdesignVideography@GrofdesignVideography15 күн бұрын
  • That Sony 85mm 1.8 is really in need of an G update!!

    @Ryanide09@Ryanide0916 күн бұрын
    • It’s pretty G already but yeah an official badge be nice.

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
    • This is also what im waiting. 85mm 1.8 G.

      @argelquiane9021@argelquiane902115 күн бұрын
    • Same here. Waiting for 85mm 1.8 G.

      @argelquiane9021@argelquiane902115 күн бұрын
    • @@JasonVong nah come on it’s old. Needs new XD AF motors, aperture ring, Custom Hold button and reduced size and weigh.

      @Ryanide09@Ryanide0915 күн бұрын
    • @@Ryanide09 It has a customizable button already and it's pretty lightweight and relatively small. Aperture ring would be nice though.

      @DjimmyTrovy@DjimmyTrovy15 күн бұрын
  • That slow, consistent power zoom killed me! Your videos are always better than the last!

    @MrBeastKorea@MrBeastKorea16 күн бұрын
  • Great job on the video Jason! Thanks for making it.

    @Hobbies4Hire@Hobbies4Hire11 күн бұрын
  • I like your sense of humor, it's perfect ahahah!

    @lookid@lookid14 күн бұрын
  • My kit is the Sony 20 mm 1.8 and the 55 1.8 g 😅 can it be included in the Jason combo ?

    @tomariko@tomariko14 күн бұрын
  • the snob joke sent me! haha

    @brivnii@brivnii16 күн бұрын
  • @Jason Vong, do you have a recommended 2-lens combo kit for an a6700? I do videos and photos. Thanks.

    @TheOtherChef@TheOtherChef15 күн бұрын
    • I recommended 3 lens! Check out my video "The Only 3 Lenses You Need for Sony APS-C"

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • Hi Jason, are you sure that is 2 x XD motors? What I read on Sonys website the lens has 2 X Linear motor [LN] not the 2 x [XD LM]

    @marcushedman9740@marcushedman974015 күн бұрын
  • I thought the top half of the Vong "fertography" (sorry Jason I can't unhear it) wombo combo was the Zeiss Batis 85 - what led you back to the Sony 1.8?

    @molybdnum@molybdnum15 күн бұрын
  • Ahh I just bought the 20-40 Tamron, but this looks awesome too! Would be perfect for vlogging!

    @RetroBreak@RetroBreak16 күн бұрын
    • that autocorrect 🤣

      @JasonVong@JasonVong16 күн бұрын
    • @@JasonVong OMG!!!

      @RetroBreak@RetroBreak16 күн бұрын
  • Hi there were very few hot shoe hats in this video, is it possible to get more in the future please? Thank you

    @TaylorJacksonPhoto@TaylorJacksonPhoto16 күн бұрын
    • The audacity of this comment!!!

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
    • @@JasonVong can there be more tho plz

      @TaylorJacksonPhoto@TaylorJacksonPhoto15 күн бұрын
  • Hi Jason, would you recommend the Sony a7iv or the Sony a7cii???

    @martinsegovia3016@martinsegovia301616 күн бұрын
    • a7C ii

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • This is the lens I’ve been waiting for 🎉 I really wish it was a little lighter than my 20mm 1.8 but… the G spot 😂

    @MollyFitzBrown@MollyFitzBrown16 күн бұрын
  • The… g spot 💀 lol another great vid. Love you and appreciate you.

    @McMurdo@McMurdo12 күн бұрын
  • I have a zve10. I really want a zoom. I know it will crop. Would you recommend?

    @GloryBrand@GloryBrand15 күн бұрын
    • Dont get a zoom, get a prime, save $, your videos will look better

      @pringleboat@pringleboat15 күн бұрын
  • Does it make sense to get that one and use it on a APSC camera? So it is future proof when I switch to full frame at some point?

    @whateverplaceholder6179@whateverplaceholder617916 күн бұрын
    • Only if you’re getting a FF soon but the limited range on this doesn’t make sense for APSC. Better if you get the 16-55mm f/2.8 or just get the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • Ahhh!!! I just bought the f4 power zoom last year. I was neither here nor there about the zoom but if I had the choice at the time, I would have picked this f2.8 instead for better low light performance.

    @josev666@josev66615 күн бұрын
  • I dropped my GM v1 off my monopod and have it out for a repair estimate. Might have to be my replacement if the cost is outrageous to fix.

    @ECSchultz09@ECSchultz0916 күн бұрын
  • I’m gonna need a longer review of this 16-25mm to the 16-35mm GM2 . I have a student discount from B&H that allows me to get the GM2 for $1950 , but still waiting for the edu price for the 16-25mm , I’m thinking it will be about $1050 . Trying to see what’s the justified price for a hobbiest that does paid gigs about 1 or 2 times every couple months . I have a Sony A7IV. Been looking for a good wide angle zoom lens .

    @kdtheporchpodcast5785@kdtheporchpodcast578516 күн бұрын
    • Same I need this comparison

      @Natedel00@Natedel0016 күн бұрын
  • I am disappointed that 16-25mm isn't also PZ. I was waiting for this lens hoping its also PZ, in my line of business 2.8 is very useful (even on an ultra wide, yes)

    @photograhy@photograhy15 күн бұрын
  • Thank you for your idea, How about 20f18g with 85f18

    @nine96six@nine96six16 күн бұрын
    • Works too!

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • If I just got the sony 11mm aps, should I still consider this?

    @USConsumerReview@USConsumerReview10 күн бұрын
    • If your camera is an APSC sensor, then no. Stick with the 11mm

      @JasonVong@JasonVong10 күн бұрын
  • So does the 14mm f1.8 zoom at all?

    @FaithingIt00@FaithingIt0013 күн бұрын
  • 0:06 is pretty fire low key

    @TomatoWong@TomatoWong15 күн бұрын
  • It sounds like a great companion for my 20-70 f4 to get something wider and brighter for astro and night photography when 85 is too tight. *GAS engaded*

    @KsaweryKarwacki@KsaweryKarwacki16 күн бұрын
  • I own the Tamron 17-28 and am very happy with it. But a Sony 16-25mm f2.8 is hard to resist. It would fit nicely on my Sony a7cr. And the price seems fair compared to the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II Lens

    @shalgiva@shalgiva15 күн бұрын
  • That third/fourth eye lol

    @bdvisuals_@bdvisuals_16 күн бұрын
  • Vivienne has TRANSFORMED!

    @bokbokeh@bokbokeh15 күн бұрын
  • What happened to the flashing/flickering? Pretty serious at the end of the video

    @xmanreturn@xmanreturn15 күн бұрын
    • Timecode?

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • While the AF is still great on this lens. It does not have XD motors. Just "highly optimized" ones. Per sonys own site specs.

    @SenorToneh@SenorToneh15 күн бұрын
  • I also wish this lens existed long ago, like before i bought the 20mm 1.8

    @aransamson@aransamson16 күн бұрын
    • the 20mm F/1.8 is pretty epic though

      @JasonVong@JasonVong16 күн бұрын
    • Prime lens >>>> 9 mm zoom lens any day. Should have gone with a zeiss tho

      @pringleboat@pringleboat15 күн бұрын
    • you did the best choice don't worry

      @gnnaropanin@gnnaropanin11 күн бұрын
  • How about distortion? It looks quite bad in other review

    @frankygamaliano7058@frankygamaliano705816 күн бұрын
  • all I want is a 16-50 f4 pz but all they ever make is everything but that

    @SergFlicks@SergFlicks16 күн бұрын
  • this seems like it would go great with my 20-70

    @tone_bone@tone_bone15 күн бұрын
  • I want to see a review of a sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 vs the new 16-25mm f2.8 .

    @kdtheporchpodcast5785@kdtheporchpodcast578516 күн бұрын
  • I am not into zoom lenses, but I am a spec nerd, this Sony 16-25mm 2.8 is 409g ($1200), so it is about the same as the Tamron 17-28mm 2.8 at 420g ($800), if you want a more light weight Lens, then there is the Sony PZ 16-35mm 4.0 at 353g ($1200). I am not into video, but if I was I would take the cheaper Tamron 17-28mm or the Sony 16-35mm with longer reach !

    @cameraprepper7938@cameraprepper79387 күн бұрын
  • HELLO FROM ALASKA !!

    @Chuakiagx3@Chuakiagx316 күн бұрын
  • LOVE YOUR HUMOR STUFF LOL !! PHOTOGRAPHY EYE !!

    @Chuakiagx3@Chuakiagx316 күн бұрын
  • At one point you HAVE to team up with cory wong. You have too. It will be legendary. IF you dont know him - he is a funk guitar player (Fearless Flyers, Vulfpeck)

    @berndkiltz@berndkiltz14 күн бұрын
  • Meh... not excited about this one. I think the PZ16-35 is a better option for most people. The extra range is better for one lens carry, most people are stopping down with angle images, it's internal zoom, versus reverse zoom and it's smaller and lighter. Yes it's an f4 vs the sexier f2.8 but I think it's better in every other way.

    @SilatShooter@SilatShooter14 күн бұрын
  • *G lens As I've found out with my first G lens for my FX30 which is a 15mm f1.4*

    @BlackapinoTheTechGuy@BlackapinoTheTechGuy16 күн бұрын
    • Great lens

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • Is the discord gone? I don't think I'm in it anymore.

    @wilburyuen@wilburyuen4 күн бұрын
  • I can’t keep up with all these lens 😂

    @edventures9884@edventures988415 күн бұрын
  • Why did I have to go and buy the 16-35mm F4 G :(

    @TheTrailMixTV@TheTrailMixTV16 күн бұрын
    • I mean it’s really light! Still a great lens

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • Dang it! I just committed to getting the 16-55mm 2.8 G lens for APS-C for my a6300 instead of the 24-50mm that's about to come out, and now this? Now I'm torn (again!)

    @Ak47ira@Ak47ira16 күн бұрын
    • You did nothing wrong. The 16-25 is for full frame. You got a wonderful APS-C lens! Enjoy!

      @sashinger5230@sashinger523016 күн бұрын
    • @@sashinger5230 Haven't bought yet, just mentally committed :). But I can use FF lenses on an APS-C body, it's just 1.5x on the range (so, 36-75mm instead of 24-50). My back and forth was between "do I want the newest and hope that its faster/sharper/better, AND future proof for if I go to full frame, or do I spend the extra $300-ish to get something wider that is for APS-C and won't work as well on a FF if I go that route?"

      @Ak47ira@Ak47ira16 күн бұрын
    • @@Ak47ira Yes, you can use ff lenses on APS-C but the 16-55 (or the 17-70 from Tamron) would still be the more flexible choice while still shooting APS-C. The 16-25 is a quite limited option on both imho. On another note: If you already know you will be switching to ff then do it rather sooner than later. Doesn't make that much sense to invest and think for both imho. It really helps to commit to one of both as soon as possible and keep it like that. Been there, done that.😂

      @sashinger5230@sashinger523016 күн бұрын
  • All those sony 16-35 lenses are great but give me a small 16mm pancake like lens with f2.8 to pair up with the zv-e1 and that would be perfect. Sigma 17mm f4 is great but man wish it was a f2.8 at least.

    @chickenandricecrew9867@chickenandricecrew986716 күн бұрын
    • Which I’m still very surprised this hasn’t happened yet

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • This needed to be internal zoom!

    @SPDTDL@SPDTDL16 күн бұрын
  • Still haven't found my G spot 😭

    @BryceKoebel@BryceKoebel16 күн бұрын
    • Keep looking!

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • It did exist years ago... As a 16-50mm f/2.8 for the a-mount

    @I_am_BlinkStar@I_am_BlinkStar16 күн бұрын
    • That’s… that’s a different lens 😂

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • love from bangladesh bro...

    @gaminghaha3727@gaminghaha372712 күн бұрын
  • sony merchant

    @gnnaropanin@gnnaropanin11 күн бұрын
  • I go with Tamron. I paid $400 for my 17-28mm like new lens, thank you.

    @brunomamede2352@brunomamede235216 күн бұрын
    • Can’t argue with a deal

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • It has its called the sigma 14-24 or you could’ve gotten 16-35

    @mattricci2981@mattricci298114 күн бұрын
  • I thought it was cake.

    @97nelsn@97nelsn14 күн бұрын
  • and if i'm using sigma 2.8/14-24 for the wide, than i'm what? 😁

    @ondrejkratochvil4589@ondrejkratochvil458916 күн бұрын
    • Beast. Crazy. But a beast.

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • Think of all the fun things to do with that still at 1:18 lol

    @JustinPinedaMedia@JustinPinedaMedia16 күн бұрын
    • Very J Jonah Jameson vibes

      @JasonVong@JasonVong15 күн бұрын
  • Get a 20 1.4 and crop. 😅

    @jbmedia8882@jbmedia888215 күн бұрын
  • 😮

    @LouisLuzuka@LouisLuzuka16 күн бұрын
  • 🤩😊

    @yokeshs8140@yokeshs814016 күн бұрын
  • The "asian" size.

    @hotcoffeeamericano@hotcoffeeamericano13 күн бұрын
  • if it was only pz!

    @amapro_ted@amapro_ted16 күн бұрын
    • that's crazy talk

      @JasonVong@JasonVong16 күн бұрын
  • I only want to carry one lens with me having my eyes on the 35-150m from tamron but damn why cant they just make a 16-200 1.8 lens for the one that can rule them all haha

    @DrocDoc@DrocDoc15 күн бұрын
  • Pff no need for that i have 16-35 GM II that is my perfect focal range and i don't need anymore 24-70 as well trying to sell it ! And really i don't see nothing in this lens better than in 16-35 GM II just money waste and will be need again walk around with many lenses when i can use only 1 and second take 70-200 just perfect combo ! And if this lens is only little bit better than tamron then pay for it so much nooooo way !

    @rozentals_photography28@rozentals_photography2815 күн бұрын
  • Too much cutesy joking to take this channel seriously.

    @86BBUB@86BBUB15 күн бұрын
KZhead