"Renowned Professor Debunks Evolution: Unveiling the Truth!" with Professor Major Coleman
2024 ж. 15 Мам.
226 975 Рет қаралды
Subscribe for more content!! This video is an exciting discussion with Major Coleman. Clips of this famous interview have gone viral all over Facebook and instagram.
Professor Coleman elegantly dismantles the theory of evolution, give a realistic perspective on Noah and the flood, and shares why you can trust the Word of God. This is a powerful interview!
#God #Hope #Today #Wow #Checkthisout #1min #Inspirational #Jesus #Heaven #Apologetics #sermon #scripture #instagram #christian #Comfort #Positive #Today #Christianity #Law #teachers #academia #evolutiondebunked #Evolution #mustwatch #classroom #praise #praisesongs #evolutionchallenge #creationism #genesis #creation
(Anil Kanda interviews Major Coleman)
It’s very unfortunate that those who disagree with what Major Coleman said seem to belittle or degrade him rather than submit counterpoints. It does not make someone less intelligent for submitting a different viewpoint from you, if your viewpoint is as superior as you claim, it should be nearly effortless to convince them to your “truth”. It doesn’t cost anything from us to be kind to one another and we need it most when we disagree.
He thinks cats and dogs should be able to breed if evolution was true (it would falsify evolution). He thinks abiogenesis is part of the theory of evolution. He basically understands nothing, and is just arguing against a strawman. Incompetence or malice is of course hard to judge. Probably he is more willfully ignorant. I am not saying he has to accept evolution for me to respect his opinion on it. But he has to understand it. He does not. And we are not talking "he got a few details wrong". No, we are in the 2+2=5 level of ignorance here.
@@lmoelleb abiogenesis has historically been part of the theory of evolution. Evolutionary theory is an attempt to explain the origin of species through natural means without supernatural Creation. Logically, unless you concede the existence of God and subscribe to theistic evolution in order to explain the origin of life (a position that has been shown to be unsustainable), abiogenesis must have originally occurred in order to commence the process of Darwinian evolution. Abiogenesis is required by evolution as the starting point. The growing trend among evolutionists today to attempt to sidestep the problem of abiogenesis by contending that evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, but rather is a theory which starts with life already in existence and explains the origin of all species from that original life form is either intellectually dishonest, agenda driven or just brainwashed indoctrination.
@@lmoellebexplain a single point where he was wrong?
@@lmoellebhe quite literally described what evolution and macroevolution is 😂😂😂😂 and how illogical it is.
@@lmoellebhow can you not link Abiogenesis to evolution when evolution relies on creation being non-life to life doofus…?
"A war of ideas" So true. I grew up in the church and was bombarded on all sides by what we might cal today memes casting doubt on Christianity. I always believed in God, but like many people I was filled with doubts and unanswered questions. It's only with the help of KZhead that I have finally solidified my faith in Jesus, and the Bible. Yes, I watch debates, I listen to competing theories. There are a lot of good sounding theories, but they all fall apart when taken as a whole. Yet, the Bible continues to outshine all other theories when properly examined.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.” Ephesians 6:12 Geneva Bible version He was absolutely correct about having a duty stand against evils.
So biological and geological science is an evil to you?
Just as hard to wrestle against ignorance and willful ignorance at that.
☦❤🕊
Facts
@@riccardopellegrini1698 some people are extremely foolish. They usually do not know who they are, and most of the time they think they're wise. 🤷🏼♂️
I'm so honored to see my professor on screen. Truly humbled. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I wish I pursued your wisdom knowledge and understanding before graduating. God bless you, Professor Coleman.
Your professor is a moron
You should be embarrassed by his scientific ignorance....
@user-xp4fm2st8u then why don't you go up and debate with your evidence? Instead of trolling comments, show what you got. At least he chose to risk his name and rep... don't hide behind a screen and a random user name. Go up and debate it if you're so well versed.
@@snollennubecause literally every point Coleman or any creationist has brought up has been debunked a billion times over. Why don't you get out of an echo chamber and try to demonstrate your beliefs & claims.
@cwillis92 Oh wow, it looks like someone is big-mad. Can't argue with you. 🤣🤣🤣 Well, you know that Professor Coleman has reward money for anyone who was willing to debate him on his research and prove him wrong. You should go show your "billions of times" research, surely you could win the money. You surely got more credentials than the university professors who disagree but never showed. Go on now, let's see whose behind the screen debunking scholars... For the record when a person inflates the reality of their claims like "billions," "every," and "echo chamber," its usually due to them not being confident in their own statement and needing to exaggerate it to make it appear greater than it is to make it sound credible or strong. Hopefully that helps... 🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️
Please dear sir, write a book. Please publish a book that will be accessible to all and will be available long after you’re gone. You have a wealth of wisdom and knowledge. Please immortalize it by publishing.
You mean write a paper, for a peer reviewed journal. Anyone can write a book.
@@kosgothWhere do you think what he is refuting comes from?
@@prn72271 idk probably an echo chamber . not a paper published in a scientific journal that's for sure.
Yes, write a book so you can publish your unchallenged falsehoods. Don't write a scientific paper where your beliefs can be blown apart by evidence. Please keep preying on the scientific ignorance of your audience to keep reaping in that money. Not bad for a high school dropout!
I recommend any book by Dr Jonathan Sarfati, Refuting Evolution, The Greatest Hoax on Earth A Refutation of Dawkins' Greatest Show on Earth, By Design, and his commentary, The Genesis Account.
This is POWERFUL… i am a preacher, but I learned a lot from this anointed professor
You learn how to lie and spread bible bullshit
It's like learning how to build a house from a chef. 😅
@@lionzion1879you are saying that because you didn't hear the falsehood you want to hear...if you have a better argument come out and debunk his claims the prize money is still available for grab 😅😅😅 Nothing can create nothing but Nothing 😮.
@@lionzion1879 yes because you must first go pay to get indoctrinated before you know something 😂😂
@@fadaelviz7212 prize money? It's all for show, it's not worth the money when debating idiocy.
I am so happy to see this! He use to come to my house for dinner after church! A long time ago.
God’s wisdom was poured into this professor’s brain😍
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology....whatchutalkin bout....Katie?
@@daviddavenport9350lol. Then take him on. You can win $20000!!!!! Go for it! Although... I know you wont.
You can see it from the start. This guy is REALLY smart.
@@daviddavenport9350what's your degree in?
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology and I have a degree in engineering. I would not try to explain law to this man and I don't expect him to explain biology to me or anyone else unless he is qualified in that field. He is explaining a belief he has, if I was explaining a belief I had in something that was concerned with the law and getting it wrong I would expect to be called out for it by people with knowledge and not by people with beliefs.
I like what this man is doing. He’s not a pastor collecting tithes and offering. He has distinguished himself from other by embarking on a unique journey that will make people remember him after he’s long gone.
I am not a pastor, and i collect nothing, but I will try to share honoring tithes and offerings. I give tithes and offerings because these are needed for the church( not the building but the body) to function and work on reaching everyone with the gospel. If you are a true ambassador of the Kingdom of God, you will be looking at where to give tithes and offerings, because your business is to promote God's kingdom. Now when you don't tithe, this is not sin, but those who tithe without are making a covenant with God since God is a God of covenant. So even though not tithing is not a sin, those who tithe get the benefit those who don't will not get. it is like going to the gym improves your health while those who don't go don't have the benefit of those who go. Of course, any pastor or man of God forcing you to tithe is wrong. but please let us understand well what tithing and offerings are before speaking against them in general. Tithing and offering are spiritual exercises of faith. and God sees all those who do it and the reason in their hearts and reward everyone according to their motives
You don’t think pastors should be paid for teaching, preaching, leading people to Christ, counseling and being available for service 24/7? Dr. Coleman seems to think so.
@@PastorBrianBetsworth no I don't think pedophiles should be paid to abuse children
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood???? Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me. It's just food for thought for yourself. As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements? Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant? God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work? He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked, He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked, He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin. for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long?
We the followers are the church.not a building.give to the needy. That's what God said
Anil (and team), this is the first time in my life seeing this show - had no idea it existed. Compliments on your presenting (and the team's hard work), you're doing a fine job - Praise God. Love from 🇿🇦
SAME HERE!!!!
Same with me, and I am also South African.. 🤝🤝😒🤞👍
I'm a game dev. I can make a simple universe in a weekend. I can program the "natural processes" like erosion for example. I don't even need to be present once I execute. With enough time, knowledge and power I could sim our universe to the atom. I would be the watch maker. My simulated humans could have free will to choose. I can give them attributes before they are conceived that I would be completely aware of. I could make my universe scale to full in 6 in game days with the appearance of thousands. None of this would be random unguided processes. Even if it appeared so to my sims. The best part? Trying to make them understand my world and their place would be quite challenging. I would be beyond their understanding. I'm a highschool dropout. If I can do this.... Imagine what's out there beyond what people claim to know. How many true things are beyond the reach of your senses? Magnetism, electricity, DNA, radiation are all discoveries, excavated from reality. None are scientific inventions. We don't even know what gravity is or how it works. The fool says there is no God, sitting in their little corner of infinity. Random natural unguided processes? Pure fantasy. It's a joke. The evidence is blinding if you have the courage to actually consider it. ( edit: My responses won't show. My fundamental claim is that it is feasible the universe is created. Multiple overlapping contingent systems are likely not accidental. How many perfect dice rolls (back to back) are you willing to believe are "strange coincidences". What sum = proof? )
🥇
Well said. All discoveries are just waiting to happen. But men would rather praise themselves than praising He who made it be. They rather give credit to randomness in order to exalt their ego. The fool said in their heart there's no God. Their "wisdom" is turned into foolishness.
Lol in my 40 years of being a Christian, and I consider myself a devoted scientist, I love your post :-). Last but not least, I have not looked but is there a Sim Universe out there? I also was a software developer but not your caliber, but I have thought it would be cool to have an object oriented DNA creation simulator, have not looked for one of those either.
Whatever can be imagine can be created. The laws of physics keeps changing because what is imagined, and manifests from imagination, the laws of physics have to alter, and expand to account for the impossible stuff of imagination.
@@fibo12358 Thanks. I appreciate it. I don't think those sims are available, .... Yet.
WOW!!! To God be all the Glory Amen ❤❤❤
Amen
Amen
Amen
I wish professor was my lecturer in Jurisprudence, maybe I'd have continued pursuing my law degree. Lol, I was in Africa though. My lecturer told us to forsake God if we were believers. Sadly, many did stop believing. I chose my faith; it was a constant battle between my faith and the philosophers whose arguments I had to read and vouch for lol.
You folks worship your masters imaginary god
@hzkelly I'd sure like a lecture in jurisprudence..
Kudos to your lecturer for trying to save you from wasting your brain. That is something we rarely see in Africa. His efforts were in vain but he tried.
God doesn't seem to like AFRICA 😆😆😆
It's amazing that you stood your ground, I pray you continue to do so and that God will strengthen and bless you
The Good Lord will bless you abundantly Professor.
I love this episode ❤
Glory to the Lord. May God bless this man.
Thank you. This was so interesting and makes me realize what a wonderful God we worship. 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Simply Put: GOD SPOKE THROUGH THIS MAN. That is what i can say.
How do you know this with this degree of certainty?
"GOD SPOKE THROUGH THIS MAN." Which is why he was wrong.
I can say a literal snake spoke through him, but it doesn't make it true.
That explains how we got everything about evolution wrong. Either he is ignorant on it, or he lied to fool his creationist followers.
If we just trust God and humble ourselves He elevates us. What a great man.
So trust god/s to get 'elevated' - yes, you guys always want and need to be 'something.'
Which God, there's an assortment
@@houmm08 clearly common sense would tell you we are talking about the Christian God as obviously stated in the video. 🙄
@@veridicusmaximus6010 you know elevation doesn’t mean becoming famous. It sometimes means to succeed in your work. Maybe you should try having some work we can all look back on than spreading your blatant hatred because others choose to have a faith and you chose not to. Thanks
@@hzlkelly Yes, I'm aware. I'm also aware that the 'prosperity' gospel is crap - at least from the NT perspective. Following God/Jesus so you can elevate just shows your true motive for following him - it has nothing to do with the truth or reality - you guys choose comfort over truth because you can't handle reality without your useful fictions. And speaking the truth is not hatred particularly with the clown in the video. He should know better being educated and a lawyer. But you know what they say liar lawyer what's the difference. So is he lying or just completely ignorant?
When we see a metropolis, we think of the architects. When we look at the intricate inner workings of a swiss watch, we think of the watch-maker. When we look at the immensely complicated machinery of the human cell, which works like a metropolis & swiss watch on the molecular level, we think of the Architect & Watch-Maker, not random processes.
And the only reason you think of the architect and the watchmaker is because of the overwhelming amount of physical evidence that you can see, touch,and witness for yourself that leaves you with no other choice Then to be convinced humans are Responsible for not only the creation of the watch and the building but These creations of human beings have evolved from the very simple, As is the case with the human created sun dial, to the very complex human created Rolex wristwatch. The very simple mud and grass hut shelters, To the very complex skyscraper. For the bible tells me so is not evidence that a character from a book Created Anything.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi what you've presented is overly simplistic sophistry. Do we necessarily need to 'see, touch' or feel something to know it's real? No, we don't. Does something need to be tangible to be real? No, it doesn't. 90% of the universe is made up of something called dark matter which we can't 'see', feel, 'touch' or even measure directly (it has to be measured indirectly from the speed of light & is so subtle that it hardly exerts gravity). Yet it is real and in abundance in the universe. Simple mud huts? Sure. Fact is, simple or complex, someone still made them. They are created. So, I'm really unsure what your argument is.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mimud huts didn't evolve into skyscrapers 😂 There were intelligent creative beings building them. ☦❤🕊
@@skunkape5918 The evolution of the building from hut to skyscraper was a play on words meant to highlight the evolving complexity, style, and artistic design of the humam amimal.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi i understand what you were going for. Peace 🕊
Thank you for uploading this! So much good stuff in such a short video ❤
This man is awesome
True. An awesome comedian
The Irony of a Law professor rejecting Evolution when Creationism and ID have lost in court several times as "not science" isn't lost on me.
@@kosgoth Why is it that you feel the need to minimize others in order to make a point? Also, how is a lawyer debating an opposite position ironic? In my opinion, he seems to be the perfect person for the job. He has all the proper training to prove his point. All it would take is researching both sides and comparing the evidence. There is a lot of creationist scientist in the world that rejects evolution, so the data is there for a good debate. So a judge concluding that the “intelligent design claim had no scientific merit” and could not “uncouple itself from religion” is somehow enough proof for you? You don’t think it took an intelligent designer to create all the order and precision in our universe? from the molecular level to the order of the galaxies? But somehow taking God out of it and saying we’re all here by accident/chance is somehow science. Evolution has a lot of holes in its theory. For example, there’s no fossil evidence for the intermediary stages of any species on Earth. How does the universe arises from nothing and then explodes in a bang? Where did the energy come from for the explosion to take place? Where does consciousness come from? How are we able to discover math in an accidentally created universe? umm sound like a religion to me lol But the bible doesn’t get enough credit. Once upon a time, people claimed a flat earth rested on top of elephants. The Bible always claims it to be a circle/sphere (Isaiah 40:22) and suspended on nothing (Job 26:7) before anyone. If you think about it, evolution is only popular today because of indoctrination. Most of us are taught to believe it from a very young age and it would be taboo to refute it.
@@inboxmail2053 If you say so...
Because he is a lesser. So are the people that accept this nonsense, just like flat Earthers. These claims are known by the relevant scientists and they know they are meritless. eg. Entropy refers to usable energy in a system. not complexity, we get energy from the sun via plants. Evolution doesn't violate that. A living body or set of bodies, or species etc, isn't an enclosed system. The Prof is wrong. I could go on every point but that would be a major response. Any of these topics are available on the internet. pewresearch Darwin Day 6 from 2019 Scientists overwhelmingly agree that humans evolved over time, and most Americans are aware that this is the case. Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time. In court it has repeated failed for In Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005) District Judge John E. Jones III ruled that intelligent design is not science but “a religious argument” and “nothing less than the progeny of creationism.” There is no science to creationism. It is false.
Amen and Amen! God still has His people! He will never leave us groping in darkness! Hallelujah!!!
Hmm, seems to me you are groping in the darkness. Read a science book, see the light!
I grew up Catholic and was taught to only have “blind faith” and not question any of the Church’s doctrines. When I went to university I was quickly indoctrinated into Secular Humanism. I took so many philosophy of religion courses that I had an unofficial minor in it! (Of course, not one single class was taught by anyone of faith - all were taught by Atheists.) It wasn’t until almost 2 decades later when I was 37 years old that I was actually exposed to Apologetics. That is, the evidence for belief in God. But even more succinctly, the truth that Yahweh, the one true God and Creator of the universe loved His creation (humanity) so much that he humiliated Himself by becoming one of us. This was foretold in multiple scriptural prophecies. He lived with us, He loved us, He taught us the true meaning of the Torah, Tanakh, and other scriptures and most importantly… He died in the most humiliating and tortured way while taking the sins of the world upon Him. After this, He was resurrected and defeated death itself for any and every person who chooses to accept this gift of salvation. I truly believe that anyone who honestly seeks truth will find it in the One who is Truth.
Jesus did not die for your sins and was treated the same as any other criminal of his day
Excellent
@@captaingaza2389Citation?
Hi Lisa, your story can be true. But to say being a Catholic is to follow the truth of the faith blindly can't be true. May be you were young at that time when you were told just to have faith in God. However, Catholicism is the most developed and highly sophisticated form of Christianity because it's of Christ. It can't be anything else. Right before Luther came, Catholicism was 1500 years old. And that means the Church has examined and thought about the truth for 1500 years. Indeed, betrayal and corruption, just like Judas, was and still is part of Church. As unacceptable as it is, it doesn't change the fact that Catholicism, with it's younger sister Church in Orthodox, is the only faith that is of Christ and Christ of God.
the interviewer is really good at his job
Thanks!
I agree, he allows for a natural flow and doesn’t get in the way of the topic or make it about himself! His technique should be studied and copied!
@@michaelsmith7995 true
I see the bar is very low here. All you have to do is to claim there is a God
Similar to atheists claiming the universe created itself. @@ntsokolomemani3874
Single to multicellularity has been demonstrated in the lab. The Methusaleh tree is 4,855 years old which predates the traditional date for the flood, but so does Pando which is 80,000 years old.
Sure, a single sperm and a single ova connect to make a single animal, sometimes 2 if there are identical twins. Parthenogenesis is a myth
@@marionchase-kleeves8311 In what way is parthenogenesis a myth?
”Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.“ Hebrews 11:1
That’s right!
FAITH: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Good! You read the bible!
@veridicusmaximus6010 WRONG: Incorrect FAITH: Trust I hope this helps. Peace and God speed
@@jaredmarcelli2919Sure: FAITH: Trust without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Thank you for the opportunity to help us understand more Really Interview. God will reward you. It IS written that, men will hate you for my sake. So do not be too surprised. Do not be surprised that they hate God. And reject HIS Truth. They will all be very sorry. It would be sad but oh well. Their free choice
How do you know God will reward him? You speak for God now?
🥇
The part about Noah's flood is one of the major issues I have with the Bible. If the genealogies in Genesis are correct, the flood would have occurred around 2348 BC. However, there were at least 4 major civilizations that existed at that time that were uninterrupted (Norte Chico, Egyptian, Sumerian, and Indus Valley). Also, if it happened at that time, then how did the civilizations get to the Americas? Either the flood was a localized event and was embellished in the Bible, or it didn't happen at all and is just a parable. And, if it was recorded by Moses, which people still aren't sure about, then it would have been recorded more than 1000 years after the flood, which gives the narrative plenty of time to be changed. Many of the books in the Old Testament are sketchy.
It was most likely a localized event written down in some babylonian book, and then story was then "borrowed" by the bible.
Parable??? with all those detailed measurements and specified materials? Even Jesus’ parables didn’t go to those lengths. If it were a myth Jesus was mistaken to refer to the days of Noah.
There is Epic of Gilgamesh . How do you explain that Major ?
The Epic of Gilgamesh and Genesis may just stem from the same historical event, that's why they are similar. Both stories have an ark, but the one described in Genesis is seaworthy, the one in the Epic of Gilgamesh is not. Also, just because the Epic of Gilgamesh may be older doesn't mean it's the source for Genesis.
@@Meow-xx6oo Gilgamesh must be a giant giving his side of the story. Remember they were destroyed yet some survived, as Genesis 6 says there were giants before the flood and after that. Therefore some must have survived in something unsubmersible of sort, the story of Enki tells exactly that. The so called mythologies are various tales from the perspective of these "men of renown", caried over and embellished by the "loosers" In any case these giants/nephilim give credit to the genesis account, even from their twisted mind, we gather that the flood was reaL, it's the TRUTH and that's what matters. Let's choose who we follow.
Evolution has been dismantled so many times over the years, even within the secular scientific community....but it's nice to see a fresh face have at it.
@@OlivierGaffuri-wc2dl if you're truly interested in a different opinion, I'd suggest 'Darwin's Dilemma'. They explore how the Cambrian explosion can't be explained by the prevailing theory/ideas behind evolution. They're not exactly Young Earth Creation Christians either.
@@OlivierGaffuri-wc2dl Also, there are people who do not believe the Bible but see evidence all over the world of a global flood, Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson come to mind. A global flood would burry animals in perfectly even rock layers, which would refute the idea of them slowly being laid over millions of years. Again, these people are not Christians. They're just open minded people with questions based on observations that challenge the common narrative.
If evolution is not real, how come humans have different "racial" features? We should all look the same then since we all descended from one man and one woman.
It has never been "dismantled", depending on how you define that word.
@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 the mainstream evolution narrative has been proven impossible at worst, questionable at best.
How do you reconcile the heat problem?
Elaborate.
@@anilkanda611 are you familiar with radioactive decay? If so, do a search on Young earth creationists. And the heat problem
@@anilkanda611 The RATE Group admitted that massive amounts of radioactive decay occurred during earth history but proposed a period of accelerated decay during Noah’s Flood to fit the resulting history into a young-earth timeframe. Finding a mechanism for the acceleration and dealing with the excessive heat and radiation it would generate posed major problems for the project. Catastrophic plate tectonics was proposed to explain continental movements in a short timeframe and serve as a trigger for Noah’s Flood, but other creationists rejected the idea citing hopeless chronological problems. Creationists have also sought to explain the order of the fossil record and the Ice Age in a young-earth timeframe. An examination of these efforts demonstrates the anti-scientific nature of using the Bible as a non-negotiable framework for earth history. kzhead.info/sun/ZN6ynK55Z5SirGg/bejne.htmlsi=pGwov973jxOf73LD ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Sc%26Ed..18.1341H/abstract
This guy is brilliant! Of course, the emotionally driver non-believers just refuse to see the facts
OK! Trot out the evidence that a supernatural realm exists and that supernatural entities exist there... The world has been waiting for thousands of years and all they get is a big goose egg on this question.
@gerardgauthier4876 it takes faith and nobody argues that, just like it takes faith to believe that life came from non life which is a scientific impossibility. It takes more faith to be an atheist. How does a pot of soil grow a seed? It takes a being with intelligence to water it, correct? Now think of that on a bigger scale with a deeper thought process, how does plants in a forest grow without a an intelligent being watering it? It takes intelligence on a larger scale to open the clouds to rain upon these plants to grow them just as it takes you planting a seed in a pot and watering it. Just a different view on things. It takes faith to believe in the creator. Jesus lived and died and rose again. That takes faith to believe but He promises us eternal life if we believe in His resurrection. Have faith my friend it will save you from Hell.
@@davemorrill2490 do you have a source for this amazing scientific discovery that abiogenesis is impossible?
@lmoelleb I did. The order of life proves intelligence. Let me ask what you believe so I know what I'm getting myself into, and I know what kind of evidence you would like.
@@davemorrill2490 when I ask for a source for a scientific discovery, then the primary source would be scientific papers, but a secondary source (a reliable publication) referring to it is probably a better starting point. They are typically easier for us laypersons to understand and if we can correlate a few of them we should start getting an idea of the current scientific understanding. People debating or making statements without scientific papers to back them up are not following the scientific process, and they are therefore not scientific and irrelevant as scientific evidence. For what I believe. I believe we do not yet know how life originated. We have demonstrated amino acids can form naturally, but this is not enough to claim we know more than a few of the needed parts - or said in another way: there is no current theory of abiogenesis. So what i "believe" is: I believe "we do not know". Notice that is "we do not know", not "we do not know, therefore God". Humans have stuffed God or other supernatural in as an explanation for things we do not know again and again - one would think we learned from our mistakes, but no. I do not know how thunder and lightning happens, therefore Thor - oh, it was electricity. I do not know why people get sick, therefore demons - oh, it was germs. I do not know why there are earthquakes, must be god - oh, it was plate tectonics. I do not know why there are all these species, must be God - of it was evolution, ...
I looked him up and he has not a single science degree i could find , this is a blurb about his position in 2022-2023 i think "Coleman, who will teach Wills and Trust, most recently taught at the New Paltz State University of New York. Coleman has nearly a dozen publications on various research topics, including American politics, public law, political economy, religion and politics and Black politics. Coleman earned his JD from the University of Maryland at Baltimore, a PhD at the University of Chicago, and most recently, he finished his J.S.D. at Emory Law School. VERY IMPRESSIVE....BUT NOT A SINGLE BIT OF SCIENCE SEEMS TO BE INVOLVED IN HIS LIFE!!!!!
I cannot believe that no credible evolutionist is terrified to debate this man . The problem with God is who created “ God”. Respect
His science qualification is the Bible and his relationship with God. You must remember they claim God is the God of science. So in his world he is more than qualified as a scientist
You reject the concept of God, then say your strawman proves there is a problem. God is by definition uncreated. No problem there.
@@ntsokolomemani3874 your post is pretty nonsensical
YOU'RE just showing the innate intelligence of this bonafide Israelite with your commentary.
I am genuinely interested in learning how Professor Coleman explains why the age determination by the Radiocarbon 14 Method (which seems to measure time periods far greater than 6000 years) yields incorrect results. - As I said: honestly interested.
He has a website where he responds to these questions. Power station something?
It's the rate that carbon "expires". There was a science book I took in Classical Conversations that had a zebra on the front that explained the nitty gritty of this very thing! It specifies the math etc. I don't remember the details but I remember it being very exacting!
I remember the science being called stoichiometry. I LOVED it!
Classical Conversations is a homeschooling group.
Also, it took 100 years to build (one guy! Maybe his sons helped), When people asked “what are you doing?” He said “building an arc because when it’s done, God is gonna make it rain and flood the planet!” Rain? What is rain? (It had never rained previously.) They laughed at him! 100 years of mockery! When he pulled the door closed the rain began. It covered every mountain. No more mockery! Today, we’re at it again. Mind you, anyone who believed could get in the boat. Nobody believed! Global unbelief is not a strange thing. Christ is the new Moses type! Anyone who wants in the boat is welcome. Anyone who wants to stand with the mockers is welcome to do so also. Free choice!
Mostly true, except that Noah did not pull the door shut. Angels did that.
I believe Methuselah was one of those who helped in the construction.
Amazing details you can all spout for something that never actually happened. Too bad that the ENTIRE WORLD, with the exception of Israel, never experienced or historically recorded this " worldwide" flood !!!
Nowhere does it say anywhere that anyone else was welcome. The story literally say as build an ark for you and your family. As far as we know, no one else was welcome.
@hdmaragh This is true. God decided to murder (the BIG hypocrite) every man, woman, child, and baby on Earth, including nearly all of the animals and plants, except for Noah's family!
AWESOME!!!!! God bless this man of God!
I've been to the Kentucky Ark that Ken Hamm's group constructed and it is very impressive.
I believe you and i also believe that's were everything should end at impressive. Nothing more nothing less. What they built is impressive but proves nothing
@@ntsokolomemani3874Then clearly you haven’t been. That ark is literally full of evidence. Sticking your head stubbornly in the sand does not count as counter evidence.
But is it as impressive as the Duripinar site in Turkey on the mountains of Ararat. Mountains being plural in scripture concerning Noah's Ark. Not only are the dimensions spot on, but ground penatrating radar showed right angles and the look of compartment remnants. It's certainly no mere rock formation. I hope to go soon. The Turkish government conducted these tests, and they even made a visitor center. The length is exact in royal Egyptian cubits, as Moses would have known, while the width is a little wider since ancient boats will splay. If the writer of the ancient story made it up by the boat shaped object's dimensions, it would have been these wide measurements. Instead it conforms with reality. Not to mention all the holed anchor stones dropped in the area, up in the mountains.
I’m struggling with the premise here… how do we reconcile the ‘young earth’ working hypothesis with the age of dinosaur bones/fossils? Please help me understand, thanks.
Good question. Death did not exist until Adam sinned. Scriptures make that clear. If we accept the flood story as Jesus did also, we need rework our understanding of the age of dinosaurs too. I think some evidence has come out which speaks to that. Over 14 living tissues specimens have been found in fossils dating supposedly 60-150 millions. History is starting to correct itself
@@anilkanda611 one must also remember that God's time is not the same as ours. But this professor gave a good explanation of the meaning of young earth. What we can't say for sure is that "scientist" way of proving the age of anything is accurate - what exactly do they have to compare to? How does anyone know the true age of a fossil or any other remains? Nothing is 100% accurate.
@@robf.1493 You ask questions assuming there are no answers, just because you don't know them. And 100% accuracy is not necessary for evolution to be correct. Religion on this topic, however, is vanishingly close to 0% correct.
@@Astrobrant2 - Then apparently you don't know the Bible. There is NO EXACT in anything not even science. So someone at sometime worked up a bunch of numbers and formulas and just because they added up makes it all correct? Q: What exactly is science based on? A: Science is a system of knowledge that studies the physical world and its phenomena with OBSERVATION and EXPERIMENTATION!!! So is Religion is close to 0% correct then who judges what the outcome of science is? Who says it's right or wrong? There is NOTHING that is 100%. Even the age of dinosaurs is guessing - how do they know 100% that a dinosaur bone is how many thousands of years old? No one kept records back then so how is the way they determine the age of anything 100% correct? Parts of the Bible has been proven but again - how does anyone know for sure? The cloth that covered Jesus was proven to be a male, approx his age from DNA found on the cloth. The man was Jewish and died at approx the time that Jesus did - but how do we know that time frame? Humans made up their own 24 hour days - 7 days a week - 52 weeks a year. We made that up - God's time is completely different from ours so what is the 100% proof that science or the Bible is true?
This Professor is amazing
Why?
Because he can convince all these people to give them their money…
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood???? Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me. It's just food for thought for yourself. As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements? Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant? God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work? He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked, He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked, He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin. for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long? How low is your IQ?
He says time works against evolution (15:05), How is that? , yet previously, he said that you needed one type of dog to create different species of dog like coyote, wolves, dingo etc etc (13:00) that sounds and looks like evolution to me. He also claims the planet, solar system, universe is thousands of years old, but that time frame is not long enough to observe evolutionary changes although on that time frame evolution is still in progress. Evolution works on the billions of years time frame to SEE GREAT CHANGES IN ANY SPECIES. Beside we humans don't leave long enough to see these evolutionary changes. Everything is still evolving as we speak..... he claims the flood happened 2500 BC then the question is when was the ancient Egyptian civilization started? 3100 BC...yet we know after the ancient Egyptian empire came the ancient Greeks 1600 BC, then the Romans 753 BC, then the Byzantium empire 330. The histories are the evidence. At 23:00 he was asked if any other humans or animals could have survived the flood, he responded, '' absolutely not''' meaning nothing survived but at 29:40 when ask about insects on the ark he states that insects are hardy just like giants of the sea that were not on the ark but though many died some survived. But earlier nothing outside the ark survived. SMH....Your argument is porous, incongruent, slightly piggy backs on science and frankly misguided. keep trying creationists, you will find it increasingly difficult to defend that point of view as science provides more evidence with the passage of time...and you will still be stuck with the same old story of creation that has not moved one millimetre. I had a good laugh though.
Keep asking questions. You have much to learn. This earth is not evolving- it follows the second law of thermodynamics. The changing distance between the earth and the sun should be one very simple truth to demonstrate that the earth is not Billions oy years old (evolution is based on uniformitarianism).kzhead.info/sun/pbyeqMWOqqiedoU/bejne.html
He can't deny evolution itself because there are strong evidence for it (evolution of bacteria last few weeks, you don't have to wait millennia). What he says is he doesn't believe in evolution of one species into others. Dogs evolution from wolf to puddles lasted few tousends of years and it's scientific fact nobody denies. It was possible because it wasn't evolution triggered by natural selection. I'm not creationist but your argument with dogs is too weak. Better argument would be how did Kangaroos get to Australia and why there are no Kangaroos anywhere else if they departed Noe's ark in middle east?
oh yes! the guillible audience could not realise that! Thank you!
Thank you! At las not all of the readers here are guillible. But let even look at the morality of the story since morals matter to them Before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, (John 3.16) he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood???? so as Christians are extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would they emulate God and kill all their wayward children in order to give yourself a new start?? As humans with far less intellect and compassion than their God, if they had the power to change/reform their children just by the power of their own pronouncements wouldn't the killing of their children be the last thing on their mind as a solution? Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then what happened afterwards? He regretted again??? hahaha And then promptly promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant? SUMMARY God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK He burnt down Sodom and Gomorrah too with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted (women and children killed), with the objective of dealing with their pervasive sinfulness. iT DIDNT WORK He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK TODAY TODAY TODAY THERE IS PERVASIVE SINFULNESS Now, for ascribing such spectacular failures to "God" supposedly a an all knowing being, how long before you all realized that all this could only be borrowed mythology? How fucking long? I believe there is a Creator of the Universe, but certainly not the one in the bible and quran doing some quixotic stuff including entering a bet with Satan to destroy Job to show Satan that he is the boss.
building blocks for life is very fragile, it won't wait millions of years keep shuffleling until become functional, it will decompose. how it was gradualy formed while it's gradually decomposed?
BANGER❤️
Major snapped kudos too fitting the puzzles pieces in by simply reading
This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does and I'm so grateful you've presented this bit as well. Easy to understand and broken down to something reasonable. P.S. I would love to see if you could come to Campbell University here in North Carolina. They used to be a Christian school, but have recently broken off from the Baptist convention and have started becoming a little too "liberal" if you know what I mean.
“This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does…” What a fitting statement. Yes, they are both willfully ignorant.
@@theatheistcowboy4227 Name specifically what he or Kent Hovind says is scientifically wrong? You're paid to make responses like this.
@@josefniederer5039 I’m paid to make responses to KZhead videos? The fuck are you on about, mate? 🤣 And it’s precisely because I DON’T get paid to comment or teach and have to do other work that I will not be teaching Biology 101 here. If you want a quick one to check “Dr.” Hovind on, try seeing if you can find him defining what a “kind” is and then see how long it takes you to find an animal or plant that doesn’t fit that definition. Or perhaps Dr. Coleman’s take on cats and dogs breeding. If cats and dogs could breed that would actually disprove the theory of evolution as it actually exists. According to the theory of evolution, cats and dogs most definitely should not be able to breed. If you’d like to know more, there are many many sources on both KZhead and educational journals. I am not a science, teacher, or a paid “evolution, promoter“ or whatever the hell you think I am. I am just a man who loves science education and hates scientific misinformation.
@@josefniederer5039 watch the millions of times he's been debunked lmao
name specifically one time he's been debunked. If you're confident in your statement then provide your proof he's been debunked.@@ferociousrazordino3581
Why would a Professor of Law know anything about the Theory of Biological Evolution? And surely he doesn't. 11:50 Where on earth did he get 90 forms, kinds, of life - and what are they? He mention the wrod 'genus' but it by no means clear what he means. And where did he get the number '15,000 animals on the Ark' from? 13:10 He think there were TWO pairs of each 'kind'. Where did that come from? Everyone else think there was ONE pair. 14:20 Four postulates fo evolution 1: Life come from non-life 2: All multicellular life-form comes from single celles life forms. Then he states something that is simply not true, that we have no two celled life forms. Besides that, there is no need for wuch a creatiure in evolution, but it does actuallye exist. 3: Time and Chance drive evolution. A very naïve description - or rather downright wrong, as it rules out Natural Selection. His calculation of a single protein 'coming together' is probably correct, but is just irrelevant. We know that functional beneficial n´brand Ne protein coding genes can emrege in the genome of various organisms. 4: Small differences accumulate to major differences. Then he refers to Mendel who didn't show anything like what he suggests. And it is actually not true - new genes DO appear. When he cannot describe Biological Evolution correctly, and cannot point to relevant problems, there is really not so much more to say. The rest is just irrelevant!
Why would a KZhead commentator define what is not science?
There is literally no two celled life form that exists. That's a fact.
Okay, then answer those four postulates/questions…with scientific evidence. Bet you can’t. Look…evolution COULD still be an answer, but nobody to this date can actually answer the biggest flaws of it.
Yes! God never asks for a blind faith.
If you’re referring to the Christian God, he exclusively asks for blind faith. If the Bible is to be believed, that is.
@@theatheistcowboy4227biblical faith is 'sure of what we hope for and certain of what we see'. No blind faith
@@allenminter4728 “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe” - Jesus, supposedly
@@theatheistcowboy4227 Context on this one matters. None of us have physically seen Jesus. That would mean every living Christian is doing it wrong. Or,... Or maybe you just need a little more understanding. He was talking to Thomas about his doubts. Thomas was the only one who had not seen him alive after his crucifixion. It's not a call to blind faith...
@@theatheistcowboy4227and you weren't there at the big bang nor have you seen any forms of macro evolution?
Am new to listening to this presentation. The professor is using very specific dimensions and quantities to describe things. How were this dimensions and quantities derived?
Check his website
This man is brilliant
😂😂😂😂
For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain brilliance but employ it to promote ignorance?
I enjoyed this show. It’s beautiful to see such passion for the Word of God. Thank you so much.
but its weird that he never had a point and his stories don't make sense.
The catch phrase to this video is misleading “…debunks evolution”, there is nothing in the videoclip that debunks evolution. Coleman at the start says there are three ways of deriving the truth - logic, science and vision. Unfortunately, logic can also lead to false conclusion. Take for example the simple logic construction A=B, B=C, therefore A must equal C. All animals have 4 legs, a table has 4 legs, therefore a table is an animal. A logically sound construct that led to a false conclusion. Just look at the many so called visions from famous “seers” and see how many of these came true, the statistic is not significant. Science with all its own challenges still remains one of humans most reliable method at deriving a probable truth within a confidence level. Science is not reliant on old documents (many of which are questionable including the Bible), what a person says is the truth, dogma, race, tribe, customs or traditions but involves rigour and a truth that can be independently confirmed or proven wrong by different people across the globe. Let’s look an other arguments put forward by Coleman for the truism of the Noah Ark story. Biblical scholars trace the origin of this story to Mesopotamia, in a genre of myth. The numbers cited in this Noah story, 120, 40 days and night, 300, 50, 3 levels, 6 (3 sons 3 wives = 33), 600 years, 8 people, etc, can be found in different cosmological derived stories of various cultures across the globe. I have written a book called Akashic Records and the Holy Grail, in this book I dedicate a chapter entitled “Divine Numbers” that discusses the persistency and meaning of various numbers found in various societies and the meaning thereof. It is said that it took Noah and family (8 in total (1 Peter 3:20) another mythological number also rendered as the infinity sign), 55 to 75 years to build the Ark, it is most likely the number 72 that it is related to Pythagoras’ famous theorem of a right angle triangle. The sins for which this god wanted to destroy the earth and all living creatures are because sons of god saw human females as fair and took them as wives and because of violence on earth. What does poor creatures have to do with human love/sex matters and human violence and have to suffer collective punishment. There is no genetic proof that all humans came from the Noah and his family family-tree. Coleman also does not understand animal diversity as linked to their habitat and thus geographic spread. For example the polar bear is found at the North Pole regions, the Panda in China, so Noah in the Middle East must have had an Alien spacecraft to travel the world to collect the different species? What amazes me most is the blatant illogical nonsense which you often found in so called religious texts, let’s look at the Bible, you have a god the is all might, can perform miracles, yet he needs weak people to carry out his will. If he is as might as is claimed, all he needed to do is gather all the animals he wanted to save at a specific place and destroyed the rest, why would he need an old man like Noah. Why is the miracles he performs so insignificant to the majority challenges facing nature and humans - what significance is the changing of water into wine when you had applauding slavery, and the then incurable diseases like leprosay (colonies of these people existed, it took science to cure this disease), endless wars and other ills of humans. I always laugh at the nonsense of Allah prohibiting the drinking of wine or alcohol and then you fined some Muslims taking drugs, and when you confront them their reply is that Allah only forbids alcohol not drugs! Of what value is the levitation of Buddhas monks!
No.
A foolish response!
@@rachmondhoward2125 tell us more how sheer chance created the universe
Anil. I do not purport to know how our universe and material life came into existence. The chance theory versus creationist theory of the universe have a long history of debate. The chance theory is supported by some scientific observations whereas the creationist theory which is given as fact is only supported by religious dogma - because some religious texts says so therefore it is so. Different so called religious texts from different societies have their own versions of the creationist “theory” or shall we say creation myth. For example in the Bible, we have an old male deity (Jewish god) speaking the universe and life into being. The Hindus believe that everything always existed in a constant flux resulting in ever changing of one thing into another - the Wheel of Samsara. All effort must be made by humans to escape this endless cycle of reincarnation by becoming enlightened beings. In the ancient Egyptian belief system, Path , a ram-headed god created humans from clay on a spinning wheel. In other creation myth, a god sacrificed himself and out of this the entire universe was created. So which one of these stories is true and why chose one when all of them are based on dogma. Let’s turn to science and see what we know about the universe. The universe is about 14 billion years old with some new evidence suggesting it might be even more older. Life about 1 to 2 billion years, human species (the most destructive beings on planet earth who have created nuclear capabilities that can wipeout itself and all living things) about 1 to 2 million years old. Only about 5 percent of the universe is made of matter, about 95 of unknown (dark something and dark energy). Most of our scientific endeavours have been focused on understanding matter related issues but in roads are being made to understand the 95 percent. Quantum theory is assisting us to gain new insights into this “unknown” phenomenon. Let’s turn to living things and see what science has discovered. The elements that forms the building blocks of life was formed billions of years ago in the so called Big Bang theory. We have a fairly good understanding of all of these elements, identified in what we call the Periodic Table. Our fossil records show that the first life forms were simple single cell organisms and these evolved to form multicellular organisms. No religious text says anything about this but the Hindu text might hint at this saying that inorganic matter can transform into life. Inorganic matter can spontaneously associate to form complex structures, look at a snow flake or crystals as examples but what is still a massive unsolved problem is the question of what constitutes “life” and how and why would inorganic matter became “alive”. From a physics point of view, elements want to be at the lowest energy level, complexity demands higher energy levels and is thus unstable. There are still no definitive answers to these questions. We know that all life forms are made of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA). The famous Miller Experiment showed that under the right physical conditions simple inorganic elements can spontaneously associate to form simple chain macromolecules, strings of RNA and peptides. You did not need a deity to create these. It has also been discovered that celestial bodies like comets carry simple nucleic chains and so there is some suggestions that life may have arisen from these macromolecules. So what we call chance is far more complex than what the average Joe Blocks understand, yet, he is always the one who passionately argue, not based on facts but emotions, that the six-day creation story is true!
Anil. I do not purport to know how our universe and material life came into existence. The chance theory versus creationist theory of the universe have a long history of debate. The chance theory is supported by some scientific observations whereas the creationist theory which is given as fact is only supported by religious dogma - because some religious texts says so therefore it is so. Different so called religious texts from different societies have their own versions of the creationist “theory” or shall we say creation myth. For example in the Bible, we have an old male deity (Jewish god) speaking the universe and life into being. The Hindus believe that everything always existed in a constant flux resulting in ever changing of one thing into another - the Wheel of Samsara. All effort must be made by humans to escape this endless cycle of reincarnation by becoming enlightened beings. In the ancient Egyptian belief system, Path , a ram-headed god created humans from clay on a spinning wheel. In other creation myth, a god sacrificed himself and out of this the entire universe was created. So which one of these stories is true and why chose one when all of them are based on dogma. Let’s turn to science and see what we know about the universe. The universe is about 14 billion years old with some new evidence suggesting it might be even more older. Life about 1 to 2 billion years, human species (the most destructive beings on planet earth who have created nuclear capabilities that can wipeout itself and all living things) about 1 to 2 million years old. Only about 5 percent of the universe is made of matter, about 95 of unknown (dark something and dark energy). Most of our scientific endeavours have been focused on understanding matter related issues but in roads are being made to understand the 95 percent. Quantum theory is assisting us to gain new insights into this “unknown” phenomenon. Let’s turn to living things and see what science has discovered. The elements that forms the building blocks of life was formed billions of years ago in the so called Big Bang theory. We have a fairly good understanding of all of these elements, identified in what we call the Periodic Table. Our fossil records show that the first life forms were simple single cell organisms and these evolved to form multicellular organisms. No religious text says anything about this but the Hindu text might hint at this saying that inorganic matter can transform into life. Inorganic matter can spontaneously associate to form complex structures, look at a snow flake or crystals as examples but what is still a massive unsolved problem is the question of what constitutes “life” and how and why would inorganic matter became “alive”. From a physics point of view, elements want to be at the lowest energy level, complexity demands higher energy levels and is thus unstable. There are still no definitive answers to these questions. We know that all life forms are made of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA). The famous Miller Experiment showed that under the right physical conditions simple inorganic elements can spontaneously associate to form simple chain macromolecules, strings of RNA and peptides. You did not need a deity to create these. It has also been discovered that celestial bodies like comets carry simple nucleic chains and so there is some suggestions that life may have arisen from these macromolecules. So what we call chance is far more complex than what the average Joe Blocks understand, yet, he is always the one who passionately argue, not based on facts but emotions, that the six-day creation story is true!
Let’s see the debates .
No one is debating him even though he offered money. 😂🤣
Prof. Have you heard of the Anunnakis, Enlil, Enki and Zuisudra?
Anunnaki have nothing to back them up and have nothing to do with the Bible. At Most you could claim they were angels whom ruled over nations as established after the Tower of Babel.
Are you sure moon dust is dated that early?
5:20 He says that revelation from god is _science??_ This man is no expert in critical thinking.
Says the guy who thinks billions of years of chance formed the solar system. Tell us more about critical thinking
@@anilkanda611 And why the Solar system couldn't form by natural causes?
@@anilkanda611 I suppose it could be called chance, but the solar system formed from a cloud of interstellar gas and dust. (Mostly hydrogen). An accretion disk developed around the central mass which was condensing into the sun. Gravity caused clumps to form in the accretion disk. As they got larger their gravity increased and most of the rest of the debris was pulled into them. These became the planets. We have seen this process taking pace in other star systems. When the central mass gets hot enough it is called a protostar. Further gravitational collapse eventually triggers nuclear fusion at the core. That's when it becomes a star. One principle of critical thinking is accepting verifiable facts. Everything I just described is entirely consistent with what we observe in our own solar system and a handful of others that can be observed from a great distance. Go to Wikipedia and read about stellar evolution.
A building has a builder, a painting has a painter, and yet the most sophisticated creation, life, occurred spontaneously from nothing.
@@Sola_Scriptura_1.618 No. Science has never said that anything came from nothing!
That model is pretty big but it is dwarfed by the 1 to 1 model in Kentucky - of course it is easier to carry around.
Wonderful video. Just happened onto your channel. I will be watching more videos.
yay!! Thank you. Please continue to share.
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
Amen
yea because back then it was, it is hillarious that you think we learned nothing in the last almost 200 years
@@daftwulli6145 what's hilarious is that you didn't respond by telling us who has been observed in your family lineage who was not human.
@@refuse2bdcvd324 NIce straw man buddy. You get a gold star on your report card for creating such an utterly disingenious and dishonest argument That is not how evolution works. WE HAVE directly observed the evolution of new species, and WE HAVE found over 6000 transitional fossils spanning more then 20 transitional species just for human evolution alone. But instead of arguing against the actual evidence and what we are actually saying you first completely misrepresent what we are saying and then argue against that instead
@@refuse2bdcvd324 So on some level you must realize that we are right and that you cannot argue against the facts and arguments we present, or why else would all of you do what you just did ?? Or they outright lie about what science says and then argue against that. while in 20 years I have never seen a creationist make an genuine argument against what we are really saying . NOT EVEN ONCE Btw doesn´t lying go against the core values of your religion ?? So not only are you being a hypocrite about evolution, youi are being a hypocrite about yxopur own religion as well.
It would be interesting to plan a debate between Major & Hugh Ross.
yea!
I am a Christian and although I didn’t need to hear Dr. Coleman to believe the Bible it is very good information I can use when I’m talking to non believers. I only have one problem and maybe one of you can help me. What is Dr. Coleman’s first name. Before I believe anyone I try to find out who they are and I can’t find anything about him that tells what his name is. Shirley it’s not G so does anyone know his first name?
"Major!" If I'm not mistaken
Thank You Jesus !!! My redeemer
This looks like a skit right out of the Onion. Holy shit Debate Aaron Ra, Professor Dave, Forrest Valkai, Gutsick Gibbon for the 20,000
Those people argue that evolution is true because the God of the Bible isn’t true. That does not logically follow. Notice how they cannot argue for evolution without also contrasting it against Creationism. Take Creationism away and their arguments for evolution evaporate.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
@@davemorrill2490 it’s always fascinated me the way you theists are so smug and condescending towards atheists as if not believing in magic and fairy tales is unreasonable.
@@notnero5280you believe nothing created everything and that order came out of absolute chaos. Still waiting for my laundry to fold itself in the dryer... Yeah that's not gonna happen just like a book doesn't write itself.
How can I meet him, even online
look him up. but you aren't getting the money. lol
Ok. i generally believe of course. But i am close to 11600 B.C life on earth theory. And. - how they collect all animals? Maybe Some of them physucally and some as Dna? i am just curious- dont hate me. thank you
I agree with u
Next up, we'll have a plumber discuss the illogical nature of Muslim beliefs. Stay tuned.
Next up, KZhead keyboard warrior thinks they alone know who’s qualified to talk about anything. ^
major coleman is awesome with his teaching thank god we still have minds like this on earth
How did noah build the automated water cleaning systems he mentioned?
That’s not hard. He has 50-70 years to build if
@@anilkanda611 Thats funny. I couldn't do that today with wood and nails and I have much more knowledge about technology than he did. You people are unserious clowns.
Thanks God @Major Coleman for defending the truth using science and archeological evidence like the story of the Arch of Noah. God bless Major.🙏🙏🙏 and this channel Anıl Kanda❤️❤️❤️
But...he's not "defending the truth", he is in fact telling you a bunch of lies. Right here right now, I'm actually defending the truth.
@@hongotedesco8931what lies did he tell?
@@Matthewc5610 We can start with the Earth is 7k years old. That's just a blatant lie.
@@hongotedesco8931 that doesn’t answer my question, he states the things from the textbook on evolution, that’s what I was referring to, not the age of the earth.
@@Matthewc5610 Um, it does answer the question "what lies did he tell". I pointed out one lie. Now, if you want to get specific, that's fine. But I'm not sure what you're referring to when you say "he states things from the textbook on evolution". What precisely did he state? And what's your point?
I love when people who clearly have no idea what they’re even arguing against think that they’re going to disapprove the most sound scientific theory in the field of biology. As if they who don’t even understand the theory, see something that people who have studied it for the vast majority of their lives, didn’t see. it would be downright hilarious if only it didn’t mislead even more people into thinking they know what the theory of evolution even proposes, let alone that it’s been debunked. And I see plenty of people on here who think they’re going to argue that this law professor has all the facts straight about what the theory of evolution is, and says should happen according to said theory. Let me make it clear now: he could not be more objectively incorrect. He does not understand what the theory of evolution is or says. If you were to spout this in a base level college biology class, he would probably be corrected by freshman in the first two minutes of speaking, and it would only get worse from there.
Yet evolutionists have largely avoided debates with creationist , and when they have agreed the weight of scientific evidence to support creationism has invariably overwhelmed them . Why ? Because the evolutionists theories don't stand up to empirical scrutiny !!!
Well said. This video has me gobsmacked in its ignorance. And people just lap it up. Faith scares the crap out of me.
Evolutionism is a tautology and therefore false.
How long was the ark out on the water with the animals? I’m from Cape Town and we just had a ship dock our port a few days ago coming from Brazil. It had 19,000 cows on it. Travelling took 2.5 weeks. They’re came for a feed and they’re heading to Iraq. The cows were covered in faeces and urine. Some died due to ammonia. The smell from the ship was so bad, the entire city smelt so bad. I can’t imagine what the ark must have endured during that time
The ark voyage was about a year. Modern livestock transports are open on the sides and need additional powered ventilation. They also have desalination equipment. I am not sure how the animals on the lower deck of this ark model got any sunlight or fresh air. Some say there were also moon pool holes on the bottom to pump air.
The animals on the ark were many different kinds, so not one terrible smell. God could have had them go into hibernation too. Hope those cows get good treatment. It's best to be vegetarian.
@@statutesofthelord Yes, I guess it would be a mix of different piss and shitty smells. God could also shrink everything down to the size of a nickel. I wonder why He told Noah to pack lots of food and water.
@@haggismcbaggis9485 haggis, you mock God, then profess to believe him. Let's face it, haggis, you are on the path following the Father of all Lies who is going to the Lake of Fire. Please repent, and turn square around today.
Awesome video. Truly insightful. The only thing I, I guess have not an issue, but rather a question is about the height of Noah and his family. That has nothing to do with anything but I imagine they were taller 😅 lol
Honest question: where did all that water came from? I mean kilometers of water in height is unimaginable. You would have to have kilometers of water in depth underneath the crust of the eatth, right? Even if the water burst out from underneath the crust, what would support the crust? That's just impossible imho. Also where would that water go? Also the Bible mentions 40 days heavy rain as the reason for flood. Is there so much water trapped in the clouds? Would you be able to see the sun then? I can image there could be like a huge wave circling the surface of the earth, but this wave would just crush the ark, wouldn't it? If not, why would there be no survivors outside the ark?
from the comets that in part formed earth
Water was created before the dry land and currently accounts for over 70% of earths surface with the current deepest depths as of yet unknown. There was a lot of water on the surface prior to the global flood and it had significant depth too but the highest land wasn’t as high on the solitary land mass of Eden/pangaea. The water came out of the firmament that’s no longer there or is our atmosphere that’s been diminished and is still diminishing. The water came from below the surface land too and broke apart the landmass while submerging them, we still feel the after shock and tremors from that greatest of quakes to this day. I hope this is helpful but studying the Bible with someone more knowledgeable would be best. Also, observing the known universe and critically thinking without the biases, presuppositions, and assumptions of the atheistic progressive/liberal hive-mind and government sponsored nonsense shoved down all our throats should be considered. Good day and God speed
@@jaredmarcelli2919 nice children’s story for people who are anti reality
New Evidence for Oceans of Water Deep in the Earth Water bound in mantle rock alters our view of the Earth's composition www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=111648
This story is myth. Treat it as such.
The Ark replica in Kentucky is worth noting and it is actually to scale.
The one that doesn't float and took hundreds of guys with power tools years to build?
@@torreyintahoe You wouldn't scoff if you saw it in person. It is beautiful. And if you have interest in Bible stories its clarifying.
@@christinebridges4212 I'm sure it's impressive from a carpentry point of view. The problem is that it reinforces the false world view of fundamentalist creationists like Ken Ham. There was no flood. That is beyond a proven fact. The flood has been disproven using every discipline of science. Evolution is settled science. There is no scientific argument against it. The world is not thousands of years old it's billions. Dinosaurs did not live alongside humans. These are all objective realities about the world that Ken Ham is in denial about.
2 Peter 3 In the last days scoffers will come denying the global flood. Matthew 24 In the last days lawlessness will increase and the hearts of many will grow cold.
@@wingandprayer8 2000 years of any day now.
Incredible farce ! is it a parody ? What about fishes and mollusks ? They went all into the ark too ? ;))) What about the plants ?
Read the story man, You are incorrect about a lot of details.
@@anilkanda611 Yes but who is correct then. Who was actually there ? It's all hearsay.
Fish stayed in the water. For plants you only need the seeds.😊
Did you really say fish!? Do you not see how they would swim during a flood??
I thought the fishes live in water. Wasn't it water that caused the flood?
I want to see his documentary, can I stream it?!
The full episode?
Thank you for responding. I listened again to it and what I was actually interested in was the Origin Series program, and heard wrong about a documentary lol. I did get Dr. Coles website. I loved this episode, I heard it twice!
I wonder what he would say about deep space time. As a young earth creationist Christian, that was something that I struggled with when I heard that even well known conservative apologist christians don’t have really good answers for why we can see stars that are millions of light years away.
When I first read your comment, I thought you said "Deep Space Nine", as in the Star Trek series. There is a very interesting video on the Truth in Genesis channel, titled: How do we see stars billions of light years away? See what you make of that. I hope it helps.
@@lindenh2014 haha, “deep space time” versus “deep space nine” yes, very different. Glad you noticed before commenting.
10:20 - no plants could survive the flood as described. cacti from Arizona can't make their way to the middle east to survive on an ark and get back to Arizona. Neither can any animals by the way. The entire story is as foolish as the "Tower of babel" story where magically people start speaking different languages because their god thought their tower was too tall.
Seeds can survive! The world had one climate so you didn’t need to go to Arizona to find your cacti
@@Bereafrank No, you can study this yourself. Put some cactus seeds in water and see how long they last. There are no trees to make "rafts" in the desert. And there is zero evidence that the world had one climate. You have to make up silly fantasies now that are contrary to what we see. in the real world. If there were only one climate how did cacti and tropical plants live in that same climate? See how silly that is?
Everyone who has examined the evidence, especially those who are trained investigators always concludes that the biblical narrative is correct. Lee Strobel, - The Evidence For Christ, and J. Warner Wallace, - Cold Case Christianity have written their findings down for everyone to read. Both were ardent and hardened atheists but left atheism behind for the truth. There are many more former well-known atheists who have diligently researched the evidence and left atheism behind. Before the Internet was even a possibility I did it at the University library and also the City library. When neither place had the necessary books I had to wait while they were mailed. Today the Internet makes about a month's work out of what took me years. J. Warner Wallace has a KZhead channel with the name Cold Case Christianity. The answers are available if someone is willing to look. KZhead has an almost endless supply of NDEs Near Death Experiences of former atheists who knew everything was a fairy tale until they had a visit to one place or another.
@@Bereafrank and that one climate was just like Arizona? There is zero evidence that Saguaro cacti ever existed anywhere but a very small part of Arizona. How did that support all the tropical plants? that doesn't make sense.
Neville Goddard gives the best interpretation of the bible ❤ Absolutely beautiful! You’d fall even more in love with Jesus and God. More than you could ever imagine.
The same Neville Goddard that thinks we are all incarnate as God? You need to repent now, and trust in Jesus as the incarnate God who died for you sinful life and was raise on the 3rd day.
Neville Goddard was a man who said Jesus never existed and that our imagination is "god." This is heresy and blasphemy. Goddard was a simple con artist of his day and best, and an evil man deliberately leading people away from Christ at worst. Repent of this nonsense.
Neville Goddard was a freemason whose books sprinkled in metaphysical theories contradictory to the Word of God. This was not a secret, he was open about his beliefs throughout his writings. I'm curious about why you believe he has the best interpretation of the Bible when much of his writings were blasphemous. It could be an honest misinterpretation, but your promotion of him sounds more nefarious. As if you're trying to steer people into the opposite direction of Biblical truth. I say that as an ex new ager who has read Neville Goddard's books, so I am on high alert when I see things like this, so forgive me.
Why is noah's arc written in 300BC and is just The Epic of Gilgamesh from 2000 BC?
Moses wrote the account as it was shown to Him. And the story of it dates older than Gilgamesh and describes real people and real location
“Now the appetite is twofold; namely, the will which is in the reason, and the sensitive appetite which follows on sensitive apprehension, and is divided into the irascible and the concupiscible, as stated in the First Part (Q. LXXXI., A. 2). Again the act of rendering his due to each man cannot proceed from the sensitive appetite, because sensitive apprehension does not go so far as to be able to consider the relation of one thing to another; but this is proper to the reason. Therefore justice cannot be in the irascible or concupiscible as its subject, but only in the will: hence the Philosopher (Ethic. v. 1) defines justice by an act of the will, as may be seen above (A. 1).” [Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, vol. 9 (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne, n.d.), 569.]
This is powerful message.
Yes true!
Yes, and that message is, "Blind faith and denial of facts will keep you ignorant." Blissfully, though, I expect.
First time listening, been saved nearly 50 years and I totally agree with him. So far he's right on point. Great man of God. I pray God's blessings on him.
Then he should stick to religion and leave science to the scientists.
He lied and misrepresented scientific facts from start to end. I feel sorry for you since you think what he said is true. It is easy to strawman someones position to make it easy to take down like he did, and that's the best case scenario. Worst case is that he doesn't even understand what he is debating against, making him an idiot. If you want to learn about evolution, read biology books and attend open colleges or university classes on biology. That will ensure you know what you are debating against. The moment you misrepresent science (intentional or not), I cannot take you seriously. I just look at you as a fool.
The event of Noah. Sometimes when we call these event stories people that's the more why there's confusion. I try not to call biblical events as stories. I may be wrong on this but I fully agree with all Major says in this video.
By the way, are you certain whether baby or adult elephants need 700 ponds a day regardless?
What
Major is a powerhouse, indeed.
Next week: we ask a geologist on the best samba techniques, followed by a trip to the dentist where I will be operated on by a mechanic.
Followed by a KZhead commentator who determines what is and what is not science
@@anilkanda611 I have a BSc in Biology.
@@RustyWalkerthat doesn’t matter much. I literally have PHDs (biology, geology, history, psychology) on the show and people still say the same.
@@anilkanda611 Just goes to show that religion makes people who should know better lie then, doesn't it? Because this guy presented some of the worst out of date arguments. Evolution is a proven fact, and religion has shown in the past that it can absorb new information and adapt. This is no different.
My question isn't about the ark but about the age of some people in the Bible. Like some lived to 600 and older. Was it how we count our birthdays now or was it different..i hope im making sense in my question.
The scripture records people living a lot longer before the flood. They grew taller too.
If we also only use 10% of our brain capacity too it’s because of the fall from grace and the depletion of the firmament as far as I can surmise. Life is tied to the environmental conditions and coded for a vast amount of variation capability within an individual while it grows and experiences the environment.
Becoming as a little child and exercising your "Faith" (God gives everyone a measure) with repentance is all it takes to start your walk with God. Born-Again. The mind has to be brought into subjection to God by focusing on God. Being led by the "Holy Spirit" is far different from walking by natural sight/understanding, but can be accomplished by submission and experience. Those who choose to rebel have missed a chance to "walk with God" and experience Love, Joy & Peace in high definition. Walk On, and Close to God everyday! ☺♥†♪♫ 3-9-24
["Becoming as a little child and exercising your "Faith" (God gives everyone a measure) with repentance is all it takes to start your walk with God. "] Is there a reason God wants us to act like idiots?
@@iriemon1796 Amazingly enough many children are better examples than adults, and if they connect with God at an early age it is pronounced. Many people have chosen to act very irresponsibly. Actions can create reactions in a similar context. Lying starts at birth, but most bad behaviour and biases are learned at a young age. Walk On ! ☺♥†♪♫
q
All praises to God for giving His servants wisdom to help us understand the things of God. With humans it's impossible with God all is possible and we see that in the story of the flood. Thank you professor for preaching truth uplifting God and His plan for humanity 🙏 ❤
I used to consider the people from WEST to be critical thinkers but I am slowly losing confidence in my consideration.
Shun your prejudice remarks and challenge his ideas instead.
@@anilkanda611 yeah sure. Here is an article about the age of the earth, Patterson, C., paper at a Conference on Application of Nuclear Processes to Geological Problems at Geneva, Wis., Sept. (1953). If the Major has some data published in any peer reviewed paper please provide the link for his paper. I will be happy to read the paper about his conclusions on the age of the Earth.
@@anilkanda611 "ideas"...🤣
@@HernanToroA Because you were there at the beginning. Right, spare me your sanctimony😆
Thanks for the dialogue. I do not hold to his ideas of the age of the earth. I frankly don't know and or desire to but the age of life, I have contention. For example, the amount of living tissue specimens that been recently discovered present challenges to traditionally thought models of long spans for evolutionary model to work. "Soft-tissue preservation in terrestrial Mesozoic vertebrates -Mary H. Schweitzer et al. "Molecular preservation in Late Cretaceous sauropod dinosaur eggshells- Jasmina Wiemann et al. "The record of microbially mediated redox reactions spanning 2,000 meters of sediment" -Gordon D. Love et al. @@drsravan
Lots I agree with him on. However the Hydro-Plate theory has largely been replaced by a better model called "Catastrophic Plate Tectonics."
ok
Where could his findings be found?
Go to his website. Powerstation.org
Out of his ass.
@anilkanda611 do you believe in the substitutanary atonement of Jesus?
@@anilkanda611 Thanks a lot
@@clydekimsey7503 I do, with my whole heart... Do you?
who needs silly things like evidence and logic when you can just explain it all away with faith and magic?
Tell us more how aliens created the universe.
@@anilkanda611 never said aliens did, but enjoy thinking a silly old fanfic holds the answers.
Like faith everything came from nothing by magic?
@@stevenwhite8937 bb model doesn't explain where matter came from, you'd know that if you looked into it.
@@DistinctiveBlendbetter yet explain how life came from non-life, without faith or magic.
So a guy that dropped out of high school and has no formal education and biology somehow knows more than the people that study this for a living?
Right because completely trusting every scientist these days is proving a great thing to do. 😆
@@anilkanda611 nobody said completely trusting anybody. But you usually got to know what you're talking about before you can tell somebody else that they're wrong. I'm going to trust the guy that went to flight school rather than the guy that went to the video arcade. Education is important. Simple minds accept simple answers.
@@captdoug yes but thats called an “appeal to authority” fallacy. Attack the messenger because nothing substantive has been offered. I understand your point, friend but I have a background in epidemiology and etiology and I found his reasons completely plausible. He sits on panels with other scientists during conventions. I’m not claiming it’s every answer but I think it’s reasonable.
@@anilkanda611 thank you for the respectful dialogue. Have a great night.
@@captdoug you too 🙏🏽
00:02 Dr. Major G Coleman: Expert on political economy and critical thinking 02:09 Challenging Evolutionary Studies Program 06:14 Debunking misconceptions about the biblical story of Noah's Ark. 08:35 The scientific evidence supporting the biblical flood story 13:18 Noah's Ark story supports the authenticity of the Bible. 15:33 Debunking evolution with scientific evidence 19:41 Challenge in aligning religious beliefs with evolutionary theory 21:41 Encouragement for sceptics' and doubters 26:03 Old documents and archaeological findings substantiate the accuracy of scriptures. 27:59 Higher laws superseding human laws 31:58 The Ark could have carried baby dinosaurs to conserve space. 33:47 Some dinosaurs likely survived after the flood
How can we get this man to speak at Florida Atlantic University
Does he really argue that the proof for his "young" earth is how old the oldest trees are? OMG.
Learn the difference between oldest tree and clonial trees.
@@anilkanda611 "Clonial" isn't a word
stop condescending. State ur counter point. Don't just signal idiocy
@@yodaheabebe3756 ["stop condescending. State ur counter point. Don't just signal idiocy"] My counter-point here is crystal clear. I'll try to dumb in down for you. Trying to argue the age of the earth is determined by the age of a tree is complete idiocy. Do you really need an explanation why? Apparently you do. Trees, like other living things, are reproducing. The grow from seedlings, create more seedlings, and ultimately die. The fact that a tree is living in no way implies the age of the earth, any more than looking at the oldest living person would indicate the age of the earth. Good lord.
@iriemon1796 No you're being dum on purpose here. He clearly spoke about multiple lines of evidence here to support his claim of young earth. He just brought up the oldest tree to show that we don't find anything older than that to show for absolute certainity that it lived longer. you're making look as if that's ALL he said, he's just adding that to support his other claims.
gotta be dishonest to be a creationist.
Kinda like Piltdown Man...Oh wait.
@@anilkanda611 the one that was doubted from the start and then shown to be false by scientists?
Father God, Thank You so much for men like this. You are so AMAZING.
Amazing? Debatable. Right? No.
Professor of law query about engineering, quantum mechanics, mathematics, evolution ????
people can research without having PHD. What makes you qualified to say what is and what is not science.
What a great interview. Such an intelligent man who is very easy to listen to.