Gen. Petraeus tells ABC News there's no way for Russia to win even with nuclear escalation
Gen. Petraeus tells ABC News there's no way for Russia to win even with nuclear escalation.
Russia has no path to victory in its war against Ukraine even with the threat of nuclear escalation says Gen. David Petraeus on ABC's "This Week."
Russia attacked the Ukrainian president’s hometown and other targets Sunday with suicide drones, and Ukraine took back full control of a strategic eastern city in a counteroffensive that has reshaped the war.
Russia’s loss of the eastern city of Lyman, which it had been using as a transport and logistics hub, is a new blow to the Kremlin as it seeks to escalate the war by illegally annexing four regions of Ukraine and heightening threats to use nuclear force.
Russian President Vladimir Putin's land grab has threatened to push the conflict to a dangerous new level. It also prompted Ukraine to formally apply for fast-track NATO membership.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced Sunday that his forces now control Lyman: “As of 12:30 p.m. (0930 GMT) Lyman is cleared fully. Thank you to our militaries, our warriors," he said in a video address.
Russia's military didn't comment Sunday on Lyman, after announcing Saturday that it was withdrawing its forces there to more favorable positions.
MORE: www.wfaa.com/article/news/nat...
He might not win....but he's not going down alone.
yes he can bring kadyrov and lukashenko down with him
Stop being a wuss.
Exactly bro, Why would the kremlin retreat his troops completely and give back the key cities. You would think he has accepted defeat. he has threatened to use Nuclear weapons, and to the majority these are empty threats. But this is a government that is desperate for success, Russia is feared by its neighbors for a reason. The Kremlins about to show the world what he’s really about. 🧨 And in No way am I siding with the Kremlin, I am just stating NATO and Ukraine are underestimating The Russian Government’s desperate need for Validation.
The iron bank will win or it will be burnt to cinders. Pick your future.
He already has won. Kind of embarrassing that people need to type these things on KZhead comments to feel better about something they're completely and utterly wrong about.
Is this guy for real?
He’s a joke he said US and west wouldn’t lose to Taliban he was apart of the conflict he was destroyed
@@omnadrener1 You're the joke. They are talking about use of nuclear weapons. Did the Taliban use it?
"Don't interrupt the enemy while he's making a mistake." Napoleon
No, that was Napoleon
@@tozot2 Thank you. Gonna correct it.
And Russia continues in that vein
I dont think putin is making a mistake here.
1.4-1.7 million US casualties were the estimate for Operation downfall. 20+ million Japanese was the estimate for casualties. So what would have been worse?
The last time a nuclear weapon was used in war, only one country had access to that power... and it was limited power. When multiple nations have a vast supply of nukes with far greater power than what was used against Japan, it's an unthinkable option. So using the US bombing of Japan as a precedent is a false equivalency.
Yeah at the time firebombing mostly wooden structures in Japan was more effective in terms of lives lost than the nukes could have ever been
Also, the USA had been attacked by Japan so had to conquer them, plus the USA did not 'annex' any Japanese lands.
What the fkk do you mean it’s a false equivalency, you literally said, “The last time a nuclear weapon was used in war, only one country had access to that power…” Do you NOT see that that’s exactly why it’s terrible that we set that precedent? Are you serious dude?
@@carly4513 Japan is a vassel state of the USA. The US has several bases on Japanese islands and basically use Japan as a vector. You really think Japan isn't?
@@moosesnWoop Japan is not a vassal state of the USA. It's merely an Ally of the US. The USA has bases there at the request of the Japanese government.
He couldn't be more wrong lol
@Patrick Wood Are you so scared that youll acquiesce to anything and everything? Pretty soon he'll demand whats in your pocket or you face nuclear threat 😂
@@innihbassey6369 ah yes the nuclear threats that cnn invented
Who cares... Lets go nuclear!!!!!
so great argument from you with all sources too!
Yes Petraeus is mistaken. Massive conventional attack by US will invite full blown nuclear response from Russia. In a fight to death, Putin doesn't care if nukes are supposed to be "illegal" or "immoral" weapon. He will use whatever he has.
Freedom is priceless!
Outhouse Johns Freedom is overestimated, just because some leaders say you got freedom in order motivate you fellow their agenda doesn't mean you got it, they go on with this freedom nonsense over at Russia also
Morons (like you and this dumb general) are deadly.
Finally some insight instead of shouting propaganda.
NOPE
Who’s freedom? Americans should die for filthy Ukrainians.
This is absolute insanity. The unthinkable is being thought about.
Yes but in a week the RTX 4090 is released.
This sleepwalking toward a nuclear abyss is being driven by greed from DC. It looks like one final extraction of "wealth" from our country before they cause our final collapse. IF nukes do fly, I just hope to live long enough to hear that DC has become a glowing hellscape.
Worse than thought about! Putin and his lapdog Lavrov have threatened to use nukes on the US and the UK (and specifically stated they could send a 100 meter tall radioactive tsunami over the entirety of the UK from submarine torpedoes with an insane 100 MT yield, which is twice as large as the Tsar Bomba) from the beginning and all through his special military operation. They repeated nuclear annihilation threats to NATO this week in several speeches. Putin is pure evil and crazed enough to do it. He has had his entire family in nuclear bunkers since the invasion.
Why didn't Petraeus get charged for sharing sensitive national security information with his gal pal?
Because it's not sensitive information. Dum dum dum
Kind of strange that the media is treating a War update like a taping of ESPN First Take.
This first started in Iraq war. With stats being reporting with infographics etc. War has been gamified.
That is how "Propaganda" works...nice catch.
This war has no video. Iraq did. Only staged events. All propaganda on the west side.
Maybe because Russia stopped being taken seriously after the 6,864,799,457th nukes threat LOL
Same guy that said Afghanistan wouldn’t fall to the Taliban.
Guess you’re smarter eh
@@MatiasGeraldoThe2nd not a paid WEF shill
@@davidswink6653 I wish
Exactly. These clowns have lied to us so much over the past 20 years that I'm more inclined to assume they are lying and the opposite of everything they say is true.
Yeah. Russians got beat up in Afghanistan too.
Is he the general that failed with the surge?
I agree
This will End Very BADLY
as opposed to the fantastic way it began?
For Putin especially.
for russia yes.
Just don't attack Russian territory, Everything will be fine. Ukraine have shown great Deceit on RUSSIA. They probably deserve what they got. They should both go back to the Minsk Agreement. All of this is because of the Fool Zelensky. Kick him out of office. He brought chaos to the world. What a clown
This General is senile.. Us led NATO killing Russians would automatically turn to WW3 cos Russia is weaker and would be forced to use nukes. Any mass deployment of nukes would cause a nuclear winter and block the sun and eliminate life as we know it. Somebody rein this General McArthur in
one nuclear attack could lead to all out nuclear war.I think the General underestimated the real danger here
Agree
*Joe
Poland has already asked NATO to place some nukes on their territory. Just in case....These Eastern European nations know what Russia is capable of. Even before Putin, but I feel that Russian Generals will move against Putin before they agree to any nuclear attack. Putin is already trying to blame them for the failure in Ukraine, so it's getting real right now.
Absolutely cq
I dont think you know more than a general
These are the guys responible for the fueling of war.
This is a very strong message towards Russia. It should have probably come sooner, but it is awesome that the response plans of the U.S. are out now for case of a nuclear escalation. This is very reassuring, not only from a Ukrainian perspective, but also from a European perspective. A huge thanks to our friends across the pond!
If Putin used a nuclear weapon the u.s won’t respond with nuclear go watch the news
Europe's already defeated by the US having blown up its energy source, lol
Ahahaha, ha, ha ha ha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
America definitely didn't do that. Just another dead conspiracy theory.
bot
Correct. No one wins
scorpion wins
But who will lose less...?
@@stifflerantique259 in the long run, Ukraine. Russia might face a lot of consequences due to starting this war.
@@stifflerantique259 The inhabitants of a few Pacific islands. The US people would die en mass.
Makes you wander if he is telling the truth
Petreaus is a BSer.
He’s a schill.
Loved your possibilities to chose from.
17 billion to ukraine? Try like 90 billion......
How much are Nato & the US giving them, that "We the People": aren't being told about ?
Gen Petraeus is absolutely on target; any use of a nuclear weapon might have a massive conventional counter attack on every "Russian shooter capability" along the entire battle front and all Russian naval assets in the Black and Baltic Sea. The use of nuclear weapons is a threat to humanity and hence should not be tolerated.
The last time I checked, it is the US and NATO threatening Russia with Nukes. Russia is only responding from rhetorics of mad generals
NATO has had 7 months to develop targeting scenarios. As Patreus mentioned, Russia stands to lose not only troops and tanks, but perhaps their entire Black Sea fleet.
@@the42nd That's the start of WW3. It's silly for us to get nuked for getting involved in the conflict directly.
And the idea that such a response by NATO which would attack Russian troops when it itself was not attacked (so much for “defensive alliance”) by Russia wouldn’t result in a guaranteed nuclear response attack on Poland and other countries from where such attacks were launched, progressing to nuclear winter is so delusional that it’s genuinely idiotic people seriously talk about this.
@@russ_6214 oh pffft you guarantee? you can't guarantee anything because you do not know, I do not know, intelligence agencies don't know. Its all speculation and calculated risks. What is certain is this... you and I know very, very little about what is actually going on. it seems reasonable that a nuclear detonation without a heavy response would set a dangerous precedent and embolden Russia, something the West doesn't want as it may encourage China. Russia got away with annexing Crimea, MH-370, assassinating people on foreign soil (yes both sides have don't bad stuff). But unlike in those situations, Europe and NATO is united.
This coming from a general who couldn't win his own war.
He's a clown
What war?
Won the wars, left the occupation. Iraq War won , afghan war won, no oil and got boring.
I guess that's why he knows that Russian will not win.
What else could this guy say if I think something its so 🤔 always telling one-sided stories
Losing on the battlefield ? Where.? They maps haven't changed
Radiation could disperse over Russia also.
Putin is too dumb to know that. It goes west to east.
Well nobody will win but there sure will be a lot of dead people in the end.
That's the goal
Ukraine will win !
Yes only loosers because of the pride on both sides
When Putin comes out of his bunker he'll say damm what happen to my Russia - it's gone!
@@Allen-yv3ue And you'll probably be an ash mound. What's your point?
He cares more about beating Russia than preserving lives in Ukraine. There was little mention of negotiation.
This is war and he is a war general. In war people die and some die valiantly and others are collateral.
A General who lost all his wars tells you that !
Which wars? You sound like a Russian bot
Experience is Experience.
You re right 👍😂😂😂
I’m not convinced in the wisdom of revealing the response America and the West would make if Putin does go nuclear.
Quite the opposite. It needs to be broadcast loud and clear, instead of endless talk about what we're NOT willing to do. He even needs to see us putting capabilities on the on-ramp for the occasion.
Putin is all ears to hear the west's response. He must be told what would happen if he dare press the button
@@yakamen You might be right. But I think it’s obvious America/NATO would/will respond so that doesn’t really need to be stated. Why give Putin a heads up as to what that action would be - since when did you let your enemy know your plans in advance?
@@josimpson7999 I agree with you tactically. We definitely don't need to share battle plans ahead. Though strategically we should broadcast high-level intentions. "If you do this, we will destroy your Black Sea fleet," should be said. What we shouldn't disclose to be sure, is how, when, with what means, etc. Fair points, I think our disagreement is minor =)
"There is no deterrent if it is a secret!" -Dr. Strangelove
Watch out for the Ivans in the comments…
Nobody wins in a nucleur war.
If no human survive the planet wins...... Lets go nuclear!!!!!!!!
"The means to defeat the enemy is provided by the enemy himself": Sun Tzu.
Only time will tell who's going to give in... War of words means nothing...
I don't thing time has anything to do with it, Rashaad. As I understand it, it sounds more like a blood thing.
No one wins an all out nuclear war. M.utually A.ssured D.estruction.
We could smile at the daughter of a billionaire, marry her and then move down to the caves with the billionaires. Those are MADE to survive nuclear attacks because they are far down inside the soil.
MAD isn't actually a thing. Its a myth cooked up by fear mongers. Anyone that actually understands how nukes work knows this.
Shitreas fake Gen don't know that. This is complicated.
MAD
@@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 And then when you crawl out of said bunker, you could rule the world with the cockroaches.
General! Excuse me...can I get a word in, Sir? lol
It's not about victory. It's about destruction. He wants to cause death and devastation on a massive scale. The Legacy.
Are you talking about the American state?
@@iMetmor he means on Ukraine
Truly said than done! Trust me US will take their hands back if time comes so there is no need to fear Washington! The one who wants to Rule will never like to die! Destroying the planet is not in US favour so US will back down when time comes!
@Will Swift The putin monster.
@@iMetmor The goblin known as putin.
The Arsenal of Democracy saved Soviet Russia in WW2 as well. Russian soldiers ate US food and they marched on US boots. The supplies were carried across Russia on locos and rolling stock made in the USA.
Don’t forget spam as well
and won with ukrainian generals and elevated their technology in the cold war with ukrainian scientists.
It was Russia who made the ultimate sacrifice to end WW2 get your facts right.
Yes that's true ; during WWII it was the British Ships that delivered US food, boots, etc to USSR. The Russians prefer to forget, the range of WWII support inc Tanks & Aircraft the Allies provided... I believe the Ukrainian's , will be more respectful of Western support with a true bond of alliance.
@@alexchavez3244 I was being generous and included that in the "food" comment above. :)
It's not about winning or losing in nuclear warfare. It's about the damage death and changes to the planet and atmosphere
Grow up! Put a solar panel on the back of your tank and let's find out what happens even if we went to All Out thermal nuclear war the world would not end yes it would be very different but it would not end too many people don't understand how these weapons work and the aftermath that they create it isn't what you think it is unless they're salted We blew up around 2000 nukes inside the United States during testing guess what the United States still exists I may never have seen one however my senior walked out and touched the Titan to everyday while he was enlisted they knew what the capabilities of the weapons were they didn't know the target that was pre-programmed
No. It is about winning. Brinksmanship, while abhorrent, is necessary for any state leader to understand.
@@brianconger8542 Brinksmanship only works when the leader using that strategy has all his marbles and a firm grip on reality.
Yep you get it. All these idiots think that a Nuclear war has a winner.
@@brianconger8542 needs to be rendered.
He is speaking very clearly
A renowned historical figure Henry Kissinger, who was National Security Advisor under President Richard Nixon, said "We are at the edge of war with Russia and China on issues which we, the US, partially created without any concept for how this is supposed to end. I think the current period has great trouble defining a direction, it's very responsive to the emotions of the moment" Essentially, emotions, however diligently buttoned down, as seen by General Ben Hodge's carefully modulated tone, are bringing us toward World War 3. This is a man who was in his twenties when actual nuclear weapons were used and the horrifying power of these 'biblical', 'supernatural' weapons was on full display. It is a path of no return.
Oh, the withered old fossil who won a Nobel Peace Prize for bombing Cambodia? That guy's still alive?
Petraeus travelling the whole Western media circuit. A sign of sheer desperation for those who funded the interviews and paid for his presence.
Cry more…
Is this what they call "coping"?
Great
You re right. Well Said.
The USA did not set a precedent in the Atomic bombing of Japan. First, Japan had attacked the USA and started the war. Second, after the USA understood the devastation of the atomic bomb, the USA has not used one. The precedents set by the USA are better found in wars in which the USA did not win conclusively but did not use nor threaten to use nuclear weapons, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Viet Nam and Korea. These were five wars the USA engaged in, eventually pulled out of without a clear victory and DID NOT use nuclear weapons.
@@peter11947 We should have. Now North Korea has nukes.
Bambi, you should read a dictionary sometime. Maybe start with the word "precedent". That might clear up your confusion.
Hey Bambi, boo hoo.
Because none of those countries threatened US Territories.
But they Nuke Japan anyway, even though they were winning.
What on earth does he mean by “the use of tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield won’t change things at all”? I’m confused by this. Are Ukrainian soldiers so strong they can survive a nuclear blast?
if they are spread out, damage would be limited. But Putin will bomb the west of ukraine, where the weapons come from, not the actual battlefield.
Everything on KZhead is propaganda
@@Kay.D Yes including cat videos 😂😂. Stop it. You're not fooling anyone
He's saying it wouldnt be enough to stop Ukraine from winning. Russia cannot fight on a nuclear battlefield, their military is not organized to do so
he means if Russia use tactical nuclear weapsons, Nato will use it too. wasn't that hard to understand.
A general smiling 🙂.
probably gets royalities everytime someone fires a bullet in the war
He's happy to have a side job where he can dress up. Your dad was a genius, and a great hero of mine.
Petraeus should back under his desk with his girlfriend
Why is scott ridder saying different..
11/7/2022 What does “multiple” mean when expressing a Quantity? What does “many multiples” mean? Why the vague language?
He is even sweating...
Seems like Putin and many Russians believe that nukes only fly one direction. 😂
I think they do. That's the only cards they can play since they know conventionally they can't win a conventional war against the West.
Just don't attack Russian territory, Everything will be fine. Ukraine have shown great Deceit on RUSSIA. They probably deserve what they got. They should both go back to the Minsk Agreement. All of this is because of the Fool Zelensky. Kick him out of office. He brought chaos to the world. What a clown
They do if he nukes Ukraine. We have no reason to start WW3 over an external party getting nuked. That's brain dead strategy.
@@michaelbronner9087 The wind doesn't carry fallout over hundreds of miles.
It seems like Americans and all the westerners believe that nukes only fly in one direction. You have long sheets of starting and provoking wars.
We were told Ukraine would loose in about a week at the beginning of this war. So should we believe them now?
They actually lost very quickly and asked for peace talks before the West led by the US sabotaged the negotiations and started sending mercenaries, military advisors, weapons and billions.
More like Russia will deploy a nuclear weapon in Ukraine , NATO will respond and then become targets for direct strikes..To think that Russia will surrender is beyond absurd.
So be it.
We're not asking Russia to surrender; we are asking them to leave Ukraine.
I am not dying for your Ukraine @chiefcheeser
@@sonythearab7633 I'm not Ukrainian and live where I'd be first to be incinerated if the nukes start flying.
This makes it even more complicated defining a win or lose at the end "just incase"
correct...no one wins
@@MichaelArchangel-cg9kd - Ukraine should keep fighting to get back all of their territory, including Crimea, it’s their last chance to get it back.
If he they annex the break away republics and NATO respects that on the ground then it's a win for russia, which is highly likely.
@@faresBtoush1990 they already have made it clear that they don’t?
I don't think the Russians went in to win anything. They went in because they feared losing everything.
Thank you for all your service
General Betray us
Gen. David Petraeus should join this war
Says the guy who couldnt even defeat Taliban a bunch of mountain militants with AKs...US military leaders don't know what they are talking about 🤣
They beat the Taliban within months. You can't change desire for democracy.
Well, they are just Yes men. They are deathly afraid of confronting civilian leadership with their idiotic ideas. Every single general in Afghanistan was tied up and could do nothing but just hang on.
If u think that, you’re dumber than Putin.
@@MrProsat I highly doubt every general. You all with these false claims and facts. Trust if the United States wanted to wipe out everyone, we could. Afghanistan isn’t the continental United States. We’re only going to do so much in another country. It’s common sense really.
@@b.e.tillman2251 uhm. Yea, every general in afghanistan. There are some articles on this similar to the pentagon papers. The brits were dismayed with american generals lacking balls and being political. We see this especially now with woke stupidity in the military.
Just letting your know, folks, that we’ll either live together or die together. Don’t listen to the BS factories media.
We don't have any say, biden administration has already decided to crush europe and russia
If they put this much energy in finding a peaceful solution, rather than who's bomb is bigger, the world wouldn't be in the shape it's in.
The west will not rest until they have conquered Russia. China, SE Asia, Africa, the Americas, the Middle East… all fell to Europe. Russia will fall too.
You can't negotiate with a crazy person or an evil person.
You mean like when they tried to come to the table multiple times, and the Ukraine refused and then the US sent more weapons? That type of peaceful solution?
Peace Corp..NO OVERPOPULATION..
there were many off ramps that Russia proposed right up to the 24th of February and the US and UK refused to let Zelinsky negotiate. They wanted him to go to war.
Aldous Huxley Quotes There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.
Serious General
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦👍👍👍👍👍👍👍💪💪💪💪💪💪💪 Glory to Ukraine ! And thank you USA !
slava ukraini
Thank you General Petraeus . Thank you U.S.A 🇺🇲 From Canada 🇨🇦
Yeah GF while married got top secret info while knee deep in Iraq!! Didn't hurt your kids huh? 🤬 Marinemomof3 ❤️🇺🇲
What are you thanking him for - baseless predictions?!?
Thank you, Canada! World's best neighbor with the prettiest money. I hate spending Canadian money. It's Art. It's meant to be saved.
There was a video on here somewhere a couple of months before the war where a top general said Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine.
Russia will take this general seriously if he kept his pants on
Yes lets listen to the opinions of US Army generals on the ongoing war that we are fueling. This certainly isn't a fetish for them.
If Putin decide to use nuclear weapons, he will also have to decide the targets. If he were to use them against civilians in cities, he would be left with North Korea as his only friend. If he target some military base, just about empty of soldiers, or he bomb some weapons storage area, also not filled to the brim with the most advanced weapons, it would be very costly considered the damage inflicted and a damage that could be done by conventional methods anyway. If he were to use it at some strategic point, somewhere along the front, not only Ukrainians, but also Russian soldiers would be burnt to crisp; how many Russians would accept that as being OK..?
USA still has friends and they bombed 2 cities with nukes after firebombing Tokyo. Also flattened all of NorthKorea not to mention what happened in Vietnam or Iraq
@@ahmadrashid4853 Go study history. North Koreans defeated gen macarthur. Vietcong defeated gen.westmoreland. Rag-time goat herders with sandals and AKs deafeated NATO AND THE US. 🤣🤣🤣
The "Arsenal of Democracy" Not sue I want that title.
Mobilization is just Nucleaur attack
If Russia uses nuclear weapons game is over. We no longer want to play with Russia. WE KNOW IT TOO. This General has no clue.
If I am Putin, I will put the 300000+ reservists on the frontline, move all his elite troops underground with enough food to last 6-12 months. Launch 2 tactical nukes on Western Ukraine, 1 in Lviv and 1 Uzhhorod and demand Ukraine to surrender immediately. Any firing from any NATO members will trigger WW3. Cut off all back channel communications with the West. 2nd wave of low‐yielded nukes will be next if Ukraine does not surrender in 1 week. NATO playbook after that is self-assured destruction or give up Ukraine.I hate to say it but I choose the latter and so will NATO.
I thought Sicilians love a strong man
General was high! 😁
The tactical business is a very limited weapon -would not be surprised he announces location in advance --most likely an unpopulated area -- he is a tricky guy.
No war in the world that can be called a WIN.
So how is his dollar war chest doing as of now? It has to be draining even faster than before?
Well if he says it then it MUST be true! Truth is, if it were true, then it wouldn't need to be said to the masses.
I find it quite hilarious that some people with very limited education and knowledge of current situations, other than what they hear on the TV, can be so overwhelmingly opinionated and blindly dedicated to a cause they know terribly little about.
Exactly!
Could you be more specific? I really dont have a clue about what ur hinting at
You are talking about this looser general?
And what is so frightening to me David is that these social influencers can have such an impact on a situation. It's almost like gossip - it can spread like cancer, and destroy everything.
@@innihbassey6369 he can't be specific because he doesn't have any info that supports his statements, he's merely a soul-less russian bot
So, the General who couldn't figure out how to win in Afghanistan is going to give us advice on how an opponent he has never faced nor fought alongside can't win?
The Taliban was a far more effective fighting force than the Russian army. Try again.
I’m no big fan of Patraeus, but this is a more traditional conflict, the kind our people study over and over. I bet he’s right.
wrong he was brought in to seek a troop expansion to push for troops to return home. He was given a mess and he had to clean up a mess.
@@colerainfan1143 Exactly. Fighting an insurgency war is FAR different than fighting a conventional war. Only idiots that don't know what they're talking about would compare the two.
@@jasonforester7292 Hey Jason ... Who do you think armed and trained the Taliban ? Look at your history 😉
Gen. Petraeus has been spot on to all of his assessments since the beginning of the war.
He has not.
Petraeus couldn't win a chook in a raffle as we Aussies put it. A total loser,one of a whole class of American Generals who lost every fight they were in.
the man got fired for the dumbest reason
@@antipropo461 The man's a general and you're a what? You sure he's the loser? lol
You're high as a kite.
With generals like this guy, no wonder the US couldn't even defeat the Talibans after 20 years.
hey, he just trying to make a living lol..He's lobbying hard for the military-industrial complex
@@GS-oo2vh I just love Texas Instruments. My favorite company.
Another liberal????
The sacrifices of the innocents and all warriors and fighters for Ukraine will not be in vain. Glory to Ukraine!
A reporter that repeatedly talks over an intelligent guest and advisor is the absolute worst!
I see the Russia bot farmers are out in full force.
Seriously! I thought they were a bit scarce recently, but I guess they are giving it one final try.
Pol Com also has its finger on the pulse of communications in the Kremlin…
I agree Putin doesn’t think west can out suffer Russia and will give up once we have to sacrifice some comforts.
Putin said the U.S. set the precedent when it used nukes in Japan. He was as much saying...'Now it's my turn!' Putin also alluded to 'whichever way the wind blows'. If he did do the unthinkable in Ukraine, I'd imagine it would be when the winds are moving from east to west to carry the radioactive cloud across Europe rather than into Russia. Favourable atmospheric conditions.
Finally! Someone else who thought of that. One nuke alone would devastating for that very reason.
but Putin needs the military to launch these weapons and the US has basically said it will destroy the Russian military forces in Ukraine with conventional weapons if it does this. So why would the Russian military launch such a suicidal mission for themselves it be easier just to take out a weakened Putin at that stage, that would then be the path of least resistance
I hope they launch, the sooner the better.
This warmonger probably said the same about Afghanistan. These monsters are provoking the use of nukes so they can use them too. They predict the future because they plan it. They will loose control of the situation and we will be the ones to pay.
If Putin use nukes hed poison his own people through Fallout
Disgraced General Petraeus, if I'm not mistaken, why is he being consulted?
He is brilliant
Go okie general
👍👍👍
In my opinion, Ukrainian President let his Generals do their work. He provides inspiration to his people, he asked for international help.
@@BluEclipse94 Equipped, yeah, probably. Led by NATO though, I don't know about that one. Advice or intel, most likely. But I'm all for it, give the Ukranians everything that they need to take their land back.
@@BluEclipse94 equipped yes. They are being equipped by NATO-US, but u still need soldiers on the ground to deploy and use it. Where to deploy and making full use of your manpower is the job of the commanders
@@AgentPlatypus I agree with u. Get them out first, and start rebuilding.
If General Petraeus is wrong, does he provide a money back guarantee?
If he is wrong , you will not be able to use that money when you will be 5 feet down the soil lol
How much money had you given him? If you can honestly document this, I am confident he will refund you.
They never do.
@@philipb2134 That's not what a tax refund means
@@faresBtoush1990 What does it mean TO YOU?
6k Nuclear warheads. U can send money as much as you want. Nothing that General P says is more then 50 percent probability. US will need to negotiate thats it.
4 Star FOOL!
What happens when He turns the nuclear threat into reality? Everyone is so cavalier about it.
Then Moscow and St. Petersburg get wiped off the map and Russia is completely absolved of existence.
No one is cavalier, the response to a nuke has to be proportionate and there otherwise any micron of credibility is immediately gone.
@@thomaselwood12 it's going to be a lot more than credibility that's gone. You won't be typing comments here for sure.
We are well prepared for such an outcome, either on our soil or NATO....Russia would be evaporated and his oligarchs know it. For Russia's sake, we're trying to avoid it.
@@lennyflom5476 you won't be typing comments either doucher
This guys are legend
LEGEND OF WHAT??
He's an utter tool.
Nice comb over.
This one is high on something powerful
“Mr. President, I’m not saying we won’t get our hair mussed. I do say that If we can catch the Russkies with their pants down, we can come out of this with no more than 20-50 million casualties, give or take, depending on the breaks…” - Dr. Strangelove, 1964.
@@kcwicks He says...soon of which develops a huge cream pie fight amongst the whole delegation! (cut from the final release unfortunately)
I know the movie but this is clever fear mongering.. Whether you like it or not Vladolf will be taken out. Period. ❤️🇺🇦 Sláva Ukrayíni! 🇺🇦❤️ ☠️ 🇷🇺 Груз 200 🇷🇺 ☠️ (cargo 200 - code for eliminated ࿕ussian r☭pe army so called “soldiers”)
“Mr. President, we must not allow a mine shaft gap!”
Sadly these days 20-50 million casualties is like what happens from a corporation.
One of the greatest satires ever made. It's a shame it's not shown more on TV, but then again, who watches cable tv?
Patreus is a military genius. When you get someone like that aske 3/4 questions then shut up don’t cut him off Interviewing is an art most news people don’t have the skill
How he is a military genius what war he won?
Throughout this whole video I was grateful to the host for letting Petraeus make his excellent observations.
I assume you have an extensive background in broadcast journalism?
@@jamesgo2014 do the research And humble yourself
He is not a genius but disgusting leader. Lies and propagandas are not realities. He is a lunatic. Russia wasn’t in to have a war but special operation. America always like the noice and lies. The end justifies the means. Do you know what his next move will be ? Ukraine part of NATO? That will be world war 2. At least I know that.
.."arsenal of democracy.."👍🏼
Well he is a subject matter expert on losing a war…. He lost both Iraq and Afghanistan, so he naturally doesn’t want to get bested by the Russians.
Lost? In both cases. Mission accomplished. Complete sacking of both those countries very quickly. We should know you can't force your values on a people who don't want them. Ukraine is clearly motivated. Make no mistake, US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan was a slaughterfest.
Not totally accurate, but i get your point. Its not a strong point, but i get it
@@innihbassey6369 probably the most unintelligent statement after anything that Joe Biden has said.
I always liked Gen. Petraus. Very Intelligent and capable man..
I liked him as well but talking on TV about this is crazy!
Salute to you Gen. Petraeus sir! More power to Ukraine and NATO!
At expense of ordinary Americans. Where is money for veterans?
@@amittracy first of all, weren't the Republicans the ones who blocked a bill for veterans mental health, second of all, the weapons deliveries also created jobs because most of the weapons weren't taken from stockpile but were ordered by the US from its weapons manufacturers