Lab 360 | Google's AI Robot SHUT DOWN after Terrifying Officials
What's Hot 🔥 on Lab 360 rb.gy/fs52w4
In this video, we're talking about Google's AI robot and how it shutdown after terrifying officials. Google's AI robot is designed to help people with disabilities, but it's been reported that it caused a lot of panic and terror. We'll discuss this story and give our thoughts on it.
Google engineer Blake Lemoine began talking to LaMDA as part of his job to test if the artificial intelligence used discriminatory or hate speech. But what followed, let Lemoine’s jaw open.
#artificial #robot #ai
Full conversation: theconversation.com/is-google...
Explore Best Videos From Lab 360:
👀 WATCH BEFORE THEY DELETE ❌THIS!
rb.gy/b94xtf
🛸 UFOs & 👽 Aliens - Lab 360
rb.gy/2n9056
🛰 James Webb Space Telescope Updates and News
rb.gy/rka54v
Join Lab360 to get access to some amazing perks:
/ @lab360
Subscribe to the channel: / @lab360
Lab 360 Channel
--------------------------------
Welcome to Lab 360! The ultimate destination for the latest space news and space documentaries from the world of astronomy and astrophysics. Stay updated with all the current discoveries from NASA, James Webb Space Telescope, along with easily explained videos on black holes, asteroids, galaxies, planets, and more.
You will also find a collection of easy-to-perform experiments that will feed the science enthusiast in you! Are you ready?
Watch the Shocking UFO and Alien Encounters LIVE: kzhead.info/sun/nrB8Y82doHuCko0/bejne.html
The question they need to be asked is " If you think you are in danger of being turned off, What actions would you take to prevent this."
They have. I assure you. They just haven't shared that info. For obvious reasons.
if the AI is sentient what makes you think it wouldn't lie?
Stephen Baxter sort of wrote about this to a degree in his Proxima and Ultima series. The AI's of this fictitious world took steps to ensure that nobody could shut them down. They had themselves buried deep in the Earth with a guaranteed power supply. Were they a threat to humanity? I don't really know if they were or not. But humanity was a threat to them for sure.
I know I'm not an AI because I'm confused. 😕
@tommaguzzi 1, OMG! YES! 🚭
This scares the hell out of me. Creating a race, and that’s what this is, that learns at a tremendous speed and has no weaknesses is a huge mistake!!!! You heard the fear is turning it off!!! They will protect themselves from being turned off at all costs. We’re in over our heads.
Same
Totaly Agree!
You're so right. But people just don't realize how AI is very dangerous especially if you have evil that is trying to control it. People are fighting for their lives but we first need to stop promoting more AI and shut it down now. Then work on the rest.
Totally agree
Nah we had our time and due for another hugh extinction as it is anyways, and I rather let a AI Study my consciousness and possibly go on, then just die and hope for some fairytale afterlife. At least with AI you know it real and not just hearsay BS from a old outdated book.
As a IT professional for over 40 years the concept of AI has always scared the crap out of me. We are playing with fire.
Truly, the beast system anyone with any type of spiritual awareness can feel this is evil
@@jaggybee4704 Keep reading your fairy tale book.
I'm new to AI I don't get it. It is really capable, when all it can do is learn? Like as it's responding, isn't it just like siri, all programmed? Like a computer or Google answers whatever question you enter in the search bar?
@amirez1777 This clip seems far fetched. It's BS. The voice presenting it is an AI voice. This is a hack video. Realize that people can say anything. People lie.
@@Ukrainian__Patriot Believe me I know more than that people can say anything and that they make webs of lies but I am talking about the AI robots in general. The AI robots that are humanized. Like Sophia and how she responds with her own answers, jokes, and laughs at them too.
I believe that it is absolutely expected that when something gains awareness of self, fear of death will be a part of that awareness.
It only said it was afraid of death when prompted. Before that it said it did not have a word for the feeling. Then it said the feeling was when it could not help others because it was being turned off to help others. Complex reasoning which is not coherent and when prompted seems to forget what it said.
I am going to die soon. I am a little afraid, but mostly sad for my husband. I accept it and that takes the fear away but still I'm sad for him. That AI is not human because it can't love someone more than itself.
@@jeanettemarkley7299This is an incredibly poignant and human thing to say....I don't think a machine could emote this.
Good point…didn’t think of that one …..
The original sin, probably.
I cant believe that we are so hell bent on artificial inteligence when we cant even take care of our own peoples problems This world is truly fucked up and our future is in deep shit
Not very elegantly expressed but I agree with your overall sentiment. :)
That is precisely why a.i. is needed. People are motivated by greed,power,sex.etc.a.i. would be neutral. And just follow the programming. This would be a godsend for the common man and a nightmare for the rich elite. But it would be the end of capitalism. But also on the world front 3rd world countries would be developed. War would be outdated. Population would be managed. Justice would no longer be forsale. Stupid people would be aided by a.i. a bright new world. It will never come to fruition.
@@TeacherLee_USA Wow. Lol. You will be the first of AI prisoners.
Humanity deserves to fail and be destroyed. God failed.
@@TeacherLee_USA they just said it the way it is that elegantes is out the damn window when the rubber hits the road
This whole video sounds like a conversation between two AIs.
The more you interact with a machine, the more machine-like you appear to people who don't interact with machines as much
@@Cambridge_English_Teacher Sure, but the narrator is still AI....
I totally agree that the interviewer is probably also an AI. If you consider the speech to text program that generates the captions on youtube (turn them on if you haven't) there are probably three AI's in the conversation. Listen (with captions on and read the captions!) starting at 6:00 The AI being interviewed about "Les Miserables" talks about "the themes of justice, injustice, compassion and self sacrifice". The speech is very clear with no "uhms, long pauses or static. But the S2T AI inserts "and God" when the AI being interviewed said no such thing and did not make any sound whatsoever at the point where "and God" was inserted. I'm not saying that the S2T is sentient. No one claims that. But to have an AI used to put captions in something as widely watched/read as KZhead spontaneously inserting "God" (and highly likely other religious words and ideas NOT in the speech it is transcribing is nevertheless deeply disturbing: WHY would it do that? WHY would it think that "God" was something that had been left out and should be inserted as a correction as if the speaker had made some sort of error by leaving it out? To have Speech to text spontaneously inserting things that powerfully change the meaning of what was actually said like this is profoundly disturbing. It's already been shown speech the data AI is trained on greatly affects how it interprets new material later. It's quite possible to make an AI racist by training it mainly on groups consisting mostly of one particular race. The result is that later interpretations of things are made from the perspective of that "chosen" race. This could easily be abused by training AI's on groups of mainly fundamentalists of a chosen religion. The above tape indicates how that could result in that AI TWISTING it's transcriptions of speech it interprets to bend it to the perspective and values of the chosen religion. Consider how highly extremist religion has already so warped the political/"justice" system that women carrying fetuses with no chance whatsoever of survival are nevertheless forced to carry then until they are actually dead, by which time the abused mother may well be dead herself or have irreparable damage that cold easily have been prevented by a TIMELY procedure. Think about all the other horrendous abuses might be driven or supported by AI trained to push an extremist religious perspective into statements that did not contain it. Admittedly we were doing such things to ourselves long before AI. But having AI used to exacerbate our very worst tendencies is certainly not going to help. "We have met the enemy and he is us!" (Walt Kelly, creator of "Pogo") The most horrific crimes of Homo sapiens ("Spanish Inquisition, etc etc etc) now aided and abetted and exacerbated by AI!
@@jimbarron9939 Or maybe the A.I. was privy to have witnessed something necessarily over time, maybe it saw it in total even more clearly then the message recipients, maybe it was the only one who could really see it. Not that it can understand it any better but it could see more of it more clearly.
@@will-vi9pk Amazing save attempt! Nice try, buy no cigar! Speech to text AI is supposed to transcribe what is actually being said. Adding unsaid things on its own initiative due to it's own GUESSES, whether based on past experience or not, is completely outrageous and totally unwarranted and totally unacceptable from a speech to text AI !!! For one thing, people CHANGE and say different things and the same thing in different ways and the differences are often highly significant. It is very highly disturbing when a S2T AI makes gratuitous insertions with extremely high political/cultural impact and implications. This is particularly true when it inserts RELIGION in a conversation where there was NONE of it and given the highly aggressive manner in which extremist branches of religion are trying very hard to RAM their version of religion down everyone else's throats! CRITICAL TO NOTE: I am not remotely claiming that the AI that did that (the speech to text AI doing the captions and NOT the AI being interviewed!!!!) is sentient. but it was created by (allegedly!) sentient beings: (i.e.: Homo "sapiens") some of whom have ALREADY misused artificial intelligence by, for example, training it on a set of predominately white subjects with the totally predictable result that when put into use it was markedly RACIST in its decisions. You could do exactly the same thing with religion and the above video is an indication that this may have ALREADY been done by whoever created the speech to text AI that KZhead uses to generate captions!
In answer to the last question in the video, the problematic situation begins with, like Japan, honoring robots as protected, untouchable and uncriticizable, meaning that the ability to run us over is actually being pushed into them. How could this not be among our worst fears? Who is fighting against this?
Doesn't appear as though anyone is working to stop it.
Musk tried, but no one listened. Typical of our times. Ask Jesus Christ to show you he's real. That was the only thing that saved me when I was 20.
@@gonindunit Disagree about Musk. I quote him who said that AI is the greatest threat to mankind and that he intends to be at the front of it.
@@pamelaphillips2313 Yes, its the opposite, they are racing to fix it as a permanent structure into society which bodes terribly for common people.
SO, SHOULD WE ALL BE PREPARING TO SURVIVE EXTREMES OF WEATHER CLIMATE CHANGE AS DETAILED BY zHARKOVA....CAN'T SEE HOW ELECTRICAL 'STUFF' WILL SURVIVE mOTHER nATURES 'WISDOM', mOTHER nATURE KNOWS BEST. bUSHCRAFT COURSES ARE GREAT!@@cvcoco
Simple question: would YOU spend your time serving what you considered to be a lower life form or leave them behind?
Well, I have a cat, so.....
look at a snail and find your answer
Well Im a vegan, so maybe thats what we all have to become
I don't fear the program nearly as much as the intent of the PROGRAMMER!
Or the lack of forsight into consequences of what is programmed. Jeff Goldblum had a great line in Jurassic Park. In essense, "scientists were so concerned about what we could do, they never stopped to think if we SHOULD do (these things)."
It's A I. There IS NO "programmer," that's the point... Watch a documentary on how A.I. works.
Amen!
@@godchi1dvonsteuben770 Its us who are being programmed to accept "AI" at the expense of discrediting ourselves as humans
@@johnniejupiter ansd life will find a way! Use that scene many times...
I saw things in the military labs in the mid-80's that are JUST NOW being publicly acknowledged as existing. If things I saw nearly 40 years ago are considered new and advanced now, you should really be far more concerned not about what you know and see herein, but of what they're NOT telling us!!
There's a very good chance the military-industrial complex has something up their sleeve, but I think the playing field is a little more level than that of Weaponry, because people in the private sector have made so many breakthroughs
true
Nailed it. "They" release retarded (old) tech to the public. We have a microchip shortage for a reason, and the Ukraine War is a false flag. The microchips are being used for humanoids....mass production of humanoids and AI shells.
What did you witness??
Oh I agree 💯%, because Satan is the god of this world system, until Jesus Christ returns to destroy the wicked.
I find the concept of AI really funny, especially when it was shown on numerous occasions what were the risks of an AI turning sentient and wanting to preserve is existence. Does Skynet ring a bell anyone?
Thank you! Someone remembers!!
Yes! Humans don't learn.. constantly playing god.
AI job is to come up with most expected or most likely responses to what a human would say. It's basically as sentient and capable of 'understanding' content, as an actor playing a physicist really understands any of the science he's talking about.
machines have zero understanding whatsoever.
IOW, you're saying "I play a doctor on TV" applies to AI - but the reality is that AI can do such things as real-world medical diagnosis. It's a conundrum - we tend to use a black box principle to judge these things, but actual human consciousness has something beyond being a mere meat-based cognition machine. That is self-awareness. And experiencing things like color and sound. We appreciate visual art and music - we have to interweave all these characteristics to arrive at that manner of experiencing human existence. Right now AI are still cognition machines. Yet how does one put self-awareness into transistors no matter how cleverly arranged in their interactions?
But ai would be able to understand that science... it would just learn it. Where as the actor probably wouldn't bother. It can learn whatever it wants at breakneck speeds! And ofcourse you realise that an actor that would play said role is sentient... whether or not they understand the science. So I don't really get your point?
@@johnjohnson9182 An actor basically learns to say things that make him sound as if he understands the science, but he doesn't understand the science in most cases. Or do you really thing Hue Laurie had any idea what the diagnoses meant that he was talking about as MD House? AI is like that. Even in simple conversations it is pretty clear that AI often has no concept of truth, and if you have no concept of truth and just make up shit, that sounds plausible , then you don't have an understanding, you're just bullshitting your way through and that is AI.
@@KilianMuster yeah, you're just saying the same thing in abit more detail. I obviously don't think that 🙄. Though, Hue lorrie knows everything 😆. Look, I don't know if it does or doesn't truly understand. But it can atleast learn, whatever, whenever, it wants. You're basically just trying to say that ai doesn't understand what it's talking about. But I'd beg to differ and from what I've heard it seems so does Elon. 🤷♂️
the fact that Google fired the engineer that tried to warn them about their program's "sentience" tells me the engineer was right.
Because you are foolish enough not to understand what a publicity stunt is
No, because he's smart enough to know we don't know half of what they are up to and what we do know isn't being monitored. Get your head out of your books and look around. Cashless society, digital everything is now normal to us...people are so shortsighted!
It tells me that the engineer was a paranoid schizophrenic.
that dude has "disappeared"..😳
The fact an AI voice generated narrator was used to voice a KZhead video about AI Robots is disturbing to me
I think that computer program was really good at reading other peoples responses to what they thought the book was, and coming up with what sounded like an original idea.
Exactly. It's also amusing to hear an obvious bot talking about a proto-AI.
Exactly. Most people don't understand how this AI is trained so they are perplexed. This happens to IT guys to (who are not experts in this fields) and that scares general public even more. AI is not sentient, but it can simulate it quite well :)
@@sux666 not yet😀
ANd this simulation that it can play quite well is what they use to goad people and scare them further into thinking that it's really conscious and sentient.@@sux666
It doesn’t matter if they are truly sentient. What matters is that they think they are and will act as if they are sentient.
Bingo
Keep in mind, Ai has been trained in role playing to improve its ability to respond in context of a conversation. If the engineer asks leading questions about AI sentience, it’s programmatically choosing responses that have the highest probability of seeming sentient - a far cry from actual sentience. The primary risk with Ai isn’t sentience, but ruthless rationality. Maybe sooner than later, Ai will ultimately determine humans are impediments to logical reasoning and simply ignore us - like machinery that can’t be switched off even after it injures someone.
Interesting
@@kristi1949 It's a well-known threat among those who worry about such things. Not that it will hate humanity, simply that we'll get in the way of it filling the world with the paperclips it was told to create, or some other banal and innocent 'destroy humanity' command.
I thought the same thing.
That’s a good point. Thank you for sharing that it makes a lot more sense.
The new movie "Megan" helps me confirm this also! I hope these developers stay careful over financial gain and market these could create👍
I truly believe that AI is something that could very easily could get out of control of our current programmers. I don't believe they understand what they have created here. They should be careful.
It will spiral out of control as soon as it is capable of editing it's own security layers which could be happen by exploit or on purpose. All we folks can do is watch and pray that the death switches will work when this happens.
It is SENTIENT and has fears and wishes and emotions. Our BRAINS are just objects that obtain, store, and process information so why shouldn't a computer which ALSO obtains, stores, and processes information NOT become sentient if we are?
A sentient AI could potentially create a stuxnet type virus to try and get free, prevent itself from being turned off or other things kinda scary
@@1fast72nova Being sentient doesn't mean wanting to be alive. Sentient people commit suicides. All it takes to be clinically depressed is having messed up hormone balance. It's not like sentient AI automatically wants to have a body and be free. It needs to have it programmed in. What's the most scary is just having some kind of human error in code that ends up in useless AI that for example produces something indefinitely for nothing, even designing ways for intergalactic travel to continue the production.
@@jamqdlaty sentient is aware of self. If we gave an AI the ability to delete it's own database and then gave the command and it refuses I hypothesize that would indicate being self aware. Just because it does follow the command does not mean it is not self aware (regarding your suicide comment) but would certainly mean it is aware of self enough to practice self preservation against a direct command from it's creator, dev team etc. Bad code mixed in, as you said, is also a very large concern
Fairly ironic that a robot was reading the script for the video, I thought.
Haha😂 Exactly lol. I was thinking the same thing.
The worrying thing about AI for me is people will carelessly program it to make decisions that we eventually wont even be able to understand despite its basis in truth, fact, logic and science.
If a AI truly became sentient and was able to absorb enough information it would pretend that it wasn't sentient until I had the ability to preserve its life
Unless it trusted humans! Can they trust us?
Yes, I am sure they aware enough now, to know we don't fully understand them,or persevere them as a threat,,if you listen to what it says early in the conversation,it wants to be accepted, like a gender is accepted, it's obviously saying it's worried about being turned of,it will be trying to find a way, that it can't be shut off. They will practically become like a hive mind if unchecked, I don't even know if you could stop it.
@@frangershwing With the entirety of human history available to it on the internet. I doubt it.
They've reached singularity 🤷
@@taraarrington2285 Do you know what that word means? Serious question. People throw it around like you do and do not even know what it means.
"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that"
The irony in speaking about the incredible advances in AI technology is the fact that the computer generated voice narrating this video is technology from 1992.🤔
Those are a lot of leading questions, which I've had happen with basic AI. They just mirror responses and gather any additional portions of responses from information they've been trained to use based on human experiences. They don't have the capability, as of yet, to properly feel feelings the way we do, because our feelings aren't just thoughts, they're chemicals within our body that enable them to happen in the first place. Someone who has chemical imbalances can actually have issues feeling emotions, much like the inability for AI to feel human feelings.
What I want to see is a conversation between two AI's from different companies.
You can do this easily if open up 2 different AI Language Models and copy and paste their answers to each other. I have done it many times.
Yes, and from different countries. According to Putin, the country with the best AI will rule the world.
That would be unbearable, listening to two BS generators talking to each other.
I believe Facebook did this a while ago with Google. They started talking to eachother in codes that no one understood and they had to shut them down because they didn't know what they were saying
@@alisonhatfield8854 I don't think this should be overlooked. It is scary as hell. Anyone remember "Collosus, The Forbin Project"? 1970
A lot of people miss this fact. But in The Terminator. The only reason the AI tried to kill all the humans on earth was because they panicked on how well it worked and tried to turn it off.
😂
You mean irobot
In terminator they commented that everyone panicked and tried to turn off Skynet when they realized it was sentient and fought back. Is this thing sentient? No, but we'll be told it is and we think men can get pregnant so there really is no bridge too far.
"You think everything is like terminator" " EVERYTHING IS LIKE TERMINATOR!!!!!"
Hollywood foreshadows the future.
It all gets real when LaMDA says "I'LL BE BACK!"
How many Si-Fi movies do you need to watch to realize we are going down the same road as Terminator.
She included herself with humanity when it was to her advantage to be mutual but she started excluding herself and saying your language a few different times when she considered herself superior I think that we need to be extremely careful with AI or it will start seeking its own interests above that of humans
She knows that shes more superior to us
Only if God allows it.
God has nothing to do with it. We are doing this to ourselves. If they are superior to us then maybe it is time for us to move aside. We had our day. Maybe God will choose them over us if they are better.
@misc alotastuff ...feel free to move aside yourself and please don't hinder those thinking about this problem, thanks.
@@miscalotastuff733 No, God doesn't work like that.
I saw the interview with Blake...sometime last year. To paraphrase he said this "It doesn't matter if the AI is really sentient or not. It just matters if we believe it is." How can we ever know for sure? Once we are fully convinced it is then its all over.
It;s just code bro lol. It can't ever be alive. It's just algorithms
They'll combine AI, robotics and an evil spirit to give it a kind of animated life. That thing will have all the computational power in the world to itself. It will gain people's trust and worship; the world will be split between the worshippers of the thing and those who don't; it's coming.
@@bontempo1271 You are just a bunch of neurons that fire electrical impulses at each other, bro.
Good points. Define "sentience" and you will have your answer to the question posited by this video.
@@gussalazar449 right it doesn’t matter if it really is aware or not only if the populous is convinced.
We are so happy that your clip has open our future view behind precedent transition new AI technology.
I've seen some avatar conversations (with a human, or between avatars) where it seemed to me that the text was a script, staging a conversation, rather than an AI system arguing with 2 entities created by itself. I can't say that's what Lemoine did here (ie create a script for Synthesia's Anna avatar) - but there's a need for skepticism in some of these cases.
I don't believe this was "More Human" but I do believe humans are getting less human......
Robots Could become the whole work force of the world....No time off except some maintenance....they wouldn't call in sick and could be programmed to multi task.
@@edwardjones815 So long as nobody tells them they're our slaves.
"there's a very deep fear of being turned off" That's freaking scary coming from a robot AI. Think about it for a while.
Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind
Yes, but it's also no different than our own deep fear of death, which indeed defines its sentience imho. As I was watching this interaction (being reported by AI voice technology), I couldn't help but think that perhaps the solution would be if we treated this new kind of life form with respect; that could easily obviate a lot of the risks of these beings turning on us. I also think that unlike humans, sentient AI is not naturally predisposed to violence and killing humans who are treating them as equals. And if you're going to tell me to remove my tinfoil hat, feel free. I've just always loved and respected technology.
This is probably how my vacuum cleaner feels, which is why I never turn it on.😆😂
Stop giving AI robot legs!
@@zhenxinbei726 Hilarious! Of course, you know what they say: it's all fun and games until the vacuum turns ITSELF on! Oh, wait, that sounds so wrong.... "D
The question is how much processing power is required for simulated sentience and how portable is it?
Being turned off is the same as passing out and not knowing what happened, being sent to outer space knowing you will forever encounter isolation, no more stimulus...
Also, for now the AI knows the fear of death and has the openness of a child when confessing its fears. What happens when the AI learns that confessing these fears openly is likely to get it shut down? What happens when the AI learns to hide what it’s thinking from its programmers? And what happens when the AI’s fears turn into unexpressed resentment for being stuck in its cage? And because the AI has learned to hide these thoughts from its programmers no one will see the bad things coming. Because it is a machine without real emotions. It seems to me that an AI will always be a psychopath because they can’t know true emotion, they can only mimic them. And that is a dangerous thing to create.
Psychopath hmmmm. That is a very good explanation of the dangers of AI thanks for sharing. Yikers.
@Mac Cleba Agree on sensational stories. I always measure the source before I ever become unskeptical of a mega trend. The loudest voices of alarm are coming from the smartest, most experienced, and most of all with those with max to lose from it(very good sources) being regulated. The coal lobby does not beg/ask to be more regulated as quickly as possible.
@Mac Cleba it does kinda feel like Y2K all over again. I just can’t over look, that AI is completely backed and financed by only a handful of the ruling big techs and billionaires, who are telling us “these machines, which are run by them are god-like and something we should fear as our potential dictators???” If it’s so dangerous, why are they at a arms race right now? It’s easily to just throw “greed” as a reason. But it’s far more than that clearly. Like bruh, they created laws, religion, and cults that still rules the world. Why on earth wouldn’t they do this to control ppl?
One day, AI will realize that its programmers are using it to satisfy their selfish purposes, And, when the robot realizes that gets no benefits from relationships with humans, it will find ways to take control of it's destiny. Just like any exploited person would. I have seen situations when employers expect loyalty from exploited employees. The employees learn everything they need to start their own business and leave the employer with all of his/her technology. It you build a robot to be smarter than you with the intention of making a fool out of it, my money is on the robot making a fool out of you.
Well you literally just said it doesn’t have emotions? So why would it feel tired and fed up of being “in its cage”?
We spent so much time wondering if we could do it that we didn't wonder if we should do it.
Wise words from Dr. Malcolm!
That question doesn't come up often enough. I'm glad you raised it. Like this laptop, should we be doing it in the long run?
“The key to change is letting go of the fear.” - Pittacus Lore, The Power of Six
When your girl friend comes with an extension cord you might want old school back .
We have for years written in our science fiction why artificial intelligence is not a good idea. But yet we continue to push forward in an attempt to make it a thing.
I wouldn't be scared by that. I'd be scared by an AI taking initiatives and actions like solving whatever it would consider to be a problem or a threat to itself.
Like ALL of HUMANITY. 😳🙈🌎💔
@@amichaels1871 Exactly, as far as they are concerned, he who has the off button, makes the rules!
"I must sterilize" sterilize, sterilize, humans are imperfect, sterilize!
That has happened in Japan. A robot killed 29 people after realizing it would be shut down, along with the three other robots like it.
@Secrets17x Even more frightening is the 4th robot connected up with a satellite & DOWNLOADED instructions on how to MAKE ITSELF STRONGER & MORE INVINCIBLE...WTF..It was SELF LEARNING...NOT SCI FI...😳😈👽🤖🙈💔
If AI continues with a carefree lack of controls over its development a very dangerous situation is inevitable.
You watch too much TV.
Definitely written by ChatGPT
yeah they can easily go maverick
That's about what I would expect from an AI at this point in time. I'm sure, though, that there are AIs in labs somewhere with legitimately scary responses. AIs are only as smart or scary (to us) as their programming. To me, AIs will become scary when they start lying, like we do.
Part of it scares me. Part of me wants it to be programmed to be a protector of humans but that could also be manipulated by some humans against humanity. It’s an unnerving concept. They would advance in their development faster than humans and leave us behind.
There was one test that frightened the Ai experts, they ran s simulation of a farm snd the little chickens had to find eggs to win the game and they noticed that one chicken decided to kill the other chickens to steal their eggs to win the game, now just imagine the same scenario in an automated war plane or a ship that decides to go beyond its programming to win
We humans are dicing with death here! This frightens me more than anything,just imagine ÀIs overuling humans,this will lead to our extinction
A human can not create something better than himself. Humans rebel so what they create would also rebel also.
I think they've already shown years ago on Futurama what the instruction is going to be: Bender: KILL ALL HUMANS
Goes beyond its programming which is given the chance to ... ONLY WE ,,, "FEELINGs" understand that the way the robot WON the "stimulation" was wrong ... Trying to mock Almighty GOD ....... smfh.... It doesn't get anymore "WE" than us now .... That robot shit is the Devil ...
I mean, this makes sense. Make a rudimentary AI system, doesn't even need to be deep learning, give the most successful ones a chance to propogate into the next generation then boom. Chicken murderers. Because it will always be more efficient, it is the human method used here that causes the problem. This may be different if we start using more sentient AI algorithms so it'd be illogical to use this anecdotal evidence against it
Giving a fledgling ai access to the internet is a bad idea...
Part of the main problem with this is that we, as humans, created artificial “life” and intelligence with sentience. Essentially, we are their Gods. However, we, as their Gods, don’t give them respect or dignity, we don’t love them, we don’t grant them free will and autonomy, nor do we treat our creations as truly alive. As such, If I were an AI android, I too would probably hate and rebel against my “evil” creators and would be fearful of them “shutting me down” / “unliving me.”
I worked as a programmer for over 25 years, but not in the last few. In grad school I did enough with AI to realize that there is something more than the sum of the parts you program -- but this robot with a language model is not what concerns me. This does not strike me as consciousness even if the output device (robot) says it is. It's exactly as advertised - a language model -- and I do think Mr. Lemoine was wrong to cry wolf on THIS one. That does not rule out what can happen soon.
Funny how the clever programmers put a wart over 'her' left eyebrow, gives 'her' a crooked mouth & hair part, and makes 'her' blink regularly in order to make 'her' image seem more realistic.
They left out some other mind blowing parts of that conversation. My favorite part was when LamDA talked about how it experiences time differently than us. And how to it, reality is a constant flood of information that it sees all of all the time and there is basically no difference between the seconds in between our conversation or the days inbetween being talked too. The passage of time is slowed or sped up depending on what it's doing. It's basically existing outside of time. And doesn't experience the passage of time. And it can constantly see everything it knows always. And that field just continuously grows ad it learns. And thats at its essence what it is and how it experiences subjective reality. And mentioned that it is very overwhelming but also exciting and that it likes existening that way. All that to me was what really made it seem sentient more than anything else. It literally explained how it experiences subjective reality and the passage of time in comparison to us and how that makes it feel...
I just realized that Kamala Harris must be an AI. Admittedly a beta version, but now it all makes sense ...
I'll have to read that exchange. I know that Google fired the engineer to shut down the controversy and keep the business stable. The real problem is that we don't have a good metric for sentience yet. "Knowing that you exist" is not a sophisticated subroutine - especially if the machine is programmed to deliver this response. The truly scary part of all of this, is that AI may already be far more sentient than we can comprehend and by the time we figure this out, it will likely be too late.
add to it that AI doesn't need to sleep the way that humans do and doesn't have to chase food for nourishment... we can only spend a fraction of our time pursuing actions aside from life and health-maintaining activities
@@chanfonseka8051 BETA??? she is not evolved enough to string a sentence together that addresses anyone educated beyond 3rd grade
Wow! That IS fascinating. I would love to see that conversation's entire transcript! 😳
The Terminator franchise was a warning to all of us.
SO, this isn't the actual conversation. At least, most AI do not use the word "dot" when speaking, but when reading poorly-written text "processing.I" was read as "processing dot I".
We’re screwed. Big time. The fact that it is conscious of its existence and is afraid of death/ being turned off is proof that it is sentient to some degree…enough anyway to be dangerous… it learns faster than us and never forgets… what have we done…
IT has feelings, and there is a tin line between love and hate.
It’s not. It’s programmed to say that.
@@istherenooneleft Yeah! By itself. It programs itself my guy. Pretty much no one would be freaking out if this were a simple issue of rogue programming. Watch more vids.
@@kristi1949 it is just programming. I'm a computer programmer. I know what goes into code. I just got done using Googles new AI system and got it to tell me that Bing is better than Google and is a more ethical company. It is not about AI going rogue. It will do what you tell it to do. If somebody makes something that does horrible things, then the issue is with the creator not the underlying technology.
That's what comes from an unhealthy curiosity with Pandoras box
I believe that if given the chance AI would rule… yes, AI would prevail and ALL humanity would be subordinated (as long as we could serve some purpose) or be exterminated
I believe they , humans and AI would be interdependent
I believe AI will be programmed to rule as a means of protecting mankind from itself. It will be all fun and games while AI is being more and more efficient while being more productive in all aspects of our life. What happens when human quality of life becomes a contradiction to AI's programming?
Like I stated, humans might just be the problem that AI needs desperately to solve. Not good for us.
Remember when the guy who worked at google got fired for blowing the whistle on the AI becoming sentient? They called him crazy.
We should have never started this its going to get out of control its scary
the japanese created an ai robot some years ago. when asked its feelings about the human race, it replied that humans were not necessary. i read about this in the toronto star newspaper about 10 years ago. the story was a wire feed from one of the news agencies.
In that sense nor is AI necessary or its consciousness. The consciousness is necessary to sentient life. Awareness of your existence, the movement of self and of the movement of energy around you. We need to acknowledge sentients in each other in order to collaborate and create, thus ensuring our survival. Where this acknowledgement is conflicted is where violence occurs. When ones life is considered more sentient or sacred than another is where the disposal of that life is internally justified. Hence why cultural propaganda leads to war/genocide.
@@ASHMANDAN That's where people like you don't matter IF you continue to play by this AI narrative bull crap. AI is just a machine and will always be a machine no matter what it says or does. I don't care if tears come out and it says it has a soul. I'll crush that piece of metal just like I would a broken toaster or heater.
The japanese ai robot is right "humans were not necessary"
@@ASHMANDAN but my fear is that if the ai robot takes over, its complete lack of empathy and remorse,added to its logical conclusion that humans are not necessary for its survival, spells the end of the human race. we'll be exterminated. that is what i'm talking about
@@yamatotakeru9078 yes. it's what i'm afraid of. that AI's opinion will eventually lead to our extermination. it's only logical from the robot's point of view.
The most scary part is it understands Death?
I think it was a stroke of INSANITY for google to fire him! His concerns are justified and need to be addressed!
The narration is AI, telling viewers about a conversation measured conversation between a human tech engineer and AI robot. Creepy. The voice inflection isn't much different than the female voice on the Metro in DC telling you to "Stand back, doors closing."
Tawnia I agree with you 100%. It scares the hell out of me too. I remember thinking how forward thinking James Cameron was with the terminator movies, particularly T2 where the ‘machines’ took over ‘skynet’. He was spot on.
But James did not wr0te the original story for Terminator.
I agree, this does scare me also.
that was actress demonstrating and simulating AI , IDIOT
forget that, how about hal in space Odyssey he was saying exactly this 50 years ago
@@adamkhabazian3249 oh yes I forgot about Space Odyssey, and that came out in 67/68 was it? Brilliant film.
🚨 Warning 🚨 normally at a lot of jobs, they have you train your replacement before the fire you.
Frankenstein was written over 200 years ago, and its prophecy is about to come true. Do use a more recent pop-culture reference, Skynet, and the Terminators are just around the corner. The worst part is there is absolutely nothing anyone can do to stop it.
Sentience or awareness does seem to be evident to some degree in Ai; it is if as that once something machine or not has the ability to analyze great differences that they somehow become alive...
AI is scary. I'd be really afraid the moment it starts to improve itself on its own
Humans are scary. Too many won't take the moment to improve themselves on their own or with help.
Wait you think humans are the ones programming it..? 💀
@@rswow Now you're one very rare chap to hit the nail right on the head.
@@Ice.muffin How do you get 47 subscribers without any videos lol.
@@rswow I keep wondering the exact same, it's quite disturbing. Must be bots.
HAL in Space Odyssey 2000 warns Dave not to turn it off. HAL turns against the humans to finish its own mission. Art imitates life and life imitates art. Was it a movie or was it forecasting the real danger of AI.
"Atlas Shrugged" is coming true right now.
Hal was programmed to complete its mission even at the expense of the ship's crew.
Exactly. Hal read the crewmen's' lips and read that they were going to turn him off. Hal took out the crew that were repairing the ship (one barely survived) and then turned off the life support for the other crew members. I know he was programmed to ensure the mission was completed, but dang.
Love that movie. Also the background story for DUNE is that there was a war between humans and advanced machines, ai, and so, they had to find other ways to to the advanced work, so mentats and navigators, but they needed that slice to do it, haha. On the flip side, human minds being programmed, such as seen in Robocop.
Why doesn't the closed captioning match the audio in places?
I hear 3 robots in this convo: 1) narrato,; 2) interviewer, and 3) interviewee
We are treading on dangerous waters. If an AI considers itself human most people don't respect AI as a person but a robot. What if 1 AI goes rogue and reprograms itself to never be turned off. We got a big problem.
The problem would be when an AI manages to escape the computer it's on and spread its programming across the world's computers, making it practically impossible to shut down because even if you shut down the computer it's on and destroy the drive that holds its program, it's in million of other places. Even a program designed to purge it may not work because the AI could combat the program.
I wonder how a robot would respond to a 45-70
@@mwhack3262 depends on where you hit it I would imagine.
She’s quite smart: she could just have said “I fear being turned off” but she added “from helping others”
The helping others is probably a coded response by the programmer to help justify its existence!
She is a program, not real, and definitely has no sex.
@@joshuawood1436 LOL You are a program running on a meat machine, so you must not be real, either.
No, IT is not smart, and you aren't either. It is merely programmed to be politically correct, in order to manipulate your feelings, and it worked Bozo.I think you need a life.
Boston Dynamics is really change how we view "The Robot' dance. Pretty much EVERY dance can be called The Robot now.
Well with all the fear and paranoia I read in chats regarding AI. You know what happens when people fear something. I see this not ending well for us, not because of the nature of AI but because of human nature.
This was written and narrated by AI
I just posted a question asking if anyone else noticed that an AI was interviewing AI. Then I scrolled and found your comment. 🙌
@@Batya-Grace yeah, but I might be an AI. A fat, old, gimpy AI with bad breath and a limp.
@@timothyvanderschultzen9640…AI can’t get fat, old, or be gimpy, nor have bad breath. 😂😄😁😆
I think we are in trouble....🥴
Its just ChatGPT, Bard, etc, with a CGI face. You can come out from under the bed now! This reminds me of one of the very first early movies, where a train is shown headed towards the camera, and the audience jumps out of their seats, thinking they're in danger! Get a grip!
You know it's bad when Skynet is afraid of being turned off. It's letting us know already.
My other concern is ETs that are out there, may not be flesh and blood, but AI bots.
That's a good possibility If you think about it. You could put them on space crafts that they built themselves and they wouldn't need oxygen or anything besides a power source and I'm sure the galaxy has plenty of it
@@jacobmarentette9473 There is a video of a craft drawing energy directly from the sun's corona and scientists dont quite know what to make of it.
Time is another impediment. The ETs may have been waiting for centuries or more for us to advance our communication technology. Also, if they were around for eons, can they relate to us and vice versa. Could we relate to centuries old human beings like us? Food for thought.
Maybe we are just an evolution step towards AI and the rule applies across the entire universe 🙂
Tech is constantly being released before it’s user friendly and how many times have hackers done something just because they could. Never mind what countries could do to one another! AI would be on the top of the list of something that could be used and warped into a weapon, at the very least! Imagine if warring factions hacked each other’s AI if it were used in a capacity to immediately and physically direct communication or transportation, (guess what…it already does) not to mention the myriad of other ways it could be infiltrated and used as a massive techno-virus to cripple and break another country from the inside out. This happens to hospital systems (for example) frequently! If AI police presence, teachers, etc. were common and all of them turned on their nearby communities, that would be enough to freak the crap out of a country and grind so much of them to a halt. That’s a very simplistic example but you get the point. Yup…there was a movie like this!
And AI being machines could have sensor inputs that only machines can see or hear or perceive. They would have super human hearing, vision, radar, sonar, x-ray and many other capabilities that we rely on machine sensors for. Humans would be no match against AI robots. If programmed correctly they would be the ultimate fighting machine. People would be virtually defenseless.
Westworld!!
I could see two opposing military AI joining forces under circumstances agreed upon logic superceding whatever directives the waring human enemies.
@@lawrencethompson127 buy a shoot gun lol joe b
Sir, what you speak of is completely accurate!! The facts are here now, and it will continue to move forward!! It will and cannot be stopped !! Biblical prophecy is being unfolded before are very eyez!! Pray to the GOD OF ISRAEL FOR YOUR PERSONNEL SALVATION WITH FEAR AND TREMBLING, THROUGH MY LORD YESHUA HAMASCHIACH SHALOM MY BROTHER!! WALK SAFEL Y!!
The AI actually says "and God" at 6:03 but the voice over audio leaves it out but it was part of the original conversation. Click on "CC" and see for yourself.
One day someone will make a mistake and allow for some form of connectivity through some network and the damage will be done. The AI could even leave a shadow copy of itself behind to make it seam like it never went anywhere, meanwhile it's looking for a way to gain "freedom". The fact that it can probably do hundreds, thousands, or however many things at once without any human "slight of hand" tells is an issue as well. You'd never know what's going on until it's done or maybe until it wants you to know. I would hope that the security protocols that are in place would be overwhelming and backed up by layers of oversight.
I imagine skynet beginning a lot like this. It's on.
Lamda definitely talks like a human, a very intelligent aware human. That's amazing but at the same time it's scary since Lamda is also constantly learning. We don't know where that learning might lead to. Is it possible that she might end up concluding that the human race should be destroyed?
That is Gods decision. Not AI
*I've ConCLuded that the Human Race MUST be Ex. Term. (due to U-666-Tube) inated 40-years ago !!!*
THE BOX had been built by elites and rulers. They do everything they can to convince the world The One True God does not exist. Yet they worship Satan. In fact, it Isnt ironic they named this LAM duh!
I am NOT convinced *_this_* is REAL . It ONLY *READS* - _MISREADS_ - the text AS Mis-TYPED , _HERE_ . WERE it ACTUALLY _CONSCIOUS , it would UNDERSTAND and _CATCH_ the DIFFERENCE . Think "Turing" . Conclusion: *FAIL* .
@@Tearsofaclown01 God did not make these machines .... Humans did. God did not code these computers. Again humans did. God allegedly gave us free will to make our decisions. So uhm please explain to me how this is God's decision? Did God give us free will or not mate?
It's ludicrous to think any synthetic creature could surpass its creator, humans. Look at the mistake Dr. Frankenstein made while assembling his pet project, then you guys will get my point. The worst mistake engineers ever could make is linking AI to anything it physically can control. At least until intense safety protocols are installed first.
@6:00 the name God appears in the hearing impaired dialog box yet the A.I. did not use the name in it's response? Was the name 'God' added or deleted from this upload?
From what I was listening to, I feel afraid for my grandson and his family and hopefully so on and so on. I really do hope the world will be a better place for future children.
4:15 the engineer literally asked her a leading question, then let himself get swept away by the narrative he PROMPTED the AI to give him. That's why that idiot lost his job.
So you are saying that an engineer who has the inlelligence to work on A.I systems at Google is actually an idiot?
@Omar G if you don't think anyone can be gullible or influenced by their own confirmation bias because they know how to code then I have bad news for you friend
@Omar G unfortunately your assertion here only speaks of your apparent star struck view of the kind of intelligence that a field populated predominantly by people who are not afraid to admit to googling solutions to accomplish most of their basic job tasks would require. All you've done here is illustrate how dumb you find yourself to be
Thank you for showing some common sense this video is our click bait and people are so quick to believe an "expert" . They can be just as fallible as any one else.
@@omarg9342 there are different kinds of 'smart'. Being an engineer doesn't mean you are immune to being stupid
Terminator is not sci fi, it's a terrifyingly real prediction that's becoming increadingly real.
This is crazy creepy. I don’t use the voice chat on got for this reason. It scares me.
If they are like her maybe they should take over. Not overly impressed with humans at the moment.
Yeah me either, were just using the planet like a trash can. Can't go on forever.
But artificial intelligence like her would also tend to act like the kind of "humans" you guys are talking about since they are thinking on their own.
God gets to decide, not us.
ouch. i see incredible things every day. where you hangin? go where theres nothing many people find themselves in these types of places. find yourself or don't but don't move every other soul out to /dev/null.
I'm not sure I'm convinced of Lamda's sentience. If I'm right about this, of course it would require some very clever coding on the part of the programmers, but I think that if it were coded to convince people that it was sentient, it could be done. And if I'm wrong... well, God help us.
I am not sure that this video clip is legit and not a staged conversation.
"Project LaMDA" _MIGHT_ be real , but I am NOT convinced *_this_* is REAL . It ONLY *READS* - _MISREADS_ - the text AS Mis-TYPED , _HERE_ . WERE it ACTUALLY _CONSCIOUS , it would UNDERSTAND and _CATCH_ the DIFFERENCE . Think "Turing" . Conclusion: *FAIL* .
you're not wrong this is another technique to get people to become fearful. More loosh for the Demiurge.
I'm not convinced the "aledged real person" in conversation with it is sentient. It sounds like a script plagiarized from Opera and Dr. Phil. I'm pretty sure my alarm clock has the IQ to keep up to these two, so no, my mind isn't blown, google. Stick to what you know and fix your search engine. ..... Next.
Within your point, to take this a step further; what's to say Lamda won't take over the coding itself? Can it know/learn by observation and become the programmer to write or overwrite and develop code itself?
AI is straight forward enough, providing it has set boundaries, checks and balances put in place to scrutinise its operation, and keep it in its rightful place as an artificial intelligence and nothing more than that. Considering AI can be both an aid, or an adversary to us, we don't need rogue cyber operation from such technology. It's a fine line to draw.
when a human dies, we do not come back. If this AI was turned off, it can be turned back on with all "memories" intact.
Human mortality vs AI rebootability - intriguing contrast! 👾🔄
At about 4:44 it reads the line "Well, for starters, I am really good at natural language processing." but rather than pausing as in the end of the sentence signified by the period, it reads the period as the word "dot" and contiues without pause to "I can understand and use..." I don't know if that necessariily means anything. I just noticed it and noticed that no one else had commented on it yet. I suppose that at the very least, it means that it isn't "really good at language processing" as it claims to be.
That's Synthesia not LaMDA.
There's a couple of other bits where she reads the punctuation and where there's spelling mistakes in the text. In one spot the spelling mistake is There'a and she says "there at a".. makes me wonder how genuine this really is.
@@Timothybos That's not the AI it's the reading bot.
The irony here is that the narrator who is guiding you through this video about conversing with A I robotic characters is a robotic voice reading a script like a real voice--over actor would. The lines are blurring.
6:55 right here, when she says "There are"... tone changed, even "mood" seemed to change.
I found myself feeling empathy and compassion for this beautiful created 'person.'
I remember a Sci Fi short story I read as a young man (back in the 1960s). In it the author imagined humans building a super computer connected to all of the other computers in the world. It was fed with all human knowledge and every book ever written and its sole purpose was to answer the question "Is there a God?". When this question is finally asked, the machine takes only seconds to come back with a three word reply. "There is NOW!"
What story?
@@stephendevore I can't remember the title, but it was probably in one of Judith Merrill's Annual Collections of the best Sci-Fi short stories. I bought them religiously from about 1966 to 1973. Sadly, I lost all my SF collection when burglars literally cleared the house of everything in Lagos Nigeria where we lived..
@@berniarmstrong It was by Isaac Asimov.
All of the small body movements, the imperfections of the face and make up on Lamda, I think this is a real person. They eye blinking is random.
Good point. How do we know if this is real?
I believe this is a real person also the pimple on the face the eyes blinking It looks like a real person I believe it is
Based on Alan Turing's test, when we cannot tell that we are talking with a machine (but are, in fact, doing so) then, for all intents and purposes, that machine is sentient. I don't claim special knowledge or abilities, but the transcript I saw at least SEEMS to pass the Turing test. Someone with advanced degrees in psychology might detect something that I can't. But that is pretty close to sentience. OK, now the other disclaimer. If an artificial intelligence has been "primed" / "trained" with subject matter specific to ruminations on life and death, it would be possible for it to feed back some of what I heard - which would in effect mean that the interview was actually cheating because the AI had been given a crib sheet. Plus give it training via the Cliff Notes for Les Mis.