Putin’s New T-14 Armata Tank Has Been ‘Unleashed’ In Ukraine
As of July 2023, it is uncertain whether Armata tanks have started participating in direct combat. There are several potential reasons for their non-involvement so far. One possibility is that Russia, being aware of the advanced technologies incorporated into its next-generation tank, aims to prevent it from falling into Ukrainian hands in close combat situations. As of now, there have been no open-source reports or documented instances of an Armata tank being destroyed, abandoned, or captured in Ukraine. The introduction or potential engagement of the T-14 Armata raises crucial questions regarding the fleet's size and the effectiveness of its technologies. The exact number of T-14 tanks operated by Russia remains unclear. Even if these main battle tanks are indeed deployed in combat, their quantity may not be significant enough to create a substantial impact. Various news reports suggest that the Kremlin initially placed orders for several thousand T-14 Armatas to be produced several years ago, but the timeline for their arrival appears uncertain and may have been extended beyond 2025. Consequently, determining the exact size of Russia's T-14 force proves challenging.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
While I don't intend to defend Russia, it's worth noting that Russia primarily employs T62 and T55 tanks for indirect fire, specifically in the context of artillery operations, rather than for direct confrontations. The direct confrontation involves the utilization of T-90, T-80, and T-72B3. This is Ukrainian propaganda meant to discourage the Russian Army.
Also t-62s were introduced in 60s, not 40s
Yeah, most people seem to ignore those facts,
...clever misinformation : talking about the ability of the T 14 to dominate on the battle fields, but in the same time production capacity in question, army disorganized and not motivated, according to the ISW, a neo-con think tank, created for the purpose of downing grade the possible adversary...
Cope, russia is not using T62s for indirect fire, entire battallions armed with them have been wiped out in Kherson. Russia is using old tanks to fill gaps
@@freedomordeath89 stop watching CNN or the BBC, they reduce intelligence and degrade IQ levels. 🤔
Yes, the T55's and T62's have been supporting assault troops as indirect fire. The T80s and T72's have been doing the donkey work although the T90s have been seen on the battlefield. I saw drone footage of a T90 getting hit 19 times by ATW, it still continued on its mission and withdrew in good order, I'm not sure how the crew fared but they were still operating the machine. The T90 and T14 are the first tanks to be built by any nation for the modern era. I note Russia has also ramped up tank production and as well as their 10,000 various tanks in reserve, they are making 900 new tanks a year, doesn't look like Russia is running out of anything for now.
You saw a video. LOL.
And you are a Russian stooge.
Source: I saw a video
Instead of giving us the correct informations, he distorted it to make it look like Russia is totally bad at everything ... there is a video here on KZhead of ISIS firing anti tank missiles at T-90 tank, the tank continue moving after it got hit
Russia has less than 10 modern tanks and less than 8 operational su57. Very weak when u consider little Ukraine has pushed back russian invaders with a few supplies from 5 nato countries
"As ukraine gears up for offensive" ....bruh.... you been paying attention lately?
OfFeNsSiVe FaIlEd CuZ lInEs DoN't ChAnGe On ThE mAp WhIcH uSeS rUsSiAn SoUrCeS aS sAfEtY mEaSuRe
bro everyone on youtube is cringe regarding whats happening. they all tow the party line lol you just get used to it
@@winnah2314 yep I'm just watching
@@jerrymoore7817 russia lost 12% of the 30% in a year, is that winning?
@@phantom1021 And according to what sources exactly?
Челленджер 2 уже доехал до фронта? Хочу посмотреть как он горит😊
just look for ur self @ the special operation ...
What is Kyiv doing…you already made it possible to capture it 😂…just saw all the Ruskie equipment litter the streets but you didn’t make it, Vatnik loser!
The older tanks were just gun platforms
Indirect fire, that’s all
Exactly just making them guns for the defense. It's really smart actually infantry platoon or infantry platoon with 125mm gun support
@@YankeeVatnik1917copium
All tanks are platforms. You don't design something to last only 2 years unless it's a consumer product lol.
@@YankeeVatnik1917 por ser o melhor tem a Rússia tem mais tempo a Rússia usado todo tipo tanques e não e capaz de ocupar Ucrânia todos javalis que atingiu T 90 ou T 80 estão feitos em ferro velho a Rússia não é capaz de entrar na Ucrânia Himar atingiu T 90 ficou peças tem vários vídeos no KZhead
You showed a Soviet T34-85 on the firing range while talking about the T-55 and T-62. I don't know why that was included in the video and I don't understand why you didn't clarify that we were not looking at either of the tanks you mentioned. In addition, neither the T-55 nor the T-62 originated in the 1940s. The T-55 design was discussed in 1953 and the T-62 in 1957. I am not an expert, but when what appear to me to be clear mistakes in your presentation are uploaded, it makes me doubt the validity of the information posted to your channel.
What you write is absolutely correct, but does not necessarily have to lead to questioning EVERYTHING. But you are absolutely right with your comment!
@@h.-u.spengler6366 Point well-taken. Thank you.
My thoughts exactly. Probably still lives with mom and dad.
I agree with you, it was just a propaganda video.
and to add the note that he labeld the T-62 as a T-55 and Visa Versa
Russia does not need any game changer, Ukraine does.
Betul
M1ABRAMS
Russia needs a new President. It's gonna loose.
@@williamzk9083дегенерат,это тебе нужна сиделка,а то ты серешь под себя а убрать некому😂
Your country is FOS. You economy is destroyed. Your per capita income is one seventh the per capita income of the USA.
То, что Вы сейчас видите на экране, это не окончательная версия Т-14, это её предыдущая. Т-14 продолжает свою модернизацию с учётом эксплуатации в строевых частя. Если обратить внимание в район фар, между ними, перед как-бы скошен по углом. В новой версии, этого скоса нет, всё выполнено в едином монолите, от левой до правой гусеницы, углубление отсутствует, это углубление заняла дополнительная бронеплита, что ещё больше увеличивает защиту экипажа от поражения. Это то, что бросается в глаза. Вам показали опытные образцы, как не завершённая версия Т-14. Впереди ещё много дополнений, которые Вам не понравятся. Мощь и сила будет сокрушительной. На представленном образце орудие со 125 мм, есть уже готовый вариант с орудием 155 мм. При попадании снаряда 155 мм ни какая защита не поможет, кинетическая энергия на столько велика, что любой танк будет поражён на вылет, со всеми вытекающими последствиями. С русскими лучше не воевать, с нами дружить надо. Всем добра и миролюбия.
Можно с Россией дружить, если такие как Путин не будут сидеть в троне президента.
@@alexandrastanaev4399 пошел на хер с такой дружбой!!!
@@alexandrastanaev4399Если Путин не будет там сидеть, а будет кто-то типа Горбачёва или Ельцина, как хотят враги России, то со страной будут "дружить" как в 90-е годы прошлого века: превратят её в колонию и сырьевой придаток Запада с голодающим и вымирающим населением. Мы это уже проходили и 2-й раз на те же грабли не наступим. Хуже вражды с западными странами может быть только "дружба".
@@alexandrastanaev4399 Путин/не Путин - это не имеет абсолютно никакого значения. Никто с Россией никогда не дружил, не дружит и дружить не будет (за некоторыми исключениями). Пора бы уже урапатриотам зарубить сей факт у себя на носу.
@@zahinho9519 я так не думаю. Если бы проклятые американцы помогли бы белогвардейцам на полную, то с Россия была бы страной получше. Потом украинцы будут так же злы на США, как и я и другие люди, обиженные на весь мир.
Obviously, Russia needs to test the T-14 in combat. That being said, all new tanks have teething problems when first deployed. Currently there is not a good situation to try the Armata as it is designed for tank on tank combat and we are not seeing much of that. The current tanks that are used for direct and indirect support are much cheaper and are doing what is required. Once some portion of the front is breached and the fight becomes more mobile and the probability of tank on tank combat goes up, that would be the time to test the T-14.
T14 has engine problems, the optics for the driver are lame and standard, if the gun gets jamed it’s difficult to clear. The concept is good the problem is in the implementation. Germany’s PUMA IFV has an unmanned turret.
Tank on tank combat was never a thing...in the sense that it was avoided unless no other option was possible. Most tank loses in history was Tank vs Anti-Tank (mines, AT guns, Infantry AT weapons)
@@AleksandarLomovic I would say that the design of the T-14, as with most tanks is to overcome other tanks. Certainly, they will spend much of their time in infantry support. Maybe, sometime acting like artillery for indirect support. But their main purpose is to fight other tanks. That's why I said there has really not been a good time to use them thus far. You need a much more mobile scenario when the tanks can come together head to head. And with the way war is changing, as we see in this war, we may be returning to WWI rather than WWII situations.
@@williamzk9083 So when you were testing it did you find the engine power was good? He declares here it is between 1500 and 2000 horse power....just wondering if the let you drive it when you were testing the gun ? and if so is there anything more than "lame" as a description.
@@TP-ie3hj The T-14 Amata is a half baked POS at this time. It’s not coming from me. Russians know this them selves. If they produced it, the T-14 would be a maintenance nightmare consuming enormous resources and it wouldn’t have the desired affect of being superior in anyway because of its many flaws and bugs. I suspect there’s another for five years of work on this and that they may even have to start again because it will be out of date by the time it’s ready
In general, not much known about T 14 Armata, yet a lot of criticism, how could that be?
Because every potential buyer of Russian military hardware tested and denied buying the tank. Both India and China didnt want to purchase the tank. The tank was made in 2014 and is still yet only a "prototype" as Russia is not buidling them in a large quantity. Either because its to expensive, not reliable enough or/and Russia is lacking parts to actually produce them.
Because it's Russian, it must be bad, for propaganda reason alone. Just like everything coming from the West is insta "the best ever", that end up being destroyed somewhere just the same. When you see "Putin's" in the title instead of "Russia's" - you already know what kind of garbage is coming.
@@NaV3P I've read that the general testing and refinement period for Russian tanks is 10 years.
@@aaaaaa2206some things with countries like the US
@@NaV3P sanctions played a huge role in that
Old tanks are good enough for close combat in fortifications.
Yes, and as additional artillery... 120mm shells are big enough and can do a lot of damage.
@@ozymandiasultor9480they are using old tanks due to reverse technology
destroyed Russian Tanks in this video is actually Russian Tanks sold to Ukraine as an export model. Same Tanks in Russian Army is different and protected on top points shown on Telegram Chanel
You are such a clumsy liar.
Carl Gustav is not a top attack weapon. The Bofors Bill is.
So dont buy a ruzzian tank unless you want to use it as a novelty BBQ!
Battle too unfair they have to give their tank to their enemy
Ukraine did not buy tanks from Russia LOL. After the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine sold Soviet tanks to the United States for military testing. And this is a real betrayal on their part.
It was actually smart of Putin to send the old tanks first, because even the Leopard 2A6 failed in theatre, and there is no doubt the Abrams will be destroyed, those tanks are littered throughout Yemen and Iraq, one Lancet 3 or Kornet will do the job.
We never said they are invincible. Also, those Leopards may be destroyed, but the crews survive to fight another day
I call BS !! You should go fight for Russia since you are so confident !! I bet you don't have the balls keyboard warrior !!
Failed, against those old tanks no lol. Tanks no matter what not invinca le and the mines and arty took them out not Russian tanks lmao..😅 facts are fun.
@@geoffreydunne7422 the crew is more important than the tank. There is a reason why the Sherman is touted as the best WWII tank because it was a very survivable tank, while the T-34 was called Crematorium for 4 comrades. Guess where they put the fuel tanks on the T-34. While the Sherman as I said earlier was highly survivable which also resulted in no tank crews deaths
@@Sp00kyV0id - Have you seen Bradley Square? The crews didn't survive.
0:24 didn't know T-55 and T-62 were 1940s era tanks
The technology is most definitely 1940s.
This video is full of (unknown , disclosed, unsure….etc) Thanks for the update
It's also full of a lot of I saw on a video a "T90 took 19 hits and continued" and I saw on a video "T90 destroyed 3 Leopard, 2 Bradley" and a "Ka 52 deflected 18 missiles". The videos are always edited and stitched together. If a tank is destroyed its already immobilized long ago.
Are the Experts who said that Russian troops were disorganized and had low moral, the same ones that pushed Ukraine into an offensive without air cover. How consistently wrong can you be and still be considered an expert?
so fucken true
Well those "experts" were usually journalists, as real military experts said that while Russian army was less professional than US army they could and would adapt fast if Ukraine did not use well their time and momentum.
@@tiagodagostini Well the Russian army don't seem to be "adapting" all that fast, as they still appear to be making the same tactical mistakes they were making 2 years ago......
M.B tanks almost never engage each other at 3 miles, usually it's less than one mile, often much less. They almost never travel at 50 mph, especially when entering hostile territory with accompanying infantry, it's more like 10mph. 50 mph is possible on roads, but damages the road. The Leopard, Abrams, Challenger and probably the Amata are too heavy for many bridges and too bulky for some railway tunnels, that was also the case with the British Conqueror, which was otherwise a good tank. I doubt if M.B tanks will be much use in future wars.
Без танков в пехотных боях пока никуда, даже с учётом появившихся дронов
THE RUSSIAN STEALTH TANK, NOT SEEN IN COMBAT *
Doesn’t matter what and how these are built they always find a way to destroy them
Indeed. Wait till Abrams arrive in Ukraine and are taken out by anti-tank mines, artillery and drones. It will happen you can count on it.
That is true for any weapon or armor and for every country
It sounds ridiculous that Russia doesn’t want to use their best tank out of fear it might be captured. If that's the case, what's the point in making them?
To your point if one is damaged, abandon or destroyed it will give the West a look at them. And that means all the Russian propaganda was a lie as per usual. Russians always over hype their equipment and once captured and are looked at their found to be less than advertised.
Theyre saving them for the worst case scenario, total war between Russia and nato
Dawg think for a second and use your brain. I'm Russian by the way. its because we prefer to keep them on stock to have a large range of T-14's against literally thirty one countries to take on that is united to just counter 1. (Which is embarassing but whatever we don't talk about that) Why use modern technologies on a ex soviet country we're fine with the equipment that we pulled out the most like T-72's, TOS-1, Tornado G, KA-50, Tiger Kornet, BMP-1, BMP-2.
@@Sil-zx OK makes sense. That way if Nato tries to jump in you have your best guns waiting for them.
@@joeylopez7978 Yeah technically. NATO and Russia hasn't sent their best weapons in Ukraine. Are you inside the NATO alliance?
Yep destroyed tanks are not russian, there are no Z or V on these tanks, they are ukranian
You have released this video like 10 times in the last 2 years. Pretty sure this whole video is speculation and not journalism.
😂😂😂"disorganized and tired "yet they are making Ukraine fight for every inch ,and taking extremely high losses
Only because the russian forces dug in. Russia is being forced to fight in trenches its laughable that russia claims to be effective despite being stomped in ukraine. 🤣
@@skullduggery7917 It isnt getting stomped just today the ukrainaians forces in Zaporozhian front and have the Ukrainians circled in Robotyne . The ukronazi are losing just like Germany in WW2 slowly but surely
@@City1Tiger a day later, what you stated is already established as false. No surprise
@@vme1111 It isnt false
@@City1Tiger haha you loser ;) what is Wagner doing by the way…oh wait Putin got issues ;)
I think that the most important ace up sleeve of the T14 Armata is the crew Housed in the armored cell , that is a rational and safe arrangement . After , an excellent reactive armor make the tank ever safer. ✌🇮🇹🇷🇺
самым главным козырем является то,что армата не видима🤣🤣ее ни кто ни когда не видел😂😂😂👍
@@maks8105 я бы сказал, как и контрнаступа, но мы все знаем, что это не так😉
@@VASYA_V0R0N что за контрнаступ? 🤔чей херсон?🤣🤣
@@maks8105they will see early !
@@maks8105а ты подумай почему он ваш или слишком глупый ? а нуда украинцы не умеют думать, размышлять
I think the point is being missed here. The information about what is happening is not found in any 1 video put a culmination of videos. We are seeing a switch over from live units to unmanned drones. Tanks are becoming obsolete because of drones and the reason the t14 never took of is probably because all that fancy equipment on the turret gets damaged pretty easy. I would think the t14's role to be like a snipers role in a platoon. Spotting and sniping enemies from a distance.
They are not. The Russian-Ukrainian war is a huge joke. None of the sides have any normal tactics. Otherwise tanks are very effective platforms.
@@newkillaaa4934 They are big expensive coffins on wheels with a gun.
They are not obsolete. You dont know how it works, kid
@@gook5219 Drones and AT missiles can easily destroy a tank 100x their price. Tanks are as obsolete now as knights were in the 17th century - there is still some use for them, but they're too expensive and being replaced by new technology.
@@newkillaaa4934indeed. A normal attack would have air support, or at least something like Gepard or anything with armored chassis and Oerlikon autoturret to put down the drones
Ah the Nuland institute for the study of neocons........great source hahah
Without combined arms tactics it´s just any other tank waiting to be hit by a guided missile, or waiting to sit over a mine.
These T-14 Armadas are incredible. It seems that they are invisible since no one has seen any of them! (sarcasm Alert!)
Nice! Best comment on thread.
Cry
there crap
They will see it when will be too late ! 😂😂😂
ABRAMS??? Abrams no matter how much you modify one,, they are sagging in time! Watch what happens when an abram goes up,,, abrams weak spot is its turret pivot and barrel hinge!! Basically the old saying for a abrams is "they always loose their heads when slapped" meaning the turrets are known to pop and blow off
Dumb ass that is true for any tank lol get with the program
If anyone is expecting the T-14 to be sent to the frontlines….prepare to be disappointed! The chances of seeing a T-14 in battle, or on the frontlines is comparable to seeing a Bigfoot on the frontlines.😂😂😂
Yeah or unicorn in North-Korea
depends on the crew.. how to operate the tank well i say every kind of tanks
Barbed wire will stop the T-14
You may be right that that's if the T-14 doesn't break down on the way to the Barbed Wire.
@@stunick1573 🌈aw, you two are soulmates 🏳🌈
@@Conserpov Yeppers, you caught us out!! But the facts are the Armata is still crappy. Until and unless Russia dusts it off and uses it which they wont.
@@stunick1573 Nothing to see here, just a Lib coping.
T 14, is like a king tiger in ww2. You have a better chance getting hit by lightning than running into one of the battlefield. Same for t-90.
T-14 is way more rare. Tiger 2s saw a decent amount of combat. And the T-90 and the rarer M variant are also pretty common in Ukraine
@@uraninite8151 Tiger was made of shit and sticks so it was incapable to change anything
No T14's destroyed because none have been deployed! Tik tok tank!
Where's the challenger btw? Pretty sure the media says it will roll the rus defense like a hot knife through butter. Is it equipped with super advanced alien stealth tech or something? Because it's invisible. Unlike the T14 which has been seen in combat.
@@far_centrist T14 never been seen in combat. Been seen on the parade ground, where it broke down!
we just waiting to most performed cringe game changer abrams to come over ukraine
Just like the UK challenger 2s. As soon as the images of burning Leopard 2s started coming out the British government told the Ukrainians not to use it on the front lines, 🤣.
Western leaders said the same thing about Avangad and other new weapons of Russia and laughed. But when this weapon was shown in real tests, the West was not laughing. Same thing with you.
Interesting when abrams low spec facing with armata premium
Well, we tried three Abrams, but didn’t even get to the armata.
WHERE ARE THE ABRAMS?? WHEREEEE?
Bigfoot has been seen more often than the T-14
Pray you never get to see it.
The tank is a great tool, but needs to be in hands of proper well trained operators and work in a tactical group. Letting in tank with monkeys inside alone in the field is not going to bring any good outcome
Hitler found out the hard way. All the effort to produce a knockout weapon instead of high-volume production of current weapons on the battlefield lost him the war.
Yeah I like it better when the video has no speculation. Would rather listen to the information that’s concrete along with any video evidence that exists of such topics.
They have a handful of them, operational, at best. Won't do anything but create a scramble to destroy it, or scare the crew away and capture it. Bonus or excalibur would make mincemeat of them.
maybe they have 100..
Congratulations on the mince of the first three Abrams!
A new entry into the turret toss olympics
The T14's turret can't pop off, because the autoloader is in the turret itself, not in the main body of the tank beneath it. It's designed so that if the turret gets penetrated and the autoloader blows up, the crew will remain protected even if the turret is destroyed
@@nathangamble125 Yes, the Russian's who are notorious for caring zero for crew safety/comfort made a tank that magically shields the crew from the equivalent of a 2000lb bomb. Makes sense.
@@nathangamble125do your homework bud. It doesn't matter where the auto loader is, it's where the ammo is stored, and it's stored in the same spot that it is on the T90 which is what makes the turret enter orbit when it's hit. Same ole same ole.
@@cvrbon6 crew safety. Do you know what happens if m1a is hit? Turrets stays in place because it's too heavy to pop. but the crew is dead 99%. Stop watching TV
@@Galova I don't watch TV, I just fully grasp tank design. The autoloader of Russian tanks means if they're hit it goes boom, along with the crew. Whereas the Abrams stores ammo behind the crew in the back of the turret. Where there's a BLOWOUT PANEL MORON. Read a book.
I think they should test them on an actual battlefield to see how they perform and where they need to improve them
The first thing you need to be a loser...you just need to underestimate your enemy
in what i see the armor in turret is a thin layer of iron metal. its basically its easy to be destroyed by powerful anti tank rounds or missiles. unless its defense system is some what infinite it might be considered.
Turret is unmanned, a small target, and only protected from autocannons and missiles through APS but easily replaceable. Tank is impenetrable on its hull though, meaning it can simply roll out of a fight once its turret is compromised and have it easily swapped out. Actually quite a forward design
The lack of armor also makes the turret lighter, again easier to replace. Things like sabot will go through the other side doing less damage to structure and no crew casualties
_> what i see the armor in turret is a thin layer of iron metal._ What I see in this comment is elementary school dropout 🤦
@@Conserpov so your telling me its made of like abrams tank has? you sure?
@@TindahanPampalipasOras Do you also think that mudguards are too thin? It's not armor. Armor is inside. Go outside and touch grass.
Improved missile technology is making a lot of weapon systems obsolete. Aircraft carriers is one example. A carrier can be hit by a missile while it is still out of range for its aircraft.
I like your channel but please do not use headlines which states one thing and then in the video it is completely different. :(
The ues of the T-14 in Ukraine is definitely not for propaganda purposes.
the U.S. ARMY WANTS TO DRIVE IT.
Russians wanna drive the Abrams. That is why the US is SCARED to send them to Ukraine LMAO gonna burn wonderfully like the expensive junk Bradleys
Russian Tank Not Putins tank Putin is not a Country Name You People are so Obsessed with Putin...
I wouls say that the T-14 is a Potemkin village. Made only to impress and nothing more
The T-14 is a 5 generation tank which means it can easily win the war in Ukraine
It means nothing of the sort. That is simply speculation. Putin thought Ukraine would be his within 10 days. Look how that worked out.....
It can't be 5th gen unless you think it's more advanced then a leopard 2a8
what he means is , in 5 generations time ...they will have built some .
So the Russian's are producing 900 new tanks a year, with further increased production capacity in the pipe, but Ukraine are still waiting on 30 something Abrahm's tanks they were promised more than six month ago. Even if the Russian tanks are crap - and they are not - the West is screwed. I read an article the other days where a French general admitted there were only 600 tanks in Europe that are combat ready. And the American's have completely depleted there Javelin missile stockpile. I think it's time to listen to Putin's terms for peace before more people die for nothing.
Except, Russia isn't actually producing anywhere near that number. They produced 20 Armata over the last few years, and half of them are test models. Russia has one factory that builds its tanks, called UralVagonZavod, and its numbers are DRAMATICALLY inflated.
@@theprogressivecynic2407Вы глупый
For what reason should the Russians use their most modern tanks, when it is perfectly sufficient to successfully fight the western main battle tanks even with the somewhat older tanks... The German LEOPARD 2 tanks burn just as well as the Swedish CV90, 8 (in words: eight!!) of which were destroyed by a single Russian tank (seen here on YT on some channels covering not only western UKRAINE- bring propaganda)... Even the modernized T - 72 from POLAND are not "game changers"... Of the LEOPARD tanks delivered from POLAND, 8 tanks arrived already broken in UKRAINE... It's actually like this...: The West uses the UKRAINE as a junkyard for disposing of old war toys. RUSSIA is now behaving much more intelligently. The Russian army "reactivates" the stored models and studies the already captured Western "top models" to find their weak points, in order to then fight them successfully and inexpensively with the already old RPG-7 anti-tank rifles... SHOIGU inspected a CV90 (which the Russians captured) today and had it explained to them what the RUSSIANs found to be weak points in this "west's most modern infantry fighting vehicle"... The Americans have already brought a T-90 like a trophy from UKRAINE to the USA to study its technology (and it's not even the most modern tank in the Russian army!)... Well, we're happy to help, wherever we can! The T-90 is still more modern than the latest ABRAMS version and the Americans are keen to avoid such images as the ones with the burning LEOPARD tanks...
So provide a link. KZhead allows links to other youtube channels.
@@williamzk9083 You really haven't seen the video? Google it - it's all over the place.
Successfully fight??? The Russians??? What war are you watching 😂 😂 😂
If the T14 then the next order of battle should be the introduction of the A10 followed by some longer range missiles.
A10 would get shot down as soon as it took off in this war.
A10 is slow as shit😂 it would get instantly shot down😂 this ain’t the taliban buddy this is a real army
Maybe they could set up decoys to confuse the thermal sights on a T 14. Or maybe the Ukrainians could work out some really cool ways to jam them.
they already set up a mental decoy, and your meager brain bought into it. You are a Nazi, if you support the genocidal Nazis who rule in Kiev.
The only jamming going on is of the NATO F-35 fighter jet 😉
It an experiment. Clearly there always room to improvement. And in Ukraine, this T-14 will be test. Just avoid whole column of T-14 and BMPT terminator mixing in this formation if you want. Or just surrender before they actually engage.
T-14's armor seems to be much thinner than T-90M's. If this is the case, its not going to be a good picture of T-14 if it's automatic-Defense systems (Active Protection system) missed the incoming rockets.
"Thinner armor" is not always automatically worse armor... RUSSIA has the appropriate raw material resources to work with much stronger metals (titanium?) in combination with other lighter composites in order to achieve these very good core data (range, cross- country ability, maneuverability and armor) in the T-14 ARMATA.. . In contrast, the ABRAMS, CHALLENGER and the German LEOPARD are much too sluggish ... WHY is the West now so "worried" that the Ukrainian "counteroffensive" won't be successfully ended in time before autumn/winter? It is well known at NATO that the RUSSIANS get along very well with these times of the year, in contrast to the UKRAINIANS, whose weapon systems are pretty to look at, but which cannot be used in the cold seasons under real war conditions... We'll see it this winter, I'm absolutely convinced! In the spring of 2024 the situation will be completely different from what we are experiencing now and KOKAINSKY will wish he had offered the RUSSIANS peace negotiations...
Armour is gonna be obsolote. You need enough armour to stop 30-57mm rounds from an auto cannon,but against higher calibers/missiles you need something else in my opinion
Tanks are going the same way battle ships did obsolescence there is no such thing as an unstoppable tank military tech always changing the Russians better not put to much hope in this tank
@@jamesschenk Not the tanks,but most of the current ones are obsolote. Next generation is coming and electronical warfare gonna be crucial also defense systems...
Armata is the most armored of any tank in the world. It is built around surving AT weapons. Why? The turret is unmanned. It is only armored to stop autocannons or missiles through the APS but if damaged can merely be swapped out. The tank is not killed. The frontal armor of armata on the hull is better armored than any tank including Challenger. 900mm vs Kinetic, there's no other tanks with this on the hull. This means a hit armata can simply retreat once turret is breached by sabot and swap it out. It is the most protected tank of the modern era. People say armor is useless because every hull is currently outdated and obsolete for anything prior to armata and maybe Challenger 2 [which is still very old] No Challenger 2s have been knocked out on ukraine side. Lighter armored Leopards have. It is quite the contrary: armor and APS are more vital than ever.
"Disorganized and exhausted."😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
could simply be a case of them only being pre-production models,with very limited spares and repair infrastructure
That is the estimated current position.....
That would be my best answer
Ukraine has lost 40,000 killed and 2,000 vehicles lost in Battle of Nuland.
And you know this because you just got back from the front lines, and you counted each individual dead Ukrainian soldier and destroyed vehicle, right? You have no more idea of the casualties than the man in the moon.....
@@Brian-om2hh Ukraine announced that it needs refugees to return, to replace 500,000 COMBAT LOSSES. the Cokehead Clown of Kviv needs you!
all his resources are propaganda resources eg Business week/ Institute for the study of war. Russia does not need propganada when it comes to war. They fought of the Mongols after 200 years of occupation. They kicekd them oyt in of medieval russia in 1400.
Unleashed but not yet deployed in the battle 👏
I wonder how the CC will be able to aquire targets from such a low position. I dont think cameras on the turret can cover all viewpoints and give him 360 degree situational awareness.
It's like unleashing other "Wild Beasts"... most will simply run like hell, instead of fighting 😂
Slava Ukraini
well, where is your "super tank" named T-84?
We will know for certain about the T-14 presence in the Ukraine when we see it hit by a Javelin.
How many tanks did they hit so far in the entire conflict? 10? Go outside and touch grass
You do realize that the Javelin's performance was abysmally and that there's a big shortage of them (i.e., they're out of them). This is not Kremlin propaganda, it's been well reported by western media like Wall Street Journal etc.
T-14 is an impressive feat of engineering I've to admit, it reduce workload and improve passanger's comforts and safety. Hope they will be able to improve it's RND more by using the recent war intels. T-90M upgrades are looking more promising with the new ERA armor designs.
Видимо проблемы с производством поэтому их не видно
be interesting to see them go up against abrams and challenger2 and will those sensors work against nlaw, as it has no targeting laser
yes. i agree. lets get rid of the rest of russias tanks.
Houti rebels have no issues destroying the Abrams, If cave dwellers can destroy them, russia won’t have any problems
From the performance of the Leopard tanks and the Bradleys Bradleys, western junk will perform badly. Cv90 is already in the hands of the Russians.
@@justme-ud2vkcopium, your leo boys isnt get to the frontline to fire a single shot, couple vd show leo have been destroy by T-80 and T-72 using ATGM and your leo boy isnt see a shit to fire
the reason why leo buring beacuse anglos duped idiot sulz with abrams and challenger2
Russia: we have the best tank in the world but we won't use it we will just sacrifice 250000 men instead 😂
t-90m some orc clown direct made it 2 meter frontz armor : _ D
on wiki*
The greatest Tank ever made!!!! IS4 and 5 isnt bad either!
It's at best comparable to a 1st gen Abrams.
@@judahmac1799 Phahaha!! Armata is the best tank in the world, even new versions of Abrams are not good as Armata.
@@ozymandiasultor9480 the armata doesn't have anything that wasn't already present in western tanks for decades. Not to mention that there's only like 8 ever built so even if they're the best tanks in the world, and precision airstrike or fire mission would wipe out their entire fleet.
That's why they're taking them back to Russia . It's a POS !!
@@ozymandiasultor9480challenger 3 and germanys new tank puma f51 is will actually be used in the battlefields
I can't see how they becoming artilly with their burnt out barrels. Usting like crazy with no replacements
What we have today are 3 burnt Abrams that did nothing on the battlefield; as soon as they are exposed on the battlefield, they become scrap metal. The T-14 is being tested in Ukraine and it is highly undesirable if this vehicle falls into enemy hands. That's why they are still not used, it makes no sense. It is the EU countries and the USA who are happy to provide all samples of their weapons for detailed study! I am sure that this data will be very useful in the development and improvement of our weapons!
Okay. So even if there's nobody in the turret a top attack would still destroy the gun thus effectively rendering the tank useless.
1 500 pound bomb case filled with concreate will knock it out. 10.000 feet drop. sure will.
@@georgecoons6872 And how will you get the bomber above the battle field threw the worlds most sophisticated and effective air defense system? 🧌
@@jayspik6498 the new american bomber can't be seen with the naked human eye. . Anyway the F22 can get in and out. Thermite want a dandy.
@@georgecoons6872 I bet that clocking devices will work miracles.. So stop talking and send them in so we can see.. 😂
@@jayspik6498 won't see anything just explosions that make a Russian soldiers butthole tighten 50% more.
The actual speed of the T-14 is the speed of the recovery vehicle that pulls it along.
🤣😂🤣 Nice one!
All i can say is with the amount of go pro footage and drone cams on that particular battlefield...if the Armata was being deployed, we would have most likely seen it
Сам не понимаю, зачем так раздувают существование этого танка, если значительная часть запчастей на него поставлялась из других стран. Их выпущено пару десятков, и то, они являются опытными образцами, которые сложны в эксплуатации из-за сложности компоновки двигателя, поэтому и выбрали более стабильный Т90М, но выпуск его менее 20 экземпляров в месяц. Да и смысла танков на поле боя становится все меньше. С задачей маневренных наступлений справляются бронемашины, те же Брэдли, они же способны эффективно уничтожать и танки, на днях было видел, где Брэдли 1 на 1 уничтожил т90м, уничтожив приводы наводки и заставив выйти экипаж. Что то я переразмышлялся. В общем, верьте не тому, что говорят политики, а что говорят толковые военные обозреватели и очевидцы..
@@SeaCatty Tanks will always have their place, but in this particular conflict a 2 man anti-tank team with ATGM, drone, and off road motorcycle is more mobile and costs A LOT less than a tank and it's "highly" trained crew. High speed and high mobility is what is effective on the muddy and forested terrain of this battlefield. The 2 men shoot and scoot before any one notices where the shot came from. This tactic is enhanced by the recon info a drone can provide so hit and run is even faster or dropping a grenade from the drone onto the tank to soften them up before ATGM strikes. What will win this war is logistics, attrition, and the will of those fighting.
@@airgunbubba2505 Огромное влияние на ведение боевых действий является "крепость" экономики, и сейчас у нас она трещит по швам из-за многих факторов, например: в конце прошлого года приняли бюджет на ведение боевых действий 11 триллионов рублей(сами пересчитайте в доллары), и при этом, в конце года в экономику были закинуты огромные деньги, для закрытия дыр(Фонд народного благосостояния, то есть копилка на черный день). Этих денег в фонде осталось на 1 раз, а доходов, что бы эти деньги не использовать становится все меньше и меньше, к тому же, цена на нефть "Urals" стала около 62$ , но в документации, для того , что бы бюджет не был в пи@де, цена должна быть не менее 70. И недавно, 12 января, произошла авария на НПЗ НОРСИ Лукойла(там была добыча нефти и переработка, что то вроде того), она составляла около 12% со всей России. Это произошло из-за нехватки сложных механизмов и деталей из Германии, США и тд. Что бы с иностранной стороны думали, что санкции не работают, с бюджета сливают огромные средства для стимулирования. Не слушайте эти высказывания "России санкции ни по чем". Загуглите, в регионах России жители замерзают из-за сломанных котельных, в квартирах до +6 доходит(когда на улице до -30, а то и холоднее). Это происходит по всей россии, но может кроме Москвы. Бесят ваши газеты. Если вы можете в KZhead сделать англ субтитры, то советую посмотреть на канале "Майкл Наки" экономическую сводку с Владимиром Миловым, название "Новый бензиновый кризис. Инфляция разгоняется. Тотальный кадровый голод. Кремль расходует ФНБ. Милов". В европе Милов очень даже известен. Надеюсь прочитаете :)
I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Even if it is eventually introduced into service. It'll probably be obsolete by then.
I doubt we will see these tanks in significant numbers. The late delivery is due to the Russian Oligarchs taking all the money out to buy Super Yachts that have been confiscated.
Russia isnt like America. It is we Americans that have been raped by our rich for decade aftter decade in imperialist wars to gain more power for international oligarchs. 33 trillion in debt, and still too fucking stupid to get what that means? Drink more flouride.
@military tv the carl gustaf M3 ammo dont use top attack.
You say old tanks. But they have a 125mm gun with new square-time ammunition and modern electronics, I don't see anything old there. That is, adapted to the current situation
This video strengthened in me the feeling that how much tanks are obsolate in the modern battlefields. Instead of developing these behemoths you should better use the modern RPG-s (Javelin, NLaw, Carl Gustav etc.) for the fraction of the price of a modern MBT and for sure you will shoot out the tank to become a scrap-steel. If still you are connected to these mammoths then forget the turret, put forward the engine (like in the Merkava line) and use them as troop-carriers, infantriy armored vehicles, whereas each soldier has got an e.g. Javelin over their regular arms, and arriving to the battlefield they take positions to wait for the enemy-tanks. Then they shoot two Javelins against one tank, and one Javlin will shoot out the tank for sure.
Any soldier will tell you that tanks and artillery do 90% of the killing. Tanks are ultimately a weapon which can be destroyed. Additionally every tanks armor and aps save the T14 in the modern era is outdated and insufficient against modern AT. Too much design focus on other things but survivability
Oh no!! Not the Armata. That's it, the war is lost.😂😂😂
Oh no another ukrainian game changer, Russia should collapse in the next hour 🤙🏻
The name could prove to be prophetic. Perhaps the Russian Armata will go the same way as the Spanish Armada.
they've only got about 10!
Thousands of T-14 Armata ? "He" should have buy his soldiers socks at least before sending them to "military operation"
I love Putin ❤️! he doesn't allow the Anglo /American money powers to exploit his people!
I think a javelin could still scratch the paintwork off one of these.
If it not fails. 45% hit rate according to Ukraine 😂
Every tank is mobile pill box, no matter the age.
Although most Russian tanks are sh*t boxes.
you do know that T-55's and T62's are popping leopards like balloons xd
All this means is Russia has lost so many tanks in Ukraine that they have to start using new ones !! Don't be fooled , this is not a game changer for RUSSIA !!
true... it's the lancet
New tanks are being tested on the battlefield. That's what it means and nothing more. Don't post nonsense here.
Nonsense you posted
It only means that Russia is testing its weapons. Russia doesn't need to change the game, thus it has no need for the "game changer". Unlike the other side of the conflict, which can't shut up about "game changers".
Wrong. T80's got pulled out from the grave and a bunch of modernized T72B3M and T90M got deployed in Ukraine
This tank won't be seen on the battlefield unless Russia is planning to keep the war going for another five years. This tank is heavily reliant on western technologies and will not be any better than any other modern tank that is on the field today. It is still vulnerable to top down attacks as if the turret is damaged or destroyed, the tank will be out of the fight just like any other tank would be.
Is there a reason you're spelling miles as miles in your visuals?
They MUST have been deployed somewhere. The war is perfect oportunity that lets both sides test their new "toys".
Victory to Russian Federation ✌✌✌
What's the ruble doing? 😂
@@wyringen Shouldn't you be asking why so many countries around the world are dumping the Dollar ?🤔
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@merlin1346 The Dollar exchange rate looks stable to me? The Ruble on the other hand....
@@wyringen you are babbling ignorance as knowledge. USA is economically finished , the bankers are making sure of that. While brics will shove the American petro dollar up their mass murdering imperialistic arses.
T14 and t90 best tanks in the world
The t 14 Armata has such advanced camouflage that its’ never seen in battle
Tanks will always be good as a very mobile artillery firing platform. Shelling cities from a distance. Inner city combat is a bag of burnt popcorn for nost tanks. Does the T14 carry drones.? The new phase for modern tanks is to carry trophy", drones and high camouflage capabilities. Radar defense. Little is known about the T14.
You know what works even better than tanks as a mobile artillery firing platform? An *actual* mobile artillery platform. Self-propelled artillery and tanks are different things.
I’ve seen this Tank in action and seen inside and it’s capabilities.. The Russians are modernizing there military, but also developing new combined arms warfare tactics that even the US 🇺🇸 are unprepared and untrained to fight.. That’s why it’s not deployed because it takes years to develop modern combat tactics that have never been implemented in real life modern battles.. People can laugh and denigrate the Russians because of their Russophobic mindsets, but you can hate peoples all you want but your hate won’t change the fact that your gonna die for arrogance and hubris hatred in the face of a 10-1 advantage too which you have no response except talking smack, and using a nuclear weapon to save face.. It just makes peoples insanity clear for the whole world too see.. If you think you can take on Mike Tyson in the ring, by mouthing off, than by all means show us what you got, and stop talking..
Just where and when did you see this new tank in action??
"Russians because of their Russo phobic mindsets". You make it sound like there is something wrong with "Russo phobia". After invading Georgia, Moldova, Chechnya. After threatening various small countries of the world with invasion. After a long history of imperialist rule and oppression and assassination, after a long history of manufactured genocides and famines (especially in Ukraine), after the development of Ruski Mir neo Nazis you think people should think people shouldn't fear you? That they should respect you? That after jailing journalists and citizens for calling a war a war your country deserves respect? How about having a President for 20 years? Or being a corrupt country? You DESERVE russo phobia. Take some responsibility.
Cope harder.
@@nathangamble125 Troll 🧌 better..
Wagner was using the old tanks 😂😂 the regular Russian army has new technology 😂😂
Чё клоун,смешно?
@@user-xg4lw1zo6ybroke Russian nigguh
would be stupid to start mass producing t-14 at the moment when they can see how to increase protection. once it enters serial production making modifications becomes so much harder.
I think the main reason the t14 is not on the battlefield because it has not been through Battlefield trials yet and to throw a new tank on the battlefield without first testing it in combat most of the time always ends in disaster new equipment can be put through every test imaginable but does anything really compared to real Battlefield conditions and real firefights
People didn't believe in Rocky to beat Drago. I think we all know how that ended. Sometimes, you have to lose an Apollo to take down an Ivan.
Bahahaha, good joke. Except, movies are no reality.
@@AsteroSSB really??? i thought alien was a documentary series and barbie was real.....
@@dannythomson5239Why doesn’t that surprise me…
except those are fiction.
@@dannythomson5239 even better joke, great!