KZhead
Ғылым және технология

Why Lancet Drones Highly Effective in Ukraine?

Military TV
2023 ж. 28 Шіл.
753 884 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

ZALA has shown ongoing efforts to enhance the Lancet drone, as seen in the introduction of upgraded Lancet-3M UAVs, showcasing larger payloads, increased endurance, and transitioned X wings for enhanced aerodynamic properties. Following the undeniable success of the Lancet drone, the ZALA Aero Group is actively engaged in developing and testing a novel variant named the "Product-53." This new drone can be remotely launched from a Multiple-Launch System, such as a quad-packed 4x4 launcher, and boasts a distinctive capability to communicate with other drones, enabling coordinated "Drone Swarm Tactics" to target specific objectives. Alexander Zakharov, the visionary behind the Lancet series, enthusiastically shared updates on the progress of the new variant, mentioning that two hundred thousand units are already prepared, with an additional million in the pipeline.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

Пікірлер

  • - US Switchblade 600 vs Russian Lancet 3 kzhead.info/sun/m6l6osaQmamknXA/bejne.html - 1,000 New Black Hornet Drones to Ukraine kzhead.info/sun/eK9pmrCsa5eKjJE/bejne.html - Ukrainian HIMARS Successfully Destroyed The S-400 kzhead.info/sun/lM9vkd6IiXZugJ8/bejne.html

    @Military-TV@Military-TV9 ай бұрын

    • and people laughed and said it wasn't possible, when I explained the networked sky mines, swarm robotics . . . . they are not laughing now.

      @SeaJay_Oceans@SeaJay_Oceans9 ай бұрын

  • Russia is not using these drones because of having lost attack helicopters, but because the drones are cheaper, faster to manufacture & are unmanned, which reduces potential Russian casualties considerably. They are also much harder to spot & shoot down.

    @tarmotyyri6733@tarmotyyri67339 ай бұрын

    • Russian helicopter anti-tank missle Vihr has range of 8 km because a helicopter must see a target and mark it with laser beam. Lancet 3 has rage of 40-70 km. It means Russia use helicopters and lancets for different targets simultaneously. I heven't heard about heavy losses of Ka-52. It might be an Ukrainian propaganda meme.

      @WinyPouh@WinyPouh9 ай бұрын

    • ​@@WinyPouhThere is but about 5-6. And Russia can build new.

      @nikolayshopov-shangov6115@nikolayshopov-shangov61159 ай бұрын

    • The concept of cost effectiveness is alien to western military doctrine due privatised nature of its Military industry.

      @richardv9648@richardv96489 ай бұрын

    • @@WinyPouh Oryx is not a credible organization.

      @nightwatch2686@nightwatch26869 ай бұрын

    • ​@@nightwatch2686afaik, I consider onyx like the infamous "fact checker" that plagued us in the covid era

      @pierluigidipietro8097@pierluigidipietro80979 ай бұрын

  • There are no substantial losses of attack helicopters. It's just that Lancet drones are cheap and effective, that's all.

    @user-ew7eg3ot2m@user-ew7eg3ot2m9 ай бұрын

    • 100 units total(documented) are not substantial ? 1/8 of the total count.

      @alfe4741@alfe47419 ай бұрын

    • @@alfe4741 let me guess, documented by oryx, right? You know that oryx documents the same pictures taken from different angles as different vehicles?

      @user-ew7eg3ot2m@user-ew7eg3ot2m9 ай бұрын

    • @@user-ew7eg3ot2m Well if you have a proof of what you're saying, you can join Oryx team and fix the discrepancy. I'm sure there might be 1 or 2 at the most.

      @alfe4741@alfe47419 ай бұрын

    • ​@@alfe4741это не верная информация на пальцах посчитать можно потери ударных вертолётов

      @user-eh9qh2eu5m@user-eh9qh2eu5m9 ай бұрын

  • Russia came late in drone technology but within short time have master it and leading the race in the field.

    @sageo4389@sageo43899 ай бұрын

    • Russians are intelligent people.

      @jahloveredeemer4093@jahloveredeemer40939 ай бұрын

    • Russia was first who start making drones

      @vaninec@vaninec9 ай бұрын

    • ​@@vaninecno , Russia has bad history with drones even it requested for Israel help about 20 years ago

      @user-nh8rw9ek9g@user-nh8rw9ek9g9 ай бұрын

    • Russia mass prod drones more than 50 years

      @user-qm7ii8fq9e@user-qm7ii8fq9e9 ай бұрын

    • @user-nh8rw9ek9g Israel high tech run by RUSSIA They speak Russian LoL

      @vaninec@vaninec9 ай бұрын

  • The Lancet is without a doubt the most impressive weapon I´ve seen used in the Ukro - Russo war so far. Amazing weapon.

    @donkeymilkers6708@donkeymilkers67089 ай бұрын

    • Thought Russians only using IRANian Shahed Drones 🤔❔

      @Booz2020@Booz20209 ай бұрын

    • @@Booz2020 it's cheap

      @agungprasetyo2665@agungprasetyo26659 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Booz2020Iranian drones are very special price .. Lancet is unstoppable force masterpiece weapon

      @trumpameri1638@trumpameri16389 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Booz2020shahed is a long range heavy drone with very large payload ( around 90 pound). They are different class of weapons. Those are used to attack large static targets in depth, Lancets are used to attack small mobile targets near frontine. Without lancets, Ukrainian casualties would have been significantly lower. Mines, lancets are responsible for stalling Ukrainian offensive.

      @kevindominic5224@kevindominic52249 ай бұрын

    • GMLRS had more effect than lancet. Ukraine also operates large numbers of highly effective drones.

      @williamzk9083@williamzk90839 ай бұрын

  • It’s amazing what they achieve with those washing machines 😂

    @akula9713@akula97139 ай бұрын

    • Damn those washing machines are destroying Nato Wonder Weapons then 🤔

      @digitalronin7787@digitalronin77879 ай бұрын

    • Don't forget about the showels and breast pumps.

      @henrik_worst_of_sinners@henrik_worst_of_sinners9 ай бұрын

    • Стираем танки потихоньку

      @canfindyou@canfindyou9 ай бұрын

    • Вы еще лопаты наши не видели…😏

      @user-pd4fs3rn5n@user-pd4fs3rn5n9 ай бұрын

    • powered by nutella

      @Stormidze@Stormidze9 ай бұрын

  • During Ukrainian offensive attempts for more than 2 months not a single attack helicopter was lost on the frontline. At the same time KA-52 helicopters destroyed more than 200 armored vehicles with videos confirming that.

    @user-wv6ee7ez8f@user-wv6ee7ez8f9 ай бұрын

    • Hi can we get the link?

      @angelolitrico9448@angelolitrico94486 ай бұрын

    • Delusional clown😂

      @ijutsu2438@ijutsu24383 ай бұрын

  • Russia hasn't lost "a lot" of choppers. It's just that these drones are WAY cheaper, VERY efficient in destroying or disabling enemy systems, and can't be grounded by cyber warfare systems.It's just a practical choice and if ukes had similar equipment, they'd do the same.

    @galoobigboi@galoobigboi9 ай бұрын

    • 100 units total is not a small number by any means

      @alfe4741@alfe47419 ай бұрын

    • @@alfe4741 Russians can spit those out on a scale that no other manufacturer in Europe or the US can. And I call bullshit on that number, as It certainly doesn't only comprise KA 52's only. For a better reference, you should check just how many choppers the US lost during the Vietnam war. So yeah, a hundred really isn't that much, given the intensity of the conflict and the stakes at play.

      @galoobigboi@galoobigboi9 ай бұрын

    • @@galoobigboi Yes, 100 helicopters total including transport, reconnaissance, electronic warfare, etc. To your point US lost 5,607 helicopters in Vietnam. Considering that war lasted 20 years, that brings us to 280/year. However, I don't agree that rate of helicopter production in Russia would be significantly higher than that of the US, considering sanctions & loss of acccess to engines from Motor Sich

      @alfe4741@alfe47419 ай бұрын

    • @@alfe4741 Russia, according to the latest data from the world bank is now the 5th most powerful economy in the world. They have an OVERabundance of raw materials of all kinds, that they can tap into to produce efficient tech for the battlefield at a fraction of the price we produce ours. The sanctions have never stopped them from importing chips from China. Anyone who thinks they're not is deluded and no amount of sanctions is going to stop that. Take also into account that vietnamese folks NEVER had access to the kind of tech Ukrainians have access to and still were shooting down choppers almost everyday during the conflict.(if you even out the number of downed choppers relative to days of conflict) Anyway you slice it Russia comes out looking good here. I'm not trying to shill here. Then again, it's horrible what's happening and I wish they weren't killing each other. But yeah, Russians are clearly doing much better than the common narrative would have you believe.

      @galoobigboi@galoobigboi9 ай бұрын

    • @@alfe4741 n Russia, helicopters have been produced and are still being produced, unlike the industry of the West, Russia focuses on its own forces.

      @user-zz6uy5sv1w@user-zz6uy5sv1w9 ай бұрын

  • 200.000 lancets in production inventory and another 1 million in the pipeline? They can take out all of NATO tanks and vehicles with that!

    @DilbertMuc@DilbertMuc9 ай бұрын

    • Probably they sacrifice other thing to produce it. Like stoping more modern airplane or helicopter to produce. But man 50 uncontroled drone swarm already terrifying

      @bagusrestuaji222@bagusrestuaji2229 ай бұрын

    • 👏Polska pozdrawia. Stop Bandery SS

      @rafasolak6885@rafasolak68859 ай бұрын

    • That was a star wars meme from russian authorities =) На самом деле, их изготовлено пара десятков тысяч. Уже неплохо, не так ли?

      @meetthespy3398@meetthespy33989 ай бұрын

    • ​@@bagusrestuaji222talks about creating swarms of 300 geran 2 (much bigger warhead/range than lancet) to overwhelm any air defense systems. Terrifying indeed

      @societyreborn33@societyreborn339 ай бұрын

    • ​@@rafasolak6885ruSSki naZisto z ciebie taki Polak jak z Putina Pop.

      @narowisty@narowisty8 ай бұрын

  • The (upgraded version) KA-52's are the best helicopters. Logistics and pilots are main reason to use very cost effective drones against enemies. 💥

    @vkham9944@vkham99449 ай бұрын

    • Previous version was not bad either.

      @AlexanderTch@AlexanderTch9 ай бұрын

    • Helicopter launched lanced?

      @m_zbrv3967@m_zbrv39679 ай бұрын

    • But the anti-tank missle which they use probably costs around the same as lancet... In larger conflict they can be more effective due to their range.

      @andyz7711@andyz77119 ай бұрын

  • Drone tech is seriously challenging the dominance and effectiveness of tanks and armored vehicles.

    @silvazoldyck366@silvazoldyck3669 ай бұрын

    • The days of the battle tank is over

      @johnmuloch8545@johnmuloch85459 ай бұрын

    • @@johnmuloch8545 It's looking that way. The disparity in cost effectiveness is pretty alarming.

      @silvazoldyck366@silvazoldyck3669 ай бұрын

    • @@johnmuloch8545 So what type of war will fhs future hold for us if we don't have tanks and armored vehicles? I guess until they can come out with a laser defense system tanks and armored vehicles are going to be very useless.

      @titanproductions3628@titanproductions36289 ай бұрын

    • @@johnmuloch8545 ya man one fast aerial drone can take out an entire tank.

      @AlienTech-bk5xl@AlienTech-bk5xl9 ай бұрын

    • Ability of small aerial vehicles to carry heavy warheads keep improving

      @AlienTech-bk5xl@AlienTech-bk5xl9 ай бұрын

  • The Lancet is the Kalashnikov of the 21st century. I think in 20-30 years Lancets will be in all conflicts just as there is a Kalashnikov assault rifle everywhere now

    @DedHobbit@DedHobbit9 ай бұрын

    • With the current rate of technology development, in a couple of years there will be swarm drones with artificial intelligence even among the pirates of Somalia and the Berbers in Africa ...

      @kanakubatov5508@kanakubatov55089 ай бұрын

    • @@kanakubatov5508 but so far America does not have :)))

      @kir2317@kir23178 ай бұрын

    • через 10 лет дроны станут не нужны ..потому что закончатся танки ..

      @user-gt8td2ly1n@user-gt8td2ly1n5 ай бұрын

  • Fly shovel is really effective.

    @moratheexplorer5791@moratheexplorer57919 ай бұрын

    • Друг откуда пошло это Лопата и Стиральные Машины? Это в новостях запада так говорят что Россия воюет ими?

      @Sl2ven@Sl2ven9 ай бұрын

    • @@Sl2ven sim, e ainda tem a história das cabras e abelhas que atacaram os soldados russos e os derrotaram no campo de batalha 😂😂 a imprensa ocidental já perdeu a noção do ridículo 😂😂😂

      @galactuscausandoimpactus9521@galactuscausandoimpactus95219 ай бұрын

  • I like how western media try to show even most successful russian tactics as a failure due to heavy loss or poor technology. I think a 30k drone taking down 5 millions vehicule with the crew who cost maybe more to train is genious

    @yassine1806@yassine18069 ай бұрын

    • К тому же он не стоит 30 тысяч, цена увеличена как минимум в два раза.

      @FligMatik@FligMatik9 ай бұрын

    • Это на ваших сми показывают что Россия потеряла очень много людей вертолётов,, нет мой друг это ваша пропаганда хорошо работает с голевудскими сенарями,, если бы Россия захотела за неделю бы не было Украины на карте мира без ядерного оружия, просто русские не бьют по гражнаским инфраструктуром,, русские очень умело воюют против НАТО и Америки,, Россию не можно а невозможно победить

      @AsasinAllamuta@AsasinAllamuta9 ай бұрын

    • ​@@FligMatikони уже добавили таможенный сбор и НДС

      @antonyakubovskiy1887@antonyakubovskiy18875 ай бұрын

    • most of those vehicles cost more than 5 mil, but yea the western news media is carrying water for Ukraine and all the western equipment failures in Ukraine.

      @andyknolls8735@andyknolls8735Ай бұрын

  • Where are the mentioned "lost helicopters". We don't see any lost helicopters. We do see a lot of lost Leopards and Bradleys - that's for sure. And that's thanks to both Russian helicopters and drones.

    @AlbionTVLondon@AlbionTVLondon9 ай бұрын

    • There is a video of a Russian tank crashing into a column of Ukrainian armored vehicles destroying 2 tanks and 6 MRAP Maxxpro , what courage to perform that feat.

      @overdrivelzma.9219@overdrivelzma.92199 ай бұрын

    • Where's the vid of that

      @royalgunsup25reee90@royalgunsup25reee909 ай бұрын

    • Both sides helicopters have been largely neutralized by air defense, tho Russia’s Ka 52s are getting back into action firing from within Russian held territory at attacking vehicles.

      @stevewapner9061@stevewapner90619 ай бұрын

    • ​@@royalgunsup25reee90Hindustan time's

      @michaelp8838@michaelp88389 ай бұрын

    • They lost around 40. But in last year they manufactured 32 new ones.

      @waliza001@waliza0019 ай бұрын

  • Russia has lost relatively few attack helicopters in Ukraine. In fact the Ka-52 is operating over Zaporizhzhia virtually unchallenged. And, the cost of a Lancet drone was never US$35,000. It's original cost was likely around US$20,000, but its price has plummeted as Russia has significantly scaled up production in spite of improvements -- i.e., the Lancet 3: extended range and larger explosive charge. In fact virtually all Russian weapon systems have experienced a sizeable drop in unit cost production as Russia's defence industrial complex has ramped up production right across the board.

    @researchscholar@researchscholar9 ай бұрын

    • There were 35 confirmed losses of Ka-52, vast majority of them being at start of the war. Each one is around 16,000,000$, so it's quite a hefty amount of money lost.

      @KGAnims@KGAnims9 ай бұрын

    • @@KGAnims на первый этап вообще пришлось больше всего потерь техники. Танки тоже со временем научились использовать в новой реальности. Не колоннами, а увешанных Динамической защитой и решетками от fpv

      @Fulgream@Fulgream9 ай бұрын

    • @@KGAnims Confirmed by whom? Source - Ukrainian media, you can't even imagine the level of lies in Ukrainian resources - everything is based on lies! Even their spokesmen are talking about it: "If we tell the truth-our country will simply collapse" Arestovich In Russia they lie, in the USA they lie, but in Ukraine it has become exactly "Black is white and white is black" everything is twisted, everything is twisted - that's how their elite tries to survive. there is zero constructive there

      @user-fp3cf5vs7m@user-fp3cf5vs7m9 ай бұрын

    • indeed, but you know Russians are fighting with shovels and using chips from washing machines :D :D :D

      @TheMrakic@TheMrakic9 ай бұрын

    • @@KGAnims 🤣Albo mniej słońca kolego. Albo mniej ukro propagandy , która bije wszelkie granice absurdu 😅

      @robertagowski9492@robertagowski94929 ай бұрын

  • The most advanced kamikaze drone right now in the world I hope my country Egypt gets it

    @mohamedayman5666@mohamedayman56669 ай бұрын

    • Egypt-Russia relations are stronger than earlier. Egypt's president is a great man

      @MrAlexStoryteller@MrAlexStoryteller9 ай бұрын

    • For what? you're not in a war rn

      @tyrtrolas@tyrtrolas9 ай бұрын

    • @@tyrtrolas What's RN? Royal Navy?

      @MrAlexStoryteller@MrAlexStoryteller9 ай бұрын

    • @@tyrtrolas We are not in war But this drone is a game changer 😁

      @mohamedayman5666@mohamedayman56669 ай бұрын

    • @@MrAlexStoryteller it means right now

      @tyrtrolas@tyrtrolas9 ай бұрын

  • Bravo Rusia 🇷🇺. Lo mejor en tecnología. Excelente 👍🇦🇷

    @renedecima6644@renedecima66449 ай бұрын

    • Gracies Che! Ganaremos pronto

      @njkt9o@njkt9o9 ай бұрын

    • @@njkt9o 👌❤️

      @renedecima6644@renedecima66449 ай бұрын

  • According to the results of July 2023, 134 episodes of strikes with "Lancets" against the AFU targets were published. • The record of May 2023 (62 strokes) has been more than doubled. • An increase in the number of strikes by 22.3 times compared to the same period in 2022. • The number of strikes in July 2023 is more than in the whole of 2022 (lostarmor)

    @Serg_M@Serg_M9 ай бұрын

  • A drone that costs 30 000$ destroying Ukrainian tanks that cost well over 1 millions$, to me, that is a pretty cost effective way of demilitarizing Ukraine, or NATO I should say !

    @coshyno@coshyno9 ай бұрын

    • closer to 10 000.

      @waliza001@waliza0019 ай бұрын

    • @@waliza001нет. Стоимость ланцета около 30000$ около 3000000₽

      @djtrip5611@djtrip56119 ай бұрын

    • @@waliza001стоимость леопарда в десятки раз больше. Ланцету не нужно взрывать танк полностью,достаточно нанести повреждения не совместимые с дальнейшим движением. Больше уже в условиях боя ничего будет не сделать. Машину придется покинуть. А уже потом будет работать артиллерия. Все это осуществляется при втором беспилотнике который контролирует происходящее

      @djtrip5611@djtrip56119 ай бұрын

    • @@djtrip5611 Я знаю это :)

      @waliza001@waliza0019 ай бұрын

    • If you are a Russian schizophrenic, then of course the Russian Federation is at war with NATO.

      @jeniat2206@jeniat22069 ай бұрын

  • Lancet is Kalashnikov of our days.

    @sosovlasov4262@sosovlasov42629 ай бұрын

  • "To all German units and divisions! Says the representative of the Supreme Soviet Command, Marshal Zhukov. Our only condition is unconditional surrender. Stop fire on both sides in fifteen minutes. We will take prisoners at the Brandenburg Gate. We guarantee life for everyone. Place firearms on the other side of the gate. Officers are allowed to keep edged weapons with them." May 1945

    @user-xx5xz5gh8e@user-xx5xz5gh8e9 ай бұрын

    • В точку

      @canfindyou@canfindyou9 ай бұрын

    • after 80,000 killed and 300,000 wounded yeah nice job 😂

      @johnnywaffen4581@johnnywaffen45819 ай бұрын

    • ​@@johnnywaffen4581If we are ready to fight, then we are ready to die

      @ionbased5117@ionbased51179 ай бұрын

    • Oh Yes. Soviet Russia is coming back in 2023.

      @atifshahzad4728@atifshahzad47289 ай бұрын

  • 7:11 The vehicles' graveyard looks wild. So many Bradleys and Leopards destroyed.

    @impersonal6650@impersonal66509 ай бұрын

  • Russian flying shovels are the most precise shovels in the world😊

    @1Q84-00@1Q84-009 ай бұрын

  • God bless Russia.

    @dayandknight.@dayandknight.9 ай бұрын

  • Необходимо сделать лансет 4 с кассетной боевой частью для уничтожения наступающей пехоты

    @EcoZen24@EcoZen249 ай бұрын

    • Насколько я знаю, уже есть разные модификации - фугасная, кумулятивная и термобарическая. Они будут очень быстро развиваться и совершенствоваться.

      @user-sv4ou5bz7m@user-sv4ou5bz7m9 ай бұрын

    • нифигасе вы тут. а где вы про них информацию узнаете и что все эти слова значат...

      @Iv4Bez@Iv4Bez9 ай бұрын

    • Кассеты в дроне весом 12 кг? На мух чтоль охотиться? Все, что не может поднять больше 50 кг загружать кассетами бессмысленно.

      @RustedCroaker@RustedCroaker9 ай бұрын

    • @@RustedCroaker кто сказал что дрон должен быть 12кг? Я сказал сделать другой лансет даже 1 и 3 разные по весу что за тупая логика

      @EcoZen24@EcoZen249 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-sv4ou5bz7mкассетную еще бы сделали

      @1mrzealot1@1mrzealot19 ай бұрын

  • The design of these drones are more and more similar to star wars design

    @pierluigidipietro8097@pierluigidipietro80979 ай бұрын

    • Atomic hearts

      @c.r.e.a.z@c.r.e.a.z9 ай бұрын

    • Посмотрели фильм терминатор сделали терминатора , посмотрели звёздные войны сделали ланцет 😀🤣

      @vadimivanov983@vadimivanov9839 ай бұрын

    • А что будет если мы русские сделаем эту хреновину в обратной стреловидностью крыла?)))) У американцев во всех фильмах где инопланетяне захватывают землю все корабли имеют обратную стреловидность крыльев как у самолёта су47 беркут. В общем нагоним жути на янки)))

      @user-xo5tq9op5e@user-xo5tq9op5e5 ай бұрын

    • так военно-космические силы называется в РФ структура. Да и удары из космоса это реальность.

      @nzt489@nzt4894 ай бұрын

  • The design of the first version is Dope as fuck.

    @hydrohasspoken6227@hydrohasspoken62279 ай бұрын

    • Yep, but I like the newer model much more

      @agentepolaris4914@agentepolaris49149 ай бұрын

    • It is scarey looking on purpose.

      @NathansHVAC@NathansHVAC9 ай бұрын

    • When will we see a R/C version for hobbyists? :)

      @MM-tt3np@MM-tt3np9 ай бұрын

    • Does it look like a Dragonfly spaceship from "Lexx"?

      @user-mc7ez6lm4x@user-mc7ez6lm4x9 ай бұрын

    • Looks like a Jedi X-wing 😊

      @wolfswinkel8906@wolfswinkel89069 ай бұрын

  • Why use a multimillion dollar helicopter when a sub 40k munition does the job more effectively

    @danielconquer909@danielconquer9099 ай бұрын

    • The zala lancet can not destroy the Leopard 2A6 tanks its armor is very thick can only immobilize them

      @overdrivelzma.9219@overdrivelzma.92199 ай бұрын

    • @@overdrivelzma.9219 An immobilized tank is just as bad as destroyed. It cant move, it cant be used and it will cost time and money to recover and repair.

      @Stringfellow-xo6do@Stringfellow-xo6do9 ай бұрын

    • @@overdrivelzma.9219 An inmobilized tank is a destroyed tank. Once you know the tank can't move on, the artillery will strike that position to destroy it totally.

      @reconcordoba8096@reconcordoba80969 ай бұрын

    • A helicopter is a multipurpose weapon. It can work at night and has multiple types of weapons against tanks, infantry, fortification, and enemy's aviation.

      @NIB2307@NIB23079 ай бұрын

    • @@overdrivelzma.9219 Обездвиженный танк - лёгкая цель для арты + приманка для тех, кто захочет его забрать и попадёт уже под скорректированный огонь артиллерии на пристрелянном месте.

      @MichailKravchenko@MichailKravchenko9 ай бұрын

  • Job well done Rooskies. Keep going.

    @YaHussain3_1_3@YaHussain3_1_39 ай бұрын

    • Палестина?

      @nzt489@nzt4894 ай бұрын

  • O lancet é uma arma temível e formidável virou o jogo pra Rússia

    @enivaldopantojateles8770@enivaldopantojateles87709 ай бұрын

    • Virou o jogo? Ucrânia nunca chegou perto nem de empatar esse "jogo" kkk

      @user-go8vt9lp7i@user-go8vt9lp7i9 ай бұрын

    • @@user-go8vt9lp7i verdade 👍

      @enivaldopantojateles8770@enivaldopantojateles87707 ай бұрын

  • Drones: the future of warfare!

    @Desire123ification@Desire123ification9 ай бұрын

    • Jep - Until a sophisticated anti drones systems render them obsolete and the circle of development begins again...

      @poulhenningsrensen3305@poulhenningsrensen33059 ай бұрын

    • Future in "Interference Army"

      @vaninec@vaninec9 ай бұрын

    • @poulhenningsrensen3305 When there are cheap anti-drone drones, it moves from tech into manufacturing capability. It becomes an economic war. The one who can produce the most cheap drones win. This is a warning to the USA: don't start a war with China. You won't keep up in manufacturing capacity.

      @larsnystrom6698@larsnystrom66989 ай бұрын

    • u need to send out loads of them to be effective against modern armour ... i mean with proper protection... they need to test it on merkavas ...

      @klaabu99@klaabu999 ай бұрын

    • Thanks, Captain

      @IncognitoUnknown-fc2tu@IncognitoUnknown-fc2tu9 ай бұрын

  • The Lancet is probably the best drone of its class at the moment. I wonder what happened to these US Switchblade drones that were so higher regarded?

    @nm2000@nm20009 ай бұрын

    • They are just a fancy name only.

      @humpreykalombe4036@humpreykalombe40369 ай бұрын

    • GPS не работает по причине воздействия РЭБ, соответственно Switch Blade не работает тоже!

      @Vvkiurv@Vvkiurv8 ай бұрын

    • All American weapons are obsolete! Even those samples of American weapons that are still under development are outdated shit!

      @user-uz1lc7kt9t@user-uz1lc7kt9t8 ай бұрын

    • you know what the Nato should invade Russia and let's see who hat the best weapons and technology. agree?

      @mineralwater6736@mineralwater67365 ай бұрын

    • @@mineralwater6736 Согласен. Только пускай НАТО проконсультируются у шведского короля Карла 12, императора Франции Наполеона Бонапарта и фюрера 3-го рейха Адольфа Гитлера.

      @user-mi2ys3vz4e@user-mi2ys3vz4e5 ай бұрын

  • This week, the milestone of 500 attacks by lancet drone was crossed.

    @Lancetdrone@Lancetdrone9 ай бұрын

    • 😳😨

      @user-ee8uu3zp3h@user-ee8uu3zp3h4 ай бұрын

  • Props to Zala group, what an interesting piece of engineering, cheap yet extremely effective as per russian tradition.

    @ilovehihats@ilovehihats9 ай бұрын

  • "Millions are in the Pipeline" 🔥🔥🔥

    @nawfelislam20@nawfelislam209 ай бұрын

  • Production of Lanset drones is at 40000 per month, yes, 40k

    @genem895@genem8959 ай бұрын

    • 😨😳😰

      @user-ee8uu3zp3h@user-ee8uu3zp3h4 ай бұрын

  • There will be more and more lancets. In July, twice as many attacks have already been recorded as in June.

    @Lancetdrone@Lancetdrone9 ай бұрын

  • Omg, this ZALA Lancet-3 kamikaze drone is like a flying “Terminator”!

    @hermionefinnigan7469@hermionefinnigan74697 ай бұрын

  • Russians love to invent and build new things.

    @nerinine@nerinine9 ай бұрын

  • 100 successful strikes?! i would say a lot more

    @Mkeric1971@Mkeric19719 ай бұрын

    • a bit over 100 may be right number ... out of thousands they used ... there are so dew videos about these hits ... some videos are even multiple hits on same target ... then add same hits but videos made by different drones

      @klaabu99@klaabu999 ай бұрын

    • @@klaabu99 dude there are 20 to 30 videos daily .i watch both sides and lancets are used successfully on daily basis. Especially since beginning of june and ukranian offensive they are all over the place

      @Mkeric1971@Mkeric19719 ай бұрын

    • @@klaabu99 There are many more, many more.. I think it's getting closer to 500 hits. Lately, they have been playing the role of a finisher on the battlefield. A caterpillar flies off the tank and a lancet flies to finish off, but they also smashed a lot of artillery. Every day, from 5 videos, telegram channels are definitely thrown out.

      @user-fp3cf5vs7m@user-fp3cf5vs7m9 ай бұрын

  • I like the way they said the loss of Russian attack helicopters when only one has been shot down the last six months by the ukrainians😂😂😂😂😂

    @Nolefan1966@Nolefan19669 ай бұрын

    • ya ~ KA-52's have destroyed all ukrina positions

      @lovealways2609@lovealways26099 ай бұрын

    • Y’all must be only reading Russia news’s lol because it’s videos out! Y’all so funny

      @melvinmelvin8577@melvinmelvin85779 ай бұрын

    • @@melvinmelvin8577 we're all watching Russian Telegram channels of war reporters. There are a lot of Ukrainian side videos there. So you cannot blame on us that we do not know the uncomfortable truth. But we know that Ukrainian and Western propaganda lie to such great extent that our own state propaganda sounds like truth compared to theirs.

      @WinyPouh@WinyPouh9 ай бұрын

    • @melvinmelvin8577 I watched DPA everyday and that is definitely not a Russian Channel. You need to stop watching them Ukrainian channel that have them video games and pass them off as real videos and people praise Ukraine

      @Nolefan1966@Nolefan19669 ай бұрын

    • @@Nolefan1966 why Russia brings gn old tanks out if they not getting wrecked lol

      @melvinmelvin8577@melvinmelvin85779 ай бұрын

  • It's cheap, environment-friendly...and deadly. 🙂

    @Aetila@Aetila9 ай бұрын

    • Lol really. Tanks using diesel, no tanks - no diesel.

      @Iv4Bez@Iv4Bez9 ай бұрын

    • только стоимость копья 6000-9000

      @nzt489@nzt4894 ай бұрын

  • Mille BRAVOS vous TROUVEZ TOUJOURS des SOLUTIONS vous ne BAISSEZ JAMAIS les BRAS . Vous êtes FORMIDABLES

    @user-js8lu6od9t@user-js8lu6od9t9 ай бұрын

  • The ukrainains have not downed a Russians helicopter since the offensive began in early June.

    @jimcroft3633@jimcroft36339 ай бұрын

    • Всему виной этого то что ка 52 начал использовать ракету вихрь у которого дальность 12 км

      @user-xk9jw6gh2j@user-xk9jw6gh2j9 ай бұрын

  • Alexander Zaharov,stay safe! In fact Lancet is not a weapon to terrorize infantry or buildings, so it is not used against civilians. No one will spend $35000 to commit a simple act of terror, this UAV is pure defensive weapon, only suitable to destroy costlier weapons! As a Russian I am proud. As americans say: God created us equal and col.Colt made this equality into a reality. Zaharov does something similar by negating the privilege of the rich armies over the poorer states armies! Zaharov, banzai!

    @user-mc7ez6lm4x@user-mc7ez6lm4x9 ай бұрын

    • interesting approach - this cheap assassin may be be nightmare used by terrorists/freedom-fighters

      @zachariasobenauf1895@zachariasobenauf18959 ай бұрын

    • @@zachariasobenauf1895 This looks too sophisticated to proliferate in the hands of the typical cartel or paramilitary. There are plenty of NATO weap/ns in the black market I'm sure.

      @respekted@respekted9 ай бұрын

    • @@respekted agreed - not the pro-military versions - but the lancet-1-class or the shaheds are a really cheap weapons which may be operated with low-tech controls on "people" inside stationary - hitting them on entering or leaving ... not to mention the domestic drones with improvised handgrenades .... the 2-dimesional protection on gated communities may stand naked ... wasn´t Yemen attacking saudi-arabia with cheap homemade drones ? it may alter the way of the privileged - on a scale the longbow the colt or the first machine-guns had the obama drone-killing may get a payback by those who lived under the death from above -and no "terrorist" with wahtever insane agenda had to expose himself anymore

      @zachariasobenauf1895@zachariasobenauf18959 ай бұрын

  • Waiting for the product 53 lancet debut.

    @agungprasetyo2665@agungprasetyo26659 ай бұрын

    • Yeah, I'm hyped

      @ilovehihats@ilovehihats9 ай бұрын

    • Can't wait to see them in action!

      @RustedCroaker@RustedCroaker9 ай бұрын

  • The Lancet is the 'poster boy' of this war.

    @hugh8329@hugh83299 ай бұрын

  • Bravo Russia. Amazing capabilities !

    @samfernando5389@samfernando53897 ай бұрын

  • Lancet and leopard tank is "best friend"😂

    @solehbandung5974@solehbandung59749 ай бұрын

    • You're wrong. They are lovers & have a penetration so often :)

      @pauls3357@pauls33579 ай бұрын

  • This is the greatest factor to the increased roasting of marshmallows. There is nothing tastier then roasting marshmallows on a burning German Leopard Tank. The fires from such burning Ukraine armour will greatly increase the need for additional marshmallow production and the growth of marshmallow companies.

    @herberthall8082@herberthall80829 ай бұрын

  • This is what one can do with some shovels and washing machine chips.

    @justarandomname420@justarandomname4209 ай бұрын

    • For some reason russia doesn't want to be owned by wall street.

      @NathansHVAC@NathansHVAC9 ай бұрын

    • We’re running out of washing machines 😢 Using stolen Ukrainian microwaves and toasters now ✊

      @vladm5920@vladm59209 ай бұрын

  • 俄罗斯必胜👍

    @chingychan6931@chingychan69319 ай бұрын

  • This thing is wrecking havoc on Ukrainian battlefield! I see multiple Lancet hits every single day!!!

    @evilleader1991@evilleader19919 ай бұрын

  • The Russian Lancet drone destroyed the American Avenger, German Gepard, British Stormer and Spanish Spade systems. Indeed, the Lancet is a Russian legend like the Kalashnikov rifle

    @user-ur2mq7hf1d@user-ur2mq7hf1d8 ай бұрын

    • Kalashnikov is a stolen german rifle, clown😂

      @ijutsu2438@ijutsu24383 ай бұрын

  • Lancet 53 will come in swarms.

    @win5tonh968@win5tonh9689 ай бұрын

    • on year 2090?

      @klaabu99@klaabu999 ай бұрын

    • @@klaabu99Through QA, waiting for first use. They will shock the world.

      @ChristianGustafson@ChristianGustafson9 ай бұрын

    • They say the new zala Lancet product 53 drone can be launched from helicopters such as the Kamov 52 or the Mi 8.

      @overdrivelzma.9219@overdrivelzma.92199 ай бұрын

    • @@overdrivelzma.9219 I mean that is more interesting is making them as fast as helicopters and then using it as an anti-rocket defence system lol

      @Iv4Bez@Iv4Bez9 ай бұрын

  • Lancet Drones continue taking names. Abrams and Challenger Tanks are missing out… Send those “ game changers” to the frontlines ASAP.

    @emilioesdabes7086@emilioesdabes70869 ай бұрын

    • havent seen challenger 2 "the British tank that's never been destroyed yet" on the front yet. dont want the same fate as leo2😂

      @oppaceh7394@oppaceh73949 ай бұрын

    • Давайте уже всех сюда, что у вас там осталось

      @canfindyou@canfindyou9 ай бұрын

  • Range of an Excalibur Ability to top attack as Javelin Downside : less warhead for tanks but enough to knock out spg, ifv, apc But Russian operators are now target to disable or immobilize tanks which ended up by artillery or fpv

    @abrarzarif5061@abrarzarif50619 ай бұрын

    • I dont think its too little of a warhead for tanks, it has taken out plenty of soviet tanks and even a t80BVM. And as seen in the video and others, it has disabled and penetrated even Leopards

      @MrZombiekiller23@MrZombiekiller239 ай бұрын

    • The warhead still usually puts the Tank out of commission but usually can be repaired if the ammo magazine doesnt go off and its pulled back behind the lines and to a Repair facility.

      @swiftusmaximus5651@swiftusmaximus56519 ай бұрын

    • Lancet 1 does moderate damage to tanks but Lancet 3 have better range and more penetration capability that allow to destroy tank or cause critical damage make it inoperatable.

      @boocomban@boocomban9 ай бұрын

    • Well new types are being produced with 10kg warhead soon to be used

      @valiantone6937@valiantone69379 ай бұрын

    • @@MrZombiekiller23only if they hit the rear of the torret where the ammo are kept inside

      @fatgirlboy9341@fatgirlboy93419 ай бұрын

  • Well, dobt be surprised when an opponent turns your tactics against you

    @jamesgornall5731@jamesgornall57319 ай бұрын

    • US military complex have no capacity to raise rapidly production. Its build to provide small numbers of expensive and overengeenered things which need to much manhours to be build. Russia military complex is build with idea of huge expansion in the time of war and they now used it and their toys are made to be simple and easy to build like AK47.

      @jirivrana3623@jirivrana36239 ай бұрын

  • WANTED! Leopard tank drivers! Lousy work conditions! Early retirement!

    @craig4867@craig48679 ай бұрын

    • lancet destroy leopard-2 : 1 lancet damaged ❎ 2 lancet finally burn ✅

      @scpgaming-452@scpgaming-4529 ай бұрын

    • Pay is $30k per year from US tax dollars.

      @NathansHVAC@NathansHVAC9 ай бұрын

    • There are many leopards that were attacked in small trenches and ditches the Leopard is too heavy for the territory of the dombas so the Soviet tanks are medium weight.

      @overdrivelzma.9219@overdrivelzma.92199 ай бұрын

  • In animated videos the drone is blowing up tanks and trucks. In the actual footage, it damages the vehicle - not a single one brewed up like Russian tanks do when hit by FPVs. Leopard in question had it's tracks damaged, it was disabled, not destroyed.

    @ignacj@ignacj5 ай бұрын

  • The next lancet model will be in the form of a Ukrainian trident. As they say , they are salom and musalom

    @StanislawKarbowski13@StanislawKarbowski139 ай бұрын

  • Lancet Go Green! Save the environment

    @novalhikmat9042@novalhikmat90429 ай бұрын

  • И всё-таки боевую часть не мешало бы увеличить !.....

    @user-uh9nf9mi1t@user-uh9nf9mi1t9 ай бұрын

    • Russia is on its 3rd generation in 1 year. Bigger, faster, and cheaper ones are coming

      @troysweeney8432@troysweeney84329 ай бұрын

    • And don’t forget, it’s not the size of the warhead but the type. The X wings are using penetrating darts to bypass the thick nato armor. These small darts can disable the armored vehicles or cause ammunition detonations.

      @troysweeney8432@troysweeney84329 ай бұрын

    • ​@@troysweeney8432Детонация бывает редко , экипаж в большинстве случаев остаётся жив а это плохо !....

      @user-uh9nf9mi1t@user-uh9nf9mi1t9 ай бұрын

    • НАТО передало Украине снаряды с объединенным ураном А если сделают точно такой же ланцет?😂😂😂

      @user-wn1ms2pz2n@user-wn1ms2pz2n9 ай бұрын

    • @@user-wn1ms2pz2nпрочитай, что такое БОПС, а потом уже пиши глупости.

      @AugustSchroif@AugustSchroif9 ай бұрын

  • I'm steadily becoming a lancet fanboy Like an explosive scalpel, the last second change of course they can do is crazy

    @FlyingNazgul-wm1dv@FlyingNazgul-wm1dv7 ай бұрын

  • These drones made of shovels and washing machines parts are surprisingly effective.

    @AlexanderSeven@AlexanderSeven9 ай бұрын

  • Glory to Russia!

    @martinjanecek4950@martinjanecek49509 ай бұрын

    • And you are the home of your favorite Russians. schizophrenics.

      @jeniat2206@jeniat22069 ай бұрын

    • smrt rusiji

      @mineralwater6736@mineralwater67365 ай бұрын

  • I really love that LANCET Drone!

    @jaimedu5350@jaimedu53509 ай бұрын

  • Very informative thanks you

    @williambrown1480@williambrown14809 ай бұрын

  • T 84 is not a Soviet tank - T 84 is a tank produced in Poland, Romania, Yugoslavia and Ukraine under license of the Soviet T 80! 🥸

    @alfatar6183@alfatar61839 ай бұрын

  • Muitos parabéns por este canal de notícias, faz muita falta ter informação real e não notícias falsas.

    @camilojosecorreiadepina5673@camilojosecorreiadepina56739 ай бұрын

  • Lantset is the 'game changer' for sure. But, why they don't add bigger warhead on them? 2-3 more kilos at least? Since some of the targets are just damaged. Why they use Shahed kamikaze drones as cruise missiles only and not striking targets like Leopard 2? If they correct those errors there is not point of sending more tanks and vehicles to Ukraine from NATO

    @user-um6dd8rl2t@user-um6dd8rl2t9 ай бұрын

    • They have enough power to destroy MRAP Maxxpro , IFV Bradley m2a2 tanks T 64, M 109, polish Krab, M 777 only lacked more power to destroy the Leopard 2A6 and Challenger II.

      @overdrivelzma.9219@overdrivelzma.92199 ай бұрын

    • Shahed/Geran-2 really is a cruise missile, not anti tank missile. It doesn't even have camera or optic sensor.

      @DonVetto-vx9dd@DonVetto-vx9dd9 ай бұрын

    • Never doubt what Slavic Russians able to do when they are in dangerous, I’m going to sure something to you, this war give Russian military designer views for the future, next generation of Russian kamikaze drones will be very dangerous and game changer.

      @alexsalemo9137@alexsalemo91379 ай бұрын

    • Lancet 3 has a 3kg warhead

      @JesterEric@JesterEric9 ай бұрын

    • One reason: cost-effectiveness (no overkilling). Besides, armored vehicles repairs are so expensive that Germany withdrew from running its repair stations in Poland. Hehe, German-Polish ties are strained as a result. Damaging the vehicles also stresses the resources of Ukraine, because they have to go and get them on the field - and what awais them there....

      @MrAlexStoryteller@MrAlexStoryteller9 ай бұрын

  • I prepose a swift, orderly move away from caling weapons like these kamikaze drones. That epithet has a particular context as a crewed weapon in the Pacfic in WWII. Weapons like the Lancet are better called drone munitions. There are many other possibilities: Uncrewed Guided Weapons; Flying self-destructing Drone Munition, uncrewed combat aerial vehicle (UCAV), etc.

    @stevefreeland9255@stevefreeland92559 ай бұрын

    • They are called Loitering Munitions

      @gflvnfp2873@gflvnfp28739 ай бұрын

    • But the names you gave are lame

      @manserizawa2327@manserizawa23279 ай бұрын

    • One way drones

      @WinyPouh@WinyPouh9 ай бұрын

    • We already have a term for unmanned, guided munitions with its own independent propulsion: missiles. The Lancet is a cheap and slow-flying missile.

      @djinn666@djinn6669 ай бұрын

    • Woke they/them army needs safe space.

      @NathansHVAC@NathansHVAC9 ай бұрын

  • 👍👍👍 nice work, Alhamdulillah,bagus kalau lancet ini boleh ditembak dari kapal selam,dan terbang lebih jauh di laut.

    @yzyz7779@yzyz77799 ай бұрын

  • What happened to the US switchblades sent to Ukraine? They went the way of the Bayrakters, JDAMs and HARM missiles pretty quickly... BASICALLY Russian Electronic warfare made them useless.

    @Kayzef2003@Kayzef20039 ай бұрын

  • the real game changer

    @Dek4DenZ@Dek4DenZ9 ай бұрын

  • They are highly effective because they are cheap, can be produced rapidly and are easy to use unlike nato equipment. Remember, the X wings are piloted by the good guys.

    @troysweeney8432@troysweeney84329 ай бұрын

    • The X Wing was much more expensive than the Tie Fighter. So, actually, the Rebellion (the good guys), used a more complicated system than the Empire...

      @globalcitizen8321@globalcitizen83219 ай бұрын

    • God is on the “good guys” side (aka Russia)

      @YaMomsOyster@YaMomsOyster9 ай бұрын

    • @@globalcitizen8321 it was a joke…

      @troysweeney8432@troysweeney84329 ай бұрын

    • They have always been the bad guys, just ask any Pole, Fin or Romanian also there is no God, if there was a God why did he not kill Hitler, Stalin Marx, Lenin, Mussolini, Jesus, Abraham, Mohamend and the idiot Gavrilo Princip who shot Arch Duke Ferdinand, as babies,

      @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi37239 ай бұрын

    • @@troysweeney8432 I know... I wasn't talking seriously either... After all, Star Wars is just a story...

      @globalcitizen8321@globalcitizen83219 ай бұрын

  • Lancet drones = the true grim reaper against US NATO armaments

    @joeharry32817@joeharry328179 ай бұрын

  • Impressive.

    @MISSIONRIDERMOTOVLOG@MISSIONRIDERMOTOVLOG9 ай бұрын

  • Substanial helicopter losses? Lol. Alligators are flying all over the frontlines 😂😂😂

    @tadzdgreat@tadzdgreat9 ай бұрын

  • Russia´s guns are always very effective . We can see what USA´s weap*ns are capable of in counterofensive in Ukraine :) The only things which are remarkable regarding american weap*ns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which they are being wiped out...

    @mirekslechta7161@mirekslechta71619 ай бұрын

    • They seem to do some damage but they actually don´t take out the target.

      @usernwn7qe@usernwn7qe9 ай бұрын

    • @@usernwn7qe Russia needs to do the damage to those extreemly expensive machines without spending a fortune... That is the art of war.

      @mirekslechta7161@mirekslechta71619 ай бұрын

    • u get it wrong ... russia tried with mass take ukraine: first tanks and armor they failed ... then artillery and infantry also failed ... now they try with drones ... why u think there is so few videos of drone hits if russia have produced so big number of drones(every hit does not destroy vechicle)

      @klaabu99@klaabu999 ай бұрын

    • @@klaabu99 "Every hit does not destroy vehicle" well ask a T72 crew. (in case they´re alive)

      @usernwn7qe@usernwn7qe9 ай бұрын

    • @@klaabu99 so you think they destroyed only mentioned vehicles?

      @radiozvrk6784@radiozvrk67849 ай бұрын

  • Amazing изделие 🎉

    @purgalimited@purgalimited9 ай бұрын

  • This single weapon is now the top of the line Predator

    @phongnguyen007@phongnguyen0079 ай бұрын

  • At 2020 Turkey was the most experienced on drone technology but it was strike drone that has weakness as much as small rotor plane. switch blade was good but that thing purpose only to targeted light vehicle and foot soldier mainly consist of small fragmentation explosives.. but Lancet basically was flying TOW missile on drone platform

    @bagusrestuaji222@bagusrestuaji2229 ай бұрын

    • Yes but if a Turkish Anka or Bayraktar strikes with it's missiles any tank is beyond repair condition.

      @selcukcilek555@selcukcilek5559 ай бұрын

    • Turkey most experienced on drone technology? 😂😂. Turkey doesn't produce innovative technology, never did and never will. A drone is not halva. Turkey's technology comes from nato

      @arimoff@arimoff8 ай бұрын

    • @@arimoff You need to be a consultant to governments of 28 countries. 25 having the Turkish drones and 3 non declared yet. They seem not to know what you know. If "Turkey's technology comes from nato" then why do NATO countries like Poland buy from Turkiye? And why do other NATO countries don't manufacture them? Do you have any clue of how many Chinese and Turkish electronics is within the drones and that Aselsan makes the cameras because "NATO Ally" Canada sanctioned exports of the previous Canadian camera producer?. You made yourself just laughable.

      @selcukcilek555@selcukcilek5558 ай бұрын

  • Lol.... where is Turkish Bayraktar drones ???? i thought you guys were running your mouth about it not so long ago ! where is the "GAME CHANGER" now???

    @TsarOfRuss@TsarOfRuss9 ай бұрын

    • @tsar5501 The game changed... again! The problem with them was that they were expensive enough to use missiles against them. I think everyone now realizes that using expensive things against cheap things is a bad business.

      @larsnystrom6698@larsnystrom66989 ай бұрын

    • Ukraine ran out of Bayraktars in spring of the last year.

      @AugustSchroif@AugustSchroif9 ай бұрын

  • Seeing this thousand of them flying all at once would be a nightmare for armoured vehicles

    @valbrend9819@valbrend98197 ай бұрын

  • Ланцеты - красавчики!

    @maikl1080@maikl10809 ай бұрын

  • Do a video about the entire concept of IFV's being obsolete. Top it off with hours of footage of burning Bradleys.

    @captwillard3346@captwillard33469 ай бұрын

    • Or upload the video of Bradleys cemetery in Ukraine.

      @overdrivelzma.9219@overdrivelzma.92199 ай бұрын

    • Bradley - deadly💀💀💀

      @user-bb5up7qk4e@user-bb5up7qk4e9 ай бұрын

  • ironic that a lancet just smacked today an IRIS-T Launcher

    @jetfighter200@jetfighter2009 ай бұрын

  • Lancet is new Ak 47 of Russia 🇷🇺✝️🇷🇺 God bless Putin and Russia

    @servantofchrist2483@servantofchrist24839 ай бұрын

    • 👉☦🙄

      @starikanleks3198@starikanleks31989 ай бұрын

    • Peaceful land to you, above your head.

      @jeniat2206@jeniat22069 ай бұрын

  • Big Russia ! Victory for you ! ❤👍✌🇮🇹🇷🇺

    @wolfschanze.@wolfschanze.9 ай бұрын

    • Z ❤️🇷🇺

      @user-kx8xk2lc7s@user-kx8xk2lc7s8 ай бұрын

    • smrt rusiji

      @mineralwater6736@mineralwater67365 ай бұрын

  • 133 registered hits with lancet just in July....

    @mocnijogurt@mocnijogurt9 ай бұрын

  • God bless these drones and Iranian drones. 😁🍻👍🏼

    @sonyx5332@sonyx53329 ай бұрын

  • The Lancet drone was first presented at the Army 2016 Forum at the Patriot Convention and Exhibition Center.

    @user-gy2xk4ot8f@user-gy2xk4ot8f5 ай бұрын

  • The triple efp warhead doesn’t hurt

    @davidphillips8674@davidphillips86749 ай бұрын

  • Harga murah,efisien,sulit dideteksi,berdaya ledak tinggi & saat ini area tempur ada di ruang terbuka,maka lebih mudah bagi lancet utk mencari mangsa

    @masadjie79@masadjie799 ай бұрын

  • Ah yes, the Shovel drones....

    @tzeentch8281@tzeentch82819 ай бұрын

    • Built in prisons

      @NathansHVAC@NathansHVAC9 ай бұрын

  • 8:33 that drone looks cute like a little puppy 😊🐶

    @davhot4107@davhot41079 ай бұрын

  • Can anyone explain the aerodynamics of X shape of wings

    @shivamRudram@shivamRudram9 ай бұрын

    • Один нормальный комментарий👍😂

      @user-nn8bt2ch2w@user-nn8bt2ch2w9 ай бұрын

    • not a clue. But looking cool

      @Iv4Bez@Iv4Bez9 ай бұрын

    • Just simple. better aerodynamics, stability in flight, maneuverability. the best aerodynamic properties allow you to save energy (charge) of batteries.

      @Feadeaf@Feadeaf9 ай бұрын

  • they have also shape charged lancets

    @roman335i@roman335i9 ай бұрын

    • all of thr lancets are 1kg shape charges

      @FrenchmansFlats51@FrenchmansFlats519 ай бұрын

    • @@FrenchmansFlats51 No, they have different payloads now.

      @CyrilSneer123@CyrilSneer1239 ай бұрын
KZhead