Scientists Reached The Edge of The Universe, But Were Shocked When They Looked Out The Window
A scientist and a pilot volunteer for a high profile mission to reach the end of the universe. After 13 years, the ship crashes through the end of the universe and into the unknown.
Our team strives to create quality recaps of your favorite films. On the channel, you will find stories about movies in Sci-Fi, thriller, fantasy, horror, drama, fiction, trash, comedy, detective, psychological thriller, and dystopia genres. Each video will intrigue you with surprises and mystery. Leave the names of your favorite movies in the comments, and we will make an exciting review about each of them.
We will be very grateful if you give us a like for our efforts and subscribe to the channel so as to not miss the next entertaining video. Thank you for watching our recap.
#movierecap #spoilerlab
Hi! What do you think of this movie? Movie name: Beyond the Edge (2016)
Thank you for the great summarization of the film. 👍 Well done.
Confusing
The protagonist discovered a multiverse.
Good movie 👍. A bit of a Mind Trip 🤯!! But I like this stuff 😂. Keep'em coming .
Very confusing
The man reached the edge of the universe, and started to skip into others where he existed. He attempted to change it, but every time the result would be the same, he'd see his partner die, then get to the end. He learned that he partially could influence the events of these universes by using observation. If he drew and documented the death of somthing, it would happen. Yet the death of his partner was still immutable. He then unwittingly cracked the edge of the universe, sending himself spiraling between multiversal worlds, where subtle things changed. He finally landed in one where he NEVER got in the ship, and the ship never reached the end of the universe, ending his cycle.
THANK YOU
@@tallboy015 When I saw it years ago, needed a second watch.
Gave up watching these kind of movies after Interstellar, and before I say this I already know people will say their pre-scripted spiel, if you're watching for X then you're watching for the wrong reasons, but I'll still say it anyway. It all became about "drama sells". I mean dramas and soap-operas has been played by everyone's moms, aunts, etc since dawn of time, it's getting boring already.
@@MangaGamify I understand what you mean. This kind of stories can become tiring eventually.
@@GerardMenvussa Yeah, I like concrete conclusions. These types of stories feel unfinished to me.
All I know is that the Hero of The Federation, Johnny Rico, would not be killed so easily by an eel. Dude's fought giant space bugs.
The moment I realized who it was I rushed to the comments to see who else realized that
Not to mention he has the Doctor from Firefly with him there.
The eel was a bug infiltrator that finally got him....
@@CriminalonCrime Damn bugs! He'll be avenged!
Rico's Roughnecks! HOO-AH!
Why does this ship have so many booze packs ?
Precisely what I wondered about too!
I'm more curious about the eel honestly.
Made in Russia (or Germany)
When you find the edge of the universe may as well party
They were Lucky for having booze onboard 😊, No one knows when you need to Celebrate or Party 🎉 in dark Void of Space. Plus for some people Booze help them to gather some Courage within.
I love how most of the set is made from plastic industrial bins. The "air lock" is literally just the plastic hinged door on one of those crates.
Still took NASA 268 years to build.
We have those bins at work. 😂
I work in a factory and can confirm. They're called "Knockdown Crates" because they can collapse on hinges to save storage space when not in use. When being used, it's a box without a top around 4ft X 4ft. A surprisingly high number of places I've either worked at or have seen, also use the same exact type.
They're called gaylords lol. No cap.
@@jackbandit2114 - I know the cardboard ones are. We call the plastic ones bins.
The end of the universe stories are fascinating. Some are serious science fiction films, while others can be fanciful. In the early '80s I watched a short film called, "Voyage To The End Of The Universe", on public television. I've been searching for it for quite some time without any luck. A rocket flys to the end of the universe. As they are approaching the end, they come upon a vast white surface. The astronauts do a space walk and can touch this white surface. One of them takes out a knife and cuts a hole in the white material. He then sticks his head out of the hole he has just made and sees a bright blue sky above. A minute later he sees a giant girl walking toward where he is. As he screams, a hand comes down over him and picks up an egg and places it in a basket along with other eggs. The picture fades as she walks toward a farmhouse, with the basket of eggs.
It reminds me of the end of the men in black movie. A universe within another, as ignored and insignificant as a marble
Rings a bell 😖🤦? Being I'm in my 40's 😎. Though the title of the movie is a mystery 🤷. Someone remembers it! We; who can't remember it. Would be thankful 👍.
kzhead.info/sun/ituolK6PaJuheac/bejne.html is it this movie?
kzhead.info/sun/lLeFnLGhql93eIU/bejne.html or this one?
@@mattking3148 Thank you. Hopefully someone will have seen the short film and post it here.
He went into a fourth (or fifth if you count time as a dimension) dimension and had mastery over his own timeline. Then he shows he passed through another dimension and could travel through his own timeline of different universes, not understanding what was happening he haphazardly chose to return to one of the universes where he's still together with his wife and never travels with the ship.
Time isn't a spatial measurement; they describe spacetime as 3 dimensions +1 time dimension. Dimensions describe space and not other universes; if this person was "in" or able to perceive a 4th or 5th dimension, everything would appear to be fundamentally different; a good example of dimensional-relevant perception would be describing various shapes in dimensions: a point in space is 0; a line is 1; a square is 2; a cube is 3; a tesseract (or hypercube) is 4; all of these describe the same shape, but with increasing dimensions. Also, each new dimension is orthogonal to the last, so you will have a serious issue with perceiving dimensions above 3 because we aren't equipped to imagine an angle which is orthogonal to x, y, and z, however non-euclidian geometry may be able to accommodate this. In the case of time, new research suggests that there may be multiple time dimensions as well.
And then he turned himself into a pickle.
Nice one
@@davidmistoffelees8459 when you mean by orthogonal, are you referring to Euclidean Geometric Matrix (in Analytic Geometry) that is a transpose of it (to which the matrix of nth dimension is symmetric) is also its inverse, pre or postmultiplied to its original matrix = the Matrix of nth dimension itself?
Oh so this is how he collects so many booz sachets😂
Maybe the dude stumbled into a universe with many more dimensions, then saw and traveled between past present and future without having any control over it because his mind can't process what he was experiencing.
I'd say this would be more than likely. Humans are incapable of actually 'controlling' time, space, energy, matter, etc. Should a human reach a point in the universe where it "ends" would probably end up killing or destroying them. I'd be good in real life science could prove the existence of tachyons as they travel faster than the speed of light. That being said; scientists said black holes couldn't exist because they violate the laws of physics as we know them. And yet they are proven to exist. It seems humans always posit something doesn't exist just because they don't understand it. It's rather pathetic tbf.
I already addressed this, but here's the short version: dimensions describe space, they do not describe other "realities".
sounds like drugs to me...
@@AffordBindEquipment We call this a UPG: an unverifiable personal gnosis. The problem with UPGs is they rely heavily on undescribed terms; for example "energy" is a variable and anyone that uses the word, and can't define what the energy represents, is either a physicist (hard at work on that exact same problem) or is simply making stuff up.
Trying to believe an astronaut would be dumb enough to chase a pen into an electric eel tank instead of using an insulated grabber, and you know they would have something like that to clean the tank. Then again, why bring an electric eel.
astro-NOTS. The Earth is Flat.
Its the concept of Multiverse where there a universe which him dumb enough to do so and another universe not to do so
@@russelllukenbill”flat” is the perfect description of a flat earthers brain
@@russelllukenbillthe earth is not flat
@@Theproclaimed Nice Ad Hominem, do you have any more? Don't worry, I'm a big boy, I can take it. Might as well get it all out of your system, the Flat Earth reality can be overwhelming at first.
Love how he didn’t even check the guys pulse, just goes to throwing him in a sack and dragging him to the airlock within minutes of finding him 😂 some “friend” 😂
he seems rather incompetent in general
The movie where you are expected to figure out the meaning because the authors have no idea.
You win! 😂😂😂👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Lol😂
Rico is the perfect space marine to be sent on such missions.
You wanna live forever, you apes!?
HE WAS REMOVED OF COMMAND
Looks like after his Infantry career, Rico finally went to college 🤣 and became a scientist
😂
He found bugs at the end
@@jacklamb2904 it's all a circle
You mean Casper Van Dien? He has a name, ya know?
@@nocturnalrecluse1216 Johnny Rico. He'll always be Rico to me and a lot of other ppl
That's a load of crap there's no way Johnny Rico would be killed by an electric eel.
RICO'S ROUGHNECKS
“Do ya wanna live forever?”. Don’t retrieve your pen from the electric eel tank then, Trooper 😅
Yeah, the shock, while painful can't kill you outright. It requires many shocks to stop the heart. Most deaths in humans from eels is due to being stunned and drowning.
And now you know how Johnny Rico died after the war ended.
😂😂😂😂😂
I hate these kinds of sci fi movie where nothing is clear, no begining and no end.
wait wait wait hold on you need things to be clear and make sense oh you silly people and your castles🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@SaraMorgan-ym6ue no, a story has tonhave an ending, not a mystery that serves nothing. If you want so called philosopht go read some bs philosophical book and pretend you are wise.
How do you end up on a ship and not know anything about how it works….
it's like we wake up inside our bodies and don't even know how the human body works..
@@alejandronunez7650 its like being hired as a captain for an airline and having no idea how to fly a plane
It's like buying a car and not knowing how to drive a car 😂
Like buying a seat on a small submarine that is said will take you down to see the Titanic and bring you back up?
@@johnhmielewski1230 "bop it!!!"
We can never reach the end of the Universe, because the Universe is moving away from us faster than the speed of light.
What if a warp drive was possible.
I’m sure that the actor playing Abe is the same guy from Firefly who played the doctor that smuggled River on board.
The other dude is johny Rico from starship troopers, I haven't seen him since that movie.
Sean Maher and Casper Van Diem
Yep, that's him.
@@finalcam1740 Starship Troopers, one of my top five fav sci fi films ❤️
Bet he also playes some serial killer in the second season of American Horror Stories.
The dude probably thought he was going insane seeing the same thing happening again even with subtle differences.
Thank you, Spoiler Lab, for watching Beyond the Edge, so that I don't have to. Your work here is much better than the movie it's about. The acting and sets look really good, but what a stupid script. "The only competent person on this highly improbable crew accidentally got himself killed by being stupid, so I accidentally spaced his corpse because I got really drunk and passed out on the airlock lever, and then maybe went insane but I'll leave that for you to decide in case you stay til the end."
Plot twist, Harold is how majority of American's imagine themselves, Abe is who they actually are
@@arcanewondersfann1567 You ignorantly think it's just Americans?
@arcanewondersfann1567 Brother u spittin straight facts & don't even kno
Bro I swear this was like 3 different movies in the same recap. It was so confusing.
“Wow, so there’s an infinite number of universes?” “No, just the one.”
theory proves by 13 years old then disappeared
Futurama
When I was 11 in astronomy class I asked about the universe and space and was told that it never ended, it was infinite. It stopped me sleeping for days, my brain couldn't get around the idea of a vacuum that was endless and since then anytime I hear someone say that this or that is impossible, try endless space ! Scary.
It isn't, the Earth is flat and motionless. The edge is in Antarctica.
@@russelllukenbill Wow that could be very funny but I have a feeling that you are serious!
@@TheFiown You are right. I am very sincere.
@@russelllukenbill WOW I thought that flat earthers was just a joke, didn't know that people ACTUALLY beleived in that !
@@TheFiown Well, now you know. People know the Earth is flat.
It is amazing to me the sheer number B-grade/low production value scifi movies that are out there.
It is good to see Adrienne Barbeau still working.
I cannot believe how far I had to scroll to find the first comment acknowledging Adrienne Barbeau. She looks great!
Good to see casper van dean in movies, loved him as johnny cage and in starship troopers
It seems they found a multiverse convergence point in the black of space and when they hit the barrier it reset reality for them
This movie screams 'straight to DVD - B grade', but has an interesting plot that might have been a blockbuster with a huge budget, A list actors and a director like James Cameron.
Years ago, the phrase was HBOnly
Personally, I think he died when he tried to hang himself and everything after that is just his brain having crazy visions as he passes on, kind of like Jacob's Ladder.
The two main characters are named after the USS Richard Anderson. A Destroyer that served in the US Navy for many years before being given to the Chinese for use in their Navy.
Richard Anderson was the scientist behind the Six Million Dollar Man.
@@ecphorizer Close. Richard Anderson played Oscar Goldman, the CIA Brass who was Steve's Boss. Dr. Rudy Wells was the scientist who created the cyborg technology and fused it to Steve Austin.
The best scene in the whole movie was the fight in the control room. Crewman: "What happens if you don't push that button?" Pilot: "You don't want to know." Fight ... Fight ... Fight ... Crewman: "Aha! You didn't press it! Nothing happened!" Pilot: (sheepishly pushes a button a minute after the alarm has already ended.)
The multiverse is a trippy journey. 😂
As he looked out the window he should've seen himself looking back at him through a window...
I’m trying to imagine what an edge of the universe would look like. If the edge is expanding it’s create more space, time, matter, and reality.
The earth is a flat plane with a dome above it called the firmament,no living flesh is ever lieaving here
@@muhacnt7988 💀💀💀
@@muhacnt7988 you can't spell for shit
@@muhacnt7988and gandolf helps Santa deliver the presents on Christmas
@@muhacnt7988 yeah made by your magical daddy
While I do like the multiverse theory, I prefer the idea that Anderson went insane. I believe losing his wife pushed him over the edge of sanity, and he never went on this voyage, two other people did, if it even happened at all. Everything seen could merely be inside his mind
Explaining everything is ust in the protagonists head is such a cop out
what about the ending tho?
That absolutely makes no sense if the movie is pitched as sci fi LoL. With that logic i can take any movie in Hollywood history and use this, doesn't mean it's correct!
Including events that take place that he isn't present for and has no knowledge of? IF that's the intent then it's bad writing. It's the same problem with that ridiculous 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer' episode where it turns out she's actually a mental patient even though stuff happens that she's not around for all the time (including an entire spinoff series in a different part of the country!). I'm okay with this kind of psyche out but there's a way to go about it and this wouldn't be it. A good example of doing this right is a book I read when I was in school called 'I Am the Cheese'.
When did he lose his wife ? She was back on Earth.
Gee it's almost like reaching the edge of existence would have a negative effect on one's perception of space time.
so are they caught in an event horizon, "spaghettification", like a time-loop because noone full knows what exactly happens inside of a black hole. hovering on the edge, or being in different galaxies.....looks like a super film, nice one for uploading it!!!
Good it seems you solved puzzle of black holes
@@manisherande4568 the universe has always fascinated me , since time is a social construct, certain particles would be too unstable, as we understand/interpret them in re time. i used to imagine a tesseract inside of a tesseract when I was very young, staring at the ceiling or out into the night sky, it both scared and fascinated, moreso te latter. i wonder will anyone ever figure or, or go through ...outside of a time trip tv trope. 7-dimensional dolpins jittering about like a 1990's music video. it could be like lemniscate, you know, the infinity symbol, instead of as something as simple as ab "end" there is an infinity that just does our human brains in , perhaps it just keeps going. but on hitting a black hole and the apparent spaghettification, or extreme tidal forces, sounds truly terrifying. maybe one just ends up as a tin of spaghetti shapes.
Suppose you could reach the end of the universe; what then? The universe contains everything we know of, including space. Space, as in, the six directions; or the 3 dimensional raster in which things exist. Your body needs space to exist, and if there is no space, then your physical body wouldn't have any 'place' to exist in. If space becomes non-existent beyond the boundary of the universe, then you couldn't exit the universe. You couldn't exist where there is no 'where'. That is, there wouldn't be any locations beyond the boundary for your body to be in: no coordinates to occupy. In other words; you cannot leave the universe. So how would that be like? Encountering the boundary. Would it be like a surface that cannot be broken, punctured, pierced, shattered, etc.? What if you could pass beyond this 'wall', what would happen to you? Would the void simply annihilate every particle in your body? Surely, you'd perish. But what if the barriere couldn't be lifted? Not even for space itself. If it could, then space would've been pouring out of the universe for billions of years, like water leaving a vessel. Since the universe is expanding, then space itself is expanding. Expanding into what? Nothing. It's almost just like a balloon being filled with a gas; its surface area's expanding, but there's always the thin layer of rubber that separates the inside from the external. If the air outside of the balloon is devoid of space, and all of space is contained within the balloon, then the expansion of existence (i.e. the universe containing all that exists) is reducing the nothingness surrounding it. If the nothingness of the beyond is infinite, then how can an expanding universe be reducing it? Of course, this 'nothingness' wouldn't exist. Nothing doesn't exist, by definition. The expanding universe is all that exists. Stranger still is that as existence expands, its surface area increases; and the nothingness that is beyond its boundaries is increasing with it, just as the expanding rubber creates more surface area to come into contact with more of the outside air. Nothingness is reducing because the universe is expanding 'in it', and at the same time, because the universe is expanding, the nothingness it 'touches' is increasing. A peculiar idea for sure. Existence increasing in size and duration now seemingly produces a paradox in relation to the nothingness 'around' it. But how can nothingness increase and decrease simultaneously, if at all? Hmm.. The other option, of course, is that the universe doesn't have an end to it, and that space is infinite. I've considered this, but I think it's problematic. If the two guys on that spaceship set out to find the edge of the universe, and we give them eternal lives and limitless energy, for their journey, and we (for the sake of argument) propose that the expansion of space isn't happening at a speed that their spaceship cannot match; and we assume (for the sake of the thought experiment) that they're not traveling in a loop: then this attempt of theirs can only result in two possible conclusions. The first is that they encounter the edge of the universe and find out that space is finite. The other option is that they do not find said boundary. Now, in case of the latter, and bearing in mind that they have infinite time, life and energy to keep traveling, then at no point during their search can they ever conclusively claim that space is indeed infinite. This is quite bizar, but even when given an infinite amount of time, they can never know for certain that the (unreached) space still ahead of them goes on forever. That is because an infinite distance cannot be concluded. And so they can only either confirm that space is finite (by finding the end of it), or they have to remain in perpetual doubt concerning the supposed infinitude of space. That is, if we're taking the kind of direct approach that the movie present us with (i.e. by literally flying a craft across space in hopes of running into that wall at some point). Perhaps theoretical calculations or other empirical methods could prove more valuable in this. The edge of the universe; where existence ends, including the space bodies require to be in: wouldn't that be the moment of the Big Bang? Isn't that the type of barriere we encounter when trying to reach the beyond? No space means that our instruments cease to function there. No space also means no time, as a crude definition of 'time' would be that this is simply the measurement of motion, and motion pertains to bodies in 3D space. No space: no bodies: no movement: no passing of time. Beyond this perhaps hypothetical barriere: there is no "where", as "where" pertains to coordinates in space, and there is no "when", and no "before". There would be no "prior to" the emergence of existence, unless there's a time before time, and an existence before the emergence of our known universe. Seems we venture out into the realm of conjecture here. We barely know how our own world works. Is the universe inside something? Is it within non-existence? Perhaps it just 'is'. Here's what really gets me.. We're surrounded by non-existence on two sides. The end of the universe, in a sense, is just behind us, and right infront of us. After all, the entire universe and everything in it, as it was a second ago, no longer exists. It ceased to be as soon as the present moment arrived. And the next moment; the future; that's not extant yet either. The second that just passed, and the second that still lies ahead of us in the future; maybe these are the edges of the universe, in a strange but eeringly practical way. We can't go to the universe as it was a second ago, and we can't jump forward in time either, all cool sci-fi flicks aside. But what does that mean? That the present moment is all that exists. And the present moment and all of the universe's contents, and all the countless minute incidental characteristics of everything that exists within the universe; only this present moment is existent; has existence. And it's gone again. Existence after non-existence: emergence after annihilation: constantly, fluently. Dare I say: the creation ex nihilo of all of existence as a continuous proof for the existence of its Creator? Because how do wise men reflect upon the creation of the universe, without seriously considering God?
I'm very proud to say that I read the whole thing
You had me until the god part, was a nice trip reading everything you said though. Whats your definition of god if i may ask. All righteous, all powerful , all knowing God ? Or perhaps your talking about something more vivid?
I deserve a medal for reading the whole thing and I, in all honesty, knew this was going to end with God. Interesting read.
@@user-wg8en5fz1y True theology is found primarily in the Islamic religion. A quick overview of the (sunni) Islamic concept of God: The Creator is beginninglessly eternal and ever-lasting and is attributed with attributes that are beginninglessly eternal and ever-lasting. The attributes of the Creator are not Him Himself [i.e. God is not merely an attribute, e.g. we do not believe that Allah is power, but that He is attributed with power], nor (are His attributes) other than Him [i.e. His attributes are not divisible, or 'parts']. Some attributes are always 'in effect', while others are not [e.g. God's Wrath, which is His punishment, 'manifests' in accordance with His will, but His Knowledge is always 'active']. The Creator is One: He does not have a like [so He is not something with specified incidental and/or bodily characteristics], He has no opposite, nor an equal or partner [i.e. there is only one Creator]. God is One, not in the sense of numbers, as it is impossible that He should be divisible or be composed of units; He is One in every sense of the meaning, whereas everything else is one in one sense, but not in others. He does not reproduce (or produce or take offspring in any way), nor was He begotten, and there is none like Him. He neither resembles any of His creation, nor does anything among His creation resemble Him. Literal anthropomorphism is rejected, and we do not interpret the Divine attributes in the same way when [similar nomenclature is] applied to created being. He does not have an end [to His existence or to that of His attributes], or a shape, or a limit. [Thus, He is not a body, or a plane, or a particle, or a dot]. He does not exist in something else [because He does not need anything]. Events do not occur in Him, and [hence] He is not attributed with movement or changing position [or stillness, since He is not a body]. He cannot be ignorant of something/anything, and it's impossible that He should lie (i.e. speak falsehoods). It's invalid to say that things begin to exist in Him, that He could be transported, and He cannot be attributed with any kind of imperfection. He is seen [by Muslims] in the Hereafter without being in a location or direction [i.e. seeing Him is not like seeing a creation]. Whatever He has willed will be, and whatever He has not willed will not be. That is because He creates in accordance with His eternal will. Everything that is, therefor, is exactly how He has willed it to be in eternity. He does not need anything and nothing is incumbent upon Him. Everything created [i.e. everything that has a beginning, including bodies and what occurs in them of movement, color, shape, ideas, intentions, etc.] is according to His predestination, specification, and will. [All acts of creation are created by God,] however, acts of creation that are said to be ugly due to their sinfulness [by His legal prescription] are not said to be liked, commanded or accepted by Him. He is not attributed with emotions, since emotions imply needs as well as change in state of being, and God does not change. Hence, words like mahabbah (literal translation: love) are ascribed to Allah in Arabic with reference to certain acts of creation to mean that these acts are rewardable in the Hereafter. God is now as He has always been, and before creation existed, God existed, and there was nothing (existing) besides Him. Your inability to (visually) comprehend God IS the correct comprehension of Him. God is neither male, nor female, nor is He neuter. We use masculine pronouns, as they do not necessarily specify a gender (in most linguistic families), whereas feminine pronouns always specify the female gender while excluding the masculine mode. Plural pronouns are also used sometimes; either to indicate His majesty, or to include the angelic realm. We are commanded to only say that which is true about Him, and our knowledge comes from revelation, and sound argumentation. We are commanded (in Qur'an 47:19) to "know" that He exists and that there is only One God. We bare witness that prophet Muhammad(saw) is His elect emissary and the final messenger to all of mankind. I'm not interested in discussions. This was just to share some of our beliefs, and may Allah guide you on your way: ameen.
> If the two guys on that spaceship set out to find the edge of the universe, and we give them eternal lives and limitless energy, for their journey, and we (for the sake of argument) propose that the expansion of space isn't happening at a speed that their spaceship cannot match; and we assume (for the sake of the thought experiment) that they're not traveling in a loop: then this attempt of theirs can only result in two possible conclusions. The first is that they encounter the edge of the universe and find out that space is finite. The other option is that they do not find said boundary. Now, in case of the latter, and bearing in mind that they have infinite time, life and energy to keep traveling, then at no point during their search can they ever conclusively claim that space is indeed infinite. This is quite bizarre No, it is not bizarre in any way. Why do you think so? There are lots of true facts which can't be conclusively proven. I can't conclusively prove that you never killed, cooked, and ate a baby, but it is true (and not bizarre at all) that you did not, correct? Also, if space expands uniformly everywhere (say, in one day any two objects 1 light year apart move away from each other by 1 kilometer), then inevitably at some distance the recession "velocity" is faster than speed of light (in my example, objects 25.92 billion light years apart recede from each other at 300000 km/s, the speed of light). This means that your hypothetical astronauts have a limited reach in this model of expanding universe, so this method of "finding the edge" is rather ... suboptimal.
just looked this up on my amazon... will be watching it later! Thank you!
Scuffed interstellar , but good movierecap ! thx a lot
"It's Bender -- but with a cowboy hat!"
So the last scene where he gets a phone call where he's told that the position is already filled, is one of the alternate realities?
these recap video titles are killing me 😂 this is the best one yet
I fear these deja vu moments. As if I had it, lived through it, especially in the dreams. Then I can't recollect anything upon waking up despite forcing myself to remember the dream, and then being awake and having that feeling that I've been here when it occurs. Sometimes even years later. It's visual, subtle, emotion and feeling based, not textual or word. It happens rarely, but the feeling itself freaks me out with shivers and tingles. At times I ponder if things are somehow preprogrammed and there are no other paths. That it will happen anyway.
you mean like when you're in the present and suddenly get struck by the feeling that this has happened before even though you never visited that place ever before? it happens with me too. i see a dream and sometime later i get the feeling that its happened before but im aware that it was a dream. it's called 'deja reva' and hits harder then deja vu. apparently it happens to a lot of people. i actually saw a whole community of 'normal people' talking about it on the internet. by normal i mean they aren't into astrology or dark magic or psychic stuff. some theories ive come across says that our sub consciousness knows what could happen to us in the future (bogus, ik) but i believe its generally related to our everyday lives, as, indeed our mind picks up more from surrounding then we consciously remember.
@@momsspaghetti6195 It is all: place, moment, actions at certain very short period. First, it is the realization of coinsidence with something that has happened, seen or lived in the dream. Then there is a like 2-3 seconds of what will follow right now after the initial realization. It coincides with the dream. I can't change it or affect it in any way. It will happen anyway. That coincidental feeling is what freaks me out. I wonder if I picked it from sci-fi movies. That is, when a character would experience something similar they would also freak out. Btw I also freak out or become hyper aware when a character in a sci-fi movie goes through this. Thanks for clarifying.
Kinda like eternal recurrence.
or more like anemoia , nostalgia for a time/place one apparently hasn't known.
I once had severe deja vu for a period of 4 months. Everything I experienced looked and felt insanely familiar, everything, from the traffic each day, to conversations I had, the people I walked past on the street, everything, even going to see the doctor to find out if I had a tumor in my brain because no way this should be going on as long as it did, even my doctor's reassurances that I was fine had been something I am convinced happened before. I woke up one morning and felt like something was different, which both excited and terrified me, when I went outside everything seemed scary and unpredictable but I was so relieved that it was over. I still wonder what the hell happened to my brain or the universe or whatever the hell that was , it's just amazing how one's perception can be skewed so dramatically that it affects how you view reality.
"Dude, have you fixed the pinball machine yet?" "Nah... I made us some dope friendship bracelets out of the wiring instead!" ...just another day in the life of the 3-man crew partaking in the what I can only assume to be the most important mission in the history of all mankind.
Even this being explained i still was lost lol
Scientists reached at the end of the universe, shocked when they look out the window and see a restaurant
Private Rico should have stayed in Klendathu, killing bugs instead of trying his luck as an astronaut. Duh..
Every single one of these kind of doomsday or end of the universe scenarios all have the stupidest flaws. They get to hand pick the two most talented, dedicated, and trade people out of the entire planet and they always end up picking either psycho's, lazy people, or people prone to panic at the tiniest things.
Two humans isolated for THIRTEEN FUCKING YEARS. You and legit every other person making this stupid comment couldn't mentally last a day without electricity.
No intergalactic alien or human can ever reach the edge of the universe. It's the definition of a fool errands.
Unless they already live there.
@@ExtraBullano, it is expanding faster than speed of light
@@voiceofreason1829 exactly! And to go faster than the speed of light, you’d need all the energy that exists in the universe. Based on our understanding of the universe (and we only understand about 4% of our universe) it’s impossible
@@ExtraBulla You can't live in newly created space, and if you could, life doesn't evolve fast enough to be aware of a universe, let alone its limits or surroundings.
@@Jamietheroadrunner Not only that, matter cannot exceed energy, to do so would break the natural laws of the universe.
Thank you 🤩🤣, I’m glad I got to see the “ Speedy “ version of this movie .
This is the movie you make when your teenager writes the script, you use your basement as a movie set, and record it with 2 to 3 iPhones. What cheap nonsense.
spaceship with periscop 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 that’s too much
The old style Klingon BOP also has a periscope. They used it to aim their photon torpedoes.
That's crazy. Their tech level is relative to ours, so not far future. They've made ship capable for FTL travel, but they decided to send it straight to end of universe instead of to neighbor star.
what do you do when you realize that your living in the matrix?🤣🤣🤣
Scientist was shocked to see harbor freight was already there at the edge of the universe selling tools and toolboxes to the aliens
Seems like an off-shoot of: Star Trek: TNG - Quantum Incursions (Season 7 Ep.11). The twist here is that it occurs inside the space ship vs. outside as in Star Trek episode. Same theory, though.
The end of the universe is always expanding that is faster than light so they would need to go faster than the expanding universe and go to the same speed when there near but that would be literally impossible
How come this ship avoided infinite heats, pressures and forces of gravity from different huge objects? And more over the black holes??
Because it's a movie
@@viperdeath8534 LOL...
Just call it black magick
@@viperdeath8534 Exactly the reply I had in mind before I noticed your reply!😂
universe is a big place lots of room to bypass ANY hazard...
How did all electricity dissapear when eel electricuted a man?😂😂😂
That was really dumb. As if the whole ship was being powered by the eel.
I'm glad I just watched the story recap instead of watching the whole movie
Wow all that years and Rico hasn't aged that much at all! What's his secret?? - From India with Love ❤️
Well from where does the bees collect honey in space???🤔🤔🤔
That's what
I'm just glad that the Starship Trooper is getting work.
Ive watched this before, good movie.
where did you watch it?
I watched it on a streaming site.
i always wondered if there's a physical edge of the universe like a wall and if so, what's on the other side..
We can not observe, as the speed of the expansion of the universe is faster than light. Infact the longer we wait the more impossible it becomes to even reach other galaxies. We will never achieve space travel with the conventional understanding of physics that we employ now. What we DO know though is the distance, its the age of the universe times the speed of light which is roughly 14 billion light years. So if the universe would stop expanding and you had a spaceship with an 1 LY speed drive, it would take you 14 billion years to reach the edge.
@@sinanuygur5273 We know so little. We understand only 5% of our universe. Dark matter is 95% of our observable universe and we don’t understand it at all. These days when I think about what we can see of our universe and what might lie beyond what we can see, I think of “The Three Body Problem” series: “physics is a lie”. That phrase sends chills up my spine
There isn't any end its like a country the boundaries are imaginary
The question you asked is very complex. It is relative to several physical phenomena and others that we still do not fully understand. Simplifying it, if there is an end, an edge, a horizon of the universe, we will never be able to see it, and we will never be able to reach it because the universe is still expanding, and it is much faster than the speed of light. Therefore, if we try to look at that edge, the light that we see will always be old and it will provide us with certain but old data. On the other hand, we cannot see beyond what has not been created nor enlightened. Nor can we reach that edge or barrier, because if the universe expands much faster than light, it exceeds the relativistic speed, therefore, if we propose a hypothetical scenario where the universe expands one meter per minute, in one hour we would have sixty meters, and if we managed to travel thirty meters in one hour, it would take us two hours to reach the position where the barrier of the universe had been an hour before. We would always lose the race against expansion. So far the only thing we can see, or capture, is the microwave background that is a remnant from the beginning of time. A kind of shock wave from the initial explosion that we can measure, although I don't know how accurate it can be.
@Chaos Mage no they aren't 😂
My last two brain cells have been on an identical journey for several decades.
Wondering how bees could make honey without any flowers. Atleast that shouldn't be a science fiction.
My response to this entire movie is.. "Bro what?"
interesting, but in reality its kind of sad to think we will never get to see the edge of the universe if there is one
Never is a VERY long time.
Sad? We'll never know the end of time either, but so what? Brighten up, the present has plenty of mysteries and challenges to contend with.
I remember reading a short sci fi story where the universe was orbiting a giant naked dead woman because a naked dead woman was forced outside the universe where all physics and concept of time and scale break down.
Link to that story plz?
Somewhere between 2001, Red Dwarf and Dark Star... Holy shit that's Adrienne Barbea!!!
Theyd have to be going ALOT faster than the speed of light to reach the edge, we can actually only reach 6% of all observable objects in space, because they have gone out of the "event horizon" of the expansion of the universe, we may get to see them now but if we were to try and get there, wed never make it even goin the speed of light.. eventually the entire universe wont be observable even the background radiation from the big bang will eventually not be detectable.. we live in a golden age where we get to know what made our universe, we dont get to go there but we atleast know what happened, eventually (millions or billions of years) there will be civilizations that only see their local galaxy cluster and will think that the entire universe is made up of their one galaxy and that it is forever and wont change (because they wont be able to know what created our universe)
@brandoncampanaro7571 what you said got me thinking, like eventually as you said, if there is an Alien Civ for example, that existed billions of years from now where only their local galaxy or supercluster is in the vicinity, and to them that will be their only knowledge of the "universe" as it is. Then what separates that hypothesis to our situation now? what if there are other "galaxies" or "universes" beyond the "edge" of what we can see or measure? Isn't it a popular theory that the our universe has no center, which I still cannot wrap my head around, but if it has no center then that means outside of the theoretical "edge" there could be other universes in the cosmos that also expand infinitely out of grasp similar to ours? I can't properly explain what I'm trying to say at the moment but I hope you get my point @XaeeD also tagging this brother since he seems fun to chat with
Another well-stated explanation. I'm glad to see some good science behind the comments.
My opinion they didn’t reach the end of the universe, they reached the beginning, where all reality converges. Just a thought.
I feel so bad for that guy, his only crewmate is a big child..😂
It's a hideous paradox in which seeing him watching himself watching TV he got zapped in to another universe, became a cameraman and the only fatality in a global disaster while his footage made lots of people very wealthy.
Sounds like the writers of this story never paid attention in Science class.
It's Sci-fi, you have to add fiction for it to be good
Of all the ways to die in space.. it's an eel that does him in? That was destiny... they're truly at the edge of the universe.
I think this theme would fit better with a fantasy or something, because we all know that the universe is infinite and doesn't have an edge or end, but I like the premise ❤
I was waiting for the one guy to say "Come on you apes, do you want to live forever!" .
Is that Rico?!
Rico’s roughnecks!
It is indeed.
Would you like to know more? LOL
Rico nasty
Wowo Casper Van Dien aged really well! Lol!
That was one powerful eel.
This is a movie you'd need to watch a few times, but I don't think I could bear it. I think I'll stick with Red Dwarf
A criminally underrated series. A toast to, 'The Boys from The Dwarf'!
@@MPeaches1958 I wish I could do a 'Boys from the Dwarf emoji"
As someone who’s been to the end of the universe, this is completely inaccurate. There’s actually a white void with a nice balcony to stand on that has one of those 25 cent binoculars. You look through and you’ll see across the void and find yourself, but a little different looking, who also made it to the end of HIS universe. The me I saw was wearing a cowboy hat.
I saw you too 👀
my theory is that as far as you go, all you'll ever see are stars, planets, galaxies, cos that is like our 'spectrum' of viewing the universe at our size and rate of time passing etc. Even if from an incredibly zoomed out perspective, the universe has become something different - I think at our level of seeing it we'd just see this. It's like, if you were quark sized, and you went throughout the universe at that size, the atoms themselves might be different, like the planets / stars are to us, but you're still only ever going to see atoms, protons, electrons etc, and have no clue that you're just a tiny little part of a chair leg or a cloud, or a monkey or a car. Probably not. I have no idea of the exact size differences of these things I'm just trying to paint a picture that enforces my theory. i think if we could witness ourselves from the point of view that makes us small as sub atomic particles in comparison, we would quickly go insane, and have to detach to everything on our little plane of reality, because everyone is gone in an instant. it frightens me to think whole universes might be birthing and dying in a vast sea of connected energy, with every breath i take.
Very strange... but enlightening.
It is odd to me that only 2 men were sent on the mission.
Very odd !
Cause they r gay
What if this is a psychological test. They never left earth.
There was a movie like that! It was a female protagonist and I forget what it was called, dang it
@@raeraebadfingersOrbiter 9 movie
@@ms.solinvictusmithra5700 thank you! It was driving me crazy
Writer had a general idea for a plot, but couldn't settle on an ending, so they said, "oooooo, let's have the viewer decide".
What is the background music…l love it!
At the edge, you face eternity. You don't 'smash into' it, you go through it. All of it. All at once. Every version of you that makes it there is forced through an ontological sieve until only the purest concept of you remains.
Movie name please
Beyond the Edge (2016)
Good. They were ready for the scenario of encountering hostile space bugs. Sad they didn't plan for the death by electric eel scenario.
The ending that everyone hates. Great
Space expands faster than the speed of light; approximately 2.5 more faster then light. But we can not travel faster than light. Quick tip; "nothing can move faster than light" only applies to the motion of objects through space but space itself can expand faster speeds. Ref: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe
Your observations are erroneous, null, and void once you sighted wikipedia as your sourcebbha
@@mikejackson8971 a wiki page may be good place to start, then you look at the sources at the wiki page and this wiki page has good sources
@@mikejackson8971 It changed when i measure and observe it. kzhead.info/sun/p5mGn8yDbHh-eJE/bejne.html
@@mikejackson8971 Michael Jackson likes touching little boys, therefore anything you say is irrelevant and incorrect. If you disagree, you are wrong.
I remember a short story that involved a coin-op peep hole. "Does anyone have a quarter?" Don't recall the author, but Ted Sturgeon would have known him.
I remember that one. As I recall they came to a wall with a big sign THE END OF THE UNIVERSE or some such. Edit: Found it. "Ado About Nothing" by Robert K Ottum (as Bob Ottum Jr.).
Anderson got a whole dump truck on him
The first half was like the tv series "Red Dwarf" with Rimmer and Lister,then things started going backwards and multiple realities started forming.
Why do you keep using different names for the same person? It's confusing...
do you want a space honey?
The idea of running into a parallel universe which is only slightly different is absurd (except if you're going to suggest that such very similar Earths somehow attract each other). Everything, all the 5 billion years of Earth's existence, all the millions of years since austrolapithicus, all the history of humanity in almost every detail would have had to have been pretty much totally identical right up to the last few years for this to be possible. Any Earth would have had a FAR different history than any other, with little chance that all if any of the inhabitants of our Earth being present on any other.
in the infinite multiverse everything is possible because it's infinite. But yeah, running into one just like ours super unlikely even if it probably exist somewhere in the multiverse.
except if the multiverse and the parallel universes are more like layers upon layers of realities, and piercing through a layer you'll end up to a reality that has barely any changes so that would mean the changes happened closer in time. One change 1 year ago would create an unquantifiable amount of realities, butterfly effect. One change a minute ago would be more easily attainable in this scenario than one that took place a year ago or a century ago
@@teovu5557 If the multiverse is infinite, then presumably there is an infinite possibility that there is no other reality like ours.