THE COST OF CHOOSING BIGGER 4x4 TYRES
2024 ж. 9 Ақп.
100 517 Рет қаралды
The Real COST of BIGGER Tyres
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @ronny_dahl
Thanks for watching and Please Subscribe: / ronbacardi666
MERCH HERE below the videos
Find us at the links below:
Website: www.4-wheeling-in-western-aus...
Wow, the production quality going into these videos in getting insane. Nice work Ronny (and everyone behind the scenes). And as always, top notch advice. I run 31.5 Ko2s on my daily for all the reasons you mentioned. No extra costs, no headaches or reliability issues, and they still work off road when I need them to. Just switching the stock road tyres to decent A/Ts makes a world of difference without changing anything else.
- yep going 31.5" (17" rims)- just brings a 4wd ute up to design specs. (I'm still wearing out a set of 29"s (AT) on 16" rims, I got with my ute - they still work, save the better set for trips. - eventually throw some more mud oriented tyres on the 16"s)
Wow, the production quality going into these videos in getting insane. Nice work Ronny (and everyone behind the scenes). And as always, top notch advice. I run 31.5 Ko2s on my daily for all the reasons you mentioned. No extra costs, no headaches or reliability issues, and they still work off road when I need them to. Just switching the stock road tyres to decent A/Ts makes a world of difference without changing anything else.
@@URAGAN-es9mg wtf is this bot shit?
Fitting larger tyres, especially 35’s will also reduce braking performance - so brake upgrades are, in my opinion, also required
Honestly im abit old school i prefer the 33s on a 2" lift its definitely the sweet spot.
Still very much enjoy and look forward to your next video. I started watching you 8 years ago, figured it was cheaper watching you than actually do it, well turns out you gave me the bug for off road! héhé! Bought a 2016 4x4 gmc canyon (1/4 ton) 2,8 diesel took me 2.5 years to desired state, 3'' lift and suspension upgrade, 33'' mud tires, steel back and front bumpers and completely boxed frame with skid plates and 15500lbs winch, aluminium cab that i made all the electrical set up (isolator, 2nd battery, distribution...) it was a way of life for 5 years until I got crank bearing issue, started a year and a half nightmare ended up loosing lots of $$$ now its behind me but do not regret the incredible experience it was and these amazing places we visited that would not have been accessible otherwise, cheers Ronnie!🍻
Went from 29.6 to 31.6 inch tyres on my 2010 dmax. After adjusting for the tyre size in the fuel calculations. I use around 0.2 to 0.5L /100km more. So well and truly worth it. Also fit with no lift of trimming required.
Legend. Thanks mate. 33inch tyre with 2 inch lift on solid axle all the way
I’m contemplating a 2 inch lift to fit 37s.
Ronny, from the other side of the planet - I admire and appreciate your well presented information. All the best from Tennessee, USA.
A lot of us men (yes, men) need a giant project to get us away from our families and soak up our excess time before we wind up in the old folks home
Our main enemy is when there is nothing to do (boredom).
What excess time?
All 3 comments above are relatable 👌
Maxxis Razr AT 235/85r16 on ROH Steel Rims are the perfect combination for me and my 78 series
265/70/R17 Maxxis Razor AT, P12 rims , 40 mm lift , airbag man also fitted to my 2023 fortuner gxl . The car went some of the places that i though no way we could get theres . Towing camper nearly 2 tons to get to off grid was abit nervous but we got there. That just show do you really need big massive tyres .
Yup, my Triton runs similar size tyres and lift, and I'm always surprised at the places it'll take me with a bit of careful line choice.
That’s a lot of solid information there mate. It plays a lot into your vehicle much more than others think it’s does. The other issue you have to consider (different per state) is GVM. Yep bigger tyres robs you of your gvm the bigger you go, especially if you need to carry more fuel or a rear bar to carry that spare wheel on your wagon. As obvious with my profile picture I own a ‘16 duel cab ranger, ideally it’s my jack-all-trades vehicle. It’s my daily, it’s my weekender, it’s my tourer, it’s my dream rig. I’m building mine up to 275/70/17 or 32.2” tyres with 2” lift, diff drop, new UCA and a GVM upgrade to have a rear bar and 122L tank. A bit much just to go that size but being its usage I can mildly justify it. However I can’t exactly justify cheaping out my camping gear on Kings drawers 😅
Another awesome video! The shot at 1:33 is WAY more work than most would have even noticed! The time-lapse split with Ronny talking. Great work team!
Great video Ronny. Very informative.
Hello from Indiana. I have a 2022 jeep wrangler jlu with a deisel. I'm running on an evo stage 2 defender with King shocks. Going on 1.5 years with this setup and it works great. Really like the content.
Wow! This is a well put together and informative video. Well done and thanks!
To put a true 33 12.5 on my NP300 navara apart from suspension, which is obvious, was trim the inner gaurd a tiny bit, and I changed diff ratios to suit. The only other thing I want to do is a brake upgrade, but it stops fine now, it's really just for towing our van.
Can’t believe how far this channel has come in the last few years! Awesome video!
Very educational movie; many thanks, Ronny. You made no mention of the brakes' diminished effectiveness. I had to upgrade my brakes due to an increase in tire size.
Great video! Some really good info here not a lot of people consider. I'd go 32" pizza cutters and negative offset rims on a 2" lifted IFS vehicle
I purchased a Hilux 'N80' in the UK, I have to agree with this video as I wanted to run 33" M/T, I have purchased OME BP-51 with 2inch lift, OME UCA, Kaon diff drop, 17x9.0 ET0 wheels and after all that yes you can easily get 33"s on now.. but they still rub so I've now removed all the interior and dash (I mean everything) to modify the inner arches so I can actually get full articulation from the suspension with zero rubbing... its allot of work just for 33"s... I don't personally see how 35" on a Hilux are possible unless they are just for show and don't fully compress on the front... The other thing is the Hilux and 70series *new one* have same engine and I presume a similar auto gearbox, so bit confused how it could be said that IFS no to 33"s and non-IFS yes.. surely its the ratios that determine how well they will work. The hilux has 3.909:1 ratio, I read the new 70 series has 4.3:1 finals, so clearly if the Hilux was re-geared it would be same. No one in Australia will send me gears of the N80 Hilux as I was happy to re-gear mine but I think only 4.88:1 was available and I thought that was too much for 33"s.. but I could be wrong.. I worked out previously that 4.3:1 would be perfect.. but no one sells this ratio.. in the UK the 2.4ltr engine has a 4.1:1 and that might be what I do as a half way measure... Either way this thing is costing me a fortune.
Hey buddy. I dropped a 2.5" lift into my LN106 'lux a couple of years ago as the very old 2" lift had sagged (and broken, as it turned out when I pulled the rear springs out) it's way back to stock. Stock tyres on them things were 29" outta the dealership. I had 31" boots on it then and after the lift it looked (to me at the time) a little silly. So I rocked down to my local tyre guy - Bridgestone Kalgoorlie for the win - we looked at it a bit, I wanted big tyres, he's like you won't like it, I'm like nah yeah cocko, he shrugs and rounded up some worn out 35", got them on rims, mounted them on my bus and I went for a wander out bush for half a day. They were great offroad, fantastic even, and I had no issues at all with scrubbing or rubbing. That lift included a tailshaft spacer, extended brake lines, no need for a drop steering arm, I have full articulation all corners, good kit. Thing was on the highway they were, as expected, absolute shit. The LN106 don't make a lot of power to start with and these things were just sucking it out. Deflated for sandy stuff - even worse. So back to the shop, he said told ya so cocko, yeah righto, some umming and ahhing, I rolled out of there with a set of Maxxis RAZR 265/75R16 MT772M's - 33" - as a kinda compromise. Same deal, great tyre and an effective total lift of 4.5 inches. And they have been a fantastic tyre - bloody awesome in fact - so long as you are not driving on the road. On the road, 10l/100km or worse when the rig is loaded up, squirrelly and being so much bigger, takes a lot of middle pedal to pull it up from speed. Just because it can, does not mean you should. I'll drive these current tyres down to the plys like any good ole goldfielder, then flick 'em for some 31 inch tyres. I'll end up at 3.5" total lift - meh, big deal - and consumption and power back where it used to be, which was much better than this. Nah, no turbo. The only better way to wreck a 3L motor is to drop all the oil out of it.
Awesome video once again mate. My personal experience: GU Patrol coil cab, standard suspension handled 33 inch tyres with no rubbing noticed, 2 inch lift handled 35 inch tyres with minimal rubbing: this seemed to be the sweet spot, just springs and shocks upgraded. I've now gone to a 3-inch lift and softer rates to try and increase flex, but got lots of rubbing in the guards when flexing fully loaded. It's since escalated into a large list of suspension mods to make it all work. Coils seem tricky to get right if you want good flex at low speed and bottoming resistance at high speed when touring/fully loaded.
Wil my experience I find that 32 and 33 inch tires tend to be the preferred rand for many vehicles when it comes down to Touring and most 4WD situations. Pair that with the right suspension and you are pretty much set. Even some vehicles like.my 1993 WD21 have no problems doing most things with Factory 31's. I guess it really comes down to what you do and what you need for what to get.
Depends where you live. Most of my local tracks you physically won't be able to drive without atleast 35s due to the ruts being so deep
@@Jacobtheunwise has nothing to do with where you live, but where you travel when you think about it. Yes I am in Colorado, but if I travel to another state then it's going to matter more for the state I travel in vs where I live
Thank you for this informative video. I have a manual MR Triton and as is, with after market 18" alloys and 30.5" all terrains performs great for what I do, mostly sand driving but occasionally it sees a bit of mud. I did watch your steel v alloy video and think I made the wrong choice. I think now a set of steel 16" (maybe 17"?) rims with 30.5" tyres would be the go for me, without any suspension or inner guard mods. That would certainly give me a bigger 'footprint' when pressures are down and certainly allow for some mild rock crawling, not that I'll be doing too much of that. It would be pretty easy to sell the alloys anyway. Cheers!
Y62 for me with 295s (34.5 inch) was just zip tying the inner guards back.
I've recently put on 275/70r17s (true 32) on my n80 and I reckon that's the limit for me. I've had to do some light trimming to the mud guards and that's it. I can easily see how a 33 would require so much more work. The larger you go, the more exponential the hassle is. My 32s are a sweet spot and often get mistaken for 33s too!
Don’t forget about increasing rotating mass Rhonny makes a huge difference for sapping power regardless of regearing. A huge point I think you missed with the 4 cylinder vs v8 towing vid. Anyone changing wheels on same tyres will tell you. I thought I had the handbrake on when I got steelies, then went back to factory lc70 alloys differences is incredible there would only be 5-10kg difference per wheel, but difference was enormous. I am surprised you did not notice when going to patriot wheels on your 79
Brilliant video. Very interesting and informative.
My manual px2 ranger was not as good to drive once I put on 33’s with new rims so I got the front and rear diffs from an auto ranger and that got it back close to stock gearing, pretty good! However, while I had that new rear axle out I couldn’t help but put on rear disc brakes and, because I had a rear axle from a px3 ranger, I had to get a patch cable to get the factory rear locker to work, all good still. While I was changing that front diff I couldn’t live without an elocker in there and that got me to a new switch panel in the interior, nice! Of course I couldn’t have it without a 2/12 inch lift and that really works best with adjustable upper control arms and while I was in there I thought why not do some nice super pro lower control arms and then you really need a wheel alignment from somewhere that understands how to set up those adjustable upper control arms . I felt like it would be wrong not to give the front brakes some love so upgraded rotors and pads went in too. Those stock brake lines looked suspiciously short now, so some longer stainless braided ones were best front and rear. And then I couldn’t help but install a diff drop, weld in (because they’re meant to be better on a ranger) and the aluminium bash plate over the front diff did need modification too 😂. Those 33 inch muddies were sticking out well past the guards so on went some good looking flares that definitely look better still with raptor coat tinted to the colour of the front grill on a wild track. Oh, I haven’t done the speedo correction yet….it’s close enough 😊
Nice, keep the moneybucket rolling down the road buddy 😉
Dont forget the regular wheel bearing adjustments and reliability with 35 inch tyres
I could do 35's if I wanted to do some trimming. As a budget. To do it moderately, I'd need to re-gear (mainly as a drivablity preference like how your hilux loses 6th gear). But re-gearing is "cheap" (especially if you're mechanically inclined to do it at home) and easy as it's a "generic" upgrade. My truck runs factory at 3.42 gears, 3.73 gears can be found in a scrap yard/used if you know what to look for. The biggest expense would be braking... which thanks to GM, is also a factory option that can be done after the fact. But brakes would be a $5000 item (not counting the rims that would need to be a minimum of 18"(might be 20", I'm not certain). Plus the obvious few hundred to have the computer/speedo corrected. (I get that free as part of my original tune/speedo correction)
I went with the biggest tire t could without any major mods. Went from a P255/70/r17 to a 285/70/r18. All I did was a 2" front leveling kit (ifs front) and a canned tune/speedo correction. That's it. It's a big 33" or a small 34" depending upon how you want to think of it. So in total. With the tires, alloy rims, leveling kit and tune. (And my labour) it cost about $3000. Anything else would be "invasive "
Great video Ronnie on the brake down of the costs involved to do any of these mods, your pricing is in Australian dollars which are generally allot higher than there in North America, the process is all the same, some commenter said here in North America the big tires are for looks only, WRONG, they are used off road on a regular basis, 37's ,39's and 40 and 42's are that more more common nowadays, lots of over landers and off roaders using them now, even from GM you can buy a mid size truck Colorado or Canyon with 35's from the factory, you just have to pay the enormous price which is easily over 50k actually closer to 55-60k if you add options, the new Tacoma nice rig will start at 40 plus to get a decently equipped model that is before taxes or any extras we are still cheaper than Australia, the catch is allot of insurance companies now won't cover you at all or you have to pay an enormous separate rider policy almost equal to your annual insurance cost for the unmodified vehicle, Germany with the TUV laws you can't do any of this at all, people ask all the time and its a no go , I camp, canoe and hike lots of places for my photography hobby that a vehicle won't take me to anyways and it is still the experience at a lesser cost with the same results, and i have owned and sold loads of vehicles able to do all this and yes its fun and does cost a shitload of money, and i love tall sidewall tires, more ground clearance, better ride and they are only 1 inch taller so theres no major cost, not $56000.00 👍 I still love the look of these units and always thumbs up to the owners that use them as intended
I think you don't realize that we don't use the US dollar here bud, that's 56,000 AU dollars which comes to $36,500 American.
Lifts and bigger tires are completely legal in Germany, you just have to get them engineered and follow certain rules. My 80 series is on 36s with a 3" lift, all TÜV-approved.
Awesome video! and the production level is off the roof! (I'm a long time follower). One thing I would add is that, although changing the diff ratios can compensate for the difference in gearing and help with fuel efficiency. More roll resistance will still be evident... I own a few 4x4 vehicles with tyre sizes ranging between 29" - 44". My 76 stays on 33", currently on a 2" lift and with rear track correction. but even without the lift and correction, 33's fit (almost) perfectly. It's just the sweet spot for these wagons in my opinion.
And all these points sit to explain why I still run the stock size tyres on my 02 Pajero. I do have a 40mm lift so could go from 265/70/16 (30.6inch) to 33's without any other mods (as far as I am aware) but it is more wear and strain on my drive line, more fuel and in my opion not worth worrying about. I'm not out to rock crawl anyway so clearance generally is not an issue. I've had so many people tell me to go bigger but I don't feel the need. 33's in NSW with the 40mm lift is also the maximum legal without major mods requiring engineering. That would give me 2 inch suspension & 1 inch tyre lift matching the maximum 3 inch lift.
No offence I used to be subbed but most of the 4wding you put on your channel could be done in a X-Trail or RAV4, you basically only drive fire trails
@Jacobtheunwise that's because I'm not interested in the harder trails. I like to drive to places to see things not just to say I have done some difficult track. My content is not for everyone.
33’s and a 2” lift for me because I almost never come across a situation where I would need more and the benefits of increased fuel range and reduced wear and tear are very attractive. Thanks for the videos Ronny..
Very helpful Ronny. Dream car for me would be a 90 series on 31" BFGs, factory alloys and a 1-1.5" lift. Nice and cheap with easy to find tires. But I wouldn't do anything as serious as Ronny.
Great video!!! Thanks so much!!
I love your content Ronny, always clear explanations and real life experience to share. The only thing is that not only tyres raise your axle, portal axles can also do that. Keep on the great content👏🏻
Great video. The best way to save money is HAVE A PLAN. Don't start with 31's, then go to 33's then to 35's etc. Figure out what you want and build to it.
I thought long and hard about my upgrade to my 105, and I’m shaking hands with myself after watching this. 2” lift and 33’s. She looks good and performs awesome. Only additional change was swapping out to an adjustable Panhard rod. Thanks for confirming I made a wise choice
Very informative video thanks Ronny. You didn't mention the reduced braking performance. I had o do a brake upgrade going up in tyre size
Really good video.. except that on IFS suspension lift at any height doesn't clear tyres, as up travel remains the same regardless of lift, all you lose is down travel
For most overlanders--and off-roaders--a set of 33s will suffice on a front and rear locked rig. 35s will cost you in modifications to the vehicle and the 37s and 40s that Americans put on are often mainly for looks.
Along with bigger tires, consider the added cost of body mount chop, regearing and eventually wear and tear of suspension components. Better to go for a stock size modern MT tire. Today they are far better on and off road and some have low noise as well.
Built a 2022 Prado VX with a Lovells GVM upgrade @ 40mm. Considered 285/70/17s, but problematic (?). Advice was to go 18" rims with a lower ratio rather than drop a tyre size on 17s and end up with some obscure tyre spec that would be difficult to source - so based choice on 18s for tyre availability. Aimed for 285/65/18s (ROHs -12mm offset was a minimal change from OEM) but no go. Settled for 285/60/18s but that still required 30mm removed from panel under TJM bull bar to relieve space/mitigate rubbing at full lock. Probably need to sort out mud guards too (in time). UCAs centred well enough for now. Uptake of all this: 31.6"/803mm tyres not quite where I'd wish to be and probably at minimum sidewall, but setup has proved to be perfectly fine and fuel economy good. Learned a lot and if had time again would get the build, rims and tyres at one spot with a Prado specialist that understood all the codependent elements better. At the time my advice was "siloed" and I was a bit naïve despite researching.
Great vid. Very informative. Would be nice to include 34s (285/75r17) in the comparison as this size is becoming more available with a couple of manufactires eg nitto, bfg, yokohama, offering some tyres in this size. Obviously, comments about availability apply, but tyres are getting much better and tougher these days Also, note that tyre dimensions can vary between brands. For instance, a BFG runs small, so 33 (285/70r17) could fit in that brand where it wouldn't in a different brand.
Excellent Ronny! 35s were great clearance for the patrol, but the 33s feel so much better overall when handling the vehicle (less bounce, less lean, more stability, more power, etc.).
Great vid, another point is driving at highway speeds. I run 275/65r18 on my n80, and 6th gear is illusive. Long drives can become annoying as it will hunt between 5th and 6th. I’ll usually use the gear selector to lock it in 5th to preserve my sanity
Great content, Mate! Had to lift, regear, body mount chop to put 33x12.5 MT on FJ Cruiser. We don’t have very many solid axle SUV options here in the states (unless you want a Jeep). A Land Cruiser 300 is a Lexus LX600 $100,000 vehicle. We don’t know much about the new 2024 Land Cruiser except it is a Prado.
Love the vids! Informative. I run std size on my 2104 Dmax...but AT3W not HT tyres. I would love to go to a 265/70-R17 one day but if it needs mods from stock I couldn't be bothered, maybe next set of tyres I"ll try it in a year or two. I don't do too much hard offroading, its my daily driver and I value wet bitumen performance over most things. One day I hope to build a comp style truck...just to get some 44" tyres in the house! 😁
You can do most tracks on 32's. Spending that much to do a few extreme tracks that you'll only every do once or twice in your lifetime seems a bit excessive. The best drivers I've seen over 30 years on the tracks look like they're in almost stock standard cars. Some of them have blown my mind, like the guy that easily did Spanish Steps at Newnes in a standard looking Prado after all these souped up utes were bashing and crashing their way up having all sorts of trouble. Learning how to drive and pick a line is a better cheaper option. It was a good video RD, thanks.
32-33 for mid size on 16 or 17 wheels. 33-34 for full size on 17 or 18 wheels.
If you think that you obviously don't do many hard tracks. You wouldn't even be able to drive most ruts on 32s without dragging a diff
@@Jacobtheunwise I've done most of the "name" tracks in 5 states mate. Roothy had 32's on Milo.
As usual, Ronny makes great vids. Unlike other folks who claim regearing benefits fuel economy etc, the real advantage is just as Ronny said, retaining low range performance.
Fantastic video and in depth analysis of this issue, amazing how much people will spend to cost themselves more money in the long run. Sometimes just to cover up the deficit in their ability.
My old 90 series came with larger size tyres when we bought it. Looked cool, but when I dropped to standard tyre size it drove so much better. It felt happier. If it had a much more powerful engine I think it would have soaked it up. Of course now I have a petrol 120 with somewhere around twice the power I don't want to go any bigger. This thing is thirsty enough.
When I first bought my 80 series it was still on original Springs which had sagged 2 inches in the rear and a bit over 2 in in the front. It's still fit 33s easily with a 2-in sag. It now has a 2 inch lift and I have 33s for regular driving and I can chuck on a set of 35 if I want easily.
Lot of work going into this video. Quality. I've got a 2010 Cab Chassis Patrol, 3.0l, heavy steel tray, toolboxes, tools... Daily driver, use it for work everyday. It needs a tune and probably a few engine mods and repairs just to get out of its own way not to mention tyres and other work... I guess fitting 33s with better steel rims is the way to go, stick some flares on the front and a 2-3" lift engineered with a GVM upgrade and we'll see if there's still money for a house in a couple years, lol.
Great video! Got 255/ 85/ R16 ( narrow 33 s) on a LR defender flat deck, no mods needed. Agreed with all said 👍
Nice Vid Ronny and yep you are right had 35's on my patrol and hated them now have 285/33 drives better, more efficient and less effort to move
Portal axles saves the day. By dropping the wheel relative to all mounting points you avoid the geometry problems, get real ground clearance under the diff that regular lift doesn't get you and they will often be geared to compensate bigger tires. Downsides are cost and fuel efficiency/maintenance
Got a 3500 Kg GVM upgrade on my PXIII Ranger with adjustable UCAs. Went from OEM wheels and tyres to a 17" with 33s (285/70/17). That's very close to a 2" lift, 1" on the body and 1" on the pumpkin. Happy with that because there's no intervention required for the drive train.
This is one of the best videos I have seen from a 4wd channel. No jokes. Well explained and reasoning, plus awesome production. I think I’ll stick with my 33’s (which I’m sure you convinced me of in a video a few years ago 👌🏻)
To quote the great James May : "keep it STANDARD"
I was thinking a long time about 33s vs 35s inch wheels on my troopy. In the end I stayed with my 33 (285/17 r16). I love the look of the 35 (315/75 r16) but it would have cost too much and for traveling 285/75 r16 is hopefully easier to get As I changed from All Terrain to mud terrain I took a slightly bigger tire. The Toyo Open Country is a bit bigger than the BFG, so in the end, its a good compromise 😊. Thanks for that video! It confirmed my decision 😅
I only went to 295/70r17 on ky jk but I upgraded my carrier to a terafelx hd carrier to hold up to a 37" that alone cost me $1200,basic 2" King springs and 4" shocks cost me $350 used but had a shock blow out and cost 4 new 3-4" teraflex shockies for $480,Jeeps a little slow but throttle controller fixed that but I would love to re gear but that's an expensive exercise. If I go that route I will cladding lockers at the same time
For remote travel I want the weakest link in my driveline to the Traction of the tyre on the road better to break traction than anything mechanical! No one talks about wheel bearings and Wheel studs and the detriment effects of bigger and heavier tyres and wheels a seventy Series needs wheel bearings service every 20K or annually. Add big wheels and water crossing or spacers and I would replace bearings every year and carry a full set of wheel studs and nuts
Very nice blend of the tire deflation timelaps and Ronny talking in real time😮
Regarding the fuel efficiency info given in your "big wheel short" - did you allow for the odometer / speedo variation when changing from smaller to larger tyres - most people fail to realise the percentage difference in speed / distance travelled. ie. my ute - is about 4-6% under speed (over measuring by odometer) with standard tyres (~29s) and (pretty much) bang on the money with "not excessively massive" larger tyres . (29s are 8% under circumference vs 31.5s - for example - ratio of diameters and circumferences - with different sizes is "the same") Using the trip computer to tell anything really useful tends to be a mistake, unless corrected for the variation. (of course "gps correction" is the easiest to do without ?? calibrated rollers/ dyno/speed trap.)
Also need to factor in the additional load/wear on driveline components and wheel bearings.
I did a 2 inch lift on pb51 shocks 33inch tires baha boss 17 rims . Unbelievable it’s amazing. 76 series
If you want toget technical tyre arent the only way to increase diff clearance, you could install portal axles. But the cost of that means its basically out of reach for most people
As a tourer / overlander rather than a mountain climber I put 33's on the 300 Sahara with a 2 inch lift. Kept the OEM wheels. Control arms were changed. Same time did a GVM upgrade. Beefed up the suspension as added a lot of weight with bullbar, winch, rock sliders & bash plates. I have a rear bar on order but 6 month lead time. The car is now twin locked & I'd reckon it will go anywhere I would be game to take it. Some of the stuff I see you doing I'd never attempt.
Great video guys well done explains a lot to a beginner 👌
Meanwhile in America, here i am with a cut off wheel to my body mounts in my garage to fit 35x12.5s on my FJ Cruiser with out having to worry about the law. I didn't even weld a plate back in place. Love the looks and the performance over rocks or high speed desert running but it's been several years since I've installed 35s and now I'm starting to eyeball 37s. Can never be satisfied.
Just did the same to my fj in Australia but I welded the plate. FTP.
Great breakdown Ronnie, although I don't think the split between IFS and Solid Axle is the most accurate here - it seems to be more between full size and mid size vehicles, given you had to call out all the full size SUV's as being comparable to the Landcruiser for cost and modifications.
Toyota got it right first time with the Troopy - comes with 225/95R16 - a tall skinny A/T tyre - 32.6" and incl steel rim only weigh 29kgs. Heaps of sidewall, airs down easily and takes little time to reinflate. Best fuel consumption. A set of 5 new ones costs $600 on Marketplace - owners taking them off their new vehicles. Bargain of the century. Just lacks Testosterone.
35s and a 2 inch leveling kit! That's what I run on my 07 tacoma! Regear, twin locked makes a hell of a time!
Think I'll stick with 32s on my IFS vehicles.
great video mate! things can go south pretty quick when it comes to mods and money.
Body mount chop, front bar, caster pushed all the way forward and some +25 wheels is all my ute took to fit 285/75r18s (narrow 35s) on it. 6k including wheels and tyres,no poke no rubbing no lift, the spare even fits in the stock position. Did 15k kms before I changed the suspension setup. Car is a GWM Cannon.
Hi mate …I’m considering 35’s for my GWM… how does she go on skinny 35’s with the smaller donk?…do you take her off-road ?…if yes, any issues ?
@@hamishholmes3213 Hey mate it drives absolutely fine, the 0-100 is still in the 11 second range (same as stock). You do lose 8th on the highway (100gps is 93 on the dash) 1500rpm in 8th is 100gps and it doesn’t make enough power that low without lugging it really badly. Everything in the front is still mint (ball joints,cv’s,tie rods even the brakes are still on the original set). Off-road on the beach is great, miles of clearance. However I did break the rear diff (pinion sheared off where the tail shaft bolts up) at glasshouse, the rear diff is definitely the weakest link. The car has 50k kms, 42k on the 35s and I still love it. The lifetime fuel economy is 11.3l/100km but because the odometer is so far out it is more like mid 10s.
Cheers mate …so +25 offset was required to make them fit?…body mount trim & leveling kit I can do but not new wheels atm….did the bigger tires likely contribute to the diff breaking yeah?
also, what is: move caster arm all the way forward?…is that done when you get a wheel alignment & it moves the wheel froward a bit, so you don’t need to chop the body mount too much?
@@hamishholmes3213 Caster is all wheel alignment bud, there is plenty of caster,camber and toe adjustment in the stock setup, even lifted. The leverage from the big tyres and the weight( I was running heavy) is definitely what caused the breakage. You still have to chop a lot out even with the caster pushed all the way forward. You aren’t in Brisbane are you ? Haha you could come and have a look to see if you are willing to do the surgery needed for clearance.
meanwhile in US , raptor rolling out with 37s from the factory
Or loads of other vehicles with 35s even from Ford, like the bronco on any trim the sasquatch package.
Some of your big off road vehicles really do need those big tyres to have decent rampover/breakover angle as the wheelbase is very long. In Aus we mostly drive what you would call compact or mid size trucks (or utes) and we prefer diesel engines these days. Starting to see more US trucks on our roads these days like the ram 1500s etc but to my mind they don't make much sense as they use more fuel and carry less payload then the mid sized units (they can tow a bit more though)
F150 raptor? As you can get a ranger raptor? I do get it, a mate has a H2 hummer
Great info. Going up in tyre size will incorrectly make the vehicles calculation/display of fuel economy higher by the percentage increase in rolling diameter. (Physics) Lots of people do not realise this when commenting about increased tyre size and economy. Have you factored this in when saying your fuel economy is impacted?
Excellent vid Should be mandatory for every 4wd owner to watch. One thing people don't understand when they don't re gear the engine runs at a lower speed. Most untrained people think this is a good thing. Wrong Everything runs slower, your fan, oil pump, water pump even alternator and a.c. , however you are robbing your engine of air induction cycles through the engine. Expect high EGT not just because of the additional load, but you are effectively increasing your fuel to air ratio. Your brake mean effective pressure increases inside the cylinder putting more strain on head to block sealing integrity. Also brakes will not work as well due to increase in rolling mass. You are going down a rabbit hole moving up tyre size.
In the US ifs vehicles are starting to have portal axles on them. Gets 3 inch lift and reduction gears in them and keeps the factory angles for suspension so the ifs or irs axles aren’t being stressed as bad from the angles. So basically it’s like factory ride on lifted vehicle. The only downside to them is the price 15-20k usd.
The j150 prado/gx460 will fit 33s with minor trimming if you go with 255/80/17. Also, lift doesn't actually create clearance. A lot of those lifts are going to include a bigger bump stop in order to prevent rubbing. It's all about wheel well clearance. The wrangler can fit 37s without a lift because it's crazy easy to create the additional wheel well space.
agree 100%, even putting 33's on the hilux cost a lot to do it properly!
Great video - one missing thing - the 200 will need offset wheels for 33” (well in my case 32.7”) or larger.
33s on a PX2 Ranger with 2" lift no trimming or UCA needed. Did notice some power loss
35" illegal on most 4wd's in Queensland. You can go 50mm more from standard.
Tire size and how much you're willing to spend to fit them all comes down to what trails and obstacles you want to run. I've been happily wheeling everything in my area on 33s for 15 years. But now I want to finally check the Rubicon Trail off my bucket list. It's 35s or stay home so it's time to start cutting!
The other possible expense with upsizing is the new garage you have to build in the backyard to keep your pride and joy safe, cause it doesn't fit in the house garage anymore.
Hey mate would love to know your comments on ranger raptor? I own one beast of a truck, some channels are saying just trim the guard on the front. Im concerned about stuffing up the live valve shocks. Cheers mate love the content 👌
Thanks Ronny - because I don’t rock hop, do sand slamming or deep water/mud exploring with my 2010 Hilux all I’ve done is fit white Sunraysia wheels including a spare and a set of Yokohama Geolandar ‘truck’ tyres still at 31” factory specs - no suspension issues, no drive line or acceleration issues with an insignificant change in fuel economy 10.5 l/100km average - I do have to fit wheel arch body kits (A$250 plus painting) to keep it legal in my state - the grip is so much better than my original factory A/Ts in all conditions and they’re wearing really well and very quiet - total wheel/tyre budget A$2200 fitted.
I've watched this channel grow and grow I'm not totally happy with the new format but totally understand what you gotta do to make your hobby a dream job that makes money...even though it's now apart of your job to product test and also sell due to commitments of sponsors...I like this video because you do show and are honest you can do mods on a budget and still be good reliable quality gear....and that you don't need to go all the way.....
Big tyres use more fuel for sure but some people forget to factor in that with bigger tyres, the odometer will under read( without correction), thus making it seem like you’ve used more fuel. Compensating for this or using gps or a point to point comparison is the way to be more accurate
I have 295/70/17s with zero offset and 2 inch lift on my Ford ranger slight guard trim. I fuel up maybe close to 9-10 for fuel ranger which isn’t to bad. I still get 620 to 650 in tank and round 10l-11 per 100 on free way
I have 33x12.5x18 on 18x9 rims on a standard height suspension ln61 ifs front end.. just mudflap removal was required and it has been like this since 2014 and is used 4x4ing every winter and is also my daily driven car I do also have a ln60 solid axle front with 38.5 inch tyres and 6 inch lift which I have spent $2500 in total including tyres and high steer
It also has no body lift its a dead stock ifs car with 33x12.5 tyre
Re gearing the dif must surely be helpful for fuel economy and speedo accuracy too? Big tyres are effectively changing the entire gear ratio. Ronny might even get 6th gear back on his hilux
that was very interesting. i have a 2014 hilux and have put 33 inch tyres on it and found the speedo to be more acurate. that going by the gps. ive had no problems with tyres but they do just only just scrape the front mud flaps. i think ronny judgeing by what you say when these tyres are worn out ill go back to 32 inch. what do you think.??? or what does anyone think please???
What about drive shafts? with much heavier tyres wouldn't you need to replace them with stronger ones? maybe not a problem with land cruiser, but a 35 on a old Defender would destroy them after a while.. Overall I would go for 33/10.50 or 33/12.50 depending on car and use and a small lift..