Aircraft Turrets And Defense Tactics | Interesting Historical Facts You Might Not Know | FULL VIDEO

2023 ж. 9 Қыр.
1 406 245 Рет қаралды

Aircraft turrets and defense tactics used during the war. An interesting account of the ideas, and engineering behind them | FULL ViDEO
Join this channel to support it:
/ @dronescapes
Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: / @dronescapes
During World War I, air gunners initially operated guns that were mounted on pedestals or swivel mounts known as pintles. The latter evolved into the Scarff ring, a rotating ring mount that allowed the gun to be turned to any direction with the gunner remaining directly behind it, the weapon held in an intermediate elevation by bungee cord, a simple and effective mounting for single weapons such as the Lewis Gun though less handy when twin mounted as with the British Bristol F.2 Fighter and German "CL"-class two-seaters such as the Halberstadt and Hannover-designed series of compact two-seat combat aircraft. In a failed 1916 experiment, a variant of the SPAD S.A. two-seat fighter was probably the first aircraft to be fitted with a remotely-controlled gun, which was located in a nose nacelle.
As aircraft flew higher and faster, the need for protection from the elements led to the enclosure or shielding of the gun positions, as in the "lobsterback" rear seat of the Hawker Demon biplane fighter.
The Boulton & Paul Overstrand biplane was the first RAF bomber to carry an enclosed turret
The first British operational bomber to carry an enclosed, power-operated turret was the Boulton & Paul Overstrand twin-engined biplane, which first flew in 1933. The Overstrand was similar to its First World War predecessors in that it had open cockpits and hand-operated machine guns. However, unlike its predecessors, the Overstrand could fly at 140 mph (230 km/h) making operating the exposed gun positions difficult, particularly in the aircraft's nose. To overcome this problem, the Overstrand was fitted with an enclosed and powered nose turret, mounting a Lewis gun. Rotation was handled by pneumatic motors while elevation and depression of the gun used hydraulic rams. The pilot's cockpit was also enclosed but the dorsal (upper) and ventral (belly) gun positions remained open, though shielded.
A Martin YB-10 service test bomber with the USAAC - the first flight of the B-10 design occurred in mid-February 1932
The Martin B-10 all-metal monocoque monoplane bomber introduced turret-mounted defensive armament within the United States Army Air Corps, almost simultaneously with the RAF's Overstrand biplane bomber design. The Martin XB-10 prototype aircraft first featured the nose turret in June 1932-roughly a year before the less advanced Overstrand airframe design-and was first produced as the YB-10 service test version by November 1933. The production B-10B version started service with the USAAC in July 1935.
A B-24 Liberator rear turret
In time the number of turrets carried and the number of guns mounted increased. RAF heavy bombers of World War II such as the Handley Page Halifax (until its Mk II Series I (Special) version omitted the nose turret), Short Stirling and Avro Lancaster typically had three powered turrets: rear, mid-upper and nose. (Early in the war, some British heavy bombers also featured a retractable, remotely-operated ventral/mid-under turret). The rear turret mounted the heaviest armament: four 0.303 inch Browning machine guns or, late in the war, two AN/M2 light-barrel versions of the US Browning M2 machine gun as in the Rose-Rice turret. The tail gunner or "Tail End Charlie" position was generally accepted to be the most dangerous assignment. During the war, British turrets were largely self-contained units, manufactured by Boulton Paul Aircraft and Nash & Thompson. The same model of turret might be fitted to several different aircraft types. Some models included gun-laying radar that could lead the target and compensate for bullet drop.
Cover Credit (colorized by @Dronescapes): Yorkshire Air Museum
#aircraft #airplane #history

Пікірлер
  • Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions ➤

    @Dronescapes@Dronescapes
  • The fact that they made all these machines during the war without using computers is just mind-boggling

    @30ra@30ra
  • i am so happy that he was able to tell his story and not have it all edited out; it was a great way to end the video.

    @dr.scorpiopus8907@dr.scorpiopus8907
  • The planes had balls, just like our brave flight crews who we love and remember with reverence.

    @louietuna8091@louietuna8091
  • This was really two documentaries in one but it was quite good during both of them. The turret history and information was something new that few talk about in depth and the bear story was brilliant and insightful

    @TheHilariousGoldenChariot@TheHilariousGoldenChariot
  • Great video, this. Probably the best YT video on defensive aerial gunnery. I caught Ep 1 and Ep 2 separately, but fantastic work in releasing both in one.

    @kitharrison8799@kitharrison8799
  • Absolutely loved the Bear story at the end.

    @alanmurdoch70@alanmurdoch70
  • I'd probably cry too bro, to think all them BOYS who flew anything ! The ones came home and the ones still on patrol, Bravery , courage & selflessness OUR RESPECT AND THANK YOU À DEBT FOREVER OWED 😔❤️🇨🇦

    @north_snow@north_snow
  • 31.49 "The FW 200 known as the Scrooge of the Atlantic." I may well have been "mean" but I think the word may be "scourge" That said, great doco10/10

    @gordonpeden6234@gordonpeden6234
  • The airshow part was so cool. And the storyteller is awesome. It almost like I am on the trip.. 😊

    @Mega_Trond@Mega_Trond
  • Air Commodore Phil Wilkinson - What a legend!

    @freddieclark@freddieclark
  • The final story, about the Tupolev's visit to the UK was very interesting. While entertaining, it was also almost poignant to hear, considering the present war in Ukraine. How disappointing that international relations have sunk to such depths after such a hopeful period of growing trust and cooperation.

    @GarrisonFall@GarrisonFall
  • The last story of the british man flying in the bear and hanging out with the russians and vice versa was awesome. Imagine the incredible things that could happen if Nato/Russia continued to get along. The technologies and inventions of both, along with the similarities and unique differences of the people, could be an incredible friendship.

    @nickmuschong8706@nickmuschong8706
  • the bit about the bear at the end, fascinating.

    @garetteasdale7064@garetteasdale7064
  • Fabulous story of the 2 bears and their flight crews 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿👍🏻

    @ewanstewart8011@ewanstewart8011
  • If you say "fervent belief, the bomber would always get through" one more time, I'm going to scream.

    @pfa2000@pfa2000
  • The final story regarding the "bear" just highlights to me that wars are highly manufactured by the few and given the choice the majority of the world's populous would all rather get along and party, the whole thing is a racket and a nonsense. Great video.

    @jaymorris3468@jaymorris3468
  • Great doc. You produced this yourself? Easily as good or better than anything I’ve seen on TV

    @Trashcansam123@Trashcansam123
  • Absolutely brilliant documentary, never realised there was a radar jamming version of the iconic Lancaster.That is the paradox of war it forces technical advancement which after the war could be used for peaceful means For example the Enigma Code breaking machine developed at Bletchley Park,which was the Worlds first computer.Also loved the story of the Russian Bear visit when Glasnost initiated by Mikhail Gorbachev led to more open relationships with the West.

    @beachcomberbloke462@beachcomberbloke462
  • The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner

    @vintagecapgunsatyourmomshouse@vintagecapgunsatyourmomshouse
KZhead