What a fun Volkswagen! #lamborghini #urusperformante #carsshorts
Пікірлер
Forrest really changed the game for auto reviews
@cancelwarmacАй бұрын
I don't consider his shorts "reviews" as they're more of an overview of the information you need to know about the car at the shortest time possible. If Forrest was evaluating all his experience with the car AND stating his opinion if he'd recommend said car, then I'd consider those shorts, "reviews". Nonetheless your comment still stands, Forrest did change the game for this type of content (not mentioning the *clean* camera work his cameraman does).
@why_tho_Ай бұрын
@@why_tho_ well your opinion is stupid he does quick reviews of quirks and features
@tman4596Ай бұрын
@@tman4596you calling the previous comment stupid is idiotic
@kabob21Ай бұрын
@@kabob21 You calling the previous comment idiotic is moronic
@_Jeandel_Ай бұрын
Wow, kids in the chat lol 😂🙏
@GautamKarthikeyanАй бұрын
Rare footage of Marques not wearing his shoes 😅
@thegrayman19Ай бұрын
Still wearing js tho 😂
@17an28Ай бұрын
He’s wearing $2000 shoes
@rwjisdabest1Ай бұрын
Huh?
@50subsnovideos88Ай бұрын
He never wears them
@LILSLBАй бұрын
Who's shoes is he wearing then?? 🤨
@lindheАй бұрын
Did Forrest get a haircut? 😆
@SC2point0Ай бұрын
Did you get a Forrest short right before this one too?😂
@bonafidecobraАй бұрын
Well that haircut made him lose weight too jajaja
@arielgomez3785Ай бұрын
The only Forest I know is Whitaker
@jaron312Ай бұрын
Forrest Gump or who?
@chefkoch7342Ай бұрын
He became blacker
@HhhGggg-rz7buАй бұрын
Forest would have done the take off better 😂😂😂😂
@harrybaulsachАй бұрын
Way better lol , why hit the brakes on a launch lol
@ThisisPhillipАй бұрын
Directed by forrest
@tanmayshah4202Ай бұрын
Who's forest?
@BL4K_B4BIESАй бұрын
@@BL4K_B4BIESForrests's Auto Reviews He's a great car content maker who reviews cars in both short videos and full length videos. His channel and content is Greta su be sure to check it out, he's done a lot of cars.
@SouffleDude_25615 күн бұрын
Forrest style takeoff. Can't believe Forrest is OK with this 😂
@AydiniyomАй бұрын
@@cansagarri6749he said Forrest take off, he didn’t say Forrest wrote the script lol
@Tricolor40004Ай бұрын
Marques shouted out forrest in the past, Im sure he's totally fine with this Great recognize great
@ikmashane9042Ай бұрын
Forrest wasn’t the first to launch a car I don’t think he can be ok or not ok with this😂😂
@realjoshuaWАй бұрын
forrest never hits the brakes on a takeoff thankfully 😂
@ParthPatel-ei7onАй бұрын
No heated and ventilated seats?
@rcgcris1896Ай бұрын
It has apple carplay and android auto though
@lostduckkkАй бұрын
As any other car past 2016 @@lostduckkk
@iiishceptionАй бұрын
the baby has his own baby chair so no need
@sambanerjee6796Ай бұрын
Cloth seats too it looked like 🤮
@nam6128Ай бұрын
@@nam6128youre too poor to know what alcantara is aren’t you…
@21sledАй бұрын
when did forrest join the autofocus production crew
@sambanerjee6796Ай бұрын
Ok Forrest’s cousins auto reviews
@ABAtradingАй бұрын
The lengths car companies will go to just to avoid making a station wagon
@brendanressler4359Ай бұрын
Station wagons aren't in style any more, neither are mini vans. Now it's SUVs. Even though these are all the same concept of a bigger vehicle that can hold more people. (I still buy mini vans because they sell for cheap used since people prefer SUVs. Plus with the seats down you have a flat bed that's good on gas. I can have more stuff in the back then the normal pick up truck.)
@TheBoxingNinjaАй бұрын
Lmao
@FOWBOWZАй бұрын
@@TheBoxingNinja it's funny how people will complain about needing to pay big money to seat a full family in a giant SUV or a truck, yet the minivan will easily do it better than both for much less money. In Asia, people don't mind the minivans as much because Asian popstars usually arrive at locations in minivans.
@DonLee1980Ай бұрын
@@DonLee1980 I heard mini vans in Japan are looked at as luxury. It's their limousines. What ever happened to limousines? They used to be the shit in America. But a mini van is a limousine that has more head room and doesn't have to turn like a tractor trailer. Again, mini vans are where it's at. I bought a 2007 Toyota sienna XLE from a dealership for $3,500, it has two sunroofs (one for the front one for the back) heater leather seats, a TV for the people seeing it the back with their own headphones and a button to put the back seats flush with the floor or put them up. I have like 18 cup holders and two glove boxes. I think mini vans are the best.
@TheBoxingNinjaАй бұрын
@@DonLee1980 They should make a mini van limousine. The amount of comfort and luxury you can get out of a mini van... and then add more leg room and put a V8 or turbo V6 in it and call it a day. I get 24-26 miles a gallon in my van.
@TheBoxingNinjaАй бұрын
I’m convinced the designers at Lamborghini hated having to do an SUV
@bolttracksАй бұрын
They didn't really have to do much it's an audi rsq8/ vw toureg
@megodlike--Ай бұрын
They probably did but it’s necessary. It’s what Porsche did with the cayenne. That saved the company
@JDub3799Ай бұрын
@@JDub3799 That's one I forgot the cayenne too. But yeah it's the most sold lambo of all time.
@megodlike--Ай бұрын
Well it was more of a design an SUV and make the brand afloat or lose their jobs or get reassigned in VW
@fjaajfАй бұрын
Both Porsche and Lamborghini would have gone bankrupt if they didn’t start making SUV’s. The Cayenne saved Porsche. Harsh reality is that the average adult wants an SUV, the days of 2 seater sports cars is mostly meant for college kids who can’t afford these cars in the first place.
@Glock7eventeenАй бұрын
For a second, I thought they also got rid of the back seats.
@ludicrousmouse8669Ай бұрын
Yeah put an electric motor in there for that fast 0-60 mph
@everettjames6707Ай бұрын
when you take weight savings too far, like taycan gt weissach and Corolla GR morizo 😂 I mean these are cool cars but the 2 seats thing goes too far for me. same with Dodge demon with 1 seat.especially when tacan GT claims to be the fastest 4 door but it has only 2 seats. I'm still waiting for a car with no seat to improve quarter mile but then it would still get schooled by Rc cars
@geemy9675Ай бұрын
Removing air suspension on a version $30k more expensive is wild
@Pseudoku_RLАй бұрын
It’s for performance purposes though. The suspension fitted to the Performante is significantly more stiff to stop body roll and to gain better cornering speed on a track. Standard procedure on many performance version cars, e.g. Audi RS6/7 Performance, Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT, BMW X5M Competition, and many more.
@maximiliand2939Ай бұрын
Let's be honest, still gonna be a heavy ass SUV so all the weight saving doesn't really do much@@maximiliand2939
@lhmocs6368Ай бұрын
@@maximiliand2939ok then why it cost way more?. If we add those carbon fibre pieces, more horse power, less isolated, no air suspension and no sunroof then it should cost the same or at least little bit expensive.
@reda497Ай бұрын
@@reda497 Certainly, but you're paying for the name. Performance versions are always more expensive. Also, that's a lot of Carbon Fiber, which is coming in hot for your wallet, plus the exhaust is easily $10-12k for a regular Urus.
@maximiliand2939Ай бұрын
30k isn't that much for the people that are buying these lol..
@John-mf6kyАй бұрын
Welcome to the "World of Supercar special editions" 🤣 You end up with a "Superleggera Wallet"
@starfox_wr-45e93Ай бұрын
Is that the Audi Q8 Ultra?
@DrytfcАй бұрын
No, it's the Lamborghini Money Printer Speciale. Fools and their money...
Honestly? People who bought these cars never made their decision logically anyway....
@outsidethebox262Ай бұрын
Yo Forrest seems very chill with this one
@GigaNigga80085Ай бұрын
I don’t understand this forest reference everyone’s making. Like I watched Forrest Gump and I still don’t understand this.
@nawab2569 күн бұрын
I’ll never understand the sports car suv😂
@SaltpeanutssАй бұрын
Ah, yes, compromise. The stuff supercars are made of.
@dsp4392Ай бұрын
My dude creasing the f out of them union 1s.
@immortalhahnАй бұрын
Finally someone who acknowledged that!
@fury.og37Ай бұрын
Opened the comments just to see if there were like souls
@tmatthue22 күн бұрын
Lol how can there only be two of us
@immortalhahn22 күн бұрын
Lamborghini took the famous designer's words "less is more" a little too literally
@CanisoGamingАй бұрын
Audi It’s an Audi.
@TechDebtsАй бұрын
I agree with you but people pay for the badge and styling, that's about it.
@DaddyM7MDАй бұрын
Wait it’s all Audi? Always has been.
@Adam-de8jmАй бұрын
Yeah ppl are stupid
@wolfbad512Ай бұрын
@Adam-de8jm no, it's volkswagen. it's will aways be volkswagen
@ShanksD596Ай бұрын
@@ShanksD596 here's the thing right, people pay 200-300k for a Lamborghini, a huracab for example with 600 horspower
@DaddyM7MDАй бұрын
For a Lambo, it's kinda embarrassing that its slower than its Porsche twin, the Cayenne Turbo GT, yet costs much more.
@qiangsun5684Ай бұрын
Technically it’s just an Audi RSQ8, always will be but I do agree with you
@50subsnovideos88Ай бұрын
@@50subsnovideos88that seems like a better buy too.
@9snagaАй бұрын
my man its status show purchase not pound for pound value purchase
@GEO_________________________24Ай бұрын
Don't worry, Urus so ugly it's not a Lambo.
@Parker--16 күн бұрын
CCM rotors are neat, but yeah, virtually nobody truly gets their money's worth out of them. 1. Total system moment of inertia of CCM rotors vs equivalent two-piece iron rotors is lower, no doubt. But it's not nearly as much lower as some claim: CCM rotors are taller (more moment of inertia) the shed the same heat as iron, requiring taller wheels; and a lot of comparisons are done vs single-piece vs high quality two-piece rotors. It's a big difference, to be clear. 2. An equivalent iron rotor will last aaaaages for street use just like a CCM rotor; the idea that you're buying a "forever" rotor is only true if you compare against the autozone $8 rotors made out of melted pots. Any high end rotor will last absurd amounts of time for street use. CCM and high end iron rotors last a lot of track days, too, but obviously the cost per track day is many multiples higher for CCM - not to mention, heat checking is kind of whatever on iron rotors, but as soon as CCM starts to look grungy they're pretty much done. 3. Most of the fade comes from fluid and pads, and much of the coning in iron rotors comes from mediocre metallurgy and non-two-piece non-floating designs. Once you get proper calipers, proper brake fluid, proper lines, etc, and obviously proper pads, it takes a long time to learn to build and carry the kind of speed that'll cause high quality girodisc / ap racing / etc iron rotors to feel noticeably worse than carbon. 4. Don't confuse the feel of a cold brake system with firmness from CCM rotors. If you feel a difference without spending a while getting everything super hot, then the improvement is likely in the other components. 5. Yeah CCM dusts much less, but how much are you willing to pay for that vs cleaning your wheels? Cost-benefit. 6. Porsche people are sometimes like "you'll get it back on resale" but why would you want to tie up $10k in something that you literally wear away to stop at a r light, with the hopes of getting most of it back? Use properly or save your pennies. Most of the Porsche guys who track their cars regularly actually ditch the carbon ceramics. I was told by a few that they immediately remove them, and store them to put back on for when they go to sell the car. The reason being, steel blank rotors are cheap, and get swapped out regularly during track use. A good steel rotor, quality pads, sticky tires, and quality brake fluid with a big rotor and caliper setup will provide more stopping power than 99% of people can even utilize on track. In fact, if you are coming in on corner entry fast enough that a setup like that won't stop you, you'd probably be understeering into the barrier with carbon ceramics anyway. A carbon ceramic rotor, well... one rock/pebble that gets kicked up on track when someone goes into a gravel trap, and it can seriously damage that a carbon ceramic rotor, and that is a multi thousand dollar repair. Here's a front set of aftermarket quality carbon ceramic rotors. I just lol at the price. hinzmotorsport.com/ products/porsche-991-gt3-rs-gt2rs-surface-transforms-carbon-ceramic-discs-replacement-410×36mm-front-set Hell, race cars don't even use carbon ceramics. It's the ceramic part that leads to the brittle nature of them. They definitely do help with unsprung mass, brake dust, and resist brake fade significantly, but the costs of maintaining them on a car that is driven regularly on track just doesn't make sense. Even if you were going 200mph and slammed on the brakes all the way to zero, a carbon ceramic brake will not offer better stopping power to an approximately sized (and padded) metal rotor. Carbon ceramic brakes only offer brake performance advantages over metal rotors in terms of heat dissipation and fade resistance for repeated heavy braking like you would have on a racetrack. Now that said, carbon ceramic brakes are much lighter than metal rotors, so they greatly reduce un-sprung weight offering better handling, and greatly reduced rotational weight offering better acceleration. 1 upgraded my metal rotors to CC's on a Corvette Z06 once as no matter what I did for cooling and no matter what pads and rotors I ran I had terrible issues with brake fade on some local tracks, but the car was nearly dedicated to track days, and the CCB's worked really well and solved the fade problems; but it was an expensive solution that I am not sure I would do again. 1 honestly would never buy CCB's, or pay for optional CCB for a street car, even if that street car saw occasional track days. Now if I was tracking that street car every weekend, maybe, depends on the car.
@crunchycrackers7364Ай бұрын
Man got them laces choking his ankles 😂😂😂
@mikerootsАй бұрын
😁Bro you lookin kr@zy with that car😎. MKBHD really suits on Lamborghini SUV
@BlessByYou777Ай бұрын
I will never own one of these, but they are sweet!!!!! The colored seatbelt is neat too!
@justinfrye965Ай бұрын
A couple that is considering a Urus as a compromise, can surely get 2 cars, a proper Lamborghini and a luxury SUV for the same money
@musicfanIV26 күн бұрын
If as a couple, one of us wants a Lamborghini… Then I’m sure “compromise” is not on the agenda.
@morrisombiroАй бұрын
Doing what Porsche has always done.
@AI.Overlord.XАй бұрын
These things are so common in South Florida. It blends in and owners aren't are not afraid to daily drive it everywhere.
@lout3921Ай бұрын
Just more compromising. Its like making gucci loafers into track shoes. Just have a luxury car and a track car for the same price.
@fortheloveofcake93Ай бұрын
Beautiful spec. I’m also becoming a huge fan of this guy. Loving his car content.
@nardomarksАй бұрын
sometimes it’s not about what it has but what it doesn’t have that matters most, very classy design choice
@TunaTurkeyTart14 күн бұрын
People have no idea how much of a blessing is to have regular coil over springs than air, the car is way more reliable now and won’t have huge maintenance costs to replace air bags
@Politica1unifyАй бұрын
Removing the air suspension will make that car way cheaper to own for longterm economy, ill bet one airbag replacement costs more than the performante upgrade, then resale will be excellent too.
@neilk2220 күн бұрын
That blue is so beautiful. What a nice car
@jonathan_420Ай бұрын
MKBHD is only good for tech…forrest is the MKBHD of car reviews 😅
@harshchauhan8635Ай бұрын
This is common practice with performance-focused takes of pre existing models. Specifically removing weight and luxury features in the process.
@cazalorganism7020Ай бұрын
In the world of performance cars, it’s very common to pay more for less weight and advanced components. Lighter weight materials like carbon fiber are expensive.
@jg5875Ай бұрын
He took off on a regular speed 😂😂😂 Forrest really changed car reviews. His enthusiasm, energy and charisma is unmatched
@Stewie-A-SimpsonАй бұрын
Forrest influences and Motivates even the Greats 😂😂
@NBWDOUGHBOYАй бұрын
He been doing this way before forest
@ArthurWerkzTVАй бұрын
People paying more for less: Marques: 😂😂😂
@revolucionarioe21237 күн бұрын
That's a beautiful RSQ8!!!
@FullyLooted23 күн бұрын
Yeah, Porsche do the same, since a long time. But to be honest, cutting weight isn't as easy as it may seems also it's good for "performance" hence the naming
@TheGyroBarqusShowАй бұрын
for those that never felt air ride it makes the car feel less sporty... actually you almost feel like you are in a tank. like you feel the weight of the car and it feels heavy.
@downhillgroovy5859Ай бұрын
It looks really good lowered like that. Prefer it every time
@bubandit06Ай бұрын
For the Buyer that wants an even more expensive version of the Audi SQ8 put together by a bunch of pasta making Romans and half as durable as the leaning tower of Pisa
@PHAZER99Ай бұрын
"It's really funny. You pay more, for less" - Apple
@Zephriesz21 күн бұрын
I always prefer conventional suspension over air bags since they have a less chance of failure.
@vWhiz13 күн бұрын
They and a lot of other manufacturers aren't lending you a press car again.
@MrMunga911Ай бұрын
yea dont think so lol you should go see his fisker review. he went easy on this lambo
@MrBaskins2010Ай бұрын
I love you always showing the cars and most of us cannot afford
@rashidtemuri3419Ай бұрын
Let's not forget that a BMW X5 comp or X6 comp that's wayyyy cheaper will still keep up with the Urus performante
@juxyАй бұрын
Urus❌Your is✅
@matthewadriaanse952117 күн бұрын
Yes, this is what exotic car companies do. They release a car than later release a redefined usually track oriented version of the same car. And it’s usually more and expensive and faster… this is why you don’t get tech guys to do car reviews.
@adreyuu7548Ай бұрын
the safest launch id ever seen 😂🔥
@ninonezioАй бұрын
More reliable with out air suspension. Plus it's the active shocks that give it ride quality
@kevinwiltshire4445Ай бұрын
Reliability for a car and brand at this price point isn't even a thing and you shouldn't use reliability and VW group in the same paragraph. Every time you take this to the dealer expect 3000$ bills for everything.
@JJdaSamuRaiАй бұрын
Didn’t kno the urus was this short until marques stood beside it
@onandilewis3290Ай бұрын
Ferrari purosangue next…..
@yashpopat2700Ай бұрын
people seem to not know that the power plant for this car is used in so many other “luxury/sport” suvs. you are paying for the name of this car. there are about 8 other suvs with the same exact power train
@newportlordАй бұрын
No air suspension is crazy cuz it arguably makes a better car for track use
@blueyf22Ай бұрын
Porsche and lamborghini have been doing this art for decades over 10 years ago my dad was doing his supercar grand tour and lamborghini borrowed him a gallardo super lugera which means super light in the hopes that he'll fall inlove with it and trade his gallardo in for it, it costed like 50 grand more than his normal gallardo it didn't have 4wd to save weight
@yusufabdoolla5919Ай бұрын
The only problem with it is that is sound like a Porsche, and not like a screaming, crazy, utterly violent Italian bred super car.
@gavriushkaАй бұрын
That kinda comes with TTV8. Unless we r talking Ferrari
@v.j.1017Ай бұрын
@@v.j.1017so what you’re saying it could’ve sounded like a Lambo, but they just cheaped out on development a bit and just ignore the sound, like half of what makes all these special?…
@gavriushkaАй бұрын
@@gavriushka nah not with the v8 lol. Lambo needed a v10 front mounted setup but yea they cheaper out in the name of profit. Its a damn tuned RSQ8
@v.j.1017Ай бұрын
the shoe creasing 💔😔
@Skorpio285Ай бұрын
I preferred the long luscious hair
@texaАй бұрын
The driving off in the end sealed it, LOL'
@saiharsha5353Ай бұрын
This has been a thing for years and years. I remember the mustang being famous for making you buy expensive performance packages that remove items to save weight
@sportsdomination9729Ай бұрын
I don’t wanna hate but a guy like him shouldn’t be reviewing such a car. It just doesn’t make sense for his brand. This is a pure performance car not an iPhone on wheels. People don’t buy this car for the features, they buy it for pure driving pleasure.
@patrickjanek255022 күн бұрын
Worth it just cause of the color
@rright6563Ай бұрын
Not racing people: “You are getting less for your money “ Racing people: “Nice weight reduction”
@moisesgil50826 күн бұрын
It’s depressing that the ugliest and most pointless Lambo sold the most. 😕
@andrewmontague9682Ай бұрын
What do you expect? It's the cheapest and most practical Lamborghini available. Remember, without the Urus, we wouldn't have as many really exciting cars Lamborghini makes.
@AbdussalamMisbahudeenАй бұрын
@@AbdussalamMisbahudeen a high optioned Urus Performante surpasses technica price you clown.
@MichaelYounesАй бұрын
Lamborghini must’ve paid bots to raid this comment section. 😂😂😂
@TheThirdMuskateer22 күн бұрын
I can't imagine choosing an Urus over a RS Q8 or Cayenne Turbo GT.
@zkiller195Ай бұрын
I can, it docent have plastic everywhere in and out like the other two
@MichaelYounesАй бұрын
@@MichaelYounes What are you even talking about plastic inside and out? They all have the same typical plastic parts on the outside (front and rear bumpers, wheel arches, side sills, sploilers). Though Porsche and Audi have a much classier look that doesn't look like a plastic toy (like the front end of the Urus). As for the interior, both the Porsche and Audi have better interiors. Porsche has high quality Alcantara on most surfaces (from steering wheel to ceiling liner, armrest, seat inserts, doorcards and more) and higher quality leather than Lamborghini on the rest. Audi has more traditional "luxury" Leather interior but still retains Alcantara for the steering wheel, headliner, upper doorcards, and side center console panels. The Lamborghini has the most plasticy interior of the three, particularly it's center console, where everything from the grab handles up the center stack and through the dash is plastic. Not only that, but the Urus has a train wreck of a design that looks like a 3rd graded came ip with it, and the interior looks more fitting of a $40k STI than a $250k SUV. The Porsche and Audi have nicer interiors, more features, and better styling inside and out. Plus the Porsche beats the Urus in a straight line and handily outhandles and outbrakes it, and is more engaging to drive. The RS Q8 lags behind the Cayenne (still in the same realm as Urus), but starts at $70k less than the Cayenne Turbo GT and $115k less than the Urus. It's also mechanically identical to the Urus, and with a $1k tune could handily outperform an Urus. Hell, even stock the RS Q8 beat the Urus Nurburgring record.
@zkiller195Ай бұрын
You're broke. People aren't buying these because of irrelevant performance numbers or to get the best out of their money. They buy it because it looks cool, sounds cool and is cool. The Audi and Porsche are not very cool@@zkiller195
@gotworcАй бұрын
@@zkiller195same reason the hurican sells better than the r8. It's cooler
@gotworcАй бұрын
@@gotworc I guess coolness is in the eye of the beholder. Maybe it's just me, but if I had to pick a winner out of these 3 in terms of "coolness", I'd pick the Cayenne Turbo GT. Honestly though, if I was looking for fast and practical, the RS6 Avant has more curb appeal than any of these crossovers. I'd take a sleek wagon over its bloated, lifted counterpart any day of the week.
@zkiller195Ай бұрын
why get rid of the air suspension? better for cornering/racing rather than cruising? genuinely curious & am asking
@alexthejew420Ай бұрын
Stiffer suspension means better handling. Getting rid of unnecessary things such as a sunroof, air suspension, seat heating and cooling etc… are all amazing ideas for saving weight. For example, another car like this is the GT3 RS that thing doesn’t have doorhandles it has straps instead. This is a performance car. It’s meant for the track, not for every day, cruising to the grocery store and picking up kids from soccer practice like the regular Urus.
@patrickjanek255022 күн бұрын
The Porsche method. Im excited to see the Lamborghini watch that they will inevitably include as an add on
@redwolf9455Ай бұрын
I still can’t comprehend that the best selling Lamborghini of at all isn’t one at all.
@MichaelSeibert15 күн бұрын
Whenever i hear anyone talking about the lambo urus i cant help but to remember that clip of the dude that disassembled it psrt by part with his bare hands…
@Kratos1902Ай бұрын
U could buy a scraped Urus at a car lot, dismantle & remove all the electronics yourself. Put all the performance focused parts including a “sunroof delete” mod & get a proper performance SUV for way less than a regular urus
@syazwanali709423 күн бұрын
That’s so clean
@321MisfitsАй бұрын
“Paying more for less” was a Top Gear bit re: the Porsche 911 GT3 variants back in the mid 2000’s
@JFeinАй бұрын
i like how marques roasts car manufacturers for their bad decisions.
@souhaylnaimi3376Ай бұрын
Marques gone from setting trends to following them.
@prospersikhwari5289Ай бұрын
Creasing the Union 1’s hurt my soul 🥲
@905drewАй бұрын
Long gone are the days of beautiful sports cars.
@ashwinsujith9946Ай бұрын
Love Forrest but pushing pistons was first
@JayceWendelАй бұрын
Why does this Forrest look off brand ?
@bhavishaypooniaАй бұрын
That's true for every sports car
@AttilaTheHun333333Ай бұрын
Lamborghini going bankrupt with this one🗣️🗣️
@Nath_Ay_28 күн бұрын
Honestly, removing the air suspension just saved the customer thousands in repair costs and some headaches.
@nachoproblemАй бұрын
The fact that the best-selling Lamborghini of all time is an SUV, bruh...
@pandamilkshakeАй бұрын
Car enthusiasts have always known that real performance versions just means paying a whole lot more for a lighter faster car overall. Think Porsche gt2
@TheDarkPacific15 күн бұрын
Still don't get point in "performance" SUV words just don't go together 😅😂
@urbanstrencanАй бұрын
This short scared me I thought now it’s electric 😂
@malodeityАй бұрын
30 thousand extra for 104 pounds of weight saving is outrageous
@sagethorburn9821Ай бұрын
I think the Performante is for people that ignores the "pay more for less" question
@itzmespencerАй бұрын
Isn't that how supersport cars work? You pay for less? Bruh. They're all about performance
@INDIANBEA5TАй бұрын
Lambo found out about ultralight hiking gear and got some ideas
Forrest really changed the game for auto reviews
I don't consider his shorts "reviews" as they're more of an overview of the information you need to know about the car at the shortest time possible. If Forrest was evaluating all his experience with the car AND stating his opinion if he'd recommend said car, then I'd consider those shorts, "reviews". Nonetheless your comment still stands, Forrest did change the game for this type of content (not mentioning the *clean* camera work his cameraman does).
@@why_tho_ well your opinion is stupid he does quick reviews of quirks and features
@@tman4596you calling the previous comment stupid is idiotic
@@kabob21 You calling the previous comment idiotic is moronic
Wow, kids in the chat lol 😂🙏
Rare footage of Marques not wearing his shoes 😅
Still wearing js tho 😂
He’s wearing $2000 shoes
Huh?
He never wears them
Who's shoes is he wearing then?? 🤨
Did Forrest get a haircut? 😆
Did you get a Forrest short right before this one too?😂
Well that haircut made him lose weight too jajaja
The only Forest I know is Whitaker
Forrest Gump or who?
He became blacker
Forest would have done the take off better 😂😂😂😂
Way better lol , why hit the brakes on a launch lol
Directed by forrest
Who's forest?
@@BL4K_B4BIESForrests's Auto Reviews He's a great car content maker who reviews cars in both short videos and full length videos. His channel and content is Greta su be sure to check it out, he's done a lot of cars.
Forrest style takeoff. Can't believe Forrest is OK with this 😂
@@cansagarri6749he said Forrest take off, he didn’t say Forrest wrote the script lol
Marques shouted out forrest in the past, Im sure he's totally fine with this Great recognize great
Forrest wasn’t the first to launch a car I don’t think he can be ok or not ok with this😂😂
forrest never hits the brakes on a takeoff thankfully 😂
No heated and ventilated seats?
It has apple carplay and android auto though
As any other car past 2016 @@lostduckkk
the baby has his own baby chair so no need
Cloth seats too it looked like 🤮
@@nam6128youre too poor to know what alcantara is aren’t you…
when did forrest join the autofocus production crew
Ok Forrest’s cousins auto reviews
The lengths car companies will go to just to avoid making a station wagon
Station wagons aren't in style any more, neither are mini vans. Now it's SUVs. Even though these are all the same concept of a bigger vehicle that can hold more people. (I still buy mini vans because they sell for cheap used since people prefer SUVs. Plus with the seats down you have a flat bed that's good on gas. I can have more stuff in the back then the normal pick up truck.)
Lmao
@@TheBoxingNinja it's funny how people will complain about needing to pay big money to seat a full family in a giant SUV or a truck, yet the minivan will easily do it better than both for much less money. In Asia, people don't mind the minivans as much because Asian popstars usually arrive at locations in minivans.
@@DonLee1980 I heard mini vans in Japan are looked at as luxury. It's their limousines. What ever happened to limousines? They used to be the shit in America. But a mini van is a limousine that has more head room and doesn't have to turn like a tractor trailer. Again, mini vans are where it's at. I bought a 2007 Toyota sienna XLE from a dealership for $3,500, it has two sunroofs (one for the front one for the back) heater leather seats, a TV for the people seeing it the back with their own headphones and a button to put the back seats flush with the floor or put them up. I have like 18 cup holders and two glove boxes. I think mini vans are the best.
@@DonLee1980 They should make a mini van limousine. The amount of comfort and luxury you can get out of a mini van... and then add more leg room and put a V8 or turbo V6 in it and call it a day. I get 24-26 miles a gallon in my van.
I’m convinced the designers at Lamborghini hated having to do an SUV
They didn't really have to do much it's an audi rsq8/ vw toureg
They probably did but it’s necessary. It’s what Porsche did with the cayenne. That saved the company
@@JDub3799 That's one I forgot the cayenne too. But yeah it's the most sold lambo of all time.
Well it was more of a design an SUV and make the brand afloat or lose their jobs or get reassigned in VW
Both Porsche and Lamborghini would have gone bankrupt if they didn’t start making SUV’s. The Cayenne saved Porsche. Harsh reality is that the average adult wants an SUV, the days of 2 seater sports cars is mostly meant for college kids who can’t afford these cars in the first place.
For a second, I thought they also got rid of the back seats.
Yeah put an electric motor in there for that fast 0-60 mph
when you take weight savings too far, like taycan gt weissach and Corolla GR morizo 😂 I mean these are cool cars but the 2 seats thing goes too far for me. same with Dodge demon with 1 seat.especially when tacan GT claims to be the fastest 4 door but it has only 2 seats. I'm still waiting for a car with no seat to improve quarter mile but then it would still get schooled by Rc cars
Removing air suspension on a version $30k more expensive is wild
It’s for performance purposes though. The suspension fitted to the Performante is significantly more stiff to stop body roll and to gain better cornering speed on a track. Standard procedure on many performance version cars, e.g. Audi RS6/7 Performance, Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT, BMW X5M Competition, and many more.
Let's be honest, still gonna be a heavy ass SUV so all the weight saving doesn't really do much@@maximiliand2939
@@maximiliand2939ok then why it cost way more?. If we add those carbon fibre pieces, more horse power, less isolated, no air suspension and no sunroof then it should cost the same or at least little bit expensive.
@@reda497 Certainly, but you're paying for the name. Performance versions are always more expensive. Also, that's a lot of Carbon Fiber, which is coming in hot for your wallet, plus the exhaust is easily $10-12k for a regular Urus.
30k isn't that much for the people that are buying these lol..
Welcome to the "World of Supercar special editions" 🤣 You end up with a "Superleggera Wallet"
Is that the Audi Q8 Ultra?
No, it's the Lamborghini Money Printer Speciale. Fools and their money...
@@ktakashismith money printer speciale AJAJAJAHAHAHAHAH🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Honestly? People who bought these cars never made their decision logically anyway....
Yo Forrest seems very chill with this one
I don’t understand this forest reference everyone’s making. Like I watched Forrest Gump and I still don’t understand this.
I’ll never understand the sports car suv😂
Ah, yes, compromise. The stuff supercars are made of.
My dude creasing the f out of them union 1s.
Finally someone who acknowledged that!
Opened the comments just to see if there were like souls
Lol how can there only be two of us
Lamborghini took the famous designer's words "less is more" a little too literally
Audi It’s an Audi.
I agree with you but people pay for the badge and styling, that's about it.
Wait it’s all Audi? Always has been.
Yeah ppl are stupid
@Adam-de8jm no, it's volkswagen. it's will aways be volkswagen
@@ShanksD596 here's the thing right, people pay 200-300k for a Lamborghini, a huracab for example with 600 horspower
For a Lambo, it's kinda embarrassing that its slower than its Porsche twin, the Cayenne Turbo GT, yet costs much more.
Technically it’s just an Audi RSQ8, always will be but I do agree with you
@@50subsnovideos88that seems like a better buy too.
my man its status show purchase not pound for pound value purchase
Don't worry, Urus so ugly it's not a Lambo.
CCM rotors are neat, but yeah, virtually nobody truly gets their money's worth out of them. 1. Total system moment of inertia of CCM rotors vs equivalent two-piece iron rotors is lower, no doubt. But it's not nearly as much lower as some claim: CCM rotors are taller (more moment of inertia) the shed the same heat as iron, requiring taller wheels; and a lot of comparisons are done vs single-piece vs high quality two-piece rotors. It's a big difference, to be clear. 2. An equivalent iron rotor will last aaaaages for street use just like a CCM rotor; the idea that you're buying a "forever" rotor is only true if you compare against the autozone $8 rotors made out of melted pots. Any high end rotor will last absurd amounts of time for street use. CCM and high end iron rotors last a lot of track days, too, but obviously the cost per track day is many multiples higher for CCM - not to mention, heat checking is kind of whatever on iron rotors, but as soon as CCM starts to look grungy they're pretty much done. 3. Most of the fade comes from fluid and pads, and much of the coning in iron rotors comes from mediocre metallurgy and non-two-piece non-floating designs. Once you get proper calipers, proper brake fluid, proper lines, etc, and obviously proper pads, it takes a long time to learn to build and carry the kind of speed that'll cause high quality girodisc / ap racing / etc iron rotors to feel noticeably worse than carbon. 4. Don't confuse the feel of a cold brake system with firmness from CCM rotors. If you feel a difference without spending a while getting everything super hot, then the improvement is likely in the other components. 5. Yeah CCM dusts much less, but how much are you willing to pay for that vs cleaning your wheels? Cost-benefit. 6. Porsche people are sometimes like "you'll get it back on resale" but why would you want to tie up $10k in something that you literally wear away to stop at a r light, with the hopes of getting most of it back? Use properly or save your pennies. Most of the Porsche guys who track their cars regularly actually ditch the carbon ceramics. I was told by a few that they immediately remove them, and store them to put back on for when they go to sell the car. The reason being, steel blank rotors are cheap, and get swapped out regularly during track use. A good steel rotor, quality pads, sticky tires, and quality brake fluid with a big rotor and caliper setup will provide more stopping power than 99% of people can even utilize on track. In fact, if you are coming in on corner entry fast enough that a setup like that won't stop you, you'd probably be understeering into the barrier with carbon ceramics anyway. A carbon ceramic rotor, well... one rock/pebble that gets kicked up on track when someone goes into a gravel trap, and it can seriously damage that a carbon ceramic rotor, and that is a multi thousand dollar repair. Here's a front set of aftermarket quality carbon ceramic rotors. I just lol at the price. hinzmotorsport.com/ products/porsche-991-gt3-rs-gt2rs-surface-transforms-carbon-ceramic-discs-replacement-410×36mm-front-set Hell, race cars don't even use carbon ceramics. It's the ceramic part that leads to the brittle nature of them. They definitely do help with unsprung mass, brake dust, and resist brake fade significantly, but the costs of maintaining them on a car that is driven regularly on track just doesn't make sense. Even if you were going 200mph and slammed on the brakes all the way to zero, a carbon ceramic brake will not offer better stopping power to an approximately sized (and padded) metal rotor. Carbon ceramic brakes only offer brake performance advantages over metal rotors in terms of heat dissipation and fade resistance for repeated heavy braking like you would have on a racetrack. Now that said, carbon ceramic brakes are much lighter than metal rotors, so they greatly reduce un-sprung weight offering better handling, and greatly reduced rotational weight offering better acceleration. 1 upgraded my metal rotors to CC's on a Corvette Z06 once as no matter what I did for cooling and no matter what pads and rotors I ran I had terrible issues with brake fade on some local tracks, but the car was nearly dedicated to track days, and the CCB's worked really well and solved the fade problems; but it was an expensive solution that I am not sure I would do again. 1 honestly would never buy CCB's, or pay for optional CCB for a street car, even if that street car saw occasional track days. Now if I was tracking that street car every weekend, maybe, depends on the car.
Man got them laces choking his ankles 😂😂😂
😁Bro you lookin kr@zy with that car😎. MKBHD really suits on Lamborghini SUV
I will never own one of these, but they are sweet!!!!! The colored seatbelt is neat too!
A couple that is considering a Urus as a compromise, can surely get 2 cars, a proper Lamborghini and a luxury SUV for the same money
If as a couple, one of us wants a Lamborghini… Then I’m sure “compromise” is not on the agenda.
Doing what Porsche has always done.
These things are so common in South Florida. It blends in and owners aren't are not afraid to daily drive it everywhere.
Just more compromising. Its like making gucci loafers into track shoes. Just have a luxury car and a track car for the same price.
Beautiful spec. I’m also becoming a huge fan of this guy. Loving his car content.
sometimes it’s not about what it has but what it doesn’t have that matters most, very classy design choice
People have no idea how much of a blessing is to have regular coil over springs than air, the car is way more reliable now and won’t have huge maintenance costs to replace air bags
Removing the air suspension will make that car way cheaper to own for longterm economy, ill bet one airbag replacement costs more than the performante upgrade, then resale will be excellent too.
That blue is so beautiful. What a nice car
MKBHD is only good for tech…forrest is the MKBHD of car reviews 😅
This is common practice with performance-focused takes of pre existing models. Specifically removing weight and luxury features in the process.
In the world of performance cars, it’s very common to pay more for less weight and advanced components. Lighter weight materials like carbon fiber are expensive.
He took off on a regular speed 😂😂😂 Forrest really changed car reviews. His enthusiasm, energy and charisma is unmatched
Forrest influences and Motivates even the Greats 😂😂
He been doing this way before forest
People paying more for less: Marques: 😂😂😂
That's a beautiful RSQ8!!!
Yeah, Porsche do the same, since a long time. But to be honest, cutting weight isn't as easy as it may seems also it's good for "performance" hence the naming
for those that never felt air ride it makes the car feel less sporty... actually you almost feel like you are in a tank. like you feel the weight of the car and it feels heavy.
It looks really good lowered like that. Prefer it every time
For the Buyer that wants an even more expensive version of the Audi SQ8 put together by a bunch of pasta making Romans and half as durable as the leaning tower of Pisa
"It's really funny. You pay more, for less" - Apple
I always prefer conventional suspension over air bags since they have a less chance of failure.
They and a lot of other manufacturers aren't lending you a press car again.
yea dont think so lol you should go see his fisker review. he went easy on this lambo
I love you always showing the cars and most of us cannot afford
Let's not forget that a BMW X5 comp or X6 comp that's wayyyy cheaper will still keep up with the Urus performante
Urus❌Your is✅
Yes, this is what exotic car companies do. They release a car than later release a redefined usually track oriented version of the same car. And it’s usually more and expensive and faster… this is why you don’t get tech guys to do car reviews.
the safest launch id ever seen 😂🔥
More reliable with out air suspension. Plus it's the active shocks that give it ride quality
Reliability for a car and brand at this price point isn't even a thing and you shouldn't use reliability and VW group in the same paragraph. Every time you take this to the dealer expect 3000$ bills for everything.
Didn’t kno the urus was this short until marques stood beside it
Ferrari purosangue next…..
people seem to not know that the power plant for this car is used in so many other “luxury/sport” suvs. you are paying for the name of this car. there are about 8 other suvs with the same exact power train
No air suspension is crazy cuz it arguably makes a better car for track use
Porsche and lamborghini have been doing this art for decades over 10 years ago my dad was doing his supercar grand tour and lamborghini borrowed him a gallardo super lugera which means super light in the hopes that he'll fall inlove with it and trade his gallardo in for it, it costed like 50 grand more than his normal gallardo it didn't have 4wd to save weight
The only problem with it is that is sound like a Porsche, and not like a screaming, crazy, utterly violent Italian bred super car.
That kinda comes with TTV8. Unless we r talking Ferrari
@@v.j.1017so what you’re saying it could’ve sounded like a Lambo, but they just cheaped out on development a bit and just ignore the sound, like half of what makes all these special?…
@@gavriushka nah not with the v8 lol. Lambo needed a v10 front mounted setup but yea they cheaper out in the name of profit. Its a damn tuned RSQ8
the shoe creasing 💔😔
I preferred the long luscious hair
The driving off in the end sealed it, LOL'
This has been a thing for years and years. I remember the mustang being famous for making you buy expensive performance packages that remove items to save weight
I don’t wanna hate but a guy like him shouldn’t be reviewing such a car. It just doesn’t make sense for his brand. This is a pure performance car not an iPhone on wheels. People don’t buy this car for the features, they buy it for pure driving pleasure.
Worth it just cause of the color
Not racing people: “You are getting less for your money “ Racing people: “Nice weight reduction”
It’s depressing that the ugliest and most pointless Lambo sold the most. 😕
What do you expect? It's the cheapest and most practical Lamborghini available. Remember, without the Urus, we wouldn't have as many really exciting cars Lamborghini makes.
@@AbdussalamMisbahudeen a high optioned Urus Performante surpasses technica price you clown.
Lamborghini must’ve paid bots to raid this comment section. 😂😂😂
I can't imagine choosing an Urus over a RS Q8 or Cayenne Turbo GT.
I can, it docent have plastic everywhere in and out like the other two
@@MichaelYounes What are you even talking about plastic inside and out? They all have the same typical plastic parts on the outside (front and rear bumpers, wheel arches, side sills, sploilers). Though Porsche and Audi have a much classier look that doesn't look like a plastic toy (like the front end of the Urus). As for the interior, both the Porsche and Audi have better interiors. Porsche has high quality Alcantara on most surfaces (from steering wheel to ceiling liner, armrest, seat inserts, doorcards and more) and higher quality leather than Lamborghini on the rest. Audi has more traditional "luxury" Leather interior but still retains Alcantara for the steering wheel, headliner, upper doorcards, and side center console panels. The Lamborghini has the most plasticy interior of the three, particularly it's center console, where everything from the grab handles up the center stack and through the dash is plastic. Not only that, but the Urus has a train wreck of a design that looks like a 3rd graded came ip with it, and the interior looks more fitting of a $40k STI than a $250k SUV. The Porsche and Audi have nicer interiors, more features, and better styling inside and out. Plus the Porsche beats the Urus in a straight line and handily outhandles and outbrakes it, and is more engaging to drive. The RS Q8 lags behind the Cayenne (still in the same realm as Urus), but starts at $70k less than the Cayenne Turbo GT and $115k less than the Urus. It's also mechanically identical to the Urus, and with a $1k tune could handily outperform an Urus. Hell, even stock the RS Q8 beat the Urus Nurburgring record.
You're broke. People aren't buying these because of irrelevant performance numbers or to get the best out of their money. They buy it because it looks cool, sounds cool and is cool. The Audi and Porsche are not very cool@@zkiller195
@@zkiller195same reason the hurican sells better than the r8. It's cooler
@@gotworc I guess coolness is in the eye of the beholder. Maybe it's just me, but if I had to pick a winner out of these 3 in terms of "coolness", I'd pick the Cayenne Turbo GT. Honestly though, if I was looking for fast and practical, the RS6 Avant has more curb appeal than any of these crossovers. I'd take a sleek wagon over its bloated, lifted counterpart any day of the week.
why get rid of the air suspension? better for cornering/racing rather than cruising? genuinely curious & am asking
Stiffer suspension means better handling. Getting rid of unnecessary things such as a sunroof, air suspension, seat heating and cooling etc… are all amazing ideas for saving weight. For example, another car like this is the GT3 RS that thing doesn’t have doorhandles it has straps instead. This is a performance car. It’s meant for the track, not for every day, cruising to the grocery store and picking up kids from soccer practice like the regular Urus.
The Porsche method. Im excited to see the Lamborghini watch that they will inevitably include as an add on
I still can’t comprehend that the best selling Lamborghini of at all isn’t one at all.
Whenever i hear anyone talking about the lambo urus i cant help but to remember that clip of the dude that disassembled it psrt by part with his bare hands…
U could buy a scraped Urus at a car lot, dismantle & remove all the electronics yourself. Put all the performance focused parts including a “sunroof delete” mod & get a proper performance SUV for way less than a regular urus
That’s so clean
“Paying more for less” was a Top Gear bit re: the Porsche 911 GT3 variants back in the mid 2000’s
i like how marques roasts car manufacturers for their bad decisions.
Marques gone from setting trends to following them.
Creasing the Union 1’s hurt my soul 🥲
Long gone are the days of beautiful sports cars.
Love Forrest but pushing pistons was first
Why does this Forrest look off brand ?
That's true for every sports car
Lamborghini going bankrupt with this one🗣️🗣️
Honestly, removing the air suspension just saved the customer thousands in repair costs and some headaches.
The fact that the best-selling Lamborghini of all time is an SUV, bruh...
Car enthusiasts have always known that real performance versions just means paying a whole lot more for a lighter faster car overall. Think Porsche gt2
Still don't get point in "performance" SUV words just don't go together 😅😂
This short scared me I thought now it’s electric 😂
30 thousand extra for 104 pounds of weight saving is outrageous
I think the Performante is for people that ignores the "pay more for less" question
Isn't that how supersport cars work? You pay for less? Bruh. They're all about performance
Lambo found out about ultralight hiking gear and got some ideas
Beautiful
That’s an expensive ass Volkswagen. 😂
oof the wind noise on the mic 😵💫