Bradley easy kills Russian tanks in battle
2024 ж. 26 Қаң.
947 851 Рет қаралды
Bradley easy kills Russian tanks in battle
#ukraine #military #russiaukrainewar #russiaukraine
PayPal: warmysupp@gmail.com
This documentary video is investigative journalism and is not intended as a call to action or political agitation. All sensitive scenes have been hidden or processed in accordance with ethical standards. The purpose of the video is to inform viewers about the events in Ukraine based on available data and evidence. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this video are those of the authors and do not reflect the position of the channel or its partners.
Continued for sponsors kzhead.info/sun/esiQk6eRq3iZg2g/bejne.html Part two kzhead.info/sun/ksl6f9akcJqsmI0/bejne.html
how can I sponsor in order to see?
Why do you post inaccurate propaganda, the Bradley could not destroy the tank, why do you think the video cut off after the Bradley struck the smoke fired by the tank, go watch the full video and see 😂
@@CHRAXY it disabled the tank what do you mean?
@@CHRAXY not propaganda, it technically killed the T-90M, "mission killed" basically rendering it useless, so the crew cant use it, instead of a destroyed tank or exploded tank, it became an abandonded critically damaged tank, utility wise, no difference,in terms of if its destroyed or still intact, then yes it didnt destroy it.
Ukraine is getting wrecked lol. have to be a dumbass to not know it
Man it's wild how much of this war is being recorded, and the quality of some of the footage is like nothing I've ever seen from any other war or battle. It's kind of surreal to see this stuff in high definition.
It's pretty much the first modern war between industrialised countries so that's why
@@Lewinner-nj6bhThat's part of it, there's a lot of footage from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but it's all low quality. Camera technology has improved a lot since then, 4K cameras are common now so we are getting a lot of super high def footage of this war, it's so much different than the footage from any previous war.
Yeah true, I feel the same way
uncanny, disgusting but yes
And don't forget it is from the active duty fighters themselves to film it with drones or Gopro which provide huge amount of data and experience what happen in the modern combat
Probably the most detailed and most recorded war ever in history.
Maybe because it's the most modern???
i hate how light hearted are narrated this kind of hell... Like a some sort of psychopath....
Yeah, war is heck when you're losing all your expensive armor to drones carrying cheap RPG warheads which the Ukes have in abundance.
@@donaldprice1597 Well, Russians do not have to attack Ukraine... It's just that their dictator leader have sick urges to feel "powerful leader"... but at the expense of ordinary citizens, of course.
🤨
@@donaldprice1597or when people are KILLED
same emotions bro. not funny at all
Was gunner on a Bradley for two years. I can tell you we were never trained to use 25mm on tanks. It was always TOWs for tanks. Those guys got lucky from being killed in the Bradley because the T72 crew didn't know what the hell was going on
That was a t90, yeah the Bradley got lucky, it manage to disable all of the scopes and messed up the turret
This is why the Russians should train their soldiers better
Judging from the video, I agree.@@reconsoldier135
Not surprising, the US was never in a similar position as Ukraine and the training reflects that.
@@reconsoldier135Wouldn't help...😂
Victory in the world of tanks is for whoever finds the target first... However, for those who do not know the details, the T90 tank was hit by a drone, and then it encountered the Bradley, and its destruction was completed by another drone after its crew fled.
Even if Bradley didn't destroy the tank, he definitely blinded it, so even those shots make sense.
Autocannons are probably better against tanks than tank cannons, autocannons just destroy every optics or sensors so the tank cant work properly
a single HE shell from a tank can do the same but have even more effect@@Dumifyy
If you score a good hit. If you dont theres reload and again the process of aiming is repeated as things change already. Autocannon can shoot one after another so its easier to score hit and the sound inside target vehicle must be paralizing, mind taking terror.
I am still puzzled by what really happened here. I'm thinking the 25mm gun somehow damaged the turret. In later videos it spins and spins while the tank crashes into a building. My question is why didn't one of these Bradleys use their TOW system? There's two M2's in this video. One could engage with the 25mm gun and the other should destroy it with a TOW. Did they not have any?
Who knows, anything can happen in a combat situation.@@zedvar3806
bro is blurring watermarks so he can put his own watermark lmao, how desperate r you?
PGU-25 SAPHEI is scary stuff. It's all of the most damaging parts of Bushmaster ammo all together in one tiny super explosive package. I'm a Retired 19K Abrams Tanker who worked closely with my Infantry Brothers and got to be educated on all things Bradley.
Do you believe in that video?
@@CheGuevara58 Yes
@@k.r.u.a.6174 why do you think so? Did you have a physics course in school?
All of this stuff right now is proven true. You cant just say it is wrong cause the person you asked doesnt have a doctorate in physics. You are going to need a redo of many basic rules of physics to prove some stuff wrong nowadays @@CheGuevara58
are u saying that its fake?@@CheGuevara58
Totally absurd that Russian generals haven’t turned on Putler!
They are watched very closely, it would take several to move against him, but they all know no one can be trusted not to inform.
People who say bad things about him seem to fall out windows accidentally.
However patriotic the generals may be, seeing their armies destroyed, their troops slaughtered and their fellow officers eliminated must be hard to bear. It's pretty clear that Putin is now making battlefield decisions, much like Hitler did during the final years of WWII, something the generals must find humiliating. Where is the Russian Staufenberg?
Why would they? They got cushy jobs with big money and are sitting far away, safe.
Similar to WW2 and Hitler. Dicey situation for them probably.
You really should study something about Tank Armor. Those are sacrificial explosive panels on the Russian Tank designed to lesson the effects of Armor piercing Sabot or HEAT Tank Rounds. In reality the Bushmaster gun on the Bradley is setting off the explosive panels but the Tank body was not penetrated and the Crewmen survived. In fact I watched this very video footage. The tank returned to its lines where the crew evacuated the Tank. I am not saying that the Tank was not damaged. What I am saying is that it was not Destroyed and the Crew was not killed.
Bingo.
Exactly! It’s wild the propaganda people eat up 😋
Somehow the Bradley managed to start the tank's turret turning, till it was blocked by a tree
But the tank still has damaged optics and other things so it doesnt work properly
@@Dumifyy I stated in my comment that the tank was damaged, but it was not destroyed. The tank will either be towed or driven off the battlefield and repaired. The tank hull was not penetrated. The tank crew will be given a replacement tank and be sent back onto the battlefield after being checked out and treated for any injuries they may have sustained. There is a reason why Bradley’s carry two anti-tank Tow missiles. It is to destroy tanks. I suspect that either the Bradley did not have any Tow missiles or the Bradley crew may have panicked upon seeing a tank and did not deploy it and just shot at it with the Bushmaster gun.
Not a very good report. clip 1 was 2 bradly against a t-90. The T-90 was badly damaged but the crew managed to escape alive. The tank was later destroyed with a drone. Clip 2 was an already defective BMP that was abandoned and the bradly just destroyed it so that it couldn't be repaired again. Furthermore, it's funny how the original videos have no sound but here everything suddenly goes boom and bang. Sweet and so on ...... yes, the bradly is good.... but you don't have to exaggerate everything just because you want it to sound good for the clicks.
The Bradley didnt detroy the T90M the explosions are the reactivate armor doing its job the Tank retreat where it layer was attack by 2 drones and shelled by artillery and being knocked out everyone in the T90M survived later seen in drone footage!
The small arms fire damaged the turret. It was spinning, which is a sign that they hit between the turret housing, and the body. Any tank can sustain small arms fire. This tank was advertize as indestructible, and clearly that's false. It's done.
While the BMP is defeated, the piece that falls off is NOT armour, it is a mud skirt. It is thin sheet metal held in place by clips, and four bolts. It exists to prevent mud from spraying up over the top of the APC, and it also helps channel water while swimming.
holy shit the misinformation in this video is insane
Slobba jukraine!
Ukraine barely has a little over 25 Himars systems I believe and limited munitions. I can't imagine what they could do with hundreds of systems and tens of thousands of round out to 300km. The Prasm rounds are already in production as well but that will be slow. Still, it seems to me like increasing Himars munitions production 10x is very important. This war has exposed how lacking western production is and how it takes too long to scale up production of simple weapons like artillery rounds. Unfortunetly, Putin's friends are outproducing the west since we are not turning to wartime economies.
full video shows that the tank was hit by an artillery strike after it retreated in which 3 crew members emerged and retreated to Russian lines. Thats reactive armor exploding, one of the crew interviewed that day said that they were trying to blind the tank since they lack armor piercing and giving enough time for artillery and FPV drone operators time to execute the finisher. Sadly one of the bradley was hit by an FPV drone the next day.
A very interesting story, but there was an interview with the commander of this Bradley a few days ago. Try better Russian bots.
@@vladkudrya9615 why don't you just check it first ??
@@vladkudrya9615 Ukraine has no losses btw. They are perfect. Not.
Whistle blower engineer held up release of the Bradly around 1980. The armor could not stand up to RPGs of that era (He was afraid his son would have to go to war in it) The magnesium alloy armor burned with hit So they improved the armor That engineer saved thousand of lives In Gulf War II, the Bradly took multiple RPG hits and kept going. Now of course, the armor of 2024 is way beyond what was provided in 1981 I exchanged emails with that engineer 18 years ago
Engineers name… Bradley by any chance lol
@@thestruggler3338 Actually, General Omar Bradley, General of the Army (WWII), Joint Chief of Staff later
Thanks for supporting Ukraine in this cold winter
ЭТУ ЗИМУ ЕЩЁ ПЕРЕЖИТЬ НАДО!!! СЛАВА РФ!!!
@@user-tx6pq8rs2r 🐒
It’s like watching that old game Command & Conquer
Command & Conquer General
and the battlemaster tank that loses his turret when destroyed
can we watch your full videos somewhere else or only youtube?
the clip you're referencing a Bradley killing that tank, that was an external explosion not internal. and thats also why it cuts off. fyi.
There is an interview with the Bradley gunner, he had problems with armor-piercing shells and used high-explosive shells. But he was still able to critically damage the tank and it was finished off by drones
im pretty sure his bradley was also later destroyed look at history's legends video@@user-wj1un7nl4s
@@user-wj1un7nl4s there was an interview with the russian tanker, but he died during the exchange.
the large explosion at the end was likely a smoke grenade launcher. tank was probably mission killed, unuseable but not destroyed.
@@fraserhenderson7839 in the full video after the bradlys disable the tank they send in a kamikaze drone that finished it off. The crew fled the tank just before it started burning. But I only saw 2 get out and I believe the t90 is a 3 man tank sooo...
Some trick. If you find the full version of this video, you will see how the tank retreats under its own power. The Bradley cannon knocks down active protection from the tank, but it is not able to penetrate the tank's armor.
yankeez are 2 stupid to catch that. let em there illusions.
As we saw, it isn´t needed. Enough indirect damage can disable an MBT, sometimes beyond any repair.
@@asturiancetorix2552 “no. The destruction of the dynamic protection cannot disable the tank. He may not be able to shoot for a while because of the bright light, but it won't damage vital components. Basically, Bradley could have been damaged by the cameras. But this is unlikely. There are several cameras, and they are small enough to aim at.
@@user-fh9bt7gx8e The T-90 was blinded with its sensors and optics gone, it's as good as a dead tank in that range otherwise they could've retaliate or if some cameras were intact it just shows the low morale and incompetence of the Russian crew .
@@kentarthur8329 The tanks turret was spinning uncontrollably, before it ran into the tree. They were definitely having problems.
typical videos and storys for people without telegram... in the first video actualy 2 bradleys fire at a t90 with explosive ammo and the only thing they damaged was the foglouncher wich exploded spectacular, then it was cut^^ the other t90 who drove into the tree with the rotating turret was just blindet or hurt gunner. the tank was hit by a drone after he hit the tree and the crew walked away. the huge explosion at the beginning in 39. sec was interesting ,because it was less than 100m away from the tank who drove in the tree but there was nothing to see even in good quality .nobody know what did explode there. maybe it was arty explosive shell support ,but there was nothing, the quality of this video is made so shitty so you cant see the tank drive into the tree at the lover left side of the video also he cut the video so that it looks like the huge explosion belongs to the t90 where the foglouncher exploded but it was a different fight and day, after that he shows a totaly burnt out tank and said "they look like this after a encounter with a bradley", hillarious. no way side and front armore can be penetrated by any amo bradley uses. maybe from behind with armor piercing ammo, but it was explosives at the front. the not moving russian bmp was probably abandoned and they destroyed it for a show, they destroy all abandoned vehicle and record it, you can see it here clrearly a few time, seen a few videos where they blow up some left behind russian tanks with tnt , a whole shitload of explosives ,realy and then they say it was hit by arty with the first strike.... ive seen all of these videos on ukrainian and russian telegramm channels in good quality 3 weeks ago and more. this channel must be some NGO propaganda machine, i mean what kind of person is would tell people so much BS, seriously, get telegram guys, dont be fooled
The Bradley did little damage to the T90, taking out ERA plates and outside electronics such as gunner and Commander sights, and achieving what is called a "Firepower Kill", or potentially a Mission Kill, meaning the vehicle is rendered combat ineffective, but not necessarily destroyed. It could potentially be towed, repaired, and returned to service again. A tank that suffers a K-Kill, or Catastrophic Kill, is rendered permanently non-functional, for example through an ammo detonation sending the turret sky high, or a fire raging inside leaving it a burnt out husk. Either way, a K-Kill leaves the target unable to be returned to service, while a vehicle that has suffered a Mobility Kill, Firepower Kill, or Mission Kill, can sometimes still be repaired and returned to service. So what have we learned? Keep firing til it blows or burns.
The other lesson is: STOP SENDING YOUR TANKS OUT ALONE OH MY GOD! The mission kill basically turned into a k-kill when the tank got stuck in that crater. It's arguably worse than a full k-kill, since the Ukranians sure as hell aren't gonna turn their nose up at a free T90.
Brad to the Bone! Makes you wish the allies had had Bradleys in WWII.
not kid yourself more than 30 bradleys are destroyed it isn't as good as it looks the it only take out 2 tanks one of which was just disabled by tow, so it only effectively took out 3 medium armour targets and one heavy
Dumbest comment
Даже интересно что бы сказали те кто воевал с дивизиями СС тогда, тем кто сейчас поддерживает тех у кого в героях легионеры из дивизий сс
@@oneshortgamer2540 well of course, ukrainians are not as trained as americans, and they also use a different doctrine in war. bradley was made to be in close formation to tanks and infantry.
still a 3;1 trade off. @@oneshortgamer2540
funfact the exact bradly was destroyed 2 days later with the driver saying "this time we werent so lucky"
I did see that too!
no shit, you were sitting right next to the driver
trust me bro
the gunner of the bradley uploaded the video himself same guy as in the interview you can look it up if you try to really bash your 2 chimp braincells tghr so use ur brain before yappin pls@@MP-wb5yd
The U.S. MUST continue to support Ukraine with ammo and replacement armored vehicles, including tanks and Bradly's. We must remember WW2 when we cou;d have stopped Hitler in his tracks had when Hitler FIRST attacked the Checks.
There also weren't nuclear weapons when Hitler attacked Czechoslovakia 💀
United States is not working properly right now.
No it could have been stopped when Hitler moved into the Rhineland in 1936with just a few thousand lightly armed soldiers and old armored cars. He was scared the French and British would kick him out but we worried we'd inflame things. If we had done so, the German military would have turned on him, and he'd have been no more than a footnote in the history books
@admiralcraddock464 You are absolutely right. However, the allies didn't do anything at that time because they reasoned that the Rhineland was part of Germany. Cancel Reply
@@randommanchild112 Russia is well aware of MAD.
im getting rust launch site flashbacks with the bradleys cannon going off
You believe in what suits you. You are not interested in the truth. Bradley had no other chance to survive than to shoot all the tank's sensors and blind him. Which he succeeded in doing. And what about the explosion and flash of fire? Fumigation device - all smokehouses exploded at the same time.
Lolol...
And then the Russians decided to drive their undamaged tank into a tree and abandon it?
U sound like your on the waaa
nice to watch, but there are people inside those tanks.....:(
I could watch these videos for hours. Bye, bye Ivan.
ХА-ХА-ХА!!! ГЛУПОСТЬ ЭТО ДАР! ДА???
You really think a Bradley can completely destroy a russian tank lol, go watch the full video and not this cut version from the ukranian
Wee will give u a syahed drone kamekaze😂😂
I and my co-workers appreciate the compliments. BAE Systems employee here.
You just violated your employment contract
Are these sound effects added by you in post production?
Yes they are
yup, I've seen the original videos on reddit's CombatFootage, mots have no sound at all or some random music
You haven’t seen anything yet, you haven’t seen how he destroys the vaunted T90 tank and makes mincemeat of the russian infantry👍.
Całym sercem za Ukrainą!!! Polska 🤝Ukraina
The Bradley did not destroy the T-90 alone 😂 it was 2 Bradleys and a number of drones lol
bro they making themselves believe that they are winning , sad way to give themselves fake hopes
what those videos shows is that a "machine" is nothing without someone trained to use it... The Bradley is a top of the line veichle, but we see a lot of inexperience in the enemy crews... look at that BMP taking fire from 50 - 60 meters and not responding...
Riski looses as Always. Slava Ukraini
I did see the video on Instagram, the tank was able to back way from it! Then it did stop and the crew walked way.
Ryan Macbeth explained that the Bushmaster didn't penetrate the armor, since Russian tanks used in Ukraine are about around 200+ mm in thickness. However it is possible that the Bradley landed a lucky shot to make the Russian tank loses its turret control, compound that to the intense noise the Russian tank crew are experiencing as those rounds landed on to the tank armor. During all that confusion, crew communication isn't possible.
Perhaps not penetrate, but internal spalling can be fatal to the crew.
But it is clear to everyone that 25 mm will not penetrate the armor of the tank. But as we can see, the tank met Bradley, the tank fired three shots and missed, Bradley fired shots and disabled the tank. The tank crew fled. In this case, Bradley won
Lucky strike u rekon?
@@thestruggler3338 for me, most probably.
@@k.r.u.a.6174 they didn't disabled it. The tree did it for the Bradley after their shots landed at that specific part on the Russian tank in which it made the turret spin uncontrollably.
Great advert for Russian equipment. Those countries must be delighted they bought them..
I feel bad for all the soldiers who are forced to fight and lose their lives during war. Its such a awful thing to see people just explode inside of a piece of metal where they cant escape.
Reminder that these are humans being killed… fathers … sons … brothers .. etc this war could have been avoided
Yes by putin not invading!
But think of the money!
@@Katsura_ja_nai_Zura_da no, by ukraine not provoking
@@vooltex8216 lol sure princess. Maybe next time putka not send girkin to Ukraine in 2014 to provoke the war!
@@vooltex8216 lol sure princess. Maybe next time putka not send girkin to Ukraine in 2014 to provoke the war!
Guess what? Other BMPs can do that, too. even russian ones. You just cherry picked some scenes where Bradley luckily is in a good position, thats all. Poor effort
Dont compare russian shit with bradley) Bradley best of the best in this war. Ukrainian soldiers have russian, bradley, cv90. And they told that the bradley vs rus bmp like ferarry and lada. Its true. russia has many of technic, but not quality.
How can you in good conscience make a claim like this? The M2 did NOT kill the T90. It was firing HE rounds and only damaged optics and turret traversal. It was a subsequent drone that knocked out the tank after it was abandoned. No claims of mobility kill and strategic kill will counter the simple fact that the tank was not penetrated. Plenty of M1s were left in a much worse state during the Middle Eastern wars and we still make the claim that no Abrams were lost to enemy fire, cause damaged tanks were repaired and returned to service.
Absolutely fabulous content
jes and god game...silulator arma or war thunder or........absolutely fabulation
hehehe sci fi movie goebbels he is ashamed
Middle of the barrel content, nothing special.
Spain announced that they are selling their M-60 MBT. They will likely be going to Ukraine.
RU side on, but correctly angled in the initial engagement, a useful thing to know. Thanks. The deangle kill shots are text book
Being a tanker in a modern war has never been more dangerous.
Drones are terrifying!
I did not know the Brad being such a monster.
It is because the US always updated their target acquisition systems and incorporated thermal imaging systems into the super stabilized cannon.. Even if it has smaller rounds, like the Ukrainians who smoked that main battle tank said, if you can blind the optics of the opposing vehicle quickly they are completely useless. The Bradley can fire way faster than a T series tank and if they use high explosive rounds, the optics on that Russian tank were probably destroyed and rendered completely useless within the first few shots. Thats one thing none of these video games accurately represent, you could be in the best tank in the world, but the second a few rounds explode your cameras and windows to see out of the tank, you're done... And it doesnt take much to do that with 25mm cannon rounds. Russia cheaped out on their BMPs and T series tanks, a lot of the money meant to go toward upgrading all their optics to FLIR and cannon stabilization all that along with regular maintenance was stolen via corrupt military structure so even when it looks like a modern Russia main battle tank its probably poorly cared for and lacks upgrades
@@GriseldaBlanco-kt2to you have no idea what you are talking about... and you have never been inside a tank or ifv... he (high explosive) shells wont destroy cameras or "windows" of a tank also there is no "super stabilized gun" most modern military vehicles have 2 plane stabilized guns and the t72, t80 and t90 all have stabilized guns its not an upgrade they always had stabilizers (and some video games are pretty realistic like war thunder)
It did not destroy the tank, it is impossible 😂, tank was destroyed by artillery and fpv drones after the tank retreated and crew abandoned it because they could not see anything due to broken optics. You can also find interview of the ukranian inside the Bradley online. One of the Bradley was also destroyed. They said they only damages optics but could not penetrate the tank. This video is clearly propaganda
@@CHRAXYyou are clearly a fake account😂
@@ka_gamma_77 no I'm not, I'm more real than your dad 😂
You know every war thunder player can easily use something light to outmenuver medium to heavy tanks. Not only that, a few shot to the turret of the tank makes it useless for anything but a big moving shield. And drones will be the end of tank war if they won't revolutionize how tanks work.
KABOOOOOOM!!!!!! 💪🇺🇦
Ambushmasterd...
- Vinh quang cho Ukraine.💙💛
So why is the Ukraine is still loosing terrain then, and what were those charred bradley hulls during their so called summer offensive? , they looked like range targets after many battle runs. Every attack vehicle has it's pro's and con's, a lonely T90 is no good against a few IFV's like the Bradley, although the Bradley operators were hammerings the optics and made the T-90 virtually blind. A T-90 with IFV backup and suppression would make minced meat of a bradley any day of the week.
I don’t think so pal…
@@thestruggler3338 As the practice of battles in Ukraine shows, Abrams, Leopards and Challengers burn in the same way from drone strikes
minus a turret toss @@fray60rus
the reason you have seen them is a lot of them at the beginning of the 2022 spring offensive died in minefields laid down by the Russians they were towed back for repairs and reconditioning which will take months to do, but the Ukraine really did a haphazard, drastic move by advancing fast without sappers checking the place and clearing the mine to gain land fast is out of the questions because the Russians had months to plant millions of mines everywhere, tank ditches and dragon teeth barricade
The whole video showed that the Bradley didn't destroy the tank at all, the blow up was the reactive armor, the crew of the tank hit a tree and a building and the tank got stuck and they bailed.
the tank actually survived the bradly - the crew only left after an FPV drone hit his engine. Also you dont need to make a tank explode you just need to damage the barrel or the sights which means pretty much everything can disable a tank. Good copium for the bots though.
Keep coping, they abandoned the tank after the 25mm fucked up the turret ring which sent it spinning uncontrollably and rendered them blind. The driver literally crashed into a fucking tree or some pole and then they bailed. FPV came later.
This Bradley disabled the T-90's gunner+commanders optics, making it unable to fire back because it was blind lol. If the T-90's optics weren't disabled, that Bradley would be more then scrap metal.
For context, the first Russian T was against 2 Bradley's, while still a valid kill, the tank was bound for destruction, as of my knowledge none of the Bradley's in that fight were ever hit, they used great tactics such as flanking and communicating with one another on when to strike when the other ran for a new position. 0:39 is the tank in question
the tank wasnt destroyed it was damaged and the exact bradly was destroyed 2 days later with the driver saying "this time we werent so lucky"
But it was destroyed as the insides started to seize and the turret began spinning out of control, later the tank exploded on camera, it was seen on a Ukrainian FPV drone. I also saw the footage.@@nekko5778
They didnt destroy the tank. They damaged it to the point that it retreated. On its way back to their FOB, it got hit by Drones. The Bradleys merely scared it off
I never stated the tank was destroyed but used a metaphor "bound for destruction", It was a kill, a battle kill as the tank was damaged to a point where it was no longer fit for combat of any sort.
Please refer to a reply toward another person for more info in order to correct your thought.@@nekko5778
So far 65 out of 190 Bradleys have been destroyed, abandoned or lost in the Ukraine war.
dont mess with US military tech theyre decades ahead of what you might think
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
🇷🇺🔜🌻🥔👁✅🇺🇦💙
Героям Слава!
Hard Hitting Bradley!
bradley isnt a tank it a semovent and anyway probably you guys didnt know bradley is a rocket launvcher and missil
@@italian_main : What is your point? All bases are covered above!
The M in the designations of russian tanks stands for improved moon-landing capabilities of the turret.
LOL it was not the Bradley it was the Swedish cv 90 that destroyed the tank
The drones become more powerfull BOOM
Thanks for your help, American citizens !!!
ага , Пендосия за эту помощь сейчас Техаса лишится, пусть до самой перемоги теперь не вылазит, там еще Аляска своего часа заждалась
The tank was lost their team, this is not how they work for a Russian tank
Russian bmps can do the same to western tanks by destroying their optics. And drones can destroy any tanks, not just the russian ones.
It was an "adyacent target" (so maximal possible penetration of cinetic Bradley projectiles, as 1 Sherman could penetrate a Tiger side at 200m, and not in a dream at 800m (these were at 30-50m?), AND the T90 made the panic error of "side" against the fire!
Кто сказал что они его пробили ? Видео обрезанное !
Its almost unnerving when you realize how accurate those games were that you played when you were 12... Call of duty, arma, squad We were just playing a silly game, but in reality, someone was doing the same thing except they were shooting at real people...
I doubt the 25mm gun would penetrate the front of the tank. The sides and back would be a different story though.
I think all sides of the tank are well over ~80mm thick so I believe the Bradley "mission killed" the T-90 meaning it was disabled via optics/sensitive equipment and abandoned by the crew.
Это был не танк,а бронетранспортер бмп
Cool compilation but you need a proof reader real bad, there is a lot of grammatical errors in the commentary
Right . So why is the Russian army advancing???
Did Russia come to provide Ukraine with scrap iron?
sound stupid it like try to say t90 was kill by a rifle
war.. war never changes.
You just saw modern tanks get destroyed by hobby drones, so I think it's changed quite a bit.
You the new battlefield looks so real
Yeah, it wasn't destroyed. I know everyone knows this by now, but still worth mentioning it
The face of war is now unseen
The Ukrainians Army is LEGENDARY
"legendary" losers !!!
@@J.fetterstupid Take the L and move on. COMRADE!!!
@@ChosenOne6666 Like Ukraine is going to do, snowflake?
They've been decimated.
Ya, legendary LOSERS !!!!
bradley switched to MIB in world of tanks
Remember to drive electric guys! Or we might destroy the planet!!!
Two piece ammo in Russian tanks not a good idea. Bags of explosive propellants right in with the crews. Allied tanks use sealed rounds. Only arty uses two piece ammo. Its in the back firing from the rear with the gear.
0:13 Termiczne wabiki w T-90 wybuchły na zewnątrz.Pozatym były tam dwa Bradleye, ktore nie byly wyposarzone w pociski TOW 0:50 To są opuszczone pojazdy, ktore Bradley dobija... Nie wprowadzaj ludzi w bład, weryfikuj materialy
Every 2 days the same movie ?
Reworked the video and republished it. Thanks to those who watched it a second time.
@@war_myFun to watch.
Hmm wars in the furure will be about who has the best drones ? I wonder how drones would fair against western tanks too ?????
'Modern T-90'--those T-90s are not very modern, at all.
A bradley has TOW ANTI TANK MISSILES which can take out an m1 tank
So my m1 macbook isn't safe? :(
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
@@TheUntypicalGerman I installed ERA on mine, you should try it too
SOME Bradleys do. At times.
they cost a whole big bunch more than 25mm rounds and there are only 2 mounted at the best of times.
Nope. That T-72 did not get KIA by the 25mm chain gun. The smoke deployed. It didn’t blue up. The crew kept on charging and making course corrections, keeping the front plates forward. Smart.
you so dump. the turret did 360 because the was parrying the ukrainian attacks, am i right?
This Russian bot name Alexander
It was a T-90 it pulled back after smoke and was hit with arty and FPV drones, crew jumped out and survived!
no winners in war waste of lives and many children lost their fathers
Вот тебе и аналоговнет 😂
Смешно чел. А то что по нему дроном е6анули, а потом он попал в ловушку из 2 брэдли это так. Выбили механизмы поворота и оптику. Но по сути по танку это было как по банке камушками. Экипаж выжил.
@@firgamer7724 Ну я посмотрю как тебе выколят глаза, сломают одну ногу и ты будешь говорить как по банке камушками)
@@kaktus6364 прикольно танк с человеком сравнивать, слона с человеком тогда сравни
@@codenamevisualtechbeta-4679 Я по факту сказал что единтсвеное что танк мог делать в тот момент это ехать)
✌😎💙💛
Yeah... those Bradleys have since been destroyed along with some German Leopards.
Modern technology is like cheating, you can literally take out millions of dollars of equipment that’s miles away from the battlefield with a drone or 2 rigged to explode.
The 25mm can ot penetrate main battle tank armor......they can disable and get mobility kills maybe, but unless they are very very very lucky the 25mmm isn't going to make it through the armor.
The armor around the engine of T-90M doesn’t get any ERA and is only covered by slat armor, so it can be penetrated. But that’s at the back of the tank and the chances of that area being hit is very small
that's what happened so a drone finished off the tank after mobility was destroyed
@@V3ry_Ep1c the tank was only immobile because it’s crew abandoned the vehicle
actually the engine and tracks were disabled so no@@yarnickgoovaerts
@@yarnickgoovaerts crew didn't get out until after the drone hit from what i saw. it was immobile because they ran into a tree and the turret was spinning which seemed to lock them in because of where the barrel got stuck but i wasn't there so idk. but they abandoned the tank after the drone hit in the video i saw but that could be editing.
i had NO idea the 1990s 25mm Bushmaster could TOUCH a MBT!! NOW there's frigging 50mm Bushmaster for IFVs!! hoooleee shizat
In the Gulf War there were several ocassions when a Bradley ran around an Iraqi tank, damaging it so badly the tank had to be abandoned or just caught fire
@@bikechainmic wow, amazing. well, what is the 50mm bushmaster bradley going to do the basic conduct of armored warfare, MBTs?
This is like a cheesy infomercial lol I was waiting for an affiliate link and 10% off buying your first Bradley 😄
2024 Is weird times
I wonder how much hardware the Russians have lost