This is How They Actually Made Jumanji - FX Breakdown

2022 ж. 19 Қаз.
1 112 458 Рет қаралды

Get some cool drag & drop VFX here! ► www.famefocus.com/go/getvfx/ ◄
According to Robbin Williams, the word "Jumanji" is a Zulu word that translated into English actually means "Many Effects", whether this is actually correct or not, we don't know. However what do know is that the movie Jumanji did indeed have, Many Effects.
Like the music in this video? I made it!
Support me by getting it on any of these sites :P
Get it on iTunes: ► apple.co/2ENGfu9 ◄
Listen on Spotify: ► spoti.fi/3boTfCl ◄
Buy it on Amazon: ► amzn.to/2QVJZfk ◄
Pushing the limits of what was possible for special and visual effects at the time, not only did Jumanji have more puppets and animatronics than Jurassic Park, but it also had over double the computer effects, more than 12 minutes! and a much wider variety of style of effects.
So, in this video, we're going to explore...
Some of those detailed models and sets, like the overgrown vine set or the house splitting in two, complicated puppets, animatronics, and... well, I suppose you'd call this "Plantatronics" and incredible digital effects!
...For this warping effect, ILM didn't actually have any proper scans or measurements of the actor's hands so they got the production company to send them a Xerox of the actor putting his hands on the photocopier's glass.
ILM even spent 3 months developing two ground-breaking software programs,
one was called iSculpt and was used to create realistic facial expressions
and the other was for creating realistic digital hair and fur for the awesome CG lion and these ... Ummm... not-so-awesome monkeys.
Designing the look for all the animals took months of research, hundreds of photographs, and numerous sketches before they managed to find the correct balance between amusing and threatening which was both wild enough to scare the audience and still tame enough to achieve a family-friendly rating.
The mantra for every movie is "Get as much in camera as you can" so during the design process they also had to assess which animal could be a physical puppet and captured "in camera", and which had to be CGI.
For example, animals that didn't have to move around too much, like the plants and the crocodile could be 100% animatronics, animals that had to have a wide range of movement, like the mosquitoes and the monkeys were 100% CGI, and animals that had to move around but also had close-up beauty shots or had to interact with the cast were both animatronics and CGI.
The lion was one of these digital/practical hybrids.
They built the lion with an animatronic head that could be controlled by external operators whilst the front paws were controlled by a creature performer.
This performer was concealed inside the lion and wore a headset with LCD screens in order to see how he was moving. the entire puppet was then supported by a crane on a dolly that it could be moved around on.
The animatronic lion was used for the close-up and the facial expression shots, and the CG version was used for the shots that required full body movement.
If you stop to look for it, you can actually see the transitions between the two quite clearly in this scene
We start with the animatronic model, here too, now it's CGI back to animatronics and back to CGI
Now here, if we slow it down, you can see just how good their new fur tool was.
There are around 1.5 million hairs individual on this lion and the two minutes of total screen time that the CG lion has, took 5 months to complete.
Now I know what you're thinking "if they were able to make this CG lion look so good, why did they leave these monkey's looking so bad?"
Well, the short answer is that, back when the movie was made, they just couldn't possibly make them look any better, and the main reasons for this were lighting, and reference.
For the lion scene, they had an animatronic puppet that they could use as a light reference on set, the scene also occurs inside the house under controlled lighting conditions.
This meant that even though there were parts of the lion (Like this rear leg here) that didn't quite sit right in the shot they could be hidden in shadow.
The monkeys though were a completely different story.
Even though maquettes were made to define the monkey's look, there was no puppet that they could use for light reference, and the monkeys themselves mainly appeared outdoors in broad daylight with little or no shadows to hide their flaws.
(...)
❗️ amzn.to are Affiliate Links. If you buy something through them, nothing changes for you, but you support my work.
The above ActionVFX link contains a Special Fame Focus Discount. We also earn an affiliate percentage of each purchase.
Read more here: www.famefocus.com
Follow us on Twitter: / focusfame

Пікірлер
  • In my opinion, Jumanji 1995 will always be one of the legends.

    @sakinahafifah8451@sakinahafifah8451 Жыл бұрын
    • @@GraemeGunn well itsa better than the latest jumanji movies

      @TheJarlath9@TheJarlath9 Жыл бұрын
    • that's your opinion ok so what

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
    • I seriously dont get how people can sey the new once are better?! This was an adventure movie. The new ones are colorful comedys.

      @nyengster@nyengster Жыл бұрын
    • @@nyengster isn't there is an interview where the producer said that they don't want to taint the 1995 version that made up the childhood for many people with some cash grab sequel or remastered like some recent real-life disney movie, hence why they made sequel with completely different take where content almost not related to the original at all and new people don't need to watch the original to understand the new one?

      @akpembroke8717@akpembroke8717 Жыл бұрын
    • @@nyengster The new ones entertain, in a very good way, and that is enough.

      @rylandwatts2587@rylandwatts2587 Жыл бұрын
  • I never had a problem with the monkeys in the movie. They had a weird look which blended in well with the overall weirdness of the movie.

    @ReallyBadDriving@ReallyBadDriving Жыл бұрын
    • As a child, I came up with my own explanation for this. All creatures of the game have a common magical origin, they are like ghosts consisting of ectoplasm, so their unnaturalness and bizarreness looks normal, because they are not ordinary animals.

      @fgjjdgb3949@fgjjdgb3949 Жыл бұрын
    • @@fgjjdgb3949 correct

      @VeganRevolution@VeganRevolution Жыл бұрын
    • the thing is that the other creatures blended well but the monkeys were always sticking out. if all the creatures were sticking out then it would be fine to show a gamey look

      @murtazarizvi368@murtazarizvi368 Жыл бұрын
    • @@murtazarizvi368 At the time I didn't notice anything weird. Now I do but for the time they were still pretty good...

      @MysticalJessica@MysticalJessica Жыл бұрын
    • Same for me lol

      @alex43223@alex4322311 ай бұрын
  • Jumanji 1995 is a classic

    @chasehedges6775@chasehedges6775 Жыл бұрын
    • I'm so OLD!! 😔😔😔

      @Rick_Cleland@Rick_Cleland Жыл бұрын
    • Mid 90's was the absolute best time for moviegoers. So many classics.

      @murdock6159@murdock6159 Жыл бұрын
    • @@murdock6159 facts now we live in the age of the remakes smh

      @wastedtalent666@wastedtalent666 Жыл бұрын
    • @@wastedtalent666 and constant marvel cookie cutter movies.

      @Nmdixon-cu7vm@Nmdixon-cu7vm Жыл бұрын
    • @@Nmdixon-cu7vm yes dude I'm so sick of superheroes

      @wastedtalent666@wastedtalent666 Жыл бұрын
  • Robin is one of the best performers of all time & will be deeply missed.

    @-darrell@-darrell Жыл бұрын
    • Always ❤️

      @Imdakybando@Imdakybando Жыл бұрын
    • so what there are so many performers is waiting for so many roles but not give chance for that

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
    • @@chandrusekar6746 having the ability to type doesnt mean you have to use it.

      @ThisUsernameSystemF-ckingSucks@ThisUsernameSystemF-ckingSucks Жыл бұрын
    • @@ThisUsernameSystemF-ckingSucks I know right?? They've commented a few times on other people's comments. It's getting kind of lame lol

      @kclarke5796@kclarke5796 Жыл бұрын
  • This video stands as an important lesson in why it's always best to mix practical effects with CGI, whenever possible, as opposed to the modern tendency to rely almost exclusively on CG effects. The manner in which they shot the car being crushed practically and then added a CG elephant works marvelously. These days, filmmakers would almost certainly compose both the car and the elephant with CGI and as a result, the effect wouldn't look half as seamless.

    @Right_Said_Brett@Right_Said_Brett Жыл бұрын
    • Maybe 10 years ago, but not today. Today it would be almost impossible to tell that the CGI wasn't practical as long as the VFX team is any good, and their budget was adequate enough. Movies have shots that are entirely CGI that people are totally unaware of, because nothing too crazy is happening and suspension of disbelief isn't being pushed too hard. But doing as much practically as possible is always good, at the least for reference to the animation, but we are very far away from the technological abilities of Jumanji, and really, that elephant does no hold up well anymore, or those awful drop shadows on the rhino.

      @Grand_Works@Grand_Works Жыл бұрын
    • The real problem with CGI is they often overdo it, by adding "cool" aspects to the effect, but then it gets overdone to the point it just doesn't look real.

      @peoplez129@peoplez129 Жыл бұрын
    • I believe they had some hydraulics inside the car to pull in the roof.

      @RegularJohn53@RegularJohn53 Жыл бұрын
    • Complete agree that practical effects are still crucial to making believable special effects. It's sad with today's technology, practical effects are never used (I think Mad Max Fury Road is the last big budget movie to use practical effects and they were amazing).

      @TheBlargMarg@TheBlargMarg Жыл бұрын
    • @@peoplez129 Actually, the real problem is when the VFX team isn't given enough time and resources to do their work. Basically all the big VFX studios have *amazing* artists, specialists and experts on their teams, who definitely know how to make almost anything work and look amazing... As long as they're given the time to make it look amazing, and get the support they need. I can almost guarantee you, that anytime you can tell something's CGI, or the CGI is bad, that it's not the VFX artists' or studio's fault, it's the fault of the budget, or someone interfering with the VFX studio, by for example having them redo months of work, not allowing them to take the references they need, or them being asked to do something that'll just look bad.

      @MyriadSkies@MyriadSkies Жыл бұрын
  • A film made 27 years ago and animation holds its own even today

    @meenashetty9782@meenashetty9782 Жыл бұрын
    • Watched it last Sunday, don't feel outdated at all

      @victorbukhaltsev9010@victorbukhaltsev9010 Жыл бұрын
    • and we in 2022 , came with ADIPURUSH 🤣

      @Saxena_vishal@Saxena_vishal Жыл бұрын
    • We must have peaked already back then

      @isaaccutlip5815@isaaccutlip581511 ай бұрын
  • This gives me a new profound respect for film making. Absolutely miraculously how great the human imagination is!

    @Anfiyaah@Anfiyaah Жыл бұрын
  • The effects in this movie are much more convincing on a low-resolution VHS tape.

    @starkj92@starkj92 Жыл бұрын
  • I adore Jumanji!!! Its one of very rare horror-adventure family-friendly classics!!! And hell yeah, Cgi was way ahead of its time

    @NenadlPopovic@NenadlPopovic Жыл бұрын
  • One of my favourite and most nostalgic films from my childhood. Incredible & very clever use of both CGI & Practical effects. I especially loved how they explained the cross-cutting between the miniature house and the torn rubber floorboards to create the illusion that the house was being split in two!

    @Darkstarproductions1@Darkstarproductions1 Жыл бұрын
  • A friend was able to take a few of us on a tour of the set at Bridge Studios, I remember looking close at the lion and being amazed at how realistic it was, incredibly detailed. The bookshelves all had signs on them saying remember this is make believe so don't put anything on them, and the underside of the shelves were all routed out resembling wormwood to break easier. Remarkably interesting to say the least. So many memories popped back watching this video, thanks for posting it!

    @WhiteRockBoy@WhiteRockBoy Жыл бұрын
  • I miss DVDs for this very reason. i always found behind the scenes footage and discussions to be fascinating. Now your lucky if production will give you a 5 min montage of the cast and crew smiling. And its hard to find any decent interviews that go into any depth.. This was great to watch!

    @KisDraga@KisDraga Жыл бұрын
    • Yeah same! I always liked the behind the scenes of the making and commentary. I miss that.

      @g8807@g8807 Жыл бұрын
    • I used to re-rent dvds JUST to watch the behind of scenes and commentaries (gosh I loved watching my fav movies with the director and actors explaining how it was). They should add this on streaming sites at least. And I often want to watch again some making offs of the dvds I still own but I just don’t have any computer that supports cd anymore 🤦🏼‍♀️

      @kora4185@kora4185 Жыл бұрын
  • Pretty impressive for nearly 30 years ago!

    @SunnyGirlFlorida@SunnyGirlFlorida Жыл бұрын
  • The amount of work that is done for just a couple scenes is incredible.

    @ihadanamebutitwasbadsonowi8186@ihadanamebutitwasbadsonowi8186 Жыл бұрын
  • I think the subpar look for the monkeys actually works for the tone of the film. I think it gave them an uncanny look that suggested they were from some other realm. And it made them scarier.

    @RichardDuryea@RichardDuryea Жыл бұрын
    • In addition, they are much smarter and more emotional than earthly counterparts. Perhaps they are not even animals in the usual biological sense, but spirits from ectoplasm, which may partially explain their final elastic metamorphosis with other animals.

      @fgjjdgb3949@fgjjdgb3949 Жыл бұрын
  • As a Zulu native I can assure you that Jumanji absolutely does not mean "Many effects" .. its simply gibberish, it does not mean anything, as far as the Zulu language is concerned

    @Madiela@Madiela Жыл бұрын
    • Exactly ,this word does not exist in the Zulu Language

      @isaacsithole@isaacsithole Жыл бұрын
    • @@isaacsithole Like Mark said, Williams was likely joking.

      @Ass_Burgers_Syndrome@Ass_Burgers_Syndrome Жыл бұрын
    • I think he was quoting the original author.

      @knightofarkronia9968@knightofarkronia996811 ай бұрын
  • I don't think there's anything wrong with the monkeys, tbh. They don't detract from the viewing experience. ILM did a great job, as always!

    @j.lindback@j.lindback Жыл бұрын
    • lol really bruh?

      @Unknown-us4ob@Unknown-us4ob Жыл бұрын
    • @@Unknown-us4ob yeah, it's called suspension of disbelief and imagination. Try it out 😉😉

      @IreneWY@IreneWY Жыл бұрын
    • They scared the crap out of me!!!

      @MamiTT237@MamiTT237 Жыл бұрын
  • Hm... The "Anima" in "Animatronics" refers to animation, as in, bringing inanimate objects life. So I guess, it's still considered animatronics eve when it's plants. :)

    @jmalmsten@jmalmsten Жыл бұрын
    • Animatronics... in a way means "animated-electronics".

      @derk4737@derk4737 Жыл бұрын
    • @@derk4737 Yes, and the word "animated" was created through reference to "anima" as explained above.

      @u1zha@u1zha Жыл бұрын
  • A movie with very good computer effects for its time.

    @yabaniiybn@yabaniiybn Жыл бұрын
  • Most of people cannot understand how amazing that lyon is and how incredibly hard was to make it and other animals at that time... More, the compositing of vfx is so amazing!

    @ILLUSIONgroup@ILLUSIONgroup Жыл бұрын
  • Jumanji was the best movie of that time with CGI

    @Abu-Hudhud@Abu-Hudhud Жыл бұрын
    • Keep hoping to see you make a video over the movie Twister

      @Twisterguy-ic5sp@Twisterguy-ic5sp Жыл бұрын
    • Jurassic Park had much better CGI! And it came out just 2 years later.

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
    • The CGI of the lion and the monkies in Jumanji looked pretty fake.

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
  • This is a brilliant forensic study into the making of this classic. Though I still think it’d be fascinating to see them make a special edition of this film - Preserve the original live action filming but give the CGI a significant contemporary upgrade. The outcome would be particularly interesting!

    @TheSimMan@TheSimMan Жыл бұрын
    • A remake?

      @simonediliberto4314@simonediliberto4314 Жыл бұрын
  • The film is done so well, it is so iconic, it lead you to believe that it was reall....well done

    @andeeharry@andeeharry Жыл бұрын
  • I had managed to ask my mother to take me see the movie, she had no idea what it was about. I remember on our way home she said that the special effects, both cgi and animatronics were made to look that way on purpose despite the technical limits which she had no idea about at that time. We as viewers can project ourselves in the movie and know that all those animals and elements were sort of magical so they "had to" look that way. To this day, i still think this was a clever remark from her. Jumanji is my all time favourite movie, i went through school waking up earlier and watch it over and over again every morning. Love that movie and everything about it!

    @saint-gallier@saint-gallier Жыл бұрын
    • Likewise, apart from the animated series, Zatura and the recent mobile game, Jumanji has not received more development. The newest films have a different approach.

      @fgjjdgb3949@fgjjdgb3949 Жыл бұрын
    • @@fgjjdgb3949 I pretend the other movies don't exist. They don't, they just don't.

      @saint-gallier@saint-gallier Жыл бұрын
    • @@saint-gallier I understand that I came up with a more cunning explanation: Dwayne Johnson starred several times in jungle films, so the newest trilogy refers specifically to these jungle films and you can forget about them, because they are all very similar. The only decent alternative storyline of Jumanji for me is an animated series. I watched it in my youth, as soon as I found out about its existence and this animated series was incomparable. Excellent Jumanji, which has taken a different path of development.

      @fgjjdgb3949@fgjjdgb3949 Жыл бұрын
    • @@fgjjdgb3949 Well the animated series had an atmosphere on its own with its own mythology, it was cleverly made and what a great opening theme. The Dwayne Johnson movies have two major flaws: Dwayne Johnson himself - i call him the licence killer and mostly the entire cast, and these movies deny the most important aspect of what makes Jumanji a great story and a great movie: the element of magic thrown into a realistic world. The plot is the opposite of what Von Allsburg's Jumani is. Same goes for Jurassic Park for example, creatures from the past/ a board game are back into a 1992 world and not the other way around: it cannot function for the imagination, not to mention how poorly created these imaginary lands look in the movies. It's bad, so bad and of course it goes too fast with a cheap humour. I am so afraid of what the end of the second movie ushers.

      @saint-gallier@saint-gallier Жыл бұрын
  • The older I get the more I love the movie and the psychological themes

    @kremesauce@kremesauce Жыл бұрын
  • I worked on that film. Awesome job.

    @1971bdott@1971bdott Жыл бұрын
    • What was your job?

      @robertmac7833@robertmac7833 Жыл бұрын
    • i m also worked do you remember me 🤠

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
    • @@robertmac7833 I was in charge of the Rubber end of special effects. Like the car that the computer generated elephant walked over. The whole car was made out of rubber, and we put hydraulic cylinders inside that was connected to a computer program that industrial light and magic made. And then we made it mechanical fish. We made the big vine that came out of the plant that grabbed the kid. lots of mechanical vines, and the Jumanji game board and play pieces And lots of other things if you look my name up, you can see me on IMDb.

      @1971bdott@1971bdott Жыл бұрын
    • @@chandrusekar6746 boy that was almost 30 years ago. What department were you in?

      @1971bdott@1971bdott Жыл бұрын
    • @@1971bdott That’s incredible! Sounds like a lot of hard work, but also great fun!!

      @robertmac7833@robertmac7833 Жыл бұрын
  • Jumanji 1995 made our childhood amazing 😍😍

    @razaabbas4595@razaabbas4595 Жыл бұрын
    • not for me because I am not watch this movie that time our childhood different going to playground with friends not only watching movie then say amazing childhood 🤣

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
  • It’s not fah-kade. It’s fah-sad. Façade.

    @kjamison5951@kjamison5951 Жыл бұрын
    • Glad 😊 I wasn't hallucinating.

      @angosalvo5734@angosalvo5734 Жыл бұрын
  • What do you mean with ‘a monkey on a motorcycle is difficult to find’? - I see one every day…oh wait…that’s my dad…😂

    @MegaKorben@MegaKorben Жыл бұрын
  • Given the time period. It was top notch vfx and movie even to theseday's

    @dawacool9628@dawacool9628 Жыл бұрын
  • The BEST Jumanji. That's all. 🔥🔥❤️❤️

    @brooksashmanskas4516@brooksashmanskas4516 Жыл бұрын
  • This movie blew my mind when I was a kid. Aged excellent.

    @RegularJohn53@RegularJohn53 Жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂 me too lol

      @Ayushpatel03@Ayushpatel03 Жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely amazing breakdown of this movie

    @DrunkInPublic@DrunkInPublic Жыл бұрын
  • The movie of my childhood, now we can make better many effects but the movies are not the same as before, about deep and magic feelings.

    @alooncnej4696@alooncnej4696 Жыл бұрын
  • One of the most interesting videos on effects I've seen, thank you so much, really helpful and full of great insights. That's true, monkeys were to be shown in full daylight and doing not so animal-like stuff, so.. more complicated. Interesting, really

    @valentinabucibattorti9813@valentinabucibattorti9813 Жыл бұрын
  • My childhood classic. Thank you for making this video

    @Nirlep70@Nirlep70 Жыл бұрын
  • That was kinda cool. Way ahead of it's time.Great story JUMANJI (1995). I miss Robin Williams, as he was one of a kind, and always brought that magic with him when infront of the camera. I remember watching a video clip of another movie behind the scenes, where they had to design water droplets and wave motion and mechanics that would look as real as possible using VFX. We've come so far in what seems such a short time frame. Could you possibly look into WAR OF THE WORLDS - Tom Cruise - (2005). Brilliant movie. Be interesting to see how the specifics were created. Thanks Mr.FF

    @SkipSpotter@SkipSpotter Жыл бұрын
  • would love to see more of the animatronics! Especially what the mechanism to move the facial features looked like!

    @AnimatronicsArchive@AnimatronicsArchive2 ай бұрын
  • great video, thanks

    @AAvfx@AAvfx Жыл бұрын
  • I love that the thumbnail implies that the production found an actual quick-sand floor, but not a person to pull Robin Williams out of it.

    @riskRED@riskRED11 ай бұрын
  • this is your best video yet!

    @mobdeli@mobdeli Жыл бұрын
  • i always loved the effects of this film, can't beat practical effects.

    @-sollarz@-sollarz Жыл бұрын
  • WHAT?? Large amounts of CGI *AND* practical effects?? That's not possible! Everyone knows movies can only use one or the other! Not both in a balanced, symbiotic relationship that shows the director has a keen understanding of the limitations of the ALL tools available, and the knowledge to know which tool to use in what situation!

    @fireaza@fireaza Жыл бұрын
    • 😂

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
  • Many Effects will be translated as “Imiphumela Eminingi” in Zulu, which may also mean Many Results. Therefore, Jumanji is 100% not a Zulu word, it’s foreign to us Zulus and the only time we use Jumanji in a sentence is when we ask someone “usuke wayibuka yin lefilm okuthiwa yiJumanji” which means “have you ever watched the movie/film called Jumanji”

    @shortdarktales@shortdarktales Жыл бұрын
  • i love all the jumanji films and i love props and effects so seeing this was just amazing

    @gerardmcquade@gerardmcquade Жыл бұрын
    • Have you seen the Jumanji movie with Dax Shepard? It wasn't named Jumanji, but it had the same plot as this movie. I think it came out in 2005, if I remember correctly.

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
    • @@thewildbruce5612 i don't know i haven't heard of him

      @gerardmcquade@gerardmcquade Жыл бұрын
    • @@gerardmcquade I looked it up and it's called Zathura.

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
    • @@thewildbruce5612 is that the space one?

      @gerardmcquade@gerardmcquade Жыл бұрын
    • @@gerardmcquade Yes.

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
  • That is awesome!! One of my favorite movies ever.

    @rogeriohcaraujo@rogeriohcaraujo Жыл бұрын
  • Just watched this again and wow, and I thought the effects were so good for back then I had to look up how they did it!

    @VersatilePessimist@VersatilePessimist9 күн бұрын
  • Such ingenuity will never be seen in any recent movies

    @raraszek@raraszek Жыл бұрын
  • The fact that they did the animation on a dinosaur of a computer like that is so impressive to me. This movie was ahead of it’s time

    @rileyolson6008@rileyolson6008 Жыл бұрын
    • I can't imagine what they could have done if they had the technology we have today. The cgi would clearly have a proper use and would make it even more spectacular!

      @JI04@JI04 Жыл бұрын
    • its*

      @cebruthius@cebruthius11 ай бұрын
  • I’d still have to say that this jumanji is better than the sequels

    @sharronbrennon899@sharronbrennon899 Жыл бұрын
    • Yes, it is! Jumanji from 1995 will ALWAYS be the best!!! 😁👍🏻

      @thewildbruce5612@thewildbruce5612 Жыл бұрын
  • I still don't understand how the idea of tornado and spaghettification appeared at the end of the game. It was extremely unusual in terms of getting rid of antagonists and unusual in technical execution. Once I heard on a television program that the idea was based on the rotation of the Mask. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

    @fgjjdgb3949@fgjjdgb3949 Жыл бұрын
  • Outstanding performance !! ❤

    @davidchahal7682@davidchahal768211 ай бұрын
  • i wonder if they could take old movies like this and update the vfx with modern tech some day

    @khzero@khzero Жыл бұрын
  • I've waited for this for years!!

    @MsGalen@MsGalen Жыл бұрын
  • I love this movie... It's a childhood memory...

    @juliusphilipligan5975@juliusphilipligan5975 Жыл бұрын
  • Contraption at 2:30 is probably the funniest special effect thingy I have ever seen :D

    @wojtek1582@wojtek1582 Жыл бұрын
  • 0:48 myself and Habib Zargarpour worked on this shot: a combination of CG and particle effects.

    @harroldsheep@harroldsheep Жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant movie and explanation in this Vid

    @phatbusted@phatbusted Жыл бұрын
  • This jumanji is 1000times better than recent ones

    @mersies2986@mersies2986 Жыл бұрын
    • First time, the surprise effect by the ideas is always higher. Once you got it, it's only a continuation.

      @holger_p@holger_p Жыл бұрын
  • The last running rhino always hit me😃🔥

    @loksvid@loksvid Жыл бұрын
  • this is so crazy hard work

    @GODLUAT@GODLUAT3 ай бұрын
  • Watching this in the 90s, immersed in the movie and also not used to seeing CGI in movies, it never even occurred to me that the animation was "bad." Sure, it was obvious those weren't real monkeys, but it's funny how nowadays they immediately jump out at me as being "bad" CGI. Luckily the movie itself is just as incredible today as ever!

    @tesser3569@tesser3569 Жыл бұрын
  • great video, I need to rewatch this film

    @AndrewSmart32@AndrewSmart32 Жыл бұрын
    • don't wait go and watch

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
    • @@chandrusekar6746 please move name?? 🥺

      @Hojjat_sz@Hojjat_sz Жыл бұрын
  • I think the stampede and the lion hold up quite well. I think overall the CGI was more convincing than the animatronics.

    @vfxfan@vfxfan Жыл бұрын
  • This shows how smart and creative ppl who make these kind of movies are

    @dynamicdave2647@dynamicdave264711 ай бұрын
  • never see another masterpiece like this

    @javiercampillay6045@javiercampillay6045 Жыл бұрын
    • why another piece go to watch same movie problem solved

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
  • You may just imagine that all it was about 30(!) years ago! It's a little strange thing that almost all best movies were made before 00's (I think that period 2001-2003 was like any turning point). I mean such movies as Robocop (1-3), Terminator (1 and 2), Jurassic Park (1-3), Jumanji, Aliens/Alien vs. Predator etc. Maybe it could be called "when creators did their job with soul and heart"...

    @Yurgens21@Yurgens21 Жыл бұрын
  • Great episode!!!

    @RumleKjaer@RumleKjaer Жыл бұрын
    • first of all this is not series it a movie 🍿

      @chandrusekar6746@chandrusekar6746 Жыл бұрын
  • Great job

    @Raiders-wm5kb@Raiders-wm5kb Жыл бұрын
  • Even if the cg hasn't aged the best, it still looks pretty good.

    @isaacthemonke233@isaacthemonke233 Жыл бұрын
  • This was my movie growing up loved it 😍

    @violah@violah Жыл бұрын
  • Now I want to rewatch this 😊

    @Eric_1991@Eric_1991 Жыл бұрын
  • Super creativity

    @nepoliannepolian3650@nepoliannepolian3650 Жыл бұрын
  • Nice vid

    @commander-mn7lx@commander-mn7lx Жыл бұрын
  • feals we don't get any movie as ambitious as this anymore ;/

    @Kruku666@Kruku666 Жыл бұрын
    • all are lazy now and join the trend… thats why stories are almost same

      @PunxTV123@PunxTV123 Жыл бұрын
    • Studios only care about money and saving money and making money.

      @captchasuck@captchasuck Жыл бұрын
    • Blumhouse and A24 not included.tho I'm sure they enjoy profits those small financed indies make every few months.That low budget genius competition.

      @captchasuck@captchasuck Жыл бұрын
  • Love that Thumbnail. XDXD

    @OddOneOut665@OddOneOut665 Жыл бұрын
  • I'm almost 100% positive the vertically challenged rhino in the stampede was real.

    @MrFLUIZZLE@MrFLUIZZLE Жыл бұрын
  • 2:20 was freakishly real until it got closer and I realized it was a person.

    @AFCompany@AFCompany Жыл бұрын
  • Thx 4 sharing.

    @dannyrichards6233@dannyrichards6233 Жыл бұрын
  • Nostalgia

    @sornesh6520@sornesh6520 Жыл бұрын
  • Big fan..why don’t we try these techniques on paranormal activities?

    @maheiluwang515@maheiluwang515 Жыл бұрын
  • @Fame Focus 6:40 That's facade _fassard_ not fackade!!!!

    @AMPATL@AMPATL Жыл бұрын
  • Growing up with having this movie on VHS, for some reason I had a love hate relationship with it. For a long time I was really traumatized by the scene of Alan getting sucked into the game. At the same time I really enjoyed how fun and energetic it is. The solution was for me to watch this movie was to fast forward the scene of Alan getting sucked and I would always close my eyes. And my mom or my sister would always press play as soon as that part was over

    @Jeff-fu8is@Jeff-fu8is3 ай бұрын
  • Miss films like this man 😔

    @WhoCaresAnymoreTho@WhoCaresAnymoreTho2 ай бұрын
  • The new Jumanji films are like animes in comparison to this masterpiece. And I do believe the animals were intended to look a bit unreal...

    @enigmawstudios4130@enigmawstudios4130 Жыл бұрын
  • so sad how cgi ended this art of practical effects

    @MakarovFox@MakarovFox Жыл бұрын
  • One of the tricks they did with Who Framed Roger Rabbit was to act out a scene with life-sized rubber replicas of the toons, that the animators could later use for reference. I bet the same principle could have worked for the lighting on the monkeys. Or, alternatively, they could have gone the Jim Henson route and used puppets operated by people in green-screen suits.

    @unrellated@unrellated Жыл бұрын
  • artist knows the accomplishments of the effects

    @christopherespinosa3699@christopherespinosa3699 Жыл бұрын
  • could you imagine opening your bedroom door and there's a line laying on your bed

    @scvmbag707@scvmbag707 Жыл бұрын
  • They did a NICE JOB(actually the whole gang of the movie: from director&actors to special effects crews). I think: for the fact/main point that;JUMANJI's story was about a magical boardgame, the makers could have the advantage of NOT NECESSARILY ABSOLUTELY REAL LOOKING CREATURES(the monkeys for example); I mean, when you make a REAL LIFE(or not fantasy,etc.)movie, using real persons&as much as possible REALISTIC LOOKING creatures is a must, but with fantasy(or even sometimes some sciences fictions)movies not. Very interesting🤩👍👌Thanks for Info&Sharing👍💕

    @sarahaurara@sarahaurara Жыл бұрын
  • Aye! to all the unsung heroes of movie productions, the digital special effects crew.

    @albertdadzie4567@albertdadzie4567 Жыл бұрын
  • Actually, in the DVD extras, one of the people who worked on the film said they wanted to make the monkeys look unrealistic. Like something that would come out of an otherworldly game.

    @amyecorbin@amyecorbin Жыл бұрын
    • That makes sense, after all, it all came out of a "magic" game, not a local zoo.

      @SkipSpotter@SkipSpotter Жыл бұрын
  • I can still hear the sound of the giant mosquito picking and chilling it’s ways through the screen

    @toddjensen8806@toddjensen8806 Жыл бұрын
  • I’ll be honest, I appreciated the effort that went into making the monkeys looking the way they were much more than how the spiders ended up looking. Those things gave me nightmares for weeks…

    @vorco8120@vorco8120 Жыл бұрын
  • Someone seems to think 'forcade' is a word at 6:41. I doubt it.

    @mwarnas@mwarnas Жыл бұрын
  • I won't be able to unsee the model house being torn apart

    @jabber1990@jabber1990 Жыл бұрын
  • This got me thinking, what I would do if I was walking down the street and a Lion was just cruising down the street

    @MamiTT237@MamiTT237 Жыл бұрын
  • took me 20 years to realize the guy playing the dad in the movie was also playing the crazy African Safari Hunter.

    @Punisher6791@Punisher6791 Жыл бұрын
  • Jumanji, a rare example of a movies series where the OG and the Remake/Sequel were both Great.

    @PopeDuwang@PopeDuwang Жыл бұрын
  • first... OHH GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE

    @sideoffries3203@sideoffries3203 Жыл бұрын
KZhead