Lightning - effective exotics

2024 ж. 9 Мам.
144 121 Рет қаралды

The English Electric Lightning (later BAC Lightning) is a British fighter-interceptor developed in the 1950s. Featuring a unique design with an unusual wing and tail, as well as vertically mounted Avon engines, the Lightning became one of the most advanced combat aircraft of the 1960s. It had outstanding flight performance, including the first supersonic cruise among serial jets. This has given it a certain cult status among aviators around the world.
However, the uniqueness of the aircraft also had a price: it was complex and expensive, and it was also difficult to adapt to modernization, which quickly made it outdated. The aircraft served with the UK Royal Air Force, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia until the late 1980s. A total of 337 units were produced.
Thank you for watching!
If you want to support Skyships and our work, welcome to our Patreon. We will create some special content for you there: / skyships
Our Facebook: / skyshipscom
Our Instagram: / skyships_world
00:00 - The English Electric Lightning
00:42 - Protection from Red stars
01:50 - Exotic design
03:33 - Implementation of the program
07:07 - Service
11:53 - Interesting stories
13:43 - Export
14:22 - Flight into history

Пікірлер
  • As a kid growing up in the 70's and going to a lot of airshows, we saw loads of Lightnings. Watching it do its vertical climb while it made a noise like it was tearing the air around it apart is something you never forget- even fifty years later. Along with the Vulcan, the Harrier, and the Buccaneer, we had some pretty exciting aircraft in our skies. And the weather was nicer back then.... 🍄

    @the_unrepentant_anarchist.@the_unrepentant_anarchist.2 ай бұрын
    • Not forgetting the beautiful Hawker Hunter.

      @paulgeraghty1448@paulgeraghty144816 күн бұрын
  • 13:13 "going through all the variations of the word "fuck"" Did not expect such a top notch joke from this channel.

    @gaveintothedarkness@gaveintothedarkness3 ай бұрын
    • it was a JOY RIDE! I would too! Dude stuck the Landing! with ZERO training! just Observations? His Officer/Pilot was a RICHARD with not much skills, always blaming the Ground Crews, for Any FAILURE, and Arrogant, so he Proved it And HAD FUN!

      @davefellhoelter3299@davefellhoelter32992 ай бұрын
    • Hahaha, that and new undies I would imagine! It's probably good to mention that the thrust levers when pushing into reheat, flop to the side and lock in position and continue to move forward until max position, and to unlock you have to pull them backl then flop them back the other way. Obviously whilst going through variations of said word and decimation of undies his brain wasn't quite quick enough to realise this minor detail and with the performance of the aircraft it got airborne real quick. Even seasoned pilots struggled with it taking off. An american exchange chap got in one and said he was in control rite up the point where he let the brakes off.

      @jcreedy20@jcreedy202 ай бұрын
    • I've watched a number of Sky's videos and he puts gags in many of them. He has a very sharp sense of humor but you have to pay close attention to catch them.

      @henrychubbs2823@henrychubbs2823Күн бұрын
  • Whatever you say about the Lightning, it was (and remains) incredibly cool.

    @Oliverdobbins@Oliverdobbins3 ай бұрын
    • the British, either they make very nice beautiful planes like the Hunter, Harrier, or the most ugly ones like the lightning

      @Ezekiel903@Ezekiel903Ай бұрын
    • Ugly?

      @jimmeryellis@jimmeryellisАй бұрын
    • @@jimmeryellis yes ugly!

      @Ezekiel903@Ezekiel903Ай бұрын
  • One, if not the most iconic interceptor for me, its shape and its performance were like no other contemporary plane.

    @Tom-Lahaye@Tom-Lahaye3 ай бұрын
  • For an interceptor designed in an era where slide rules and graph paper were the chief tools - not bad!

    @CONNELL19511216@CONNELL195112163 ай бұрын
    • Remember the time for a nuclear attack for Britain was three minutes and for north America 7 minutes and you might have some understanding for an aircraft with outstanding power and a short range.

      @howardchambers9679@howardchambers96792 ай бұрын
  • My favorite aircraft of all time. Was lucky to see them at airshows in the 70s and during my time in the RAF in the 80s. Awesome aeroplane. Wing Commander Taffy Holden was the engineer who got his 14.5 mins in his log book by accident. He was a pilot and had solo'd on a T6 or Harvard years before. Landed on the 3rd attempt. Happened at RAF Lyneham in i think 1966

    @richardmarshall4322@richardmarshall43222 ай бұрын
  • The only interceptor that could catch a concorde In April 1985, British Airways were trialling a Concorde up and down the North Sea. When they offered it as a target to NATO fighters, Mike Hale and his team spent the night before in the hangar polishing XR749 which he borrowed from the LTF for the occasion, and the next day overhauled Concorde at 57,000 ft and travelling at Mach 2.2 by flying a stern conversion intercept. "Everyone had a bash - F-15s, F-16s, F-14s, Mirages, F-104s - but only the Lightning managed to overhaul Concorde from behind". Even then it could do nothing about it as catching it and staying with it is a different matter, although it's amazing to think the lightning was the first jet fighter to supercruise all conceived in the late 40's early 50's. Its still an abiding memory watching the Lightning as a wide eyed pre-teen at an airshow open up the two reheated Avons and after a short take off and flying low down the remaining runway, then pulls violently straight up like a saturn 5 rocket. Awesome sight and sound from an iconic aircraft🔥

    @Gez492@Gez4923 ай бұрын
    • So many times I've heard this story. It always smells like barnyard waste. The F-15 is quite a bit faster (M2.5 vs M2.27) than the Lightning and will out climb the Lightning by about >200% (67,000 fpm vs 20,000). The only way the F-15 didn't catch something the Lightning could catch is if they didn't try. The F-14 will also outrun and outclimb the lightning. Even the Starfighter, while not faster than the Lightning, will out climb the Lightning easily.

      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus@fantabuloussnuffaluffagus2 ай бұрын
    • Dream on sunshine. An F-15 E at RAF Lakenheath requested a max performance takeoff. A Lightning F Mk6 was #2 on the runway. The Lightning overtook the F-15 in the climb. American pilots who flew both said the F-15 was better on range and electronics, but for sheer exhilaration, they preferred the Lightning. What is more, a fully air refuelled Lightning at altitude attained Mach 2.65 on a full throttle return to base. He did land on fumes though. And also don't forget, it first flew in 1954. Lightnings don't smell of bull excrement, they smell of kerosene and freedom. @@fantabuloussnuffaluffagus

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
    • @@foxstrangler Making up stories doesn't make it true.

      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus@fantabuloussnuffaluffagus2 ай бұрын
    • You should know, you are good at it. @@fantabuloussnuffaluffagus

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
    • ​@@fantabuloussnuffaluffagusyou know you could research it instead of just assuming everyone else is lying. Obviously you'll have to ask your mom if you can stay up late

      @howardchambers9679@howardchambers96792 ай бұрын
  • 4:22 The Rolls Royce Avon was very good! 4:25 There was only one drawback... it didn't exist yet. LMAO, i don't know why but that just cracks me up, comedic timing is on point on this one!

    @LtNduati@LtNduati3 ай бұрын
  • Back when the British really could make things. A wonderful bit of engineering, in Wolverhampton there is an excellent display of cold war jets.

    @williamrutter3619@williamrutter36193 ай бұрын
    • Make things? Everything the Lightning did the SAAB 35 did better, with half the power!

      @LolTollhurst@LolTollhurst3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@LolTollhurstMake thing ≠ make the best thing.

      @copter2000@copter20003 ай бұрын
    • I think you are referring to the RAF Cosford museum in Shropshire. Well worth a visit.

      @philhawley1219@philhawley12193 ай бұрын
    • Instead of buying american garbage 💔. They had an amazing industry

      @emaheiwa8174@emaheiwa81742 ай бұрын
    • @@copter2000 the US had so many shit planes, its laughable

      @emaheiwa8174@emaheiwa81742 ай бұрын
  • I remember as a young boy anytime mid - end 1970s I saw a Lightning Jet flying in very low altitude over the village here in Germany where I am living…a couple of days later I bought a plastic model kit (Revell?) It was the only time I saw this jet, I will never forget this, since this day the Lightning is one of my favorite….

    @rolandschlossmacher1859@rolandschlossmacher18592 ай бұрын
  • I remember as a child watching these aircraft take off and land at RAF Binbrook. They shook the very ground you stood on, and when in the 1980's car alarms started to become a thing, every alarm would be triggered by the outrageous cacophony of sound produced by these incredible aircraft. It was like sensory overload and I bloody loved it 😊 Thank you for the great video 👍

    @stuartthornton3027@stuartthornton30272 ай бұрын
    • I spent many days at the crash gate at binbrook watching these taxi and take off . Good memories

      @jonthompson5123@jonthompson5123Ай бұрын
  • It was designed for a single role and it did that very well. Only 15 years after the first British jet aircraft flew.

    @SimonAmazingClarke@SimonAmazingClarke3 ай бұрын
  • I always thought the Lightning was one of the most awesome looking aircraft ever made. I heard that it was an absolute favorite at air-shows.

    @thelegendaryblackbeastofar39@thelegendaryblackbeastofar393 ай бұрын
  • 15:39 "The Lightning's main task was to prevent Great Britain from being bombed. . . well no one bombed it, mission accomplished." Not only did the Lightning succeed in its main task, but it also succeeded in its secondary task. *The Lightning succeeded in preventing Godzilla from invading Great Britain.* I'm not sure if this secondary task has been declassified yet but I'm willing to violate the State Secrets Act and tell you anyway.

    @ddegn@ddegn3 ай бұрын
    • * Official Secrets Act

      @g8ymw@g8ymw2 ай бұрын
    • @@g8ymw Thanks. I stand corrected. (Actually, I'm sitting corrected.)

      @ddegn@ddegn2 ай бұрын
    • It was main task of menkind over centuries to prevent the world from British Colonialism.

      @axwest1@axwest12 ай бұрын
    • @@g8ymw Section One or Section Two, they are noticeably remember.

      @robertridley-fj8zz@robertridley-fj8zzАй бұрын
  • I used to LOVE watching the Lightnings flying out of Coltishall and coming back in over the tiny little Chapel. As a teenager I was spellbound when they would come over the crowd at Biggin Hill, then fire up BOTH afterburners and go STRAIGHT UP in the air and disappear through the clouds, with the whole ground shaking underneath us as they roared heavenwards. AMAZING beautiful aircraft !

    @GilbertdeClare0704@GilbertdeClare07042 ай бұрын
    • Was there, did that. When they went vertical it was just as you describe. Even the long grass we were standing in got flattened! It was bloody marvellous.

      @iansprescott@iansprescott2 ай бұрын
  • I was taught to be an instructor by an ex Lightning (and Red Arrows leader) the late Ted Girdler. Of an evening, in the pub, he'd occasionally tell a "WIWOL" story - aka "When I was on Lightnings". What a spectacular aircraft - truly loved by pilots!

    @Fidd88-mc4sz@Fidd88-mc4sz2 ай бұрын
  • I met a Lightning pilot the other day at a museum where he cares for a Lightning F53. He gave me and my son a private Lightning flight sim demonstration. Absolutely top bloke and batshit crazy! He said the aircraft easily exceeded the Mach 1.7 limit imposed by the RAF. It could smash through Mach 2 and nudge Mach 2.4. Altitude was limited by the RAF to 55000 feet, but was more than capable reaching 68000 feet.

    @ScienceChap@ScienceChap2 ай бұрын
  • I will add two stories of my own - from my dad who was Chief Tech of a Lightning simulator at RAF Coltishall back in the day. 1. A missile was fired from a Lightning on the ground. It passed by the married personnel housing, and... vanished... without a trace. After several hours of manic searching, it was located in a ditch, and recovered - more-or-less intact. 2. An overspeed on the peri track combined with burnt-out brakes led to one Lightning going through the wall of an Admin office, where the engines ingested many bricks, a desk, typewriter, chair, and filing cabinet before expiring. No people were in the office, but my dad described the undercarriage leg bending with the strain and the giant cloud of brick dust after the impact! As for me? As a youth, i remember Lightnings performing formation aerobatics - and those airshows were LOUD!

    @claveworks@claveworksАй бұрын
  • I've been to many air shows and believe me, nothing stuns the crowd quite like a Lightening

    @copferthat@copferthat2 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for this outstanding documentation. Memories woke up, because I grew up in West Germany and as a child I saw them flying in the skies. I was afraid of them, because they looked different than anything else in the sky at that time, and they where freightening fast. The fear for aircraft disappeared, and I became very interested in them, until I made it into the cockpit in the German air force as a helicopter flight engineer and co-pilot for about 20 years. I ended my carrier in part of the Airbus A400M (Atlas) project as a speaker for the German Air Force concerning the certification related maintenance of the new developed engines. Now you may imagine, that I like good documentations about technological and military history in flying.

    @wilhelmgeraedts5946@wilhelmgeraedts59462 ай бұрын
  • Gorgeous aircraft. Certainly one of the most innovative and successful interceptor fighters ever. A true icon and a tribute to British aircraft design ingenuity.

    @user-ts9ks3ls7d@user-ts9ks3ls7d2 ай бұрын
    • Maintenance heavy. Could be a headache

      @jimboll6982@jimboll69822 ай бұрын
    • Headache? That's like calling WWII a police action

      @chrisfox3161@chrisfox31612 ай бұрын
    • @@chrisfox3161 I was controlling my inner angst, when writing my writing last comment

      @jimboll6982@jimboll6982Ай бұрын
  • During the Cold War I lived in the flight path of an airport with Lightnings 92 and 19 squadrons. It was a great machine⚡⚡👍

    @dieterlohmeyer986@dieterlohmeyer9862 ай бұрын
  • Known by some pilots as the "Frightening", I remember see one display at an air show in the 70s at the end of the display it screamed down the runway at approx 20 feet and then climbed vertically straight as an arrow and just kept climbing untill no longer visible in a clear blue sky. The Lightning was a beast.

    @mfuller1093@mfuller10932 ай бұрын
    • That was always its show-closing party piece. Often cloudy skies in British airshows, it would exit by screaming away from ground level into the one patch of blue sky and just disappearing straight line out of sight, acelerating all the way.

      @peterthomson127@peterthomson1272 ай бұрын
  • I remember reading about a NATO exercise using the Concord to simulate a supersonic bomber interception from astern. The Lightning was the only aircraft in NATO inventory to succeed. If I recall, even the mighty F-15 failed.

    @thelegendaryblackbeastofar39@thelegendaryblackbeastofar393 ай бұрын
  • As a British Gen X kid, the lightning was my Spitfire, the aircraft you imagined flying. Plus in our card games, you could use it to win on performance stats.

    @danko6582@danko6582Ай бұрын
    • Fairey Gannet = To OLD for ya, right? 😛

      @dallesamllhals9161@dallesamllhals9161Ай бұрын
  • This was one of the most amazing aircraft for its era. What a wonderful aeroplane.

    @oldergeologist@oldergeologist2 ай бұрын
  • This thing (but a "hot" example rather than an ordinary one - meaning one airframe that happened to be perfect in every way) actually caught and overtook Concorde - which was cruising along at Mach 2.2 and serving champagne cocktails to the punters at the time. Little did they know. Lightning was a performance monster. A mini rocket ship with sharp teeth. The perfect Soviet bomber interceptor.

    @Ingens_Scherz@Ingens_Scherz2 ай бұрын
  • There was a squadron of these based at Taif in Saudi Arabia back in the early 80s. We used to taxi past them in our Falcon 50 #goodolddays

    @IndaloMan@IndaloMan3 ай бұрын
  • Thunderbird 1 adopted the Lightning's wing design! 👍

    @mansurazeez2229@mansurazeez22292 ай бұрын
    • FAB

      @andrewanderson5297@andrewanderson52972 ай бұрын
  • As a child in the late 50's and to mid 1960's this was my favourite aircraft I drew it many many times. I just loved the look of it and now I'm in my seventies I still love it, and I now know about its stellar performance. Having listened to interviews with former Lightning pilot Air Marshal Sir Cliff Spink he tells of the interception of the Dragon Lady and of other pilots " reputedly" going a lot higher than the service ceiling of I think it was 56,000 feet. And of its " Rocket ship" performance. British engineering with a capital E!

    @samrodian919@samrodian9192 ай бұрын
  • A nice video. Jeremy Clarkson had an English Electric Lightning in his garden because it was so damn cool.

    @Hvitserk67@Hvitserk673 ай бұрын
  • I went to the Woodford airshow in the late 80's. A EE Lightning took off and the pilot immediately put her into almost vertical climb, she shot up into the sky, leaving every car and house alarm going off in the surrounding area🤩

    @RedcoatT@RedcoatT2 ай бұрын
  • As a seven year old it impressed the hell out of me, dad was an aircraft electrical technician with 92 Squadron. We were in Germany at two front line RAF stations, 1965-68.

    @grahambloodworth4770@grahambloodworth47702 ай бұрын
  • I love seeing how different minds come up with such different ways to solve problems, this jet is so unique and interesting.

    @j.brendenstookey3437@j.brendenstookey34372 ай бұрын
  • The great English Electric Lightning! A rocket with a seat on it.

    @ValiantB2@ValiantB22 ай бұрын
  • First time I saw a Lightning, it accelerated down the runway, took off, immediately went vertical and quickly vanished ! I live not far from Cranfield. There was one preserved there for a while which was capable of ground runs. Everyone within a five mile radius knew when they started it up and gave it a run ! Legendary aircraft. Thank you for your video that brought back many memories.

    @davidfarrow875@davidfarrow8752 ай бұрын
    • It would go supersonic in a vertical climb!

      @fredeagle3912@fredeagle39122 ай бұрын
    • Initial rate of climb, 60,000 fpm.

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
  • I remember going to an air display at RAF Horsham St. Faith (now Norwich airport) in, I guess, the early 1960s, and watching them take off, pitch into a vertical climb, and disappear. The commentator said that was not the fastest way to gain altitude - a 60 degree climb was better - but it certainly was impressive. The same airshow had a Spitfire and a Hurricane performing mock dogfights; the Lightning outshone even them.

    @rogeratygc7895@rogeratygc78952 ай бұрын
  • I saw a Lightning perform a reheat taxi at Bruntingthorpe. Laughed like a schoolgirl, the noise was so extreme I checked I hadn't ruptured my body. Do they still do the twilight reheat taxi demonstrations? Roland Beamont EE's chief test pilot always tried to get the fuel load increased. Beamont as TSR-2's (The greatest thing that never was) test pilot lit one Olympus into reheat and left the following Lightning for dead.

    @COIcultist@COIcultist3 ай бұрын
    • Sadly not. Bruntingthorpe runway is full of stored cars. They do engine runs though, as do Gatwick museum, they have a runner. There is now a TMk5 flying in the States, and the Thunder City Cape Town fleet have been sold, but no further news.

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
  • First plane I saw at an airshow. Just as it went vertical after take-off. My fave from that moment.

    @kingoftadpoles@kingoftadpoles2 ай бұрын
  • This is one of my favourite aircraft. I saw one beat up the runway at Tollerton in Nottingham when I was a boy. It came in low fast and disappeared vertically with a deafening roar never heard in Nottingham before. From that moment, I've been an aviation fan, and now at 68, I still get a buzz out of seeing this aircraft fly. Great video, thankyou for sharing. I've now subscribed 😊

    @stephenbrown1077@stephenbrown10772 ай бұрын
  • The aircraft that introduced the world to supercruise, the ability to cruise at supersonic speeds without afterburner. This aircraft was designed in the late 1940s. When they were in service a common joke was that they only had wings to keep the nav lights apart. The other joke was that on take off the pilot was with it all the way until he released the brakes.

    @mothmagic1@mothmagic12 ай бұрын
  • Anyone making a video about the lightning should never leave out its parting shot. Clips were short but ok .Fast run in 100 ft along the runway centre line full, after burner and stand her on her tail and go vertical. The noise is hypnotic . I miss that at air shows now but the typhoon does a good show and goes vertical from 10--12 seconds from brake release, Assum. 😳😳

    @davespragg4570@davespragg45702 ай бұрын
  • Saw Lightnings perform at UK airshows in the 70's before present rules were used. It would fly so fast over the crowds and make a fantastic noise but the take-off was the best, becoming airborne by retracting the undercarriage then straight up vertically for such a long time.

    @walterblanc9708@walterblanc97082 ай бұрын
  • Always a fabulous aeroplane. If it weren't for the complexity, and hefty fuel burn, it might have been better travelled. But one thing; anyone who went to those 1960s airshows, and watched 16 lightnings take off as one big diamond, all on afterburners, will remember the air in your chest vibrating your ribs and gut! Same with the Vulcan. But 16 lightnings = 32 motors doing their stuff, such things are memories made of (-;)~

    @bobphillips2188@bobphillips21882 ай бұрын
  • I've seen one of these in a museum, its really intimidating with its sheer bulk and general disposition, definitely a cold war heavy G!

    @stevecallagher9973@stevecallagher99732 ай бұрын
    • Yes, we have one in our collection. Sadly minus the engines, as we have a suitable runway to exercise it.

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
  • Britain needed an exceedingly fast interceptor with a phenomenal climb rate to show any potential aggressor (or spyplane) to get off our patch. What is too often overlooked is that it did a key job on behalf of all Atlantic-facing states which were 'visited' by the Soviets and caused the USSR to stop work on projected jet bombers, relying instead on the TU 'Bear' in the northern quadrant. This gave time for France and the UK to work with others on the formidable Tornado and France's independent Mirage Series for use in it colonies as well as over the ocean. Britain operated a much revised F-4 Phantom for just a few years while the Tornado MRCA was perfected and, of course, had the specialized, unique Harrier family as well as Hunters, Gnats and Lightning air refueled planes on the Greenland airspace dash. The mentioned Starfighter was not in the same league and had a tendency to kill pilots.

    @stephenhall3515@stephenhall35152 ай бұрын
  • The engineer who accidentally flew the lightning was a very lucky guy to live to tell the tale,as the aircraft did not have it's canopy.

    @marlenehoy2487@marlenehoy24872 ай бұрын
    • The aerodynamics were so good, even minus the canopy, his notepad on the coaming stayed put for the whole flight.

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
    • Don't forget the seat pins were in and he would never have been able to bang out.

      @madrafboy@madrafboy2 ай бұрын
  • An exceptional aircraft that fit the purpose as intended. A criminally under appreciated aircraft

    @lyedavide@lyedavide2 ай бұрын
  • Thanks Sky! I wanted...needed...and appreciated this today! Cheers mate!

    @Jedi.Toby.M@Jedi.Toby.M2 ай бұрын
  • Another interesting fact of the Lightning: it is the first aircraft that can hold its own weight using the engines alone, ie no lift is needed from the wings to go up.

    @Guderian0617@Guderian06173 ай бұрын
    • Not with fuel and ammunition on board. Specifications (Lightning F.6) Thrust/weight: 0.78 (1.03 empty)

      @gort8203@gort82033 ай бұрын
    • ​@@gort8203 That seems right with the published weight and thrust figures. And yet I've seen numerous claims it could exceed Mach 1.0 in a vertical climb. Wonder where those came from?

      @markallison4794@markallison47943 ай бұрын
    • @@markallison4794 Those claims come from people who don't understand what they are talking about. There is a huge difference between zooming an aircraft and rotating it into a vertical climb just after takeoff. The airplane is not going to accelerate to supersonic speed from the latter, and in fact will not climb for very long. But if you have supersonic speed on the jet and pull it straight up it will be climbing at supersonic speed . . . for a while. Even if the airplane is nearly out of fuel and has a 1:1 T/W ratio, that is only true at sea level. In a vertical climb the thrust has to overcome both the weight of the airplane and the aerodynamic drag, and the thrust decreases with every foot of altitude. You can do the math.

      @gort8203@gort82033 ай бұрын
    • @@gort8203 👍

      @markallison4794@markallison47943 ай бұрын
    • @@gort8203 The F6 Lightnings fitted with Avon 302r engines produced over 40,000 lbs of thrust in a 26,000 lb airframe. The Lightning was introduced into service as an Operational Development aircraft and many of it capabilities were Top Secret. No one knows the tops speed of the Lightning, as it would still be accelerating before running out of fuel, Dutch air traffic control would often clock them at mach 3 over the North Sea. Brian Carrol flew his to 87,000 ft. and tested it against the F15, where he found it was just as good if not better apart from the avionics and range.

      @sichere@sichere3 ай бұрын
  • Breaking sound barrier in a vertical climb ❤

    @Radio478@Radio47815 күн бұрын
  • Spent a week at r.a.f binbrook, watching these awesome machines take off, well you can’t forget the noise or feeling Polishing the aluminium intake to the engines was actually fun, Thank god for the lack of health and stupidity nanny state back then, Sitting just off the runway in an mp Land Rover waiting to pass on the peri track… the low grumble on full afterburner was just wow..

    @peteb5343@peteb5343Ай бұрын
  • LOVE your video's man!!! Thank you for producing them-

    @Rockstago@Rockstago3 ай бұрын
  • Really enjoyed this being a ex 111 Sqn armourer in the early 70`s , taken many weapon packs and ventral tanks on and off !!!!!!

    @1tonyboat@1tonyboatАй бұрын
  • Total beast of an aeroplane.

    @jonginder5494@jonginder54942 ай бұрын
  • I really enjoyed this one! I didn't know that much about the English Lightning.

    @aditj@aditj3 ай бұрын
  • One thing you forgot to mention is that a Lightening could stand on its tail at the end of the runway and disappear as if it were a rocket! I have not seen any other aircraft do this since.

    @kymvalleygardensdesign5350@kymvalleygardensdesign53502 ай бұрын
  • I was born in the 70s and this was an iconic aircraft in my childhood. It was one of my favorites all my childood, until I saw a SU-27.

    @arainmk@arainmk3 ай бұрын
  • Great video, I almost forgot about this old bird, what an impressive aircraft. Great script by the way.

    @spladam3845@spladam38453 ай бұрын
  • Another brilliant episode👍

    @gusmanovr@gusmanovr2 ай бұрын
  • I justed wanted to tell you that the Lighting on the thumbnail looks like a spaceship on a quick glance

    @delfinenteddyson9865@delfinenteddyson98652 ай бұрын
    • Considering how high it could flight it came close to being a spaceship.

      @bigblue6917@bigblue69172 ай бұрын
    • @@bigblue6917 true, haha

      @delfinenteddyson9865@delfinenteddyson98652 ай бұрын
    • It’s showing off its nice big pregnant belly, mmmm

      @SenorBigDong69@SenorBigDong692 ай бұрын
  • Excellent video as usual

    @HolyNorthAmericanEmpire@HolyNorthAmericanEmpire3 ай бұрын
  • Great work! Enjoyed it.

    @generaldvw@generaldvw2 ай бұрын
  • Great video. Thanks.

    @eddieboy4667@eddieboy46672 ай бұрын
  • I spent my childhood in the 60s and 70s on various RAF stations around the world, alongside these magnificent jets. It takes a lot to impress MORE than a squadron take off ALL going vertical at 100 feet both burners firing ,and thundering scream of full power making the ground shake.

    @andiross8898@andiross88982 ай бұрын
  • There is some aweseome charm to this aircraft I can't put my finger into.

    @brutusmuerto@brutusmuerto2 ай бұрын
  • Great story as usual! Thank you

    @thomasbelmont810@thomasbelmont8102 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for the video, when i lived in Vladivostok (1991-95) I was so fortunate to have a ride in the Mig 21 trainer and it just triggered my love for this plane (I was there with a Learjet). Can you make a video about this aircraft and why it was built? Maybe you have doene it - will check....

    @jsvno@jsvno3 ай бұрын
  • Fantastic!!!

    @oat138@oat1383 ай бұрын
  • Great channel, really enjoying your videos

    @rchassereau2@rchassereau2Ай бұрын
  • A Brilliant Aircraft from a time when Britain was still able to hold its own in engineering thanks to eccentric people in sheds.

    @huwdavies6650@huwdavies66503 ай бұрын
    • It's a shame that so much is lost now

      @flyerkiller5073@flyerkiller50733 ай бұрын
  • I used to see with awe in late 1970s with afterburners on taking off at night at Dhahran airport Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and also used to see mountain of used tires as apparently it almost chewed the tires per flight

    @hagopakasparian7732@hagopakasparian77322 ай бұрын
    • Max 4 landings per set of tyres. It was so powerful it was possible to use it's entire fatigue index in one flight. One pilot did just that on it's first and only flight on squadron strength.

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
  • Thanks! I’ve seen many stills of the EE Lightning, but I don’t recall much video. The first time I saw an image of the Lightning, I was a kid in the early ‘60s, on the back of a box of Cheerios cereal (I remembered the taste as I started watching the video). To my young American eyes, it looked weird, especially the squared-off wings and elevators.

    @petesheppard1709@petesheppard17092 ай бұрын
  • The performance even by today’s standards was absolutely amazing

    @djpalindrome@djpalindrome21 күн бұрын
  • Thunder City - Im sure you are aware or became so during your research for this video. I was so enamored with the Lightning since it was so unique that when the videos on Thunder City flying them started hitting KZhead a decade or so ago I was hooked. It's really a shame how that all played out. Cannot say they were not told that exact series of events were likely by the guys who used to fly and maintain them. Wild that something so complex...probably beyond a lot of what is flying today in terms of shear man-hours required to inspect/service...was flying in private hands

    @CMFL77@CMFL772 ай бұрын
  • Known in the RAF affectionately as "The Frightening"

    @trevormoat6919@trevormoat69192 ай бұрын
  • the only completely British mach 2 aircraft to be put into service

    @mustang5132@mustang51323 ай бұрын
    • The only completely british aircraft to fly supersonic!!!!

      @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke2 ай бұрын
    • @@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke that’s not even close to true

      @mustang5132@mustang51322 ай бұрын
    • @@mustang5132 Please name a single all british production aircraft besides the Lightning that is supersonic????

      @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke2 ай бұрын
    • The Fairey Delta 2 took the air speed record off the USA F100 at speeds in excess of 1100 mph. Original statement did not specify a series production run. TSR2 was faster than the Lightning, but the production run was cancelled with 30 aircraft almost complete. @@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
    • @@foxstrangler *F-104 Starfighter was faster... faster than the Fairey Tale and the TSR.2* *Both british aircraft were epic failures*

      @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke2 ай бұрын
  • Beauty!

    @RandallSoong-pp7ih@RandallSoong-pp7ih3 ай бұрын
  • To me, the most beautiful of the post war military aircraft, with awesome performance too!

    @carlwalker7560@carlwalker75602 ай бұрын
  • I imagine the engineer that found the afterburner were not the only ones to say "fuck " after a encounter with this aircraft.... I'm quite positive that anyone who had to overhaul those e engines are probably still going through those variables of the word " fuck " just thinking about having to do so...

    @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko@ThomasBestonso-zr4koАй бұрын
  • Designers where bold back then :)

    @skylem5373@skylem53733 ай бұрын
  • One word for the Lightning - GREAT.

    @emmabird9745@emmabird97452 ай бұрын
  • Complex, expensive and an absolute bitch to work on. I still have the scars.

    @chrisfox3161@chrisfox31612 ай бұрын
    • Laf. Awesome. We ground grunts never get the glory.

      @ronjon7942@ronjon79422 ай бұрын
    • If it didn't leak it was empty

      @chrisfox3161@chrisfox31612 ай бұрын
    • @@chrisfox3161 Sounds like a Detroit Diesel 😂

      @prevost8686@prevost868618 күн бұрын
    • ​@@prevost8686. Nowhere near as reliable

      @chrisfox3161@chrisfox316118 күн бұрын
  • Interesting video, great ❤

    @Radio478@Radio47815 күн бұрын
  • Very fast interceptor which apparently gave an SR71 a run for its money on at least one occasion. Perfect for the job that would have been asked of it had push ever come to shove.

    @pgs1796@pgs17962 ай бұрын
  • most beautiful combat plane ever...

    @marcdunord@marcdunord28 күн бұрын
  • A young Air Cadet camped not far from the runway at RAF Wattisham at the height of the Cold War . 111 Squadron scrambled at night . Awesome. ✈️✈️✈️

    @muff.t2780@muff.t27802 ай бұрын
  • I LOVE THIS JET!! She was bad ass

    @DaveSnelson-ox2vv@DaveSnelson-ox2vvАй бұрын
  • Supersonic cruise in 1960's. Crazy design

    @flyerkiller5073@flyerkiller50733 ай бұрын
    • If you only want to cruise for 10 minutes... 😆

      @gsmdo8836@gsmdo88363 ай бұрын
    • @@gsmdo8836 Exactly what it was designed for,fast short range interception.

      @stephencrowther524@stephencrowther5242 ай бұрын
  • Very well made documentary

    @rinsedpie@rinsedpie2 ай бұрын
  • the legendary aircraft

    @edutaimentcartoys@edutaimentcartoys2 ай бұрын
  • I was at last lightning show Binbrook 1987

    @Radio478@Radio4782 ай бұрын
  • When you look in the dictionary for the word ,the 1950's, it has a picture of the EE Lightning next to it. OK the 1950's isn't a word, but you catch my drift. Most jets from the 50's still look kind of modern today, but the Lightning looks like it's straight out of a British 50's sci-fi film or comic.

    @yakacm@yakacm2 ай бұрын
  • 16:11 It's not the "BAC" Lightning, it was made by English Electric. BAC didn't even exist until 1960 and had nothing to do with the Lightning.

    @JimmyJamesJ@JimmyJamesJ2 ай бұрын
    • Gotta correct you here my friend, but if you correct someone who was in fact correct, then you’re leaving yourself open. Aircraft are almost universally known by the parent company of their concurrent manufacture, not by the designator of their design team or initial manufacturer. Lightning production had barely got going by 1960 when English Electric as a company ceased aircraft production, so I’m not sure why you stated that BAC had nothing to do with it - “they” went on to produce the majority of Lightning airframes. English Electric’s other ongoing project at the time also became an official BAC product ie the Canberra. Hunting’s Jet Provost too became a BAC product but no-one quibbles over that. Other examples of corporate takeovers officially re-designating aircraft include the McDonnell-Douglas Phantom and DC9, both of whom’s production overlapped the merger. The best reference points are in-period Observers Book of Aircraft or Jane’s’. When an aircraft has ceased production before a corporate takeover, then the original manufacturer’s entitlement generally remains eg it’s a “Douglas DC7” not McDonnell-Douglas; the Hurricane retained it’s purely Hawker designation etc etc. There are some exceptions whereby a reformed business continues to use an old brand name to badge its aircraft (eg Vickers with the Supermarine Spitfire and General Dynamics with the Convair F106 and CV990 Coronado) but the Lightning wasn’t one of them.

      @neilturner6749@neilturner67492 ай бұрын
    • It's a bit like calling the P-51 a Boeing product. Just because you buy or merge with the company does not take the fact away the it was designed by Teddy Petter who worked for.....English Electric, and it was known as such until the F Mk3 was introduced. @@neilturner6749

      @foxstrangler@foxstrangler2 ай бұрын
  • It flew up and past the American U2 .It reached 88,000 dropped back down to the U2 .in a simulated Attack. To say the American pilot was surprised ( Gobsmacked ) is an understatement. It also caught upto and overtook Concorde.

    @user-ze5tu4ck1t@user-ze5tu4ck1tАй бұрын
  • A very weird & very cool plane. Not my first choice as personal transport. Cheers Sky.

    @UncleJoeLITE@UncleJoeLITE2 ай бұрын
  • Just for clarity, that fly-past at the 58 second mark, is actually a Fleet Air Arm formation. Sea Vixens, Buccaneers and Gannets I believe.

    @robertridley-fj8zz@robertridley-fj8zzАй бұрын
  • Nothing to discuss...I like it :)

    @jernejfunkl8300@jernejfunkl83002 ай бұрын
  • It might have had severe limitations, as did that other wonderful British interceptor, the Spitfire, but they are the two aircrafts I wanted to fly in the most.

    @clive373@clive3732 ай бұрын
  • That Lightning which took off accidentally while in maintenance is now on show at Duxford IWM.

    @mike.47@mike.472 ай бұрын
KZhead