Call of Duty MW III vs Battlefield 2042 - Physics and Details Comparison
In this video I show a comparison of physics, details and shooting Call of Duty Modern Warfare III vs Battlefield 2042 video completely filmed and edit by me (GameBest) I show which game is better in physics and details
If you liked this video, please don't forget to subscribe and like. Thanks for watching😃👍
Timings:
0:00 - Water Physics
0:30 - Legs Footprints
1:01 - Shooting at car Tires
1:31 - Single mode and Auto mode
1:56 - Swimming
2:28 - Car Suspension
2:54 - Peek Door
3:29 - Glass Physics
4:03 - Climbing Ladder
4:40 - Crater
5:03 - Shoot Through
5:30 - Bullet tracks
5:41 - Tank
6:23 - Snow Physics
6:41 - Car Explosion
7:14 - Others
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 vs Battlefield 2042
Call of Duty vs Battlefield
Battlefield 2042 vs Call of Duty MW3
#callofduty #callofdutymodernwarfare3 #battlefield #battlefield2042
With the door detail, I think one thing people tend to ignore is that in bf2042 when you aim your gun and open the door, it does open slower then normal, I know it's not peeking like mw3 but at least it's there, just something to point out
7:44 One thing I like about 2042 is you can hear the grenade clicking sound from the grenade fuze after throwing it
I read it as it was happening
@@rodrigodeangelis1275 Me too xD
Mw 2019 still is the best cod as far as graphics animations and realism
It's sad that after mw2019 they kinda went down
And best gunplay and movement
This is just wrong lmao MWII graphics are ten times better and MWIII's animations are amazing
@@ColossalKaiju ten times better 😂 ofc the graphics and animations are still gonna be good because it’s a reskin of mw2 which is a reskin of mw 2019
@@yellowflash7696 I agree. I love mw 2019 for the attention to detail and everything about it. It feels like your shooting a real gun unlike the other games which feels like it’s a BB gun.
I miss BF3 and BF4 😢
probably among the best chapters
You can still play BF4 on the PC with ultra settings it looks great and high FPS. Also plenty of servers, im bored of it now and actually prefer 42
Why miss? Did you brake up with them? 😂
I miss bfbc2 😭
@@johnweak6788
Shoot through walls is not fair for BF2042. Why would you shoot on a metal wall?
It's not a fair test but it doesn't matter because BF2042's bullet penetration is so minor 99% of players will never even know it exists. Most walls are bulletproof even to high caliber weapons
@@trashcompactorYT because most walls are thicc.
@@coffee7180yes, but the real reason is that there is little to no real destruction or levolution when compared to other battlefield games.
@@quad849 Wrong, even if you count the term itself and not just the mechanic. Battlefield Hardline literally used Levolution as a selling point just like BF4. Battlefield 1 and V have fully dynamic destruction so it’s not needed. Battlefield 2042 has Levolution on multiple maps. Discarded, Kaleidoscope, Orbital, etc. It’s just not to the same scale as it was in BF4 and Hardline. The mechanic was prototyped in BF3 on Metro and Captain Border. Metro had a missile strike that opened up the subway for player access, and the big tower comes down on Captain Border and takes out a big section of the otherwise indestructible wall, opening up easier access to that portion of the map.
@@quad849 Again, you are wrong. Hardline had it too. Arguably even moreso than BF4 at times. You could collapse a whole subdivision, take out a massive crane that opened up routes between sky scrapers, blow up massive oil tankers and open huge craters to the underbellies of maps. Just say you never played the fucking game bro stop acting like it doesn't exist. Hardline had the best levolution events between the two games and everyone loved them
MWii and iii may have better attention to detail but 2042's scale and vibrance is on another level. Things like the weather and tornados in 2042 are just an unmatched experience
Pftt nah those tornados are trash and the weather is great
@@lazyvoid7107 bro tornados are pretty cool you gotta admit that
BF2024 is cartoonish, DICE lost it. MW3 is superior in gameplay and graphics. Sadly BF stands now where it used to be in BF3 and BF4 days, COD was light years behind.
a tornado entering the match must be the most underwhelming thing ive experienced in a bf game. It does absolutely nothing for the gameplay. I get a better rush from tryna jihad jeep someone in bf4
@@raghavtripathi564honestly both game sucks now
Do MWII and MWIII comparison. Oh, wait, there's nothing to compare. It's the same game. 😆
MWIII is graphically and audibly way worse
@@Settiisits a beta and its running without on graphical settings to max
@@Settiis Yeah, all I see in MWIII is greyness.
then u have a bad tv@@perocigla4425
@@perocigla4425thats just map design, not graphics issue
7:23 BF2042 has the character switch it to safe when reloading, this happens on most AR's with similar designs in game.
Most weapons are technically not possible to reload while safety is on, because safety mode prevents bolt from moving.
Have you listed the destructibility of vases in CoD as a plus? Then I ask you to add as a plus how practically the building can fall apart in Battlefield
destructible vases could be a nice detail for both games while buildings being destroyable make no sense in a arcade shooter like cod
Only kids are excited about destroying buildings.
@@perocigla4425 Then it doesn't make sense to compare these games. You may not have played battlefield, but you can destroy a building there to kill an enemy who is hiding in the building, for this you can use different game mechanics. Cod is just to run around and make frags for yourself. Even a car explosion in cod is a pre-made script, and in battlefield you can kill the enemy by flying over him with a car that explodes at the same time.
Hell, yes, you can kill an opponent who is sitting in a building with a car that had c4 in it and blow it up, but maybe you guys prefer to just die from a camper who was just sitting in the building and who just oneshots you
Or the dozens of small inside objects that are destructible that aren’t vases lol
Its interesting to see how many people enjiy 2042 now, knowing how that game was 1-2 years ago, now people seem to be giving it a second chance and im honestly glad its improving
I've been playing 2042 non-stop since launch (1560 hours logged so far) and I'm glad that people are giving it a chance now.
@@TheSanityX i feel like its always the same thing with battlefield games, they start off rough but as time goes by they start improving, i mean look at battlefield 4, how buggy it was at launch and now its considered one of the best battlefield games
@@axelramirez6201 considering that bf4 is just a bf3 with less destruction, its hard to understand why it was so buggy on release. its literally same game
@@gghostan i guess it problably had something to do with the engine or something like that
@@TheSanityXI feel like it's so hard to see your enemies from a distance and when you do its too late lol I know some will say skill issue but no I'm pretty good at fps games. Also it gets kinda frustrating getting killed by somebody 160 meters away in the bush on his stomach
both games are attempting different things. cod is smaller scale battles with extreme detail on a micro scale. bf doesnt need to focus on such details because its focus as a game is on the macro, the large playercounts, the weather, the large scale destruction, etc. both games excel in what they set out to achieve
Well said mate
Load of crap. Old battlefields were way better than cod in every small detail. The quality of games nowadays has just gone down the drain.
@@AlkaVirusdude he said these two current games....are you high yes OLD BF games were great in smaller scale but now it's vice versa and yea MW3 does look good in these small scale and BF 2042 looks good in large scale and he's right both games are different for different audiences
@@AlkaVirusyou are talking about load of crap, could you explain to me, how many details you are waiting from a mode 64vs64? İts not 5v5 deathmatch multi bro.
@@berkeucar2924 nice way to expose yourself as someone that has no idea about battlefield. Call of duty has always been arcade-like meanwhile battlefield tried to be as realistic as possible while still being accessible. That's why they aimed for massive destruction and realistic guns. Something that call of duty never even got close to being as detailed. But yeah tell me Mr. Zoomer what you know based on these new crappy games these devs are making.
Both games have some unique details that are unmatched.
mw3 is superior in almost every way
@@rsea8751 I love both games but if you dig digger the Battlefield destruction is incomparable to COD they destroy buildings houses in all aspects but there are some details in COD they have that Battlefield 2042 don't have which i like too
@@rsea8751 No it's not you can see the destruction of Battlefield the reloading animation is more accurate grasses are moving and COD don't when tanks walk the trace of trail in Battlefield we pilot jets
In battlefield if you fall for too long you start to skydive
you guys probably wont believe it. but I still sometimes play the original CoD4-Modern_Warfare (2007) multiplayer game. I personally prefer it if I want to get huge fps and a 100 kills in tdm in about 15 mins. you know when you are in a mood to destroy. LoL
in a couple places you pick different materials. shooting through wall in COD you picked dry wall and in BF looked like a metal sliding door. as just one example
indeed, all concrete walls can be destroyed in BF
after mw2019 cod lost it's realism in terms of graphics and after battlefield 1, battlefield games no longer feel realistic
After BF1, Dice lost many of its prominent devs.
Bfv may be worse in gameplay and story/libtards propaganda but it still has much more details compare to bfv. Bf1 didnt have tremendous amount of animation and world details bfv had, if they didnt try to push too much political more players woukd have played and experienced the team's hard work
Nah your wrong dude BF5 is so realistic to as well as 2042 but 2042 little less than the others
@@m4j0r3xBFV literally had the best gameplay in the franchise, the only reason why it was so mediocre was because current DICE is incompetent and there were so many delays and false promises all over the place, especially with a lot of dev time going into the 5v5 which was ultimately scrapped, making all of that time go to complete waste
@@Fridgemasters not to mention they dropped it straight up after promising us russia dlc
Oh that's what my teammate doing while I'm fighting for my life
" vases can be destroy " 😂😂😂 OK man this is AMAZING LOL
5:12 That just shows how advanced CS1.6 was for it''s day. And every one is considering it a bug. But now is cosidered a feature....
The tornados may not appear every match, but when they do they completely can flip the script on the enemy team .
yeah that blows
Needed a Street Fighter comparison for the tires
The building destruction and the graphics in Battlefield look much better. Up close the weapons and models look great but when you showed the tank shots, seeing the landscape and buildings it wasn't even a question of what looked best. The particle and explosion effects in BF look better as well. Honestly both of these games cater to different audiences.
battlefield fanboy😂
2042 have barely any big destruction 😂😂😂, bf4 sh4at all over it
@@revivemefellas9637BF3 and 4 and 1 were the best.
@@revivemefellas9637 BF2042 has the same level of destruction as BF4 lol it just has less of the small buildings that you can completely level. The big buildings have the exact same level of destructibility. You can blow out the walls and make them into skeletons of buildings.
Tank thing when I seen the cod scene I thought reminded me more of battlefield days. I think you just liked to colors battlefield shown. Cod does have that boring color scheme
I remember when I used to be impressed by graphical / detail oriented improvements in games. Now that I haven’t played games in a couple years, I see that nothing has really changed either.
It has but not in these games
play a game with ray tracing, starting off with cyberpunk and you will be impressed
Try ac Valhalla buddy
a plague tale requiem still there
Have you played rdr2 4k?
Always battlefield for me
Ok But do not cry
Cry for what you silly little child!... run along now boy mummy's calling you
Impressed this matters at all to cod gamers.. . My friends and I call them hampster wheel gamers. Just running in circles for years. Doing the same thing..
I honestly thought you would have done a MWIII vs MWII office before you did this. You already have the MWII vs MW19 video so maybe I'll watch that one too get an idea. But we def need it 😂
Something I personally hate about the lighting of BF 2042 is how hands don't cast shadows on the weapons. On the other hand COD shadows are completey wrong, usually casting shadows in wrong angles. It feels like it doesn't consider where the direction of the lighting is coming from. Making some optics to cast shadows where there no suppused to be one. Another games like Cyberpunk also use the same technique. I would like to know about video game development to explain myself better. But you have played both COD and BF you probably noticed how that.
This vs Battlefield 5 is a better comparison. I think you should do that next, they put way more attention into that game
How did you get that crosshair in bf 2042 looks sick 👍
A cool idea would be if you break a widow while you are too close to it, you get lightly damaged. Sure that might effect gameplay a bit but it would be realistic lol
It's not like you are naked near broken glass.
@@LEOvsMAO you don't need to be naked to be hurt from falling pieces of glass, because it is sharp and have some weight which is enough to penetrate cloth and skin.
@@lilbidlo that is true if your clothes are civilian-grade. Operators has military-grade clothing and they are much sturdier than the average clothes you wear everyday. Plus, certain characters may have a full-body set without leaving any part of their skin exposed, so it'll be a nuisance adding that in a game.
@@ravelisland military clothing can stop piercing, but you still will have a scratch on your skin. With cuts military clothing handles not better than work jeans
@@lilbidlo COD operators usually wear multiple layers of clothings so... Not an universal case, I guess ?
Increíble Battlefield 2042 es un juego que ha pasado por malos momentos, pero aun asi gana en muchos aspectos
El frostbite es un super motor grafico a pesar de que tuvieron problemas con este pudieron trabajar ciertos detallitos. En todo caso DICE no es un estudio que requiera reciclar un motor como lo hacen Treyarch y Sledgehammer Games que directamente agarran lo que hizo Infinity Ward para no complicarse. Pero bueno los 2 estudios que mencione son los 2 canceres del COD...
tbh, I am just surprised how far Battlefield 2042 had progressed
if there's one thing you can trust DICE in doing is that. updating the game to a great state.
You should make another video on the full game release. This is just a beta.
I love how the comparison shows things you can do in MW3 and can't in Battlefield like peek through doors. But what about the other way around like things you can't do in MW3??? like fly gets, or helicopters???
The audio design and gun physics is excellent in MW. But in Graphical fidelity, COD still cant come near Frostbite engine.
Mw has a more realistic art style but ngl bf is more colorful
you remember modern warfare 2019
@@mememan143 Frostbite engine always has a better lighting effects than iw engine. Dice had selected wrong colour pallete scheme for Battlefield 2042. That’s why it has saturated colours.
@@elguachinangosupremoxd6949 Even when compared to BFV’s graphics, MW19 graphics is not above frostbite engine.
@@elguachinangosupremoxd6949Battlefield 1 and V destroy MW2019s graphics
Ill always love battlefield for rhe destruction that can be caused in a map. Like leveling buildings 😝
I hate it when my teammate is doing a graphics comparison in the midst of a ranked match !!
This video really, REALLY makes me wanna play MW3
Nice video!
Make sense!
Test seemed a little biased. Car suspensions, but not destructsbility...
Car destructibility or map destructibility? I assume you can destroy the car in both but map destruction is a battlefield only gimmick Watched more of the video, I'm surprised they did show map destruction in this comparison
@@FriedProfile Also he didn't compare maps size. On "others" fragment the autor compare M97 and G17 for what? And the last thing which make me laugh is when he shows vases destructibility XD In CoD u can destroy some vases, but not all, but in BF u can destroy A ENTIRE MAP
@@yiffka334 I remember in Battlefield 2042, I think it was season 4 or 5? Whichever that small map was that had the two buildings that were predestroyed. I wish we had destruction like back in bad company, but when I first saw those buildings with holes in the roof, I thought Battlefield was finally back. And then I tossed a handful of C4 trying to blow another hole and, nothing Bad Company 2 >>> MW3 remastered
@@FriedProfile agree. I miss that old days too…
Re salutations peut-on avoir des métiers dans les New battlefield comme world of warcraft ? Merci ++
Swimming in cod looks just awesome
Bf2042 mechanics are too complex for the youth lol standing on dry land will make your footprint deep, walking will leave a light print, sprinting will lift the dirt. It’s different for every terrain
This comparison is pretty COD skewed. MW3 isn’t even out yet, but 2042 is two years old. And every COD car tested is one you can drive, but he didn’t test any deiveable vehicles in BF. Also.. how many COD games can you even swim in at all, whereas almost every BF game you can swim in. Also, you can “peek” doors in BF, you were just doing it wrong haha.
U can swim in 5 call of duty games and in all that 5 games u can swim underwater. These games are black ops 3, black ops 4, Cold War, mw2, mw3
in multiplayer?@@lorol-zu7yv
some of these comparisons don't make much sense, the wall penetration test for cod was using a house wall while for battlefield you used some weirdly shaped metal wall. the ladder test is odd because why would someone hold as pistol while using both hands to climb? It would make sense if you pull the gun out after stopping but him holding it while climbing is unrealistic, foolish and would be uncomfortable and clunky. These games also take place decades apart so the suspension test doesn't make sense either because vehicles in 2042 could have some kind of modern dampening or something. I'm not trying to bash the guy I'm just trying to point things out, great video!
Mw 2019 was the greatest in graphics, animation and detail, literally with the ghost skin, even if you didn’t have a pistol in your attachments, because it had a gun on the skin you could use it climbing ladders
No cod he ever been as cod as battlefield, even 2042 which is by far the worse yet still beats Cod.
5:25 based on wall vs steel. Genius comparison lmao
Why not try to shot build? or use c5 / c4 ?
Would be great to add bullet Ricochets from hitting the water at certain angles...
Imagine combining the best attention to detail into a single game. Both games are honestly really good
COD mechanics with battlefiend environment would be epic. However, IMO COD has made much more progress than BF. BF3 and 4 were ahead of their time.
@@nicolasch7039buddy battlefield mechanics are so much better then cod
Oh man…
It only shows characteristics that mw3 has, however it does not show those that BF2042 has, for example, destruction of buildings, variable weather, which affects visibility, tornadoes, sand storms, rain, etc. other details such as dirt on weapons or operators when interacting with the map, mud, rain, etc. instead of looking at the details of mw3, I end up angry at comparisons that aren't equally fair to both.
There is almost none of destructable buildings in bf2042
@@lorol-zu7yv you don't play it to say shit like this, the game has bad company 2, 1942 and bf3 maps in it.
@@coffee7180 ah u mean bf portal, i was saying it about bf2042 main mode - all out warfare. It’s sad that portal was abandoned by devs almost none new content for portal since release of the game. And also it’s better to play this maps in original games. I did played every bf game since bf bad company 1 that was exclusive to 7th generation consoles. And bf2042 is the worst one. Even worse then bf1, but at the time bf1 was released I thought they can’t make bf game worse
@@lorol-zu7yv wft dude Did you play bf2042 or since when have you not played?, valparaiso, arica, nohar channels, caspian border, spearhead, stealth, operation ourbrake, exhibition. They are main bf 2042 all of warfare maps. There is destruction like in BF4, if not more, constructions like the Shanghai skyscrapers or the Lancang Dam were scripted events. There are maps like Hourglass before the rework that entire points of houses were destructible by vehicles, walls in the debris map before the rework as well. It was simply a bad comparison of this channel, but I imagine it achieved what it was looking for, an audience that watched and commented.
@@nicovirust1175 anyway bf2042 is trash
Nice video gamebest
i want the sprit screen version as the beginning of the clip
Crazy that you can even compare the two being years apart.
Like 4 years apart it takes like 3-4 years for battlefield as cod is every year
Exactly
Only 2 year gap
2 years is not much today kiddo
@@findgod... 2 yrs a lot of time for technology
You can definitely see the color pallet differences. I am excited to see what Treyarch does with it cause their games coloes are always cranked up to 11. IW and SH tend to go for the more realistic and darker tons. BF2042 is saying here are all the color Bi
Thank you for comparing two unfinished game, gotta love it when they're good at these physics and graphics stuff and professionally lacking content.
in COD MW2 you could stand on the other side of a wall, tank could shoot at that wall over and over.. you're safe, in BF2042, you're dead. Has MW3 fixed that?
COD Modern Warfare 2 on PS3 had the best sound effects and best simulation. Activision seems to have gone the Black Ops engine route. Kinda sad considering we have moved on to more advanced game consoles. In current games, the chopper sounds like a ceiling fan. Guns without silencers sound like they have silencers on. The RPG simulation and sound effects are weak. Sentry guns sound like a dog scratching the door.
Mw2 sound effects of guns were really bad. Also u can put good sound effects on any engine. And also black ops 3 engines water simulation and smokes casting a real time shadow is still quite impressive
battlefield 1 is still more fun than any of these. I don't know what game engine it uses but it's way better.. wish all first-person shooters felt like that. Been trying to find a new one to play but I keep going back to battlefield 1
Seriously bro unfortunately the server are no longer up to play online
@@scottyscott8234 yeah they are I play conquest and team deathmatch everyday still in PS5
@@mkarns7 really battlefield one huh damn that's dope I'm a try to do that tonight 🔥🔥💯
Modern Warfare 2 (2009) is probably the best of either series, nothing else from either series compares to that era of clans and trickshotting it was literally a culture you had to be there to get it. MW3 and BF3 were both amazing though
But problem is bf1 has bots only now
You didn't seem to show all the other details 2042 has though, not exactly a fair comparison. Anyway, I been playing 2042 for a while now and even though the atmosphere is not like the previous entries, it still beats COD by far. I have played both so I can judge as well. Heck, I actually prefer the gameplay of 2042 over MW3. One MAJOR thing Battlefield has always done right is sound as well. I feel they don't get enough credit for this. The footstep audio is fantastic unlike COD where a person can run up behind you without hearing anything which sucks. MW2019 was really good though.
Lol look at battfields camer angle while looking down. I still remember the "patch" that caused it. Nice to see they never fixed it.
20 years of call of duty and we still don’t have destruction, at least let us blow the doors of the hinges
They did the destruction thing on Vanguard, and people hated it
@@beeaggressive160 because it was mid in that game a few doors and windows for each map and that game was the worst COD in my opinion, Piercing Vision perk was busted didn’t even need to hit your target for it to work
Cod Ghosts from 2013:
Bro wants destruction in cod 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@@findgod... is that a problem, at least for ground war maps it’d be interesting
Eu acho o gráfico do Battlefield insana
Are you in 2023? Or 2017
Well in physics that doesn't matter COD Wins, what about bulding destruction or bullet velocity?
Possible link to download the game Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 Remaster
fun fact csgo 2 has better water physics than BF2042
Thats about it
Wtf is csgo2? It's called cs2.
Mw3 has this cloudy look to it that makes it look terrible. I've been enjoying 2042 so much lately. Mw3 is just a waste of tike and money.
why do people like over bright games , i prefer darker tone
@userking327 it's not about bright but clarity
@def-po8tu bf2042 has fortnite colors which is kinda weird
@@TheSparkynuts no it doesn't, u just wanna simp for cod
check your eyes,@@TheSparkynuts
Bonjour 👋 est-ce-que dans les nouveaux battlefield et anciens battlefield le bout des canons de blindé et de canon du fusi il peut se dégager une petite ou mini flamme avec un peu de fumée 🚬 aux bout des canon comme un petit effet comme dans le réel comme le métal devient rouge fumant avec le frottement des balles de munition ? Merci ++
Best video my brother
many of those details are design choices for example: It makes little sense to waste money and dev time to make cars bounce when you jump on them in bf because it is much bigger game and such detail is implemented to show players in close quarters games that there might be player camping Same goes for aiming while climbing the ladder and bullet penetration - it would add unnecessary complexity to a game with big maps where players might be hidden in many different places
Battlefield fan thinks that the games shouldnt be immersive
@@J..0p_4nQ there is a difference between immersion and gameplay design. Why not make bf like tarkov or Arma but no one would enjoy playing something like that... It's like saying that Forza horizon doesn't have simulation like driving but rather a mix of arcade and simulation and that makes it less immersive. Except most people enjoy such gameplay design
I also hate when people make videos about "detail comparison" and they go ahead and compare mechanics. Mechanics are not some "oh cool" things you see in the game when you pay attention to them, it was a deliberate by the dev team to make things work like they are.
@@thebigsam 💯 What's more many of those details and 'extra' mechanics are a waste of money and dev time that could have been spent of removing bugs and other more important things
spotted the battlefield fan lmfao
Comparing those 'small' details doesn't make much sense cuz gameplay of COD still feels the same. By playing it i didn't notice some changes between MW 2019 and MW3.
Gameplay changes But that's about it
You need to do a comparison when the new BF drops you doing new Duty with old BF in hats not fair lol
Hold up....did you just use the APC and call it a tank? You do realize there is a light tank you could have used, right?
Everybody gangsta till you start driving a tank. Battlefield is the goat with those. Nothing to compare 🙌
mw3 looks like the best cod we got in the last 5 years since bo4 gameplay wise with mw2 being the worst
ur saying that like mw3 isn’t trying to mimic mw2019
It’s not even better than cold war...... and no new cod game will be better than mw19
@@wangslangin mw2019 sucked, good cod died with bo4.
@@wangslangin and the numbers prove it, cod is back to pre-covid player counts and its only decreasing.
@@KA-vs7nlbo4 never even met good cod
Now show flying in both games. Tank battles and bullet drop in long range with riffle.
I see all these people trying to give both of the games a participation prize. It would all be true if there wasn't battlefield 1 with the craziest graphics and details. Also Far Cry 2 had some incredible unmatched details for an open world fps game (old but gold).
As a PC player, in this type of games i really don't care about phisics and deatils, it only slows the game even more, if i want some realism i go play some tarkov, i want some fast action, most of the times u won't even have time to notice all this, in my opinion is all a waste of resources instead doing the game actually likeable and comfortable to play
Learn how to spell seriously
Why do people keep comparing these franchises, theyre nothing alike
Two games have been completing with each other for a long time since the development of fps games. But now, both of them are going down due to greedy developers who only care about their pocket. They are now completely trash
@Soldierkid2626 cod hasn't declined in popularity sadly tho so they aren't gonna change, battlefield has big time so hopefully they do
@@Hungtran0707 it was Medal of Honor and COD as rivals, once COD destroyed MOH in 2012, they’ve really just been doing their own things
@@sabresergal8989I don't remember MOH ever being as relevant as cod, we were all playing MW2 and MW3, don't remember shit about MOH, I certainly remember BF3 though
the suspension in the cars is missunderstood, cars in the future doubt about having very sensitive suspension
Mw3 graphics looks like mobile game even at max settings
Bf2042 more closer to mw19 than mw3
what are u on
BF has always had better mechanics, physics, and graphics over cartoon call of duty 😂 with modern warfare 3 due to release it will have updated physics and graphics and be a lot better. However BF2042 came out in 2021 and Isn't taking advantage of newer hardware. BF7 will be using updated physics, graphics, on a more powerful engine and only current gen consoles.
nah that wont be the case, nowdays battlefield games are just straight up garbage, only 2016 and before were good.
u can compare mw2019 with bf2042 and mw2019 will still come out on top so idk what u on about + bf2042 mechanics\Gameplay are dogshit and it is such a disappointment that this shit came from the same studio that created bf3\4 and 1
@@ilovemylife878then cod is ultra garbage today
Wait till the new battlefield comes out then do a fair comparison on the 2
car suspension without even driving one, for real.
Bf 2042 first person is weird (The arm placement)
wdym?
Agreed, BF1 arm placement was perfect ,. So much so that MWII, and now also MWIII is using a placement that looks similar.
@@DonMan_98I meant Battlefield 2042 by the way. Battlefield 4 was my mistake. Im glad you still knew what I meant.
@@angeldust4I meant Battlefield 2042
Animations/Sounds: COD Models: Battlefield 2042 Don't get me wrong, COD really outperformed Battlefield even to this day, but the constant butchering of gun models since 2019 due to legislation and licensing limitations makes 2042 a little better in portraying weapons in video games in the 2020s
So Fun in a M1A1 tank with T1 camo 😁😎 or Helicopter destruction or Brawler. Fun toys
MW III: "Car suspension works." I had to chuckle. If my car would dip like that when I entered it or climbed on it, I would bring it to the next shop asap.
MW3 seems better to me
It's not at all
@@def-po8tu then you're blind
@@ilovemylife878id say your pretty blind if you like games that are rigged and sbmm for the blueberries ...
@@a-animal1206 i dont think so because the video Is about the graphics not gameplay
lol cod fanboy cope imagine being outscored by the worst bf game yet lol
Can I play these as TPS
Mw3 multiplayer is gratis with plus?
I only see graphics better in battlefield other than that MW3 is way better🙌🏽
Graphics are way too cartoony in 2042
Mw3 has better graphics battlefield is to bright and looks unrealistic
@@mememan143 I mean other battlefield not this 2042
@@alerttrics7224 By your logic, you can compare BF5 with CoD2...
@@Arath.91 MW3 is too grey... 🤮
I think battlefield is better
Gameplay wise probably in detail matter not really
@@mememan143Who have time to study details in a online PvP if unless you are not playing?
@@V3ntilator people are picky anyway so they would probably look around for details
Me playing the match. My teammates:
Comunque le auto in Call of DUty hanno una migliore grafica pk sono utilizzabili, in Btf 2042 servono per fare da sfondo. Oltretutto in Btf 2042 l'acqua è presente in pocchissime parti delle mappe.
2042 is better
2024 looks way worse
@@mikehasfallen 7:00
Call of duty mw3 better
no way man ...check it
@@CYBERGODJTH battlefield 2042 got a lot of hate despite mw3's beta on how it looks i probably prefer that than bf2042
@@matt815bf 2042 got hate despite how good it looks
@@kevinsteelflex7371 my point exactly lol
@@matt815 ohhh i misread lol
Looks like frostbite engine is not already competitive in the next gen era. EA had to first create a new engine and only then release the service game, but they decided to save money and put everything on the old Frostbite.
Great comparison between PUBG vs PUBG!
BATTERFIELD IS BETTER
2042 is the biggest piece of dog sh!t At least Call of Duty isn't poorly optimised as Battlefield 2042, only previous battlefields were great and superior compared to call of duty but it seems like Call of Duty is starting to improve, hope battlefield next games better optimised and fix battlefield 2042 so any GPU even most low-end could run it.
@@tangdynasty4735what battlefield is better? And which one does everyone still play online the most. I might start back multiplayer
@@bigmaneastsideBattlefield 2042 is very active
@@tangdynasty4735does he know?