KZhead

Abrams Just Got Destroyed. First Abrams Loss in Ukraine

RedEffect
2024 ж. 25 Ақп.
515 403 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

It finally happened, the Abrams got destroyed. Today, we got several videos and pictures of a Ukrainian M1A1SA getting destroyed by Russians in the field.
Patreon with discord: / redeffect
Outro: "face away" - svard

Пікірлер

  • Never bring an Abrams to a washing machine and shovel fight

    @osamabinbiden01@osamabinbiden012 ай бұрын

    • У нас в России давно кончились боеприпасы. Это просто кондиционер взорвался.

      @user-fe8on5cb8d@user-fe8on5cb8d2 ай бұрын

    • Yeah, the Abrams just got "washed up"..

      @ENIGMAXII2112@ENIGMAXII21122 ай бұрын

    • lol, not as much as every single russian tank ever invented @@ENIGMAXII2112

      @xxtripleokgaming@xxtripleokgaming2 ай бұрын

    • Never bring a T-90 to a Bradley fight

      @chaosXP3RT@chaosXP3RT2 ай бұрын

    • @@chaosXP3RT Bradley in question when an Invar blows it up from 4.8km the next day:

      @MausHausOKW@MausHausOKW2 ай бұрын

  • I think they should stop calling every weapon to Ukraine a"game changer". Seriously I lost track 😅

    @loulahassan4191@loulahassan41912 ай бұрын

    • F-16 is coming , it's a game changer

      @oliverwilliam6931@oliverwilliam69312 ай бұрын

    • Lol! So many game changers... Russian forces when spot this "game changer" , they start to compete among each other, who will hit it first! So they literally hailstorm a new Western toy with everything whoever can reach it! Plus they are getting hefty money prize for the first one spoted, assisted in destruction, destruction/or capture.

      @digimaks@digimaks2 ай бұрын

    • Well, its the media keeps telling every weapon the West sends are "game changers". The media should really stop that for the betterment of everyone.

      @itzyaboimemez2074@itzyaboimemez20742 ай бұрын

    • Shovels ARE the game changer !!!!!

      @supa3ek@supa3ek2 ай бұрын

    • all western weapons go from game changer to game over in a couple of engagements, when was the last time you heard anything about Leopard1/2 or Challenger2? I cant wait for the F16 first and last mission (may be the same mission) and the silence of the main street media,

      @marosslovak7308@marosslovak73082 ай бұрын

  • They used the latest fifth generation stealth laser guided shovel to take her out.

    @soothsayer2406@soothsayer24062 ай бұрын

    • ...In between vodka and playing the balalaika

      @user-ng8qv4pd5f@user-ng8qv4pd5f2 ай бұрын

    • 😂

      @Styl.Da-ShiftFamily@Styl.Da-ShiftFamily2 ай бұрын

    • 😂 bro

      @Hooman1@Hooman12 ай бұрын

    • @@user-ng8qv4pd5f Do you still think that in Russia there is only vodka and balalaika? you're an stupid!

      @stanislavRV@stanislavRV2 ай бұрын

    • Those pre ww1 shovels are too stronk, Geneva convention should nerf them. Crazy what Ivan can do with just a shovel when promised a new washing machine and Lada.

      @KrolKaz@KrolKaz2 ай бұрын

  • Spoiler alert everybody, there is no such thing as an invincible tank. Thought that should be common knowledge.

    @eldestmochi913@eldestmochi9132 ай бұрын

    • not for the Abrams because in Hollywood and in video games they are indestructible.👌

      @Theduel5618@Theduel56182 ай бұрын

    • @@Theduel5618 In Hollywood and in video games practically everything that is American is super good and invincible, while their enemies are super evil and their stuff is made out of paper.

      @pelinalwhitestrake3367@pelinalwhitestrake33672 ай бұрын

    • @@Theduel5618 Indeed, that is true, and the same can be said for Russia with the T-90 and T-14. It seems like tanks in general aren’t necessarily becoming “obsolete”, just more of an expensive liability on a modern battlefield with weapons such as precise guided artillery, air strikes, and among many other things, of course, drones. Whether it’s in a field, forest, or city, a tank is never safe these days. Essentially, tanks are still effective… they are just a priority target of the utmost importance.

      @eldestmochi913@eldestmochi913Ай бұрын

    • ​@eldestmochi913 The tank vs anti artillery devices have always traded blows. We're just in the valley where anti artillary has the advantage. Eventually the pendulum will swing back and tanks will start nullifying most anti artillary equipment. Thems the rules, I don't make em.

      @itsreapernecrosis2215@itsreapernecrosis2215Ай бұрын

    • @@itsreapernecrosis2215 You are right about that… especially since the seasons are changing and operating conditions are improving for the tanks. I still worry about the vast minefields. They make it very dangerous for armored columns to navigate through in large numbers.

      @eldestmochi913@eldestmochi913Ай бұрын

  • Ukraine has already lost a technical vehicle based on Abrams chassis a few days ago according to a telegram footage popularly circulating a few days ago.

    @mik1984@mik19842 ай бұрын

    • Yes,by the way,thanks for refreshing the memory.I dont know why nobody is talking bout it

      @ChobeVelyasha@ChobeVelyasha2 ай бұрын

    • They have also lost Leo's disguised as combine harvesters...

      @thomaslunde5014@thomaslunde50142 ай бұрын

    • Yeah, M1150 ABV, overall tank body with a different turret. Notably also heavier armored, given its role, though I'd argue in Ukraine is the first time it had gotten any real use. Marines had them in Iraq and Afghanistan but clearing a tiny minefield of APERS mines that the Taliban laid out versus using one in an active route clearance role where your enemy has air superiority and combined arms capabilities is much different. Apparently two of those ABVs were killed during the delaying action Azov tried to fight, Russian artillery or aviation got them trying to clear routes for the retreat.

      @Esper320@Esper3202 ай бұрын

    • Yep. Its definitely bigger loss than ordinary M1A1. But cause it doesnt have a gun, it didnt received much attention.

      @davidkopecky6687@davidkopecky66872 ай бұрын

    • Its more of a due to western propaganda we dont actually get to hear whats happening tbh. Im in no ones side but to me i thik the west medias are more biased.

      @kola_bhaji4578@kola_bhaji45782 ай бұрын

  • It’s great seeing Abrams in woodland colors again instead of the disgusting desert tan

    @SlapStyleAnims@SlapStyleAnims2 ай бұрын

    • True

      @p_filippouz@p_filippouz2 ай бұрын

    • the desert one is the best one, the abrams just look good in it.

      @engineerenginering8633@engineerenginering86332 ай бұрын

    • @@engineerenginering8633 desert camo is boring.

      @p_filippouz@p_filippouz2 ай бұрын

    • The desert is how Abrams is for most people@@engineerenginering8633

      @gerfand@gerfand2 ай бұрын

    • Yeah

      @Owlzz_@Owlzz_2 ай бұрын

  • Not a surprise, Saudi Arabia and Iraq loss few Abrams. Abram is not invincible, idk why media proclaim that it's invincible.

    @originalpinoy2020@originalpinoy20202 ай бұрын

    • To boost morale. Do you not understand this?

      @AdrianFahrenheitTepes@AdrianFahrenheitTepes2 ай бұрын

    • So does the T-90M yet NAFO bots memed it to hell so it's only natural that it's Abrams' turn now 😏

      @titan_tanker@titan_tanker2 ай бұрын

    • It’s over 40 years old tank that’s hardly ever been destroyed that’s why

      @greenlamp9219@greenlamp92192 ай бұрын

    • BECAUSE THOSE ARE EXPORT VERSIONS AND THE ONES DESTROYED IN IRAQ WAS FROM FRIENDLY FIRE

      @MrDICKHEAD28@MrDICKHEAD282 ай бұрын

    • ​@@greenlamp9219 This tank met a modern enemy for the first time in 40 years. The same challenger was considered invulnerable due to the fact that it had not yet been destroyed, but when two of them burned out, they immediately disappeared from the battlefield

      @lordlol3787@lordlol37872 ай бұрын

  • Instagram already prohibits photos and videos of a burnt-out Abrams; the invincible weapon was burned too quickly by a cheap drone

    @sergiovictor7581@sergiovictor75812 ай бұрын

    • I uploaded only the photos and i was ok

      @alexanderK2700@alexanderK27002 ай бұрын

    • The only people who thought them indestructible are Russians who are deathly scared of them

      @iamyourmom2@iamyourmom22 ай бұрын

    • This is reality

      @stanislavRV@stanislavRV2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@iamyourmom2"abrams before ukraine: it is mightiest tank in the world indestructible muricaaa🤓😎" Abrams after ukraine: "No tank is invincible" Cope and cry you are one of them as well

      @alexanderK2700@alexanderK27002 ай бұрын

    • People have said for a long time, no tank is invincible not even the T90M or T14 and we have seen that as quite a few T90Ms were destroyed lately, not just the one destroyed by the drones and the Bradley @@alexanderK2700

      @AntonioDeNinno@AntonioDeNinno2 ай бұрын

  • bro activated a 500% booster

    @Hornet7581@Hornet75812 ай бұрын

    • Yes,war thunder moment.

      @BaNeBlade@BaNeBlade2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@BaNeBladeGaijin has to nerf that thing even more

      @alexanderK2700@alexanderK27002 ай бұрын

    • @@alexanderK2700 hehe,maybe.))))

      @BaNeBlade@BaNeBlade2 ай бұрын

    • Don’t use the booster lol. Cuz either your game will crash or you need to carry you team so hard.

      @sapphirelionet8752@sapphirelionet87522 ай бұрын

    • gaijin RNG is dangerous when you use that

      @cristoferrojasumana1761@cristoferrojasumana17612 ай бұрын

  • Damn this sounds like war thunder where you're 3 mins in and already in your backup tank.

    @syrez156@syrez1562 ай бұрын

    • Someone figured out the source finally, good job

      @ericthered494@ericthered4942 ай бұрын

    • You can. War thunder is basically all ABOUT comparison. @@Blondoneve

      @SuspiciouslyGroomedPegasus@SuspiciouslyGroomedPegasus2 ай бұрын

    • Dude is about to be revenge CASd by a Corsair

      @Atesz222@Atesz2222 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Blondoneve If you want to know something about tanks, play war thunder 😂

      @VIPER276@VIPER2762 ай бұрын

    • @@Blondoneve Its an apt analogy.

      @streuthmonkey1@streuthmonkey12 ай бұрын

  • Когда подбили Т-90 с fpv дронами и 2 Брэдли, который спас экипаж американцы смеялись над танком Когда подбили Абрамс они начали ныть, что оказывается вместе с Абрамсом должен был быть в комплекте 3 апачи 1 пехотный полк и 1 авианосец

    @CENTURION0305@CENTURION03052 ай бұрын

    • Bro you were saying the same thing

      @GrindThunderer@GrindThunderer2 ай бұрын

    • Как бы ты не относился к этому, но замечания американцев вполне обоснованы, уровень организации США и Украины совершенно разный, как и уровень вооружения, если американцы делают упор на воздушное господство, то украинцы делают упор на активную оборону, так как у россиян превосходство в воздухе (прошу заметить не господство, а превосходство), огневой мощи и в живой силе.

      @burtsev_anatoly@burtsev_anatoly2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@burtsev_anatoly Господство в воздухе против России и США с Китаем это непозволительная роскошь. Прошу это заметить =) К тому же если у одной стороны в воздухе что-то появляется раз в месяц, им намного легче сбивать с земли тех у кого постоянно что-то в воздухе и зеркально с другой стороны. То есть если у одной стороны постоянно что-то в воздухе, им сложнее сбивать вражескую цель=) И как у вас ужилось наступление с активной обороной ? А давайте лучше тогда назовём это пассивным наступлением =)

      @SuperTpyc@SuperTpyc2 ай бұрын

    • @@SuperTpyc бро.. я добавлю это в свой словарный запас "пассивное наступление". в словарик запишу себе.. а лучше на стенке выгравирую.. это прям хорошо.

      @Stormidze@Stormidze2 ай бұрын

    • @@burtsev_anatolycat profile picture 😂 don’t get it twisted friend, the Russians have absolute air supremacy, they have defeated the combined efforts of NATO to stop their air forces, they have adapted and are now the masters of twenty-first century hyper-advanced warfare. There is no sugarcoating.

      @blooddixmond@blooddixmond2 ай бұрын

  • rip 7k sl

    @wzr3293@wzr32932 ай бұрын

    • The worst part of war; going back to your commander and saying you're out of SLs for the repair costs. I still have PTSD from that.

      @Juel92@Juel922 ай бұрын

    • Don't forget going to the Forums and complaining about how the Abrams is not as good as it is in real lfie.

      @pilotman9819@pilotman98192 ай бұрын

    • ​@@pilotman9819Tbh Abrams in war thunder is pretty good. Good reload, good shell, good mobility but average Armour but teams are bad as hell

      @bluebud169@bluebud1692 ай бұрын

    • @@bluebud169the worst thing in the Abrams in war thunder is the players who play it. Anything else about the abrams is pretty good

      @harellevi3810@harellevi38102 ай бұрын

    • ​@@bluebud169 thats level 10 M1 KVT player for you, they are everywhere 😞😞

      @radityabudimansyah1240@radityabudimansyah12402 ай бұрын

  • I just lost the battle in an Abrams. Now all the credit and XP boosters I used have gone to waste. My winrate is going down due to a shovel.

    @militaryhatsguide8725@militaryhatsguide87252 ай бұрын

    • Proceeds to pull the Wolfpack with bushes on it 😂

      @alexanderK2700@alexanderK27002 ай бұрын

    • I just lost my only gold booster because of a shovel.

      @DumbRotate2@DumbRotate22 ай бұрын

    • Using all XP booster is a rookie mistake

      @thenasiudk1337@thenasiudk13372 ай бұрын

    • Should have bought premium

      @kornet001@kornet0012 ай бұрын

    • @@kornet001 "Your Premium has been expired"

      @DumbRotate2@DumbRotate22 ай бұрын

  • Doesn't really suprise me since anything can be destroyed in a conflict

    @awagwa@awagwa2 ай бұрын

  • We should not be shocked. A M1A1 Abrams was destroyed in 2003 in Iraq, form what I understand to be an RPG-29. If an RPG-29 could take out an Abrams tank, then it would be no problem for a t-90 tank round, or modern Russian ATGM, or even the artillery and drones that seem to be everywhere in the Ukraine right now. From the picture of the destroyed M1 Abrams, we can see that the ammo must have cooked off, blowing out the blast panels. Given that we see smoke coming out the crew hatches, tells me that the fire got into the crew compartment. There are two ways this could have happened. One is that the fuel tank got hit, and the set of the fuel. And the other is that blast door form the turret to the ammo storage was opened when it got hit.

    @andrewnelson4148@andrewnelson41482 ай бұрын

    • Right now 3 Abrams were destroyed. 1 by a cheap drone Upyr that costs 500$. 2nd one by a con inaction of antitank rpg and a drone. The 3d one was destroyed by a modernized T-72 today.

      @kamizumoku@kamizumoku2 ай бұрын

    • Only one M1 was lost in Iraq and that was due to a missive IED that turned the whole 4 lane road into a crater. Crew all survived that by the way. The others such as the one your talking about were only disabled, NOT destroyed, and later repaired. As far as I know all those disabled by RPGs were hit from above to the top of the engine bay where nearly all tanks have embarrassingly thin armor. Tank being taken out by a top down attack does not mean anything regarding tank vs tank combat.

      @Thorgon-Cross@Thorgon-Cross2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@Thorgon-Crossтолько танки редко встречаются с другими танками

      @user-lc4kn3gq3g@user-lc4kn3gq3gАй бұрын

    • @@Thorgon-Cross Multiple US Army M1s were "destroyed" in Iraq, however I only recall one penetrated by enemy fire (hull armor penetrated by tandem warhead RPG) That tank if I recall correctly remained in service. Most losses were due to engine fires caused by damaged APU fuel tanks.

      @boogerhooks@boogerhooksАй бұрын

    • @@kamizumoku I bet those Abrams tanks were alone with no support (like what happens all the time with the tanks we give Middle Eastern countries).

      @andyfriederichsen@andyfriederichsenАй бұрын

  • It's actually second if we count that demining modification of Abrams lost a few days ago...

    @bdleo300@bdleo3002 ай бұрын

    • Да? Что за модификация? В России об этом вообще ни слова не было. Просветишь?

      @user-kz5co3gu4j@user-kz5co3gu4j2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-kz5co3gu4jIt was a mine trawl based on Abrams

      @lordlol3787@lordlol37872 ай бұрын

    • @@user-kz5co3gu4j Хотел скинуть ссылку, но не нашел. Пару дней назад было видео с подбитой модификацией Абрамса, у которого впереди ковш для расчистки мин.

      @1Know1tHurts@1Know1tHurts2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-kz5co3gu4j it was a mineclearing Tank some time ago. It was just the chassis of an Abrahams

      @minnihd6470@minnihd64702 ай бұрын

    • Было. Инженерная машина на базе обэмы была потеряна. Не помню из-за чего, но точно сгорела.​@@user-kz5co3gu4j

      @jebediahkerman3826@jebediahkerman38262 ай бұрын

  • I swear it was only a couple of days ago we saw the first combat footage of this tank in Ukraine

    @yaraelpoof7242@yaraelpoof72422 ай бұрын

    • yessir

      @delirious3911@delirious39112 ай бұрын

    • 2 days exactly Superior American engineering Well its still beter than leos and bradleys who were destroyed in great numbers in the first day of use,aswell as challenger. Abrams survived for 2 days,tho its unfair it wasnt counteroffensive

      @ChobeVelyasha@ChobeVelyasha2 ай бұрын

    • @@ChobeVelyasha I hope you are no older than 15 otherwise you are r-worded.

      @Juel92@Juel922 ай бұрын

    • war where thousands of russian tanks have been knocked out. its war. Iraqis lost multiple abrams against insurgents. Use the thing correctly@@ChobeVelyasha

      @gopnik9967@gopnik99672 ай бұрын

    • @@ChobeVelyasha They're also not using them in large numbers throwing them into minefields.

      @viktoriyaserebryakov2755@viktoriyaserebryakov27552 ай бұрын

  • “Crew still survived” strongest ukrainian argument

    @birdonplate0520@birdonplate05202 ай бұрын

    • weakest*

      @mpkid5@mpkid52 ай бұрын

    • @@mpkid5It’s easier to replace a tank than the crew.

      @daleksaan935@daleksaan9352 ай бұрын

    • crew still survived meanwhile 100k death poll

      @neymarjr_.@neymarjr_.2 ай бұрын

    • Why does nobody realize that yeah they get out, but that does not mean they escape the battlefield alive and not captured

      @gamingwolf6735@gamingwolf67352 ай бұрын

    • Because the Russian armoured vehicles like to transport their crew into orbit

      @rezo6212@rezo62122 ай бұрын

  • 2 Russian men decided to close the mortgage, and demolished Abrams

    @user-rv8ps1fw5h@user-rv8ps1fw5h2 ай бұрын

    • Просто показали,что Американское оружие -это полное дерьмо😂😂😂

      @user-ys4qx6jl8y@user-ys4qx6jl8y2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-ys4qx6jl8y, как там Сергей Котов на днище морском со своим экипажем поживает 😂? А то от них только бульки слышны 😂. А ваши аналоговнетные Т-90 прорывы, которых уже уничтожили около 5 шт ? Вы почему-то старые абрамсы преподносите, как супер-пупер неуничтожимое оружие.

      @kingpeleskov7808@kingpeleskov78082 ай бұрын

    • ​@@mikhailprosto9042 а что это за прикол про лопату?

      @callmekrutoy@callmekrutoy2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@callmekrutoyНу а как же, ведь у Русских заканчиваются боеприпасы на протяжении целого года, нет снаряжения, а из оружия у них лопаты ... И вот Русские отбили Бахмут без боеприпасов с лопатами в руках, так ведь они еще и наступали на оборонявшихся Окраинцев обученных по стандартам НАТО с полной современной экипировкой от стран НАТО. Так потом еще и сдержали натиск наступавших трёх сотен современных танков из НАТО, которые были успешны разобраны с помощью сапёрных лопат.

      @-uned-4217@-uned-42172 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-ys4qx6jl8yT-90 turret goes flying

      @Dude_bruh@Dude_bruhАй бұрын

  • ATGS - Anti-Tank Guided Shovel

    @frododiddledeebipedybopedy9840@frododiddledeebipedybopedy98402 ай бұрын

    • On rpg7

      @nicolasolton@nicolasolton2 ай бұрын

    • ATCS - Anti Tank Combat Shovel

      @user-xk8mq5ic9k@user-xk8mq5ic9k2 ай бұрын

    • "Try shovels next time. They are better at armored encounters" Lev S. Kennedydov, somewhere in the uncivilized part of Europe

      @RenanMendes-zd8hj@RenanMendes-zd8hj2 ай бұрын

    • Gaijin take notes please✍️

      @alexanderK2700@alexanderK27002 ай бұрын

    • i remember a soldier from the war who shot rpgs at the enemy with a schovel as a round

      @cptshitters@cptshitters2 ай бұрын

  • "If Abdul in sandals can blow it up, so can Yuri with his shovel" - KZhead's most dangerous historian Edit : I had to add the shovel thing after Yuri; now it's perfect. I can sleep well.

    @monax2130@monax21302 ай бұрын

    • A "legend" for a reason

      @dragonstormdipro1013@dragonstormdipro10132 ай бұрын

    • NAFO ... NAFO everywhere

      @patriotenfield3276@patriotenfield32762 ай бұрын

    • Lmao

      @Chris-rs4so@Chris-rs4so2 ай бұрын

    • Смешно !!! Привет от Ивана

      @user-eq6rp8mc7z@user-eq6rp8mc7z2 ай бұрын

    • Who is it

      @Reichsritter@Reichsritter2 ай бұрын

  • It got destroyed before I known it was deployed

    @Hensg@Hensg2 ай бұрын

  • Самовозгорание. Наверняка кондиционер взорвался.

    @vvp_rus@vvp_rus2 ай бұрын

    • 🤣🤣🤣

      @toliklisiy5868@toliklisiy58682 ай бұрын

    • sosi dyra

      @Momentoman@Momentoman2 ай бұрын

    • @@Momentoman ghri huy bandera

      @vvp_rus@vvp_rus2 ай бұрын

    • Просто мехвод узнал что его жинка делает в Польше и у него сгорела дупа.

      @metalkefir591@metalkefir5912 ай бұрын

    • 🥓🥓🥓​@@Momentoman

      @KasKusOK@KasKusOK2 ай бұрын

  • The internet when a T-90/T-80/T-72 gets destroyed: 😂🗑️🤣 The internet when an Abrams gets destroyed: *"the woodlands camo sure does look nice today."* *"Theres no such thing as an invisible tank right guys?"*

    @Tsirkon@TsirkonАй бұрын

    • Its literal cope

      @kanestalin7246@kanestalin7246Ай бұрын

    • Putin simps when Russia destroys a NATO tank: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! Get ready for the victory parade! Meanwhile NATO: we got thousands more of those and we can build thousands more if we wanna.

      @giovannifoulmouth7205@giovannifoulmouth7205Ай бұрын

  • In fact, it was already the second Abrams destroyed within a few days. the first was the M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle

    @crazyidea83@crazyidea832 ай бұрын

    • Losing an engineer track is ... sadly expected breaching is fucking hell.

      @TheCollector1987@TheCollector19872 ай бұрын

    • the whole process will be automated i think russia has a few of those robots @@TheCollector1987

      @blue_ish4499@blue_ish44992 ай бұрын

    • Good call

      @MrDarthBudda@MrDarthBudda2 ай бұрын

    • especially sicne assault donctrine is pretty much jsut go in a straight line behind it losses are expected sadly @@TheCollector1987

      @williamjepson04@williamjepson042 ай бұрын

    • how many Ts got destroyed again ? oh oké well over a 1000 right ? you people seem to forget that

      @JuniorJuni070@JuniorJuni0702 ай бұрын

  • Those russian shovels are no joke

    @josephkush1032@josephkush10322 ай бұрын

    • Get ne jokes seriously pls

      @RAEJDER@RAEJDER2 ай бұрын

    • Noooo, its meant to be an game changer

      @gigihgigih9192@gigihgigih91922 ай бұрын

    • @@RAEJDER These americans sure know how to build expensive bbq grills.

      @malthus986@malthus9862 ай бұрын

    • @@RAEJDER Its not a joke tho. western sources literally claim they are out of ammo and are using shovels a year ago haha

      @ymroo8299@ymroo82992 ай бұрын

    • @@RAEJDER so space program jokes are new?

      @TheRealGazebo@TheRealGazebo2 ай бұрын

  • Another M1A1SA Has Been Destroyed Today

    @AutherComrade@AutherComrade2 ай бұрын

    • and another M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle

      @user-zz9ug3fb8g@user-zz9ug3fb8g2 ай бұрын

    • Almighty shovel boys!

      @user-sc8uk4dv8s@user-sc8uk4dv8s2 ай бұрын

    • The difference between equipment made for war and expensive tech demos made for profit. :D Russia makes equipment that can easily be maintained and repaired on the field. And if lost, easily replaced. The west makes expensive luxury cars that need higly trained crews and constant care and in the end underperform under stress. In protracted conflicts "Good enough in plenty of numbers" will always defeat "excellent but in small numbers". Russia can replace lost equipment. The west can't

      @andrews.5212@andrews.52122 ай бұрын

    • @@user-sc8uk4dv8smay I ask where this shovel thing came about? I’m curious😂

      @Infidel108@Infidel1082 ай бұрын

    • ​@Infidel108 it was UA propaganda shit like: Russia dont have weapons so they go in charge with shovels, also they lie abot russians stealing washingmachines 😂

      @erdeni2349@erdeni23492 ай бұрын

  • How many "game changer" did Ukraine have already? ._.

    @khangduongtuanan616@khangduongtuanan6162 ай бұрын

    • hình như 31 bạn, bay mẹ nó 3 rồi :penguin:

      @Alek_AN@Alek_AN2 ай бұрын

    • STILL WAITING ON THE F-16 "GAME CHANGER" 🤣🤣

      @MrDICKHEAD28@MrDICKHEAD282 ай бұрын

    • “Game changer” you’re saying that the Abrams/Leapord/HIMARS is a wonder weapon that could kill entire continents with one shot. They aren’t I hate that people call these weapons game changers. They’re just weapons meant for a purpose of course some will be destroyed they aren’t fucking invincible. And this war itself is the most fucking ass backwards mess I’ve been around to experience the fucking war on drugs was more successful than this pathetic excuse for genocide AND I MEAN BOTH SIDES Ukraine is NOT innocent from refusing surrenders on the Russian side to just drop grenades on wounded soldiers via FPV

      @Goober762@Goober762Ай бұрын

  • Not even 24 Hours after its spotting. Sheesh that was brutally fast. What's bad is that black smoke coming out of the Commander and Gunner hatch. That will take weeks to repair or even just trashed and replaced.

    @pilotman9819@pilotman98192 ай бұрын

    • It's actually second if we count that demining modification of Abrams lost a few days ago...

      @bdleo300@bdleo3002 ай бұрын

    • months battle damage especially the electronics is going to require manufacturer level repairs. or at the least us contractors in the rear with a ship load of spares. they are not repair friendly

      @matthewgibbs6886@matthewgibbs68862 ай бұрын

    • Old video from Afghanistan. Next!

      @lostbirdsproduction@lostbirdsproduction2 ай бұрын

    • Actually slow. But I guess Russians didn't have antitank weaponry there where first one was spotted.

      @FBugle@FBugle2 ай бұрын

    • They got more than one... supposedly a full battalion

      @TopShot501st@TopShot501st2 ай бұрын

  • All those American weapons appear to be invincible only to countries that don't have the technological means to destroy them. Not a single one of those weapons is indestructible.

    @charles-iii6759@charles-iii67592 ай бұрын

    • You’re forgetting the gulf war

      @CloNeKiD321@CloNeKiD3212 ай бұрын

    • @@CloNeKiD321I’m pretty sure that the most modern Abram’s were fighting against one of the first iterations of the t-72

      @verzache-@verzache-2 ай бұрын

    • @@verzache- the Iraqi made ones weren’t even made with armoured plate, just mild steel, like rolling platforms for drivetrain testing & demo vehicles

      @mickvonbornemann3824@mickvonbornemann38242 ай бұрын

    • A weapon can be destroyed. Yeah, is that a shock to anyone?

      @Lili_Chen2005@Lili_Chen20052 ай бұрын

    • And who told you that American vehicles are invincible? Kremlin clowns and propaganda monkeys? Every tank however advanced still can be destroyed. The question is, how well will he fare, and how much he will accomplish untill the destruction. Also don't forget about the crew safety. From what I've read and seen, the western tanks, BMP, and troop carriers like Maxxpro have quite a high crew survivability, which can't be said about Russian vehicles.

      @1LERS1@1LERS12 ай бұрын

  • I can't wait to see the discord around this. I mean it's just an Abrams a great tank yes, but just an Abrams. I'm getting tired of people treating any and all Western weapons like some fantastic wonder weapon 20 years ahead of it's time, and then getting shocked when it's destroyed by a former tier 1 military.

    @jasminna2768@jasminna27682 ай бұрын

    • In Ukraine, children are named after American weapons)

      @kostar.2749@kostar.27492 ай бұрын

    • The tanks are replaceable the crew is not

      @GrindThunderer@GrindThunderer2 ай бұрын

    • @@kostar.2749 it describe ukranians only

      @user-wh4yr9oy8s@user-wh4yr9oy8s2 ай бұрын

    • It’s because western tanks have turrets on them after ammo cook offs. Oh and western missiles have a +- range of a few metres, rather than kinzhals accuracy of +- 18 miles

      @ArmUkraine@ArmUkraine2 ай бұрын

    • 1 abrams is worth 3k T series and 350 aircraft plus an entire black sea navy fleet! Sounds like 3 day smo back on track orc

      @leonleeoff2216@leonleeoff22162 ай бұрын

  • I find it strange how often tanks are isolated in this conflict.

    @Drownedinblood@Drownedinblood2 ай бұрын

    • How fast, how far & how long can you walk on foot? If you look at US & IDF tank warfare, they too don't always have infantry around their tanks especially when in the open. The tanks burn gallons of fuel per minute, they'll run out of fumes if they waited for you most of the time. Having infantry around sometimes get more KIA from enemy fire and landmines.

      @jayjay53313@jayjay533132 ай бұрын

    • @@jayjay53313 You don't understand what I mean. I mean they are totally isolated...like there isn't even another tank overwatching it, or even another vehicle that doesn't have to be a tank.

      @Drownedinblood@Drownedinblood2 ай бұрын

    • @@Drownedinbloodor infantry tanks are bad ass but with out air or infantry it is easier to take out

      @staybraaapin3464@staybraaapin34642 ай бұрын

    • @@Drownedinblood this dumb war is filled with obsolete military vehicle going out in the middle of open field with zero air/ground support/recon. What ever happen to combat coordinate, what happen to all the military exercise that show perfect combination of multiple forces???? I haven't seen once, just a vehicle gone to the middle of nowhere just to get blasted by UAV. I dont care anymore at this point, this is how military combat happened in reality, just UAV and bombard the shit out of each others.

      @peachout6227@peachout62272 ай бұрын

    • Welcome to combat in 2010+, where having multiple vehicles together is often worse. Hard to remain unnoticed in an armored column, and what is killing almost all tanks in this war? drone aimed artillery and suicide drones. Better to be alone and less likely to be spotted. War changes so fast in the 21st century@@Drownedinblood

      @spetsnaz892@spetsnaz8922 ай бұрын

  • "This abrams had no strategic meaning".

    @Korovkin_Pavel@Korovkin_Pavel2 ай бұрын

    • Like others

      @user-ek5uv9dv2q@user-ek5uv9dv2q2 ай бұрын

    • Actually tanks doesnt have strategic meaning in modern wars, especcially m1 cuz it lacks everything that required to modern tanks. So Artillery and drones rules the battles

      @AkyJLa_@AkyJLa_2 ай бұрын

    • I mean, its a single tank. It literally doesnt.

      @fredthefish581@fredthefish5812 ай бұрын

    • 😅

      @torkilvold3855@torkilvold38552 ай бұрын

    • isn't this the same argument that ruskies constantly make about the mobiks?

      @fkoffrtrd@fkoffrtrd2 ай бұрын

  • Do you guys also notice that the NAFO kids belive on a "separate health bar" theory? Like... no matter the state of the tank, they will say that the crew pull out alive and the tank still recoverable.

    @eermirosemh8339@eermirosemh83392 ай бұрын

    • They know this how? Even the video uploader is correct in saying you don’t know without more information, and he’s right. For all we know the hatch blew open, or on the opposite end, maybe the crew evacuated and burned the inside of the tank to make it unrecoverable for the enemy.

      @AdrianFahrenheitTepes@AdrianFahrenheitTepes2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@AdrianFahrenheitTepesthe Russians posted how they get that tank , the ammo got detonated and the crew is gone

      @Giganibba511@Giganibba5112 ай бұрын

    • @@Giganibba511 so its basically a uranium coffin dam

      @theyseeyou7283@theyseeyou72832 ай бұрын

    • @@theyseeyou7283 exactly.

      @Giganibba511@Giganibba5112 ай бұрын

    • @@Giganibba511Is there video? In a tank like the abrams with blowout panels, ammunition detonation does not neccessarily mean the crew got killed.

      @planterion7969@planterion79692 ай бұрын

  • idk why anyone is surprised, this aint desert storm, they don't have all the things that prevented any abrams from being lost.

    @franklinclinton3211@franklinclinton32112 ай бұрын

    • Many seriously overestimate that tank, taking the Gulf War as a example, but they don't understand that Russian isn't Iraq and Ukraine isn't the US

      @MrTarka34@MrTarka342 ай бұрын

  • Dam that was quick

    @communistbiased8986@communistbiased89862 ай бұрын

    • 2 days in service and blastin better then leo or challenger 10/10 american engineering

      @ChobeVelyasha@ChobeVelyasha2 ай бұрын

    • @@ChobeVelyashaBet the crew survived unlike most of the Russian tanks that have their turrets pop when hit

      @LibertyorDeath1787@LibertyorDeath17872 ай бұрын

    • ​​@@ChobeVelyashait didnt really blast to me, the tank is lost. But no turret flying in the air, you could not say that for a russian tank.

      @optic_wt@optic_wt2 ай бұрын

    • been following these telegram videos, It was spotted moving to the front line about 1 week ago in avdivka direction. and then was spotted on the frontline 2-3 days ago lobbing shells, when they( ruskis) said "abrams hunts commences" meant some of them were on it. Literally hours later not even 24hrs, we got reports there were hits and damages by a lancet drone strike on the abrams

      @delirious3911@delirious39112 ай бұрын

    • ​@@optic_wtthings russians do for autoloaders

      @chudthug@chudthug2 ай бұрын

  • The mighty abrams stands no chance against the unstoppable might of the shovel

    @wombatuser@wombatuser2 ай бұрын

    • Do they really tell you that Russia is fighting with shovels?

      @AplayYouTube@AplayYouTube2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@AplayKZheadI think it was sarcasm. Everyone knows that Russia has one of the best weapons in the world.

      @legalalien7009@legalalien70092 ай бұрын

    • @@legalalien7009functional, as for the best well that really depends on who you ask literally every comment thread is an argument lol

      @Huckleberry68@Huckleberry682 ай бұрын

    • @@AplayKZheadyes. It’s stupid fact😂

      @9l_ectb_rpyht_wotb290@9l_ectb_rpyht_wotb2902 ай бұрын

    • @@legalalien7009Russia has good weapons but they can’t fucking use them correctly

      @HanzTheODST@HanzTheODST2 ай бұрын

  • Result of 20 years propaganda machine. Lots of people flabbergasted when their "god" tank burned 😂

    @renwoxing7788@renwoxing77882 ай бұрын

    • Lasted longer than both the Leo 2 and challengers it was on the front for over a month and wasn’t destroyed, also remember the T90M vs Bradley, and like the 4 T90Ms that were destroyed like 2 weeks ago

      @AntonioDeNinno@AntonioDeNinno2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@AntonioDeNinno The T90M is actually seeing frontline combat unlike the Abrams which the Ukrainians are hiding

      @kanestalin7246@kanestalin72462 ай бұрын

    • @@kanestalin7246still ahbrams is a better tank

      @Bluebottlenose@Bluebottlenose2 ай бұрын

    • @@Bluebottlenose No one truly knows which tanks are the best. All we have is a bunch of biased fan-bois battling it out online is a rather pathetic display of chest-pounding bravado.

      @thechloromancer3310@thechloromancer33102 ай бұрын

    • lol. RUssia destroyed 1 tank.

      @user-ft3zf2nj8n@user-ft3zf2nj8n2 ай бұрын

  • Wow! What a game changer!

    @oompalumpus699@oompalumpus6992 ай бұрын

  • Shovel 1 : Abrams 0

    @ericp1139@ericp11392 ай бұрын

    • 😂 Cool

      @raze9197@raze91972 ай бұрын

    • Russia has lost over 3000 shovels before they were able to destroy a single Abrams.

      @snaileri@snaileri2 ай бұрын

    • 😂😂😂😂😂😂 guess you never heard of desert storm 😂😂😂😂😂😂. More like shovel-1 Abrams-2000 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 cope mudder flubber cope

      @smyers820gm@smyers820gm2 ай бұрын

    • @@snaileriat least 300000 and near 1000 washing machines

      @austinpowers7030@austinpowers70302 ай бұрын

    • ​​@@snaileri The whole strength of American weapons is that they are not used, but only praised. The same applies to all US technologies. Country - advertising

      @ita4iu@ita4iu2 ай бұрын

  • ⁠The National Interest wrote: “Jun 27, 2023 - The American Abrams in particular is known to be battle-proven and virtually indestructible.” And it got destroyed by FPV.

    @TS-vn2fc@TS-vn2fc2 ай бұрын

    • That is an abrams from the 1980s, those have been destroyed by Hajis in the middle east with much less than an FPV drone.

      @kappakappa19@kappakappa192 ай бұрын

    • ​@@kappakappa19the M1A1SA is from 2000s

      @SergyMilitaryRankings@SergyMilitaryRankings2 ай бұрын

    • National Interest and Defense Express, two of the biggest propaganda pieces.

      @SergyMilitaryRankings@SergyMilitaryRankings2 ай бұрын

    • @@kappakappa19An Abrams from 1984 and 2024 will be destroyed in the exact same way. Stop acting like tank tech has had huge advances since the M1A1 initially came out

      @fim1344@fim13442 ай бұрын

    • Who the fuck says it’s invincible? No one said it’s invincible only just better

      @HanzTheODST@HanzTheODST2 ай бұрын

  • bravo druze ❤, ti si odlican, zaista profesionalan posao obavljas, koje si godiste ?

    @user-yi7gm8jg7q@user-yi7gm8jg7q2 ай бұрын

  • hey man can you do a video on the vt4? you havnt done a video about a tank in some time. would be nice

    @MrOrbitzHD@MrOrbitzHD2 ай бұрын

  • Opinionologists: The Abrams M1 was the tank that took the longest to be destroyed ☝🏻🤓 And how many days had he been in combat? Opinionologists: It was his first day 😭

    @lyonvillareal7583@lyonvillareal75832 ай бұрын

    • Wasn’t the first day, it was fighting in Avdiivka for over a month

      @AntonioDeNinno@AntonioDeNinno2 ай бұрын

    • @@AntonioDeNinno How would you know. All we know for certain is that it was destroyed days after first being spotted or recorded. It could've been commissioned but nowhere near the front you don't know

      @off6848@off68482 ай бұрын

    • ⁠@@AntonioDeNinnoIt hid there for months and was used to make Videos. 😂

      @nam3less14@nam3less142 ай бұрын

    • Танки Абрамс с октября месяца на войне.. за пол года один танк 😂😂😂.. Каждый день российские таки запускают башню в небо!!!

      @mikhaileskola3581@mikhaileskola35812 ай бұрын

    • ​@@mikhaileskola3581на какой войне они с октября? Их прятали до февраля, чтобы не просрать. Но провал в Авдеевке вынудил использовать даже их и вот результат

      @dodgex6592@dodgex65922 ай бұрын

  • Lazerpig is rolling rn

    @TinyBearTim@TinyBearTim2 ай бұрын

    • Rn?

      @nicolasolton@nicolasolton2 ай бұрын

    • right now@@nicolasolton

      @tanker12999@tanker129992 ай бұрын

    • Good.

      @marcks-3980@marcks-39802 ай бұрын

    • ​@@nicolasoltonI think he means- RIGHT NOW - but I am not sure.

      @dragicadjuric3635@dragicadjuric36352 ай бұрын

    • But why lazerpig?

      @ka3ax85@ka3ax852 ай бұрын

  • Was the tank operating alone? Did it have 2 Bradleys and several squads with it? I'm no military expert, but isn't it the case that all vehicles are sitting ducks if not advanced with complimentary support?

    @AstonSubstantive@AstonSubstantive2 ай бұрын

    • That's only in tight urban warfare or hugging tree lines. This was being used as artillery indirect fire from 3km behind the front

      @off6848@off68482 ай бұрын

  • One more Abrams (3rd) destroyed today by Russian T72B3 tank with video-proof. The Kornet missile flies at the Abrams, but a moment before the missile the tank is hit by a heat shell from a Russian tank.

    @user-gf3yh4pe7p@user-gf3yh4pe7p2 ай бұрын

    • I love when there is evidence of the Russians taking out Abrams tanks but never any of them getting past the Patriot System. Nice to know our allies can't use our tanks well but the Patriot System is so good yet so old.

      @Khajiidaro@Khajiidaro2 ай бұрын

    • @@Khajiidaro Today 4 Patriot launchers were destroyed using Iskander-K, there is a video

      @user-gf3yh4pe7p@user-gf3yh4pe7p2 ай бұрын

    • @@Khajiidaro Bro... bad news

      @marcusmt4746@marcusmt47462 ай бұрын

    • @@user-gf3yh4pe7p Or you need a doctor.

      @grigor.h3929@grigor.h3929Ай бұрын

  • Abrams got destroyed before i even knew it was delivered...

    @djs.m.d.r.a.5993@djs.m.d.r.a.59932 ай бұрын

    • Superior american engineering and its wunderwaffel tank Abrams is being destroyed faster then its being deployed

      @ChobeVelyasha@ChobeVelyasha2 ай бұрын

    • Little Dimitri ran off to cancun ^

      @dirt-kw7cy@dirt-kw7cy2 ай бұрын

    • @@ChobeVelyashaWhy are you replying to every comment, are you angry that Russia is losing a war it expected to win in just a few days?

      @uumok7748@uumok77482 ай бұрын

    • You're super late or out of touch with the conflict then! Because 31 Abrahams were delivered in September 2023, they've been in Ukraine for half a year already and this is the first one destroyed.

      @PluvioZA@PluvioZA2 ай бұрын

    • @@ChobeVelyasha literally no American calls the Abrams a "wonder weapon"

      @Just_A_Random_Desk@Just_A_Random_Desk2 ай бұрын

  • Goodbye 7k Silver lion, and what's worse is it don't have enough SL to repair 😢.

    @fritzmordred4874@fritzmordred48742 ай бұрын

    • he doesn't have enough rp to spawn in CAS either 😥

      @rxzxqx6982@rxzxqx69822 ай бұрын

    • 100 billion SL package to Ukraine when?

      @GENERICNICK-kj4lm@GENERICNICK-kj4lm2 ай бұрын

    • @@GENERICNICK-kj4lm how about 100 billion golden eagles to buy all premium tank , heli ,. jet and premium time xD

      @annguyenlehoang7779@annguyenlehoang77792 ай бұрын

    • not gonna lie, for the US M1 Abrams is a reserve vehicle.

      @micklenier6152@micklenier61522 ай бұрын

    • Nothing a little bit of tape can't fix, that and some paint...

      @comdr@comdr2 ай бұрын

  • Are the UA M1s running APU in the bustle? It seems like most M1s knocked out in Iraq were from APU fuel tanks being damaged and starting fires in engine compartment

    @boogerhooks@boogerhooks2 ай бұрын

  • the smoke inside the turret is from the ammo cooking off because it gets toasty in there and the hatch for the ammo if its air tight probably had the rubber seal melted.

    @lorddeathofmurdermountain76@lorddeathofmurdermountain762 ай бұрын

  • A stealth tank that no one saw appeared and was immediately destroyed

    @altar771@altar7712 ай бұрын

    • Sorry, we didn't know he was invisible.

      @user-hv4vl5qk1u@user-hv4vl5qk1u2 ай бұрын

    • Rabid anti-Americans celebrating lol. Nobody cared when Leopard, Challenger, T-90, etc got destroyed. But they kill 1 Abrams and all the America hating Brits slither out of the woodwork to act smug. It's so gross lol. Also, nobody ever claimed it was the best tank ever. US military actually points to the latest Merkava tanks as the me most modern MBTs.

      @Snack-Sized-Femboy@Snack-Sized-Femboy2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-hv4vl5qk1uwell then that changes everything🤣

      @kriptoanalitika@kriptoanalitika2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-hv4vl5qk1uI understood that f117 reference🤣🤣

      @AZ-dj1ni@AZ-dj1ni2 ай бұрын

  • You have been preparing for two years to be destroyed by a shovel in the first 20 minutes of the battle...

    @bobigorg1665@bobigorg16652 ай бұрын

    • Welcome to the real war

      @user-lz8qo2ie7s@user-lz8qo2ie7s2 ай бұрын

    • Imagine being hit by a missle..

      @unknownname6519@unknownname65192 ай бұрын

    • @@unknownname6519 2700 Russian tanks don't have to imagine...

      @Just_A_Random_Desk@Just_A_Random_Desk2 ай бұрын

    • You were there and had a timer on which counted exactly 20 minutes, wow astonishing

      @tetispinkman9135@tetispinkman91352 ай бұрын

    • @Just_A_Random_Desk Why not 20,000 at once?

      @bobigorg1665@bobigorg16652 ай бұрын

  • From the 2 plumes, and placement on the chassis (both centralized) one was the ammo storage and the other was from the crew compartment. The engine area wouldnt burn that violently, and the closeup looks like fire spilled onto the engine bay, rather than coming from inside it.

    @deven6518@deven65182 ай бұрын

  • Abram’s blow panel is the weak point now. Drone attack against it would blow the ammunition and the tank can’t fight without shell. The crew might escaped but the tank was disabled and put out of fight.

    @rinsonator1668@rinsonator16682 ай бұрын

    • If the blowout pannel was damaged, the crew didn't escape. They became barbeque. The explosion from the ammo detonation will seek the path of least resistance. If that door is intact, that will be breaking through the weaker rear turret. If the door is pierced, then it will leak into the tank, essentially cooking the crew the same way the russians get cooked by those big ammo detonations. The blowout pannel means nothing if it is compromised.

      @alexmaximus9134@alexmaximus91342 ай бұрын

    • @@alexmaximus9134 according to physics law. The panel has less resistance as it was designed. Even it was hit by suicide drone from the top. It will react like ERA but more force. The crew will survive for sure but it can’t deny that Abrams is weak against drone attack now. May be multi layers of space armor would help for fastest and cheapest way to adapt.

      @rinsonator1668@rinsonator16682 ай бұрын

    • @@rinsonator1668 when i said pannel, i meant the one that separates the crew from the ammo. If that is damaged, the crew stand no chance. When ammo ignites and/or detonates, that blast will seek the path of least resistance. With the pannel compromised, the path of least resistance is the hole between the ammo and the crew. If the pannel is intact, then the plates connecting the ammo with the outside of the tank will give in, as they are weaker than the pannel. Hopefully now you have a better understanding of the situation.

      @alexmaximus9134@alexmaximus91342 ай бұрын

    • @@alexmaximus9134 Oh I see.

      @rinsonator1668@rinsonator16682 ай бұрын

    • @@alexmaximus9134That one is… inside the turret? It isn‘t any easier to hit than the carousel ammo rack of a T-series tank… which is also an instant kill… how is the abrams more vulnerable to drones?

      @planterion7969@planterion79692 ай бұрын

  • When Russian tank is destroyed after months of fighting: "haha, useless junk" When Abrams gets destroyed the moment it rolled on the battlefield: "the tank did its job"

    @verriosh.f.d.3763@verriosh.f.d.37632 ай бұрын

    • And the classic "it is not invincible"

      @priyansnhughosh4431@priyansnhughosh44312 ай бұрын

    • Celebrating one Abrams lost when Russia in 2 years has 2759 tanks visually confirmed lost. Yes "months of fighting". Of which 64 of the most modern T90M, 126 of the very modern T80BVM, over 650 of the modern T72B3M. Everybody knows the Abrams is not invincible.

      @yungpindakaas@yungpindakaas2 ай бұрын

    • Months of fighting you mean getting destroyed in a first push?

      @tetispinkman9135@tetispinkman91352 ай бұрын

    • im not trying to defend any side here but dont you think ukraine would have similar losses if they had the assets? the reason ukraine doesnt seem to lose much is because they dont have much to begin with@@yungpindakaas

      @viejitaloca2810@viejitaloca28102 ай бұрын

    • @@yungpindakaas Don't mention the actual numbers! It's bad for all the reaction farming bots!

      @Just_A_Random_Desk@Just_A_Random_Desk2 ай бұрын

  • The Abrams was no match against kitchen appliances and iron shovels

    @Russian_Waifu@Russian_Waifu2 ай бұрын

    • No democracy?(

      @ChobeVelyasha@ChobeVelyasha2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@ChobeVelyasha managwd democracy is not democracy

      @user-iv8ky5qi4n@user-iv8ky5qi4n2 ай бұрын

    • @@user-iv8ky5qi4n It is. I will report you to Super Earth officials traitorous socialist

      @Stormyy6310@Stormyy63102 ай бұрын

    • @@user-iv8ky5qi4n *Angry Helldiver players want to know your location!*

      @RandoGrunt@RandoGrunt2 ай бұрын

    • @@ChobeVelyasha Who need democracy when we got free shovel.

      @Emays24@Emays242 ай бұрын

  • what is the name of the song in outro?

    @fatcat4674@fatcat46742 ай бұрын

  • Abrams 0 - 1 Shovel.

    @benhaloho8231@benhaloho82312 ай бұрын

    • Abrams 0 - 3 Shovel😂

      @tipersonic@tipersonic2 ай бұрын

    • Ещё граблей не было и мотыги! Вот охуете когда на них наступите🤣

      @user-sc8uk4dv8s@user-sc8uk4dv8s2 ай бұрын

    • 0-3

      @alexeys.8010@alexeys.80102 ай бұрын

    • HIMARS VS SHOVEL kzhead.info/sun/nc2RnpGFe2uFraM/bejne.htmlsi=lt0H1BMG5nE5Zuvi

      @thegermanball9336@thegermanball93362 ай бұрын

    • ​​@@user-sc8uk4dv8sПо моему по граблям ВЫ скачете выкрикивая: "Хто нэ скачет, тот москаль. Москаляку на гиляку." Аборигены вать машу.

      @user-lc4kn3gq3g@user-lc4kn3gq3gАй бұрын

  • Let's praise the holy Russian shovels (also motherboards from microwaves and washing machines)

    @elkapusto2414@elkapusto24142 ай бұрын

    • the death Korps of Krieg approves the shovel

      @justacomment1657@justacomment16572 ай бұрын

    • That shovels is terrifying,don't want to be in the end of any of that 🏃‍♂️

      @larryfoulke1596@larryfoulke15962 ай бұрын

    • You forgot air conditioneers (=

      @user-ek5uv9dv2q@user-ek5uv9dv2q2 ай бұрын

    • 😆😆😆

      @lewisray2697@lewisray26972 ай бұрын

    • fill me in on the shovel jokes

      @obamajoker7166@obamajoker71662 ай бұрын

  • I kind of find this ironic how people have been shitting on Russian tanks for the past war, only to find out that their superior 10 million dollar "wunderwaffe" tanks like the Leopard 2 and this Abrams performs identical in the same exact combat scenario.

    @spimpsmacker6422@spimpsmacker64222 ай бұрын

    • US Abrams have trophy. Also why no slat armour on the top like Israeli and Russian tanks.

      @rupertbe@rupertbe2 ай бұрын

    • NAFO redditors when you tell them that irl plot armour doesn't exist

      @antoniodelaugger9236@antoniodelaugger92362 ай бұрын

    • Russian tanks were shit on because of how lethal they are to their own crews when they get hit. Turret tossing and all that. But if I'm talking to Russians, I can see how they don't perceive that as a negative. Life is cheap after all.

      @sprolyborn2554@sprolyborn25542 ай бұрын

    • identical to what? you don't have any numbers LOL

      @bluemeriadoc@bluemeriadoc2 ай бұрын

    • @@sprolyborn2554 life is cheap on both sides. That tank didn’t have cope armor. Seems like only the Israelis work to keep their tanks protected

      @rupertbe@rupertbe2 ай бұрын

  • Cheers!

    @mikahakinen6106@mikahakinen61062 ай бұрын

  • *loud metal pipe crashing to the ground sound*

    @itsyaboiwan6416@itsyaboiwan64162 ай бұрын

  • Calling Abrams a game changer is like calling Biden a competent president.

    @just_a_turtle_chad@just_a_turtle_chad2 ай бұрын

    • Real presidents would use the Abrams to forcibly stay in power

      @MattA-fi5qe@MattA-fi5qe2 ай бұрын

    • engagement farming bot

      @Just_A_Random_Desk@Just_A_Random_Desk2 ай бұрын

    • or you an actual user.

      @daxtertalon4@daxtertalon42 ай бұрын

    • They would be in numbers. If US would have sent say 800 of them, then they probably would not be game changer, but meaningful upgrade/force multiplier... but 31 I mean c'mon that is literally a token force in the war with 1000s of tanks and over million people.

      @lp9280@lp92802 ай бұрын

    • dude just shut the fuck up, I see you on every video commenting the same thing

      @iota515@iota5152 ай бұрын

  • Washing mashines so far destroyed Abrams M1A1, Bradleys IFV, Patriot and HIMARS launchers. Next up ----- F16.

    @milostomic8539@milostomic85392 ай бұрын

    • Neither himars or patriot have been destroyed past a state which it can’t be repaired. The difference between reds and the west is that we send our 90s era tanks with the expectation that they will be destroyed. Meanwhile orcs will believe their T-90M is invincible only for it to be disabled by 25 mm guns.

      @swguren@swguren2 ай бұрын

    • And who is going to repair them in Ukraine?No one. They will send damaged equipment to Poland or Germany.That will cost time and Ukraine has no time. Meanwhile Russia is making tanks while Ukraine is receiving them from NATO countries. What is the cost of one Bradley M2A2?Between 4 and 5 M dollars I heard.What is the cost of one Kornet missile?6,000 dollars. War isn't just about destroying stuff, but about making stuff as well. Ukraine completely depends on foreign aid, country is running out of men and is running out of time.

      @milostomic8539@milostomic85392 ай бұрын

  • Bravo!!!

    @ivo2563@ivo25632 ай бұрын

    • 3000 tanks gone 🤡

      @user-hr1uw4cj2z@user-hr1uw4cj2z2 ай бұрын

  • The fact that Abrams was by itself with no support to speak of is concerning.

    @crimsonxdevil4988@crimsonxdevil4988Ай бұрын

  • For me, it is really weird when seeing this tank but not in desert !

    @FabioH47@FabioH472 ай бұрын

    • Abrams for the first time in his life saw armed Russians, not barefoot Afghans

      @ioopi12@ioopi122 ай бұрын

    • @@ioopi12 there poor people who fight for their life, their home but always be called by rebel or terrorist. "War feeds war-maker"!

      @FabioH47@FabioH472 ай бұрын

    • ​@@FabioH47yeah but the thing is I will never side with a muslim shouting colonialism when they sit in Constantinople,Antioch most of Armernia etc They can whine all they want if they give back all the historical lands of christians

      @calebmcallister4289@calebmcallister42892 ай бұрын

    • ​@@FabioH47 I have no pity for Islam after all there religion demands death or forced conversion to the disbelievers then they cry when we do it to them its Hypocrisy

      @calebmcallister4289@calebmcallister42892 ай бұрын

    • ​@@calebmcallister4289 wasn't they should also returned "Constantinopel" to ancient Greeks if we used your logic?

      @imanuelc143@imanuelc1432 ай бұрын

  • I remember an article from Warrior Maven saying the Abrams would beat the T-14 and that "the mere presence of the Abrams can act as a deterrent" I'm not joking

    @SergyMilitaryRankings@SergyMilitaryRankings2 ай бұрын

    • I mean... this event doesn't negate that claim in any way, did this Abrams get taken out by a T-14 or something?

      @bodybag22@bodybag222 ай бұрын

    • @@bodybag22 it's obvious you don't know much about tanks, abrams is 3rd gen, T-14 is 4th, this is like saying an F-14 is better than a F-22. T-14 beats 3++ Gen SepV3 9-4 in relevant categories. Check my bio for full details

      @SergyMilitaryRankings@SergyMilitaryRankings2 ай бұрын

    • @@bodybag22 also if you think an Abrams is a dETeRrAnT then you are just delusional. Check my bio and read my essay Truth About War and US Military Part 2 for full details

      @SergyMilitaryRankings@SergyMilitaryRankings2 ай бұрын

    • @@SergyMilitaryRankings That doesn't mean anything... a gen 2 tank could potentially take out a gen 4 tank, no tank is invulnerable, these vehicles are being taken out by several hundred dollar drones, do you honestly think a T-14 would fair any better in the same situation? Absolutely not.

      @bodybag22@bodybag222 ай бұрын

    • @@bodybag22 it literally does, T-14 is a technologically better tank. Simple as that. An F-22 could be destroyed by a MiG-25 but regardless it's still a better aircraft

      @SergyMilitaryRankings@SergyMilitaryRankings2 ай бұрын

  • There's a Abrams got destroyed by a T-72B3 today

    @cursedpikachu7644@cursedpikachu76442 ай бұрын

    • The abrams that the US is sending is watered down, they don’t want them having the armor they actually use because it’s top secret, making it less effective.

      @cough9584@cough9584Ай бұрын

  • So apparently a 3rd one was recently destroyed in a 1v1 shoot out with a T-72B3. as for this one it was apparently tracked with an RPG then destroyed with a drone, the second was hit by 2 RPG teams who flanked it each side, knocked off the tracks then shot out the ammo storage. I also heard in one of the reports on the second Abrams the "this time the crew escaped" so I assume the crew was KIA in the 1st one, but that's certainly far from confirmed.

    @pcfree4994@pcfree49942 ай бұрын

  • @RedEffect bro can you cover the T-55 M6???

    @denden8425@denden84252 ай бұрын

  • The information has changed in recent days. Documented over the last few days. Ukraine lost 3 M1A1 Abrams inglorious at once: The first Abrams was hit from an RPG by a fighter with the call sign "Dawn" and he received a monetary reward. The second Abrams was damaged by the drone's FPV and was finished off with an RPG. The last Abrams was shot down from an ambush by a Russian Kornet. Two engineering vehicles at the Abrams base were lost, the vehicles were unable to properly demonstrate their potential. Also on this day 05.03.24 Ukraine lost the Himars MLRS from the impact of the Russian Tornado-S.

    @haljordanwithm6077@haljordanwithm60772 ай бұрын

    • the 3rd was also apparently destroyed in a 1v1 fight with a T-72B3 so there goes the "well all tanks are vulnerable to drones and artillery" argument

      @pcfree4994@pcfree49942 ай бұрын

    • The abrams that the US is sending is watered down, they don’t want them having the armor they actually use because it’s top secret, making it less effective.

      @cough9584@cough9584Ай бұрын

  • There's no hope in repairing that. It was left in Berdachi village and that village is now under Russian control

    @kieffer9705@kieffer97052 ай бұрын

    • The Russians might tow it away and copy its design

      @SolaireKnight434@SolaireKnight4342 ай бұрын

    • ​@@SolaireKnight434For what? Russian tanks are much better. Rather, they will study it to know its vulnerabilities

      @firegirl24@firegirl242 ай бұрын

    • ​@@SolaireKnight434зачем? Что бы сделать огромный медленный сарай. Да у него отличная лобовая броня, но артеллери, авиации и дронам на нее плевать, ведь бьют в крышу или борт.

      @kosiposha.1803@kosiposha.18032 ай бұрын

    • @@firegirl24 Russian tanks are better? Really O please tell us all how being slower, reloading slower, having less armor, lower range, worse targeting systems, less accurate, easily blown up ammo with no blow out panels, etc, etc is somehow better.

      @Thorgon-Cross@Thorgon-Cross2 ай бұрын

    • @@Thorgon-Cross your arguments are wrong, you need to watch CNN less

      @firegirl24@firegirl242 ай бұрын

  • From what i'm seeing in the images shown. The Abrams looks pretty repairable if it is retrieved in some way.

    @DSillius@DSilliusАй бұрын

  • You know they will say that tank has to be retrieved and go in a mission to get it out of the enemies hands to use for making new stuff.

    @Runt8887@Runt88872 ай бұрын

  • 4 Abrams tanks have been destroyed as of 3/5/24

    @newerty1294@newerty12942 ай бұрын

    • The abrams that the US is sending is watered down, they don’t want them having the armor they actually use because it’s top secret, making it less effective.

      @cough9584@cough9584Ай бұрын

  • Well, are we surprised at all, drones have already proven that the tank will be weak if not outright obsolete. No tank is invincible.

    @TheBICBOIChannel@TheBICBOIChannel2 ай бұрын

  • I quite like how Red impartially interprets every Sirs of information :)

    @piker78@piker782 ай бұрын

  • The dreaded “so-called” best Abrams tank was found founding. Its awesome reputation is simply the Best Tank in the world. The US and the western media touted the Abrams as the game changer along with the Leopard tanks and the Challenger tanks as one of the most capable tanks in the planet. Some say it is the best tank ever. It is a game changer and its reputation is beyond comparison. So much hype over nothing as the Abrams bite the dust in the war zone just like any other tanks.

    @paultsjan6047@paultsjan60472 ай бұрын

    • Yeah, no tank is invincible but only about 15 western tanks have been fully destroyed after several months of combat, compare that to like the 4 T99Ms destroyed last week

      @AntonioDeNinno@AntonioDeNinno2 ай бұрын

    • @@AntonioDeNinno Dude they lost 15 Leopards in one day in Bradley square alone

      @off6848@off68482 ай бұрын

    • @@AntonioDeNinno Bro can't even get the right name for the tank

      @gamingwolf6735@gamingwolf67352 ай бұрын

    • That's a lie dude, nobody ever said game changer but people with no military experience, stop being fucking stupid

      @TwistedTeaToTheFace@TwistedTeaToTheFace2 ай бұрын

    • Yeah anyone that thought none would be lost is delusional. But just because two tanks can get destroyed by the same weapon doesn‘t mean one isn‘t more capable than the other.

      @planterion7969@planterion79692 ай бұрын

  • What baffles me on both sides is the lack of infantry support when deploying tanks on the battlefield not that they could’ve done much of anything to stop the fpv drones.

    @chrisholcar6278@chrisholcar62782 ай бұрын

    • this is not for you to fight with civilians in sandals

      @kxxx6548@kxxx65482 ай бұрын

    • Почему не бывает пехоты? В основном танки это больше поддержка самой пехоты, уничтожение огневых точек и быстрого ухода обратно в безопасное место- «дал дал и ушёл», чтобы артиллерия не разнесла танк в клочья. Я бы тоже хотел увидеть пехоту вокруг танка бегущая со скоростью 50-70 км/час😂 другое дело в жилых массивах, там уже другая песня

      @timmurk2976@timmurk29762 ай бұрын

    • @@timmurk2976yes, But putting a Tank with no assistance is very stupid, no? It would be more effective to pair it with a bradly, leopard, challenger or any other Tank or APC

      @MountainManPhil@MountainManPhil2 ай бұрын

  • Lazerpig inhaling copius amounts of copium right now

    @freetime5803@freetime58032 ай бұрын

    • Why? What's the matter?

      @carotte9581@carotte95812 ай бұрын

    • Man, I guess the pig was right about the trolls on his back, lol

      @openthinker6562@openthinker65622 ай бұрын

    • No? He's even said that an Abrams WILL BE lost no matter what. And nobody here should be surprised that it happened, and will keep happening.

      @murmenaattori6@murmenaattori62 ай бұрын

    • 😂😂😂

      @City1Tiger@City1Tiger2 ай бұрын

    • this is an industrial war, a first one since decades. ANY tech or weapon sent there will die, the question is how much time is needed. Even if you pull a tank from 2100 you could probs destroy it by sabotage, setting up an underground a charge with remote control after tracking its movements and it goes boom

      @warbrain1053@warbrain10532 ай бұрын

  • M1A1 Abrams Production started in 1985 and continued to 1992. M1A1SA (Situational Awareness) Upgrades similar to AIM v.1 tanks + new third generation depleted uranium armor components. Configuration for the Royal Moroccan Army, which is almost identical to the Australian variant, except exportable turret armor is installed by General Dynamics Land System to replace the DU armor.

    @GodKitty677@GodKitty6772 ай бұрын

  • the fpv drones with rpg warhead will never stop to blow my mind, imagine installing separate ai target spotting on the drone, and you dont even need to be close or be afraid of jammers, you can just send hundreds of these drones in the direction of enemy and it will be adisaster

    @maratpirate6343@maratpirate63432 ай бұрын

  • This was totally unexpected since acording to the 49th nafo tiktok brigade "the abrams will clap any russian it sees" and "its invincible becaus no 30yo outdated and undermaned T72 has been able to defeat it in its many years figthing extreemly infirior insurgencies"

    @kuunoooo7293@kuunoooo72932 ай бұрын

    • Thank you for setting up a strawman. And you did this under a video posted by a channel known for its objective takes. Since we are at strawman arguments. What happened to that A50 recently shot down? $350 million gone.

      @rpgta@rpgta2 ай бұрын

    • Saw some article claiming an Abrams tried to scuttle another Abrams in Iraq or something by shooting it in the rear and the dart apparently just bounced off. Tank must be made of vibranium or something.

      @viktoriyaserebryakov2755@viktoriyaserebryakov27552 ай бұрын

    • Yeah we all care a lot about Tiktok takes. They're right up there with military analysts and retired generals.

      @Juel92@Juel922 ай бұрын

    • @@ZoomerStasi Another strawman. But what happened to the dozens of visually confirmed lost T90Ms and the hundreds of T72B3Ms? You see? I can keep this up all day. Because it is much easier for me to provide you visual proof for 50 destroyed tanks than death certificates for hundreds of thousands of people. Do you want some more? I don't even know why you comment under a channel that is known for objective takes? Are you a kid in his mother's basement, stealing wifi from his neighbor, or are you a troll?

      @rpgta@rpgta2 ай бұрын

    • @@viktoriyaserebryakov2755 Usual BS propaganda. If anyone actually believes in indestructible or miracle weapons, is either a kid, in which case it's OK, or is seriously challenged, or just plain dumb.

      @rpgta@rpgta2 ай бұрын

  • A lot of people talking about shovels for some reason. A tank gets hit and some get destroyed. That's war. People on both sides of this conflict act like this one Abrams is the only thing holding the line

    @zeni104@zeni1042 ай бұрын

  • Can you do a video of the South African ratel apc/ifv

    @Heokleis@Heokleis2 ай бұрын

  • You guys think he will do a video on the recently first confirmed loss of a HIMARS system?

    @Aperson13314@Aperson133142 ай бұрын

    • ​@@mikes989full video has detonation with rockets flying around.

      @Suhov@Suhov2 ай бұрын

    • @@Suhov what you said is the latest, totally confirmed one, Im talking of a different, some days back. there is another one , on thermal image, but is hard to say

      @mikes989@mikes9892 ай бұрын

  • Correction this is the first recorded Abrams destroyed in Ukraine. It is quite possible many more Abrams have been destroyed that have just never been verified with video footage

    @danielwu7238@danielwu72382 ай бұрын

  • Turns out Abrams is not invincible. What a shocker, americans are probably bawling their eyes out over their invincible freedom machine

    @Sira_Kackavalj@Sira_Kackavalj2 ай бұрын

    • No tank is invincible and saying it is obsolete because one was destroyed after nearly 1 month of frontline duties in Ukraine is a lot better than how long a new platoon of T90Ms lasts on the front

      @AntonioDeNinno@AntonioDeNinno2 ай бұрын

    • No one even thought it was invincible you idiot.

      @carlvanlugpin9984@carlvanlugpin99842 ай бұрын

    • Wow almost like no tank is invincible 😳😲😮

      @cough9584@cough9584Ай бұрын

    • @@AntonioDeNinnoI never said it was obsolete. I just find it funny how many americans are brain washed into thinking their freedom fighting machine is invincible

      @Sira_Kackavalj@Sira_KackavaljАй бұрын

  • To be expected from old worn out tanks that have prolly been damaged before seems how the ones we sent were in storage since like the early 2000

    @hunterwilson6703@hunterwilson67032 ай бұрын

  • Nah dude, no hull breeches its repairable. We did that to a lot during gwot. It'll be interesting to hear about the crew. Just a quick look and limited info available I'd say they were able to evacuate.

    @mtmadigan82@mtmadigan822 ай бұрын

    • Perhaps they managed to jump out, but drones hunt not only tanks, but also people

      @kostar.2749@kostar.27492 ай бұрын

    • @@kostar.2749 i didntny

      @mtmadigan82@mtmadigan822 ай бұрын

  • Are we surprised

    @sabelodavhana1057@sabelodavhana10572 ай бұрын

    • Well its kinda surprise I mean leos,chally and bradleys were destroyed on their first day of combat,and abrams survived for 2 days American engineering proved superior again

      @ChobeVelyasha@ChobeVelyasha2 ай бұрын

    • For those with a thinking brain? No it isn’t. For NAFO fanboys? Yes

      @lucks4fools978@lucks4fools9782 ай бұрын

    • @@lucks4fools978 thing is, nafo fanboys usually own a functioning brain compared to vatniks

      @sapiensiski@sapiensiski2 ай бұрын

  • >gAMe cHaNGer >Pulls out old M1a1 Abrams out of the shelves >Got instanstant destroyed in middle east by some poor crew experience

    @jamesedwardladislazerrudo1378@jamesedwardladislazerrudo13782 ай бұрын

    • Rabid anti-Americans celebrating lol. Nobody cared when Leopard, Challenger, T-90, etc got destroyed. But they kill 1 Abrams and all the America hating Brits slither out of the woodwork to act smug. It's so gross lol. Also, nobody ever claimed it was the best tank ever. US military actually points to the latest Merkava tanks as the me most modern MBTs.

      @Snack-Sized-Femboy@Snack-Sized-Femboy2 ай бұрын

    • Is a month on the front instant?

      @AntonioDeNinno@AntonioDeNinno2 ай бұрын

    • ​@@AntonioDeNinnoThey only deployed Abrams like 3-4 days ago

      @slavicemperor8279@slavicemperor82792 ай бұрын

    • @@slavicemperor8279 first 31 abrams deployed in Ukraine was 5 month ago, report in frontline was 2 month ago, first footage in combat 5 day ago and first destroyed 1 day ago

      @KrisstyPark@KrisstyPark2 ай бұрын

    • @@KrisstyParkIt's barely been used and kept back. We all know why.

      @CyrilSneer123@CyrilSneer1232 ай бұрын

  • I'd be interested to see the crew survivability rates between western and Russian tanks.

    @sidwainhouse@sidwainhouse2 ай бұрын

    • You can look at the passability. And for some reason, where Russian tanks pass with ease, Western tanks are not able to pass

      @nikitashulmin1883@nikitashulmin18832 ай бұрын

  • ‘NO SMOKING LAW.’ Please.

    @MrBravo048@MrBravo0482 ай бұрын

  • Are they still saying that Russian gear could not hit the side of a barn..? He who laughs last, laughs the best...

    @ENIGMAXII2112@ENIGMAXII21122 ай бұрын

    • Pretty sure they were talking about the horribly inaccurate cruise missiles. I‘ve never heard anyone say a Russian tank gun or ATGM couldn‘t hit a tank what are you talking about

      @planterion7969@planterion79692 ай бұрын

  • my thousght on that are: it got hit from behind with an atgm or with an heat round so it penetrated the fuel tank and fuel leaked inside the tank and burnt it out or it got hit behind the turret and its shockwave and explosion made the fuel catch fire and also cooked the ammo

    @MrUnchinged1@MrUnchinged12 ай бұрын

  • Its almost like tanks have become obsolete

    @chairmanxina2338@chairmanxina23382 ай бұрын

  • Red Effect knocked out another Abrams with an anti-tank missile, please do an analysis

    @Stependiya@Stependiya2 ай бұрын
KZhead