The Best Alternative to a Light Jet - the TBM960

2024 ж. 28 Сәу.
125 957 Рет қаралды

If you want to purchase a TBM 960, you must be willing to shell out 4.8 million dollars for the standard version. The price of the aircraft exceeds $5million with customizations. And do you want to know what the estimated cost of a flight per hour is? Well, it is around 1,100 dollars. While the TBM 960 is a standout aircraft in the single-engine turboprop segment, it is not the only heavyweight representative; one of its closest competitors is the Epic E1000. The performance characteristics are quite similar; the Epic E1000 started commercial production in 2020, so it is a modern and recent aircraft. It is powered by a Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-67 turboprop engine, which equips a 4-bladed Hartzell propeller with full reverse. It achieves a maximum cruise speed of 325 knots, although its recommended flight speed is 265 knots for best fuel economy. Depending on the speed at which it operates, its range varies between 1,385 and 1,650 nautical miles. Also, its service ceiling is 34,000 feet, slightly higher than that of the TBM 960. Although the TBM 960 and the Epic E1000 are one-to-one competing aircraft, they are intended for different audiences, and that is evident in their prices. As the Epic E1000 is a kit option, its cost is significantly lower than the TBM 960, at around 2.25 million dollars.
#Turboprop #DaherTBM #TBM960
Chapters
00:00 - Introduction
02:00 - Exterior/Design
03:55 - Interior
06:35 - Engine
08:20 - Performance
09:20 - Avionics
10:01 - Systems
10:33 - Variants
13:38 - Market
16:50 - Cons
18:03 - Pros
19:02 - Conclusion
_________________________________________________
To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
_________________________________________________
Our channel is about Aviation.
We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.

Пікірлер
  • Dahah 😂 Please bash me here 👇👇👇

    @Dwaynesaviation@Dwaynesaviation Жыл бұрын
    • To quote Homer J Simpson, Dooooohhhhhh!

      @aircuda3697@aircuda3697 Жыл бұрын
  • Daher have taken two amazing aircraft and transformed them far beyond their original concept. The TBM from a Mooney design. The Kodiak 300 took the 100 into the next level. Daher took the cutting edge and made it stronger and sharper than ever.

    @michaelshaw8370@michaelshaw8370 Жыл бұрын
  • IMHO it makes more sense to compare it to the Pilatus PC-12 than to the Epic.

    @abc2662@abc2662 Жыл бұрын
  • Best lookin single I've ever seen Now I just have to win on bingo nite.

    @philiporourke7896@philiporourke78963 ай бұрын
  • I'm sure you know by how its "day her". LOL Lower cost option, how about Piper? Then there is the versatile Pilatus. The TBM once was a Mooney. The design changed hands a couple times and ended up with Daher. It's made in Tarbes, France. They got the name TBM from TarBes Mooney, TBM. I believe they are the fastest of the bunch, and have a lot of dedicated owners. At that price point, your getting close to Slowtation (Citation) territory. 8) They are a great airplane!! 8) --gary

    @gtr1952@gtr19522 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for a great video. The pronunciation of Daher is closer to Dah Er or Dah AIR, more or less. It is most certainly not DA HA.

    @michaelwatt5007@michaelwatt5007 Жыл бұрын
  • Excellent video! Well done sir!

    @pilotpeego1820@pilotpeego1820 Жыл бұрын
  • HELLO, The Epic E1000 GX is FAA type certified aircraft back in 2021, yeah they started as kit back in 2005. Do some exacting comparison, it sure would be interesting. The Epic will appeal to a different kind of buyer and it will hold a price advantage around 1 million USD over the TBM which is about right for a newer manufacturer without the number of units sold and in operation. Still, a valid competitor.

    @mikolaygrudzien8764@mikolaygrudzien8764 Жыл бұрын
    • Totally! I would actually still prefer an Epic E1000 GX over a TBM. I particularly love the fact that the Epic houses an engine of 1200 horsepowers, which is a lot more powerful than the TBM 960s’ turbine. 👍

      @southernlights3682@southernlights368211 ай бұрын
    • ​@@southernlights3682uh. The epic is a turbine as well... it's just a different variant of the PT6 turbine

      @slpater1@slpater17 ай бұрын
  • French planes are the best!❤ Falcon too!

    @randyreynolds1045@randyreynolds104510 ай бұрын
  • Nice Video :)

    @iygeal@iygeal Жыл бұрын
  • It's not DAHA ,it's DA AIR .

    @jme104@jme104 Жыл бұрын
    • No, it’s DA HA! They got famous for their hit “Fly on me!”

      @tacodias@tacodias2 ай бұрын
  • I often see guys walking towards this plane with a briefcase in one hand and a porta-potty under the other arm. I also see them walking towards their Pilatus. With a briefcase in one hand and a box of chocolates for the mistress in the other.

    @mlo5083@mlo50834 ай бұрын
  • I think Daher could look at lengthening the fuselage and widening the cabin a bit to put a legit independent lavatory in.

    @americanpatriot27@americanpatriot274 ай бұрын
    • Especially for the price point

      @Tousanx@Tousanx3 ай бұрын
  • I'll take two thanks.

    @rabidbigdog@rabidbigdog6 ай бұрын
  • Holy Guacamole! You should have named it Sexy Beast.

    @degraham9198@degraham9198 Жыл бұрын
  • If I had a few million to spend on a turboprop I would purchase the TBM 900, it has all the major airframe upgrades without all the fluff and added cost: 5 blade composite propeller, drag reduction features, winglets, redesigned engine intake, the full 850 SHP available on take off, longer range, faster speed, pilot door standard, redesigned exhaust stacks gained 2 kts speed, etc. All the drag reductions Daher did would equal an additional 50 HP. Plus the Garmin G1000 glass cockpit.

    @chrisdaniel1339@chrisdaniel13397 ай бұрын
  • Was that payload number after full fuel or total?

    @kwplumber@kwplumber Жыл бұрын
  • good

    @user-xl6gj8fx1v@user-xl6gj8fx1vАй бұрын
  • oh yes , i want my one too

    @adalbertohernandez5390@adalbertohernandez53907 ай бұрын
  • Now put a trailing link landing gear in it and it won't be like landing a shopping cart.

    @armyranger9346@armyranger9346Ай бұрын
  • DAHA! I knew it! 😂

    @shiz778@shiz7784 ай бұрын
  • Good thing I’m not wealthy, because- cool as this plane is- it’s tiny and I’m a big guy. I would be crammed in like a sardine 😢

    @ditto1958@ditto19589 ай бұрын
  • Dahah -- Robovoice

    @vnyc88@vnyc8810 ай бұрын
  • Virtually everything you say about Epic is incorrect. They haven't done kits for many years, their present model is certified and has twice the useful payload at max fuel fuel than the TBM. All the numbers of the TBM you have given are half lies. For instance the TBM maximum speed uses almost twice the fuel at the recommended speeds which are much lower. You'll never use those speeds unless you are in fire or something worst.. This video is either paid by TBM or made by someone who has no idea of aviation.

    @FIREFLYCLASS@FIREFLYCLASS Жыл бұрын
    • probably, and the PC 12 is similarly priced and has two additional passenger seats, near the same if not more cargo capacity, and a lavatory

      @Adumzzinthehouse@Adumzzinthehouse Жыл бұрын
  • Whats the essence of having a 4.8million plane without an actual lav especially with a out 2000miles of range...it's crazy...

    @Cptkelvin@Cptkelvin3 ай бұрын
  • The pilatus pc12 ngx is very Best, because have lavatory, and fly rangue is 3500 km, and is more beautyful ,

    @robertolachica1691@robertolachica1691 Жыл бұрын
  • Daha DAha where did you learn to read?

    @sector7offshore@sector7offshore8 ай бұрын
  • I like the TBM 960 but... If I won the Lottery today I wouldn't buy one.. Personally I love twin engine aircrafts also the TBM in my opinion isn't wide enough.. If you were to take the TBM Fuselage and split it in half Vertically from the nose and add that half onto the current fuselage.. I was thinking I a Twin engine up front cold air intake for the engines in the center and exhaust out each side. Wings Wider by 2 feet ish and longer by 8 feet. In my 1000 gallon fuel total 350 each wing and a center tank of 400 gallons. Total Passenger at 6 with two pilots but enough left over for cargo and that sort of thing.. I really think Dual engines whether mounted at the nose of the plane or on the wings would also increase the Cruising speed. Idk Just brainstorming love the electronics love the auto throttles and autopilot system love the Heating/A/c unit anti ice system along with all the other features.. If cabin isn't pressurized I would recommend Pressurized cabin up to 45k feet. The plane looks great but a twin engine like I mentioned for business class or utility use would be the best.. Oh and handicap Accessibility mounts on the floor for passengers that may be in a Electric Wheel chair example my electric wheelchair is a Quantum Q6 Edge HD The chair itself weights 350lbs plus my weight puts it in around 800 lbs so the capability to be flexible would be great on weight. Also some sort of chair lift design to bring the electric chair on board the craft.

    @LorenTedford@LorenTedford8 ай бұрын
    • "The chair itself weights 350lbs plus my weight puts it in around 800 lbs" so your weight is 450lbs? Then I get why you want it to be wider. Most people are not that wide and don't need it that wide. They like the andantage of having a smaller aircraft from the outside, though nobody would complain about it beeing "bigger on the inside"

      @dannyfar7989@dannyfar79896 ай бұрын
    • @dannyfar7989 The other issue is the low ceilings being almost 6 foot with head protection gear.

      @LorenTedford@LorenTedford6 ай бұрын
    • ​@@LorenTedford Those of exceptional mass width and height will want a vehicle that offers exceptional space and pay the price. For averagesized person the size is not an issue, people fly little Cessnas and Ultralighs too, this one is faster and a little bigger.

      @dannyfar7989@dannyfar79896 ай бұрын
  • The best looking single engine GA aircaft on the market in my opinion is the Diamond DA50. I'd love to see Diamond bring a turboprop to the market.

    @FiveTwoSevenTHR@FiveTwoSevenTHR Жыл бұрын
    • I hope that Chinese company goes bankrupt.

      @pistonburner6448@pistonburner6448 Жыл бұрын
    • @@pistonburner6448 why?

      @FiveTwoSevenTHR@FiveTwoSevenTHR Жыл бұрын
    • @@FiveTwoSevenTHR What do you mean why?? I guess you never were taught ethics, or don't live in the West. Because Diamond Aircraft Industries is Chinese, they work for PLA and CCP.

      @pistonburner6448@pistonburner6448 Жыл бұрын
    • @@pistonburner6448 I hope Diamond becomes the best GA company

      @FiveTwoSevenTHR@FiveTwoSevenTHR Жыл бұрын
    • @@FiveTwoSevenTHR I hope your family is the first to the camps.

      @pistonburner6448@pistonburner6448 Жыл бұрын
  • Id definitely buy one… if i won the lottery and had an extra 5 mill to burn.

    @cjoller2701@cjoller27017 ай бұрын
    • You going to buy one and store it in a hangar?? what about cost to upkeep, try $at least $1/2 mil a year??

      @tonylam9548@tonylam95484 ай бұрын
  • Otto Celera will crush this in every category. My fingers are crossed.

    @getit9066@getit9066 Жыл бұрын
    • Ewww, it won’t crush it in looks

      @superskullmaster@superskullmaster Жыл бұрын
    • @@superskullmaster That sentiment is why you probably can't afford one.

      @getit9066@getit9066 Жыл бұрын
    • It will first have to make into production.

      @fifi23o5@fifi23o511 ай бұрын
  • What? No lavatory? At 4.8 million ---> That fact is absurd!

    @tuffitout2568@tuffitout2568 Жыл бұрын
    • There’s a lavatory option, but it takes one seat away

      @samviation@samviation11 ай бұрын
    • At that price it comes with a blonde one.

      @VirgilHawkins1@VirgilHawkins17 ай бұрын
    • Ridiculous!! Why can’t they put 6 sqfoot space more by lengthening the plane and correspondingly increase engine power? How much more it will cost

      @MrRajeshkpy@MrRajeshkpy2 ай бұрын
    • To use the lavatory, simply open the pilot’s door. 😂😂

      @planetetelios9748@planetetelios97482 ай бұрын
    • Juse a trash can, that always work for me..cheap. and you can throw your shit out in the air.

      @sabb8hk@sabb8hk2 ай бұрын
  • Crash because icing

    @andimilan5348@andimilan534820 күн бұрын
  • It doesn't fly more then three hours I think at a time, so lavatory isn't necessary. I went to Cali 5 hrs and didn't need the bathroom if I was prepared in advance.

    @jeffreyschnitman2484@jeffreyschnitman24848 ай бұрын
  • Still needs Prist. Not that good...

    @andresn1433@andresn1433 Жыл бұрын
    • I'm sure, the next evolution will have a larger fuel heater that doesn't needs Prist

      @340Captain@340Captain Жыл бұрын
  • 5 million and no toilet? No thanks

    @waqarghulam3548@waqarghulam3548 Жыл бұрын
    • You take out the rear seats and pay 35 Grant. Then you have a toilet....

      @340Captain@340Captain Жыл бұрын
    • I wouldnt want to have it. Cause I am not cleaning it.

      @asoshkin@asoshkin Жыл бұрын
  • You keep chewing words !

    @Sandhoeflyerhome@Sandhoeflyerhome3 ай бұрын
  • This was written by a child for children

    @Sandhoeflyerhome@Sandhoeflyerhome4 ай бұрын
  • Waaaay too small inside 😢

    @ditto1958@ditto195810 ай бұрын
  • what should I do if I have to go to the toilet?

    @SKYLIMI@SKYLIMI2 ай бұрын
  • "DAHAW"???

    @moejaime2654@moejaime26543 ай бұрын
  • Pc12 is far superior

    @satyanarayan-og2tw@satyanarayan-og2tw11 ай бұрын
KZhead