Best High Resolution Full-Frame Cameras (Canon EOS R5, Sony a7R IV, Nikon Z7 II, Panasonic S1R)
2021 ж. 15 Қаң.
310 973 Рет қаралды
What's the best high resolution mirrorless camera? We compare the Canon EOS R5, Sony a7R IV, Nikon Z7 II and Panasonic S1R to find out. Learn which high resolution camera is best for you!
Available to Purchase At:
Canon EOS R5 - fave.co/4bhwvlb
Sony a7R IV - fave.co/4dj0SJZ
Nikon Z7 II - fave.co/4b186kg
Panasonic S1R - fave.co/4dpjKa4
Music provided by BeatSuite.com
www.beatsuite.com
Rentals provided by The Camera Store
www.thecamerastore.com
-----------------------
DPReview.com is the world's largest digital camera review website. Welcome to our KZhead channel! Subscribe for new feature videos, reviews, interviews and more.
Discover the world's most in-depth digital camera reviews at www.dpreview.com
"lens variety or quality" should be a category.
"Ecosystem" or even better "native ecosystem" should be a category for sure. A body isn't useful without glass and it's best served by native glass.
@@IanHobday honestly, some of the non-native Sony glass is better than the native stuff. Same for EF Canon glass. But I mentioned lens variety to include more affordable options because not many people are willing to spend 2k per native mount lens just because that's the only option in a given focal length. Canon's 50mm 1.2 is great but it's not the right choice for most people. They'd be better served by a cheaper, smaller 1.8 or something
@@vikmanphotography7984 By "native" I mean using the native protocols, not reverse engineered. Sony licenses their mount and protocols to Tamron and Sigma which is one of the reasons their E mount lenses are so awesome. The new Sigma 85/1.4 DG DN is a great example, I can't wait for them to bring out more DG DN primes!
@@IanHobday took Sigma a while but they managed to reverse engineer EF protocols really well towards the end. And idk what samyang/rokinon is doing in terms of licensing vs reverse engineering but *everything after their first few AF lenses work great (stay away from the 50 and 35 1.4 lenses)
@@vikmanphotography7984 The difference is that Canon and Nikon actively work against the 3rd party makers and try to break compatibility. This is why you see things like Sigma's USB dock and the USB ports in some lens mounts. They have to be able to upgrade firmware to maintain functionality. It's very anti-consumer for Canon and Nikon to behave like this and such a nice change to see Sony doing licensing deals. Samyang/Rokinon and Viltrox make some interesting stuff but the reliability isn't there yet.
These guys could talk about anything and I'd still be watching. That and the fact that you have this great dynamic and analyze every camera both from a Photo and Video standpoint.
Nikon Z7II all the way for me please!
Bought one in December, to replace my 2014 D810 and gotta say; really loving it ! And loved the fact that they kept the ergonomics pretty much the same as older F-mount (you miss a dedicated AF mode selector+button & metering button but you can remap them to FN 1,2 or the record button in stills mode) dSLR's. Made the switch to mirrorless very easy.
Not with these SONY fan boys. So biased its laughable
@@richardgorski23 I would love to jump on to Z system someday. Currently I'm doing most my still work on D750. and use a7III for all video work. I like the HLG from Sony and it seems to color grade better for me. Stills from D750 still have the color and the tone that works better for me most of the time. Perspective from food/portrait photography
I have to wait.... I would love to jump on the Z7II boat but the auto-tracking isn't there yet.
Same
Z7 with the 14-30mm f4 and the 24-70mm f4 for landscapes. Incredible resolution sensor and lightweight crispy sharp glass.
14-30mm is not that sharp. It's nice and compact and light .
@@richardgorski23 It is very sharp, such a great lens.
I have the 24-70 f4 and I cannot say i´m impressed. My Canon RF 24-105 f4 is sharper. Dont know if its the autofocus of Nikon that isnt really as reliable.
@@bjure8111 My experience is very duodenum Different. My autofocus is very responsive and accurate with the 24-70mm f4 s with corner to corner sharpness.
@@mrsusan893 there may be some difference between copies, maybe I got unlucky this time, nevertheless it's sharp enough if I don't compare them side by side.
I really look forward to every one of your vids. Great unbiased views, the right touch of humour and perfect editing all around.
The Nikon Z7 II really is a solid all around camera. Best bang for the buck.
The Sony has been down to $3k us for over 6 months now. Just saying.
Solid trash, that’s true.
As is Z6 II
@@cactus22minus1Solid trash, true. Thumbs up for this :)
@@thomastuorto9929 at that price it's really a no-brainer to go for the Sony. High res cameras are bought mainly for stills, and the Sony blows the competition out of the water.
Just upgraded from my Sony A7 II to a Sony A7R IV. Totally love it! I love the Sony system because of the lenses they offer. Especially the Zeiss Batis lenses and the newer Sony GM primes offer a great balance between image quality and size.
Next time I would love to see lens selection included as it is maybe the most important factor when comparing cameras from different brands. The Nikon and Canon adapters also make this a very interesting topic.
I go with Nikon Z7 II and I love it. 45 Megpixel is absolut Maximum for me. More than 60 MP no thanks.... Nikon is for me the best compromise over all.
Downsample anything greater than 45mp and you get an even sharper image.
If I need to downsample the file I don‘t need it. In my opinion the pics of the Z7II are big, sharp and detaiiled enough. For professional Users the resolution might be important. I‘m Amateur...
@@lkjslkdjfglkjsldkfjl higher pixel count will not play nice with high iso noise.
@@silvere36 You're correct from what I have observed. ACR makes it worse since Nikon and Adobe don't work/talk together. It just means a little more post processing. Or when it matters use NX2 to convert to DNG heading to Lightroom. More than half the time I shoot JPG. Nikon's expeed6 has a great JPG engine. Noise reduction is still a tad too strong/soft on the Z7/Z7II.
15 minutes packed with unbiased and excellent comparison points including real-life examples which is a lot of work. Great job Chris and Jordan. You deserve many more subscribers than what you have today.
Did my own side-by-side test for a couple of months late last year when moving from Fuji to FF for professional work. Not with the R5, but incl. the SL2. I choose the Z7II (tested the Z7 though). I’m shooting mostly fashion and (make-up) portraits and in terms of image quality the Z7 was simply the best. The Sony may have a few more mp’s, but the beautiful color reproduction and tonality of the Z7 was key. You can’t test these cameras without knowing which lenses you need. The Nikkor Z glass might not be the most spectacular in terms of fast apertures, but all the lenses I used (incl. the 50 and the 85 f1.8) are fantastic for stills. The Z7 EVF might be only 3.69 mp, I much preferred it over the Sony. Next to an uncluttered view, it gives beautiful natural colors and a crisp and large view esp. for people wearing glasses (like me). Throw in the good ergonomics (you can really see the experience Nikon has) and for me the Z7II was the clear choice and I ordered it along with a few lenses. Now lets hope Nikon delivers a fast 35 and 85 similar to the quality of the GMs (I’m sure they will).
I enjoyed reading your comment.
Great and reassuring comment as a Pro Fuji XT4 user who is waiting for the Z7Ii to arrive any minute!
I would put the S1R as first place for video cause of the overheating issues with the R5.
I love that every major manufacturer has a great camera this years, so it mostly comes down to which system you are already using.
I took the Panny S1R, it's a great camera for landscapes and is currently on sale for 2800 USD (converted from local currency) body only and 3700 USD for 24-105 kit. It was no brainer. I am incredibly satisfied with the results i have.
Same here I got the S1R too!
Do you use its 187mp high res'mode? Does it cope ok when there's any breeze,
Out of interest, how useful is the high-res mode in the real world?
@davothedon don't own the S1R but anything above 60mp is pushing the limits of what modern lenses can resolve, unless you are printing billboards it's not that useful
Lets go! I've been waiting for this video to find the best camera to scan my film negatives!
Excellent review, thanks. A review the current lenses/system by category for each company will definitively complete the review.
Great comparison guys. I have the Z7ii with the new firmware 1.21 since April and curious how the AF performance today would compare to the version you tested. Nikon supposedly improving it again with a new version in September? Loving the couple Z lenses I have - with the exception of the 2.8 trinity, so far all of them are very reasonably priced with excellent quality.
I have almost all of those cameras except Panasonic. I gotta tell you, image quality and handling goes to Nikon Z7ii. Because of other youtubers, people think Nikon is not up to par with those other cameras, , but trust me, I have had all those cameras, R5, A7R4, Red Komodo, Blackmagic, A7S3 , A7iii you name it. And I think Nikon Z7ii and Z6ii is beyond amazing! Dont be fooled by some other people talking trash about nikon! Is really that good especially for photos.
Prices of lenses also play role in choosing the camera.
RIGHT
Yes I was going to say value would be a better proposition.... price of the bodies with a midrange zoom and 35mm prime would have been better IMO
Not just price, but lens availability, roadmap, and particular qualities. You’re not buying a camera, you’re buying a system. But Chris and Jordan know that very well, it’s just a much much harder/longer video to make, we’d probably be here for an hour watching that video 😵
Quality of lenses should also play a role which would swing back to Canon
Right, which really is a win for Sony (currently). The price to quality ratio is generally solid and the amount of third party options is massive. It won't necessarily be that way forever, but I think that's where it stands now.
The battery on my Nikon is way under rated. I just shoot an elopement and got 1400 shoots and still had 25 percent left.
i shot 700+ raw with 25% battery remaining on Z6ii, EVF and LCD Mixed
Same. This always confused me. I get 1,500+ on my Z6 and Z6ii.
@@dylanjames2213 i think they have too high expectations with all camera, kind of unrealistic.. eye af, animal tracking.. may be nikon is a step behind than sony, but its just there second generation and sony had years of RnD witj time..
@@everydayfitness6605 I'd disagree as these are getting to the upper echelon of pro-sumer cameras so you have to begin nitpicking on all points. I love Nikon but you're also failing to realise that all the other companies have had time to reverse-engineer Sony's template of success and softwares, while Sony had to do most things from scratch. It would more surprising for brands like Canon and Nikon to not reduce the gap between them and Sony.
This is the same for all cameras though. The CIPA ratings are ridiculous and vastly underrate real world usage. I bought a Canon M6 Mk II for street photography and it's rated at about 320 shots, 250 with the EVF. I consistently get closer to 1600 shots and my record shooting birds in flight was 2106 shots. This is on a 1040mAh battery! So all the cameras tend to get much better battery life than the CIPA ratings.
As a stills shooter, the 3 things that matter to me are image quality, auto focus and battery life. As noted in this review, my a7rIV is good at all these (although I hope Sony will add an update to match Canon's automatic animal eye focusing). I don't see any big deal about ergonomics on my a7rIV, i just added my desired functions to my favourites menu and rarely need to navigate the menus. Very happy with my Sony but I'm sure all these cameras would be fine. Manufacturers will keep leapfrogging each other making new and better bodies and you can't keep changing systems. Make a choice and just enjoy using it.
Y’all so good on what y’all do, I have lots respect for y’all , thanks for sharing my perspective on this is about creating great images so I keep my Leica SL2 and those amazing lenses!
Great engaging content as usual, 0% fluff, 10% humor, 90% pure gold. This video makes me look forward to the A7RV even more! Oh, and I have a secret for you guys to get 1M subscribers like some of the other bloggers out there - put up cheesy shots of yourself and controversial video titles that all end with a question mark... sad but true.
Nikon Z7 II MSRP is 2999, not 3249 as mentioned in video.
Deep pockets - Canon Lens collector - Sony Photo purist - Nikon Jordan - Panasonic
Most accurate description I've seen lol
the new Nikon is actually decent for video now ;)
Pretty much spot on
@@CsendesMarkThey have added 4k60p otherwise it is exactly the same as before, no internal Log and limited to 8-bit internal E.g. a very minor upgrade as the pricing and model naming would suggest.
Thanks...an excellent review.. good info' and very well presented...
I would love to see a comparison between something like the Sony and an old but now similar priced medium format from Fuji - the GFX50 vs any of the options in this video would be super interesting I think
I'd go for the Fuji any day.
I’ve used the GFX50S for a while in our studio. Mostly fashion and make-up portraits. After a few months I returned to one of our full-frame systems (the A7RIV and now waiting for my Z7II). While the GFX50 has a very good image quality that is comparable to the A7RIV, it is a very different camera. Compared to these newest full-frame mirrorless cameras, it is quite big, heavy (gripped 5D) and a bit clumsy. The AF is very slow esp. in low light and eye-AF is useless. With a moving subject it often lags behind and focuses on eyelashes or cheekbones instead of pupils. I used it with the 32-64 and the 110 lenses, which are both excellent. The GFX works best in a studio or at location on a tripod and with static setups like portraits, product photos or landscape. In that sense it’s very similar to our Hasselblad H6. As said, in image quality the GFX50 can keep up with the A7RIV, but it is not visibly better unless you print man-sized high. For that you need the GFX100. However for general purpose a full-frame mirrorless camera is definitely more flexible and easier to work with. We now use the GFX50 with an 120 macro lens for our product photography (perfume bottles, lipsticks et cetera). For that it’s perfect...
These modern camera bodies are all awesome devices that take terrific images and videos. It takes quite a lot of practice as a photographer to outgrow these devices and I believe once you come to the point, you'll realize that the camera is actually not that important.
Thank's so much for the articulate video!
Nice to see Ron again. I miss the Live Show.
For the price of the body alone, the Z7II is a no brainer. Granted, the AF may be a tad behind the EOS R5 but it's the Nikon S line lenses that makes all the difference here. Combine that with either Z6II or Z7II, it is to me....the best compromise overall.
It stands to reason if you are a Nikon guy go for the Nikon, if you are invested in Sony go for the Sony. Reviews bring views on KZhead and I enjoy them, but just about any high resolution model from the major manufacturers are quite capable and the differences are splitting hairs. I will say the AF system on the R5 is pretty slick if you are into wildlife photography.
How is that a reasonable assessment? Nikon's mirrorless lens line-up is by far the worst of the big three. Sony has third party support, Canon offers great first party options. Nikon has a bunch of overpriced f/1.8 primes - and the worst 50 f/1.2 and worst 70-200.
@@youknowwho9247 "worst 50mm 1.2 and worst 70-200 2.8" Really? Those lenses are nothing short but EXCEPCIONAL, the only 70-200 that is on par with the Nikon y the Panasonic 70-200 f2.8.
Hi there maybe you don’t see often good sales on the S1R but let me tell you that in France we often have real great price operation on it. Once it was sold with the 24-105 for 4400€ and you had the 50mm S Pro for 1€. Last one was 2500€ including the 24-105... real good operation. And one point you forget to mention is that the S1R is an L mount Alliance camera which means you can mount extraordinary Leica SL lenses... this you can forget with whatever the 3 other brands you compare the S1R with... and this kills the game ! Don’t you think?
Thanks for a great review
Great work, thank you Nikon Z7 II my favorite dinamic range and resolution size and more !
Choose Nikon and you will avoid all problems no matter where, it just works.
My reason would be Nikon because I have old Nikon AI lenses for my Nikon F3
Despite If you want to shoot birds
@@airb1976 Ok I never shoot birds, but I believe you when you say that (and it is not about lack of knowledge).
@@airb1976 no one ever shot birds with mirror less cameras before?
Wow really love your content this is amazing. What is your preferred editing software you use for videomaking , I'd love to have a conversation and maybe even collaborate on different ways in telling stories through film!
Great review. Thanks!!
My conclusion : i even cannot afford one of that list
And that's not even considering the lenses!
Go out and buy a 5Dm3 or something. Still fantastic cameras for still photography (less so for video) and can be had at great prices nowadays.
@@vikmanphotography7984 bro i even cannot afford a6100 LOL
@@dwisetyoaji5007 Then maybe stop torturing yourself with camera review videos until you can afford something. Practice with your phone in the interim.
@@dwisetyoaji5007 used A7II for around $500 and some vintage primes and you'd be set.
In IQ i don't get how the Panasonic is at the bottom, in the color comparison to the Canon it wasn't as vivid but in the recovery it didn't tint the shadows like the R5, in low-light it was superior to the Sony and didn't have as much color noise as the Canon/Nikon. In-body HR mode also sets it on-par with Sony's UHR mode; I don't get it but all of them are great anyways. Unless you are shooting in non-subzero climates like Canada.
Another thing I'd like to see in the reviews, especially from Jordan's side, is how the camera can be powered externally, and how much longer it will operate with additional external power. Will it only charge the battery with the camera off, or can it "charge" while powered on? With the extended record times and reduced overheating these days, it would be handy to know which cameras will truly make use of an external 28000 mh bank.
I wish build quality was considered. Currently on A7R2 and the shutter kept freezing in Rockies winter. Trying to decide if I should switch.
I think it was overlooked that the a7rIV has no limit in the video mode. I think it is cool that they got rid of that limit :)
It would be interesting to compare the gfx cameras to these and see how big the differences are, since they are getting more affordable and in a small body, as you would find in full frame.
The problem with the GFX100 /100S is that literally only one lens (the 110mm) can resolve to match the sensor. All the other lenses are better on the 50MP GFX cameras.
Really well done, thanks.
I love how you guys are still so happy with such whiny comments on your website. Great review. Also, Vikman Photography is right, "lens variety or quality" should be a category.
You should consider lens selection in these. Canon is nice because it has a fairly reliable adapter so you have access to all that legacy glass, but also Sony is more open to playing nice with third party manufacturers, so you can get some nice, new, designed for mirrorless Sigma glass that works amazing on your Sony and is really affordable. That's why I ultimately went with Sony when I traded in my Nikon DSLRs (though I also went with a used a7R iii for like $1800, and still got over 40 megapixels).
Can you do battle for video-centric high end mirrorless for the four brand. That would be interesting to see
@DPreview TV Can we get an updated video comparison on the out of camera color science of each camera? Sometimes you just want to JPEG and go instead of fiddling with RAW processing. And sometimes getting a RAW that is 80-90% there speeds up workflow.
"Gold and teal"..."NO!" I love you, guys. Never change!
b-b-but that's cinematic!
Awww.. now be a good boy and give them a BLJ😆
Jokes that only people of Asian descent can make for $200, heh.
@@AshleyPaul for *20$
I bought a Nikon z5 after shooting 5 years with Sony. I still have the Sony kits for jobs, but I find the Nikon much more enjoyable as a everyday carry camera or travel camera. Better colors from raw files straight from Lightroom, better image stabilization, more touches like the red blinking “no card” alert, much more visible than Sony. And great kit lenses, better quality and price than Sony budget kit lenses. There are some usability points that transcend the best autofocus and such.
My head would say the Sony but my heart would say the Nikon.
Listen to your heart :-)
some times we gotta ignore what heart says .. LOL
Nikon still a little behind the competition. Particularly with lightweight lenses.
Both are deceiving you ... :-)
@@steventhomas231 Nikon Z lenses are above competition. And for portrait photography Nikon Z AF is more than enough. For sports you'll need Sony A9 either way.
I just got a Z6 II! Upgraded from D7200. And I subscribed (a few days ago!).
What are you shooting? I’m hesitant to go mirrorless as I’m shooting birds/wildlife... D7500 200-500 f/5.6
@@SolamenteVees Landscapes, sometimes casually my friends and my cat. I feel like having the EVF is great, I can zoom in to 100% using the viewfinder and check focus and also see the exposure I'm going to get, or if I disable exposure preview I can get a little better autofocusing performance. Many reviewers haven't mentioned that, but if you disable the exposure preview it gives a boost to af acquisition. Then of course you need to revert back to DSLR style of checking exposure, as you can't use the live histogram in the viewfinder in that mode either.
@@SolamenteVees Here's a sample photo taken at ISO 22800 with Lightroom noise luminance reduction at 30: nikosite.net/i/_NIH4735.jpg This is without reduction: nikosite.net/i/_NIH4735_no_noisereduction.jpg My old D7200 would look absolutely trash at that ISO :D
@@Noksus Thank! Eventually I will be forced to go mirrorless. Appreciate the input.
Great timing for this video as I sold my Z6II in search of higher resolution once again.
Wired conclusion on Image quality, Lumix last. It’s one highest ranking sensors by Dxo and other quality tests with a nice DR of 14. Compared to the competition its always1 1 Stop ahead up to 25600. Nikon and Lumix swap or are even across iso range. Worth knowledgeably is that all cameras lose Several DR stops as you increase iso. After 12800 on most cameras you are hovering around 10 in DR or lower.
Very interesting review!
Lol “background is too distracting” Puts a title card over the distracting part 😂
I think z7II is sub 3k
I opened up a martial arts gym a couple years ago and have been doing our marketing. Mainly social media content. I’m torn between the R5 and A7R iv. Either will handle the pics with ease, but I plan on filming video tutorial content for KZhead. Any recommendations on which camera? I’m leaning towards Sony for the autofocus. There’ll be lots of movement while the instructor talks to the camera. Thanks in advance!
Great video. I personally don't dislike Sony ergonomics like everyone else, but I never liked bulky DSLRs like the Canon 5d line or Nikon's D8xx cameras. That feels like the most subjective measurement in the comparison, but it feels like the folks who thrived on DSLRs don't like the difference. I'd be interested if folks that don't have that legacy preconception of camera "feel" would agree or not. Not sure if that's fodder for a future video or not.
Finally! A balanced, unbiased review by professionals (Chris and Jordan) who when evaluating cameras, don't make "ignoring KZhead reviewers" an evaluative factor.
Unbiased? What review did you watch?
@@richardgorski23 As it says right in my comment, Chris and Jordan's. Tony and Chelsea's review was biased drivel.
was a canon shooter switched to sony love it.... but i miss that canon glass and with the R5 i switched back the camera does feel the best in my hand...
But the end Game Nikon has the Z Mount now bring me those Best of Breed S Lenses
Dang, for Black friday in France, the S1R was at 2499€ with 24-105 f4 + 85mm f1.8 That was an incredible deal, but they got bought so quickly ..
Samys camera store online has had an s1R with 24-105 open box for 2500 for the longest time .
I bougth mine in late 2019 whith the 24-105 for 3700€ and that was even with 900€ cash back ufff 2500€ that hurts to hear
@@samuelb.107 Oh i forgot, it was also with the battery Grip. When I saw that deal it almost felt like they stopped the production of S1R so resellers tried to empty their stock, but it's still in stock today. So dunno.. How is your S1R ? great camera ? any regrets ?
@@BaptisteLandrodie I mostly do zoo animal photography and landscape photography for that I think it was the right choice for me. I came from an G9 and did not want tho go to sony because of the menu and at that time nikon had no long lens and still don't have (I would have bought old f lenses) and die R5 wasn't out so I went with panasonic and I think it pays of what it was more experience in the first place I can save with buying sigma glass. My mail lens is the 100-400 sigma and I love that combo it is heavy but I see it as an workout 🙂 . I'm planing on getting a fast wide Engel Prime for landscapes and milkiway. Over all I think it is a good camara great operation and handling and the autofocus could be better but is good enough for me. I'm not sure if I would buy it again today maybe would take the a7 4 when its out or the R5 or an S1r a bit lighter with phase af
85mm Hasntt even been released yet.
I wish you do some review of Pentax as well
I’ll stick with my Contax 137MA and Zeiss Planar 50mm. Love the reviews and channel though 👍🇨🇦
Great review. After 15 years of using Canon DSLRs I decided to drop the Mark IV and buy a Sony RIV, I am still amazed at the battery life and the image quality, even using the Canon lenses on it. At this point, I prefer to invest in some G lenses instead to go back to Canon and buy RF lenses. Glad to have Sony and Canon making nice stuff for the photographers but I feel Canon is a step behind since 2017...
Well, you can't go wrong with either option. But if you want to save some money. Go back to R6/R5 with the EF-RF adapter, all your EF lens will be very capable.
If you like SONY then these two fanboys are the ones to watch. Their Sony bias is laughable and is causing them to lose credibility.
What I find funny is when people talk about image quality of newer cameras. I bet if you put images side by side printed out I bet you could not really tell a difference. Out 10 photos you may get 4 right.
Got the A7RIV as my stills shooter and absolutely love it. For that auto focus, battery life and resolution. Glad its still standing strong 😤👌
Fujifilm xt-3 all the way;). Not very high-resolution but certainly does the job. Enjoyed the video guys!
Good video, thanks, but suggest you include IBIS in next update.
Cool. Thanks for sharing.
Interesting that DXOMark rates the S1R at par with the Z7II and the A7RIV , and above the R5 in terms of sensor image quality.
great video thank you
Really interesting. Thanks :)
Best video make more like that👌🏻
6:06 "And with a paid firmware upspnsjdnkbkdnknf this can do pro res raw " LOL
I Love that he kept that in! :-)
Someone that understands what we need!!!
Great comparison
I am really sold on the Canon R5. I have seen a lot of Yotube video's comparing other cameras to the Canon R5. I like the 4K 120fps, the Clog 3 and auto eye tracking for my football games. This is will be my second camera for my Canon 5D Mk IV along with the rest of my "L" series lenses.
Wish you tubers didn't give flippy screens an auto-win over tilt screens. The apps work better for that anyway. Wish the Sony a99 screen would come back into fashion so everyone could be happy.
Flippy screens satisfy KZheadrs narcissistic tendencies. They forget that not many photographers or even videographers want to photograph themselves.
That’s why I have a flippy screen camera and a tilt screen. Two different styles completely.
High resolution clearly the Nikon Z7, ZII has the performance edge to edge performance. Rear screen the Nikon Z is much better than those KZheadr inspired flip out things.
A lack portrait axis screen articulation is a problem for photography though - especially if you shoot landscapes, where the camera is often closer to the ground.
@@richrollin4867 Is it the Panasonic that has the flip out portrait screen ?
@@terrywbreedlove Yes. I think it's the best system. Perfect for photographers.
got the S1R with 24-105 F4, 85mm F1.8 and batterygrip for 2500$ couldn't say no
You lucky I paid 3600€ whithout grip or 85 :(
panasonic s1r takes s1r good pictures like z 7ii. do you think that. I would like to buy it but i think z7ii is better
*I needed this! Trying to figure out what’s the best camera for filmmaking as a university student with high resolution* 🤔
Best cameras for video won't be hires. The line skipping and pixel binning worsen noise and moire.
If 4k is enough resolution for your film making, the A7SIII is the best and the GH5s is pretty good. If you want around 6k, the S1H and the S5 is best, going even RAW with external recording and if you need 8k, you have to go with the R5 (if you can stand the heat). On top, you find the Blackmagic 12k 60p that is making everything else looking like back markers.
@@Ulrich.Bierwisch Thank you!
@@1fareast14 Thanks!
A good review, but should have considered lenses choices, cost/performance as we don't buy MILC for just the body.
Z7 II MSRP is $2999 isn't it? Anyway nicely done.
Can Explain the downsampling issue at some point in the Jordon?
What's that wrist strap on the A7R4? I want...
How they make the cipa standard? Because I made easily between 1,5k and 2,5k with the canon r6 and r5 at a wedding with one battery from 100 to 0% Nice video 👍 thank you
A fun and informative video as usual. However, if I could equate this to cars, this is like watching information about F1 race cars while I'm thinking about whether I can afford buying a used Honda Civic.
Great vids as always, boys. This vid is gonna have a new player soon if Sony actually drops an 50mb a9 III....
Well, the sony a1 is basically that-
Only thing missed I think is the Sony A7RIV has the pixel shift feature. 240 megapixel product shots yah! :p I used it a few times. It's mind blowing if you have the lenses for it. Also I had the A7RIV since 2 Septembers ago! :)
Why cant they do it in camera like Panasonic. A hassle to do post.
how many mega pixel is enough?
You missed one BIG category: LENSES. The Nikon "S" line of lenses are the best of the bunch, and they've only just started.
And how did you come to that conclusion? What testing did you do to make such a ridiculous claim? It’s ok to be a fanboy but please don’t be delusional.
@@NoBananasthird I didn't come to that conclusion; the experts who conducted the objective tests did. It's okay to be ignorant, just don't open your mouth and reveal your ignorance.
@@mugdays what experts????? You clearly said they missed a big category which was lenses. So who are the experts who say that Nikon lenses are better than Canon and Sony glass???? Please help with my obvious ignorance.
@@mugdays I'd love to have a citation of those expert opinions. As far as I can see, the consensus among all reputable sources is that Nikon is behind Canon and Sony in terms of their lens line-up. Both of them have more glass to choose from, Canon's is now innovative and Sony's is now economical thanks to third party support. S line glass on the other hand is mostly known for its lack of availability...
@Shah Mohammad Sharafat when you tell the truth your a fanboy??? Lol ok guy
Jorden ..I subscribed :) video guy !!!
An important part is missing : lenses quality and the price of them... Being able to have third party lenses reduces the cost drastically, long term.
7:26 bad acting! Hahaha good video as always, thanks
Nice job
Nikon's best asset not even considered: the forward looking Z-mount, and the splendid glass. Throw in best value price wise, superb image quality, and I found the winner. Nikon! 📷😎👌
I don't know where this narrative comes from. Sony has third party support, Canon has the most innovative native lenses. Nikon is mostly offering slow, overpriced primes and with a smaller selection than the competition.
@@youknowwho9247 slow and overpriced? Do you use these lens or what? They are amazing, and you’d understand that if you used them.
@@youknowwho9247 The "narrative" comes from using the Nikon Z system. Nikon now has the Holy Trinity, and the 50/1.2S is superb and fast. The 1.8 primes more than hold their own by being in their own class. No one else comes close. Either you get it or you don't. The Z mount is Nikon's most important feature, and in a review like this, it's not even mentioned.
Yup, their lenses are already better than competition. All their z series lenses completely lack both LOCA and lateral CA
@@ych8312 Yes, not to mention sharpness edge to edge.
There are two sources of heat when taking videos, the processors and the battery. The battery gets hot when passing a lot of current. It seems to me having an external battery feeding a dummy battery insert, would get around the heat problem, or at least increase the video time before overheating.
Which lens was used for S1H video?
Nikon - never the best but never the worst = a great all around camera! Love my Z6, it's just a fun camera to use, and Nikon have done a great job with the Z system in general.
At the end of the day the only important thing is: Autofocus so regardless of how much tilting screen you have or Evf that can see germs it boils down to autofocus and the confidence that you nailed every job. Would you rather be second in F-1 Ferrari that is confi or first in Merc that is hot and hard on its suspension? 1st or 2nd ?
Agreed - and how easy it is to use. Im a Nikon hybrid shooter - I want to move to a Z but the bad reviews put me off.
@@markshirley01 I think I asked that before? Did you give them a try, yet? They are good, capable cameras and I barely encounter situations where they give me headaches. And their video features are vastly superior to Nikon‘s DSLRs
@@markshirley01 I am a Nikon Z6II shooter and I can tell you that the autofocus is fine. You are watching reviews and succumbing to hype. I use a D850 and other Nikon cameras also and the Z6II is fine. Knowing your subject and anticipation will get way more keepers than any camera. Do your own review because your needs aren’t the same as someone else’s. You are splitting hairs with any of these in all categories including ergonomics. I handled the Sony and hated it but that just makes it bad for me. Others have no problem with them. Do your own review on the camera or cameras you are interested in. If you wait on the perfect camera, you will go cameraless. If you go by someone else’s views of said camera, you are cheating yourself
@@markshirley01 Sony's is defs the best but the Nikon autofocus receives an unfair amount of criticism. I have a Z6 and even that has stellar autofocus, particularly in video mode. The Z7II should be better. I honestly believe it's just as good if not better than the dual-pixel garbage on the R5 (from what I've seen)