Small Mistakes With HUGE Consequences

2023 ж. 16 Мау.
3 544 566 Рет қаралды

Here are some small mistakes with huge consequences!
Suggest a topic here to be turned into a video: bit.ly/2kwqhuh
Subscribe for more! ► goo.gl/pgcoq1 ◄
Stay updated ► goo.gl/JyGcTt goo.gl/5c8dzr ◄
For copyright queries or general inquiries please get in touch: hello@beamazed.com
Legal Stuff.
Unless otherwise created by BeAmazed, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources: pastebin.com/sDha7AGa

Пікірлер
  • Yes, I can confirm fireworks only need a small mistake to be dangerous. Back in July 2021, we were celebrating Fourth of July in our neighborhood. My family had only brought smaller fireworks, but one of our neighbors and his friends had lit a big rocket in their backyard. Just after lighting the rocket, they noticed the plastic wrapper on the rocket hadn’t been removed. So, one of them went to go take it off, and knocked it sideways. The rocket launched, and exploded right in the middle of the neighborhood. My family scattered. Everyone had a fireball less than half a foot from them, one of the fireballs landed on the neighbors’ Shelby GT350, but fortunately, no one was hurt. After watching this I can see how much worse that could’ve gone

    @DroidzandBrix@DroidzandBrix10 ай бұрын
    • here in germany, every new year's eve has massive semi-rioting crowds using big firecrackers and horizontally launched rockets as weapons against each other and the also always present riot police. it seems to not produce very many injuries, mostly because the vast majority of fireworks are legally purchased and regulated to only use black powder for the explosive charge, which explodes so softly that a firework has to be in direct contact with a body part to cause serious injuries. illegally imported flash powder firecrackers from poland or the czech republic are also poular though, and those have much more injury potential.

      @Ass_of_Amalek@Ass_of_Amalek10 ай бұрын
    • I never read those long comments .

      @pepperkilldevelopment9069@pepperkilldevelopment906910 ай бұрын
    • Poor GT350

      @zacharyarchbold4097@zacharyarchbold409710 ай бұрын
    • @@pepperkilldevelopment9069 wait til you read the hello kitty case comments

      @manchesterguava@manchesterguava10 ай бұрын
    • @@zacharyarchbold4097 don’t worry, the GT350 was also unharmed

      @DroidzandBrix@DroidzandBrix10 ай бұрын
  • Wow! That last story was refreshingly admirable. I was waiting to hear "and William ignored her warning", but the fact that William listened to Diane was great to hear. Thanks for this one!!

    @misspeachy3@misspeachy310 ай бұрын
    • Amen to that! So many people wouldn't do so because of pride.

      @anablackwood6141@anablackwood614110 ай бұрын
    • Holy snapchat imagine building à skyscraper just for it to be threatened by your neighbor's because they chose formidable over function? Its à good thing he solved that issue, or else he would have been sued by thousands of people for billions of dollars, and thats not including damage costs: it would have been for loss of life and injuries ( doctors in the US aren't cheap)

      @gouadjiosabine9414@gouadjiosabine941410 ай бұрын
    • Yeah it is an example made into textbooks. However, the root cause was those legs were supposedly be around corners instead of centers when it was designed. However, there was a building beneath it, so they move those legs to the center instead. However, moving them to center created the corner problem, as mentioned in the video.

      @delightXD@delightXD10 ай бұрын
    • same

      @joshrazer2286@joshrazer228610 ай бұрын
    • Eareaeraea

      @anna-gt2mu@anna-gt2mu10 ай бұрын
  • Omg that last one! Not only was William cool about having someone tell him his design had a flaw, he accepted it and worked on how to fix it, without causing panic amongst people unnecessarily. Good for him, he really stepped up. And good for the lady too, who notified him of the issue instead of just thinking “not my problem”

    @KaiM2583@KaiM25838 ай бұрын
    • Higher intelligence is displayed, when considering criticism, as practical, and a check on the work?

      @j.dunlop8295@j.dunlop829521 күн бұрын
  • Really well done to Diane for spotting it and well done to William for listening and fixing . Too many times pride gets in the way but cudos to these two

    @jentapsell1137@jentapsell11378 ай бұрын
    • first!

      @sebastiaanvanderpauw4594@sebastiaanvanderpauw45944 ай бұрын
    • @@sebastiaanvanderpauw4594 And? You're not getting an award for that.

      @sinkingpotatosalad@sinkingpotatosalad2 ай бұрын
  • Props to the designer of the building for making sure that the building was safe and not assuming he was right. If more people looked into structural issues, many disasters could be avoided.

    @ShockDiamondStudios@ShockDiamondStudios10 ай бұрын
    • We need more like him

      @JoshuaGutierrez-yq2bi@JoshuaGutierrez-yq2bi10 ай бұрын
    • I totally agree. He was able to recognize he made a mistake and instead of making excuses he made changes

      @foff9905@foff99059 ай бұрын
    • Yeah, one Korean fella 🇰🇷 in the 90s was negligent. Once he was convinced his department store was giving way, decided to leave without alerting customers and staff for fear of revenue loss, then hundreds died, and another over 1000 injured.

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd9 ай бұрын
    • One of the rare times when an important man listened to a woman.

      @citizenoftheearth6@citizenoftheearth68 ай бұрын
    • take surfside for example the question on that is less why did it collapse but more how had did it ever stand

      @ThunderClawShocktrix@ThunderClawShocktrix8 ай бұрын
  • I'm really glad William LeMessurier actually listened to Diane and actually spent the time, money, and effort to correct his mistake. So many architects get too prideful of their work, and just ignore the warnings of others, and just let their work be.

    @God-heaven4life@God-heaven4life10 ай бұрын
    • First!

      @Abrix123@Abrix1236 ай бұрын
    • Bro you can't say first with that pfp nerd 💀

      @vidamaciulyte1206@vidamaciulyte12066 ай бұрын
    • ​@@vidamaciulyte1206what? Dead emoji

      @Thawhid@Thawhid4 ай бұрын
    • How many architects do you know? It must be quite a lot, since you even studied their behavior.

      @gehtdianschasau8372@gehtdianschasau83724 ай бұрын
    • @@gehtdianschasau8372 About 3 and a half. That fourth one got cut his left half cut off in a freak box fan accident. He's all right now

      @God-heaven4life@God-heaven4life4 ай бұрын
  • It should be noted that Citicorp Center was designed with "legs" not just for the sake of being unique, but because a church owned the corner of the site and refused to relocate. So the skyscraper's developers worked out an agreement where they'd put their building *above* the church, with columns to hold it up.

    @danielbishop1863@danielbishop18638 ай бұрын
    • Wow just wow I mean I can understand not wanting to move your place of worship but this could've caused a huge failure that would've costed hundreds of lives if it wasn't for the quick thinking of engineers

      @Dovah_Slayer@Dovah_SlayerАй бұрын
    • Great Church, Why Care about OTHERS.

      @ishmaelepling9115@ishmaelepling911527 күн бұрын
    • ​@@Dovah_Slayeroh I see

      @honor9lite1337@honor9lite133710 күн бұрын
    • Um..the “legs” design was SOLELY to build around the Church.

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
    • @@Dovah_SlayerQUICK thinking? It was YEARS LATER that the mistake was discovered!!!

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
  • A Priest : "My small mistake was saving a kid from drowning in a lake named Adolf Hitler."

    @Youknowwhatandwho@Youknowwhatandwho6 ай бұрын
  • 15:54 it's actually surprising how much a single lit bud can cause a lot of trouble. In my previous job, we had a "big tool room" where a lot of people used to go for smoke breaks since it had large doors leading outside. One day i was left in our building to prepare tools and materials for a job , when I noticed smoke in the corridor. I looked through all the rooms only open the tool room and see it filled to the brim and fire somewhere. After telling others of the fire and putting it down, we realised that it was a trashcan someone dropped a still lit cigarette into it and things could have been much worse. Trashcan stood next to jerry cans filled with benzene and diesel as well as propane tanks and if it wasn't for the can melting away from jerry cans and us noticing fire fairly early, things could have gone much worse

    @konradzukowski213@konradzukowski21310 ай бұрын
    • Boy, you sure dodged a bullet there! Did you buy a lottery ticket afterwards, from how lucky you were?

      @makutamon@makutamon10 ай бұрын
    • @@makutamon Not at the time for sure

      @mahapatrasohamm@mahapatrasohamm10 ай бұрын
    • Wow, that sure was lucky. I've heard benzene fires are hard to extinguish, and that you can't use water for it at all.

      @amberkat8147@amberkat814710 ай бұрын
    • @@amberkat8147 Yeah, similarly to burning oil, trying to extinguish those with water only makes it spread out faster as water literally boils and throws it everywhere in the process. Oil and benzene/petrol/gasoline you can only fight using powder filled extinguishers to create this hardened layer that suffocates fire.

      @konradzukowski213@konradzukowski21310 ай бұрын
    • @@makutamon I have luck in avoiding life threatening situations, but not in lottery or gambling. I can get through things that would normally end badly to others, but can't win a dime even if my life depended on it.

      @konradzukowski213@konradzukowski21310 ай бұрын
  • I was absolutely livid when the El Dorado fire happened. I went home on leave while still serving the military after being away from family for almost 2 years. Literally the day after I arrived home, I woke up to tinted orange skies and was forced to cancel all plans I had the following few days due to all the smoke and restricted outings because of covid, forcing me to stay home until my flight back 10 days later. Stuff like this are the reasons why we can't have nice things.

    @ThisIsHunglo@ThisIsHunglo10 ай бұрын
    • And all for something as ridiculous & pointless as a gender reveal party.

      @reddwarfer999@reddwarfer99910 ай бұрын
    • @@reddwarfer999 The memes about it were coming in real hot though

      @ThisIsHunglo@ThisIsHunglo10 ай бұрын
    • I'm really sorry your RandR got screwed up. I know you were looking forward to it. And, sincerely, thank you for your service. Mine is an Air Force family, mother, father, and daughter.

      @GrandmaLoves2Scuba@GrandmaLoves2Scuba10 ай бұрын
    • @@ThisIsHunglo There is that, and hopefully enough people heard about it to realize how easy it is to do that crap and maybe won't. I'm not counting on that, there's a lot of idiots

      @asbestosfiber@asbestosfiber10 ай бұрын
  • There's more to the Citicorp building story. If the building had been constructed as LeMessurier (pronounced "le-measure") had specified, it would likely have been adequate to resist "quartering winds", but an on-site change to the construction of the diagonal braces that directed load to the legs of the building - from through-welding to bolts - significantly weakened the structure. LeMessurier discovered that on his own, once he was prompted to start thinking about quartering winds. The timing as reported here is also very sloppy. It was only toward the very end of the refit of the building - which could be done at night, with minimal disruption - that the hurricane showed up, and it veered away from the city, in any case. LeMessurier took his time to mobilize the people, resources, and plans needed to carry out the refit responsibly. It's really a model of how professional engineers should behave. Also, fun fact: the building was one of the first to feature a tuned mass damper, a huge block of concrete on bearings at the top of the building, which served to reduce sway . . . but which would have increased damage to the surrounding area had the structure failed. Also also, at the time of the building's construction, New York City building code did not have any specifications regarding quartering winds, which just goes to show that building codes are often inadequate on their own.

    @AretaicGames@AretaicGames8 ай бұрын
  • I was on vacation in NYC from the UK and witnessed the blackout. My friend and I were very lucky - we’d just been on the subway and were minutes away from being in an elevator. We managed to grope our way up to our floor and escaped the mayhem on the streets.

    @Pluggit1953@Pluggit195310 ай бұрын
    • if your apartment is in a high flour. how was this mayhem?

      @nikoskonstantinidis4069@nikoskonstantinidis406910 ай бұрын
    • It's scary how easily people descend into savagery when order is disrupted, in this case, all it took was a power shortage.

      @carloscatarino7890@carloscatarino789010 ай бұрын
    • @@carloscatarino7890 Not all countries descend into savagery when blackouts hit though.

      @RatKindler@RatKindler10 ай бұрын
    • @@nikoskonstantinidis4069 Our hotel wasn’t made of flour.

      @Pluggit1953@Pluggit195310 ай бұрын
    • @@Pluggit1953 ok I accidentally said the ingredient flour instead of one of the floors of the hotel. my bad

      @nikoskonstantinidis4069@nikoskonstantinidis406910 ай бұрын
  • 8:34 *The Comet disasters weren't specifically the passenger windows.* It was microcracks from the punch-type rivets. With each pressurization/depressurization the cracks lengthened. There are KZheads videos about the Comet that can describe it in more detail.

    @jsl151850b@jsl151850b10 ай бұрын
    • ​@@fantasynx4730What?

      @Cenn_Devel@Cenn_Devel9 ай бұрын
    • @@fantasynx4730he isn’t wrong

      @OmarGarcia-kr4jz@OmarGarcia-kr4jz9 ай бұрын
    • There were a number of factors including the windows, but it's not just the windows.

      @paulbarnett227@paulbarnett2278 ай бұрын
    • At last someone that checks facts. After all these years rubbish is still being spewed out.

      @iscmiscm@iscmiscmАй бұрын
  • The stadium collapse was caused by a resonance of the structure, much like the infamous Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse. This concept wasn’t widely understood in all structural design. It’s understandable that a resonant excitation, people jumping in unison, in the design of a stadium structure, especially in the 1930’s. Not even an earthquake excitation would be expected to excite vertical vibration mode.

    @tajdvl-advocate6113@tajdvl-advocate61139 ай бұрын
  • The fact that my mom drove right past the firework factory back then is crazy 💀

    @claravonlinstow7650@claravonlinstow76507 ай бұрын
  • i am amazed

    @tomazbohinjec7346@tomazbohinjec734610 ай бұрын
    • Literally

      @Wubspotter58@Wubspotter5810 ай бұрын
    • Fr

      @johyo.2297@johyo.229710 ай бұрын
    • He has done his job.

      @MORON_Gaming@MORON_Gaming10 ай бұрын
    • same

      @magnetsstyle@magnetsstyle10 ай бұрын
    • Fake

      @Cheeseyt12@Cheeseyt1210 ай бұрын
  • As a resident of Japan I don't find fault with your information about the Hanshin earthquake but I do want to point out that at 23:33 you state that 1995 is remembered for a single catastrophic event. Actually it is ALSO remembered as the year the crazy cult, Aum Shirikyo released Sarin gas into the Tokyo subway system resulting in many deaths and thousands with serious physical effects.

    @Aiko2-26-9@Aiko2-26-910 ай бұрын
  • A small change to the building plans for a pedestrian catwalk in the lobby of the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Kansas City led to its collapse during a party in the early 80's. There were something like 180 fatalities. It wasn't faulty materials, or improper methods. It was simply a small change made after the plans were completed. As a result of 1long bolt changing to 2 short bolts, the weight distribution went from being shared across multiple levels to being entirely put on one level. A high school student doing a small experiment could have determined the logic behind the change being catastrophic, but it was changed for 1 stupid reason. Its easier to carry 2 small ones than 1 big one.

    @stephenwest6738@stephenwest67386 ай бұрын
  • *blackout happens* everybody: 😭 new york: 2:00 👹👹

    @unknownname8186@unknownname81868 ай бұрын
    • underrated comment

      @rBox.@rBox.8 ай бұрын
    • Purge 😅

      @dearthditch@dearthditch29 күн бұрын
    • Because the outage lasted longer than it should have.

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd17 күн бұрын
    • Kay (Tommy Lee Jones): This caused the New York Blackout of 1977. A practical joke from the great inventor....he thought it was funny as hell!

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd6 күн бұрын
    • @@dearthditch Close to it.

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd6 күн бұрын
  • The DeHavilland Comet window theory has been disproven. The issue was with the structural integrity of the airframe itself and the overestimation of the material resistance lifespan (i.e., how many pressurization cycles it could withstand before failing).

    @MiTBender@MiTBender10 ай бұрын
    • True.

      @nightwishlover8913@nightwishlover891310 ай бұрын
    • Just about to post the same thing

      @edwardhuggins84@edwardhuggins8410 ай бұрын
    • The real culprit was microcracks that formed because the structural pieces of the fuselage were riveted together instead of drilled and screwd. Seconds from disaster series does explain it quite well.

      @dund3360@dund336010 ай бұрын
    • *New York has a blackout* *Everyone goes pandemonium and starts looting everywhere* That’s about the correct civilised response you can get from the people apparently. That will definitely resolve your power cut.

      @matthewcohman1171@matthewcohman117110 ай бұрын
    • It makes me so mad for some reason when people keep blaming the windows

      @brycehill6678@brycehill667810 ай бұрын
  • Kudos to the engineer who fixed the building. When watching disaster videos it seems many times the problems are ignored causing the disaster.

    @mattiemathis9549@mattiemathis954910 ай бұрын
  • Hey, one can be even more amazed by conviction and triumph vs. stupid oversights that resulted in catastrophe. That last one was brilliant. We need more men and women with that type of gumption, IMHO.

    @siriusbreak2212@siriusbreak22128 ай бұрын
  • So far, the worst tiny mistake I've made was not checking which way round my coffee mug was. That was quite a sad start to my morning.

    @BlindWeeb05@BlindWeeb059 ай бұрын
    • If it’s round it doesn’t MATTER!

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
    • @@traybern 😂 😂

      @BlindWeeb05@BlindWeeb057 күн бұрын
  • Mad is one of those actors that will leave you speechless because of his impeccable acting. Stunned me in Hannibal and marvelled in James Bond. Always look forward to his next project. Absolute Legend.

    @stephantranquille6681@stephantranquille66819 ай бұрын
  • A correction on the Comet airplane one- yes, those square corners may have been where it was always going to break, but planes broke so quickly because at the time they didn't have any experience with flying that high so the metal was just too thin. That thin metal flexed with every flight cycle- every cycle of depressurization and repressurization- and was bound to give out.

    @amberkat8147@amberkat814710 ай бұрын
    • Also while the windows were squared they had round corners

      @FormerlyEpicjcat@FormerlyEpicjcat10 ай бұрын
    • The windows as the cause for the loss of the Comet airliners has been debunked so many times.

      @neiloflongbeck5705@neiloflongbeck570510 ай бұрын
    • Agreed with all the comments. The issue wasn't the 'square' windows (they had rounded corners). Another factor was the way DH bonded the metal, it just wasn't strong enough, and lead to metal fatigue too, at the joins.

      @shero113@shero1139 ай бұрын
    • Correction on titanic, it was an ocean liner, not a cruise ship

      @richardstrom707@richardstrom7079 ай бұрын
    • The first N1 explosion didn't cause the Soviets to lose the moon race either. They launched 4 of them and all of them failed only one due to a bolt coming loose and being sucked into the engines. It had many of the same problems the new spacex craft has like having a lot of engines that all have to work in sync. I think the N1 had a 30 different engines of 2 different types and most of them needed to work in sync to have a successful launch. They also couldn't test the rocket in a standing position like the USA could due to a smaller budget.

      @Nilboggen@Nilboggen8 ай бұрын
  • The first story about the power outage was repeated in 2011 in San Diego, but without the riots, although with an even more stupid cause. An engineer was doing maintenance tests at a major power hub in Arizona and did some steps out of order. The result was the trunk line from AZ being shut off. Which left all the load for San Diego falling on the trunk line from Los Angeles, and that rapid spike caused it to shut down as well. The result was all of San Diego and surrounding areas to be in the dark for 11 hours, with some areas taking up to 36 hours to get restored.

    @warrenwattles8397@warrenwattles839710 ай бұрын
    • I'm in Oklahoma and Saturday's storms have left us without power. Hinted return time is from tomorrow to the 24th. I know it's not the same, but I appreciate how not having power sucks.

      @GrandmaLoves2Scuba@GrandmaLoves2Scuba10 ай бұрын
    • Actually it still had riots.

      @Suisfonia@Suisfonia10 ай бұрын
    • I'm in Puerto Rico, a cat and an iguana caused two separate power outages that lasted hours

      @alphabravo424@alphabravo42410 ай бұрын
    • ​@@SuisfoniaThere were no riots in the 2011 Southwest blackout. I was living in Southern California then, and Google searches (Wikipedia, San Diego Union Tribune, other sites) confirm my recollection.

      @larrywest42@larrywest4210 ай бұрын
    • @@alphabravo424 Puerto Rican iguanas are gigantic.

      @pollypockets508@pollypockets50810 ай бұрын
  • 1:48 that’s the first time I’ve heard this guy laugh like that

    @Monkeygamer-bd1eb@Monkeygamer-bd1eb8 ай бұрын
  • You gotta love William’s story. He didn’t ignore the situation or just tell them off for pointing it out. He realized his mistake and did everything he could to rectify it.

    @andrewmunro6106@andrewmunro61062 ай бұрын
  • I’ve got another reason why Hannibal’s campaign failed: because siege engines/machines in the ancient world were so bulky and hard to transport, Hannibal simply couldn’t bring them with him over the Alps, even when they were disassembled, so he simply left them behind. This led to one important rule in ancient warfare: you can’t lay cities “to siege” without siege machines.

    @makutamon@makutamon10 ай бұрын
    • Should have just had his medivacs bring the siege tanks in, thats what jim raynor would do

      @gejamugamlatsoomanam7716@gejamugamlatsoomanam771610 ай бұрын
    • Bro you’re so smart

      @user-yl5tw6tc1p@user-yl5tw6tc1p6 ай бұрын
    • The phrase 'carthage must be destroyed' was mostly used by Cato btw Ceterum censeo carthaginem esse delendam - Cato the Elder

      @hromeise@hromeise4 ай бұрын
    • Nice to have a bit of a history lesson. Thank you.@@hromeise

      @makutamon@makutamon3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@makutamonInteresting 🤔

      @honor9lite1337@honor9lite133710 күн бұрын
  • Oh yes, fireworks can be very dangerous. One New Years Eve, I was outside with my dogs. It had been a very dry winter and I live in south Texas so there wasn't any snow. I watched my neighbors set their driveway on fire. Technically, all the dead, dry leaves but still the whole driveway was in flames that rapidly went above the 6 foot privacy fence. This was right next to their RV which had big fuel tanks. And the neighbor between us is a painting contractor who stores hundreds of gallons of paint and primer in his garage. Fortunately, they managed to put the fire out but I keep an eye on them now as I now know they're not the brightest bulbs.

    @robinoconnor553@robinoconnor55310 ай бұрын
  • Accidently setting off a fire suppression system at a remote Fuelling facility. Big mess! It was because of me losing my good multimeter. I had to run to a local hardware and buying a cheap one! Big MISTEAK! The releasing panel had a trouble fault on it, so I was using pos meter to test continuity on the circuits and when testing I touched the wrong terminal with the meter leads and heard a pop sound. It was the fire suppression system releasing! I was so pissed off at what I did I smashed that pos meter. I was coursing and screaming so loud that the workers at the facility heard me and were making sure I was ok! Damn! I was so pissed! I had to report back to my company what had happen and the said fix it whatever it takes. Well with in 24 hours we also had it back to normal. $5000.00 later, we also had to pay them another $1000.00 to have a professional cleaning company come in to clean up after we had everything cleaned up. Needless to say, a cheap multimeter and me are to blame. And yes, we lost the account! Got to love it!

    @billsidle1839@billsidle18393 ай бұрын
    • MISTEAK??? 😱😱😱

      @honor9lite1337@honor9lite133710 күн бұрын
  • "However embarrassing your mistake was you can rest easy knowing it wasn't THAT bad..." You underestimate my power!

    @robdom91@robdom918 ай бұрын
  • You're missing a huge part of the City Corp case... The building would've been strong enough if it was built how he designed it but the company building it decided to switch from bolted to welded joints on the metal beams the support the weight of the building. LeMessurier wasn't informed of the change when the building was being built. The student was the one who informed him, after which he re-calculated things and realized it wasn't strong enough

    @jorocker7229@jorocker72299 ай бұрын
    • The builder bolted the joints instead of welding them. You got it swapped.

      @hedaron3787@hedaron37876 ай бұрын
    • ​@@hedaron3787Who cares?

      @stellviahohenheim@stellviahohenheim4 ай бұрын
    • ​@@stellviahohenheimwell it clearly made a difference to the integrity of the building, so...

      @yuriydiakunchak2400@yuriydiakunchak2400Ай бұрын
  • Story to tell. Apparently some workers were in the oil mine in the western part of kentucky. I was at home at the time when one of the workers threw down a cigarette and something caught fire. Once it caught fire it caused the whole mine to explode. When it exploded (over 10 miles from our home) we felt the shockwave and our house shook from the blast. I dont remember it exactly but they found their remains. So yea small mistakes, but deadly consequences.

    @gamingdoge_yt8113@gamingdoge_yt811310 ай бұрын
    • Not small mistake that is what being cheap hiring idiots gets you save a little but then pay out big later

      @basillah7650@basillah7650Ай бұрын
  • My first job in 79 was at a store as a cashier. There was no digital registers like today. It was a manual register with rows of buttons from 0 to 9 and for the cents, dollars, 10s, and 100s. The 100s were covered as we didn't use them. After cleaning it I removed the cover and the replaced. I rang up the next customer having forgotten to clear it after cleaning. The customer was charged several hundred dollars for that item. The manager fixed the error and I got a warning. Taught me to clear it every time after cleaning.

    @Datrebor@Datrebor7 ай бұрын
  • The blackout in NYC in 77 also Happened in August 03... to the entire North East Coast. One of the power plants in Niagara falls around Ontario Canada went down and created a chain reaction. It lasted a few days.

    @L.S.Stryke@L.S.Stryke6 ай бұрын
    • 2003 blackout?? I remember that! Ofc it was on a really hot day of the summer too.. First time I ever saw the entire night sky :)

      @bowechosqualler@bowechosquallerАй бұрын
    • THIRTY HOURS….is NOT MULTIPLE DAYS!!!

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
    • @@traybern think we know that why u yellin 😶

      @bowechosqualler@bowechosqualler8 күн бұрын
    • @@bowechosqualler lmao pay him no mind

      @L.S.Stryke@L.S.Stryke8 күн бұрын
    • @@L.S.Stryke ahahahahhaha

      @bowechosqualler@bowechosqualler8 күн бұрын
  • Fred Fleet's binoculars were not the only "small mistake with huge consequences". The reason the Titanic is so memorable is not because of the number of lives lost or any other reason than the incredibly large number of "small mistakes with huge consequences". For example, it took the ship about two hours to sink giving the people plenty of time to save more people but small mistake after small mistake cost about three fourths of the passengers.

    @theunintelligentlydesigned4931@theunintelligentlydesigned493110 ай бұрын
    • The Titanic had enough lifeboats for UP TO 1178 people. The ship had the legal MINIMUM amount of boats because they figured in the event of an accident, they’d have time to deliver passengers to other ships during rescue. Unfortunately, for the Titanic, the ships that had responded to her distress calls were nowhere near her vicinity at the time. The Carpathia was roughly 54 miles away and though the Olympic, Titanic’s sister, also picked up the distress signal, they were over 300 miles away. On top of these facts, the Titanic had NO lifeboat drill. One was scheduled the morning of the 14th, however, it ended up being canceled for unknown reasons (though sources claim it was due to Captain Smith wanting to conduct a final service before retiring as he was due to retire at the end of the Titanic’s voyage.) The cap to the whole thing however, is that most of the boats launched in the “earlier” phases of the sinking were not launched at capacity and this was due to quite a number of factors, but the two biggest being a severe lack of training and urgency, which resulted in passengers believing that there was no imminent danger. In fact, many passengers thought that the launching of boats during the sinking was merely for a drill. Was just a whole mess!

      @Th3On3Y0uW4nt@Th3On3Y0uW4nt10 ай бұрын
    • @@Th3On3Y0uW4nt Don't forget that the Californian was probably less than 20 miles away but miscommunication resulted in the Californian not even responding to the Titanic's distress call.

      @theunintelligentlydesigned4931@theunintelligentlydesigned493110 ай бұрын
    • @@Th3On3Y0uW4nt They would also have had more lifeboats if seeing more lifeboats on the ship was not deemed 'unsightly' as the ship had to look 'nice' instead of practical. On top of that they had water proof bulkheads in the ship, but only up to E deck as it was again ugly to show such things on the decks that had upper class people. It was estimated that if the bulkheads were up through the whole ship it would not have sunk with the damage it got. So too few lifeboats, not putting the water protection through the whole ship, cruising at too high a speed because the captain was sure there was nothing there and it being night which makes ice very hard to see and you have the reason who no-one should say something stupid like 'not even god can sink this ship'. God clearly heard him. and decided to prove a point.

      @Excanda@Excanda10 ай бұрын
    • It also has to be taken into account that some passengers were afraid the lifeboats wouldn’t make it and the crew downplayed the severity of their circumstances. They fully believed a nearby ship would get to them before the titanic sank so it made more sense to them to stay put fully believing the ship either wouldn’t sink as it was “unsinkable” or another ship would be there. When most survivors recount their stories they talk about how calm everyone was and that it was so quiet as if they were in church. Just horrible most never had a chance.

      @elizabethfulton8988@elizabethfulton89889 ай бұрын
    • Another reason so many people died on the titanic was because the people constructing it didn’t include enough lifeboats for everyone on board

      @iloveappleyoutube7198@iloveappleyoutube71989 ай бұрын
  • Re the Comet disasters - much of what we know now about weak points, and especially what we know about the repeated pressurisation and depressurisation stresses and strains on the fuselage, comes from these tragedies. Not having computers to help them work out what was going on, they built a huge water tank and put a Comet in it. They put it through many pressure cycles and eventually they found the first "tear". From that they - using extremely powerful microscopes - saw and learned a lot about "creep", where a metal's atoms move in such a way as to weaken it (I know, this is a *very* basic comment, it's supposed to be). It wasn't just that the windows themselves were wrong, it was that _plus_ the constant pressure cycle. And given that Comet was the first ever jet-engined passenger aeroplane and travelled higher than any other plane, it's not surprising that they didn't think about that being a potential problem. When we look at the numerous later design problems of plane types that, in most cases, are still around (Boeing 737 Max, anyone?), we _should_ find it impossible to look back at every design fault, particularly with each development in technology (the Max's problem, from what I remember, was from a new tech item or system), and have a holier than thou attitude to it. I'm *not* accusing this narrator of it in this case, but I have heard, in so many videos, on so many channels, about so many preventable disasters or other problems (if you have 20:20 hindsight...) that I get a bit annoyed. It really does depend on the tone of voice. At least this guy speaks respectfully when there are innocent casualties from any accident or whatever. I appreciate that. As an aside, it is such a shame about Comet. Once they retrofitted the windows, she had a perfect record, but companies like Boeing were growing more rapidly than De Havilland could, especially given that they were still just recovering from war production and rationing (for the workers). She was a stunningly beautiful plane! For me it's a toss up between her and Concorde as to the most beautiful. I think Comet gets that, but Concorde gets the most awesome prize. Having watched her taking off in Heathrow (on the observation deck - the roof - that was there. No idea if any airports still have them) in the mid-70s, and watching the place come to a standstill - even staff who'd see her daily! - nothing in manned flight is a more awesome thing!

    @y_fam_goeglyd@y_fam_goeglyd10 ай бұрын
    • Y did u write so much

      @Wolfx3n@Wolfx3n8 ай бұрын
  • There were no cosmonauts on the N1 rocket when it failed and exploded because it was an unmanned test launch. This applies to all 4 of the launch attempts. There were, however, a lot of people killed from the ground support staff.

    @aaronpingle9839@aaronpingle98398 ай бұрын
  • Correction: The Commet Crashed Beacause Of Tge Windows Around A Sensor, Not The Passenger Windows, If You Look At The Cornors Of The Passenger Windows, They Are Rounded, Tge Reason For The Cracking Was Screwes Around A Window For A SENSOR, When The Screws Where Punched Into The Fusilage Of The Plane The Screws Made Tiny Cracks Wich Spread Until Tge Plane Could Not Handle It Anymore.

    @BlueAirways@BlueAirways8 ай бұрын
  • There’s another mistake to the Titanic disaster that wasn’t in this video, but should have been: the tanks/hull divisions that should have prevented the Titanic’s sinking weren’t sealed at the tops, and they were designed so that any number less than or equal to four wouldn’t cause the ship to sink; however, any number greater than four would cause the ship to sink due to “water overflow”, as I call it.

    @makutamon@makutamon10 ай бұрын
    • I was expecting them to mention that although steel was used for the central sections of hull of the Titanic, the design called for iron rivets for bow and aft sections. Most of the cracks that opened after its collision with the iceberg were in the iron-riveted forward part of the hull. Apparently the shipyard was overwhelmed by the demands of building three ships at once and therefore directors were forced into compromising on quality, not only using sub-par iron but also hiring extra riveters of less certain talent.

      @beck86@beck8610 ай бұрын
    • And one more there titanic have secretly have side burn

      @haonsanion8851@haonsanion885110 ай бұрын
    • @@haonsanion8851 Nope, there was not a single coal fire or burn. Even if there was it wouldn't be enough to cause the Iceberg to "damage more"

      @reddwarf5133@reddwarf513310 ай бұрын
    • That's not actually a mistake. That was perfectly normal for ships of the period why watertight doors.

      @jfangm@jfangm3 ай бұрын
  • Shout out to our firefighters! They all face amazing dangers.

    @ritawashere5787@ritawashere578710 ай бұрын
    • Amazing dangers that's very opposite

      @therat2.094@therat2.09410 ай бұрын
  • The Titanic disaster was a combination of blunders. 1st. The captain was on his last cruise before retirement. He wanted to set a speed record which the Titanic was designed to do. When entering the iceberg area he did not slow down to 15 knots, as maritime law required. 2nd. The Titanic was made of riveted brittle steel that opened like a zipper when she scraped the iceberg. Better steel and welding were developed years later. A welded ship would only have been dented. 3rd. Life boat drills were not conducted. This brought confusion to the passengers. Some lifeboats had 3 or 4 people.

    @user-bf1md8xv1p@user-bf1md8xv1p7 ай бұрын
    • DUMBBELL!! If better steel didn’t EXIST until YEARS LATER….the Titanic’s steel was NOT a BLUNDER!!!!

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
  • I made a mistake at work once. I was upset about it but my boss said, "If you do not make mistakes you are not doing anything worthwhile." I had a date that night and we went to PF Chang's. It was good food and delightful conversation. While we ate I told my GF about the mistake and what my boss had said. We laughed about it, with her commenting that with her job, mistakes tended to be a bit more catastrophic. She was a cardiac nurse. We got our fortune cookies and I cracked mine open, read it, said, "I don't believe this!" I showed her my fortune cookie and we both laughed. I even took the fortune to show my boss the following Monday. The fortune read, "If you do not make mistakes you are not doing anything worthwhile." He smiled and said, "Where do you think I got that?"

    @erictaylor5462@erictaylor54624 ай бұрын
  • It’s debated whether or not the lookout on Titanic would have been able to see the iceberg with the binoculars. Because it was a moonless night and the sea was a flat calm, the iceberg was all but invisible. The only reason he saw it at all was because it appeared as a black mass on the starry horizon. So the binoculars probably would have been useless.

    @theminingassassin16@theminingassassin1610 ай бұрын
    • Not to mention the fact that if they were that important the ship would have had multiple sets of binoculars or at least forced open the cabinet they were stored in.

      @emilypower9748@emilypower974810 ай бұрын
    • @@emilypower9748I thought that, too.

      @theminingassassin16@theminingassassin1610 ай бұрын
    • Fun fact there a KZheadr that does titanic videos called historic travels I think

      @FreedomeBlitz@FreedomeBlitz10 ай бұрын
    • ​@@emilypower9748 A lot of safety-related things on the Titanic (most famously, the lifeboats) were skimped or outright overlooked just because no one thought they'd ever be needed. The binoculars were no exception.

      @kerriemills7184@kerriemills718410 ай бұрын
    • There’s a KZhead channel called “Oceanliner Design”, and the host of that channel is very knowledgeable about ocean liners. He has done many videos about the Titanic, and in one video he explained the real reason Titanic had so few lifeboats. The reason was that lifeboats were actually more risky than one might expect. In choppy waters, lifeboats were prone to flipping over, and in many situations, were more responsible for loss of life than the ship sinking itself. This was the reason ships were being fitted with things like watertight compartments and all that, in order to turn ships into massive lifeboats in case of an emergency. Lifeboats were meant to simply transport passengers to rescue ships when they arrived on scene. In other words,the new technology made people overconfident, and this was realized in the Titanic disaster. This was why, after Titanic sank, Olympic and Britannic were given the proper number of lifeboats, along with other improvements to their safety features.

      @theminingassassin16@theminingassassin1610 ай бұрын
  • Regarding the collapse at 25:09: this is the Goffert Stadium in Nijmegen, not Vitesse. More even so, there is no city of Vitesse in The Netherlands. Vitesse is the name of the professional soccer team from Arnhem, just 10 miles to the north of Nijmegen. And even though the stadium was orignally built in 1939, it was completely rebuilt in 1999 (the old stadium was demolished) and reopened in 2000, so all wasn't caused by a lack of maintenance but faulty calculations in construction.

    @bosshogg7513@bosshogg751310 ай бұрын
  • Do to David Blair’s anger he managed to forget to hand over the key to the safe containing Fred fleet’s binoculars if Blair had handed the key the tragedy wouldn’t have happened in the first place 14:54

    @Async_Industries@Async_Industries6 ай бұрын
  • It's amazing how when people admit their mistakes and then work to fix them, people's lives can be saved without them even knowing it.

    @beez1717@beez17175 ай бұрын
  • The reason for the Comet's demise had nothing to do with square windows ... that was an incorrect reporting by the British press. As the Wikipedia article states "Design and construction flaws, including improper riveting and dangerous concentrations of stress around square cut-outs for the ADF (automatic direction finder) antennas were ultimately identified." The real cause was metal fatigue caused by repeated pressurization and depressurization cycles, which was not well understood at the time.

    @jimmeade2976@jimmeade297610 ай бұрын
  • A good video, well done, though I did spot an error in the Titanic section, so here's a quick correction from a Titanic enthusiast: In 1911, the Titanic's sister ship, the RMS Olympic, collided with the Royal Navy cruiser HMS Hawke, which damaged the ship a bit. The Titanic's construction was put on hold and the Titanic's maiden voyage was bumped back so White Star could make repairs on Olympic. The Titanic's first and chief officers were, before the incident, William Murdoch (demoted to first officer and died when the ship went down) and Charles Lightoller (demoted to second officer and survived the disaster). So the White Star executives had no choice but to transfer Henry Wilde onto the Titanic while repairs on Olympic were carried out, which bumped Murdoch and Lightoller down a rank and kicking Blair, the previous second officer, off the ship, which then lead to Blair taking the keys and the disaster.

    @CaptainACT_Official@CaptainACT_Official10 ай бұрын
  • 12:15 Matt Lowne built and successfully flew an N1 to the Mün in _Kerbal Space Program,_ where things like loose bolts are inconsequential.

    @cardinalhamneggs5253@cardinalhamneggs52538 ай бұрын
    • kerbin is like 10 times smaller

      @alfieho-br1cw@alfieho-br1cw16 күн бұрын
  • @25:14 The stadium in question was from rivaling team NEC (Nijmegen) and the supporters on it are from Vitesse (Arnhem) "The images show how the supporters jump into the stands and celebrate the three points achieved together with the players, when suddenly the front part of the stands gives way. It appears no one was seriously injured. It was the first meeting between the two rivals since NEC’s relegation to the first division in 2017. The rivalry between the two teams from Arnhem and Nijmegen is enormous. The match was marred by misbehavior from the stands and regularly running high emotions on the pitch. Vitesse supporters escaped disaster on Sunday when they celebrated the victory over NEC (0-1). During a party with the players after the first Gelderland derby in 4.5 years, the front part of the branch collapsed." (quoted source unknown)

    @Fuzzems@Fuzzems8 ай бұрын
  • Fun fact: In rocket science, this is known as a 'Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly' or RUD for short.

    @Rekuzan@Rekuzan10 ай бұрын
    • As an explosion is the rapid disassembling of the weapon.

      @navret1707@navret170710 ай бұрын
  • Check your facts on the dehavilland story… mentour now did a great video on it… the crashes were caused by metal fatigue because they were able to go really high, meaning that there is high cabin pressure which damaged an opening on top of the of fuselage, not the passenger or pilot windows. There were also other causes.

    @mr.mastor@mr.mastor10 ай бұрын
  • Cleaning lab supplies with acetone, then wiping said acetone with paper towels, then throwing said paper towels into the lab bins. Considering that I was cleaning roughly 2,000 beakers and flasks over the course of 3 hours, that was a LOT of acetone-laced paper inside those bins. Is it any wonder that half the lab was scorched black when, immediately after I finished cleaning, a group of summer camp teens used that lab room to do something related to fire, and they threw their still-smoldering matches into the bin? No one was hurt, though several girls had to walk around with ruined hair and make-up for the rest of the day when the flames causes a downpour from the sprinklers system.

    @1003JustinLaw@1003JustinLaw7 ай бұрын
  • The primary reason for the Comets breaking up in midair was the decision to install two oblong windows above First Class so passengers could see the sky. The square windows were also a factor. They learned what was happening after building a huge tank, filling it with water then submerging a Comet's fuselage in it. Then they pressurised and depressurised it until they discovered the cracks around the windows. If you want the full story try Wikipedia.

    @Aye-McHunt@Aye-McHunt8 ай бұрын
  • Your channel should be shown in all high schools, within History and Geography classes. I definitely would of gotten A+ instead of just passing as I found those classes really boring. But I may have become something important given all you have taught me! Thank you! I’m always AMAZED at your content! 💕💕💕

    @jacklasz@jacklasz10 ай бұрын
    • This makes me sad - this is an ENTERTAINMENT channel, NOT educational. You not realizing that means I believe you learned nothing in school and that's sad.

      @ross-carlson@ross-carlson10 ай бұрын
    • @@ross-carlson I learned plenty in school during the 70’s and 80’s I just found school hard. Yes it’s entertainment but it’s also educational. Sorry that’s just my opinion. And don’t feel sad for me. We can’t all be smart.

      @jacklasz@jacklasz10 ай бұрын
    • @@vujoleenanh Sorry but I disagree as this channel is filled with information and can teach people a variety of things about life.

      @jacklasz@jacklasz10 ай бұрын
    • My school did but for science

      @No-one_is_home@No-one_is_home10 ай бұрын
    • Apparently you didn't do too well in English either...

      @UpperDarbyDetailing@UpperDarbyDetailing10 ай бұрын
  • I know of two other small mistakes that caused big consequences. Well, the first one was a mistake while the other was a mishap despite watchful maintenance. 1. The Challenger disaster on January 28, 1986 was caused when a single o-ring came loose, causing the shuttle to break apart upon launching. This disaster was also caused by a lack of a good night’s sleep the day prior. 2. The Columbia disaster on February 1, 2003 was caused when a large piece of foam fell from the shuttle's external tank and breached the spacecraft wing upon launching sixteen days prior. When reentering Earth’s atmosphere, the shuttle disintegrated. RIP: Dick Scobee, Michael J. Smith, Judy Resnik, Ellison Onizuka, Ronald McNair, Gregory Jarvis, and Christine McAuliffe and Rick Husband, William McCool, Laurel Clark, David M. Brown, Kaplana Chawla, Michael P. Anderson, and Ilan Ramon.

    @ethankajfosz5912@ethankajfosz591210 ай бұрын
  • 5:02 Girl, how about blaze

    @davidkennedy8@davidkennedy88 ай бұрын
  • 8:20 Fooled them once, fooled them twice, then they took our paradise. Now our scheme went all to crap. That was no time to nap!

    @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd7 ай бұрын
    • that was really good

      @Weston-ir3jb@Weston-ir3jb7 ай бұрын
    • @@Weston-ir3jb Yes. Took me a while to think of a parody of that actual song based on the title the guy gave for the story. 😉

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd7 ай бұрын
    • wait that was an actual song?@@WilliamDearthwd

      @Weston-ir3jb@Weston-ir3jb7 ай бұрын
    • @@Weston-ir3jb Yes. It was from the newest James Bond movie of the same title: No Time To Die, Oscar Winning song. Performed by Billie Eilish.

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd7 ай бұрын
    • The part I spoofed really went. "Fool me once, fool me twice. Are you death or paradise? Now you'll never see me cry. There's just no time to die!"

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd7 ай бұрын
  • You did point out a good flaw when it comes to the sinking of the Titanic and many lives have been lost, but there were others. Flaw 1: number of life boats. If the trade regulations were not out of date, then they were able to do 64 life boats instead of 16 which means many lives would have been saved. Flaw 2: coal fire. There was a coal fire in one of the coal bunkers that weakened the hull. They decided to put the fire out and continue on with their voyage instead of going back to Holland and Wolf for repairs. Flaw 3: ignoring ice warnings from other ships. The people in the telegraph room were so occupied with messages from passengers to Cape Race to family and friends that only 1 or 2 ice warnings went to the captian, not all of them.

    @godessoflife9810@godessoflife981010 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for pointing this out because not much people know about how the titanic actually sank. Basically the coal workers were trying to get the coal out as fast as they can to put the fire out but this made the ship stay at high speeds through the iceberg zone and they just kept putting more coal into the engine so the ship never slowed down too avoid the iceberg

      @cullennyborg155@cullennyborg15510 ай бұрын
    • Wasn't there also a fire before it's launch as well

      @vexile1239@vexile123910 ай бұрын
    • @@vexile1239 theres also the theory the titanic was secretly replaced with her sister ship before the voyage. the two being nearly identical. I don't remember all the details of the theory but it seemed very viable

      @kaiseremotion854@kaiseremotion85410 ай бұрын
    • Nope, there was not a single coal fire or burn. Even if there was it wouldn't be enough to cause the Iceberg to "damage more"

      @reddwarf5133@reddwarf513310 ай бұрын
  • It's crazy to think that one loose screw changed history forever

    @Monkey_Man2300@Monkey_Man230010 ай бұрын
  • Square windows vs. round windows on a plane.........I learned something valuable today.

    @TheAeroAvatar@TheAeroAvatar9 ай бұрын
    • Check further. Clue, it was not the shape of the windows.

      @iscmiscm@iscmiscmАй бұрын
  • I was working in a bank, the bank was closed between 12h and 14h each day, in that time we would fill up the ATMs and empty the night safe (where businesses can deposit their revenue after bank hours). I emptied the night safe (which was in an ATM vestibule, open around the clock), I put about 90.000€ in an envelope on top of the safe while locking it back up. I went to lunch and forgot to put the money in our vault. I only realized an hour late, when a colleague asked me if I counted the night safe money yet :D

    @CharlieTheNerd91@CharlieTheNerd918 ай бұрын
  • A similar situation to the cigarette scenario was at Bradford Stadium in 1985. During a football/soccer match, someone in the crowd tried exstinguishing a cigarette, but it slipped through the floorboards and ignited the litter below.

    @KatieAliceGamer@KatieAliceGamer10 ай бұрын
  • Thank God William was open minded enough and didn’t have an ego problem, so that he listened to Diane about the structural flaw of his NY building. In a different scenario, he could have ignored her and disaster may have followed. Good on both of them. 👍

    @wht-rabt-obj@wht-rabt-obj9 ай бұрын
  • 23:21 Technically it is not an operating system, but an operating environment, since Windows versions 1.x to the 9x series, run on top of DOS. Windows 95 just happens to boot straight into itself, skipping the need to type WIN into DOS.

    @weimarballproductions83482@weimarballproductions834827 ай бұрын
    • DOS means disk operating system.

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwdАй бұрын
  • Imo this is one of the best lists on KZhead to ever exist.

    @sinewedbastion@sinewedbastion6 ай бұрын
  • 1:42 🤣🤣🤣If thats all it took, now i wonder what happen if the Wi-Fi goes down

    @tigertex7257@tigertex725710 ай бұрын
  • There's a game by Ambrosia Software called Deimos Rising. There are 12 sectors to secure and complete the game. The sector names have references to actual places, battles, or former empires. One called Neo Kowloon, which is a reference to Kowloon Peninsula in Hong Kong. And another one called Greater Babylon, and the final sector is titled Carthage. 😉 21:27

    @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd9 ай бұрын
  • Ive been amazed, and learnt quite a bit, this helps me learn when I study.

    @German_bri-ish_Guy@German_bri-ish_Guy7 ай бұрын
  • The window shape on the Comet was _not_ the underlying cause of its crash. While it was a weaker point the primary reason for the breaking apart was the manufacturing process that had riveting on a thin skin creating stress fractures later propagating as fatigue fractures through each flight cycle. The Comet would have failed even with rounded windows (albeit probably over a couple more cycles) unless the manufacturing was changed. You will notice how minimal the rounding of corners are on the very front pilot windshields on modern airliners.

    @pop5678eye@pop5678eye8 ай бұрын
  • Albert is the reason they handcuff the briefcases to their wrist now.

    @robgable2426@robgable242610 ай бұрын
  • The comet windows aren't square because the corner of it is smooth, it's not sharp. The crashes was caused of fatigue on the structure (please add anything that I have missed)

    @danniserendret4301@danniserendret430110 ай бұрын
    • Yeah, Mentour Pilot has a vid or two about this. Blaming it on square windows was just poor reporting that has been passed along as fact for years and years now

      @MrGoesBoom@MrGoesBoom10 ай бұрын
    • @@MrGoesBoom Yep

      @danniserendret4301@danniserendret430110 ай бұрын
    • Yes, fatigue added to the corners.

      @WilliamDearthwd@WilliamDearthwd10 ай бұрын
  • Vitesse is the name of a foodballteam (or soccerteam) based in Arnhem. The incident was in the Stadium of N.E.C Nijmegen (wel known for the International 4Days marches) It occuredes at the end of the match between N.E.C. and Vitesse

    @gert-jantroost9594@gert-jantroost95948 ай бұрын
  • 18:00 Worse, Ukraine could REALLY use those explosives to defend itself right now. Worst news so far in this video

    @espnthefuture@espnthefuture8 ай бұрын
  • If I remember correctly regarding City Corp, the architect first came to the conclusion that it would still be strong enough but did an inspection and found out that the beams, which according to the drawings should have been welded from the beginning, had been changed to be bolted together to save on cost with the reasoning that all other buildings was bolted, why add the cost of welding. But the design with the legs had the effect that unlike other buildings where the anchoring to the ground extended to the corners, meaning you always had compression forces stabilizing the buildings, in the city corp building, when wind was hitting the diagonal, you had not corner support and got stretching/pulling force instead, and while bolts worked well for compression, they only need to prevent the pieces sliding to the side, for pulling, the bolts carried the full force, and they where not even close to be enough for the hurricane that was to decent within days.

    @davidmartensson273@davidmartensson27310 ай бұрын
  • It's questionable as to whether binoculars would have been helpful for Frederick Fleet in spotting the iceberg that sank the Titanic. One thing that people in the crow's nest looked for at night was water breaking against icebergs. The splashing was easily identifiable against a dark background. But with a calm ocean that night, that was not as easy to spot. Also, with the cold temperature that night, it's possible that the binoculars would have justified fogged up.

    @ronfehr7899@ronfehr789910 ай бұрын
  • 5:14 just a normal new year in the netherlands

    @liamvanhelmond1901@liamvanhelmond19018 ай бұрын
  • I was a geriatric medical assitant in Spain, One dayt after an emergency shift of 19 hours the previous day that finished at 1 AM I had to be on a home visit for a checkup at 7 AM but I overslept and was 30 min late, because of this the ambulance that I ordered for that visit had to wait and thye had to call another one for the other patients and that of course lead to the delay of 9 ambulances and a mixum pf 2 hospitals for patients. No fatal injuries but just a huge delay in the checkups of a city that day because of me in 2018

    @Soyinutul@Soyinutul8 ай бұрын
  • That last one shows what happens when A: You're humble, even though you designed a big ass building B: You take responsibility for your work. C: you don't discount someone because they are a student or a woman

    @asbestosfiber@asbestosfiber10 ай бұрын
  • 15:49 I’ve seen those keys. They’re now on display at the museum Titanic Belfast. A MUST see for all historians of Titanic like me!

    @laratheplanespotter@laratheplanespotter10 ай бұрын
  • A correction is needed on the Soviet N-1 booster, designed to send a crew to the Moon. First, there were actually four test flights, all of which failed, before the Soviets shelved the entire project. However, there were no cosmonauts aboard any of those test flights, so no cosmonauts died aboard the N-1.

    @johncronin9540@johncronin95406 ай бұрын
  • 5:35 😂🇩🇰 i didnt know we Dane’s could make a mistake😢😂😂😂 Edit : btw we don’t use euro we got kroners/kr

    @VirtualGamerHD@VirtualGamerHD8 ай бұрын
  • The Comet did not crash because of it's windows. This is a common misunderstanding of the comet crashes so don't worry. The planes actually crashed because of tiny fatigue cracks which were created when the plane's bolts were made.

    @commuterjack@commuterjack10 ай бұрын
  • I'm from Minneapolis and grew up going to the Metrodome. It wasn't an oversight as much as it was just an old building in need of renovations and an unusually large snowfall that year. The building was already being planned to be either demolished for a new stadium to be built or have a huge overhaul. Not a mistake - just neglect 😊

    @DiscoPenguin8@DiscoPenguin810 ай бұрын
    • Same here. Every game I went to at the Metrodome I kept looking at the ceiling thinking that at some point it would break down. It did when I was in my 20’s. The Metrodome was still active for small events like the Rollerdome. No games were held till Target Field was built and a new Vikings stadium was built after the dome was demolished. Good memories before that disaster happened.

      @SeerDragon@SeerDragon9 ай бұрын
    • Gotta leave the heat ON in the winter!!!

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
  • The titanic disaster was also the captains fault. Since he turned the ship was damaged more then if he went head on to the iceberg

    @michaelspring3404@michaelspring34048 ай бұрын
    • WRONG!!! Going HEAD ON would NOT have sunk the ship. The boat DRAGGED along its SIDE, ripping open SEVERAL compartments!!!

      @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
  • He worked for THREE MONTHS to find a solution, ALL while the hurricane PAUSED for 90 days off the coast of New Jersey!!! THANKS, Ella!!!

    @traybern@traybern8 күн бұрын
  • 10:38 That wasn't the source of the pressure. The source was internal - the plane was flying in extremely thin, unbreathable air at around 40,000 feet but was pressurized internally to the equivalent of a breathable 8,000 feet. This substantial pressure difference, combined with the cyclic nature of its application due to landing between flights, caused the metal around the window corners to fatigue.

    @bobogus7559@bobogus75599 ай бұрын
  • 8:56 as an aviation enthusiast, as soon as I saw the plane right here the first thing I noticed was the square windows which then made me predict of there being a lot of crashes because of the square windows

    @emirates777landatkittila@emirates777landatkittila9 ай бұрын
    • It was not the square windows that caused the problem. It was badly made holes for the rivets combined with the skin being too thin and the lack of a way to prevent cracks spreading. Lazy journalists etc just repeat the same old stuff without checking facts.

      @iscmiscm@iscmiscmАй бұрын
    • @@iscmiscm the square windows caused pressure to build up at the corners making weak spots and the windows could snap and break at those weak points and those holes in the windows was made to equalize the pressure

      @emirates777landatkittila@emirates777landatkittilaАй бұрын
    • @@emirates777landatkittila Sounds great, but the pressure testing after the crashes came to a different conclusion. Observation tells one what to expect, but testing tells the real truth. The points of failure in testing were the rivets joining the panels due to the way they were punched combined with the thickness and lack of means to prevent cracks spreading. Boeing were also able to use the hard earned knowledge on the 707. Sometimes being first is not the best plus we gave our knowledge for free.

      @iscmiscm@iscmiscmАй бұрын
  • One small mistake I made was not checking that the tube wasn't sandwiched between the tire and rim. POP!! Did that twice in a day (poor lighting was one, a panic to get to work was the second). I eventually said **fuck this shit** and took the bus to work. Upon arriving home afte the shift, I patched the two blown tubes (pinched popped), and always check from now on that it isn't caught. Another fucked up thing was somebody tossed a lit cigarette from a balcony and caused a huge fire that damaged TWO UNITS facing my building (the one where it happened and the one above it). Toronto fire services got to it and I did catch the most of it on video. It happened a few months ago actually.

    @rootbrian4815@rootbrian48159 ай бұрын
  • You're confused, boy! "Delenda est Carthago" was Cato the Elder's way of ending his speeches that triggered the THIRD Punic War. Hannibal Barca's excursion was the SECOND Punic War.

    @ManuelCampagna@ManuelCampagna6 ай бұрын
  • The speed of the De Havilland Comet had nothing to do with the crashes. The issue is the pressurization and depressurization cycles causing metal fatigue.

    @SDWNJ@SDWNJ10 ай бұрын
  • Actually, it was a series of errors that lead to the sinking of the Titanic, not any single one! A coal bunker fire leaving the bulkheads compromised and the ship listing (with visible signs on the hull if you look, you can clearly see where the metal had darkened from said fire STILL BURNING when the ship first set sail) and not to mention the order to pull full reverse and to turn hard, plus the First Class passengers leaving all their windows open - I am not making this up; these are genuine factors that contributed to why she sunk so damned fast!

    @CD-Gaming@CD-Gaming10 ай бұрын
    • Nope, there was not a single coal fire or burn. Even if there was it wouldn't be enough to cause the Iceberg to "damage more"

      @reddwarf5133@reddwarf513310 ай бұрын
    • @@reddwarf5133 There was a coal fire, the bulkheads were warped from it! It was raging well into her maiden voyage! She was well out into the Atlantic before they got it under control! You can clearly see a dark spot on her hull in the photos of her, bearing in mind she was listing as well! And I didn't say it caused more damage, it compromised the inner hull integrity, which did not help!

      @CD-Gaming@CD-Gaming10 ай бұрын
  • Where’s the old guy?

    @A-6flicks@A-6flicks5 ай бұрын
    • I think it’s puberty

      @carissaprokopowich885@carissaprokopowich88526 күн бұрын
    • May be

      @Daniel_0923.@Daniel_0923.16 күн бұрын
  • 8:24 The guy who disapproved some guy trying to go to art school: bro are you sure? 💀🗿

    @PringlesL0vr@PringlesL0vr5 ай бұрын
  • I live in Colorado. Fire awareness and prevention is key. We had yhe Hayman fire when I was a teenager, it was just as bad as the one in this video. Many friends lost houses and family members. This is all because a forest service lady burnt a love note in a camp ring and forget to put it out properly. Any small spark can light shit up if its dry out. Be safe and fun camping!

    @cosamglass7970@cosamglass797010 ай бұрын
  • I don't do fireworks because one nearly hit me in the face, a cat got spooked while I was holding it and clawed me up, and a small brush fire started because our neighbors decided our yard was OK to dump their large amount of sticks in our yard. (The pile was 4-6 feet wide and definitely 6 feet tall) all this happened in one night. I also hate loud sounds so this was just the final straw.

    @jewelhenson3034@jewelhenson303410 ай бұрын
    • I hate loud sounds too

      @LilliKitti529@LilliKitti52910 ай бұрын
  • Really surprised that Chernobyl wasn't on here. That's the pinnacle definition of small things with giant consequence. The deadly AZ-5 button.

    @llemS_U@llemS_U2 ай бұрын
  • Slight correction about Carthage. The famous phrase "Carthago Delenda Est " or the full phrase "Ceterum (autem) censeo Carthaginem esse delendam " was said after the 2nd Punic War and was said by the politician Cato the Elder trying to convince the Roman senate to intiate the 3rd Punic war, which he was eventually able to do.

    @hoabinhnguyen8839@hoabinhnguyen88395 ай бұрын
KZhead