Economist Fact-Checks Zeihan's China Collapse Story
Visit guard.io/moneymacro to get your free browser scan and a 7-day trial of premium features.
If you appreciate the research, consider buying me a 'coffee' at ko-fi.com/moneymacro or supporting long-term for membership benefits via: / moneymacro
LIKE CHATTING ECON WITH ME?
△ Follow me on Twitter: / joerischasfoort
△ Follow me on LinkedIn: / joeri-schasfoort
△ I have a private Discord server for Senior and Chief economist Patrons / members.
Otherwise I sometimes hang out in two Discord servers:
SOURCES:
I've linked my sources in the blog that goes along with this video. Links are in the text.
www.moneymacro.rocks/2023-10-...
Timestamps:
0:00 - introduction
2:22 - demographic collapse
9:36 - sponsor
11:20 - food and energy disaster
16:32 - failing growth model
19:05 - increased authoritarianism
Attribution:
- various Peter Zeihan clips are from Zeihan's own channel (see source blog for links), some crips are from Zeihan's appearance on the Joe Rogan experience and some of his appearance on the Jordan Harbinger Show.
Narrated and produced by Dr. Joeri Schasfoort
Edited by Christopher Adewole
Visit guard.io/moneymacro to get your free browser scan and a 7-day trial of premium features.
One contradiction is that bring in people from the rural areas to continue to boost the economy and having the option to grow their food. You cannot have both.
@@clanholmes sure you can. Most agriculture production is mechanised anyway. One machine can replace the work of dozens of people whose effort can then be brought into the city and trained to do other things. Surely you don't still believe everyone still farms the old fashioned way.
Hes right about 70% of the time he simply uses analytics. I made a lot of money from him. By the way, how much is the CCP paying you to talk trash on him?
China is absolutely NOT addressing their fertility rate issue, as you say China's latest rate is already down to about 1.2 (replacement needs 2.1 or more) and demographic experts see a Chinese government refusing to engage with child-rearing booster polices. The overnment attitude most people see from China's government is "there will be much fewer Chinese in a few decades but it is okay, the quality of life will be better for a smaller population"
@@Gabriel-lChinese farmland requires a lot of fertilizer, which requires a lot of energy, which China does not have. Plus mechanization in agriculture has its downsides, even if you temporarily boost yields you’re draining the soil and soon enough you get a great dust bowl.
I read a great comment about Zeihan. "He's successfully predicted 20 of the last 3 global crises." Cracked me up.
That originated from all the sensationalists on KZhead. Peter Schiff predicted twenty of the last two recessions. Fear bros predicted twenty of the last two housing collapses. Etc.
Well saying "everyone is gonna live happily together in a stabile world" doesn't sell that well lol
Hahaha
Zeihan’s tall tales get longer as his hair gets longer.
He goes on the principle that even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day
This sort of credible challenge is deeply appreciated. Peter is still human and can make mistakes. I appreciate even more that you delivered this critique with the utmost of respect. You’re an excellent example of professionalism in this regard. Thank you.
Mistakes are human, yes. But if so many arguments are flawed or simply wrong, one has to question the other sides honesty.
If his primary thesis behind his predictions are totally flawed what of value remains?
There is a difference between honest mistakes that all humans make and having an inherent bias which peter has. According to him and many of his fans america has no major problems and the rest of the world is on the verge of collapse. Its not about his false predictions on china, he has made numerous predictions over the time that have fallen flat on his face, kinda like his mentor george friedman
He doesn't make mistakes...he is telling you this crap cos he is paid to
But did he come out and ever say ... ooops, I was wrong here or there? maybe he did, tell us if so
Not just with China, but elsewhere, Zeihan does an excellent job identifying problems but consistently underestimates the ability of people to adjust and muddle through problems without falling apart. He is generally too pessimistic, but the problems he mentions are valid.
I hear that he's paranoid, it may be because of his background and long history of dealing with all this information in his head, the question is when China is 300 something billion dollars in the hole with poor gdp growth what exactly are the workarounds for every day Chinese citzens?
To be fair to Zeihan I'm fairly he says that he that it's still theory.
Exactly, all of his predictions for the future assume that people are just going to roll over and die, rather than rise up to the challenge and work to solve the problems. (As they've always done)
It’s also useful to explore the worst-case scenario and try to gain insights about how the country will respond to these challenges. As the video says, it’s an interesting perspective.
Peter Zeihan is like that postman Cliff Calvin in Cheers TV series. He knows everything a little bit. And he can string some big words together and appears to be coherent.
I think your peer reviews and fact check videos of these popular youtubers are really important. Especially as they serve a big audience that might not be as critical. This may cause even more less critical information spreading the globe. So well done Joeri. You make youtube a better place
It depends on one's ability to evaluate the validity of what they r being told by those propagandas
Some of the best academic work is refutations
You can't even speak English correctly, wumao.
@@yaoliang1580Just look at Comedy Show CIA Funded Analysis that china's recent 7nm Chip leap..he said a just month before that china can't make chips Above 10nm Lmao😂😂And then that huwae thing happened 😂😂..Suprised he even reacted to it😂😂😂but as usually he does..he did state China bad again 😂😂and Collapse story was still present there
@@GTFO_0 he's just a sponsored anti China fake news propagandist and he isn't worried that his lies are being exposed bcos his followers are so brainwashed n ignorant that they will buy into all those garbage narrative that he regularly feeds them
This is not a rampant debunking. It positions an strong alternative argument in a respectful way. Enjoyed it. Kudos.
Well stated, my thoughts exactly!!
Don’t know about STRONG.
The current rapid ascension of labor costs are directly related to the impending population collapse in China. With a majority of the population base needed for healthcare when the 1-child policy comes to fruition, few to no people will be left to man the factories. What is on the horizon is an absolute collapse. China is at the peak of their current empire's run.
@@chuckpool78 strong might be too strong a word. lol.
It was respectful. PZ is rampant, always.
Your first point misunderstands the consumption. People in late 20's to early 30's are taking on lots of debt for housing when they start family formation. That's why that demographic is so important for growth. That economic demand shows shows up immediately without the corresponding income.
Nicely done! I've learned a lot from Peter, but have often wanted to see the other side of the story...this was perfect to balance the conversation.
Nope - that guy here does not even address the key Chinese issues of stupendous debt overextention, insane communist inefficiency on top of the demographic crunch. Demographics alone would not do it were it not for the main issues which the bloke here does not address.
As a geography teacher I've been keeping tabs on Zeihan for many years and, in my view, he has always attracted people's attention through sensational claims. To me, he is a very knowledgeable sophist. In many of his talks with military personnel he make these claims about how America's greatest rivals aren't really a threat and that countries like China could be easily contained. In his lectures to American soy farmers he always claims that they shouldn't worry about Brazillian competition because of Brazil's bad infrastructure and narrow export corridors.However, year after year, Brazil has produced more soy beans, exported more and more, and has now finalized its largest railway in decades, that cuts the nation from north to south. To me, he will always overlook other nations success, particulary those that have some sort of beef with the US, may it be peaceful competition or geopolitcal rival. I'm a great admirer of the US society and, as a Brazillian, always find ways to learn more about our flaws by observing America's example, but Zeihan only seems to apreciate the success of his country and some of America's friends.
I lived in China 2014 to 2019. Zeihan is right. China is a shithole and is in a depression right now.
'Geography teacher' Sit down and learn your place trash 😂😂😂😂
@@craftsmanceramics8653 Not the brightest bulb are you son. 😏
Do you consider Brasil to be adversary of US and Western world?
Yeah, you're spot on. The world is full enough of fake news as it is; people like Zeihan aren't merely harmless entertainers - they're spouting lots of pointless messaging at high volume. All that noise really does distract from the signal. People overestimate their ability to filter out that noise, because we usually only consider explicit examples - but that's a form of selection bias; the most pernicious noise is the kind we barely have time for and can't be bothered to think about, *not* the kind we both to sink time and effort into; and that's just everywhere due in part to people like Zeihan.
I've watched a lot of Zeihan vids and value his analysis, but I'm often surprised at the somewhat extreme nature of his conclusions because they seem not to allow for the possibility of any intervention. I just don't think the world works that way. Thanks for your presentation.
Zeihan's premises are always better than his conclusions. :-)
Who exactly would intervene, how would they do it, and why?
@@fell5514 the world is so chaotic that nothing ever follows predictions. A new war, natural disasters, world leaders falling ill or getting involved into scandals, economic crisis, etc. Any of these events, or their combination, can totally change the trajectory of any country.
That in no way means that we shouldn't try to make predictions about what will happen, you can still plan for the future even though we're all well aware that unexpected things sometimes happen.@@mind.journey
I learn a lot from what he (Zeihan) presents. I sometimes disagree with his conclusions though, particularly when they get political and his biases show through. Not sure he always takes the ability of people to screw things up into consideration, or that things don't always happen for logical reasons. In his books he goes into great detail about US geography and how this makes the US so super competitive on the world stage, and how it in fact is so much better than much of the rest of the world, which I believe is correct. However he then states that "it is impossible to screw this up," which I disagree with completely. Never underestimate the ability of human beings to screw things up. For example, if for some reason the US were to end up subdividing into multiple countries, this would in fact screw this up. You could say that this would never happen, but never is a long time. None of the folks I worked with expected the Soviet Union would suddenly collapse, and that it would do so not with a bang but with a whimper. Yet it did. If there is one thing I have learned in 66 years on this planet it is "never say never."
I love Peter Zeihan. My biggest critique is a country could decline but not collapse. North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela are good examples. But to his credit he was the first one to call out Chinas issues when everyone else was saying China would surpass the US. I think Peter lays out a worse case scenario, but not far fetched scenarios.
Thanks for your insights. As with all rigorous research, all sources of information must be weighed up, critiqued and used in context. In this day and age, the greatest challenge is not getting wrapped up in a bubble, or descending down rabbit holes.
Great video, as a military officer I appreciate Zeihans perspective but yes, definitely important to understand that his perspective is one opinion and not an absolute truth on which to entirely base decisions.
You - a military officer ? Of which crap nation - England ? USA ? Canada ? Australia ? Small wonder. It takes a microscopic small brains in order to believe Peter Zeihan's rubbish work; let alone appreciate it.
Peter openly admits his American bias and it seems most of his Intel is US or Western which would leave a gap of info expecially w Russia and to a lesser degree China. I've been able to confirm some stuff on China but the Russia stuff has been much harder.
@@nelliegracelongwood5485 you've done well - most of the ruling 'elite' in China don't even know the actual data!
Both of them are credible, but the most important element was overlooked. China is not governed by the Western political system; instead, they have the "RED BOOK." The Red Book is highly effective in controlling a massive population in both good and bad times.
I am retired military and I do appreciate hearing detailed analysis. There was none of that in this video. If you look at his summation of the issues surrounding shipping and piracy you will see little data and NO appreciation of naval logistics and what is needed to counteract piracy across the globe - as well as a deliberate (?) omission of PZs argument that nations hijacking vessels is a concern - not just pirates. The pirate flag was cute - but a give away of the level of this critique.
I have traveled and worked in China for about forty years, and have followed its astonishing economic progress with a great deal of interest. You are correct: Zeihan correctly points out problems that now face China, but draws hyperbolic negative conclusions.
Hyperbolic is definitely an accurate description of Zeihan. This time last year Zeihan took Apple's obvious, and significant problems manufacturing in China at the end of covid, and confidently announced Apple would not launch their next phone at all. Of course Apple didn't just give up, they made a few changes and fixed it. Ziehan doesn't factor in those motivations, so predicts a crash. However, the comment in this video that there's no evidence that Xi isn't making big mistakes seems to not factor on Xi's 'zero covid' policy, which was totally nuts and almost broke the country. One more of those mistakes would knee-cap China.
So what do you think will happen in the future?
kzhead.info/sun/jbqAdd2Je6GhlJE/bejne.html
@@sunnyinsanya2almost broke the county? Who told u that? I just came back from China
@@harryliu2008 of course, dynamic zero covid was such a raging success that they decided to stop it just to let everyone catch up.
Having lived in Mainland China, I got the sense that the more pessimistic reports about China tend to be the more accurate take. While PZ might sensationalize his predictions, the underlying trends he analyzes from are solid.
Same here. And I worked at a major university that emphasized finance and economics.
My Chinese friends agree with Peter. China is in trouble.
Huge fan of Zeihan, but also was looking for someone who would look at the positions in a critical way, because it is just too easy to take his word for gospel. I think you did that in a respectful and informative way, and I feared something more drama-like as we know it from KZhead. I find your video to be a perfect starting block for some more discussion and peer-reviewing. Have a good one.
Zeihan is known for pushing sensational narratives/outright lies masked behind half-truths. You should definetely not take his word for gospel.
Zeihan is an economic / geopolitical guru for the poor and naive. He mixes some truths (which are reported about by mainstream media anyway), adds some numbers and in a artificially accented and inflected voice he heads to some overdramatic conclusions to appeal to the not so bright target audience
@@lukaszpawlowski6078 Zeihan is a U.S. intelligence asset. His analysis is not so much about really predicting the future as it is in shaping the future through the promotion of a particular narrative.
He is either lying or the worst analyst ever. Half of his facts are wrong and his conclusions are even worse.
Honest question: May I ask what do you admire of Zehian? Not mocking, simply asking
Reason for following Zeihan: he explains important geopolitical issues in short videos in a clear, concise way. Nobody else is doing this, so he has a monopoly.
Yes, but if he is doing it incorrectly, it doesn't help any issue. Can China not survive if the population drops to 600-800 million people? Authoritarian government can literally force reproduction by tax incentives, restricting birth control, extra taxes for less children etc.
reason for following Zeihan is that most people are ignorant fools with no time and interest to do the research and who just want to hear about imminent demise of China so they could feel better about their own increasingly shitty lives and countries.
@@marleneprokopetz1857 A lot of people don't understand China. Yes, China is very repressive. But it doesn't have absolute control over its people. It's a system where the people are generally obedient, but choose to work within the system. China's greatest asset are its people, so the people do have some kind of leverage, unlike in Russia or Saudi Arabia where it's just one dictator controlling vast amounts of natural resources. Besides this is highly educated people, so a lot of this is not people being stupid but people just closing one eye. China in the near past was not really authoritarian. Everything was controlled by the party, but the inner party was democratic. Now it's changed to one man rule, but it could well change back if a power struggle goes in a few directions. Yes, you can force people not to have children. But anybody who lives in the West would know that you cannot force people to have children. Especially highly educated people who don't have a lot of money.
@@marleneprokopetz1857 They can't force marriage, or solve housing crisis, esp when each family has 5 houses 4 of which were destroyed by wind and rain.
You just consume product (and don't think about it to hard)
I appreciate your thoughtful criticism of Zeihan's predictions and assessments of China. I must mention the Lancet study was published before China admitted to miscounting its population in 2023. The impact was over 100 million. Given the propensity for China to report data with an overly optimistic lens, we are likely to see more corrected census reports. Not to criticize the Lancet, but if they are using faulty data from China, then their conclusions will be inaccurate.
All data from China are lies anyway. But you can find the data that show China is sinking from that lies lol.
the claim that China regularly lies in it's data is one without evidence. but hey its always open season when talking smack about "others" right? We all know the US government is pristine for it's track record with honesty. Also, if you actually understood the first thing about China or it's culture then you would know that if they do lie they would almost certainly be lying to make themselves look weaker, not stronger. That's basic Chinese culture and mindset even a child would understand. KZhead geniuses, of course not. Did you actually finish high school? Not that the so called standards are very high in the US, where 2/3 of the country can't read on a 5th grade level and half of adults are self reported creationists who think the Earth isn't even as old Chinese pottery.
I can't find China admitting to miscounting it's own population anywhere.
Using wrong or faulty is a problem. Using good data is important for predicting or correcting the current problem. Humans can use data to control to a certain point. But mother nature has the ultimate control, like the weather. China imports a lot of things. If the weather is bad in a country where China imported things from then, it would be bad for China.
@@talkinghand4839We all know where this is going: China evil. USA NO. 1. The white race is supreme!
Thanks for this video. At risk of showing my own “confirmation bias”, I’ve been watching doomsday predictions for various markets where my own business operates for over 35 years and though there is always a grain of truth to be respected, the net results have almost never unfolded the ways most observers have expected. The moral I have learned is listen to everything, believe nothing, and be prepared to react to real and tangible threats.
Doomsday predictions clutter the mind and get in the way of taking advantage of opportunities for future growth both business and personal. It messes with your ability to have faith in the future. Just look at all those barely middle class professionals in America who thought disaster was going to happen because America voted for their first black President. Tens of thousands of clowns who could not afford it bought expensive shelter systems. If they invested that money into the stock market or other investments they would have been pretty well off today instead of broke making payments on rotting shelter systems.
Excellent, listen to everything ….same as myself…listen and learn to doubt
Collapse can be deferred by piling up state debt. Then it can't.
If you study enough history, you'll gain contextual knowledge and that'll allow you to filter out the BS. It doesn't allow you to predict the timing of certain things, like when a market bubble will burst, but it allows you to understand the existence, or lack thereof, of a market bubble.
Right? The arrogance of man to say anything will happen for certain
I recently got into watching Mr. Zeihan because I've taken a great interest in geopolitics. While I appreciate the way he condenses a lot of information and explains how issues are connected to each other, I did also get the feeling that he was a little hyperbolic. I think you're doing a super important job in holding creator accountable, since modern media seems to be filled with "pop science", which uses partial truths and whatnot to further their own narratives. Thank you!
He generalizes too much and has biases. When he did his recent cancel series on Molten Salt Reactors, I was done listening to him. China has just started one up. The U.S. is ten years behind with Oakridge National Labs just beginning one. They expect it to go online in ten years or so. This is what people like PZ cause.
@@deaddocreallydeaddoc5244 .....Not sure if you're from the U.S. or not, but one of the most refreshing things I found with his videos when I first came across PZ, was that he DOES generalize, in a good way, and compared to most U.S. media, he's one of the least bias I have seen. I only now of PZ via the YT channel featured in this video, I've probably watched 3 dozen, likely more, of his videos and I still have no clue which side of the U.S. political isle he leans towards, and if you think you know due to offhand comments he's made about different presidents, then you've fallen into a typical U.S. echo chamber that blurs your views. Plus, he was so on the ball with geopolitical economics in his fairly short 9-5 career, he retired in his 40s, and huge corporations pay him insane amounts of money for an hour of his time to give them financial/investment advice, so he must be predicting something worth paying attention to. Also, not trying to pile on or throw shade, but strictly FYI, of course he has biases, ever single person, and media outlet on the planet has biases, it's human nature, and how we survived as a species. If you meant to state your opinion is that he has unfair biases or ones that cloud his judgement, the word you are looking for is.... he is "biased".
@@deaddocreallydeaddoc5244 I love this comment. My experience with many YT polymath experts is they sound profound due to their confidence, but when they talk about something you actually know, they are full of errors, overly broad assumptions, and straight line extrapolation.
This is very competent, careful analysis. Your conclusion is right on the money. Peter Z provides provocative insight, but people are seduced by his confidence and salesmanship. NOBODY knows the future, especially when it comes to collective human behavior. Having said that, COMPARATIVE analysis like this is invaluable to help us understand our complex world. Thank you.😊
he is alex jones for smart people, relatively speaking .
bullshit@@tocreatee5736
Agreed, but there is one source that has accurately predicted the future over and over without error -> the Bible. It predicted Israel to return on exact date May 14, 1948 near 3000 yeard ago. And predicted this new war with Hamas in Psalm 83. Next up is Ez 38,39 and the Tribulation and Rapture. People need to be alarmed at this because these prophecies are finally really happening.
Tommy, you said "Nobody knows the future". WRONG. Do you remember February of 2021 when everyone in Texas almost froze to death during that hard freeze, and some people burned their furniture to stay warm? Part of the prolonged blackout was caused by the natural gas supply lines freezing. There's water vapor mixed in with the natural gas and it condenses and freezes in the pipe. So when Zeihan predicts that Russian natural gas lines, running across Siberia, are going to freeze and stop the flow of natural gas, he's accurately predicting the future BASED ON THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. Do your research bro.
@@stevechance150 OK, went back and did my research, bro. Still, NOBODY KNOWS THE FUTURE. NOBODY. Some make a ton of predictions, some of which are bound to be right. Some guess. (The great Billy Mitchell “predicted” Pearl Harbor, but was he just lucky? Of course!) Some imagine they can. Some others, like you, imagine others can. But nobody knows the future. As for research, look up “confirmation bias.”
Excellent analysis. Mr Zeihan, in my opinion, confirms the theory that "a man sees what he wants to see, and disregards the rest".
and his audience r like church goers, it makes them feel better without critical questions
well said!!!
definitely your take on life, buy subscribing to this video. I presume you also know very little about China and the Chinese.
I have regularly worked in China for 15 years. Can you tell me anything about China and the Chinese?
That’s exactly what I suspected, I always enjoy listening to him. I just turn his predictions down a few notches.
Remember how he was predicting like half of China was gonna die overnight if they removed the COVID lockdown? I remember lol
Did he? I don't actually believe he has said that, he says this when he talks about a blockade of the Malacca straits.
I mean it’s hard to trust Chinese numbers and they did actually weld people into their homes to stop the spread. Also cut off food purchasing until they got their booster shots.
Thank you for this detailed insight. Sometimes when listening to Peter I have this nagging feeling that he is caught up in his own confirmation bias. I appreciate your rational and thorough analysis.
Very American centric, his history knowledge is sketchy, and predictions around China are extremely difficult. Everything is extreme reaction in comparison to the West. They tend to blow up trade deals and then scratch their heads when that action becomes negative and are bewildered when apologies don't restore the status quo. The articles in Asian media mocking the new 'China likes America now' rules, Xi's non reaction to the second dictator comment and a third construction giant's collapse, foxxvcon slow down, and W.H.O knocking on the door wanting details about their new respiratory disease outbreak will bring forth some more China is doomed content. Even Michael Petitis has a sense of foreboding.
He is biased and I don’t like it. When he praises Biden and bashes trump I know where he leans. He has Trump derangement syndrome and should look at reality
It's good to get a fact check, at least on the economics aspects but neither one has a perfect analysis of the situation, Zeihan is likely right about the piracy bit as the Houthi attacks in the Red Sea have shown.
I feel like the most obvious red flag in this case is him apparently equalling a potential economic collaps with the end of China as a political entity...
@@Worddwizard I think this is the one component that I think Yuri falls out of his expertise and relies on a caricature. The US Naval doctrine for 70+ years has been explicitly about freedom of navigation and straight control. It has been, through fits and starts, changing that doctrine over the last 10 (see the concept of the littoral combat ship, the Zumwalt shenanigans, and most recently restarting frigate production). I think both Joeri and Zeihan, to a degree, have caricatured piracy, of which we all tend to think "disney movie/Johnny Depp." Or privateering on the high seas. When, as you point out, the more relevant point is the US' less stringent response to security concerns, such as Houthi attacks on shipping. The last time someone repeatedly tried/succeeded in poking holes in shipping, the US had a bad habit of "proportionally" wiping out large sections of their navy or crippling their country. Now, it is using Houthi attacks as Aegis target practice. And shipping companies are considering and using alternate routes. A less secure trade environment does produce economic effects. Whether it keeps going towards Zeihan's analysis or this channel's analysis is up for grabs. I suspect it's more likely to be a lack of US intervention when other countries make a trade dispute slightly more physical, impounding ships, or imposing higher transit taxes, or semi/non-state actors replicate Houthi tactics. Rather than seeing swashbuckling sub-continenters hijacking supertankers on the regular.
Your opinion of Z is spot on! he gets the big picture more correct than most - but facts are sensational (and a bit sloppy). PLUS his presentation style is just so good! I am now a follower of YOU!! Excellent piece.
I really appreciate this video! Thank you for your fact checking! Love your perspective!
such a clear, savvy analysis and assessment! the apt visuals help, too. good work, thank you
PZ is the best at describing which players hold what cards, and which of those cards matter. When he misses, it's usually on how the players play their cards. We also gotta give him credit that most prognosticators who are as bold in their forecasts are far less accurate. Also he gives better info than most news headlines these days. ("$1T of rare earth elements found in Afghanistan!" vs "that was one survey, there is no infrastructure, there is no electricity"
And he admits that he isn't a fortune teller. He is just giving the projection based on the information he has and historical trends. If you want a well rounded understanding of things you'll want to listen to multiple experts.
@@gmarefan One should also be aware that neither Europeans nor Asians particularly like him. He says things they do not want to hear, which includes how the US and North America are doing well and will thrive in the coming years. Geopolitical forecasting is much harder than economic forecasting, which economists are terrible at. The factors of geography, history, and the human element all come into geopolitical analysis.
@@gmarefanPeter zeihan is a heavy generalist. He's knowledgeable no doubt but when I saw his views on France and India I realised how terribly wrong he was. He also has an extremely Pro Anglo bias. Beyond that he's pretty good and far better than most geopolitical experts.
@@buck4490 People don't like negative news, sure. But for instance most people in Japan acknowledge they have a demographic problem. You can definitely see it in their media at times. So I don't think we should over estimate how much they dislike him for telling the fact of a matter. Many people will accept the things that are true. Beyond that I'm not sure why you think they'd care that much that the USA will do well, for them the USA is an ally, so if anything that's almost reassuring, one less thing to be worried about. In general I think some of the dislike instead comes from him being perhaps a little to negative over their current situations and being a bit to dismissive at times over their ability to adapt to the situations. And considering his predictions on them miss at times, like the prediction the gas shortages would be catastrophic for German industry, this is perhaps not entirely with out merit. Another example in this could be how West Europeans are using a fair bit of immigration to take the worst edge off of their demographic situation, and so don't really feel quite as endangered by it in the short term as Zeihan thinks they should be.
To be fair, saying that someone is more correct than headlines is kinda easy, almost everyone is
It's always smart to have multiple inputs regarding these big complicated global issues, especially when they act in a check and balance dynamic.
Yeah, but this channel is wrong in this instance. It is far worse than experts think. They are not used to dealing with authoritarian economies obsessed with propaganda. All you hear from China right now is highly optimistic, unless you happen to get leaked sources. If China says that the economy is growing more than 4% then it is probably shrinking. You have never in resent times seen China lie this much about their economic data. The CCP only know how to lie. They think that lying can solve every issue. Now that they have huge issues they are lying like mad. They think that if they can convince that the economy is fine then it will be fine as well.
Zeihan is like those clowns that write for private industry global intelligence websites and magazines. I can 100% see him writing for a place like Stratfor and getting it wrong constantly, but still getting published each month.
@@QuickBulletin He predicted that the invasion of Ukraine would happen in 2022 back in 2014. He predicted that China's demographic issues would eventually break China. He is just no blind about the fact that China is collapsing right now. China's astronomical housing bubble has collapsed.
@@MegaBanneevergrande just collapsed.
Yes people can take potshots as to the details, but I need to hear a comprehensive narrative not a breakdown of everything small statistic that takes hours to understand.
Great video! Loved hearing your perspective.
Not hitting your timing and being wrong are two different things. Things are falling apart slower than he expected, but we can see it happening in real time.
I'm glad you did this b/c I've watched many of Zeihan's videos, and while I find them illuminating (and not to mention entertaining) I've often wondered whether his prognostications are overblown and presented with way too much certainty. I think you've confirmed by hunches.
ive found his knowledge is very wide but also very thin. he tends to get broad strokes right, but loses out in the nuance.
you might as well reading gordon chang book.. 🤣🤣
Ditto.
Yep... But everyone presents their predictions with way too much certainty. It's difficult to communicate if you have to pepper your sentences with qualifiers and exceptions, and when speaking about future events it is generally accepted that circumstances can change. Much like when you discuss Harry Potter you can temporarily talk about magic like it's a real thing.... :D
@@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV You don't need to pepper it with qualifiers and exceptions. You can also go with a spectrum of scenarios instead of "this is exactly what will occur".
Like you said, Zeihan talks about some real problems but then makes outlandish predictions to get more attention. I think you can learn some things from his videos, if you just ignore his predictions.
It's like a UFC analyst. They won't predict every fight outcome, it's how they are predicting outcomes that is so important. It's important that he can be wrong, what is important is how he can be wrong, what things were not factored into his predictions.
@@dixonhill1108 Zeihan is sucking shit for decades and was wrong every single time.... on everything... not only on China.
Perhaps, but his predictions on China are not outlandish if they are please get into specifics. I don’t know if any specific that he gets wrong. Yes, you can debate certain things but that’s always been the case with academic arguments and thought experiments.
I think the point that Zeihan makes on the Chinese navy is that whilst they have more vessel’s, those vessels have got a very small range and would be able to provide support over longer distances e.g Middle East or Argentina. Also the shipping lanes they have to go past on both routes head through the territory of US allied nations so could easily be disrupted. Good video over all and quite eye opening on the first point but I do think you have underplayed his arguments on 2 and 3
They also have to go by India... And they actively fight with sticks
There are no points he makes, it is harvesting view of low IQ viewers.
India isn’t a US ally, nor are the Philippines and Vietnam. They’re independent of either poles.
@@flyingpharoah4867 philipines are sliding slowly towards the us under marcos, however malaysia and singapore is ironically becoming closer with china for some reason, under the us backed survey under pew research some how malaysia and singapore are some of the only countries surveyed (along with greece) that actually has a higher opinion of china than the usa
@@flyingpharoah4867vietnam said to a journalist... why you talking about the Vietnam war? we had 1 war with America we've had 100 with China, I think if the time came the old adage of the enemy of my enemy would provail, I've been to Vietnam and in my opinion the world doesn't need China as much as it needs us
Listening to Peter's book on tape gets into a lot more detail than the videos. A global finance crunch, caused by mass aging in the developed nations, combined with the deglobalizing effects of rising global wages, will make this world more scarce, fractured, and chaotic. His real, secret point is that we will inevitably need a new global economic model to face this reality, and he doesn't have any cute answers about that. In that sense, he is surprisingly un-evangical.
Dude definitely goes into the doomsday scenarios but he does bring up valid points about the challenges modern nations are facing which are real concerns
The way Zeihan looks at the world is so geographically determinist that you'd think we're one big famine away from Europe reverting back to feudalism and Eurasia being reconquered by steppe nomads.
@@wwpl8371 with how some reactions to the Russian invasion were they doesn’t seem like an uncommon opinion. He definitely overestimates US geography and makes it seem like a haven when he’s ignore the deeper flaws that have already rendered America no longer a country
@@wwpl8371 I didn't know someone could say something more hyperbolic than Zeihan.
Geography has been destiny for most of human history. Human civilizations have always been centered around countries with good farmland, navigable rivers, natural resources, etc... While the countries that don't are screwed. These are always a couple exceptions to the rule, like Japan, but you can't use exceptions to disprove the norm. And even then, Japan's geography is excellent for a modern, industrial maritime empire
I like Zeihan's observations and data, but his conclusions and time frames are at the very least aggressive.
What's telling about people like Zeihan is this: He speaks with absolute certainty without differentiaton on things that nobody can predict with certainty. He is a performer looking for fame, not a serious researcher or analyst.
This comment is spoken like a person with a real understanding of economics, including the limitations of predictions. You’ve identified the exact problem with Zeihan. I’ve yet to find a major criticism of the underlying facts he lays out, so I still find it useful to let him deliver them to me in a pop-news format.
@@adamseidel9780 You have yet to find a major criticism of his "facts"? How about this one: global seaborne commerce does not depend on the presence of the US Navy. Here's another one: NatGas transportation through pipelines is cheaper than seaborne transport, and Russia is next to China. Zeihan is an absolute moron and he makes his money selling COPIUM to stupid boomers.
@@adamseidel9780That's obviously an entirely reasonable choice; yet I question the wisdom of it. We all overestimate our ability to separate the wheat from the chaff; best to avoid sources of information that largely just produce high volume noise lest you drown out whatever signal there is to find in public discourse. We don't live in an era in which freedom of speech is at risk; we live in an era in which freedom to hear is at risk. Zeihan and people like him are one part of that problem - but one we can partially choose to avoid.
You literally lost me as "people like Zeihan". That's when I stopped reading your comment.
My grand mother may she rest in peace , told me the only one with the answers is time , now i get it
Appreciate the alternate explanations. You do bring up important topics. This is why it is good to always verify what others are saying.
Thank you for your research and insights.
When my favorite economical channel fact checks my favorite geo political channel... Loved it!
Zeihan is a fool, for geopolitics try Caspian Report or Defense Politics Asia.
@@crhu319caspian report is also trash nowdays, sad but it usually happens when a channel gets popular like real life lore
@@crhu319caspian report is realist rubbish
@@SigFigNewtonWell it's working!?!
@@NeostormXLMAX The Latest Turkish video of RLL is a straight up a malicious psyop so much so that I actually he was payrolled to publish such biased propaganda.
This content is really valuable and represents a growing niche in the age of social media, where that guy is right who is the most handsome or talks the smartest. Peer review and discourse in general, picking up the line from another contributor is essential and what we need. Please continue with this!
i agree
Both of them are credible, but the most important element was overlooked. China is not governed by the Western political system; instead, they have the "RED BOOK." The Red Book is highly effective in controlling a massive population in both good and bad times.
Or barks loudest...ie Trump
You think Zeihan is handsome? Mmmhhh charismatic yes,Handsome? Idkkkk lol
Or it’s quite possible you have no appreciation how to use his information. It’s not binary, right or wrong. It’s all about volatility, which you clearly and most others don’t understand how to trade.
60 minutes had an episode on Sunday evening. The reporting from that segment pretty much reflected what Peter said in his episode.
Very Fair!!! Exactly the commentary I was looking for after watching Peter's presentation! Thanks
This was a really useful video. I was somewhat skeptical of Mr Zeihan's claims already, so it's nice to have a proper economist taking a look and coming to a similar conclusion. You were remarkably respectful given how misleading some of what's he's said is :-) I do wish sensible analysis like yours got as much airtime as sensational analysis like Mr Zeihan's does, but people are suckers for bold claims so long as they sound vaguely plausible.
Well said, snake oil is still available !
I think these two channels are simply doing two different things. Money & Macro is serious, peer-reviewed journalist doing deep dives. Zeihan is giving you a 5-minute bite of geopolitics that informs you (even if not perfectly) of countries and trade you probably didn't have a clue about.
@@armandaneshjooAnother Zeihan Propaganda fan boy spotted 😂..they really think that china will collapse anytime soon as their CIA Propaganda said that!So what do you think You are more intelligent than chinese Economciz planner that have lifted 80 millions out of extreme poverty??or Brough china into a global state as only competitor to Uncle sam
@@armandaneshjoo@armandaneshjoo Just look at Comedy Show CIA Funded Analysis that china's recent 7nm Chip leap..he said a just month before that china can't make chips Above 10nm Lmao😂😂And then that huwae thing happened 😂😂..Suprised he even reacted to it😂😂😂but as usually he does..he did state China bad again 😂😂and Collapse story was still present there
@@armandaneshjoo 😂Another china exper
I'm currently living in a country where it is considered socially acceptable to say something that is either opinionated, subjective, or outright completely wrong, and get a way with it. But at the same time, for someone to fact check and scrutinize based on objectivity is usually considered socially unacceptable. It's frustrating. It makes it all that more refreshing to hear your take. Thank you!!
Sounds like a country headed for disaster. Are you living in Argentina? :D
You mean US? :)
germany or canada?
@@user-ng9yz4ut7i No single country is suffering this. It's why I'm so concerned for the world. At this point, saying every problem and failure is American would be a COMFORT, but too obviously a lie. We lost that cope in the early 2010s, so time to wake up, boomer.
You just described ‘free speech’. While that is perceived as more scary by many gen-z folks, it will be OK. It’s been around for centuries now and society is still here.
Great job, very professional and valuable work! 👍
Healthy skepticism is great - and Ziehan does make some interesting predictions - but with respect to safe shipping lanes - I think issues like Houthis lobbing missiles at marine traffic in the Gulf's choke point demonstrates how quickly some of those shocks might happen. It's not just piracy that puts global trade at risk.
Zeihan is the Tony Robbins of geopolitics. He leaves you feeling absolutely convinced that he's a guru. But some of his conclusions don't stand up to critical inspection, as you've just demonstrated.
Exactly, he's either a propagandist or just an entertainer.
Well he does have a bit of that but this video is also a bit off When it comes to pirates in the book he speaks about state sponsored pirates (ex India) due to how China becomes more and more hostiles to them. They might look to disrupt their trade, leaving the whole area exposed. He also says that one arm dealer to fund these might be France with their anti-ship missiles. I do think he tries to get views by exaggerating things though
@@balsdsa lol yeah I am sure the Chinese navy is afraid of Indian pirates lmao
nah he is comedian@@YN-ot9jk
100%, he’s just an en entertainer, his analysis are only good at entertaining people, but demographic is surely not a reliable variable to forecast economic outcomes or anything else, especially as technology and automation are the main driver of prosperity
Zeihan always forgets that actors can change and adapt. Basically "given the current trajectory, in 10 years X would happen" refusing to acknowledge that changes can be made to respond within that time period.
To be fair, he also thinks that China is too autocratic to be that flexible.
@@davidbarry6900 Zeihan is sucking shit for decades and was wrong every single time.... on everything... not only on China.
Unfortunately, the way authoritarian regimes react often have deadly consequences. China's "Great Chinese Famine", the Soviet Union's "Great Ukrainian Famine", and Ireland's "Potato Famine" (in which Irish grain was still being exported to England) were all results of bad policies strictly implemented. Regardless of how much food China thinks it has warehoused currently, neither PZ nor M&M are forecasting a repeat of a Chinese famine, which could implement PZ's predictions for reasons not discussed. Similar economic disasters can occur, namely importing the Argentine economic disease to China.
He's said on a number of occasions that circumstances can change, and that maybe there's an unforeseen way out of this.
@@alanbland1976 PZ has specifically said China cannot successfully address it's shrinking population problems as it's too late for any amelioration for its sickness.
Regarding piracy, do you find it at all ironic that, since the Houthi's have begun attacking shipping, the only safe shipping through the region are those flagged either under China or Russia?
The Hootie thing is likely a distraction, so you won’t pay attention to Israel, expelling the Palestinians to North America. Some thing either the Palestinians northern north Americans want but some thing that is going to happen because the Jews don’t control America and it’s just a coincidence. You know like the Jews, not controlling the economy and Kanye West just happening to lose $1 billion in a day just a coincidence don’t say anything about it or you’re an antisemite!
Well done! About time too.btw, i actually read Peters book but was skeptical about his conclusions
Videos like this are so helpful. I think a lot of people, like me, circulate in KZhead spaces similar to your channel because we're interested in learning about something that we don't already understand. The problem comes when we don't have the experience to know whether we're being fed BS. I am constantly on the lookout for reasonable voices like yours, and I appreciate when those reasonable voices raise red flags about people who I shouldn't rely on for information.
Ummm - no. Zeihan makes broad & bold general arguments & then plays them out as scenarios. This person is randomly citing bits of data that might need more explanation to be integrated into the broader argument, but are actually irrelevant to the issue supposedly being discussed. EG - why would Bulgaria's unique experience with population change be the relevant comparison, rather than the universal expected experience presumed by Zeihan ?? Keep on learning! Cheers
zeihan is basically a moron who is unaware how stupid he is so he can trick other morons who just happen to hate chinese ppl, what a scammer
Zeihan has to be the most overrated thinker I've come across. He seems to take a few data points and make huge claims.. Eg on Sam Harris, he was saying the US needs to massively expand its navy because of the threat of pirates in the few choke points in global shipping. The problem is that Nato had an anti piracy mission that ended becuase it had 0 incidents in its last 3 years. He seems to be to be a sensationalist posing as an expert
Actually, the truth doesn't matter.., !! ask Gordon Chang the charlatan who has been predicting China's collapse since 2000. The answer is : 👇👇👇 The Uncle Sam is forking out 500 millions USD for all and any kind of anti China stories. So no wonder all the liars, con man, snake oil salesman are coming out of the woodwork for a piece of the pie. To be fair, a half billion dollar budget is a pretty good offer to throw away many things. No government in the world put aside millions of dollars to slander its competitors except US. But one thing for sure,..the USA await its Karma sooner than it can realize.
Anytime zeihan comes up in my feed I silence the channel unless it's critical of his rambling.
When you analyse consumption and show higher income of older people to show that most consumption is done by 35+ year olds, you forget one crucial element - taking on mortgages to buy apartments/houses by younger people. Its a big expense, driving consumption up a lot in the present - but being paid of in later decades. This totally changes the argument - double in Zeihan's favor, since this will also exacerbate China's real estate problems.
China works differently. It is the whole family putting in the money for an apartment.
Actually if people were expected to continue buying houses in China it wouldn't be a problem. The problem is exactly that they won't.
@@neodym5809the whole family, which is decimated structurally by the One-Child Policy.
@@E4439Qv5 Not really , its just a lot smaller now but familial bonds are still pretty strong there like most of asia. there is a reason that most of peter zeihan fan's are americans because he feeds them a biased world view and arguments and their confirmation bias does the rest
There are two parts in paying for the mortgage in china: a 10 to 50 percent of the total mortgage payed in advance - always by the parents, then there's the monthly payment, usually payed in 10 - 30 years.
I feel like your argument is solid but didn’t address Zeihan’s points around how: 1. China’s military can’t operate largely further than 1000 NM from shore with their current navy (his point on relying on the US Navy for global trade security) 2. On Chinas food security and farming- you didn’t address the fertilizer inputs argument or how a failed Russian state can’t provide such inputs. It’s nice to hear contrasting perspectives! Good video
And while we’re at it, who wants to speculate how long before the three gorges dam, which the CCP was warned against building by its own engineers, because of the geology around it, is destroyed like all the towns and cities that it has destroyed. How long till it dumps a ton of water all over China massively culling the population and causing famine. I’d say this three gorges dam is a bigger threat to China than much of what the CCP pays attention to. How about some speculation on that?
Good content, good explanation of how you came to your conclusions 👍
Excellent, more analysis like this would be extremely helpful to help me criticise people I know and to find new sources of ideas. Great work!
A refreshingly reasonable and fair minded presentation. Your analysis highlights the quality of your character as much as it does the clarity of your thought. Thank you, and more please.
Interesting comment on Zeihan's statements, most of which I agree with. Where I see a massive misrepresentation of the situation is in the area of foodproduction. Not only has agricultural land in China shrunk massively due to the crazy construction boom, but climate change has further exacerbated and worsened desertification in large areas. Another problem for agricultural production is water. Not only is the quantity of water problematic in many areas, the quality is also disastrous. Around 60 % of groundwater is contaminated and should not be used for agricultural production. I consider a significant switch to domestic food production, in a timely fashion, when imports are eliminated or significantly reduced to be a pipe dream.
Massive amounts of water in some parts of the country and not another’s. You would fix this with building projects if you had a functional government as opposed to wasting the same funding on building, high-rises that you just knock over because they have no inhabitants. about 10 years ago I believe China was extremely smart for building all this shit because they knew that the population floor was coming out and by building them now well they had the people to build them. They would set up the following generations. Then I saw their building start tipping over every day, and I knew it was just corruption.
13:00 Regarding China needing a lot of ships to protect from pirates - small ships have a limited range, and so they need lots of big ships, not lots of little ships
This is exactly the comment I was looking for when I reached that part of the video. Big difference between a "Blue Water" navy and a "Green Water" navy.
Which is why China has a carrier battlegroup (based around the carriers 'Liaoning' and 'Shandong'), and is building another around the carrier 'Fujian' (a fourth carrier is being finished at the time of this typing)? Do Americans really believe China doesn't have a Blue Water Navy? It doesn't match the American one, but is plenty for basic protection.
@@KnightofAges They have theoretical carrier battlegroups, but in practice they have what one might call naval base battle groups because those ships are spending more time docked getting repaired than at sea
@@theredscourge Sorry to disrupt your confirmation bias that you're amazing and your competition sucks in every way possible and will, certainly, collapse within a month while you take over the world efforlessly thanks to your sheer amazing hypertalent, but warships do stay in docks often; in fact, not that many years ago, the UK Royal Navy had precisely zero ships of destroyer and above class at sea because all were under repair.
@@KnightofAges That doesn't make China sound good, it just makes UK look bad, which in this century should surprise no one.
I've said before about this guy that I feel like I need to fact check every word he says. It just sounds so dramatized.
Dramatised and charismatic. And charismatic people ALWAYS need to have their facts checked, because they are able to make nonsense sound legitimately.
@@ernest1520 this is very true. They get away with a lot.
EXACTLY!!!
100% for sure. @@ernest1520
@@ernest1520 what are you talking about! Jim Cramer has never steered me wrong! 😅
Note on Japan's economy stalling in the 80s: Japan was forced to sign the 1985 Plaza Accords where it forced the US Dollar to devalue against the Yen, which contributed greatly to Japan's lost decades. China has no such constraint.
No the Plaza accords only lasted 2 years and made no difference in trade between Japan and the US
@@jonathanaustinstern1That's because the Plaza Accords achieved its intended result, and it was followed by the Louvre Accord, signed in 1987, to stop the continuing decline of the dollar and stabilize exchange rates.
@yojimbo3681 No difference in trade with Japan Zero
@@jonathanaustinstern1 It's not about the trade, it's about contributing to Japan's bubble bursting. Look up: "Investopedia Plaza Accord how long it lasted" if you don't believe me. First article.
Yes trade deficit stopped growing and plateaued. This created an opportunity for Korea and China to grow instead.
I listened to this and now I am more convinced that Zeihan may be right.
Thank you for your critical video that's providing a broader perspective on that matter!! Similar video about Zeihan's EU predictions much appreciated!
I think he’s better at making EU predictions because he’s more familiar and less biased
👍You are generous! Zaihan has joined the category of the infamous Gordon Chang, who has been predicting the collarpse of China more than 2 dacades ago😂!
The nations with the lowest birth rates are S. Korea n Taiwan. Have they collapsed?
Great video. I follow Zeihan often and I appreciate your data driven and logical argument.
This critique has very little data and very loose arguments. In fact, someone already commented on one of his sources being incorrect.
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. I am intrigued by China's situation like everyone else watching this video probably. I have been listening to Peter's audiobook and watching his presentations, and your arguments bring a few things to mind for me. First, the piracy issue. I think Peter's point isn't that the US is currently preventing piracy from affecting Chinese shipping but instead that the US naval projection to protect all shipping routes since WWII has served to deter piracy and other quasi at-gun-point "fees" from being charged by intermediate countries (I'm thinking Iran demanding a fee at Hormuz or UK/Spain demanding fee at Gibraltar, etc). So, assuming the US decides to stop its defense subsidy on the oceans (which I'm also not convinced completely by Peter that the US would opt to do this), these countries would have the ability to "hold up" international shipping lanes, i.e. Middle Eastern oil to Far East. There are many implications here, such as Japan assuming the US's role in the Middle East and then offering coverage for Koreans, Taiwanese, etc for a security alliance "fee" like the US did during the Cold War, and many more configurations. Basically "piracy" as in 5 guys in a dingy with a couple of AK-47s is not the issue. The issue is that places that can squeeze others and haven't been doing so because of the shadow of a US destroyer may choose to do so when that shadow moves on. I want to clarify that I'm just trying to get a better idea of what's going on, not married to Peter's or Joeri's stances; I'm just pointing out some bumps in the logic as I see it, absolutely open/wanting to someone more knowledgeable than me laying this out.
Precisely. Also "Piracy" may not be small bands of privateers in leaky boats, but small regional powers that may threaten to cut off access to various routes as an economic lever. I agree that the US isn't about to surrender its command of the seas; it's simply too powerful a hand to fold. As for China's naval "power", I think the presenter vastly underestimates the time and resources required to build, fund, and support a global naval presence. Let's face it, it was Lend-Lease and the war economy that (rather quickly) shot America to preeminence in that regard.
Excellent point! Indeed, US protects shipping lanes all over the world, enabled by the system of military bases it has all over the world. That's a system built over many decades when the only serious opponent was USSR, and otherwise a lot of countries were willing to enter an alliance with US. China does not have such a system, and it is not clear at all it can find alliances in so many other countries to start building a system of bases that can secure shipping lanes in a large stretch of the world where it trades. So indeed it is extremely vulnerable in that regard and essentially at the will of the US protection. Also, regarding collapse, I think Zeihan does not predict any calamitous collapse, just that China's power and relevance will decline, to an extent where it will be again comparable to Japan or even worse. Collapse can mean many things. Did Japan collapse in the 90s? In the 80s it was projected to surpass US in many respects within 1 or 2 decades. It slumbered in the 90s, that's collapse to me. I think China is restrained in its potential to a much greater degree than people realize. China is surrounded by many countries that are of non-negligible power and that she cannot draw into long term alliances: Japan, Russia, India, Vietnam, etc. Even more so, since it is a distinctly ethnic state, the same as the countries it's surrounded by. It may be stronger than anyone else in her neighborhood, but not strong enough to compensate for all of them. In this regard, the south-east asian system is very similar to European one: Germany stronger than everyone else in its neighborhood but weaker than any strong alliance of the other European powers. This instability led to 2 world wars until germans learned to cope (with some help from US reforming their intelligentsia after WW2). Let's hope the same does not happen in south east asia. I do have my doubts though, just because the chinese nationhood is so super ethnic-based. People forget that US is far ahead in many regards: it is safe geopolitically with weak neighbors and two oceans to protect it. This secures continued wealth creation uninterrupted by invasions in its own territory. It is resource rich, underpopulated (check out population densities), and it is not an ethnic nation, enabling thus further assimilation of immigration waves without much issue. Zeihan is fully correct to go long on US and short on China, even if he doesn't get the timeframe right.
I agree. Zeihan never really suggested China needs the U.S. Navy to protect its imports. Zeihan's point, which you brought out, is about the whole global order and shipping network, and the safe and easy transport of goods around the world thanks to U.S. led protection of shipping lanes.
Say hello to the CCP for me
I’ll listen to people’s opinions, but my spidey senses always go up when someone tries to get into the domain of predictions
As a Zeihan fan, I have to say I love this video. Great critique. Thank you!
Economies are not directly dependent on population as Money and Macro demonstrates. CIA bot Zeihan says anything that will run down america's competitors
I agree .... a very well prepared debate and argumentation.
His analysis of Scotland showed he hadn't even looked at the wikipedia page. Reckons we have no energy when we have oil, gas, electricity, dirty and green and export a lot of it.
He scrutinized Peter's message without attacking him personally. That's very professional and a breath of fresh air for social media.
You're a Zeihan fan because he tells you what you desperately want to hear. It's no secret that there's considerable anxiety in the Western (read Anglo) world about the global rise of a non-Anglo power and all that entails. Zeihan is here to sooth those anxieties.
As you mentioned, the economist Michael Pettis also wrote about the debt-fuelled investment problem in China. Can you do a video explaining Pettis’s view on the matter? For instance, what did Pettis mean when he wrote about “rebalancing the Chinese economy”, “cutting nonproductive assets and infrastructure” and “transferring more wealth to the household”. I’d be interested to learn how other countries navigated out of the old growth model.
I'd second this
Read about The Kindleberger Trap.
Well based on what I've read, by "relalancing" Pettis just means converting the growth model from the debt-driven one they're using now to a consumer-driven one, which means transferring wealth from big companies and government into households. The question is how that's going to be done.
@@bobjones2959 Interesting. I wonder if there’s any successful examples of this. For instance, the series of privatization under Thatcher did not result in rebalancing though it did give the UK govt a one-time cash boost during the sell off.
Former student of Professor Pettis here and worked in China in the financial sector prior to Covid. So the Chinese economy/GDP growth are driven by three factors mainly: 1. Fixed asset investment (think roads, bridges, railways, and most importantly, real estate.) 2. Export, and 3. Domestic consumption. Domestic consumption is ridiculously low in China compared to many other nations. People just don’t have the ability to go out and make enough purchases to drive the economy. This is due to many reasons. One, China lacks a social safety net in terms of medical care and education, among other things. Citizens are forced to save their money for a rainy day. Two, the ridiculously high cost of owning a home also forces citizens into saving money. So in order to drive economic growth, the government becomes increasingly reliant on exports and state led investment. Exports were healthy and robust but have already started showing signs of fracture pre-Covid. Cost of manufacturing is increasing and China does not yet have the technology to build higher end products en masse. The trade war and technological sanctions didn’t help either. Exports have dropped precipitously in the last year or so. That leaves us with investments. Investing in building massive infrastructure projects brought about positive returns until maybe 2008 or so, but you can only build so many four lane highways and tunnels and high speed rails into poor rural areas before the IRR drops. But spending a billion dollars on a bridge to nowhere will make it look like your city’s economy grew by a billion dollars, and that looks good for government officials with no accountability. A good resume gets you a promotion, and that’s all that really matters. Municipal governments via city investments vehicles (城投）were able to get massive amounts of low interest debt from state banks, sold too much bonds, and are now hopelessly in debt. Local governments must sell land to raise funds, since the majority of taxation goes to the central government. So they sell land at overpriced rates to real estate developers, who then pass this to buyers. The state, in order to fund its massive infrastructure projects, keep interest rates low, so citizens have no choice but to invest in the stock market or real estate. The Chinese stock market is lethargic and non transparent, so people have no choice but to invest in real estate. So you see it’s all a vicious cycle. People don’t spend because all their money is in real estate, real estate doesn’t improve productivity. The government takes people’s savings and build money losing projects that look good on paper, and must fund themselves by selling land at ever higher prices. Everything runs along but they are all connected. COVID hit people and local governments especially hard financially, so now, no money to buy apartments, governments are losing revenue from land sales, decreased consumption, decreased exports, and infrastructure don’t boost the GDP all that much anymore. What professor Pettis was essentially calling for was a more balanced approach to growth. Subsidizing Medicare and education for example, so that people can buy things, which is good for the economy. But no one had the courage to break the wheel, and now the music is about to end. 😢
I really enjoyed how this video presented the keypoints raised by Mr. Zeihan. I agree with some of the counter arguments, one thing wasn't addressed about the housing market in China, oversupply. They have double the amount of housing units to house double their population. The more of something you have the cheaper it becomes. How will the Chinese deal with this inflationary bubble which will collapse and likely take two thirds of the property value with it. Fundamentally, I do not see a way out without a serious and painful market correction. This is one thing in a democracy, something completely different in a dictatorship.
"They have enough apartments to house double the size of their population." Sorry there was a typo in the previous post.
351 ships vs 294 means nothing without understanding the capabilities involved and that's Zeihan's point...China lacks the operational capacity because they lack a truly Bluewater navy. They could have twice the number of vessels but so what. Means nothing if they lack range and ability to remain on station...
Excellent work! I'm a big fan of peer review, and taking it to the KZhead platform makes a lot of sense and should help to cultivate a better information ecosystem on the platform.
Very solid analysis. I've watched some and a friend sent me a video of Zeihan. My conclusion was similar. Zeihan gets a lot of stuff right, but I wouldn't put all my eggs in his basket. He's work with some good organizations before (either Stratfor or Geopolitical Forecast) and while a lot of what he said, is also said by it's director (George Friedman) his conclusion go much further. Thank you for your well reasoned analysis.
Spot on.
Excellent post. One thing to say someone is "wrong", another to provide legitimate research to contradict Mr. Zehhan's thesis is totally different. I will more closely monitor Mr. Zehan's post going forward. Thank you for this carefully argued presentation.
Very well done, Joeri. Zeihan is quite absolute in his convictions, however a reasonably intelligent reader of his work recognizes that, as you say at the end of your video above, he provides speculative analysis, rather than education in its purest sense. I take many of his conclusions broadly informative, but I've always considered the timing of his predictions to be questionable. Thanks for such a thorough, balanced presentation of your findings.
"No body can predict the future, least of all economists", credit Economics Explained. Great video, always like an alternative view.
New subscriber here, really, really enjoyed this. You echoed my assumptions about Peters geopolitical views prior to watching this video and backed it up with facts and good analysis, thanks for the great content 👍👌
I can’t thank you enough for not telling us where you are reporting from! Can’t say that about somebody else.
Thanks for all the hard work!
Great video. Very informative. I've been watching Zeihan's videos for a while now (and I enjoy them) but it's refreshing to watch a review of his claims. Thanks.
Well-said, Sir. I concur
“No one can predict the future - least of all an Economist” EE. Economics Explained
Gotta love Peter Zeihan. On Joe Rogan, he called the absolute bottom on Bitcoin when he said it had 'no intrinsic value' and was going to zero. From that moment onwards Bitcoin surged to today's valuation of $70k.
'to get a broad overview, and an interesting perspective on international affairs.' Great, so don't expect more from him and you won't have to criticize him. I think that's the lesson for everyone, and thank you for your analysis.
I just want to say that the is video is fantastic. I am kind of a Peter Zeihan fan so I came into this video with actually a little skepticism but you nailed every point about him and changed the way I take in his content. Your video was super unbiased and honestly very fair. I know a bunch of people who make these sort of counterpoint videos and they just end up bashing the person they are countering against but this video was not that AT ALL. Great video man it’s videos like these that make me want to be a KZheadr someday.
I’m a Zeihan fan too, and I’m realizing he’s probably more useful for understanding geography and how it affects world economies, rather than accurate predictions about what’s actually going to happen. He is pretty funny though! 🤣
It's a nonsense prediction. If Mao's disastrous regime didn't topple the CCP why would this?
It's actually a really shallow criticism that misinterprets the points Peter is making. I was hoping for something more critical and thought provoking, I was sorely disappointed.
@@rhmendelson Zeihan certainly knows quite a bit, yeah. Though I've always found that Zeihan leaves insufficient space for innovative solutions to problems. You can see this a bit like in the situation of grain exports from Ukraine, where Ukraine turned out to find various ways to keep getting out far more grain that Zeihan thought was maximally possible. Of course this was fortunate for the world, as a food shortage would be pretty unfortunate. But basically Zeihan doesn't give enough allowance for potential solutions to still be available in areas he doesn't know about yet. Which is probably in part why he always seems to overestimate how bad things will get.
He failed to mention that china's navy has no expeditionary capabilities and thus can't realistically protect their trade routes (oil imports being the most important one)
My issue with Zeihan’s predictions in general (not just on China) is not that they are fundamentally wrong but that he imagines these elaborate international systems as a being similar to a helicopter where, if you stop the rotor blades that keep the craft aloft, it simply falls out of the sky. In reality I think these systems are more like an airplane that can glide some distance and possibly even manage a crash landing.
I think the helicopter approach is fine when it come to food and energy supplies: After all, the 2nd law of thermodynamics (no energy no production) is fairly unforgiving. Zeihan's problem is that he imagines that one day the US navy will suddenly pull back and everything will stop: Ignoring the fact that every other country also has an interest in upholding the laws of the sea.
That's a good metaphor. All my life I've seen these bold predictions about how complex global interdependence makes the world more fragile, but instead it's only made things more resilient, as problems in certain areas can be compensated for with surpluses elsewhere. The problems are still bad, and the surpluses aren't limitless, but there's more options available than there once were.
@@domtweed7323even food and energy is not such a dealbreaker. Russia cut off many eu countries from energy supply and they were able to find alternatives relatively fast.
Zeihan is saying exactly what his neocon audience wants to hear. He's an excellent grifter.
A soft landing if you will
This is really well-reasoned. The only test of Zeihan's predictions is how well they correspond to future reality, but meanwhile you make good points.
You didn't actually refute, or even address, any of Zeihan's evidence for his opinions. Specifically, the demographic and geographic data, chaotic reactionary policies based on a lack of information getting to decision makers, the fact that China's navy is primarily non-"Blue Water," and that China can't just return to growing its own food without the inputs required to do so, etc., etc. China's president's latest US visit where he was taking a radically different tone, one of cooperation, friendship, etc., strongly suggests Zeihan is more right than wrong.
These guys are paid money by the CCP to put this shit out. They are not going to debate anything on its merits more than they have to. The point of them is to get as many people as possible saying that Peter Zeihan is crazy and he goes to far and he’s right about some things because they can clearly be verified But he shouldn’t be trusted because he makes wild speculation. For the CCP this translate says keep sending your investment dollars to China. It’s not collapsing even though Apple has started making iPhones in India, and everyone is fleeing the country because they don’t have enough young workers to keep the thing going . Never mind all that pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. China is the wonderful Wizard of Oz.
Thanks for making this video. I’ve watched a bunch of Peter’s talks and have found it difficult to find well informed counter-arguments and debates on YT.
Hes a good bullshitter with an interest in politics, nothing more. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
The man is a complete con artist. He just throws a bunch of shit out there and sound confident doing it. Basically overwhelms you with information overload. For example, he will take a truthful fact (China imports food) but spin it into a false narrative. China and India has roughly the same population size, however they never say India is on the verge of starving. Yet if you dig into the data, you would see although China has smaller arable land it out produce India by a factor of 3x. So the question is why China imports so much food? China has a trade surplus with many countries, including the US. However the US limits things China can buy from them including high tech or companies the US deem sensitive to their national security. So with so much surplus the thing China can use is often food product. China imports lots of high end food products from the US as well, such as lobsters, crabs, and other seafood, but these aren't essential and they could do without. The real weakness in China today is their energy needs.
@@rufanuf1 arent we all
Most of these refutations suck though.
For example he’s ignoring the fact 70% of china’s energy is supplied by the Middle East, which has to go through the strait of malacca and could easily be blockaded
Listen to Zeihan to understand the present (at least when it comes to geopolitics and supply chains), but ignore his predictions about the future. He always cranks everything up to eleven.
concluded the same after watching a few of his videos. Interesting stuff, but insane predictions...he also never follows up on his "failed" predictions.
@@Rausslyea but it is interesting he is basing his current perditions on real major problems in china, even by analysts within china. Most would say his predictions on china are very reasonable.
@@nsevv "very reasonable" as long as you dont look at the evidence. His prediction is that china will collapse in the next decade. He can be correct in identifying weaknesses in chinas economy, pretty much everyone agrees that china is going to have things a lot tougher over the next few years and is going to have to do a lot of painful rebalancing. But claiming china will collapse is pants on head nonsense given the currently available evidence
He got the Ukraine conflict and its timeline (in his previous books) almost right. I'll give him credit for that. He did not predict the massive Western support Ukraine got and is still receiving in terms of military and humanitarian aid, though.
Depends what you mean by collapse
Glad for review. As an Australian our economy relies a great deal on exports to China, so if China was crashing my country would be in trouble.
Fair review!
To fact check Zeihan for myself I recently emailed a high school friend who majored in Chinese Studies, then continued with this subject when he got a Ph.D from Stanford. After that he lived in China and now teaches at a US college. I emailed him one of Zeihan's videos that lays out his views on China and asked my friend what he thought. His short reply was, That seems about right.
Yeah and my buddy Zhou says “nah that’s wrong”
this comes across as somewhat lazy
You should emailed his neurosurgeon and asked whether your friend has a brain. Seems he lost it or has shrunk from all the studies. 😂😂😂
LOL is your friend serpentza or laowhy86??? or gordon chang? all dumb anti chinese LOL
@@hangtuah888CIA BOTS NEW TACTICS 😂😂 I OR SOMEONE CLOSE TO THEM USED TO LIVE IN CHINA AND BLAH BLAH BLAH BS
Thanks for presenting another view on the China situation. I am a follower of Mr. Zeihan, but I am always in the habit of making my mind up after considering multiple points of view. I’m a new subscriber and plan to keep watching your content. Thank you from Canada.
About the housing bubble, there is a report from the CPC accessing the issue, claiming that it is inevitable and necessary for the bubble to pop at this point before it become so big that it will cripple the economy, encouraging the government to simply give up on saving Evergrande even though they have the complete ability to buy its debt and share it with their 4 largest banks in China and also the world.
One more point: Zeihan writes books. He has the courage to write one where he discusses what he got right and wrong and what is yet to occur. I don't read many of this character's books. The truth is making predictions has to be based on the input factors and logical perspective. You can always, safely, pick apart a few things with any prediction but this man, Peter Zeihan, is NO NOSTRADAMUS. He is, INSTEAD, RIGHT ABOUT MOST THINGS AND SPECIFIC TOO. Something those like this person who simply resents Zeihan's success, cannot understand. Oh and his claim that older people spend more is WRONG. They spend more UNTIL THEY GREY UP. THAT is what Zeihan said so this character is already twisting truth. OLD PEOPLE DO NOT SPEND. Once past 50, they KEEP what little is left. So get that straight. That's what AMERICANS do. Aging nations do NOT field capable armies and they do NOT produce increasingly high production levels. The overall perspective is the END of globalization, the return of American blue collar industry over time and a decline of any nation with top heavy population issues. China will NOT reproduce masses of YOUNG. Sorry but reality is not what this "character" claims. Follow Zeihan; disregard his JEALOUS critics!
Man so right on all points. I wanted to type something like this out as well. Zeihan has never presented him has omniscient, but he has educated well thought out arguments with proof behind them
My sense of the book is that it describes sectors of possibility in terms of, "What if no one responds to correct contemporary behaviors?" By that orientation, it leans towards the negative. I really appreciate Dr. Schassfoort taking the time to respond thoughtfully. I learned some points that are worth closer investigation to detect any over-negativity.
Agreed and also the fact that authoritarian regimes often can respond quicker, to the good and the bad, compared to democratic regimes with all their checks and balances. Ignoring their human rights records
i think you also don't understand China and the Han
He tells people what they want to hear. Whether its fear or hope he sells both and people are buying.
Yep. He found his niche and he keeps pounding it.
Yup, they're an online cottage industry of "China is doomed" and "Russia is doomed" grifting. And the grifters never tire of it, even as the long-predicted doom keeps not happening.
I think he is a tool of the American govt to look good and spread propoganda
It should be a red flag that the man is basically pessimistic about every country but America. I watch his content just so that I have an idea what other people are going to start parroting. But there is so much wrong with his content. In some cases he leaves out such important known information that it feels 100% like purposefully misinformation.
THIS, exactly
I love a good peer review that isn't just "let's try to end someone else's career" I would love to see him debate Zeihan as well.
this argument on m&m is mostly just full of holes and cherry picking data taking the best case scenario vs zeihan's worst case. are you an optimist or pragmatist?