This video is part of a short series that provides some of the best evidence against the current Cosmological model of the universe, Lambda Cold Dark Matter (the Big Bang).
The point of these videos is to show how Cosmology and mainstream science will not falsify their current models despite evidence to the contrary. They keep updating them or "tweaking" them with invisible unfalsifiable constructs, which is analogous to adding epicycles of the past.
The lack of studies on UAPs stems from the same ignorant attitude.
00:00 5 Reasons the Big Bang Model is Wrong
01:51 Light Elements,
05:59 CMBR is not Isotropic
8:52 Large Structures
10:10 Surface Brightness
12:12 Dark Matter is falsified
15:56 Science will not consider new ideas
Thanks for watching, liking, and subscribing! It really helps the channel.
Links in the video:
The Big Bang Never Happened- The Science of the Censored Papers
• The Big Bang Never Hap...
The dark matter myth Pavel Kroupa full interview
• The dark matter myth |...
Support the channel and get exclusive content at
/ chrislehto
Join this channel on KZhead to get access to the perks:
/ @chrislehtof16
Join the UAP Society Discord here:
/ discord
Follow Chris on Twitter:
@ChrisOtis78
Lehto Files is now on Instagram:
/ reels
Invest in UAP Society NFTs!
Each UAPSociety NFT grants early/ad-free access to all LehtoFiles videos-
opensea.io/collection/uapeez
Donate eth to:
chrislehto.eth
full ETH address is
0x26E3c9b2A5E5b6B7FB54f5F0120B0E4840EB7B24
Try out my Streamyard affiliate link below for a discount
I use Streamyard for the majority of my videos, it is like a pro zoom
streamyard.com/pal/c/54135175...
Clearly the universe is much older and more complicated then we thought.
and electric..
I agree. Usually that is the case isn’t it? It’s bigger than we can imagine, we aren’t the center, and we’re not the only ones. History repeats itself
@@ChrisLehtoF16 Socrates - 'The more I know, the more I realize I know nothing.
Dr. Halton Arp may get the Nobel he deserves yet. I'm not holding my breath, though.
i respected chris for his status as former pilot and perspective on uaps. But instead he has gone well into the long grass, on the same self destructive course as Greer got into, a complete slave to clicks. what a pity.
I don't think anything should be set in stone ,ideas should always be excepted and discussed , after all things change science wise over time .
Yes, we need “new physics” and “there is a serious misunderstanding in our understanding of the universe”, and yet they will not even entertain new ideas. We haven’t changed since Galileo AT ALL.
Thomas Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" would be great reading for anyone interested in how paradigm shifts come about within the scientific community. The tendency is to place all data into the current scientific model until eventually the number and nature of anomalous data no longer supports the original model (what Kuhn calls Phase 3). Then the data is reassessed, a new model created, and a paradigm shift occurs (Phase 4). You are definitely onto something here Chris and I imagine the data from the Webb telescope will continue to reveal very many observations that don't fit our current model.
Until AI breaks through I don’t think it will matter. People can’t even entertain the idea their minds are made up already
What is happening probably is like In Machine Learning training: Over-fitting bias Yes the scale is so big, and we are so young civilization trying to grasp generational knowledge pressured by social-economic situations. I am no scientist, but I had experience in a cult, and this type of bias fits cult model behavior. We need more intelligence and integrity in: social, physio, mathematics, inner-world. It will take time to culturally connect dots in this exponentially progressing technological world. It is so easy to laugh from something obvious, but from un-obvious point of view the reality is different.
Hope you’re doing well 👍 thanks and keep the vids coming I look forward to those notifications! Your contents been great and I’m still behind your light is love theory ❤ hang in there
Thanks! I haven’t found anything to falsify it! Hanging, this is a tough topic and field
@@ChrisLehtoF16 for sure 👍 much love 💕
@@ChrisLehtoF16 I just need help wrapping my mind around it all. The way you go through things helps me so much. You have a gift for describing things to those of us without your knowledge of equations in science and math. Truly, it’s helpful to me in seeing the big picture.
first!
And best!
Hi Chris, I hope you're taking care of yourself !! 8:25 Notice the peak-to-peak excursion of the cmb is 0.0001 K (or C, they are the same size). That's Astonishingly isotropic! Interesting that it's a sort 1 lambda spherical sine wave, but I'm not sure it's not a test or measurement instrument artefact at that miniscule 1/10,000 level. Very isotropic Indeed. 19:00 Why do we rubbish dark matter, then use it to explain away the big bang and Then stand on the foundations of Vcdm? Where does your theory stand on dark matter? We can't have it both ways.
My argument is dark matter doesn’t exist. It’s a band aid to correct an incorrect theory just like epicycles were. If the cmbr was isotropic and random then It should be fully isotopic and random! Also if so we should get the same hubble measurement wherever we look.
But we do get the same measurement wherever we look. The difference is in the two measuring tapes that disagrees. An aviation analogue is when your inertial navigation unit says you've moved 10km while your GPS says you've moved 10,3km. We still see clearly the expansion and Hubble constant in the data.
Hey Chris did you get your 100k plaque yet?
I did in December yes thanks! It’s a nice plaque actually
Get Niel on and have a proper discussion with him about all your misgivings. That's a show I would love to watch !
NGT would constantly interrupt and have a condescending attitude toward Chris. It would be frustrating.
This was an excellent video, Chris. The universe is far more complex and interconnected (via electromagnetism) than the Big Bang Theory ever imagined. Einstein theorized that the only force in space was gravity. However, the electric force is 10 to the 39th power (1 followed by 39 zeros) stronger than gravity. In fact, many of the scientists around the time of James Clerk Maxwell's derivation of the equations for electromagnetism believed that the force of gravity may be an artifact of the electromagnetic force. I read Lerner's book you cite several years ago and agree with his assertions. The Electric Universe Theory and Plasma Cosmology actually do a much better job of explaining (and matching what we now see with the JWST) and does not require "imagined" things like Black Holes, Dark Matter and Dark Energy. However, no Astronomy Course nor Cosmology Course currently teaches anything about the electric force or electromagnetic forces. Consequently, mainstream astronomers and cosmologists keep having to make up more "Garden Gnome" type explanations to try to keep their precious Big Bang Model relevant. However, they have no explanations yet for what JWST is now revealing, and that data clearly destroys Big Bang Cosmology! We live in interesting times...
Like the marble in honey analogy. Really helps.
Yes, if extra dark matter is there, we should see its effects. They don’t get to just make up stuff to fix their broken models and then have it not there when it’s convenient.
In a simulation anything can be created.
But what's the purpose of this simulation??
@@ronaknanda6175 to expand consciousness
The supporting evidence that all matter at its most basic level behaves like a probability wave is reason enough for me to think humanity, at this point, can’t possibly understand how the universe exists. We don’t even understand how a single particle comes to be!
Great point!
Empirical Science supersedes Theoretical Science. As for galaxies red-shifting, galaxies were not even discovered until 1925 by Edwin Hubble getting one of the first equatorial mounts for a large observatory, allowing time-exposure photographic plates. Up to that time, galaxies were smudges on the plate and the astronomers didn't know what they were. Edwin Hubble, able to get clear images of other galaxies and determine their red-shift from each other in 1927 that the universe was Dynamic, not Static. That was when Einstein was still in Europe and only known in Europe. He had to make a public retraction, in Switzerland in German, of the Cosmological Constant in his General Relativity expressions, which he had stuck in as a "fudge factor" to make the Universe Steady State, as that was the "knowledge" at the time.
I can hear the phone calls !! "Prof Idleburg, we need an urgent conference. Maybe this one should be in Davos.."
So we are in a non expanding universe?!
Looks that way yes
The ancient giant ring of galaxies also help prove this out no?
@@ChrisLehtoF16 I think the universe expands in the "Alien Interview" way when new matter is added by souls, not in the big bang way.
"Over 5 sigma certainty" is as good as it gets. That's damning. Edit: I'm just an enthusiast, but I've never subscribed to the dark matter/dark energy thing. It feels like a convenient way to ignore problems with the theory.
Thank you so much, Chris!!! Love the episode!
Glad you enjoyed it! Many people didn’t like it, I think it ruffles too many feathers
He’s lost it are you serious?
@@ChrisLehtoF16 I say f their feathers. They can fly elsewhere.
Glad to see you today, sir. I hope the algorithm treats you nice these days! 🇳🇴
Thanks for writing! The audience doesn’t like this topic apparently. if we understood cosmology we might understand UAPs
@@ChrisLehtoF16 it's science based, the right audience needs to find it, & they will.
i see this video doing very well, if u average it in time over the next year.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 I read almost all comments and see this, but there are so many comments here and such a nice community that teach me and inspire me so as my fellow viewer under me said, the right audience just need to find you. I am sure you will grow, I know there has been a "minor" setback lately, but I'm here to stay. ✌🏻
The narrative always wins unfortunately Chris, until one day it doesn’t. Keep up the good work. The truth will set us free soon enough ❤️
I wonder, if the Hubble model were to be run backwards, what size the initial universe was, and did it start expanding slowly? Yes I know they also says there's inflation... Chris I want to hear you talk about fighter jets.
The universe isn’t expanding so that’s a useless exercise. Watch my previous videos on fighters! I’ve made a lot of them.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 I've watched them Thanks, Chris. I'd like to hear you as an experienced fighter pilot talk even more about aircraft and your expriences. As a fighter pilot and not an astronomer are you sure about your statements on physics and the universe? I'm a PhD and also read physics for fun - I even have my own Hypotheses on some stuff.
This is going to be an awesome watch.
Precession would not be trackable if the universe was expanding.
Science is meant to help us discover - including dead ends and mistakes.
@chroslehtof16 have you watched any of the Ashton Forbes videos? Would love to hear your opinion on them! Especially the Live Streans about Thomas Bearden about scalar physics, relating to MH370
Well done Chris. Finally people outside of the Natural Philosophers are looking at the maths guesswork originally dreamt up in the era of gaslight (with the main stream trying to refine it since then), with them seeing that the guesswork doesn't work in the era of plasma physics and the 21st Century.
Theory of Everything needs to be developed to figure out alien propulsion systems.
seems like it lol
Onnit. "Cam's Hypothesis of the Rate of Causality" - I actually have an idea (hypothesis) on what space actually is and why the speed it is what it is, and a lot of proven physics pop out of it. But I need a way of testing my hype to turn it into a theory. Writing a white paper :)
Excellent video my friends.
Thank you very much!
Bentovs black hole/white hole model from stalking the wild pendulum seems like occums razor imo because everything else in the universe is a constantly cycling toroid.
WHAT A FAKE INFO. You are an ex-pilot but want to talk about a very different discipline (the cosmology) from flying an aeroplane.
Its real info.
To my understanding the universe is contracting rather than expanding. Just look at where you have the highest mass and what does the high mass do, it attracts elements, doesn't it? So, if we accelerate backwards, it appears as the outer side accelerates. So how can you judge if it accelerates or if it is the opposite.
i respected chris for his status as former pilot and perspective on uaps. But instead he has gone well into the long grass, on the same self destructive course as Greer got into, a complete slave to clicks. what a pitty
A slave to clicks?! These videos get no clicks lol. If I wanted clicks I would make videos of fighter jets and avoid UAPs and definitely challenging the Big Bang. There’s a reason I’m the only fighter pilot doing UAP videos
@@ChrisLehtoF16 You've lost it bro. Seek help before this gets any worse.
Thank God for Chris, exposing this stuff and helping reveal the truth that the leftist faciist establishment is trying to cover up...
I love you covering the big stuff. It's been obvious to me for a while now that there's something wrong with our current models. It's such a shame that scientists fall for the same peer pressure and biases that we all do, but since we know it happens, there should be more done to mitigate the effects of it.
Directly related to no science of UAPs. Maybe if they realize they’ve been totally wrong for decades they will reconsider their position
For sure, there is an optical illusion that is expected with galaxies of large Z that far out galaxies should look as big but way dimmer than nearby galaxies because these galaxies were way closer when the light was emitted. The CMB picture is obrained thru the plane if our galaxy as if our galaxy was not there! Yet it is used to calculate the Hubble constant with great precision.. This model at best should be returned to the gray basket..but..
Yes! How is that Hubble “constant” measurement coming along?
@@ChrisLehtoF16 If red shift is not caused by recessional velocity what value would you give the “expanding constant”??? They should determine scientifically if space is really expanding… Lerner thinks that this expansion could be measured experimentally..
Great information Chris, great research! I have always thought that the Speed of LIGHT "constant" was incorrect! In a nutshell.....infrared and the ultra violet travel at different speeds over vast distances. And so with our "limited" observational technology, we describe an accelerating and expanding universe! Just a thought
Glad it was helpful!
I love your theory in the prior video! But such great information an evn BETTER questions good points! To me its unfathomable to even NOT consider these questions! Such basic curiosity opens so many doors and windows of wonder!
Yes!!! I need more about red shift!
Coming!! I’m meeting with the man who solved the redshift equation tomorrow! I am pretty damn sure his math checks out and that means all redshift is simply gravitational redshift. NDGT and the rest of the cosmology world will have to eat their own shorts.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 can’t wait!!!🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼
Thanks Chris.
You bet!
to my "weird speculation" the "dark mater" 13:00 is a kind of "depleted plasma" suppose the "fourth state of matter" not occupied in the three dimensional form again but it still keep the energy either magnetic or kinetic then it will become the dark matter or it will be back to the 'repository of celestial objects" as Nebulae.. analogy is suppose the humanoid in material form is depleted but its consciousness is still exist then the consciousness will become either running around in the three dimensional form as a 'ghostly entitas' or back to the 'conscious repository' such as akashic record or 'lauh mafudz'..
I suggest a visit to Brian Keating's KZhead channel and watching his video entitled "The Big Bang NEVER Happened? A reply to Eric Lerner" Keating is a cosmologist at the University of California, San Diego, and dives into a bit more detail about the limits of Lerner's arguments. Brian says... "By popular demand, I'll present 10 reasons why I believe Eric Lerner's article, based on his 30 year old book of nearly the same name, "The Big Bang Never Happened" is wrong, as well as some legitimate claims he raises. Join me for some live questions and maybe some answers. Along the way, I'll provide insight into how I review such claims and how you can too even if you're not a professional cosmologist to judge for yourself "
Watched it. Doesn’t answer the questions posed, mainly just character attacks
@@ChrisLehtoF16 See my other reply with a list of Lerner's errors.
The presented cosmic background radiation map looks to be the result of a field phenomena.
Chris, we are finding giant structures in the universe that challenge BB homogeneity including a reported 2022 study of a million galaxies that clearly shows an asymmetrical distribution. The discovery of the Great Arc and the Giant Ring (apparently more of a corkscrew) create serious challenges to the standard model and cosmologists are, once again, being forced to rethink a cyclic big bounce universe. AGI may stem the growing realization in the scientific community that the more we think we know, the less we actually know and also help overcome the hubris blocking new ideas. Let young, bright minds 'discover the big bang' on their own if it is fact, don't force feed it and make their careers dependent on "correct thinking."
But they are 💯% sure of Climate Change…… 😂 pure bunk science.
There are definitely too many aberrations in the Big Bang theory for it to hold up against scrutiny. ✨👍 Keep at it with your research, and thanks for sharing ✌️
Gravity is a rather peculiar thing. In physics calculations, it is said that it decreases with the square of the distance. In reality, the gravitational field of a body does not decrease with distance, it continues for immeasurable distances, and we do not know how the gravitational field combines with the fields of other masses. Us gravitational fields "visible everywhere", deafening?
the strength decreases by the distance, but there is no limit to gravity. This will be in my next theory video, the math that shows all cosmological redshift could be gravitational redshift.
I'm only a carpenter...this is too deep for my educational background
@@ChrisLehtoF16 I assume the gravitational field forms our world and we share the same gravitational field. There is no place in space without a gravitational field. Although the "strength" of the gravitational field weakens as the square of the distance, its interaction space increases as the cube of the distance.
“Highly organized research is guaranteed to produce nothing new.” 'Bureaucracy destroys initiative. There is little that bureaucrats hate more than innovation, especially innovation that produces better results than the old routines. Improvements always make those at the top of the heap look inept. Who enjoys appearing inept?' RIP Frank Herbert always appreciate you fighting the good fight Chris =]
great quotes! Thanks, it is not a popular opinion, but I don't do this for the money. If I did I would be making videos about drone striked in Israel.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 ur not wrong brother , they always want to keep us divided and killing each other =/ ; reminds me of the scene from All Quite on the Western Front 'why should they send us out to fight each other...'
I notice that you avoid Unzicker and Robitaille for some reason. I still want to hear the CDM alternative arguments for the rotation rates and angular momenta of (spiral) galaxies first researched by Vera Rubin.
Check my last big bang video. I talk about both of them!
I proposed that the faster rotational rates is due to Machs principle. The density of the galaxy gets lower and lower as you go further out. Gravity is directly related to the density of matter. Less density of matter the outer part rotates faster.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 Chris, thank you for replying. Yes, I heard Dr. Unzicker talk about Mach’s principle. Atm, I’m working in the torque and angular momentum area-nothing beyond what is in my physics books and several good articles and excerpts that I’ve been able to hunt down. Also, Professor Lewin makes it a point to always use angular velocity bc all points on a rotating (rigid) body move with the same angular velocity regardless of their distance from the rotation axis. I need to mull over Mach’s Principle for a bit. (I’m also aware of the liquid sun model unzicker and robitaille adhere to based on liquid metallic hydrogen.)
Vera Rubin found out, using Empirical Evidence, that the Newtonian mechanics being used to determine the galaxy rotation curve profile of spiral galaxies had been wrong for 60 years. Even then, she made a mistake with one assumption. *“Don’t shoot for the stars, we already know what’s there. Shoot for the space in between because that’s where the real mystery lies.” - Vera Rubin, 2016, a few months before she died.*
@@voidagent Astronomers have known since Huygens (!) that the motion of the stars in our galaxy is non-uniform and succeeding generations of astrophysicists have proved it to be true. From what I gather re Mach’s Principle it only holds for galaxies with uniform motion. Most galaxies are non-uniform. Vera Rubin’s accomplishment is finally being recognized with the scheduled launch of the Vera Rubin Satellite.
Hi Chris, I never really comment on any of your videos but I wanted you to know I really enjoyed this one quite a lot and it sent me down a rabbit hole. I watched several videos referenced and aligning to this one. Thanks for the content, brother. Be well.
Glad you enjoyed it! You’re one of the few people open to the idea, I appreciate it
Been subbed to you sense you were at like 3k! Not that that’s cool I’m saying it’s awesome you came up like I knew you woulda! So glad you are brother. Keep the good shit. Coming!!!
Thanks for the long term support!!
@@ChrisLehtoF16 thanks for acknowledging it! You’ve just been doing better and better. Ain’t gonna say “I knew from the start! Im amazing!l lmao. But I hoped and glad To see you where you are brother. Please keep it up. Love your videos.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "TIME": Out here, in the universe at large is only Matter / Energy and "information" in motion, even a clock, is just matter and energy in motion, the fact its currently in the form of a clock, is the information. Call it the "umoved mover" A truer description of the cosmological constant. The "Constant Now" Movement without space ? = No. Without Time ? = Yes. (Time is an illusion of mind past due to memory, future to imagination. So, how can what did not begin ever end ? 'Specially that what you're trying to measure doesn't exist OUT HERE:
7:25 yes but didn't matter / anti matter annihilation disrupt this spread?
Of the cmbr?
You can't measure the size of the ocean by looking at the colour of the fish.
You're killing me with your tomaters, Sir... 🤣
Tomatoes? Meaning TOE? It’s why I make videos. To find the truth of the universe
@@ChrisLehtoF16 i meant the way you kept saying certain names, Sir...lol
Keep the big bang question alive Chris, it's the only way to get young scientist's to look at new evidence. At the moment it is to much money spent and prestige on stake to get the right answer.
Will do! There is a lot of stigma related to it.
@@ChrisLehtoF16it’s a load of theories and unknowns. Stick to what you know
People can’t handle new theories. They are too weak minded. But i enjoyed the video, I don’t think the Big Bang theory is correct. We have a lot to learn
It isn’t being weak minded, it’s being human. We get invested in an idea. We learn it in expensive education, compete for jobs in the field, have to perform to keep the job, make social connections, so now our economic and social welfare are in invested. And then we also have the problem of our jobs being central to who we are and how we think about ourselves. That’s our very identity. And people who have gotten ahead because of the accepted idea are going to try to defend it. People trying to establish a career are going side with the respected authorities. It’s a deep problem of social structure, not weak mindedness. It’s normal mindedness. The ones who go rogue from the group are the rare outliers who are not “normal”. And it isn’t necessarily better or worse than the center of the bell curve, it’s just different. They can be wrong, and badly so, just as easily as being a trailblazer to a new understanding. We should provide education that helps people overcome rigid thinking. Perhaps establish institutions that serve to pose challenges as an outlet for new thinking on established ideas. Recognizing that a problem exists in our fundamental organization of social groups and economic welfare due to our very natures as humans is beneficial to all of us.
Maybe the hotter regions are the spiral arms full of stars and the colder regions are the space in between them.
They say it’s random and isotropic
For some reason I always felt the “big bang” theory wasn’t correct. 🤷🏽♀️
you aren't alone! If it was correct it woldn't need additional invisible things to make it work
Excellent research and thought provoking as always Chris. Keep it coming!
Letho, focus on our alien visitors or did you get visited by MIB?
I do what I want. This is focused on it.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 no worries 🤙
Another good show. Read Itzhak Bentov's books. The WMAP map is similar to his universe model (which he arrived at through meditation). Meditate to participate.
Density of light is a missing component
Yes, that’s my next video
I watched your video about stacking light, and a/the Unifying theory. Fascinating.
When spiritual density achieved consciousness unifies and begins again. One rollercoaster ride we cant get off of. Prob solves need for dark matter and Fermi paradox all at once, if the focal point of the unification is on planet earth.
It's very sad that so many scientists have lost their scientific minds3t and treat their beliefs that are based on assumptions and indirect evidence as fact. They have closed their minds to possibility, however far reaching as not possible. I have lost respect for NdGT as he has put down much evidence he has not studied himself.
great video
Glad you enjoyed it! You’re one of the few who watched it. My audience isn’t interested apparently
One of my favourite videos. I really loved it. TBBT always sounded absurd to me, I hope the experts get to the truth.
HAEL YAH CHRIS!! Now this is a great topic!
You’re one of the few!
@@ChrisLehtoF16 you should have Salvatore Pais on
Great video!
Thanks!
Been studying the subject of sasquatch. Insane! Human like people that can disappear with a cloaking ability. I can link some channels if you want.
DMT trip I saw the big bang does that count
I thought that radiation diminishes at the CUBE, not the SQUARE OF DISTANCE.
Inverse square law. Magnetism is the cube randomly I believe
@@ChrisLehtoF16 Thanks.
Fascinating breakdown analysis!
Glad you liked it! Thanks for writing
Another great upload from Chris very interesting.If our physics model is fundamentally broken we can progress no further in this field.
Absolutely, this is why cosmology has been a broken record for the past several decades. We listen to NDGT wax poetic BS and nothing really moves forward. Look at string theory. I’m proposing we look at real observations and people call me out of my lane
The cmb seems to show hot spots like Jupiter and every other body at 19.47 degrees latitude.
Actually, the gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn are not hot, they are very cold, because they are the temperature of liquid hydrogen and helium, near absolute zero.
uh oh, he's Greer in disguise all along!
Greer talks about the big bang?
It shows people like Neils lack of ACTUAL dedication to the scientific method when they make such definitive statements about the universe. All of these models are limited to our human understanding and ability to understand which is inherently limited. Despite the subjective nature of our determinations about how the universe works or came into existence, subjectiveness is alway derided by that community. Though we create machines to see what we cannot those machines must be made to define thesw things to a human level of understanding which means its by nature subjective. We cant get away from that and that is OK, we can only attempt to have a human understanding of things. But to make declarative statements that what we describe is actual reality is only anthropecentric reality not how reality actually is. Todays scientists are just the priesthood of our time, telling the masses what to believe and condemning those that think differently. Its become just as dogmatic. Luckily people are trying to break away from it
Dark energy might be the biggest blunder in cosmology.... Of course the galaxies that are far away appear to move at higher speed than the ones close by. The ones close by are more slowed down due to gravity. And the measurements from far away galaxies are measurement from the past. We see the galaxies as they where millions of years ago. And millions of years ago they where not slowed down as much by gravity. So it is not that far away galaxies are accelerating but close by galaxies are slowed down more due to more gravity and time difference when comparing far away and close by galaxies. Please prove me wrong as i have never found a clear argument against above reasoning.
I have a video for next week that will explain the redshift clearly
If your reasoning is correct you described a cyclical cosmological model. But, and there's always a but, we see close by galaxies accelerating - not slowing - compared to galaxies further away in the data. This observation lead to the discovery of dark energy.
@@altsak840 we do not actually see galaxies accelerating. We deduct that galaxies must be accelerating based on the low speed of closeby galaxies and high speed of far away galaxies. We do not measure a higher speed if we measure the same galaxy a couple of years later. There is one way to measure acceleration that is now looked at. If you look at a galaxy which light is bend by gravitational lensing you can compare speeds. The distance of the light travelled that went through the gravitational lens is different. The light on the outside has more distance and is thus older. Therefore the red shift of a gravitational lens must be different in the center compared to the outside. The red shift on the inside has to be greather. We are waiting for telescopes that are sensitive enough to measure this. And if my suspicion is correct than the redshift in the center is not greather but the same or less than the the outside....
@@martijn5207 There seems to be a misunderstanding on your part. The acceleration of the expansion of the universe at close by and therefore older universe is an observation that contradicts your original hypothesis about "close by galaxies slowing down due to gravity". You should think about acceleration in the second derivative. Yes the universe expands faster the further away we look but it has nothing to do with gravity. The expansion is an innate attribute of the medium getting expanded and not the galaxies itself moving anywhere.
I wouldn’t necessarily throw the baby out with the bathwater. There is more to the big bang theory and there’s a lot of information that matches to it. There are also some assumptions you made in the video that doesn’t follow through. What I would say is we are still working on the theory. The model is not complete. And if we do actually find something that contradicts the theory or kills it out right as another possibility, then yeah we have to work on a new idea.
We’ve been “working” on that broke theory for 80 years and it hasn’t predicted anything correctly. They just added invisible fake stuff! Throw it out and start over. That’s what’s required but big science can’t do it.
I gave 5 reasons that show it is false.
🔥🔥🔥
One of the few! This is a tough topic. It’s like UAPs, brains are closed on the topic
Where is SETI at? Did SETI shut down? Specifics are good thing to get into.
SETI is still going
@@ChrisLehtoF16 listening for radio signals from advanced civilizations is like looking out for smoke signals. No one would use radio to communicate in the vastness of space.
Neil is just a step above Bill Ney, the skience guy
Oh no! What are religious people gonna do if this piece of hope for a creator goes away!
I’m not sure it’s really related, they can just say it is eternal and he created it, but the belief in the Big Bang despite many counter points mirrors religious dogma
Good work Chris, facts matter 👍
Thanks 👍 They don’t want to even entertain the idea
@@ChrisLehtoF16Hang in tbere Chris. Dr Tyson is, no doubt, a heck of a nice guy but even he must consider inconvenient facts, dependant on ego, sooner or later. I would love to hear Dr Sabine Hossenfelder's view on this, she's a pretty straight shooter when it comes calling out questionable science.
We all love ya Chris but my mate Steve Loves like loves you 😂
The Street Slang term "big bang" was coined by Fred Hoyle as a term of derision, not science jargon. It is a Big Dud. "Children of the Atom" kzhead.info/sun/rZmjcsOSpoibZ40/bejne.html
Love the channel Chris!
Neil…really, gone
Agreed Chris. The model is def incorrect. I have always thought that how a person or persons actually figured we started with a bang. Get real, we don't know nothin'
Once the model couldn’t predict things without inventing new invisible unfindeable material they should go back to the beginning
This is all above my pay grade lol. However I've seen Dr. Keatings video as well as a few others on this subject. That being JWST disproves the big bang. It really doesn't seem that is true at all. Nor do physicists think it does. As an outside observer and complete laymen I can pick up on a few things that aren't necessarily scientific. When I listen to Lerner talk he speaks in a similar way to Graham Hancock. Using buzzwords and strawmans about "Mainstream Academia" and such. That's usually a red flag when people do that.
It’s not that complicated. If the universe is 13 billion years old, you can’t have a structure that is more than a billion years old. This should be enough to break their model but they have their heads in the sand. It will break at some point. We put up with string theory for years and other ridiculous ideas. Everything I propose is based on observations. It has always been this way. The people on high know they are right until some new outsider shows them they are wrong and is ostracized. Same same.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 The JWST is a better and more accurate tool. The premise that their model is broken is just not factual. Models can and are refined in science when new information and data comes out. Occam's razor. Either the timeline is a bit off or the entire model of the universe and known astrophysics is wrong and this guy is right. But that also goes into the misrepresentation of what has been said on the subject. Not to mention the fact that JWST data is new. It will take time to really understand what's happening. Jumping to conclusions is unwise.
in many ways science seems no more flexible than the middle ages, or even ancient times. where politics and a scientific "religion" step in. maybe the big bang theory will end up like the geocentric theory, in the history books. it might be our own innate nature, which really has stayed the same in modern humans for 1000s of years that limits our ability. power, wealth, ego drive us. the true genius and innovation seems to only come from a few select individuals that are often suppressed by the collective community
Exactly correct. The true innovators are considered quacks until they’re suddenly considered geniuses after beaten down for years. We are the same as we were a thousand years ago and somehow can’t see the repeating cycles of arrogance combined with ignorance. But now we have KZhead and decentralization is more and more the norm
Do you know it didn't start with nothing? There was always something as far as we have been able to detect. Dark matter the space that seems like there is nothing there we now know there is something there. Read a Lawrence Krauss book. A universe from nothing. Spoiler alert, the universe didn't come from nothing.
Yes.. N.D.T has a brilliant mind, but his arrogance and ego limit him from thinking outside the box
He’s your classic academia scientist
I suspect there are a few other things Tyson is wrong about.
I thought Neil new everything about everything ,that’s what he’s lead you to believe 😂
This was a really interesting video Chris, don't listen to these easily offended, one dimensional thinkers that can't possibly believe that something that they have swallowed wholesale for so long could be wrong.
It’s tough! Thanks 🙏 yes it’s like aliens. People’s minds are already made up
Greta video!
Lehto is grasping at straws for clicks. Sad. Just lost my subscription. Bye.
You can make plenty off video's of neil being wrong about a lot off stuff. Don't get me wrong, he is a smart guy but what he says about aliens and UFO's is just him being close minded about it. He deems it impossible and thats that.
Your initial hubble constance data graph 📊 is not up to current day, new data brings them closer together
Un, they aren’t close and if you look at my previous big bang video the numbers don’t even agree with themselves. They’ve spent billions of dollars and can’t get the same number
How do you explain the background radiation if there is no big bang.?
The best idea I have heard is hawking radiation from the observable universe. You can falsify a theory without having a better explanation. My own hunch is it like the black body radiation of the observable universe
@@ChrisLehtoF16 thank you for your reply Chris.
@@ChrisLehtoF16 ..Hawking radiation comes from black holes. Not "the observable universe".
Ive studied physics all my life, just out of curiosity. Even though alot doesnt make sense when we look at quantum physics, the big bang theory has just never felt right. Every time a "famous" physicist talks about the big bang as a fact, I just stop listening to that person. Im 100% sure it will get disproven within the next 25 years.
100% sure = fact, at least according to you. Now plug that into your thought process.
Hopefully sooner than that! AI will come on board in the next few years and the physicists and cosmologists will be caught with their pants down. Same as string theory. Their made up theories to explain observations are the same as epicycles in the past. They add free invisible parameters instead of removing parameters. New theories remove things, they don't add additional unknowns.
Listen to Einstein Letho. He's smarter than any astrophysicist or Nobel prizes.
I wouldn't say that! But, I have been trained to call a spade a spade when necessary.
Don't know about this one....😮
If the universe is 13 billion years old, how can there be a 3 billion light year structure? Ask an astronomer
Its too easy to take a cheap shot at Chris who is out there doing his thing while you keyboard warriors hide behind your screen in your Mothers basement. It's just shameful. I expect you are so lacking in your real life that you think it's okay to have a go at Chris. It's not okay to have a go at Chris so go away and leave him alone.
I’ll survive but thanks! Its more that people won’t even consider the arguments
It’s a miracle we can even kinda understand anything. I mean, I asked my daughter’s rabbit about the federal reserve and Mr Hoppy had nothing. That’s us and the universe in a nutshell!
❤