I admired Jess's bravely because when I first saw this, I was quite shocked and surprised when she goes for it.
@lukeshiel39 ай бұрын
30 grand for a 20 second time advantage seemed good enough to me!
@beng16038 ай бұрын
Yeah I'd have probably taken 3 chasers on for the £30k. Though I can see why someone would take on the super offer if given the chance!
@TheSpotify957 ай бұрын
@@xxshadowgamer2 which is like I said a 20 second time advantage over the chasers
@beng16036 ай бұрын
Id gone 4 chasers 5 is too hard
@C_Williams84_Vlogs5 ай бұрын
I would've went for 47 seconds she still might have won if she did
@Ryan_Gaffney4 ай бұрын
@@Ryan_GaffneyDoubt it, given the Chasers had 29 seconds to spare.
@beng16034 ай бұрын
While she did lose, she is the only person currently who can claim that she took on 6 chasers, which is brave.
@oliverorchard67745 ай бұрын
She gave it a go. How many others could stand there in front of 6 people who does that for a living and in front of an audience and answer questions like that within one minute? Fine, there has been a few do it. I'd struggle answering those with a 20 second head start. Hat's off to her for giving it her best
@kenbearsley83224 ай бұрын
Anyone that bothers to apply for the show I imagine
@kevinmoore26963 ай бұрын
100k for 13 sec advantage is actually really good
@UneasyDragon1094 ай бұрын
Especially as The Beast would be omitted.
@Isleofskye4 ай бұрын
@@Isleofskye yeah
@UneasyDragon1094 ай бұрын
I'd have either gone £30K for 3 chasers or £100K for 5, depending on how I was feeling. For 4 chasers (versus 3), the small difference in time advantage, plus an extra chaser, isn't worth only £20,000 more in my opinion. At that point you might as well go for 5.
@ngarcia1032 ай бұрын
Definitely earned my respect going for that large offer.
@kweets247 ай бұрын
Imagine taking on Britain's 6 biggest nerds for 500K with no advantage
@lukecartwright1lf3f4 ай бұрын
Like she said, you only live once
@LoAsha4 ай бұрын
I watched it
@Tylersgaming244 ай бұрын
Never expected 13 likes and 3 repliea
@lukecartwright1lf3f4 ай бұрын
Stupid boy 😅
@johnbatch92764 ай бұрын
@@johnbatch9276boy?
@kuromi6674 ай бұрын
I've always wanted to see someone go for the full house of six chasers. Really great effort Jess 🎉
@nintendomal91618 ай бұрын
Personally I'd have gone for the £100K. Half a mil would be nice but 60 seconds is very tight!
@TR1PLE_63 ай бұрын
With 29 left on the clock she would have struggled to get one of the lower offers anyway. Such a shame. My heart thumped for her, for sure. I was thinking before the timer started, no matter what happens, I have massive admiration for her choosing that option, and the Chasers and audience obviously respected that as well. This would have been such an incredible win though. Would have loved to see that.
@DK_Son2 ай бұрын
I think it's great she went after all 6! If you're not after the money but just want to have a good time challenging yourself, then why not! I don't think anyone would try taking on all 6 with no time advantage if they wanted to bring home some cash. 😂
@wreck84 ай бұрын
Thanks for posting Beat the Chasers!
@lonewolfx4999 ай бұрын
I do believe this is the first and only time that a contestant has chosen to take on all 6 chasers. What’s also interesting to note is that there was another contestant who could’ve taken on all 6 but chose to take on 4 and he absolutely slaughtered them. He had about 30 seconds left on his clock so potentially, if he’d have taken on all 6… they might have won an even more incredible amount of money.
@Harvey12119 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure it isn't the first, and I think that person won, but I may be wrong on them winning. But for me it's more about the time than anything else. Sometimes the chasers get tripped up on BTC because they have to consider each other as opposed to when they're alone and can just say 'pass' if they're unsure. Sometimes people have won not because they played too well, but because of the time running out and the chasers getting a pop culture question none of them knew the answer to and waiting too long to answer. I think she would've won against 4, and maybe even 5
@SaiSaiGre9 ай бұрын
I know Steven got all 5 questions and was offered $500K but went for 3 chasers for $25,000.
@lonewolfx4998 ай бұрын
@@lonewolfx499 that might be the wrong I was thinking of. I’m sorry for being stupid.
@Harvey12118 ай бұрын
I wonder if Steven would have beaten 4 or more chaser’s, the only thing is the chaser’s might have known the answer’s to the 2 Paul got wrong and the 1 Darragh got wrong so I’m not sure if Steven would have won if there were more chaser’s he faced.
@qasimhussain16788 ай бұрын
@@qasimhussain1678 hmm fair enough. Have you ever thought about the strategy you would deploy if you were on Beat The Chasers? What’s most important to you, the time, the money or the chasers?
@Harvey12118 ай бұрын
The pressure is already high as is when she chose to face all six of them. The chasers saw this as a challenge as well - took less than 3 seconds to answer the first question, and less than 4 on average for subsequent questions (ones that were answered correctly, anyway.) The pressure on the girl probably multiplied itself by 500000x when she failed to answer the first time, and then another 500000x the second time. When she started shaking her head and smiled to herself she already knew she lost. I believe her train of thought was almost at "Mayflower" when she passed to save time. Still, major balls of titanium to take on six of them, knowing your chance of winning is probably slim to none. I would've taken the 40-second deal (best value, in my opinion).
@nooobiechild14 күн бұрын
she went for the gusto, props to her! first 20 seconds she did amazingly but would've needed to keep that pace throughout the whole round and essentially not get 1 wrong if she wanted to win, but I guess thats how it goes when theres 500k on the line, also going first definitely does not help. GG
@Tronny6 ай бұрын
Also I think once she did get one wrong, she dwelled on it and I think that threw her. I've noticed now, because time is so crucial if the answer doesn't come to you right away, just pass immediately and cut your losses don't waste time thinking, if you do get one wrong, let it go mentally and just focus on the next one don't let it throw you off.
It's not just a game of knowledge. Psychology plays a big part in this game! You give one wrong answer you have to brush it aside and focus on the next question! Like a psychopath with no emotions ~ ice cold !!
@jojobee422 ай бұрын
You wouldn’t beat an average pub quiz team in a 6v1, let alone when you’re against some of the best quizzers in the UK.
@him050Ай бұрын
They play with an inherent time disad in addtion to having to- 1. Press the buzzer, and wait for the buzzer to call the person 2. Wait to see if anyone knows the answer to the question, if not them, instead of instantly passing These two things can waste a major amount of time, but admittedly in a no-pressure contest, you are right
@dashyz3293Ай бұрын
Maybe they should invite Kevin from eggheads on as a celebrity contestant. Maybe he could win the 500k.
@-mattm7 күн бұрын
@@-mattm would love to see that! The man knows everything!
@him0506 күн бұрын
@@him050 Problem is would he be quick enough to answer at speed. We know Anne is a top chaser but she seems very redundant on Beat the chasers.
@-mattm6 күн бұрын
You need to be a mastermind champ to beat all 6 of them, what would be interesting if one chaser for example: Beast playing against all other 5 chasers, same with The Chase, 4 chasers being the contestants and one other chaser trying to hunt them down
@ITVgameshows9 ай бұрын
Would love to see more Beat the Chasers clips if you had any intention of uploading more! Seeing all 6 chasers at once looks so cool but daunting too, I wish we got the chance to see more
@koyo11099 ай бұрын
@@koyo1109 I LOVE beat the chasers. Yes more more more!!!
@josephkane78059 ай бұрын
@@koyo1109 Yh wish we got more of contestant’s taking on 6 chaser’s shame it only happened once (so far)
@qasimhussain16789 ай бұрын
Also the Chasers need to slip up at least one question, since your clock go first it's very likely that your clock also ends first should both side answer flawlessly.
@HNBGamer9 ай бұрын
No guts, no glory, no money 😮
@julierobinson81736 ай бұрын
Good for her ! She probably calculated she wouldn’t win but had a go anyway, so maybe it’s not just greed .
@Muzzy684 ай бұрын
I get the feeling Mark was only told 500,000 through his ear piece or monitor as he said it based on his own reaction.
@misstrussteLgbTq9 ай бұрын
1:42, errr what do you mean, very confused 😕🤔🤔🤔, don't know what explanation I can give you mate?
@southernboi81548 ай бұрын
@@southernboi8154 don’t think you meant to ask me that.
@misstrussteLgbTq8 ай бұрын
@misstrussteLgbTq what are you talking about ear piece, monitor thing he just said the offer normally right?
@southernboi81548 ай бұрын
The chasers don’t have earpieces. Mark was just being himself.
@jamesnimarko14398 ай бұрын
@@jamesnimarko1439 of course they have earpieces. This is television.
@pugsterjosh79255 ай бұрын
2:11 Jess: "You know what? No guts no glory. Let's go for it let's go full beans Brad take them all on!" Chasers: 😙 🙇🏾♂️ ☺️ 🤦🏻♂️ 😲 🤔
@joyeuxlice_yt4 ай бұрын
Why should the contestant have to answer first? Disadvantage straight away.
@woodstarwoody4 ай бұрын
The chasers have to buzz in and be called on though, I think that makes up for it.
@marcpower41673 ай бұрын
@@marcpower4167the opposite version of the chase but still it can still be annoying though lol yes what playing for was good though lol yes lol
@alanmawson2187Ай бұрын
They’re offering a chance to win money; they make the rules. Don’t like it? Don’t play.
@FactsMatterАй бұрын
3.46 world class answer by the dark destroyer. Won the game for the chasers imo
@Boxinghotspur577 ай бұрын
mark is literally buzzing in as well
@BTLeague_official7 ай бұрын
They won by 29 secs.... I don't think that one question made a difference.....
@thomassf37 ай бұрын
@@thomassf3dunno man such a niche question that kept the momentum in their favour. We’ll never know for sure but I think that was a pivotal moment
@Boxinghotspur576 ай бұрын
That's a bad case of mixing ambition with ability, but fair play to her for having the guts to go for the big offer. She should have gone much lower and she would have given herself a great chance of going home with a decent amount. Once she lost her train of thought it was all over.
@user-xv2kk5fe5b8 ай бұрын
In short to play for half a million you`d be facing Aristotle - arguably the last man on earth to know practically everything there is to know.
@dogwithwigwamz.732020 күн бұрын
Jess was unlucky though. After that first wrong answer, every question after that was tough
@andrewfenn30198 ай бұрын
Going down in glory. Like her self-confidence. What a nice person as well
@alwayslaughingtoby4 ай бұрын
13 second advantage for a hundred grand was a good offer. She got greedy
@XaviRonaldo05 ай бұрын
To all who call her greedy, yeah, hindsight is 20/20. I applaud her confidence. Let's see how many would call her greedy had she won. To all that say she should have gone for lower money, well... the chasers used 31 seconds, that's less than the lowest offer. Yes, some chasers wouldn't be able to answer, but it's not clear she would have won with any of those offers.
@msolec20004 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, that was so beautiful.
@rotkatzeredcat42845 ай бұрын
She played well but it was nerves.
@jamesrobert6808 ай бұрын
I can't blame her for taking that offer, how often do you get a chance to win half a million? Thanks for the upload, these are always fun to watch.
@RisingSunReviews9 ай бұрын
You came with nothing and while you could leave with nothing, why not take the chance to change your life forever?
@thesmithersy9 ай бұрын
@@thesmithersy Exactly. Like she could have probably won the 5k, which would be nice, but wouldn't really change anything.
@RisingSunReviews8 ай бұрын
@@RisingSunReviews Having 100k would make a difference as well but the pressure might have been lower.
@coswiger6 ай бұрын
There are so many "you should've taken the lower offer instead of being greedy" comments that are entirely based on what the end result was, instead of taking the perspective of being there in the moment, before the actual decision is made. When you're there, you never know. Despite being superbrains, the chasers have a history of messing up big time in quite a few instances, and with the right questions at the right time, it's still doable. So while the lower offers may have changed the outcome, you cannot fault her for going for the 500K. Brilliant start if anything.
@ArcienPlaysGames2 ай бұрын
@@ArcienPlaysGames Sometimes taking a risk is worth it, especially with a life-changing amount of money. Sure, it may not always work out, but that doesn't mean it was the wrong decision in the moment.
@RisingSunReviewsАй бұрын
Fair play to her for going for it, she may even end up being the only player ever who had the guts to take on all 6!
@chaingangsoldier31005 ай бұрын
I kind of doubt even James holzhauer or Ken Jennings could beat this kind of challenge
@majrankin3 ай бұрын
I would love to see beat the chasers repeat on challenge TV at some point and she try very best to try beat all 6 chasers
@paulridley91363 ай бұрын
I don’t care what anyone says. You could never convince me NOT to take the highest offers possible. Like dark destroyer said. No guts no glory
@absolutebad33333 ай бұрын
he was just quoting what the contestant just said lol
@davidz26902 ай бұрын
@@davidz2690 ok?? How does that change anything of what I said
@absolutebad33332 ай бұрын
@@absolutebad3333 because no one says "Like ___ said" if they're quoting someone lol
@Hazetal2 ай бұрын
@@Hazetal semantic police over here… who cares does it take away from the point of what I said?
@absolutebad33332 ай бұрын
@absolutebad3333 nothing semantic. You quoted (gave credit to) the wrong person. On a video you can watch again and check. And instead of apologizing and editing, you’re defending yourself. When you’re demonstrably wrong. Be better.
@FactsMatterАй бұрын
Paul calls her a fool after saying Skin for "Neuro"melanin hahahahahah
@plazmiq0Ай бұрын
The best thing about it is that he is a doctor
@lainiejack7989Ай бұрын
It’s a very easy mistake to make, she was perhaps a little foolish in accepting the deal. You listen for keywords when you’re a quizzer, and 9/10 times you’ll see that the answer for a question relating to melanin is “skin”.
@anthonythatcherchurchilled285Ай бұрын
Well melanin is constantly related with skin so it wasn't exactly a howler was it?
@rosscleary9110Ай бұрын
Ballsy, but she did get the 5 questions in the builder
@benpotaka58933 ай бұрын
OMG the offer from the beast was huge 😲500k
@christophercarr13316 ай бұрын
Greedy got the better of her plus she the questions weren’t the best for her. Pressure she really should have thought about this
@mallyscutchings84525 күн бұрын
I would have also tried £500,000. You never know.
@BlackStarASMR2 ай бұрын
Yeah agreed. Sometimes on the normal chase I’m sure they go easy on them and essentially let them win.
@him050Ай бұрын
Knew it was Mark who tempted her, of course
@Duval-In-The-Wall5 ай бұрын
“Step aside”🤣
@idvetryn2790Ай бұрын
I love Bradley I think he's absolutely brilliant
@katiesmith203127 күн бұрын
I love how it said £0 with 5 seconds before she actually lost it. 😂
@WTyrahcaZ2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Lewismooney12318 сағат бұрын
This is what happens when the Chasers dominate
@Duval-In-The-Wall5 ай бұрын
Very Brave But One Question Tripped Her Up And The Game Was Over Plus When It Had 1 Second Left The Amount Was Already £0 And The Chasers Question Too
@catherinearnold94238 ай бұрын
Yeah, I’ve seen that happen on a previous series. It’s quite strange.
@jamesnimarko14398 ай бұрын
Dang girl got balls
@jatu29384 ай бұрын
It looks flat enough to me 😊
@johnbatch92764 ай бұрын
I am sure someone will find this useful. Mark answer two questions, both correctly. Shaun answered one question correctly. Anne answered no questions. Paul answered one question incorrectly. Jenny answered three questions correctly. Darragh answered no questions.
@josephchambers20002 ай бұрын
1v3 then really. 30k to go for 3 with 20 more seconds. Take 20 off the chasers and she is still 9 seconds away. Could of gone for the 30 and probably won because of who the chasers were.
@WTyrahcaZ2 ай бұрын
Any contestant without a time advantage is always going to be up against it, because the contestant goes first - so assuming the average length of each question is the same on both sides, if the chasers get all theirs right then you're toast whatever you do. You really need an advantage of about 5 seconds just to counter the disadvantage of having to go first. 47 seconds would counter the disadvantage and then give you about a two question advantage, i.e. even if they get all theirs right you can afford to get two wrong and still win. So I'd probably have gone for the five chaser offer - £100k is still a lot of money but you have a MUCH better chance. Probably only a "professional" quizzer - Kevin Ashman or someone similar - would be able to take them all on with no time advantage and have a reasonable chance of winning.
@escapedlunatic276 ай бұрын
Agreed. Thats why the time advantage is so important.
@mbdg68105 ай бұрын
They should flip a coin to decide who goes first when there's no time advantage.
@XaviRonaldo05 ай бұрын
They should make it so that the contestant's time doesn't start until Brad reads the first question, that should nullify the disadvantage of going first.
@24magiccarrot5 ай бұрын
What about the fact the chasers have to buzz in and be called on, that takes a second or two, isn't that enough to nullify it?
@marcpower41673 ай бұрын
@@marcpower4167 A human reaction time to an audio stimulus is 0.17 seconds and it takes about 6 seconds for Brad to ask a question, to simplyfy this for you it would take about 18 questions each for the buzzing in to nullify the advantage of the chasers going second and in 60 seconds Brad only asks about 10 questions each
@24magiccarrot3 ай бұрын
Wheres the full episode
@keanewilliams17049 ай бұрын
The full episode will be on ITVX. Series 4, episode 4.
@jamesnimarko14399 ай бұрын
I watched hoping she had won it! How disappointing 😮
@julierobinson81736 ай бұрын
Me too! I was hoping she would win the $500,000 as well! That’s why I watched the video because it sounds exciting
@fable91595 ай бұрын
2:18 2:21 2:26 2:29
@Xboxfan173 ай бұрын
she tried
@thaveesh4 ай бұрын
So sad she lost £500,000. Good try tho
@williamevansshorts-nu5fq5 ай бұрын
Could have been for 10mil but she never gonna beat all 6 with the same time is she lool
@jamie123b4 ай бұрын
Could you with your bum juice?
@user-SJT22054 ай бұрын
Hold on how is this Series 4 when Darragh is a chaser.
@sadas31909 ай бұрын
Darragh joined Beat The Chasers in series 3 when Paul was ill. Series 4 was recorded in summer 2021.
@jamesnimarko14399 ай бұрын
Some mudders do have em
@peznino16 ай бұрын
Not 500,000 to bigger
@naseembegum15768 ай бұрын
44 for 50k Perfect
@C_Williams84_Vlogs5 ай бұрын
All 6 having a full 60 seconds is too much of an advantage for them. Should’ve only been another 3 seconds for 50.
@Foxhound38579 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@joysynmonds90829 ай бұрын
Seen this start. Surely not ????
@joysynmonds90829 ай бұрын
Well that's why they award half a million!
@HNBGamer9 ай бұрын
but she gets half a million if she wins
@ninjapirate1238 ай бұрын
She would have won a lot of money, more money than 99.9% of uk game show contestants will ever be offered
@animefan74247 ай бұрын
Well, that was close 😆
@danielali65712 ай бұрын
I honestly really seriously do not get why there hasn’t been another episode where a contestant plays for this much and instead actually wins it 😢😢
@alanmawson2187Ай бұрын
Because they have no interest in losing all this money
@inahole2678Ай бұрын
They have to get 5 questions right in the cash builder first, I’ve never seen anyone else get 5 right before
@Mhxqu3Ай бұрын
In all game or quiz shows that involves answering questions. It is all about the odds, the right person being there answering the perfect questions that they happen to know answer for. So someone might have got all questions right and gone home with half a million quid. And someone else might have gone home empty handed etc. In theory it is a trap to lure you in with big money offers. But also as well on the on the other hand. U might as well have a go and take up that big money offer as contestants alway say your only here once
@yuenkentsang9446Ай бұрын
Greed won again.
@TC-qd1zw25 күн бұрын
I think if someone got all 6 ?'s right, if they beat the chasers they get £500,000 if the chasers beat them they still get £250,000
@disneydanny28 ай бұрын
No, they leave with nothing if their clock runs out before the chasers’.
@gameshowclips8 ай бұрын
what sense would that make LMAO
@jamiepsilon7 ай бұрын
5:05 Lose
@darrenstarling20637 ай бұрын
She'd of got 30k if she wasn't so greedy
@jamesdunkley86804 ай бұрын
No she wouldn't. She wasn't quick enough.
@truthseeker18674 ай бұрын
not really even being greedy since if you walked in with nothing and you leave with nothing, then you've lost nothing. I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory
@mrbow500012 ай бұрын
go big or go home
@nathanbombardo20 күн бұрын
All the chasers look fucking missrable
@D3VILD3VI2 ай бұрын
miserable*
@NeptuneOnYouTube2 ай бұрын
I don't think you can really talk shit with that grammar mate
@markn.79142 ай бұрын
@@markn.7914 It's one typo moron, it isn't a grammar mistake they knew what they mean to type, and if you're gonna talk about grammar why didn't you use a full stop, a mistake using a computer isn't the same as writing, as you can't miswrite a letter, typos happen however.
@bobbob69782 ай бұрын
@@bobbob6978 Ohhhh, someone's in a mood, oh! Talk about a mood!
@Christina_Tydaughter2 ай бұрын
@@Christina_Tydaughter nah they're speaking facts and you cannot doubt that
@hdnqc20032 ай бұрын
Silly Girl, She would have easy won 30k with 20secs time advantage
@chrisphallheatlover98484 ай бұрын
Pointless video when it wasn't even close
@cathallynch82692 ай бұрын
That was such a a ridiculous decision
@jack.1.2 ай бұрын
You never know the outcome.. The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it.
@jojobee422 ай бұрын
In hindsight maybe, but you never know in the moment.
@ArcienPlaysGames2 ай бұрын
@@jojobee42 Don't be stupid. Playing against 6 whilst going 1st actually puts you at a time disadvantage, which is the only thing other contestants usually have over the chasers.
@rosscleary9110Ай бұрын
@@rosscleary9110 The point of the person you mentioned still stand: "The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it". See: hindsight bias
@ZeroEightOneАй бұрын
@@rosscleary9110why does going first put you at a time disadvantage?
@him050Ай бұрын
I can’t believe that this is the only episode of beat the chasers that’s for half a million why isn’t there been another episode of this like with of a man and he wins not being sexist she was just unlucky lol cause there’s been a couple if not a few episodes on deal or no deal with the jackpot at the hjghest being been for £500,000 now if they won that on there won that on here and went on who wants to be a millionaire sire they’d be be £2M rich/richer lol
@alanmawson2187Ай бұрын
What's her gender got to do with anything
@gelofshowerАй бұрын
Skill Issue
@HyperColt145 ай бұрын
Heaven's sake. Whooping, cheering and a standing ovation? She failed. Miserably. After saying yeah i'll have a go at some free money. Isn't she brave? 😂 This is not a U.S show thank you
@kevinmoore26963 ай бұрын
lighten up a bit mate 👍
@esseven3 ай бұрын
Hey Kevin, just wondering if you're thinking of going up there at all in the not-too-distant future? Seeing as you have such a big mouth, you should probably stick to offroading, it would appear that you share the same level of intelligence of people who enjoy that hobby 👍
@CSRLaunchpad3 ай бұрын
@@CSRLaunchpad Hey Mr Pad. You're clearly very perceptive, well done for that. It's probably best you keep your wonderings to yourself, and perhaps mind your own business? Thanks for reaching out though.
@kevinmoore26963 ай бұрын
@@kevinmoore2696 A friendly suggestion then, please watch more of Beat the Chasers and you'll see how many people really go for 6. Have a good day.
@CSRLaunchpad3 ай бұрын
@kevinmoore2696 you're an absolute massive disgrace to Kevin's. Ya big hill
@kevintablet7433 ай бұрын
500k... obviously the show doesn't have the budget for it.
@lolipedofinАй бұрын
Most shows in this format get insured for rare, high paying prizes that are unlikely to be won. It's budgeted in, but they don't need to pay out the full half a million, just the insurance premium for claiming it.
@jude_illusionАй бұрын
The beast has an earpiece telling him the offer
@NameReveal-yy7qbАй бұрын
Well they would of had the budget for it if she won. They'd have to pay her if she won
@BrAnDoN67k23 күн бұрын
She was being greedy Yes I am judgmental
@paulahowse65434 ай бұрын
Perhaps just mental, for commenting on a quiz show video twice 5 days apart
@pgp5194 ай бұрын
@@pgp519 perhaps mental like you for being on here to put a comment Still I feel very lucky to know another mental person, like yourself on here, thank you for making my day. Happy Christmas Oh! mental one
@paulahowse65434 ай бұрын
@paulahowse6543 indeed same here, happy Christmas, I hope we can watch the chase together whilst chucking down a can of roast dinner
@pgp5194 ай бұрын
Deserved to lose for being GREEDY!
@paulahowse65435 ай бұрын
Or she wanted to have fun and an enjoyable experience. Imagine being this judgmental.
I admired Jess's bravely because when I first saw this, I was quite shocked and surprised when she goes for it.
30 grand for a 20 second time advantage seemed good enough to me!
Yeah I'd have probably taken 3 chasers on for the £30k. Though I can see why someone would take on the super offer if given the chance!
@@xxshadowgamer2 which is like I said a 20 second time advantage over the chasers
Id gone 4 chasers 5 is too hard
I would've went for 47 seconds she still might have won if she did
@@Ryan_GaffneyDoubt it, given the Chasers had 29 seconds to spare.
While she did lose, she is the only person currently who can claim that she took on 6 chasers, which is brave.
She gave it a go. How many others could stand there in front of 6 people who does that for a living and in front of an audience and answer questions like that within one minute? Fine, there has been a few do it. I'd struggle answering those with a 20 second head start. Hat's off to her for giving it her best
Anyone that bothers to apply for the show I imagine
100k for 13 sec advantage is actually really good
Especially as The Beast would be omitted.
@@Isleofskye yeah
I'd have either gone £30K for 3 chasers or £100K for 5, depending on how I was feeling. For 4 chasers (versus 3), the small difference in time advantage, plus an extra chaser, isn't worth only £20,000 more in my opinion. At that point you might as well go for 5.
Definitely earned my respect going for that large offer.
Imagine taking on Britain's 6 biggest nerds for 500K with no advantage
Like she said, you only live once
I watched it
Never expected 13 likes and 3 repliea
Stupid boy 😅
@@johnbatch9276boy?
I've always wanted to see someone go for the full house of six chasers. Really great effort Jess 🎉
Personally I'd have gone for the £100K. Half a mil would be nice but 60 seconds is very tight!
With 29 left on the clock she would have struggled to get one of the lower offers anyway. Such a shame. My heart thumped for her, for sure. I was thinking before the timer started, no matter what happens, I have massive admiration for her choosing that option, and the Chasers and audience obviously respected that as well. This would have been such an incredible win though. Would have loved to see that.
I think it's great she went after all 6! If you're not after the money but just want to have a good time challenging yourself, then why not! I don't think anyone would try taking on all 6 with no time advantage if they wanted to bring home some cash. 😂
Thanks for posting Beat the Chasers!
I do believe this is the first and only time that a contestant has chosen to take on all 6 chasers. What’s also interesting to note is that there was another contestant who could’ve taken on all 6 but chose to take on 4 and he absolutely slaughtered them. He had about 30 seconds left on his clock so potentially, if he’d have taken on all 6… they might have won an even more incredible amount of money.
I'm pretty sure it isn't the first, and I think that person won, but I may be wrong on them winning. But for me it's more about the time than anything else. Sometimes the chasers get tripped up on BTC because they have to consider each other as opposed to when they're alone and can just say 'pass' if they're unsure. Sometimes people have won not because they played too well, but because of the time running out and the chasers getting a pop culture question none of them knew the answer to and waiting too long to answer. I think she would've won against 4, and maybe even 5
I know Steven got all 5 questions and was offered $500K but went for 3 chasers for $25,000.
@@lonewolfx499 that might be the wrong I was thinking of. I’m sorry for being stupid.
I wonder if Steven would have beaten 4 or more chaser’s, the only thing is the chaser’s might have known the answer’s to the 2 Paul got wrong and the 1 Darragh got wrong so I’m not sure if Steven would have won if there were more chaser’s he faced.
@@qasimhussain1678 hmm fair enough. Have you ever thought about the strategy you would deploy if you were on Beat The Chasers? What’s most important to you, the time, the money or the chasers?
The pressure is already high as is when she chose to face all six of them. The chasers saw this as a challenge as well - took less than 3 seconds to answer the first question, and less than 4 on average for subsequent questions (ones that were answered correctly, anyway.) The pressure on the girl probably multiplied itself by 500000x when she failed to answer the first time, and then another 500000x the second time. When she started shaking her head and smiled to herself she already knew she lost. I believe her train of thought was almost at "Mayflower" when she passed to save time. Still, major balls of titanium to take on six of them, knowing your chance of winning is probably slim to none. I would've taken the 40-second deal (best value, in my opinion).
she went for the gusto, props to her! first 20 seconds she did amazingly but would've needed to keep that pace throughout the whole round and essentially not get 1 wrong if she wanted to win, but I guess thats how it goes when theres 500k on the line, also going first definitely does not help. GG
Also I think once she did get one wrong, she dwelled on it and I think that threw her. I've noticed now, because time is so crucial if the answer doesn't come to you right away, just pass immediately and cut your losses don't waste time thinking, if you do get one wrong, let it go mentally and just focus on the next one don't let it throw you off.
多くの観客に囲まれながら、たった一人で6人のチェイサーと戦うのは大変なプレッシャーだと思います。彼女のその勇気に拍手👏
It's not just a game of knowledge. Psychology plays a big part in this game! You give one wrong answer you have to brush it aside and focus on the next question! Like a psychopath with no emotions ~ ice cold !!
You wouldn’t beat an average pub quiz team in a 6v1, let alone when you’re against some of the best quizzers in the UK.
They play with an inherent time disad in addtion to having to- 1. Press the buzzer, and wait for the buzzer to call the person 2. Wait to see if anyone knows the answer to the question, if not them, instead of instantly passing These two things can waste a major amount of time, but admittedly in a no-pressure contest, you are right
Maybe they should invite Kevin from eggheads on as a celebrity contestant. Maybe he could win the 500k.
@@-mattm would love to see that! The man knows everything!
@@him050 Problem is would he be quick enough to answer at speed. We know Anne is a top chaser but she seems very redundant on Beat the chasers.
You need to be a mastermind champ to beat all 6 of them, what would be interesting if one chaser for example: Beast playing against all other 5 chasers, same with The Chase, 4 chasers being the contestants and one other chaser trying to hunt them down
Would love to see more Beat the Chasers clips if you had any intention of uploading more! Seeing all 6 chasers at once looks so cool but daunting too, I wish we got the chance to see more
@@koyo1109 I LOVE beat the chasers. Yes more more more!!!
@@koyo1109 Yh wish we got more of contestant’s taking on 6 chaser’s shame it only happened once (so far)
Also the Chasers need to slip up at least one question, since your clock go first it's very likely that your clock also ends first should both side answer flawlessly.
No guts, no glory, no money 😮
Good for her ! She probably calculated she wouldn’t win but had a go anyway, so maybe it’s not just greed .
I get the feeling Mark was only told 500,000 through his ear piece or monitor as he said it based on his own reaction.
1:42, errr what do you mean, very confused 😕🤔🤔🤔, don't know what explanation I can give you mate?
@@southernboi8154 don’t think you meant to ask me that.
@misstrussteLgbTq what are you talking about ear piece, monitor thing he just said the offer normally right?
The chasers don’t have earpieces. Mark was just being himself.
@@jamesnimarko1439 of course they have earpieces. This is television.
2:11 Jess: "You know what? No guts no glory. Let's go for it let's go full beans Brad take them all on!" Chasers: 😙 🙇🏾♂️ ☺️ 🤦🏻♂️ 😲 🤔
Why should the contestant have to answer first? Disadvantage straight away.
The chasers have to buzz in and be called on though, I think that makes up for it.
@@marcpower4167the opposite version of the chase but still it can still be annoying though lol yes what playing for was good though lol yes lol
They’re offering a chance to win money; they make the rules. Don’t like it? Don’t play.
3.46 world class answer by the dark destroyer. Won the game for the chasers imo
mark is literally buzzing in as well
They won by 29 secs.... I don't think that one question made a difference.....
@@thomassf3dunno man such a niche question that kept the momentum in their favour. We’ll never know for sure but I think that was a pivotal moment
That's a bad case of mixing ambition with ability, but fair play to her for having the guts to go for the big offer. She should have gone much lower and she would have given herself a great chance of going home with a decent amount. Once she lost her train of thought it was all over.
In short to play for half a million you`d be facing Aristotle - arguably the last man on earth to know practically everything there is to know.
Jess was unlucky though. After that first wrong answer, every question after that was tough
Going down in glory. Like her self-confidence. What a nice person as well
13 second advantage for a hundred grand was a good offer. She got greedy
To all who call her greedy, yeah, hindsight is 20/20. I applaud her confidence. Let's see how many would call her greedy had she won. To all that say she should have gone for lower money, well... the chasers used 31 seconds, that's less than the lowest offer. Yes, some chasers wouldn't be able to answer, but it's not clear she would have won with any of those offers.
Thank you so much, that was so beautiful.
She played well but it was nerves.
I can't blame her for taking that offer, how often do you get a chance to win half a million? Thanks for the upload, these are always fun to watch.
You came with nothing and while you could leave with nothing, why not take the chance to change your life forever?
@@thesmithersy Exactly. Like she could have probably won the 5k, which would be nice, but wouldn't really change anything.
@@RisingSunReviews Having 100k would make a difference as well but the pressure might have been lower.
There are so many "you should've taken the lower offer instead of being greedy" comments that are entirely based on what the end result was, instead of taking the perspective of being there in the moment, before the actual decision is made. When you're there, you never know. Despite being superbrains, the chasers have a history of messing up big time in quite a few instances, and with the right questions at the right time, it's still doable. So while the lower offers may have changed the outcome, you cannot fault her for going for the 500K. Brilliant start if anything.
@@ArcienPlaysGames Sometimes taking a risk is worth it, especially with a life-changing amount of money. Sure, it may not always work out, but that doesn't mean it was the wrong decision in the moment.
Fair play to her for going for it, she may even end up being the only player ever who had the guts to take on all 6!
I kind of doubt even James holzhauer or Ken Jennings could beat this kind of challenge
I would love to see beat the chasers repeat on challenge TV at some point and she try very best to try beat all 6 chasers
I don’t care what anyone says. You could never convince me NOT to take the highest offers possible. Like dark destroyer said. No guts no glory
he was just quoting what the contestant just said lol
@@davidz2690 ok?? How does that change anything of what I said
@@absolutebad3333 because no one says "Like ___ said" if they're quoting someone lol
@@Hazetal semantic police over here… who cares does it take away from the point of what I said?
@absolutebad3333 nothing semantic. You quoted (gave credit to) the wrong person. On a video you can watch again and check. And instead of apologizing and editing, you’re defending yourself. When you’re demonstrably wrong. Be better.
Paul calls her a fool after saying Skin for "Neuro"melanin hahahahahah
The best thing about it is that he is a doctor
It’s a very easy mistake to make, she was perhaps a little foolish in accepting the deal. You listen for keywords when you’re a quizzer, and 9/10 times you’ll see that the answer for a question relating to melanin is “skin”.
Well melanin is constantly related with skin so it wasn't exactly a howler was it?
Ballsy, but she did get the 5 questions in the builder
OMG the offer from the beast was huge 😲500k
Greedy got the better of her plus she the questions weren’t the best for her. Pressure she really should have thought about this
I would have also tried £500,000. You never know.
Yeah agreed. Sometimes on the normal chase I’m sure they go easy on them and essentially let them win.
Knew it was Mark who tempted her, of course
“Step aside”🤣
I love Bradley I think he's absolutely brilliant
I love how it said £0 with 5 seconds before she actually lost it. 😂
😂😂😂
This is what happens when the Chasers dominate
Very Brave But One Question Tripped Her Up And The Game Was Over Plus When It Had 1 Second Left The Amount Was Already £0 And The Chasers Question Too
Yeah, I’ve seen that happen on a previous series. It’s quite strange.
Dang girl got balls
It looks flat enough to me 😊
I am sure someone will find this useful. Mark answer two questions, both correctly. Shaun answered one question correctly. Anne answered no questions. Paul answered one question incorrectly. Jenny answered three questions correctly. Darragh answered no questions.
1v3 then really. 30k to go for 3 with 20 more seconds. Take 20 off the chasers and she is still 9 seconds away. Could of gone for the 30 and probably won because of who the chasers were.
Any contestant without a time advantage is always going to be up against it, because the contestant goes first - so assuming the average length of each question is the same on both sides, if the chasers get all theirs right then you're toast whatever you do. You really need an advantage of about 5 seconds just to counter the disadvantage of having to go first. 47 seconds would counter the disadvantage and then give you about a two question advantage, i.e. even if they get all theirs right you can afford to get two wrong and still win. So I'd probably have gone for the five chaser offer - £100k is still a lot of money but you have a MUCH better chance. Probably only a "professional" quizzer - Kevin Ashman or someone similar - would be able to take them all on with no time advantage and have a reasonable chance of winning.
Agreed. Thats why the time advantage is so important.
They should flip a coin to decide who goes first when there's no time advantage.
They should make it so that the contestant's time doesn't start until Brad reads the first question, that should nullify the disadvantage of going first.
What about the fact the chasers have to buzz in and be called on, that takes a second or two, isn't that enough to nullify it?
@@marcpower4167 A human reaction time to an audio stimulus is 0.17 seconds and it takes about 6 seconds for Brad to ask a question, to simplyfy this for you it would take about 18 questions each for the buzzing in to nullify the advantage of the chasers going second and in 60 seconds Brad only asks about 10 questions each
Wheres the full episode
The full episode will be on ITVX. Series 4, episode 4.
I watched hoping she had won it! How disappointing 😮
Me too! I was hoping she would win the $500,000 as well! That’s why I watched the video because it sounds exciting
2:18 2:21 2:26 2:29
she tried
So sad she lost £500,000. Good try tho
Could have been for 10mil but she never gonna beat all 6 with the same time is she lool
Could you with your bum juice?
Hold on how is this Series 4 when Darragh is a chaser.
Darragh joined Beat The Chasers in series 3 when Paul was ill. Series 4 was recorded in summer 2021.
Some mudders do have em
Not 500,000 to bigger
44 for 50k Perfect
All 6 having a full 60 seconds is too much of an advantage for them. Should’ve only been another 3 seconds for 50.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Seen this start. Surely not ????
Well that's why they award half a million!
but she gets half a million if she wins
She would have won a lot of money, more money than 99.9% of uk game show contestants will ever be offered
Well, that was close 😆
I honestly really seriously do not get why there hasn’t been another episode where a contestant plays for this much and instead actually wins it 😢😢
Because they have no interest in losing all this money
They have to get 5 questions right in the cash builder first, I’ve never seen anyone else get 5 right before
In all game or quiz shows that involves answering questions. It is all about the odds, the right person being there answering the perfect questions that they happen to know answer for. So someone might have got all questions right and gone home with half a million quid. And someone else might have gone home empty handed etc. In theory it is a trap to lure you in with big money offers. But also as well on the on the other hand. U might as well have a go and take up that big money offer as contestants alway say your only here once
Greed won again.
I think if someone got all 6 ?'s right, if they beat the chasers they get £500,000 if the chasers beat them they still get £250,000
No, they leave with nothing if their clock runs out before the chasers’.
what sense would that make LMAO
5:05 Lose
She'd of got 30k if she wasn't so greedy
No she wouldn't. She wasn't quick enough.
not really even being greedy since if you walked in with nothing and you leave with nothing, then you've lost nothing. I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory
go big or go home
All the chasers look fucking missrable
miserable*
I don't think you can really talk shit with that grammar mate
@@markn.7914 It's one typo moron, it isn't a grammar mistake they knew what they mean to type, and if you're gonna talk about grammar why didn't you use a full stop, a mistake using a computer isn't the same as writing, as you can't miswrite a letter, typos happen however.
@@bobbob6978 Ohhhh, someone's in a mood, oh! Talk about a mood!
@@Christina_Tydaughter nah they're speaking facts and you cannot doubt that
Silly Girl, She would have easy won 30k with 20secs time advantage
Pointless video when it wasn't even close
That was such a a ridiculous decision
You never know the outcome.. The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it.
In hindsight maybe, but you never know in the moment.
@@jojobee42 Don't be stupid. Playing against 6 whilst going 1st actually puts you at a time disadvantage, which is the only thing other contestants usually have over the chasers.
@@rosscleary9110 The point of the person you mentioned still stand: "The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it". See: hindsight bias
@@rosscleary9110why does going first put you at a time disadvantage?
I can’t believe that this is the only episode of beat the chasers that’s for half a million why isn’t there been another episode of this like with of a man and he wins not being sexist she was just unlucky lol cause there’s been a couple if not a few episodes on deal or no deal with the jackpot at the hjghest being been for £500,000 now if they won that on there won that on here and went on who wants to be a millionaire sire they’d be be £2M rich/richer lol
What's her gender got to do with anything
Skill Issue
Heaven's sake. Whooping, cheering and a standing ovation? She failed. Miserably. After saying yeah i'll have a go at some free money. Isn't she brave? 😂 This is not a U.S show thank you
lighten up a bit mate 👍
Hey Kevin, just wondering if you're thinking of going up there at all in the not-too-distant future? Seeing as you have such a big mouth, you should probably stick to offroading, it would appear that you share the same level of intelligence of people who enjoy that hobby 👍
@@CSRLaunchpad Hey Mr Pad. You're clearly very perceptive, well done for that. It's probably best you keep your wonderings to yourself, and perhaps mind your own business? Thanks for reaching out though.
@@kevinmoore2696 A friendly suggestion then, please watch more of Beat the Chasers and you'll see how many people really go for 6. Have a good day.
@kevinmoore2696 you're an absolute massive disgrace to Kevin's. Ya big hill
500k... obviously the show doesn't have the budget for it.
Most shows in this format get insured for rare, high paying prizes that are unlikely to be won. It's budgeted in, but they don't need to pay out the full half a million, just the insurance premium for claiming it.
The beast has an earpiece telling him the offer
Well they would of had the budget for it if she won. They'd have to pay her if she won
She was being greedy Yes I am judgmental
Perhaps just mental, for commenting on a quiz show video twice 5 days apart
@@pgp519 perhaps mental like you for being on here to put a comment Still I feel very lucky to know another mental person, like yourself on here, thank you for making my day. Happy Christmas Oh! mental one
@paulahowse6543 indeed same here, happy Christmas, I hope we can watch the chase together whilst chucking down a can of roast dinner
Deserved to lose for being GREEDY!
Or she wanted to have fun and an enjoyable experience. Imagine being this judgmental.