The Most Dangerous Part of the Moons Orbit Is Coming in the 2030s
The catastrophic effects of the ‘Lunar Nodal Cycle’. Go to incogni.com/astrum to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan.
Astrum Podcast: www.buzzsprout.com/2250635/share
Displate Posters: displate.com/promo/astrum?art...
Astrum Merch! astrum-shop.fourthwall.com/
Join us on the Astrum discord: / discord
SUBSCRIBE for more videos about our other planets.
Subscribe! goo.gl/WX4iMN
Facebook! goo.gl/uaOlWW
Twitter! goo.gl/VCfejs
Astrum Spanish: / @astrumespanol
Astrum Portuguese: / @astrumbrasil
Donate!
Patreon: goo.gl/GGA5xT
Ethereum Wallet: 0x5F8cf793962ae8Df4Cba017E7A6159a104744038
Become a Patron today and support my channel! Donate link above. I can't do it without you. Thanks to those who have supported so far!
#astrum #astronomy #space #solarsystem #moon #LunarNodalCycle #lunarcycles #environment #climatechange #ecosystems #floods #tides
You guys have really been enjoying learning about the cycles affecting the Earth, and this was the last one in this series in production. If you want to see the other videos I've done on this series, check out this playlist: kzhead.info/sun/oMuggtBwZ4mwlX0/bejne.html Have I missed any cycles out, or is there something you want to learn more about? Let me know.
I love these videos SO MUCH!!
I learned a lot about the tides and what causes them. I love learning but I’m struggling on this sea level rising panic. They’ve risen 10cm in 30 years but that’s less than 4”. The way it’s portrayed in the media is as if it’s risen 10 meters which greatly affects their credibility in my eyes. They try and panic everybody and that’s just nonsense. If you do a deep study you’ll see that technically we’re in an ice age compared to the last billion years. It goes up and down quite a bit and we’re barely on the upswing. I believe the climate is changing but it’s a natural cycle and man has very little impact on the temperature change. The Bible clearly states that the sun will burn mans skin in the last days but they will not repent. Instead they try and make everyone struggle to be carbon free. Thank you for all the videos because I’ve spent many hours binge watching the different planets lol. Great job ❤
Thank you, Alex!
We're doomed! *DOOMED!!* I tells Ya!
Why did you change thumnail so fast? The first one was cool
After Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, the government was studying flood & storm surge damage. They brought in experts from Northern Europe. They recommended building canals through housing neighborhoods, instead of big lakes & dams. The locals said the canals would be unsafe for children, and wondered by they work in Europe. The answer was “we teach our children to swim.” The suggested improvements were never built.
Typical
@@lulumoon6942 It isn't just teaching kids to swim. Holland doesn't have alligators and water moccasins.
They have alligators in Europe?
I lived in Kenner ( an outskirt of nola ) when Katrina hit and settled in Lutcher/Gramarcy, then Watson, La. after. It snowed in Southeast Louisiana enough for it to stay on the ground once for the next 3 years straight. 2006-2008 and had coolest sustain temps I'd seen in Louisiana to that time. It's snowed in Southeast Louisiana 5 times in the last 20 years. The last time before that was in 2001, then 1988. Snow is actually becoming MORE frequent here.
Yeah, the real answer is that in Europe there isn't anything living in the water that would eat a child.
My interest in Waxing moon conversations never Wanes. I’ll show myself out.
don't leave, gibbous more of your hilarious comedy!
😂❤
🧀 🧀 🧀 Cheesy
Hello Wayne, waxing eloquent for the hairy legged?
I'm something of a moon enthusiast
Mangroves are super underrated for coastal flooding and the plan for Florida to use them needs to be taken seriously.
yeah, it's like tipping a fish tank
Amen
Florida isn't flooding because of " climate change ". It's flooding because the land is literally sinking.
Also, mangroves serve as a nursery 75% of game fish. Florida needs mangroves to keep brining in the tourism dollars from game fishing.
Definitely! We need more mangrove forests to mitigate a lot of climate change! ❤️🌴🏝
I think one of the main reasons for the South Carolina floods was the absolute firehose of rain coming in from the Atlantic. The rising levels in Lake Murray required all six floodgates on the dam to be opened to avoid an overflow; the increase in water flow broke 2 more dams further down the Saluda River. (The area near where I live was under 7 feet of water). This begs the question, is the actual weather affected by the nodal cycles or just the tides? Most people think the floods were just part of a particularly unusual weather event.
The sun and moon do create tides in the atmosphere, but I don't know how much that would effect the weather.
Exactly. Poor video 👎
@@FLPhotoCatchermakes the troposphere thicker, much more atmosphere in the tropical troposphere so the Greenhouse effect is amplified. That's why so much global warming is present at the equator and so little affects the poles. The poles don't get much greenhouse effect at all.
@@kayakMike1000you have it backwards. Global warming is affecting the poles and northern latitudes more than the equator.
That is 100% wrong, the poles are experiencing the fastest warming out of anywhere on Earth @@kayakMike1000
I remember the floods in 1998, that affected my town quite badly. It took years for thing to get totally back to normal.
That was climate change. Don't say different.
@@thebull2757😂
oklahoma flood?
@@thebull2757 "That was climate change. Don't say different." It was a result of the super El Nino event which started in 1997. Don't say different.
different
Its 3 am here in aus but i gotta click when astrum drops another banger
I’ll only worry when all the millionaires begin to leave all their riverside and coastal homes.
💯
They just keep rebuilding. That's the whole problem. There is only so much we can. Flood insurance was never meant to keep people in the flooded areas and that is all it has done . People need to get it. You can't live in th water. But I agree with you.
And they’re all going to inform you when they do?
@@XtopherBrysonThey are buying up that land line crazy. And it's really ready to know when expensive properties go on sale.
That started more than 15years ago in Florida, and about the early 2010s in other lowlying eastern states. Search for "not insurable" on private home listings, because at high tide those "buildings" main floor is under at least 6inches of water. The homeowners technically can't sell them directly, as they have zero value due to zero home *and fire department* coverage! BUT... Florida's governor has given them special dispensation in every yearly budget since 2002. , They have outright refused to rightly declare those entire sub-divisions as condemned, because it would overwhelmingly hurt +55 year old voters! Effectively erasing ~3 Billion USD in mostly leveraged, and/or income generating, assets! That would instantly trigger every bank and private insurance (& re-insurers) to reassess all the coastal properties for the same Climate Change caused loss of value. Acknowledging climate change will/has cost those Purple and Red States tens of billions in personal asset vaues, would have a seismic shift like the Civil Rights Bill's passage did.
The water is trying to fling off into space due to its somewhat linear momentum in a lower gravitational position. Spinning is an effect that increases towards the equator and has nothing to do with affecting lunar tides. If the Earth weren't spinning you would still get the same tidal effect. The spin effect is completely separate.
This guy (Astrum) indeed doesn't have a clue.
The crazy thing is when the moon actually hits your eyes, kind of like a big pizza pie, that's amore
And when the moon makes you drool just like pasta fazool you're in love ❤
Get your coat and leave 😅
4:40 Spring tides happen twice a lunar month "not 6 to 8 times a year". I think you might mean "king tides" in this instance. The spinning dancers explanation of the 2nd high tide opposite the moon is just brilliant. I have been trying to visualise how that opposite side bulge occurs for a long time. This really explains the mechanism for me. So simple. Thanks!
👧HOW DARE YOU!
@@MikeJones-mf2fw So you are the perfect example of someone that grew up with participation trophies.
@randomdude8877 Yeah, my room is full of them... tell me more wise master of doofasism
@@MikeJones-mf2fw Blind obedience makes you the dufus. Just because Alex usually makes a good video doesn't make him incapable of error. Giving up critical thinking skills in exchange for hero worship is part of the problem in todays America. You and trumps Maga misfits have much in common. Good luck with those growing pains.
As a Brit living now in Australia I can tell you that the term ‘king tide’ isn’t used in the UK. The first I ever heard of it was when I moved here 8 years ago. This might explain the confusion because Brits call King Tides Spring Tides.
I just looked at the NOAA Tide tables predictions for Puget Sound in year 2034 and didn't see any appreciable difference in that year to any other year.
Because if they acknowledge the lunar nodal cycle, they can't blame the subsequent flooding on "climate change" and bilk the public for billions of $$$$
The political operatives forgot to tell the guy figures who out the tides that the tides will be rising more.
@@ralphholiman7401 I read your sentence 4 times and still can't work out what you're trying to say.
@@antred11 , beats me. I can't figure it out, either.
Right, using rising sea levels that have not been the least appreciable really kind of makes this a worthless vid
It used to be the friendly satellite we know and love but I always knew there was a dark side of the moon.
Some day The Moon will leave us on our own.
* *rimshot* *
I don't know , was he really drunk at the time?
A dark side, and a far, distant side
😂❤
Great video! Thanks for the care put into writing and producing it. Well done.
Some minor corrections: Spring tides occur every two weeks so there are about 25 per year rather than 6-8. The tidal force from the sun is almost exactly half that of the moon, not a third as much.
Another interesting facet of orbital dynamics! Thanks! I was slightly disappointed with the simplified and erroneous tidal forces explanation for the two bulges caused by tidal effects of the Moon and Sun. The reason for the bulge on the opposing side from the Moon or Sun is not due to centrifugal forces of the spinning Earth. (If this were the case we'd truly be screwed!) The distance differential and thus gravitational forces on the distant side of an orbiting object is less and thus a spherical object will flatten.
You are correct, I felt the same disappointment as you. The effects of gravity are exponetial, the opposite side is accelerating much less towards the moon, the tides on the other side of Earth are the result of the water lagging behind. The Earth is solid and moves as one, but the oceans can flow, and thus they can lag behind, ironically causing high tides on the opposite side of the moon...
I find it at least a little bit dubious that every single potential, existential threat that we may be facing… is the most extreme EVER.
I'm not so sure climate change is going to cause so much sea level rise to makes this worse than normal. 20 years ago they said Miami would be under water 10 years ago and the ocean is still no where any kind of description of NEAR putting south Florida in the under water. I have a feeling some high tides will truly be the least of anyone's problems in 2034.
The sea levels have been rising slowly since the end of the ice age because we are in an inter-glacial period. When they tell you that you have to stop eating beef and driving a car to try to 'stop' this, it's a scam to push billions back into poverty and under authoritarianism.
Diego Garcia is barely above sea level. Has been for centuries and it’s still here.
All predictions are based on our collected data, scientific research of influencing factors (water temperature for example). Our whole planet is a system of greater or smaller dependencies in a factor (water temperature) and between different factors (water and air temperature interacting). Now think for a moment, how badly our network for data collection is. In the USA, Europe, Australia, Japan.... nice. North and South Pole, South America... Africa, Central Asia, pacific islands.... in the water, at different depth levels.... Our big headache, if certain factors become bigger then we expected because of this inconsistent data or influencing other factors more then we expected. We know for example, an cooling of the gulf stream system could bring an ice age to Europe rather quickly. Would be bad for Europe and the global economy. A huge amount of ice covered area would reflect more sunlight, having an cooling effect... imho.... we act careless in the sake of company profits in comparision to the risks we are taking.
@@michaelpistey4001 please google how many cities we know from historic sources that have been nowadays under water. You will be surprised. The USA is a pityful young nation with not a lot historic experiences with continental or global desasters.
Climate change was a problem before they fixed it.
Just found the channel. Always been interested in the different cycles out planet goes thru and by extension the moon and sun. Learned a lot thanks dude
Beautiful video! Lots of great visuals, and thank you for bringing this to us
This is the best of KZhead. Consistently thoughtful, clear and engaging. Thanks for making this for us.
We have to do something. We have to DOOOO something! WE HAVE TO DOOOOOOOOOOO SOMETHING!!!!! Think of the children. We need to send the astronauts up to the moon and point it in a better direction.
9:58 Good to see the Minnamurra River featured in your video. I live about a 30 mins drive from there!
Hi! I'm a uni student who's currently in a restoration ecology class. I'm going to strongly disagree with your point about the Netherlands. Those pump and levee systems are rather fragile, because they need really high levees in order to keep the water out, and constant maintenance to keep them functioning. Where these systems are built, they destroy native habitat that is just as much of a carbon sink as the mangroves you mentioned. They also prevent silt deposition to the coastline from the channelized rivers, which makes the coastline more vulnerable to erosion. It is not a long term solution, as ocean water levels will continue to rise and more money will be needed to put together even more aggressive pump/levee systems. A better "working with nature" approach would be to put everything on stilts, and not completely destroy the habitat that everything is built on. That isn't particularly appealing or functional for our current way of life, so the real best alternative is to move away from the coastlines and onto higher ground.
I am really grateful that you are here with us on KZhead! You could easily be top dog on the major networks as science communicator.
Amen to that brother.
Wish he'd do a back up channel on an alt platform.
If he got his science right it would be better. I've noted his mistakes in other comments.
Every 19 years is pretty frequent. Surely we’re used to dealing with this by now?
No, because governments mostly consist of men, and those are not generally known for their long term policies. They prefer shiny new toys for themselves to less sexy projects that benefit everyone. Hence the oversized armies.
@@kellydalstok8900 what a misandrist comment.
@@kellydalstok8900bizarre how you display your hate for men on this topic. Who's your daddy?
Many of these cities were developed centuries ago and are simply built upon areas in which are susceptible to weather events. Extremely minor changes like (a few centimeters) of a rising water level, which is otherwise so minimal as to be within the margin of error of instrument readings, can affect cities already susceptible to these events without any change in water level. Cities not so sensitive to such small changes will see no perceptible change in effects. Example: Hurricanes can mess you up something severe no matter how well designed. The Netherlands proves to us how little that effect can have even on a below sea level country if designed in a good way. Mangroves are a great idea, specifically for the US coastal cities in the south. New Orleans is famously well below the sea water level so it's just not a good example of anything related to changes in weather patterns. I would be concerned if cities otherwise unaffected, start to feel effects. This is what would concern me.
@@Knight_Kin The Netherlands do not have to face hurricanes. Winter storms are frequent, but mostly moderate enough as not to harm coastal infrastructure. Devastating storms are the exception there. The modern dikes were designed to withstand even them, but the actual threat is less obvious. The Netherlands are a river delta country at the North Sea, where sea and rivers meet. That favored human settlements to use the sea and rivers for transport and commerce. In order to feed the people, the land had to be agriculturally used. That posed a problem, as the fertile areas were partly drowned. Hence the polders. These polders tend to sink, as the soil becomes more dense. Water-management nowadays tries to mitigate the issues by allowing natural water to reclaim areas, which even can deposit more soil than previously existed there. These areas cannot be used for human habitat anymore, so plans need to be conceived on how to offer a growing population the means to settle.
Is it just me or is the theme of his videos now turning ever so slightly shock/worry or “scientists’ concerns” flavoured…? Dunno how to say it, but maybe you’ll get what I mean
Yea, kinda loosing my interest in this channel too.
@@gorillapermacuture ok good, so it’s not just me. 😅 I’m sorta new to the channel but it’s already starting to shine through to me as boooorderline clickbaits (not to sell short that which I’ve learnt from its other videos) with pretty obvious answers… Wondering if it goes up or downhill from here
Kyogre is slowly winning.
Had me until the video swung to apocalypse porn. Maybe Florida will be underwater in 2030 like Al gore predicted for the 2010s😊
We can only hope
Disappointing. Starts talking about tidal flooding and then jumps to flash floods from rainfall. What exactly is the connection between these? We don't find out because Alex launches into a press release from NASa 🙁
This is informative in many ways. We learn so much from your own insights.
oh thank you, I was distracted trying to figure out the second high tide in a day, and then you answered it at 4:11 and following. I loved the simplicity of high tide is when the moon flies by, great plain language communication. ok, connecting the mangrove canopy cover to this lunar cycle is really freakin cool
Mangroves were recommended to be planted in a coast of a local government in the Philippines. The officials approved the reclamation thereat instead and the building of shopping malls.
They were going to build shopping malls in the ocean?
@@Knight_Kin they expanded the seashore by putting lots of soil. I don't know how they did it but it happened and now a shopping mall was built.
@@Knight_Kin Shopping malls in the ocean sound sweet actually.
I would say the video is a bit dramatic. True, if the Sun and Moon line up perfectly, their forces will more effectively combine, but the Moon is at most 5 degrees "above" or "below" the Sun, so their forces still add up (the cosine of 5 degrees is still pretty much 1), so I don't see how this is going to make much of a difference. Tides are more neatly explained by differences in gravitational acceleration. The "front" of the Earth falls a bit faster towards the Moon and the "back" of the Earth a little slower, which causes the two tidal bulges. This tidal bulge is quite small and only becomes significant near the shore, where the tidal wave gets slowed down. Finally, a polder is not necessarily an area below sea level. It's an area in which the water level is regulated. Apart from having to protect these low-lying areas from the sea or a river, water has to be actively pumped out, as it cannot naturally drain into the sea.
Very interesting. Most of my family live in a coastal community just a couple of blocks from the beach. There were floods back in 2015 but they were not devastating. I wonder how big they will be in the 2030s
Thanks for the video brother Alex
Before you mentioned it, I was thinking about how they handle things in the Netherlands. Proud to be Dutch!
Every time I hear about threats to low-lying coastal areas, I think about all the low-lying areas that have been consumed by the seas in recent decades - and then I remember that weren't any and that (for instance) The Maldives are still there and not only that, but so many global powerbrokers have high-value properties right by allegedly threatened coastlines.
mate i've lived by the beach for thirty odd years and haven't seen anything to suggest sea level rise is happening.
Every 10 years we're doomed! All the islands will be gone! No snow! No rain to fill our dams! Hmmm..... yet, the islands are still there, snow still falls, and every rain event and drought is caused by climate change. And here I thought that "weather" is not "climate". Guess I wuzz wrong.
I live less than ten miles from the gulf of Mexico in a city outside Houston Texas.. We've had a few big hurricanes and such but the most I've seen was maybe two feet of standing water in my yard.. Which is a decent amount but it was ocean accompanied with heavy rain pour.. Otherwise this beach and galvaston beach has been relatively unchanged for even as long as my grandparents remember.. Galveston been wiped out from Hurricane winds before but it doesn't happen often
@@tim1843what's even crazier is when I lived in iowa there was a flood in 2008 from the river next to my place and that was more devastating water wise than anything I've ever seen living on the ocean.. There was 20 feet of water with the whole downtown under water.. All from heavy rain over flowing a river lol. The ocean is so massive it has a larger area to distribute most of the worst
Your thinking on a very short time scale.
So educational. Thank you
Good evening everyone!
Recently showed your channel to my friends and noted how your effort and professionalism is such a great asset. How do you do it without being paid? Then you told us about your membership...willing to pay for this amazing content. Thank you and happy to be here!❤
Sucker
Astrum and Anton will be earning a fair wage from KZhead. Once you are over a million subs, it becomes a proper job. But I'm sure they're grateful for any extra, like buying T-shirts of bands and musicians. At least it's a proper channel, not just a clickbait KZhead algorithm abuser.
@@spencerhardy8667Not to mention the hundreds of science/tech youtube channels that are completely AI generated...
What a complete ass kisser
It's AI written with different wikipedia listed papers mashed together. You can easily reverse it given you have a beefy GPU.
The stuff about the Moon and its impact on Earth is really cool, especially the Lunar Nodal Cycle. I never realized how much the Moon, Earth, and Sun work together to create big tides and even floods. It’s like everything in space is connected in this delicate way, and what happens way out there actually affects us here. It’s pretty wild to think about! (EDIT): The fact that I took a youtube transcript of this video; fed it to chatGPT and told it to make a comment that makes me look stupid at the same time as it seems like I payed attention to the video to make people argue Just shows how dangerous AI can be. keep your eyes peeled :)
@@EatonShitsonseems you forgot to learn basic human decency.
@@EatonShitson let me dive deeper into that high school flashback for you! So, picture this: I'm sitting in my high school science class, and the teacher starts talking about the Moon, tides, and all that jazz. At first, I'm like, "Okay, the Moon makes the tides go in and out, got it." But then, the more we get into it, the more I realize there's a whole cosmic soap opera happening above our heads. I mean, come on, the Moon, Earth, and the Sun are basically the ultimate celestial trio. The Moon's gravitational pull is like this cosmic magnet, and it's tugging on our oceans, creating these massive tidal movements. It's like the Moon is saying, "Hey, Earth, I see you, and I'm going to make your oceans dance." But then, they drop the bombshell about the Lunar Nodal Cycle. Now, that's where things get seriously mind-boggling. It's not just about tides; it's about how the Moon's orbit changes over time, and it messes with those tides even more. It's like the Moon is playing this long-term game of cosmic tug-of-war with our oceans, and we're just along for the ride. Sure, some might say, "Oh, we learned this in high school, what's the big deal?" But here's the thing - it's one thing to learn it as a fact, and it's another to really grasp the idea that everything in space is connected. It's like this delicate cosmic ballet where one move by the Moon can lead to big tides, and in some cases, even floods right here on Earth. So, yeah, maybe we covered this in high school, but every time I think about it, I'm reminded of how awe-inspiring the universe is and how even the seemingly distant stuff happening up there can have a real impact on our lives down here. It's like a never-ending cosmic show, and I'm here for it!
Not just those three, but the entire Solar system. Sol, of course has the lion share, but even far planets like Saturn have an effect on Terra.
@@EatonShitsonGo ahead and live up to your name amigo
@@EatonShitson Assuming everyone has had the exact same life experience as yourself is remarkably short sighted. You can grasp the scale of universal forces but not the scale and complexity of the human race. Fascinating.
Awesome to see this channel with 1.7M subscribers 👍 ...I've been subscribed since it was around 60k 😉
Nuclear could be a game changer for shipping emissions. Thanks for covering this, Sal. 🤝
So what great natural catastrophes happened in 2015 and 1996?
I always enjoy your shows that are backed up by evidence. Nicely done.
Evidence.....must have missed that
TRUST THE SCIENCE! HAIL FAUCHI!@@hissingsidll750
@@hissingsidll750 I know lol, these weather patterns were happening millions of years before human existance, people claiming we are making these changes happen are insane.
@@KingcoleIIV you are either misinformed or misinforming Whatever it is, be better
@@matheussanthiago9685 Literal climate change scientists talk about massive co2 increases before humans were even on this planet. You should be better.
That sponsorship transition was genius
When planting trees, do not forget mangroves.
Great video. Please note that we have two spring tides per month, not one. New moon and full moon. Same is true for neap tides.
In 1912's northern hemisphere spring, an extreme lunar perigee coincided with high tide in the North Atlantic. There is an hypothesis that this effect brought more icebergs into the northwest Atlantic ocean, which caused problems for shipping routes ...
That's kind of really absolutely dumb
@@arionthedeer7372 Not at all. An extreme high tide in the March North Atlantic would have floated out larger icebergs and in greater numbers.
@RideAcrossTheRiver okay sure, then, what else did it affect? Were there more incidents of maritime disasters or close-calls in that period? What about the other cycles before and after it? I find it a case of humans trying to fit tragedy into nature/science, seems too good to be true
@@arionthedeer7372 "Were there more incidents of maritime disasters or close-calls in that period? " Yes, the entire fuckirg North Atlantic. "What about the other cycles before and after it" Lunar PERIGEE. Look up the word.
@@arionthedeer7372Did you ever hear about the Titanic?
Always good to see my country (the Netherlands) being presented as an example of how you can do things.
The Netherlands is not really a good example of working with nature, but of overcoming and reclaiming it, with eventual consequences as sea levels rise.
Please look up examples as 'Zandmotor' / Sand Motor in The Netherlands. Which is a clear example of engineering working with nature to more create land. They even have a video here on YT called: Sand Motor - 10 years of Building with Nature .
Yes, and also due to drought (less riverwater keeping the sea out of the estuary) and with the land behind the dunes sinking or just being lower then, salt water infiltrates under the dunes into the groundwater behind it leading to salination. Tech only does so much. Yes it was a smart(ish) thing to do after the horror night in 1953 that flooded the southern coastal islands, but there are limits to how high they can be build. And the experts are already warning/worried about that height being reached.
Sea levels rising…?🤔
@@DrRock2009Global warming
@@hillockfarm8404 Lessons have been learned, and keep being learned. Nowadays, water-management in the Netherlands is targeting these issues by leaving more room for natural flooding of previously reclaimed areas. Indeed, the polders tend to sink, increasing the height difference between them and sea level. By allowing water to follow its more natural ways, these effects can be partly compensated. There are now ideas about abandoning large areas and moving population to other areas that are less problematic. The polders of the Netherlands were a great achievement some centuries ago, when population density was still modest and the risk of floods less intensive. But things have changed since then.
There are lots of ancient locations under water. Could it just be the way our world works? Better just to fear monger climate chnage rather than inevitable change.
Thank you once again, Alex......that was brilliant.
Thank you for your work ❤
NOAA sea levels at Fort Dension Sydney (where I live) show a .8mm/year increase over the last hundred and thirty years of records. The graph is quite straight on average and the Australian east coast is relatively stable ( please show me otherwise if I'm wrong) so that seems a long way from your graph of 3.3mm/year. Can you explain the difference?
...sea levels are not rising,.. the graph used is manipulative suggestion. I've unsubscribed with this guy.
@@omegalast800 from what I have seen this 'less than a ml/year has been going on for over a thousand years so nothing to do with the current nonsense.
Our moon effects life and weather on Earth. Wouldn’t a moon sized “Death Star” entering a planet’s orbit, also cause natural disasters? I always wondered why Lucas never showed the tides going crazy. When the “Death Star” entered the orbits of planets, it targeted
Maybe it's not that dense🤷♂️
The ability to alter a planet's tidal cycle is insignificant next to the power of the Force.
@neutraltral8757 you're gosh dern right🫵(imagine walter white saying though)
Tides are a fact of life and are affected by wind direction, local land formations, local weather, atmospheric pressure and the distance that the moon happens to be from the earth at any particular time. If all the factors line up in an unfortunate manner then coastal regions will suffer flooding no matter what levels of sea defences exist. This is why we have once in a century or once in a millennium weather or tide events. They will happen eventually, it is just not economic to take measures to mitigate against them. Like living on the flanks of a volcano, the crops are excellent and the living very good in between the eruptions, which serve to re fertilise the soil. Floods reshape the shoreline and generally clean up habitats and improve local fish stocks and wildlife in the long term.
There is definitely a delay in the tidal response to the moon and sun's positioning. I was fishing on a estuary about 20 miles from the open sea one night, at midnight there was a total lunar eclipse and I have never seen the water as extremely LOW as that moment. I thought I might see bottom, but the estuary (slough) at Martinez, Ca. was shockingly low. I have been told there's actually a 24 hour delay or more, as the water is responding to the position of the sun and moon as they were many hours before. But I know for a fact the absolute opposite happens from what you might expect.
And here I was believing squirrel farts were responsible for the climate.
Silly comment perhaps, but wouldn't the moon and sun being in the same line mean an eclipse?
We should look into creating artifical mangroves near seaside cities.
One of, if not the BEST one, you have ever done!,👏👏
I am afraid that we will do almost nothing to prevent negative impact of the Moon node cycle. Money is tight everywhere and thus there is always a big resistance to spent it for long term programmes. There are always more immediately pressing holes with more influence on electors' behaviour.
Money is not tight in the US, although some politicians would like Americans to believe that.
Well, with the wars being funded and everything, it's understandable that funds are tight for protecting the actual citizens 🤷♀️
No wars = plenty of money available!
The Surfing will be Awesome 😎 Earth has seen this before during the Eemian Interglacial Period 115-135,000 years ago. Sea Levels were 20-30 ft higher and temps were 4-8F higher. Thanks for the plot to the next Climate Cult Disaster movie. 🍿
I assume the most dangerous scenario is nodal alignment combining with moon's perigee and earth's perihelium at the same time. Imagine: Earth being at it's closest point to the sun, moon being at it's closest point to the earth, at the node, when nodal alignment happens. Besides years of dangerous floods happening around that period due to nodal alignment alone, there would be a paticular year, a paticular month during which there would be COMPLETELY HUMONGOUS floods.
This must have happened several times through history.
@@OpenCorridor-en3ox aye, but i assume such an alignment happens once every X thousands of years. Maybe it was even responsible or at least factored for some of the great dying period.
Funny I’ve lived on the gulf coast my entire life and I’m still waiting on the water level to rise from global warming. Some of these little docks have been around over 50 years with the same water line on them. Been going to the same beach on an island for decades. I’ll believe it when I see it.
But the "Global elite" said so. If we don't believe then WE are the problem!?!
Your eyes are not getting paid millions, but the "scientists" are. I think your eyes are telling the truth...
I have a hard time believing that a 0.4% difference (that's the difference in cosine of 5°) has such a big influence. I'd wager a guess that overlap of weather events have much larger influence.
Amazing video! Astrum do you have a link for the music you use?
Can you add your sources into the videos/works cited in the description?
I like how it's now just climate change not man-made climate change.. the climate constantly changes due to many variables.
Does his choice of words soothe your ignorant consciousness?
climate = "the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period"
@spijkerpoes lol no I was pointing to the idiotic link to the U.N website
@@jsmith5479 youtube does that
@gibbybtw280 what, really, that's crazy.. I think I'm done with KZhead pushing agendas
Feels like maybe up here in Québec there is a 21 yr cycle. I remembered really bad flooding several yrs ago n looked up flood history in Montréal n found data from 1928-2017 when it turns out that flooding I remembered had happened, not 2015, we actually had no flooding that yr. But in 1996 we did have our worse flooding (over 15,000 people evacuated) ever which would be in time with this cycle u mention. Our 3rd worse flooding (5000 people evacuated) was 2 yrs later in ‘98. N our 2nd worse was in 1975 (10,000 people evacuated) which is 2 yrs too early for the cycle u mention but fits when u line it up with 1996 n 2017 (0ver 2000 people evacuated n our 4th worse flood) on a 21 yr cycle. We would need lots more data to see if this 21 yr trend continues but more likely something is altering which side of that 19 yr cycle we get the worse of it
Look at Bangladesh' coastal areas on Google Earth. Much of their mangrove forest have been cut down to clear farmland all the way to the coast in some river deltas and it doesn't take a Typhoon to flood the coastal areas for long distances any more. It is local climate change that has nothing to do with temperatures, a simple tropical storm floods and people live on stilts. It hasn't happened for a while, but a big typhoon will destroy hundreds kilometers up the rivers because the mangroves are gone.
This is something I didn't know. Thank you for sharing.
Some bad info on this. Sea level. Hawaii reference is silly
The youtube definition of climate change grinds my gears.
8:00 I feel especially hurt for that blue s15 silvia.. Good thing that I had in mind to build my garage higher than supposed by 10 cm by 2030, we'll see how that helps!
Fascinating! Astrum has a real gift for presenting topics that normally go unnoticed (except for specialists) and always with superb graphics. I had no idea about the existence and potential risks of the moon's nodal cycle. The great effort in producing this series is really appreciated.
😮
Fear mongering
Not at all. It's a very real thing.
@@EgoChipHe’s clearly not a man of science 😅
Sun causing it's high tide : Prepare for trouble Moon casing it's high tide in the same time and angle as Sun : And make it double
isnt the moon in the ecliptic plane each time we have an eclipse, either solar or lunar eclipse? eacht time we have that there are spring floods rite? so why is the node being in line to the sun so much worse? is it cus the moon is at its closest point?
So spring and neap tides happen every solar cycle. I believe you are referring to perigean spring tides when you said 6-8 per year. This is where the alignment of Sun-Earth-Moon also aligns with the lunar perigee point. Also, if the nodal precession has a period of ~18.6 years, then shouldn't we have an alignment every 9.3 years, as there are two nodes. or does this alignment also have to do the the apsidal precession of perigee (8.85years)
I'm further confused because yes the lunar nodes happen every 18.6 years, but the earth is also orbiting the sun every year. so 4 times a year one of the nodes passes in front of the sun from earth. if the moon so happens to be in that spot then we get an eclipse. eclipses happen much more then every 18.6 years.
this sounds all good and nice, a fun time for all, but why are those yelling climate change buying ocean front property? there is a disconnect between the good times of flooding and death you describe and the poverty of not getting insurance for damages for the land bought on the coast. i'm not seeing it.
This was extremely understandable. Thank you.
Are you still in Switzerland?
Guarenteed to blame global warming.
To your note about rising sea levels, they're going to rise no matter what we do unless we induce another ice age. Keep in mind that human civilization began around the end of an ice age. Where a bunch of water that should have been in the ocean was locked into massive glaciers. The effect of this is that we've managed to settle areas that were originally underwater and they will return to that state eventually. For instance, those of you familiar with north carolina would do well to note that "sea level" is geologically speaking supposed to be at the fall line around 100 miles inland of the present day coast and its been trying to return to that ever since. Really unlucky timing on our part when you think about it. You can harp on about manmade climate change all you want but solving that will only slow, not halt the rise as we've been told it will.
Great reply! The oceans are rising less than 3 mm a year, over a long time that is meaningful, but by 2034, that is less than 3 inches since 2015. If monumental flooding takes place, it won't be due to a 2 to 3 inch change in sea level. The reason the tides are high on the opposite side of the moon is due to gravity. The Eath being solid, moves as such. The exponential relationship of gravity cause water on the other side of Earth to lag, or not accelerate as fast towards the moon, thus seems to swell. It's actually lagging though... Don't get me started on AGW...
@@corchem see the fun part is remembering back in school in the late 90s being told that the island i currently live on would be underwater by 2020. denying science is bad enough in itself but to me, a bigger sin is misrepresenting it for personal gain. there is alot of money and grants floating around in the "climate crisis" industry therefore there is plenty of incentive to make data say what you want it to...
@@sprolyborn2554 The problem with AGW, is that anything other than CO2 is NOT considered. AGW is a one trick pony for the very reason you mentioned. There is no money to be made if there are a multitude of reasons none of which we can control such a gravitational variations that cause vulcanism, or orbital cycles. Controlling our energy is were money, power, and the politics that come with it reduce AGW to only one thing, CO2. The topic is too complex to discuss on such a platform, but CO2 is NOT the issue, it is a blessing to the planet. The greatest proliferation of like on Earth, the Cambrian Explosion saw CO2 levels 15 times greater than they are today. The biosphere has been sequestering CO2 for 540 Million years, we are near geologic lows. 40 to 50 years of brainwashing produces this mindset that we see in society today. Daytime highs have been going DOWN for over 80 years in the U.S. and I bet globally as well. Ugh, I could keep going and going...
@@corchem me too but we'll leave it at this. all i can say is preach it brother.
The 19-year cycle is known and the weather forecasters regularly predict 'Astrononomicly High" tides when the Moon's & Sun's influence are at their combined peak. these are not - as you assert - 'unexpected.' In fact, they are indeed predicted and expected.
Lovely study for Me this thank you
This was dissapointing. The basic info about the cycle was well done but the fear mongering is just a turn off. Just as with the last cycle, concurrent abnormal storms or hurricanes can compound the effect, but the general effect itself is not of major concern.
ancient stories around the world speak of a time before the moon. even Aristotle mentions it.
😂
amazing right @@CustardCream22 👍
@@CustardCream22 modern people sometimes disregard consistent worldwide accounts due to hubris, bias and assumptions
@@cryptophasia8511 But we know the moon is older than human life 🤣 Science wins over stupid ideas. Stop smoking weed 👍
Thanks for some more information pertaining to celestial forces influencing the planet
Surprising mistake about Spring tide frequency, but also some good bits.
Excellent video. My only comment is that the sea levels are not rising, certainly not in the CM range.
0 hour gang
yoo
Yessssss 00 🤖
Here
i still count ?? fuck it i do idc i early
🍆
I've got a feeling something bad is going to eclipse this around that time.
Great video, Thanks
The sea level at the Statue of Liberty has not changed since it was built.....HOW ABOUT A VIDEO ON THAT THEN ?
And you lost me at the climate change covid chicken little turtle flu panic.
+ mosquito fever plague