I Changed Astronomy Forever. He Won the Nobel Prize for It. | 'Almost Famous' by Op-Docs
Growing up in a Quaker household, Jocelyn Bell Burnell was raised to believe that she had as much right to an education as anyone else. But as a girl in the 1940s in Northern Ireland, her enthusiasm for the sciences was met with hostility from teachers and male students. Undeterred, she went on to study radio astronomy at Glasgow University, where she was the only woman in many of her classes.
In 1967, Burnell made a discovery that altered our perception of the universe. As a Ph.D. student at Cambridge University assisting the astronomer Anthony Hewish, she discovered pulsars - compact, spinning celestial objects that give off beams of radiation, like cosmic lighthouses. (A visualization of some early pulsar data is immortalized as the album art for Joy Division’s “Unknown Pleasures.”)
But as Ben Proudfoot's "The Silent Pulse of the Universe" shows, the world wasn’t yet ready to accept that a breakthrough in astrophysics could have come from a young woman.
See more of "Almost Famous:" • ‘Almost Famous’ by Op-...
Credits
Director: Ben Proudfoot
Editor: Mónica Salazar
Featuring: Jocelyn Bell Burnell
Producers: Elizabeth Brooke, Abby Lynn Kang Davis, Gabriel Berk Godoi, Ben Proudfoot, Brandon Somerhalder, Sarah Stewart
Cinematographer: Tom Welsh
Original Score Composed and Orchestrated by: Nicholas Jacobson-Larson
Co-Producer: Jeremy Lambert
Supervising Sound Editor and Re-Recording Mixer: Sean Higgins
Colorist: Stephen Derluguian
Post Production Supervisor: Dillon Brown
Post Production Coordinator: Laura Carlson
Assistant Editor: Cody Wilson
Sound Designer: Tom Boykin
Second Unit Director: Mónica Salazar
Second Unit Cinematographer: Haley Watson
Scoring Mixer: Brad Haehnel
Musicians: Garth Neustadter, Nicholas Jacobson-Larson, Erik Kertes
Story Reported By: Sarah Stewart
Consulting Cinematographer: Brandon Somerhalder
More from The New York Times Video:
Subscribe: bit.ly/U8Ys7n
Watch all of our videos here: nytimes.com/video
Facebook: / nytvideo
Twitter: / nytvideo
----------
Op-Docs is the New York Times’ award-winning series of short documentaries by independent filmmakers. Learn more about Op-Docs and how to submit to the series. Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram (@NYTopinion).
Hey there! My name is Ben, and I directed this film. Happy to answer any questions you may have about the filmmaking!
Brilliantly shot and edited. Perfect balance of talk and silent punctuation.
The music is too much. Needs to be toned down.
Amazing job! Fantastic! How much time would you say was put into the film, from start to finish? Did you do the interview as well, or just directing?
@@HerAeolianHarp Thanks!
@@carlosivandegodoy The film has been in the works for more than a year! Yes, I interviewed Jocelyn, last June. We did it remotely - I was in Los Angeles and our DP Tom Welsh was in the UK. We used a special safety protocol so that Jocelyn never came in close contact/the same airspace with anyone during the shoot. Our editor Mónica Salazar spent many weeks editing the film - lot of hours by a lot of talented people!
I'm an actual pulsar & radio astronomer, and I just wanted to say that among our community, there's probably not a single one of us who doesn't know of Jocelyn Bell and her fundamental contribution to the field we all work in. She hasn't been forgotten by us, and I don't think it's possible that she ever will.
That's really good to know.
Ah this makes me so happy.
gravitational wave astrophysics here: same! My own thesis is surrounding neutron stars. Amazing to think that something that is so important now across all of the astro-genres was discovered by a graduate student. And one who didn't get the proper credit, at that.
pls consider telling us we would wanted to hear . promote the lady.
Why was the mistake, actually fraud, not corrected by the Nobel prize people?
They gave her three million dollars, and she gave it away to help others who might face the same obstacles she did. THAT is greatness.
although I think that the idea of something that massive speeding as fast as a dentist drill is just silly, but indeed, THAT is greatness!
Best comment on the board.
@Umer Qaiser I mean, you can search it up on the award website and scholarship website. She only kept about 7 % of the funds! Although I guess there's no point in telling ignorant politically-polarized people like yourself that.
Many have done great things that will never be credited to them, thanks to horrible people and the ways that they behave. This woman is brilliant, and brave. Not only brave to walk the path she chose, but braver and stronger still to share her difficulties and help the world learn from them. We only have survived this long because we *LEARN*
Trolling may be Umer’s day job, night gig or whatever…..
I once attended a public lecture she was giving in my home town while I was still in high school. After the lecture, I asked her if he had any adive for girls going into physics, and she simply replied: “Only to go into physics.” This stuck with me through the hard years of undergrad and now I am doing a PhD at a prestigious university. I am so greatful to have met her, she really is a role model to so many of us.
Amazing! & beautiful! One meeting with extraordinary person set the trajectory for PHD.
i support equal participation of women in the male dominated jobs that they conveniently don't want to do like construction, fishing, plumbing, etc!!!!!! There is too much oppression of women there less than 1% participation is way too misogynistic
@@AC-mp7cx Every one of my experiences exploring the trades was met with a load of misogyny. I graduated high school in 1980. I wonder how much difference there is today, if any. I almost never see women working in a car repair shop (unless it's her own) or a construction site.
@@AC-mp7cx Evidence that they don't want to do those jobs?
My daughter got a degree in P Chem. She is a wizard at thermo - I have quizzed her (Naval Nuke). She prefers the social sciences. She graduates in that at the end of November.
It's heart-breaking that her Nobel Prize wasn't awarded to her, but heart-warming that Fred Hoyle stood up for her. If Hoyle hadn't made a fuss about it, Bell may never have gotten any recognition for her work.
Because he understands how much perseverance and hard work goes into discovering and pushing knowledge beyond the scope, so he probably felt strongly that she requires this recognition
It is totally normal. The principal investigator usually gets the prize. Wikipedia noted she said: "I believe it would demean Nobel Prizes if they were awarded to research students, except in very exceptional cases, and I do not believe this is one of them." However, if Hewish was discouraging of her interpretation at the beginning, I don't know if he should have been on the prize. I don't know how he presented the work.
@@AshiStarshade i agree, its a group effort, she was the researcher he was the leader of the team, without him there is no research, without her they would just hire another researcher, he gets the price, is not about gender. a special mention would have been nice tho
@@AshiStarshade The fact that it is common does not diminish the wrongness of it.
@@Sideshow-Bob without her efforts pulsars may have never been discovered or at best years in the future…..her persistence is what made this happen, the lead astronomer had declared this as nothing but noise.
She was my Prof, one of my heroes, and a wonderful human being. Definitely should have got a Nobel.
It seems the Nobel prize wasn't so noble.
She may not have been given the Nobel, but she proved to be noble. Look at just what she did with those 3 millions! What a role model she is herself, indeed! :)
you can tell just by this short video she is amazing. what a lovely human being.
@@maskedmarvyl4774 they gave a Nobel prize to the guy that invented the lobotomy. The Nobel prize has been a joke for most of its existence
U lucky sod
the part of this story i loved the most is that her inspiration, fred hoyle, fought for her recognition
a role model (Burnell) and how her role model (Hoyle) fought for her. what a great situation.
@@rahard Hoyle of course had his own experience of being an outsider, being from a fairly ordinary background, a Northerner, and later a champion of a number of ideas that were definitely not mainstream. I would think this might have made him more sensitive to the unfairness that Bell experienced.
Me too, I didn't know who he was before this, but that shows excellent character on his part
@12:40 Her definition of a pulsar to visually show how Newton, Einstein, and Hoyle all got the spotlight, while she as a woman didn't was so poignant and moving. To whoever came up with that scene...that was beautiful journalism. Thank you.
What a delightful, gracious and intelligent woman. This is a great acknowledgement to the true discoverer of Pulsars. She may have been "the man on the mast that shouts land ho" but it was the "moronic" ship's captain Hewish that first dismissed the signals and couldn't recognize the shore until she brought him some sand from the beach in the form of the expanded graph. He should never have accepted the prize on his own. Even his mother should be ashamed of him for that!
Excellent analogy, and I couldn't agree more.
i hate people like that even in field of IT
@@Salmankhan-wb4xi Who Antony Hewish or Jocelyn Bell?
@Terry Ketron - Hear, hear!!! Well said sir and I could not agree with you more.
My thoughts exactly. An arrogant and selfish oaf he is.
Even Stephen hawking believed that she was the one who discovered it
Who cares what Hawking thought. He never produced anything of value.
@@based9930 ???
@@based9930 ur joking right?
@@maia9557 No, clown. Name a single thing that was invented due to his work.
@@based9930 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
She is very fortunate that she had parents who reinforced and supported the fact she had every right to pursue what she wanted.
Maybe even more importantly, _we_ are very fortunate that she had that.
only to fall foul of two usurpers
@@surfaceten510n Do you really think that ? The Universe planned it in the correct order.
@@MotorGoblin Yes!! Good point.
@@surfaceten510n Yes, but those that mattered new the truth. It is just sad that it was not corrected for the world to know and those usurpers to be taken down.
She gave a lecture to some schools in my area about how pulsars were discovered and yet she mentioned nothing of the nobel prize scandal and her struggle to get into stem. She is so incredibly humble and genuinely seems to enjoy science for the sake of science. What an incredible story, and an even more incredible person to have emerged from it
I'm from Sri Lanka and organised inter-school quizzes on astronomy are a big thing here i.e. many schools have their own astronomy clubs and many students strive to become aficionados including myself. I distinctly remember "Pulsars were discovered by Jocelyn Bell" is one of the most prominent facts I memorized when I was in 6th grade and so did many of my peers becuse it was a question that would come up in quizzes so frequently. It was significant beacuse, at that time, it was very rare for a female astronomer to make a major discovery like she pointed out in the video. So I'd say she's pretty famous in the community.
She sure is. I first heard about her from an American woman I met when she came to my country to work at the Parkes Dish, a very important radio telescope in the outback. She spoke about how she'd believed she could do it after hearing Jocelyn Bell's story. Role models matter so much. When you grow up not ever seeing anyone like you doing the thing you want to do, it's very hard to believe that you can do it. And it's hard for other people to accept you. I talked to my dad about my career in computing hardware, but he still kept encouraging me to be a librarian or work in a fashion boutique. Seriously. He thoght I should work in a dress shop. Once, he praised me for the way I'd taken a phone message for him and said: "You'd make a very good secretary, dear." I was in my 40s at the time and had post-graduate qualifications and had been running my own consulting business. I smiled calmly at him and said, "Than you, Dad. So would you. You have a fine phone manner and your handwriting is quite legible." He harrumphed. I managed not to laugh, then, but I still smile when I think about it. I loved my father, and he was an intelligent man, but by god did he have a blind spot about the capabilities of women! Like so many men.
Yes, beaucuausue accuracy and attention to detail are so important.
Mad respect! She donate the whole prize which is 3 millions dollar to fund study of future scientist! What a beautiful mind.
Sorry but it's pounds not dollars
@@erickm119 2.3 million pounds was, at that time, 3 million dollars. She called it dollars herself. It depends on the reporting as to which monetary unit is used. It spends the same.
which prize?
AMEN.
they usally do that anyway
She still deserves her Nobel Prize! It was hers too.
facts
I demand she be given it.
@@Xylospring yeah me too
Can we petition for this !? If so please send me a message
@@PJZZZZ highly doubt that cause its a long time ago but we can try I geuss
Sad that she had to face harassment and her Nobel price was stolen. When this story is narrated by the victim, it is more divine. This story deserves to be made as movie.
No one stole her Nobel prize. The thing is there is only one Nobel in physics every year and it can only be given max three people. There are so many physicists who should have won the Nobel but somehow they didn't because it's a very competitive field. Still, they didn't choose to whine about it because they are working for something bigger.
Tony Hewish deserved some credit but he landed the lion's share of credit . I wander if the Nobel prize might be apportioned according to percentage of credit due . It then becomes politics. However it's politics that removed Fred Hoyle from contention for a Nobel prize concerning origins of life . Hoyle made waves at Cambridge concerning the treatment of Jocelyn Moving over to Oxford University , the saga continues concerning how much limelight credit that Alexander Fleming shoulda received for his ,, discovery ,, of penicillin. The real toil was done by Florey and Chaim but they weren't British and Britain claims the credit for penicillin. The mentality was different for the era.
Start with a movie starring Rosalind Franklin, James Watson and Francis Crick.
I cried when they showed the picture of her holding the award. Wow, so inspiring. I'm so thankful for women like this who paved the way in science for the rest of us🙏💪🏻
me too .. in fact tears are streaming down my face as I read and like all these comments. Jocelyn captures humanity and inhumanity in one life.
The confidence she's exuding is so impressive to watch. The pain in her eyes of not being credited at the time of Nobel is so evident. A great soul. God bless her !
She's over it and has had a wonderful life doing what she wanted. The whole scientific world knows it's all her discovery as she spotted it and knew it was an anomaly. She said she wasn't that bothered at the time being pushed out of the frame. The sexism and taunts form sexist bigots affected her much more than having the Prize stolen from her. I really don't think she would change anything now. I love her and wish I had followed in her footsteps becoming an astronomer. Such an exciting field and can't wait for Kepler to begin data gathering. It's going to blow the doors off everything that went before such as Hubble.
@@MICKEYISLOWD the prize was not stolen from her because she said clearly that Tony Hewish was the one who had the idea of the research and financed the project so he own the project fair and square sorry she had been neglected because she was the student and the underated woman but beside of that she received many prizes and honours for this particular discovery other than Nobel prize which is frankly biased prize and politicaly motivated and we saw it many times particularly the Nobel peace prize, the ones who need to get over it are the people who are emotional for it for no rational reason
@@abedbbb7083 He didn’t finance the project of discovering pulsars, he was searching for quasars. She discovered pulsars. She was the one who claimed that it wasn’t an interference and that this was something new. She was instrumental and should have received the reward. People like you who say “people are emotional for it for no rational reason” seem to not be understanding how many times similar situation happened where women were ignored and how many men use arguments like "How many women won nobel price in science?" as an argument for how men are superior. I m not saying Hewish should not have been credited or that he shouldn't have received the award, but he did attempt to minimize her role instead of acknowledging her and trying his best for her to be included as well.
@@veles1415 look what matters is not me not you not the opinion of people if the one who was unjusted did not get his justice then anything said or done is useless needless to say that she was acknowledged for her role later and the talk was about this particular case so don't project your understanding of this comment as beeing mine it stills yours i am not saying that women are inferior and i am not denying that some brilliant women were ignored or their work was stolen and you should ve understood from what i said that the Nobel prize is not the reference and should not be because is biased and not every great mind got it let us take an example do you know Sir Ronald Fisher? this man had shaped science as we know it he was behind a huge improvment in experimental design especially for clinical trials he literally made medecine a real science and he is probably the most famous Statistician ever beside beeing a Geneticist that revived the theory of evolution and established Population genetics his name is everywhere he developed so many statistical tests named after him but guess what?! he was not awarded any Nobel prize so if this man did not got it and he is way more influential than Ms Bell and he affected all kind of science as we know it so what it is wrong with this prize or with its committe ? do you think of it as a reference ?
@@veles1415 The way to look at it is eventually the truth comes out. Though she got pushed out of the frame, her story is known and has been told.
What a wonderful human being. I didn't just learn about pulsars, sexism, and justice, I learned about kindness, elegance, personal values, perspective, and giving back. Funnily enough already forgot name of chap who took the prize, his smallness has made him vanish from my mind already.
Unbelievable he just took the Nobel prize from her!
He couldn't even share the Nobel Prize with her. Two men that without her research and findings, nothing to get a Nobel Prize about.
bro he just died
Yes!
Guess the more appropriate word is insignificance to describe that chap
I got the chance to meet Jocelyn Bell Burnell at the recent PhysCon 2022 event, and she was such a kind and inspiring person!
Professors/ research advisors are notorious for taking credit for their underlying’s genius. This is another case and one that illustrates how deep systemic biases have seeped into academia. It was great to learn about this brilliant woman, I hope more stories like hers will be told in the future, and that the contributions of young women to sciences will become more widely appreciated.
All too common unfortunately. The really sad thing is while this woman seems to have gotten hers in the end, but most young men never get a second thought.
I got an acknowledgement in the "thank you" section when my ex published the book we worked on together, admitting he couldn't be sure what parts were mine and what was his. But somehow this translated into a "thanks!" instead of coauthorship credit, because he was a professor and I was a grad student! I take quiet pleasure in the fact that it's the one out of all his publications that is taken most seriously, because it has more substance and better ideas than the books I *didn't* coauthor.
As a female science graduate, I’m so grateful to these incredible women who have paved the way for us to be able to build our careers without prejudice and with pride. Thank you Jocelyn!
If you need a role model to do science then maybe you should be in drama instead of science.
@sabin97 no, the men did not pave the way for women in science. In fact common practice was to gatekeep scientific education from women, since they apparently used to "belong in the kitchen". While growing up, if everyone around you that resembles you is working at home, and not allowed to pursue higher education, your mind is not open to the idea that hmm, maybe I can be a scientist as well because no one like you has done it before
@@sabin97 Yes, they were. but were they freely seen as equals by some male scientists at that time? and don't project your hatred on modern woke (western) feminists on me, because neither me and my statements have connection to those. I'm just simply answering your question with facts.
@@sabin97 "Women's pursuit of an equal, in-depth, high-level education as adults has met many stumbling blocks over the centuries: inferior standards (or the complete absence) of education for young girls, beliefs in women's intellectual inferiority, and worries that education in non-domestic subjects wouldn't adequately prepare women for their "natural" role as wives and mothers..." (I cannot put its link because of KZhead moderation, but its article is titled "Here's How Women Fought For The Right To Be Educated.")
@@whispersofveracity63 Still it would very intimidating if everyone in society thinks it's not for you
As the only female in my masters course in Theoretical Physics and about to enter an "all-male" research group for my PhD, I am so inspired by you.
❤️❤️❤️❤️ I just know you'll stand out
@@tshidi129yes by having a vagina.
@@yarakharam5343 Someone with a vagina made history, in the video that you're watching... Not to mention that you came out of one when you were born... Be humble
Good luck! Stay away from string theory and study up on Clifford Algebras.
@@charlesspringer4709 why stay away from String Theory.
Jocelyn spoke at our astronomical society when I was a student at St Andrew’s in the 1980s. I still have the slip of paper she handed out to everyone (somewhere!) on it it said (approximately) “in picking up this piece of paper you have used more energy than has been received from pulsars since their discovery”. Fantastic demonstration of communication. A role model for all, not just women, and not just scientists. And carrying on the amazing tradition of the Religious Society of Friends in making major contributions to science and industry.
“Tradition.” That’s disgusting. As a (currently studying) female conductor, I’m facing the same thing over here in Europe that I never faced in the States. It’s terrifying sometimes. Edit: holy CRAP the media questions. The photographers. The lack of support from Tony. What absolutely horrible, horrible things.
i support equal participation of women in the male dominated jobs that they conveniently don't want to do like construction, fishing, plumbing, etc!!!!!! There is too much oppression of women there less than 1% participation is way too misogynistic
@@AC-mp7cx I wanted to be a car mechanic. I loved cars, and still do. I was refused an apprenticeship because I was a girl. There were many thousands like me. I ended up going into computer hardware troubleshooting, I'd mostly taught myself. I was good at it but so often overlooked and underestimated that it became depressing. It's really hard to work in a field where people just assume you don't know what you're talking about, even though you do. That's why there's so few women builders, plumbers, fishers etc. we're discouraged from going into those industries, and if we do get in, we so often find ourselves in workplaces that are dismissive, hostile, and/or uncomfortable with us. But there are still some. I know female electricians, female carpenters, female builders, female engineers. I often seek them out when I need that service because I know that you often have to be twice as good as the men to stay in the field. Do you understand?
@@thomasdequincey8227 how can you be sure your sexual organs were the reason you were refused? Are you sure it didn't have anything to do with being arrogant, or schedule conflicts or expected payment? 🤔 theres an awful lot of men who are refused apprenticeships and an awful lot of potential reasons for it. Kind of petty to assume you failed because of someone else.
@@antonioyeats2149 No, they told me. This was in the early 80s. They told me "thank you for applying but at this time we are not accepting female candidates for mechanic's apprenticeships" and went on with some guff about it being an unsuitable working environment for a young woman. The also sent me alist of "suitable" fields I could apply for an apprenticeship in: hairdressing was at the top of the list I remember. This was through the government apprenticeship board, so it wasn't a single workplace. In my country, to be accepted for an apprenticeship meant you had to go through the Board. I went into computing instead. I taught myself hobby electronics and started putting my own basic computers together. It wasn't easy being a woman in that world either, but I got lucky in a job with a company that was very prestigious where they were prepared to give a woman a chance. Even so, there was only one female software programmer and one woman working in Final Testing and then technical writing, and me working with the hardware in R&D in the studio. Every other woman in the company was in admin or a secretary.
@@thomasdequincey8227 what country are you from?
This was maddening. Imagine finding something that advances science in such an explosive way and your boss taking complete credit for it. That is honestly INSANE.
It’s actually pretty common. It’s frustrating but common
this is quite common in labs, especially if youre a young scientist with almost no connections or unknown in the field
Imagine? This happens every minute....
When do bosses not take credit?
Happens all the time.
Above her scientific persistance, Jocelyn appears to be an award-worthy role model for a dignified attitude! Also a beautiful storytelling by Ben.
Yeah this was well done. I hope women gain responsibility in gov't as well as science. I've been amazed that Germany actually has an ex-quantum chemist (Angela Merkel) as their Chancellor! I'm so jealous. :) She is apparently the unofficial leader of EU and in my mind the Free(ish) World.
Right here, im a boy of 15 and i aspire for astrophysics. I loved astronomy and astrophysics since childhood and i have read many books on astronomy, and there wasn't a single one where your name wasn't there, Mrs. Bell mam! You are really inspiring for me as I feel even I'm an outsider due to being an Indian, since the westerners consider us the so called "Third World countries". I want to upgrade the science and technology of the world in the field of astrophysics and solve some of the greatest mysteries of the universe like Dark matter, and possibly harness them as well. Thank you so much for being an inspiration!
Pursue your dreams, I believe in you!
@@juliee593 thank you so much I'm preparing hard right now as in grade 11 in India if you are a student with physics, chemistry and mathematics as your main subjects then you have to crack one of the toughest exams in the world: Joint Entrance Exams. If i do that then no one could stop me from achieving my goal! 🔥
You the real VIP kid.
@@ocelotMartinez thank you so much! ❤️
Indians have done remarkable work in the progression of mathematics and science, and especially in astrophysics. The financial limitations on institutes like ISRO and the like have led to some incredible breakthroughs that would not have been achieved otherwise. I'm a few years ahead of you, halfway through my computer science degree at one of Canada's most prestigious research institutes. I wish you all the best for your JEE and Advance exams. It gets exhausting at times but reading your comment reminded me of the way I felt in school and how far I have come.
Just want to say that you're not just a role model for young women, but also for young guys like who want to go into astronomy like me. Thank you so much for your amazing story, that has inspired and continues to inspire so many of us young astronomers.
Grad students usually do all the science work while professors just write grant proposals to fund the research and hog all the credit. This story is very typical of academia.
But if the grad student is a feminist woman she wants to take the credit and dump the professor. Anyways she earned lots of credit for the finding.
@@sebalutz Did you watch the whole video? She wasn’t the one who made a fuss, it was Hoyle. She said she was happy to be part of a big event and said she wasn’t bothered knowing as a student and woman it was a big thing to have even been included. She wasn’t a “feminist woman” she talks about just loving astronomy and pursuing her passion despite opposition due to her gender. She didn’t demand anything for being a woman.
@@sebalutz Why can't two scientists be recognized? She interpreted it as something novel. He did not. Have you had bad experiences with woman whom you describe as feminist?
@@catherinebeaubruncooper9689 the NYT is famous for grifting on these topics and give a heavy Leftist spin to things that shouldn’t have any and should be told for what they are (like the life of an amazing person like Jocelyn Bell). Just by reading the title you can see that it underlines the obvious feminist narrative that: “a woman did all the work to win the Nobel but instead the Patriarchy gave it to a man who unjustly took all the credit (because men are bad)”. It wasn’t titled: “the wonderful life of the incredible female astrophysicist who discovered pulsars”, because sadly fostering a certain political narrative is more important to the NYT than to give actual credit to amazing people that have passed their whole lives studying and splitting their brains on theorems and calculations so that human knowledge could progress.
@@adolfolerito6744 I'm sorry, but are u denying the well known fact the PAST WAS PATRIARCHAL? Its one thing to say modern times IN THE WEST arent, its another thing altogether to say it wasn't so even decades ago. U have been watching WAY too much Ben Shapiro.
I love the cinematography behind 12:45, how when the "light" hits you, you see famous scientists, and when it doesnt, it shows a picture of jocelyn, or an "overshadowed light" its there, you just dont see it. Amazing.
Yes. Particularly gripping storytelling.
oh my god yes
Good observation! I'm glad you pointed that out, because it went right over my head.
Yes! I had the same thought, very clever and moving.
that was beautifulll beautiful story telling
You were denied of Noble prize in 1974, press had no shame, two ignoble men shared the Noble prize, but after 44 years in 2018 you had THREE MILLION DOLLAS Breakthrough Prize all to yourself and yet you chose to give it all away! You are more than inspiring, much more than noble!! 🙏🙏🙏
I knew of Jocelyn 30 years ago when I did Physics and before that. She also did work at the Open University, if I am not mistaken. As a man, I thought she was fascinating & a very brave physicist. I want the same for my Daughter, who is now in Oxford studying Classics. Thank you Mrs Bell.
I would love to see a film adaptation of this woman's life
Not an adaptation, but Contact (1997) has quite similiar story. And it's a good movie!
Yeah. The inspiration for Contact was Jill Tarter who's another first rate radio astronomer.
Me too
Hollywood cannot make a movie that ends in such a disappointing way. The ending would have to change to her driving a muscle car onto the Nobel stage fishtail the "bad physicist" into the crowd and claiming the prize at gunpoint. If only they could get the late great Tura Satana to play her character.
It wouldn't be that great. People usually exaggerate their stories.
Interesting that Dr. Hewish defended receiving the credit - while Ms. Bell-Burnell's reaction was that "pulsars were important enough to rate a Nobel Prize". She was happy about her field of study being recognized. He was apparently more concerned with being recognized. I love her passion.
*Dr. Bell-Burnell
Or *Dame Bell-Burnell Either way, certainly not "Ms."
@@taylorawell Was Mrs. Bell-Burnell knighted? That would give the title of Dame. Also I don't believe she completed her doctoral studies which would give her the title of Dr. Either Ms. or Mrs. is appropriate for a married woman as Ms. is equivelent to Mr. acknowledging a title for a woman but not specifying whether they are married or not
@@nmg6248 She holds an Order of the British Empire so that makes her a Dame.
@@annwe6 I did look it up after asking. I’m so happy for her!
I remember receiving a lecture from Jocelyn Bell, talking to her about her story was one of the most eye-opening experiences I've had.
I'm not surprised at all by Jocelyn's parents' reaction. When I was a kid there was a small grocery store right around the corner from us in our Brooklyn, NY neighborhood. The owner was a Quaker. (Yes, there were -- and still are -- Quakers in Brooklyn.) He was the most decent and welcoming person there, something I greatly appreciated as a kid in a not always welcoming neighborhood. Yes, that's only one data point, but I treasure it and what it perhaps says of Quakers by and large.
+
yes we don't hear enough about the quakers and thier goodness in this world. thanks
I have a feeling this sort of thing happens more frequently than we realize, where the "mentor" gets credit for the discovery of the researcher whose career they're supposed to be fostering.
Yes but only gets highlighted if its a woman or minority who misses out, men don't matter, it doesn't fit the victim narrative.
@@paulburns1333 Ofc...I was waiting for someone to make it about men and their woes.
It happens constantly, even now. Sadly 😥
@@paulburns1333 you were a victim of this, I gather?
Albert Einstein took his wife’s knowledge and claimed it as his own. She was brighter than him. He gave her no credit.
Her humility is beyond the universe. I love her
You said it better than I could have.
We need more women like her setting examples fow young people today. Sadly, social media has provided a platform for women to be "influencers" by strutting around nearly naked on instagram and tiktok. Where are the intelligent, grounded women like Ms. Bell?
12:20 - decision to show description of pulsar detection shining in your face, paralleled with the recognition of astronomers, powerful stuff!
She is so humble and so confident at the same time. I really strive to be like her.
I couldn’t imagine the pain she felt at the time and though all the years since. The fact she isn’t bitter against the world is so admirable. What a strong, intelligent, selfless and innovative woman.
Too bad most "woman" aren't like her.
@@lampad4549 Not sure what you mean here and I'm even more perplexed by the quotation marks... If you're referring to the not-becoming-bitter part, it's worth saying that it's a perfectly legitimate feeling. Any person would be right to feel bitter and enraged by the injustice.
@@lampad4549 Most men are not like her either! Why? They are NOT smart enough.
@@lampad4549 A majority of men aren’t like her, shes literally unique to the scientific community and yet they did her wrong
@@lampad4549 come on man you think woman dont ahve good quality's then do you think the same about men, Im a man and i would take it as well as she did
They should have given him the Nobel Prize for discovering “interference “.
Hahahahahaha. Funny!!!
True
Niice
What humility. Jocelyn Bell Burnell should get a Nobel Prize for bravery, for taking adversity and turning it into a design for the future of women in Science. Thanks for sharing. I would not have known these important events without your documentary.
What an awesome woman. Her story, character brought me to tears, you are a great role model👏👏👏👏
She is a role model. What a woman! What fortitude. Thank God for her. Many daughters are now taking to STEM because of her. Perhaps her struggle and story is more important than the Nobel. Thanks for the documentary.
Which doesn't change the fact women are just less interested in STEM and that's the only reason you see less women on STEM.
@@user-hy2ry3if8h it's ur kind of mindset that leaves less women being seen in stem for goodness sake
@@user-hy2ry3if8h and that’s men’s fault
Women taking STEM courses, adds nothing special to science.
It is sad that she doesn't receive the recognition and rewards that women need. She is a great role model and women should know this. She is a true star in her own right.
I remember Jocelyn Bell coming to speak at our Edinburgh astronomy club 35 years ago, and she couldn't have been more gracious. There was never any doubt in our minds that she was the key player in the discovery of pulsars. I was exceedingly proud to meet her and value the fact she took time out of her work to engage with the public and ignite the love of science in a new generation. Thank you Jocelyn.
Here’s a thumbs up.
was she salty about it then as well?
@@blakejonesii6485 figures a man is calling her "salty" 🙄 You wouldn't understand.
@@blakejonesii6485 As far as PhDs and their thesis advisors go, this isn't even pasta water salty.
@@DOLsenior yawn.... here we go.
A world-class presentation of a world-class astronomer. Hearing Jocelyn Bell speak in her own words and telling her story from her own viewpoint, and framing it historically and factually tells a true story that is both cautionary and inspiring. I've know about Jocelyn Bell for many years, but I had never heard her speak at length about her experience, and it is amazing. She is not just a great scientist but a heroic person that we can all admire and learn from.
I have two daughters; one with a MS in Paleontology and the other with a PhD in Criminal Justice. It was women like Jocelyn Bell that helped make that possible.
That doesn't say much about you.
@@johnbuggy9121 Jocelyn is fantastic and little did I know when I did my project on her that I would be a woman exploited some months later but by Aviva for life insurance. Yet the CEO Amanda Blanc is being made a dame yet I have been denied £500,000 it seems there is discrimination everywhere. I was denied the contract because I was identified as vulnerable in internal data. The Lunacy laws have returned in practice because I was upset about my husband's death yet I am a masters degree student with learning difficulties. There is so much exploitation by organisations
Despite the obvious unfairness in this story, the fact remains that nobody remembers his name, whereas anybody mildly interested in astronomy knows who Jocelyn Bell is. So I say screw the nobel prize and focus on public awareness which in the end is what legacies are made of.
I honestly think Nobel prizes are a scam. We hear more stories of women being robbed of their credit than of actual discoveries now.
I mean, you're right. But I still want Dr Bell to get her Nobel prize because the mere act of correcting this injustice "on the record" as it were would make future injustices less likely.
True but nobel prizes are a major factor in who the public is aware of.
Yes!
@@TheHongKongHermit There may be a better way than to depend on the institute of the nobel prize. There are instances of prizes being held off until someone dies, stories like this where a woman wasn't recognized because of being minority status, prizes going only to the head researchers even though the achievement was done by a team of hundreds of people, and so on and so forth. Lets not even speak of the nobel peace prize. A better way may be to have the nobel prize list annotated by important historical context. So we could have a list of nobel prize winners, where the nobel prize for pulsars has an entry of bell with the note of her achieving the oscars of science for it. This way, later humans will know that she belongs to the list, what award she recieved instead, and why. This context can be gathered by historians (and us), independently from the nobel prize committee,... as it should be. TL:DR: have historians hold a more nuanced and independent record.
I didn't know Jocelyn was still alive! I was aware she was the one who discovered pulsars, but didn't know the whole story. I'm so glad she's still around and featuring in this series ✨
Tony Hewitt is still alive. Surprised he can live with himself - but he's from a different era where plagerizing work from a woman was acceptable. Personally it makes me feel extreme disgust.
@@tigress63 and he's still convinced that she didn't deserve the prize to this day
@@tigress63 He gave her a job on a project he and Ryle conceived of. They built equipment, which did not previously exist, specifically to detect the wavelengths required for quasars. That's what led to the discovery of pulsars.
Yeap! She is 78 yo. She is the Bombshizzle of Astronomy.
@@tigress63 He was from an era of deceitful cowards. That’s the era he was from. I would be ashamed to live under the skirts of a great mind, not because she was a woman, but because I had stolen from her.
wow. Thank you for your discovery and tenacity. I conducted ground-breaking research in neuroscience in the 70's and my doctoral adviser photocopied my bibliography and distributed it at an international conference. Of course he had put his name on it. He frequently warned me that my research field was a waste of time, but he became the world expert by reading passages from my dissertation. Ouch. I was denied my doctorate despite my 7 years of dedication and discovery. I respect you for all you did and for bringing this injustice to light. My Dad was dying, so I dropped my battle. I regret my decision every day.
I am so sorry this happened to you. Hopefully your doctoral adviser feels his lack of integrity every single day.
Tony would have never even "discovered" pulsars without Bell (not saying he discovered them). Yes, he was the one to make the telescope, but until Bell told him that the markings weren't interference, he just brushed them aside. A remarkable woman indeed, and my new role model.
I am in tears. History, Madame Bell will give you more than a noble prize.
Well she gave to us through her life and we celebrate her cuz she is the prize
This documentary made me cry as well!
This was an amazing story. For all of the strong women like Jocelyn, those of us in the stem field, are eternally grateful and should never lose sight.
So glad I came across this!!!. Such an amazing feat & it's so good to see that she still got the deserved recognition. 🙌🏾❤️
Looks like she did get recognition after all.
What a crock, the guy thought it was interference, he truly did not deserve that Nobel Prize. Jocelyn won it.
Hey man, take joy! We're trying to right many wrongs these days, it's never happened before in human history. This is a great story and is helping right a wrong for one person.
It is odd that the Nobel committee does not right its wrongs.
@@roelzylstra and they never will, it is a common pattern in these old institutions. They have far too much "prestige" to admit to such horrible inequality in their previous decisions.
@@roelzylstra The Nobel Committee is a good thing but not a perfect thing. I agree they should give her a prize, but if they don't she'll get her deserved recognition anyway.
Another sad story where a brilliant female did not get her due.
What a wonderful story. She was robbed, but kept her head high. She inspires me to write up my own research (not astronomy). What a lovely film. Thank you, Ben.
what is your research on?
Awe when men are inspired by women
Just wow... inspiringly heart warming. The fact that she is not all that cynical after everything says a lot.
Why would she be xD academic theft is frighteningly common, she was lucky enough to get the recognition she deserves back. Most dont.
What an amazing inspirational woman! It's hurtful to know what she has been through but inspiring that she still never lost her passion. Beautiful! Thanks for making and sharing this story.
I’m an ordinary person with a long-standing interest in Astronomy and as far as I am concerned ever since Carl Sagan’s fantastic presentations at the Christmas Royal Institute lectures, the discovery of Pulsars is and always will be, firmly attributed to Jocelyn Bell. Hewish may have been the project leader but the real protagonist was Jocelyn Bell, he was just ‘interference’.
@Martin - I think it’s also fair to say that when Tony Hewish had this discovery repeatedly brought to his attention he blandly dismissed Bell’s observations as ‘local interference’. Had a less committed scientist other than Jocelyn Bell Burnell made this discovery, its significance perhaps would not have been recognised for the amazing natural phenomenon it was. Undeterred she continued with her analysis and observations until she discovered a second Pulsar and only then did the ‘big wigs’ start to take notice and see it as their opportunity to make a name for themselves. More pulsars were discovered and the true significance of Jocelyn Bell’s discovery slowly dawned amongst the scientific community. The analogy of the cabin boy, I suggest is somewhat different in that he was a ‘passenger’ just like the crew and everyone else on board the vessel in uncharted seas, that was expertly commanded and navigated by James Cook. Whereas Jocelyn Bell was ‘the driver’ of this project, much to her credit and equally well deserving of Nobel recognition for her efforts.
@Martin That's actually a relevant criticism of the science Nobel Prizes, though. Modern scientific discoveries (and many historical ones, though that's a different topic) are made by teams of people. The idea of a lone genius toiling in a lab is a myth. BUT if we're going to award these prizes to individuals, we need to think about the biases that are baked into the structures that hire, promote, and fund people into leadership positions. And then the second set of biases of how that scientific work is perceived by people within and outside of the field. Formal recognition of Bell's work is important to right the past wrong. But the scholarship she established is important in preventing this from happening again.
@Martin Safe to say that Australia and Hawaii did not need discovery, they were already there inhabited by people. T
@Martin The Captain/Cabin boy analogy is a useless one. Bell showed the data (the island) and Hewish said it was interference (not an island). Only once Bell changed the equipment to read the source in a better way did more evidence come out. And the captain once again said "not an island". Bell did all the work on equipment set up by Hewish. Under this logic, when a telescope discovers something new, is it the scientists using the telescope, or the telescope builders, that get the nobel? Bell discovered Pulsars, plain and simple. Hewish working alone would consider it "interference" and probably rebuilt the project after not being able to remove said "interference".
@Martin Some would say they were already discovered by their inhabitants. Comparing Dame Susan Jocelyn Bell to a cabin boy is dismissive and belittling. She helped build the array. She was there reading and interpreting all the data. So, she helped build the boat and navigated it and kept the log. He dismissed what she was telling him more than once. Worst of all, he sat back while the press treated her like a piece of meat, making no interruptions or intervention on her behalf. Besides, a Nobel Prize back then was only about a million dollars. She ended up with the 3 million. I think she won more money and more respect in the end.
Had she not insisted that it was not interference as they had said and kept on looking for evidence to prove it , these 2 men would have had nothing and would have won nothing. Truly unjust.
Great comment. That is exactly why the Nobel for discovering pulsars should have gone to Bell. She took an aberrant signal to her supervisor, who eventually won that Nobel, and he said it was just interference. That was the end of it, for him. But she continued to look for supporting evidence that it was not simple interference, and found it. She took that evidence to Hewish, and suddenly both he and his boss were interested. Left to those two men, pulsars might have remained covered up in the reams of "interference" signals. Bell discovered pulsars by uncovering more of them, even though her boss Hewish said she had only found ordinary interference. The first tiny bity of evidence of their existence was denied by Hewish and his boss, yet Hewish gladly dressed up in tails and accepted the Nobel and the money prize that went with it, as if he had actually done the work of uncovering pulsars instead of Bell.
Wonderful. I am not an academic, and have had very little to do with academia, but I am aware that it is a horribly competitive field, and I mean horrible in the pejoriative sense. There are some remarkably large egos out there, making a lot of collective noise - their own little quasars you might say. Lovely to hear of someone who despite being used so terribly, has such generosity of spirit. Many thanks for posting it. I think I will pass it on to some who are involved in stem.
What an inspiring story! Id love to see a full length historial film about her life
I almost teared up hearing about the injustice she had to go through, don’t worry Jocelyn Bell I will never forget you!! And you are a good person at heart that beats any nobel prize winner any day of the week.
Injustices? My god, victim complex much? This sort of stuff is super tame.
Pull yourself together son
@@networknomad5600 Yes injustice! If you don't recognize that you are sexist.
Same. That must of been awful. It would of been so easy to just quit. Thank god she kept going.
I would claim a pretty well known story. I am totally unaware of astro physists... except Neil degrasse, Hubble.. you know. I knew it was a woman and if I know... EVERYBODY KNOWS (I think) That "bosses" gets/takes the credit for employe/ "underlings" works is nothing new AND IT IS STILL SO. All research you have a "boss" and LOADS of "underpaid" people working on the problem, the person credited NEVER DID IT ALONE. Only Ayn Rand "believes" people do things alone (or CAN DO) Everything is built of knowledge gathered by others and NOT A LOT CAN BE DONE by a single human without tools made by others... with other skills in their fields. The reason this is a "thing" and what I would object to is this is a SPECIFIC example and it is used as a "men supress women issue" I would say... that guy would have taken the credit for the research NO MATTER OF THE GENDER of the person who figured this out. It is NOT a gender issue it is a "power issue" and it exists today. In regards to the Nobel Prize... that is a bit on the side here BUT generally if you work for somebody and figure something out *THEY OWN IT AND HAVE THE IP* So SONY did this or TESLA did that... Companies do not do ANYTHING, people do... and the company, university etc normally either take the crdit themself OR the head of the project gets/take the credit. My point... not really a gender issue YES there are gender issues but this one is NOT SPECIFICALLY gender orientated. Basing pensions on working years... that is a gender issue since mothers often works less during their life because they birth children. And really without new people... who will by my old car... and fund my retirement...
I remember learning about the discovery of pulsars in high school. And in the textbook there was a picture of Jocelyn Bell, stating that she had discovered them. She won't be forgotten
Studying science and engineering is hard enough in this age, she studied it in an age when there were no computers, let alone internet where you can access an entire library. On top of that she had the strength to conquer the emotional trauma of men taunting her. If this is not greatness, I don't know what is! If not for Physics, she deserves a Nobel prize, maybe the Nobel prize for peace!
I was deeply moved by this and must confess that I never knew of the name Jocelyn Bell Burnell. I am grateful to know her now and although I am no scientist, I am very touched by her story and will always remember her contributions and beautiful spirit. Thank you for posting this. And thank you, Jocelyn, for being a role model I admire.
Imagine how many dreams have been fried in home economics classes. Mrs. Bell's parents were amazing.
pun intended with the word 'fried'?
True. A life as a homemaker is below a woman worth her salt. She should be working, and hire various women not suited to other work, to bring up her children.
@@dixonpinfold2582 well if you're a parent, despite your gender, you still have an obligation to take of your children. Better yet, if you're more career orientated, just don't have kids. There's always a time in your life when you can get married and/or have kids, you can just wait till you're successful.
I longed to do carpentry but I was made to do home economics and sewing instead. Wish my parents had been aware enough to fight for me. Think I will do a carpentry course now I am retired 🤔
Or you can do both!
I have the greatest admiration for Jocelyn Bell Burnell, not only for her discovery, but for the strength of character in rising above the betrayal by her tutor and finding fulfilment in her subsequent work. A fascinating film, thank you!
Can Tony Hewish even be thought of as her tutor? I don’t think so. If I rightly recall from the film, she described him as “the guy with the money…“ I don’t think he’s worthy!
@@liondoor4554 you are right; he described her as one of the students under his supervision, but she was working pretty independently from the sounds of it, and he only became interested when she had made that amazing breakthrough.
Unfortunately, what happened to Dr. Bell Burnell still happens all the time in science, where the person with power takes credit for the inspiration, work and skill of others. It happens within academia, but also industry. It happens to women, but also to men.
fascinating story and reflection in film. With much appreciation from Bangkok, Thailand. 8/08/21
@@camplethargic8 hmmm just like the Ancient Greeks and Romans took the credit for mathematics, and Astronomy from the Ancient Africans.
Tremendous respect to Dr. Bell and kudos to the producers who made her beautiful story live and give us something meaningful to ponder upon.
What an inspiring person. It is a shame she did not get recognized for her discovery but history will look upon her as the real discoverer of radio pulsars and history will forget about those who stole the recognition from her.
Amazing. My little girl is only one but I will see to it that she knows who Jocelyn Bell Burnell is when she looks up to the sky.
That made me teary eyed ❤️
@@shena1256 God knows how this planet would have been like if we hadn't silenced the many unheard women scientists ( I don't use female ).
@@PHlophe (I love language and am very picky about words used. Would you mind telling me why you don't use 'female'?)
Oscar, your daughter picked the right dad.
She is so beautiful she made my cry... especially when she was vindicated as part the the discovery she is so humble and full of grace. We need more humans like her
She is so incredibly beautiful! Like, more than I ever imagined a person could be, so humbling.
Beautiful from inside, or beautiful like the way the press portrayed her for the sake of dumbfk-masses?
"but if doesn´t shine in your face, you don´t see anything" with her picture created a beautiful analogy
I'm in tears. This is such a beautiful short documentary. I truly relate by heart when she said "I would work my very hardest, so that when they threw me out, I wouldn't have a guilty conscience." I'm a minority in my work field (girl in audio engineering), and I can relate my experiences w/ Jocelyn Bell's. People easily overlook accomplishments the minorities make but will look for the tiniest mistake that we make and make it like it is a great deal of disaster, hence justifying their belief that the minority group doesn't belong in their work area. Thank you for you perseverance despite all that has happened to you. I just read about the universal map used pulsars as the sign posts for its direction towards earth (the one they put on a golden disc in Pioneer-10). It didn't occur to me that pulsars were discovered not long before that!
i support equal participation of women in the male dominated jobs that they conveniently don't want to do like construction, fishing, plumbing, etc!!!!!! There is too much oppression of women there less than 1% participation is way too misogynistic
she made me cry too. such dignity in the face of such shoddy behaviour. perhaps her quaker background gave her such grace?
I visited The Royal Society in Carlton Terrace recently and Dame Jocelyn’s portrait hangs at the top of the grand staircase. She’s there along with Newton, Faraday, Dirac and a hundred other scientific and mathematical greats.
An so she should be, God Bless her,
I was wondering about this, thank you! My daughter will be amazed!
that's pandering. she isn't really equal to them. if she wasn't the intern monitoring the equipment then anyone sitting there would have seen it first.
@@frankyflowers It's one thing to see it and quite another to recognise that it's something worth investigating - Hewish discredited the signals as interference; something mentioned in the film.
@@Jablicek yeah with dramatic music playing. come on.
What an incredible person. She literally decided to focus on the bigger picture and do her best to prevent barriers for future generations.
there was no focusing tool nor was there a picture, so there's nothing 'literal' about it. but yes, she's incredible ;)
Inspiring from the start and even more so at the end.
We need such role models in life! Thank you for being there and doing your work to promote your field.
She should get an award just for being one of the tiny minority of people who knew what they wanted to do before they left school. I'm 38 and have no idea.
Same. I wish there was a detailed, exhaustive test we could take that would help us know what we want to do and that we would actually be good at.
"I was pleased that pulsars were considered important enough to rate a Nobel Prize." That there is a scientist, in her essence. Dr. Bell, I work in a totally different discipline and nevertheless you made it easier for me to get taken seriously as a female academic. Thank you.
So just to be clear, Tony Hewish insisted that what they observed were just interference, but because of Jocelyn Bell's conviction that it was something else, Pulsars were discovered? I know it was very rare at the time to give women any credit for anything, but unless Tony Hewish (at 97) set the record straight and insist on sharing the Nobel Prize with Jocelyn Bell, history will only remember him as somebody that took credit for somebody elses breakthrough.
They likely won't, though. I suspect many will remember Hewish as whatever they heard about him in their own readings and meanderings... unless they stumble upon this and learn otherwise. Like those outside of the science community, I didn't know about Ms. Bell or her contributions to science until 5 minutes ago, so as of 5 minutes ago, I didn't know Tony Hewish was a thief. There's a wonderful line from the song "Wonderful" from the musical "Wicked": "Is one a crusader or ruthless invader? It's all in which label is able to persist." Even though the truth matters, the label shouts over the quiet truth, which is the crux of the problem. Ideally, the label would match to reflect the truth. The pendulum always swings from side to side, so we'll get there at some point.
A guilty conscience can be comfortably carried a very long time by a disingenuous person.
Yes we need to right the wrong! It is still not too late.
@Martin Her dogged determination alone should have been recognized as the sole catalyst to the discovery.
Sharing the prize would be the thing. But I don't think he'll alter his stance. How badly we need role models of men showing how to grow, change and improve without fear of losing! In fact there is so much to gain!
What a sad classic. Brava Jocelyn for your scientific integrity! So incredibly touching to see how your face lighting up when thinking that your discovery was important enough to reach the Nobel Arena, and truly enjoying that as a reward. You care for science. He cared for his ego. Brava for who you are and for turning this injustice into new opportunities for new students. Glad that you left Cambridge then...that castle was already taken by a (insecure) king.
I'm always in awe of people who know what they want to do from a young age. I'm 40 and still don't know what I want to be when I grow up. 😅
She epitomizes Luciano's words "Imagine what a world it would be if everybody gives as much as they would like to get". She is a model not only in science but humanity.
So true!!!!
The whole POINT of this video is that; as a girl, she was nearly blocked from giving her best. Translate that to minorities and the poor, all blocked thanks to, for instance; the New York Times not actually being liberal, just accepting that label from others so that they can drag the rest of us to be just a bit more conservative and in fact (despite this video); supportive of the pecking order.
A fascinating story, still relevant today, and should not be forgotten.
The nature recently reported on the issue.
@@brandonlu6763 The report, but it happened long ago.
It actually isn’t relevant today, and neither are pulsars really.
It isn’t relevant today. Women are in a much better position in society than men in modern times. In fact, there needs to be some movement in the other direction now.
@@networknomad5600 In some parts of the western world there is equality, yes. The world is bigger than your neighborhood though.
I just discovered this today… and was stunned that I had never heard of Jocelyn Bell before…considering my fascination with all things astronomy…these are my kind of celebrities and you just added one to my list…have come across tales on Katherine Johnson,Mary Jackson,Hedy Lamarr ….supremely intelligent women that shone through close minded societies….but now to know more on the first person to observe and document pulsars….I am positively gushing…..thank you so much for this…
I am so glad to have stumbled upon this video. This lady is such an inspiration, not only for her work ethic and determination in analyzing the data and pursuing an explanation rather than caving into her professor's lack of vision, but more especially for her perseverance in life despite the injustice of it all. She is a wonderful role model not only as a scientist but also as a human being. Not only for women but also for every human being.
If I were lying on my death bed, as a Nobel Prize winner, but knowing that I had not given or shared appropriate credit, I think I would feel a fraud. For eternity.
sadly not everyone has your integrity
You said it well...
Well, someone would need a conscience for that; he doesn’t 😑
Luckily, _your_ eternity is quite limited if you are indeed on your death bed.
In my opinion R. Feynman refused the nobel prize because of similar reasons
“I do think it’s important for there to be role models for young women, so OK I’ll be it” so powerful
Yeah, and smiling!
Whilst truly being a role model of noblesse to mankind
Believe it or not Cub', right at the end of the video I started to scroll down the comments and read your post at the exact same time as she spoke the words. Spooky for sure !!
astonishing piece of work. I knew the story but this is best exposition of it that I have seen; it is a real tear jerker. Well done and thank you. It should be compulsory viewing in every school in the world ....
Really good documentary short, thank goodness we live in (somewhat) more enlightened times now and I'm glad she finally got some recognition for her discovery.
She's such a strong, brilliant, inspirational human being.
agree
@@zebra.babes123 More than agree, she discovered PULSARS! one of the many fascinating objects that are beyond the celestial dome. It pains me to hear these things happend in the past, we where a barbaric species back then, I hope now women can look to thier dreams with stars in their eyes and a fire of passion burning in their hearts, as with me. She is the Wonderwoman.
@Fam Alam nah its the opposite
@Fam Alam oh i havent heard a single one about it so tell me further🤔🥱
@Fam Alam btw was ur comment even necessary to put under this vid? u seem out of the topic my boy🤨🤷♀️
My own daughter is now a radio astronomer working with the Pathfinder Meerkat radio telescope thanks in part to the pioneering spirit of Jocelyn. Thanks to her and her intellect, females are in the main now seen as equal at least in this field of science.
That’s wonderful to hear, but that isn’t the case in genetics. Most, but not all, of the men I’ve worked with feel entitled to take credit for my work.
@@JB-xx3vp So since the first discovery nothing have changed...
As an astronomer and a father I congratulate you! I hope my daughter will follow the path these great women cleared.
@@HotaraTakeo nothing has changed? Have you even looked at the reports of them? Or even done at research into why they are important? Obviously not, pulsars are almost perfect clocks, some can glitch and anti glitch. Thier properties are beyond my level of comprehension, but they are VERY important and are part of my research. We have the internet, use it for data, rather than cat videos.
@@snikrepak Dude chill. I was replying to JB comment on state of genetics field for women
What an amazing human being. Thank you Dr. Bell for your diligent work in astronomy. You are a true inspiration.
The most important video I have ever seen! THANK YOU and BRAVO, BRAVO, BRAVO!
What a great soul this lady is. I'm glad her passion was stronger than all the obstacles she encountered, and that she did get some support from good people. And thanks to the filmmaker for making this movie!
Watch this in its entirety, and be prepared for a COMPLETE PARADIGM SHIFT on EVERYTHING YOU HAVE BELIEVED TO BE TRUE UP TO N-O-W! kzhead.info/sun/arKjm7KZe4SGi68/bejne.html
@@richardblack9067 I watched it. Didn’t have a “paradigm shift”, but I almost had a seizure from LAUGHING SO HARD!! Flat Earthers are the *DUMBEST OF THE DUMB!* The Global Village Idiots! It’s astounding to witness people who revel in their own stupidity and wilful pig ignorance! But, I suppose it keeps you all off the streets! Lol! 🤪😂😆😜🤣😎
@@richardblack9067 And btw, Mark Sargent is almost as ludicrous a figure as Eric DUMBay! The difference between them is that Sargent is a deliberate con man and blatant fraud, whereas Dubay is too thick to be a con man, I think he actually believes the absurd piffle that he pushes.
It was my honor to meet Jocelyn Bell Burnell a few years ago at an astronomy conference. She is a class act and still fighting for the underrepresented.
so long as the underrepresented have the correct set of genitals
You are an astonishing role model and an amazing women and radio astronomer. I feel outraged on your behalf being put down and robbed of your award and recogntion due to you at that time. And finally when an award does arrive your generosity of spirit dignity altruism intelligence shone brighter even than those breath taking pulsing quasars you discovered!
masterful work, a beautifully presented story, and the music fits every second of it like a glove.