KZhead

Inside Taiwan’s Strategy to Counter a Chinese Invasion | WSJ

The Wall Street Journal
2024 ж. 18 Мам.
1 544 231 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

For decades, Taiwan has looked to its east coast as a safe haven to survive a Chinese invasion until allies, particularly the U.S., can arrive to assist. In the east, Taiwan’s rugged mountain terrain also helps create a natural shield in the event of an attack. But China’s PLA activity on the island’s east has thrown that strategy into question.
WSJ takes a look at how serious China’s threats to Taiwan’s east coast are and explores whether the island needs to change its defense strategy.
0:00 Taiwan’s current strategy
1:38 The problem
4:15 Taiwan’s reliance on allies
News Explainers
Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.
#China #Taiwan #WSJ

Пікірлер

  • Everyone in these comments is a retired 5 star general. How lucky of Taiwan to have all these experienced combat planners.

    @AK-ky3ou@AK-ky3ou9 ай бұрын

    • lol!

      @roadracerdave7645@roadracerdave76459 ай бұрын

    • dont worry these people are think the same with ukraine, they think ukraine can easly win just because they have all nato and american weapons LOL

      @privacyhelp@privacyhelp9 ай бұрын

    • Hahaha, it's entertaining tho reading top notch admiral level opinion in the comment section.. 🤣

      @hijosalih@hijosalih9 ай бұрын

    • They wish they were 😂

      @bellavista643@bellavista6439 ай бұрын

    • There is a saying in my language: "After the battle, everybody is a general". But in this comment section you can substitute it with "before battle". :D

      @miloslavfarsky9881@miloslavfarsky98819 ай бұрын

  • Omg how I missed reading comments from the world's finest military advisors.

    @asmith841@asmith8419 ай бұрын

    • It would be funny if China just shower Taiwan with long range missiles for 3 days straight and Taiwan just surrender before the US can send their first gun

      @khoamama88@khoamama889 ай бұрын

    • @@khoamama88 ye, the issue with taiwan has always been kmt working with ccp.

      @GBR9794@GBR97949 ай бұрын

    • They also have Medical degree in Virology😂

      @youarebeingtrolled6954@youarebeingtrolled69549 ай бұрын

    • @@GBR9794you know kmt fought a civil war right? Unlike dpp who sided with japan in ww2😂

      @youarebeingtrolled6954@youarebeingtrolled69549 ай бұрын

    • ​​​@@youarebeingtrolled6954they also don't realize that Japan literally used Taiwan as a staging ground where they then attacked China during ww2. This is why many Chinese in the mainland disliked Taiwan.

      @YTStopCensoringFreedomOfspeech@YTStopCensoringFreedomOfspeech9 ай бұрын

  • It’s crazy that in his age he’s that dialed into modern strategy… that guy has been around 3 times as long as me, but only has so much knowledge it’s incredible.

    @Silverscream1965@Silverscream19657 ай бұрын

  • If there is one thing I learn about war , it's that war is extremely unpredictable

    @abCd-lx8df@abCd-lx8df9 ай бұрын

    • But more predictable: Henry Kissinger Quote: “To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”

      @chriswong9158@chriswong91589 ай бұрын

    • If I was Xi Jinping I would be conducting military drills off the coast of the USA, and set up nuclear missiles bases in Cuba!

      @blake9358@blake93589 ай бұрын

    • "No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy." -- Carl von Clausewitz

      @pedrob3953@pedrob39538 ай бұрын

    • @@pedrob3953 Wrong though

      @fracapolligummala3548@fracapolligummala354816 күн бұрын

    • @@chriswong9158 Because Putin's friend is safe?😂

      @amitkenan3878@amitkenan38785 күн бұрын

  • The problems of a full scale invasion of Taiwan is well known, but a maritime blockade of Taiwanese ports is somewhat more complicated. It will most likely not have a full military response by the US, but equally the US would not be able to supply Taiwan either. How long could Taiwan survive such a siege?

    @alst4817@alst48179 ай бұрын

    • The US would just send in a convoy of supply ships. China would have to choose between firing on US Navy vessels, causing a war they have no hope of winning, or letting the US Navy supply Taiwan.

      @CedarHunt@CedarHunt9 ай бұрын

    • The US would do a maritime blockade of China. China would be out of oil in 60 days.

      @barryraymond9004@barryraymond90049 ай бұрын

    • A siege with a constant barrage of shelling, propaganda speeches, and millions of PLA troops.

      @ChadSimplicio@ChadSimplicio9 ай бұрын

    • ​@@CedarHunt China can easily crush the entire USA in conventional warfare. In no way USA either denies this fact. Nobody dares fight against China man to man on ground in any scenario. And on naval front, China can easily block the entire sea by laying mines all over. China can even blow American ships with missiles directly and deny straight forward of its involvement.

      @ajaykumarsingh702@ajaykumarsingh7029 ай бұрын

    • @@CedarHunt if China decides to start the war the most sensible thing would be to block US Supply routes, this could be mines in the sea

      @Berkeli@Berkeli9 ай бұрын

  • I really agree. Distributed network warfare demands many more distributable, expendable and networkable delivery systems that can easily pick up and move to different locations.

    @gregoryvangaya8971@gregoryvangaya89719 ай бұрын

    • They need to do everything because no matter how much they distribute, they are all on the island. Which is why in order to survive the initial surprise attack, they need to keep forces outside of Taiwan, North, South and East of Taiwan. China will probably also use swarms of helicopters and planes to get lots of people there quickly.

      @dtsai@dtsai9 ай бұрын

    • @@dtsai you're not wrong. I think a break-in defense is a great idea in this situation... It is often a great tactical strategy, but in this case especially, good call.

      @gregoryvangaya8971@gregoryvangaya89719 ай бұрын

    • I think they’re wrong about trying to have A2AD in the ocean though. The PLA Navy far outguns the Taiwanese, trying to fight at sea would be disastrous for Taiwan. Instead they’re better off using the defence advantage at the shoreline and using their ships to secure routes of resupply and reinforcement. D-Day showed us just how costly opposed amphibious landings can be. A relatively small defending force can hold up and damage a much larger one with massive consequences. Furthermore, D-Day came when theLuftwaffe was nearly nonexistent as a fighting force. Provided that Taiwan could preserve its air forces in the opening hours of the attack, they could rain air power down on the landing zones with devastating effect and quick turn around while the PLAA and PLAN would be relying on carrier and mainland based sorties for air cover.

      @dynamo1796@dynamo17969 ай бұрын

    • I actually disagree. An invasion is not even close to being possible and both sides know this. Russia couldn't cross rivers. 100 miles of ocean is a death sentence. There is no way to land ships against modern anti ship missiles. If China was serious about invasion they would be building a much more massive like 20x larger helicopter fleet to transport troops. But they are building a generally useful military not one optimized for invasion. Far more likely is a blockaid and ballistic missile attacks until Taiwan gives up. And countering this requires symmetrical assets not asymmetric ones. This is why Taiwan has moved towards consentrating on their own ability to threaten the Chinese mainland. It is a more effective deterrent. Amphibious landings against modern weapons are a joke proposition.

      @peterisawesomeplease@peterisawesomeplease9 ай бұрын

    • @peterisawesomeplease I agree…so tired of hearing about the military might of Russia and China. It’s been grossly exaggerated for decades.

      @68Tboy@68Tboy9 ай бұрын

  • The island of Taiwan's secret weapon strategy is actually the rumbling of over 600,000 Colossal Titans.

    @FRISHR@FRISHR8 ай бұрын

  • Showing ones strength to an adversary and having it well known is the key to any deterrence. Many wars including much of WW2 would never have happened if the attacking side really knew what they were up against.

    @hawssie1@hawssie19 ай бұрын

    • in ww2 the allies showed weakness through appeasement. usa was out of the picture. russia had a pact with germany. the west today shouldnt make the same mistake again.

      @MrRay168@MrRay1689 ай бұрын

    • Not quite. Hitler really was stupid enough to have started a war anyways. His generals told him it was suicide, even while the offensive in the east was still going well.

      @goliathsteinbeisser3547@goliathsteinbeisser35479 ай бұрын

    • trumps whole philosophy of peace thru strength

      @kickassandchewbubblegum639@kickassandchewbubblegum6399 ай бұрын

    • Switzerland is mountainous and armed to the teeth. It has underground (under rock) shelters enough to house it's entire population. Fortress Switzerland has not been successfully invaded in what... 600 years? Minefields can make life precarious for ships. And there is a proposal to nuke the three gorges dam floating around. Best idea is to not invade.

      @francoistombe@francoistombe9 ай бұрын

    • Not really this perspective doesn’t really make sense until the Germans attacked the Soviets and the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor the war was happening for 2 years before both of these events

      @mattbanco4406@mattbanco44069 ай бұрын

  • Being an island was a blessing in 1949 but not in 2023 since the island’s survival depends on US transports to sustain the resistance. In all war game scenarios US & allies were not able to keep Taiwanese sea lanes open without directly attacking assets on the mainland and risk starting WW3. Unlike Ukraine, supplying Taiwan would be nearly impossible once the war breaks out.

    @datianlongan5567@datianlongan55679 ай бұрын

    • Why are Americans talking about wars and invasions at length? China can just go about its business and ignore them.

      @northernsamba7388@northernsamba73889 ай бұрын

    • @@northernsamba7388 China should ignore them but they don't. They fire missiles over the island, discuss "reunification", and Chinese territory.

      @michaelhutchings6602@michaelhutchings66029 ай бұрын

    • This missiles are for American warships.@@michaelhutchings6602

      @northernsamba7388@northernsamba73889 ай бұрын

    • I don't see why firing on the Chinese mainland would be an issue. If China attempts to stop a US Navy convoy headed to Taiwan, then they've already started WW3, and China has already lost.

      @CedarHunt@CedarHunt9 ай бұрын

    • As a Chinese, America won be able to do anything really. If it does, then china has 1000's of Hypersonics to level most of the major US cities into rubble. Infact dropping one mega nuke on the yellowstone volacano alone will make US uninhabitable for centuries. American's need to remember they are fighting China not some insurgents in the middle east with their pet goats.

      @wigglyk2796@wigglyk27969 ай бұрын

  • I hope Taiwan never gets invaded. The free world stands with you.

    @amyiyen@amyiyen9 ай бұрын

    • like those NATO voted NO for Palestine join the UN?

      @xiaozhong5198@xiaozhong51986 күн бұрын

  • The war in Ukraine has demonstrated that unmanned aerial weapons, MANPADS and drones will play a far more significant part in any future conflicts. Taiwan should be building up these resources

    @Mikeandlucy1@Mikeandlucy19 ай бұрын

    • Oops China is the world largest producer and exporter of Drones...

      @rationalthinker2200@rationalthinker22009 ай бұрын

    • buy more DJI

      @billyong6878@billyong68789 ай бұрын

    • ​@@billyong6878DJI is the biggest drone industry of China, which is banned by US government when the USArmy was trying to buy and use DJI

      @riza-2396@riza-23969 ай бұрын

    • 99% of combat drone by both sides are from China.

      @zhangjason7477@zhangjason74779 ай бұрын

    • Taiwan has in fact supplied mortar-round carrying drones to Ukraine.

      @j2h226@j2h2269 ай бұрын

  • I hope the peace can continue 🙏

    @davidclark314@davidclark3147 ай бұрын

  • I like how Taiwanese admiral left sea drones part out. Which can become the most painful point during the warfare. This can disrupt supply and blockade military forces at no cost. Ukrainian war showed the effectiveness of that weapon.

    @emmanuilushka@emmanuilushka9 ай бұрын

    • Care to check who’s the world’s largest drone manufacturer?

      @DY-fy2jh@DY-fy2jh9 ай бұрын

    • @@DY-fy2jh Although China has more aerial drone capabilities and presumably that might transfer to marine drones too, it's also true that their USVs aren't going to have as much targets as Taiwan's will. Taiwan could use USVs against incoming Chinese ships.

      @poppinc8145@poppinc81459 ай бұрын

    • I don't think that was a mistake. Many of the most sensitive details critical to any military operation tend not to be brought up, at least for now. Unfortunately, China is also aware of drone capabilities. Last I heard, they were testing a supposedly civilian small cargo ship that just happens to be capable of doubling as a remote drone carrier. Not sure what's the status on that, but yeah, the future arms race looks very drone-intensive for all sides.

      @Pouncer_Fox@Pouncer_Fox9 ай бұрын

    • ​@@poppinc8145 Chinese are not stupid. They will entirely crush Taiwanese military sites with millions of missiles even before any actual invasion.

      @ajaykumarsingh702@ajaykumarsingh7029 ай бұрын

    • Turkey already has one I believe

      @Curtis69213@Curtis692139 ай бұрын

  • informative! great production 👏👏

    @3066961@30669619 ай бұрын

    • Learn more about the Taiwanese perspective on this matter: kzhead.info/sun/i8aoks2hnp6td2w/bejne.html

      @taiwanplusdocs@taiwanplusdocs9 ай бұрын

  • Spot on... He's absolutely right. Many , small makes overwhelming very much more difficult.

    @petermcgrath5215@petermcgrath52159 ай бұрын

  • Let's be honest, a major portion of Taiwan's strategy for dealing with China in the event of an invasion involves drawing the United States into the conflict.

    @DanVerley@DanVerley8 ай бұрын

    • Do you think India , Japan and Korea would stay out of it or get involved?

      @ramjam6934@ramjam69348 ай бұрын

    • @@ramjam6934 I think Japan is already preparing for it. They have been building their military up recently. Korea would depend on what North Korea says and does. I have no idea what india would do tbh. I also don't know if any of them have a treaty with Taiwan similar to ours.

      @DanVerley@DanVerley8 ай бұрын

    • @@DanVerley I meant South Korea but yeah I imagine it would be interesting to see what either would do

      @ramjam6934@ramjam69348 ай бұрын

    • I know you mean South Korea. I was saying that what South Korea does will depend on what North Korea says and does.

      @DanVerley@DanVerley8 ай бұрын

    • @@DanVerley true and vice versa

      @ramjam6934@ramjam69348 ай бұрын

  • It doesn’t take much to interrupt the ship to shore movement. Once that happens the elements on the far shore are in deep trouble.

    @Dog.soldier1950@Dog.soldier19509 ай бұрын

    • It's not ship to shore movement you need to worry about, it's the ten thousand drones per day and PHL-16 rain you need to worry about.

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • ​​@@vlhc4642Worry about both. But in the end, ship to shore will be what determines everything. Bombing campaigns rarely ever force an enemy into submission. It's the invading force that does that job.

      @SuperCatacata@SuperCatacata9 ай бұрын

    • The most worry thing happen, if china attack taiwan it will effect ecomony the whole word, it devistate more than rusia-ukraine war.. the increase price + inflation + supply food + oil + tech suply + electronic etc its scary

      @zakb7418@zakb74189 ай бұрын

    • @@SuperCatacata You know the word "siege" came from the Latin word "sit", as in to "siege" a fort is to sit back and wait til they surrender under your blockade. Taiwan is an island with just 2 month of fuel, you don't actually need any bombing campaign to force them into submission. The bombing campaign just helps convince them to submit faster.

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • @@vlhc4642 best for China to just send special forces planted inside Taiwan in to capture DPP leadership. Then begin blockade.

      @Western_Decline@Western_Decline9 ай бұрын

  • "Relying on allies to come to their aid", meanwhile those allies are building their own chip manufacturing plants so that they don't rely on Taiwan anymore....

    @philo8035@philo80359 ай бұрын

    • this means nothing... lol

      @banger2998@banger29989 ай бұрын

    • only 5 nm will be built outside of taiwan.

      @touchme211@touchme2119 ай бұрын

    • Therefore, those allies will be dependent for several decades and have strong motive to send soldiers to die in Taiwan.

      @psikogeek@psikogeek9 ай бұрын

    • With or without microchips. USA wouldn't go to war with a nuclear armed giant like chinaa. That would be suicidal.

      @Superpo0oper2020@Superpo0oper20209 ай бұрын

    • Opps, we accidentally gave Nuclear weapons to Taiwan.

      @barryraymond9004@barryraymond90049 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan needs to talk to the Swiss about their tunnels

    @ghoststark5685@ghoststark56859 ай бұрын

  • interesting how his strategy speaks to the individual warrior on the battlefield in the 21st century. Many small units with some real punch doing major work.

    @d36williams@d36williams7 ай бұрын

  • You need anti ship wall and air defense and drone defense. Long range anti ship and artillery .

    @caregazo2100@caregazo21009 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan's strategy is to rely on the US, that's it lol

    @youtubehub8190@youtubehub81909 ай бұрын

    • Yankee globalists love to get others to die for them, a la Ukraine

      @chasx7062@chasx70629 ай бұрын

    • @@chasx7062 Well Taiwan's strategy getting Americans to die for them, so we seem to be at an impass.

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • @@vlhc4642 they will die first i think..the US wont send soldier to die in taiwan..only weapons..like ukraine..

      @jeffbolton2986@jeffbolton29869 ай бұрын

    • Taiwan can threat U.S. into submission by accepting a peaceful unification term with China and hand over their entire chip manufacturing capacity to Chinese if U.S. dare not come to help.

      @jntiger1981@jntiger19819 ай бұрын

  • Asymmetric warfare against tanks with hand held missiles is easy, but there hasn't been a hand held missile ever produced that can sink a warship. Only a Harpoon like missile is capable of putting a warship to the bottom of the sea, by basically splitting the ship in two. This can't be done with a hand held missile.

    @dexterplameras3249@dexterplameras32498 ай бұрын

  • There a good reason why the US and her allies in the region are making a new island defensive chain system. The goal of it to basically dismantle the China navy during it invasion. Making China force to choose between striking at a American carrier strike force or the defensive front that can do not only cripple but has the potential to stop the invasion with short range strikes onto it fleet.

    @niko-fr9of@niko-fr9of8 ай бұрын

    • You mean like the QUAD? Where Japan was vocal about not interfering (Orianna Skylar) for fear of retribution? Or India, who's best buds with Russia? That's why Aukus was formed btw, no one in Asia is going to fight US wars lol

      @accountantthe3394@accountantthe33948 ай бұрын

    • ​@@accountantthe3394India might have close relations with Russia, but that has never been true for the Chinese.

      @paulcruz168@paulcruz1687 ай бұрын

    • ​@@paulcruz168lmao??? The Chinese and Russian are kinda buddies. Many believe in India and abroad like you that USSR or Russia has always been a friend to India... But do you know a very lesser known fact? Just before the 1962 Indo China war.. The Chinese Premiere spoke to the Russian Premier and informed him that a possible invasion of India was brewing. The Russian Premier Delayed the delivery of Mig 21s to India which cost us the war. It was one of Russia's deliberate attempts to Please Beijing and choose Beijing over NCR(National Capital Region of India). If an imminent war breaks out now..... Then India will have to face China alone without Russian help. This is exactly the reason why India is steadily shifting towards the West and also Arab and African nations and even SEA and Australia, Japan, Korea.

      @amukherjee9514@amukherjee95147 ай бұрын

  • In Taiwan's case, every single million in their defense budget is completely justified

    @jacques4703@jacques47039 ай бұрын

    • the problem is they spend it on weapon and not soldier. which is why alot of their pilot quit and went to the mainland. if war break up, taiwan has no reserve pilot to draw from.

      @lagrangewei@lagrangewei9 ай бұрын

    • Even the weapons are not delivered after long wait?

      @sneakymove@sneakymove9 ай бұрын

    • Knowing how much the CCP is breathing down their necks, they’re not investing nearly enough in their defense. It’s quite astounding.

      @X3MAntics@X3MAntics9 ай бұрын

    • LIke the their single amphibious assault ship they spent billions on for photo-ops?

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • 😂YES ! U$A "care" about Taiwan . drones for Taiwan cost 1.5 million drones for India cost 1 million

      @happymelon7129@happymelon71299 ай бұрын

  • I always thought they used the dam doomsday strategy to protect themselves

    @AvuncularMicah@AvuncularMicah9 ай бұрын

    • USA doesn't want Taiwan to have Nukes. But perhaps in the interests of peace, Taiwan could get The Rods of God up in space that would only be used when necessary.

      @dtsai@dtsai9 ай бұрын

    • @@dtsai I was referring to the destruction of the three gorges dam

      @AvuncularMicah@AvuncularMicah9 ай бұрын

    • @@AvuncularMicah That does seem like a very good deterrence strategy similar to having nukes. However, they do not yet have the capability to certainly penetrate the air defences and deal enough damage so it fails massively. Dam is a hardened structure and has many ''layers'' so it isn't even know how much damage you actually need to do for it to fail.

      @arturturkevych3816@arturturkevych38169 ай бұрын

    • @@arturturkevych3816 it’s not my plan .

      @AvuncularMicah@AvuncularMicah9 ай бұрын

    • @@AvuncularMicah I know that it isn't:) It's a possible strategy for Taiwan to have deterrence.

      @arturturkevych3816@arturturkevych38169 ай бұрын

  • Why mankind still sees war as an option is beyond my comprehension. 😔

    @JS45678@JS456783 ай бұрын

    • All living things fight each other, including bacteria, monkeys and lions. It's just a cruel part of our nature

      @amitkenan3878@amitkenan38785 күн бұрын

  • China, just leave the island alone... we're all happy with peace

    @hector.abrach@hector.abrach9 ай бұрын

    • Geopolitics gonna geopolitic

      @McCaroni_Sup@McCaroni_Sup2 ай бұрын

  • they need more modern submarines as well

    @blacksheepdog6969@blacksheepdog69699 ай бұрын

    • Water is too shallow

      @bigvaxmeanie925@bigvaxmeanie9259 ай бұрын

    • Nope

      @dogger37JC@dogger37JC9 ай бұрын

    • They are building their homemade submarines, which will be ready for testing this Sep...

      @kianono3209@kianono32099 ай бұрын

    • the sub model?

      @billyong6878@billyong68789 ай бұрын

    • They need to stop becoming the pawn of the US if they don't want to die for the elites making money from these conflicts

      @Cheesecake99YearsAgo@Cheesecake99YearsAgo8 ай бұрын

  • A good video to recommend after I just booked a flight to Taipei 😅

    @mitss@mitss7 ай бұрын

  • Their strategy is still in the 1970s, while their equipments are mostly old trashes from 1940s to 1960s... Imagine using WW2 submarine in 2023

    @riza-2396@riza-23969 ай бұрын

  • Even small army can defeat bigger army by right plan and technology.

    @madgaming2811@madgaming28119 ай бұрын

    • 中国制造能力超强 二战时期全拉满都比不上现在的中国 直接发射火箭炮和导弹 把台湾打烂就行了

      @user-fn1cr1wf6o@user-fn1cr1wf6o9 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan needs lots of torpedos and anti ship missiles and maybe even seamines

    @paulweiler8967@paulweiler89679 ай бұрын

    • so many oil ships routes surround this area, seamines and torpedoes can easily backfire.

      @user-sk7rt4qu7b@user-sk7rt4qu7b9 ай бұрын

    • you need to come to help us

      @terrytang7641@terrytang76419 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-sk7rt4qu7bThe ship routes are mostly Chinese. I don't think many non-Chinese ships would even use the Taiwan Strait during a war scenario.

      @Nn-3@Nn-39 ай бұрын

    • and Sea Drones

      @dancidchen@dancidchen9 ай бұрын

    • @@terrytang7641i think we would more likely ship out the people and blow up the factories

      @dingus6317@dingus63179 ай бұрын

  • Unfortunatily Taiwan is too close to China.

    @abarthspider3479@abarthspider34799 ай бұрын

  • exposing their own strength and strategic areas, a deadly mistake

    @jeromebahala6360@jeromebahala63608 ай бұрын

  • I am following Kings & Generals' Pacific campaign that was fought between Japan and the Allies. It's mind boggling how many amphibious assaults both sides conducted throughout the campaign. And in between those assaults, you have the successful ones, the not-so-successful ones, and the failed ones. Then there were so many battles fought just to resupply the armies already landed. From the Japanese side, you have the early 1942 campaigns where they conducted so many amphibious landings all around the Pacific - from Philippines, to Malaya, to Dutch East Indies, Guam, Wake, and so on. And then the US did the same from Guadacanal to the Pacific islands, all through Iwojima and Okinawa. And that's just the Pacific campaign - there were amphibious operations done in the European theater too by the Allies - the North African landing, the Sicilian landing, the South France landing, and of course the famed Normandy landing. Even Germany conducted some amphibious assault in their invasion of Norway and the airborne operations of Cretan assault. The amount of experience accumulated by not just the US but Japan and other belligerents in amphibious assaults were immense. Meanwhile, China has conducted 0 amphibious assault in modern time. Can they excel in their first try by just learning from military history? If the generals and its officers were first rate students and implementers of those studies, maybe?

    @awonoto@awonoto9 ай бұрын

    • In fact, what you call those experiences have long been lost in the dust of history, and modern Westerners only have the experience of the war on terror, and everyone is at the same starting line in the great power war

      @user-hd1oy5gi6x@user-hd1oy5gi6x9 ай бұрын

  • The Wall Street Journal clearly cares more about the Taiwanese than the Americans in Hawaii.

    @huas5350@huas53509 ай бұрын

    • i know the answer! cuz people in Hawaii has freedom! they will be fine, right?

      @shawnz3307@shawnz33079 ай бұрын

    • @@shawnz3307 Yes, it is true to have the freedom to be burned to ashes.

      @huas5350@huas53509 ай бұрын

    • And the CCP troll army cares more about fires in Hawaii than the flooding near Beijing. Crazy world we live in. 🙁

      @tannerhuxtable6118@tannerhuxtable61189 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan: Why thank you WSJ, I guess we die now.

    @theni3762@theni37628 ай бұрын

  • The music is pure fire 🔥🔥🔥

    @MrVenc-ef8fm@MrVenc-ef8fm9 ай бұрын

  • When PRC attack, ROC must show they can hold the island on its own during the early stage of the fight, if not USA may also bomb TSMC facilities to prevent PRC get hold of the facilities. Potentially getting bomb by both enemy and friend. What a tough position.

    @aragon5@aragon59 ай бұрын

    • I have never thought of bombing tsmc, that is crazy. Considering this means PRC loses either way.

      @miloslavfarsky9881@miloslavfarsky98819 ай бұрын

    • 😁美国轰炸台湾是对中国的战争行为，你考虑过后果吗?我们的对等报复，就是清理掉日本韩国中的美军基地，而且事先向全世界通报。

      @rayhuang6155@rayhuang61559 ай бұрын

    • TSMC has been known to have self-destruct mechanism in the event of war. To prevent technology transfer to any invading party.

      @VinLim@VinLim9 ай бұрын

    • I thunk they already put selfdestruct button at the facility..just in case of attack

      @jeffbolton2986@jeffbolton29869 ай бұрын

    • US will force TSMC move to US before the war. And offer green card to engineers and their families..

      @wanxuhui@wanxuhui9 ай бұрын

  • It doesn't matter how many times the Chinese regime repeats the *lies,* - Taiwan 🇹🇼 is still a sovereign country.

    @ArabicReja973@ArabicReja9739 ай бұрын

    • Taiwan has a official name: republic of CHINA

      @bofu1009@bofu10099 ай бұрын

    • your country and the government on taiwan itself -like all governments - does not call nor claim taiwan is a sovereign country no matter how bullied you were by chinese kids back in grade school.

      @mxn1948@mxn19489 ай бұрын

    • @@mxn1948 Taiwan is a sovereign nation.

      @prairiepatriot2162@prairiepatriot21629 ай бұрын

    • @@prairiepatriot2162 your not arguing with me. you're arguing with the government on taiwan, which is the Republic of China. free free to email them and tell them and the RoC isnt real and that "taiwan" is a soverign nation

      @mxn1948@mxn19489 ай бұрын

    • @@mxn1948 LOL! Are you really trying to tell me that Taiwan doesn't think they're a sovereign nation? What country are you from anyway?

      @prairiepatriot2162@prairiepatriot21629 ай бұрын

  • China attacking Taiwan would be like people with muskets attacking people with machine guns

    @toi_techno@toi_techno7 ай бұрын

  • Always be prepared, but I think China learned it's lesson in the 1950's to not invade Taiwan.

    @thereare4lights17@thereare4lights179 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan needs to hide weapon assets in shipping containers. Very hard to pick out which to destroy if there are tens of thousands of them.

    @Erik-rp1hi@Erik-rp1hi9 ай бұрын

    • I don’t know if Mainland China wants to invade Taiwan, but I know the Americans won’t be spilling blood and steel to defend Taiwan. Just look at the homeless drug addicts in SF and you’ll know what a disaster we are in here.

      @typicalKAMBlover21@typicalKAMBlover219 ай бұрын

    • They could also use mobile semi autonomous underwater cruise missile batteries using liquid fuel propulsion.

      @JoeyBlogs007@JoeyBlogs0079 ай бұрын

    • Also semi autonomous underwater long range torpedoes. They could automatically surface to recharge their batteries once a month, using a thin film solar panels on their surface.

      @JoeyBlogs007@JoeyBlogs0079 ай бұрын

    • Also about 200,000 drones with AI vision and object targeting with autonomous engagement.

      @JoeyBlogs007@JoeyBlogs0079 ай бұрын

    • You clearly dont know what is blockade. No shipping route for taiwan during wartime.

      @cainiaowu@cainiaowu9 ай бұрын

  • It’s not getting mentioned much but the Panama Canal is experiencing a lot of issues. The Pacific Ocean sits higher than the Atlantic so ships need to pass thru 3 lock gates. Due to droughts only 32 ships can pass thru a day with draft or weight limits in place to preserve fresh water. This could seriously limit the US ability to resupply or move assets

    @mikebarnes1239@mikebarnes12398 ай бұрын

    • What do you mean by the Pacific Ocean sits higher than the Atlantic Ocean? I know the lock gates are there to level the boats with the fresh water lakes in Panana but I'm curious to know your answer to my question.

      @eduardoramirez9162@eduardoramirez91627 ай бұрын

    • True but the fact that you know this means the US military already has it figured out.

      @Izzy-qf1do@Izzy-qf1do7 ай бұрын

    • Interesting, thanks for sharing. 👍

      @lpg12338@lpg123387 ай бұрын

    • The naval assets we'd need to put china in its place are already in the Pacific. This isn't 1945 when most of US assets were centered on the East Coast. We have major bases in Philippines, Japan, Korea, already. They would all be attacked preemptively by china if they expect to survive more than a week. (Those attacks would also result in a defacto state of war between China and S Korea, China and Japan, and China and Philippines- forcing china to stretch its resources even further). Not to mention bases in the remote pacific islands like Guam midway Hawaii etc. Unlike any other major nation, the US doesn't really need to fear direct attack on its homeland. That means we can send large portions of our collective assets to one region, and not leave ourselves open to attack. So many nations rely on the US for their national security so if the US is actually attacked (as it would be if china invaded taiwan) many would immediately come to the aid of the Americans. Australia is in a similar position as S. Korea and Japan, concerned over China's aggression. I believe they would similarly step in as they've been building up their military as well in preparation of this conflict. The UK joins us in most of our wars anyway. Should Aus be directly engaged, then the UK would be as well. In a defensive war such as this, Canada and Germany would similarly join. Obviously all would if Article 5 is activated but IIRC it is not automatically activated if the attack on a NATO nation occurs outside the north Atlantic. However, most nato nations wouldn't care about that distinction in the event of a sizable attack such this. Finally, trumping all those factors is one simple factor: microchips. For some stupid reason, no one realized what a stupid idea it is to have all the world's microchips made in one spot. Even if that one spot were as safe as, idk... Kansas, it would still be an all eggs, one basket situation. Now let's put that basket right next to our biggest rival. Granted we didn't know they'd be our biggest rival until about 10 or 20 yrs ago, but still we knew they sought to recapture taiwan. Regardless, we've had at least a decade to start building those microchip plants here. Some would be coming online now had we done so. But we are really only starting to do so now. Bc we've allowed our internal squabbles dominate our focus. Even when we aren't squabbling domestically, large portions of us say we need to only focus on ourselves and stop policing the world. Which is true, of course, but we don't have that luxury yet. I fear we adapt too slowly sometimes. This is such an enormous ship - by far the biggest ever built - this ship of state turns very slowly. It accelerates slowly. It's slow to stop. And its captain is never the best person for captain; its captain is the person best at becoming captain.

      @burtan2000@burtan20005 ай бұрын

    • @@burtan2000 WOW! That was an outstanding reply / comment, well done! 👍

      @lpg12338@lpg123385 ай бұрын

  • more effective would be to offer a $20 bribe to all air and navy personnel to get lost, confused or accidenty throw ammo over board.

    @meditationsoundscapes5203@meditationsoundscapes52039 ай бұрын

  • Hey, technically, the civil war started in 1946 didn't end, there wasn't a ceasefire agreement, the civil war was simply paused by the Korean War and Korean War didn't end either.

    @GH-xt5df@GH-xt5df8 ай бұрын

  • We are currently seeing in Ukraine how anti-ship missiles can be a cheap, powerful deterrent against navies. The Russian Black Sea fleet won't come within 150 km of the Ukrainian controlled coast.

    @jeremywilson2875@jeremywilson28759 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan's best best second layer of defence is autonomous AI attack drones that don't solely rely on GPS. They would have inertia, GPS, magnetic and terrain map navigation and AI target object recognition and be immune to electronic warfare. They would be snipers and Kamikaze mix of drones, small, medium and large.

    @JoeyBlogs007@JoeyBlogs0079 ай бұрын

    • AI is the latest shiny new thing, but suddenly it's everyone's most tried-and-true friend?

      @manofsan@manofsan9 ай бұрын

    • Russian lancets are best Taiwan should buy thousands of Russian lancets

      @ROTHSTEIN01@ROTHSTEIN019 ай бұрын

    • That wont happen. Russia is aligned with China.

      @JoeyBlogs007@JoeyBlogs0079 ай бұрын

    • @@manofsan Yes AI will change the future for the better especially when we can make it living

      @Dad-lu1oi@Dad-lu1oi9 ай бұрын

    • LOL, and China can out produce Taiwan here like what, 20:1 or is it 30:1? Not to mention China has like what, 10x as many targets? LOL.

      @tomk3732@tomk37329 ай бұрын

  • Comparing total soldier numbers is misleading, as China could not commit all of these troops to battle, whereas Taiwan could, as it has no other enemies. One needs to consider it is the 3rd largest nation and has a land border of 22,117 km border with 14 countries. In particular, India might take advantage of any depleted troops to recover and gain territory. Of course, it would still be able to outnumbered Taiwan, but this needs to balanced a defending force that just needs to hold out for a few weeks while its allies mobilise.

    @A190xx@A190xx8 ай бұрын

    • India doesn't not have the logistics to travel far into Tibet At most they only 3 to 5 days of supply on average for high mountain ranges 😂 And India has not forgotten about how British treated India before independence and how the US treated India when it needs weapons during the cold war They are not gullible enough to be the next pawn of the west lol But who knows MSM knows how to educate Americans about interfering other countries' affairs Example: doing it for freedom and democracy 😂

      @Cheesecake99YearsAgo@Cheesecake99YearsAgo8 ай бұрын

  • Well its not just about reppelling. Its cutting the enemy off from supply. You make it so costly and get then to over commit. So they take Taiwan. How long can they hold it? How many reinforcements, supplies, ships, etc... can china lose after they decide to take the island?

    @OEFarredondo@OEFarredondo9 ай бұрын

    • I mean you have to remember that Russia, North Korea and others are siding China. They won't put ground troops, but they will aid them if China runs out of resources.

      @JulsHorrorStories@JulsHorrorStories25 күн бұрын

  • Why not both? As we shift our focus to the pacific, we should be able to access hundreds of billions in more funding to put towards taiwans defense.

    @jhonklan3794@jhonklan37949 ай бұрын

    • Why not? It’s not like Americans need those billions for infrastructure, healthcare or housing….

      @angus7278@angus72789 ай бұрын

    • koreanistan vietnamnistan afghanistan ukrainistan taiwanistan usanistan - the end

      @bobevans9996@bobevans99969 ай бұрын

    • money cant solve that, in spite of what your reddit education tells you. 700BN is put towards ending homelessness, biden just signed 100bn infrastructure, and we put more of our taxes to healthcare than any other country.@@angus7278

      @jhonklan3794@jhonklan37948 ай бұрын

  • As long as there is a need to defend one's self or one's country, we are not civilized yet.

    @SocietyNeedsImprovement@SocietyNeedsImprovement9 ай бұрын

    • its a human thing has nothing to do with being civilized

      @millennium677@millennium6779 ай бұрын

    • ​@@millennium677 Speak for yourself.

      @dianahill5116@dianahill51169 ай бұрын

    • @@dianahill5116 Man woman black white gay straight doesn’t matter who’s in charge war is in our blood and it’s a part of human nature and no matter how hard we try we can never change human nature

      @millennium677@millennium6779 ай бұрын

    • @@millennium677 Speak for yourself.

      @dianahill5116@dianahill51169 ай бұрын

    • @@millennium677 There is no such thing as human nature. Humans behave differently across cultures. Among the Amish for example, there are nearly no reported murders. It is scarcity that creates viciousness between organisms, and it doesn't stop with humans.

      @SocietyNeedsImprovement@SocietyNeedsImprovement9 ай бұрын

  • Step 1: Build Giant Death Robots Step 2: Build Costal Walls Step 3: Flood the planet Step 4: Choose Synthetic Technocracy Step 5: Spam Step 1!!!

    @husseinalmashhadany@husseinalmashhadany9 ай бұрын

  • Keep Spreading The Love ❤

    @TheBeltwayBandits@TheBeltwayBandits9 ай бұрын

  • How can the U.S. refuse to recognize Puerto Rico as a soveriegn nation, but they do for Taiwan?

    @DistrustHumanz@DistrustHumanz9 ай бұрын

    • Because in open and free elections, Puerto Ricans overwhelmingly reject independence. The only real debate there is whether to keep the status quo or whether to apply for statehood.

      @IrishCarney@IrishCarney9 ай бұрын

  • ...no amount deterrence would work if China really decide to go for it.

    @KPAU07@KPAU079 ай бұрын

    • Ten foot walls are no match for eleven foot ladders.

      @Stinger522@Stinger5229 ай бұрын

    • @@Stinger522 with their collapsing economy , China can only afford 2 foot ladders, so Taiwan will be fine

      @aliali-ce3yf@aliali-ce3yf9 ай бұрын

    • @@aliali-ce3yf A faltering economy dies not stop someone from going to war.

      @Stinger522@Stinger5229 ай бұрын

    • @@aliali-ce3yf Collapsing at a rate of 5.5% GDP growth and 7.3% retail sales growth, as has been for the last 20 years

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • ​@@aliali-ce3yfThis is my first time seeing a Gordon Chang fanatic, how many years? decades has it been? Did China collapsed? I guess 1% is higher than 5%

      @jackminao2060@jackminao20609 ай бұрын

  • I’m convinced that the US should give Taiwan a combination of 250 Pershing missiles and stealthy Cruise missiles. Then give them a minimum of 2000 anti-ship missiles.

    @bret9741@bret97419 ай бұрын

  • The Chinese would certainly stop attacking after the first loss. The problem is : when do you think they will admit the first loss ? May be never. So I wouldn't rely to much on that.

    @vivianvaldi7871@vivianvaldi78719 ай бұрын

    • China will continue to say they won even after giving up

      @SpacemanGreg@SpacemanGreg9 ай бұрын

  • don't forget that Japan is almost finished establishing its 'Missile Wall' in North-East of Taiwan

    @monoken@monoken9 ай бұрын

    • never heard that before, what's that?

      @xDomglmao@xDomglmao9 ай бұрын

    • theyre plonking missiles on their southern islands near taiwan which china, has claims to itself.@@xDomglmao

      @danny2039abxhd@danny2039abxhd9 ай бұрын

    • @@xDomglmao a term I believe was said by Johnny Harris on Japan heavily militarizing the Ryukyu Island Chain where they installed Long Range Missiles capable of reaching the Taiwan Strait or the mainland China. reference: kzhead.info/sun/o9CBgrZ-f4yVmWg/bejne.html

      @monoken@monoken9 ай бұрын

    • thanks to both of you! @@monoken

      @xDomglmao@xDomglmao9 ай бұрын

    • the question: will they involved?

      @wangyaohan8824@wangyaohan88249 ай бұрын

  • The war in Ukraine really showed how far war has gone in terms of technology. With the drones, hypersonic missiles, etc. Taiwan must take great care not to underestimate its opponent here.

    @marksnyder7255@marksnyder72559 ай бұрын

    • Taiwan, as Ukraine, is not opponent. They are just pieces to be sacrificed by real opponents.

      @boobo@boobo9 ай бұрын

    • Thats not close to accurate for every hyper sonic and every super drone there are a 100 toy drones with a grenade very low tech. They have dug miles of trenches and shoot old arty at one another daily ww1 style. Ukraine mobilized an additional 700k men, Russia 300 k men over a million men dig holes and throw shells day and night not advancing but a few meters. Old tanks have been brought back to serve , plowing forward head on, War reverted if anything.

      @TP-ie3hj@TP-ie3hj9 ай бұрын

    • @@TP-ie3hj China will wallop the US. The US Lost the war in Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, how are they going to beat China in their own backyard, Goodluck

      @blake9358@blake93589 ай бұрын

    • @@TP-ie3hj This is definitely the most advanced we’ve seen in a war yet. Lower tech is being used due to low supply and high risk of losing newer more valuable assets. It’s not as spectacularly advanced as many would’ve liked to believe we are capable of at the moment, but to date it’s the greatest showing for military technological advancement in a large scale war, absolutely. Cyber warfare, extremely challenging logistics, integration of drones on a scale we’ve never seen before (even underwater drones capable of blowing up bridges), Patriot missiles and s300/400’s on opposite sides of 4th gen fighters going at, what other modern war has showcased a technological level this high? There are weapons being used for literally the first time ever, how is it possible it’s not the most advanced lol

      @marksnyder7255@marksnyder72559 ай бұрын

    • I may simply be mistaken about what you first wrote. I would not disagree with what you have here. Two near peer combatants not seen for quite some time , not on this scale. Yes Kinzhals vs, patriots, the Himars and LACM strikes. Leopards versus T90, KA 52 versus cv90... very much a modern battlefield in that sense. So much so that the Bayraktars and many other wonder waffen have canceled each other out. Leaving the war down to the infantry and arty like the wars of old. The attention grabbers like the IED jet ski, and the kids toy with rpg duct taped to it is not what I would call high tech. Just necessary. Very low tech and took it that you were stating these variants are why you believed it to be high tech.

      @TP-ie3hj@TP-ie3hj9 ай бұрын

  • and they all lived happily ever after

    @blanne9628@blanne96289 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan needs to adopt a Finland-style, whole of society defense.

    @gallaxian@gallaxian8 ай бұрын

  • Lee is basically describing the porcupine strategy and it's pretty much the consensus of military experts now. There is however still a political dimension: shiny F-16s falling out of the sky are more potent and recognizable symbols of American friendship than generic rocket launchers.

    @modash1231@modash12319 ай бұрын

    • You might want to rephrase your "F-16's falling out of the sky" remark.

      @b_ks@b_ks9 ай бұрын

    • A much better strategy is to play nice with China and do not force their hand - this way Taiwan can stay semi independent for decades.

      @tomk3732@tomk37329 ай бұрын

    • @@tomk3732 That is the current strategy. While decades ago Taiwan wanted to declare independence and the only reason they did not was the US threatening them to stop aid. Now they don't even think about independence and have record trade with China. Status quo is not the worst outcome for both parties and can last indefinitely

      @arturturkevych3816@arturturkevych38169 ай бұрын

    • @@arturturkevych3816 Now US however, wants to make Taiwan go independent - tables have turned. Status quo is of course best for China and Taiwan but not so much for US.

      @tomk3732@tomk37329 ай бұрын

    • @@tomk3732 The US does not want Taiwan to go independent. There haven't been any signals from Washington for them to move towards independence. How would war benefit the US? China is it's biggest trading partner and that war is likely to drag the US in with huge risks and consequences. What Americans want as well is maintaining the status quo.

      @arturturkevych3816@arturturkevych38169 ай бұрын

  • As a Taiwan citizen, we discuss more about whether the US will come to assist us, rather than how we can keep the invasion from happening or make it impossible. I think this video provides a great insight on how we can defend ourselves against china. This is more important than thinking about the US’s aid, since we can not change US’s decision effectively, but we can change the strategy and mindset to make Taiwan undefeated.

    @Apple_Inc.@Apple_Inc.9 ай бұрын

    • Don't be naive. It's not an issue could be settled by military considerations.

      @GavinQuan@GavinQuan9 ай бұрын

    • 我可太喜欢你们都参与抵抗了，能减少我们的治理成本。

      @user-fn7fd9zk3i@user-fn7fd9zk3i9 ай бұрын

    • Taiwan doesn’t take its defense very seriously. It’s spending is far below what it should be.

      @darbyheavey406@darbyheavey4069 ай бұрын

    • What is the chance of you fighting against Mike Tyson and win 😅

      @bellavista643@bellavista6439 ай бұрын

    • @@bellavista643 If your metaphor is correct and matches the reality, than why Mike Tyson doesn’t just come to fight us and win without a doubt?

      @Apple_Inc.@Apple_Inc.9 ай бұрын

  • Drones. Stockpile drones and C4. Drones are a cheap and effective troop multiplier.

    @maxidaho@maxidaho9 ай бұрын

  • The idiocy of mankind is truly astounding. Instead of peace and prosperity, help and solidarity to each other we rather spend money or wars.

    @maticherzog@maticherzog8 ай бұрын

  • ... we should maybe not share this with China ...😂

    @ravikro012@ravikro0129 ай бұрын

  • What will US do ?

    @ROTHSTEIN01@ROTHSTEIN019 ай бұрын

  • This is not an invasion, Taiwan is an autonomous province of China, like Tibet. Taiwan never received paperwork or contract proving its independence.

    @derekbehr8365@derekbehr83658 ай бұрын

    • Because the PRC stated they'd invade Taiwan if they declared formal independence.

      @dietcoke6492@dietcoke64928 ай бұрын

  • Did I hear Armor Wehicle? Must be some advanced system?

    @johnnevin7759@johnnevin77598 ай бұрын

  • Invasion😂 ,please learn the history of China, Taiwan was separated from mainland China due to civil war, and the civil war has not end😢

    @Patric-ds2jx@Patric-ds2jx9 ай бұрын

  • 🙏,God bless🇰🇷🇺🇲🇹🇼🇵🇭

    @GaryLa585@GaryLa5858 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan 🇹🇼 will never renounce the right to annihilate China if it's invaded.

    @lastChang@lastChang9 ай бұрын

  • Anti missile and aircraft system is the key

    @baraclude@baraclude9 ай бұрын

    • Nah Long range missles are going to saturate those systems Which China has plenty of to counter US interference 😂

      @Cheesecake99YearsAgo@Cheesecake99YearsAgo8 ай бұрын

  • Taiwan don't blow your budget on stuff like tanks, fighters and naval vessels. You should be building thousands of drone boats and aerial drones. Your battle plane is to unleash waves of drones to destroy the invading fleet as well as China's infrastructure. By the way, you also need to trust your citizens and start arming them.

    @jontsang7334@jontsang73349 ай бұрын

  • The strategy should be to cause massive losses to the PLA when crossing the strait, to prevent the PLA gaining a toehold on the Island.

    @rolopolo66@rolopolo669 ай бұрын

    • The PLA isn't going to blindly rush across the strait like Gallipoli or even Normandy.

      @tritium1998@tritium19989 ай бұрын

    • PLA can easily lose 10 thousand drones a day crossing the strait Can Taiwan afford to lose 10 thousand SAM a day?

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • @@beeperbeeperson lol, wow,. First Taiwan isn't where all transistors come from, Taiwan makes most 5nm and below processing chips used in phones and GPUs, and drones processors use 28nm chips, maybe 14nm at most, and the vast majority of chips are power transistors, power regulators and radio modules that uses even bigger nodes. In other words nobody need Taiwan to build drones. Second China is one of the worlds largest maker of 28nm chips, has been mass producing 14nm for a few years now and just started mass producing 7nm. DJI has been under US sanctions for 2 years now, did they care? Three, drones needs a lot more than just chips, you need cameras, radios, batteries, motors, motor drivers, and composites. Taiwan has none, its' all China. The only way Taiwan can build any drone is to buy from Aliababa, infact they had a scandal last year where they had to send their military drone to mainland China for repairs.

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • @@vlhc4642 China doesn't have 10 thousand drones with the range to cross the Taiwan strait. The cheap commercial quad copter and small fixed wing drones being used in Ukraine can't travel anywhere close to that far. And you don't need SAMs to counter drones. Ukraine is very effectively countering slow moving drones with small arms fire and mounted machine gun fire (anti aircraft guns). The German supplied Gepard anti aircraft gun is very effective.

      @user-ow1bn6qv8q@user-ow1bn6qv8q8 ай бұрын

    • ​@@user-ow1bn6qv8qis it effective or did the MSM said it is effective ?

      @Cheesecake99YearsAgo@Cheesecake99YearsAgo8 ай бұрын

  • Honestly Taiwan’s main goal needs to be keeping its anti-ship missiles alive during the opening CCP missile salvos launched pre invasion If they’re still left with the majority of their stock, any invasion is next to impossible. Even if China manages to land troops on the mainland, crucial logistics ships within 100km of of the coast would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Guns win battles, logistics win wars

    @maclain728@maclain7289 ай бұрын

    • Nah, China would do island hopping - i.e. it would get closer and closer to Taiwan. Eventually Taiwan would loose its missiles or run out. They could not make any more as their factories would be on fire. Also China has nice asymmetric methods to transport a lot of troops.

      @tomk3732@tomk37329 ай бұрын

    • There won't be any "opening missiles salvos", you're talking about a country that builds 20 thousand drones a day in peacetime just for commercial use, if they start shooting it's just one giant salvo that last however long it takes until there's nothing to shoot at anymore.

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • Can’t China just release a million ship drones and bleed Taiwan’s anti ship missile stock dry?

      @flyinpug3791@flyinpug37919 ай бұрын

    • @@tomk3732 Then the US LRASM assets come into play and obliterate those "assymetric methods". Multiple wargames have played out showing that in the first 2 months both US and CCP would run out of missiles but it would come at the cost of 80% of the Chinese navy and Taiwan holds off against a CCP landing, even in the worst case scenario.

      @kali7148@kali71489 ай бұрын

    • @@kali7148 You don't need a simulation to figure out who would win in the long run - China. Why? They have well over 2x production capacity of US. Just like in WWI and WWII the stronger wins. Its that simple. And to make it worse for US - China is only getting stronger vs. US.

      @tomk3732@tomk37329 ай бұрын

  • Excellent

    @Nooneself@Nooneself9 ай бұрын

  • Chinese: write that down write that down

    @dogeboi1804@dogeboi18047 ай бұрын

  • If the PLA lands on Taiwan, asymmetrical warfare is the only hope Taiwan has. However, Taiwan needs enough anti-ship, surface to air, and surface to surface missiles to defeat any PLA force from landing on Taiwan. These missiles need to be stocked on Taiwan, dispersed across the island. PLA ships should have to run an impenetrable gauntlet to reach the island.

    @markstrickland8736@markstrickland87369 ай бұрын

  • What a wildly different world we would live in IF Taiwan was in control of the mainland.

    @FritzMoney@FritzMoney9 ай бұрын

    • En un mundo vendido a los intereses de eeuu, el unico imperio que ataca en todo el globo mientras acusan a los otros que no hace nada

      @BahamuyPY@BahamuyPY9 ай бұрын

    • EEUU promueve ideologias degenerativas y destructivas como los lgbt y muchos otros. Viviriamos en un mundo podrido.

      @BahamuyPY@BahamuyPY9 ай бұрын

    • China's GDP would be 3 times the size of USA. You need to thank CCP for holding CHina back.

      @ylstorage7085@ylstorage70859 ай бұрын

    • Thank the Japanese empire for screwing over the Republic of China, which at one time did rule the country.

      @ChickensAndGardening@ChickensAndGardening9 ай бұрын

    • The case is that now Taiwan is completely independent and wants nothing to do with China.

      @EbuzzNYC@EbuzzNYC9 ай бұрын

  • Both Taiwan and PRC never said they stop the civil war. So ‘invade’ is not precise, continue attacking is better

    @chenguo4937@chenguo49377 ай бұрын

  • The war for Taiwan is basically going to be BF4 irl

    @bryceallen1334@bryceallen13349 ай бұрын

  • cheapest solutions are Best Solutions. Cheap anti ship Drones & Manpads can do enormous damage to PLA, PLAN efforts to takeover without collateral damages. Make this war very hard & expensive for CCP with body bags going back into Mainland

    @ravindersoi4654@ravindersoi46549 ай бұрын

    • I agree 👍

      @rusinventures@rusinventures9 ай бұрын

    • FOR WINNING PEOPLE'S LOSER ARMY NEEDS TO FIGHT & I DOUBT THEIR REAL FIGHTING ABILITIES 😅😅😅😅😅.

      @moneywisefinserve268@moneywisefinserve2689 ай бұрын

  • PLA does not need to take the entire Taiwan. What stopped them from partitioning the island?

    @adaml3809@adaml38099 ай бұрын

    • Becouse that would probably be the worst case nightmare scenario for the PLA. First they take heavy losses landing and taking a part of Taiwan, and now not only do they have to deal with local insurgencies, but there is still a part of the island where the enemy has their forces and can constantly launch small attacks on your positions. They either don't land at all or take the whole thing, anything in between would be a huge pain.

      @bleflar9183@bleflar91839 ай бұрын

  • With powerful lasers, drones are a nothing. Mount many more anti ship low altitude anti ship missiles on the west side. Also make sure you have stealth satellites keeping full analysis of the straights. Landing ships take a lot. Also, make sure water, electricity and food are secure in mountains.

    @hiddenname7272@hiddenname72728 ай бұрын

  • This conflict, if it happens is SO MUCH more important than Ukraine.

    @shalashaska5851@shalashaska58518 ай бұрын

  • China will never attack Taiwan unless one of the following 1 Taiwan declares referendum on independence 2 develope its own nuclear program 3 external forces to assist in the island independence. ... if none of that... stay clam and carry on

    @alanccvoo@alanccvoo9 ай бұрын

    • What happen to HongKong? Communlist China cant be trusted.

      @GaryLa585@GaryLa5859 ай бұрын

  • If the strategy is outdated, the US can help them upgrade their weapons.

    @danielmario962@danielmario9629 ай бұрын

    • better weapons don't win wars - usa itself lose all the time🤣

      @bobevans9996@bobevans99969 ай бұрын

    • Like China did in the Korean war ahahaha with more troops even @@bobevans9996

      @LightForxes@LightForxes9 ай бұрын

  • The East of Taiwan is not safe thus I suspect that is the Reason why the US setup an EDCA site at the Philippines Northern most tip that is VERY CLOSE to Taiwan's East coast..

    @josemikhael378@josemikhael3789 ай бұрын

  • Their only and possible startegy hold and wait for japan and Philippines to join the war. They should draw as many allies as possible to this war to survive since having this two countries into the war would drag US and more countries to help.

    @bsit9439@bsit94399 ай бұрын

    • Guess if Japan's entry into the war will trigger the China-North Korea Mutual Assistance Agreement, guess in what direction North Korea's nuclear fish will be launched, and guess if Japan knows that North Korea's nuclear weapons won't hit South Korea or fail to reach the United States.

      @user-ye5rs7of1z@user-ye5rs7of1z9 ай бұрын

  • they still need significant upgrades to even have a chance at adequate deterrence and standoff capabilities but they should be fine if they take the threat seriously as they have a lot of backup - they need to have enough capabilities to preserve infrastructure, they need to do more exercises and sims and also enough gear to not just defend but strike back while trying not to escalate to ww3 scenarios, diplomacy and compromises can help out both china and taiwan and they need to work together ultimately while respecting borders, the status of china here is the real wild card - what will happen politically and economically to shape future relations - taiwan can try but china has to be receptive to solutions and compromise - it will take both parties to find a good outcome and also the west and allies need to find solutions and ways to work with china more productively going forward if they can all find middle ground and establish new period of detente

    @shephusted2714@shephusted27149 ай бұрын

    • there can be no compromise. Taiwan either has its autonomy or it doesn't.

      @ChickensAndGardening@ChickensAndGardening9 ай бұрын

    • What does china has anyway ? 😂

      @ROTHSTEIN01@ROTHSTEIN019 ай бұрын

    • CCP doesnt want to compromise, they want taiwan to surrender or die, because taiwan is a threat for CCP legitimacy.

      @hominemundus@hominemundus9 ай бұрын

    • @@ChickensAndGardening taiwan has autonomy now but they need to compromise with china to some extent and repair the relationship - it is incumbent on china to step back and use the relationship with taiwan in an economically advantageous and fair way - they do have a massive economic relationship and always have, if the current paradigm persists it is not going to lead to good things - both sides need to reset and that is the nature of compromise

      @shephusted2714@shephusted27149 ай бұрын

  • I think Taiwan should build trenches along the sides of the mountains and place machine nests and anti tank guns there… kinda like a Normandy situation 💯

    @Nicer_Ricer_JDM@Nicer_Ricer_JDM9 ай бұрын

    • what people don't understand is the cities are between the coast and mountain, if you retreat into the mountain, the war is over. China has no interest in fighting for control of the island. they just need to deny the separist control of the cities and give control of the cities to the Taiwan businessman who's businesses are in the mainland and will be loyal to Chinese interest. once the economic power of Taiwan is lost, the seperatist are no longer a major threat, yes they can terrorise the cities with hit and run attack, but that would only turn the people away from them like what eventually happened in HK where majority of HK people today oppose the separatist. public opinion can change easily.

      @lagrangewei@lagrangewei9 ай бұрын

    • ​​​@@lagrangeweicorrect! Taiwan only needs to make just 1 weapon, just 1 weapon and that is an anti-madwoman! Taiwan will save the two Chinas from their enemy's made pandemic which for so long has been spread everywhere in the world, called brother will fight brother, Chinese killing Chinese.

      @djunasidharta3812@djunasidharta38129 ай бұрын

    • I think they should all go to America to live That would solve the problem

      @wingkeungkong415@wingkeungkong4159 ай бұрын

    • ​@@djunasidharta3812I have confident the Chinese people winl find a way to solve the problem Actually this is not a big problem Chinese has incredible patient After the unification of China China still wait 50 years before took Hong Kong back

      @wingkeungkong415@wingkeungkong4159 ай бұрын

    • It's not 1944 anymore, they didn't have drone swarms in 1944

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

  • I would look at how other small countries defend themselves like Switzerland and Singapore and Israel.

    @carefulconsumer8682@carefulconsumer86829 ай бұрын

  • The US demands full access to international waters. If China expects to block access to the international waters around Taiwan, will they also expect to stop US freedom-of-seas navigation trips?

    @bigglesharrumpher4139@bigglesharrumpher41397 ай бұрын

  • It's funny to see ppl discussing various military strategies to deter China's unification of Taiwan in the comment section, when NATO doesn't have the ball to send a single soldier to fight Russia, a much weaker opponent than China

    @__daddy__@__daddy__9 ай бұрын

    • Unfortunately this is because our modren way of life and global economy does not depend on Ukraine, but it does depend on Taiwan. The incentives are immensely stronger. Additionally BECAUSE Russia is a relatively insignificant threat, the response is more proportional. If giving Ukraine financial and military support is enough, it is reasonable not to do more. I think this is suboptimal and I'd prefer to see more than 5% of the US military budget and our most dates munitions being sent, but this is harder due to complex laws and conflicting incentives.

      @JonathanGoggans@JonathanGoggans9 ай бұрын

    • Of course if NATO did directly fight Russia you'd scream that NATO are warongering imperialists.

      @IrishCarney@IrishCarney9 ай бұрын

  • I’m afraid that this isn’t going to be a easy feet for China. China has a military budget of 293 billion dollars with 2,510,000 military personnels while a 2023 US-led coalition currently have a military budget of 1,481 billion dollars ($1.48 trillion) with 20,594,361 military personnels. United States have 8 times more total troops with 5 times the military budget. Would be extremely hard for China to catch up to those types of numbers. Invasion wars are never a easy thing to accomplish, it’s rather hard to impossible I say. If somehow in a miracle China accomplishes this then China would go from being broke back to being officially whole again. But the likelihood of China being successful on taking Taiwan is between impossible and possible seeing that the Chinese would get outnumbered and defeated. But hey, I don’t claim myself to be a military expert I just based it on what I’m seeing in Ukraine and the potential firepowers involved in this Taiwan conflict.

    @X1GenKaneShiroX@X1GenKaneShiroX9 ай бұрын

    • There will not be anywhere near that amount of men on Tiawan. The island is too small and China will need to leave men on the mainland to secure its borders.

      @frog6581@frog65819 ай бұрын

    • US have 8 times more troops than China? Which universe do you live in.

      @vlhc4642@vlhc46429 ай бұрын

    • What mean 'Chinese invasion'? Taiwan people are also Chinese and have name 'Republic of China' )

      @kastus77@kastus779 ай бұрын

    • ​@@kastus77"China"? You must mean West Taiwan

      @nczioox1116@nczioox11169 ай бұрын

    • China has the geographic advantage of being right next to Taiwan while all the opposing military assets have to pass a Chinese blockade. 😃😃😃😃😃

      @John77Doe@John77Doe9 ай бұрын

  • In 1683, the Kangxi Emperor said specifically that “Taiwan is outside our empire and of no great consequence” and even offered to have the Dutch buy it back. Perhaps this is an inconvenient truth for the current rulers in Beijing. When Japan won the 1894-1895 Sino-Japanese war, the Qing government in Beijing agreed under Treaty of Shimonoseki that Taiwan would be ceded to Japan in perpetuity. The elites in Taiwan, including governor Tang Jingsong, sided with the local Taiwanese gentry and declared an independent Formosa Republic to forestall becoming part of Japan. 1949 Until the Present: Separate Existence From the abovementioned information it is clear that the claim “Taiwan has always been part of China” is dubious at best. It was always at the periphery - and most of the time outside the periphery - of the Chinese empire. When Communist rule was established on the mainland in 1949 the previous Nationalist Government fled to Taiwan and it has remained out of reach to Beijing since.

    @garyjohnstone6422@garyjohnstone64228 ай бұрын

  • Chinese military planners have watched Russia's invasion of Ukraine flail. This would be vastly more complicated. United States deference of PLA invasion of Taiwan should factor that in.

    @connorburns7288@connorburns72888 ай бұрын
KZhead