The Forgotten Largest Floatplane of All Time - CANT Z.511

2024 ж. 25 Мам.
133 629 Рет қаралды

With a streamlined, smooth aesthetic, classic Italian lines and excellent performance - it's hard to understand why the CANT Z.511, which already holds such the accolade to its name of being the largest floatplane of all time - has been largely forgotten. Today we take a dive into its history, and the reason why its name is scarcely mentioned in aviation circles today.
Consider supporting us on Patreon: / aviationdeepdive
Join our Discord community: / discord
Sources:
Civoli M., Aereoplani: Regia Aeronautica-Aeronautica Militare 1923-2003 (2002)
Thompson, Jonathan (1963). Italian Civil & Military Aircraft 1930-1945. New York: Aero Publishers Inc.
John & Elke Weale, Combat Aircraft of World War Two, Arms and Armour Press, London, 1978.
0:00 - 1:51 Introduction
1:52 - 4:36 Construction
4:37 - 11:42 Flight Testing and Career
11:43 - 13:13 Conclusion

Пікірлер
  • Sorry for the microphone quality on this one, am on holiday and forgot my high quality one! Feel free to join our Discord community! - discord.gg/WCevgcufwJ Consider supporting us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/AviationDeepDive

    @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • how do you make your thumbnails?

      @dinoconc@dinoconc9 ай бұрын
    • @@dinoconc With Keynote, I know it's not really designed for that but it's the best I have

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • I actually am italian, and i am lucky to have been a rower in to Monfalcone's port, exactly were the videos are taken from . I always knew about the story of these beasts : in the lagoon outside of the Port there are multiple structures today called "caregoni" because of their resemblance to big chairs, old peaple often tell us that that they were test moorings for these seaplanes. Another interesting thing Is that in my rowing club there Is a giant catamaran called "corsara" that Is propelled by 12 rowers , It was built in 1947 out of some scrapped seaplanes pontoons. I always wondered out of wich seaplane those pontoons came. Also, amazing video.

      @mad_maxj65@mad_maxj659 ай бұрын
    • FWIW we in American, when speaking of large aircraft, measure fuel in pounds, not gallons.

      @stratcat3216@stratcat32166 ай бұрын
  • Thank you. This floatplane was built in CRDA shipyard of my town; Monfalcone.

    @lorenzogiuliani9144@lorenzogiuliani91449 ай бұрын
    • Ma i cantieri CANT non erano a Trieste?

      @hyperboy990@hyperboy9908 ай бұрын
    • ​@@hyperboy990CANT aveva sede a Monfalcone, che al tempo era provincia di Trieste

      @lolloblue9646@lolloblue964612 күн бұрын
  • You did a fabulous job on researching this unusual airplane. It truly is a beautiful machine, and deserve to be remembered.

    @geraldtrudeau3223@geraldtrudeau32239 ай бұрын
    • Definitely, it's quite surprising how little this plane is really talked about!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • What a beautiful thing....say what you like about the Italians, but their planes looked gorgeous.

    @sengalsolutions7386@sengalsolutions73869 ай бұрын
    • Well…….some of them did and some not so much! Lol

      @armoredsaint6639@armoredsaint66399 ай бұрын
    • So are their women but they are a lot smaller!

      @jimdavis8391@jimdavis83919 ай бұрын
    • The Italians make everything gorgeous including their women

      @mazdaman2315@mazdaman23159 ай бұрын
    • ​@@armoredsaint6639Like some comments . re-😂.

      @martinbrode7131@martinbrode71319 ай бұрын
    • The Italians Were Left Behind In Technology And Tactics During World War Two

      @rameshbhattacharjee4374@rameshbhattacharjee43749 ай бұрын
  • What a beautiful aircraft from the golden age of flight, such a shame that it never had a real chance to spread its wings. Thank you for this presentation.

    @PiersLawsonBrown1972@PiersLawsonBrown19729 ай бұрын
    • Glad you enjoyed it

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • The decade 1925-1935 started with wire braced, fabric covered biplanes with fixed landing gear and open cockpits. This decade ended with metal stressed skin monocoque, cantilever monoplanes with retractable landing gear and fully enclosed cockpits. Amazing advances. Arguably made possible by increases in engine horsepower from about 180 to 900 hp.

    @mblaber2000@mblaber20009 ай бұрын
  • I just saw a DC3 with floats on. The Italians certainly have more style than anyone else.

    @holeshothunter5544@holeshothunter55449 ай бұрын
    • You've lost 2 more engines.

      @emanemanrus5835@emanemanrus58358 ай бұрын
    • That's more like a DC4 with floats.

      @RielMyricyne@RielMyricyne8 ай бұрын
  • I first saw this in an aerospace periodical from the 80's in a beautiful watercolor representation. It also had the last known sad picture of it burning on a lake after a late war raid. Wonderful informative video, on a beautiful, unique plane.

    @marcusott2973@marcusott29739 ай бұрын
    • Oh wow - I couldn’t a picture like that anywhere! If you know what magazines it was, or if you by any chance have it please let me know

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • @aviationdeepdive it was the German language Aero magazin I saw it in, but I just checked the copyrights, it seems to only be a translation of an English language periodical as the copyrights go to Marshall Cavendish Ltd. 1983 and Aerospace Publishing Ltd. 1982. They had a lot watercolor illustrations, which I'm sure come out of one artist studio, that have also been used in war plane picture encyclopaedias since the late 60's early 70's.

      @marcusott2973@marcusott29739 ай бұрын
    • @@marcusott2973 Interesting, I'll have to take a look, I try to compile as much info and photos as possible as this one of my favourite aircraft.

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • It really was a beautiful looking plane. Italians sure can design things.

    @AlbertaGeek@AlbertaGeek9 ай бұрын
  • Sheesh. As many of these aircraft vids as I've watched, I never knew about this particular aircraft. And it's one of the most beautiful, wonderful lines and balance, amazing performance, very ambitious project.

    @dougsmith6793@dougsmith67939 ай бұрын
  • This plane is just ridiculously beautiful, almost as if they’d gone for streamlining and designed it from the outside in. Not unlike their big-3 fighters: Macchi Folgore, Fiat G55, and Reggiane Sagittario. It seems unlikely they received inspiration from Fairey or Blackburn. There really must be something the the adage “function follows form”. Could also have been a world-beater in early civil aviation had it been refitted with retractable undercarriage. It might have been the Italian Constellation. 👍🏻

    @ThreenaddiesRexMegistus@ThreenaddiesRexMegistus9 ай бұрын
    • I agree in every aspect. This airplane is definition of elegance, it looks like balerine dancing on stage. Edit: and fighters serie 5(and c.202) were like majestic war steeds.

      @FifingFossil@FifingFossil9 ай бұрын
    • Really well put. My own thoughts entirely. It's like something out of a Fred Astaire film- can picture him and Ginger flying down to Rio on it!

      @phaasch@phaasch9 ай бұрын
  • Filippo Zappata, the engineer, is my ancestor! I have a lot of original drawings at home made by him!

    @giuliozappata1280@giuliozappata12809 ай бұрын
    • Oh wow, that's incredible! Anything you'd like to share, I'd be really interested to see them at aviationdeepdive@gmail.com Alternatively, we'd love to have you on our server! discord.gg/WCevgcufwJ

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive8 ай бұрын
  • Wow, just when I thought I had seen every aircraft built at that time here comes another one I knew nothing about. Thank you for this brief interesting story.

    @cellpat2686@cellpat26869 ай бұрын
  • Great channel and video, I’ll just point out that the R-2600 is a 14 cylinder engine, not 18. I’m only a stickler about this because it’s the engine we have in our TBM Avenger we fly around to air shows and such. VERY familiar with it. Sometimes I wish I wasn’t lol!

    @EstorilEm@EstorilEm9 ай бұрын
    • Ah you're totally right, don't know how that slipped through. That's awesome, you fly TBM Avengers to this day?

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • @@aviationdeepdive Yup, we are a CAF wing with a few other aircraft, but the Avenger is the one people really care about. 🙈 Our radius is usually ~250 mi tops from our base of ops though. At 70-80gph (130-150 takeoff) plus regular maintenance / volunteer hours, it’s really difficult to get to local shows, much less anything away from the mid Atlantic region of the US. The $$$ just isn’t in it anymore unfortunately.

      @EstorilEm@EstorilEm9 ай бұрын
  • A beautiful and futuristic design to say the least!🤺

    @edwardrodgers9383@edwardrodgers93839 ай бұрын
  • This probably would have made a pretty good long range land based airliner. Probably would have added 30 mph to its speed, increased its payload and range. Could possibly have given the DC4 and constellation a run for its money.

    @americanrambler4972@americanrambler49729 ай бұрын
    • Yea,, I'll bet it could of.

      @I7435IC@I7435IC7 ай бұрын
  • Wow, what an incredible plane. Great video!

    @benstark2065@benstark20659 ай бұрын
    • Thankyou!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • Wow I am shocked. I've never heard about this aeroplane before. It looks fantastic. Thx for a great video.

    @thegrayknight71@thegrayknight714 ай бұрын
  • What a great looking aircraft

    @Danger_mouse@Danger_mouse9 ай бұрын
  • The same engineer Filippo Zappata made even an excellent helicopter after the war, the also forgotten Agusta A101G. Some US lobbies pushed the Italian government to produce under license in Italy the Sirkosky SH3D instead of the A101G.

    @marcopolimeni2356@marcopolimeni23569 ай бұрын
    • It wasn’t a excellent helicopter it didn’t even go in production. SH3 is far superior.

      @Toyota-ci3nj@Toyota-ci3nj9 ай бұрын
    • @@Toyota-ci3nj In 1971 I was 16 years old and I went with my father, who was a pilot, to visit the Agusta helicopter factory in Cascina Costa near Milan. We were guided by a colleague of my father who was a Sirkosky SH3D test pilot; it was on that occasion that we saw a large Agusta 101G helicopter in a corner of a hangar and our guide told us that it was an excellent helicopter that never went into production despite its potential.

      @marcopolimeni2356@marcopolimeni23569 ай бұрын
  • The Douglas XTB2D-1 Skypirate could carry up to four torpedos but was limited to two for carrier operations. It has a very similar payload capacity to the Z.511.

    @StoneCresent@StoneCresent9 ай бұрын
  • Another fantastic video. Been a lifelong aviation enthusiast and don’t remember ever seeing this before. Thank you, fantastic channel.

    @sidefx996@sidefx9969 ай бұрын
    • Thankyou so much! Appreciate that

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • That's a very handsome thing. Looks like a wide body Focke-Wulf Condor

    @AndreiTupolev@AndreiTupolev9 ай бұрын
  • Realy good video, i love your content. A questions, do you have plans to talk about specific aircraft in the future? If so please talk about the Swedish shoot down DC-3/The Catalina affair, it is a realy unknown story but very interesting.

    @oscgra9416@oscgra94169 ай бұрын
    • I definitely do like covering specific aircraft, I'll look into this incident! If you have any further info feel free to email it to me at aviationdeepdive@gmail.com

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for sharing this exquisitely beautiful plane.

    @DylanThorne@DylanThorne3 ай бұрын
  • Inspiring video! Now I'm adding these planes as an option for the Italy player in our Axis&Allies Global 1940 house rules. I found some 3D printed miniatures of them in 1/900 scale online!

    @warpartyattheoutpost4987@warpartyattheoutpost49879 ай бұрын
    • Booyah

      @patrickwatrin5093@patrickwatrin50939 ай бұрын
  • CANT built the most technically advanced aircraft in Italy during the 1930's - 1940's. Zappata was a genius in the italian aeronautical industry but due to shortage of raw materials they didn’t have the capacity for mass production.

    @ursus9104@ursus91049 ай бұрын
  • She's a beauty! A Constellation on floats.

    @buggerall@buggerall9 ай бұрын
  • Regarding the torpedo carrying capacity: There is one design that I'm aware of that has a similar load, equally never made it into full production: The Douglas Skypirate, an experimental torpedo bomber that was designed to serve on what would eventually become the Midway-class

    @Blockio1999@Blockio19999 ай бұрын
  • Well presented, interesting documentary on a promising aircraft most people would never know. Thanks!

    @tsegulin@tsegulin9 ай бұрын
  • Such a beautifull aircraft. Hope someone makes a model !

    @pascalcoole2725@pascalcoole27259 ай бұрын
  • I CANT get enough of those sleek lines ...

    @TheLateBird7@TheLateBird79 ай бұрын
    • It's truly one of the most beautiful planes ever! (aaand I just got the dad joke...)

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • what a beautiful aircraft … it truly is … It‘s a shame that everything about this airplane was lost … I wonder if there are still some blueprints … somewhere … in some archives

    @doncarlo5@doncarlo59 ай бұрын
    • I'm sure there is more to be found. When I'm next in Italy I might do some research, find out the appropriate archives and drop in to see if I can find anything. If I can, I'll likely make a 'deep dive' episode on its history that's a bit more thorough and more like 30-45 mins.

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • Beautiful aircraft. That tail is so Italian. It has always puzzled me why Italy didn't have good aviation engines in WW2 considering that their Fiat and Isotta-Fraschini Schneider Cup engines were highly developed. Thank you for the nice video.

    @charlesrousseau6837@charlesrousseau68379 ай бұрын
    • I think they were far too complicated and maintenance-intensive to be put into large scale production and used on front-line aircraft

      @AndreiTupolev@AndreiTupolev9 ай бұрын
    • It was because the government decided to swap to radial engine for military use, while the industry focused mainly on linear engine until then. This caused a lot of problem for lack of research and know-how at the time in the country.

      @lucapoli4195@lucapoli41959 ай бұрын
  • Amazing vid on an even more amazing Aircraft , this plane put the Condor in the shade and if it had went on after the War it would have spat on the Brabizon , an it was only another 77ft longer..an got nowhere ..Good vid again.

    @salvagedb2470@salvagedb24709 ай бұрын
  • Very Impressive! Anyone who thinks that the Italians could never match the other major powers in design and aviation, better rethink. This aircraft was arguably better than even the PBY Catalina and the British Sunderland flying boat. The problem for the Italians appear to have been prioritization. Not only did they not produce it in respectable numbers, they never really used the aircraft in any capacity. Axis strategy prioritized medium bombers over larger, more expensive to produce four engine bombers. The failure was in the short sighted leadership. In sufficient numbers, this aircraft could have even reached the factories producing armaments deep inside the Soviet Union.

    @buckwheatINtheCity@buckwheatINtheCity9 ай бұрын
  • thanks for the great clip! the footage was great!

    @Joey_Nova@Joey_Nova9 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for this really interesting video! I do know something about aircrafts and engines. However, I never have heard about Radials from Alpha Romeo or Piaggio. The italian streamline design of the CANT looks pretty good, even today. A pity, they scrapped them.

    @wernerschulte6245@wernerschulte62459 ай бұрын
  • Great video, was not indeed aware of this plane 👍

    @endi3386@endi33869 ай бұрын
  • THank You for this really interessting story of this beautiful plane 🙂

    @martinoppermann9868@martinoppermann98689 ай бұрын
  • I am all around impressed! First time experiencing your channel. I subscribed within minutes. Thank you and best regards.

    @lucashinch@lucashinch9 ай бұрын
    • Thanks so much!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • @@aviationdeepdiveyou're welcome!

      @lucashinch@lucashinch9 ай бұрын
  • Glad you covered this one .,.very elegant.

    @clivestainlesssteelwomble7665@clivestainlesssteelwomble76659 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for your fascinating video history of the CANT Z511 Giant Floatplane. Really enjoyed it. Thanks again. Keep them coming. Melbourne.

    @letsseeif@letsseeif9 ай бұрын
    • Thankyou! Will do!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • What an astonishing design! Zappata went on to design (and build) the equally impressive BZ 308....

    @danieleregoli812@danieleregoli8129 ай бұрын
  • Fantastic work, sir. Bellisima!

    @atatexan@atatexan9 ай бұрын
  • such a great airplan. it is alway very sad that nothing is left from it to watch it in a museum. :(

    @silviopfeifer8094@silviopfeifer80949 ай бұрын
  • why have I only just discovered this channel? Also, thank you for taking the trouble to try to pronounce these foreign names correctly

    @jasperzanjani@jasperzanjani8 ай бұрын
  • Watched from Old Harbour Jamaica. It was a eautiful aircraft.

    @kennedysingh3916@kennedysingh39169 ай бұрын
  • What a beautiful aircraft! Excellent video: well researched with a decent script. The sound quality is alright, too BTW. Duly subscribed.

    @hairydonuts6024@hairydonuts60249 ай бұрын
    • Many thanks!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • You're welcome! @@aviationdeepdive

      @hairydonuts6024@hairydonuts60249 ай бұрын
  • Great content

    @Brightsideofmilitary@Brightsideofmilitary9 ай бұрын
  • ..the old adage, "If it looks good, It flies good" certainly was true of this plane....

    @timwatson3879@timwatson38799 ай бұрын
  • Liked and subscribed! Amazing channel! Keep it up!

    @davidmok108@davidmok1089 ай бұрын
    • Thank you! Will do!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • Also the aircraft was also planned to be used in an opeartion against the American fleet in new York. Indeed the aircraft was capable of carry 4 Maiale sub platform (the same that sunk the two british bb at Alexandria). The operation gained a lot of interest and it was also planned to appen but the armistice of 1943 destroyed any possibility

    @regioammiraglio7500@regioammiraglio75009 ай бұрын
  • Elegant. Was there to be a wheeled version I wonder.

    @alan-sk7ky@alan-sk7ky9 ай бұрын
    • No mention of that in my sources, but I hope to do to more research

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • My grandpa was a flight engineer in Mariner in WW2 - his crew came together to fly a plane from Hawaii to the forward operating base - after that point they flew recon off Iwo Jima and then Okinawa where they were shot down - my grandpa said you would see a bunch of Japanese zeroes fly overhead… then later a bunch of American fighters would play overhead - eventually the zeroes would stop coming and the rescuers came in

    @birdzzzondayflu2489@birdzzzondayflu2489Ай бұрын
  • Best looking Italian Plane I've ever seen !! Would make a Steller R/C model ! Wonder if anybody's made one yet ??

    @I7435IC@I7435IC7 ай бұрын
  • What a masterpiece ❤

    @vladilenkalatschev4915@vladilenkalatschev49159 ай бұрын
  • One of the most beautiful airplane I ever saw, truly a Ferrari of the sky!

    @TheIndianalain@TheIndianalain9 ай бұрын
  • Great! More please! 😊

    @brianmuhlingBUM@brianmuhlingBUM9 ай бұрын
  • Such a sleek float plane.

    @167curly@167curlyАй бұрын
  • Excellent, thank you for producing for us! Shows yet again human intransigence, a wheeled version would have possibly been a total success, those floats weight and drag.........?????

    @drdoolittle5724@drdoolittle57249 ай бұрын
    • Interesting idea! Floats are often less draggy than people assume, and weight doesn't have tooo much of an effect on top speed - so a fairly modest speed increase is probably likely. A land-based version would definitely have been cool to see, though it does look awfully good as a floatplane!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • Funny, I was looking for this plane on wikipedia 2 weeks ago but couldn't remember it's name. I've only seen it mentioned in a war aviation documentary. It was in regards to a viable attempts to launch an attack on the us east cost. Plan was to refule via a Uboat. They mentioned this aircraft was the only viable means to make the plan work. Add it to the long list of great Italian pre WW2 aircraft forced into a roll it wasn't suited for

    @eol6632@eol66329 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for covering this interesting aircraft. I guess a flying boat was out of the question for some reason. Pherhaps the envisioned an eventual land plane only verstion in the future.

    @timcargile1562@timcargile15627 ай бұрын
  • Sorry to hear about the copywright controversy, but your films are great! I love inter-war transitional types

    @Ralphieboy@Ralphieboy9 ай бұрын
  • I've never understood the failure of the Regia Aeronautica during the war. Perhaps lack of ability to produce aircraft in the quantities required, or being late to the game, but in terms of design, no one can doubt that the G.55, C.205 and Re.2005 were fine aircraft. BTW, I recommend a video on the IAR 80. It was quite an effort by the Romanians.

    @rbilleaud@rbilleaud9 ай бұрын
    • Definitely a good idea, I'll put it on the list!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • I think it was a combination of ack of numbers, experience, effective tactics, and ability to adapt that caused their failure. Like literally everyone else, they would have been VERY competitive had the war, as it was by 1941, started in 1935.

      @jfangm@jfangm9 ай бұрын
    • Much like Japan, they valued maneuverability over everything else until they were overtaken by the opposition, and by the time advanced second generation were available there weren't the experienced pilots or the fuel available to make the most of them

      @AndreiTupolev@AndreiTupolev9 ай бұрын
    • ​@@AndreiTupolevThat and the fact that Italian industrial capacity was tiny compared with Germany, France and Britain.

      @jimdavis8391@jimdavis83919 ай бұрын
    • The weak point of the Italian industry has always been the low availability of raw materials in the country. The failure of the Regia Aeronautica is due to the wrong choices of Mussolini, who in the mid-1930s spent enormous resources in the colonial war to invade Ethiopia and in the Spanish Civil War. Finally he entered the war on Hitler's side without having the necessary resources to make a war that lasted much longer than a few months as hoped.

      @marcopolimeni2356@marcopolimeni23569 ай бұрын
  • What an awesome test pilot!

    @soundknight@soundknight9 ай бұрын
  • Bonjour , merci beaucoup . Bon choix d'avion .

    @nicolasroirand8011@nicolasroirand80112 ай бұрын
  • I hope your appeal worked! A beautiful aircraft; I am also enjoying learning about the innovation and quality of the Italian aircraft industry.

    @petesheppard1709@petesheppard17099 ай бұрын
    • Still waiting for news on the appeal - thanks for the comment!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • @@aviationdeepdive Have you looked into other platforms like Playeur?

      @petesheppard1709@petesheppard17099 ай бұрын
  • They made big look amazing 👍

    @CocoaBeachLiving@CocoaBeachLiving9 ай бұрын
  • Thanks!

    @MarkkuKoljonenwTinja@MarkkuKoljonenwTinja9 ай бұрын
  • Nice looking aerodynamic fuselage. The wing root looks really thin for that time although the horizontal stabilizer bracing looks like a dated shortcut. Overall it kind of reminds me of the Constellation.

    @billsmith5166@billsmith51669 ай бұрын
  • Yeah Idrogigante is a fitting name for this behemoth

    @lolloblue9646@lolloblue964612 күн бұрын
  • What a beautiful aircraft. Those magnificent men 🛩and their flying machines.!! Noticed it had a longer range than the Focke Wulf 'Condor', 4352 Km against the Condor's 3560 Kms. It was a bit faster too, but the payload was twice that of the Condor. A specially prepared version of this aircraft could have easily done the eastern Europe to Japan flight. And, a maritime ⚓version operating in the mediterranean, Atlantic and Indian oceans would have been a challenging foe.✈

    @mohabatkhanmalak1161@mohabatkhanmalak11619 ай бұрын
  • Get the book - "Le navi aeree di Filippo Zappata" by Giorgio Evangelisti......

    @terencewong-lane4309@terencewong-lane43099 ай бұрын
    • Unfortunately I don't speak Italian...

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • The italians are marvelous Engineers,with a flair for the beautifull,they suffered from being a relatively small nation with a smalish economy to match, but bursting with innovative Engineering talent!

    @janmale7767@janmale77679 ай бұрын
  • Bellísimo!

    @alvaroherrera5279@alvaroherrera52799 ай бұрын
  • Would love to get hold of 1/72 Vac Form kit of this.

    @johnholt890@johnholt8909 ай бұрын
  • Most interesting. Forza Italia!

    @danhubert-hx4ss@danhubert-hx4ss9 ай бұрын
  • Wow. If they had built that marine patrol version they would probably still be flying today. The famous P-3 Orion still used for marine duties is just a Lockheed Electra from 1957, the Nimrod that was relatively recently withdrawn for being too expensive to operate was the De-Havilland Comet, The HC-130/PC-130 Hercules fills a similar role and has been flying since 1954, Russia still flies the IL-38 based on the IL-18 from '56. Theyre being replaced by stuff like the ATR-72, DHC Dash8, and specialised military transports. Patrol craft are among the oldest craft flying, because the low, slow, long endurance heavy duty airliners of old are far better suited than most modern aircraft, and designing a new aircraft just for a few patrol craft would not make sense when old airliners are near perfect. Imagine this thing re-engined with the PT6 for efficiency and reliability........ Theres still so many places something like this with its range, payload and rough water capability would be relevant.

    @mycosys@mycosys9 ай бұрын
  • Every aircraft designer should be onboard the first test flight of their creation.

    @Paladin1873@Paladin18739 ай бұрын
  • Thanks

    @davidvavra9113@davidvavra91139 ай бұрын
  • If you can fly the thing using engine power differential, and just rudder... that plane works. (Damn, I always thought this thing was the size of a Condor but its more like the size of a Super Connie, good Lord)

    @robertbalazslorincz8218@robertbalazslorincz82189 ай бұрын
  • *How much DRAG did those floats create?!! Two engines JUST to counteract that!*

    @raccoon874@raccoon8749 ай бұрын
  • Bellissimo documentario! Grazie!

    @eugenio16arno@eugenio16arno9 ай бұрын
  • A great plane!

    @FrancescoAlois@FrancescoAlois9 ай бұрын
  • Another advantage over the Condor would be the ability to be refueled and rearmed at sea from a tender ship or tanker sub.

    @coreyandnathanielchartier3749@coreyandnathanielchartier37499 ай бұрын
  • Impressive, when you think that the Douglas DC-4 was a large airliner for the time. This Z.511 is very comparable to a DC-4 : same length, larger winhspan, larger wing area, similar empty weight, similar gross weight, similar engines.

    @RielMyricyne@RielMyricyne9 ай бұрын
  • The U.S.A.did something similar with the D.C.3 also known as in the military C47. Very interesting. They Remind me of after a two year old walking in there parent's big shoes .

    @adriaanboogaard8571@adriaanboogaard85719 ай бұрын
  • The Improved Catalina is Making a comeback and Japan has a variant. The Sea planes have great fore fighting capabilities as long as they have water close to land on. If it worked before upgrade it and put it back to work

    @adriaanboogaard8571@adriaanboogaard85719 ай бұрын
  • The airborn submarine option seems perfect for the Bolivian navy.

    @comentedonakeyboard@comentedonakeyboard9 ай бұрын
  • Boy, the nose and windscreen really looks like a Lockheed Connie.

    @richvalenzi6232@richvalenzi62327 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for such a good video. On the other han, fate does not exist.

    @williamenriquesanchezcolme753@williamenriquesanchezcolme7539 ай бұрын
    • I never said fate existed, I said the fate of the aircraft was unnecessary. In that context 'fate' just means what ended up happening to them.

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
    • @@aviationdeepdive OK. Thank you. I will watch your other videos because are good. Well done man.

      @williamenriquesanchezcolme753@williamenriquesanchezcolme7539 ай бұрын
    • @@williamenriquesanchezcolme753 Thanks!

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • The Spruce Goose was the largest float plane ever made. It was designed to carry 150,000 pounds (68,000 kg), 750 fully equipped troops or two 30-ton M4 Sherman tanks.

    @igotatan1@igotatan19 ай бұрын
    • Spruce Goose is a flying boat, not a floatplane.

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
  • Hughes tried to beat it but failed :)

    @domenicozagari2443@domenicozagari24439 ай бұрын
  • Am i the only one Who thinks this looks like a fw Condor with floats?

    @oiergarcia7533@oiergarcia75339 ай бұрын
  • It looks like a Focke-Wult 200 Condor on floats.

    @marckyle5895@marckyle58957 ай бұрын
  • Off-topic, but that Macchi seaplane design looks suspiciously like a Supermarine Schneider Trophy winner from the late 1920s. Please don't tell me our beloved Spitfire (of which I built so many Airfix kits in the 1960s), developed from that seaplane, was based on an Italian design! No disrespect to Italian design - I'm sure all seaplanes of that time had a lot of similarities. And I just found out that they stopped holding the contests because Supermarine kept winning, so they gave the trophy to the British in perpetuity.

    @LittleNala@LittleNala9 ай бұрын
  • Too bad they never got a prototype built of that military version, because I would love to see that behemoth in War Thunder.

    @ninjalanternshark1508@ninjalanternshark1508Ай бұрын
  • If they had taken the floats off the Z,511 and had installed retractable landing gear, it would have made a very fast (over 300 mph) bomber for the Axis.

    @flashcar60@flashcar609 ай бұрын
  • The Avro Arrow, the CAC 15 and CAC 23 .... many designs from the Empire that were very promising. I wonder if any billionaire in the world could buy the blueprints, set up a factory, and manufacture them to see how they fare....

    @loiclaronche5675@loiclaronche56759 ай бұрын
    • Some very old designs are re-entering production, like the Catalina, so I think it's certainly possible. Also some ww2 fighters, a couple of Soviet ones I think, have been rolled out of the production line in the past few years.

      @aviationdeepdive@aviationdeepdive9 ай бұрын
KZhead