The ONLY Machine Gun on the Planet That Can Turn Tanks into Scrap
2024 ж. 14 Мам.
347 620 Рет қаралды
Who doesn’t love to watch weapons at work? Well… the people on the receiving end of them probably don’t but, apart from them, who doesn’t love to watch weapons at work? There’s a reason why action movies are among the most commonly made by Hollywood. But who needs fiction when you can watch the real thing? These are the 20 most powerful military weapons in action!
► For copyright matters please contact us: mjopadi@hotmail.com
The American bazooka had bugger all influence on the Soviet RPG-7. The RPG was very heavily influenced by the German panzerschreck and, to a lesser degree, the panzerfaust.
same for the Cram the russians has a gun that shoot even more bullets and do the same job on warships (not all but any), how a granade lancher can be rank 2 and the Apachi has a counter part by russians and was used way before and can use the same kind of weapons. Not sure what people think here but the number one is the AK47 and why ? because it is so old and still wide spreaded and used today and still way more powerfull then the most Military rifels you will see nowdays because Body armor against a military AK47 ? good luck with that. What we see the most powerfull weapons are Nuclear weapons and Russia has the most powerfull Nuclear weapon why i think so ? because they tested the most powerfull nuclear weapon on earth that destroyed even windows in another countrys hundert miles away because the blast was so powerfull. Who on earth will not think the russians have not more of this kind of weapons or even developed better ones ? MOAB ... there was a bomb non nuclear tested by russia in Syria it has even more power then the MOAB but here we see just moab. When it comes to ranking of weapons this is weried because this is like more of a joke and favor american weapons instead of the truth then we have the javelin it is one of the best weapons in reality and yes it is made by the US but nowhere in this ranking like the AK47
@@allxtend4005 AK 47 is cheap, quick to produce and reliable under harsh circumstances - it's the perfect choice for a poorly trained, peasant army. That doesn't make it the best choice for a top end, well trained, professional military. No one weapon is ideal for everyone, mostly because when you make something cheap and simple, you give up fine machining that makes it accurate. When your soldiers can't shoot straight anyway (like most of the millions armed with AKs all over Africa and the Middle East), then what difference does it make if the weapons aren't terribly accurate? As for the power of the round, NATO realized LONG ago that volume meant more than power, so they switched to the 5.56 and doubled the amount of ammo an infanteer could carry. They knew that most KIAs took place from artillery and other support weapons and even during infantry fire fights, it was the GPMGs (LMGs, MMGs, HMGs) that did much of the damage.
That ClickBait picture of the tank with the white circles, doesn't look like it has been shot by anything, notice there's no damage to the tracks, the under plate, the gap between the turret, or the gun. And don't get me started on that thing that looks more like the guts of a boiler then any gun I've ever come across.
Yeah, the tank pic in the vid is also complete baloney, and they didn't even fake it WELL.
You don't detect subs with radar. You detect them with sonar.
That moment when a youtube video about military weapons can't even get the basics about them right..
A sub not appearing on RADAR? You don't say. I heard that RADAR doesn't work all that well in liquids, which is why we instead use SONAR underwater. This entire entry sounds like it was written by a chat bot using simple probability to determine the next word. Another example is the conflation between modern subs and those of ww2 (where detection by RADAR was actually a constant threat, since they ran on the surface if at all possible) and earlier. I have issues with how that was presented, but for a 2 min long segment, I'll allow it. (The way is was stated in the video can easily be argued to imply that people have used subs similar to the Ohio class, or at the lest modern style subs, since the 1910s) addendum: I would honestly not be surprised if sometimes, with their sail (that top bit that sticks out from the main body of the vessel) out of the water, they do get picked up on RADAR. Though how that well would work on days when the waves are higher than the sail is... well, my guess is 'not that well'. Granted that would only be when they are on or almost at the surface... not the usual place a sub wants to be.
"Wants" to be - modern subs are HORRIBLE on the surface - they are cigar-shaped - and in any but damn near flat-ass calm seas, the planes have a hell of a time keeping the boat from a'rockin'. Put it underwater and it's stable as a subway train at rest. Tight quarters, yes - but the smoothest ride in the Navy - SSN, SSGN, or SSBN.
Describing Russia as "a country with a very itchy trigger finger" kinda sounds ironic in an American accent ...
Yes indeed, it's not the Russians who have bases all over the world and a mentally incapacitated president.
It does. They are not Alone. We are complicit.
Regarding the Bell V-28 Valor...the narrator said the design hasn't been put into action. A similar craft (the V-22 Osprey) has been in service for almost 20 years and does everything the Bell does.
The GAU-8 is limited to a burst of seconds because if it went longer it would make the A-10 Lighting II (The Warthog) slowdown so much that it would simply fall out of the sky. The fun part is that the GAU-8 was designed first than the plane was designed around it.
the GAU-8 produces recoil that is a little over the equivalent of one engine, which is NOT enough to make it fall out of the sky or slow very much, what was the cause, was feckless idiots designing it forgot the smoke that poured out of the gun barrels when firing would be ingested by the engines and cause them to flame-out, because they never put an auto ignitor on the engines, eventually an auto-ignitor was added to each engine and tied into the firing circuit with a delayed cut-off so it would continue for a period of time after firing - the whole story of it being recoil and it slowing it down was utter BS, given most attacks are done at 30deg or more which means 50% of the mass of the A-10 is acting as acceleration to the A-10, which is greater than the sum of recoil once things were rectified.
Originally done by the Germans.
Another fun fact , this weapon also collects the spent cartridges so as to maintain it`s trim in flight
@@daniellambert1217 as do any that use the endless belt system common with such drum-mags, this is given it would not be good to drop live unspent rounds for example, as each time the trigger is released and due to the electric primer, there are always 10 to 20 unspent rounds that are cycled as it stops, as while stopping firing is instantaneous on trigger release the spin-down is not instantaneous though is still very quick, but rounds are still cycled - it would also be rather silly to to drop the big case as represent a threat to things below and to engine ingestion, given the engine placement,
The aircraft GAU is limited to 1500 rounds with a cyclical rate of 3000 rounds per minute. Although it is curbed to 2000 rounds per. With a burst rate of 60 rounds per second. Without that controlled fire rate a pilot would be defenseless in 30 to 45 seconds.
19:35. The warhead of the rpg-7 does take awhile to "warm up" as you put it. But the warhead has to be accelerated to 1000 feet per second as rapidly as possible to maintain accuracy. To do this, it is attached to a bloody powerful rocket. Firing indoors can prove fatal if the indoor space is small, or the space has few places for the overpressure to vent. Any other soldiers present, if stood near the rear of the weapon when fired, will definitely get injured/killed.
This has to be the most random list of anything...ever
Yep, total BS 😂
That's what you get when you just want to crank out an easy video without much, if any, effort.
Lousy video!
Australian government has strict gun laws. They wont let me own a GAU-8. Just about get prison time for having a picture.
Free American’s don’t ask permission for Our government! United Arms Organization For those who do not understand the meaning of ‘'Rights, we need to make it clear once and for all: The 2nd Amendment does not apply to semi-auto rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, pistols, or revolvers. The 2nd Amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT. The technology of the firearm is irrelevant. The restrictions on government remain the same, regardless of the firearm. The Second Amendment was not written to grant permission for citizens to own and bear firearms. It forbids government interference in the right to keep and bear arms, period. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This also applies to the other 'Rights!. They are not granted, they stipulate inherent rights that the government may not prohibit."
What would you do with a GAU-8 anyway? Genuinely curious coming from a country where anything more powerful than a pea shooter requires you to have a mini fort nox in your house 😢👍😀
What would you do with a GAU-8 anyway? Genuinely curious coming from a country where anything more powerful than a pea shooter requires you to have a mini fort nox in your house
Honestly, the GBU-28, GBU-72 and the JDAM series GBU-31/32/38 kits used to turn the 1000-5000 lbs. dumb bombs into precision guided munitions, but mostly the one used in the "Quicksink" program that is dropped from the air and hits the water just beside a target vessel/ship and explodes underneath the hull of the ship and the result is a broken keel and the vessel sinks within seconds! These should have been on the list for sure!
The MOAB has been surpassed by the FOAB... Also surpassed
It's freaky how small that last nuclear bomb is, compared to the amount of power it can release.
A day and a night in the air without refueling for the Apache? That's really something.😼 (Try 2 to 4h)
The Original Project Vulcan, was needed to cope with much faster Aircraft & consequent short engagement time...using the Gatling system, scaling it up to the GAU-8 & 9, & similar, It CAN fire much faster, avoiding barrel erosion etc, with a faster barrel-set...but as per GW1, Russian tanks tend to become scrapped out in just over 1 second (c. 90 rounds)...very cost effective!
where can i buy gun 1 & the varieties of ammo ? & how much ?
I got slapped in my steel pot by my instructor on Fort Sill for not firing the M-2 in the standard 3 to 5 round burst, I was aware of the possibility of the barrel warping but I couldn't help myself..I love the Ma deus
UK here - how's your ears after firing a big Browning for a living, Charles?
@@notreallydavid not great but I think the problem was the 155mm howitzer...I was 13 B FA
@@charlescurry2452 Oof! One of the oldest teachers at my high school had been at El Alamein. His war service as an SP gun crew member had done his hearing no good at all.. All best from Over Here
@@notreallydavid WOW that was the second largest tank battle of WW2 behind the battle of Kursk right? And not trying to one up you but I met a Tuskegee airman in Fayetteville
Deuce. Ma deuce, M2. Deus is what your are when firing it lol
The GAU-8A as a machine gun, no it is a Rotary Cannon. the 30mm round is more of a small cannon round. With an effective range of 5 miles.
18:45 NO!!! It is meant to be Russian “Panzerfaust” and it is NOT MUCH MORE than advanced copy of the PzF-250! RPG-2 is practically and EXACT COPY OF IT!!!
You gotta love the Maw Duce. Long live belt fed.
When an american speaks about other countries' aggressive actions on the world stage...
Yeah video has some very big anti Russian undertones instead of being neutral espacially at 7:38. Sure he tried to cover it up by saying it's used by many forces but that just means lots of units in the Russian Military that use it. I cannot find any sources stating it has been exported so he is talking about Russians when he says "with not the best intentions in mind". Vid would have been a lot better if he talked about the weapons specifically in a non-political stance instead of "waaaah Russia bad!!"
The Gau may have been set to a burst limit so the plane wouldn't stop in the sky.
5:20 A submarine that's invisible to radar. No shit Sherlock. And people wonder why Google is so big.
Exfuckingactly
The name MOAB, does not actually stand for the "Mother of all bombs". Although it was a monicker that just seemed to stick, and may very well be appropriate. The correct designation is "Massive ordinance air burst", because these bombs do not detonate when they hit the ground, but hundreds of feet above the ground wiping out everything in a very large area beneath it.
Uh, the Trident D5 is apocalypse on a stick...so yes the Ohio submarine is a nuclear weapon... don't know if I heard you say otherwise...
Where are you getting your information on the Ohio Class subs? Cracker jacks? The Ohio class boat ARE most certainly Nuclear capable submarine. It can and often does carry 22 Nuclear missiles and each missile has 8 independently targetable 300 kilo ton warheads. There are most likely 2 off Russia's coast and 1 or 2 watching China and north Korea.
MOAB actually stands for Massive Ordnance Air Burst. It's actually designed to explode in the air (usually within 50 feet and the resulting fireball literally sucks the oxygen out of the air. Where you are wrong, it's not designed to destroy caves, it's design is to explode at the mouth of the cave to literally suck everything out of the cave itself and possibly send a very hot wave of fire their way as well
The massive pressure wave is the lethal part of Thermobaric weapons. The explosion does use oxygen up but unlike napalm you will be dead from the massive over pressure before oxygen will ever be a concern. the injuries will be more like those sustained from opening the door of a submarine than burns or fragmentation.
@@mlonghammer8388, I understand what does the killing, the issue I had was this was called a bunker buster, when in fact it's designed for blasting caves. This weapon was specifically designed for the environment it was to be used in, desert mountainous terrain with caves all over the place. I was merely pointing that out to the poster of the vid a bit of basic googling would have helped them with the vid
U.S. submarines did play a major role in the defeat of Japan in World War 2. They sunk 98% of Japan's shipping in that conflict. A little over half of our submarines didn't make it back to port.
Germany caused havoc in the Atlantic. The Japanese subs shell mainland America. Hearing there have been no submarine battles made me laugh
It's only a matter of time before everything anywhere can be detected.
That tank looked like it had been infester wtih giant bot fly larvae lol
There was an Australian company - Metalstorm - which made a gun that could fire 1 million rounds per minute. Company went broke - no govt help. I dont know if the gun still exists anywhere.
THe only way that a gun like that with that much Firepower would work is if it had a Portal Built into it so it Could be fed ordnance from another dimension upon Demand... Otherwise it would need a warehouse of ammo belt fed into it. Engineers -- get ON IT! And Carry on!
@@anneinfurna8528 There are videos, its called Metalstorm 36 Barrel
@@wizzard5442 I remember that thing! it was great at shredding through stuff but economically speaking, it was only an interesting concept. it's much easier to send a 120mm APFSDS or HEAT round through a concrete wall than wear it down over time through a couple hundred thousand rounds.
Only got to play with "PUFF" a couple times. C-130 1 mini 2 Gatling guns.
sorry if I'm wrong but the title of your video is ^^ The ONLY Machine Gun on the Planet That Can Turn Tanks into Scrap ^^ right?? so I think I'm seeing machine guns, so what are you showing me, tanks, submarine, and everything other than machine guns, my question is that I don't know how to read the title of your film or have you really fooled everyone???🤔🤔🤔
Officially, MOAB = Massive Ordnance Air Blast.
I thought that MOAB was "Mother of all Bullets, er i mean Projectiles..." har!
Love Brandon Herrera..
Hell yeah, Brandon Herrera for Congress!
Annnd he loves all you Mother lovers out there!
Those cannon holes are only in sheet metal.
humans are very good at making things that will wipe him out
Russia , an itchy finger .You have to be joking look at the USA if you're looking for an itchy finger.
So unmanned vehicles taking out the enemy's unmanned vehicles. Why not have any wars at all?
In the grim darkness of the far future there is only war
Sarmat is already fully functional and already installed in silo's version and mobile...😉
You REALLY missed it with the first one without the BRRRRPppppp...
17:50 Apart from its Daddy MG42…NAAAAH! 😂
What is that a big version of Puff the magic dragon
The scary cherry makes the best videos
The GAU round is the size of a red bull can
the M2 Browning over 90 years old
Predator , Terminator 2 , Minigun ... maybe take some Time to research before putting " 79% " Videos out , still a Like
The M-2 can be practically carried by a two man team.
Click Bait. The only 'machine gun that can scrap a tank' is the GAU-8 and it's a 50 year old weapon. Still brutally effective, but this isn't new information by any means. The rest are also old news for those keeping up with current trends.
And not single flying drone on the list ? Helicopters and tanks are becoming outdated.
well now the Bell V28 Valor has not seen action because the thing keeps crashing and killing all the Marines that attempt to be part of the test flights.
i see a compete and utter disaster in our future when they install AI into these autonomous war vehicles
The Ohio class sub is the nuclear armed sub for the US.
The Rpg 7 and WW2 German Tanks...??!!! Realy !!!! Where do you get the data to fill content and how can you get so many wrong ones...🤔
i dont THINK being one of the BIGGEST targets on the field of battle {using the 134} is gonna be very LUCKY or safe
@3:10 thats not an ICBM in the computer gen little clip thats Russia's new multi warhead nuke mounted on something thats different (or so they say) 23:05 not really much worry of radiation with our new age nukes fyi good vid thanks for the info ^~^
My unit had 10 AH-64 at pleiku airstrip in vietnam. A great bird with 1200RPM mini-gun 4th div. 1969
Your unit had AH-64 Apache gunships in Vietnam, in 1969? You must've been popping a hell of a lot LSD. It didn't start production until 1975, plus it never saw service in tropical area's for several years, as it didn't work well in humid conditions.
mission masterr s the malp from stargate
If you fire an RPG7 in a room, you will be very sorry that you did. There is quite a backblast from the rocket.
26:31 - 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Seriously? When the whole World has access to satellite data in near real time, everybody knows where land-based ICBMs are.
😂, Red Bull,Gives u Bullets can sized
Bushmaster is doing the same to T72s currently. It also is not a machinegun.
I like the russain ones, we have seen they dont work
enough with the fear mogering , would ya already , gees wake-up !😇🥰 bless !
Great!!!!!
The JDAM and Satan 2 should have made the list
The image of a JDAM made it to the list when they referenced the B-83, and also the B-61 was in there too... try to keep your weapons together and not just stuff them in.
When you discussed the GAU-8 you showed an image of a M113 APC with bullet holes in the side. The M113 is not a tank but an APC, has aluminium armour designed to stop ordinary bullets but not direct hits from shells. As a target for a GAU-8 it is unworthy. Evidence is the the GAU-8 would not be able to rip apart a "modern" Russian such as the T90. A more valuable video would be to compare the GAU-8 directly with the 25mm Bushmaster gun mounted on Abram IFVs and on ships.
Clickckbait. Does ot show the weapons "In action" as claimed...
Russia's "aggressive nature" is a lot less aggressive than ours, considering WE were weaponizing their border, literally, with not just ballistic missile tech, but full of bio-weapons labs and other stuff. The final straw was inviting Ukraine, the country we were filling to the brim with weapons and labs and other things we weren't even supposed to have been partaking in, according to the world and ourselves, into NATO. That was a CLEAR provocation, and as expected it provoked a response. Let me ask - what would the USA do, if they were doing that to us? What if they started shipping their missiles into Cuba, as if it were actually necessary anymore? We all know what would happen, and it doesn't matter which country was doing that to us. We would decimate them. Obviously. Russia's actions over in it's own traditional theater, are FAR more restrained. Yes, the war in Ukraine is brutal, and they aren't playing around, but neither have they started marching on the rest of the world like the liars in the US government keep suggesting they intend to. They clearly don't - we were the ones poking a sleeping Russian bear, and we never needed to. For a long time. No one is saying "Trust Russia!" - but from movements any of us normal folks can see, their actions were quite jusitified. Of course the ones who don't pay attention to the details don't see it, but anyone who looks at what WE were doing, what we SAID we wouldn't do, and their response, it sure doesn't make US look very good - you know, us, the "good guys", so we're told. It appears looking at the details, we have not been the "good guys" in an awful lot of our more recent conflicts. Just saying - I find the weapons to be amazing and all, but cheerleading such a conflict is literally insane. Especially when we were the clear aggressors - we provoked them. The battle lines were already drawn well in advance - and both sides knew it. The US did this provocation on purpose, and the PURPOSE was to provoke, and only to provoke, to extend hard power further. Like the US seems to have great love for. I'm not anti-American, by the way. I love my country. BUT THE WAY WE ACT, AND HOW OBVIOUS OUR LIES ARE, IS DISGRACEFUL.
can you say osprey
Kind of boring since they don't show the weapons in operation. You know, the fun part...
I see that you included the Polish RGB -40 but I'm sorry to say, the American MK-19 puts that particular weapon to shame. With the RGB-40 you have 6 rounds of 20mm grenades. However on the MK-19 it is a fully automatic belt fed 20mm grenade launcher, this leaves the RGB-40 Not only outmatched but out classes completely.
The mk19 fires 40mm grenades
Minuteman III
If all the nukes were fired, many humans would die but not all
Antartica wondering what happened when they get radio silence from around the world
Dude…ww2, was a submarine war..kind of.
There have been Maxim guns showing up in battles in Ukraine.
Dude talks about the AH-64 Apache but the first thing he shows is the AH-1 Cobra. Uh, nope, that ain't an Apache! Like C'mon dude, we know the difference they aren't even close to each other, apart from being rotary wing aircraft. That Number after the letters AH, means the sequence of production/development, meaning the Apache is WAY down the line from the Cobra. and the Cobra was the first attack helicopter made/developed by the US military.
to us Uranammunition is Forbidden by genferconvention ! :( it poissening the soil !
Get your facts right.
Dude I love your videos, but please stop saying that that fucking prehistoric centipede is going to crawl over someone's face, 😅😢. That's some scary shit to see and to think about that crawl over someone's face. Jesus Christ. But anyway love your videos. ❤
the V28 Valor is nothing impressive we already have an aircraft like that it's called the Osprey the Valor is just a waste of funds
Don't just tell us about the bomb, show us its effects! You dropped the ball with the MOAB. Phooey. Why would you not show us its effects?? Not cool.
🦅
Onio class were designed as and mostly remain nuclear ballistic missile submarines. They ARE the very definition of the third strike option. Apparently, you do not bother with facts as part of your videos.
Nope.......theres a few.
Black manr toy!
a Ukraine drone took this out. On live video the russian flame thrower
😂 Second
This is awesome video
well...? Wars are started over? We'll all love from here on in. ☢not before the autocrat's bravado ☣us all with ages old ♻but cheapest pride 🌝
The Avenger is NOT a machine gun, it's a cannon. Please learn the difference.
A gatling cannon is the first manually ran heavy machine gun from the old cowboy days and thus the gau-8 avenger being more modern of aforementioned gatling cannon having an electric motor for both rotation and firing in simple terms you're wrong just calling it a cannon the cowboy one had a low rate of fire but a gau-8 avenger in comparison well look in to it
But no match again a jet especially not in control the air space. And stop making them and the main men is gone Kelly Johnson.
ruzzian technology...lolz
Everything in this article has been presented better on other sites. Just a mediocre compilation of known weapons.
Wrong there are all kinds of submarine on submarine battles recorded from US civil war to WWII. Read more history!
2
TOS-1A taken out by $400 dollar Ukraine drones. LOL
Weapons in action were promised, 5 mins into the vid - not seen a single one in action... Plus: An absolute random mixture of footage - what has a german soilder with a Panzerfaust 3 have to do - at all - with the GAU-8?!? Not worth the watch, aborted.
Enough Russian-bashing propaganda. Just detail the devices and leave it at that. Some of us really know the score.
Right on.
Yep. The score is that Russian weapons are a high quantity/low quality deal, made so because the entirety of Russia’s military doctrine has been predicated on extremely casualty-intensive Zerg rushes since the Great Northern War centuries ago. The fact that even a severely disadvantaged nation with almost 1/5th of their population, 1/27th of their GDP, and 1/60th of their productive capacity has been able not just to halt their invasion through conventional war for a couple of years, but also to humiliate them on the battlefield, really shows how much of a propaganda-bloated, incompetent state and military structure Russia has. That’s the score for you.
The Swedish submarines are better.