High Evolutionary Is The Villain Kang Should Be - Marvel Has To Learn From This!
✅Download MARVEL Strike Force on Android using the Amazon Appstore: smart.link/9s7w6ybpjk1qe
Thanks to Scopely and Amazon for sponsoring this video!
Alright, so the Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 gave us the best villain in the MCU after Thanos!
That's right, in my opinion The High Evolutionary is already a better villain than Kang the Conqueror.
And in this video, I'm gonna give you 5 detailed points explaining why High Evolutionary is a better villain than Kang!
The idea is not only to convince you, my audience but to reach out to the Marvel executives who could learn a lot from Guardians 3.
James Gunn has really shown his incredible writing skills by turning this lesser-known comic-book villain into one of the most terrifying characters in the MCU!
Thumbnail Credit: / tt.psd
Follow Me on Instagram: / thecanadianlad
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Please do like this video to help me keep growing and subscribe to my channel that helps me in ways I can't even explain. I am really grateful to you guys for supporting my channel.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
If you wanna reach me out for Marvel related theories/ideas: thecanadianbrat@gmail.comFor all business related inquiries: thecanadianlad@ellify.com (Business-Only)
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
#GuardiansOfTheGalaxy #HighEvolutionary #TheCanadianLad
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Music: Avengers: Infinity War - It's Time║Free Music // No Copyright MusicKZhead URL: • Avengers: Infinity War...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
I believe all content used falls under the remits of Fair Use, but if any content owners would like to dispute this I will not hesitate to immediately remove said content. It is not my intent to in any way infringe on their content ownership. If you happen to find your art or images in the video please let me know and I will be glad to credit you.
✅Download MARVEL Strike Force on Android using the Amazon Appstore: smart.link/9s7w6ybpjk1qe Thanks to Scopely and Amazon for sponsoring this video! In this video I present you 5 detailed reasons why The High Evolutionary Is The Villain Kang Should Be! Let me know your thoughts on this analytical breakdown.
Why all marvel villains appear Purple 😈 Thanos - 😈 Agatha- Purple magic Kang- 😈 Zemo-😈 High evolutionary- 😈 And so on 😂😂😂😂 Pls explain And maybe Galactus also 😈 Don't judge my English mistakes 😂
the only problem is he got defeated quickly (attacked while screaming), I wanna feel like it was a boss fight and probably defeating him by outsmarting the "High Evolutionary". 2/3 of James Gunns villain was defeated instantly, Ego felt like a boss battle out of the three, with display of abilities. the Characterization was very good, and is not too similar to most MCU's villains that they make every villain nowadays "sympathetic".
So High Evolutionary is not the villain we need it's the one we deserved .
Do you notice? Every main villain in this phase has a purple or blue color theme.
Totally agree.High Evolutionary is better than Thanos.He is a real threat
Sometimes I wish the MCU had villains that stayed longer instead of just being defeated in the end of a certain movie
they didn't kill off Namor in Black Panther 2
High Evolutionary is still alive in the MCU.
High Evolutionary is not confirmed dead yet so he can still be alive
@@TheCanadianLad Can't wait for a former Rick and Morty writer to try and fail to do something more with the character.
@@TheCanadianLad That's what I am thinking about. After the Controversy of Jonathan Majors, Marvel should go with High Evolutionary instead of Kang. 😊
Gunn knows how to tell a story. When Guardians of the Galaxy came out, they were unknown characters. After watching the third installment, I absolutely love the guardians. Look at the Peacemaker series. Gunn took a very obscure character and built a great story around him.
yeah , secret invasion is not even released yet but I know it cant beat peacemaker
@@ADITYAYADAV-pi5tz Secret Invasion will probably end up like FATWS. Everyone thought it would be a serious, dark series but it's just a mediocre crap with minor dark tones only casual fans enjoy. HOPEFULLY I'm wrong tho.
@scottwaa it helped that John Cena is actually a really good actor that isn’t bothered about making fun of himself, I mean can you imagine someone like say vin Diesel letting his character (that he is visible for) be made fun of or to look vulnerable, I mean just look at the contracts for the fast and Furious films you have vin Diesel, the rock and the other guy that I’ve forgotten the name of all with lines in their contracts about not been made to look weak or if they have to lose a fight that have to win the same number of fights against that character and the writers have to build a script around these demands meanwhile you have John cena talking about eating a whole beach full of ritchards if he had to and saying the line with a state face.
Well now you see it James Gunn's direction for the DCU. Having a more connected story, with mostly C to D list characters that have their moment to shine. Of course, you have Superman Legacy and Batman Brave and the Bold coming as well, but having Gunn's creative direction would help these franchises alot
For what tho, just another reason for y’all to complaining and bitch about
Yeah I totally agree. It’s a shame they wasted Gorr and Kang with poor development. I was hooked hating High Evolutionary
They didn't waste Kang...
@@eliascrooker7773 , He wasn't a Threat! If He used his brain? He'd let Scott go through the portal! Coz he's still got the Tech to go Anywhere in time at that Point! He still has his Battery n Chair! Just Lost his Fleet
@@eddysandland58id you not watch the end credits where it shows there’s more than one kang. That was the weakest version
@@disdatboi2285 ,Ok Shit writing the lot
They also wasted modok
High evolutionary was definitely up there with the best MCU villains.
He was mid. It was thanos and now possibly kang later on.
@@Fb-gj5rnI respectfully slightly disagree . Thanos will still be the fan favorite villain and I don’t think that will ever change, but Thanos didn’t feel scary at all there was too much room for us to reason with him imo. For me the high evolutionary felt like a truly disgusting person who deserved to die cus there was no good seen in him on any level. Thanos felt like a villain that could’ve turn good at some point whilst still being the most iconic villain the MCU will ever have.
@@Armyblink4life554 Agree to disagree partially. I can see your reasoning. However, I think those villains are a little better for their depth. Thanos did what no one in the galaxy wanted to do which was to kill half the universe to provide equal chance to the other half that survived. He did very destructive things like destroying Xander, killing Loki as well as a portion of asgardians, and having to sacrifice gamora for his goals. We only saw high evolutionary destroy just one civilization and a few really fucked up expeiments. The other civilizations were just briefly mentioned. Im not undermining that the stuff the high evolutionary did but it feels WAY less than what thanos did. Thanos wiped out a ENTIRE half of a universe in mere seconds. This might’ve even included high evolutionary. So HE is a good villain for the guardians series but not as the mcu as a whole
@@Fb-gj5rn ohh I see where you’re coming from now. Then yes I do agree with those points. Ya Thanos is hands down the better villain for the mcu universe and then the High Evolutionary for the GOTG
@@Armyblink4life554 Yeah. I think him and ego were the best villains. Ronin was crazy to see because he held the power stone and didn’t get destroyed at all. But ego has parts of him on many different planets. He could’ve easily taken over a good portion of the mcu universe. Thanos to me is sorta like phoenix’s joker. In that they both choose to do heinous goals whatever the cost. Joker is willing to bring down the rich elite and society. And he smiles when he sees his work fulfilled. Thanos did all that crime to kill half the universe and he too relaxed knowing his goal had a major impact on the universe at large.
I was not even terrified by Kang at all. In the movie, he just tries to run away while High evolutionary didn't even think to run when he knew he is slowly losing
When did he try running away when he was going to another universe to start his conquering again? High evolutionary was all screaming and not enough action to show how REALLY terrifying he is. Thanos did way better at showing how powerful, capable, and menacing he was
@@Fb-gj5rn high revolutionary was all screaming?? Did you even watch the movie?? He's a menace he destroyed his own planet, high revolutionary is like thanos but more menacing and didn't gave us symphaty for him, he have an amazing tech but not smarter than rocket, you're just dumb when you watched it, did you watched it without your eye or brain?
@@Fb-gj5rn…When he was focused they all got pinned or crushed with his gravity manipulation. He had to have flaws, his Super Ego being in control, in order to be beaten reasonably.
@@KPITGangsta His super ego as well as his obsession.
Yep and it didnt help the fact that a bunch of ants defeated him(yeah i know that its an advance civilization and other BS like that but who gives a shit its still ants and ants arent that menacing in real life). If you still get intimidated by kang after the way he goes down you either a child or accept anything produce by daddy disney
The writers took the 'trapped with a crazy, drunk, abusive and religious figure' and subtly wrote it into the High Evolutionary's character. This is the reason the character was easy to hate and terrifying. Most viewers had an uneasy feeling about the character because those subtle dark innuendos are common real-life evil person traits some of which were shown on screen. It was clever writing that created a compelling villain. Kang, however, is a more complex character to write about because he is not inherently evil but rather a person that knows the end, therefore his evil actions in between are a means to an end and do not matter in the grand scheme of things to him. The writers of Ant-Man struggled to balance that side of Kang's character arc and ended up creating a generic Marvel villain. He Who Remains on the other hand is exactly how Kang is supposed to be written, a nonchalant person who cares less about what evil he inflicts on those around him, radiating subtle innuendos associated with serial killers or physcopaths. That is a relatable villian that is easy to hate by the viewers.
HE is MCU's Frollo, enough said. The twisted ideals' enough, but to go as far as decimating an entire planet, that he created.. Is unimaginably sinister
Very well said and put together
We were told to hate Kang. We were shown why we need to hate high evolutionary. Edit:Never got so many likes :)
Who told you to hate Kang?
@@foamytomato9342 Kang did.
@@foamytomato9342 the end of Loki season 1 duh? Also the writing of Quantumania
@@foamytomato9342 Bruh!
RIght displacing entire populations, bombing refugee camps or genocide on a massive scale didn't do it for you. Got to have some edgelord kick a puppy because "he's so Crazy".
If the High Evolutionary is confirmed to be a Kang variant, I’m sure Chukwudi Iwuji would be perfect for it. The High Evolutionary is not only better than Kang, but he also could be a variant of Kang. Who knows, maybe we might see him again.
Better than Majors
@@MegaDynamiteDan yeah
@@MegaDynamiteDan bro what? majors preformance literally carried the movie. How can actor plays a character =/= how a writer writes a character. If this is a joke about the allegations then my bad lol, otherwhise tf are you talking about? 😂
@@echo_z319 Carry my butt that movie was a disgrace especially Modok and Majors just didn't seem intimidating and his acting seems to be from a school play which every time he spoke like those generic Saturday cartoon villains I just go "blabady blabady blah blah" as I couldn't take him seriously sorry he's one of my least favorite actors
@@Faiza_Amani_MarvelFan_earth616 Iwuji acting is oscar worthy while Majors acting was from a school play
Just saw the movie today and I can definitely say that High Evolutionary is one scary individual. Thought Warlock was going to be the villain in this movie, boi was I wrong.
Warlock in this movie was just to damage rocket and then fly into people 😂 dragging them to some distance
Jokes apart, they introduced a character as powerful as Warlock to make us realise how OP High Evolutionary really is. Plus, the way the Guardians tackled Warlock made us realise that they are a great team and was a premonition that they would kick HE's arse in the climax.
Well, you can partly blame conservative pundits trying to start up shit (because their -political pawn- got fired, the fuck they care what she's doing now that talking about her is no longer relevant), and also blame Disney for acquiescing to a largely non-existent public pressure (ffs he already came clean to them about those tweets when he was hired years before because SPOILER, major companies do background checks before hiring someone). Seriously, outside of OAN and Newsmax, barely heard calls for Gunn's dismissal. 2017, right around Vol 2's release, Gunn was talking up about Vol 3 AND possibly Vol 4. There was a plan. Warlock was always meant to join the Guardians, but in Vol 4. After his villain + redemption arc in Vol 3. Now add in getting fired, wooed by DC, given Feige Status by them = He wants/needs to end it with Vol 3. The Warlock redemption doesn't feel like an ending, so enter the High Evolutionary + passing the team to Rocket (Bradley Cooper). But since Warlock was teased at the end of Vol 2, had to squueze that in somehow.
High evolutionary was amazing the actor who played him absolutely killed it, the whole movie I kept thinking exactly this that this guy is everything Kang should have been. He wasn't perfect but he was much better handled and portrayed
Um no just no. If you like an actor making a whining boring character. Most of the torture he did was just throwing creatures in a cell and making them evolve.
@@user-sb1vz9pv5y Hell is wrong with you
@@user-sb1vz9pv5y and you prefer kang that is all talk? Talking about how powerful and terrifying he is, wiping out timelines blah blah... all talk but gets defeated by ants (yes i know the bullshit advance civilization reasoning but still it was ants) High Evolutionary shows to us how terrifying he is by being a complete psychopath killing off rocket's friends infront of him and wiping out civilzations. High Evolutionary beats kang in every category except power
@@seanjustin2082 bro was shown being able to create an explosion coming from him, but couldnt do shit against ants
@@seanjustin2082 When ever kang is on screen and says something I go blah blah blah as I couldn't take him seriously
I was already a fan of Gunn, but GOTG3 had made me fall in love with his work even more. I'm not much of a DCU fan, but I'm excited to see what Gunn brings to the table
Peacemaker was a great DC series. Has the heartwarming silliness that GotG has, but in lower scale threat and much much more gore action scenes.
Thanos was introduced way better than Kang.
Thanos was Thanos bro ....no talk only shows up does his work and leaves While kang 😒 wants to banter with Scott and refuse to return his daughter for God knows what reason 😂
yea, whereas kang is more dangerous which they could've done better in
Thanos as villain was better cause marvel showed us different levels of threats and then the boss(thanos) and story was revolving around avengers alike now just thoughts
@@AmanVerma-mo7he 😂😂
Thanos threatening Ronan was amazing. Could see fear in his eyes
Aftar a long time Marvel dropped a movie that’s actually feels like old Marvel ❤ Thanks James gunn❤
For me the moment Thanos wiped the floor with Hulk, I knew that this was not your average MCU movie.
This is back when Marvel had competent directors and writers. They perfectly sets up Thanos debut for the audience to think that Thanos will be The unstoppable force that the avengers will die trying to stop him. Marvel wants to set up Kang debut to be more impactful and terrifying than Thanos by showing us Kang getting his ass beat by ants of a side character lol
I don't know why but the high eveloutionary really made my blood boil, maybe it was how the movie made us attached to all those cute names just so he could kill them, or have us like the people on the earth like planet just to wipe them out.
So glad that they didn't gave us his backstory with some kind of trauma or torcher 😅
@@AmanVerma-mo7he torture*
Hi!! I am you🥺
Not really. Kang destroyed ENTIRE universes. That includes animals and sentient beings. Wait until Kang starts killing off members of the avengers.
@@Fb-gj5rn. In the movie, Kang said He used to kills many Avengers
I feel like with the whole delays and stuff that Kang will be written better than he was in QuantumMania and be more brilliant and dangerous like High Evolutionary considering James Gunn apparently wrote Guardians 3's script not long after Guardians 2 came out while Jeff Loveness writer for QuantumMania had a couple months at most. I feel like Guardians 3 and the delays will have the MCU learn some stuff like not being afraid to go dark and sad
Don't get your hopes up! MCU knows how to dissapoint. I want it to be great and as dark as Guardians 3, but Marvel Studios has been consistently dissapointing lately. Fingers crossed that they fulfill
@@6scar911 granted the downhill with not well recieved stuff in Phase 4 was when Chapek was under control and he apparently wanted more projects less polished per year instead of under Iger where it's now less projects more polished per year hopefully it stays that way. Along with who pushed to rush the cgi artists and was with the MCU since the beginning got fired not that long ago
Honestly between Love and Thunder, Wakanda Forever, No Way Home, and Vol. 3 I’m tired of the dark and sad stuff
@@giancosheridan1490 5 films? Wow. Most of the MCU is too feel good and campy
@@giancosheridan1490 love and thunder was dark and* sad? 🤔
They should really make high evo a Kang variant and have him come back in an insanely powerful way. I'm not very worried or excited to see what happens with Kang outside of Loki S2.
The only issue with this I see is James Gunn won't be writing it lol
I puked reading this comment.
Tbh I'm not even that excited to see what happens with Kang in Loki S2. I thought we'd be getting a version of the TVA where Kang is outright in charge and conquering. Instead, we're getting Jonathan Majors with a Einstein wig and a prop mustache. Really not the same in terms of intrigue or intimidation factor.
@@stevendchu word
They already shot themselves in the foot with that one. They showed that every single Kang variant looks the same.
I have the same feeling. High Evolutionary's cruelty was clear. The Kang in AntMan3 lacked depth, I was constantly waiting for him to do something major
And yet high evolutionary was a mid character. Kang was banished for being the most destructive and dangerous of ALL his variants which says something
@@Fb-gj5rn idc what it says, what am I reading a book?! No. I’m watching a movie so SHOW me
@@Dr.LongMonkey that was my reaction to high evolutionary. This guy just screams and we have 10 mins of flashback showing how bad he was. Should’ve made the flashback a HUGE portion of the film. Then we would’ve really seen how bad he was
@@Fb-gj5rn he destroyed a whole planet and killed millions if not billions of intelligent animals, on screen. Is that not enough
@@Fb-gj5rn I think you're conflating the movie and the comics too much here. Sure, Kang is the bigger and better villain in the comics, but in the MCU so far, High Evolutionary has had the better writing and a more fleshed out character.
Actually looking forward to seeing James Gunn DCEU. I don't think he can make it work the way he writes movies but it will be an interesting take indeed. Also GOTG 3 was really good
He did good on bright burn so I think it will be a nice fresh take on the DC universe
@@lovetodrawstufff3644 Didn't The Suicide Squad and Peacemaker was well received. He definitely did good on supper hero movie looking at the list of the movie he directed. DCEU is now definitely in better hand than Marvel.
@@Duong-zv3pf Yh, but I think you can mess with characters like peacemaker or suicide squad but not Superman and Batman such characters the way he has done in his career......I really hope he can pull it off. DCEU was started 10 years ago. We can't waste more time on it not getting a stable live action.
In antman,to show how cruel Kang is - they could have been shown Kang killing Cassie infront of ant man and reverse the time . What he only mentioned in that scene...that would have been way better.
Yeaaaa 😮 that would have been much better and would have made that dad and daughter connection movie was supposed to be made on
Nah the better scene will be the kill Scott and reverse his death. Then for the ending, leave Scott beat to shit with the wasp left behind in the quantum realm while kang leaves with Cassie and his military to go destroy Scott’s universe
Exactly, it doesn't even need to be on screen, just have the camera on Scott's face as kang clenches his fist and then a sickening crunch. Then have him turn his fist with a clock and the scream and crunch reverse, and Cassie is panting on the floor. Done, marvel.
Kang is all talk though, thats why High Evolutionary is wayyyy better. High Evolutionary is doing what kang is talking. Kang talking about erasing civilizations well High Evolutionary show to us how its done. Kang talking about torture well guess what High Evolutionary does that and its done 100x better than Kang ever did to Cassie. It is so disappointing that the lesser hyped villain turned out to be better than the supposed big bad. Hopefully competent writers will handle Kang in the future and make sure to fix this mess
marvel clearly just don't have the balls for scene like that.
It's great how Gunn has improved with his villains, we start with a not very memorable Ronan, then an interesting Ego, a curious Starro, a human trash like Peacemaker's dad, and I think High Evolutionary is his Best, the Actor is Fantastic , Design, Soundtrack, getting the public to hate him and his Presence on the screen is Perfect at all times
Not really. He was a mid villain who was just messed up just as thanos because he tortured and replaced nebulas limbs and organs with cybernetics.
@@Fb-gj5rnRonan forgettable?
@@mariposa9506Ronan is pretty forgettable. He is a generic military villain.
@@mariposa9506 Ronan was a serious piece of work but in all honesty, he was forgettable compared to all the other villains that GUnn took the reigns by comparsion
@@akmal94ibrahim Ronan is the perfect example of a generic villain actually working. Most of the times those villains make the movie worse, but Ronan worked perfectly with the movie
the last time i came this early my girlfriend cried.
Omfg
What?!
lmao
POV : you get the joke 💀
YES
The High Evolutionary is what happens when a villain gets a well written script no matter what his power level is. James Gunn is a genius and as much as I absolutely HATED the High Evolutionary and wanted him dead his performance was so great I kinda hope he isn’t really dead so that we can see him again. He was the only mcu villian imo that felt truly villainous and evil whereas Thanos there was room to understand his reasoning and Kang just had a weak script cus Kang is an extremely strong character with a great actor but Kang doesn’t feel villainous and scary like the High Evolutionary
Gunns is good. From hating peacemaker in suicide squad to loving him in the PEACEMAKER series. That shift is a proof to me of what good directing and writing can do
I felt terrified and scared when there was a close shot of high evo giving his maniac look at the G's. Required no dialogue, no build-ups, no voiceover, but Pure emotion? Nailed it Gunn. For Marvel, As our lad is also a brilliant writer and a marvel fanboy..why don't you give him a chance? MCU. I'm pretty sure, This gem will blow ur minds..
Said this while in the cinema he was ruthless and unforgiving kang was too cool
They should have included a scene where Kang brings Scott out to a 'trophy room', and Scott looks at Steve's shield, Mjolnir, the Eye of Agamotto, Hela's Helmet, Thanos' armour, and various Iron Man suits. Scott could have entered the Quantum Realm without a suit and Kang could have given Scott one of his Variant's suits, telling him he had was only giving Scott a limited amount of Pym Particles and Scott later runs out. What If Series had this exact concept with the Collector, but they could taken it to the next level, included Xavier's wheelchair, Magneto's Helmet, a Venom Symbiote, Thor's armour, and different suits from previous Marvel Movies, they could have then walked through a hanger containing the Wakandan Royal Talon Fighter, the Avengers Quinjet and the X-men Blackbird, all of the Guardians' ships maybe even the Shield Helicarrier.
This is what Marvel needs right now❤
I definitely think quantumania should’ve included another major character such as Loki or a few other avengers. This way, it’d show to the audience that it takes a lot to stop even one variant of Kang. And like you mentioned, it would be nicer if Kang was presented as a brilliant strategist. If he was presented like Grand Admiral Thrawn from star wars, I think that’d build him up as a conqueror who utilizes more of his intelligence rather than brute strength to carry out his plans.
Honestly it's the first marvel movie since No way home that actually "felt" like a proper movie , it wasn't trying to build up anything specific in the mcu agenda and it felt like it's own movie. I might go back to see it again 😅
Few days ago I also thought the same. They created great villains like Gorr, High Evolutionary etc. But the lack of proper planning among the projects killed them fast and unjustly. Villains like them deserve to be appeared in more than one movie for the establishment of their character.
*may contain spoilers 4:44 everybody in my theater cry in this scene. Especially when they see Lyla, Floor, and my boy Teeth waving to rocket in afterlife
Kang still didnt made an impact among the audience like Thanos did. I think marvel learned Quality over quantity through the experimental phase 4 . Now my hopes on secret invasion , Loki and Deadpool 3
Bro, Thanos made impact on MCU in 2 AVENGERS movies, not we gotta wait till Kang Dynasty and secret wars to see his full potential
@@nikitasharma7805 Thanos didn't get a whole movie just for introduction. Thanos was doing cameos in other movies and Kang who got a whole movie just for his introduction didn't succeed in showing the impact of the conqueror and what i hate most is they didn't show any flashback. Would be better if they showed Kang fighting different beings or Avengers in multiverse . They didn't show anything all they did show is just a 5 second quick flashback which is finished in the glimpse of our eyes.Thats what i hate in Love and thunder they didn't show anything related to Gorr going and hunting down any God's even his character had huge potential. Hope Marvel will do better in the coming movies and series.
@@moviescenes5098 Yep Infinity war was basically Thanos debut and not only that the russos had to include like 20 plus characters in a 2 hour movie each giving them equal screentime still made Thanos a household name. Kang on the other hand had a whole dedicated series for him and a 2 hour movie for him to shine and while i liked He who remains that still wasnt enough to outshine thanos first 5 minutes screentime in infinity war
I agree, High Evolutionary is one of the best MCU's villain
I had Goosebumps the moment the high evolutionary told his scientists to incinerate rocket and his animal buddies he's so cruel and I liked that he's doing it by choice
When High Evolutionary explodes his workers, I got goosebumps and shivers
As im concerned, James Gunn himself wrote and directed GOTG 3. So applaud to him, well done, high-quality and emotional ride that is.
I think that a good succesor for Gunn (if a Guardians 4 is made) would be Edgar Wright. if anyone know how to create a movie with this kind of spark, incredible visuals and perfectly using the soundtrack, its him
Edgar Wright specifically knows how to mesh the music with a film perfectly. Look at Baby Driver (I love how during the shoot out after Baby sabotages the postal job, all the gun shots match the song beat perfectly) same with Scott Pilgrim.
@@empac8631 Baby Driver was okay. Nothing spectacular.
Edgar Wright was technically unwanted for the first Ant Man movie. it clearly will not happen. disney tends to push away brilliant minds. Wright and Gunn, who straight went to the concurence. even Whedon who you can say whatever you want about, he made the first avengers, that is undeniably a milestone.
Zemo is another example of it... He literary scattered the biggest Avenger team on several levels... & we watched him making it happen with his wit. Arguably, being a normal human, he was the best villain at that time or even still..
Great video lad, I watched guardians 3 before quantumania and really wish I hadn’t - you’ve got it spot on with this one
As an embodiment of evil myself, I'm definitely a fan of The High Evolutionary, he's so relatable.
Nah. Kang is WAY more relatable. The kang we see is He Who Remains in a younger form. He’s not inherently evil like high evolutionary but he decides to do crime to make sure the multiverse stay fine. I never once felt the high evolutionary to be scary or menacing other than he was just a f-ked up villain doing unethical animal experiments
Relatable doesn't automatically make a character better. Relatability is only an aspect of making a character interesting
Okay Satan.
For me personally kang was all talks and all but I feel like it was a build up to what he’ll be capable of doing so we just have to give him time
Yup. I’m fact, Scott doomed everyone by allowing Kang to have access to ANY universe with the Time Machine engine. He might actually even be he who remains but the younger version
Yea, I don't think they planned on fleshing out Kang in the AntMan movie. Just felt like a random drop in by him.
I agree. Avengers 5 will literally be Kang’s movie, so we’ll definitely get to see what he can really do outside the Quantum Realm. Quantumania was supposed to trick us into thinking Kang is a dumb one-off villain. But no, he’ll be back with a vengeance, and so will every other variant of him.
I hope so after that disappointing debut, A big bad to be threatening doesnt need to get his ass beat in his first movie. Instead show the audience how terrifying he is by killing one of the main characters and he should be defeated in secret wars not in his first movie. I know Kang is only starting to build up but it got off to a bad start
@@batostudios946 but still it leaves an impression of kang to the viewers that he is not threatening as they told as he be, the box office reflects that. If he was done right in quantumania, we would'nt have any of this videos popping up that High Evolutionary is better than Kang
Dude I love your videos checking things that You found in marvel movies but... These videos making analysis are just awesome!!!
Thank you for making this video, Kevin
Guardians got me heavily into my emotions. When rocket was laying there and we all thought that he was a goner, it made me think of my older brother that died in the hospital while recovering from heart surgery. I was a mess for sure. The story for guardians 3 is one of the best stories written for the MCU in a while.
Really should appreciate ur efforts ❤
I was literally just watching your old videos when you uploaded this.
Lad, ur hired! welcome to MCU! Wish u buddy hear this soon 😉... Great points, great vid!
The show-don't-tell approach is such an obviously effective method. Like, they already did it with Thanos and saw how effective it was. And somehow they decided to make Kang a villain that just gave speeches and told stories 💀
And high evolutionary was just a messed up screaming villain. He had no demonstration of his REAL potential for being menacing or horrifying. Kang at least was being built up to be a even bigger villain
@@Fb-gj5rn the man casually killed Rocket’s friends and blew up a planet. Plus he isn’t supposed to be some super powerful saga villain. Kang on the other hand is supposed to be the next Thanos, they say he’s super powerful, but all he does is talk and lose.
@@jefferyandbob3137"just wait till you meet my variants." We've met three of them. They all died and lost. And are all laughably useless. The latest one turned to spaghetti 💀💀
This is the reason why I'm very excited for DCU. I understand Snyderbots' hate, but a true DC fan would be excited to see a great filmmaker being in charge of the best comic book franchise (DC)
I'll be honest, I wasn't so sure if it was too early or too late to reboot the DCU, but knowing James Gunn as a filmmaker, I have complete faith in him handling DC.
@@l.i.o.n3698 exactly! I love Zack Snyder’s Justice League, and I am sad to know that there won’t be any planned sequels moving forward. On the plus side, DC is still in good hands with James Gunn and Matt Reeves directing their own Batman and Superman movies.
@@l.i.o.n3698 Lol, your statement is confusing. James Gunn has nothing to do with Shazam's quality. It's still sucks no matter what.
Totally agree with you! Thanks for the amazing content.
It’s really cool how different in gotg trilogy main theme music are based on the main focus character where Quill main theme is more heroes united while Rocket is more the final run if you know what i mean even though the main gotg theme music is still there in some scene but didn’t use mostly in the main awesome scene
My only issue was his actual physical power; He was defeated super easily by the guardians. The second they came head to head the guardians recked him. I did not mind this too much because his threat was incredibly and more importantly his skill was his intelligence. So I did not mind it THAT much. Still it was noticeable to me.
I mean not all villains need to be super powerful or physical threats. Lex Luthor is one of the most famous super-villains but aside from his suits, his intelligence more than makes him a worthy adversary for the Man of Steel.
the thing you don't get that is the guardians were so coordinated that they didn't gave him the gap to act in that fight..and also its a hidden meaning that the guardians have grown as family
But it was never stated that High Evolutionary is really powerful and strong character. Yes he beat up Adam Warlock but as a CHILD. So I think it's reasonable that he was so "easily" defeated by the Guardians.
He's gonna return someday filled with rage and hopefully with his comic accurate suit to patch up his injuries
Have you forget about rocket that smarter than him? They even said that they already prepared the "tech" for him, he's smart but not smarter they even explanating it on the film goddammit
Literally thought that while watching the movie. High ev just made me feel scared and cringy and actually worried about what he could do next.
Your points are valid 💯 This just goes to show that in the end a great story is more important than great characters.
I love watching your videos!!
The sad thing is that Marvel has had a really good version of Kang portrayed in the past. Avengers Earth's Mightiest Heroes has an excellent rendition of Kang that the MCU should really take notes from.
Vol. 3 is gong to be a hard rewatch due to how terrifying the High Evolutionary. Gives off really severe abusive and narcissistic parent vibes
Kang defeated Ants, even though they wore advanced amour and capable of building a thousands of years evolved technology in a single day. Where were they during the last scene when Kang fought Ant man and the Wasp?
You never miss Lad!!!
Such a brilliant movie! I already miss James Gunn in MCU :( I just want to see Superman Legacy and what he does with DC 🙌🏻
You hit every nail that is needed to keep the house up on the head!
Brilliant video
Scott Lang should stayed stuck in Quantum Realm to imprison Kang... It would have shown Kang as an Avenger level threat... Telling Cassey to assemble another team and he will stall Kang till then.
What would imprisoning one Kang do? Infinite variants of him are getting organised. On that scale, it's wasted narrative as it amounts to nothing. Scott is more useful in the world leading up to Kang Dynasty as he is one of only a handful of people to meet a Kang. Killing Scott is really the only other way to have done it, and they don't seem to want that.
I'll miss James Gunn so much at Marvel. He should've been the one governing the cosmic side of MCU and we could've been very lucky. Now I can't wait what he'll do at DC and I know it's gonna be so good. Marvel shouldn't have fired him without thorough investigation first. What a waste.
All of it is because of ONE executive from Disney ruining everything and firing James Gunn without thinking things and taking too long to settle the whole deal.
I love your videos so much
Bro you spoke my heart... Ek number!
I really like these videos you make every once in a while where you explain why a story or character works or why it doesn't. You really have a lot to say, and I just wanna say don't think that movie breakdowns are all you can do, and don't let them hold you back from your full potential. I think we're all down for more videos like these👍
I agree, hope Jonathan Major not guilty and we see how he as Kang destroy planets
The details you picked just makes the movie more immersive
Rogue One showed that you can make a movie where the heroes die but complete something important. Do the same with some information about Kang getting known to everyone and Marvel can do the show version of Kang.
high evolutionary is when you actually have competent writers
I’ve always thought Marvel should’ve made a movie that takes place in a different universe but we don’t know that until the end where Kang kills our heroes and the universe. Would’ve made him a direct threat that made us understand how powerful he is and given us the personal factor
We need your breakdown of the hallway fight, and when they team up on the high evolutionary
i totally agree, but we still need to consider that we're going to see so many Kangs, directed by so many directors, that basing our judgement on the only two kangs that we already have is a bit premature
If Majors can't continue as Kang for legal reasons, they should seriously consider making something up for the High Evolutionary to take his place. Just have him be some Kang variant or something.
I think you nailed all of the points. GoTG vol. 3 is unlike most of the MCU movies. We cared all of the Guardians characters and that's why I always afraid that one of them is going to die (mostly Rocket/Drax) because the villain's objective is very personal. Kang on the other hand feels like another MCU homework that we need to learn throughout the Multiverse saga. I was expecting one of the Ant-Man characters to die to lift up the stakes for the future movies but surprisingly they survived. And I was a bit disappointed. Maybe because I don't have any connection to any of these characters. I actually rooted for Kang to win at the end but maybe he would make a surprising return in the future movies? Who knows.
I don't think that Kang is dead.
I'm really glad you're becoming more and more vocal about your personal opinions. It's important for people to point out where media and pop culture is flat out WRONG.
You’re so spot on with everything. I felt the same thing once I’ve seen both of these movies. You should write for marvel!
honestly it is not the character of kangs fault it is the writing that is to blame
Exactly 💯
I mean, that's what he said.
Yeah, thats the point
"THERE IS NO GOD, THAT'S WHY I STEPPED IN!"
You nailed it. Hope Marvel is watching. High Evolutionary gave me some William Striker vibes too. Another good villain to emulate.
10/10 explanation bro
I'm more scared of The High Evolutionary than I am of Kang! 😱
Kang in loki was better than mcu Kang, crazy how downhill it went
Kang in Loki is also MCU Kang
He who remains also from the MCU dude!😅😂😂
@@romansionis2470 no he aint
@@Faiza_Amani_MarvelFan_earth616 no he aint
@Beluga-Man I'm blocking off loki and mcu Kang in different universes cause how bad they treated my boy
I love how he tells us how long the ads are so I know how long to skip
Seeing Canadian Lad getting sponsored by other Marvel medias brings a smile to my face
Same problem can be said in case of gorr in thor : love and thunder
Those problems would've been solved if they stayed true to the source material
No, the character dovelepment of gorr is already done(in a very bad manner)so, we can see it is a lost potential, but in case of Kang, we only got a introductory movie
high evolutionary looks like the android guy Peter quill fought in volume 1.
tbh when kang was shown in loki, I still got chills, the moment it gone to dust is his portraying in ant man
Ayo Part 3 of the Canadian Rant is finally here 🔥🔥
Even though Kang os supposed to be the most dangerous villain we've seen yet, hes easily one of the least intimidating
So I don’t know what it is about Kang but I just can’t buy him as this master manipulator that has been controlling everything behind the scenes heck I’m having a hard time buying him as a villain at all, if it turns out that he hasn’t been doing any of this and just happened to get lucky and be the last man alive because the last two real bad guys oneshot each other in a stand off and now he is there been all like “”well as I’m the last one alive no one can say I didn’t do all this stuff””
This is one of the reasons I’ve gotten to enjoy this channel and your content. One thing about the MCU nowadays is they are hit or miss.
Wow love you bro❤❤
Heyy! I love your videos and mean no offence in the following words but: Kang has so much time left ahead of him, while the HE (high evolutionary) had only 1 movie, meaning they had to show everything about him quickly. I think kang will be marked as a brilliant villain in the upcoming movie, and almost garantee it!
I doubt it. Kang was no real threat in the two movies we saw him in. Just get some giant ants and he's toast.
I'm okay with the approach to Kang because that was his first real appearance as a villain. There will be plenty of time to establish him as intelligent and dangerous, and there will be a lot of heroes he'll be able to kill to demonstrate how powerful he is. I think that'll be a good way for him to be shown how powerful he is by killing at least a few strong characters.
Yes since kang Dynasty is going to show kang's point of view, we can expect flashbacks of ruthless kang.
This is exactly my reason too. They only had 1 time to use The High Evolutionary, but they get to build up Kang
That is, IF he gets off of the case
Finally, someone intellectual
@@pranav.m.warrier7407 actor switch. Not too hard.
Hey Canadian lad please do a video on secret invasion trailer
Normally i would agree with what you are saying but here I think that the portrayal of kang in antman eas just to put in perspective what kang can do so that when we see the kangs in the post credit scene we would be terrified if they would have shown kang being ruthless and destroying planets the future movies with kang would soon become repetitive granted all thr kangs have different abilities but they need some strong suits to show how the other kangs are superior than the banished one sure we would have loved more screentime for ksng and watch him destroy timelines but not showing him do it this time will make it so much more exciting when they eventually show it.