Smallest Mini Aircraft in the World Part 2

2024 ж. 2 Мам.
7 870 703 Рет қаралды

Today we are going to show you the smallest mini aircraft in the world part 2. Because you liked our first video smallest mini aircraft in the world with engine and pilot so much we decided to create a part 2. We even found some more insanely small mini aircraft this time, which will amaze you. If you like flying car or handmade vehicles that are quite special like the stuff colinfuze creates you came to the right place. All of the mini aircraft come with an engine and can be operated by a pilot. Some of the mini aircraft engine are in the ultralight aircraft category and some are even compliant with the Part 103 regulation which means you can fly those mini planes without a license in the US aviation.
Would you fly such a small airplane? Tell us in the comments below!
⏱️TIMESTAMPS⏱️
0:00 Intro
0:21 OpenSky M-02J
1:50 Wilkes Subsonex JSX-2
2:56 DCL Big Drone
3:52 Archaeopteryx
4:58 Copterpack
5:53 Wee Bee
6:59 Airboard 2.0 by Dragon Air
7:53 Bensen B-8
Books we recommend
✈ The Pilot's Handbook of Ultralight amzn.to/38gbMAC *
✈ Record-breaking Microlight amzn.to/3s1hX3i *
✈Learn to FLY on the CHEAP amzn.to/2XeI34P *
✈ Microlight Pilot's Handbook amzn.to/2XgbiUY *
✈ Ultralight Helicopter Experience amzn.to/2XhmP6h *
* I may earn commissions for purchases made through the links above.
Playlists to watch:
🔥 Awesome Kid's Vehicles: • Video
🔥 Aircraft You Can Fly WITHOUT a License: • Aircraft You Can Fly W...
🔥 Billionaire Secrets: • Billionaire secrets
🔥 Secrets you Shouldn't Know: • Secrets You Shouldn't ...
Videos to watch:
▶️ Smallest Mini Aircraft In The World - • Smallest Mini Aircraft...
▶️ 10 Aircraft You Can Fly WITHOUT a License Part - • 10 Aircraft You Can Fl...
▶️ 10 Cheapest Ultralight Helicopters You Can Buy - • 10 Cheapest Ultralight...
▶️ 10 Cheapest Airplanes Anyone Can Buy - • 10 Cheapest Airplanes ...
▶️ Most Luxurious Private Submarines in the World - • Most Luxurious Private...
▶️ Inside Marine One, The $237 Million Helicopter - • Inside Marine One, The...
▶️ 10 Aircraft You Can Fly WITHOUT a License Part 2 - • 10 Aircraft You Can Fl...
▶️ 10 Aircraft You Can Fly WITHOUT a License Part 3 - • 10 Aircraft You Can Fl...
▶️ 10 Awesome Kid's Vehicles You Need To Ride Part 2 - • Video
▶️ 10 Awesome Kid's Vehicles You Need to Ride Part 4 - • 10 Awesome Kid’s Vehic...
Follow us on:
✔️ KZhead: www.bit.ly/beyondFactsSUB
#aircraftg
#small
#aviaition
#pilot
#ultralight
#airplane
#fly
#plane
#mini
#Beyondfacts
Beyond Facts is the channel to unveil all the interesting facts for you. Whether you want to learn about the lifestyle of celebrities, how they spend their millions, the most
expensive things in the world, secret military technology, money topics, and even some of the strangest discoveries - we've got.

Пікірлер
  • Make sure to watch *Part 1* 🔥 kzhead.info/sun/bNV7mpyRqqusm4k/bejne.html 🔥

    @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • 900 hours = 2 years? Then I thought about it, 900 hours would be me just trying to sort out the parts then giving up and and trying again in 2 years time.

      @jasonnikolic@jasonnikolic2 жыл бұрын
    • @@jasonnikolic you and me both.

      @coltsfan79@coltsfan792 жыл бұрын
    • 44k is not Cheap its expensive

      @crimsonpyro6076@crimsonpyro60762 жыл бұрын
    • 1:27 were has my counrty gone. Seeing nils holgeson brought back To life without 2 living beeings as they were

      @Patrickonchohissonlykov@Patrickonchohissonlykov2 жыл бұрын
    • U are WeTop

      @rafaellinkens5590@rafaellinkens55902 жыл бұрын
  • So, we're just - not gonna talk about the thumbnail? 😪

    @SquidPlas@SquidPlas Жыл бұрын
  • Gyrocopters are a blast. And actually very safe being they are always in auto rotation…. But I guess research isn’t this channels speciality

    @theduker3@theduker32 жыл бұрын
    • I think half the budget went to making the script as cringe inducing as possible.

      @NotForHire42@NotForHire422 жыл бұрын
    • I guess that's why the channel is named "Beyond Facts"; wouldn't want all those pesky facts getting in the way of a video presentation. LOL

      @paulwhitman4864@paulwhitman48642 жыл бұрын
    • Another Don’t Watch channel selection.

      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn39352 жыл бұрын
    • I know, right? Can't believe gyros were, like, some amazing discovery. Anyone remember the birdman from "Road Warrior"?

      @geoffreytudor5674@geoffreytudor56742 жыл бұрын
    • It’s a click bait channel

      @bored2323@bored23232 жыл бұрын
  • The Gyrocopter was probably the safest of all the aircraft. Shows how much some people with a KZhead channel know.

    @douglasreagan4979@douglasreagan49792 жыл бұрын
    • Remember it well, always wanted one

      @Shadow-sm8hs@Shadow-sm8hs9 ай бұрын
    • I`d include yourself in those stats. The Gyrocopter is in fact one of the LEAST safe aircraft. Its current stats are 27.1 accidents/100,000 flying hours, General aviation is 1.1/100,000. I mean you can be stupid and argue if you want but those stats are combined average from the European and US air accident safety boards..you can go look them up yourself.

      @poiujnbvcxdswq@poiujnbvcxdswq2 ай бұрын
    • @@poiujnbvcxdswq skewed stats, 1 gyrocopter are more unregulated, and untrained as an whole, 2 look at the death rates per accidents, even if it's motor shuts down, it's safe to land with.

      @stefthorman8548@stefthorman85482 ай бұрын
  • The Gyrocopter is the only one on that list that I would fly if push came to shove. It has the least stressed components and if the engine fails it can still land relatively safely due to autogyro of main blades.

    @tomedward8652@tomedward8652 Жыл бұрын
    • ^ This

      @gunnarliljas8459@gunnarliljas8459 Жыл бұрын
    • Been there, done that, still alive. Best fun you can have with your pants on. And you are spot on about strength. Check out @eigyro.

      @EIGYRO@EIGYRO Жыл бұрын
    • Correction; Search eigyro for my gyro vids.

      @EIGYRO@EIGYRO Жыл бұрын
    • I saw a vid recently of homemade helicopters flying. You'd have to be nuts to take one of those things more than about 10-15 feet off the ground.

      @BrandonLeech@BrandonLeech Жыл бұрын
    • I also like the gyrocopter

      @solomonjenkins9505@solomonjenkins9505 Жыл бұрын
  • The thumbnail is beyond facts that's for sure.

    @nooch8692@nooch86922 жыл бұрын
    • Could be an amputee. 😆

      @lynnjohnson2482@lynnjohnson24822 жыл бұрын
  • I owned a1953 Single seat Mooney Mite for many years. It is the smallest production aircraft ever made. It was also the most fun I ever had flying 😊

    @robertblaney5033@robertblaney50332 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Robert Blaney, thanks for your comment. Are you still flying? Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • Sweet! Congratulations!!

      @CurtissCain@CurtissCain2 жыл бұрын
    • The Mooney Mite is one of the coolest small planes ever built! Awesome!

      @crooked-halo@crooked-halo2 жыл бұрын
    • prove it!

      @BestPlconEarth50@BestPlconEarth502 жыл бұрын
    • wow

      @mdmofij8966@mdmofij8966 Жыл бұрын
  • That was a hatchet job on Benson at the end. They have been around forever and its actually quite safe. An autogyro is safer than a helocopter because it is autorotating all the time. If it loses the engine, it just comes down to the ground at a reasonable speed.

    @scottfranco1962@scottfranco19622 жыл бұрын
    • I thought the same damn thing. An autogyro is always in autorotation (as opposed to a helicopter) and like you said, if the engine quits the air is already flowing upwards thru the rotor disk. A helicopter has to transition to autorotation mode if the engine quits, the air is flowing downward thru the rotor disk normally. The accidents that have happened for autogyros usually are related to pilot error, not the fault of the machine. But it is fun for people to make videos and hype things they are clueless about.

      @markswinford4806@markswinford48062 жыл бұрын
    • Dude that made the video knows nothing about aircraft, he just makes up clickbait compilations.

      @1Thatstrangeguy@1Thatstrangeguy2 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, well... Gyrocopters are claimed by the kit manufacturers to be super-safe, but half of all gyrocopter forced landings are fatal, a stat that isn't even close for helicopters or fixed wing aircraft.

      @masondegaulle5731@masondegaulle57312 жыл бұрын
    • @@masondegaulle5731 - produce your stats for this comment, a link to the claim you are making. And so what are saying, that Gyros are inherently unsafe?

      @markswinford4806@markswinford48062 жыл бұрын
    • @@markswinford4806 forced landings are inherently unsafe.

      @bobdrooples@bobdrooples2 жыл бұрын
  • I saw a Benson regularly while living in Pa, maybe once a month. When I moved to Texas, I was pleasantly surprised to see another one flying around here, but only about once a year.

    @robertsmithington8892@robertsmithington8892 Жыл бұрын
  • You should take a look at the gyrocopter in action in the James Bond movie, "You only live twice." It certainly did not tear itself apart.

    @sammarcum4931@sammarcum49312 жыл бұрын
    • And Mad Max II. Gyrocopters have been around for ages -- not nearly as rare as this video tries to make it appear.

      @couttsy222@couttsy2222 жыл бұрын
  • If you're interested in buying a gyrocopter (which is a really safe and fun aircraft, if engineered properly): Avoid the earliest designs, who lacks a horisontal stabiliser. They can be iffy in certain situations. I saw one in the video, that's why I mention it.

    @eskileriksson4457@eskileriksson44572 жыл бұрын
  • You know you guys really do show a lot of awesome technology stuff I used to dream about when I was a kid and now for the right amount of money your dreams can come true when it comes to flight

    @robertdelmarsh6350@robertdelmarsh63502 жыл бұрын
  • 6:42 As an example of tech advancement, the original Quickie used an 18 HP Onan industrial motor (with some mods), and reached well over 100 MPH.

    @bricefleckenstein9666@bricefleckenstein96662 жыл бұрын
    • Those are excellent little engines. I had a Gravely tractor with one in it and it ran so smooth, like a sewing machine. I really wish I hadn't sold it.

      @WalldoTheWInner@WalldoTheWInner2 жыл бұрын
  • Identical principal and design to the Keil Kraft Spook chuck glider my dad built in the 1950/60's

    @polygonalmasonary@polygonalmasonary2 жыл бұрын
  • The Gyro was actually the safest aircraft you showed so I guess your not really up on your aviation.

    @donparrish9659@donparrish96592 жыл бұрын
  • The $44K price for the Sub Sonex kit is just for the airframe. That small jet engine is $60,000. The avionics are around $10,000 for radios and ADS-B. A ballistic parachute is a $5,000 option. So we’re really talking about $120,000 or so for this airplane.

    @cinedelasestrellas@cinedelasestrellas2 жыл бұрын
    • Wow, those little jet engines are expensive.

      @nomadben@nomadben Жыл бұрын
    • @@nomadben heck yeah they are

      @mrpineapple3942@mrpineapple3942 Жыл бұрын
    • They spend just equal or as much as a giant scale model with a transmitter. And you can't get in it.

      @slicaltimistic1@slicaltimistic1 Жыл бұрын
    • @@slicaltimistic1 Yeah I prefer the kind of plane you fly from the inside of it. That’s why I never got into RC; my flying money goes into planes that take you somewhere.

      @cinedelasestrellas@cinedelasestrellas Жыл бұрын
  • A plane with a parachute? Absolute smartest idea ever one that makes me actually want to get into trying to fly a plane now

    @destruct61@destruct61 Жыл бұрын
    • destruct61, They have been available for 25 yesrs.

      @mrbmp09@mrbmp099 ай бұрын
  • I fly a Sting 168/nrg mosquito. Dry weight of 50 kg. I've flown it to 7500 ft, which is as high as I can before the 8000 ft controlled airspace above me. I've flown it for 4 hours at a time with a combination of motoring and gliding.

    @gasdive@gasdive2 жыл бұрын
  • I like the Wilkes Subsonex JSX-2. I'm not too crazy about aircraft that make you stand of lie prone. It'd be cool if you did a show dedicated to following someone building an aircraft from a kit.

    @anthonynorton666@anthonynorton6662 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Anthony Norton, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • Mine is the Wilkes Subsonex JSX-2

      @L39CFI@L39CFI2 жыл бұрын
    • top

      @mdmofij8966@mdmofij8966 Жыл бұрын
  • "Arc-ee-op--te-rex"? Arc-ee-OP-te-rex. You know, like, an Archaeopteryx?

    @michaelisaacson9735@michaelisaacson97352 жыл бұрын
  • The safest most cost effective, still the gyrocopter....

    @nickademuss42@nickademuss42 Жыл бұрын
  • 7:22 I'd rather be in Bond's "Little Nell" autogyro, than precariously perched above 8 electric food blenders.

    @massimookissed1023@massimookissed10232 жыл бұрын
    • Hilarious with a generous serving of the truth

      @geoffreyharbinson2488@geoffreyharbinson24882 жыл бұрын
  • Fun Fact : The Benson Gyrocopter is the one from Mad Max 2.

    @edwardfletcher7790@edwardfletcher77902 жыл бұрын
    • Thought so!

      @rangerrick8220@rangerrick82202 жыл бұрын
  • I haven’t yet seen one with two engines yet. That would be cool to stick one under each arm pit, below each back wing of that plane. Bet that’d be sick!

    @MadolfStitler@MadolfStitler2 жыл бұрын
    • You can look at the Cri-Cri then ! smallest dual motor plane

      @explocraft09@explocraft0910 ай бұрын
  • I'm going to have to butt in and let you know that the DCL Big Drone wasn't even close to being the first with a person on board. The first manned drone flight was back in 2001, in Cookeville Tennessee, and I piloted the drone. I've got plenty of footage if you'd like to see it!

    @derryktranel7518@derryktranel7518 Жыл бұрын
    • Please upload it, I'd love to see the footage

      @spolo123@spolo123 Жыл бұрын
    • @@spolo123 About to write the same thing.😁

      @jamesp13152@jamesp13152 Жыл бұрын
    • What the fuck is a manned drone

      @sunnyztmoney@sunnyztmoney Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@sunnyztmoney a dude is on the craft, no controls for the "pilot" as hes just a passenger

      @allsystemsgootechaf9885@allsystemsgootechaf9885 Жыл бұрын
    • @@allsystemsgootechaf9885 thanks bro

      @sunnyztmoney@sunnyztmoney Жыл бұрын
  • 🛩👍🏼👌🏼🤔💭 I agree with you that the Gyrocopter seems like the safest option on that list. It's impressive how the autogyro effect of the main blades allows it to glide safely even if the engine fails. It's definitely a great feature for a small aircraft. However, I'm curious about your thoughts on the other mini aircraft on the list. What makes them less safe compared to the Gyrocopter in your opinion?

    @metatechhd@metatechhd11 ай бұрын
    • you are asking the opinion of someone who is just reading a script, and that script was written by someone who doesn't know about flying . note the "rate climb" comment near 1:00 and the parachute comment at 4:46

      @AvishalomShalit@AvishalomShalit9 ай бұрын
    • Helicopters can also autorotate and land safely with the engine out

      @error.418@error.4184 ай бұрын
  • Very cool machines , I hope I can get to own one in the next few years. Thanks for the vid . 👍🏼

    @strode66@strode662 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Strode 66, thanks for your comment. Which one is your favorite? 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
  • 30 years ago, I thought Iron Man was fiction. But the next 50 years will come true

    @teddykurniawan4238@teddykurniawan42382 жыл бұрын
    • 30 years ago iron man wasn't even release So 50 years from now we will not see iron man suit.

      @Primarycolours-@Primarycolours-2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Primarycolours- lol you know nothing hahahah. Iron man has been around since the early 60s. You sound so dumb

      @matthewjdouglas6471@matthewjdouglas64712 жыл бұрын
    • @@Primarycolours- your comment is hilarious. He wasn't talking about the movie. He was talking about Iron man in general. Go back to primary school and learn something

      @matthewjdouglas6471@matthewjdouglas64712 жыл бұрын
    • There are still things impossible now like shock absorbers…

      @minercraftal@minercraftal2 жыл бұрын
    • @@minercraftal Nope they are 50 percent real now people making them

      @sanjitabiswas804@sanjitabiswas8042 жыл бұрын
  • Show de vôo meu irmão. 😊👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👊🏻🇧🇷

    @MedidaCertaUsinagemOficial@MedidaCertaUsinagemOficial2 жыл бұрын
  • Me: "Where is the Landing Gear for the Plane/Glider?" Dude's Legs Pop out the Bottom as soon as he gets close to the Ground.. 🤣😂🤣😂

    @coolmoe3289@coolmoe32892 жыл бұрын
    • Ahh this must be one of those Bedrock models from the flinstones era

      @siegfried7469@siegfried74692 жыл бұрын
    • Fred Flintstone would be Proud.. 🤣😂

      @coolmoe3289@coolmoe32892 жыл бұрын
  • "I want to fly an ME 163, but I don't want to be dissolved."

    @user-ef4gf7rr9r@user-ef4gf7rr9r2 жыл бұрын
    • maybe use a better rocket engine with safer fuel ,.. Hmmn...... Comet ,.... Safety ??????? I would still fly one and hope to live through it ! What a machine ?

      @9014jayvictor@9014jayvictor2 жыл бұрын
  • You've got some great looking prospects there. The Copterpack will be a blast to fly for some, but personally, I don't feel comfortable with a fast spinning blade that close to my neck. So, I'll just watch others fly that one. :)

    @jimwilliams3517@jimwilliams35179 ай бұрын
  • 8:56 why do they strongly advise against it?, because Beyond Facts are well beyond knowing facts about aircraft.

    @harlyquin@harlyquin2 жыл бұрын
  • Yes I think we all need to fly in these especially the second one it looks like a jet!

    @helicoptersandmore5519@helicoptersandmore55192 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Helicopters and More, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • @@BeyondFacts I sure did thanks for making it!

      @helicoptersandmore5519@helicoptersandmore55192 жыл бұрын
    • @@helicoptersandmore5519 thanks so much for your nice reply. Have you also watched the part 1 video?

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • @@BeyondFacts Yes I have before!

      @helicoptersandmore5519@helicoptersandmore55192 жыл бұрын
    • The second one looks like a jet because it is a jet! Sonic aircraft has been around for a few decades and subsonic has been available as a kit since 2014 . I remember right they have six different models Sonic makes very reliable parts. So much so that many experimental aircraft in ultra light builders will incorporate some of their parts into their aircraft. I actually use their elevator trim mixer on my airplane.

      @farmnranchapiarybeehiveser8120@farmnranchapiarybeehiveser81202 жыл бұрын
  • Finally a Radio Controlled airplane that you can actually get on and fly it with no transmitter.😁

    @slicaltimistic1@slicaltimistic1 Жыл бұрын
  • Nice video!

    @RuiPlaneSpotter@RuiPlaneSpotter2 жыл бұрын
  • DCL "manned drone" is an oxymoron. A "drone" is unmanned, by definition. If you put a person in the craft, it becomes a "manned aerial vehicle."

    @Davroz451@Davroz4512 жыл бұрын
    • I was actually going to say the same thing.

      @risksrewardsrelics51@risksrewardsrelics512 жыл бұрын
    • Jet Lee new movie

      @miamartinlimoran8494@miamartinlimoran84942 жыл бұрын
    • names are tedious for emerging technologies. Im gonna watch some other talkie now.

      @kirillkapaln4536@kirillkapaln4536 Жыл бұрын
  • It is hard to believe, but the Benson is probably the 'safest' aircraft in this bunch.

    @edp2260@edp22602 жыл бұрын
    • Actually, it's not hard to believe if you've done any research at all into gyrocopters! But, as with all aircraft, it is highly contingent on the pilot having proper training.

      @Intrepid175a@Intrepid175a2 жыл бұрын
    • Reminds me of the copter in the Mad Max movies

      @sgt7512@sgt75122 жыл бұрын
    • Hey, if you want facts you should watch the *Within Facts* channel. Remember this is *Beyond Facts.* Don't let those pesky facts spoil the fun. Seriously, I enjoyed the videos even though it wasn't always factual.

      @ddegn@ddegn2 жыл бұрын
    • @@sgt7512 that was a gyrocopter in the madmax film.

      @jasongrinnell1986@jasongrinnell19862 жыл бұрын
    • @@sgt7512 it is

      @9014jayvictor@9014jayvictor2 жыл бұрын
  • Everyone else: talking about gyrocopters Me: isn't this the same voice actor from watop?

    @_sansvisage@_sansvisage2 жыл бұрын
    • EXACTLY!!, you’re not James hahahaahhahahahaha

      @jesuschrist6521@jesuschrist65212 жыл бұрын
  • If that Benson was good enough for The Road Warrior's sidekick and snake -- it's good enough for you.

    @gui-texzan7477@gui-texzan7477 Жыл бұрын
  • That helicopter jetpack is dope I want one

    @getpoopeduponkid2059@getpoopeduponkid20598 ай бұрын
  • I don't like your comment about the Benson Gyrocopter. It is a rock-solid and stable aircraft deserving far more respect and appreciation. I have seen and known the builders and pilots of those Gyrocopters. They tell stories about their flights with incredible visibility of the ground, slow flight stability, and economical operation. Many survivors of disasters have reported being passed over by search airplanes or helicopters and were never seen because the of pilot's limited view of the ground.

    @youtube.youtube.01@youtube.youtube.012 жыл бұрын
    • Yep. You can't beat the view from a pusher gyro.

      @EIGYRO@EIGYRO Жыл бұрын
  • When you're done insulting gyrocopters, maybe you'd like to read up on the thousands of gyro designs since Bensen's original. The latest models are comfortable 2-seaters with up to 300 mph VNE, a 500 nm range, and 1500 fpm climb. And VTOL.

    @neuralwarp@neuralwarp2 жыл бұрын
    • It’s pretty much a propeller or jet that can change vertical direction

      @robbiemercury889@robbiemercury889 Жыл бұрын
    • It stands for vertical take off and landing

      @robbiemercury889@robbiemercury889 Жыл бұрын
  • The Opensky turbine inside a duct arrangement looks incresasing efficiency. Any specific comment about this? Would a PulseJet do same task at similar fuel economy? Reducing size in turbines greatly reduces its efficiency. Why an 'A' type of rudder is not used in machines such as 'Wilkex Subsonex'? Contrarily to Beechcraft 'Bonanza' 'V' tail, it would induce roll in right sense when banking. The Bugatti airplane that crashed because of a 'flat 8' knot in aileron cables was arranged this way. Blessings +

    @joseveintegenario-nisu1928@joseveintegenario-nisu19282 жыл бұрын
  • Gyrocopters are inherently safe. Should they lose power, you can make a controlled, autorotation landing in a very small area.

    @stevenmitchell6347@stevenmitchell63472 жыл бұрын
    • LOL I watched a video when the rotor spun off on take off !! Fortunate lee It was just an inch off the run way so the pilot survived .

      @9014jayvictor@9014jayvictor2 жыл бұрын
    • @@9014jayvictor link?

      @Vince_Cuh@Vince_Cuh2 жыл бұрын
  • The Benson’s were built in my home state of North Carolina. I would see one or more Bensons flying over my home often into the 1990’s. I haven’t seen any since.

    @bobbydixon9368@bobbydixon93682 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Bobby Dixon, thanks for your comment. Did you ever had a chance to fly one? Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • No never did.

      @bobbydixon9368@bobbydixon93682 жыл бұрын
  • The copter pack strangely reminds me of a cartoon I used to watch call Centurions.

    @Dadolphinsmakemecry@Dadolphinsmakemecry2 жыл бұрын
  • The safest one is the gyrocopter hands down.

    @georgetirebiter6437@georgetirebiter6437 Жыл бұрын
  • You talk about the gyrocopter as if it was made by one manufacturer and never caught on. They towed unpowered versions of these behind U-Boats during WW2 so they could get someone up high to take a good look around. After the war several manufacturers made them with engines and it can be seen in one of the Bond movies (You only live twice?) . That one was the Wallace Autogiro. Note: the rotor blades are never powered. The engine at the back is purely to give it some forward motion to make the rotor blades spin in the wind and provide lift.

    @RobinHartJones@RobinHartJones2 жыл бұрын
  • I feel like the "Goodyear Inflatoplane" should of had an honorable mention

    @TimTVOfficial@TimTVOfficial2 жыл бұрын
    • Hi TimTV, thanks for your comment. Yes your absolutly righ the Goodyear Inflatoplane would be a perfect fit in this video. I will check if we do a part 3 and I will included it. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • “ Should had have had “

      @ronpage1994@ronpage19942 жыл бұрын
    • Should have had

      @ronpage1994@ronpage19942 жыл бұрын
  • Funny you advise against the gyrocopter. They are actually very safe

    @the5thYearSeniors@the5thYearSeniors Жыл бұрын
  • James is basically Ron Burgundy. He'll read anything on the copy, including bad grammar and typos

    @GeorgeLiquor@GeorgeLiquor9 ай бұрын
  • The gyro copter actually looks safer than the rest, if the engine fails it’ll just “parachute” down using its rotors

    @bigdundee12345@bigdundee123452 жыл бұрын
    • You have to remember that a gyrocopter (except dual blades (one spinning the opposite direction stack on top of each other, etc...)) has to have a counterbalance prop or it will spin around like a top.

      @radicalrick9587@radicalrick95872 жыл бұрын
    • @@radicalrick9587 Actually, you are totally wrong. The engine is driving a pusher prop with no shaft power going to the main blades. A gyrocopter does not power the main blade set, the blades are free spinning, and auto-rotate. Much like a maple leaf falling from a tree, which is auto-rotation as well. Proof of what I say is shown right in the video, where the pilots are hand rotating the blades, to get them to start moving. This is prior to "dragging the runway" to get the blades spinning even faster. Once in the air, the pusher prop keeps the blades spinning (overcoming their inherent drag). A helicopter needs a tail rotor since the engine puts torque to the main blades, and the main blades in turn would try to spin the helicopter itself.

      @markswinford4806@markswinford48062 жыл бұрын
    • @@markswinford4806 thank you lol..you made that so much easier for me and explained it better than I would've

      @paulpz04@paulpz042 жыл бұрын
    • Exactly. It's probably the safest in the list lol

      @SeabornNomad@SeabornNomad2 жыл бұрын
    • @@paulpz04 - As an Aero Engineer, I have trouble reading many comments related to anything aviation...

      @markswinford4806@markswinford48062 жыл бұрын
  • I would definitely feel more secure in an autogyro/gyrocopter, than any of these dodecacopters or tiny fixed-wing things that can stall. The Open Sky "Mowe" (seagull) wasn't really made to be a "people mover" but it would be something to get around on. Early versions were gliders, either elastic or towed launch just to get out of GE above the runway. The later model was tested that way, before flying. There are videos of all the testing they did, so they've been very methodical. They finally took it to OshKosh. Of course the one the girl in the movie rode had empty weight under 30 kg, never needed fueling, was VTOL capable, apparently had a very smart AI autopilot, made and powered with unobtanium.

    @JFrazer4303@JFrazer43032 жыл бұрын
    • Honestly I feel safer here on the ground, though I love watching all the dare devils fly their contraptions. hehe

      @BillAnt@BillAnt Жыл бұрын
    • @@BillAnt u should try a LARM or a lamboose

      @MordiansBumole@MordiansBumole Жыл бұрын
  • Being in co start autorotation makes gyrocopters so safe that you'd have to actively work against the gyroscope to crash it

    @joshryan7635@joshryan7635 Жыл бұрын
  • As a skydiver, I feel horrified no one has an emergency rig on his back flying those things 🤣

    @moustikfaya@moustikfaya6 ай бұрын
  • “Small planes and cheap prices are a winning combo.” Are they though???

    @adamhale6672@adamhale66722 жыл бұрын
    • Definitely not. Hopefully he was t serious

      @chucknasty8090@chucknasty80902 жыл бұрын
  • The Benson gyro is probably the safest vehicle in your video, lol.

    @martiansonmaui1749@martiansonmaui17492 жыл бұрын
  • I'd love to see the expression on a lion's face if you were being chased by it and you suddenly took off with a copterpack. My vote for the most useful unit for rescue teams.

    @frankyjayhay@frankyjayhay2 жыл бұрын
  • The B8 looks so much like a mobility scooter with a gyro attached

    @TexRobNC@TexRobNC Жыл бұрын
  • I still have doubts about the copter pack, I cannot see any dust or grass movement normally caused by the rotors, would be nice to see the unedited version

    @Tappit333@Tappit3332 жыл бұрын
    • I wouldn’t expect much dust and debris around a helicopter landing pad.

      @andrewlangley9507@andrewlangley95072 жыл бұрын
    • @@andrewlangley9507 Yes, but this shows he is taking off from a sandy path on a beach

      @Tappit333@Tappit3332 жыл бұрын
    • @@Tappit333 its fake 100% you are correct on the dirt landing, it should be a sandstorm if those blades create that much lift, they have a tether that is edited out so u cant see it.

      @turboimport95@turboimport952 жыл бұрын
  • gyro copters have been around for a long time , and a lot of people still fly then today. They are no more dangerous than any other airplane ! In fact they are so easy to fly , most anyone can learn to fly one in 10 minutes on their very first flight ! I did !

    @stevelamperta865@stevelamperta8652 жыл бұрын
  • A TV show back in the mid '50s had a jet pack. A lot of stuff from then is a reality now, like Dick Trracy's radio in a wrist watch, and Captain Midnight' s flat screen TV on the wall that allowed him to see who he was talking to on the phone. My dad told me that was all fantasy & would never be real. :-)

    @romiemiller7876@romiemiller78762 жыл бұрын
    • It was invented because we saw it dreamed of it imagined

      @steveb3732@steveb37322 жыл бұрын
    • an encyclopedia in everyone's hand

      @kirillkapaln4536@kirillkapaln4536 Жыл бұрын
  • The archaepotrex looks and feels outta old bond movie where a villain escapes with his airplane

    @Ironmike2233@Ironmike22337 ай бұрын
  • Excuse me for not being a native English speaker, but aren't "electric powered engines" called ... motors?

    @Videolinquency@Videolinquency2 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Henning Kolstad, thanks for your comment. First of all your English is very good and secondly your absolutely correct. Thats clearly a mistake I haven't realized while doing the video. Hope you still enyojed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • People who speak English don't really care to split hairs so much.

      @cedarhatt5991@cedarhatt59912 жыл бұрын
    • @@cedarhatt5991 Exactly so, either term is correct but electrical motor is the more common, an electric engine could also encompass a complete electric drivetrain including batteries, controls and motor alsom in addition to also just being the electric motor itself.

      @Wingnut353@Wingnut3532 жыл бұрын
    • Motor can refer to an electric motor or an internal combustion engine (as in motor car). Engine can only refer to a fuel burning propulsion machine..either with pistons or jet turbine. Please don’t start trying to make electric be termed ‘engines’. The poor English language is constantly being butchered by internet ‘Toobers’.

      @contessa.adella@contessa.adella2 жыл бұрын
  • Dude props to the guy literally building a plane from an Anime. And a Japan native to do it!

    @beegchunguz7425@beegchunguz74252 жыл бұрын
    • What's so special that it's a Japanese person that did it? Japan has made jets, even space rockets, plus it has the second highest per capita nobel prize rate in science of any ethnicity, only one ahead of the Japanese are Jews.

      @ziongite@ziongite Жыл бұрын
  • Remember some of the auto rotate flying craft in the movie 🍿 road warrior over 40 years ago.

    @DAREDEVILBKLYN@DAREDEVILBKLYN2 жыл бұрын
  • The CopterPack with a cabin attached would be the most versatile option period.

    @bliblablubb0712@bliblablubb07122 ай бұрын
  • This is friggin hilariously ironic that I am watching this video considering I've been on an RC plane kick, namely oversized RC planes, some of which are ironically not much smaller than these! So, I went from watching videos on giant RC planes, to videos on tiny real ones!

    @americannobody27@americannobody272 жыл бұрын
    • You know what pretty much all these planes have in common? A mistake or failure while flying very well could mean, "Well at least they died doing what they loved".

      @trvman1@trvman12 жыл бұрын
    • That is pretty much true of just about any sport. A golfer who gets struck by lightning, a basketball player kilked in a traffic accident on his way to the gym... leaving your home is always a gamble. Hell, sometimes staying home is a gamble! Cheers, jc

      @jmichaelcarbonniere9549@jmichaelcarbonniere95492 жыл бұрын
    • @@trvman1 that goes for any vehicle.

      @mrpineapple3942@mrpineapple3942 Жыл бұрын
  • I learned to fly in a Benson B8M Gyrocopter in the late 60s before I could legally drive a car, this guy talks like they're dangerous or something.

    @johnnyj540@johnnyj5402 жыл бұрын
  • I love flying. 💯💯❣️ I am from Africa, Nigeria.

    @faithagindoton2011@faithagindoton2011 Жыл бұрын
  • I thought the gyrocopter looked rather sturdy. A lot of them have been built, and a lot of people had flown them. If they broke in half the way you described, you'd think we would have heard about it.

    @eveningstarnm3107@eveningstarnm31079 ай бұрын
  • That one where the pilot is laying down.......looks like it would leave you with a sore neck.

    @195511SM@195511SM2 жыл бұрын
  • The author of this vid needs to do a bit of homework. The Benson Gyro was a GREAT and VERY SAFE Gyro. Thousands of them were made and Mr. "Benson" was the demo pilot. The ONLY problem, like in most things, is the LACK of education from the pilot. Gravity is easy to understand. Density Altitude is a bit more complicated and THAT was the killer. People stalled the rotor NOT understanding how the lift was created in different situations. Too bad too. I LOVED flying it.

    @Flapswgm@Flapswgm2 жыл бұрын
  • As someone who aspires to be an aeronautical engineer I love this. Not to mention I like anime a lot.

    @justshan2413@justshan2413 Жыл бұрын
  • That Bensen really looks like fun.

    @erintyres3609@erintyres36092 жыл бұрын
    • It worked for James Bond. (or he flew something similar)

      @erintyres3609@erintyres36099 ай бұрын
  • I have built 1/3 scale Radio Control planes and with the use pf carbon fiber, a builder can design and build some strong but light airframes.

    @covercalls88@covercalls882 жыл бұрын
  • Are we going to pretend like he didn't say Aircraft-a-loompas 😂

    @me73941@me739412 жыл бұрын
  • I am missing the CriCri, the very definition of awesome tiny aircraft...

    @stuborn-complaining-german@stuborn-complaining-german9 ай бұрын
  • at 2:41 when the transition effect happened a chill went down my spine anyone else?

    @lumenalrose463@lumenalrose4632 жыл бұрын
    • came to the comments just to find this

      @LLiiaamm_@LLiiaamm_2 жыл бұрын
  • If you want to see a Giro-copter in use take a look at the James Bond Movie " You only Live twice" Little Nell does very well in it and arrives in a bunch of cases and gets assembled by Q and some helpers before Bond " Sean Connery" uses it.

    @pauldavis6390@pauldavis63902 жыл бұрын
    • What about the Road Warrior? Gyro-copter I believe.

      @SKISMONE.666@SKISMONE.6662 жыл бұрын
    • Little Nell was the star of the movie and was featured with Bond on the one-sheet posters.

      @kenttm42@kenttm422 жыл бұрын
    • Nellie.

      @geographyinaction7814@geographyinaction78142 жыл бұрын
    • A Wallis WA-116 Agile designed and built by the late wing commander Ken Wallace.

      @iamthefatstig@iamthefatstig2 жыл бұрын
  • I am impressed how strong the little jet engine on the yellow one is 😵😵😵

    @godoftestoe7956@godoftestoe79562 ай бұрын
  • Do some of these small jet planes have a parachute? That would be KOOL!

    @madhatter2465@madhatter2465 Жыл бұрын
  • First one was definitely inspired by "Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind" manga/anime :D

    @Fergusius@Fergusius2 жыл бұрын
    • Yes, I was just about to make a comment about that

      @verglas2890@verglas28902 жыл бұрын
    • I have that anime, really good movie. When I first saw it, I wish I had that aircraft that girl is flying. Now I got to find out how much one costs.

      @raystapp4001@raystapp40012 жыл бұрын
  • If u can stomach the cheesy 5th grade commentary.

    @todd5082@todd50822 жыл бұрын
    • Nope I can’t, jeez

      @thunderpants007@thunderpants0072 ай бұрын
    • Nope

      @gEtar87@gEtar872 ай бұрын
    • When I hear American commentary, I turn off.

      @sandersson2813@sandersson28132 ай бұрын
  • The thumbnail had me fooled for a sec

    @ll--FOX-DYE--ll@ll--FOX-DYE--ll6 ай бұрын
  • The thumbnail kills me🤣

    @DjyMindset@DjyMindset Жыл бұрын
  • It's a "Nike" engine by AMT Netherlands, not the "Netherlands" engine by Nike AMT as the video suggests.

    @sanchises@sanchises2 жыл бұрын
  • Question to the glider's pilots. Is it possible to fly to wherever you want on a glider with a small jet engine. You glide most of the time and only use the engine as a booster to re-position your glider to the upward airstream to higher altitude, where your glider could make the most to glide further ? then repeat the process until you get to the destination.

    @WanderingShadow100@WanderingShadow1002 жыл бұрын
    • Yes. Many manufacturers have made gliders with small engines. Some are just perched above the fuselage but the nicest ones have engines that retract into the fuselage when not being used so it still has nice clean lines for maximum performance as a glider. Often the engine is two stroke with no starter or throttle and only just powerful enough to maintain altitude but some (see ASH-26e) can also take off and climb and then would probably have a battery and starter and throttle . It is also not a 'weird' experiment, most top glider manufacturers include a self-sustaining model in their range. It should be noted that if it has a fixed propellor in the nose and an engine powerful enough to take-off and fuel for a reasonable powered journey then it is usually termed a touring motor-glider which is slightly more towards a light aircraft that can glide well (see SF25 Motorfalke)

      @RobinHartJones@RobinHartJones2 жыл бұрын
    • i think the glide function relies on weight, so adding a motor would ironically reduce the gliding capability and require engine use

      @azza-in_this_day_and_age@azza-in_this_day_and_age Жыл бұрын
    • @@azza-in_this_day_and_age You think wrong. Weight affects the speed at which the glider would stall but not the glide ratio. All modern gliders have tanks that are filled with water before taking off intentionally to move the best glide ratio speed as high as possible. One problem related to weigh is the positioning of this engine but due to the center of mass which will be affected and would require countering on the other side of the plane from where the engine is mounted. Another problem is the one of being able to retract the engine or propellers back inside the fuselage when not in use - because they would destroy the aerodynamic profile of the glider and act like an aerodynamic brake. In any way, these things already exist. Even jet propelled glider.

      @euteo@euteo Жыл бұрын
    • @WanderingShadow100 - that would not work as you expect. Gliders still are required by law to have a minimum of electronics on board (Radio, transponder) these are powered by a battery that is not super light. An engine would require it's own separate one to function, and unlike a normal plane where the engine runs continuously, recharging it's battery as it runs, battery being used mostly at engine startup, a glider that stops and starts it's engine midflight multiple times would put a big strain on that battery, that would not be recharging while the engine is stopped. And you might find yourself in the situation where before you finish your journey, you are low and plan to start the engine to do a climb, but the engine will not start.

      @euteo@euteo Жыл бұрын
    • @@euteo so gliders do have some sort if engine? i thought they were like towed to flight, and try catching updrafts to increase altitude, keeping a bare minimum of weight. very interesting, thanks for sharing

      @azza-in_this_day_and_age@azza-in_this_day_and_age Жыл бұрын
  • Just noticing that the mini jet photo on this video is not discussed in this video. We all need to work together to avoid deception on KZhead, so when I see these types of inconsistencies I post a comment. Truth is worth working for!

    @RCGache@RCGache2 жыл бұрын
    • Yup. Thumbnail not honest? Instant thumbs down.

      @gonesnake2337@gonesnake23372 жыл бұрын
  • I'm surprised it didn't show a ppg (powered paraglider) that has a parashoot above and a fan strapped to your back and are super affordable, safe, easy to transport,store it all while becoming very popular for these reasons

    @i-fart-n-elevators4610@i-fart-n-elevators4610 Жыл бұрын
    • how is a paramotor safe? The wing isn't fixed. It can collapse in flight and then you're fucked.

      @solomonjenkins9505@solomonjenkins9505 Жыл бұрын
    • @solomonjenkins9505 the parashoot is designed to redeploy and in extreme cases of wing collapse we have a reserve to throw out

      @i-fart-n-elevators4610@i-fart-n-elevators4610 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@solomonjenkins9505 Paragliders are actually quite safe. The canope is built in such a way that collapses take away energy and reopen automatically. Paragliders (without motor even!) can make flights of up to 9 hours and many hundreds of kilometers. In combination with a motor strapped to your back you can take off practically everywhere, aldn everywhere and spend hours in the sky. A sport that, when done with common sense, is the cheapest and lightest way to get into the air and to fly, even cross-country.

      @bennoventura@bennoventura9 ай бұрын
  • It would be highly appreciated if you could specify the weight and other measurements not only in regional but also in international units understood by the remaining 95%+ of us. Thanks!

    @neithere@neithere2 жыл бұрын
    • they have conversion utilities on the internet... actually the world runs on metric only the states are way behind the times. to convert kilometers to miles multiply by 0.6 you'll be close enough (the actual is 0.62x).

      @leecowell8165@leecowell8165 Жыл бұрын
  • 5:44 Love how they made the blades at neck level

    @TylerWhieler@TylerWhieler2 жыл бұрын
    • Hi Tyler Whieler, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
  • If this is ever given FAA approval, it could be an interesting alternative to my present commute to my job via mass transit . Of course, there would be the small matter of where to park the aircraft.

    @ravisriram6746@ravisriram67462 жыл бұрын
    • Just get a paramotor, basically a powered parachute and a chair

      @kings_bane1221@kings_bane12212 жыл бұрын
  • Bruhh no cap the first one that guy could’ve made the mk2 oppressor 😅 pretty lit 🔥.

    @tunenvroom9527@tunenvroom95277 ай бұрын
  • I had a jungle upski 391 and it could easily carry three times it's own weight.

    @braininavatnow9197@braininavatnow9197 Жыл бұрын
  • Sadly, the Copterpack is still just a concept and actually non-flying. The company admitted that the “test pilot” was actually lifted by a cable (that was visually edited out) in the beach promo after the Copterpack company video was examined by video special effect experts.

    @SpecterSeventy2@SpecterSeventy22 жыл бұрын
    • How do you trust your money AND YOUR LIFE to a company that pulls that nonsense?

      @brucemoyers1006@brucemoyers10062 жыл бұрын
    • Hi SpecterSeventy2, thanks for your comment. i din't heared the news until I read your comment, thanks for sharing the information. Hope you still enjoyed the video 🙂

      @BeyondFacts@BeyondFacts2 жыл бұрын
    • You know, I was looking at the motor size at the prop and it had my mind all locked up. Say you have a 150lb pilot, battery and carbon frame. I’m figuring at least 70hp for reasonable flight. A thirty five hp brushless motors is going to be at least 11” inches in diameter in one style or a little longer but smaller diameter, about the size of a large coffee can. Those motors seen weren’t much bigger than a hockey puck.

      @SkypowerwithKarl@SkypowerwithKarl2 жыл бұрын
    • Fake news again!

      @edp2260@edp22602 жыл бұрын
    • With the amount of thrust that would be coming off of those props that's sand/ dust would be blowing everywhere, but not in this video😂

      @jdmforever5583@jdmforever55832 жыл бұрын
  • It’s a shame you don’t know what a Bensen gyrocopter is. I suggest you make a better research on autogyros.

    @abnervalbuena9774@abnervalbuena97742 жыл бұрын
    • This guy's commentary is obviously ignorant and unhelpful.

      @Leesbiz52@Leesbiz522 жыл бұрын
  • I wouldn't wager on these mini aircrafts being very safe.

    @AngloSaxon-yx8tk@AngloSaxon-yx8tk2 ай бұрын
  • Interesting video, but I don't know about the practicality of any of these craft. I'm looking for something that has a range of about 600 km, can carry 150 kilos including myself, AND fit into a standard 4 x 6 m garage and I don't have to pull off any Fred Flintstone or Indiana Jones manouvers to fly it. Absent that, I'd be willing to consider a mini-blimp, but only if I can fit it inside a barn or similar structure (which I'd have to build). I'm basically looking for something that flies like a car and has all the comforts of a car, like interior heat and noise control where I can fly to my destination and back while avoiding the traffic jams in and around the major cities.

    @SunRabbit@SunRabbit2 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah it's called the Tardis I believe Dr Who has one, one careful female owner never been raced. 😉

      @ZedsDeadOK@ZedsDeadOK2 жыл бұрын
    • They already have many of those out there. The question is what is your budget. and I can point you in the right direction.

      @radicalrick9587@radicalrick95872 жыл бұрын
KZhead