What Makes Lagrange Points Special Locations In Space

2024 ж. 13 Мам.
1 507 407 Рет қаралды

Lagrange Points are special locations in planetary systems where gravitational and rotational forces cancel out. Sometimes we find asteroids or dust clouds lingering near these places. Space missions may use some of these locations for spacecraft as they offer many advantages over orbiting in the Earth directly.
Universe Sandbox is used for some of the 3 body problem animations
universesandbox.com/
Other graphics are created with GMAT and POV Ray
For a more mathematical derivation of these check out this series:
• Lectures on Halo Orbits
Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
/ djsnm
I have a discord server where I regularly turn up:
/ discord
If you really like what I do you can support me directly through Patreon
/ scottmanley

Пікірлер
  • As wikipedia says, "In an effort to avoid naming everything after Euler, some discoveries and theorems are attributed to the first person to have proved them after Euler."

    @SteveHodge@SteveHodge2 жыл бұрын
    • Good point

      @willemhaifetz-chen1588@willemhaifetz-chen15882 жыл бұрын
    • was euler really that much of a genius? a wonder he's not spoken of with the same reverence as newton.

      @oldfrend@oldfrend2 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣

      @insanitysportal6692@insanitysportal66922 жыл бұрын
    • @@oldfrend Euler was the greatest Mathematician to ever live

      @milkdrinker7@milkdrinker72 жыл бұрын
    • That tells us just how bitchy and envious these people were. He figured that shit out, so he deserves the honor.

      @mathis8210@mathis82102 жыл бұрын
  • Those were some of the most intuitive graphics I've seen when explaining Lagrange points. Well done, Scott!

    @TusharGoyal1997@TusharGoyal19972 жыл бұрын
    • I came here to say the same thing. THESE pictures are worth a thousand words.

      @danieldosen5260@danieldosen52602 жыл бұрын
    • I agree...👍👍

      @Allan_aka_RocKITEman@Allan_aka_RocKITEman2 жыл бұрын
    • Ditto. Without reservation, Lagrange points have never been better described by graphics.

      @larryscott3982@larryscott39822 жыл бұрын
    • Right, Scott is the man. Amazing video

      @jeremystern1471@jeremystern14712 жыл бұрын
    • Was going to post the same.

      @petemurphy7164@petemurphy71642 жыл бұрын
  • For a non-science person like myself, these graphics were super helpful to better understand this concept! Just witnessed the launch this morning so I had to look for more information to further clarify L2. Thank you!

    @cativillegas@cativillegas2 жыл бұрын
    • Same here 😊 Webb is on its way (3rd day) to L2 so better understand it a bit better 😀 Hope Webb will last longer than the estimated 5 years...! Happy New Year from Denmark --- Per

      @nakfan@nakfan2 жыл бұрын
    • You are not a non-science person if you're trying to understand it.

      @techtheta2164@techtheta21642 жыл бұрын
    • @Michael Jordan Rosalind Franklin

      @michaeldunlavey6015@michaeldunlavey60152 жыл бұрын
    • @Michael Jordan Fishing I see

      @Samuel-hw6in@Samuel-hw6in2 жыл бұрын
    • Does "non-science" mean low IQ?

      @ddtus@ddtus2 жыл бұрын
  • Finally, an explanation that is clear, concise, and visually communicative for us lay people. Thanks so much!

    @mjmonjure@mjmonjure2 жыл бұрын
    • Exactly. I've had trouble understanding how the JWST could basically orbit "nothing" so far, but this video at least gave me a bit of an idea of how it works. Still can't fully wrap my head around it, but at least it doesn't just sound like math magic to me anymore. xD

      @Sanquinity@Sanquinity Жыл бұрын
  • I'm a physics student and I've done the math. But those graphics were really next level. Thanks, Scott!

    @deboanalagoa8824@deboanalagoa88242 жыл бұрын
    • I’m a pixel student and have done the animating but those maths were really next level.

      @randbarrett8706@randbarrett87062 жыл бұрын
    • @@randbarrett8706 The mathematics behind it are really fun! you should try them out.

      @mastershooter64@mastershooter642 жыл бұрын
    • He lost me at Hi I'm Scott Manley.

      @PanzerBuyer@PanzerBuyer2 жыл бұрын
    • I completed an undergraduate degree in Physics and we never covered Lagrange points or the three body problem. What level of classical mechanics did you do it in, or did you just do it for fun?

      @0sm1um76@0sm1um762 жыл бұрын
    • And judging by your nickname I’d guess you’re studying physics at UFSC and lives at Lagoa da Conceição. Did I guess it right? 😄

      @talesmaschio@talesmaschio2 жыл бұрын
  • It always blows me away what math people were able to work out centuries ago. So much of where we are today and what we are able to accomplish is based on hundreds and even thousands of years of technology and mathematical understanding.

    @l.mcmanus3983@l.mcmanus39832 жыл бұрын
    • Even more wild, is that they discovered a rule of thumb that requires no math at all. L4 and L5 are located on two equilateral triangles with the long side centered on a line between both bodies. That's easy! (Though NASA points out that the distances involved are large enough that you have to take into account additional gravitational sources, such as the sun and nearby planets.

      @r3dp9@r3dp92 жыл бұрын
    • Ole Romer was a boss. Calculating the speed of light in tar 17th century.

      @stephenbarrett8861@stephenbarrett88612 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@r3dp9 Equilaterial triangles with a long side? They each form an equilateral triangle with the two bodies: E.g. Star-planet-L4 and Star-planet-L5 will form 2 equilateral triangles, and these triangles lie within the orbital plane. That perfectly defines the position of L4 and L5 for any system.

      @tiemen9095@tiemen90952 жыл бұрын
    • With you

      @brendawilliams8062@brendawilliams80622 жыл бұрын
    • They didn't have our tech, so they *had* to work it out on paper. ...practice makes perfect.

      @eventhisidistaken@eventhisidistaken2 жыл бұрын
  • I'm pleased the youtube algorithm thinks I'm smart enough to appreciate this video

    @MikePaquette@MikePaquette2 жыл бұрын
  • Scott, one of your best ever presentations with very intuitive graphics, your impeccable narration balanced between detailed but layman accessible, and kept ever-entertaining with your boundless enthusiasm! Perfectly timed preparing us for the arrival of JWSS!

    @billhart9832@billhart98322 жыл бұрын
    • I totally agree - the Webb telescope has sent me searching for Lagrange explanations, and this is great.

      @gregor393@gregor3932 жыл бұрын
  • That 3d model representation was great!

    @VeraTR909@VeraTR9092 жыл бұрын
    • Fantasy.

      @danielmconnolly7@danielmconnolly72 жыл бұрын
  • Why is euler everywhere??? okay I'm convinced that euler's a time travelling math wizard

    @mastershooter64@mastershooter642 жыл бұрын
    • Ben Stein: Euler? Euler?

      @jtn191@jtn1912 жыл бұрын
    • Genius got more ideas between breakfast and dinner that aweraje joe in his lifetime

      @juhajuntunen7866@juhajuntunen78662 жыл бұрын
    • @@juhajuntunen7866 Lmao ikr!

      @mastershooter64@mastershooter642 жыл бұрын
    • gangsta of the mathematical world

      @flix7280@flix72802 жыл бұрын
    • Being a genius is not enough. Imagine being born a genius in the 17th century - to peasant parents. You would be sentenced to a life of drudgery, your genius lost forever. The same applies today, come to think of it.

      @olmostgudinaf8100@olmostgudinaf81002 жыл бұрын
  • Indian here. Came after our space agency ISRO launched a Sun probe this morning named Aditya-L1 which will stay at Lagrange 1 point.

    @bhnuc@bhnuc8 ай бұрын
  • Lagrange Points are incredibly complex concepts. Thank you Scott for helping me understand them a little bit more.

    @apotheosis27@apotheosis272 жыл бұрын
  • La Grange means "barn" in France. Quite poetic really, to place your satellites in a nice safe barn in space. 👍😎

    @subliminalvibes@subliminalvibes2 жыл бұрын
    • Reading that reminded me of Jean-Jacques Perrey's silly little piece _Barnyard in Orbit._

      @Zheeraffa1@Zheeraffa12 жыл бұрын
    • I hear they got a lotta nice girls.

      @OvertravelX@OvertravelX2 жыл бұрын
    • The most mundane things sound so fancy in French.

      @ylette@ylette2 жыл бұрын
    • Actually mean "The" barn.. for our english friends.. . But i get the point :-)

      @AuzFrog@AuzFrog2 жыл бұрын
    • Are there "Sharp dressed man" and "Gimme all your lovin'"points?

      @thenasadude6878@thenasadude68782 жыл бұрын
  • Lagrange points getting a scott explanation is pretty awesome

    @jamalalkaabi8@jamalalkaabi82 жыл бұрын
  • Brilliantly and clearly explained, and very interesting to watch. Thanks for finally managing to make this, Scott! The rotating potential well graphics were a complete revelation moment for me.

    @DrUseful@DrUseful2 жыл бұрын
  • Just watched for a second time; now I really get it thanks to Scott’s well paced authoritative narrative and great graphics. Thanks, and long live JWST!

    @antoninbesse795@antoninbesse7952 жыл бұрын
  • I cannot wait for the James Webb. I hope the fuel it has on board miraculously lasts much longer than it is supposed to.

    @nicholasgold9021@nicholasgold90212 жыл бұрын
    • I wonder if it'd have any use in an end-of-life eccentric Earth orbit or Heliocentric orbit...

      @grantexploit5903@grantexploit59032 жыл бұрын
    • @@grantexploit5903 Yes when it finishes the 12 year mission, if it can, it's supposed to stay in a heliocentric orbit and keeping reporting on any fly-bys.

      @erideimos1207@erideimos12072 жыл бұрын
    • "We accidentally added a second fuel tank so we figured we might as well fill it."

      @StarkRG@StarkRG2 жыл бұрын
    • Let's hope Starship to make refueling easier.

      @sovo1212@sovo12122 жыл бұрын
    • The fuel is planned for 11 years but the gossip is that they think they can get quite a few more years than than. The most significant factor is the Mid Course Correction (MCC) planned for 12.5 hours after launch. If it occurs on time it won't have to dip into the L2 station keeping fuel. If the MCC gets delayed for any reason it will eat into the fuel budgeted for the science mission causing the mission to be shorter.

      @Tudarc@Tudarc2 жыл бұрын
  • "But adding a third body just leads to chaos." I love how that statement is both technically and colloquially accurate.

    @austinbutts3000@austinbutts30002 жыл бұрын
    • And add to that, EVERYTHING in the universe is attracted to everything else.

      @apotheosis27@apotheosis272 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah and let me tell you, even if it was her idea in the first place, the third body still causes chaos

      @david94549@david945492 жыл бұрын
    • @@apotheosis27 a friend of mine has a wife who is not very nice, and at one point was properly massive. I guess gravity is what kept them together during that time.

      @zloychechen5150@zloychechen51502 жыл бұрын
    • @@david94549 haha yeah man that story pretty much always ends the same way

      @apotheosis27@apotheosis272 жыл бұрын
    • well, if your going all the way to "that whore mound called LaGrange " you may as well pay for a 3rd body!

      @walley2637@walley26372 жыл бұрын
  • The contour plot max this instantly make sense. Thanks for the intuitive understanding Scott!

    @DrEnginerd1@DrEnginerd1 Жыл бұрын
  • None of the other videos about Lagrange points make any sense … just guys retelling what they heard without understanding anything. I think you understand this stuff and explained it well. Thank you.

    @dandan1364@dandan13642 жыл бұрын
  • First heard of L-points in the '90s game "I-War" where they were used as start and end points for interstellar jumps but I never quite "got" why all of them existed. So thanks for this Mr Manly, you've dissipated a bit of twenty-odd year old incomprehension.

    @stamfordly6463@stamfordly64632 жыл бұрын
    • What an amazing videogame.

      @Schyz@Schyz2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Schyz Yep. Space sims without that really stupid "space friction" can be counted on one hand, and two of them are I-War 1 & 2.

      @AldorEricsson@AldorEricsson2 жыл бұрын
    • @@AldorEricsson If you are looking for another space game with no space friction, you may be interested in Space Engineers. It is a building game though, rather than a sim. Think of it as mincraft in space with physics

      @collinbarker@collinbarker2 жыл бұрын
    • The L1 point tends to crop up a lot in sci-fi because of a subtle misconception. Writers assume it's the point where the gravitational fields cancel out. It's not, but it is very close, astronomically speaking.

      @watchm4ker@watchm4ker2 жыл бұрын
    • I think I first heard about lagrange points in Gundam, I was kinda surprised when I found out that the lagrange points were real and that the colonies design were inspired by a concept called O'Neill cylinders made by the physicist Gerard O'Neill.

      @danilooliveira6580@danilooliveira65802 жыл бұрын
  • I literally just learned about Lagrange multipliers today, with an exam on multivariable critical points/ extrema on Monday and now its connected to my favorite subject, space, and my day is made

    @chrisrandom7409@chrisrandom74092 жыл бұрын
  • Mr. Manley, superb video. I’d never seen 3-dimensional depictions of “gravitational warping” but your video showed this. The L-points were expertly shown and described. Thank you!

    @randyfriend7474@randyfriend74742 жыл бұрын
  • The way you explain complex concepts and make it so understandable and enjoyable is phenomenal thankyou scott

    @zachhouliston4508@zachhouliston45082 жыл бұрын
  • I thought I already had a good understanding of lagrange points but I learned lots here

    @1000dots@1000dots2 жыл бұрын
    • I learnt that L4 and L5 were wells- we didn’t get told about the Coriolis force.

      @idjles@idjles2 жыл бұрын
    • @@idjles It makes so much more sense. I could never understand why those points didn't just slowly accumulate dust and debris until it made a big enough object to mess up the lagrange effect. An incorrect theory I'd had myself was maybe 'large' objects can form in lagrange points and then drift away but we'd just never seen it happen. I thought it could possibly be an important factor in planet formation or whatever. Now I know the better explanation: I had been misinformed in a sort of accurate way with the best of intentions. I love when you get to understand something in a new/better way. Anti-science people never understand that science is a self correcting method of understanding things, not a list of facts. Finding out I'm wrong is so damn exciting sometimes :)

      @1000dots@1000dots2 жыл бұрын
    • Same.

      @jeffbenton6183@jeffbenton61832 жыл бұрын
  • Wonderful explanation of the LaGrange points! I knew what they were from the equations, but I never saw the rotating reference from potential wells before. That really makes it clear what's going on. I also didn't know why L4 and L5 were stable. It's pretty obvious that the others wouldn't be stable though. You are a wonderful teacher Scott!

    @EtzEchad@EtzEchad2 жыл бұрын
    • Same here. It all makes sense now.

      @r3dp9@r3dp92 жыл бұрын
    • They're not entirely stable. I read somewhere, years ago, that they should be OK to park something at for about 200 000 years.

      @ozzymandius666@ozzymandius6662 жыл бұрын
    • @@ozzymandius666 yeah though it is a matter of timescale even Jupiter's L4 & L5 aren't truly stable just stable enough to still have a bunch of captured bodies from the formation of the solar system over 4.5 billion years later. Though really given enough time no orbit is stable in our large complex universe where n approaches infinity and that is without considering gravitational waves which over vast amounts of time cause orbits to gradually radiate away energy

      @Dragrath1@Dragrath12 жыл бұрын
  • That time lapse of the Earth from the Sun's perspective as the year cycled was really fascinating.

    @user-AdamSmith@user-AdamSmith2 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks Scott! I've been curious about Lagrange points for a while (playing Star Citizen and wondering if they were arbitrary or otherwise), this was extremely clear and very fun to learn from. Keep doing your thing!

    @razzledazzlecheeseontoast9808@razzledazzlecheeseontoast98082 жыл бұрын
  • The nunber of "aHA!" moments of me realizing what you were saying because of the animations was quite high. Really good stuff, Scott.

    @matthewb8229@matthewb82292 жыл бұрын
  • Just watched SmarterEveryday’s videos on JWST and was very interested in learning more about all the Lagrange points. Thanks for the video scott

    @Default012@Default0122 жыл бұрын
    • Too.

      @chrismusix5669@chrismusix56692 жыл бұрын
    • I think Scott, Destin, Physics Girl, and Amy Teitel should collaborate to make one of a kind of a video!

      @maksphoto78@maksphoto782 жыл бұрын
    • Methinks Scott and Destin track each other’s orbits!

      @mikefriend1514@mikefriend15142 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for this lucid explanation of a very interesting scientific fact. As India has sent it's first Solar mission 'Aditya' L1, the significance of the L1 helps to understand the purpose of the mission..👍🏻👍🏻

    @shreeniwaz@shreeniwaz8 ай бұрын
  • I had to look at a few videos and websites before someone showed why L4 and L5 are where they are. The gravity-well images made it so much more clear than other sites and videos. Thanks!

    @rectorsquid@rectorsquid2 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks Scott! Now I have a much better understanding of the stability of the Lagrange Points. Likely not capable of a complete understanding but I do now have a “better” understanding. Orbital mechanics is basically simple yet mind numbingly complex.

    @thomascharlton8545@thomascharlton85452 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you so much for this. My layman mind has been struggling with this for 2 years while reading about and watching videos on the James Webb telescope. This is simplest and most easily understood explanation of the Lagrange points I've found.

    @jeremynolan4681@jeremynolan46812 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for the explanations, and the added bonus of the models and graphics. Now even us mere meteorologists can make sense of this stuff! Excellent vid!

    @TheWeatherbuff@TheWeatherbuff2 жыл бұрын
  • Fantastic visualisations to explain the Lagrange Points concepts. Great work, Scott.

    @ianoverseas@ianoverseas2 жыл бұрын
  • I've seen a hundred of these explanations, but now I finally understand it.

    @Yezpahr@Yezpahr2 жыл бұрын
  • This is exactly the nuanced explanation I’ve been looking for every time I look up Lagrange points, thank you!!

    @ME-rv1pw@ME-rv1pw2 жыл бұрын
  • Best explanation on KZhead of the Lagrange points. Easy to follow and the graphics are amazing. Thanks!

    @jaknap1@jaknap12 жыл бұрын
  • That is the best visual/graphical discussion of LaGrange Points I have ever seen. Thank you!

    @ScottSlooper@ScottSlooper2 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for a well-done explanation Scott. It's not easy to wrap one's head around this but you have helped immensely.

    @darrenmclellan6712@darrenmclellan67122 жыл бұрын
  • I've known about Lagrange points and had a basic understanding of what was going on, but the visualizations at 5:35 really made it click! I think it helps I've been recommended that one video on flipping a sphere inside out, but with the combined gravity wells diagramed as deformities on the object's surface having the "bowls" (although bowls in this diagram aren't Lagrange points themselves), "saddles", and "domes" I finally pieced it together! While I'm not using the proper terminology each time the surface "inverts" a point exists where a theoretical marble would fail to fall out of it's place.

    @Xenosplitter@Xenosplitter2 жыл бұрын
  • Very cool. After 50 other videos trying to explain it to me over the years, your video has finally given me at least _some_ decent understanding of why Lagrange points work!

    @davecarsley8773@davecarsley87732 жыл бұрын
  • By far the most comprehensive description of Lagrange points I've seen so far.

    @MiroslavHundak@MiroslavHundak2 жыл бұрын
  • Perfectly balanced, as all lagrange points should be!

    @TusharGoyal1997@TusharGoyal19972 жыл бұрын
    • spiffing brit

      @kukulroukul4698@kukulroukul46982 жыл бұрын
    • I understood that reference.

      @marvnuts@marvnuts2 жыл бұрын
    • Just like my...

      @cedriceric9730@cedriceric97302 жыл бұрын
    • Gravity is a perfectly balanced system with no exploits whatsoever

      @EclecticFruit@EclecticFruit2 жыл бұрын
  • First learned about Lagrange points through one of the cards in Terraforming Mars, great to have an in-depth explanation!

    @cstenzy9167@cstenzy91672 жыл бұрын
  • amazing graphic representation without overly oversimplifying. Awesome video.

    @RijumanSen@RijumanSen2 жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant explanation without over-simplifying - great job!

    @g4ifx@g4ifx2 жыл бұрын
  • SM is a national treasure

    @Markharlan95@Markharlan952 жыл бұрын
  • I remember writing simulations of this after taking multivariable calculus… Such an awesome problem to work on as a challenge!

    @fiveoneecho@fiveoneecho2 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent stuff Scott! Thanks so much. I needed a little more on these gravity eddies.

    @martinhealy2902@martinhealy29022 жыл бұрын
  • Really interesting video, great visuals and fantastic explanations. Thanks, Scott, you're always a go-to point when it comes to space science.

    @Arsenic71@Arsenic712 жыл бұрын
  • Great visuals and explanation of lagrange points. I understood what they were before but the graphics helps me with the comprehension considerably.

    @dracula3811@dracula38112 жыл бұрын
  • This video so simplified the concept of LeGrange Points! Thank you Scott!

    @clearlyepic9958@clearlyepic99582 жыл бұрын
  • I'll bet this video is getting a ton of hits these days! Great work putting this together. Thank you!!

    @adamdagosto570@adamdagosto5702 жыл бұрын
  • This was the best illustration of Lagrange (Euler) Points I've ever seen! Thanks, Scott!

    @nicholaswilliams8220@nicholaswilliams82202 жыл бұрын
  • That weird shadow on the Sun sphere almost convinced me I had dead pixels on my display.

    @randycastleberry3194@randycastleberry31942 жыл бұрын
  • Hey I live by a lagrange point! LaGrange, Georgia! Hyuk hyuk *slaps knee*

    @fuckoff5893@fuckoff58932 жыл бұрын
    • So hilarious 😂

      @ForzaJersey@ForzaJersey2 жыл бұрын
    • Haw haw haw haw...

      @stanburton6224@stanburton62242 жыл бұрын
    • From Atlanta here , very nicely done . a tip of the hat to you sir oh, nice to meet another fan of Scott Manley the way I look at it a LaGrange point is like watching two small soap bubbles circling 1/3 from a gravitational standpoint

      @arnoldsherrill6305@arnoldsherrill63052 жыл бұрын
    • Fun fact: Lagrange, GA is an almost perfect model of the L1 point in the Atlanta - Columbus Suckitude System.

      @stevejaworski2954@stevejaworski29542 жыл бұрын
    • So you are one of the 'party gals', or maybe the son of one. Hyuk hyuk *slaps knee*

      @thePronto@thePronto2 жыл бұрын
  • I don't think I've had a better understanding of gravity wells than I did watching this video. Thank you, Scott, for all the science knowledge you impart so seemingly effortlessly.

    @positivelysteve@positivelysteve2 жыл бұрын
  • Nice clip; and great renderings of the concepts underpinning the LaGrange points.

    @michaeldunne338@michaeldunne3382 жыл бұрын
  • Interesting to see both Lucy and JWST having their missions/orbits focuced on Lagrange Points!

    @TusharGoyal1997@TusharGoyal19972 жыл бұрын
    • There are dozens of spacecraft at SEL2, JWST will certainly be the most famous one. My personal favorite there is Gaia!

      @UnshavenStatue@UnshavenStatue2 жыл бұрын
    • And SOHO is at L1. I thought Kepler was too, but could not find the reference. I must have misremembered it.

      @olmostgudinaf8100@olmostgudinaf81002 жыл бұрын
    • @@olmostgudinaf8100 Kepler telescope wasn't on L point, but on "trailing heliocentric" orbit. That is, it is a bit farther from the Sun than Earth, with orbital period of ~373 days.

      @ivoivanov7407@ivoivanov74072 жыл бұрын
    • And Aditya L1 of ISRO

      @kishordinkarsonar91@kishordinkarsonar912 жыл бұрын
    • Interesting note: James Webb is going to orbit the Sun - Earth Lagrange point, not just park in the centre of it, because it needs to peek out of the Earth's shadow once in a while to get some Sun to power its stuff.

      @magmaticly@magmaticly2 жыл бұрын
  • Best explanation/representation of Lagrange points I've seen. Thanks.

    @zlm001@zlm0012 жыл бұрын
  • Agree with the previous comment... I've seen the whole "big black trampoline with a heavyweight in the middle" explanation before... but this was the first time it made complete sense... Seriously.... Great Job!!

    @bookingsessential@bookingsessential2 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks Scott Great explanation - the graphics really help explain the phenomena

    @peterpauldonoghue7024@peterpauldonoghue70242 жыл бұрын
  • Always love a good Manley explainer

    @xXCatalystic37Xx@xXCatalystic37Xx2 жыл бұрын
  • That was an excellent explanation for this Scott, thanks for sharing! Fly safe brother 👊

    @sjsharksfan@sjsharksfan2 жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant graphics rendition that makes it easy to understand.

    @srikkanthank@srikkanthank8 ай бұрын
  • That was a bloody epic visual representation! :D

    @andersjjensen@andersjjensen2 жыл бұрын
  • Right when I think to myself about a subject Scott uploads a video about that very subject without fail

    @adamkerman475@adamkerman4752 жыл бұрын
  • The BEST explanation I've ever seen. Great graphics!

    @canuckcorsa@canuckcorsa2 жыл бұрын
  • Very effectively explained such a complex concept with well crafted animation. Great work Scott 👍

    @rajeevmanerikar9548@rajeevmanerikar95488 ай бұрын
  • It's so much like fluid dynamics. Hearing this stuff really does help illustrate the concept of spacetime. It's literally a sea, but without water or even matter. Orbiting a lagrange point is like surfing a sea of nothingness 😎🏄‍♂️.

    @geofthompson3844@geofthompson38442 жыл бұрын
    • Not nothingness is avoiding chaos.

      @brendawilliams8062@brendawilliams80628 ай бұрын
  • Well that’s the most interesting thing I’ll see today. Thanks Scott. Great animations also. Makes me want to run a simulation with two “tethered” particles orbiting on opposite side of the L4 or L5 to see if it cancels out orbit instability at all

    @soundjudgment2150@soundjudgment21502 жыл бұрын
    • Jupiter Trojaner are on T4 and T5. Stable position.

      @friedhelmmunker7284@friedhelmmunker72842 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for the wonderful graphics I appreciate your artistry

    @josephflock6404@josephflock64042 жыл бұрын
  • One of the best Lagrange explanations I have ever seen. Thank you sir.

    @dominicturpin1886@dominicturpin18862 жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant! Wanted to learn about the nitty gritty if the Lagrange points since first heard about them.

    @mikecounsell@mikecounsell2 жыл бұрын
    • If you really want nitty gritty down to calculus and all that you should check out this series: kzhead.info/channel/PLbfY1f0QFa4OI2_zsNuuwI3YCsZluLFZ6.html

      @ntrgc89@ntrgc892 жыл бұрын
  • It's where India is trying to set it's mission thing to observe sun

    @ashokreddy2982@ashokreddy29828 ай бұрын
  • As a molecular biologist this is the best explanation of La Grange points I have seen. Great graphical representation. I understood (almost) everything. Looking forward to seeing JWST in action.

    @mountainousterrain1704@mountainousterrain17042 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent graphics and explanation. Thanks for sharing.

    @tanmayevyas@tanmayevyas2 жыл бұрын
  • the most dangerous is Lagrange Point 5 where Solomon, Zeon's stronghold, is located

    @FabioCalissi@FabioCalissi2 жыл бұрын
    • Side3, if I’m not mistaken.

      @cbst6w5@cbst6w52 жыл бұрын
    • FWIK L1 = Side 4 L2 = Side 3 + A Baoa Qu L3 = Side 7 + Luna two L4 = Side 2 + Side 5 L5 = Side 1 + Side 6 + Solomon

      @FabioCalissi@FabioCalissi2 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks, finally I understand why India Named Aditya L1 ( sun exposure mission), We are proud have say our Indian scientist made theoretical knowledge in practically applied and make the founder Proud...

    @ramji102@ramji1028 ай бұрын
  • I commented before hearing about position corrections needed for the Webb. You gave a good explanation of the stability of position at Lagrange points.

    @manaskumarhaldar2725@manaskumarhaldar27252 жыл бұрын
  • This is the best explanation and exposition regarding Lagrange points that I've ever seen.

    @modolief@modolief2 жыл бұрын
  • India's Aditya L1 Mission will reside at L1 for 5 years...L1 signifies Lagrange .

    @sukuvar@sukuvar8 ай бұрын
  • Well done explanation and animation, thanks for sharing. Not that Euler's mathematical feats weren't amazing enough, but is there any way of knowing if Euler worked on this 3-body problem during the latter period of his life when he continued to do cutting edge math while blind? Also, the JWST was inserted into its L2 halo orbit today. Kudos to all.

    @johnc.195@johnc.1952 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks! I'd always struggled to visualise how or why the L3 spot was even a thing. Now it's totally clear to me.

    @apedley@apedley2 жыл бұрын
  • Beautifully presented and illustrated Scott, Thank you. I have always had problems visualizing Lagrange points and comprehending a "rectilinear halo orbit" until now, it makes so much more sense now. Have you considered "Thesis by publication" a la Steve Nerlich of Cheap Astronomy Podcast?

    @isaacplaysbass8568@isaacplaysbass85682 жыл бұрын
  • Instant thumbs up! I’ve been waiting for this video!

    @jonathanjanzen8501@jonathanjanzen85012 жыл бұрын
  • Could you put a pair of radio telescopes at Earth's L4 and L5 points and use interferometry to get an effective dish size of only slightly smaller than Earth's orbit?

    @Briggsby@Briggsby2 жыл бұрын
    • @@gamerfortynine Not really a problem, just sync them all using the same set of quasars, then factor in gravitational time dilation. The tech is around since 1990s.

      @AldorEricsson@AldorEricsson2 жыл бұрын
    • Short answer: yes Slightly longer answer: but it's not easy Slightly longer corollary: and it's prohibitively expensive

      @insanitysportal6692@insanitysportal66922 жыл бұрын
    • You could add in telescopes to this at the L1&2 points stabilized by solar sails and sharpen up your results.

      @jamessheridan2142@jamessheridan21422 жыл бұрын
    • @@gamerfortynine Sounds like a job for one of those new fangled computers they got in them there big city's.

      @jamessheridan2142@jamessheridan21422 жыл бұрын
    • @@AldorEricsson I now quasars are fine for navigation, but are the fast enough to synch the phase of a radio wave?

      @DrDeuteron@DrDeuteron2 жыл бұрын
  • This totally made sense with the 3D donut gravity well description. Thank you!

    @frankdecrom6317@frankdecrom6317 Жыл бұрын
  • Great explanation Scott and great visuals. 👍

    @LeBator@LeBator2 жыл бұрын
  • I got the idea of JWT going for L2 is also because it has earth's protective shadow shielding it from the sun, being in a position of permanent eclipse, because it needs to be cool for the infrared telescopy to work. Otherwise, L4/L5 would be better choices, no?

    @georgelionon9050@georgelionon90502 жыл бұрын
    • @@bnightm okay, so now why is L2 chosen then for this? as L4 and L5 are much stabler wouldn't that mean a much longer period of operation? Or is it just than L4 and L5 are more difficult to reach making the additional fuel spent to stay stable in L2 not worth it?

      @georgelionon9050@georgelionon90502 жыл бұрын
    • @@georgelionon9050 L2 was chosen so that the JWST can occlude both the sun AND earth (and moon?) with one heat shield. The infrared wavelengths that JWST will observe will be affected by the heat from the Sun of course, and even the earth (and moon for all I know). So having the JWST in an orbit such that a single heat shield can ALWAYS occlude the sun and earth is a great help

      @markshumate78@markshumate782 жыл бұрын
    • @@markshumate78 I see makes sense, thank you

      @georgelionon9050@georgelionon90502 жыл бұрын
  • Hey Scott, you should do a video or two on the board game High Frontier. It's a very real projection of the solar system on a fixed board, and makes heavy use of Lagranges.

    @Jaxck77@Jaxck772 жыл бұрын
  • An excellent explanation backed up by excellent graphics. Thank you!

    @Nicho2020@Nicho20202 жыл бұрын
  • Fascinating. The final graphic depicts the Lpoint scenario best.

    @carlatteniese2@carlatteniese22 жыл бұрын
  • Wow I can't believe they named a point of space after a ZZ Top song

    @Clyman974@Clyman9742 жыл бұрын
    • Damnit, I should go to bed, but now I *have* to listen to some ZZ Top! 😂

      @ArKritz84@ArKritz842 жыл бұрын
    • beat me to it.

      @hodor3024@hodor30242 жыл бұрын
    • RIP Dusty Hill, gone to the great Lagrange point in the sky...

      @RCAvhstape@RCAvhstape2 жыл бұрын
    • I asked myself "how, how, how, how?" Now I know. Thanks Scott ☺️

      @jimleane7578@jimleane75782 жыл бұрын
    • They got a lot of nice girls out there.

      @hughbrackett343@hughbrackett3432 жыл бұрын
  • These get a role in the Neal Stephenson book “Seveneves” where some characters use Lagrange points to head out of the gravity well and go after a comet without burning insane amounts of propellant. Great book, be awesome to have Scott review it and some of the orbital mechanics used within it.

    @ianthomas7139@ianthomas71392 жыл бұрын
    • Read up on your history of the original halo orbit mission, ISEE-3. After it completed its mission, it was sent out on another mission to the comet Giacobini-Zinner in 1985. That mission to the comet was very successful.

      @walshrd@walshrd2 жыл бұрын
  • This was a great video Scott! Helps explain things in an easy to understand way

    @Dave-ct1jk@Dave-ct1jk2 жыл бұрын
  • So much education in a single video. Thanks for teaching me how to chill in a group of orbital bodies.

    @markmarco2880@markmarco28802 жыл бұрын
  • Really neat, first came across this terminology when listening to the Apollo 13 flight controller tapes on KZhead, that’s when it actually clicked in my head that as a spacecraft rises further and further towards the moon it slows down like a tennis ball at the top of it ahrc before it falls, the aim is for it to have just enough Velocity that it crosses the LeGrange point and starts falling towards the moon. I never totally understood how it all worked until I realised that

    @conors4430@conors44302 жыл бұрын
    • There isn't a Earth-Moon LeGrange along the path Apollo 13 would have taken to get there. (Remember, the Apollo craft doesn't fly to the moon in a straight line, but rather a parabolic arc) The Sun-Earth L2 is several times further out from the moon's orbit. What you're referring to is the Apollo craft slowing down as it leaves the earth's sphere of influence and speeding up as it enters the Moon's and starts "falling" back down.

      @RockChalk263@RockChalk2632 жыл бұрын
    • Play Kerbal Space Program and these things just fall into place :-)

      @GregiiFlieger@GregiiFlieger2 жыл бұрын
    • @@RockChalk263 fair enough. I just assumed it was the halfway gravity point between two objects

      @conors4430@conors44302 жыл бұрын
KZhead