HOW DO JET ENGINES work and WHY do they get BIGGER Explained by CAPTAIN JOE

2024 ж. 15 Мам.
507 817 Рет қаралды

✈️WANT TO BECOME A PILOT?✈️ bit.ly/474j06T
📗📗📗GET MY NEW BOOK amzn.to/32TH4x7 📗📗📗
📸 INSTAGRAM FLYWITHCAPTAINJOE: goo.gl/TToDlg 📸
🌐MY WEBSITE: goo.gl/KGTSWK 🌐
🛒👕---► T-SHIRT SHOP goo.gl/Svrqmx ◄ --👕-🛒
📖👨 NEW FACEBOOK PAGE: goo.gl/heUKGb 👨📖
▼▼My FLIGHT-KIT I highly recommend for you guys▼▼
MY HEADSET: amzn.to/2CrTrzz
MY SUNGLASSES: amzn.to/2VY6FNo
MY PILOT BAG: amzn.to/2DiWKux
Company iPad: amzn.to/2W1zM2n
▼▼The VIDEO EQUIPMENT I use in my studio and outdoors▼▼
MY CAMERA: amzn.to/2T1VK3g
LIGHTING: amzn.to/2szSRv4
IN-FLIGHT RECORDINGS: amzn.to/2VY7A0g
00:00 Intro
01:24 Turbo Jet Engine how does it work?
03:15 Turbo Fan Engine how does it work?
05:10 What is the Bypass?
08:55 Size limitations?
10:47 Geared Turbofan Engine
11:47 Outro
Ever since the advent of the jet, engines have been getting bigger and bigger. It's not just to support large and larger aircraft, or because of some unfounded idea that bigger is better. When it comes to jet engines, bigger actually is better. At least up until a point.
This fantastically concise video by the incomparable MinutePhysics explains the cold, hard math of the matter which essentially boils down to one core point. The bigger a jet engine is, the more efficient it is, because it will waste less energy in the process of adding to a plane's momentum. At least until drag starts to be a factor.
According to some napkin math (which looks positively terrifying when MinutePhysics writes it out on screen), the optimal size for a jet engine is somewhere around 13 feet in diameter, a little bit bigger than the biggest jet engines we have right now. Of course there will always be other innovations that can make jet engines more efficient-like cleverly engineered gearboxes-and small-but-powerful engines will always make sense for fighter jets. But at some point the limiting factors are as simple as the laws of physics.
(Source: MinutePhysics)
I hope you enjoyed this video!
Thank you very much for your time! I hope you enjoy this video!
Wishing you all the best!
Your "Captain" Joe
Big thank you to all other youtubers who provided me with the video material to create this video. Your content is highly appreciated. Please follow their channels:
@RyanBomar
@JP Richard
@Shorts Video
@cargospotter
@Ryan Nagai
@LGW340
@Warsaw Spotting
@Concorde SST
@Skyes9
@PilotSanderHD
@Carsten Travels - 100% Pure Maritime World
@GE Aviation
@MT Aviation
@Pratt & Whitney PurePower Engine
Intro Song:
Lounge - Ehrling: www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5ImN...
Outro Song:
Joakim Karud & Dyalla - Wish you were here www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXrxB...
ALL COPYRIGHTS TO THIS VIDEO ARE OWNED BY FLYWITHCAPTAINJOE.COM ANY COPYING OR ILLEGALLY DOWNLOADING AND PUBLISHING ON OTHER PLATFORMS WILL FOLLOW LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

Пікірлер
  • Great video cpt, If anyone here has not booked your call with cpt Joe I highly recommend you book it, I done it and was easly the best aviation chat iv had in years ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. Joe is a extremely passionate pilot that has the experience to help out new pilot's or answer any questions you may have. You can book the call in the description.

    @PRCOM@PRCOM2 жыл бұрын
    • 🤗👌🏽😇

      @sailaab@sailaab2 жыл бұрын
    • Oh nice. What part of the description to book the call have not seen it

      @marieme007@marieme0072 жыл бұрын
    • pl

      @ahtashamjee8172@ahtashamjee8172 Жыл бұрын
    • He’s amazing

      @andrewhatton1606@andrewhatton1606 Жыл бұрын
  • I'm an aeronautical engineering student and I have airbreathing propulsion exam tomorrow. Capt Joe uploaded this on the right time 😭😭😭 Thank you so much Joe.

    @ajmjabir1061@ajmjabir10612 жыл бұрын
    • Oh boy! I totally messed up my Propulsion & Performance Exam and still don’t know how. I’m glad I have still passed the semester though! 😅 Good luck to you, mate! 😁

      @Tranefine@Tranefine2 жыл бұрын
    • I'm mechanical engineering student and we also have airbreathing propulsion exam this week. I'm shocked.

      @Raz82000@Raz820002 жыл бұрын
    • Good luck!

      @ahuman7523@ahuman75232 жыл бұрын
    • @@Tranefine thank you, fam

      @ajmjabir1061@ajmjabir10612 жыл бұрын
    • @@ahuman7523 thank you

      @ajmjabir1061@ajmjabir10612 жыл бұрын
  • A good pilot is always learning. A great teacher is always teaching.

    @salonikaushik3892@salonikaushik38922 жыл бұрын
    • Nice one

      @LNYT-Aviation@LNYT-Aviation2 жыл бұрын
    • I would correct that to "A great teacher is always teaching himself before others"

      @HDJess@HDJess2 жыл бұрын
    • A great teacher is also always learning

      @zorilaz@zorilaz Жыл бұрын
    • And learning.

      @muzikhed@muzikhed Жыл бұрын
  • Now “suck, squeeze, bang, blow” has a whole new meaning to me 🤪😂

    @lachenmann@lachenmann2 жыл бұрын
    • its also how car engines work to

      @747simmer4@747simmer42 жыл бұрын
    • It is how something else works too😂

      @user-ps4no7vk4j@user-ps4no7vk4j2 ай бұрын
  • Captain Joe has taught me too much, I really do hope to become a pilot in the future, I wish for nothing else except the experience of flying on a plane. So many things happening all at once, it's just fascinating. after watching almost all of your videos I realized how little I knew about aviation in general.

    @StinkyScript@StinkyScript2 жыл бұрын
  • I think the Concorde is a TurboJet... Therefore making it the most famous turbojetted aircraft

    @mathuringarcier@mathuringarcier2 жыл бұрын
    • Indeed. It's the most famous and technologically advanced airliner ever made, anyway. He's (yes "le" Concorde is a "he" here in France) out of competition in many discipline. It was also the first airliner with complete fly-by-wire, FADEC engine management (albeit using analog computers, so technically it was the one and only "FAAEC" system), and rocket-technology-derived inertial guidance autopilot....

      @Damien.D@Damien.D2 жыл бұрын
    • Jettedturbo

      @TheGalonator@TheGalonator2 жыл бұрын
    • I agree that the Olympus 593-powered Concorde should be at the top of the list, but I’d add the A12 / SR71 to the tally. Yes, I know the J58 is a ramjet hybrid but it’s also a constantly-afterburning turbofan so it counts in my book. Concorde might be more famous but I’d argue that the J58 is the most amazing air-breathing aero engine ever created, especially the speed-adjustable bypass, variable-geometry intake cones and the hypergolic afterburner ignition system. The variable intake ramps on the Olympus 593, albeit amazing, are slightly less sophisticated. NB. I’m pretty fortunate in that both these aircraft sit in Duxford Imperial War Museum, 10 min drive from my home.

      @filipkonopacki1547@filipkonopacki15472 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@filipkonopacki1547 being a great fan of both planes, I have found a way to love both without competition. Concorde is the most famous and most formidable civilian airliner. The Blackbird is the most famous and most formidable military plane. There. Both the best in their domains.

      @Damien.D@Damien.D2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Damien.D Une chose est sure c'est que LE Concorde était une merveille à la pointe de la technologie de son époque!

      @mathuringarcier@mathuringarcier2 жыл бұрын
  • It's mind boggling to me how they come up with this stuff in the first place. WOW, you did a great job of explaining it in simple terms.

    @robertwren2289@robertwren22892 жыл бұрын
    • If I remember correctly, the initial design came from the turbochargers used on piston engines (to help efficiency and power at higher altitudes). Then someone had the idea to just take out the piston engine and just feed the fuel in. And fun fact, the M1 Abrams tank actually uses a jet engine instead of a traditional one with cylinders.

      @wcvp@wcvp2 жыл бұрын
    • ​​@@wcvp It's more like the earlier ideas that resulted in piston engine turbo chargers were the same ideas that resulted in turbojets. The basic axial turbojet engine was first sort of partly cobbled together around or before 1900 by Parsons (Ireland / North England) while doing steam turbine power generation machines. A bladed multi stage axial steam turbine coupled to a axial bladed multistage compressor. Then Parsons did some work on the idea of putting combusters in the middle instead of using steam. People at the time were thinking about it's use as an aircraft engine. A French chap came up with the basic axial bladed multistage turbine idea around 1875.

      @Peppa_Wiggles23@Peppa_Wiggles233 ай бұрын
  • I Have joined a flight dispatch team recently and started working on myself to learn more and more about flight planning and aviation in General , I really enjoy every moment i spend watching your amazing educational vids, interesting and rich of knowledge. Thank you Capt for your efforts.

    @abjosa4003@abjosa4003 Жыл бұрын
  • I love the content. You have such a soothing tone, makes it better. Thanks for this!

    @rishadtahjeeb3678@rishadtahjeeb36782 жыл бұрын
  • The fact that a 777-x can fix a whole 737 fuselage in their engines blow my mind 🤯

    @juancamilosotopayares2811@juancamilosotopayares28112 жыл бұрын
    • Yes. Thats biggest and most powerfull engine for commercial aircraft

      @CHOXON2CHOXOFF@CHOXON2CHOXOFF2 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah I knew it but still can't make up my mind about that!

      @Damien.D@Damien.D2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Damien.D ok.. engineering marvellous

      @CHOXON2CHOXOFF@CHOXON2CHOXOFF2 жыл бұрын
    • Imagine a 737 with a 777 engine.

      @rocko44444444@rocko444444442 жыл бұрын
    • @@rocko44444444 The cockpit would be split in half and sucked in the engines at takeoff XD

      @Damien.D@Damien.D2 жыл бұрын
  • Joe has a unique personality that defines him in a different way than others.. ❤❤ Keep growing keep flourishing

    @thattechieguy@thattechieguy2 жыл бұрын
    • Very true

      @CHOXON2CHOXOFF@CHOXON2CHOXOFF2 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, everybody has his own personality. That's life.😉 Cheers🥂

      @mikeschmit007@mikeschmit0072 жыл бұрын
  • Great video Joe! Always learning something new and you have a great visual way of explaining things! Cheers

    @benthompson8999@benthompson89992 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for the video! Love your technical content. Best explanation of angular velocity I ever heard. As a trained metallurgist, the materials that somehow survive service in turbofan jet engines boggle my mind. Maybe a future video? 😉 Thanks again!

    @peregrina7701@peregrina77012 жыл бұрын
  • I have recently started playin flight simulator, hence attracted by Joe’s videos. And most of my questions were answered 3-5 years ago. I’m amazed that the Captain can provide interesting contents frequently after all these years. Kudos to u!

    @timmyzhou1@timmyzhou12 жыл бұрын
    • Thanks mate!!!

      @flywithcaptainjoe@flywithcaptainjoe2 жыл бұрын
    • 🤗👌🏽👍🏼

      @sailaab@sailaab2 жыл бұрын
    • P

      @ironzuma4691@ironzuma46912 жыл бұрын
    • @@flywithcaptainjoe Video idea: Could you and Mentor Pilot play Roblox Pilot Training Flight Simulator together?, It could be a great video as the both of you would fly plane's and just like how it is done in real life, I do mention that the game is filled with idiot's but maybe they will be forced to be serious when you guy's fly the plane's.

      @doctorofminecraft2078@doctorofminecraft20782 жыл бұрын
  • The most iconic turbojet is the Concorde. They didn't really have a choice, for supersonic speed they needed the thrust to be of very high speed air, not of high mass of air, so a turbofan wasn't really an option.

    @iknebli@iknebli2 жыл бұрын
    • That's correct and not a lot of people understand it. The faster you want an airplane to fly the higher the speed of the accelerated air has to be as it leaves the back of the engine. That's why a propeller engine that only accelerates air backward at about 400mph can't propel an airplane forward at 600mph. To do that you need a jet engine that can accelerate the air backwards at about 700mph or more.

      @joevignolor4u949@joevignolor4u9492 жыл бұрын
    • Boom is planning to use turbofans in their supersonic airliner.

      @NiHaoMike64@NiHaoMike642 жыл бұрын
    • @@NiHaoMike64 The fan will improve the low altitude, low speed performance of the aircraft. Then the core will take over and accelerate the airplane up to supersonic speeds.

      @joevignolor4u949@joevignolor4u9492 жыл бұрын
    • I agree about the Concorde being iconic, but it’s engines are hidden from view. For this reason I’d nominate the Boeing 707 as the most iconic turbojet.

      @MendTheWorld@MendTheWorld2 жыл бұрын
    • @ Joe Vignolo Not quite. For example, the gas flow in the J-58 in the SR-71 is entirely subsonic even though the plane is flying at Mach 3. The thrust comes from the high pressure and expansion of gasses inside of the divergent nozzle. A single stage fan simply can’t generate those pressures out of the fan duct.

      @Bartonovich52@Bartonovich522 жыл бұрын
  • What a great video describing how a turbo fan works. I really enjoyed how you described the bypass ratio.

    @jabariphillips766@jabariphillips7662 жыл бұрын
  • Using this to help prep for my first airline interview with SkyWest this month and it’s helped so much! Thanks Joe!

    @steventibbs6578@steventibbs65782 жыл бұрын
  • Learning new facts every Thursday! "A good pilot is always learning" :)

    @mariokalaany1605@mariokalaany16052 жыл бұрын
  • another amazing and insightful video Joe, nicely done!

    @toldsammy4203@toldsammy42032 жыл бұрын
  • I wrote a paper about this for my physics class in high school. Been super interested in jet engines ever since!

    @simonakovacova8949@simonakovacova89492 жыл бұрын
  • The most famous turbojet is the SR-71 if turboramjets count, if not it's the Concorde

    @igornoga5362@igornoga53622 жыл бұрын
    • Rubbish ask someone if they remember the most FAMOUS aeroplane in the world they will mention the Concorde not the SR71

      @clyth41@clyth412 жыл бұрын
    • @@clyth41 you mean the wright flyer, the spirit of St Louis, the Enola Gay, or the Spruce Goose. My wife says the spruce goose.

      @kenbrown2808@kenbrown28082 жыл бұрын
    • @@kenbrown2808 Military geeks will say SR-71, most non av geeks will say Concorde bc it’s basically a household name of an aircraft, WW2 geeks will say the Me-262, remember, we’re talking abt turbojets not prop planes. It all just depends on the person really. Personally I instantly thought of the Blackbird. I just adore it.

      @soup1029@soup10292 жыл бұрын
    • @@soup1029 it all depends on how you ask the question. if you ask for the most iconic passenger jet, you will probably get a tossup between the Concorde and the 747. if you ask for the best known, this week, you might get the 737 MAX. if you ask for the first jet people think of, Learjet might make a strong showing.

      @kenbrown2808@kenbrown28082 жыл бұрын
    • SR-71 has 9.9 billion results on Google. Me-262 = 7.4 billion. Mig-21 = 162 million. Concorde = 89 million.

      @captaindunsel2806@captaindunsel28062 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for this great video Cpt Joe - understanding the engines is one of my weak points when chatting in our AV community. I now understand the basic principles of an engine, how the bypass system works and has evolved, and the limitations of that system. Agree with you - total respect to engine designers etc. The info about the 777 engine being as wide as the 737 fuselage just blew my mind lol! Great content as always Joe, thank you!

    @pandaroll2323@pandaroll23232 жыл бұрын
  • The most famous turbojet aircraft: Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird. The engines at subsonic speed were indeed a turbojet. But above mach 2, it became a hybrid engine (well it was called turboramjet), and it's fuel efficiency increased.

    @darkknight1193@darkknight11932 жыл бұрын
    • That what I thought of too; however, the Concorde is, no doubt, more famous to the general public.

      @jsmariani4180@jsmariani4180 Жыл бұрын
  • Very interesting video. All of your videos are so informative. I appreciate all the hard work you do to prepare these videos!

    @MrOlderandwiser@MrOlderandwiser2 жыл бұрын
  • My first plane ride was on a Constellation four engine prop. The noise was incredible and hearing others talk was difficult. Today’s engines sort of hum and what a difference!

    @chilitoday@chilitoday2 жыл бұрын
  • Such a great work learning new things 😀

    @muhammedarfak1380@muhammedarfak13802 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for making this.

    @lizpurr8402@lizpurr84022 жыл бұрын
  • Joe you are amazing teacher ❤

    @arishravi4139@arishravi41392 жыл бұрын
  • Love your videos Capt. Hatsoff 👏👏👏 For an aspiring pilot like me you are always on the youtube subscription list 👍 Cheers!

    @nanduashok1848@nanduashok18482 жыл бұрын
  • The SR-71 with it's J 58 turbo jet engine.is.probably the most famous jet with a non-fan engine. Great video as always and with me being one of the first group of F 16 mechanics (1979-1983) that shot of an F 16 with all 5 stages of burner lit still gives me chill bumps.

    @wingrider7627@wingrider76272 жыл бұрын
  • Beautifully explained. Thank you!

    @A6la3MnRasi@A6la3MnRasi2 жыл бұрын
  • I have nothing but love for those videos. Great information, great delivery of it!

    @andreicrisan8145@andreicrisan81452 жыл бұрын
  • It’s a great day when Capt. Joe uploads! 😃

    @rithvikjoshi@rithvikjoshi2 жыл бұрын
  • Great video! That explanation of how a turbo engine works - in particular Suck Squeeze Bang Blow - even I could understand and I’m about as far from being an engineer as it’s possible to imagine. I’ve soon got lost when I’ve listened to other explanations, but Joe is such a great teacher I enjoyed this video because I could follow it!

    @moiraatkinson@moiraatkinson Жыл бұрын
  • Wow Amazing Thanks for this Detailed Video

    @Jupiter12.000@Jupiter12.000 Жыл бұрын
  • Wonderful video and amazing explanation Captain Joe. Thanks for sharing.

    @canitood1458@canitood1458 Жыл бұрын
  • Very interesting video! I watched many others on jet engines, but I still learned a lot from this one. I'm looking forward to watching others by Captain Joe!

    @bobjacobson858@bobjacobson858 Жыл бұрын
  • I really love the noise of jets spooling up; the loudest I've ever heard was a de Havilland Comet 4 built in 1963, which until 2019 used to do fast taxi runs at Bruntingthorpe airfield in Leicestershire; you could walk so close to it during engine start-up (RR Avon turbojets) that I could feel the noise vibrating through my body! It's still there, alongside an HP Victor, but they don't do taxi-runs anymore, as the runway's been turned into a massive car park. I think their EE Lightnings still do engine runs occasionally though. Although I used to live near Heathrow, I've never stood as close to Concorde during spool-up (Bristol Siddeley turbojets, later known as Rolls-Royce), so I can't compare it.

    @halcyongeezer@halcyongeezer Жыл бұрын
  • Really enjoying the more posts recently. Nice video as well!

    @TheBestGamingCritic@TheBestGamingCritic2 жыл бұрын
  • Great Explanation on engine tech. Congrats Captain

    @luismh184@luismh1842 жыл бұрын
  • Having been fortunate to fly long haul from Birmingham (UK) to Barbados, a 9 hour flight, I just loved the Boeing 787 dreamliner's Rolls Royce Trent 1000 engines. They seemed soooo quiet even at max power on take off. As I understand it, they are also quite fuel efficient too

    @WayneM1961@WayneM19612 жыл бұрын
  • I always knew how high bipass engines worked but I didn’t know why engines couldn’t go stupidly big due to the fan blades going faster on the outside so I found this really useful thankyou

    @f18forlife72@f18forlife722 жыл бұрын
    • it's the same reason prop driven planes and helicopters have a maximum airspeed.

      @kenbrown2808@kenbrown28082 жыл бұрын
    • I worked for and did and engineering apprenticeship with Rolls Royce so was aware of the tip velocity issue but the main issue with the engines we made was small size needed in helicopters. You couldn't just make them bigger to get more power and you reach a physical size that you can't go below with the HP compressor blades as they don't work. The pressure ration in a helicopter engine was pathetic compared to a much larger engine. To get round that the HP compressor is centrifugal running at mind boggling rpm.

      @kevinrayner5812@kevinrayner581210 ай бұрын
  • Incredible understandable! Thank you!

    @assai74@assai743 ай бұрын
  • Many thanks for the valuable info

    @ramzishawa1110@ramzishawa11102 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for this very good lesson about the jet-engines! 😃👍 Of course the Concorde is the most famous turbojet aircraft! 😉

    @PilotUlli@PilotUlli2 жыл бұрын
  • Hi, I have worked for Safran Aircraft Engines for a while. By the way, thanks or the appreciation of our work 😃 To give extra information on your very good video: - You mention 80% of the thrust comes from the cold air (bypass). The order of magnitude for the leap is around 65%, and 70% for our competitor if i'm not mistaken. But the general idea is indeed to get a bypass ratio as high as possible. The concept is that the hot air that comes from the nozzle drives the cold flux. Therefore, the faster goes the hot air, the faster goes the cold air as well. And as the cold flux represents 10x the amound of air coming from the hot flow, the thrust developped by this bypassed air is huge. One limitation comes from the fact that at some point, the hot flow is not strong enough to lead that much cold air, and you loose in efficiency. That's why we are desperately trying to increase the RPM of the shafts and fan, as well as the turbines' maximum temperature with composite materials. The goal is to rise hot flux's energy to be able to increase the Bypass ratio even more. - One limitation to even bigger engines is definetely their size: can't mount them under the wing; they disturb the flow over the wing as they get bigger and bigger; they induce more stress and bending moments on the wing as they become way too heavy; and so much stress is applied on the fan and other internal components as all parts become too big and tend not to rotate as fast as smaller ones ... We expect to be able to increase efficiency from a maximum of 10-15% compared to current modern jet engines in the following decade, but the next jet engine generation will require a new technology to go further. That's what the Open rotor is about for example. Bye

    @Slyze33@Slyze332 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome being a captain

    @androbright@androbright2 жыл бұрын
  • Well Explained! Thanks a lot!

    @DanisTV350@DanisTV3502 ай бұрын
  • Nice video Captain Joe! I used to wonder why the engines on 737s that were manufactured in the 1970s were smaller than the ones manufactured today. Thanks for answering my question!👍

    @jeremybaraka9301@jeremybaraka93012 жыл бұрын
  • I'm not entirely sure of my answer, but for me the most famous turbojet aircraft is the SR-71 Blackbrid, which was powered by the Pratt & Whitney J58 engines. Those were some mighty engines.

    @MarceloBenjamin@MarceloBenjamin2 жыл бұрын
  • BEST PILOT ON THE TUBE.CANT WAIT FOR NEW INSTALLMENTS,IM WITH YOU RADIO GUY ONLINE,SAME THINKING

    @bobdoom3423@bobdoom34232 жыл бұрын
  • Perfect video like always

    @soroushmoallemi774@soroushmoallemi7742 жыл бұрын
  • Once again a great analysis, informative and impressive session Captain Joe.

    @SinghAlokkrishna@SinghAlokkrishna2 жыл бұрын
  • Famous turbojet: I have to say the early Boeing 707s with the JT3D turbojets. It's amazing what Boeing has done to the 737, which today resembles a twin-engine 707. I miss the classic Boeing 747 "buzzsaw" sound with its P&W JT9D taking off.

    @BryanDorr@BryanDorr2 жыл бұрын
    • JT3D is actually a turbofan which has a low bypass ratio.

      @mrcannotfindaname@mrcannotfindaname2 жыл бұрын
    • @@mrcannotfindaname You are correct. however the first Boeing 707s had the JT3C, which was a turbojet, which was upgraded to the JT3D turbofan. Some links: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_J57 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT3D That’s why I nominated the 707 as the most iconic turbojet. (The engines in the Concorde were hidden in the wings!).

      @MendTheWorld@MendTheWorld2 жыл бұрын
  • This is the clearest explanation I have ever seen !

    @boytheodore@boytheodore2 жыл бұрын
  • Very educative vid bro! Keep it up 👏🏽

    @aaronaustrie@aaronaustrie2 жыл бұрын
  • The Concord was the most well known Turbojet engine aircraft. And, the most loved and missed. Enough to make me actually cry when I saw on T.V. the last one land, thereby bidding a farewell to a dream I will never have the chance to fly on.

    @smartbraininternational7138@smartbraininternational71382 жыл бұрын
  • The most famous turbojet aircraft I can think of that would be related to this channel would probably be the de Havilland Comet. Opening the door to a new age of air travel while teaching important lessons about the challenges of having a pressurized cabin. Unfortunate that they were such hard learned lessons.

    @drewb.9301@drewb.93012 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for the useful and curious information.🇵🇹👍

    @DiogoF.@DiogoF. Жыл бұрын
  • Our family love learning from your channel. This was another well explained video. Keep up the good work!

    @julzb7165@julzb71652 жыл бұрын
  • Much better graphics and lighting Joe! Keep up the good work.

    @richc47us@richc47us2 жыл бұрын
  • You forgot about the triple shaft technology of the RR civil engines. This decoupled the Fan from the the LP compressor allowing better rotor speed management.

    @davidg6370@davidg63702 жыл бұрын
    • At the expense of higher weight and complexity.

      @Bartonovich52@Bartonovich522 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for explaining this you definitely get a thumbs up.

    @rdaugherty52@rdaugherty52 Жыл бұрын
  • What a great video captain your videos always motivated me

    @mursaleenbhatt@mursaleenbhatt2 жыл бұрын
  • Great video, one of the best explanations of jet engine technology that I have ever come across.

    @PaulGodfrey@PaulGodfrey2 жыл бұрын
    • A more detailed video is coming soon

      @flywithcaptainjoe@flywithcaptainjoe2 жыл бұрын
  • Great video that is very informative and interesting to watch. Is there a threshold where it becomes more economical or physically more viable to increase the number of engines as opposed to increasing the size of the engines? I have heard that there's a trend towards twinjets and away from quadjets, but it seems to me that engines can be designed to be only so large and so there must be some point where it becomes more efficient to deploy (three or) four engines.

    @serdip@serdip2 жыл бұрын
    • That is a good point you have here. Maybe in 10 years airliners will need to be bigger and uses the largest turbofan possible to keep pushing the limit of efficiency per passenger transported, and that is where Airbus will deeply regret not having an A380NEO to sell......

      @Damien.D@Damien.D2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Damien.D Hahaa, they're too big now. Good bye A 380. Does seem strange, but it just didn't work.

      @donaldstanfield8862@donaldstanfield88622 жыл бұрын
  • This explanation is so clear, I got it at firt time, Bravo!

    @user-cq4nq8ci9o@user-cq4nq8ci9o4 ай бұрын
  • Love how turbo fan’s create a majority of the thrust, reduce noise and create a cooling effect for the core of the engine. So simple, yet brilliant! (The acceleration of the turbo fans air via the Venturi effect, again … awesome)!

    @lcprivatepilot1969@lcprivatepilot196911 ай бұрын
  • I have worked for Rolls-Royce for Trent engines, and yes I can say, you've explained everything with super ease..

    @mostlybasic@mostlybasic2 жыл бұрын
  • I'm sure Joe is looking for the Concorde as the answer to his quiz but I'm saying the SR 71 even though some say that's a turboramjet.

    @jeremymurphy7320@jeremymurphy73202 жыл бұрын
    • It technically is a turboramjet and not a pure turbojet.

      @ChrisZoomER@ChrisZoomER2 жыл бұрын
    • @@ChrisZoomER god bless Kelly Johnson for making the most legendary supersonic recon plane to ever soar the skies....

      @scarecrow108productions7@scarecrow108productions72 жыл бұрын
  • I really like this type of videos and your explanation, thanks Captain Joe!)

    @evgenytsvetkov2781@evgenytsvetkov27812 жыл бұрын
  • Captain Joe has an amazing way explaining airplanes. I am not an engineer but he has a knack of teaching laymen in a very simple way. Great teacher and what a smile. Wonderful

    @sudhakarmalu4299@sudhakarmalu4299 Жыл бұрын
  • The most known turbo jet aircraft would have been the Havilland comet. As it was the very first to exist as a commercial option.

    @sirBrouwer@sirBrouwer2 жыл бұрын
  • TheFlightChannel and Captain Joe in one day, yup, this is the day alright 😏

    @emotionaloveracorolla5274@emotionaloveracorolla52742 жыл бұрын
    • Perfect timing on a rainy day!

      @normadesmond9659@normadesmond96592 жыл бұрын
  • Very well explained!

    @verodg2820@verodg28202 жыл бұрын
  • I swear I love this guy!

    @MrBerkelyjest@MrBerkelyjest Жыл бұрын
  • All the best from RUSSIA for all CJ's subscribers!!!

    @il-2forsale57@il-2forsale572 жыл бұрын
  • Nice haircut and the LED light, sir :-) 🙂 Edit: (8:38) Concorde with Rolls Royce SNECMA

    @prathammaliya7633@prathammaliya76332 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent lesson on jet engines. Thank you Captain Joe.

    @trevormurdoch9141@trevormurdoch9141 Жыл бұрын
  • Makes me think of the way we intake our breaths and blow out at different speeds and power. Just like wind when it blows through mountains closer together, the wind blows stronger creating a bottleneck squeeze. The smaller the space the more power it creates. Taking in large amounts of air and squeezing it through smaller area creates power. So cool to hearing him explain this!!!!

    @eradutiu@eradutiu Жыл бұрын
  • As much as I loved and miss the Concorde, the 737 will always be an icon and that it was first rolled out with my favorite airline Lufthansa! The haircut will have to grow on me Joe :). Great video as always!

    @normadesmond9659@normadesmond96592 жыл бұрын
  • I would say that the Concorde was the most famous Turbojet airplane that existed.

    @dakkedankos4116@dakkedankos41162 жыл бұрын
  • Another great video, tks capt

    @manunitedphong@manunitedphong2 жыл бұрын
  • One of the best explained materials about jet engines for non engineers!

    @mambula30@mambula302 жыл бұрын
  • I would say the de Havilland Comet is a pretty famous turbojet aircraft.

    @dgraves14@dgraves142 жыл бұрын
    • Until a certain BBC reporter got his hands on one, then lungs ruptured.

      @martintheiss4038@martintheiss40382 жыл бұрын
    • The Comet was my first thought, but it had a pretty short and sketchy life. I nominated the Boeing 707!

      @MendTheWorld@MendTheWorld2 жыл бұрын
  • The real question is when will airlines finally implement Rockwell Automation's Retro Encabulator into their engines?

    @Deltarious@Deltarious2 жыл бұрын
    • Joe needs to explain it's operation first

      @MeaHeaR@MeaHeaR2 жыл бұрын
  • wow your studio back ground lighting is dope 👌👍🙏

    @KBSINN@KBSINN Жыл бұрын
  • Thanks Capt Joe very helpful information 👍🛫

    @thedracula3039@thedracula30392 жыл бұрын
  • 2:44 When G-rated meets R-Rated.

    @maboleth@maboleth2 жыл бұрын
    • Yep, I saw that, laughed for a second. Then thought. Wow, I am an adult with the humor of an adolescent. 😅

      @ExarchNZ@ExarchNZ2 жыл бұрын
  • Great session, illustrated by great animation clips. I was wondering at what approx. altitude the jet fans start to receive the bypass air ? in other words when can no longer supply the LP compressor with intake air ? Now you know why the aircrafts like cold climates ( air density at higher altitudes)

    @rudinatelaj71@rudinatelaj712 жыл бұрын
    • On the ground, that is where they need the most thrust for takeoff, plus reverse thrust to land safely!

      @donaldstanfield8862@donaldstanfield88622 жыл бұрын
    • I believe the confusion comes from ALL the air going through the fan, and a small amount of air *after* the fan is drawn into the core.

      @mikecowen6507@mikecowen6507 Жыл бұрын
  • Great video! I love that! Now I know how a jet engines works. Thank you Captain Joe!

    @otherplane0183@otherplane01832 жыл бұрын
  • Very cool info thank you.😀

    @heroknaderi@heroknaderi Жыл бұрын
  • I’m thinking Captain Joe has never heard the buzz saw sound of supersonic fan tips that happens in many turbofans.

    @superskullmaster@superskullmaster2 жыл бұрын
    • The sound of inefficiency 😂

      @topethermohenes7658@topethermohenes76582 жыл бұрын
    • He's heard it all right, mate.

      @donaldstanfield8862@donaldstanfield88622 жыл бұрын
  • Larger fans create more drag as well. That's another limiting factor to the turbo fan.

    @leniterfortis4832@leniterfortis48322 жыл бұрын
    • Don't forget the cowling weight, it makes up more than a third of the total engine weight.

      @philippm.3244@philippm.32442 жыл бұрын
    • It actually takes away some of the efficiency coming from the use of the latest engine tech.

      @srinitaaigaura@srinitaaigaura Жыл бұрын
  • Extremely nice and well perceivable presentation. When I watched your videos about landing, instruments, etc, I thought it is going to be all that a pilot does. However, never guessed there is a great aeronautical engineer in you as well. Congratulations.

    @syedghalib3158@syedghalib3158 Жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant brilliant brilliant video!!!

    @michelenigro478@michelenigro4782 жыл бұрын
  • IMHO, the Messerschmitt ME 262 is the first plane that comes to mind when you ask "What's the most famous turbo jet aircraft?". It revolutionized aircraft propulsion.

    @grumpybear741@grumpybear7412 жыл бұрын
  • The Max and Neo engines look ginormous on their planes.

    @pigybak@pigybak2 жыл бұрын
  • Most clearly understandable video on this topic, had seen alot on jet engine ,u d best explaination

    @s.yadvendumyplaylist3748@s.yadvendumyplaylist3748 Жыл бұрын
  • SUPERB lecture!

    @mibo747@mibo747 Жыл бұрын
KZhead