NASA's Dream Chaser Space Plane Is Finally Complete!
Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉 Get up to 65% OFF your subscription ➡️ HERE: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=1200m60-y...
Last Video: The Soviet's 70 Year Old Abandoned Moon Base Plan
• The Soviet's 70 Year O...
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars
Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉 Get up to 65% OFF your subscription ➡ HERE: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=1200m60-youtube-thespacerace-dec-2023&btp=default&KZhead&Influencer..thespacerace..USA..KZhead
A scaled up and modified version of dream chaser as a replacement for the nose cone of starship, detachable, and able to glide back to earth with 30-40 people to any runway on earth -> Guaranteed human rating. For those who also foresee the problems with starship and human rating...something to chew on.
Amazing!! If you need thumbnail contact with me.
This is the second most exciting project vehicle next to starship that i am really excited to see happen!
omg its like your brain cant say x37b
lolol @@benhuffington8482
I’m a big SpaceX fan, but I love me some Dream Chaser!
Right😂 humanity is great indeed🙌🏼
It's unique
Just my opinion but I think it will be the new delivery work horse for the ISS. It will definitely help keep costs down.
I listen/watch many space reporting shows. You are one of my favorites. Professional, detailed, enthusiastic and hopeful. Keep up the great work!
Much appreciated! @dctranberg1
I would be careful they get a lot of things very wrong frequently
Their main factory is a couple of miles away from my house and got a tour of their facility. Really amazing team of young engineers. Happy to see them making it happen and hopefully they manage to make the crewed version someday
I hope the Dream Chaser will be able to carry passengers
They do have a crew variant coming!
Once it becomes man rated, just like cargo dragon did to become the crew dragon, it will carry up to 7 people but will probably carry 4 per flight.
I believe the crew variants are destined to support Orbital Reef. Sierra Space was not selected for commercial crew contract to transport crews to ISS.
I hope it is crew worthy as well. Human rated. It would be nice to have multiple options in the US
@@chrischeshire6528 Imagine a scaled up and modified version so it would fit in place of the nose cone of starship. 30-50 person capacity, detachable so it can glide back to earth on any runway. The tanks and engines can do the classic belly flop re-entry while the crew returns in the safest and least uncomfortable manner in existence. And it acts as an abort vessel in case of a failure during launch.
Great Work ! Love to see Dream Chaser make its mark early 2024. Outstanding development & tech , plus it can also land anywhere around the world. A new chapter in the making, all the best. 😎
Baby shuttle! Would be cool to see an upsized model using the SpaceX heavy engines
It's already too heavy to be useful.
They plan to build a crew version in the future. For now they want to test the design and start fulfilling cargo deliveries to the ISS.
@@Forevertrueca
Imagine being the person who made the error with those tanks for the Vega, or the supervisor who failed to catch it. 'Oops' doesn't cover it, and future job prospects may be dim if they want to stay in anything like the same industry.
Always to the point and well delivered no-nonsense news
Never heard about Dream Chaser before, the concept sounds good
Dream chaser is my favorite project out here ! ❤
On the way back from Mars they should stay on the 🌕 moon for about a month before returning to Earth in order to reacclimate to gravity to rebuild strength after such a long return voyage.
gorgeous looking ship
Thanks!
I've been watching for about 6 months. Great videos. Very informative. Thanks folks !
Tiling the Space Shuttle, at least for Columbia and Challengers. The issue in the 1970's was the extreme cation engineers used when installing the tikes on the first Shuttle. The tiles were extremely critical to the safety of the Shuttle missions. Nothing like the tile system had ever been tried before. They had to make sure they weren't missing some small thing that would cause the tiles to fail.
Of course just teasing here but that fuel transfer test internally between two tanks feels a little like the fastest gun in the west routine: “wanna see me draw?”Waits 2seconds without moving “wanna see it again?” I do love this content and thanks for clearing up the timing of the transfer test misunderstanding.
How else would you do it?
@@jtjames79 :) Exactly. It is not criticism...it is funny is all. Hopefully they are as awesome at displaying the transfer telemetry as they are about engine status graphics.
It's good to see that nasa's farescape program is reaching an ultimate conclusion
I thought the same thing 😂😂
Just watchout for an electromagnetic wave...😉
Honestly my biggest surprise with space travel right now is that there isn't a station-to-station rocket operative or in development. It would be pretty useful to have a craft that doesn't need to undergo the stress of escape and reentry every time. It would also be able to hold a lot more cargo, fuel, and crew, making it probably a lot better for missions to the moon and mars. It would definitely be helpful for a mars mission, since you could stock up on like 5-6 years worth of food, water, fuel, etc. and just ship it to martian orbit, then use a few surface-to-orbit and orbit-to-surface missions to bring it down as necessary.
Well there really are only two space stations up there and neither is permanant. Nor is it so easy to transfer from one to the other when you consider the different orbits and the relative velocities. You might as well sent up rockets instead. You idea isn't bad, we're just not there yet in either technology or need.
@@chrishartley4553 I guess I'm thinking moreso about the future, and I do think it would be a lot easier for a mars mission/moon mission.
Oh my god, the missing Vega Tanks story killed me! 😂😂😂
I can't wait to see this tech get used in space
I been waiting for you to drop this ❤honestly I love the dream chaser and I hope it feels the gap where the shuttle left
Hold on, it is Sierra Space that is developing "Dream Chaser", not NASA !!! I wish them well, but they have been working on this since 2010, and they still have considerable work to do.
Good to know the dream chaser becoming more than just a concept and a model.
Thank you
Looking good NASA
Aye OK... 2012?. This design has been "flying!" about since the 50s. You could say its... A dinosaur!. Ha.
Wasn't that one the "Dynosoar"?
@@frankmcgowan9457 aye
that's exactly what i would say...1957-1963.
@@darinladd5312 GR8 minds
@@BarryHWhite i love the usaf museum. they have a display, near the missile tower, but no artifacts. would love it if they could find the prototypes and display them.
Science and the universe are something too sublime for me. Thank you for letting ignorant people like me see more of the universe. I really like this channel
I love how Dream Chaser looks like a sci-fi re-entry vehicle named Komusai
They should have an extra one connected to the Space Station at all times as an emergency vehicle.
They already have ships there for emergency, which are moved out when crews swap. You can't really keep a ship there all the time without swapping them. They are rated for so many months only. Things like the batteries, filters, and even the vales and pipes only have a set life.
Is me or does Dreamchaser look like John Crithons ship from Farscape 😂😂😂.
All you "space kids" out there might not remember that it took YEARS to mount the Space Shuttle heat tiles too. They had massive problems with them falling off. So I guess all the old hands must have been shaking their heads when today's engineers were expecting Dream Chaser would not pose a problem. And all those people saying that Dream Chaser should have been chosen over the Boeing Starliner, have no idea how much longer it will be before a manned Dream Chaser ever flies. I think Starliner will have been operational for several years before a manned Dream Chaser is.
Wow, the Vega tanks were mistaken for garbage and ... just wow. 10/10 😜
These would be great as escape vehicles for space stations.
I think Dream Chaser looks similar to a fictional spaceship called the Farscape module. Refer to the series called "Farscape" starting around 2000
It looks just like John Chriton’s space plane on Farscape. Farscape was awesome.
The solution for the ESA's Vega problem is to launch their satellite on a Falcon 9. It would hurt, however, it would get the job done.
Nice. A space shuttle looking craft instead the same old rockets
Bro if you're ever in quebec, holla'at ya boy! Montreal or quebec I'll meet you there and we go out.
What about using the capsule they put the ship in to make or increase the size of the space station?
Go tenacity!
Avio, use shulker boxes and a sorting system, n00b!
So we got a new space pickup truck...... Nice
6:40 and the Starship landing on the moon isnt going destroy the landing area and possibly just fall over? I know its not like the boosters destroying the launch pad, but Space X is much larger than the Apollo and will require a lot of thrust to nail the landing.
Skip from 4:56 to 6:18 ! ... Your welcome 🤗
Losing a couple of tanks is almost unbelievable. Heads will roll Lol !....cheers.
Dream chaser looks like a giant Nike with wings! 👍🤣🏴🇬🇧
Since I came from the newest video on the channel, it looks to me that SpaceX is probably targeting a double launch in 2024. If they can get two platforms into orbit and do the transfer successfully, they can keep Artemis on track - at least for their part.
Stargazer!!!
Hope you will have a good time in Quebec :)
The fuel transfer will be interesting. S28 is already out of the Megabay, if they did mods to the ship to allow for the transfer it will already have been done . Hopewell can get a gleem into them doing the transfer. I'd hate to s e a last minute mod done to the ship. They're still trying get ship into orbit without any mechanical failure like S25 exploding.
What do you think about a manned version? Why it takes so long to develop an unmanned version, anyway?
Lifting Bodies testing began in the 1960’s… Remember the “Six Million Dollar Man” opening, was a 2-Vertical Tail model… A shape similar to Dream Chaser’s was also proven… What’s old is new again!!
Dream chaser is the only vehicle that I care about outside SpaceX, maybe RocketLab, but they're a distant third.
"Yuope has a problem" Yeah, that about sums it up.
Dream Chaser looks sweet! I wish them great success. I wish they'd refresh the Space Shuttle. Dream Chaser for just manned missions and Shuttle for cargo missions. Like having both a car and truck.
no; like having a car and a giant roman candle. shuttle design was terrible...it never met its turnaround promised (like two per month), and had an abysmal safety record. just say "no" to buran!
@@darinladd5312 Strip the Shuttle down to its bare airframe and refit it with Dream Chaser thermal tiles, avionics, and other modern systems. You would need Space X's Super heavy for its booster which would remove the SSME's making more like Buran
Yes, it is technically possible (except the solid booster idea, discussed below); although, at their current age and condition the shuttles cannot be returned to service. Even if they could, and were literally sitting on the launch pad in the configuration you recommend, the cost per launch of launching a shuttle will NEVER match that of any rocket--reusable, or otherwise. It can't (by design). Plus, remember that the shuttle's main engines are used with an external liquid fuel tank, so they could not simply be retrofitted with a new solid booster (or two, or three). @@scoutdynamics3272
A pure cargo variant of the space shuttle was considered, but ultimately canned since very few payloads actually benefit from the orbiter.
oh my!!
Bummer. Really sad to see that ESA is incompetent and inflexible at the same time. They are too inflexible to build some more Ariane 5 rockets to fill the time gap because the developement of Ariane 6 is delayed. Their new Vega-C rocket exploded already two times and now they are so incompetent to "lose" two tanks of the the old Vega rocket. And now they are too inflexible again to rebuild those two tanks? Big facepalm! At the same time a private space company is very close to reaching 100 launches of a reusable rockets this year, the same company ESA was launghing at some years ago when they started to try reusing an orbital class rocket!
7:58 propellant transfer in my mind is the biggest risk of failure for Artemis III.
NASA said it will take 20 starship tank to refuel just one lander.
reminds me of the space ship from FarScape
A 3rd option for Vega would be to 3d print new tanks...
I saw the design and the first thing to come to my mind was "Farscape."
why do we have to re-enter the atmosphere fast? Cant we use engines to descend slowly so it doesn't cause fire to develop on the tiles?
Thank you for building HERMES, - with a different name.
dyna soar with a different name.
‘Years to put on the tiles’ imagine space x saying that
Mini shuttle
Suddenly the thumbnail changed. 😳
The Dream Chaser Space Craft looks like a bigger version of the one from the Farscape TV Series.
No, it looks like a bad copy of the Soviet Spiral project.
😂😂😂 Looks mysteriously similar to the one the military uses and the Phantom 'Aurora Project' craft. Finally, done, huh? It has state of the art tech, I bet! 😅
"Boss, bad news. I misplaced 2 rockets stages."
Beyond the fuel transfer challenges, I'm _really_ having trouble seeing how they're going to get the Starship human-rated in anywhere near time for Artemis
i'm just waiting on the postponement to be announced, It feels inevitable at this point.
Now to build something like Sojourner from for all mankind
they repurposed the usaf dyna soar design from the 60s. it was a better design than the shuttle to begin with. adding an external cargo bay solves the dyna soar problem, and the lifting body design solves the shuttle's problem. with a slight paradigm shift.
0:25 It resembles the Black knight satellite...
Would they have the money to go into production?
Damn it !! Don't you know I watch all your shit... !! I was 10 minutes into this before I realized I had watched it Before !! I'm 70 yo and my Dad used to say the same thing when he was 83 !! But he didn't mind as he could watch his favorite TV show two days in a row !! ...and actually I'm just give you a hard time, it happens all the time, but I did think I had a new drop... until 10 minutes in... and Thank You, Sir... again Sir... !! ... lol...!!
You could easily guess which photos where which device, all Sony pics are warmer
They SO need to paint one to look like Gizmo Duck…
Notification Squad! :)
Thank you . ( 2023 / Dec / 20 )
A good book on how to frugally colonize our solar system is Second Exodus Colony. Located at the Internet Archives.
When will we see a dream chaser mounted onto a dragon & falcon (9/heavy)?
If we are going to explore space can we all take time to think about what we will do there because if it's about making the same mess there as we do here it ain't worth it.
Sovjet build on in the 60s
2025 launch of Artemis 3 to land humans on the Moon was never realistic. 2027....Maybe but a lot of technical hurdles remain including dual starship refueling test and a non human starship demonstration landing must occur before NASA commits humans
Agreed, 2025 always seemed incredibly ambitious
True enough but I'm guessing that if NASA runs interference with the federal bureaucracy, we will all be amazed at what they accomplish and how quickly the get it done.
Dream chaser is SOOO small! They should have doubled its size… then it would be mildly useful.
Then what would launch it?
The flying shoe.
Nice! Can someone explain why NASA is going to use SLA? SpaceX Starship (100 people capacity) could do the whole work alone without SLA (4 people capacity)... is it about the timing as Starship is not prepared for people transport yet? But the plans assume it would be to hold people as a moon lander so it is not the valid argument...hmm...
2024 will be remembered as the year humanity truly became a spacefaring civilization.
This decade will probably be so singular and relevant in space exploration history as was the Apollo Era
@@josepaulosfbeat me too this comment.
Not impressive. We should have been doing this in the 1990s. None of this technology besides the computers is even more advanced than we had in the 1980s
@@jameswilson4732apparently you never heard of the space shuttle.. the most famous space craft in history
@@Time2gojoe Yeh it's a decades old platform that houses systems dating back to the 80's, like he said. Yes it's an impressive aircraft but it's archaic.
This is cool but small they need a space craft like the space shuttle but new and improved, So they can take big things to and from space ????
absolutely incorrect. i'll let you do your own research as to why....
DON'T WAIT, launch it on a Falcon heavy. Come on, someone make a command decision.
10:09 watch there be some mysteriously missing money on top of it
It goes back to Dyna soar program
1957-1963.
Mini shuttle, suppose it will be ok for the sandwich run.....
When/if (sorry open minded) we went to the moon the LEM only had a few steps down . So how the hell are they going to be able to leave the lander when they land if they land . Dam they need some long steps .
According to experts, the American Dream Chaser is neither more nor less than an unsuccessfully copied Soviet "BOR" (Spiral), which qualified American engineers managed to recreate only partially...
Google BOR-4 and you will see that this aircraft has originally been built in the early 1980-s in the USSR. I think originally it was designed to be an orbital nuclear bomber.
google "dyna soar." usaf did it first.
Soviet Mig-105 and BOR-4 both were based on Boeing X20 Dyna-Soar, they were in 60s and 80s respectively while United States Air Force was working on X-20 Dyna-Soar in 50s.
@@JigilJigil The Soviet BOR (Spiral) program has nothing in common with the X-20 Dyna-Soar, not even approximately!
Dream Chaser == MiG 105
= dyna soar.
Sorry to disappoint you, but it is based on Boeing X20 Dyna-Soar, actually Russians stole and copied the tech & the design, Soviet Mig-105 or BOR-4 were in 60s and 80s respectively while United States Air Force was working on X-20 Dyna-Soar in 50s.
Looks like the Farscape One.
Dreamchaser. Let's see. Does HL-20 from 60 years ago sound familiar? If it's a Boeing, it ain't going. And cost a LOT.