NASA Reveals NEW Lunar Rover!
Last Video: The Soviet's Secret Mars Landing
• The Soviet's Secret Ma...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars
We'll need to have satellites around the moon to keep both humans and rover in contact with earth
Im not certain but I believe there are already communication relays in orbit from other missions no?
@@twitchy.mp3 Not sure about the U.S. but China recently launched a satellite (Queqiao-2) for the purpose of communications between the Moon and Earth.
No we wont the moon is tidally locked meaning we will always have contact with the side facing us and we already have satellites that are able to connect to it.
I'm pretty sure the U.S. doesn't have any. But someone somewhere is working on it.
@@AmateurHistorian999 The IM-2 mission includes a satellite launch for lunar relay.
Moon roads and landing pads are a really important aspect. It might make sense to melt the regolith into slabs.
Makes me think of the road heaters used in Colorado. When road repair is needed in winter, the pavement is far too cold to work on. So they heat it with what's basically a giant broiler, a flat machine on wheels, one lane wide, with maybe 150 gas burners facing the pavement. It's a kick to watch. There are jokes about giant pieces of toast.
like NUKE it before landing?
thats IF we can even get a Human to the Moon... WHY so long? ... was it truly FAKE to begin with? ... how you it even remotely be 'harder' now than it was in the 70's?
Moon dust is a huge issue. Low sitting astronauts not a functional option.
OTOH if you want to be a little faster - low gravity helps to offset the issues with low gravity.
@@ThomasTomiczek moon dust was a major design flaw of the Apollo are moon vehicle. The astronauts need to sit up higher in vehicle away from being splattered with moon dust.
@@icare7151 Or just put on fenders.
@@filonin2 The did that with the original one still in Moon but not enough.
@filonin2 doesnt stop it from floating up the way the dust worked is basically like a woft of air despite there not being any air. This design has major flaws, not only do the seats need to be higher but they made multiple design flaws that they did before.
I still wanna see the cybertruck on the moon lol
Facts that would be best rover
Brother ughh What the hell brother Ughh
Lmao
that thing is a POS.... what a most UGLY vehicle... aside ti being absolute junk.
Why are people suggesting cybertruck as a rover? It is not a viable option. It's tires would need to be redesigned, it does not have power generation capabilities, it would not survive a lunar night without heating, its touch screen controls would need to be redesigned to account for the space suit drivers will wear, it does not have any inertial (or any other form that doesn't rely on GPS) positioning systems, it is not remotely controllable, its durability has not been vetted at 10 years, the sharpness of the panels could be dangerous for the space suits... I mean at this point we have multiple EV that would offer at least an equivalent starting point for your design! To be fair, your comment is pretty understandable (I read it as a comment on the esthetic of the vehicle fitting with the moon, something I don't disagree with). I just commented on yours because I saw a few others seemingly thinking the vehicle would work as is on the moon.
When I saw the thumbnail, I flashbacked to watching "Breakfast at Tiffany's" with Audrey Hepburn singing "Moon River" followed by another memory of watch Apollo 14? astronauts driving around in their titanium wire wheeled buggy... then recollection that my wife's mom had her hand slashed open when a spool of that wheel wire unwound while she was holding it (she'd worked on one of the buggies at NASA or one of its contractors back then, don't know if it was one that went to the moon or a prototype or what), fortunately no lasting damage, she was lucky. When you get old, every moment one may get yet another taste of memory soup.
Apollo 15-17 had buggies, 14 only had a hand cart, which they had to abandon during one of the more distant EVAs as they were on foot.
It's the brain exercising the memories by refreshing them...as one gets older, the older memory protein chains tend to break, or get damaged by a plethora of factors (i.e disease, (medical)drugs), and reminiscing helps battle that by refreshing them before being lost forever. I have a strong feeling it has become part of our instincts now that life expectancy has rapidly risen in the last couple of centuries.
As an 80 yr old, you said it and I agree.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I was quite unsure. Thanks for the detail. :)
"Memory soup." 😄 At age 67, that makes more and more sense.
Love getting notifications when new video are uploaded. love your channel
awesome yh ! like alot of other channels on here
@@edwardclarke768 indeed! What other KZhead channels about space tech do you suggest i check out? I already subbed to Tim Dodd's The everyday astronaut" and Scott Manley
That slide at 7m43s is the perfect example of "The best part is no part". Most people would expect that increasing the thrust would increase the complexity of the engine, but the complete opposite happened.
Great video. Thanks!
The Flex rover seem to me as the best. If they make a few other, much simplier Flex frames, connect it behind each other (with some smart flexible connection allowing still some degree of manueverability) as a "moontrain", and lay its top around with sun-following solar panels, (and one of the "payload" cubes of the "main" Flex is a huge acumulator), the rover could stay on the moon for much longer than 10 years.
Wouldn't it be great if SpaceX could succeed with the landing and rapid reuse, before we continue the PR of what future Starships might be capable of. Managing liquid propellant in space seems to be a major problem that a lot experimentation with Falcons could have achieved.
Has anyone ever noticed that Blue Origin's New Shepherd has a slightly orange tint to the rocket exhaust on take-off in those videos? Since they use a HydroLOX engine, it seems like it should be clear, right? Or do they use some sort of ablative nozzle extension like the Delta 4? If they are supposed to reuse the entire engine, nozzle extension and all, then it looks like they have issues with the engine. It looks like "engine rich exhaust" as they say.....
Its from the carbon in graphite being burned away. Any impurities will cause hydrogen fire to turn colors, same way as igniting a h balloon the flame is orange from the carbon in the rubber.
Hydrogen burns a pale red. I think it's from the heat of the fire, making the exhaust gas itself hot enough to glow.
Very cool! It's ground work like this that makes big goals a reality!
Ok now thats Intresting❤
The rover from Apollo era is still up there on the moon. All we have to do is fill up the tires with air and put a new battery on it and it will run fine.
Yeh definitely up there and not in a studio… 👀😃
Pity NASA cannot contract all three proposed rover, as they each have attributes for specific roles in lunar exploration. Lunar Recon Car: for exploration beyond the base (Intuitive Machines); Lunar Tow Truck: for erecting outposts at sites located by the LRC (Lunar Outpost); Lunar Forkhoist: for unloading cargo, some for loading onto LTT. A welcome addition would be the Lunar Panel Van (Toyota/JAXA); this pressurised vehicle offers long range exploration opportunities. All four vehicles fufilling essential roles efficiently. Future companies will competing for future NASA contracts using these four vehicles as the base line; which is how NASA will view their offers anyway.
Interesting. Thanks.
Blue origin didn’t go into ‘space’. It went up less than 100km/60m.
"the edge of space" is in no way a 'defined' line... its more like a 'general area' of sorts... and why in the world would someone 'playing it safe' do the dumbest thing imaginable? >> chance you may never make it back... its just a test... and thats all it is.
I am kinda scared about the SLS. With the solid rocket boosters, it could be a problem like the challenger.
Yes. They should have developed *liquid* fueled boosters ASAP after the Challenger debacle.
where to order one?
Moon Racer will probably win the contract, because it looks like a Batmobile and it counts the most these Hollywood days.
Interesting, maybe its mars versions ive seen , pressurised with the suits on the outside -- guess mars is far more benign (if more weathered) environment.
what about creature comforts like MP3, infotainment screens, hydraulic steering and brakes, Nitrox, lights under the chassis, flametrhowers on the exhaust, and everything that Toretto and company makes us think is necessary for a cool car?
MP3? You mean the music files? Who's still using that decades-old format in 2024? Hasn't everyone switched to AAC or OGG yet?
Time in these things seems to not always follow the rules of entropy, it is not known if the project comes first and then the money or if the competition comes before the decision and so on.
That's not how any of this works lmao. They propose a design first as eye candy to investors. This isnt just funded by thin air and it's not like the money is just going to the development of the rover. The money goes to the development of everything from the ground up, literally meaning how to get from earth to the moon with that payload. Essentially investors pay to see this made into reality, not just the rover itself but the rover being on the moon specifically.
1:30 looks like a Daft Punk DJ platform
Hope it has Blind spot Monitoring.😮
But does it auto parallel park?
No direction, this away, that away. No goals defined.
All they need to is advertise moon buggy riding all over the lunar surface and the space race will be finished.
If Musk can get ticket prices down to 10 - 15k a head, he'd do huge business with moon trips and buggy joyrides and the occasional close encounter with an impacting micrometeoroid. Until someone actually gets perforated by one of those things - then there'll be an inquiry as to how this could happen and look for a scape goat - D'Oh!😂
How are they going to transfer the rover from "Star Ship" to the second ship that will be going from the earth to the moon?
The second ship launches from Earth with the rover on board, no transfer needed.
There will be 2 starships , one will carry fuel and wait in orbit , then the star ship from earth will launch with the rover and dock with the Star Ship in orbit where it will transfer the fuel to the Star Ship with the rover and then the Ship with the rover will make it's way to the moon
HLS will be fully supplied launching from earth. Only SpaceX hls will be refueled in earth orbit, but crew transfer will be in orbit if moon. Rover, scientific instruments, and snacks will be loaded on earth
"Moon rover, wider than a mile ♫♪"
Inventen otra más ❤
they should have a landing tower completely separate from Boca Chica so as not to risk the take off site
Transportation is fine, but they will need earth (moon) moving machines, too. Are they working on such designs, I wonder.
Eliminate the chopsticks!!! 6:40
So how much are these "new" RS-25 engines a pop?
Approximately $100 million.
Eventually can co down to 70 mln. Still a "bit" more than 1 mln for more powerful raptor 2, 250k for even more powerful raptor 3, or even BE-4 with 7 mln
Needs more armor…
Van allen belt 🤔
They are "belts" - since there are two, plus a third that is transitory. Unfortunately, the conspiracy theorist that you parrot neglected to tell you that bit. What about them? if you have anything remotely approaching a shred of integrity then I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions: 1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation? 2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it? 3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from? 4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts? 5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself, (and his soviet counterpart Sergei Vernov) had to say about the belts and the Apollo missions? 6/ What have I done to challenge my preconceptions and the claims made by online conspiracy theorists in relation to the VABs? If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers will prevent you from pointlessly bringing up something in public that you clearly have no prior knowledge of whatsoever.
I have never understood a moon vehicle totally exposed to the moon's atmosphere. for safety reasons (life saving reasons) and general practicality. Rovers should be self contained life supporting "motorhome" type vehicles. If I were walking on the moon away from my ship, I'd want to know that I can get in the nearest life supporting space outside my life support suit.
THere is a second Lunar rover program for the enclosed rover with life support.
That’ll be later. First they want a simple design that’ll be ready by 2030 and will offer human/cargo transport and can be autonomously controlled
The moon doesn't have GPS but maybe it should?
China plans a basic lunar InterNet/GPS system as part of the "International Lunar Research Station"; base construction begins 2030-35 by automated landers. The system triangulates base/Lunar satellites/Earth mission control with lunar outposts/rovers/probes. This system is a must; as while ILRS is led by China/Russia, it is a consortium with interested potential partners including ESA, France and United Arab Emirates. No doubt the Artemis U.S/Japan/ESA consortium will also construct an lunar InterNet/GPS but NASA has yet to present any concrete design for the Artemis base, as yet only GATEWAY specs. Hello from New Zealand.🇳🇿🚀🌚
It's funny how they all have the astronauts sitting in the rovers when gravity is a lot less than earth and the suits aren't the most flexible.
What do you expect them to be doing? Laying down?
@@filonin2 what would be the opposite of sitting where they wouldn't have to struggle to get up? It's not a riddle.
Astronauts were sitting in Apollo rovers too, it's not that hard
@raptorwhite6468 no duh and of an astronaut fell over they caught hell getting back upright. It was not easy for them to get in and out. The suits made sure of that.
@@fgeiger41Do you suggest a standing up position? That seem to been pretty much the standard on ships and old style locomotives. Even crane operators used to stand up in the olden days as my father attested being one of them.
Didnt NASA just come out and awarded the contract to JAXA?
They should just send a cybertruck and ask those companies to make "accessories" for it like: positionning system, robot arms, teleoperations. Cybertruck already has way more batteries then necessary, it could even tow things around on the moon!
Cybertruck is a really bad option. It's extremely heavy, has unnecessary parts and rubber tires
sure... send the absolute biggest POS vehicle in existence.. LMAO
For the same price, they could ship like 10 Cybertruck in one Starship. Starship is really huge and will be able to lift 100 tons to orbit. A couple Cybertruck will cost a lot less than a billion dollars
@@TheKdcool you Elon "enthusiasts" are ALL the same... you DONT THINK!!
@@raptorwhite6468ugh. Tyres can be changed….
It's good that they are using electric vehicles on the moon. If they used petrol it would destroy the moon's atmosphere like we are doing here on Earth.
😂
What...!? No Battery & Solar powered , Big Tired , Mud 4 x 4 Truck ...! Bummer..
Cybertruck
Intuitive Machines has Boing as part of the team. What could go wrong?
"What could go wrong"? You, misspelling Boeing.📚🤡
Cybertruck. ~4600 of them for $4.6 billion.
Your math is off. Ct is 100k, not a million. So it's 46 000 CT 😂😂😂
you'd think nasa would be smart enough to have some kind of realistic landing system ready within the next decade before they started handing out billions for rovers. but you know what they say about commercial space: failure just means you didn't clap hard enough!
You mean that commercial space launching more than anyone else, ever? Leave engineering to engineers and you they'll let you keep flipping burgers.
@filonin2 it's true... engineers and people who pretend to be them online seem to be the only people stupid enough to cheer when 2 billion dollars explodes and crashes into the ocean. 🤣
NASA is all about Politics and NOTHING about Science... its a money thing.. thats ALL they care about.
@@zotfotpiqrofl. You mean that Starship crashes into ocean.. Newsflash. 2 bln is WHOLE budget for 2023 for Starship development. In that money is included EVERYTHING related to Starship. From building 2 frigging factories, big hangars, to every test related to Starship AND raptor 2 and 3 development. Single integrated flight test costs around 100 mln. It's LESS than NASA pay for refurbishment of ONE rs-25 engine. And you have to refurbish it to mount on SLS, and second time after green run test.
@just_archan well... one thing is for sure... you can trust what spacex says about development costs and timelines! how many time are they supposed to have landed on mars by now? almost enough times to refuel a single HLS? spacex fans are a joke. you clap for failure. you're pathetic.
FYI, if you'd like more likes on your videos, you need to give a few seconds at the end as a fair warning for those of us watching on a smart TV. Several times I've lost the chance to pause the video & navigate to the "thumbs up" option because the video ended too quick. You need at least a couple of seconds of "Thanks for watching The Space Race," or "This has been The Space Race" or some credits or something. Just sayin'.
Should i say 4th ?
I hope that IFT4 launches on.... May the Fourth...be with you....🤪
Why Didn't NASA Contact : Polaris , Toyota , Artic Cat , John Deer , Kawasaki , etc...who Already build Off Road 4 x 4 s / ATVs...!??
Segway??
People from all those companies already work for them that's literally how nasa designs things lmao. Only like 10 people get hired by nasa each time they request workers, and they're the best in the world at what they do. Think about it next time.
Cars and lunar rovers are not the same thing
I'm perfectly aware of That . But , these companies already have Solid " Off - Road " Designs / Concepts that Could be Engineered for Space Planet / Lunar travel . And 1 other thing , I'm tired of my tax dallors be waisted All in the Name of " Government Military Contractors WELFARE " Good example here : Innovative Designs ; Boeing $30 Million dallors...and That's just 1 of the 3 design companies
Whaaat - $4.6B didnt elons starship lander only get $1.8-> 2 billion.
I like space
❕
First…… I would try…….. simply a 4 wheeler😀 battery powered of course………🤷
The regolith is going to enjoy eating these things up😂
This one won’t be an RC car this time with a dummy strapped in…
What exactly do we achieve putting a man on the moon when we have rovers
First 1 hour gang
Yeesssss
WRONG PLAN: None of the designs I saw here are worthy of the money or the effort. These vehicles should be the size of a small bus. They need room for 6 to 8 people in seating and with 8 compact bunks. They need to be like a small RV. They need to be able to tow a trailer or implement as well. They need to have air and pressure inside to enable the lighter space vehicle suits to be worn. There would have to be an Airlock Entrance/Exit Room to allow astronauts in the Moon RV to go from inside the Vehicle to outside the vehicle to do a moon walk. Don't worry, you can bring your kids as Michael J wont be there. 😆
Okay... I couldn't resist the humor. MJ would have loved to have performed his Moonwalk on the Moon I would imagine. As for the man, I believe in the justice systems many democracies have, so I have to put a lot of weight on the fact that MJ was never convicted criminally. I have to consider the fact that the man may have never committed any crimes. Many people would argue with me. I was not there, so I could never truly say I knew what happened. I know he made a lot of his fans very happy.
Well, with as totally bonkers as you've mad yourself out to be it's a good thing your opinion doesn't matter. That'd be terrible if it for some reason did.
They need an 8 seat vehicle even though they’re only sending 4 astronauts at a time…
@@zachb1706 It's job can be to transport equipment and materials to other locations, which would require some of those bunks and seats to stow away like in a Dodge Caravan, or some other method. Most importantly though, I am thinking about the future. In another 10 years it may be seldom that there is only 4 to 10 men on the moon. China could have some people there, along with other countries. By the time the Dune buggies arrive on the moon, they will start to need the vehicles I am talking about almost right away.
I like the moon truck. I have no true reason. It just seemed kool. Just a question is starship ever not going to explode? I know soooo many out there love Musk and his ship. I would love to see it succeed. As i am tired of watching it explode. It will help advance things. That would be good. Please don't freak out on me i want starship to succeed.
Well the starship didn’t explode in space. It broke apart during reentry, something that is completely irrelevant to the Artemis mission
@@Unknown-oh6ue It needs to not break apart. If it doesn't do so it's not going to be very useful as a lander. I want it to succeed, as I've already said. So less exploding more flying.
@@Unknown-oh6ue boohoo
@@jssomewhere6740 Sure but it was shredded by the plasma, considering it was tumbling out of control. At least there’s no atmosphere on the moon
@@Unknown-oh6ue There is rock involved. Tumbling out of control is never good. Look I'm going to say this one last time. I WANT STARSHIP TOO SUCCEED. So too accomplish or to see success the ship must ( must ) be safe for folks to ride in. I should have never exchanged with you. It's some kind of game y'all love to play. So you win I give up. You win, you win, you win. So unless you have constructive things to say, like @Js I know starship has destroyed it self every time it has launched and that sucks. Yet look at what they have learned blah, blah, and blah. Do you see how that works. Instead of just contradiction use education. I get the feeling that you are very young. So see this little lecture as coming from your a$$Ho/@ uncle that lives very far away. Take care be careful, and try not to just argue try to educate When you contradict people it's a way of starting a fight.
Is it weird that having Boeing involved in this makes me uncomfortable?
-LUNR-
Cybertruck. Meets all the requirements. Elon has 10 of them since yesterday.
Looks like a wrecker.
3rd
2nd
I like trains
They both ran out of fuel with zero payload. How are they going to haul 100 tons of payload and make it back? Nobody is answering this question.
What happened to the Audi lunar rover?
7:45 God Damn I hope you haven't got that on open servers Musk, I really do. We saw what the Chinese did with the F22 documents.
NASA - No taxpayer dollar left unwasted
NASA awarded a Lunar Road Contract last year (4:50) for a 500m linear lunar road, connecting pad and base; a fuel tank depot is sited in between with fuel pipelines running parallel with the road out to the pad. Road, pad, fuel tank are all 3D printed; with the pipework extruded directly from lunar regolith. NASA wants this constructed by 2029 along with "10 tonne of lunar oxygen ready for use". That year, Artemis 5 is scheduled with the first landing of "Blue Moon" (one of 15 TBD, based at GATEWAY). Source: NASA contract press release, TheSpaceBucket channel, 2023.
Looks only so far intuitive machines is way ahead. That square job is just oogly.
I want to be arrested for speeding on the moon.
Pfft NASA... do they even do anything anymore? They might as well just close down.
right?... look how many times they postponed past Manned Moon Missions.... ALL of them since the last time that said we set foot on it... kinda has people questioning... did they even go there at all?
Just give the money to Tesla for their Cyber Truck. Maybe need some modification installing high efficient Solar panels with batteries capable of 1000 km and solar charge time of 4 hrs.
So double the normal range? So you'd need at least a 246 kWh battery. To charge that in 4 hours you'd need 80 amps or 61,500 watts of solar panels. Solar panels make 200 watts/m^2 so you'd need 307.5m^2 of solar panels. A tennis court is 261m^2. So no, that cannot work.
You are right. Given all that it is better to drop pre fabricated solar panels to make a power grid with AI these days nothing is impossible..@@filonin2
Bring NASCAR to the Moon and make more billions!
If you don't control the lunar dust you won't be there very long,,,
NASA figures that a Moon Rover must cost at least billions each and must have no other possible application. SpaceX will just fly an off the shelf Cybertruck to the Moon.
Honestly before its all said and done you may be right, I still cant believes tesla put a car on orbit around mars
Cybertruck is a terrible option, it's a car, not a moon rover
this must be a joke... of course
@@raptorwhite6468 Please explain why TAXPAYERS must spend BILLIONS of dollars for a *one off* single purpose machine rather than spending a few millions to adapt an existing EV? The big reason why SpaceX was able to make the lowest bid for the HLS was because it is only asking the taxpayers to pay for *modifications* to a vehicle which is intended to be manufactured in thousands of units for other customers. Why does that economic principle not equally apply to a Lunar Rover? Of course an off the shelf Cybertruck would break down in short order
@@jamescobban857 Cybertruck is so far from being a lunar rover that it just can't be modified to become one, it would literally just have to be a completely different vehicle. - it's extremely heavy, which is never a good thing in spaceflight - it has a lot of unnecessary parts and systems that would make it harder to maintain - none of its parts have any sort of protection from lunar regolith - high temperature gradients on the Moon would definitely have a negative impact on its performance - regular rubber tires aren't the best option to use on the Moon - the vehicle would probably get stuck quickly, unless more complex modifications are made - it's unnecessarily big, as of now space for only two astronauts is required So after turning it into a rover, probably the only major part that could remain unchanged would be batteries, assuming they can withstand the temperatures. All that to make something that would still be very far from perfection.
why not use Cyber truck?
Because it's a car, not a moon rover
who would even think that was a good idea?
@@raptorwhite6468 it is an EV and all terrain. A few mods? lol why not?
@@Helliconia54 A few mods? Well: - the entire body of the car is extremely heavy, so as much of it as possible should be removed and probably made of different material, maybe carbon fiber - most of the computers would be unnecessary, self driving would be impossible anyway - it may be an all terrain car, but that doesn't include the moon, the very fine and sharp dust is unlike anything on Earth, so modifications to suspension and wheels would be necessary, along with specialized tires - a lot other parts should be removed; they should get rid of three seats, as well as anything that's added only for the car to be comfortable and fancy - no need for that on the Moon - engines and all the other moving parts have to be protected from the regolith, otherwise it will quickly destroy them - the batteries could maybe stay, assuming they can withstand the temperature gradients, which I doubt So, literally not a single part would remain unchanged
Very wealthy old men...
I'd make Willys jeep. In electric.
Why the f do you need a stylish racecar on the fucking moon? You need something that works like a truck.Something you can haul stuff with Something that is off the ground quite a bit so it doesn't hit little rocks and Get stuck in the wheelwells. Some of these people should be designing hot wheel cars not moon rovers
Someone somewhere must be working on a lunar GPS system.
It already exists, the moon is tidally locked and we have multiple satellites already in orbit of earth that have lunar gps functionality. You just dont know because why would you? Whens the last time you used gps on the moon?
@@A_piece_of_broccoli Well, I'm going next month and I wanted to know if Google Maps would work. I had no idea! Eventually Luna will need its own system though, especially for the far side.
Wouldn't it be called LPS or MPS?
@@IvanKapor I reckon so. Damn my Earth-bound thinking.
Looks like a toy I had as a kid.
it may as well be a "toy" ... NASA has cancelled every single proposed Manned Mission to the Moon since.... this cannot be by chance... there MUST be a reason they HAVEN'T been back.
4.7bn dollars for that? I cannot help but think the nasa moon thing is just a scam.
Or how about modified Cyber truck?
that thing isn't fit for the Earth let alone on the Moon.
Atro-NOTS to the moon 😱 Bahahahahahahahahahaha 🤪
Some puerile emojis. Get you! Does your Mum know that you're on her work laptop again when she isn't looking? Now run along and play with your crayons.
@@yassassin6425 SNL you silly individual, oh wait……. You are probably way too young to even know what that is 🤷🏼♀️
@@kristimcgowandarkoscellard3126 *_"you silly individual"_* Said the emoji user. To remind you, this is what you typed... "Bahahahahahahahahahaha" Do you have anything approaching an original thought or observation. *_"oh wait……. You are probably way too young to even know what that is"_* If you mean Saturday Night Live, I recall watching it in the early 80s when I lived in California and it actually has attracted a reasonable following here in the UK with the advent of the internet.
@@yassassin6425 😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝 Silly rabbit 🐰 trix R 4 kids 🐐
@@yassassin6425 😝😝😝 Silly rabbit 🐰 trix R 4 kids 🐐
SpaceX is clowning everyone with their ridiculous concept for the human landing system. That vehicle will definitely capsize and kill everyone on board if it attempted to land on the Moon 😂
perhaps
Do you have an aerospace engineering degree? If so, please prove your point with some calculations and examples that make it blatantly clear HLS is unsafe to land. If No, STFU and let the experts do their jobs. Ignorance may be bliss, but it makes you look like a complete fool. Remember that NASA chose this design, the same bureau that made it possible to build and fly the Space Shuttles and put men on the moon back in 1969. That expertise and experience has not been lost to time, not as much as people think. Most of the original engineers mentored younger engineers so they could take over the stick. The problem is not engineering prowess or knowledge, but mentality and politics.
Doubtful...MUCH less gravity to pull it down on its side.
My original reply was deleted so here it is again, in condensed form: You make yourself look like a fool with such a comment.
How would it capsize without a medium to cause friction? It just has to hold retrograde and perform a landing burn, it has been done numerous times without incident because contrary to what you believe its not actually hard to land on the moon.
This channel is basically a elon musk super fan clip channel. its sad.
i dont trust lockeyedmartin. stop it.
Why not just launch a Tesla? Already sent one past Mars 😂
because Elon is like a spoiled brat that shoots Model Rockets in the air with no real care they are even successful... he ACTUALLY had praised "failed missions" as a success... who does that? ... he's like a child.. the dude is NOWHERE as 'intelligent' as people make him out to be.
Lol, you people still think this shite is real...
Hehehe , thats really cute. NASA haven't even got out of orbit since 72, and they are building a moon buggy. NASA is the biggest waste of money in the States They need to have an international conference to change the toilet paper roll.
Artemis I already happened
What's the bet the first rover will be a CYBERTRUCK.