DC, Rogan & Anik react to Blachowicz vs. Ankalaev scorecards at UFC 282 | ESPN MMA
2022 ж. 9 Жел.
118 121 Рет қаралды
Daniel Cormier, Joe Rogan and Jon Anik discuss the split draw between Jan Blachowicz and Magomed Ankalaev in the main event of UFC 282.
#UFC282 #UFC #MMA
✔ For more UFC, sign up for ESPN+ espnplus.com/ufc/youtube
✔ Get the ESPN App: www.espn.com/espn/apps/espn
✔ Subscribe to ESPN on KZhead: es.pn/SUBSCRIBEtoKZhead
✔ Subscribe to ESPN FC on KZhead: bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoESPNFC
✔ Subscribe to NBA on ESPN on KZhead: bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoNBAonESPN
✔ Watch ESPN on KZhead TV: es.pn/KZheadTV
Ankalaev and Jan was closer than people think, the Paddy fight on the other hand.... super robbery.
Exactly. 47-47 and 30-27...
@@NotKimiRaikkonen Lmao no shot it was 30-27. People put way too much weight on takedowns and control time that dont do anything
All jared did was hold on and stall get real
@@Poopopotamusgaming it's the only thing to score by when it takes up the entire round. Seriously how could anyone possibly ever score round three for Paddy?
go look at the stats for jan vs magomed
Judges need to be interviewed to explain their scores. scoring the first round for paddy is ridiculous
Judging in combat sports sucks big time and nobody does anything about it. The judges, the commissions and the committee are lame, corrupt and lack knowledge of MMA and boxing...
Yes. I've been saying this for a long time. There's no reason why they shouldn't be at the post fight presser to explain their controversial scores
@@TrayTrucking which is exactly why they need to be put under the gun asap so this sport doesn't get ruined like boxing
scoring any round for paddy was ridiculous 🤣😭 he lost all 3 clearly
@@RWJ127 The judges and the commissions are extremely protected. It has always been like that. Combat sports is extremely neglected and not favored at all in comparison with all the other major sports. Nobody does anything about it because there's no sheriff to handle all the mess. Fighters and war veterans have always been treated like garbage and forgotten in general.
Jan vs Ank wasn’t a robbery. Paddy vs Gordon was 100% robbery
I actually think that it was a little bit more on Ank's side Even Jan gave him the win and said that he deserves the belt But the saddest thing right now is that Ank is thinking about leaving the UFC just like Petr Yan which would be very sad
I agree with you
Absolutly
I agree, a draw is very reasonable, the first round was a tossup and if you give Jan the first 3 and Ankalaev the fifth with a 10-8 then it’s a draw
@@STiergoofball jan may have said it in disappointment bcoz he should have finished him after round 2 but he didn't and got dominated in last 2 rounds.He just blew it.
come on man you made Magomed cry
😤
Lol poor Magomed
What a child. I've never seen a grown man have a temper tantrum like that over a fight that he clearly didn't win. I can accept the argument about mike vs sal's card. As far as derek's, theres no way ankalaev won the third round it wasn't even that close. And to make it all worse it wasn't even suppose to be a title fight.
@@SEAL7471 seriously what a baby
@@SEAL7471 Did you see Kevin Lee after he lost to Tony. This is nothing lol.
I really admire Blachowicz's sportsmanship He said in the post fight interview that Ankalaev should get this belt and deserves it He is a good man and an amazing fighter❤️ It was a really close fight but I think Ankalaev won that fight too but it was very close But dude I mean even Ankalaev's opponent said that he deserves the win and belt but now we have a draw And now Ankalaev is the next fighter who thinks about leaving the UFC after Petr Yan
Enemy ? Jan is his opponent. Not an enemy. This is not the first draw in UFC fights
@@kaladinstormblessed765 Sorry Wrong word My englisch is not the best :(
Jan dominated Ankalev in the standup and would have finished Ankalev if Ankalev didn't go for the takedown. Ankalevs legs were damaged badly. However, even after the takedowns and being busy with the G&P, Ankalev didn't do much damage to Jan at all, but still the takedowns counted so he won those later rounds. I actually called it a draw after the 5th round ended, and I was right. Blachowicz needs to work on his ground game because there is no way he will get past Glover like this.
@@vegan-rising I agree with this
@@vegan-risingwell said.
This is real legendary polish power. Blachowicz came to fight in general and not cry whether he won or lost the belt. This is difference.
he is a petty stupid inbred dishonest dagestani
Can't leave it to the judges when you're russian lol like Yan last time. You can be called O'Malley or Paddy Pimblett, even if everyone thought you lose the fight, you will win only because you bring show and entertainment, that's sad.
Pause. O'Malley vs Yan was MUCH closer than Paddy vs Jared Gordon. You can't even compare the two. O'Malley bloodied Yan's face. Paddy did almost nothing to Gordon.
The UFC cant have Russians hold a title, especially what's going on in Ukraine and Russia. This was strictly political, nothing more. It's really disgusting.
Its impossible to score the fight for Magomed fairly. A draw is his best case scenario.
@@mikeedwin1905 anyone with a brain saw that Ankalaev won the first round easily
I thought the paddy fight decision was a lot more controversial than this one
Cause that was a clear loss
Wasn’t controversial he clearly lost.
You’re delusional
No controversy here , he lost 100 % . Ufc is a joke
I will say i said before the decision was read there was a chance of a draw. Was stunned it actually was one. It came down to rd 1 since rd 5 was a 10-8. 1 was close but from what i can remember ankalaev had more strikes and moments. Def closer than some on here are saying. That said, Magomed should be champ, the visual of him crying is heartbreaking.
Lol nerd
You do not win belts by crying. Best case scenario for Magomed is a draw, he should be thankful Derek Cleary has not been fired yet.
Yes, the result being a draw is not that outrageous but how the judges scored it individually is where the problem lies imo.
@@mikeedwin1905 Beta energy coming from you
What a travesty the co-main & main were. Those judges should NEVER be near MMA again.
Why cant they use Ex MMA fighters to come judge instead?
@@manchuk1d The ex fighters would favor styles and be subjective. The judges clearly need to be educated because they lack MMA knowledge.
@@alcottdevalte7440 i still think bringing in ex mma fighters would be way better, they need to fix this... tonight the company and Dana looks bad.
The main decision was fine, co main was 1000000x worse
@@manchuk1d they would be biased towards their teammates
Happens way too often. Messing with people's lives man. This isn't a joke. Real as it gets. Sad
I thought Jan won the first 3 rounds and Russian dude last 2 Draw was fine for me I had a weird feeling of uncertainty at the end
Everyone knows this is why you never let it go to the judges!
easier said that done!!!!
Esp if u can’t speak English or aren’t a showman. Ufc has become WWE🫠 Rigged. Bias judges. Embarrassing.
The Paddy decision was just as bad. It's time for MMA to take a long hard look at who they let judge these fights. They cost 2 guys that won fights millions of dollars.
The paddy one was way worse. And they need to at least show the scorecards live so the fighters know if they are winning or losing
The paddy one was a clear robbery but you can’t call a very close fight a robbery. Jan clearly won 2 and 3, round 1 could’ve gone either way but was slightly favoured for jan because of the hits that led to ankalaev swelling. Ankalaev clear round 4 and 5, you could make the argument that it’s a 10-8 round. Overall either a draw or jan winning 48-47 if last round is 10-9 for ankalaev
@@VIi726 no that's a bad idea, the fights would just become all boring. What we need is for the judges to be held accountable somehow.
😂 agree the paddy has to be the worst I’ve seen since gsp vs Hendrix
@@akindtroll28 you could also argue it would be more exciting because a fighter will for sure know he’s losing and go for the finish in the last round. There’s a lot of fights where both fighters think they are winning the fight and they both coast in the last round. I completely disagree with you
In the Yan vs Sean fight y’all wanted to mention the stats, now y’all say hey screw the stats look at the rounds, Lmao amazing
Great point
Every big fight there’s a constant battle of which scores higher control or damage and each big fight unless it’s a shutout the criteria flip flops the scoring in mma is pretty unbalanced
Sean won, Jan v Uncle Aev was a draw, Paddy lost.
@@Jsc.75 I think it also flips based on the particular match ups for example the Sean vs Petr matchup Petr was looked at as the best striker in BW and some said the best boxer in the ufc so to see him avoid striking and constantly tried to wrestle Sean wasn’t a good look in the judges eyes
The stats don't matter under any circumstance. Just look at font vs vera and that will be obvious
These judges were off tonight
They’ve been off for a awhile now it’s only getting worse that’s why people are finally noticing especially the Paddy vs Gordan fight. That fight was literally written in the script
Thanks for exposing the names of the judges
Bad decisions in the main and co main event.
no, the decion was good. the paddy one was incorrect...most mma fans dont undertand the judging criteria
I actually agree with the last judge. Jan had the first 3 and ankalaev had the last 2 with a dominant 5th
I love how they posted this one but not the paddy commentary. Lol I didn’t see the ppv but I wonder what they said
Real fighters need to be judges. People who understand
It’s should be dc joe and John
@@ADroneGamer sorry this comment up, was ment for you👍
The judges have been on crack the whole night. We just didn’t get to see it because every fight was a finish up until that paddy bout. Worst decision ever, even worse than the draw in the main event. And paddy got the nerve to ask for a FOTN bonus. What a delusional 🤡
Solid match up between Jan and Magomed, now Jamahal Hill Vs Glover for the belt in Brazil at UFC 283 👏
Paddy for sure lost but a draw wasn’t that bad of a decision
Самое плохое решение ничья а Ян точно не победил там. Явно анкалаеа
Био је Јан бољи док су били на ногама, Магомед бољи на земљи, нерешено је реалан исход. Поздрав из Србије
@zaurzaur1409 balqurvrksysfsjdpgevwbzkso04725idnosozv29e7h
@user-im3ze6wo5y pw8sgvk071gfjxpwi r1 v🥜🥝🌽🍎🍒🍏🍄🍐🍅
Ankalaev clearly won and paddy lost
Obviously Paddy lost. But I had it 47-47 in the main event.
Paddy definitely lost. After everyone watches the replay they’ll see that a draw is fine.
@@NotKimiRaikkonen Youre blind
Ankalaev tied at best, first 3 rounds were Jans for sure. Magomed may have had a 10-8 so a draw makes sense
@@Poopopotamusgaming to be fair round won could go either way
What is the background song?
Not a robbery... People always tend to use the word robbery way to often it was a CLOSE fight and not a robbery..... I thought ankalaev won 48 to 47 but not a robbery at all Paddy's fight was more of a robbery than this one
If the fighter himself said i lost 🤣🤣🤣 even the commentator says anklaev
Agreed, I think magomed should've won, but the fight was very close in my opinion ankalaev won the first and of course the last two. The Paddy fight was just a disgrace. And on top of that his delusion to think he won that fight clearly lol
Seeing Ankalaev tear up is kinda sad man, he’s fought battles better than this fight without any belt and the fact that his opponent came over and honorably said “he deserves belt” speaks volumes. I don’t know if it was a race thing don’t wanna get into that or if it’s because he was speaking his mind on the UFC but what about Coby? Idk shits sketchy and I hope Ankalaev gets what he deserves and that’s that belt 💯.
You do not win belts by crying. A draw was his best case scenario given that he lost 1,2 and 3 undisputably upon rewatching.
@@mikeedwin1905 You drink Soylent
Bruhhh race thing??? They are both from Eastern Europe come on man 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Paddy really is the next mcgregor…. in Diaz 2
Honestly, I agreed with Sal D'Amato on this with a 47-47, with Jan winning the first three, and Ankalaev winning 10-9 and 10-8 in the last two
Glad you arent a judge. Clearly doesn't know what championship rounds are. Round 1, Mago was way more active with more volume and damage.
ur an idiot.
@@SSH939 Muslim crying
@@Natsteinman Last name Konny lmao foh
@@SSH939championship rounds are not something specified in the rulebook is it? That’s just fighter talk like you have to take it in the championship rounds, well it’s actually just a round on the scoring cards..
It was stupid for Jan to say who or who didn’t win the fight. Pissed off Dana and I doubt he gets another title shot unless he gets a great win against a rising star.
This wasn’t like Canelo vs GGG 1, it was a close fight. I wish we get more draws in fights where it’s 50/50
Front kicks to the body were damaging?!? This is insane, 282 felt like I was watching n UFC fight in purgatory
*Horrible night of judging. Paddy lost, Ankalaev won. Revamp the entire scoring system or get more competent judges. Maybe both need to happen actually.*
The scorecard on the screen at 0:17 for Derek Cleary adds to 48-47 (3 rounds to 2)
Yeah these are not correct numbers. either 5th is 10-8 or round 1 or 2 is 10-9 also for Ankalaev
Lol good catch
Changes at 00:53
I think now there will be a new rules and regulations for how point scoring is done
Is the graphic wrong? Because it says Derek put 48 46 which would mean ankalaev would win by split decision
Why do they keep talking about the front kicks what about the punches to the head?
Sal D'Amato had it 100% correct. Paddy vs Gordon was actually criminal and should be investigating immediately.
We need a rematch
There are three obvious rounds in this fight. Jan clearly won round 2. Ankalaev obviously won rounds 4 and 5. You can make an excellent case for a 10-8 for round five. It comes down to rounds 1 and 3. Both are close, but it’s a little cruel to give Jan both of those. Splitting those rounds would be fair, and I had Ankalaev winning 48-46.
Did Derek Cleary score a round as 10-8 to Anakalaev? Or have they just messed up the graphic and Jan’s total score should be 47
Who are these judges? Why isn’t anyone questioning who are these judges the state’s commissioners are assigning?? And what are their accolades to make us and the fighters rely on their judgement
FUNNY HOW THEY POST ABOUT THIS FIGHT SCORECARDS BUT WILL DEFINITELY WON'T DO IT FOR THE JARED VS PADDY ONE
the problem is the 10-8's . They need to better define what a 10-8 round is.
Man joe talking about Jan saying he lost was the telling thing. Is so crazy like that was clearly a close fight and what the fighter thinks whether he won or lost is irrelevant. It’s like Devin Haney saying “oh ya I won” when he clearly lost has nothing to do with the outcome. Draw is a good call
Before decision i thought it could go any way, i don't mind it as draw
you cant let it go to the scorecards if sal d'amato is involved
What to do next: Jiri vs. Glover (Title Match) Blachowicz vs. Ankalaev (rematch)
Jiri won't be back in a year.
Jiri is out till 2024 probably
Ankalaev vs Glover. Ankalaev definitely deserves another title shot
next fight for lhw title will be glover vs hill in ufc 283 brazil blachowicz vs ankalaev rematch or ankalaev vs winner of glover-hill will be next
How was it a draw man ? If you add up each of their score cards, Ankalaev leads by 1 point
Hopefully UFC doesn’t make a joke out of this show as they did realising the effort put in by these fighter’s inside the octagon
Jan almost won by TKO THREE TIMES IN A ROW with DEVASTATING leg kicks. This is what the world is forgetting. The equivalent is rocking someone so bad that the judges almost stops the fight THREE TIMES! It would not had been a robbery if Jan had gotten the fight. If anything, a split is controversial in Jans favor. Such a gentleman though. Good fight.
Jan himself said give the belt to ankalaev. That ends all the discussions.
Lmaoo Muslim crying
@@Natsteinman stupid American
These are the same judges who gave Paddy the nod
ESPN trying to make us forget about Paddy "The Crappy" Pimblet Robbery.
after rewatch this fight again, this is so hard, draw is clearly the right thing, but the paddy vs jared fight clearly robbed
Mike Bell scored the 5th round 9-10. What did Jan do in the 5th round to get a score of 9? Jan himself said the belt belongs to Ankalaev!
I don't understand split draw the score card 47 - 47 , 48-47, 46-48 that means one of them had more points
It’s stupid af it’s based on the judges 1 of them gave it to Jan, the other 1 gave it to Magomed, and the other a draw. But if that happens the points should determine the winner of the fight unless it’s tie then a split draw would make sense
R1 : tie R2 : Jan R3: Jan Championship Rounds R4: Ank R5: Ank WINNER: Ank
BACK TO BACK ROBBERIES! Thank God most of the fights ended with a finish tonight because the judges were on crack...
Main event was not a robbery lol. I agree with co Main tho
Judges and UFC using this one as a distraction for what happened in the decision right before this one
I think 1 was not a hard pick for ankalaev, 2 was close, 3 was Jan, 4 and 5 were ankalaev.
1 was a very hard pick for Ankalaev considering he clearly lost it, especially upon rewatching the fight.
@@mikeedwin1905Ank threw more and landed more, and looked much cleaner. He won easily
I don’t jan was trying to be humble when he said ankalaev won, he was being sarcastic
Sal scored about how I would. I could honestly see a draw. I gave the 4th a 10 8 to Mag
So rounds 1, 4 and CERTAINLY 5 (10-8) Give that man his belt bruh
3 judges 3 different results lol wow … definitely a issue
It’s always in Vegas and it’s always under NSAC. If you’re angry at the judges tonight, don’t blame the UFC this time round, they had no say in who the judges were. It’s the Nevada State Athletic Commission, they choose the judges at T-Mobile. They’re behind Nick Diaz’s ridiculous suspension for Weed; behind the wild fines for Khabib and Conor and they’re always the reason for bad judging in Vegas. They’ve already messed up boxing, now they’re coming for MMA. And eventually all combat sports’ events held in Nevada.
It’s crazy had that judge not given ankalaev the 3rd he would’ve lost but then again looking at the fight I thought he did enough to win everyone is wrong on this 😂
Break it round by round 1st round u can call a draw but most scored for Ankalaev but let's put it a draw 2nd Jan 3rd was close despite lot of leg damage Ankalaev had 19-16 significant strikes & takedown before last 20 secs 4th round Ankalev 5th round 10-8 Ankalev Ankalaev clearly won this fight.. no doubts.. he adjusted to Jan's game plan but Yan cant do anything for Ankalaevs Ankalaev was the deserved winner and clear robbery
@@letsrumble8933wtf jan defo won the first ur crazy for thinking otherwise
@@letsrumble8933 You should rewatch it, looking at it after the fact without the emotions of the moment its clearly 1,2 and 3 Jan. So a draw is the best case scenario for Magomed.
@@letsrumble8933 its not that ank adjusted to jan, its that jan was gassed out because he is an old guy who trained for a 3 round fight
This was a close fight, talk about the Paddy result haha
Keep fighting.#
After tonights judges i lost interest in watching UFC anymore , i will never buy their payper views again
Cleary's scorecard should be 47-48 not 46 math isnt correct
I think judges wants to send the message "don't control without damage". If you controlling to prevent damage to yourself and not putting damage to your opponent, it won't count much.
They gave 4 and 5 to Magomed, what do you mean
I literally turned off the ppv after the final round because I knew mogamed had won. I was shocked and laughed out loud this morning when I saw the results were a draw 😳
Pretty much the same with me lol I was shocked when I woke up today
You're daft. Who does that?
@@craigr4763 I was tired from piping your mother and sister and decided to call it an early night, my bad son.
Try rewatching it and you will quickly realise that a draw was Magomed's best case scenario.
@@mikeedwin1905 EXACTLY i had it 3-1 jan for sure. He actually was gifted the draw. those judges should not have scored round five 10-8
Why don’t they just do a points total for judges and give it to the overall high earner? The point difference was clear, the judges stupidity was clearer.
Make rematch for Jan and Ankalayev
can UFC arrange a commentator with a hair?
It doesn't look like Dana will consider a rematch...he knows why
They are both good and Yan was honorable but the victory goes to the overall winner
Judges have to explain their scoring...
Tell me DC ain’t biased !!! 😂
you need to KO paddy to get a draw
Yan said that Ankalaev won. That’s it.
Sal D'amato and Derek Cleary need to be banned from judging fights. They have judged so many fights terribly. They need to change it to 5 judges.
How can they be so convinced that Ankalaev won? DC thinks the first round went to Ankalaev but all the judges gave it to Jan. Then he says that the round was very even. DC also says the third round was Jan's, while the referee who gave Ankalaev the win also gave him the third round.
if my opinion, after the wrong decision about Paddy vs Gordon they were scared and they made another mistake beacuse the didn’t want choice a winner in a close match
Derek Cleary messed that up
Funny how they DIDN'T react to the decision stolen from Gordon.
According to this scores cards..... Jan total points 141 Ankalaev total points 142
derek clearly doesnt know how to count 10+10+9+9+9= 47 not 46
I think Jan actually won 3 rounds on two of the judges score cards so they changed Derek Cleary's round 5 score from a 10-9 to a 10-8 at around 50 seconds into this video. It's hilarious all the Ankalaev fans think he got robbed when in fact he might have been the one to be gifted a draw rather than a loss by decision. Either way both guys made mistakes Ankalaev not grappling early enough and Jan with the round 5 slip at the beginning of the round. Not sure about the judges but them changing live on air like this is suspicious I want to see what was on the physical cards.
Man went to fight without legs n they said it’s a draw n Jan didn’t won the first round 🤷🏾♂️ n tbh all he did was leg kicks
The middle card isn't even added right. 10, 10, 9, 9, 9 is 47 not 46. They need to be able to do basic math, that should be a requirement lol.
Jan took the first round. he also took 2 & 3. i think he very well could have won that fight. Ankalaev did what he did in 4 & 5 out of desperation - and, yes, he dominated and took the 2 rounds... but.... idk. i don't think Ankalaev should feel like he was robbed. if anything , he should feel fortunate he was gifted a draw
The judges got the main event right it was 47-47 Jan won rounds 1, 2, 3 because of damage the pressure means nothing if the damage isn't equal and Magomed won rounds 4 and 5 last being 10-8 so please stop if you think this was a robbery then what do you call Paddy vs Gordon?
Change the scoring system already
Mike Bell and r5 should have been a 10-8 and there wouldn't be any issues, and that was for sure a 10-8 not 10-9
Kinda crazy that ankalaev got a 10-8 for that round tbh.
Lol is base on damage lol... go to school for judges
@@JONELMixvideos And Ank did almost no damage. He got wrecked for three rounds then counted on Goddard not to split them up by being a blanket.
@@ThenDarknessFalls exactly
How was round five not a 10 eight round. How can the other two judges not scored that way
Lol. Baseob damaged lol . Your not a judge. Takedown is nothing if you can't punch. That why no points only take down
Honestly if you watch match close you see that Jan give it all and the judges make a right decision. First round 1 is close and I will give it to Jan round 2 and 3 is for Jan also I will give round 4 to anka but if you watch the round 4 even with the take down Jan was still throwing some elbow d only solid win for him is only round 5 causes he dominate that round from start
Joe. Shut up! Jan DID NOT say he lost!