Worst Decisions By DRS In Cricket History - Best Fails Of DRS - Funny Umpire

2016 ж. 26 Қар.
14 628 831 Рет қаралды

Worst Decisions By DRS In Cricket History - Best Fails Of DRS- Funny Umpire
FOR FAST , FREE AND CHEAP GAMES VISIT: www.g2a.com/r/user-587099ca9c856
Worst Decisions By DRS In Cricket History - Best Fails Of DRS- Funny Umpire
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you Like The Video then SubScribe To My Channel
● CRIC CLEVERS●
●As We Know That The Cricket Is Very Intresting Game. But Our New Generation Is Busy With Their Phones.
So We Are Tying To Reach Everyone To Make Cricket More Intresting Game By Showing Cricket Videos.
Everyone Can Learn Intresting Cricket Skills By Watching Our Videos.
●If you (owners) Found Any Of Clip Of You In This Video And You want to remove That Clip From This Video,
please CONTACT US DIRECTLY Before Taking Any Action. We will Respectfully Remove it.
●HARD WORK IS KEY TO SUCCESS.
●CONTENT DISCLAIMER!?
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
I must state that in NO way, shape or form am I intending to infringe rights of the copyright holder. Content used is strictly for research/reviewing purposes and to help educate. All under the Fair Use law.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#cricket drs in real life,
#cricket drs errors,
#cricket drs system,
#drs cricket controversy,
#cricket drs
#batsman crying
#India vs England 2016
#DRS comes to Parthiv Patel's rescue during the Mohali Test
#drs cricket controversy,
#drs cricket india,
#drs cricket rule,
#drs system in cricket,
#cricket drs errors,
#drs cricket,
#drs cricket funny
#India vs England 2016 day 3
#HD
#best fail compilation 2016
#LATEST
#DRS Spoils Parthiv's Comeback
#DRS LOSES
#india against drs
#why drs
#Worst Decisions By DRS
#Cricket History
#Best Fails Of DRS HD
#drs cricket funny
#funny umpire moments in cricket,
#funny umpires in cricket,
#funny umpire moments,
#funny umpire decision in cricket,
#funny umpire videos,
#funny umpire strike out,
#funny umpire decision,
#funny umpire dance,
#funny umpire billy bowden,
#funny umpire billy,
#funny umpire,
#funny umpire in cricket,
#funny umpire de,
#baseball umpire funny,
#umpire billy bowden funny moments,
#funny baseball umpire moments,
#funny umpire cricket,
#funny umpire calls,
#funny umpire compilation,
#funny umpire calling strikes,
#funny umpire commercial,
#cricket umpire funny moments,
#umpire funny strikeout call,
#funny umpire ejections,
funny umpire fails,
#funny football umpire,
#funny little league umpire,
#funny mlb umpire,
#funny umpire strike out calls,
#funny umpire strike calls,
#funny umpire strike,
#funny tennis umpire
===================================================
Thanks For Watching Subscribe For More

Пікірлер
  • Steve Bucknor is retired but his teaching lives. #legend 🙏

    @niteesh__mishra@niteesh__mishra4 жыл бұрын
    • 😂

      @sreejiths2989@sreejiths29893 жыл бұрын
    • 😁😁😁😁😁😁

      @shaildailyv6256@shaildailyv62563 жыл бұрын
    • Sachin loved him the most !

      @nirmalasoral8843@nirmalasoral88433 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂

      @review7779@review77793 жыл бұрын
    • Comment of the Thread 😂🤣😂🤣

      @arslan809@arslan8093 жыл бұрын
  • DRS and SriLanka.. Better love story than twilight

    @venugopal9376@venugopal93763 жыл бұрын
    • Lot of lovers for sri lanka

      @nipunshow2152@nipunshow21523 жыл бұрын
    • Bada yarana lagata hai.

      @vijendrapuri5064@vijendrapuri50643 жыл бұрын
    • India and the icc... Better love story than titanic

      @connor4689@connor46893 жыл бұрын
    • Any story is better love story than twilight 🤣

      @vergil1238@vergil12383 жыл бұрын
    • Shut up

      @joyson7@joyson73 жыл бұрын
  • If Tony Greig is defending Australia, you know it's legit 🤣

    @seanhuggan1989@seanhuggan19893 жыл бұрын
    • despite being an Englishman

      @kartikrajsingh1895@kartikrajsingh18952 жыл бұрын
    • @@kartikrajsingh1895 South African

      @RobNoles79@RobNoles792 жыл бұрын
    • @@RobNoles79 I thought he was English

      @kartikrajsingh1895@kartikrajsingh18952 жыл бұрын
    • @@kartikrajsingh1895 nope, South African who played for England when South Africa were banned from sport

      @RobNoles79@RobNoles792 жыл бұрын
    • @@RobNoles79 He isn't South African when both his parents are Scottish and he claims he is.

      @CaptnWeatho@CaptnWeatho2 жыл бұрын
  • The second clip was back when the DRS model didn't account for gravity 🙃

    @pasunurusaivineeth3739@pasunurusaivineeth37393 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
    • It's keep going up😂

      @sujithlasantha6153@sujithlasantha61532 жыл бұрын
    • @@sujithlasantha6153 it was a hand grenade .

      @Eleventhearlofmars@Eleventhearlofmars Жыл бұрын
    • @@Eleventhearlofmars expected as the bowler was a Pakistani

      @vaibhavsen5032@vaibhavsen5032 Жыл бұрын
    • Legends say if the pad wasn't there that ball would have gone for a 6

      @aadityasrivastava2887@aadityasrivastava2887 Жыл бұрын
  • 4:12 bowler = howzat DRS = In the air gone for six 🤣🤣

    @HassanAli-bz9ed@HassanAli-bz9ed4 жыл бұрын
    • lol

      @rapidorapido9741@rapidorapido97413 жыл бұрын
    • Lolololol

      @llecropus3465@llecropus34653 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣🤣

      @rohitmishra023@rohitmishra0233 жыл бұрын
    • 😂

      @SaiTeja-ob6zg@SaiTeja-ob6zg3 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @kumaylsaleh6948@kumaylsaleh69483 жыл бұрын
  • 4:16 red ball gives you wings

    @poojamane7542@poojamane75423 жыл бұрын
    • Lol😂🤣

      @vishnu_mudhraj1718@vishnu_mudhraj17183 жыл бұрын
    • Nice one.

      @akhil__dev@akhil__dev3 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂😂

      @madsam9403@madsam94033 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @eshanwanninayake5781@eshanwanninayake57813 жыл бұрын
    • Underrated comment

      @ShivamSingh-yl7jo@ShivamSingh-yl7jo3 жыл бұрын
  • 9:01 i still remember Sachin's gesture.

    @binga4026@binga40262 жыл бұрын
  • 4:05 LMAO that is one of the most rigged drs ive ever seen

    @AhmeddR6@AhmeddR62 жыл бұрын
  • Ea sports 2007 had better Technology than this 😂😂😂

    @abhauppal1703@abhauppal17034 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣🤣

      @teamassence5958@teamassence59584 жыл бұрын
    • Most of their technology is for charging your credit card every time your player gets a haircut.

      @QuasiELVIS@QuasiELVIS4 жыл бұрын
    • It's in the game.

      @peek4boo734@peek4boo7344 жыл бұрын
    • 😂

      @raafay_s1027@raafay_s10274 жыл бұрын
    • @@QuasiELVIS I got everything free smh. ......

      @azibch7293@azibch72934 жыл бұрын
  • Steve Bucknor is the reason DRS was introduced 🤣

    @xijinpingpeoplesrepublicof7096@xijinpingpeoplesrepublicof70963 жыл бұрын
    • @@jahno7154 excuse me how is that racist? He was saying that the umpire was bad, nothing about his race.

      @cheesy4384@cheesy43843 жыл бұрын
    • hahaha exactly 😂

      @gauravpatil2174@gauravpatil21743 жыл бұрын
    • @@jahno7154 man you threw teh race card quicker than bucknor used to give his incorrect calls.

      @rejuvenatingsoul3498@rejuvenatingsoul34983 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
    • @@jahno7154 Actually racist are you here

      @dushyantsingh7406@dushyantsingh74062 жыл бұрын
  • Lol I just love Tony's reaction. This has also reminded me just how much I miss Tony's commentary.

    @rjrastapopoulos1595@rjrastapopoulos15952 жыл бұрын
    • Definitely. He’s much missed.

      @mrkipling2201@mrkipling22012 жыл бұрын
  • Why is it that everytime the decision went SL's favor? 😂

    @MianMuhammadMoeez@MianMuhammadMoeez3 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
    • BWAHHHHHAHAHAHAA

      @minioat@minioat2 жыл бұрын
    • Because these clips have been selected by an indian channel

      @bp-lx7lf@bp-lx7lf2 жыл бұрын
    • @@bp-lx7lf all are drs mistake so it is srilanka....anyway nice way to talk about india even if it's their fault

      @ungraduate_0799@ungraduate_07992 жыл бұрын
    • Because earlier it was 50% ball must be hit stump

      @cadificationdesignsolution5223@cadificationdesignsolution52232 жыл бұрын
  • "outside leg for me" 😂😂😂😂

    @ashishkaisare@ashishkaisare5 жыл бұрын
    • 🤪🤪🤪

      @sohailnizami5503@sohailnizami550310 ай бұрын
  • “Pitched outside leg for me...” Is he blind or just bias.

    @DanAL2@DanAL23 жыл бұрын
    • @R S No he didn't. The other commentator corrected him.

      @Jivvi@Jivvi3 жыл бұрын
    • Charu Sharma is the commentator. He’s surely blind 🤣😎. That for me is bias. He even says it isn’t hitting 50 percent. No wonder they no longer bring him to commentate. He had a very average career as a commentator.

      @cosmicgibber8142@cosmicgibber81423 жыл бұрын
    • i still dont get that DRS like fuck its out...wtf and its pitching perfectly inline.

      @ausgaze@ausgaze3 жыл бұрын
    • he's blind ;-)

      @johne6479@johne64793 жыл бұрын
    • @@cosmicgibber8142 he was right. 52% of the ball was missing the middle of the stumps. He was saying that the rule was whether 50% of the ball was hitting the middle of the stump, which it wasn't, just under. He didn't agree with the rule, he just said what it was. I'm with Tony Greig in saying I disagree with the rule, but that's what the rule was and thats all the other guy ways saying

      @calebsmith4315@calebsmith43153 жыл бұрын
  • azmal's hawk eye projection is to the moon😂

    @sandyy55555@sandyy555553 жыл бұрын
  • 1:20 thank god under today’s rules that would be out

    @wwemario12345@wwemario123453 жыл бұрын
  • DRS- Don't Review Sri Lanka🤣🤣😂😂 Edit- Thanks for 3.6k likes it's my first comment with 3.6k+ likes

    @RahulSharma-tp8xz@RahulSharma-tp8xz5 жыл бұрын
    • @@cricketfan9611 dharmasena review system

      @mirfazil5957@mirfazil59574 жыл бұрын
    • Shutup

      @sbshdhvsbdb5279@sbshdhvsbdb52794 жыл бұрын
    • @@sbshdhvsbdb5279 What kind of bullshit is that

      @impg8801@impg88014 жыл бұрын
    • Woohoo

      @mr_abdurr@mr_abdurr4 жыл бұрын
    • @Team Selector Ohh sorry boy,i think u have been seeing cricket only from this world cup ,just go and see Indias matches under dhonis captaincy,AND JUST DON'T PISS OFF COMMENTS

      @entertainmentvideos5694@entertainmentvideos56944 жыл бұрын
  • I think the title should be changed to Best DRS fails against Sri Lanka😂😂

    @soumyaroy1442@soumyaroy14424 жыл бұрын
    • @@alisubooh bhai logo se kya lag raha hai?? Haan bhai Columban hi hun😂😂

      @soumyaroy1442@soumyaroy14424 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @itissundar@itissundar4 жыл бұрын
    • Lol

      @mooxxc6885@mooxxc68853 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
  • Steve Bucknors soul in DRS 😂

    @vinayakhegde7714@vinayakhegde77142 жыл бұрын
  • 5:50 I'm with you on this one, i will give him out Really nice to hear that lol, i wish the 3rd umpire also said that

    @ARU-THLESSGUY@ARU-THLESSGUY3 жыл бұрын
  • I'll never forget Nigel Llong's infamous "it could be anything" when hot spot picked up a clear spot on Lyon's bat and gave him not out. The commentator was like; "what else could it be that made the spot, a bumble bee?",gotta be the worst ever decision by a third umpire

    @AsuperBeast@AsuperBeast5 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, I do think that umpire's need to be provided with more specific rules to follow than they seem to have been. We've seen countless decisions where RTS/UltraEdge shows a spike as the ball passes the bat and that is assumed to be an edge, yet we know for a fact that other sources of sound can cause similar spikes because we've seen them when the ball is clearly not hitting the bat. On that basis, any mark on HotSpot in the right place should be assumed to also be the result of an edge. I get the impression that Llong was saying that it could have just been a reflection rather than an actual mark, which we do see on HotSpot quite often, but they always look distinctly different to actual marks on the bat and, in that case, it was clearly a mark on the bat. I strongly suspect that, had Lyon been given out on the field and reviewed himself, that same mark would have been considered evidence of the correct decision. I think Llong erred too much in favour of the onfield umpire.

      @wunnell@wunnell Жыл бұрын
  • Original decision: Not Out Wickets (hitting): Umpires Call What????

    @gauravv3367@gauravv33675 жыл бұрын
    • Same i was shocked

      @ThatGuyForLife@ThatGuyForLife5 жыл бұрын
    • The was just out of the stump so umpires call.......

      @aayushbisht6334@aayushbisht63345 жыл бұрын
    • out hota hai

      @AbhayKumar-vs6fy@AbhayKumar-vs6fy5 жыл бұрын
    • @@AbhayKumar-vs6fy umpire call not out so it not out stick to descious

      @ajwithgaming9716@ajwithgaming97165 жыл бұрын
    • That ball is outside off.as the cricket rule outside off is the decision of the umpire

      @carromshots5081@carromshots50815 жыл бұрын
  • Man, Anil Kumble straight up went for review 😂. I guess either he was captain or well, nobody really questioned him in whole team.... Badass 😎

    @part-timebrock1126@part-timebrock11262 жыл бұрын
    • He was captain at that time

      @backstagescenario6991@backstagescenario69912 жыл бұрын
    • Just like Brock 😎💪

      @kitchentreat@kitchentreat2 жыл бұрын
    • He did that cuz he knew it was OUT. DRS was like aaj kuch tufani karte hain

      @habeebpashahs@habeebpashahs2 жыл бұрын
    • Impact over 2m

      @sureshchanaka3352@sureshchanaka3352 Жыл бұрын
  • I thought this list was about general bad umpiring decisions but turns out it's about a love story between Sri Lankan cricket team and the DRS

    @33amaddo@33amaddo3 жыл бұрын
  • Outside leg seriously how much pot did that first Sri Lankan commentator smoke.

    @anthonyanlezark4039@anthonyanlezark40397 жыл бұрын
    • Anthony Anlezark I know it's hilarious

      @joshnevill5046@joshnevill50467 жыл бұрын
    • he was Indian commentator charu sharma.

      @sportssingh6837@sportssingh68375 жыл бұрын
    • +sports Singh he is not charu

      @peakyblinders8759@peakyblinders87595 жыл бұрын
    • +sports Singh its waqar

      @peakyblinders8759@peakyblinders87595 жыл бұрын
    • Charu sharma...leg ko pakkad k baittha hai..

      @tvaits802@tvaits8025 жыл бұрын
  • Why on the planet are Sri Lankan batsmen getting benefit of these decisions every time........may be because DRS is Dharmasena review system😳

    @amrit780@amrit7807 жыл бұрын
    • amrit padda because it's Punjabi propaganda

      @AL3X2580@AL3X25807 жыл бұрын
    • amrit padda hahahaha

      @AhmadKhan-cg4fb@AhmadKhan-cg4fb6 жыл бұрын
    • Hahaha nailed

      @salaarkhan7689@salaarkhan76896 жыл бұрын
    • Hei its not right damn

      @malinfernnando@malinfernnando6 жыл бұрын
    • amrit padda because srilanka people only have kind heart

      @rkentertainmentsl4811@rkentertainmentsl48116 жыл бұрын
  • The only thing with the Wagner delivery was that in the event of a full toss, the Hawkeye assumes the ball travels in the same direction of impact and doesn't take into account the reverse swing he got. That was the reason it was very unfortunate Wagner didn't get that wicket because with the reverse swing on that, the ball was crashing middle of leg stump.

    @mohamedsuhailirfankhazi6628@mohamedsuhailirfankhazi6628 Жыл бұрын
    • no, DRS clearly got it right - it hit the back pad in line with off stump, was moving away from the stumps

      @jbmuggins8815@jbmuggins881510 ай бұрын
    • @@jbmuggins8815no it didn’t - watch the delivery again and you’ll see the reverse swing towards the end of it. No way the ball misses the stumps

      @jh.72@jh.7210 ай бұрын
    • and you can actually see when it starts swinging in, the trajectory hawkeye has it going in starts to deviate from the actual path of the ball. You can see where hawkeye thinks it hit is pad is slightly to the right of where it actually hit his pad.

      @Trepur349@Trepur34910 ай бұрын
    • Actually even the freeze frame @5:20, shows ball is on mid stump but tracker puts it on off stumps, two inches wider than were it is. Same was done on the Tendulkar decision that won them the match, Ball line was clearly changed by hawkeye. That one seemed less of a coincidence

      @ahsansafdar4265@ahsansafdar42659 ай бұрын
    • The issue is that even with the ball straightening slightly, Wagner has bowled it from an extremely wide angle, meaning that it would have to swing way more than it did to hit. It's a bit of an optical illusion because it hit him in front of off stump, but I'd agree with DRS here that it's most likely missing given the point of release.

      @Lilac_Lotus@Lilac_Lotus9 ай бұрын
  • @9:00 look at Sachin Tendulkar so angry but so accurate.

    @himanshujolly8985@himanshujolly89853 жыл бұрын
  • Sri Lankans hacking the DRS System😂🤣😂

    @tanmeysaraiya4130@tanmeysaraiya41304 жыл бұрын
    • Bruh we ain’t doing anything don’t blame us

      @photoballa@photoballa3 жыл бұрын
    • @@photoballa Just fun

      @durgapavantejamsd8666@durgapavantejamsd86662 жыл бұрын
    • Icc=indian cricket council)

      @nikolanimoskvin1257@nikolanimoskvin12572 жыл бұрын
    • Lol typical indians 🤣🤣

      @mohaimenulislam8782@mohaimenulislam87822 жыл бұрын
    • @@mohaimenulislam8782 typical Pakistani 😂😂😆

      @user-jh8qh1bt7o@user-jh8qh1bt7o2 жыл бұрын
  • DRS cannot predict the reverse swing of the ball.

    @clovisdacruz6078@clovisdacruz60784 жыл бұрын
    • can you, johnny portugee ?

      @blackbob3358@blackbob33582 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
    • Lol it was a conventional swing

      @ipad007@ipad0072 жыл бұрын
  • That was the time DRS in very early stages and not matured enough

    @RajKumar-qg9iv@RajKumar-qg9iv2 жыл бұрын
    • Yes

      @302_BOSS_FF@302_BOSS_FF2 жыл бұрын
    • The tech is a lot better now but still not faultless, that's why Umpire's Call exists now but is a lot more of a smaller margin.

      @ohhahhglennmcgrath4202@ohhahhglennmcgrath42022 жыл бұрын
  • LMAO, DRS shows Ajmal's ball bouncing like it's an aussie pitch.

    @BullC6@BullC62 жыл бұрын
  • 4:16 sec rip cricket 😂😂😂

    @ahmed99988@ahmed999884 жыл бұрын
  • 4:16 rip DRS

    @Keshavkumar-ho1eb@Keshavkumar-ho1eb4 жыл бұрын
  • How the hell is that first one umpires call? It’s absolutely smashing the stumps.

    @happyChappy96621@happyChappy966219 ай бұрын
  • Well said the late Tony Greig and this was something the late Shane Kieth Warne was wanting to get fixed in the game. If it's going on to hit the stumps after the DRS and everything is alright in the replay the decision has to be out and not umpires call.

    @owendavies7452@owendavies74524 ай бұрын
  • Even DRS didn't miss out on trolling Ajmal 😂

    @rajbeergaurab3022@rajbeergaurab30223 жыл бұрын
    • So not gonna talk about the review for Sachin wicket in 2011 world cup which showed different ball than the appealed one?

      @insxne_xd@insxne_xd10 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for watching guys keep up and peace. Note - Please SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE.

    @TECHCLEVERS@TECHCLEVERS7 жыл бұрын
    • sfr the v ggax

      @anheruddin@anheruddin7 жыл бұрын
    • ALL DRS DECISONS DID FAVOR TO SRILANKA TEAM

      @keerthihasareddy5031@keerthihasareddy50316 жыл бұрын
    • CRIC CLEVERS I hate you

      @jwsthegoat1517@jwsthegoat15176 жыл бұрын
  • When your favourite team is playing and you are sitting on DRS 😁

    @Monty22181965@Monty221819653 жыл бұрын
  • The number of times "Hawkeye" has the ball doing the craziest things after it hits the pads is crazy! It projects it bending all over the shop.

    @CNCTEMATIC@CNCTEMATIC2 жыл бұрын
  • 4:12 the ball suddenly got wings

    @learningforgrowing@learningforgrowing4 жыл бұрын
    • Ball was dipped in Redbull?

      @arachnid83@arachnid834 жыл бұрын
    • True 😂

      @asharahmed5238@asharahmed52384 жыл бұрын
    • These balls are soaked in Jack Daniel whiskey..

      @hiprem21483@hiprem214834 жыл бұрын
    • The only thing saving the batsman was that he was way way in front of the crease, giving ball the time and distance to bounce.

      @sarangthacker3800@sarangthacker38004 жыл бұрын
    • @@arachnid83 *Red* bull Get it?

      @YellowLAVA@YellowLAVA4 жыл бұрын
  • 5:44 That's good to see 😂

    @hhhh-gs1og@hhhh-gs1og3 жыл бұрын
  • This needs a yearly release!. There was some absolute gems of wtf's with DRS the last 12 months. It seems physics no longer apply.

    @nitehawk9270@nitehawk9270 Жыл бұрын
  • 'Outside leg for me'😂😂😂

    @user-vm3tj9bs6e@user-vm3tj9bs6e10 ай бұрын
  • I was pissing myself when the commentator said he thought it was pitching outside leg on the first one when it pitched almost on middle😂

    @leo_laughlin1414@leo_laughlin14144 жыл бұрын
  • RIP Tony Greig. What a great cricket brain he had, cutting through the DRS bullshit !

    @vishal-846@vishal-8463 жыл бұрын
    • Not a good enough brain to understand how DRS worked at the time, it seems. I can't believe that professional commentators didn't make the effort to actually learn. I suspect that they were all briefed but maybe it was inadequate or maybe some just didn't listen properly. Interestingly, the protocol was later changed to what Tony was suggesting, but ball-tracking technology has also improved since then, so the actual margin of error in the predicted path is smaller nowadays.

      @wunnell@wunnell Жыл бұрын
  • Though the decision made me irritated, still I'm happy as it didn't favour Australia

    @BB-kh1mx@BB-kh1mx3 жыл бұрын
    • You mad lmao?

      @Tom-js3iz@Tom-js3iz2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Tom-js3iz may be

      @BB-kh1mx@BB-kh1mx2 жыл бұрын
  • This is a perfect example of why Broad and co wanted the whole "Umpire's call" thing to be completely reworked.

    @gonufc@gonufc9 ай бұрын
  • 4:16 wtf the ball is going to the moon 🌝

    @mr_worry@mr_worry4 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah man

      @shivi1711@shivi17114 жыл бұрын
  • 2nd one perfectly maintained Newton's 3rd law😂😂😂

    @jamilkhosru6980@jamilkhosru69804 жыл бұрын
    • Gravity was like; am I a joke to u?

      @suyashsangale185@suyashsangale1853 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
  • Poor Ajmal and DRS 😂

    @haiderraja4533@haiderraja45332 жыл бұрын
  • ONCE in a Lifetime Talent on The Pitch...Funny , Engaging , Intelligent , Superfluous Sportsman , Legendary Aussie . The Greatest Leg Spinner to ever play The Game. A Corona with Warnie at Chasers in Sth Yarra will never be forgotten.. In this time of sorrow, may the outpouring of love, support, and cherished memories provide some measure of comfort for the Warne Family around The World. Shane meant a lot , to a lot of people. His was a truly beautiful soul. DJ MC Mark Sharp. Sydney , Australia's , No.1 Party Maestro.

    @marksharp943@marksharp9432 жыл бұрын
  • The 1st one was like a Heart Attack to me.

    @arslan809@arslan8097 жыл бұрын
    • Same here bro

      @anshikasharma434@anshikasharma4345 жыл бұрын
    • Same

      @subirsadhukhan6441@subirsadhukhan64414 жыл бұрын
    • I know. crazy! good they fixed it

      @jamesiyer4937@jamesiyer49374 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nM-Jl6uGkKRsq5E/bejne.html

      @cricketrevise2236@cricketrevise22362 жыл бұрын
    • @@jamesiyer4937 yes now drs is not that bad

      @pratikshah3005@pratikshah30052 жыл бұрын
  • The commentator in the first video had doubts about what an off stump and leg stump are

    @lankarocks@lankarocks4 жыл бұрын
    • Ya

      @arulmani9622@arulmani96224 жыл бұрын
    • It was a lefty so they just forgot a couple times

      @Sh3rk69@Sh3rk694 жыл бұрын
    • The terminology isn't so clear cut with left handers. For example a left arm bowler technically can't be an off spinner or a leg spinner, they're orthodox or unorthodox/Chinaman/something-else-racist

      @QuasiELVIS@QuasiELVIS4 жыл бұрын
    • @@QuasiELVIS waaaah racism

      @SFTaYZa@SFTaYZa4 жыл бұрын
    • @@SFTaYZa I wasn't crying or complaining? Calling an unusual delivery a chinaman is pretty racist though.

      @QuasiELVIS@QuasiELVIS4 жыл бұрын
  • 1st one was ridiculous 😂 ICC should correct its rule to take in account the whole stumps not the centre. Its ICCs mistake rather than DRS's

    @ampmskm@ampmskm7 ай бұрын
  • Absolutely shocking decisions. How is that first one not out 🤣🤣

    @alexkrycek3359@alexkrycek33592 жыл бұрын
    • Umpire gave it not out, so it’s umpire’s call.

      @Tillyard86@Tillyard86 Жыл бұрын
    • DRS was not as accurate as it is now. So the ball basically had to be entirely hitting the stumps. The change to half a ball came in later when the tech improved

      @penguin492@penguin4929 ай бұрын
  • I'm a Canadian who got into cricket during the 2015 CWC and must say I've never like the 50% of the ball hitting the stump rule. It should be less like 25% of the ball must be touching. If he hadn't hit the batsmans pad it would have been bales off...

    @Schoobs31@Schoobs317 жыл бұрын
    • they accually have done that now. Not sure exactly but its pretty close to 25% overall rather than 50% of the ball hitting 50% of the stump like in the first video. Honestly they could have gone further but steps in the right direction.

      @lilwang2@lilwang27 жыл бұрын
    • Cody Schubert the reason its 50% of the ball is to counter a possible chance of error in the ball tracking

      @clubslaben@clubslaben7 жыл бұрын
    • waganaut not true at all. its still 50% of the ball. but its not from the middle of the stump like in this video

      @clubslaben@clubslaben7 жыл бұрын
    • If there is possible error in the ball tracking, then they should use the 50% rule even if the umpire has given them out. Why the 50% rule really exists is to stop the game becoming a technological game about margins, and whether or not 0.5% or 1% of the ball hits the stumps.

      @mandatory055@mandatory0557 жыл бұрын
    • Thanks everyone for the replies - I never really thought about it in the way that it's a bit too nit picky. There's always been umpires whom have tried to the best of their abilities make the correct call, I guess having "to much" technology would defeat the purpose of those umpires duties. Thanks again.

      @Schoobs31@Schoobs317 жыл бұрын
  • The only reason i clicked because i wanted to see crying ricky pointing!

    @prasadghodke4206@prasadghodke42063 жыл бұрын
    • I also

      @creativelordzx5543@creativelordzx55433 жыл бұрын
    • He made his opponents cry more often when he went out to bat.

      @ashishpokharel4870@ashishpokharel48703 жыл бұрын
    • You double parked your rickshaw

      @warrensykes193@warrensykes1932 жыл бұрын
    • @MAGIC ㄆ SOUMIK cry cry 🤣🤣🤣🤣

      @ashadwivedi7110@ashadwivedi71102 жыл бұрын
    • Ponting made India cry in 2003 WC Final 😂

      @yuhin4694@yuhin46942 жыл бұрын
  • I love seeing these. They're all from a period when DRS was being introduced and tuned from a technology standpoint, but just as importantly, as a set of managed rules. It's still happening to a much lesser degree, more akin to every other set of review rules, and I think is an enhancement to the game today. But man, some of these teething troubles... fascinating. And it's interesting to see that the troubles in these clips are centred in a range of areas. That first one with Tony Grieg is so clunky. I mean, you can see they've chosen to display the path predictor with more precision than the rules at the time allowed for consideration. That's just asking for confusion, and people at the time thought it might fly. Grieggy didn't seem to get it, so it was always going to be hard for viewers. I think nowadays, most in the cricket community are comfortable accepting a higher degree of precision from the tech, and that's fixed a lot. But you can see from the second clip why people didn't totally trust it early doors. The exaggerated bounce in the predictor in that one seems to suggest an error of some kind. That one truly is a terrible call. The Wagner/Llong one doesn't belong here on the merits. The tech is totally correct. The confusion with the commentators (and the field umpire) comes from a perception error, I think, mostly caused by Wagner's wide release point, and the comments are just misattributed to DRS. The lack of sound makes it hard to tell what's going on in the last one. But yeah, looks like some iffy tech there indeed. No doubt the players and commentators are only 90% familiar with the rules, so are generating additional confusion too. Probably good I can't hear it.

    @Simmo87@Simmo8710 ай бұрын
  • Doesn’t help when the skipper is uncertain about reviewing, good to see his support fr his Men. I miss Tony, Richie and Max. 🇦🇺👍

    @aloysiusjones3985@aloysiusjones39852 жыл бұрын
  • This is fault in graphics. Not in decision 😂

    @saranshpandey3056@saranshpandey30563 жыл бұрын
  • 8:33 what the hell is that

    @sujithmk2273@sujithmk22734 жыл бұрын
    • Even I didn’t understand. Did they not allowed ball tracking because the ball hit pads for more than 2 m away from stumps ?

      @pulkit1995@pulkit19953 жыл бұрын
    • The technology was basic back then

      @fredboger5073@fredboger50733 жыл бұрын
    • @@pulkit1995 yup back then DRS was only used if the ball hit the pads less than or equal to 2m

      @rahulkumar-xo3tf@rahulkumar-xo3tf3 жыл бұрын
    • @@pulkit1995 Ball tracking wasn't required since the batsman made genuine attempt to play the ball and the impact was outside off. Impact should be in line.

      @akshatagrawal3795@akshatagrawal37953 жыл бұрын
    • @@akshatagrawal3795 bro impact in line rule was introduced just 2 years ago

      @subhankar5502@subhankar55023 жыл бұрын
  • Three of those were spot on. The first was stiff, but the two spinners hit the pad so far down the pitch that they really couldn't be given, and the Wagner delivery was a no ball, his foot touched the return crease.

    @rickydumas9994@rickydumas99942 жыл бұрын
  • I've only watched the first one so far but, already, this really just demonstrates how so many people don't understand how DRS works, including commentators and the creator of this video. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that decision based on DRS. You might think that the DRS protocol was imperfect - in fact, it has since changed in this specific regard - but the NOT OUT decision was absolutely as it should have been based on the protocol at the time. For those who don't understand, if the centre line of the ball is outside the centre line of the stump, it is considered to be "umpire's call" and so the on-field decision stands, whatever that was. The reason for this is that there is a degree of uncertainty in the predicted path based on ball-tracking and so they consider that, in cases of "umpire's call", there is not conclusive evidence to overturn the original decision. Partly because ball-tracking technology is improved, the centre line of the has to be outside the outside edge of the stump for it to be considered "umpire's call". This would have been out under the newer protocol but was correctly called NOT OUT under the old one. As someone paid to commentate on cricket, it's unforgiveable that Tony Greig didn't understand this and helped to fuel the public's negative perception of DRS. He certainly wasn't the only one though.

    @wunnell@wunnell Жыл бұрын
  • That saeed Ajmal one is the worst because it’s a dead Sharjah pitch and the Wellington would be proud of that bounce and it’s a spinner bowler it would be crashing into lower middle stump

    @harrygill5705@harrygill57054 жыл бұрын
    • Going under mate surely??

      @ralf7923@ralf79234 жыл бұрын
  • 1:48 It hit the stumps!

    @archierch0463@archierch04634 жыл бұрын
    • early drs rules. 50% had to hit the middle of the stump

      @jhoeshua@jhoeshua3 жыл бұрын
    • @@jhoeshua Thanks

      @archierch0463@archierch04633 жыл бұрын
  • They had a huge problem with estimating bounce (from spin bowling in particular), in the early days of DRS, that second one was not the only one by a long stretch. It was like spin LBWs completely dried up.

    @TheToledoTrumpton@TheToledoTrumpton9 ай бұрын
  • 4:20 DRS has crossed its level.

    @rafatayon2946@rafatayon29462 жыл бұрын
  • I want that much of confidence in my life which the SL batsman had while reviewing against New Zealand appeal !

    @tejasbhagat4444@tejasbhagat44443 жыл бұрын
  • Isn’t umpires decision 50/50. That first one was like 80/20

    @psych0tic870@psych0tic8704 жыл бұрын
    • When it is umpires call, they check whether half or more of the ball is hitting. In first one, it was like 48% was hitting, 52% of the ball wasn't. The center of the wicked was just right of the center of the seam. A very close decision. I don't like umpire call either, but according to the law it was not out. But there should be some changes made to the rules. That was not out. But totally unfair to the bowler, so maybe they should introduce that Umpires call should only be valid if 20% of the ball is hitting the wicked. Cause more than 50% is very unfair to the bowler. The bowler can easily knock out the baills, even if 10% of the ball hits the wicket. This gives batsman and unfair advantage

      @masoodjalal1152@masoodjalal11523 жыл бұрын
    • @@masoodjalal1152 That's not what the video and the commentator is arguing though. They are arguing that the ball is hitting the stumps by more than half. About 80% of the ball was hitting the stumps because the stump includes the whole thing, not just the middle. The ball was hitting the middle of off stump so therefore more than half of the ball was hitting the stump. The majority of the outside 52% is still hitting the stump, just not in the middle.

      @nothinnonthing6951@nothinnonthing69513 жыл бұрын
    • @@nothinnonthing6951 Excellent explanation👏

      @Risenroll65@Risenroll653 жыл бұрын
    • @@nothinnonthing6951 The thing is now rules have changed. Earlier only the middle line of the stump is taken for calculating the percentage of ball hitting the stumps, So the decision was correct in the first one according to law.Now the edge of the stump is taken after these incidents.Now people are argiung to declare if ball hits the stumps in ball tracking. In few years we might see a rule change again if ICC believe current technologies.

      @KiranKartheep@KiranKartheep3 жыл бұрын
    • @@KiranKartheep true

      @25fpslagger81@25fpslagger813 жыл бұрын
  • Facts that it happened only with Sri Lanka 😂😂.... Something's cooking

    @atifahmad7701@atifahmad77012 жыл бұрын
  • Weirdly, all these DRS mistakes were happening with SL being favourable to all those decisions. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    @sreeramprabhu6756@sreeramprabhu67562 жыл бұрын
    • slanka will miss drs in the upcoming series. 😂

      @ArunArun-uw6je@ArunArun-uw6je2 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣

      @unknownjohnson6137@unknownjohnson61372 жыл бұрын
    • Trust me i wonder the same as SL

      @nowtykid9500@nowtykid9500 Жыл бұрын
  • To put things in perspective on the last one between India and Sri Lanka - one of the "umpire's call" conditions for the review of an LBW decision was if the impact was 6ft or more from the wickets. As the impact was 7ft, the review didn't change the decision, even though it was plumb.

    @chaos1357@chaos13574 жыл бұрын
    • Isn't it 2.5 meters?

      @arafatzahan3697@arafatzahan36976 ай бұрын
    • If u see in one of the side angles he was clearly within the limits to be given out

      @navneetjain5751@navneetjain57514 ай бұрын
  • Ricky ponting in thumbnail is hilarious, looks like he is having regret of his lifetime.

    @marcusscott4024@marcusscott40244 жыл бұрын
    • 😂

      @rk02536@rk025363 жыл бұрын
    • For a split second I thought it was Toby green 😂

      @themaster7552@themaster75523 жыл бұрын
  • 1:35 umpires call really 😠😡😡😠

    @gujjuroks8712@gujjuroks87122 жыл бұрын
  • Part of the ball was hitting Middle Stump - Tony Grieg always Hilarious

    @aniket385@aniket385 Жыл бұрын
  • The system is improving. At least technology is helping the sport and giving the teams a chance to review decisions. It will keep improving.

    @baldeepbirak@baldeepbirak4 жыл бұрын
  • Srilanka & DRS untold story 😂

    @sivakumars3549@sivakumars35495 жыл бұрын
    • Yes

      @tagore8435@tagore84354 жыл бұрын
    • www.cricketudrs.com/

      @senakaweeraratna741@senakaweeraratna7413 жыл бұрын
  • Charu Sharma is a legend 😂 Pitched outside leg 😂😂

    @panchkuta@panchkuta2 жыл бұрын
    • Mere avhintak.samaj bahut srech kita abhi sahj jwan nbj mola

      @biggbosskhabri@biggbosskhabri Жыл бұрын
  • 5:33 that was really close. Probably as close as you can possibly get. If the wind had just changed slightly he would have been out.

    @jeffcarroll1990shock@jeffcarroll1990shock2 жыл бұрын
    • It seems to reversed.. just not enough too much much angle from that wide a release

      @aussiejezza@aussiejezza Жыл бұрын
  • Title- in cricket history. Video- in sri lankan matches.

    @kunjanshah6661@kunjanshah66614 жыл бұрын
    • Clark nai go review lia tha woh clear out tha

      @hilalahmad3529@hilalahmad35294 жыл бұрын
    • 😂

      @eshanwanninayake5781@eshanwanninayake57813 жыл бұрын
  • With the new rules on ball tracking in DRS, the first one would have been given out.

    @Maxman013_@Maxman013_7 жыл бұрын
    • Even with the old rules, it should've been out as more than 50% of ball is hitting stumps

      @gonzobombers@gonzobombers7 жыл бұрын
    • Well the rules were that more than 50% of the ball had to be below the bails, and inside the black line on the stumps (middle of off/leg stump) Now 50% of the ball still has to be below the bails, but the "black line" (where 50% of the ball has to be inside) is now the outside of off/leg stump.

      @Maxman013_@Maxman013_7 жыл бұрын
    • I agree the first one has more than 70% of the ball hitting the stumps HOW IN NAME OF THE GAME IS THAT UMPIRES CALL? thanks goodness that has been changed from that test to the first test against Aus vs SA at the WACA.

      @shinysylveon1652@shinysylveon16527 жыл бұрын
    • Maxman013 DRS has got that wrong. It was swinging back and would of nearly hit middle. DRS cannot detect late swing.

      @metminco@metminco7 жыл бұрын
    • Damn right

      @shyaanimam8297@shyaanimam82976 жыл бұрын
  • Whilst the replay in the first decision shows the ball hitting the stumps I can see why Aleem Dar gave the batsman the benefit of the doubt. When he finished the shot he moves slightly and it certainly gives the impression that the ball might have missed off stump. Look where Brad Haddin goes too, so in my mind that's a pretty good decision really.

    @MrDtrain69@MrDtrain692 жыл бұрын
  • Very nice DRS system 👌

    @ramangautam7460@ramangautam7460 Жыл бұрын
  • @4:39 He knew very well what Srilankan DRS is capable of :D

    @mrharistalks@mrharistalks3 жыл бұрын
    • UAE

      @theodoreree7100@theodoreree71003 жыл бұрын
  • All the opposition team was srilanka 😂😂 DRS all were favoured in them

    @sifatsarvar4878@sifatsarvar48786 жыл бұрын
    • That's called dharmasena review system

      @mirfazil5957@mirfazil59574 жыл бұрын
    • Because most umpire come from sL

      @tamandeepsingh4728@tamandeepsingh47284 жыл бұрын
    • @@mirfazil5957 No that's called Dhoni review system

      @amansethi7453@amansethi74534 жыл бұрын
    • @@amansethi7453 Then it would have Favoured India Everytime.

      @mirfazil5957@mirfazil59574 жыл бұрын
    • @@mirfazil5957 ... Ha ha ha... He he he... Well said bro

      @nivan231@nivan2314 жыл бұрын
  • In Wegner's case.... I think the ball tracking software was unable to track the entire trajectory... It just took the initial position of the ball and the position when ball hit the pad.... And from that, the software calculated that the ball will miss the stumps but that was not the case... Ball was definitely hitting the stump.

    @warlord050@warlord050 Жыл бұрын
    • It's fine margins but I actually think that one is very feasible, Wagner delivered that from ridiculously wide in the crease + over the wicket and it hit him on leg stump, where ball was projected to end up was only like a ball width from where it struck despite that extreme angle cause it angled in a tiny bit at the end.

      @philipsoutherton@philipsoutherton3 ай бұрын
  • 6:51 Meanwhile swing : honey i m not even there I m a hallucination

    @krishnajangid6571@krishnajangid6571 Жыл бұрын
  • The majority of these actually show the awesomeness of DRS.. no way anybody would've doubted the decisions by umpires on most of these incidents without DRS showing us. But the first and last ones were the exception, where the rules were so bad that they needed just a few decisions to realize how bad they were.

    @ArvindhMani@ArvindhMani7 жыл бұрын
    • Wdym bruh the second one was like Drs hadn't turn on gravity and was going for six lmao bro that was clear as day

      @testaccount3880@testaccount388010 ай бұрын
    • He is indian so ofc he would say that

      @sophielin4404@sophielin44047 ай бұрын
    • Bro straight up ignored the second one lol

      @razortk77g95@razortk77g956 ай бұрын
  • @0:49 outside leg for me! Are you kidding me

    @sundarramansairam8747@sundarramansairam87475 жыл бұрын
    • Stupid hai sale...

      @letsbeginthechange@letsbeginthechange3 жыл бұрын
    • Okay everyone is confused Outside leg was meant for a right handed batsmen

      @shravanr2593@shravanr25933 жыл бұрын
  • Siriwardana's decision being overturned was correct. before the replay I thought it was out, during the replay I felt he was bowling too wide off the crease, for the ball to come back that much, the angle was always going to take it away, maybe hit the 5th stump. The ball tracking showed it was hitting the 4th.

    @iodboi@iodboi7 ай бұрын
    • So... you're blind too?

      @TheShepdawg9@TheShepdawg94 ай бұрын
    • @@TheShepdawg9 nope, but you sure are retarded.

      @iodboi@iodboi4 ай бұрын
  • Amazing 👌

    @cricketcraze2407@cricketcraze24072 жыл бұрын
  • 8:15 what is this?

    @sajeelahmed9389@sajeelahmed93895 жыл бұрын
    • Checking if impact is inside or outsidw the line of off stump

      @aniljalan3962@aniljalan39623 жыл бұрын
  • DRS exists for fair cricket Umpire's call and ball tracking : I'm gonna end this man's whole career.

    @Chintan25_07@Chintan25_073 жыл бұрын
  • 2:43 If It's clipping the wickets, out. End of story.

    @umairvirk4161@umairvirk41612 жыл бұрын
  • 5:37 shows that there needs to be an umpires call for balls just missing the stumps as well as for balls just hitting the stumps.

    @e55exeagle@e55exeagle3 жыл бұрын
  • 4:15 bounce?? Hahaha... That one would have bounced a bit then dipped at that pace... 5:10 Worst tracking.. Even impact point was read wrong lol, the impact marker moved with his leg.. And where is the swing??

    @viratkohlifan6289@viratkohlifan62897 жыл бұрын
    • The bounce was because of the trajectory I guess...

      @chiranthsanketh562@chiranthsanketh5626 жыл бұрын
    • ur mom giey

      @anfork8083@anfork80836 жыл бұрын
    • Virat Kohli Fan drs doest work with reverse swing mayb

      @zamanhimel9680@zamanhimel96805 жыл бұрын
    • Yes sir i will agree...

      @venkateshnaidu2652@venkateshnaidu26525 жыл бұрын
    • Bounce I think shoaib akhtar is bowling

      @Rebel_Life_476@Rebel_Life_4765 жыл бұрын
  • 4:16 seriously 😂😂😂 I was like oh god

    @chethankumar8317@chethankumar83173 жыл бұрын
  • When umpires give wrong decisions in their favour: Aussies sleep. When Aussies get done dirty by umpires: "that's not umpire's call" 🤣

    @Xinnie_The_Flu@Xinnie_The_Flu Жыл бұрын
  • Oh yeah 🤣🤙

    @sanjaycb1238@sanjaycb12382 жыл бұрын
KZhead