JUNK Ford Ecosport 1.0L 3-Cylinder Ecoboost Teardown. LAWSUIT ENGINE!
Check out our website at www.Importapart.com or email us at importapartsales@gmail.com for parts and part inquiries.
I've been tearing down engines on camera for 2 and a half years! Search my channel to see what I've torn down.
You have been asking and FINALLY! I found one of these little nuggets of combustion. A 1.0L, turbocharged, direct injected 3 cylinder Ecoboost from a Ford Ecosport. This is a pretty unique engine in design as there aren't a lot of 3 cylinder offerings in the US, and I think its the first domestic branded 3 cylinder since the Geo Metro of the 90's. This 1000cc powerhouse puts down 123hp and is available in the front wheel drive Ecosport and Ford Focus, although they are available in more cars for different markets. This particular core engine is thought to have around 70-80k miles on it which is very premature for an engine failure on a modern car. I tear this engine all the way down to try to figure out what happened, and why it failed.
Why on earth am I doing these teardowns? I own and run a full service auto salvage business in the Saint Louis area called Importapart. Part of our model is buying blown, core and unwanted engines and dismantling them to resell the good, usable parts. We do not rebuild engines, we merely supply parts to those who do.
I really hope you enjoyed this teardown. As always, I love all of the comments, feedback, and even the criticism. Catch you on the next one!
-Eric
"I Do Cars" Hopefully NOT for a living - I've not seen such an incompetent mechanic in many years of being in the industry.
I bet you’re the guy who walks into a morticians office and tells them they’re a terrible surgeon. Hope your oil pump belt doesn’t break.
Or the guy that walks into an Autozone and complains to the cashier about delays in parts shipment.
@@I_Do_Cars I love that you pinned this 🤣🤣 Love your videos by the way watch them every week.
@gren509 Tell us you know nothing about this channel without telling us you know nothing about this channel. Idiot.
Or the guy complaining that his car has no oil 😂
This video reinforces a theory I’ve had for a while, the only people Ford hates more than their customers, are their mechanics.
Nah. This kind of crap keeps people employed. Job security. Doesn't mean it wasn't a dumb idea. Every vehicle manufacturer has done this at least once.
That's why you buy Vauxhall
Thats because engineers dont work on their designs
Any small unibody vehicle ain’t worth a damn today, not just ford.
My wife's stepdad works at a Ferd dealershit since the 1980's he's about to take his retirement. He had some years left but he explicitly said it was because he couldn't care less for the new training and the "Audi" build style 😂
I’m surprised you risked putting all that weight on your engine stand.
I was surprised he didn't use his forklift to pull the head.
I bout lost it when hepicked up that crank with one hand!! ROFLMAO
Serious risk putting that big boy on the stand
@@dennisgoans701 and turned it over BEFORE pulling the plugs :D
good 1
As a Ford Mechanic from Germany I service the 1.0 Ecoboost alot. First of all the 1.0 is extremly sensitive, service it well and don´t mistread it and it will run for a good while, but make one mistake, ( run without water/ put in the wrong oil/ abuse it when cold...) it will die on you garanteed. I have seen allot of Timingbelts and Oilpumpbelts like that because someone put the wrong engien oil in wich then started to degrade the Belts. Takes only a few weeks for this to happen with the wrong type of Oil. Also the Cranksshaft isn´t keyed so the belt can balance itself when you tension the new Timingbelt, because you need to lock the VVT units and the camshafts when changing the belt. That also means you need to take out the starter motor and put a Flywheel lock in so the Crankshaft can´t turn when you change the Belt. The New 1.0 Ecoboost now has a Timingchain, but for some UNBELIVABLY STUPID REASON (mostlikly money). The Oilpump is still Beltdriven. So you still need to tear the engine all 10 years or 200000KM/125000miles apart just to change one small belt. Facepalm!! Also the waterpump is now Driven by a Dry theeted Belt wich is Driven by the Camshaft end by Cylinder 3. YAY. Pls end me know.😥
I never liked the concept of turbo charged tiny engines.
@@jeffsaxton716they are absolutely fine when they are not designed by monkeys high on crack.
I understand that on this engine there is no key way for the oil pump drive (a seperate belt to the crank belt) The oil pump though needs no timing like crank!!
My 2006 S430 is nowhere near that delicate.... Almost 300,000 miles on it now... That car is a beast. It doesn't know what quit or die means.
Thank you very much. Can you tell me if that new little oil pump belt is Dry or Wet (in the oil) ? Thanks
As an ex warranty administrator for Ford here in the uk I can say we changed dozens of these engines under warranty. We were doing several a week! It’s a completely poorly designed engine with little robustness. We had them meticulously maintained and still failed. Ford technical told me they were stressed to the limit the minute they leave the production line and have no resistance to any faults like low coolant. In the end we didn’t even bother stripping them down. Just fit new ones. Must have cost Ford millions in warranty repairs. Same as the 2.0 litre eco blue diesel in the Transits. They have tarnished the Transits reputation.
I watched the BBC news story on this. It clearly showed where coolant had leaked into one of the cylinders. I believe that it was a 1.5 L.
Very surprised Ford allowed this design to go into production!! This wet belt type must have limited life - with such destruction by the belt through the oil pick up etc When the engine was stripped!! (Even the tensioners were damaged too)
Thanks for your information. Didnt no that!
I had the misfortune to own a Focus, worst car I’ve ever owned, every thing that could go wrong Did. I will never buy another Ford Ever Again, that’s I’ve now found out how good Vauxhall cars Are !
@@michealhaskell7258Ford started that the wet belt, was a lifetime fit!
Always love how a $10 belt destroys the entire engine.
In this day and age that belts probably 65 bucks not including tax.
It wasn't the belt that failed 🤦
@@SASMacDroidbelt debris blocked the oil pickup.. I’d say that was pretty significant
I hate that auto manufacturers constantly ignore if it isn't broke don't fix it. So many car companies take designs that worked perfectly fine and then make it worse.
@@firingallcylinders2949programed obsolescence
As a Ford tech for a little over 2 years, this is the 6th time I've personally seen this happen, not including the rest of my shop. What we hear is either 1. The tensioner itself fails and there is no longer any oil pressure, or 2. The timing belt loses every single tooth (likely still tensioner failure) and becomes smooth and of course, no oil pressure. Most cars will keep driving like this until the "Low Oil Pressure" warning crops up, at which point we get it. There is no recall, but ford issued a TSB which directs to replace the long block and turbo. Which is why they are in such high demand. Obviously just a horrible engine design. Absolutely loved watching this one. I also hate that turbo vacuum line, and there's always one fuel injector connector that gives me hell. Great teardown!!
Ecoboost across the board are trash
@@shadowopsairman1583 the only one I almost never have issues with is the 1st gen 3.5, even with half-assed maintenance. I've owned 2 and worked on many. But all the small ones are a pain to work on and have numerous issues. Both 1.5's especially. So yes, I'm inclined to agree.
since u have only seen 6 of these failures means theirs only 6 of these engines in your area.
ive replaced 2 1.0l ecotrashes so far. first one belt failed and lost compression and the second one they drove it in at 0 psi of oil pressure and surprisingly it still ran great
Can you say anything about the 2018+ 2.7 EB?
Recent MSN story: "According to the recall notice, the belt tensioner arm may fracture because the retention caulk joint isn’t robust enough to withstand engine vibrations. If this happens, the tensioner could separate from the backing plate and cause the belt to degrade by losing teeth."
Wow - Thank you!
I actually want a documentary on what happened to the engineer who made this and how it was pitched to the CEOs
It may have been the other way round!!😆
Yes that is something the ceo forces the engineer to do. 😂
Netflix won’t touch it that actually sounds interesting
@@barryporteous4904 I thought ideas are pitched to CEOs? 😅
@@garden0fstone736 What about Amazon prime? diney+? 😁
In the UK these engines are known as "ECOBOOM" for their ability to self destruct. Great teardown, enjoyed this one.
UK autos example Jaguar, Range Rover etc. need I say more.
@@gonesideways6621 and they’re going out of business in the next 15 years!
The ecoboom name came from a cooling pipe fault in the early cars. That issue is long gone
kzhead.info/sun/as2AdKmpiXSoZGw/bejne.html
Now *that's* funny! ECOBOOM 😂
They were so preoccupied with figuring out if they could make a disposable engine that they never stopped to think about whether they should.
Like yoga pants...... Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.😳
Furd doing Furd things
@@aaronbryan5095 Yeah, like it was a major technological advancement to put the timing belt in the oil. Like to meet that guy...
@@InsideOfMyOwnMind just to tink the new 5 liter uses an oil pump driven by a wet belt
The self melting timing belt soaked in oil will assure in most cases that you don't pass the predicted life expectancy. Ford build assurance...
Thank you for showing me what happened to my ford focus ecoboost 50,000 miles, serviced by ford at the correct times and it still went wrong and ford don't care. 30 years driving ford, but never again!
You were unlucky, the belts usually shred at 70,000 miles with the teeth going into the oil pump so the crank bearings fail. These engines are well know for this if you are a car repairer
yep
this has got to be one of the funniest teardowns on the channel, because I see these engines a lot as a technician and they always sound like they're close to dying. Ford never fails to impress me with their engineering silliness
It may ne engineering silliness or a symptom of the MBA disease.
wet belts are the most prime example i’ve ever seen of “just because you can… doesn’t mean you should” 🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
underrated comment here!!
I'm nowhere near an expert on engines, but I have had a couple apart, and of course I watch this channel. This is the first time I've ever even *heard* of a wet belt.
@@TheRealColBosch The actual engines from Stellantis Group (1.2 Puretech 100/130/155 Hp engines) equiping Peugeot/Citroen/Fiat/Opel cars, are all wet belt engines. If you change oil as required by manufacturer, with required specs oil, there should be no problem.
Works good in honds GC mower engines... Maybe not a car 😩
@@scuba2nuno1 Sure, i understand that with some proper engineering or whatever it can work but still begs the question, fkn whyyyy 😂
I remember when Ford introduced this engine. Part of the marketing included demonstrating how just the block, or the block with head on it could fit in a suitcase. Seems that was intentional not to show how compact it was, but a new mode for transporting replacement engines to dealers.
Yeah they were total idiots with all the crap they were saying about that stupid engine.. I was like "WTF"
Stupid crap, Ford deserves what's coming to it.
Saved on shipping! 😂
europeans are convinced this exact engine is one of the BEST bc europeans are used to even worse garbage from VW (VW engines that were never offered in america) LOL
Totally remember that article. The Ford engineer took it in his carry on luggage.
Car industry making engines over 100 years and they came up with this genius design in 21st century
lay down your bought off or brain dead car corps are a pack of criminals!!!!
This engine (an many others) are probably from the same morons that designed the new and improved "EPA friendly" 5 gal. gas cans.
They can design a good engine but they prefer cheap stuff , in the short term they save $$$ bigger Christmas bonuses. GREED!!
Disposable vehicles in the name of quick profitability
Ford engineers " We've been using chains to drive engine internals for 75 years, and they are bullet proof. Lets change that......................."
I doubt any engineer said that. More likely an actuary and executives in a boardroom demanding cost cutting design options. "Do it or you're fired" is a very convincing argument. It's not just Boeing building crap to increase short term stock price.
Amen So true
@@IslandArt61 the car (or any other produt) only hs to last the warranty period) then it isn't manuf's problem. No point in building cars that last 20yrs for munuf's
This engine was designed to survive just long enough for the car to be out of warranty. Also, Ford hasn't keyed their timing components in at least a decade. It's all held in time via tension. They even make special tools to lock everything in place anytime you need to undo the crank pulley. Because that bolt is the only thing keeping the engine timed.
Same with VW
wait 'til you get one of those shitty Peugeot 3-cyl ones. they destroy themselves way before the warranty is over and Peugeot always try to put the blame on you... 😹
The older Mazda L engines(MZR 4 cylinders) also didn't have keyed cranks. This channel has 3 teardown videos for the turbocharged 2.3 engines and Eric wasn't happy any time he had to touch one. Mazda's own Skyactiv engines have changed the crank to have keys, but some of the Ford Ecoboost 4-cylinder engines are based on/have design influences from Mazda L engines, so they still lack crank keys.
I'm not an automotive design engineer. But I have worked on several models of older American engines. V-8s of course. Is there any other kind? OK. Straight 6s can be great. The lack of keyed belts still stuns me. Am I correct that the tensioner made of plastic, that had disintegrated, was all that kept the engine timed? Unbelievable. It must be a non-interference engine because there was no evidence of valve damage? American Ford V-8s could be be poorly designed. A 289 1966 Mustang used a cam gear with nylon coated teeth. The nylon would wear down and cause the incredibly strong metal timing belt to slip a tooth or two. Hopefully no more than that. Why? It made the engine quieter. And probably accelerated planned obsolescence for Ford.
I followed a ford puma the other day and one of the exhaust pipes was still shiny inside.... They've welded a second pipe by the side of the real pipe to make a fake twin pipe exhaust to make it look like a powerful car. I've also seen 3 new ish pumas with rusty non functioning back brakes.... Dopey owner driving around for 3 years in a new car with only front brakes... 🤮
I hope this does not sound too cruel but if you buy a 3 cylinder Ford engine, you deserve a 3 cylinder Ford engine.🤣
You could delete "3 cylinder" from that phrase and It would still be correct
In Europe you could get a civic with a 1L 3 cylinder earth dreams turbo.
Have had 2 ecoboost v6 vehicles since 2010 and both were exceptionally powerful and reliable.
Yeah true, but I still feel for non car people who buy this crap.
@@ganzonomy The difference is that Honda knows how to make really good small displacement engines.
I end up on one of these videos at 3am when I can’t sleep. Never fails
Enjoy watching you tearing down engines, this is the second one I come across on KZhead. Thank you for keeping it clean, God bless brother!
In the UK this engine is known as the ‘Ecoboom’
I have heard it called that here in the USA as well.
I'd call it the EcoJunk.
The “B’hang Guuud?”
In the US we call it ecopoop or eco trash 🤣
I'll always remember the advice my Dad gave me. "Son, it's just as easy to find an engine that DOESN'T have an oil-soaked timing belt."
My wife's ecoboost Focus engine split a coolant pipe(plastic) and dumped its coolant in a few seconds, overheated in under a minute and conked. A Ford replacement was 1400 pounds sterling, and with a new clutch and flywheel fitted our bank account was minus 3600 pounds sterling. This was a 15000 pounds sterling car that had only covered 75000 miles. We still have the car and it is now on 108000 miles. Our daughter is having it as her first car and hopefully squeeze another few thousand miles from it. Thanks for the engine breakdown vid, I hope they have sorted thise daft belt probs out. Duplex chain drives would have been much better, after all, it us a motorcycle engine😄
🙂 more like a sawing machine ... junk. I'll never buy after seeing what's inside
Ford needs to have a new car called the Ford Triple Threat -- it uses the wet belt system, the Power Sh*t tranny, and the old Pinto's "built-in-BBQ" rear gas tank
The engineers really worked their asses off to make these as cheap and quick as possible to assemble. Which is good, because they'll be replacing a lot of them
All ecoboost
I don't know about "asses off" that'd mean the thing would actually also be durable and fuel efficient. Seems like a slap n dash job ruined by pencil pushers (accountants) and hand waving educated idiots (marketing). As always. Sincerely, an automotive engineering student.
@@Meton12765 That's what I mean though. Someone worked really hard to make it this poorly. They min-maxed their stats favoring cheapness
Typical ford penny pinching junk
Better belt solves the problem
These engines were only designed to last 60,000 miles just long enough to cover the warranty period 👍
My 2012 Focus 1.0 ecoboost is on 77k I’ve had it 4 years and apart from a fuel leak and a battery that died it’s hasn’t missed a beat. I don’t know how your epa fuel rating works but I have recently getting 47.2 mpg
@@johnfullbrook628 I've had my 2016 Toyota Auris 1.2T I4 for 4.5 years, its on 72000 miles and has had no mechanical issues at all outside of wear and tear items and servicing. It is bigger, more refined and doesn't sound like its misfiring unlike a 3 pot yet its still able to return more than 50mpg. Best part of all its chain driven rather than belt driven mean it won't have a costly £1000 bill for belt replacements.
@@gravemind6536 i agree I think the wet belt over a chain is stupid considering how many hours labour it takes to change it. Ironically the 2006 Focus that it replaced was a chain driven engine and I traded that off with 140k on the clock I’d say the mk2 Focus was a much better built car as this mk3 has had silly little things needing to be done and it’s only on half the mileage
Here in Germany they blow up at around 60 k kilometers, not miles!
@@gravemind6536my 3 cylinder Toyota 1KRFE in my Aygo gets 61 mpg and if I go slow without air con on, 78 mpg.
These were initially introduced into the US market in the 2014 Fiesta. I have one sitting in front of my house with a dead motor with 83,xxx miles on it, which is toward the upper end of the life expectancy you can expect out of the 1.0 ecoboom. I believe most failures occur due to the cheap plastic Ford used in the cooling system getting brittle after a few years and cracking or even shearing off completely, dumping all coolant and causing very rapid catastrophic overheating. I read a post from someone claiming that their CHTS registered something like 2,100 degrees at the time of failure. The upside to the motor is that it actually puts out about 149hp when at full boost (~21psi) which the ecu's allow to occur in I believe 20 second intervals (plenty of time to be full throttle in most real world situations). Coupled with a 2,500lb car, in the Fiesta, and it actually makes for a fun go-kart like driving experience. It also can get very good gas mileage. We got 46mpg once on a trip with four people and luggage. My avg when driving the car for a full tank was usually 38-39. My wife's avg was more in the 31-34mpg range. One day I'll fix mine and then sell it immediately. Not a fan of planned obsolescence.
My 1.0 Fiesta is just about to cross 150k miles on the original engine and belt. Waiting for it to go boom, then will just replace the engine. The belt replacement job in the US costs about $3k, just not worth it.
@@arooooooI’ve got 400k on mine, also waiting for the timing belt to Grenade as a new engine from ford isn’t expensive.
I agree it’s quite zippy for 1.0, my best mpg was 64 and average 52.
@@lancethompson8145Amazing! That's 400k mi or km?? I swapped out the factory airbox for a cold air intake, best decision ever. The turbo noises are alot of fun.
@@aroooooo 400k kilometres.
I have this engine in my 2014 Fiesta. I regularly get 45mpg on the hwy and 34 in the city. Currently at 150k miles 😬
All the engineers who worked on this cried when they were told it had to have no timing keys and that they couldn't afford either a timing chain or seals for the belt. Only the accountants went home happy that night. Still.... There was this one engineer, maybe a team, who stood their ground. They may have risked it all. Their careers....everything. I salute the head bolt team. That was unexpectedly satisfying
As the recalls roll in, the accountants realize they had successfully sabotaged Ford, once again.
On the negative side, the oil-soaked belts mean the engine will fail relatively quickly. On the plus side it'll still outlast the two PowerShift automatic transmissions it'll be connected to 🤣
Actually... you'd be surprised. My aunt and uncle had (or maybe still have) an EcoSport and the engine was nothing but trouble from day one. It was taken care of but seemed to chew up a belt like this one did every 20k miles. I think it spent more time in the shop than it did their possession, but the transmission never went out. I hit the transmission lottery with my 2013 Fiesta.... for a while, at least. It went in for the recalls, and every once in a while it would shudder, but the TCM going out at 132k did it in back in 2021. After six months of waiting I bought a new car, and here we are almost two years later and it's still sitting on the lot, not fixed. A shame, because other than the TCM I never had an issue with the car at all. Ran great, got amazing gas mileage, and the only time it left me stranded were dry rotted tires from sitting before they went on my car. Wasn't obvious at the time of purchase, unfortunately.
They didn't use the dual clutch on the 1.0 ecoboost. They had a 6F15 torque converter transmission and a manual transmission option.
wow
They use wet belt in lawn mower engines, but a car engine? NO thanks.
@Discretesignals wet belts in mowers are an equally awful idea right along with plastic camshafts...even Honda makes trash like this
There is a good reason for no keyway on the crankshaft sprocket. It is known as a fully floating sprocket and is a very common feature on most modern OHC engines. It allows for perfect valve timing using alignment tools rather than timing to the nearest tooth. It is almost obligitary on diesel engines due to tighter piston to valve clearance. It is extremely rare for the sprocket to slip, if fitted correctly using a new bolt with each use. The added benefit is that timing is unaffected if the cylinder head or block needs to be skimmed.
Keep doing what you're doing. Look forward to your tear downs every Saturday night.
I really like the use of a plastic thermostat housing living right next to the turbo.
its super genius, Corvettes should have it too.
turbo so tiny they thought it wouldnt generate enough heat
Looks like that is more reliable than the tensioner so it doesnt matter long term anyway
What could possibly go wrong. One of those miracle high temperature plastics no doubt
I think the designer got shit-canned and decided to sabotage it.
Wow! 1st time seeing a timing belt engine like this. They made it as a throw away car when anything goes wrong.
Ford cologne 4.0, such a turd
pfft, its built Ford tough. it'll easily outlast every other brand on the road. which is easy to do when Ford's spend more time dead on the road or in the shop somewhere
@@harveylong5878 Outlast? Maybe, but what good is it if it's in for repair all the time or broken?
@@tradde11 that's the joke.
Everyday I come to this channel in the hope that he quietly and consistency rhymes the entire episode without mention and I learn more about an engine that I forgot about
At 30:36 ... The mirror hanging on the King Ranch is priceless, as are all the scratches down the side. The fitting end to a Ford.
This engine has an appalling reputation in the UK. It is known in the motor trade as the Ecoboom because it blows up so frequently! Wet belt failure blocking the strainer and causing low oil pressure and subsequent bearing damage…pretty much exactly what you had there.
I also hear Wednesday's can make it explode.
Talking shite
Just so simply not correct for over 10 years was the best selling car in the UK most of the doubling the amount of registrations the the car that came in 2nd place so yes will seem like high failure rate but if driven well and serviced great fun engines in 2014 the fiesta had a 1.0 140ps I drove one for 6 months averaging 46 mpg and a run to Leeds from London I was getting 60mpg.
How does it run long enough while missing so many timing belt teeth to nuke the bearings? If would expect valve contact or just so out of time it won't run before all that bearing damage
@@rossmills7218 McDonalds is one of the most popular restaurants in the world... doesn't mean it's any good. Ditto the Ford Fiesta. Though to be fair the Poms are used to rubbish cars, they bought all that BMC/BL/Rover shite for decades lol
I've seen redundant systems before, but never redundant failure modes. If that oil pump belt didn't get the job done, that timing belt was ready to let go at any minute and finish the engine off
Thanks for the Video, as a technician who retired from the Ford Dealership in 2003 I can only imagine the aggravation of doing this in the car.
Great job on ALL your tear downs. Amazing how "progress" takes a back seat to costs. The little eco ford used a small sized turbo; any details as to make and model"
A masterpiece of brutal cost cutting.
trimming the hardware costs down to a penny ...
Cost cutting has nothing to do with it
@@davelowets what tf else could it be.. pray tell..
@@davelowets For sure it is, you could easy make a better design on the oilpump/balance chaft if there was no cost issue. Even using buckets on the head is a clear sign. you don't use buckets on car engines, well you could if you are going past 8000prm appication, but I don't think a eco motor have that's for a goal.
Its actually bad even for cost cutting. To cut costs, they would have made a better engine by NOT having a fuel pump attached to the cam. And the chain design is the worst I've seen for , well ever. They could have used a single double link design and a crankshaft oil pump.
When Ford first announced this engine, I thought "Cool, good economy in a high-revving, low displacement engine. Sounds like a spiritual successor to the Firefly turbo." Then Ford did Ford things, making numerous bad engineering choices, cut costs and corners, while still coaxing poor fuel economy out of it. Well done, Ford, well done.
Bad engineering choices? I mean they aren't bad they objectively work. And are used in many places.
@@jdrok5026 they didn't seem to work here...
@@mphilleo again the ideas are proven to work. The problem normally ends up with defective parts or not a stringent enough qa policy on procedures etc. Even afm and mds can be perfectly reliable. But the problem is that clearly the material selection isn't enough
@@jdrok5026 that's a fuckin essay that can be summed up with "It didn't work"
I had high hopes for this engine too.
Wow! This is the first time I've seen one of your videos, and what a pleasure it was. A very enjoyable watch. you put out a lot of information in a short amount of time in a clear and concise manner, and it is clear that you value our time. My interest was in this engine specifically, in my recently purchased 2020 Ford escape. No failure in my engine, but your title of this video caught my eye. I had to tear down my sons 2.5 L Ford, however, and was struck with what I thought was absurdity when I found that the crank pulley/harmonic balancer was not keyed. I've been found out that the location is determined by a crankshaft counterweight stop which is in the form of a threaded bolt, used specifically for when the engine is serviced in anyway that requires the disassociation of the valve train, and the crank. after putting the engine back together, I realized that this is a fairly straightforward and solid engineering principal. It's essentially the same thing to my understanding as the Miata engines, and about 1 trillion other small car engines over the past couple years! Again, thank you so much for a wonderful video.
Thanks for the video, love when you get down to the end and let us know what you think happened.
That air gun makes for more boost than the actual engine 😅
It's not about massive performance it's for the masses cheap small small engine
Believe it or not they run 22psi stock.
that turbo was the least of the problems.
I think it'd be interesting to see you do a tear down with an engineer that helped design the engine. If they are no longer employed by the manufacturer then hopefully they could give honest answers about the design decisions they made and the constraints that were placed on them.
They would tell you they were forced to by upper mgmt which is very likely the truth.
never seen a wet timing belt design. Never new it existed.
Packaging, crash safety and cost. Just survivable past warranty.
@@thegrandhoovalation a 3 year motor or something.
id like to beat the sh1t out of designers.
Why has it taken so long for your channel to pop up in my feed, this is so cool, getting to see failure modes of engines that I don't have the time or resources to autopsy myself. in this video as soon you revealed the belt my reaction was literally "W T F!" I can not belive an engineer at Ford proposed a wet belt to the execs and they "hmm hmm 😉👍 looks good" and not to mention no keyway on an interference engine.
Another great idea from FOMOCO which came and went. Glad you have some amusing videos to show the folly of untested ideas put into products, THANKS!
The Ford timing belt dipped in oil has got to be the gift that keeps giving.
magnificent dip🤣
@@Species-zn8vz 🤣 excellent comment! And Ford is not the only manufacturer doing this 😬
Works fine in the 1.6l 4 cylinder!
@@markharris8929the 1.6 isn’t a wet belt
Either Pug or Citroen have the same stupidity
This engine is also used in the Fiesta, in 100, 125 & 140 hp. Despite being calld 'eco', the fuel consumption was only slightly better than the previous normally aspirated 1.4. The 1.4 was just an adequate engine, burnt a bit of oil, but will probably outlast all the ecoboosts. Here in Europe, no keyway is becoming more common. Like you, I think the main reason is cost, but the excuse given is that the timing is set using holding tools, then the bolt tightened, so the timing is more accurate than being fixed by a keyway. My brother left a breaker bar on his crank pulley (Peugeot 307 2.0 petrol), hit the starter, bar hit the chassis, undid the crank bolt, timing moved, valves bent. Oops!
The no keyway thing it's just a straight up cheap move. Glad Mazda moved away from it.
I'm baffled by why this engine and car exist with such terrible fuel economy. The Toyota 5S-FE (2.2L I4) in the XV20 Camry was a basic NA engine with an ancient 4-speed (3+1) auto was rated 21/27mpg on the EPA cycle. Admittedly that standard has been updated but I personally saw 29-30mpg on long highway trips with the AC running. The Ecosport is about 300 pounds heavier and has more emissions criteria to meet but...how can it be 25 years newer and still be this bad?
My 1L gets ~40mpg in my fiesta. I’m sure there were different variations but some of them got really good fuel economy
@@aaronvienot Ford EcoSport uses a more reliable torque converter automatic transmission, not a DCT (Dual Clutch Transmission), which effects fuel mileage.
No keyway is madness for the timing-critical parts. Hell, even way back in the 70's and before, they used keyways to make sure things could not get out of basic alignment. There were always ways to tweak the timing in other ways back then.
These teardowns are strangely hypnotic...
I loved your tear down thank you you were great 👍 👌
I worked for Ford as a mechatronics engineer in Germany... The Eco boost has been around since 2010 in European fords. And what can I say, at that time Ford could no longer provide replacement engines under warranty, we had cars that had to wait for new engines for over a year... Built to just survive the lease, if I had to guess?
This comment reinforces why I'm a GM guy. But gm makes a couple of turds these days. 1.4 4cyl turbo and 3.6
there are so many little fiesta running around in the UK with I'm assuming the same engine. I have a feeling that it comes down to the usage scenario rather than the actual engine. Such as short drives, low miles, low miles but long wait until oil changes. Low miles, short distance driving and long time until oil service is what I believe kils engines nowadays.
@@Dmxravin that's true
can you imagen wait for 1 yr... yet if you are fail to make a paiment, you get all kind of fees and penalty fees. sucks how big corp get away with their BS.
@@noahcotney2957gm is literally garbage. Their DOD failures and piss poor transmissions are a joke. Any of their smaller engines are also junk. The l5p is good but damn, I see so many of their gas v8s and transmissions replaced.
You were having entirely too much fun spooling up that turbo. 🙂 Of course, I would have been doing the same.
Might as well. With that much play it won't be repairable.
It sounds like one those toy siren whistles.
I wonder if it could be repurposed as a door chime …
Hate turbos on cars !!!
ZIMM....ZIIIIIMMMMMMMMMM...........ZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMMMMMMMMMM!!! Lmao!
Am not an auto mechanic but loves watching what's inside in any of these engines
Sidenote: They also offered the Ecosport over here in Europe with a 5 speed since 2017 (they got facelifted and no longer looked like some blind transformer) a 6-speed manual. MPG ranges from 42-45 on average depending on the extra or missing gear. The 6-speed automatic on the other hand averages 37.. idk what happened there but no Honda from the 90's has such a negative jump up in the fuel economy. The reason they went with a wet timing belt design is for better noise and vibration isolation, it also lowers the emissions, fuel consuption and friction loss. PSA(=french automakergroup of Peugeot and Citroen do the same, now some Opel and even a Jeep model use these engines with PSAs design. The engine series is known as Puretech or specifically the 1.2 Turbo versions I'm talking about EB). I know for a fact that these Puretech engines struggle with short distance usage. This way the oil dilutes and the timing belts dry out and crumble good bye engine, mind you short distance trips are nothing uncommon here. 2013-2017 facelifted Ford Fiestas are common with the 1.0 EcoBoost engines with either 101, 125 or 140 hp. They struggle(d) with dryed timing belts as well, part of that was also that Ford recommended the wrong oil viscosity ^-^
Great comment! Thank you! What would be the correct oil viscosity?
Perfect ! But pleas write bel-in-oil need special oil types. Standart oil and the pladtic.tubber get hard and tooth will be fast lost than you can imagine. YES short distance use and you must have smal amounts of petrol and water in the oil volume. Open the filler cap and small. Remember use a bike or a bicycle for short distance. Car engines must get warm and must have hot oil for a lot of minutes. Otherwise shorten service intervall dramtical !! less than half distance !!! And pry that the beli in oil will surview. Oh not cheap to change = a lot of working houres ! Short distance and 160,000 kilometer = 100,000 miles will be impossible (or a high risk to loose the engine !). Never ever forget to ask the car service person if he knows that these engine need special oil ! Better write a note and place it in the car.
I've been quite curious about these little units for a while now.... all I can say is my face was contorted in disgusted ways most of this teardown! This engine easily deserves to be on the top of the list of worst engines ever designed and built!
Makes my HT 4100 look like an excellent engine. Actually, my 4100 in my 83 Eldorado has been perfectly reliable, still running fine at 182.000 miles. But I know they definitely aren't great engines. My meticulous maintenance has certainly been most of the reasons, and possibly i just got a good one also.
Plus it's ugly. The timing cover is ugly. The oil pan is ugly. The camshafts are ugly. We can overlook brutal design if a thing is useful, or if it is dependable. This engine is neither. It looks like something out of mid-70s Soviet factories.
@@johnfranklin5277 I see another person that likes to self inflict pain. Mind you, your ht4100 is miles ahead of my Olds Diesel
Meh hold my beer. You guys like Audi's and BMW's? 😢😂
It looks like something communists would design and make everyone use.
I think that Ford labels that car as “Eco” because it is cheap for them to build. That’s it. Never intended to be cheap for the customer or in fuel. Great video, as always, Eric.
2:05
Eco stands for engine cheap option 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I thought "Eco" means they're biodegradable :)
Very educational and informative. Great job!
My 2012 B-Max 1.0L Ecoboost is in the garage atm for a timing belt replacement at 80k miles which I have been neglecting for a year. The condition of the engine you teared down worries me a bit but I had no major problems with my car. Let's hope it stays that way as I plan on keeping it another 3-4 years.
They are very eco friendly because they're always catastrophically broken so they're never running 😂 We had one that shut off on the customer, it would crank but not start. Pressure tested the cooling system and cylinder 2 filled up the spark plug tube in about 2 seconds. Engine overheated so badly you could feel the warped spot between the block and water jacket lol.
I love when you tear down engines like this...smaller displacement units that us average Joe's might have out in the driveway. If you're taking requests I wouldn't mind seeing a 1.4L Fiat Multi-Air teardown so we can see the funky electro-hydraulic intake valves...
You don't see a lot, it's a whole module that goes on top of the head. Not a lot to tear apart. Good system providing you keep the oil fresh and use exact specs for it. Oh, and on the 1.4l if you replace regularly the small bolt-with-filter on the side of the head.
the multiair module is reliable if the car has good oil in it
Great video thanks! Glad I've got an old Focus with the 2.0L Mazda motor. No Belts or crappy turbos to blow up!
That 2L is indestructible, I had a 2007 mazda3 with the 5speed manual and the 2L, no matter what I did that thing refused to give up
My thoughts too. Ford was putting out better cars in the 2000's. I personally drove that 2.0L over 225k before I sold it. Sold it for a what? You guessed it, another Mazda. The only thing I don't like about the next gen Mazda engine (same on the 2.0L) is the lack of port injection (gotta manually clean those intake valves..... again). Funny when I hear people say that the Ford/Mazda collaboration was bad. They don't know what they're talking about. Ford had better rust prevention at that time (look at the Mazda 3's) and Mazda is the new Honda will their engine designs.
Had a 93 protege lx with the 1.8L DOHC that engine was a gem good low end torque and could be rung out to the 7000 RPM red line all day. It took a loose oil filter( yeah the first oil change that I didn't do myself)and running it out of oil to lame it. Then running it out of coolant to kill it.
The current version of this engine is being built today for a large variety of Ford’s European small cars up to the not so small Focus. In fact it is just about the only engine option left on Ford’s consumer cars in Europe. The Ford 2.0 diesel engine and some Peugeot engines also use wet timing belts. They are fine if changed at around 60,000 miles. Recent build have much improved belts and shorter official change intervals [down to 100,000 from 160,000 miles I think. Together with shorter oil change intervals they ‘should’ be near bomb-proof now. Yes, we’ve heard that before! These are great engines as long as the timing belt is changed at least twice as often as Ford originally recommended, which is an issue because very few owners do that, hence they have a high failure rate. The 2.0 diesel used in Transit and Ranger has also had a poor reputation for belts and injectors installed up to 2000 which were faulty and supplied by Continental. There is an ongoing recall on all these including a timing belt inspection and replacement with the latest parts. At one point whole fleets of transit vans were out of action for months, but from 2021 onwards Ford seem to have built them right.
This engine is another example that the primary goal of the auto industry is to take as much money as possible. When such a breakdown occurs on the engine, most people decide to buy a new or another car because the repair is extremely expensive. It most often happens when the warranty expires. The timing belt is perfect, quiet, safe up to 90-120 t/km and its replacement is relatively cheap compared to, for example, changing the chain on an Opel Astra 1.6 cdti. But on that same Astra, when it stretched, the chain started banging and people still noticed (those who occasionally listen to their car) and still went to the service center and prevented the engine from breaking down. That's why the engineers decided to put an end to it and decided to install a wet timing belt so that the engine is quiet, so that you can't look at it in the service center and assess whether it needs to be replaced. And that it breaks just when the warranty expires. And this is not only a problem with Ford, all manufacturers do this. The Japanese are no longer what they used to be, neither Mercedes nor any other.
It's a shame, they could've made this engine so much better with little changes to it's design, and it'd probably be quite reliable, but the way they did it is just crazy.
Yeah. Without wetbelt it would look like they're quite ok little engines.
It's exactly as designed, a cheap car engine that's expendable right after warranty so you'll be in market for a new car. First time with Capitalism I presume?
The only car you would want to swap IN a rotary engine.🤣🤣🤣 you could break it down, replace the seals and put it back together in the time it took to look at that ecoblah!
The new version for a few years now has a timing chain, not belt
@@cuddlefish999 Thank god. That was a good decision.
Great video, humor, accurate and helpful
"Mechanically re gapped".... priceless phrase 😂😂😂
They really didn't go through much effort to obfuscate how intensely they wanted the engines to fail rapidly. I'm surprised that this is not a consumer protection issue.
Agreed. Wet timing belts should be outlawed. What an abomination!
Mine lasted for 90000 miles and nearly 10 years before I heard of this issue and got rid of the car, now it’s someone else’s problem. 😀
I'd own another one in a heartbeat. Completely reliable if you do the oil changes early and use the right filter and oil. I drive over 40k miles a year and I'm an auto tech. So many people talking out their bums without any facts.
@@marvetheman The wet belt breaking up and clogging the oil pickup is a real issue affecting many cars and I just wasn’t prepared to risk it. I did do regular 5000 mile oil changes but the Ford oil was so expensive, whoops😁
@@marvetheman The facts are that it uses a belt for critical timing issues, and un-keyed sprockets to drive its oil pump. Regardless your claimed authority in all things mechanical, because someone paid you to obey some tabular data and get excited for more tabular data, the engineering is poor. Mechanics are not engineers, or they would claim to be engineers, along with the engineer paychecks. Meanwhile, it doesn't take an engineer, nor even a mechanic, to know that these design choices are both risky and cost-saving... A double-positive, from a financial expert's point of view... Hence, massive - and warranted - skepticism. ...or at least, that's what my bum tells me.
You're actually right about how common the failure is and exactly why. I've only worked at our small dealership for about 10 months and have seen at least a dozen of these. It's always the oil pump/balancer belt failure. It starves the rotating assembly and literally self destructs. That includes destroying the turbo. Just a terrible design. The worst part is, we had more economical 3cyl engines back in the 80's and 90's that lasted longer. They just didn't have the power. Most ranging from 55-70hp. With stricter emissions and safety standards, the cars themselves got bigger while the tech lagged behind on 3cyl performance. So, they were phased out until the Smart-For-Two came along and piqued the public interest. At any rate, this is an example of over-engineering, and in all the wrong ways.
Supposedly the wet belts create 30% less friction than equivalent chains. I can believe that, but given that a good chain drive is already like 98% efficient the total gains can't be much.
@@nerd1000ify it makes sense when they're not wet drive like this and can be replaced easily, but now you gotta tear into the entire engine to remove them from a lubricated block to replace something that last almost the same amount of time lubricated with oil than when exposed to ambient temperatures
Belt failure isn't caused by the tensioner though. Few people seem to realize that for wet belts you need to use a very specific kind of oil that does not have any solvents in it. Apparently this car got regular engine oil after a service. Just look at how badly the timing belt is deteriorated at 10:03
In the UK we had loads of really small engines in big cars but those cars even though they were four door weighed less than a tonne. They got better mileage on 50s technology engines than modern cars which is ridiculous
@@mrcaboosevg6089 and yet somehow better economy doesn't mean less emissions. I'm no scientist, so it doesn't make sense to me. I feel like it's a ploy.
The EcoSport is discontinued but the 1.5L version of this engine is in a lot of newer Ford cars. A major problem with all the Ford Ecoboosts is they're direct-injected so there's no fuel/air mix from the old style port injectors to clean the intake valves off. I'm told they get cruddy fast since the PCV system feeds a lot of crankcase blow-by into the intake manifold.
This was a great video. Loved it
I had a 2014 Fiesta with the 1.0T. Started exhibiting head gasket failure symptoms (cold start misfire, no heat due to air in cooling system) around 40K miles on it. Ford put a new engine in it under warranty and I sold it not long afterward. Having seen this teardown, I’m glad I did. Their paperwork said “cracked block” - assume they meant cracked head. It was amazing on fuel, torquey, and sounded neat - neat enough to get my car/youtube video featured in a Jalopnik article on “cars that sound better than they ought to.”
No, they do mean cracked block! They cut a channel between the cylinders and that apparently cracks, giving the symptoms of a head failure whereas you really need a short block to fix the engine. Or a complete swap of everything.
Regarding fuel economy, EPA rates 1.0T Focus worse on fuel compared to, say, a Mazda3 Skyactiv 2.0 from the same era while making LESS power. EcoSport was also rated worse on fuel than Mazda CX-3 or Honda HR-V, both with larger NA engines that make more or similar horsepower. Given the lack of displacement tax in North America and the issue with Ford Powershift, I'd love to know the reasoning of anyone who bought the car. This is why I am glad North America doesn't have displacement tax because then you get terrible engines like this. In a Fiesta or Fiat 500 I think it's fine, but in a Focus or EcoSport, the displacement is just too low and so you have to constantly rely on boost, which destroys fuel economy(engine has to run extra rich to prevent knock) and engine longevity. If you have to have a tax, base it on fuel consumption or emissions, not displacement.
If a turbo engine is not on boost it is inefficient equalling WORSE fuel economy due to lower compression to allow for the increased cranking pressure of the extra air blown in due to the turbo.
@@gvicj05 I'd say it's a bit more complicated. My Subaru on boost was thirsty, keeping it off was more efficient but less fun. My direct injection 330i was very efficient, unbelievably efficient. So much so that my 1.5l Ecoboost couldn't match it and you needed it in boost all the time because there was no power without it, and would leave you limping out of junctions dangerously. My current 320i does have turbos and you can hardly tell it's a boosted engine, and is even more efficient due to the direct injection. I'd say direct injection is the key to an efficient engine, turbo or not.
@@johnsim3722e said that an engine with a turbo not in boost will be less fuel efficient than that same engine without a turbo, which is true due to parasitic drag.
Very common issue around here in Brazil, using The wrong oil specification causes that problems on the belt material, it deteriorates and get loose in the oil, Ford Ka, GMC onix are other examples. Very good vídeos Eric!!
That actually makes a lot of sense
When I saw that the filter wasn't motorcraft, I wondered if it was an incorrect oil issue that caused or contributed to the belt failure.
I also was thinking that the wrong and oil would be detrimental to the belts. The problem is that all the heat and contaminants can be good for rubbers.
Óleo errado ou de má qualidade aqui no Brasil já é um problema rotineiro
Hi, "I Do Cars" -thank you so much for this video. Long story short, I've owned a 2014 Ford Fiesta 1.0L since day 1. today in 2024... that thing is running like new. of course, I can feel the plastics shaking and vibration from wear... but the engine, I have nothing to say about it. My oil changes have been ON TIME. Maintenance is key, changed the spark plugs at 100,000 Mi, same with the Coolant and the belts (all). I had to replace the water pump and that's it.. I am very happy with this little engine.. It does gives a 45MPG on highway... and about 38.5 combined. Stilll.. yes still after 10 years and 140,000Mi... Thank you for this video, I will be happy to do more on my little engine to last longer... Cheers!
had this in a 6 speed manual focus before it was totalled. I really liked this engine, the torque band was very low and I easily got 48mpg average
Same car. Gutsy little engine, pair well with 6 speed
I grenaded the 5spd in my fiesta and installed the focus 6spd. I miss the taller 5spd final drive for highway.
While I agree that is a cheap, poorly designed, POS engine, I have to say it had the coolest sounding head bolts when loosened that I've heard on the channel. Thanks for sharing, Eric!
I had a 2016 Fiesta with this motor It was smooth, sounded great, had nice mid range punch and got 52mpg highway. Definitely made an economy car more interesting to drive. I also dumped it when the warranty expired because I knew it was a ticking time bomb as evidenced here.
I've got a 2017 Fiesta SFE 5-speed with just over 40,000 miles, should I be worried?
@@obsoleteoptics yes.
@@obsoleteopticsa little. they are notorious for their unreliability. If it's what ya got then run with it while it works but dont expect any more than like 100k tops.
@@obsoleteoptics I'm convinced that the engine in this video had 50,000 miles and failed as written on the oil filter. I recommend you get that belt changed out for piece of mind.
Good choice hahaha
A good experience (so far) from non-mechanic point of view. I drive a 9 year old 1.0 EB Focus wagon, bought it when it was 4. Been solid on daily drive and longest roadtrip was around 1500 miles over a week. It's a weird thing, that wet timing belt. And it's labour-intensive -> expensive to replace because of the layout, but best do it ahead of time. I had the belt replaced at around 90k miles, mechanic said it was still super clean at that point. Ford says the change should be at 150k but didn't trust that.
i've heard that some types of engine oils do accelerate the wear of the belt significantly. what oil are you running?
I have 400k on mine and kinda went with the I’ll replace the whole engine route for cost.
Called the 'Ecoboom' here in the UK. Belt shreds, blocking the oil scavenging gauze in the sump and BOOM !
Here in Brazil, we've been dealing with those three cylinders engines, wich push the Ford Ka vehicle since 2014. We've regularly been dealing with that timing belt failure you've faced, when the timing belt loses its teeth. It's been caused when owners use not specified oil for a long time and timing belt starts to lose teeth or releasing material, wich block the oil pump. That engine has another serious problem I've faced so many times: in some cases, the engine is running with no oil or with low oil pressure and there's no oil indicator blinking. When you finally realizes the engine has lubrication problem, the engine is destroyed. 🤦🏾🤦🏾
Long story short, you have a bunch of car owners not following guidelines, neglecting their cars. Then when they break, they say "you should have bought a Toyota".
I've noticed this on a few Fiat 1.2l engines. The tiny ball inside the oil pressure sensor seems to stick in the "everything is fine" position 😅
@@mrdomhare Ford and Fiat, I guess we better avoid 4 letter brands starting with F.
@@bmw803 To be fair having a wet belt is just asking for failures nobody expects. Timing belts will eventually fail and with this system they will send pieces into your oil.
@@Alobster1 That I ain't gonna argue. It's definitely STUPID. Put a chain and forget it. They want to save on a chain vs belt, but spend how much more replacing engines when they fail.
The 1.0 3 cylinder ecoboost engine was available in the Ecosport, Focus, *and the Fiesta* in US. In the Fiesta it was decently quick since so light.
The owners of the ST variant of the Fiesta. We called them FiSTers. I’ll see myself out now
@@TheMadTube The FiST used the 1.6 Ecoboost engine. Oddly enough, that same 1.6 EB engine and 6 speed manual combo was sold for a few years in the last gen Fusion. It was oddly slow and not that efficient. Weird.
Slap one of those GR corolla 3cly in the Ecosport and it will go flying.
You could get a 3 cylinder focus in the USA?!
@@ganzonomy yep.
I bought a 2014 Fiesta 1.0 automatic ecoboost in the uk in July. Took it to a Ford specialist and had the wet belt and water pump replaced. Car is now good for at least 7 years as long as I service every 5000 miles.
A good time ago, i was talking to mates and people, here in the uk, about buying a van. Every single one said, "Avoid wet belt", advice that i followed.
I'd like to say I was surprised with how bad the engineering and design of this engine was, but Ford has a long and sordid history of making subpar engines. Love the teardown and commentary!
And yet Ford also produces the absolutely brilliant 5.0L Coyote V8 engine so go figure!
@@DJDinaggio They get lucky every now and then.
Shockingly GM has a wet belt in at least one of their new diesel engines, I think powering the oil pump, and you have to pull the engine or trans to get to it. Imagine spending the diesel tax, and having this junk in your engine. Sadly it's probably going to be a trend to keep cars from being too reliable and keep them failing so you have to replace it with a "cleaner" new vehicle.
The 5.0 Coyote is probably the best modern engine they have. The old 5.0/302 from back in the day bc was a good one also. The problem with Ford now is “planned obsolescence”. They don’t care if you want to keep a vehicle long term. They quit product support as soon as they are legally able too.
@@OUSWKRYeah but that's their one thing. Funny enough I feel like nearly every generation of mustang has a fairly bulletproof motor.. but most of their other cars go to shit. It's like they're obsessed with the Mustang only lol
I remember when this engine first came out. I had recently stopped driving my 3 pot 1991 Geo Metro and thought the idea of a small car with a 3 cylinder and a manual was not so bad. Then I looked at that wet timing belt and the amount of power they were trying to get from a 1 liter (about 2.5x that of the Suzuki 1.0 in the Metro) and knew that it would be a bad idea. I bought a new 2015 Prius C instead and it's been a great transportation appliance (if a bit unlovable). In 8 years and 142,000 miles, all that has failed is the A/C compressor (under warranty) and the 12 volt battery. With the Fiesta/ Focus/ Ecosport, they had bad engines and even worse transmissions, as well as poor fuel economy. If you want a good small car, you buy a Toyota or a Honda. Anything else just won't hold up.
And the funny part is, Yamaha gets 118hp out of an 890cc 3 banger with no turbo and that engine is known to be bulletproof. Of course it's in a motorcycle, not a car, but still MCs do some things that you'd never do on a car engine, like use the engine oil to also lubricate the transmission, clutch and stator, and also rev to 11k RPM and make most of your power at over 6k rpm.
@@mrvwbug4423 car manufactures cut corners. They aren't as worried about a large gathering showing up to tell everyone how bad the product is.
Well....I just turned 100.000 miles on my 2017 Hyundai Elantra, with 0 repairs, and 0 issues. It runs smooth and quiet, uses no oil between 3000 mile changes. Even the brake pads are original, and again last week when having the tires rotated, I was told they are still good!! My 2 previous kias were also excellent.
@@mrvwbug4423 they built the V-6 SHO for Ford back in the day. A triple sho would be nice. But this. No key way? Oiled belt?
The 5 car fleet of delivery Fiestas we had at one of my jobs….. 3 transmissions failed. My boss replaced each of them with a Prius
Love this channel!
My Dad had a 1971 Ford Ranch Wagon with a 351 Windsor engine under the hood. it blew up at 40k miles. When we tor it down, we found nylon teeth from the timing gears jammed in the oil pump. I'm sure that nylon timing gears will go down in history along with wet timing belts and screen doors on submarines as some of the best ideas ever.
I have an 18 Focus with one of these engines. Typically see 44-48 MPG on it with the 6 speed manual. From all I've heard and seen, the first few years had bad rubber/plastic for the cooling system externally leading to more overheating issues, but all years share those little coolant passages between the cylinders. Later 1.5L 3cyl ecoboost have a small passage drilled a bit deeper so coolant isn't touching the head gasket. Additionally, the belts are meant to be maintenance items at 150k miles, though I'm not sure how realistic that is with 7.5k mile oil change intervals, so I change mine every 4-5k. Every time I have seen this failure, the same symptoms happen, making it hard to know the cause, but effectively the oil pump locks up and sheers the teeth off the belt. Given both belts have continuous oiling from the oil pan by being dipped in, it seems like junk gets in the oil pickup and stops the flow. Whether that is sludge from long intervals or bits of the belt cracking off as gas and carbon get into the oil is hard to say and know as it kinda all looks the same when it is small. The belt is materially designed to not decay from being in oil, but I don't know what amounts of gas might do to it. That said, I think the most important thing is checking oil level (should be cooler oil then) and condition. I saw plenty of Equinox have stretched timing chains and is was anywhere from 60-120k miles, a shorter interval than these belts for replacement (while timing belts for GM were 100k and chains started becoming 150k on the newer Colorado's timing chain). Though I figured you'd have to take the head off to get these belts off... there goes my idea of an almost engine rebuild and check at 150k miles. I was hoping it would be like the GM V-8 with AFM where you see almost no head gasket failures in them... because you see lifter issues and the head gaskets are replaced when you do lifters. In my ~4 years at GM I saw a LS head gasket failing once, but lifters hundreds of times. Was ~$3.5k if it was just lifters, $5.5k if the cam was bad and ~8k for a new engine installed. I'm interested to see how my 1.0 does compared to my 302.
these timing belts became very common here in Brazil, including ford ecoboost... the problem is the oil spec, if you use the wrong oil and/or use some additive the belt is destroyed
Yes. 21:45 that's the most common problem on that engine. Poor oil or not changed on time and debris of belt will block the oil pump filter.
@@nlousapt Noted...my wife has a city turbo 1.0 3cyl with a belit in oil design. Maintenance with the correct fluids on these engines is critical. This is why our car has an oil life indicator. Fortunately, we don't even get to 10K kms in 6 months, so the oil is changed early. There have been a few issues with the engine - mainly poor / wrong maintenace, abuse or remapping. It's fast when remapped...but kaboom eventually...
I have a Ecosport with 110k km and 5 years. Nevertheless, when was the 100k service I asked to be checked if the belt was alright and how was the oil pump filter, and was everything clean. When reach the 200k km i will replace the belts.
The Ecoboost was heavily revised around 2020, one of the changes being a switch to a timing chain instead of the wet belt.
So they knew all along the belt was the problem😂
2015 Focus 1 liter gets 36 mpg with my foot in it hard and 39-42 highway. 39 mpg at 83 mph with a 6 speed. Love it but your assessment is correct. So far it’s a money saver for me.
This gives me a greater appreciation for the rugged simplicity of my Geo Metro's engine.
As a Pinto survivor I got so much pleasure to see inside the worst 3cyl engine design. Thanks Eric.
Here in Europe, many of Ford's engines do not have a keyway on the crank. This enables more accurate setting of the timing which is then secured by the tightening of the crank pulley bolt.
Great stripdown video, I got shut of my Ecoboost engined Ford while it was still running 😅
I absolutely love this 999cc ecoboost motor, my 2016 fiesta sedan averages 52mpg with a best tank of 56mpg. It was dubbed the sfe (super fuel economy) and was an option with a 5 speed manual in the 2016-2018 fiestas in the US. Ford hugely under rated the fuel economy of these motors. Mine is listed as 31 city, 43 highway, 36 combined. And it actually gets 40-50% better economy combined. Highway only at 60mph the economy sits in the 65-70mpg range. I bought the car used dirt cheap and has been amazing as a daily driver. The only issue ive had so far is a leaking coolant tank that cracked at the outlet barb, got a new one for $35. I do plan to replace belt, tensioner and plugs at 100k miles. Ultimately goal is to pull 200-300 lbs out of it and do a few aero things to see if I can get her to 60mpg average. Its also not really a slouch the car is so light the 125hp suits it well so its not boring to drive either.
Cuz its behind a tow truck all the time..
wonder if that motor came with a pull-start option! 😂
I bought a 2020 ecosport SE awd with the 2.0 and my wife liked it so much she wanted one. We ended up with a 2021 ecosport S fwd with the 1.0. We lined them up and did a short run to 55. They were neck and neck and the 2.0 didn't have a full car length by the end. I have driven both vehicles extensively and I can say this. Off the line the 1.0 has a lot of grunt and feels quicker. Around 55 mph you can feel more vibration from the 1.0 where the 2.0 is smooth. Even though my 2.0 is heavier with the awd system and doesn't have a turbo the two get almost identical mpg (within 1mpg). The 1.0 runs hot. When you shut down the car it buzzes (I assume electric water pump) for several minutes cooling itself down (my 2.0 doesn't). I had read about the failures prior to buying the 1.0 ecosport but the forums said it was due to a oil not compatible with wet belts and prolonged maintenance. I only use mobil 1 extended oil which is supposed to be compatible and I perform our maintenance regularly so took the risk and purchased the car. With the new recall on the 1.0 at least her vehicle is still low mileage (28K) so hopefully the solution comes before any issues but I also have the 6 year premium extended ford warranty on both just in case.