1815 Battle of Waterloo: Napoleon's last battle, how it happened

2024 ж. 18 Сәу.
56 136 Рет қаралды

Using new archaeological findings, first hand accounts of the battle, expert interviews and CGI and 3D animations this program helps us understand the dynamic elements of strategy and weather that led to Napoleon's historic defeat by the Duke of Wellington on the fields of Waterloo.
Directors: Marianne Cramer and Guillain Depardieu

Пікірлер
  • Just, wanted to correct something in this documentary, there were no ''English only''in duke of wellington's army, they were british soldiers , meaning collectively all nations in the united kingdom fought as one, under the union jack flag,🇬🇧 What, you got to remember after the battle which was as gruesome, as the battle itself, and typical of the Napoleonic era of warfare, There ,was no organized retrieval or system to collect the wounded from the battlefield, they were Litter Bearers, but was still a ad hoc, affair, the scale of casualties overwhelmed the litter bears task ,they were so many casualties, thousands of dead, dying, and wounded on both sides, that they were unable to be removed for days after, The lucky ones, if you can describe it as lucky ones , were stretchered off or walked off,, but what awaited them when they got to the field hospital , was another matter, Army surgeons, had to work quicky, bearing in mind there was no pain- relief drugs ,when amputations were performed, the speed and efficiency of the surgeon of cutting the limb off, and trimming the bone,and creating a flap to cover the stump was the best the unfortunate soldier could hope for. The rest, out there had to wait in the cold ,wet conditions , they were left for days, there thousands perished in agony, At night, came the locals from around the area, the ''scavengers'' they got amongst them, and picked clean the dead and wounded, the horrors didn't stop, the teeth were hacked out and the prized teeth were from the young soldiers because they had a full set ,even the wounded were not spared, even killed, theses teeth were worth a lot of money because they were used to make dentures for the wealthy , this is never mentioned in the aftermath of warfare, it's all about glory .

    @soultraveller5027@soultraveller502714 күн бұрын
    • I accept some of your points but there was a very great effort on the French side at least to deal with casualties, one of Napoleon's personal doctor's Larrey devised improved methods of recovering and treating casualties using purpose made ambulances. Plus, the "British" had surgeons working non stop at the field hospital at La Haie. So it wasn't as primitive as you suggest. Teeth weren't just obtained directly after the battle, although this is one of the horrors I often imagine about for those poor souls laying out in the fields once darkness fell. The burial pits were exhumed to use the bones in the fertiliser process years after the battle and thus teeth would have been easily obtained. So let's just say, these programs are entertaining and somewhat informative, but not always complete or accurate.

      @Lee.Enfield-303@Lee.Enfield-30311 күн бұрын
    • @@Lee.Enfield-303 That's quite true that the french made great efforts looking after their wounded soldiers and sought to improve the french soldiers misery in better after care then the British did ,l believe the french organised a ambulance service of a kind to carry off the wounded too. In fact the British military medical services were no different all the way to the Crimean war 1853/56 38 years later. However, let's not paint a too brighter picture here, we are talking about the early 19th century still ,they were no drugs to relieve the soldiers pain . The experience was unimaginable .they suffered and endure having the limbs amputated , simple because there was no alternative. you or I cannot even comprehend the suffering back then, they endure because they had no choice , disease like Typhus was endemic, serious bacteria infection killed many, all was prevellant in abundance, the mortality rate after surgery was low 5% for a forearm to 35% for a thigh removed bacteria that lead to disease was not understood, in the context of war bacteria and disease was not proven untill 1884, by a German bacteriologist Robert Koch, , stomach wounds were untreatable and the soldier was left to die in agony. What am saying is I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy enduring the suffering

      @soultraveller5027@soultraveller502711 күн бұрын
    • @@soultraveller5027 I aint painting any bright picture, I simply stated it wasn't as primitive as your initial comment stated. They, no matter what side or what era were discussing will always struggle with the numbers of casualties in a large scale operation or action. And we can comprehend some aspects of the suffering ! Have you never hurt yourself, seriously hurt yourself ? I recently broke my shoulder and went without any pain killers the night I did it and only mild painkillers for few days after. And I've been stabbed in the leg, didn't know I had until someone pointed out the blood. So I can imagine to a certain extent. But sock is one of the biggest killers on the battlefield. let's not forget the poor animals too, I've rad accounts that almost traumatised me. But I aint here for a ding dong 😀 I accept your points and after completely watching the documentary, I feel safe in advising others to look elsewhere, this one just skims the surface and doesn't stand up to scrutiny Cheers

      @Lee.Enfield-303@Lee.Enfield-30311 күн бұрын
    • @@Lee.Enfield-303 Fair enough I wasn't implying anything that didmished your comment,I was ultimately at the end of the day looking at it from a historical perspective, in that yes medical care was sorta improving a little from past decades centuries of course but by no means great strides certainly not in my opinion. Yes ,of course I have been injured in my younger days, broken my femur due to a road accident a car knocking me off my bicycle, luckily for me it was a clean break no compilations like a compound break. The pain was noticeable ,after the endorphins released by my body wore off, apparently, I was a excellent patient and surprised I wasn't screaming and shouting while the Nurse was cutting of my brand new jeans. I ,must have a high pain threshold ,I didn't receive any pain relief until I was laid on a hospital trolley awaiting to be rolled into Theater, least from what I can recolate It was bad, but tolerable, the worst part was post opp, the intermittent muscle spasms occuring, a few days after surgery, was something I wasn't expecting, that was uncomfortable,which is a normal side effects apparently, after breaking a leg ,while surrounded by a steel cage and attached to pulleys wire and weights called a traction contraption. It was considered a serious injury even back in the 1950s so I was informed by a nurse due to infection specially compound fracture where the bone comes through the skin

      @soultraveller5027@soultraveller502711 күн бұрын
    • Later - Wellington want say - His Victory.. NO - it was German Prussia, Fürst Blücher, Commander, brought the Victory - with His Strategy and Tactic with His Brave.. Heroes Troops...

      @AlexanderJScheu@AlexanderJScheu2 күн бұрын
  • Napoleon fielded 72,000 troops against Wellington's 68,000. It may not sound much of an advantage but he had 250 cannons and Wellington only had about 140 cannons if accounts are to be believed. If I was Wellington I too would have fought a defensive battle of attrition.

    @douglasprewer7913@douglasprewer79133 күн бұрын
    • Correct. I agree. Also, Wellington had less cannons, but more Prussians 😄

      @cmourat1@cmourat1Күн бұрын
  • Bones are rare. After Waterloo, more than 27K tons of human/animal bones from Napoleonic battlefields were imported through the port of Hull to be processed into fertilizer. The young soldiers still had good teeth and these were used to make dentures, they were called "Waterloo teeth" at the time. The British were called the vampires of Europe when all this happened.

    @Ap-cm7mx@Ap-cm7mx5 сағат бұрын
  • What is rather sordid is that the mass graves where the soldiers who died during the battle were buried were desecrated. After the looting of personal belongings, the teeth of the dead were used to supply the market for dentures of the time. Around 1820 several articles in English newspapers refer to the trade of bones from the battlefield, in order to be transformed into agricultural fertilizer. Besides, some isolated bones, like this skeleton of which the video speaks, were found, there are no common graves on the battlefield.

    @user-pb4gl5dh4p@user-pb4gl5dh4p14 күн бұрын
    • gotta make a buck some how...don't panic it's organic

      @smartbomb7202@smartbomb720211 күн бұрын
  • Outstanding job my god sir, mhm yess indeed.. But that armor that was pierced by a cannonball was not that of a Rifleman, but that of a French cavalryman. A Cuirassier. Helpful tip mate!

    @TheRealSlimshadyyyyyy@TheRealSlimshadyyyyyy4 күн бұрын
  • why do you use pictures of another era and country in this clip (the execution scene at the beginning around minute 1.10)

    @RIcklacantina@RIcklacantina12 күн бұрын
    • quick stock pics i guess ?

      @GavTatu@GavTatu5 күн бұрын
    • @@GavTatu I think so too, but it lowers the quality of the vid so much, and it is such an interesting subject

      @RIcklacantina@RIcklacantina5 күн бұрын
  • Thankyou sir for showing this great Emperor documentary

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
  • Sir in India mysour emperor Tippu sultans also got this type of gun Tippu sultan received guns by napoleon Bonaparte

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
  • Just because the archeological remains of the fallen soldier suggest he was "small" and had a birth defect, does not mean he was frail lol. Those dudes would March miles with their gear as foot soldiers. Dude was probably more hard-core than 80% of males now

    @jaredfleagle6126@jaredfleagle61269 күн бұрын
  • Sir does franch archaeologist found napoleon Bonapartes naval fleet in bottom of ocean

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
    • Wooden ships of that era tended to burn on the surface or explode rather than sink intact. Metal and non-wooden artifacts have been recovered, but nothing recognizable as a ship wreck.

      @PeterOConnell-pq6io@PeterOConnell-pq6io3 күн бұрын
  • I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's Napoleonic warfare series as a complement

    @antoniomoreira5921@antoniomoreira592115 күн бұрын
    • His output is phenomenal.

      @valentinius62@valentinius6215 күн бұрын
  • Explaining the loading process: "With the stick, he mixed it all together" 😂😂 Nice try though 😉

    @fessorjespersen5437@fessorjespersen543713 күн бұрын
  • Good visuals. That script needed editing. Nothing built on Waterloo since 1815 in the same breath as the Lion Mound, an artificial hill. "Months of fighting" to describe without anything further the yearlong long War of Liberation in Germany 1813 that sealed N's fate. Also "Blewher" for Bluecher. Yikes.

    @kevinmurphy7218@kevinmurphy72184 күн бұрын
  • Yes and half of wellingtons army were Dutch Belgium and once fought for the french

    @swiftymorgan3001@swiftymorgan3001Күн бұрын
  • Sir please show us biryani and Paris military schools that napoleon started his military education

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
  • 43:29 A Rifleman wore that breast plate did he ? Good grief 😵‍💫

    @Lee.Enfield-303@Lee.Enfield-30311 күн бұрын
    • No, he was a cavalryman.

      @loyalpiper@loyalpiper9 күн бұрын
  • Thank you for this work..

    @ENIGMAXII2112@ENIGMAXII211210 күн бұрын
  • i read an article that stated that the bones of the dead soldiers were ground up for fertilizer. Is that so?

    @BobBlarneystone@BobBlarneystone9 күн бұрын
    • Yes I believe so

      @lynnedelacy2841@lynnedelacy28418 күн бұрын
    • Yes it’s true that’s why their are very few skeletons from Waterloo

      @robinfereday6562@robinfereday65628 күн бұрын
    • Это какой же "дробилкой" в 19 веке можно было раздробить кости нескольких десятков тысяч павших воинов ?! А мясо на колбасу пускали ?! И свозить их надо было со всего поля в одно место ?! После всякой битвы всегда старались трупы захоронить, чтобы избежать эпидемии ! Для этого использовали всё, что только возможно : овраги, различные ямы и углубления, колодцы и т.д. Костедробилку придумали гораздо позже : западная "цивилизация" во главе с гитлером !

      @user-ft8ej3nj2i@user-ft8ej3nj2i2 күн бұрын
  • Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher. Prussian Army Field Marshal.

    @robnewman6101@robnewman610114 күн бұрын
  • Wellington commanded an allied army, British, German and Dutch.

    @Youtubechannel-po8cz@Youtubechannel-po8cz12 күн бұрын
    • they was no German in the early 1800's they were Germanic independent stats yes

      @daniellastuart3145@daniellastuart314511 күн бұрын
    • @@daniellastuart3145 King's German Legion fought at Waterloo.

      @Youtubechannel-po8cz@Youtubechannel-po8cz11 күн бұрын
    • Not German, Prussian. Germany was not a nation until 1872.

      @raymondfitzgerald-kuhl5976@raymondfitzgerald-kuhl597611 күн бұрын
    • @@raymondfitzgerald-kuhl5976 The Kings German Legion fought at Waterloo under Wellington.

      @Youtubechannel-po8cz@Youtubechannel-po8cz11 күн бұрын
  • Türkçe alt yazı desteği olmaması üzücü 😢

    @galapagos4154@galapagos415412 күн бұрын
  • Holland a alie of Napolein ?? we were condered ,people were pressed in the army of napoleon ..so no allie

    @MegaRebel100@MegaRebel10013 күн бұрын
  • Napoleon Bonapartes is lion of 100 wars

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
    • But it's the last ones that count.

      @reluctantheist5224@reluctantheist522414 күн бұрын
  • 1815 battle at Ulm?!?

    @pakoutac@pakoutac7 күн бұрын
  • Nice ❤❤❤

    @mwovlog@mwovlog14 күн бұрын
  • Жаль, что Императору не удалось добраться до острова и не уничтожить наглосаксов, как государство-вампир ! История пошла бы совсем по другому пути развития. Многие последующие войны на состоялись бы вовсе ! Смешно слушать про "агрессивного" Наполеона, если учесть, что все коалиции, созданные кознями и золотом наглосаксов, были направлены на уничтожение главного конкурента на континенте - Франции.

    @user-ft8ej3nj2i@user-ft8ej3nj2i2 күн бұрын
  • Loud terrible music under the narration spoiled it.

    @GOINGNOMAD@GOINGNOMAD4 күн бұрын
  • Bad narration and cheesy music to say the least,not a good doco about the battle of waterloo at all,most of the senseless comments below honestly seem to be bot generated.

    @s1nb4d59@s1nb4d5914 күн бұрын
  • Sir please show us napoleon Bonapartes pyramid wars

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
  • Not "Blue-er"....but BLOOKER......(BLÜCHER)...."BLOOKER...followed by horse neighing.

    @scottleft3672@scottleft367210 күн бұрын
  • Sir napoleon Bonapartes he is my inspiration role model for every soldier sir please show us napoleon Bonapartes artifacts and his museum

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
  • Поэтому они сходились

    @romakaverin7467@romakaverin74672 күн бұрын
  • Napoleon's biggest mistake was making enemies of the British. He was doomed from that moment. What a fool.

    @airstripone2419@airstripone241911 күн бұрын
  • Самопал

    @romakaverin7467@romakaverin74672 күн бұрын
  • who is bluer?

    @thewhitedoncheadle8345@thewhitedoncheadle83457 сағат бұрын
  • 20🇨🇵24 AP🌹RIL ...°°°... ❤️* ^❤️ ^❤️*

    @monalizoelgrande2579@monalizoelgrande257915 күн бұрын
  • less of the history lesson and more about the soldiers as in the title ...

    @petethefeet1461@petethefeet146113 күн бұрын
  • Very annoing flickering images through this video, I lost interest after two minutes. Why doing this on purpose? Seems rather stupid..

    @hedgehopper9055@hedgehopper90552 күн бұрын
  • Without Blücher and his "tall fellows," Wellington would have been defeated. By the way, the British have always managed to gain the support of other countries against their own declared enemies. "History is always written by the victor" Napoleon Bonaparte.

    @magnusmcgraw@magnusmcgraw15 күн бұрын
    • Hey muppet, we get it your not a big fan of the british yes well done sir, Wellington knew that you too, he knew more than half of his army were europeans including some his staff were inexperienced untried in battle, while a percentage of his best soldiers were sent to the north america during the 1812 war ,with the y anks , the british having set fire to the White House, while a Yank eeee army at the same time crossed into canada torching the place up cheers matey 😁🤣

      @soultraveller5027@soultraveller502714 күн бұрын
    • So true! The single truth that the British gets everyone on there side is because we’re right and just!👍🏻🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️

      @kylefrank9186@kylefrank918614 күн бұрын
    • gained support ??? They paid the equivalent of thousands of billions worth of gold to the coalitions countries to wage war against France for 30 years and all this gold was pillaged from India.

      @ommsterlitz1805@ommsterlitz180513 күн бұрын
    • Well done captain obvious yes Wellington know what he had to fight with and made the best of it. Yes over half his army were Europeans inexperienced unproven in battle ,as were half his staff his best troops were scattered around the world special north America defending Canada after the war of 1812 when an American army marched into Canada and torched the place while the British touched the white house good and proper b ellend 🤣

      @soultraveller5027@soultraveller502713 күн бұрын
    • i think you find it the other way round if it was not for the Wellington the Blucher would got he butt kicked, remember they lost both the battels ay Lingey and Wave and by the time Blucher army arrived at Waterloo in force the French army was all ready 80% defeated by Wellington

      @daniellastuart3145@daniellastuart314511 күн бұрын
  • BOOOO Bonaparte! 😡😠👎

    @robnewman6101@robnewman610114 күн бұрын
  • Ю

    @romakaverin7467@romakaverin74672 күн бұрын
  • From time to time there’s a leader the world needs to be rid of. Napoleon is a classic case of this. Better to nip it in the bud early!

    @bradleydass3075@bradleydass30757 күн бұрын
    • not sure, Napoleon wasn't a bad leader, at that time he became what English made him become, for defense of France against all European Kingdom who wasn't found of French Revolution era and the end of monarch, so who knows, he have to fight for sure but what if English and others didn't attack him ?

      @stephanemouton7250@stephanemouton72502 күн бұрын
    • Napolean wasn't a bad leader 🙈 A vain dictator that declared himself Emporer and crowned himself Emporer because, in his own opinion there was nobody else good enough ! In Napoleans own words "When we started the whole of Europe was with us, now the whole of Europe is against us". The explanation is Napolean himself ......his maniacal self belief, constant threats of war unless his neighbours complied with his demands, coercion alienated every single one of his Allies. 🤮

      @garymoore2535@garymoore25352 күн бұрын
    • @@stephanemouton7250 Well, it's a little bit complicated, but he certainly wasn't THE MONSTER. Napoleon the Monster is a british invention

      @cmourat1@cmourat1Күн бұрын
  • I pray Jesus give the child for every franch parents like Emperor napoleon Bonaparte Amen

    @narayankulkarni5378@narayankulkarni537814 күн бұрын
    • What do you mean?

      @raymondfitzgerald-kuhl5976@raymondfitzgerald-kuhl597611 күн бұрын
  • On s'en fout, on vous a battu au foot !

    @corfmatm7313@corfmatm731315 сағат бұрын
  • OOPS ! WRONG VIDEO ................. I THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT ABBA. 😂 🤣 😂

    @TRICK-OR-TREAT236@TRICK-OR-TREAT23615 күн бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂at least you learn something 😂😂

      @terryfletcher2886@terryfletcher288614 күн бұрын
  • Самопал

    @romakaverin7467@romakaverin74672 күн бұрын
KZhead